Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Missing, Exploited and True Crime => Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5 Fayetteville, NC Missing 11/10/09(BODY FOUND) => Topic started by: MuffyBee on November 15, 2009, 05:45:11 PM



Title: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on November 15, 2009, 05:45:11 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/shanaya5.gif)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 06:28:51 PM
 ::MonkeyAngel::

Made it


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 06:29:10 PM
made it too!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 17, 2009, 06:29:35 PM
We made it safe and sound!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on November 17, 2009, 06:29:44 PM
 ::MonkeyBike::  Thanks Klaas.That was super smooth.   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 06:30:50 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 06:31:37 PM
brb.. testing the monkey bunkeys! 


(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/monkey%20fun/MonkeyJumpingonBed.gif)

ooooooop! 

 ::MonkeyEek:: 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 17, 2009, 06:33:24 PM
Housekeeping O/T: Next thread's already made, Klaas!    ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 06:33:31 PM
Shaniya Davis' mother pregnant

<snipped>

FAYETTEVILLE, NC (WTVD) -- ABC11 Eyewitness News confirmed Tuesday that the mother of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis is pregnant. Jail officials in Cumberland County said for that reason, Antoinette Davis, 25, was being kept separate from the rest of the prison population.

News of the pregnancy came a day after volunteers found the body of the missing girl in a wooded area near Sanford. She had been the focus of a nationwide Amber Alert since last week.

Antoinette Davis is accused of human trafficking, prostitution and felony child abuse in her daughter's disappearance. Warrants say she provided her daughter with intent that the girl be held in sexual servitude.

Davis showed no emotion during a court appearance in Fayetteville Monday afternoon and she did not enter a plea to the charges.

Shaniya's body was found in an area bordered by Highway 87 south and Walker Road - just south of Sanford - during a second day of searching.

Fayetteville police spokesperson Theresa Chance said the body of a child was located about 100 feet off the road. The state medical examiner positively identified the body Tuesday afternoon.

Authorities are releasing few details about the findings or a cause of death.

Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, spoke with reporters from the front porch of his home Tuesday afternoon. He asked everyone to remember his daughter, and to work to prevent a similar tragedy from happening again.

"My heart bleeds and hopes and prays that this community, this country can unite as one to possibly prevent something like this from happening again, to another special angel. I ask that everyone makes it a point not to ignore or look past a situation where a person, a child, or anybody might be in danger," he said.

Lockhart thanked all the law enforcement officers and volunteers who put in countless hours in the search for his daughter.

"It's not the result I wanted, or any father would want, but God has a greater calling for all of us," he said.

MORE....

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7123252


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 06:35:25 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html



Northern Rose,
Thank you for bringing all of the news articles and links. ::MonkeyCheer2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 06:36:04 PM
Am hoping that they will allow Antoinette out into the dayroom with her peers for one hour, just one hour, while the guards oooooh I dunno - look the other way - tie their shoes - busy themselves doing something.  Hope that's not a lot to ask.. wish for. 

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 17, 2009, 06:37:12 PM
I was still reading.   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeyguy-reading-1.gif)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 17, 2009, 06:38:08 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

So are they saying that Mc Neill is the man that she sold Shaniya to ? Or that there is another man in custody for the purchase that has not been charged yet?..... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 17, 2009, 06:39:52 PM
Now I am wondering what the complaint was about AB's seven year old.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyMad::  I'm sure it was nothing good and I bet child protective there is puckering up right about now.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 17, 2009, 06:39:57 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

This tells me there was no hand off as I suspected. sick sick sick people they are. I hope they rot in he11 for what was done to that baby girl.. I am sure the big boys in prison will show him what it feels like to be assaulted like that. They will change his name for him to ben dover.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 06:40:12 PM
Am hoping that they will allow Antoinette out into the dayroom with her peers for one hour, just one hour, while the guards oooooh I dunno - look the other way - tie their shoes - busy themselves doing something.  Hope that's not a lot to ask.. wish for. 

 


I suspect all of those other women in the jail are just as angry with Antoinette as we are.
There could be an accident. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 06:40:22 PM
I was still reading.   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeyguy-reading-1.gif)

OMG how cute is that! . ::MonkeyDebonaire::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 17, 2009, 06:41:09 PM
Am hoping that they will allow Antoinette out into the dayroom with her peers for one hour, just one hour, while the guards oooooh I dunno - look the other way - tie their shoes - busy themselves doing something.  Hope that's not a lot to ask.. wish for. 

 
::MonkeyCheer2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 06:41:24 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

So are they saying that Mc Neill is the man that she sold Shaniya to ? Or that there is another man in custody for the purchase that has not been charged yet?..... ::MonkeyConfused::

Sounds to me like they are implying McNeill, yep.. without saying it in so many words. 
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 06:42:02 PM
Now I am wondering what the complaint was about AB's seven year old.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyMad::  I'm sure it was nothing good and I bet child protective there is puckering up right about now.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

NG last night said it had something to do with serious burns to the 7 year old IIRC.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 17, 2009, 06:42:07 PM
I was still reading.   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeyguy-reading-1.gif)

OMG how cute is that! . ::MonkeyDebonaire::

Shhh! I stole it. I think BRANDI made it.  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 17, 2009, 06:42:25 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html


I will not be surprised if MM is charged with murder.  I will not be surprised if MM led authorities to Shanyia's remains.

When I consider the charges against AD and ... the locating of Shanyia's remains ... I think both AD and MM are talking and revealing all.

Maybe MM was suppose to bring Shanyia back by 8:00 AM but ... AD called him in a panic and told him about the 911 call and ... a short distance past the hotel Shaniya was silenced and disposed of like trash. 

However ... the observant hotel clerk and ... hotel security cameras had not been anticipated.

These two are the lowest of the low.

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 17, 2009, 06:44:13 PM
Am hoping that they will allow Antoinette out into the dayroom with her peers for one hour, just one hour, while the guards oooooh I dunno - look the other way - tie their shoes - busy themselves doing something.  Hope that's not a lot to ask.. wish for. 

 


I suspect all of those other women in the jail are just as angry with Antoinette as we are.
There could be an accident. ::MonkeyTongue::

A really BAD accident.  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 06:45:20 PM
Am hoping that they will allow Antoinette out into the dayroom with her peers for one hour, just one hour, while the guards oooooh I dunno - look the other way - tie their shoes - busy themselves doing something.  Hope that's not a lot to ask.. wish for. 

 


I suspect all of those other women in the jail are just as angry with Antoinette as we are.
There could be an accident. ::MonkeyTongue::

A really BAD accident.  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyTongue::

Wouldn't that be lovely? ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 17, 2009, 06:45:46 PM
Guess I will go back to what I was doing.. take care.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 06:45:51 PM
will be interesting to see what NG has to say tonight about it..
HLN is talking about Sarah Palin...real important discussing her darn book when children are missing in the world.. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 06:46:11 PM
I was still reading.   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeyguy-reading-1.gif)

OMG how cute is that! . ::MonkeyDebonaire::

Shhh! I stole it. I think BRANDI made it.  ::MonkeyTongue::

Tis ok Fanny, your secret is safe with ermm all the hundreds, thousands of us.  Not to worry!    ::MonkeyTongue::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 06:46:13 PM
Guess I will go back to what I was doing.. take care.

what were you doing?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 17, 2009, 06:49:34 PM
Housekeeping O/T: Next thread's already made, Klaas!    ::MonkeyWink::
Thanks CBB  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 17, 2009, 06:51:14 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

This tells me there was no hand off as I suspected. sick sick sick people they are. I hope they rot in he11 for what was done to that baby girl.. I am sure the big boys in prison will show him what it feels like to be assaulted like that. They will change his name for him to ben dover.

I never did think it was a hand off. I am still wondering about the 60 yr old man the LE put the description out on. I wonder if he was seen with Shaniya at ANOTHER time. Ok, I just made myself mad again.  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 17, 2009, 06:51:21 PM
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=523161980#/pages/Pray-for-Shaniya-Nicole-Davis/177802057491?ref=mf

Pray for Shaniya


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 17, 2009, 06:51:27 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

This tells me there was no hand off as I suspected. sick sick sick people they are. I hope they rot in he11 for what was done to that baby girl.. I am sure the big boys in prison will show him what it feels like to be assaulted like that. They will change his name for him to ben dover.

I didn't think there was a hand off either.  Yes, they are both sick. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 06:52:28 PM

I will not be surprised if MM is charged with murder.  I will not be surprised if MM led authorities to Shanyia's remains.

When I consider the charges against AD and ... the locating of Shanyia's remains ... I think both AD and MM are talking and revealing all.

Maybe MM was suppose to bring Shanyia back by 8:00 AM but ... AD called him in a panic and told him about the 911 call and ... a short distance past the hotel Shaniya was silenced and disposed of like trash. 

However ... the observant hotel clerk and ... hotel security cameras had not been anticipated.

These two are the lowest of the low.

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet


I agree, Janet! 

LE said in one report earlier on that MM was doing some talking.....  and then there was "a tip".... then the search.... and in looking at that area Shaniya was found in, my gosh, that had to have been a very specific tip.  My guess is that MM is trying real hard to make some kind of plea bargain to beat the DP.  Hope that doesn't work out for him, no matter what info he's been giving LE. 
   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 17, 2009, 06:52:45 PM
NR posted this on the last thread


DSS, police probes detailed

<snipped>
He said, though, that he wished the Cumberland County Department of Social Services had notified him about any problems in Davis' home.

DSS looked at Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son, not Shaniya, according to her uncle, Michael Davis. The case was closed, and Antoinette Davis was able to retain custody of the boy, her uncle said.

DSS Director Brenda Jackson declined to comment on her agency's involvement with the Davis family, citing the criminal investigation into Shaniya's death as well as confidentiality rules for child protective services cases.

A search of court records turned up no previous criminal charges against Davis, but she lived at a home on Wall Street in July that police raided. Officers found "narcotics manufacturing materials" in the house, but no one was charged, according to an incident report.

Residents said they had seen Shaniya running around the neighborhood unattended, but her families maintains Davis was a good parent.

"I know she’s a great mom. She’s a great mom. Antoinette really loved her children,” said Davis' uncle, Arthur Cromartie.

Cumberland County Schools officials said Shaniya was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School until mid-October, when she was taken out of the school and wasn't enrolled elsewhere.

"We have no knowledge of what the reason was for her being withdrawn from school," Morganton Road Principal Charlotte McLaurin said.

Lockhart said he allowed Shaniya to move in with her mother on Oct. 9.

During a Monday morning interview on CBS' "Early Show," he said Davis had worked to get her life together and had been working for at least six months and gotten a place of her own.

"She had asked if she could be a mother, and I felt she was sincere in asking, and I figured to give her a chance," he said.

Davis worked in the kitchen at Carolina Inn at Village Green, an assisted living facility in Fayetteville.

CES, a South Carolina-based staffing company that has a contract with Carolina Inn, hired her in June 2008 after an extensive background check, an official said. She had a good employment record at both Carolina Inn and the Haymount Nursing Rehabilitation Facility, but she is no longer employed by the company, the official said.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6435879/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 06:53:40 PM
911 CALL: Shinaya Davis 911 call from Fayetteville Police Dept

http://www2.wnct.com/nct/news/local/article/911_call_shinaya_davis_911_call_from_fayetteville_police_dept/75988/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 17, 2009, 07:04:38 PM
Guess I will go back to what I was doing.. take care.

Searching....don't go...I just got back and wanted to hear what your thoughts were


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 17, 2009, 07:05:22 PM
Guess I will go back to what I was doing.. take care.

what were you doing?

research on prison populations and the cause there of..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 17, 2009, 07:05:23 PM
Slain NC girl's aunt says she worried about child staying with mother because of neglect

Slain NC girl's aunt says mother was neglectful
1 hour, 17 minutes ago
Carey Lockhart-Davis said Tuesday that the mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, neglected her children. Lockart-Davis is the sister of the girl's father, Bradley Lockhart, and helped raise her. The girl went to stay with her mother a month ago.

Authorities found the body of Shaniya Davis on Monday, though they have declined to say how they died.

Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking and felony child abuse. Her sister has said she doesn't believe the charges.

Another man has been charged with her kidnapping. Police say additional charges could be filed soon.

http://www.newser.com/article/d9c1i8a00/slain-nc-girls-aunt-says-she-worried-about-child-staying-with-mother-because-of-neglect.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 17, 2009, 07:06:37 PM
Guess I will go back to what I was doing.. take care.

what were you doing?

research on prison populations and the cause there of..

interesting.....that could take years!! 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 17, 2009, 07:07:11 PM
Well, that only took me 10 minutes to post  ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: Keep getting locked up/out


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 17, 2009, 07:09:06 PM
Well, that only took me 10 minutes to post  ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: Keep getting locked up/out

Me too...it makes me so angry....gggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 17, 2009, 07:17:37 PM
(http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/8209/091117152340resizedshan.th.jpg) (http://img255.imageshack.us/i/091117152340resizedshan.jpg/)

Police have new information in Shaniya Davis case

Although it was no surprise, authorities officially announced today that the body they found on Monday was that of missing 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

Also today Fayetteville police said they had "new information" about the case, prompting them to cancel a news conference scheduled for this afternoon. Police also reiterated that new, additional charges are expected to be filed in the case.

The only details the police department would reveal prior to this tomorrow's press conference is that they believe Davis was alive when she left the hotel.

The body of 5-year-old Davis was found yesterday in a wooded area off of a North Carolina highway. Police say it was reliable information from a tip that led investigators to where the body was found.

Davis was reported missing from her Fayetteville, NC mobile home park around 7 a.m. on Tuesday, Oct. 10. Her mother says she last saw the girl that morning around 5:30 a.m. She was seen shortly after at a hotel with Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, who was arrested and according to police confessed to her kidnapping.

Authorities have also arrested Antoinette Nicole Davis, Shaniya's mother for human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution and filing a false police report. She made her first appearance in court on Monday where the judge explained the charges against her, and she requested a court appointed attorney.

Early on in the case police had arrested the mom's boyfriend, Clarence Coe, 30, for kidnapping, but released him after McNeill was arrested.

The press conference has been rescheduled for Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. It will be held in front of the police station.

http://www.examiner.com/x-28599-Crime--Media-Examiner~y2009m11d17-Police-have-new-information-in-Shaniya-Davis-case


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 07:17:55 PM
I think it's pretty clear what happened here. Shaniya was never going to make it back to dad. We will find out that the egg donor had been prostituting her since she got her. I'm sure there were very obvious, outward signs of abuse. And there's no way they were going to risk getting caught by giving Shaniya back. And they would have. In cases like this, thank God for dumb criminals.
God bless you, Shaniya. This world has become and evil,evil place.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 17, 2009, 07:21:17 PM
I think it's pretty clear what happened here. Shaniya was never going to make it back to dad. We will find out that the egg donor had been prostituting her since she got her. I'm sure there were very obvious, outward signs of abuse. And there's no way they were going to risk getting caught by giving Shaniya back. And they would have. In cases like this, thank God for dumb criminals.
God bless you, Shaniya. This world has become and evil,evil place.


It's such a sick and scary thought, but I bet it's true. This little girl's fate was sealed weeks ago. All it took was her dad to make a surprise visit, or for someone to care and stop the madness. Sadly that never happened. Poor Shaniya.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 17, 2009, 07:22:57 PM
(http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/8209/091117152340resizedshan.th.jpg) (http://img255.imageshack.us/i/091117152340resizedshan.jpg/)

Police have new information in Shaniya Davis case

Although it was no surprise, authorities officially announced today that the body they found on Monday was that of missing 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

Also today Fayetteville police said they had "new information" about the case, prompting them to cancel a news conference scheduled for this afternoon. Police also reiterated that new, additional charges are expected to be filed in the case.

The only details the police department would reveal prior to this tomorrow's press conference is that they believe Davis was alive when she left the hotel.

The body of 5-year-old Davis was found yesterday in a wooded area off of a North Carolina highway. Police say it was reliable information from a tip that led investigators to where the body was found.

Davis was reported missing from her Fayetteville, NC mobile home park around 7 a.m. on Tuesday, Oct. 10. Her mother says she last saw the girl that morning around 5:30 a.m. She was seen shortly after at a hotel with Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, who was arrested and according to police confessed to her kidnapping.

Authorities have also arrested Antoinette Nicole Davis, Shaniya's mother for human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution and filing a false police report. She made her first appearance in court on Monday where the judge explained the charges against her, and she requested a court appointed attorney.

Early on in the case police had arrested the mom's boyfriend, Clarence Coe, 30, for kidnapping, but released him after McNeill was arrested.

The press conference has been rescheduled for Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. It will be held in front of the police station.

http://www.examiner.com/x-28599-Crime--Media-Examiner~y2009m11d17-Police-have-new-information-in-Shaniya-Davis-case

A RANT!!!!  I detest it when people have no more respect for the dead than to refer to them by their last name only...her name was Shaniya Davis...not just DAVIS you Ahole!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: joesamas mama on November 17, 2009, 07:26:47 PM
Okay, my opinion may not be popular and I am way behind on here, but regarding the aunt that took her to the "mom".

She took her with clothes for two days, "mom" calls and says you won't ever see her again..etc. The aunt in my opinion had no legal control over the situation and if the Dad's name is not on the birth certificate, neither did he once they let Shaniyah off at the house. Should they have not taken her there, YES, but once she was there they had NO way to get her back except through the court system.

The aunt and Dad are not blameless, BUT what if the mom had come to the house to get her? She would have every right to take her home and there would be no reason for LE to keep her from getting Shaniyah. 

JMO, JSM  ::MonkeyBike:: BTL


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: allalone on November 17, 2009, 07:28:59 PM
Okay, my opinion may not be popular and I am way behind on here, but regarding the aunt that took her to the "mom".

She took her with clothes for two days, "mom" calls and says you won't ever see her again..etc. The aunt in my opinion had no legal control over the situation and if the Dad's name is not on the birth certificate, neither did he once they let Shaniyah off at the house. Should they have not taken her there, YES, but once she was there they had NO way to get her back except through the court system.

The aunt and Dad are not blameless, BUT what if the mom had come to the house to get her? She would have every right to take her home and there would be no reason for LE to keep her from getting Shaniyah. 

JMO, JSM  ::MonkeyBike:: BTL

You are completely correct.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 07:32:35 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: allalone on November 17, 2009, 07:33:35 PM
I am wondering, and hoping someone can answer my question.

Because there has been talk about drug use, would the jail have tested AD for drugs when the took blood? If they did and she tested positive, could they add extra charges because of the pregnancy?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 07:36:59 PM
Allalone, do you mean add charges for taking drugs while pregnant?  There is no such crime as far as I know.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 07:40:56 PM
Allalone, do you mean add charges for taking drugs while pregnant?  There is no such crime as far as I know.


maybe not a legal crime but certainly a moral crime...as we would all agree on that one!
Hi Jess!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 07:41:31 PM

klaas, I am bringing this over here from the last thread and thanks for posting it. I know that I had read an article last night that Shaniya was alive when they left the hotel, but I grew more weary trying to find it again.

Still trying to catch up.

Thanks again, you saved me. I was beginning to think that I had misread or that the article was in error.  ::MonkeyCool::

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/17/952898

More charges expected today in Shaniya Davis case

SANFORD - Shaniya Davis was alive when she left a Sanford motel, Fayetteville police said this morning in a news release.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 07:42:38 PM
Allalone, do you mean add charges for taking drugs while pregnant?  There is no such crime as far as I know.


Endangering the life of a fetus is a crime in some states, I think.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 07:46:32 PM
Okay, my opinion may not be popular and I am way behind on here, but regarding the aunt that took her to the "mom".

She took her with clothes for two days, "mom" calls and says you won't ever see her again..etc. The aunt in my opinion had no legal control over the situation and if the Dad's name is not on the birth certificate, neither did he once they let Shaniyah off at the house. Should they have not taken her there, YES, but once she was there they had NO way to get her back except through the court system.

The aunt and Dad are not blameless, BUT what if the mom had come to the house to get her? She would have every right to take her home and there would be no reason for LE to keep her from getting Shaniyah. 

JMO, JSM  ::MonkeyBike:: BTL

You are completely correct.

Which brings up the next question of why neither of the egg donors sought legal custody of this child.

Another child that did not stand a chance!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 07:47:57 PM
Endangering the life of a fetus hasn't been a crime since Roe v. Wade.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sunshine12 on November 17, 2009, 07:50:20 PM
Allalone, do you mean add charges for taking drugs while pregnant?  There is no such crime as far as I know.


Endangering the life of a fetus is a crime in some states, I think.

its not a crime to take drugs while pregnant.  the reason its not kinda goes back to the whole "when does life begin?" debate.  if taking drugs while pregnant was criminalized it would bring up major problems with abortion laws, roe vs. wade and all sorts of stuff.  we get calls all the time from people that want to report women who are pregnant for child abuse/neglect, but until the baby is born there is nothing we can do about it unless there are other living children in the home and the mother is using drugs.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 07:50:48 PM
I think it's pretty clear what happened here. Shaniya was never going to make it back to dad. We will find out that the egg donor had been prostituting her since she got her. I'm sure there were very obvious, outward signs of abuse. And there's no way they were going to risk getting caught by giving Shaniya back. And they would have. In cases like this, thank God for dumb criminals.
God bless you, Shaniya. This world has become and evil,evil place.


Those are my thoughts as well JessStar.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 07:52:14 PM
Allalone, do you mean add charges for taking drugs while pregnant?  There is no such crime as far as I know.


Endangering the life of a fetus is a crime in some states, I think.

its not a crime to take drugs while pregnant.  the reason its not kinda goes back to the whole "when does life begin?" debate.  if taking drugs while pregnant was criminalized it would bring up major problems with abortion laws, roe vs. wade and all sorts of stuff.  we get calls all the time from people that want to report women who are pregnant for child abuse/neglect, but until the baby is born there is nothing we can do about it unless there are other living children in the home and the mother is using drugs.


Pregnant South Carolina Women Go to Jail for Drug Use | Pregnancy ... Oct 27, 2009 ... Should Pregnant Drug Users Be Jailed For Endangering the Fetus? ... should be prosecuted for endangering the life of their unborn child? ...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: joesamas mama on November 17, 2009, 07:55:48 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.
Sorry, I am not smart so I don't know the ins and outs of the law. My mistake, that is why I lurk.

But it happened to a friend of mine who was raising her nephew. The parents show up and there was nothing she could do but give him to the parents. Sorry for the confusion.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 07:56:01 PM
drug use is illegal whether preggers are not...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 07:56:36 PM
Hello evrybody, just got caught up reading,   I guess we still dont know the cause of death here, but I bet I can guess, these people make me sick....And I think the same way, thats the reason the egg donor wanted Shaniya back to begin with...she was probably happy to have the Dad raise her until she found out she could make money off from her and then thats when she out on the goody goody act to gain his trust and get her back......she makes me ill listening to her on the 911 call also.....piece of crap.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: joesamas mama on November 17, 2009, 07:58:13 PM
Endangering the life of a fetus hasn't been a crime since Roe v. Wade.
Endangering the life of a fetus, but what about if the baby is born alive with drugs in their system? Is that not a crime?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 17, 2009, 08:00:12 PM
Nancy Grace is on now.

5:00 PM PT


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:00:33 PM
Endangering the life of a fetus hasn't been a crime since Roe v. Wade.
Endangering the life of a fetus, but what about if the baby is born alive with drugs in their system? Is that not a crime?
That is a crime, as soon as the baby is born and if he or she is born addicted to drugs...yes here where im from it is a crime..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 08:00:55 PM
Shaniya Davis' Mothers' 911 Call Released By Investigators

Fayetteville, NC -- Fayetteville Police say more charges will be filed in the death of five-year-old Shaniya Davis. However they haven't released specific details.

Search crews found Davis' body yesterday afternoon in a wooded area outside of Sanford. Davis' mother, Antoinette Davis, reported her missing last Tuesday, but has now been charged with child abuse and human trafficking.

Earlier today, Fayetteville police released the 911 call Davis made to police.

ANTIONETTE: I woke up this morning and my daughter was not in the house. I don't know if she walked out or I don't know what's going on but she's not here.
911: How old is your daughter?
ANTIONETTE: She's five.

911: Have you checked the neighborhood?
ANTOINETTE: I've checked everywhere. I haven't checked the back end of the neighborhood yet, but I've checked the front end. I'm just...I don't know what else to do, I'm so...I don't know what else to do.

A memorial fund has been established in Shaniya's name.
An autopsy is being conducted to determine how she died.
Funeral services are being planned.

http://www.digtriad.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=133316&catid=57


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sunshine12 on November 17, 2009, 08:01:18 PM
Endangering the life of a fetus hasn't been a crime since Roe v. Wade.
Endangering the life of a fetus, but what about if the baby is born alive with drugs in their system? Is that not a crime?

it's not a crime but its a good way to get your child taken away from you and placed with a relative or placed in foster care.  you wont get arrested for it tho unless you are found with drugs in the hospital while giving birth or something, but if you and/or the baby test positive you can get arrested.  you will have social services called on u immediately tho.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: flamom on November 17, 2009, 08:02:17 PM
What does the law say?
Currently there is only one state, South Carolina, that holds prenatal substance abuse as a criminal act of child abuse and neglect. Other states have laws that address prenatal substance abuse:

Iowa, Minnesota, and North Dakota's health care providers are required to test for and report prenatal drug exposure. Virginia health care providers are only required to test.
Arizona, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Utah, and Rhode Island's health care providers are required to report prenatal drug exposure. Reporting and testing can be evidence used in child welfare proceedings.
Some states consider prenatal substance abuse as part of their child welfare laws. Therefore prenatal drug exposure can provide grounds for terminating parental rights because of child abuse or neglect. These states include: Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Some states have policies that enforce admission to an inpatient treatment program for pregnant women who use drugs. These states include: Minnesota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
In 2004, Texas made it a felony to smoke marijuana while pregnant, resulting in a prison sentence of 2-20 years.
http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancyhealth/illegaldrugs.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 17, 2009, 08:02:22 PM
Good Evening Monkey Friends ::MonkeyCool::
I think someone else was at the Comfort Inn when  MM took Shaniya there, I guess I just have my doubts that this scum would spend the money for a room, when the non caring egg donor could have easily let him do what he wanted right there in the mobile home. Idk I still have question that someone else was at the Comfort Inn.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 08:02:42 PM
Did NG just say that Coe has visited AD in jail?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: joesamas mama on November 17, 2009, 08:03:25 PM
Endangering the life of a fetus hasn't been a crime since Roe v. Wade.
Endangering the life of a fetus, but what about if the baby is born alive with drugs in their system? Is that not a crime?
That is a crime, as soon as the baby is born and if he or she is born addicted to drugs...yes here where im from it is a crime..
Thanks HH, I thought it was a crime, or at least it is here.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: flamom on November 17, 2009, 08:04:19 PM
I hope that helps.. I shall jump back up into the rafters now.. Love to all of you Monkeys!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:04:37 PM
Did NG just say that Coe has visited AD in jail?
Yes she did......WTH


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: joesamas mama on November 17, 2009, 08:06:44 PM
Good Evening Monkey Friends ::MonkeyCool::
I think someone else was at the Comfort Inn when  MM took Shaniya there, I guess I just have my doubts that this scum would spend the money for a room, when the non caring egg donor could have easily let him do what he wanted right there in the mobile home. Idk I still have question that someone else was at the Comfort Inn.
I asked that question last night mymonkey. Semi posh hotel for him to be taking her to for just an hour or two for himself. I think that there was someone else waiting in one of the rooms. JMO JSM BTL


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 08:06:59 PM
Please don't take this sarcastic, because it's not meant to be. But once a baby is born alive, the baby is no longer a fetus, so that's a different issue altogether.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 17, 2009, 08:07:03 PM
The 911 call AD said 5:30 last night I question now did she intend to say this until the dispatcher corrected her, was AD going to give a different story? ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 17, 2009, 08:07:50 PM
Good Evening Monkey Friends ::MonkeyCool::
I think someone else was at the Comfort Inn when  MM took Shaniya there, I guess I just have my doubts that this scum would spend the money for a room, when the non caring egg donor could have easily let him do what he wanted right there in the mobile home. Idk I still have question that someone else was at the Comfort Inn.
You are not alone, I feel the same way.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: joesamas mama on November 17, 2009, 08:08:04 PM
I hope that helps.. I shall jump back up into the rafters now.. Love to all of you Monkeys!
Thanks it did help. I thought it was a crime here, but I guess just a reason to get a baby taken away. Thanks. Flying to the rafters with you.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 08:08:07 PM
Good Evening Monkey Friends ::MonkeyCool::
I think someone else was at the Comfort Inn when  MM took Shaniya there, I guess I just have my doubts that this scum would spend the money for a room, when the non caring egg donor could have easily let him do what he wanted right there in the mobile home. Idk I still have question that someone else was at the Comfort Inn.

that makes sense...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:08:22 PM
I hope that helps.. I shall jump back up into the rafters now.. Love to all of you Monkeys!
Thanks flamom......stay and talk with us...dont hang in the rafters...lol


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 08:10:34 PM
The 911 call on NG right now, I swore when AD was describing what Shaniya was wearing she started to say "she was wearing a blue velvet..... a blue shirt"

I think she damn well knew she was wearing the blue velvet dress we are seeing in the elevator images as she dressed up nice and pretty. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 17, 2009, 08:10:57 PM
It Pizz me off when a mother says they do not know how much their child weighs ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:11:41 PM
Hey, Monkeys......didnt we read here and hear that Shaniya had a big scar on her foot....did we ever know what happened there??   we need to see if we cant find something out about that to....wonder if that happened at the hands of the Mother too...we need to find out about that scar...it must be pretty big if they used it as identifying messures....hmm


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 08:11:53 PM
Jesus! how many times does the mom <<<used loosely>>> have to tell 911 that Shaniya knew how to unlock the doors! NG  just said it ! she must be logged onto here! tee hee!

anyways...I believe that the mom meant the 5:30 p.m. time till the operator corrected her...someone else on here had said this earlier as well...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 08:12:57 PM
Shaniya Davis' death is second tragedy for the child's father

By Gregory Phillips, The Fayetteville *******, N.C.

Nov. 17--The death of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis is the second time her father, Bradley Wayne Lockhart, has dealt with tragedy.

In 1998, Lockhart's wife of seven years was murdered along with her 19-year-old sister at a home on Graham Road. The two women were bound, gagged and shot with a shotgun in what police said was a robbery.

Three others were also shot; one, 24-year-old David Epps, also died.

Lockhart and his wife, Vickie Sue Lockhart, had three children together. Since the murders, the children have mostly stayed with their grandparents in the Remington subdivision behind Seventy-First High School.

"We've had a lot of tragedy in our family," said Byron Coleman, the father of Vickie Sue Lockhart and Channel Coleman. That's about all he could bring himself to say, after the discovery of Shaniya's body Monday near Sanford.

Two men were later convicted and sentenced to life in prison for the 1998 killings.

Shaniya had spent most of the past three or four years living with Bradley Lockhart at his home in northern Cumberland County. Lockhart has said he didn't have much of a relationship with Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis.

Last month, Lockhart let Shaniya live with her mother after she had appeared to get her life together, he said. Davis and another man are now implicated in Shaniya's disappearance.

Byron Coleman and his 13-year-old grandson helped in the search for Shaniya, which began Sunday morning along N.C. 87.

Coleman said he also spent Saturday night driving back roads between Sanford and Siler City looking for any sign of Shaniya. The former Marine said he had talked to officials at Camp Lejeune about helping with the search about an hour before Shaniya's body was found.

"It made my stomach just turn," said Phyllis Coleman, Byron's wife, of hearing the news. "It was heartbreaking to us ... We loved Shaniya, too."

The Colemans said Bradley and Vickie Sue Lockhart's three children -- Byron III, 20; Cheyenne, 17; and 13-year-old Chivas -- are handling the loss of Shaniya as well as they can. They are Shaniya's half-siblings.

"Cheyenne just broke up," Phyllis Coleman said. "That was the only sister she ever had."

Staff writer Gregory Phillips can be reached at phillipsg@fayobserver.com or 486-3596.

-----
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/yb/137877100


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 08:13:49 PM
Good Evening Monkey Friends ::MonkeyCool::
I think someone else was at the Comfort Inn when  MM took Shaniya there, I guess I just have my doubts that this scum would spend the money for a room, when the non caring egg donor could have easily let him do what he wanted right there in the mobile home. Idk I still have question that someone else was at the Comfort Inn.
You are not alone, I feel the same way.

ITA.  He was either taking Shaniya so he got the profit, or was sharing the profit with AD.  Either way they are both scum.  I still think we will hear about the 60 year old in the future.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 08:14:19 PM
It Pizz me off when a mother says they do not know how much their child weighs ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::

me too!

it sounds like Shaniya had the long blue t shirt on when she was last seen by the mom and it appears to be the same thing that she had on when video saw her with MM...and when she was found


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 17, 2009, 08:15:34 PM
Jesus! how many times does the mom <<<used loosely>>> have to tell 911 that Shaniya knew how to unlock the doors! NG  just said it ! she must be logged onto here! tee hee!

anyways...I believe that the mom meant the 5:30 p.m. time till the operator corrected her...someone else on here had said this earlier as well...

I said that also Cookie, that jumped out to me and I think AD was just going along with morning since the 911 operator said it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 08:16:12 PM
The 911 call on NG right now, I swore when AD was describing what Shaniya was wearing she started to say "she was wearing a blue velvet..... a blue shirt"

I think she damn well knew she was wearing the blue velvet dress we are seeing in the elevator images as she dressed up nice and pretty. 

Shaniya had on an oversized navy blue t-shirt (possibly long sleeve). I least that is what I think I saw in the pics.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Ariana on November 17, 2009, 08:17:13 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

 
You can give your kids to anyone to raise, just get a certified letter saying you are giving guardianship to so and so and that is all that person needs to be able to receive government assistance, file them on taxes, register them in school, take them to the doctor, etc.  But unless the papers are filed in a court giving them legal guardianship you can go get your kid back at any time and there isn't jack that the person that was raising them can do without taking you to court to get the child/ren back which we all know takes time and money.  So he could be legally presumed Shaniya's father because he has done all this stuff but he would still only be able to get her back by taking the mother to court, which if he had filed right away (and he said it was his descision to give her to her mom) he would still be waiting for that court day that would never come now, because it takes months.  And only then would his legal right to her, birth certificate or no, then be decided.  Shaniya never had a chance.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 08:19:45 PM
Published: 07:41 PM, Tue Nov 17, 2009

A community grieves, but where are mom's tears?

Bill Kirby
 

Timidly, she stood before the judge. She wore a tan detention garment, and she was surrounded by five deputies.

"Are you Antoinette Davis?" District Court Judge Talmadge Baggett asked.

Yes, she acknowledged.

"You are charged with two felonies," the judge said during Davis' first appearance in court Monday. "Do you understand?"

Antoinette Davis had little expression.

"Yes sir," she said.

Baggett continued to read the accusations against the 25-year-old mother, when a lawyer, Susan Hall, requested the judge forego reading the charges.

The judge gave pause. Not for long. No, he ruled.

These were charges of human trafficking and felony child abuse involving prostitution, and this was the child's mother who was being arraigned.

This, the judge reasoned, was a heinous crime. This, the judge deemed, was an egregious crime. This arraignment, the judge understood, was about an innocent child - a victim of evil ways.

Good for this judge.

This is about as despicable a crime as Cumberland County has come to know; as 5-year-old Shaniya Nicole Davis' body was discovered just an hour earlier Monday in a wooded area off N.C. 87 in Lee County.

Antoinette Davis is the child's mother, who reported her daughter missing in the early morning hours nine days ago from the mobile home park where the family lived, just off Murchison Road.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, is charged with first-degree kidnapping, after police say he admitted to being in a Sanford hotel some 40 minutes after the mother reported last seeing her daughter.

Antoinette Davis, as she listened to the judge, nervously clasped her hands. She munched her lips.

She knew, according to a sheriff's department spokeswoman, that a child's body had been found.

There was no emotion from Antoinette Davis inside the Cumberland County Detention Center, where the judge scheduled a probable cause hearing for Dec. 3 and appointed her a public defender.

There were no tears.

Just a countenance of the surreal across her face before being led back to a 10 by 8 jail cell with a cot, toilet and sink/water fountain.

Outside, an aunt grieved.

"She's only five," Yvonne Mitchell, 36, said about little Shaynia, who was identified Tuesday as the lifeless child discovered in the woods south of Sanford. "What could she have done? This is a child."

Yet, Mitchell says the family stands behind Antoinette Davis, who is accused of - forget the legal terms - offering her child for sexual servitude.

"Maybe she met somebody crazy," she said. "But I don't think she had anything to do with it."

Meanwhile, the words of Bradley Lockhart, the child's distraught father, should haunt us most.

"Drop her off at a hospital, a police station," he pleaded Monday on national television. "At a Walmart."

It was evil enough to take this defenseless child from her home for sexual bondage, but to take her innocent life and leave it like garbage among kudzu and deer carcasses ...

... She was, for God's sake, a kid with a cute smile and dashing brown eyes who weighed 40 pounds.

It's unconscionable.

And unforgivable.
Bill Kirby can be reached at kirbyb@fayobserver.com or 323-4848, ext. 486.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953042


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 08:20:03 PM
What does the law say?
Currently there is only one state, South Carolina, that holds prenatal substance abuse as a criminal act of child abuse and neglect. Other states have laws that address prenatal substance abuse:

Iowa, Minnesota, and North Dakota's health care providers are required to test for and report prenatal drug exposure. Virginia health care providers are only required to test.
Arizona, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Utah, and Rhode Island's health care providers are required to report prenatal drug exposure. Reporting and testing can be evidence used in child welfare proceedings.
Some states consider prenatal substance abuse as part of their child welfare laws. Therefore prenatal drug exposure can provide grounds for terminating parental rights because of child abuse or neglect. These states include: Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Some states have policies that enforce admission to an inpatient treatment program for pregnant women who use drugs. These states include: Minnesota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
In 2004, Texas made it a felony to smoke marijuana while pregnant, resulting in a prison sentence of 2-20 years.
http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancyhealth/illegaldrugs.html

For those interested in the most updated summary of the law in every state, see http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/drugexposedall.pdf

You'll quickly see that the law requires the birth of the child as a prerequisite to the crime.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 08:20:33 PM
Jesus! how many times does the mom <<<used loosely>>> have to tell 911 that Shaniya knew how to unlock the doors! NG  just said it ! she must be logged onto here! tee hee!

anyways...I believe that the mom meant the 5:30 p.m. time till the operator corrected her...someone else on here had said this earlier as well...

I said that also Cookie, that jumped out to me and I think AD was just going along with morning since the 911 operator said it.

I knew that someone had said it but I couldn't remember who it was...


has anyone done a background check on Dad? just out of curiosity...I  tried to do one but there was a charge so I didn't do it...I am sure that he is clean..
just makes me wonder why a guy like him would have unprotected sex with a prostitute...a 1 night stand as he put it...
not trying to bash the dad, just nosy I guess...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: texasmom on November 17, 2009, 08:20:48 PM
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30485355&op=1&o=all&view=all&subj=177802057491&aid=-1&oid=177802057491&id=1233451030


(http://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs058.snc3/14536_1168001840230_1233451030_30485355_1792792_n.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 17, 2009, 08:22:07 PM
I also think someone else was at the comfort inn. And what ever happen about the 60 ish year old man driving a blue toyota what is up with that why has nothing been said about that? Or has it and I just don't know about it?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:23:24 PM
OMG...thats a beautiful picture Texas....look how nice and clean and well cared for she is...and again.,,,,,,nothing wrong with her ears here either...thats why I said I think that was the ends of MM hair in the pict in the hotel or the light reflecting off the earring in her ear...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 17, 2009, 08:24:43 PM
So did I just read that the egg donor was a prositute when she got preggo with shaniya?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 17, 2009, 08:24:46 PM
I also think someone else was at the comfort inn. And what ever happen about the 60 ish year old man driving a blue toyota what is up with that why has nothing been said about that? Or has it and I just don't know about it?

It may have been a false tip, we just don't know.  Keep in mind that even after her body was found they were getting tips that she was seen alive places.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 08:26:19 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

 
You can give your kids to anyone to raise, just get a certified letter saying you are giving guardianship to so and so and that is all that person needs to be able to receive government assistance, file them on taxes, register them in school, take them to the doctor, etc.  But unless the papers are filed in a court giving them legal guardianship you can go get your kid back at any time and there isn't jack that the person that was raising them can do without taking you to court to get the child/ren back which we all know takes time and money.  So he could be legally presumed Shaniya's father because he has done all this stuff but he would still only be able to get her back by taking the mother to court, which if he had filed right away (and he said it was his descision to give her to her mom) he would still be waiting for that court day that would never come now, because it takes months.  And only then would his legal right to her, birth certificate or no, then be decided.  Shaniya never had a chance.

Sorry, Ariana.  After 16 years of practicing law, I have to disagree with you.  You're talking about something completely different.  You're talking about turning over legal guardianship to someone, not a determination of parenthood.  No one contested that the dad was the dad.  And if he had a hint that Shaniya was in danger, he could have filed for a TRO and had the child back within an hour.  Now, I'm just talking from my experience, which might not be the same everywhere.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:30:33 PM
well papers or no papers ......custody or no custody...if I thought for one second that my child was in danger at the hands of this woman.....trust me....I would have gone there and gotten my child back,,,,,one way or the other.....it might have not been legal...but I would have her.......promise you that,.......been there...done that.......


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 17, 2009, 08:30:45 PM
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30485355&op=1&o=all&view=all&subj=177802057491&aid=-1&oid=177802057491&id=1233451030


(http://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs058.snc3/14536_1168001840230_1233451030_30485355_1792792_n.jpg)

Now we know what Angels look like... ::MonkeyAngel::I have never seen a more beautiful child. I know God held her in his arms  and took away the pain while these monsters did what they did to her...that is my prayer for Shaniya. I also think this horrific crime will bring changes in our laws I think Shaniya's family will see to it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 08:30:47 PM
No murder charge yet in girl's death

Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 5:34 a.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — A week after a 5-year-old Fayetteville girl disappeared and a day after her body was found near Sanford, police are still trying to sort out the evidence in the case to determine who to charge in her death.

Shaniya Nicole Davis was reported missing from her home, at 1116-A Sleepy Hollow Drive, by her mother last Tuesday morning. Volunteer searchers found a body Monday afternoon in some woods off N.C. Highway 87 near the Lee-Harnett county line.

On Tuesday, the State Medical Examiner's Office confirmed that the body was Shaniya's. No cause of death has been released.

Two people have been arrested in Shaniya's disappearance – charges against a third person were dropped – but no one has been charged with killing her.

Police said one issue holding up any charges is the question of jurisdiction in the murder case. Prosecutors must prove where a slaying occurred.

Lee County authorities have referred all questions to the Fayetteville Police Department. The department plans to address the media at 10 a.m. Wednesday, but it's unclear whether new charges will be announced then.
Two held in disappearance

Police arrested Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, on Friday and charged him with first-degree kidnapping in the case. Investigators said McNeill has admitted to taking Shaniya from her home, and hotel security video from a Comfort Suites in Sanford last Tuesday appears to show him carrying her.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, 25, was arrested late Saturday and charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and she "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

In a 911 call released Tuesday, Davis was hysterical when she told a dispatcher that her daughter was missing.

"I woke up this morning, and my daughter was not in the house. I don't know if she walked out. I don't know what going on, but she's not here," Davis said.

Later in the nearly three-minute call, her voice is completely calm as she noted twice that Shaniya knew how to unlock the front door.

"I'm telling you she knows how to unlock it. I'm hoping that she didn't unlock it and walk out," Davis told the dispatcher.

Both McNeill and Davis are being held in isolation at the Cumberland County Detention Center for their protection, authorities said.

Authorities confirmed Tuesday that Davis is pregnant and that Clarence Coe is the father of the child.

Davis initially accused Coe of kidnapping Shaniya, but police dismissed the charge and released him from jail after determining the information to be false and then arresting McNeill.

Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, thanked everyone Tuesday afternoon for their prayers and support and thanked the Fayetteville police, other law enforcement officers and volunteers who helped find his daughter.

"It's not the result I wanted. It's not the result any father or family would want for their children," Lockhart said. "My heart hopes and bleeds and prays that this community (and) this country can possibly unite as one to prevent something like this from happening again to another special angel."

As he stood amid a shrine of flowers and teddy bears in his front yard, he said he was "appalled and disgusted" about the possibility that his daughter was sold as a sex slave.

Lockhart's sister, Carey Lockhart-Davis, urged people to help any child they see who might be in danger.

"Don't let another innocent bystander go unnoticed because we, as adults, fail to realize that they depend on us for safety and trust," Lockhart-Davis said as she choked back tears. "To every pedophile, every person who thinks of taking a child, please beware . I'll be watching."

She said she felt "robbed" because her special bond with her niece has been broken. She recalled helping Shaniya learn how to tie her shoes and color pictures.

"She had such a wonderful, kind soul, and her spirit and smile brightened every day of everyone she touched," she said.

Shaniya's death is the second family tragedy for Lockhart. Eleven years ago, his former wife, Vicki Lockhart, was one of three people killed in a home invasion in Cumberland County.

Although Lockhart said he would try to forgive Davis for Shaniya's disappearance and death, his sister said she never cared for Davis and how she cared for her children.

"Never have I allowed my children to live in an environment that was unsafe," Lockhart-Davis said.

Lockhart said he didn't want to blame anyone for Shaniya's death, saying he could have done things differently himself.

"Every parent would blame themselves. We all look within ourselves to see what we could have done differently," he said.
DSS, police probes detailed

He said, though, that he wished the Cumberland County Department of Social Services had notified him about any problems in Davis' home.

DSS looked at Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son, not Shaniya, according to her uncle, Michael Davis. The case was closed, and Antoinette Davis was able to retain custody of the boy, her uncle said.

DSS Director Brenda Jackson declined to comment on her agency's involvement with the Davis family, citing the criminal investigation into Shaniya's death as well as confidentiality rules for child protective services cases.

A search of court records turned up no previous criminal charges against Davis, but she lived at a home on Wall Street in July that police raided. Officers found "narcotics manufacturing materials" in the house, but no one was charged, according to an incident report.

Residents said they had seen Shaniya running around the neighborhood unattended, but Davis' family maintains she was a good parent.

"I know she’s a great mom. She’s a great mom. Antoinette really loved her children,” said Davis' uncle, Arthur Cromartie.

Cumberland County Schools officials said Shaniya was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School until mid-October, when she was taken out of the school and wasn't enrolled elsewhere.

"We have no knowledge of what the reason was for her being withdrawn from school," Morganton Road Principal Charlotte McLaurin said.

Lockhart said he allowed Shaniya to move in with her mother on Oct. 9.


During a Monday morning interview on CBS' "Early Show," he said Davis had worked to get her life together and had been working for at least six months and gotten a place of her own.

"She had asked if she could be a mother, and I felt she was sincere in asking, and I figured to give her a chance," he said.

According to court records, Lockhart has five other children with three women. He has had custody and child support disputes involving several of the children, but there was no record of any disputes involving Shaniya or Antoinette Davis.

Davis worked in the kitchen at Carolina Inn at Village Green, an assisted living facility in Fayetteville.

CES, a South Carolina-based staffing company that has a contract with Carolina Inn, hired her in June 2008 after an extensive background check, an official said. She had a good employment record at both Carolina Inn and the Haymount Nursing Rehabilitation Facility, but she is no longer employed by the company, the official said.

    * Reporters: Bryan Mims, Amanda Lamb

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6435879/
    * Photographers: Michael Joyner, Terry Cantrell, Greg Clark
    * Web Editor: Matthew Burns


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 17, 2009, 08:33:41 PM
Idk the more I read the more I am thinking that shaniya was at that motel from 5 30 the night before ad called 911. I swear I am thinking that more and more. He found out he was caught on tape and knew what he and maybe someone else had done to poor little shaniya. And he had had to kill her because she is old enough to talk. Idk jmo at this moment


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 08:35:02 PM
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30485355&op=1&o=all&view=all&subj=177802057491&aid=-1&oid=177802057491&id=1233451030


(http://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs058.snc3/14536_1168001840230_1233451030_30485355_1792792_n.jpg)


Thanks TM,
She is a gorgeous child!!

The Aunt always fixed her cute.  Not so with old Antionette.

It hardly looks like the same child we saw at the elevator.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 08:35:27 PM
well papers or no papers ......custody or no custody...if I thought for one second that my child was in danger at the hands of this woman.....trust me....I would have gone there and gotten my child back,,,,,one way or the other.....it might have not been legal...but I would have her.......promise you that,.......been there...done that.......

A-fricken-men HH.  You and me alike.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 08:37:12 PM
Police said one issue holding up any charges is the question of jurisdiction in the murder case. Prosecutors must prove where a slaying occurred.

Lee County authorities have referred all questions to the Fayetteville Police Department. The department plans to address the media at 10 a.m. Wednesday, but it's unclear whether new charges will be announced then.
Two held in disappearance

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6435879/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 08:38:24 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

 
You can give your kids to anyone to raise, just get a certified letter saying you are giving guardianship to so and so and that is all that person needs to be able to receive government assistance, file them on taxes, register them in school, take them to the doctor, etc.  But unless the papers are filed in a court giving them legal guardianship you can go get your kid back at any time and there isn't jack that the person that was raising them can do without taking you to court to get the child/ren back which we all know takes time and money.  So he could be legally presumed Shaniya's father because he has done all this stuff but he would still only be able to get her back by taking the mother to court, which if he had filed right away (and he said it was his descision to give her to her mom) he would still be waiting for that court day that would never come now, because it takes months.  And only then would his legal right to her, birth certificate or no, then be decided.  Shaniya never had a chance.

Not all states assume biology to mean legal father.  From a quick scan North Carolina does not have a putative father registry . 

http://www.courts.state.nh.us/probate/registrylist.pdf

http://www.eriksmith.org/content/Memo/default.asp?id=43

http://www.onevoicenosecrets.org/main/content/view/23/28/

The Rights of Presumed (Putative) Fathers
State Statutes Series
Author(s):  Child Welfare Information Gateway
 
Current Through October 2007

The number of nonmarital births in recent decades has led to an increased focus on the fathers of these children. Many of these alleged (or reputed or putative) fathers of nonmarital children seek recognition of their legal rights and expanded roles in the upbringing of their children.

Constitutional Rights

Historically, putative fathers have had fewer rights with regard to their children than either unwed mothers or married parents. Over the past several decades, putative fathers have used the Fourteenth Amendment to challenge the termination of their parental rights when the birth mothers relinquish their children for adoption. Nevertheless, States have almost complete discretion to determine the rights of a putative father at termination of parental rights or adoption proceedings.

The U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutional protection of a putative father's parental rights when he has established a substantial relationship with his child. The Court defined a substantial relationship as the existence of a biological link between the child and putative father, and it defined the father's commitment to the responsibilities of parenthood as participating in the child's upbringing.1

http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/putative.cfm

From what I am reading , North Carolina is behind in this area and JSM is correct, the father could do absolutely nothing if the mother showed up and took Shaniya from him if he did not establish with the courts that he was the father.  Because every article indicates that Brad and AD had an informal arrangement in regards to Shaniya I am betting he never filed with the courts that he was the father.  Again my scan has not been in depth so I could be looking at outdated info but I do not think there was anything that could have been done once AD told Carey that she would never see Shaniya again without involvement of the courts.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 17, 2009, 08:38:58 PM
And she took her out of school just because she knew that shaniya would tell the horriable things that her mom was putting her through. Jeez I hope she gets what she deserves FAST


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: joesamas mama on November 17, 2009, 08:39:51 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

 
You can give your kids to anyone to raise, just get a certified letter saying you are giving guardianship to so and so and that is all that person needs to be able to receive government assistance, file them on taxes, register them in school, take them to the doctor, etc.  But unless the papers are filed in a court giving them legal guardianship you can go get your kid back at any time and there isn't jack that the person that was raising them can do without taking you to court to get the child/ren back which we all know takes time and money.  So he could be legally presumed Shaniya's father because he has done all this stuff but he would still only be able to get her back by taking the mother to court, which if he had filed right away (and he said it was his descision to give her to her mom) he would still be waiting for that court day that would never come now, because it takes months.  And only then would his legal right to her, birth certificate or no, then be decided.  Shaniya never had a chance.

Sorry, Ariana.  After 16 years of practicing law, I have to disagree with you.  You're talking about something completely different.  You're talking about turning over legal guardianship to someone, not a determination of parenthood.  No one contested that the dad was the dad.  And if he had a hint that Shaniya was in danger, he could have filed for a TRO and had the child back within an hour.  Now, I'm just talking from my experience, which might not be the same everywhere.


But the Dad wasn't there at the time, the Aunt was and that is what I think Ariana and I are talking about. The Aunt had no legal authority to go and get the little girl because the "mom" was the parent, not the Aunt.

Sorry not trying to speak for Ariana.

I am not a very smart monkey, but I know here no matter what paperwork you have, if CPS hasn't given you custody of a child, then you have no rights and the parents have them.





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 17, 2009, 08:39:58 PM
JessStar I was trying to quote your post about the dad filing a TRO and could have had Shaniya back within the hour, I'm not sure what that is. But I can't believe that the dad and the aunt and other family members didn't see the problems. There is no bringing Shaniya back, and I don't want to say anything that looks like I'm slamming them, but something seems off with all this. Maybe they thought if they didn't let Shaniya stay, the mom would have taken off with her, and then they wouldn't see her again? Just trying to make sense out of that decision.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 08:41:20 PM
Reporting on NG that drugs had been sold out of the trailer home. Antoinette's family members had previously sold drugs out of the trailer.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:43:59 PM
Im sorry, but what this all boils down to is a crack head no good woman with access to a little girl that meant nothing but a way to get her next fix and she just happened to know the no good sorry excuse for a man (MM) that knew his way around in this filthy underworld of how to prostitute out a child and make money and she jumped at the chance and had this child never known her father and there was no one to worry about her or ask about her.....this Mother would never had even called 911 or said a word about her being gone......Sick Monster...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 08:45:14 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

 
You can give your kids to anyone to raise, just get a certified letter saying you are giving guardianship to so and so and that is all that person needs to be able to receive government assistance, file them on taxes, register them in school, take them to the doctor, etc.  But unless the papers are filed in a court giving them legal guardianship you can go get your kid back at any time and there isn't jack that the person that was raising them can do without taking you to court to get the child/ren back which we all know takes time and money.  So he could be legally presumed Shaniya's father because he has done all this stuff but he would still only be able to get her back by taking the mother to court, which if he had filed right away (and he said it was his descision to give her to her mom) he would still be waiting for that court day that would never come now, because it takes months.  And only then would his legal right to her, birth certificate or no, then be decided.  Shaniya never had a chance.

Sorry, Ariana.  After 16 years of practicing law, I have to disagree with you.  You're talking about something completely different.  You're talking about turning over legal guardianship to someone, not a determination of parenthood.  No one contested that the dad was the dad.  And if he had a hint that Shaniya was in danger, he could have filed for a TRO and had the child back within an hour.  Now, I'm just talking from my experience, which might not be the same everywhere.


But the Dad wasn't there at the time, the Aunt was and that is what I think Ariana and I are talking about. The Aunt had no legal authority to go and get the little girl because the "mom" was the parent, not the Aunt.

Sorry not trying to speak for Ariana.

I am not a very smart monkey, but I know here no matter what paperwork you have, if CPS hasn't given you custody of a child, then you have no rights and the parents have them.





That is absolutely correct.   ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 17, 2009, 08:45:28 PM
Don't miss Dana Pretzer tonight, he has a great lineup!  Show starts in about 15 minutes!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Pretzer111709.jpg)

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2009/11/17/the-dana-pretzer-show-on-scared-monkeys-radio-tuesday-november-17-2009-special-guests-retired-lt-colonel-ralph-peters-discussing-ft-hood-shooting-aes-bill-kurtis-robin-sax/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 08:48:47 PM
Byron Coleman, Shaniya's half brother also bi-racial.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 08:48:52 PM
Im sorry, but what this all boils down to is a crack head no good woman with access to a little girl that meant nothing but a way to get her next fix and she just happened to know the no good sorry excuse for a man (MM) that knew his way around in this filthy underworld of how to prostitute out a child and make money and she jumped at the chance and had this child never known her father and there was no one to worry about her or ask about her.....this Mother would never had even called 911 or said a word about her being gone......Sick Monster...

I believe another catalyst was the fact that the school had schedule a meeting for the day after Shaniya went missing to discuss why she was taken out of kindergarten and not enrolled anywhere else.  If abuse had occurred prior to her disappearance (which unfortunately I believe did occur) AD could not take Shaniya into school with outward signs of abuse or chance Shaniya talking about things that may have taken place while she was out of school.  JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 08:52:19 PM
Hmmmmm..


 ::MonkeyEek::


Arrested today:


Samuel McNeill
Probation violation
No bond  <---------------------------- !!!!

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:53:38 PM
Im sorry, but what this all boils down to is a crack head no good woman with access to a little girl that meant nothing but a way to get her next fix and she just happened to know the no good sorry excuse for a man (MM) that knew his way around in this filthy underworld of how to prostitute out a child and make money and she jumped at the chance and had this child never known her father and there was no one to worry about her or ask about her.....this Mother would never had even called 911 or said a word about her being gone......Sick Monster...

I believe another catalyst was the fact that the school had schedule a meeting for the day after Shaniya went missing to discuss why she was taken out of kindergarten and not enrolled anywhere else.  If abuse had occurred prior to her disappearance (which unfortunately I believe did occur) AD could not take Shaniya into school with outward signs of abuse or chance Shaniya talking about things that may have taken place while she was out of school.  JMO
Thats what im trying to say, if Shaniya had never known her father then Im sure her life would have been like the past 3 months has been and she would never had made it to kindergarden, and when she did exspire, the Mother wouldnt have even called 911.....I would still like to know what the 7 year old has told LE about what was going on in that home...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 08:53:56 PM
Hmmmmm..


 ::MonkeyEek::


Arrested today:


Samuel McNeill
Probation violation
No bond  <---------------------------- !!!!

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx



Sorry... to see this, you'll need to type in his name.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 17, 2009, 08:54:17 PM
Hmmmmm..


 ::MonkeyEek::


Arrested today:


Samuel McNeill
Probation violation
No bond  <---------------------------- !!!!

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx


Will this turn out to be Mario's father?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 08:54:22 PM
A different way of putting it article 

NOW AT 'EUR THIS N THAT': Beautiful Baby Shaniya Davis Found Dead (Video)
(November 17, 2009)


    *Our fingers can barely bring you this devastating news. This story is so incredibly horrible and disgusting any decent person reading this, whether a parent or not, should feel their heart stop just from reading it.

     This beautiful "angel," as her daddy, Bradley Lockhart, referred to her, was only on this Earth five short years.

     Her father had a one-night stand with a freak of nature disguised as a black woman named Antoinette Davis.

     He said he had been raising her, but decided he would try and give her mother a chance to be a mother.  Surely, Lockhart is now cursing the day this soul-less piece of trash was born.  CBS is reporting that Davis sold her daughter into prostitution.

     The baby was seen being carried into a hotel room by another putrid waste of life named Mario Andrette McNeill.  According to CBS, the relationship between Davis and McNeill has not been verified.

     Lockhart's sister, Carey Lockhart-Davis has been the child's mother and aunt.  The married last name of Davis is strange as well.  Maybe there is somehow a connection between the mother's family and Carey.  Hopefully not.

     If you can, click over http://www.eurthisnthat.com/2009/11/16/shaniya-davis-found-dead/ and watch the desperate plea from them both on the CBS Early Morning show just "hours" before the child was found dead in North Carolina.

http://eurweb.com/story/eur57480.cfm


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 08:54:52 PM
OMG....Wyks.....dont tell me its a family thing now,,,,,,is this guy kin to mario..???


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 17, 2009, 08:54:54 PM
I would like to know if the aunt or dad called to talk to Shaniya in those weeks I can not help but think  that something could be sensed that things were not right in that mobile home by talking to Shaniya, and I would think Shaniya would tell her daddy she was not in school.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Lenie on November 17, 2009, 08:55:48 PM
Hi Monkeys, Does anyone hear someone in the background on the 911 tape. It isn't constant but about midway I think or close to the end. I believe it is when she is asking her about her underwear and you can hear someone in the background kinda telling AD what type of underwear Shaniya had on.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 17, 2009, 08:56:07 PM
I would like to know if the aunt or dad called to talk to Shaniya in those weeks I can not help but think  that something could be sensed that things were not right in that mobile home by talking to Shaniya, and I would think Shaniya would tell her daddy she was not in school.
That's what I wondered, if there were any phone calls to Shaniya.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 08:56:09 PM
Hmmmmm..


 ::MonkeyEek::


Arrested today:


Samuel McNeill
Probation violation
No bond  <---------------------------- !!!!

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx


page 2
Charge: M:POSS MARIJ UP TO 1/2 OZ

They have some strict pot laws in NC    ::MonkeyDevil2::

Are you thinking he is related to Mario?   This guy is 51 so could be his father.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 08:56:33 PM
Hi Monkeys, Does anyone hear someone in the background on the 911 tape. It isn't constant but about midway I think or close to the end. I believe it is when she is asking her about her underwear and you can hear someone in the background kinda telling AD what type of underwear Shaniya had on.

yes.  deep voice but just for a sec.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 17, 2009, 08:56:45 PM
timeline, sorry long
on 11-10-09: @6:53am mom calls in and reports Shaniya missing
Shaniya Davis is a 5-year-old girl who went missing from a Fayetteville, N.C., trailer park early Tuesday morning.
Her mother reports last seeing her at 5:30 a.m. that morning, and foul play is suspected in her case.
 
On Wednesday,11-11-09 at 11 p.m.,
police arrested Clarence Coe, 30, and charged him with first-degree kidnapping.
Coe maintains his innocence, but police argue that this was not a random arrest.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, was arrested Friday 11-13-09
for the kidnapping of Shaniya Davis. Investigators are still
trying to determine McNeill's connection to Shaniya. Authorities were able to arrest McNeill because of footage
found of him on a hotel surveillance video, where McNeill is seen carrying Shaniya.

hotel surveillance video date time
11-10-09:
6:11am Mario is seen on video carrying Shaniya into hotel
11-10-09:7:30am Mario is know to exit hotel w/Shaniya
the videos aired THURSDAY, November 12, 2009

Antoinette Nicole Davis arrested,11-14-09Shaniya Davis' mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, was arrested and charged authorities said Saturday night for
human trafficking and other offenses. She has been accused of offering her daughter for prostitution.
Antoinette says she doesn't know where her daughter is, but she was also charged with felony child abuse,
 prostitution and filing a false police report. Authorities still haven't been able to locate Shaniya.

11/16/09
The body of Shaniya Davis has been found along a North Carolina highway


link to 911 audio
http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/6439590/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a more detailed timeline i snipped from
http://crimeseekers.net/forums/showthread.php?p=10623

TimeLine For Missing Shaniya Davis

TUESDAY, November 10, 2009

3:00 AM: Neighbor, Andrea Moore, described hearing noises outside her mobile home

5:30 AM: Mother put Shaniya Davis on sofa and last time she saw her child

6:11 AM: Shaniya observed on survellience video at hotel 40 miles from home in the arms of Mario McNeill waiting
 on elevator

6:53 AM: Antoinette Davis calls LE to report her daughter missing

• Law enforcement search the mobile home park and find a blanket covered in feces in garbage pail of neighbor,
Andrea Moore. Blanket believed to be that of Shaniya. Theresa Chance, Fayetteville Police spokesperson stated
Ms. Moore is not a suspect.

• Back porch and railing of home Davis family lives in is covered in feces.

• Ms. Davis, her 7-year-old son, Davis' sister and another child are removed from the home and not allowed to
return due to extensive sewage leak.

• The N.C. Offender Registry lists two sex offenders who live in the mobile home park.

WEDNESDAY, November 11, 2009

• Clarence Coe, boyfriend of Antoinette Davis, is arrested for the kidnapping of Shaniya. Reports provided to
LE state he was seen leaving the mobile home park with Shaniya.

• Clarence Coe said he did not take Shaniya.

THURSDAY, November 12, 2009

• Still images from a Sanford hotel survellience video aired nationally of Mario Andrette McNeill, ex-boyfriend
 of Antoinette Davis' SISTER, carrying Shaniya Davis to the hotel's elevator.

FRIDAY, November 13, 2009

• Mario McNeill turned himself into police early morning after seeing the hotel images.

• Clarence Coe was released from jail and kidnapping charges dropped.

• Mario McNeill charged with kidnapping Shaniya Davis. Hotel survellience video confirmed him with Shaniya on
Tuesday morning. McNeill stated he took Shaniya but denies that he kidnapped her.

• The whereabouts of Shaniya are unknown. FBI and U.S. Marshalls are involved in the nationwide search for
Shaniya.

• Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, arrived in Fayetteville and went on national TV begging for the return of
his daughter who has lived with him for about 3-4 years, but only lived with her mother for the last three weeks
.

• Clarence Coe, boyfriend of Antoinette Davis, is said to be more upset about Shaniya's disappearance than her
mother...as per a neighbor intervewed by local news station.

SATURDAY, November 14, 2009

• Late Saturday, Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, was charged with human trafficking, felony child
abuse/prostitution, filing a false police report and resist, delay or obstruct.

• Police said Davis was being held at the Cumberland County Jail on $51,000 secured bond and is scheduled to
appear in court Monday morning.

• Still no sign of Shaniya Davis.

SUNDAY, November 15, 2009

• Authorities acting on a tip are scouring a portion of south-central North Carolina for a 5-year-old girl
reported missing by her mother. Multiple agencies have been searching for Shaniya Davis since 8 a.m.

• SANFORD, NC (WTVD) -- Fayetteville police confirmed Sunday that they were searching on the ground for a
missing 5-year-old girl between Fayetteville and Sanford. Chopper 11 confirms a Fayetville forensics truck is
 on the scene and officers are searching near Walker Road off Highway 87 in the Sanford area.Witnesses told
ABC11 Eyewitness News they saw officers searching a ravine in that area around 10 a.m.

• Sanford is about 40 miles north of Fayetteville. Police did not say if they were looking for a body or if they
 hoped to find Shaniya Davis alive.

• The father of a missing 5-year-old North Carolina girl says he never should have allowed her to go back to her
 mother.

• Another day gone by. A long day of searching wrapped up at 5:00 PM with still no sign of Shaniya.

MONDAY, November 16, 2009

• Search for Shaniya remains in the area on Walker Road. Over 200 searchers are combing the long stretch of
road and 100 yds off the road on each side. This search is based on a tip that her body was dumped along Walker
Road off Hwy. 87.

• Lockhart and his sister, who live out of state, cared for Shaniya until last month.

• Anyone wishing to help with the search was asked to e-mail their name and contact numbers to
Shaniyavolunteer@ci.fay.nc.us to be added to a central list so police can coordinate volunteer efforts.


• The body of little Shaniya has been found. News of the discovery of her remains found on Walker Road came in
around 1:30 PM.


• Davis' 7-year-old son was taken into protective custody last week and placed into foster care.

• According to the non-profit agency, Child of the Night, Shaniya's case is very rare. Typically, child are in
the age range of 11 to 17 when entered into the world of human trafficking/prostitution. When a child is
prostituted or sold by a parent it's usually involving drugs.

TUESDAY, November 17, 2009

• "Lord, I come to you with open arms, and it is hard. It is hard," Bradley Lockhart said at a vigil in a store
parking lot, according to The Associated Press. "Don't give up on me and don't give up on Shaniya. She's right
there with you."


• Lockhart attended a prayer vigil last night for his daughter and broke down while speaking to the crowd.


• "The investigation at this point indicates that Shaniya Davis was alive at the time she left the Sanford hotel
," police said in the statement Tuesday.

• Shaniya's half-sister, Cheyenne Lockhart, told HLN's "Nancy Grace" Monday that she found it difficult to
believe Davis had treated her daughter so poorly. "She seemed like the sweetest woman. She didn't come from much
, but ... she had the sweetest voice, she had the sweetest personality, and especially toward me. I would never
think that she would do anything like that," said Lockhart, who shared a father with Shaniya.

• The aunt of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found off a rural North Carolina road says she had a hard time
letting the girl live for a while at her mother's house.

• Carey Lockhart-Davis said Tuesday that the mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, neglected her children.
Lockart-Davis is the sister of the girl's father, Bradley Lockhart, and helped raise her. The girl went to stay
 with her mother a month ago.

• Jeff Riccio of Tarheel Canine Training Inc. said Tuesday his team returned after getting information that the
body of Shaniya (shuh-NY-ah) Davis might be near the carcasses. The searchers found the body Monday afternoon
underneath kudzu along a rural highway southeast of Sanford.


link to 911 audio
http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/6439590/







Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 08:58:05 PM
dang.  had dinner and now i'm 7 pages behind.

o/t - can I ask everyone to please stop by Elizabeth Olten's thread and post - just to maybe increase positivity for the hearing tomorrow?

maybe a silly request....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 17, 2009, 08:58:26 PM
cw618 Thank-you for the timeline.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 08:59:16 PM
JessStar I was trying to quote your post about the dad filing a TRO and could have had Shaniya back within the hour, I'm not sure what that is. But I can't believe that the dad and the aunt and other family members didn't see the problems. There is no bringing Shaniya back, and I don't want to say anything that looks like I'm slamming them, but something seems off with all this. Maybe they thought if they didn't let Shaniya stay, the mom would have taken off with her, and then they wouldn't see her again? Just trying to make sense out of that decision.

Sorry about that.  A TRO is a temporary restraining order.  It is filed on an emergency basis without providing notice to the "other side."  As an officer of the court and a staunch advocate for children, I don't want anyone to get the false impression that there's nothing that can be done when a child is in danger because that is patently false.  While I recognize that there are people that have had bad experiences, I'd hope that those horror stories do not work to cloud others' judgment or effect anyone's decision about whether to take action to protect a child in the face of danger.

Having said that, we all have to accept that there will always be bad parents who subject their children to the most horrific crimes.  Look what's going on with the Mohler family in Missouri.  It doesn't get much worse than that.  And the witness victims who are coming out are in their late 20's, talking about horrifying stories of abuse, including bestiality, that happened when they were as young as 6. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Lenie on November 17, 2009, 09:00:51 PM
Hi Monkeys, Does anyone hear someone in the background on the 911 tape. It isn't constant but about midway I think or close to the end. I believe it is when she is asking her about her underwear and you can hear someone in the background kinda telling AD what type of underwear Shaniya had on.

yes.  deep voice but just for a sec.

Thank you thought I was going crazy (er)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 17, 2009, 09:02:51 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

Jess - I am not sure how it works there, but here in Michigan the affidavit of parentage that the guy must sign if he wants his name on the birth certificate (and is presented to him at the hospital at the time of the birth) states that "The mother has initial custody of the child, without prejudice to the determination of either parent’s custodial rights, until otherwise determined by the
court or agreed upon by the parties in writing and acknowledged by the court."  So I am pretty sure that in this case, the police would be powerless to order the mom to give the child back to the dad unless there was a court ordered custody agreement. I know that when my ex called the cops to get his kid back after mom's visitation ended he was told it was a civil matter and he would have to go to court to enforce and/or punish her for not following the rules.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 09:02:52 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

This tells me there was no hand off as I suspected. sick sick sick people they are. I hope they rot in he11 for what was done to that baby girl.. I am sure the big boys in prison will show him what it feels like to be assaulted like that. They will change his name for him to ben dover.

yeah, he wasn't smirking in the latest court footage.  Actually looked scared to death.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 09:03:06 PM
I dunno if he is kin or not.  Read somewhere, by a local, that McNeill is like 'Smith' in that area, there are so many. 

Still and all tho.. Interesting that this Samuel is 51, arrested for poss of weed and probation violation, and there is no bond.   

Wonder what kind and color vehicle he drives, if any?? 





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 17, 2009, 09:03:24 PM
I found this On Samual McNeill.. Also check his vehicle out.. but not 100% sure if this is the same McNeill..



MCNEILL , SAMUEL LYNN
826 EGYPT RD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28314   
 


VEHICLE INFORMATION: 
TAX YEAR TAX BILL NUMBER TAX DISTRICT AMOUNT PAID
2009 5076388 06  1000  $100.00

EXPIRATION DATE YEAR / MAKE / MODEL TAXABLE VALUE EXEMPTION
6/30/2010 2006 CHEVY IMLT  $11,320.00 $0.00
 

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 09:03:46 PM
:no doubt in my mind that this baby was loved and was  very well taken care of  by the dad and the aunt...my only problem with them is why they decided to let Shaniya go live with the egg donor...there are conflicting stories...last night on NG, Brad's daughter said that they knew that she was doing drugs still...then tonight, Brad's son said that if they knew that AD was doing drugs, no way would they have allowed the baby to go over there...
this dad has 5 other children by 3 different women? sounds like he did more than work all the time...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 17, 2009, 09:04:16 PM
Allalone, do you mean add charges for taking drugs while pregnant?  There is no such crime as far as I know.


Endangering the life of a fetus is a crime in some states, I think.

In Michigan (which is my only experience) it is not a crime to take drugs during pregnancy - but it is a basis for the CPS to come in and take the child at birth. It can even be a basis for termination with no effort to reunite the family.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 09:04:35 PM
Hmmmmm..


 ::MonkeyEek::


Arrested today:


Samuel McNeill
Probation violation
No bond  <---------------------------- !!!!

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx



Sorry... to see this, you'll need to type in his name.



(http://www.ccsonc.org/MugShots/134666.031)(http://images.news14.com/media/2009/11/12/images/ENLARGE_02mcneil.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 09:05:52 PM
I dunno if he is kin or not.  Read somewhere, by a local, that McNeill is like 'Smith' in that area, there are so many. 

Still and all tho.. Interesting that this Samuel is 51, arrested for poss of weed and probation violation, and there is no bond.   

Wonder what kind and color vehicle he drives, if any?? 





Here is a side by side to compare



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Ariana on November 17, 2009, 09:07:43 PM
I agree with JSM if the Aunt's version is the correct one.  All child custody/support issues the father has apparently had combined with the fact that his parents have and are raising his kids by his deceased wife (what is up with that), just to find out the Aunt was the one raising Shaniya makes me think the dad isn't much better than the mom anyways and as another monkey had said (not verbatim) he is just acting for the cameras.  I think that the only people who even cared about Shaniya was her fathers family, specifically the Aunt.  And she is probably the only one telling the truth.  I just honestly can't see her saying to her brother, "Oh yea, I have invested all this time into taking care of your daughter and it's ok with me that you send her to her mother because you feel that she deserves a chance to be one this late in the game.  Especially one who knowingly slept with an HIV positive man and is pregnant with his baby." And maybe the Aunt didn't know the mom was pregnant but could you really just give up a child you have raised and cared for as your own to someone like that?  I think it was a visitation and the mom basically slapped her in the face and the dad doesn't want to look like he just didn't give a crap to not come down and save his daughter after the mom took her so he concocted this story up about giving her to the mom.

      And if it was my child, I would go to any lengths to get my child back.  I do mean any.  So I can say I agree with HH and JessStar on that.  The auntie just didn't have a say or a choice.  I don't know her situation so I am not gonna throw my stone at her yet for not doing whatever it took to get her child (she did the work) back,my guess is she wanted to do everything legal like and was waiting for the dad to get back.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 09:07:54 PM
They look nothing alike to me......


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 17, 2009, 09:08:28 PM
Thank-you for answering JessStar, for some reason tonight when I hit quote and try to post, it jumps and won't allow me to do so  ::MonkeyConfused:: So then the dad could have done this if he felt there was a problem, maybe he just didn't think there was a problem? I don't know.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 09:08:50 PM
ok, let's all take just one small minute to think about this.

Let's put ourselves in the aunt's place.

She hands the child over to a bio m om that she does not like.

On Oct. 9th, not the 31st as has been stated previous to about 5 hours ago, right?

The mother subsequently tells this aunt that she will never see the child again.  No warning sings there?

And the aunt does nothing?  Doesn't dig around, trying to find something that she can use to get the child back?  Doesn't even call the police?


So now the dad is asking Americans to please report any suspicions regarding child abuse?
Did the aunt call the dad in Oregon?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sunshine12 on November 17, 2009, 09:09:02 PM
Allalone, do you mean add charges for taking drugs while pregnant?  There is no such crime as far as I know.


Endangering the life of a fetus is a crime in some states, I think.

In Michigan (which is my only experience) it is not a crime to take drugs during pregnancy - but it is a basis for the CPS to come in and take the child at birth. It can even be a basis for termination with no effort to reunite the family.

it's very hard to terminate a parents rights without the cps agency at least attempting to provide reunifcation services.  unless of course there are aggravated circumstances, which could be possible if a  mother has other children that her rights have been terminated on and then gives birth to another child in a certain period of time after her rights on the other children have been terminated.  either way, the fathers are still supposed to be provided reunifcation services.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 09:10:41 PM
They look alike to me. ::MonkeyConfused::

They have both got that big eye/little eye thing going on.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sunshine12 on November 17, 2009, 09:11:04 PM
ok, let's all take just one small minute to think about this.

Let's put ourselves in the aunt's place.

She hands the child over to a bio m om that she does not like.

On Oct. 9th, not the 31st as has been stated previous to about 5 hours ago, right?

The mother subsequently tells this aunt that she will never see the child again.  No warning sings there?

And the aunt does nothing?  Doesn't dig around, trying to find something that she can use to get the child back?  Doesn't even call the police?


So now the dad is asking Americans to please report any suspicions regarding child abuse?
Did the aunt call the dad in Oregon?

i agree completely. hindsight is always 20/20, but there just way too many red flags in this situation that the father and aunt should have acted upon.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 17, 2009, 09:11:09 PM
 Jill, those are all great questions.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
I dunno if he is kin or not.  Read somewhere, by a local, that McNeill is like 'Smith' in that area, there are so many. 

Still and all tho.. Interesting that this Samuel is 51, arrested for poss of weed and probation violation, and there is no bond.   

Wonder what kind and color vehicle he drives, if any?? 





devil's advocate - there might be no bond because he is heading back to prison for probation violation automatic.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 17, 2009, 09:13:31 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

 
You can give your kids to anyone to raise, just get a certified letter saying you are giving guardianship to so and so and that is all that person needs to be able to receive government assistance, file them on taxes, register them in school, take them to the doctor, etc.  But unless the papers are filed in a court giving them legal guardianship you can go get your kid back at any time and there isn't jack that the person that was raising them can do without taking you to court to get the child/ren back which we all know takes time and money.  So he could be legally presumed Shaniya's father because he has done all this stuff but he would still only be able to get her back by taking the mother to court, which if he had filed right away (and he said it was his descision to give her to her mom) he would still be waiting for that court day that would never come now, because it takes months.  And only then would his legal right to her, birth certificate or no, then be decided.  Shaniya never had a chance.

I am in total agreement.  I doubt that AD even put him on the birth certificate.  He was not in a position to stop this...LE would not have helped, no one would have helped..she was with the bio Mom..and had the bio Mom come in the middle of the night and taken her out a window and they could prove it..nothing would have been done..the bio Mom had her and with no formal custody agreement..and even if a custody agreement was in place, unless the Dad had full 100 percent custody and the bio Mom gave up all rights to the child..in a court of law, in writing, pronounced by a judge.....LE , the family ..could do nothing.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 09:13:40 PM
thanks for the responses - sorry for the typos, i'm upset.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 09:13:48 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

Jess - I am not sure how it works there, but here in Michigan the affidavit of parentage that the guy must sign if he wants his name on the birth certificate (and is presented to him at the hospital at the time of the birth) states that "The mother has initial custody of the child, without prejudice to the determination of either parent’s custodial rights, until otherwise determined by the
court or agreed upon by the parties in writing and acknowledged by the court."  So I am pretty sure that in this case, the police would be powerless to order the mom to give the child back to the dad unless there was a court ordered custody agreement. I know that when my ex called the cops to get his kid back after mom's visitation ended he was told it was a civil matter and he would have to go to court to enforce and/or punish her for not following the rules.

That document is intended to acknowledge parentage and establish paternity.  Paternity was not an issue for Shaniya.  I don't doubt for one second that the cops took the position that the visitation issue is a civil matter--it absolutely is.  Police are powerless to order any parent to turn over his/her child to another parent, even if the parents are happily married.  But if the father showed up and took Shaniya, there's nothing "mom" could have done about it either.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 09:13:50 PM
does anyone think that MM took Shaniya to the motel, gave her to someone in a room who was already checked in waiting...the guy did what he wanted to do with the baby while MM cooled his heels either in the restaurant at the hotel or his car, then MM went back up  to the room to get her an hour later and that is why he was carrying her to the elevator?
she must have been so scared...it breaks my heart to even let my mind go there...I have little grand daughters and the thought of them being so scared makes me want to scream!!! I hate these people who did this to her, to her family and to all of us..!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 17, 2009, 09:13:53 PM
I'm guessing I am way behind with this information but a few posts up was the first that I had heard about the sewage leak. So the blanket probably had feces on it from a sewage problem in the house? Sorry if this was already mentioned. I have only read parts of this thread.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 09:14:23 PM
I found this On Samual McNeill.. Also check his vehicle out.. but not 100% sure if this is the same McNeill..



MCNEILL , SAMUEL LYNN
826 EGYPT RD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28314   
 


VEHICLE INFORMATION: 
TAX YEAR TAX BILL NUMBER TAX DISTRICT AMOUNT PAID
2009 5076388 06  1000  $100.00

EXPIRATION DATE YEAR / MAKE / MODEL TAXABLE VALUE EXEMPTION
6/30/2010 2006 CHEVY IMLT  $11,320.00 $0.00
 

Interesting!  Thanks JG! 

I dunno if that's the same one or not, but could be.  There also is a Samuel E McNeill (52) in Sanford. 

On the BOLO, they were looking for a man in his 60s or so, in the Sanford area, with a blue toyota.  And then they hushed up about that. 

 ::MonkeyConfused::





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 09:15:39 PM
Fayetteville PD scanner if anyone wants to listen

http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?ctid=1912


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 17, 2009, 09:16:16 PM
I found this On Samual McNeill.. Also check his vehicle out.. but not 100% sure if this is the same McNeill..



MCNEILL , SAMUEL LYNN
826 EGYPT RD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28314   
 


VEHICLE INFORMATION: 
TAX YEAR TAX BILL NUMBER TAX DISTRICT AMOUNT PAID
2009 5076388 06  1000  $100.00

EXPIRATION DATE YEAR / MAKE / MODEL TAXABLE VALUE EXEMPTION
6/30/2010 2006 CHEVY IMLT  $11,320.00 $0.00
 

Interesting!  Thanks JG! 

I dunno if that's the same one or not, but could be.  There also is a Samuel E McNeill (52) in Sanford. 

On the BOLO, they were looking for a man in his 60s or so, in the Sanford area, with a blue toyota.  And then they hushed up about that. 

 ::MonkeyConfused::





I was thinking about that too. I wonder if they are still following that lead or not?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 09:17:06 PM
ok, let's all take just one small minute to think about this.

Let's put ourselves in the aunt's place.

She hands the child over to a bio m om that she does not like.

On Oct. 9th, not the 31st as has been stated previous to about 5 hours ago, right?

The mother subsequently tells this aunt that she will never see the child again.  No warning sings there?

And the aunt does nothing?  Doesn't dig around, trying to find something that she can use to get the child back?  Doesn't even call the police?


So now the dad is asking Americans to please report any suspicions regarding child abuse?
Did the aunt call the dad in Oregon?
I had read that the Aunt was mad because Shaniya had been punished for doing something to her cousin..like hitting them or something and the Aunt and the Mother got in a augument about it, so yes the Aunt had most likely been calling to check on Shaniya......and the Mother got mad and told her she would never see Shaniya again.......she must have called the father and said something because she said that she knew when he got back to town that they were gonna have to do something and file some papers to ensure they had a say in where shaniya went after this......I think Shaniya had visited the Mother before and prolly came back ok...by listeneing to shaniyas sister and brother thats the way I understand it....she had visited the mother before, so maybe the aunt figured she would be fine until the father got home and sought legal advice...IMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 09:17:08 PM
Hi Monkeys, Does anyone hear someone in the background on the 911 tape. It isn't constant but about midway I think or close to the end. I believe it is when she is asking her about her underwear and you can hear someone in the background kinda telling AD what type of underwear Shaniya had on.

yes.  deep voice but just for a sec.

Thank you thought I was going crazy (er)

no crazy (er) than the rest of us.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 09:19:14 PM
does anyone think that MM took Shaniya to the motel, gave her to someone in a room who was already checked in waiting...the guy did what he wanted to do with the baby while MM cooled his heels either in the restaurant at the hotel or his car, then MM went back up  to the room to get her an hour later and that is why he was carrying her to the elevator?
she must have been so scared...it breaks my heart to even let my mind go there...I have little grand daughters and the thought of them being so scared makes me want to scream!!! I hate these people who did this to her, to her family and to all of us..!

That is what I have thought all along.  I also think that Antoinette was keeping her locked in a closet
when McNeil didn't have her.  I think that is why the blanket was soiled.  It was like the Patty Hurst
treatment.  Shaniya thought McNeil was rescuing her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 09:20:00 PM
timeline, sorry long
on 11-10-09: @6:53am mom calls in and reports Shaniya missing
Shaniya Davis is a 5-year-old girl who went missing from a Fayetteville, N.C., trailer park early Tuesday morning.
Her mother reports last seeing her at 5:30 a.m. that morning, and foul play is suspected in her case.
 
On Wednesday,11-11-09 at 11 p.m.,
police arrested Clarence Coe, 30, and charged him with first-degree kidnapping.
Coe maintains his innocence, but police argue that this was not a random arrest.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, was arrested Friday 11-13-09
for the kidnapping of Shaniya Davis. Investigators are still
trying to determine McNeill's connection to Shaniya. Authorities were able to arrest McNeill because of footage
found of him on a hotel surveillance video, where McNeill is seen carrying Shaniya.

hotel surveillance video date time
11-10-09:
6:11am Mario is seen on video carrying Shaniya into hotel
11-10-09:7:30am Mario is know to exit hotel w/Shaniya
the videos aired THURSDAY, November 12, 2009

Antoinette Nicole Davis arrested,11-14-09Shaniya Davis' mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, was arrested and charged authorities said Saturday night for
human trafficking and other offenses. She has been accused of offering her daughter for prostitution.
Antoinette says she doesn't know where her daughter is, but she was also charged with felony child abuse,
 prostitution and filing a false police report. Authorities still haven't been able to locate Shaniya.

11/16/09
The body of Shaniya Davis has been found along a North Carolina highway


link to 911 audio
http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/6439590/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a more detailed timeline i snipped from
http://crimeseekers.net/forums/showthread.php?p=10623

TimeLine For Missing Shaniya Davis

TUESDAY, November 10, 2009

3:00 AM: Neighbor, Andrea Moore, described hearing noises outside her mobile home

5:30 AM: Mother put Shaniya Davis on sofa and last time she saw her child

6:11 AM: Shaniya observed on survellience video at hotel 40 miles from home in the arms of Mario McNeill waiting
 on elevator

6:53 AM: Antoinette Davis calls LE to report her daughter missing

• Law enforcement search the mobile home park and find a blanket covered in feces in garbage pail of neighbor,
Andrea Moore. Blanket believed to be that of Shaniya. Theresa Chance, Fayetteville Police spokesperson stated
Ms. Moore is not a suspect.

• Back porch and railing of home Davis family lives in is covered in feces.

• Ms. Davis, her 7-year-old son, Davis' sister and another child are removed from the home and not allowed to
return due to extensive sewage leak.

• The N.C. Offender Registry lists two sex offenders who live in the mobile home park.

WEDNESDAY, November 11, 2009

• Clarence Coe, boyfriend of Antoinette Davis, is arrested for the kidnapping of Shaniya. Reports provided to
LE state he was seen leaving the mobile home park with Shaniya.

• Clarence Coe said he did not take Shaniya.

THURSDAY, November 12, 2009

• Still images from a Sanford hotel survellience video aired nationally of Mario Andrette McNeill, ex-boyfriend
 of Antoinette Davis' SISTER, carrying Shaniya Davis to the hotel's elevator.

FRIDAY, November 13, 2009

• Mario McNeill turned himself into police early morning after seeing the hotel images.

• Clarence Coe was released from jail and kidnapping charges dropped.

• Mario McNeill charged with kidnapping Shaniya Davis. Hotel survellience video confirmed him with Shaniya on
Tuesday morning. McNeill stated he took Shaniya but denies that he kidnapped her.

• The whereabouts of Shaniya are unknown. FBI and U.S. Marshalls are involved in the nationwide search for
Shaniya.

• Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, arrived in Fayetteville and went on national TV begging for the return of
his daughter who has lived with him for about 3-4 years, but only lived with her mother for the last three weeks
.

• Clarence Coe, boyfriend of Antoinette Davis, is said to be more upset about Shaniya's disappearance than her
mother...as per a neighbor intervewed by local news station.

SATURDAY, November 14, 2009

• Late Saturday, Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, was charged with human trafficking, felony child
abuse/prostitution, filing a false police report and resist, delay or obstruct.

• Police said Davis was being held at the Cumberland County Jail on $51,000 secured bond and is scheduled to
appear in court Monday morning.

• Still no sign of Shaniya Davis.

SUNDAY, November 15, 2009

• Authorities acting on a tip are scouring a portion of south-central North Carolina for a 5-year-old girl
reported missing by her mother. Multiple agencies have been searching for Shaniya Davis since 8 a.m.

• SANFORD, NC (WTVD) -- Fayetteville police confirmed Sunday that they were searching on the ground for a
missing 5-year-old girl between Fayetteville and Sanford. Chopper 11 confirms a Fayetville forensics truck is
 on the scene and officers are searching near Walker Road off Highway 87 in the Sanford area.Witnesses told
ABC11 Eyewitness News they saw officers searching a ravine in that area around 10 a.m.

• Sanford is about 40 miles north of Fayetteville. Police did not say if they were looking for a body or if they
 hoped to find Shaniya Davis alive.

• The father of a missing 5-year-old North Carolina girl says he never should have allowed her to go back to her
 mother.

• Another day gone by. A long day of searching wrapped up at 5:00 PM with still no sign of Shaniya.

MONDAY, November 16, 2009

• Search for Shaniya remains in the area on Walker Road. Over 200 searchers are combing the long stretch of
road and 100 yds off the road on each side. This search is based on a tip that her body was dumped along Walker
Road off Hwy. 87.

• Lockhart and his sister, who live out of state, cared for Shaniya until last month.

• Anyone wishing to help with the search was asked to e-mail their name and contact numbers to
Shaniyavolunteer@ci.fay.nc.us to be added to a central list so police can coordinate volunteer efforts.


• The body of little Shaniya has been found. News of the discovery of her remains found on Walker Road came in
around 1:30 PM.


• Davis' 7-year-old son was taken into protective custody last week and placed into foster care.

• According to the non-profit agency, Child of the Night, Shaniya's case is very rare. Typically, child are in
the age range of 11 to 17 when entered into the world of human trafficking/prostitution. When a child is
prostituted or sold by a parent it's usually involving drugs.

TUESDAY, November 17, 2009

• "Lord, I come to you with open arms, and it is hard. It is hard," Bradley Lockhart said at a vigil in a store
parking lot, according to The Associated Press. "Don't give up on me and don't give up on Shaniya. She's right
there with you."


• Lockhart attended a prayer vigil last night for his daughter and broke down while speaking to the crowd.


• "The investigation at this point indicates that Shaniya Davis was alive at the time she left the Sanford hotel
," police said in the statement Tuesday.

• Shaniya's half-sister, Cheyenne Lockhart, told HLN's "Nancy Grace" Monday that she found it difficult to
believe Davis had treated her daughter so poorly. "She seemed like the sweetest woman. She didn't come from much
, but ... she had the sweetest voice, she had the sweetest personality, and especially toward me. I would never
think that she would do anything like that," said Lockhart, who shared a father with Shaniya.

• The aunt of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found off a rural North Carolina road says she had a hard time
letting the girl live for a while at her mother's house.

• Carey Lockhart-Davis said Tuesday that the mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, neglected her children.
Lockart-Davis is the sister of the girl's father, Bradley Lockhart, and helped raise her. The girl went to stay
 with her mother a month ago.

• Jeff Riccio of Tarheel Canine Training Inc. said Tuesday his team returned after getting information that the
body of Shaniya (shuh-NY-ah) Davis might be near the carcasses. The searchers found the body Monday afternoon
underneath kudzu along a rural highway southeast of Sanford.


link to 911 audio
http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/6439590/







excellent.  thank you for bringing this over - and for your own work.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 09:21:45 PM
Heart and Northern Rose - thanks for posting the pics!  Helps to see the side by sides of them.  I think their nose looks very similiar, yet am not so good with that stuff. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 09:22:31 PM
ok, let's all take just one small minute to think about this.

Let's put ourselves in the aunt's place.

She hands the child over to a bio m om that she does not like.

On Oct. 9th, not the 31st as has been stated previous to about 5 hours ago, right?

The mother subsequently tells this aunt that she will never see the child again.  No warning sings there?

And the aunt does nothing?  Doesn't dig around, trying to find something that she can use to get the child back?  Doesn't even call the police?


So now the dad is asking Americans to please report any suspicions regarding child abuse?
Did the aunt call the dad in Oregon?
I had read that the Aunt was mad because Shaniya had been punished for doing something to her cousin..like hitting them or something and the Aunt and the Mother got in a augument about it, so yes the Aunt had most likely been calling to check on Shaniya......and the Mother got mad and told her she would never see Shaniya again.......she must have called the father and said something because she said that she knew when he got back to town that they were gonna have to do something and file some papers to ensure they had a say in where shaniya went after this......I think Shaniya had visited the Mother before and prolly came back ok...by listeneing to shaniyas sister and brother thats the way I understand it....she had visited the mother before, so maybe the aunt figured she would be fine until the father got home and sought legal advice...IMO

thanks, HH.

I knew the part about Antoinette being mad that Shaniya had been disciplined - but didn't know that she had visited there before.

That actually brings up more questions...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 17, 2009, 09:27:25 PM
I found this On Samual McNeill.. Also check his vehicle out.. but not 100% sure if this is the same McNeill..



MCNEILL , SAMUEL LYNN
826 EGYPT RD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28314   
 


VEHICLE INFORMATION: 
TAX YEAR TAX BILL NUMBER TAX DISTRICT AMOUNT PAID
2009 5076388 06  1000  $100.00

EXPIRATION DATE YEAR / MAKE / MODEL TAXABLE VALUE EXEMPTION
6/30/2010 2006 CHEVY IMLT  $11,320.00 $0.00
 

Interesting!  Thanks JG! 

I dunno if that's the same one or not, but could be.  There also is a Samuel E McNeill (52) in Sanford. 

On the BOLO, they were looking for a man in his 60s or so, in the Sanford area, with a blue toyota.  And then they hushed up about that. 

 ::MonkeyConfused::





I did a search today on S/O in the Sanford are in Lee County.. The police stated Mcneill has been known to visit the Sanford area.. To me that means he knows people in the area..The following caught my interest:

1. Larry Cox.. age 60.I seen this man name before I dont know if it was on one of the FB
2. Lacy Mcgee-age 61
3. Tommy Lee Neal-age-62
4. John Blue-age 51
5. Rex Knight-age 46
6. Kendrick bynum-47
7. Thomas Edward-age 56



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 09:28:18 PM

I had read that the Aunt was mad because Shaniya had been punished for doing something to her cousin..like hitting them or something and the Aunt and the Mother got in a augument about it, so yes the Aunt had most likely been calling to check on Shaniya......and the Mother got mad and told her she would never see Shaniya again.......she must have called the father and said something because she said that she knew when he got back to town that they were gonna have to do something and file some papers to ensure they had a say in where shaniya went after this......I think Shaniya had visited the Mother before and prolly came back ok...by listeneing to shaniyas sister and brother thats the way I understand it....she had visited the mother before, so maybe the aunt figured she would be fine until the father got home and sought legal advice...IMO

Am thinking it's the other way around..  IIRC, (and I could have it wrong), am thinking I heard the paternal aunt reporting this in an interview somewhere, that Antoinette was angry with her because she (the aunt) had "disciplined" Shaniya over some kind of run-in with her cousins.  Antoinette was supposedly angry about that, had called her on Sunday morning and said that she would never see Shaniya again. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 17, 2009, 09:31:00 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

Jess - I am not sure how it works there, but here in Michigan the affidavit of parentage that the guy must sign if he wants his name on the birth certificate (and is presented to him at the hospital at the time of the birth) states that "The mother has initial custody of the child, without prejudice to the determination of either parent’s custodial rights, until otherwise determined by the
court or agreed upon by the parties in writing and acknowledged by the court."  So I am pretty sure that in this case, the police would be powerless to order the mom to give the child back to the dad unless there was a court ordered custody agreement. I know that when my ex called the cops to get his kid back after mom's visitation ended he was told it was a civil matter and he would have to go to court to enforce and/or punish her for not following the rules.

That document is intended to acknowledge parentage and establish paternity.  Paternity was not an issue for Shaniya.  I don't doubt for one second that the cops took the position that the visitation issue is a civil matter--it absolutely is.  Police are powerless to order any parent to turn over his/her child to another parent, even if the parents are happily married.  But if the father showed up and took Shaniya, there's nothing "mom" could have done about it either.


Nope - in Michigan, the affidavit of parentage must be used if an unmarried couple wants to have the father's name on the birth certificate. Even if the parents agree that dad is dad they still have to have the affidavit of parentage done if dad want to be on the birth cert. Even if later mom goes in to get child support, the dad is not on the birth certificate unless he specifically request the court to enter an order to do it.

If you do not have an affidavit of parentage, then when you go into court, you must have a DNA test to prove that you are dad - then you get an judgment of filliation. Then the court may or may not order visitation based on the best interest factors. But they will order child support.

Like I said, Michigan is my only point of reference.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cartfly on November 17, 2009, 09:31:12 PM
Perhaps it is been discussed already but my thoughts:

About Bradley Lockhart (Dad) saying he wanted to give AD "a chance to be a mother" does not make sense to me. She already had a child (7 yrs old by another baby daddy), and was supposed to be a "mother" to that one. It wasn't like she didnt have kid/s already. I guess he probably meant so "Shania" could have a mother in her life. But then the Aunt looks like she was that mother figure and by all accounts doing a good darn job.

I also was thinking maybe if Mario was the pimp and AD the prostitute that when he found out AD was pregnant she was no more use to him, so he threatens AD and she came up with this scheme to hand over Shaniya. Just some thoughts, not fact. But I would bet her welfare check she is a crack addict with a debt to some druggie (Mario) and has abused the other child of hers in ways I dont even want to think about.

I hope AD is HIV positive but the baby is born healthy and given to a family that will love and care for him/her. The reason I hope AD has aids is because I want her to suffer a slow agonizing death while waiting on death row. Sorry, I know it sounds harsh but she deserves it and so much more.

Ok, coming down off my soap box.  ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jennifer34 on November 17, 2009, 09:33:15 PM
trying to catch up.... I have to say, not taking sides and yes, hind sight is 20 /20 and unless you have been exposed to any type of "custody" or lack there of ... it is not as easy as it seems.  The Aunt, mad as hell or not, truly had NO legal recourse to get that baby back short of staging some kind of coo, plus you have dad out of town.  (Just throwing this out there...) No, it wasnt the ideal circumstances and probably most of us would have put up a big hell no she isnt staying there... the aunt is a single mom with 3 children herself and probably dealing with alot of this herself.  I mean who in their wildest of dreams would have thought her own (uterus, cause that is all she was) would pimp her out?  Your average person living day to day just doesnt really think that is something that could happen.  The Aunt was probably thinking about how to plan the next plan of not having to deal with AD EVER again. 

Not defending anyone... just saying from the stand point of a person in those shoes, and LE that DO NOT, WILL NOT, UNLESS NO OTHER RECOURSE WILL GET INVOLVED IN DOMESTIC ISSUES.  Only speaking from personal experience.   

Believe me, I have been on BOTH sides of the fence on this one and still am.  I only hope this does make more awareness to people and you know, even if you just suspect things arent right...make the call. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 09:33:31 PM

I had read that the Aunt was mad because Shaniya had been punished for doing something to her cousin..like hitting them or something and the Aunt and the Mother got in a augument about it, so yes the Aunt had most likely been calling to check on Shaniya......and the Mother got mad and told her she would never see Shaniya again.......she must have called the father and said something because she said that she knew when he got back to town that they were gonna have to do something and file some papers to ensure they had a say in where shaniya went after this......I think Shaniya had visited the Mother before and prolly came back ok...by listeneing to shaniyas sister and brother thats the way I understand it....she had visited the mother before, so maybe the aunt figured she would be fine until the father got home and sought legal advice...IMO

Am thinking it's the other way around..  IIRC, (and I could have it wrong), am thinking I heard the paternal aunt reporting this in an interview somewhere, that Antoinette was angry with her because she (the aunt) had "disciplined" Shaniya over some kind of run-in with her cousins.  Antoinette was supposedly angry about that, had called her on Sunday morning and said that she would never see Shaniya again. 



I thought that AD told the aunt that SHE had disciplined Shaniya for fighting with her cousins and she was really mad and then she told the aunt that she would never see her again...I took that as more punishment for Shaniya to hear that she would never see her aunt again...she must have really loved torturing this child with her words and her actions jmo....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Ariana on November 17, 2009, 09:36:29 PM
Now I have a good question (IMO) Why is it that parents are just allowed to withdraw their kids from school without proving a child will be being homeschooled (with a curriculum plan as proof) or without the school that the child is being transferred to faxing for the request for information?  There have been far too many abuse cases out there where parents withdraw their kids, say they are moving, sometimes they do sometimes they don't, and the kid is beaten to death or starved to death or locked up for years, etc.  I mean I have heard so many cases of it I just have issues that there isn't some kind of law to protect the kids who have actually been enrolled from being in this type of situation again.  A lady I know,who has had so many CPS cases open, has had her kids removed twice, decided she was going to move and didn't want anyone to know where she was going so she withdrew her kids and didn't leave any type of forwarding to anybody, she didn't even tell her landlord she was moving, just up and did it.  I asked the school why they let her do that and they said that they couldn't stop her.  I was thinking that there should be something in place to help LE and CPS monitor these at risk kids and help protect those who haven't been discovered to be at risk yet but are at risk without us knowing.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 17, 2009, 09:40:34 PM
well papers or no papers ......custody or no custody...if I thought for one second that my child was in danger at the hands of this woman.....trust me....I would have gone there and gotten my child back,,,,,one way or the other.....it might have not been legal...but I would have her.......promise you that,.......been there...done that.......

A-fricken-men HH.  You and me alike.


I hate to say this, but it wasn't the aunt's child..had she done that she would have been arrested and the child placed with the mother until a court hearing..months away.

Does no one understand that custody rights in this country are bizarre at best.  Especially for father's who are not assigned custody..as in this case..the law would say you have no rights until you go to court ...LE would not and could not do anything.

The father and the aunt were not in a position to steal her..that is how the court would have seen this.  And if they would have had legal joint custody..nothing again..she was with her bio Mom.  LE nor her Dad nor Aunt could have stopped this.

The only person who could have stopped this is her Mom.  It is her Mom that sold this child...no one else.

I am becoming engrossed in this placing balme.  I will say that to me only the bio Mom and her cohorts are to blame.  I will step away now because I know that view is not popular.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 17, 2009, 09:41:20 PM
do we know for sure if the bio mom is the one who terminated the enrollment at Shaniya's school? she doesn't strike me as the type to even bother doing that as well as even knowing where she went to school at...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 17, 2009, 09:42:26 PM

I did a search today on S/O in the Sanford are in Lee County.. The police stated Mcneill has been known to visit the Sanford area.. To me that means he knows people in the area..The following caught my interest:

1. Larry Cox.. age 60.I seen this man name before I dont know if it was on one of the FB
2. Lacy Mcgee-age 61
3. Tommy Lee Neal-age-62
4. John Blue-age 51
5. Rex Knight-age 46
6. Kendrick bynum-47
7. Thomas Edward-age 56



Betcha these guys and Christopher McNeill in Sanford, and maybe the McNeill that was just arrested, esp if he's the one living in Sanford, have been questioned and questioned by LE.  Cuz as you've said, it was reported that MM knew someone living there. 




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 17, 2009, 09:44:13 PM
Now I have a good question (IMO) Why is it that parents are just allowed to withdraw their kids from school without proving a child will be being homeschooled (with a curriculum plan as proof) or without the school that the child is being transferred to faxing for the request for information?  There have been far too many abuse cases out there where parents withdraw their kids, say they are moving, sometimes they do sometimes they don't, and the kid is beaten to death or starved to death or locked up for years, etc.  I mean I have heard so many cases of it I just have issues that there isn't some kind of law to protect the kids who have actually been enrolled from being in this type of situation again.  A lady I know,who has had so many CPS cases open, has had her kids removed twice, decided she was going to move and didn't want anyone to know where she was going so she withdrew her kids and didn't leave any type of forwarding to anybody, she didn't even tell her landlord she was moving, just up and did it.  I asked the school why they let her do that and they said that they couldn't stop her.  I was thinking that there should be something in place to help LE and CPS monitor these at risk kids and help protect those who haven't been discovered to be at risk yet but are at risk without us knowing.

Kindergarten is not required in many jurisdictions so you may withdraw your child anytime - or just choose not to enroll them.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 17, 2009, 09:49:28 PM

I did a search today on S/O in the Sanford are in Lee County.. The police stated Mcneill has been known to visit the Sanford area.. To me that means he knows people in the area..The following caught my interest:

1. Larry Cox.. age 60.I seen this man name before I dont know if it was on one of the FB
2. Lacy Mcgee-age 61
3. Tommy Lee Neal-age-62
4. John Blue-age 51
5. Rex Knight-age 46
6. Kendrick bynum-47
7. Thomas Edward-age 56



Betcha these guys and Christopher McNeill in Sanford, and maybe the McNeill that was just arrested, esp if he's the one living in Sanford, have been questioned and questioned by LE.  Cuz as you've said, it was reported that MM knew someone living there. 




Yep...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 09:51:48 PM
NC prime destination for human trafficking?

RALEIGH (WTVD) -- The case of Shaniya Davis is shedding light on the problem of human trafficking in North Carolina.

There are several factors making North Carolina a prime destination for traffickers.

Outrage, shock, and anger are a few of the ways many describe the death of 5-year-old Davis, while her mother faces serious charges. But, perhaps even more shocking is the number of children in the country it happens to every year.

There's an estimate that says 200,000 American children are at risk for being trafficked into the sex industry every single year.

Rachel Braver works with the statewide task force called RIPPLE, which addresses human trafficking.

"It's estimated that 600,000 people to 800,000 people are trafficked across international borders every year," Braver said. "North Carolina has several factors that might make it a prime destination for traffickers to prey on victims."

Legal experts say one of the reasons North Carolina is a prime location for human trafficking is because of all the major highways that crisscross the state and the big role agriculture plays in the state.

The agriculture history in North Carolina would be a place for labor exploitation also the tourism industry on the coast; they might see some labor trafficking in the hotels or restaurants there.

Braver says there's also a high number of cases of trafficking among immigrants working against their will and the high military presence in the state also plays a role.

"That's not to say that the military causes trafficking, but often around military bases there is an increase for commercial sexual activity," Braver said. "So where there is the demand for that the traffickers will provide the supply."

But through tougher legislation, marches, and training of local officials, there is hope that supply of human traffic can be cut down so lives can be saved.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7124225


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 17, 2009, 09:51:56 PM
do we know for sure if the bio mom is the one who terminated the enrollment at Shaniya's school? she doesn't strike me as the type to even bother doing that as well as even knowing where she went to school at...

cookie I don't recall reading who it was that terminated the enrollment at Shaynia's school but it would appear that it would have been her father or someone on his side of the family since Shaynia had been living with him.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 09:53:54 PM
New Details Revealed in Murder of Missing North Carolina Girl

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. -- Late Tuesday, authorities confirmed a body found in the woods in rural North Carolina is Shaniya Davis. The 5-year-old had been missing for nearly a week.

Investigators have already charged her mother with selling the little girl for sex as part of a prostitution ring. Another man has been charged with kidnapping.

For several days, hundreds of volunteers joined police, searching rural areas for the little girl.

Investigators continue to focus on Shaniya's mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, who has been charged with selling her little girl as a sex slave.

Initially, Davis told police she woke-up and discovered Shaniya was missing from their mobile home in Fayetteville.

A turn in the case came when security video, a few days later, showed a man carrying Shaniya at a nearby hotel.

The man on that tape, 29-year-old Mario McNeil, turned himself in and has been charged with first-degree kidnapping.

The chief medical examiner in North Carolina is expected to complete an autopsy, looking for an official cause of death, later in the week.

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/usworld/news-article.aspx?storyid=148295&catid=6


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jennifer34 on November 17, 2009, 10:03:26 PM
Gypsy DD.... that is basically what I was trying to say. 

I think everyone is just angry about this whole situation. 

It is a HUGE cry to have custody type issues and other protective measures in place to protect the ones that can not protect themselves.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 10:27:17 PM
do we know for sure if the bio mom is the one who terminated the enrollment at Shaniya's school? she doesn't strike me as the type to even bother doing that as well as even knowing where she went to school at...

cookie I don't recall reading who it was that terminated the enrollment at Shaynia's school but it would appear that it would have been her father or someone on his side of the family since Shaynia had been living with him.

I don't recall it being stated.  I just think the principal said that she was withdrawn.
Probably when she missed the second day, the school called the aunt to check on her.
Maybe the aunt told them that she had gone to live with her mother.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 10:34:47 PM
HIGHT: An awful tragedy
 What a tragedy!

It’s likely that most people reading this column did not know 5-year-old Shaniya Davis. Yet, many of us feel a sense of loss.

This young girl had such an angelic face. It’s a face that remains emblazoned on our minds as our hearts ache over what appears to be the tragic end of her life.

It is believed that it was her body that was found in southern Lee County about 100 feet from Walker Road off N.C. 87.

It’s a case that has family and friends shaking their heads in disbelief, not to mention people around the world who have trouble understanding how such a tragedy could occur.

Moreso, I’m thinking of a precious 5-year-old girl whose life has come to a premature and unnecessary end.

A young girl who will miss future holidays ... and school dances ... and fun times.

A young girl who will miss the chance to grow into womanhood ... the chance to live a full life ... the chance to fulfill her hopes and dreams.

I think of the family and friends that she leaves behind, those of whom showered her with love ... and those of whom she loved in return.

Life is not supposed to end this way, especially for a young child.

It’s difficult to understand why some things occur. Especially tragedies. Especially involving a young child.

We can be thankful for Shaniya’s life and for the love she brought to this world.

Shaniya — the angel with the angelic face. And, now, she is among the angels in heaven.

http://sanfordherald.com/pages/full_story/push?article-HIGHT-+An+awful+tragedy%20&id=4515935&instance=latest_articles


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 10:37:29 PM
Body ID’d, charges coming in Fayettevile girl's case

FAYETTEVILLE — Police in Fayetteville will discuss “new information received in the investigation” of the kidnapping and murder of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis today, according to a press release issued by the department Tuesday.

Davis’ body was located in the woods off Walker Road near the Lee-Harnett county line Monday afternoon, the department has also confirmed. Although police called off the search for the missing Davis after the discovery of a small child’s body Monday, they were slow to confirm that the body belonged to her.

More than 250 searchers combed more than a square mile of soggy, wooded terrain for nearly two days before the discovery Monday.

Fayetteville police had called a press conference about the case Tuesday, but later canceled it and said it would be rescheduled for 10 a.m. today because they’d received the new information. Police didn’t release any other details about the case.

Davis’ mother reported the girl missing from the family’s Fayetteville home in the early morning hours of Nov. 10, setting off an area-wide search that came to Lee County on Sunday after authorities received information that she might be in the area.

In the 9-1-1 call released by Fayetteville Police Tuesday afternoon, Antoinette Davis sounded emotional as she told the operator her child walked out of their home without her knowledge. She said the last time she saw Shaniya was 5:30 a.m. Tuesday before she “went back to bed. Shaniya was last seen in surveillance footage at Comfort Suites in Sanford Tuesday morning, according to police. She appeared alive, according to stills released by police, and was being carried by Mario McNeill, 29, of Fayetteville, a possible acquaintance of the Davis family.

McNeill was arrested Friday on charges of kidnapping, and Antoinette Davis, 25, was arrested on charges of human trafficking and felony child abuse. Authorities believe Davis sold her daughter to McNeill to prostitution.

Antoinette Davis initially implicated her ex-boyfriend, Clarence Coe, in the kidnapping. He was arrested by police but released a short time later after it was determined that Antoinette Davis allegedly lied about Coe’s involvement in the kidnapping.

Police have said further charges could be filed against McNeill or Antoinette Davis in connection with the child’s death, but nothing was announced Tuesday.

“We’ll put information together as far as charging someone (with murder) if the body is identified as Shaniya,” Theresa Chance of the Fayetteville Police Department said Monday.

Authorities have said McNeill admitted taking the girl, though his attorney said he will plead not guilty. Although the security footage from the Comfort Suites oshowed McNeill with the little girl, Chance has said the hotel offered no further clues about the case.
“The tapes have been turned over since then,” she said. “That footage was taken Tuesday, and we weren’t made aware of it until Wednesday.”

http://sanfordherald.com/pages/full_story/push?article-Body+ID%E2%80%99d-+charges+coming+in+Fayettevile+girl-s+case%20&id=4515825-Body+ID%E2%80%99d-+charges+coming+in+Fayettevile+girl-s+case&instance=main_article


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 10:42:40 PM
If this last article is accurate and the hotel offered no further clues about the case it is possible that Mario went to the hotel and waited for whomever and that person did not show.  A few calls were made and arrangements were made to hand Shaniya over at some other place.  This would fit with the statement that Mario turned himself in for kidnapping but had nothing to do with her murder.
Just throwing it out there. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 17, 2009, 10:45:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ienH4fHpGpE

In honor of Shaniya...so beautiful...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SuzieQ on November 17, 2009, 10:45:29 PM
Gypsy DD.... that is basically what I was trying to say. 

I think everyone is just angry about this whole situation. 

It is a HUGE cry to have custody type issues and other protective measures in place to protect the ones that can not protect themselves.




Jennifer34 and Gypsy DD, I am very angry about this case also but I know you both are exactly right. Have gone through an almost identical custody dispute in my own family.  If you do not have a court order it does no good to call LE. If you remove a child from a birth mother without a court order, you will be the one going to jail for kidnapping.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 17, 2009, 10:47:33 PM
This is what I am thinking tell me what you think. I am just a beginner lol. 1 shaniya was not ever even there that night 2 she was already gone. 3 mario and maybe someone else if handed over thought it would be best to kill shaniya because she could tell. Or mario was picking shaniya up after her being there alnight with someone else at the motel. It just don't make any since to me. If I were mario I would not have turned myself in. And I sure would not say I kidnapped her. He could have made up a different excuse. Don't know what but it just don't make since. I don't think he would have turned his self in if HE was the one who killed little shaniya


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 10:48:29 PM
Not entirely correct. Whether the dad had a legal right to shaniya is not determined exclusively by the birth certificate. He was legally presumed to be the father based on his relationship with her and the fact that he'd raised her, supported her, educated her, and so forth.

Jess - I am not sure how it works there, but here in Michigan the affidavit of parentage that the guy must sign if he wants his name on the birth certificate (and is presented to him at the hospital at the time of the birth) states that "The mother has initial custody of the child, without prejudice to the determination of either parent’s custodial rights, until otherwise determined by the
court or agreed upon by the parties in writing and acknowledged by the court."  So I am pretty sure that in this case, the police would be powerless to order the mom to give the child back to the dad unless there was a court ordered custody agreement. I know that when my ex called the cops to get his kid back after mom's visitation ended he was told it was a civil matter and he would have to go to court to enforce and/or punish her for not following the rules.

That document is intended to acknowledge parentage and establish paternity.  Paternity was not an issue for Shaniya.  I don't doubt for one second that the cops took the position that the visitation issue is a civil matter--it absolutely is.  Police are powerless to order any parent to turn over his/her child to another parent, even if the parents are happily married.  But if the father showed up and took Shaniya, there's nothing "mom" could have done about it either.


Nope - in Michigan, the affidavit of parentage must be used if an unmarried couple wants to have the father's name on the birth certificate. Even if the parents agree that dad is dad they still have to have the affidavit of parentage done if dad want to be on the birth cert. Even if later mom goes in to get child support, the dad is not on the birth certificate unless he specifically request the court to enter an order to do it.

If you do not have an affidavit of parentage, then when you go into court, you must have a DNA test to prove that you are dad - then you get an judgment of filliation. Then the court may or may not order visitation based on the best interest factors. But they will order child support.

Like I said, Michigan is my only point of reference.

You might be right.  But the very reason why an unmarried couple would want to have the father's name on the birth certificate is to acknowledge paternity.  Yes, the dad would have to go to court if the parties can't agree on paternity AND the dad wants to be on the birth certificate, but that's not the issue with Shaniya. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 17, 2009, 10:51:44 PM
well papers or no papers ......custody or no custody...if I thought for one second that my child was in danger at the hands of this woman.....trust me....I would have gone there and gotten my child back,,,,,one way or the other.....it might have not been legal...but I would have her.......promise you that,.......been there...done that.......

A-fricken-men HH.  You and me alike.


I hate to say this, but it wasn't the aunt's child..had she done that she would have been arrested and the child placed with the mother until a court hearing..months away.

Does no one understand that custody rights in this country are bizarre at best.  Especially for father's who are not assigned custody..as in this case..the law would say you have no rights until you go to court ...LE would not and could not do anything.

The father and the aunt were not in a position to steal her..that is how the court would have seen this.  And if they would have had legal joint custody..nothing again..she was with her bio Mom.  LE nor her Dad nor Aunt could have stopped this.

The only person who could have stopped this is her Mom.  It is her Mom that sold this child...no one else.

I am becoming engrossed in this placing balme.  I will say that to me only the bio Mom and her cohorts are to blame.  I will step away now because I know that view is not popular.

Gypsy, your view is popular with at least one of us---Me.  In fact I think it's kind of cruel to bad mouth the father and aunt.  When one looks at the photos of Shaniya, obviously taken in nice surroundings and with beautiful matching clothes.  She was clean and hair done. There is no question in my mind that she was loved and cared for---While with her father's family.  I believe these people are truly suffering.  Unlike the Anthonys, Shaniya's father thanked all who searched and all who prayed for Shaniya.  I didn't quite understand the aunt's statement about how she would be watching all pedophiles and she and Shaniya would not go quietly into night, but people say odd things when under stress. Paraphrasing Dylon Thomas apparently, but I believe that poem is about old age.  I guess she meant she would  be more aware, but I don't think she scared any pedophiles.  They will keep on keeping on.

The fact of the matter is that already there are laws with strict penalties which apply to every action AD and MM took in regard to Shaniya.  Kidnapping and murder certainly are severely punished.  But every pedophile, every murderer, every kidnapper knows that they are acting outside the law, but do it anyway.  I see no way for society to prevent these dregs of society doing what they do. Maybe we can prevent a second time, though. Perhaps make it impossible for judges to be so lenient and have mandatory sentences which judges must apply. But as far I we can tell, nothing in MM's background and rap sheet indicated he had these proclivities so there would be no way he could have been jailed in advance. I can only hope that parents take warning from these cases and hold their children dear and close.  Protect them from these monsters by knowing where their little ones are and seeing that they are never away from the company of a responsible adult.  Other than that, I see no possible way to prevent these horrendous actions.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 17, 2009, 10:59:19 PM
This is what I am thinking tell me what you think. I am just a beginner lol. 1 shaniya was not ever even there that night 2 she was already gone. 3 mario and maybe someone else if handed over thought it would be best to kill shaniya because she could tell. Or mario was picking shaniya up after her being there alnight with someone else at the motel. It just don't make any since to me. If I were mario I would not have turned myself in. And I sure would not say I kidnapped her. He could have made up a different excuse. Don't know what but it just don't make since. I don't think he would have turned his self in if HE was the one who killed little shaniya

I agree, Luvmyboys.  It doesn't make any sense at all.  I. too, think she was gone long before her mother called the police.   Maybe a long time.  We don't really know if the aunt or father talked to Shaniya on the phone, so it could have been days she was being passed around.  But it does appear that she was wearing the blue tee shirt she was purported to be wearing when she was taken and in which her body was found,  so we can hope her suffering didn't last long. MMs actions are a mystery to me, too.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 17, 2009, 11:02:07 PM
This is what I am thinking tell me what you think. I am just a beginner lol. 1 shaniya was not ever even there that night 2 she was already gone. 3 mario and maybe someone else if handed over thought it would be best to kill shaniya because she could tell. Or mario was picking shaniya up after her being there alnight with someone else at the motel. It just don't make any since to me. If I were mario I would not have turned myself in. And I sure would not say I kidnapped her. He could have made up a different excuse. Don't know what but it just don't make since. I don't think he would have turned his self in if HE was the one who killed little shaniya

I agree that the entire scenario does not make sense.

If Antoinette and Mario were both involved, why the call to 911 while Mario still had Shaniya with him?

Unless as others have said, someone else in the house woke and saw she was not there an d pressured Antoinette to make the call.

In that case, it would definitely make sense as Antoinette completely screwed up the call to 911.

IMO, Shaniya's clothing is setting off bells to me - I don't know why.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jennifer34 on November 17, 2009, 11:02:31 PM
luvmyboys ... very good thought.  If that idiot did kill her, he probably would not have turned himself in, however... he is still the idiot on camera  .. the last one seen with her ... now its just up to the dna on her body.  God love her...

A little off topic ... I have a friend, with a son, not married to the mother of his daughter .. she is now 12, no custody ever discussed, partially because of what it costs just to go to court.  Begged and pleaded with them, that this WOULD become an issue and the dad would be SCREWED because they basically have NO rights (where I live) and now, 20k later, that my friend has begged, borrowed and stole, so to speak, just to give her son to go to court on behalf of their grandchild, of which they have NO rights, short of the parents both being dead.... at least he now has court ordered visitation. 

Long story short.. it is a very convoluted, expensive process and until you have been in those shoes ....

I guess at this point, there is PLENTY of blame to throw around and nothing will bring this baby back, hopefully it will open the eyes to others and they will learn from it and as I said before, when things look amiss, they probably are and just make the call .....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 11:03:28 PM
Gypsy DD.... that is basically what I was trying to say. 

I think everyone is just angry about this whole situation. 

It is a HUGE cry to have custody type issues and other protective measures in place to protect the ones that can not protect themselves.




Jennifer34 and Gypsy DD, I am very angry about this case also but I know you both are exactly right. Have gone through an almost identical custody dispute in my own family.  If you do not have a court order it does no good to call LE. If you remove a child from a birth mother without a court order, you will be the one going to jail for kidnapping.

I'd offer the following revision to the statement in red:  "If you remove a child from the CUSTODIAL birth mother without a court order, you will be the one going to jail for kidnapping."  This is an important distinction, as the issue of whether a parent can kidnap his or her own child boils down to the issue of whether the parent is entitled to custody, and whether removing the child is an attempt to deprive that parent of his or her custodial rights, not whether the mother is the birth mother or not.  For example, if the father has sole custody with the birth mother retaining visitation, the birth mother can kidnap the child by refusing to return the child to the father, and it would be the birth mother whose the one going to jail.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 17, 2009, 11:08:47 PM
Gypsy DD.... that is basically what I was trying to say. 

I think everyone is just angry about this whole situation. 

It is a HUGE cry to have custody type issues and other protective measures in place to protect the ones that can not protect themselves.




Jennifer34 and Gypsy DD, I am very angry about this case also but I know you both are exactly right. Have gone through an almost identical custody dispute in my own family.  If you do not have a court order it does no good to call LE. If you remove a child from a birth mother without a court order, you will be the one going to jail for kidnapping.

I'd offer the following revision to the statement in red:  "If you remove a child from the CUSTODIAL birth mother without a court order, you will be the one going to jail for kidnapping."  This is an important distinction, as the issue of whether a parent can kidnap his or her own child boils down to the issue of whether the parent is entitled to custody, and whether removing the child is an attempt to deprive that parent of his or her custodial rights, not whether the mother is the birth mother or not.  For example, if the father has sole custody with the birth mother retaining visitation, the birth mother can kidnap the child by refusing to return the child to the father, and it would be the birth mother whose the one going to jail.


SELF EDIT:  Forgot this.  This is from the federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act:

"The term “parental kidnapping” encompasses the taking, retention or concealment of a child by a
parent, other family member, or their agent, in derogation of the custody rights, including visitation
rights, of another parent or family member."

 http://www.abanet.org/child/pkprevrem.pdf



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 17, 2009, 11:14:55 PM
What I am thinking is that shaniya was taken from the home at around 5 30 like the egg donor accidently said the 1st time on the 911 tape. And was gone all night. But I feel very strongly do not think mm killed her. As stupid as he is. I feel like he would never turned his self in


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 11:17:50 PM
************WARNING  - THIS ARTICLE IS VERY UPSETTING!!!!!!***********

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home

Fayetteville, N.C.
Several people who were close to 5-year-Old Shaniya Davis and her father Brad Lockhart say they tried to intervene in the child’s life, because they felt the youngster was at risk.

A close friend of Brad’s, and his ex-father in-law both say they offered to take in Shaniya rather than let her live with her mother, because they say when the child was in the custody of her mother, bad things happened to her.


“My wife says she saw cigarette burns on Shaniya's arms,” said Lockhart’s friend Tim Allen who says he is very angry over what happened.

Byron Coleman, Brad Lockhart's ex-father in law,  said Shaniya “had burns on her legs, arms and things” after visits with her mother.


“She had a cigarette burn on the corner of her eye which she claimed her grandma did when she went over there,” added Shaniya’s half sister Cheyenne Lockhart.

The three all claimed to NBC-17 that the 5-yr-old suffered physical abuse while in the custody of her mother.

“When you wanted sex that's where you went,” said Coleman. “You knew what the girl was doing. You knew what she associated with, so why place your daughter in that situation?”

Because of that, Brad Lockhart’s ex-father-in-law blames Lockhart for Shaniya’s death.

“To me Shaniya would be alive today if she wasn't placed in that situation,” claims Coleman.

Coleman says he offered to give Shaniya a home, but says Brad Lockhart declined his offer.

Tim Allen tells a similar story.

“He had an alternative, I gave him a way out,” but Allen said Lockhart would not let him take care of Shaniya.

“I'm fighting mad. All this could have been avoided,” said Allen.

Allen had already taken in Shaniya’s half sister Cheyenne, because she said her dad wouldn't take care of her.

And Cheyenne says Brad Lockhart did not provide for Shaniya.

“He didn't take care of her, his girlfriends took care of her, she said. “He loved her, but she was raised by other people. “He hasn't been in her life.”

Meanwhile, the Cumberland County Department of Social Services says at this time, it can't comment on what it was doing with regard to Shaniya Davis because those comments might compromise the on-going criminal investigation.

VIDEO AT THIS LINK AS WELL

http://johnston.mync.com/site/johnston/news%7CSports%7CLifestyles/story/44620/some-claim-shaniya-davis-was-at-risk-and-needed-a-better-home


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jennifer34 on November 17, 2009, 11:21:59 PM
EXCELLENT point Jess star!  Most people dont really "know" the law and I am def. not making excuses, and given only the statements we have been privy too .. who in their wildest dreams would have thought that child was in that kind of danger?  I am guessing the Aunt probably wasnt happy about this, but figured maybe, hey when  brother gets back, we will get this settled, so to speak?  I dont know?  Its just hard to wrap your head around anyone thinking anyone would possibly be leaving a child in danger? 

In my opinion, the thing here is the laws for this type of crime as well as "paternity, custody" issues need to be re evaluated! 

That baby's death needs to be a voice to change the laws so this doesnt happen again. 

There are ALOT of children out there that do not have a COURT ORDERED CUSTODIAL PARENTS, which possibly puts them in peril from the get go.

ok, I ma rambling, just mad, because this could have been prevented on so many levels from the "parents" to the school etc.

I only hope to see some changes because of this and I will be glad for it to start with ME and legislation. Not sure how, but more than willing to do SOMETHING!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 17, 2009, 11:26:28 PM
Wow, that opens up a whole new can of worms. Guess dad isn't so innocent. Maybe his one night stand with mom was paid for in fact? If he knew she was a prostiture than I have no sympathy for him at all.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 11:28:45 PM
Counties jostle over jurisdiction in Shaniya Davis case

Officials from Lee and Cumberland counties plan to meet today to decide which agency will handle the death investigation of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

Her body was found about 1 p.m. Monday off Walker Road, about six miles south of Sanford in Lee County.

Her mother, Antoinette Davis, and a Fayetteville man are charged in her disappearance.

Antoinette Davis reported the child missing from her home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park at 6:53 a.m. Nov. 10.

In a 911 call released by police, a distraught-sounding Davis tells a dispatcher she last saw Shaniya at 5:30 a.m. Davis says she looked all over the Murchison Road neighborhood and couldn't find the child. Davis also says Shaniya knew how to unlock the front door.

"I checked everywhere. ... I don't know what else to do," Davis says on the tape.

Lee County District Attorney Susan Doyle said she is meeting this afternoon with Fayetteville police and her Cumberland County counterparts to work out jurisdictional issues.

Jurisdiction is generally determined by the location where the crime is committed, according to a news release from the Fayetteville Police Department.

That could put the death investigation into the hands of the Lee County Sheriff's Office or the Sanford Police Department.

The case can be considered a continuous series of acts that originated in Fayetteville, giving Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis and the Police Department jurisdiction.

State and federal officials met with Fayetteville police Tuesday to determine whether additional charges were needed.

Brenda Reid Jackson, director of the Cumberland County Department of Social Services, said her agency met Tuesday with the District Attorney's Office to review what it knew about Davis and her children.

Social Services is reported to have a history with the family, only recently allowing the children to stay with their mother.


Capt. Charles Kimble, the lead police investigator, plans to make a statement during a briefing at 10 a.m. today at the Police Department. Police offered no details as to what he would say.

Police have charged Antoinette Davis with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation. Detectives are looking into whether Davis owed McNeill money, a police source said.

Shaniya was last seen alive on surveillance video from the Comfort Suites hotel in Sanford in footage that was time-stamped 6:11 a.m.

Shaniya was being carried into a room by a man Fayetteville police say was 29-year-old Mario Andrette McNeill of Fayetteville.

Police said Tuesday they have determined Shaniya was alive when she left the hotel about 7:30 a.m.

Her body was positively identified Tuesday by the state Medical Examiner's Office, but a cause of death had not been determined, police said.

Davis initially claimed another man, Clarence D. Coe, was responsible for Shaniya's disappearance, police have said. Davis makes no mention of anyone taking Shaniya in the 911 call.

A kidnapping charge against Coe was dismissed after McNeill was arrested Friday.

McNeill, who is in jail, is charged with first-degree kidnapping.

His lawyer, Allen Rogers of Fayetteville, said Tuesday he had no new information on the case. Rogers was asked if McNeill had explained why he was seen on the videotape with Shaniya in his arms.

"I can't comment on that," Rogers said.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/17/952898


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jennifer34 on November 17, 2009, 11:29:11 PM
Your right NR, very upsetting.  I did just read that he has 5 children from 3 different mothers?  None of them are with him?  Not sure of the circumstances.  Afraid that the more that comes out, the worse this will be. 

All that can be done at this point is change the laws and at VERY LEAST, the d@mn death penalty in cases that involve giving up children for the sex slave industry.  WAAAAAY  harsher punishment for people even remotely involved in this type of crime.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 11:30:28 PM
Wow, that opens up a whole new can of worms. Guess dad isn't so innocent. Maybe his one night stand with mom was paid for in fact? If he knew she was a prostiture than I have no sympathy for him at all.

Seems like everyone knew she was a pro.  Maybe that is what Coe meant when he said he never saw Shaniya on the couch as the couch was where AD did her tricks?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 11:32:32 PM
Your right NR, very upsetting.  I did just read that he has 5 children from 3 different mothers?  None of them are with him?  Not sure of the circumstances.  Afraid that the more that comes out, the worse this will be. 

All that can be done at this point is change the laws and at VERY LEAST, the d@mn death penalty in cases that involve giving up children for the sex slave industry.  WAAAAAY  harsher punishment for people even remotely involved in this type of crime.

Yes and Social Services does not have clean hands either.
"Social Services is reported to have a history with the family, only recently allowing the children to stay with their mother."


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sunshine12 on November 17, 2009, 11:35:10 PM
EXCELLENT point Jess star!  Most people dont really "know" the law and I am def. not making excuses, and given only the statements we have been privy too .. who in their wildest dreams would have thought that child was in that kind of danger?  I am guessing the Aunt probably wasnt happy about this, but figured maybe, hey when  brother gets back, we will get this settled, so to speak?  I dont know?  Its just hard to wrap your head around anyone thinking anyone would possibly be leaving a child in danger? 

In my opinion, the thing here is the laws for this type of crime as well as "paternity, custody" issues need to be re evaluated! 

That baby's death needs to be a voice to change the laws so this doesnt happen again. 

There are ALOT of children out there that do not have a COURT ORDERED CUSTODIAL PARENTS, which possibly puts them in peril from the get go.

ok, I ma rambling, just mad, because this could have been prevented on so many levels from the "parents" to the school etc.

I only hope to see some changes because of this and I will be glad for it to start with ME and legislation. Not sure how, but more than willing to do SOMETHING!


i agree, the laws are so confusing, and a lot of times unless you have money to spend on a good lawyer, it is so hard to navigage the murky waters of family court for custody issues.... in fact, did you know that there are actually FOUR different types of legal fathers...yes FOUR. it is insane. the laws are in place for  a reason tho, and so many times i feel like the laws protect the parents more than the innocent children. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 11:35:36 PM
************WARNING  - THIS ARTICLE IS VERY UPSETTING!!!!!!***********

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home

Fayetteville, N.C.
Several people who were close to 5-year-Old Shaniya Davis and her father Brad Lockhart say they tried to intervene in the child’s life, because they felt the youngster was at risk.

A close friend of Brad’s, and his ex-father in-law both say they offered to take in Shaniya rather than let her live with her mother, because they say when the child was in the custody of her mother, bad things happened to her.


“My wife says she saw cigarette burns on Shaniya's arms,” said Lockhart’s friend Tim Allen who says he is very angry over what happened.

Byron Coleman, Brad Lockhart's ex-father in law,  said Shaniya “had burns on her legs, arms and things” after visits with her mother.


“She had a cigarette burn on the corner of her eye which she claimed her grandma did when she went over there,” added Shaniya’s half sister Cheyenne Lockhart.

The three all claimed to NBC-17 that the 5-yr-old suffered physical abuse while in the custody of her mother.

“When you wanted sex that's where you went,” said Coleman. “You knew what the girl was doing. You knew what she associated with, so why place your daughter in that situation?”

Because of that, Brad Lockhart’s ex-father-in-law blames Lockhart for Shaniya’s death.

“To me Shaniya would be alive today if she wasn't placed in that situation,” claims Coleman.

Coleman says he offered to give Shaniya a home, but says Brad Lockhart declined his offer.

Tim Allen tells a similar story.

“He had an alternative, I gave him a way out,” but Allen said Lockhart would not let him take care of Shaniya.

“I'm fighting mad. All this could have been avoided,” said Allen.

Allen had already taken in Shaniya’s half sister Cheyenne, because she said her dad wouldn't take care of her.

And Cheyenne says Brad Lockhart did not provide for Shaniya.

“He didn't take care of her, his girlfriends took care of her, she said. “He loved her, but she was raised by other people. “He hasn't been in her life.”

Meanwhile, the Cumberland County Department of Social Services says at this time, it can't comment on what it was doing with regard to Shaniya Davis because those comments might compromise the on-going criminal investigation.

VIDEO AT THIS LINK AS WELL

http://johnston.mync.com/site/johnston/news%7CSports%7CLifestyles/story/44620/some-claim-shaniya-davis-was-at-risk-and-needed-a-better-home


WOW, Northern Rose,
That article is very telling, and even Cheyenne confirms what the men are saying.
My heart aches for that poor baby.  She was only five years old.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 11:39:37 PM
Shaniya Davis's death can bring attention to trafficking of children

The tragic tale of Shaniya Davis focuses attention on a problem that no one wants to talk about, the reality of human trafficking.

The death of an innocent 5-year-old fills our hearts with sorrow. Her autopsy results may lead us down unspeakable pathways.

Shaniya's mother faces charges that make us fume, allegedly selling her little girl's dignity and self worth.

At least it forces us to think about the disgraceful statistic, the number of children in the nation who suffer the same fate.

Approximately 200,000 American children are at risk of being trafficked into the sex industry each year.

We need more extensive training of law enforcement to investigate human trafficking. We also need legislators to pass tougher laws.

Maybe one of these days a statute will be named "Shaniya's Law."

http://www.examiner.com/x-19663-LA-Legal-Examiner~y2009m11d17-Shaniya-Daviss-death-can-bring-attention-to-trafficking-of-children


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sunshine12 on November 17, 2009, 11:39:43 PM
Your right NR, very upsetting.  I did just read that he has 5 children from 3 different mothers?  None of them are with him?  Not sure of the circumstances.  Afraid that the more that comes out, the worse this will be. 

All that can be done at this point is change the laws and at VERY LEAST, the d@mn death penalty in cases that involve giving up children for the sex slave industry.  WAAAAAY  harsher punishment for people even remotely involved in this type of crime.

Yes and Social Services does not have clean hands either.
"Social Services is reported to have a history with the family, only recently allowing the children to stay with their mother."

with all due respect, social service agencies arent psychics. it is not legal to put cameras in peoples homes 24/7 to monitor every behavior of the parents and children. there are so many legal issues involved, it is not fair to blame social services.  if child protective services removed every single child from a home that they got a report on a lot of people would not have their children, including a lot of innocent people who have the been victims of false reports to child protective services. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 17, 2009, 11:40:20 PM
I thought when I saw the footage of the father crying at the vigil that it seemed a little fake. Not that I don't think that he was sad but it just didn't seem like how a normal person in mourning would act. Also, tonight on Nancy Grace he didn't talk at all but came outside when his son was talking and was hugging and kissing his son a lot. I think it's because he knew people were talking about how he didn't treat the daughter well and he knew it was all going to come to light and was trying harder to make himself look like a good dad.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 17, 2009, 11:42:19 PM
Yep I am mad as he**  that he allowed her to go with that pos. But I also look @ it like this he was NOT the one pimping his daughter out. Was not the one that was letting men hurt little shaniya. But I also understand if she was never there none of this would have happen. Omg I am so angry. Right now I could punch a wall. Jeez wth is wrong with people why can they not open there eyes and just kept them open. It is like I always tell everyone be aware always think real hard b 4 u react.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 17, 2009, 11:42:33 PM
I thought when I saw the footage of the father crying at the vigil that it seemed a little fake. Not that I don't think that he was sad but it just didn't seem like how a normal person in mourning would act. Also, tonight on Nancy Grace he didn't talk at all but came outside when his son was talking and was hugging and kissing his son a lot. I think it's because he knew people were talking about how he didn't treat the daughter well and he knew it was all going to come to light and was trying harder to make himself look like a good dad.

I got the feeling he was controlling his son and wanted to remind him not to talk about certain things. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jennifer34 on November 17, 2009, 11:43:12 PM
This baby didnt have a chance.  Cant say I blame all the responsibility on the Aunt.  There is PLENTY of blame to go around in this case.  Regardless of that ... I would like to see changes in the law for "selling" or what ever you call giving up children for that purpose.  I am not sure how just yet, and I can only speak for myself, but I will figure out a way to make this case MATTER as far as trying to at least get laws changed at least for harsher punishment.  IT IS the most heinous of crimes.  Perhaps that is what Coe meant by "educated people figure it out"  perhaps she was just a prostitute, doing what she does and selling her own child?  God have mercy on her soul because she and everyone involved with the demise of this child is going to need it!! ::MonkeyMad::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 17, 2009, 11:46:02 PM
From what I just read I feel like the dad is just as much to blame. Of course, he didn't commit the crime but he knew she was being abused when she went there. Sounds to me like he just didn't feel like taking care of her anymore. He pawned his other daughter off on a neighbor. Who does something like that? I also said before that Murchison Road which is the road Sleepy Hollow park is off of is a terrible area. It's a very high crime area. People call it "The Murk" and it has always had a bad rep. If I was the kid's parent, I wouldn't let her anywhere near there. This dad knew he was putting her in a bad situation. In my mind, he is just as bad.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 17, 2009, 11:46:58 PM
I thought when I saw the footage of the father crying at the vigil that it seemed a little fake. Not that I don't think that he was sad but it just didn't seem like how a normal person in mourning would act. Also, tonight on Nancy Grace he didn't talk at all but came outside when his son was talking and was hugging and kissing his son a lot. I think it's because he knew people were talking about how he didn't treat the daughter well and he knew it was all going to come to light and was trying harder to make himself look like a good dad.

I got the feeling he was controlling his son and wanted to remind him not to talk about certain things. 

Earlier today when a reporter asked him about Cheyenne's statement that they knew Antionette
was still doing drugs, he said something like she's not allowed to talk about that.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 17, 2009, 11:48:54 PM
I thought when I saw the footage of the father crying at the vigil that it seemed a little fake. Not that I don't think that he was sad but it just didn't seem like how a normal person in mourning would act. Also, tonight on Nancy Grace he didn't talk at all but came outside when his son was talking and was hugging and kissing his son a lot. I think it's because he knew people were talking about how he didn't treat the daughter well and he knew it was all going to come to light and was trying harder to make himself look like a good dad.

I got the feeling he was controlling his son and wanted to remind him not to talk about certain things. 

Earlier today when a reporter asked him about Cheyenne's statement that they knew Antionette
was still doing drugs, he said something like she's not allowed to talk about that.

Yeah but I doubt that the police told him not to talk about that. It's just because it makes him look bad. I hope that there are charges against the father also now.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 17, 2009, 11:48:53 PM
I thought when I saw the footage of the father crying at the vigil that it seemed a little fake. Not that I don't think that he was sad but it just didn't seem like how a normal person in mourning would act. Also, tonight on Nancy Grace he didn't talk at all but came outside when his son was talking and was hugging and kissing his son a lot. I think it's because he knew people were talking about how he didn't treat the daughter well and he knew it was all going to come to light and was trying harder to make himself look like a good dad.

I got the feeling he was controlling his son and wanted to remind him not to talk about certain things. 

I got a very uneasy feeling when the son was talking and the dad would not say anything you know would have let the dad talk, after last night when Cheyenne was on NG I thought oops you are saying to much.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 17, 2009, 11:50:43 PM
Your right NR, very upsetting.  I did just read that he has 5 children from 3 different mothers?  None of them are with him?  Not sure of the circumstances.  Afraid that the more that comes out, the worse this will be. 

All that can be done at this point is change the laws and at VERY LEAST, the d@mn death penalty in cases that involve giving up children for the sex slave industry.  WAAAAAY  harsher punishment for people even remotely involved in this type of crime.

Yes and Social Services does not have clean hands either.
"Social Services is reported to have a history with the family, only recently allowing the children to stay with their mother."

with all due respect, social service agencies arent psychics. it is not legal to put cameras in peoples homes 24/7 to monitor every behavior of the parents and children. there are so many legal issues involved, it is not fair to blame social services.  if child protective services removed every single child from a home that they got a report on a lot of people would not have their children, including a lot of innocent people who have the been victims of false reports to child protective services. 



If it came across that I blame Shaniya's death on social services it was not my meaning or intent.  If the previous article is based in fact than many people knew the mother's home was not a safe environment.  If Shaniya was burnt at the house of her mother and talked about it then Brad was more culpable at letting her go back there than anyone.  I meant that for the 5 years of her life many people had let her down by not protecting her and with social services having a history with this mother and just recently letting the kids go back there they are one more of many who let Shaniya down.  I truly believe that her death could have been prevented had all the adults in her life protected her from a bad situation that was not a new bad situation by the sounds of things.  Brad should have not let her go back there unsupervised after coming back with burns and should have been jumping up and down about it once she was allowed to be with the kids again.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sunshine12 on November 17, 2009, 11:53:18 PM
From what I just read I feel like the dad is just as much to blame. Of course, he didn't commit the crime but he knew she was being abused when she went there. Sounds to me like he just didn't feel like taking care of her anymore. He pawned his other daughter off on a neighbor. Who does something like that? I also said before that Murchison Road which is the road Sleepy Hollow park is off of is a terrible area. It's a very high crime area. People call it "The Murk" and it has always had a bad rep. If I was the kid's parent, I wouldn't let her anywhere near there. This dad knew he was putting her in a bad situation. In my mind, he is just as bad.


there is tons of blame that can go around in this case. if the people that were quoted in the recent article talking about shaniya's dad were so concerned then why didnt they call and make a report? if they were aware of what was going on then i believe they had a responsibility to report it.  it's possible they did, but why run to the papers now about it when they could have called in to the appropriate authorities when this was happening?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sunshine12 on November 17, 2009, 11:56:00 PM
Your right NR, very upsetting.  I did just read that he has 5 children from 3 different mothers?  None of them are with him?  Not sure of the circumstances.  Afraid that the more that comes out, the worse this will be. 

All that can be done at this point is change the laws and at VERY LEAST, the d@mn death penalty in cases that involve giving up children for the sex slave industry.  WAAAAAY  harsher punishment for people even remotely involved in this type of crime.

Yes and Social Services does not have clean hands either.
"Social Services is reported to have a history with the family, only recently allowing the children to stay with their mother."

with all due respect, social service agencies arent psychics. it is not legal to put cameras in peoples homes 24/7 to monitor every behavior of the parents and children. there are so many legal issues involved, it is not fair to blame social services.  if child protective services removed every single child from a home that they got a report on a lot of people would not have their children, including a lot of innocent people who have the been victims of false reports to child protective services. 



If it came across that I blame Shaniya's death on social services it was not my meaning or intent.  If the previous article is based in fact than many people knew the mother's home was not a safe environment.  If Shaniya was burnt at the house of her mother and talked about it then Brad was more culpable at letting her go back there than anyone.  I meant that for the 5 years of her life many people had let her down by not protecting her and with social services having a history with this mother and just recently letting the kids go back there they are one more of many who let Shaniya down.  I truly believe that her death could have been prevented had all the adults in her life protected her from a bad situation that was not a new bad situation by the sounds of things.  Brad should have not let her go back there unsupervised after coming back with burns and should have been jumping up and down about it once she was allowed to be with the kids again.


i agree. if it is determined that brad knew about this situation, and let her go there, then in my mind he is a perpetrator by omission.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 17, 2009, 11:56:38 PM
I just read that Brad was paying child support for Shaniya? Why was he paying child support if she lived with him?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 17, 2009, 11:57:58 PM
I thought when I saw the footage of the father crying at the vigil that it seemed a little fake. Not that I don't think that he was sad but it just didn't seem like how a normal person in mourning would act. Also, tonight on Nancy Grace he didn't talk at all but came outside when his son was talking and was hugging and kissing his son a lot. I think it's because he knew people were talking about how he didn't treat the daughter well and he knew it was all going to come to light and was trying harder to make himself look like a good dad.

I got the feeling he was controlling his son and wanted to remind him not to talk about certain things. 

Earlier today when a reporter asked him about Cheyenne's statement that they knew Antionette
was still doing drugs, he said something like she's not allowed to talk about that.

I caught that too Magnolia.  We are seeing a totally dysfunctional extended family and Shaniya paid the ultimate price. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 17, 2009, 11:58:58 PM
From what I just read I feel like the dad is just as much to blame. Of course, he didn't commit the crime but he knew she was being abused when she went there. Sounds to me like he just didn't feel like taking care of her anymore. He pawned his other daughter off on a neighbor. Who does something like that? I also said before that Murchison Road which is the road Sleepy Hollow park is off of is a terrible area. It's a very high crime area. People call it "The Murk" and it has always had a bad rep. If I was the kid's parent, I wouldn't let her anywhere near there. This dad knew he was putting her in a bad situation. In my mind, he is just as bad.


there is tons of blame that can go around in this case. if the people that were quoted in the recent article talking about shaniya's dad were so concerned then why didnt they call and make a report? if they were aware of what was going on then i believe they had a responsibility to report it.  it's possible they did, but why run to the papers now about it when they could have called in to the appropriate authorities when this was happening?

I agree with you on this. They should have reported it. I know I would have myself in a heartbeat.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jennifer34 on November 18, 2009, 12:00:04 AM
Well, I feel kind of stupid now, after watching the NG show tonight and reading the things that have come out.  Looks like dad is good at passing the buck.  He has all of these children, yet takes care of none of them physically??  Perhaps he just sends money?   Who knows?  Maybe I just want to think he is not to blame because that left that baby with no one.   

I better take a time out, because I am just plain furiously mad at the whole mess!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jan_in_Tx on November 18, 2009, 12:01:25 AM
O/T
I just created this thread...don't know much but saw it on the news tonight...so sad this keeps happening...no perps at this time...and hardly ANY media coverage--(I had to use the search engine to find the story)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6532.0


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 12:06:08 AM
From what I just read I feel like the dad is just as much to blame. Of course, he didn't commit the crime but he knew she was being abused when she went there. Sounds to me like he just didn't feel like taking care of her anymore. He pawned his other daughter off on a neighbor. Who does something like that? I also said before that Murchison Road which is the road Sleepy Hollow park is off of is a terrible area. It's a very high crime area. People call it "The Murk" and it has always had a bad rep. If I was the kid's parent, I wouldn't let her anywhere near there. This dad knew he was putting her in a bad situation. In my mind, he is just as bad.


there is tons of blame that can go around in this case. if the people that were quoted in the recent article talking about shaniya's dad were so concerned then why didnt they call and make a report? if they were aware of what was going on then i believe they had a responsibility to report it.  it's possible they did, but why run to the papers now about it when they could have called in to the appropriate authorities when this was happening?

I agree with you on this. They should have reported it. I know I would have myself in a heartbeat.

I called Social Services one time about a child that was being beaten.  He was 8 years old and was being
hit 50 licks at a time with a belt.  It really upset me.  Social Services treated me like I was bothering them.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Ariana on November 18, 2009, 12:30:02 AM
From what I just read I feel like the dad is just as much to blame. Of course, he didn't commit the crime but he knew she was being abused when she went there. Sounds to me like he just didn't feel like taking care of her anymore. He pawned his other daughter off on a neighbor. Who does something like that? I also said before that Murchison Road which is the road Sleepy Hollow park is off of is a terrible area. It's a very high crime area. People call it "The Murk" and it has always had a bad rep. If I was the kid's parent, I wouldn't let her anywhere near there. This dad knew he was putting her in a bad situation. In my mind, he is just as bad.


there is tons of blame that can go around in this case. if the people that were quoted in the recent article talking about shaniya's dad were so concerned then why didnt they call and make a report? if they were aware of what was going on then i believe they had a responsibility to report it.  it's possible they did, but why run to the papers now about it when they could have called in to the appropriate authorities when this was happening?

I agree with you on this. They should have reported it. I know I would have myself in a heartbeat.

I called Social Services one time about a child that was being beaten.  He was 8 years old and was being
hit 50 licks at a time with a belt.  It really upset me.  Social Services treated me like I was bothering them.

My ex called on some parents who were neglecting their kids.  Their dog bit their daughte and she needed stitches and they lied to the hospitalabout what happened because they seem to love their dogmore than their daughter.  They still have thatdog too.  They also don't take their kids to the doctor, let their kids miss school if they are just running late, don't cook or clean, and when their oldest got hospitalized for being bipolar and attacking the father they had her hospitalized and then NEVER followed up on carefor her disorder after that.  The same girl had a tumor on her ovary and had to have surgery, her mother scheduled a surgery for herself on the same day and wasn't even there for her daughter because she was in her own bed.  The doctor said for her to take her back for her post op six weeks check up and the mom NEVER did.  The girl is now a grown woman and gotmarried just to get insurance so she could go get her own medical stuff taken care of that hermother never followed up on.  The State was all happy too look into it until my ex told them that the father was a cop, they then refused to look into the family at all and said that the information was too old (even though the younger daughter had just gotten stitches for that dog biting her) and then quickly got off the phone.  I don't have a personal vendetta or anything against Child Protective Services but they seriously dropped the ball when they were called on that family but there are other families that happens with as well.  Maybe Social Services was called on the father, I doubt we will ever know.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 18, 2009, 12:31:07 AM
(http://image.blingee.com/images17/content/output/000/000/000/61b/525922953_176848.gif) (http://blingee.com/blingee/view/102450530-Shaniya)

Just thought I'd share this with everyone. Shaniya is at peace now. She's truly an angel.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 18, 2009, 12:31:13 AM
Baltimore Part Of Human Trafficking Problem, Experts Say
Task Force Training Officers To Spot Potential Victims


BALTIMORE -- Local advocates are using a tragic story of a 5-year-old sold as a sex slave, to talk about human rights abuses in Baltimore.

On Tuesday, authorities in Fayetteville, N.C., confirmed that a body discovered yesterday is that of 5 year-old Shaniya Davis.

Detectives accuse the girl's mother, Antoinette Davis, 25, of selling the child as a sex slave. Mario McNeil, 29, is being charged in Davis' kidnapping.

"Sorry baby that you have to do this, you are in a better place. You are in better hands. You don't have to hurt no more," Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, said.

Numbers are difficult to come by in the shadowy world of child sex trafficking, but it is prevalent enough in Maryland that there is a state task force assembled to address the issue.

WBAL-TV 11 News spoke to a member of the task force who has spent years trying to reach victims.

Sidney Ford, of You Are Not Alone, or YANA, is part of Maryland's Human Trafficking Task Force. She's counseled women who have sold their own children into prostitution and she said there are willing buyers in the Baltimore area.

"Right here in Baltimore, there are people who are willing to pay big bucks to have sex with children. (It) fuels the market for this really abhorrent practice," Ford said.

Ford said there are often missed opportunities to help victims like Shaniya before it's too late. She trains police officers to look out for potential red flags.

"In their routine calls, emergency rooms, down the street, when they see certain types of situations happening that they ask questions that go beyond the immediate situations," Ford said.

Situations which she said play out on Baltimore streets every day and often come to light if you ask the right questions.

"A woman saw an 11-year-old out on the corner. Her mother flew out of her house and said, 'You need to make $500 tonight or I will beat your ass,'" Ford said.

It's too late to save Shaniya, but those who advocate against human sex trafficking hope her story will shine light on the practice.

Ford adds that traffickers, including parents, often threaten kids or get them hooked on drugs or alcohol to make them less likely to run away or ask for help.

There is a national hotline set up for victims -- that number is 1-800-373-7888.

http://www.wbaltv.com/news/21647344/detail.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 12:33:43 AM
This is from the Fayetteville ******* Re: McNeil's record

Published: 11:06 PM, Tue Nov 17, 2009
Probation ended early for suspect in Shaniya Davis case By Greg Barnes
Staff writer

 Three weeks before Shaniya Davis disappeared, the Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping her was allowed to end his supervised probation six months early.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, was on unsupervised probation when police say he kidnapped 5-year-old Shaniya on Nov. 10, according to Cumberland County court records.

At 6:11 that morning, video surveillance at the Comfort Suites in Sanford captured a man police identified as McNeill carrying Shaniya into the motel.

Shaniya's body was found Monday in woods off a rural road south of Sanford.

McNeill appears to have been treated with leniency for years by an overburdened court system.

On June 17, 2001, court documents show, McNeill shot Roland Lee Mays in the face, neck, shoulder, chest and stomach. The records indicate that McNeill injured two other people that day, as well. He was charged with multiple counts of assault inflicting serious bodily injury.

A year later, apparently while awaiting trial in the shootings, McNeill was charged with possessing marijuana and trying to manufacture and sell it.

The charges from the two cases were consolidated, records show, and McNeill was allowed to plead guilty to lesser counts. He was sentenced to 40 to 50 months of supervised probation in June 2003, the records show.

Two months later, in August 2003, McNeill violated terms of his probation by failing to notify probation officers of his whereabouts. He was sent to prison. Records show that he entered the prison system in October 2003 and was released in May 2006.

It didn't take long for McNeill to get into trouble again. Three months after his release, records show, McNeill was charged with possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use.

The records show that McNeill pleaded guilty to reduced charges - a misdemeanor offense of maintaining a vehicle for drug use - and again was placed on supervised probation, on Jan. 1, 2007.

As part of the plea deal, District Court Judge Kim Tucker told McNeill that he could go on unsupervised probation if he tested negative for drugs three consecutive times, records show.

While still on supervised probation, McNeill was charged in April 2007 with possessing cocaine, records show. He was charged again in September 2007 - this time with hitting Fayetteville police officer R. Grimm with his vehicle while trying to flee from the corner of Bragg Boulevard and Ames Street. Records indicate Grimm was injured, but they don't say how badly. McNeill was charged that day with trying to elude arrest, reckless driving and assault on a government official.

Two months later - on Nov. 30, 2007 - Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson allowed McNeill's probation status to be changed from supervised to unsupervised, records show.

Wayne Marshburn, who oversees the probation office in Cumberland County, said he had not fully reviewed McNeill's probation documents.

But Marshburn said people who behave while on probation typically serve only about half of their term.

McNeill was six months shy of 24 months on supervised probation when a judge agreed to place him on unsupervised probation. It's unclear from the records which judge made that decision.

"He had done well on probation," Marshburn said. "He had done everything he needed to do."

In many cases, Marshburn said, probation officers make recommendations to the court on whether someone's probation should be terminated.

But in 2007, he said, his office wasn't always notified when a person on probation had been charged with another crime.

That is much less likely to happen now, Marshburn said, in part because of the slaying of UNC student president Eve Carson in March 2008.

Since then, the state's probation department has come under intense scrutiny because one of the men accused of Carson's murder should have gone before a judge on a probation violation months before she was shot to death.

Laws that go into effect in December will further address problems with the state's parole and probation system, Marshburn said.

He called Shaniya's death a horrible tragedy, but he said there is no guarantee that she would still be alive today had McNeill remained on supervised probation.

"Hindsight is always very clear," he said. "People do bad things while being supervised. That provides solace to nobody. That's not what I would want to hear. But it's a fact.

"The bottom line, I still am satisfied with how our office handled the case."

Staff writer Greg Barnes can be reached at barnesg@fayobserver.com or 486-3525.
Get your complete news report daily in The Fayetteville *******:


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 18, 2009, 12:39:43 AM


My ex called on some parents who were neglecting their kids.  Their dog bit their daughte and she needed stitches and they lied to the hospitalabout what happened because they seem to love their dogmore than their daughter.  They still have thatdog too.  They also don't take their kids to the doctor, let their kids miss school if they are just running late, don't cook or clean, and when their oldest got hospitalized for being bipolar and attacking the father they had her hospitalized and then NEVER followed up on carefor her disorder after that.  The same girl had a tumor on her ovary and had to have surgery, her mother scheduled a surgery for herself on the same day and wasn't even there for her daughter because she was in her own bed.  The doctor said for her to take her back for her post op six weeks check up and the mom NEVER did.  The girl is now a grown woman and gotmarried just to get insurance so she could go get her own medical stuff taken care of that hermother never followed up on.  The State was all happy too look into it until my ex told them that the father was a cop, they then refused to look into the family at all and said that the information was too old (even though the younger daughter had just gotten stitches for that dog biting her) and then quickly got off the phone.  I don't have a personal vendetta or anything against Child Protective Services but they seriously dropped the ball when they were called on that family but there are other families that happens with as well.  Maybe Social Services was called on the father, I doubt we will ever know.

That's how CPS is in my area. They're slow to take kids from unfit parents.

I had a neighbor who had 10 children living in a 3 bedroom house. She was living off of welfare and only bought food that she and her on the lam boyfriend (15 years her junior) wanted. She was quick to beat her kids over the silliest things and she even had her boyfriend (father of #11 who was on the way) join too.

My sister and I befriended these kids so we heard all their horror stories. Their grandmother was constantly reporting them to CPS. Workers came to our school just to interview them almost weekly. Finally a fire mysteriously broke out at their house and they moved.

Later I met up with one of those girl's in high school. We were in the same grade and had a class together. She was a major druggie at this point (we were in the 9th grade!) and she told that it the fire was set intentionally to get the grandmother off the mothers back and to throw off CPS. It worked. How sad for those kids. They truly never had a chance.

These stories are horrifying and yet they're not unique. There needs to be a complete overhaul of the system. Things just aren't working.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 18, 2009, 12:40:34 AM
So this is why McNeil admitted to kidnapping Shaniya. He admits guilt to the lesser crime and then only serves part of the sentence that he actually should be serving, just like he is used to doing. If they can't prove that he actually killed the girl, then they will just convict him on kidnapping.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 12:53:43 AM
well papers or no papers ......custody or no custody...if I thought for one second that my child was in danger at the hands of this woman.....trust me....I would have gone there and gotten my child back,,,,,one way or the other.....it might have not been legal...but I would have her.......promise you that,.......been there...done that.......

A-fricken-men HH.  You and me alike.


I hate to say this, but it wasn't the aunt's child..had she done that she would have been arrested and the child placed with the mother until a court hearing..months away.

Does no one understand that custody rights in this country are bizarre at best.  Especially for father's who are not assigned custody..as in this case..the law would say you have no rights until you go to court ...LE would not and could not do anything.

The father and the aunt were not in a position to steal her..that is how the court would have seen this.  And if they would have had legal joint custody..nothing again..she was with her bio Mom.  LE nor her Dad nor Aunt could have stopped this.

The only person who could have stopped this is her Mom.  It is her Mom that sold this child...no one else.

I am becoming engrossed in this placing balme.  I will say that to me only the bio Mom and her cohorts are to blame.  I will step away now because I know that view is not popular.

I think I would have risked that..there was no formal custody rulings in place. If the police had gone to that trailer they would have removed ALL of the children and again we wouldn't have this awful outcome. The living conditions in the trailer weren't fit for human habitation. One phone call to the police would have been enough to save her...I would have done whatever it took..sometimes you just have to stand up and be counted.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 12:57:23 AM
(http://image.blingee.com/images17/content/output/000/000/000/61b/525922953_176848.gif) (http://blingee.com/blingee/view/102450530-Shaniya)

Just thought I'd share this with everyone. Shaniya is at peace now. She's truly an angel.

Thank you  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 01:01:45 AM
************WARNING  - THIS ARTICLE IS VERY UPSETTING!!!!!!***********

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home




Northern Rose, thanks for posting this so we can see it.  However, am thinking that rather than voice my opinion on it, am gonna just  :silent: .   Seems to me that many have chosen up sides, and don't want to hear negative in any form about the dad.  Even IF it's just a discussion on why what the dad and aunt are saying, are not matching up.  Am gonna sit this out and just watch.. and wait. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 01:07:42 AM
After listening to the father, his sister, his children, friend, and ex father -in-law I know longer feel sorry for Shaniya dad.. The father apparently having 5 children who he does not seem to have the time or quality time for them.. His father-in-law, Brad friend who now has taken in Cheyenne were willing to take in Shaniya then let her go live with the druggie prostitute and her trash of friends but Brad disregard the safety and well being of his daughter and let Shaniya go... What was going on in Brad's life to make this uncareing , selfish decision? Why would he not let Shaniya go to his friend's home or his ex Father-In-Law home? Apparently  brad you weren''t even checking in on Shaniya because you stated you did'nt even know she wasn't attending school..I have to agree with the father-in-law and say to Brad .. Shaniya would be here today but she isn't because of your hasty, careless, selfish, unloving decision to let her go live with the trash...This is something you will have to live with every minute of everyday of you life..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Blumonkey on November 18, 2009, 01:32:59 AM
From what I just read I feel like the dad is just as much to blame. Of course, he didn't commit the crime but he knew she was being abused when she went there. Sounds to me like he just didn't feel like taking care of her anymore. He pawned his other daughter off on a neighbor. Who does something like that? I also said before that Murchison Road which is the road Sleepy Hollow park is off of is a terrible area. It's a very high crime area. People call it "The Murk" and it has always had a bad rep. If I was the kid's parent, I wouldn't let her anywhere near there. This dad knew he was putting her in a bad situation. In my mind, he is just as bad.


there is tons of blame that can go around in this case. if the people that were quoted in the recent article talking about shaniya's dad were so concerned then why didnt they call and make a report? if they were aware of what was going on then i believe they had a responsibility to report it.  it's possible they did, but why run to the papers now about it when they could have called in to the appropriate authorities when this was happening?
Perhaps they DID call and make a report. Since DFC states "no comment" when they are asked if a complaint was filed, it is difficult for the man on the street to confirm and verify. Because of my occupation, I am required to report suspected child abuse and have done so many times. On the other hand, DFC has no requirements to communicate the outcome to the person who filed the report. When I was a school nurse I filed two reports in one week involving 2 families. One was an infected burn on the top of a 7 year old's foot . With much encouragement the child told me they were cig. burns inflicted by Mom's boyfriend because the child had knocked over his beer bottle by accident. The other was a 8 year old girl who had tested positive for gonorrhea after a throat swab. She came to my office because she had been unable to swallow any food or drink for 48 hours. The infection was passed to her by an uncle. When I called my second report for the week, the intake person told me that she was required by law to tell me I could be prosecuted for filing a "frivolous report." That was irrelevant to me as I was only trying to obtain help for these children but I can see how others could be intimidated and back off. This is only the tip of the iceberg. I have seen abuse so severe that I have cried myself to sleep at night and these children all have a place in my heart. There are many good people who do report and try to make a child's world a little safer, a little better, but we are sometimes prevented from doing our best because of road blocks in the system. For the sake of the children,this needs to change! Sorry for the long post. Tonight my heart is breaking a little bit.
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pinkbanana on November 18, 2009, 01:39:32 AM
Good Nite All  ::MonkeyWink::

God BLESS Baby Shaniya  ::MonkeyAngel::  ::MonkeyWaa::

God Bless!!!


pb


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 01:47:59 AM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 02:02:50 AM

Weird how when LE was searching, the day before finding Shaniya, they were looking near Raeford Rd, right?  The dude that was arrested yesterday, has lived in the area of Raeford, NC. 

Wonder if the town of Sanford is near the area of Raeford?  And if there is a Raeford Rd that runs between the towns? 


From Ancestry.com

Name: Samuel McNeill
Address: Pob 967
Raeford, NC





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 18, 2009, 03:31:21 AM
Gotta drive down south in a min but I am wondering if when AD reported her missing at 5:30 pm and the dispatcher corrected her and said do you mean am that maybe Shaniya had really been gone since the night before.  McNeil could've been taking her from motel to motel and maybe carrying her because she was worn out and couldn't walk?  Maybe that is the trafficing part passing her to him to pros out?  Sick, sick, sick, evil POS! 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 18, 2009, 03:54:00 AM

Weird how when LE was searching, the day before finding Shaniya, they were looking near Raeford Rd, right?  The dude that was arrested yesterday, has lived in the area of Raeford, NC. 

Wonder if the town of Sanford is near the area of Raeford?  And if there is a Raeford Rd that runs between the towns? 


From Ancestry.com

Name: Samuel McNeill
Address: Pob 967
Raeford, NC






 ::MonkeyBike:: Raeford, NC is about 60 miles south of Sanford.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: HopeForAll on November 18, 2009, 05:31:05 AM
Raeford Rd. runs thru much of Fayetteville to Raeford. These 2 inhuman beings sit in their cells less then 2 miles from my home. Our local CBS affiliate just said that the 10am presser will be shown on their website. You would think any info about a crime this serious would be broadcast live. When I heard the first report of a missing child I thought maybe she had wandered away from her bus stop. Never did I think it would end up like this with an innocent child violated  and  ::MonkeyMad::murdered because of her own mother. :smt097 :smt093


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 18, 2009, 07:18:52 AM
************WARNING  - THIS ARTICLE IS VERY UPSETTING!!!!!!***********

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home

Fayetteville, N.C.
Several people who were close to 5-year-Old Shaniya Davis and her father Brad Lockhart say they tried to intervene in the child’s life, because they felt the youngster was at risk.

A close friend of Brad’s, and his ex-father in-law both say they offered to take in Shaniya rather than let her live with her mother, because they say when the child was in the custody of her mother, bad things happened to her.


“My wife says she saw cigarette burns on Shaniya's arms,” said Lockhart’s friend Tim Allen who says he is very angry over what happened.

Byron Coleman, Brad Lockhart's ex-father in law,  said Shaniya “had burns on her legs, arms and things” after visits with her mother.


“She had a cigarette burn on the corner of her eye which she claimed her grandma did when she went over there,” added Shaniya’s half sister Cheyenne Lockhart.

The three all claimed to NBC-17 that the 5-yr-old suffered physical abuse while in the custody of her mother.

“When you wanted sex that's where you went,” said Coleman. “You knew what the girl was doing. You knew what she associated with, so why place your daughter in that situation?”

Because of that, Brad Lockhart’s ex-father-in-law blames Lockhart for Shaniya’s death.

“To me Shaniya would be alive today if she wasn't placed in that situation,” claims Coleman.

Coleman says he offered to give Shaniya a home, but says Brad Lockhart declined his offer.

Tim Allen tells a similar story.

“He had an alternative, I gave him a way out,” but Allen said Lockhart would not let him take care of Shaniya.

“I'm fighting mad. All this could have been avoided,” said Allen.

Allen had already taken in Shaniya’s half sister Cheyenne, because she said her dad wouldn't take care of her.

And Cheyenne says Brad Lockhart did not provide for Shaniya.

“He didn't take care of her, his girlfriends took care of her, she said. “He loved her, but she was raised by other people. “He hasn't been in her life.”

Meanwhile, the Cumberland County Department of Social Services says at this time, it can't comment on what it was doing with regard to Shaniya Davis because those comments might compromise the on-going criminal investigation.

VIDEO AT THIS LINK AS WELL

http://johnston.mync.com/site/johnston/news%7CSports%7CLifestyles/story/44620/some-claim-shaniya-davis-was-at-risk-and-needed-a-better-home

wow.

and the house of cards comes tumbling down.

thanks, NR.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 07:53:49 AM
Did any of Shaniya's family call for a "wellness check", the family members were very worried about the dire situation she was placed in just to give a second chance to this greedy mother.  Did they know about the wellness check? I didn't.

Did Shaniya's family try to locate the custodian or the real estate of the trailer park?




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 08:11:18 AM
I thought when I saw the footage of the father crying at the vigil that it seemed a little fake. Not that I don't think that he was sad but it just didn't seem like how a normal person in mourning would act. Also, tonight on Nancy Grace he didn't talk at all but came outside when his son was talking and was hugging and kissing his son a lot. I think it's because he knew people were talking about how he didn't treat the daughter well and he knew it was all going to come to light and was trying harder to make himself look like a good dad.

I got the feeling he was controlling his son and wanted to remind him not to talk about certain things. 

Earlier today when a reporter asked him about Cheyenne's statement that they knew Antionette
was still doing drugs, he said something like she's not allowed to talk about that.

I caught that too Magnolia.  We are seeing a totally dysfunctional extended family and Shaniya paid the ultimate price. ::MonkeyNoNo::

Cheyenne mentioned on NG show that "she wasn't suppose to have any kids" referring to A.D.
I haven't hear anyone commenting on her statement, I thought that was powerful..if Cheyenne knew or claims to have known
A.D. was supposed to have any kids around.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 08:15:30 AM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 

The greedy mother was a good actress...common sense didn't rule with the father.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 18, 2009, 08:43:13 AM
************WARNING  - THIS ARTICLE IS VERY UPSETTING!!!!!!***********

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home

Fayetteville, N.C.
Several people who were close to 5-year-Old Shaniya Davis and her father Brad Lockhart say they tried to intervene in the child’s life, because they felt the youngster was at risk.

A close friend of Brad’s, and his ex-father in-law both say they offered to take in Shaniya rather than let her live with her mother, because they say when the child was in the custody of her mother, bad things happened to her.


“My wife says she saw cigarette burns on Shaniya's arms,” said Lockhart’s friend Tim Allen who says he is very angry over what happened.

Byron Coleman, Brad Lockhart's ex-father in law,  said Shaniya “had burns on her legs, arms and things” after visits with her mother.


“She had a cigarette burn on the corner of her eye which she claimed her grandma did when she went over there,” added Shaniya’s half sister Cheyenne Lockhart.

The three all claimed to NBC-17 that the 5-yr-old suffered physical abuse while in the custody of her mother.

“When you wanted sex that's where you went,” said Coleman. “You knew what the girl was doing. You knew what she associated with, so why place your daughter in that situation?”

Because of that, Brad Lockhart’s ex-father-in-law blames Lockhart for Shaniya’s death.

“To me Shaniya would be alive today if she wasn't placed in that situation,” claims Coleman.

Coleman says he offered to give Shaniya a home, but says Brad Lockhart declined his offer.

Tim Allen tells a similar story.

“He had an alternative, I gave him a way out,” but Allen said Lockhart would not let him take care of Shaniya.

“I'm fighting mad. All this could have been avoided,” said Allen.

Allen had already taken in Shaniya’s half sister Cheyenne, because she said her dad wouldn't take care of her.

And Cheyenne says Brad Lockhart did not provide for Shaniya.

“He didn't take care of her, his girlfriends took care of her, she said. “He loved her, but she was raised by other people. “He hasn't been in her life.”

Meanwhile, the Cumberland County Department of Social Services says at this time, it can't comment on what it was doing with regard to Shaniya Davis because those comments might compromise the on-going criminal investigation.

VIDEO AT THIS LINK AS WELL

http://johnston.mync.com/site/johnston/news%7CSports%7CLifestyles/story/44620/some-claim-shaniya-davis-was-at-risk-and-needed-a-better-home

Good Morning Monkeys, decided to login to address this. I don't believe a word of it. Yet

1. What real friend goes to a reporter and talks this crap? Not a real friend, imo

2? If there was cig burns her Aunt Carey when giving her a bath would have seen it, it would have given her reason to stop Shaniya from going to her birth mom's house.  or her teacher would certainly would have noticed it.

3. IMO Cheyenne has issues with Brad, she's a teen maybe he did throw her out, who knows, we don't know that facts, they can say anything to a reporter, just like Cheyenne said to Nancy, it was her opinion, she had no 1st hand proof. She just wanted to get on Nancy Grace show. She didn't impress me. How did these people see the burns but no one else did?

I believe since Aunt Carey had Shaniya alot she would have noticed any abuse and would have not only reported it but probably went over and beat the egg donors a$$.IMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: texasmom on November 18, 2009, 08:53:01 AM
Good morning Monkeys! 

Last night my last thoughts before I went to sleep were Thank God, Shaniya was found.  Her murderer disposed of her like trash, but she's not there anymore.  She will have a proper burial.  Her family that loved her won't have to wonder where she is, or if she is still suffering.  In all of this horror, that is a blessing.

Please forgive if this has already been posted.


http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/


Fayetteville police to add new charges in girl's death
 

Posted: Today at 7:35 a.m.
Updated: 19 minutes ago

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Investigators piecing together why and where a 5-year-old Fayetteville girl was killed plan to add new charges on top of one for selling the girl for sexual slavery.

Police plan to hold a news conference at 10 a.m. Wednesday to discuss the case and said new charges are pending in the death of Shaniya Davis.

WRAL.com will carry the news conference LIVE.

Authorities are trying to decide where the girl was killed and if the case will be prosecuted in Cumberland or neighboring Lee County.

Shaniya was reported missing from her home, at 1116-A Sleepy Hollow Drive, by her mother last Tuesday morning. Volunteer searchers found her body Monday afternoon in the woods off N.C. Highway 87 near the Lee-Harnett county line.

On Tuesday, the State Medical Examiner's Office confirmed that the body was Shaniya's. No cause of death has been released.

Two people have been arrested in her disappearance – charges against a third person were dropped – but no one has been charged with killing her.

Police said one issue holding up any charges is the question of jurisdiction in the murder case. Prosecutors must prove where a slaying occurred.

Lee County authorities have referred all questions to Fayetteville police.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 18, 2009, 08:54:02 AM
This poor child didn't have a snowball's chance in hell.  The father absolutely disgusts me.  Five children with three different women and not one of them living with him.  What a loser.  What a total freaking loser.  And I can tell you one thing for certain, there is no way on God's green earth I'd leave my child living at some filthy resident where drugs and prostitution are going on.  The father CLEARLY didn't want to raise Shaniya.  I don't want to hear any more crying and carryin' on. 

Shaniya paid the ultimate price for being born to two people who gave two craps about her.  I feel awful for her aunt.  Just awful.  But I don't wanna hear anymore bs from the dad because that's what it is  bs.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sugarBabies on November 18, 2009, 09:32:49 AM
Gypsy DD.... that is basically what I was trying to say. 

I think everyone is just angry about this whole situation. 

It is a HUGE cry to have custody type issues and other protective measures in place to protect the ones that can not protect themselves.




Jennifer34 and Gypsy DD, I am very angry about this case also but I know you both are exactly right. Have gone through an almost identical custody dispute in my own family.  If you do not have a court order it does no good to call LE. If you remove a child from a birth mother without a court order, you will be the one going to jail for kidnapping.

I'd offer the following revision to the statement in red:  "If you remove a child from the CUSTODIAL birth mother without a court order, you will be the one going to jail for kidnapping."  This is an important distinction, as the issue of whether a parent can kidnap his or her own child boils down to the issue of whether the parent is entitled to custody, and whether removing the child is an attempt to deprive that parent of his or her custodial rights, not whether the mother is the birth mother or not.  For example, if the father has sole custody with the birth mother retaining visitation, the birth mother can kidnap the child by refusing to return the child to the father, and it would be the birth mother whose the one going to jail.
I'm not trying to argue Jess but it didn't happen that way with my son and grandson.  The mom didn't even have visitation and when she took my grandson even though my son had custody (she abandoned them) the LE, DA, Judge, DHR no one, not any one would lift a finger to help my son get his child back.  They finaly set a court date which she showed up for and after failing a drug test, on top of being in contempt, no job, no place to live, she walked out of there with my grandson.  And we've been fighting ever since.  The things that have taken place in this case I would never believe if I wasn't there to hear and see  for myself. 

I know that what you said is the way it is supposed to work but the reality is especially in the south, the courts, LE, and child services overwhelmingly favor the natural mother no matter how big a POS she is.  I'm glad you've been coming on I'd really like to get your oppinion of just what the Alabama Parent Child Relationship Act means. I've spoken with others about it and they have backed up what I thought even though the Judge refuses to enforce it.  She has moved several times in the past 8 months and one of those was an eviction, we've never received a notice of any kind.  My thinking is sooner or later that Judge will have to follow the law if he doesn't......


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 18, 2009, 09:37:07 AM
************WARNING  - THIS ARTICLE IS VERY UPSETTING!!!!!!***********

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home




Northern Rose, thanks for posting this so we can see it.  However, am thinking that rather than voice my opinion on it, am gonna just  :silent: .   Seems to me that many have chosen up sides, and don't want to hear negative in any form about the dad.  Even IF it's just a discussion on why what the dad and aunt are saying, are not matching up.  Am gonna sit this out and just watch.. and wait. 


I'll join you, and see what happens.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 18, 2009, 09:39:57 AM
Question..The daughter now says that AD wasn't supposed to have any kids.  I thought her 7 year old son was taken away prior to her arrest..or was it due to the arrest ?  If it was prior to the arrest, then wouldn't DSS have taken any other bio children of hers..checked on their well being, notified whomever they were with?  I am a little confused on that issue..anyone?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 09:44:40 AM
Question..The daughter now says that AD wasn't supposed to have any kids.  I thought her 7 year old son was taken away prior to her arrest..or was it due to the arrest ?  If it was prior to the arrest, then wouldn't DSS have taken any other bio children of hers..checked on their well being, notified whomever they were with?  I am a little confused on that issue..anyone?


The 7yr old was taken after Shaniya went missing but I think before Antoinette was actually arrested.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 18, 2009, 09:51:48 AM
Can someone tell me where I can read the 911 call instead of listen. I saw it last night but I can't find it now. Ty


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 18, 2009, 09:53:17 AM
Good Morning Monks.  I am really confused about Brad......when his son was on NG last night and he came out and put his arms around his son I got that Hinky feeling. Then after the break he was sitting in a chair next to his son but didn't talk. I got the impression he was there to make sure his son didn't say something he wasn't supposed to say. I felt he had been sitting inside watching the show and something his son said raised an alarm with him. It was just freaking weird to see him strolling up behind his son while the show was going on...hugging and kissing this 20 yo over and over.  I have not commented on my feeling about Brad, mainly because I am not sure what I think....but this really made the hairs on my arms stand up and say WTF.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 09:59:28 AM
Does anyone have a link for the press conference?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: allalone on November 18, 2009, 09:59:52 AM
does anyone know where I can watch the pd briefing? I believe it should be starting. I'm in Az and I think the time difference is 2 hrs.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 10:00:24 AM
wral says they will carry it live, but I don't see a link yet

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: allalone on November 18, 2009, 10:01:10 AM
wral says they will carry it live, but I don't see a link yet

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

TYVM!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 10:01:29 AM
wral says they will carry it live, but I don't see a link yet

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

Press Conf

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6445568/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: N2WISHN on November 18, 2009, 10:02:31 AM
Good Morning Monks.  I am really confused about Brad......when his son was on NG last night and he came out and put his arms around his son I got that Hinky feeling. Then after the break he was sitting in a chair next to his son but didn't talk. I got the impression he was there to make sure his son didn't say something he wasn't supposed to say. I felt he had been sitting inside watching the show and something his son said raised an alarm with him. It was just freaking weird to see him strolling up behind his son while the show was going on...hugging and kissing this 20 yo over and over.  I have not commented on my feeling about Brad, mainly because I am not sure what I think....but this really made the hairs on my arms stand up and say WTF.



The father came out shortly after his son made this statement.....maybe the son was giving too much info..........

And my father recently gave her -- Antoinette a chance to -- give the mother a second chance to raise her daughter. I mean, because everybody deserves a second chance. Just like a convicted felon, I mean, he deserves a second chance because he could have changed. You never know.


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/17/ng.01.html


I'm getting the impression that the father may have just decided to let that filthy mother take care of Shaniya and now is trying to evade responsibility for doing that....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 18, 2009, 10:04:07 AM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

This tells me there was no hand off as I suspected. sick sick sick people they are. I hope they rot in he11 for what was done to that baby girl.. I am sure the big boys in prison will show him what it feels like to be assaulted like that. They will change his name for him to ben dover.

I never did think it was a hand off. I am still wondering about the 60 yr old man the LE put the description out on. I wonder if he was seen with Shaniya at ANOTHER time. Ok, I just made myself mad again.  ::MonkeyMad::

Since there's been no other mention of this "60 year old man in the blue Toyota," my guess is he doesn't exist. He was nothing more than a potential defense for MM- and LE knows this. He may have admitted to dropping Shaniya off with this invisible man-per moms orders- hence the kidnapping charge. As a security measure, LE put out the BOLO, but knew they had the guilty man all along. That would also explain why it has taken so long to add more charges against him. I'm sure MM isn't volunteering info. and they have to go by the book. This is the only thing that makes a lick of sense to me re: no other mention of this 60 yr. old man.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 10:05:05 AM
wral says they will carry it live, but I don't see a link yet

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

Press Conf

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6445568/

Thank you. HLN keeps giving flashes of it. I hate it when the pressers are mostly about patting themselves on the back!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 18, 2009, 10:05:55 AM
Good Morning Monks.  I am really confused about Brad......when his son was on NG last night and he came out and put his arms around his son I got that Hinky feeling. Then after the break he was sitting in a chair next to his son but didn't talk. I got the impression he was there to make sure his son didn't say something he wasn't supposed to say. I felt he had been sitting inside watching the show and something his son said raised an alarm with him. It was just freaking weird to see him strolling up behind his son while the show was going on...hugging and kissing this 20 yo over and over.  I have not commented on my feeling about Brad, mainly because I am not sure what I think....but this really made the hairs on my arms stand up and say WTF.

I decided to go back to sitting on the fence, too.

Is there a live link for the presser?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 18, 2009, 10:06:44 AM
OOPS..I see the link above me now..TY


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 10:06:52 AM
I missed the very beginning of the PC.  If anyone saw it, did they mention additional charges for anyone or are they still waiting on the jurisdiction issue?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 10:07:30 AM
I missed the very beginning of the PC.  If anyone saw it, did they mention additional charges for anyone or are they still waiting on the jurisdiction issue?

PC is over, it was short and the part I saw was not very informative.  I missed the beginning though.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 18, 2009, 10:11:09 AM
Good Morning Monks.  I am really confused about Brad......when his son was on NG last night and he came out and put his arms around his son I got that Hinky feeling. Then after the break he was sitting in a chair next to his son but didn't talk. I got the impression he was there to make sure his son didn't say something he wasn't supposed to say. I felt he had been sitting inside watching the show and something his son said raised an alarm with him. It was just freaking weird to see him strolling up behind his son while the show was going on...hugging and kissing this 20 yo over and over.  I have not commented on my feeling about Brad, mainly because I am not sure what I think....but this really made the hairs on my arms stand up and say WTF.



The father came out shortly after his son made this statement.....maybe the son was giving too much info..........

And my father recently gave her -- Antoinette a chance to -- give the mother a second chance to raise her daughter. I mean, because everybody deserves a second chance. Just like a convicted felon, I mean, he deserves a second chance because he could have changed. You never know.


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/17/ng.01.html


I'm getting the impression that the father may have just decided to let that filthy mother take care of Shaniya and now is trying to evade responsibility for doing that....

Thanks N2W


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 10:11:23 AM
I thought that it was weird when Brad kept hugging on his son as well during the NG show...I thought, what the heck? and at the vigil when he was crying and carrying on...I know that he is upset..but I kept thinking...if I had to watch much more of him that I would switch the channel...he was making me feel like he was acting or something in a drama class...sorry if that offends but I remember saying something to hubs at the time...
I thought that what I had read is that Brad has 5 OTHER children with 3 different women, not including Shaniya which would make it 6...Alls I have to say about that is that if we were talking about a woman here, there would be plenty of things said about her having all these kids with different men, but not much has been said about the dad and his procreating  and not taking care of his own children....double standards? anyways...the dad probably really loved her, but I do believe the stuff that is coming out about him from friends and relatives...why would they lie about it? and the fact that they are already raising a few of his kids tells me that they are decent people who would have no reason to lie...
would be interesting to see where his other kids are and who is raising them...he and his first wife reportedly had 3 kids together...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 18, 2009, 10:12:33 AM
I missed the very beginning of the PC.  If anyone saw it, did they mention additional charges for anyone or are they still waiting on the jurisdiction issue?

I missed all; of it..it must have been VERY short!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 10:16:04 AM
wral says they will carry it live, but I don't see a link yet

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

Press Conf

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6445568/

Fanny, your new avi is absolutely devine!!

Thank you. HLN keeps giving flashes of it. I hate it when the pressers are mostly about patting themselves on the back!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 10:17:30 AM
I missed the very beginning of the PC.  If anyone saw it, did they mention additional charges for anyone or are they still waiting on the jurisdiction issue?

PC is over, it was short and the part I saw was not very informative.  I missed the beginning though.


I saw the whole thing and it was a whole lot of nothing.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 10:17:59 AM
Good Morning Monks.  I am really confused about Brad......when his son was on NG last night and he came out and put his arms around his son I got that Hinky feeling. Then after the break he was sitting in a chair next to his son but didn't talk. I got the impression he was there to make sure his son didn't say something he wasn't supposed to say. I felt he had been sitting inside watching the show and something his son said raised an alarm with him. It was just freaking weird to see him strolling up behind his son while the show was going on...hugging and kissing this 20 yo over and over.  I have not commented on my feeling about Brad, mainly because I am not sure what I think....but this really made the hairs on my arms stand up and say WTF.



The father came out shortly after his son made this statement.....maybe the son was giving too much info..........

And my father recently gave her -- Antoinette a chance to -- give the mother a second chance to raise her daughter. I mean, because everybody deserves a second chance. Just like a convicted felon, I mean, he deserves a second chance because he could have changed. You never know.


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/17/ng.01.html


I'm getting the impression that the father may have just decided to let that filthy mother take care of Shaniya and now is trying to evade responsibility for doing that....

Thanks N2W

Bradley came out of the house after his son mentioned that his mother died when he was ten years old, that is why Brad came
out to support his son and hug him, the son lost his mother and aunt to the killers, it was the right thing for his father to come out and hug him.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Mary on November 18, 2009, 10:18:19 AM
Well so much for daddy if all this is true. When I saw him come out to his son on
NG my thought was to shut him up in case he said something that he wasn't
suppose to.  I keep hearing that dad just had a one nite stand with this POS,
she was a hooker, how the hell would she know who the daddy was.
LE said that they got a tip about where this poor baby's body was. Well Coe went
to see her in jail. I wonder if they talked about it on their recorded conversation.
Maybe they didn't know it was recorded. HLN didn't have much of a update at all.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 10:19:31 AM
wral says they will carry it live, but I don't see a link yet

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

Press Conf

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6445568/

Fanny, your new avi is absolutely devine!!

Thank you. HLN keeps giving flashes of it. I hate it when the pressers are mostly about patting themselves on the back!!




[/quote]

Thanks MAGNOLIA. Brandi surprised me with it this morning.  ::MonkeyJnBox::

No, I didn't hear any of the presser except the back patting part.  ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 10:23:57 AM
Well so much for daddy if all this is true. When I saw him come out to his son on
NG my thought was to shut him up in case he said something that he wasn't
suppose to.  I keep hearing that dad just had a one nite stand with this POS,
she was a hooker, how the hell would she know who the daddy was.
LE said that they got a tip about where this poor baby's body was. Well Coe went
to see her in jail. I wonder if they talked about it on their recorded conversation.
Maybe they didn't know it was recorded. HLN didn't have much of a update at all.

I thought about that too...it was a 1 night stand from what the dad said...

would be interesting to see what Coe and AD had to say..wonder if the police arranged for him to go see her and get info...afterall, she set him up as the person who had taken Shaniya in the first place, he must be bitter about that I would think...

about MM, just wondering why he turned himself in rather than running if her murdered her...but if he didn't, why isn't he talking and saying who he gave Shaniya to? he is the last one to have been seen with her and he admitted to kidnapping her so that speaks volumes doesn't it...still, something is missing for me on this....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 10:26:01 AM


http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7125084

No new charges in Shaniya Davis case
Updated at 10:16 AM today


FAYETTEVILLE, NC (WTVD) -- Fayetteville police said Wednesday that they were working to determine which county has jurisdiction in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis before filing any new charges.

The girl's body was discovered Monday in a wooded area near Sanford.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 18, 2009, 10:26:30 AM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 

From all appearances in the lovely photos which we have seen of Shaniya, apparently taken when she was in her father's custody, she was well taken care of, happy and seemed well-adjusted.  I saw no evidence of cigarette burns even though I have magnified the photos.  If this were truly the case, I think it would be the responsibility of whoever saw these burns to call police or at the least report it to the aunt or father.  I take everything these people say with a grain of salt.  If Cheyenne thought AD was so bad, why would she describe her as so sweet and so sweet-talking?  It goes without saying as one of them did that it would not have happened had Shaniya not been with her mother.  Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
No, if I have to choose, which I don't of course, not being personally involved in this, I would take the side of the father and aunt who obviously took great care of Shaniya.  As to other children of whom they claim he doesn't take care, they appear to me to be adults who should be taking care of themselves.

As far as is known, the father often was taken out of town by his work and after all it does take money to live, the aunt had primary care of Shaniya most of the time.  It appears she did a very good job.

Not knowing all of the details, I condemn only MM and AD until therre is information to the contrary from sources I consider reliable.  I do not just automatically take the word of anyone in such a situation, particularly from those who may have motives other than seeking the truth.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 18, 2009, 10:33:26 AM
Good Evening Monkey Friends ::MonkeyCool::
I think someone else was at the Comfort Inn when  MM took Shaniya there, I guess I just have my doubts that this scum would spend the money for a room, when the non caring egg donor could have easily let him do what he wanted right there in the mobile home. Idk I still have question that someone else was at the Comfort Inn.

That's crossed my mind too, but wouldn't LE/the media be focusing more energy into whoever he brought her to? I don't know, I just think if there was a child killer on the loose- there would be a lot more attention on the perpetrator. I truly believe if MM didn't kill Shaniya, he would be screaming his innocence with more descriptive details- and LE would make sure parents/the public were aware.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 10:34:52 AM
<object id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268">
<param name="movie" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd&section=&mediaId=7124701&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=" ></param>
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param>
<param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<embed id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
   allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true"
   src="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd&section=&mediaId=7124701&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=">
</embed>
</object>


http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7125084

No new charges in Shaniya Davis case
Updated at 10:16 AM today


FAYETTEVILLE, NC (WTVD) -- Fayetteville police said Wednesday that they were working to determine which county has jurisdiction in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis before filing any new charges.

The girl's body was discovered Monday in a wooded area near Sanford.

thanks Klaas...can always depend on you to get us the latest and greatest! thanks for all that you and the  mods do .......


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 10:36:09 AM
The BOLO stated that LE was looking for a man "about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota". 

Of the three McNeill men that have recently been arrested on various charges, one owns a blue Toyota. 

Although I don't think the McNeill who owns the blue Toyota is near that age, the one who *could have been* driving it is. 

IMO, the man is in custody, and that *could be* why there has been no further mention from LE of the BOLO, the man, or the Toyota.   

Just my opinion tho.  Guess we'll see soon enough. 
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 10:38:43 AM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 

From all appearances in the lovely photos which we have seen of Shaniya, apparently taken when she was in her father's custody, she was well taken care of, happy and seemed well-adjusted.  I saw no evidence of cigarette burns even though I have magnified the photos.  If this were truly the case, I think it would be the responsibility of whoever saw these burns to call police or at the least report it to the aunt or father.  I take everything these people say with a grain of salt.  If Cheyenne thought AD was so bad, why would she describe her as so sweet and so sweet-talking?  It goes without saying as one of them did that it would not have happened had Shaniya not been with her mother.  Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
No, if I have to choose, which I don't of course, not being personally involved in this, I would take the side of the father and aunt who obviously took great care of Shaniya.  As to other children of whom they claim he doesn't take care, they appear to me to be adults who should be taking care of themselves.

As far as is known, the father often was taken out of town by his work and after all it does take money to live, the aunt had primary care of Shaniya most of the time.  It appears she did a very good job.

Not knowing all of the details, I condemn only MM and AD until therre is information to the contrary from sources I consider reliable.  I do not just automatically take the word of anyone in such a situation, particularly from those who may have motives other than seeking the truth.

I condemn MM and AD too, but they are all guilty of failing her in my opinion..

did you watch the video that Klaas provided with these others speaking? you might change your mind..why would they lie, especially when they are helping to raise his other children? jmo....



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 10:43:41 AM
Can someone tell me where I can read the 911 call instead of listen. I saw it last night but I can't find it now. Ty


Posted this in the last thread...



Found at WS:

Transcribed 911 Call:

Dispatcher: 911, what is your emergency?
AD: Yes, ma'am. My name is Antionette Davis at 11[inaudible] Sleepy Hollow.
Dispatcher: Ma'am?
AD: My name is Antionette Davis at 1116a Sleepy Hollow.
Dispatcher:I said I'm not getting your address clearly. Can you slow down a little bit, and tell me again?
AD: Yes. 1116a Sleepy Hollow.
Dispatcher:1115a?
AD: 16
Dispatcher: One six?
AD: Yes, ma'am.
Dispatcher: Okay, ma'am, how can I help you?
AD: (Short pause) I woke up this morning and my daughter was not in this house. I don't know if she walked out or...I don't know what's goin on, but she's not here. .
Dispatcher: How old is your daughter?
AD: She's 5.
Dispatcher: 5?
AD: Yes, ma'am.
Dispatcher: Okay. What time did you wake up? When did you last see her?
AD: I saw her, uh, at 5:30 last night.
Dispatcher: 5:30 last night? Is that when you put her to bed?
AD: Yes, ma'am. NO, when she went back to bed.
Dispatcher: Okay. That was 5 this morning, is that what your telling me?
AD: Yes, ma'am.
Dispatcher: Okay. Um, were there any doors open or anything like that?
AD: She know how to unlock the front door.
Dispatcher: Okay. What is her name?
AD: Shaniya Davis.
Dispatcher: Spell that name for me.
AD: S-h-a-n-i-y-a.
Dispatcher: And she's White, Black or Hispanic.
AD: She's mixed.
Dispatcher: Okay.
AD: She's biracial.
Dispatcher: What was she wearing?
AD: She's wearing a blue, just a big old [inaudible], blue shirt with designs on it, but her hair's out.
Dispatcher: Okay. Did she have on, um, any pants?
AD: She didn't take no shoes, no pants, no nothing. She...
Dispatcher: Did she have on underwear?
AD: Yes, Ma'am.
Dispatcher: Okay. Do you know what color?
AD: They're white, and they got pink, I guess. I can't...I can't really remember. But they like white with pink designs on them.
Dispatcher: Okay. Okay. And you said none of the doors were open?
AD: No, ma'a. They were locked, but she knows how to unlock the front door.
Dispatcher: Was it closed this morning?
AD: Yes, ma'am
Dispatcher: And you said it was about 5:30?
AD: Yes, ma'am.
Dispatcher: Okay. Have you checked the neighborhood?
AD: I checked everywhere. I haven't checked the back end of the neighborhood, yet, but I checked the front end. I'm just, I don't know what else to do. I don't know what else to do, I'm so...I'm, I don't know what else to do.
Dispatcher: Are there any more juveniles inside the home?
AD: It's my son, but he's here.
Dispatcher: Okay. And your door was not unlocked, that what you're telling me?
AD: No, it was not unlocked, but I'm telling you, she knows how to unlock it. I was hoping that she didn't unlock it and walked out.
Dispatcher: Okay. What's the number you're calling me from, ma'am?
[redacted]
Dispatcher: Okay. We already got your call in. We're going to get someone out. You said her hair was out?
AD: Yes. It's like a bushy afro.
Dispatcher: How much does she weigh? Do you know?
AD: I don't know, ma'am. I don't remember.
Dispatcher: Okay. Alright, ma'am, just try to um, try to check your home again, and check around the neighborhood again, and if anything changes, call us back. But we already got the call in, and we're going to get someone out as soon as we can, okay?
AD: Alright.
Dispatcher: Alright ma'am. Thank you.


http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/6439590/



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 10:46:37 AM
I thought that it was weird when Brad kept hugging on his son as well during the NG show...I thought, what the heck? and at the vigil when he was crying and carrying on...I know that he is upset..but I kept thinking...if I had to watch much more of him that I would switch the channel...he was making me feel like he was acting or something in a drama class...sorry if that offends but I remember saying something to hubs at the time...
I thought that what I had read is that Brad has 5 OTHER children with 3 different women, not including Shaniya which would make it 6...Alls I have to say about that is that if we were talking about a woman here, there would be plenty of things said about her having all these kids with different men, but not much has been said about the dad and his procreating  and not taking care of his own children....double standards? anyways...the dad probably really loved her, but I do believe the stuff that is coming out about him from friends and relatives...why would they lie about it? and the fact that they are already raising a few of his kids tells me that they are decent people who would have no reason to lie...
would be interesting to see where his other kids are and who is raising them...he and his first wife reportedly had 3 kids together...


I agree with you, I think he was trying to respond in a way that showed he actually cared. I think he is sad but no more than that, he isn't even a good actor. I'm not sitting on the fence, I am 100% for Shaniya, whoever let her down isn't going to get a pass from me because they demonstrate some remorse.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 10:52:50 AM
The BOLO stated that LE was looking for a man "about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota". 

Of the three McNeill men that have recently been arrested on various charges, one owns a blue Toyota. 

Although I don't think the McNeill who owns the blue Toyota is near that age, the one who *could have been* driving it is. 

IMO, the man is in custody, and that *could be* why there has been no further mention from LE of the BOLO, the man, or the Toyota.   

Just my opinion tho.  Guess we'll see soon enough. 
 


Date Arrested             Name

November 17, 2009    Mcneill, Samuel
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Dustrus Willis
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Mario Andrette


Just go to this link and type in the last name McNeill :

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 10:57:21 AM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 

From all appearances in the lovely photos which we have seen of Shaniya, apparently taken when she was in her father's custody, she was well taken care of, happy and seemed well-adjusted.  I saw no evidence of cigarette burns even though I have magnified the photos.  If this were truly the case, I think it would be the responsibility of whoever saw these burns to call police or at the least report it to the aunt or father.  I take everything these people say with a grain of salt.  If Cheyenne thought AD was so bad, why would she describe her as so sweet and so sweet-talking?  It goes without saying as one of them did that it would not have happened had Shaniya not been with her mother.  Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
No, if I have to choose, which I don't of course, not being personally involved in this, I would take the side of the father and aunt who obviously took great care of Shaniya.  As to other children of whom they claim he doesn't take care, they appear to me to be adults who should be taking care of themselves.

As far as is known, the father often was taken out of town by his work and after all it does take money to live, the aunt had primary care of Shaniya most of the time.  It appears she did a very good job.

Not knowing all of the details, I condemn only MM and AD until therre is information to the contrary from sources I consider reliable.  I do not just automatically take the word of anyone in such a situation, particularly from those who may have motives other than seeking the truth.

I condemn MM and AD too, but they are all guilty of failing her in my opinion..

did you watch the video that Klaas provided with these others speaking? you might change your mind..why would they lie, especially when they are helping to raise his other children? jmo....



It looks like he is an absentee father to me, his children are raised by others I'm sure he had no idea or interest in what was happening to her because he just wasn't there to care..The aunt should have tried harder but the dad quite obviously isn't a loving caring parent except in a very disinterested way. Although he needed to work was it necessary to farm his kids out, I'm sure he could have worked locally, he just seems neglectful to me. He didn't put his kids first..JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 18, 2009, 11:08:55 AM
Good Morning, Monkeys!!  I've got whiplash from what I'm reading!  ::MonkeyTongue::

I've got to get caught up.......... you all have been busy and we've gone from one McNeil arrested, to three!   ::MonkeyEek:: I'll head back but just wanted to say good morning! See you in a little while!   ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 18, 2009, 11:11:58 AM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 

From all appearances in the lovely photos which we have seen of Shaniya, apparently taken when she was in her father's custody, she was well taken care of, happy and seemed well-adjusted.  I saw no evidence of cigarette burns even though I have magnified the photos.  If this were truly the case, I think it would be the responsibility of whoever saw these burns to call police or at the least report it to the aunt or father.  I take everything these people say with a grain of salt.  If Cheyenne thought AD was so bad, why would she describe her as so sweet and so sweet-talking?  It goes without saying as one of them did that it would not have happened had Shaniya not been with her mother.  Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
No, if I have to choose, which I don't of course, not being personally involved in this, I would take the side of the father and aunt who obviously took great care of Shaniya.  As to other children of whom they claim he doesn't take care, they appear to me to be adults who should be taking care of themselves.

As far as is known, the father often was taken out of town by his work and after all it does take money to live, the aunt had primary care of Shaniya most of the time.  It appears she did a very good job.

Not knowing all of the details, I condemn only MM and AD until therre is information to the contrary from sources I consider reliable.  I do not just automatically take the word of anyone in such a situation, particularly from those who may have motives other than seeking the truth.

I condemn MM and AD too, but they are all guilty of failing her in my opinion..

did you watch the video that Klaas provided with these others speaking? you might change your mind..why would they lie, especially when they are helping to raise his other children? jmo....



I can't answer to that.  People have different reasons for lying.  why would they all gang up on the father and aunt?  IMO there is much more than appears on the surface.  Probably old resentments.  Maybe they were mad because they wanted to raise Shaniya. Maybe they resent something about the first wife's death.  Most of the time, things are not what they appear to be at first glance.  Sometimes they are. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on November 18, 2009, 11:20:24 AM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 

From all appearances in the lovely photos which we have seen of Shaniya, apparently taken when she was in her father's custody, she was well taken care of, happy and seemed well-adjusted.  I saw no evidence of cigarette burns even though I have magnified the photos.  If this were truly the case, I think it would be the responsibility of whoever saw these burns to call police or at the least report it to the aunt or father.  I take everything these people say with a grain of salt.  If Cheyenne thought AD was so bad, why would she describe her as so sweet and so sweet-talking?  It goes without saying as one of them did that it would not have happened had Shaniya not been with her mother.  Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
No, if I have to choose, which I don't of course, not being personally involved in this, I would take the side of the father and aunt who obviously took great care of Shaniya.  As to other children of whom they claim he doesn't take care, they appear to me to be adults who should be taking care of themselves.

As far as is known, the father often was taken out of town by his work and after all it does take money to live, the aunt had primary care of Shaniya most of the time.  It appears she did a very good job.

Not knowing all of the details, I condemn only MM and AD until therre is information to the contrary from sources I consider reliable.  I do not just automatically take the word of anyone in such a situation, particularly from those who may have motives other than seeking the truth.

BABYBEAR  I agree, bad judgement for sure and his punishment will be regret and guilt for the rest of his life.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 18, 2009, 11:31:27 AM
The BOLO stated that LE was looking for a man "about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota". 

Of the three McNeill men that have recently been arrested on various charges, one owns a blue Toyota. 

Although I don't think the McNeill who owns the blue Toyota is near that age, the one who *could have been* driving it is. 

IMO, the man is in custody, and that *could be* why there has been no further mention from LE of the BOLO, the man, or the Toyota.   

Just my opinion tho.  Guess we'll see soon enough. 
 


Date Arrested             Name

November 17, 2009    Mcneill, Samuel
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Dustrus Willis
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Mario Andrette


Just go to this link and type in the last name McNeill :

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx




Thanks Wyks/

What is BOLO?

Could it be that MM's family is involved in some capacity.  Are the other two McNeill's who were arrested related to MM?

Janet

++++

Police say they're looking for body of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis
THE FAYETTEVILLE *******, N.C. | Mon, Nov 16, 11:57 AM


At a press briefing at 10:30 a.m., Chance said people have been turning out in droves to offer help but no more volunteer searchers are currently needed. She said civilians who want to help can call the police at 433-1820 to volunteer.

Meantime, the State Highway Patrol issued a 'be on the lookout for' advisory this morning, saying that they're looking for a man who had been spotted with Davis. The man is believed to be about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota, according to an official with the Highway patrol. He may be in the vicinity of Raeford Road or Cliffdale Road.

Chance said police are following up any and all tips but are still concentrating their search for Shaniya on Walker Road.

At a press conference at the search site at 9 a.m. today, Chance said police had received some tips.

She said Mario Andrette McNeill, who has admitted to kidnapping Shaniya and is in custody, has been "extremely uncooperative" but has given some information to police.

Chance said McNeill is known to frequent Sanford. He was arrested Thursday after being identified as being with Shaniya Tuesday morning at the Comfort Suites hotel in Sanford. The two were seen on a surveillance tape at 6:11 a.m. Chance said police know McNeill left the motel with Shaniya at about 7:30 a.m. but they don't know what condition Shaniya was in at that point

http://dailyme.com/story/2009111600004240/police-body-5-year-old-shaniya-davis.html



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 18, 2009, 11:39:58 AM
Did Shaniyia's father, auntie, cousins or siblings have any type of contact in the five weeks period that the little girl was in her Mother's custody?  A phone call?

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on November 18, 2009, 11:43:34 AM
IMO dad and aunt failed Shaniya by not checking on her. If the burns were really there I think it's criminal for them to agree to let her go there at all, but we don't know that for sure. All of them share in the guilt but I don't believe that he would knowingly send her there if he thought she would be in danger. It sounded like Shaniya did visit the mom on a semi regular basis. It wasn't until she had her own place (not really exactly as it turns out) and had held a job which would on the outside indicate she was straight from drugs, that he allowed her to stay longer. I hate what happened to her and I'm fairly certain that he will feel more remorse for the rest of his life for his lack of involvement and responsibility than any one of the rest of them. Again JMO. Each of them share to some degree in the tragedy.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: allalone on November 18, 2009, 11:51:52 AM
Goodmorning everyone from Az.

I just finished watching the video about what the fathers friend, daughter and ex-father in law had to say. I'm not sure right now if I believe everything that was said and I'm trying to not place too much judgement right now about the Dad but I am starting to feel anger towards him. Yesterday when watching (or could have read a statement) another interview, what stuck in my head was that the Dad nor the Aunt knew Shaniya was not attending school. That tells me they were not calling and speaking with Shaniya. Gosh, even when my kids have sleep overs with friends, I call just to say good night. With that said, my opinion is that the Aunt was more of a (day to day) parent than the Dad. There is no question in my mind that he loved her and provided well for her but I just think that he has been the type of parent that is not that "hands on". I could write more that's on my mind right now but think I better wait until more info comes out. And I'm sure it will.

One more thing that I have wondered about is AD's sister that was living in the trailer. Does anyone have any info on her? I'm not even sure I know what her name is.


















 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 18, 2009, 11:52:37 AM
Police: No new charges now in death of NC girl

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Investigators probing the kidnapping and death of a 5-year-old North Carolina girl say they can't file more charges until they decide where the crimes occurred.

Fayetteville police had said they planned to file more charges in the death of Shaniya (shuh-NY-uh) Davis, whose body was found Monday beside a rural highway in Lee County. But Police Chief Tom Bergamine said Wednesday more charges won't come until jurisdiction is determined.

Authorities are trying to decide where the girl was killed and if the case will be prosecuted in Lee County or neighboring Cumberland County, where she lived.

Her mother, Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.

Mario McNeill is accused of kidnapping after surveillance footage from a Lee County hotel showed him carrying the girl.

http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/police-no-new-charges-201647.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Mary on November 18, 2009, 11:57:48 AM
Question??? This place was her sisters, she rented it. Where is she in all this, what has
she got to say in all this? When the landlady ask her about who was living there, she
said that the pos was her babysitter. Also the McNeill was her old boyfriend. Has anyone
seen or heard from her?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on November 18, 2009, 11:58:56 AM
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml
November 18, 2009 11:35 AM
Shaniya Davis' Little Body Found Near Deer Carcasses in Trash
NEW YORK (CBS/AP) The story of Shaniya Davis gets more gruesome as it unravels
A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.

But Jeff Riccio of Tarheel Cainine Training Inc. said his team returned after getting information that the body of Shaniya Davis might be near the carcasses. The searchers found the body Monday afternoon underneath kudzu plants along a rural highway southeast of Sanford, N.C., about 40 miles south west of Raleigh.

Riccio says it was terrible seeing Shaniya's body, but he's glad her ordeal is over. A massive search for Shaniya began Tuesday Nov. 3 when her mother, Antoinette Davis, reported her missing from their Fayetteville, N.C., home.

Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking and felony child abuse, accused of selling her daughter into sexual slavery. Police also charged Mario McNeill with kidnapping after he was captured on a hotel's surveillance video with Shaniya.

So far, no one has been charged with the girl's murder.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: MuffyBee on November 18, 2009, 12:05:44 PM
Tamikosmom (Janet) ~ BOLO is an acronym for Be On (the) Look Out


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on November 18, 2009, 12:06:47 PM
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml
November 18, 2009 11:35 AM
Shaniya Davis' Little Body Found Near Deer Carcasses in Trash
NEW YORK (CBS/AP) The story of Shaniya Davis gets more gruesome as it unravels
A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.

But Jeff Riccio of Tarheel Cainine Training Inc. said his team returned after getting information that the body of Shaniya Davis might be near the carcasses. The searchers found the body Monday afternoon underneath kudzu plants along a rural highway southeast of Sanford, N.C., about 40 miles south west of Raleigh.

Riccio says it was terrible seeing Shaniya's body, but he's glad her ordeal is over. A massive search for Shaniya began Tuesday Nov. 3 when her mother, Antoinette Davis, reported her missing from their Fayetteville, N.C., home.

Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking and felony child abuse, accused of selling her daughter into sexual slavery. Police also charged Mario McNeill with kidnapping after he was captured on a hotel's surveillance video with Shaniya.

So far, no one has been charged with the girl's murder.

 Wonder if placing her near the rotting deer was coincidence or if MM was told that were some there?
What's the hold up on charging somebody with the homicide?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 18, 2009, 12:07:41 PM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 

From all appearances in the lovely photos which we have seen of Shaniya, apparently taken when she was in her father's custody, she was well taken care of, happy and seemed well-adjusted.  I saw no evidence of cigarette burns even though I have magnified the photos.  If this were truly the case, I think it would be the responsibility of whoever saw these burns to call police or at the least report it to the aunt or father.  I take everything these people say with a grain of salt.  If Cheyenne thought AD was so bad, why would she describe her as so sweet and so sweet-talking?  It goes without saying as one of them did that it would not have happened had Shaniya not been with her mother.  Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
No, if I have to choose, which I don't of course, not being personally involved in this, I would take the side of the father and aunt who obviously took great care of Shaniya.  As to other children of whom they claim he doesn't take care, they appear to me to be adults who should be taking care of themselves.

As far as is known, the father often was taken out of town by his work and after all it does take money to live, the aunt had primary care of Shaniya most of the time.  It appears she did a very good job.

Not knowing all of the details, I condemn only MM and AD until therre is information to the contrary from sources I consider reliable.  I do not just automatically take the word of anyone in such a situation, particularly from those who may have motives other than seeking the truth.

I condemn MM and AD too, but they are all guilty of failing her in my opinion..

did you watch the video that Klaas provided with these others speaking? you might change your mind..why would they lie, especially when they are helping to raise his other children? jmo....



It looks like he is an absentee father to me, his children are raised by others I'm sure he had no idea or interest in what was happening to her because he just wasn't there to care..The aunt should have tried harder but the dad quite obviously isn't a loving caring parent except in a very disinterested way. Although he needed to work was it necessary to farm his kids out, I'm sure he could have worked locally, he just seems neglectful to me. He didn't put his kids first..JMO

Many fathers and mothers have to be away from home alot for work, when the job requires travel( such as being in the military, overseas). I'd say mostly fathers. Does not make them neglectful. Seems he provided quite well, loved his child alot very much, had his sister keeping Shaniya when he was gone. No one could have ever imagined what this wicked evil sadistic animal was capable of doing to her daughter. I just don't believe it would enter their minds that she would sell Shaniya or hurt her. Did she ever give them reason to think she would hurt Shaniya? If she did they would not have sent her back, period. That's why I don't believe the other story. If it comes out that there was evidence that they had knowledge of prior abuse by devilmama I'll be the 1st to give them a verbal backlash, and it won't be pretty. But until then I can't lay blame on Shaniya's daddy.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gizzie on November 18, 2009, 12:10:08 PM
Question. Since AD has a bail, and she hasn't been charged with the murder, what could LE do to prevent her from being bonded out, and running? Anything?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 18, 2009, 12:11:07 PM
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml
November 18, 2009 11:35 AM
Shaniya Davis' Little Body Found Near Deer Carcasses in Trash
NEW YORK (CBS/AP) The story of Shaniya Davis gets more gruesome as it unravels
A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.

But Jeff Riccio of Tarheel Cainine Training Inc. said his team returned after getting information that the body of Shaniya Davis might be near the carcasses. The searchers found the body Monday afternoon underneath kudzu plants along a rural highway southeast of Sanford, N.C., about 40 miles south west of Raleigh.

Riccio says it was terrible seeing Shaniya's body, but he's glad her ordeal is over. A massive search for Shaniya began Tuesday Nov. 3 when her mother, Antoinette Davis, reported her missing from their Fayetteville, N.C., home.

Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking and felony child abuse, accused of selling her daughter into sexual slavery. Police also charged Mario McNeill with kidnapping after he was captured on a hotel's surveillance video with Shaniya.

So far, no one has been charged with the girl's murder.

 Wonder if placing her near the rotting deer was coincidence or if MM was told that were some there?
What's the hold up on charging somebody with the homicide?


Jurisdiction. They are trying to figure out which county Shaniya was murdered in. :(


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 18, 2009, 12:11:26 PM
IMO dad and aunt failed Shaniya by not checking on her. If the burns were really there I think it's criminal for them to agree to let her go there at all, but we don't know that for sure. All of them share in the guilt but I don't believe that he would knowingly send her there if he thought she would be in danger. It sounded like Shaniya did visit the mom on a semi regular basis. It wasn't until she had her own place (not really exactly as it turns out) and had held a job which would on the outside indicate she was straight from drugs, that he allowed her to stay longer. I hate what happened to her and I'm fairly certain that he will feel more remorse for the rest of his life for his lack of involvement and responsibility than any one of the rest of them. Again JMO. Each of them share to some degree in the tragedy.

mizjay ... I don't get it.

When my youngest son was five years old ... hubby and I left him with paternal grandparents for five days while we attended a funeral back east.  NOTHING could keep me from calling him each day.  I had no concern regarding his well being.  I knew that he was in good hands and was in his glory being spoiled rotten by his loving Grandma and Grandpa.  After excitedly sharing his day's activities ... it was him who would bring the contact to an end with "Moooom ... I gotta go".  I did not mind.  I was assured that all was right with his world.

Something encompassing the family dynamic in the Shanyia case gives me a hinky feeling.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 18, 2009, 12:12:44 PM
Tamikosmom (Janet) ~ BOLO is an acronym for Be On (the) Look Out

Thank you MuffyBee.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 12:16:19 PM
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml
November 18, 2009 11:35 AM
Shaniya Davis' Little Body Found Near Deer Carcasses in Trash
NEW YORK (CBS/AP) The story of Shaniya Davis gets more gruesome as it unravels
A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.

But Jeff Riccio of Tarheel Cainine Training Inc. said his team returned after getting information that the body of Shaniya Davis might be near the carcasses. The searchers found the body Monday afternoon underneath kudzu plants along a rural highway southeast of Sanford, N.C., about 40 miles south west of Raleigh.

Riccio says it was terrible seeing Shaniya's body, but he's glad her ordeal is over. A massive search for Shaniya began Tuesday Nov. 3 when her mother, Antoinette Davis, reported her missing from their Fayetteville, N.C., home.

Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking and felony child abuse, accused of selling her daughter into sexual slavery. Police also charged Mario McNeill with kidnapping after he was captured on a hotel's surveillance video with Shaniya.

So far, no one has been charged with the girl's murder.

 Wonder if placing her near the rotting deer was coincidence or if MM was told that were some there?
What's the hold up on charging somebody with the homicide?


Jurisdiction. They are trying to figure out which county Shaniya was murdered in. :(

For goodness sakes. Slap them with State charges and they won't have to worry about jurisdiction. Actually, I think human trafficking should be a Federal charge. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 12:20:42 PM
So this is why McNeil admitted to kidnapping Shaniya. He admits guilt to the lesser crime and then only serves part of the sentence that he actually should be serving, just like he is used to doing. If they can't prove that he actually killed the girl, then they will just convict him on kidnapping.
Hi Rach, I have said several times that I don't think there was a hand off, the one in jail is the one. He admitted to the kidnapping to try to dodge the rape murder of a child. The latter charge results in certain death, by the state or fellow inmates, one way or another, he will die for it, the kidnapping is a lesser charge and I think he was going to blame the mother fully.. a "no, she gave me the kid to take to so and so, said they was gonna watch her" something like that. that explains the smirk on his nasty face. it was his thoughts of  "I am smarter then you, you can't prove anything more then I carried her in and out of there, but I know what I did" . He only admitted to that to get the results I have been seeing, "he wouldn't have admitted to kidnapping if he killed her". Yes he would, it is a lesser charge and one that any good defense attorney could get him out of.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 12:22:59 PM
No matter if the father was around, by all appearances, Shaniya was happy and well taken care of by her Aunt.  Why on earth did they allowed her to live with her mother even for a short time is beyond my comprehension. 

From all appearances in the lovely photos which we have seen of Shaniya, apparently taken when she was in her father's custody, she was well taken care of, happy and seemed well-adjusted.  I saw no evidence of cigarette burns even though I have magnified the photos.  If this were truly the case, I think it would be the responsibility of whoever saw these burns to call police or at the least report it to the aunt or father.  I take everything these people say with a grain of salt.  If Cheyenne thought AD was so bad, why would she describe her as so sweet and so sweet-talking?  It goes without saying as one of them did that it would not have happened had Shaniya not been with her mother.  Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
No, if I have to choose, which I don't of course, not being personally involved in this, I would take the side of the father and aunt who obviously took great care of Shaniya.  As to other children of whom they claim he doesn't take care, they appear to me to be adults who should be taking care of themselves.

As far as is known, the father often was taken out of town by his work and after all it does take money to live, the aunt had primary care of Shaniya most of the time.  It appears she did a very good job.

Not knowing all of the details, I condemn only MM and AD until therre is information to the contrary from sources I consider reliable.  I do not just automatically take the word of anyone in such a situation, particularly from those who may have motives other than seeking the truth.

I condemn MM and AD too, but they are all guilty of failing her in my opinion..

did you watch the video that Klaas provided with these others speaking? you might change your mind..why would they lie, especially when they are helping to raise his other children? jmo....



I can't answer to that.  People have different reasons for lying.  why would they all gang up on the father and aunt?  IMO there is much more than appears on the surface.  Probably old resentments.  Maybe they were mad because they wanted to raise Shaniya. Maybe they resent something about the first wife's death.  Most of the time, things are not what they appear to be at first glance.  Sometimes they are. 

BabyBear, I think new resentments.... They are angry at what has happened and have to blame someone, why not start with the one who sent her there.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: allalone on November 18, 2009, 12:25:12 PM
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml
November 18, 2009 11:35 AM
Shaniya Davis' Little Body Found Near Deer Carcasses in Trash
NEW YORK (CBS/AP) The story of Shaniya Davis gets more gruesome as it unravels
A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.

But Jeff Riccio of Tarheel Cainine Training Inc. said his team returned after getting information that the body of Shaniya Davis might be near the carcasses. The searchers found the body Monday afternoon underneath kudzu plants along a rural highway southeast of Sanford, N.C., about 40 miles south west of Raleigh.

Riccio says it was terrible seeing Shaniya's body, but he's glad her ordeal is over. A massive search for Shaniya began Tuesday Nov. 3 when her mother, Antoinette Davis, reported her missing from their Fayetteville, N.C., home.

Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking and felony child abuse, accused of selling her daughter into sexual slavery. Police also charged Mario McNeill with kidnapping after he was captured on a hotel's surveillance video with Shaniya.

So far, no one has been charged with the girl's murder.

 Wonder if placing her near the rotting deer was coincidence or if MM was told that were some there?
What's the hold up on charging somebody with the homicide?


Jurisdiction. They are trying to figure out which county Shaniya was murdered in. :(

For goodness sakes. Slap them with State charges and they won't have to worry about jurisdiction. Actually, I think human trafficking should be a Federal charge. JMO

You are right.....Human trafficking is a federal charge! that's why I can't understand why the heck the FBI haven't been brought in yet!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 12:27:13 PM
It's my understanding the FBI was brought in early on.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 12:27:31 PM
Published: 06:38 AM, Wed Nov 18, 2009
Slain child's dad says he blames himselfBy Gregory Phillips
Staff writer

 The father of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis said Tuesday he partly blames himself for his daughter's death.

"I believe every parent would blame themselves," Bradley Lockhart said, his lower lip trembling. "We all look within ourselves to see what we could have done different."

Lockhart said he didn't know what he could have done differently, but he wishes he had known the extent of a reported Department of Social Services investigation into the home life of Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis.

"I feel if they would have known, they should have contacted me," he said.

Shaniya was staying with her mother when she was reported missing from the Davis home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road on Nov. 10. Her body was found a week later in woods off a rural road south of Sanford.

Antoinette Davis and a Fayetteville man are charged in her disappearance.

Antoinette Davis faces charges that include child abuse involving prostitution. Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, is charged with first-degree kidnapping. Police say he was seen carrying Shaniya in a Sanford hotel after she went missing.

Lockhart said Tuesday he was "appalled and disgusted" at the nature of the charges. But he dismissed reports he allowed Shaniya to stay with her mother while knowing it was an unsafe environment.

"I choose not to talk about that," he said. "Most of it's speculation, though."

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953110



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on November 18, 2009, 12:31:48 PM
IMO dad and aunt failed Shaniya by not checking on her. If the burns were really there I think it's criminal for them to agree to let her go there at all, but we don't know that for sure. All of them share in the guilt but I don't believe that he would knowingly send her there if he thought she would be in danger. It sounded like Shaniya did visit the mom on a semi regular basis. It wasn't until she had her own place (not really exactly as it turns out) and had held a job which would on the outside indicate she was straight from drugs, that he allowed her to stay longer. I hate what happened to her and I'm fairly certain that he will feel more remorse for the rest of his life for his lack of involvement and responsibility than any one of the rest of them. Again JMO. Each of them share to some degree in the tragedy.

mizjay ... I don't get it.

When my youngest son was five years old ... hubby and I left him with paternal grandparents for five days while we attended a funeral back east.  NOTHING could keep me from calling him each day.  I had no concern regarding his well being.  I knew that he was in good hands and was in his glory being spoiled rotten by his loving Grandma and Grandpa.  After excitedly sharing his day's activities ... it was him who would bring the contact to an end with "Moooom ... I gotta go".  I did not mind.  I was assured that all was right with his world.

Something encompassing the family dynamic in the Shanyia case gives me a hinky feeling.

Janet


Janet ~   I don't get it either, in the sense of why wasn't there more vigilence, more calls etc.  No disagreement there. I do think that this family's lifestyle was slightly different from the "norm".  The way you or I might maintain everyday contact with our kids when we are apart probably would be very different from his. Sounds like thru years of extended absences due to work, he became comfortable with relinquishing parental control. He felt ok with leaving them, right or wrong, I don't know. I couldn't have done it but I know a lot of fathers that are apart from their kids who rarely check in unless it's to pick them up for a weekend visit.
I hope there's nothing awful going to come out about his side of the family, it's horrendous enough as it is.   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 18, 2009, 12:33:04 PM
The point is, who in the world leaves the child they've been raising, supporting and loving for the last five years with a person they don't even freaking know?!?  No one.  No one who loves their child would drop that child off at a person's house (even if it is the egg donor) they don't even know!  And certainly no one who loves his child would drop said child off and walk away and never call, never drop in, never make sure she was going to school, etc.

If a mother had done this, folks would be crucifying her.  This person doesn't get a pass because he's a man.  My husband would NEVER do such a thing with our daughter.  Never.

And the family/friends coming out talking now are angry!  As they should be!  Isn't anger an appropriate response to what has happened to this child?  Especially anger from people who TRULY loved and cared for her?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 12:42:31 PM
The BOLO stated that LE was looking for a man "about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota". 

Of the three McNeill men that have recently been arrested on various charges, one owns a blue Toyota. 

Although I don't think the McNeill who owns the blue Toyota is near that age, the one who *could have been* driving it is. 

IMO, the man is in custody, and that *could be* why there has been no further mention from LE of the BOLO, the man, or the Toyota.   

Just my opinion tho.  Guess we'll see soon enough. 
 


Date Arrested             Name

November 17, 2009    Mcneill, Samuel
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Dustrus Willis
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Mario Andrette


Just go to this link and type in the last name McNeill :

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx




Hi Wykes..

I found a Willis McNeill who owns a 2006 toyota...

http://www.co.cumberland.nc.us/tax_payments/LR_Vehicle_Bill.aspx


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 12:46:50 PM
So this is why McNeil admitted to kidnapping Shaniya. He admits guilt to the lesser crime and then only serves part of the sentence that he actually should be serving, just like he is used to doing. If they can't prove that he actually killed the girl, then they will just convict him on kidnapping.
Hi Rach, I have said several times that I don't think there was a hand off, the one in jail is the one. He admitted to the kidnapping to try to dodge the rape murder of a child. The latter charge results in certain death, by the state or fellow inmates, one way or another, he will die for it, the kidnapping is a lesser charge and I think he was going to blame the mother fully.. a "no, she gave me the kid to take to so and so, said they was gonna watch her" something like that. that explains the smirk on his nasty face. it was his thoughts of  "I am smarter then you, you can't prove anything more then I carried her in and out of there, but I know what I did" . He only admitted to that to get the results I have been seeing, "he wouldn't have admitted to kidnapping if he killed her". Yes he would, it is a lesser charge and one that any good defense attorney could get him out of.

Hi sis! Maybe his DNA on the wrong place on her body might take the smirk right off his face.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 12:59:15 PM
Janet - You're welcome! 

It *could be* that MMs family is involved, LE hasn't said.  And the other two McNeill's that have recently been arrested, I don't know yet if they are related to MM or not. 

I find it interesting tho that one McNeill (age 56) was arrested the same day as MM (on the 13th), with no mention about him in this case.  (petty violation charges, no bond). 

Then MM, altho being "extremely uncooperative" with LE, admitted to the kidnapping and "gave some info" to LE. 

Three days later after MMs arrest, (on the 16th), the BOLO was put out to the public, with barely enough info for the public to know what they were looking for.  ("a man about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota".)

Then the next day (on the 17th) the other McNeill was arrested, (age 51), with no mention about him in this case.  (petty violation charges, no bond). 

After that, not another word mentioned by LE or media about the BOLO, the man or the car. 

And then Shaniya's body was found. 

All interesting timing re the three McNeill's.  Are they all involved with this case?  Dunno yet.  Wouldn't be at all surprised tho.

IMO. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 01:02:28 PM
The BOLO stated that LE was looking for a man "about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota". 

Of the three McNeill men that have recently been arrested on various charges, one owns a blue Toyota. 

Although I don't think the McNeill who owns the blue Toyota is near that age, the one who *could have been* driving it is. 

IMO, the man is in custody, and that *could be* why there has been no further mention from LE of the BOLO, the man, or the Toyota.   

Just my opinion tho.  Guess we'll see soon enough. 
 


Date Arrested             Name

November 17, 2009    Mcneill, Samuel
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Dustrus Willis
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Mario Andrette


Just go to this link and type in the last name McNeill :

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx




Hi Wykes..

I found a Willis McNeill who owns a 2006 toyota...

http://www.co.cumberland.nc.us/tax_payments/LR_Vehicle_Bill.aspx

Yep, that's the one.  Willis is the middle name of Dustrus, the one who was arrested on the 13th, same as MM. 

I think Samuel was driving it before he was arrested.  JMO. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 01:04:13 PM
Janet - You're welcome! 

It *could be* that MMs family is involved, LE hasn't said.  And the other two McNeill's that have recently been arrested, I don't know yet if they are related to MM or not. 

I find it interesting tho that one McNeill (age 56) was arrested the same day as MM (on the 13th), with no mention about him in this case.  (petty violation charges, no bond). 

Then MM, altho being "extremely uncooperative" with LE, admitted to the kidnapping and "gave some info" to LE. 

Three days later after MMs arrest, (on the 16th), the BOLO was put out to the public, with barely enough info for the public to know what they were looking for.  ("a man about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota".)

Then the next day (on the 17th) the other McNeill was arrested, (age 51), with no mention about him in this case.  (petty violation charges, no bond). 

After that, not another word mentioned by LE or media about the BOLO, the man or the car. 

And then Shaniya's body was found. 

All interesting timing re the three McNeill's.  Are they all involved with this case?  Dunno yet.  Wouldn't be at all surprised tho.

IMO. 


Just a guess, but Mario may have had help disposing of the body. Like, maybe where a good place might be. He doesn't exactly look like a deer hunter to me, so maybe he didn't know about the place she was left. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 01:13:58 PM
The point is, who in the world leaves the child they've been raising, supporting and loving for the last five years with a person they don't even freaking know?!?  No one.  No one who loves their child would drop that child off at a person's house (even if it is the egg donor) they don't even know!  And certainly no one who loves his child would drop said child off and walk away and never call, never drop in, never make sure she was going to school, etc.

If a mother had done this, folks would be crucifying her.  This person doesn't get a pass because he's a man.  My husband would NEVER do such a thing with our daughter.  Never.

And the family/friends coming out talking now are angry!  As they should be!  Isn't anger an appropriate response to what has happened to this child?  Especially anger from people who TRULY loved and cared for her?

agreed.. on all that you just said.......that has been my point on all of this...WHY????
and you are right, if we were talking about a mother doing this, the view would be totally different towards her jmo....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 01:15:15 PM
MM sure did have a smirk on his face when he was brought before the judge..I wanted to smack him right in the chops...grrrrrr


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 18, 2009, 01:16:30 PM
The point is, who in the world leaves the child they've been raising, supporting and loving for the last five years with a person they don't even freaking know?!?  No one.  No one who loves their child would drop that child off at a person's house (even if it is the egg donor) they don't even know!  And certainly no one who loves his child would drop said child off and walk away and never call, never drop in, never make sure she was going to school, etc.

If a mother had done this, folks would be crucifying her.  This person doesn't get a pass because he's a man.  My husband would NEVER do such a thing with our daughter.  Never.

And the family/friends coming out talking now are angry!  As they should be!  Isn't anger an appropriate response to what has happened to this child?  Especially anger from people who TRULY loved and cared for her?

I agree 100% with your post.  Shaniya is the focus.

Adults were entrusted with the care and protection of this precious child and ... choices made by those adults on her behalf failed her.  If ANY of these adults are given a pass and ... not held personally responsible for his/her part in the tragic outcome .. lessons are not learned ... the cycle is deemed to be repeated ... placing another child at risk.

Janet
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 01:19:49 PM
The point is, who in the world leaves the child they've been raising, supporting and loving for the last five years with a person they don't even freaking know?!?  No one.  No one who loves their child would drop that child off at a person's house (even if it is the egg donor) they don't even know!  And certainly no one who loves his child would drop said child off and walk away and never call, never drop in, never make sure she was going to school, etc.

If a mother had done this, folks would be crucifying her.  This person doesn't get a pass because he's a man.  My husband would NEVER do such a thing with our daughter.  Never.

And the family/friends coming out talking now are angry!  As they should be!  Isn't anger an appropriate response to what has happened to this child?  Especially anger from people who TRULY loved and cared for her?


I totally agree.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 01:24:06 PM
In the interview with his son, the dad mentions Shaniya running into his BMW with her bike. 

Pic below is of interview in front of the dad's home. 

Nice home, nice car. 

Memorial fund for Shaniya set up.  Has it been mentioned by any of them yet to what charity (if any) those funds will be going? 


(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Shaniya/Shaniya_dad-in-front-of-his-home.jpg)





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 01:27:42 PM
MM sure did have a smirk on his face when he was brought before the judge..I wanted to smack him right in the chops...grrrrrr

Well he never had to serve a full sentence for any of the crimes he committed so far, I'm sure he feels he is gonna get a free pass on this too. Maybe he wanted his 15 minutes of shame too, who knows, I know he will have to look over his shoulder for the rest of his life though..in prison he has a price on his head thats for sure. They will slap that silly grin right off his face really fast. ::MonkeyHang::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 01:32:05 PM
In the interview with his son, the dad mentions Shaniya running into his BMW with her bike. 

Pic below is of interview in front of the dad's home. 

Nice home, nice car. 

Memorial fund for Shaniya set up.  Has it been mentioned by any of them yet to what charity (if any) those funds will be going? 


(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Shaniya/Shaniya_dad-in-front-of-his-home.jpg)






Um....why has a memorial fund been set up for Shaniya? Daddy is not poor, or is the fund to help others.? I too would like to know where the funds are going. Maybe it's set up to help Texas Equisearch or something good like that.?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 18, 2009, 01:46:24 PM
Has there been any word on cause of death? I'm bracing for that and the autopsy report.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 18, 2009, 01:48:05 PM
Janet - You're welcome! 

It *could be* that MMs family is involved, LE hasn't said.  And the other two McNeill's that have recently been arrested, I don't know yet if they are related to MM or not. 

I find it interesting tho that one McNeill (age 56) was arrested the same day as MM (on the 13th), with no mention about him in this case.  (petty violation charges, no bond). 

Then MM, altho being "extremely uncooperative" with LE, admitted to the kidnapping and "gave some info" to LE. 

Three days later after MMs arrest, (on the 16th), the BOLO was put out to the public, with barely enough info for the public to know what they were looking for.  ("a man about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota".)

Then the next day (on the 17th) the other McNeill was arrested, (age 51), with no mention about him in this case.  (petty violation charges, no bond). 

After that, not another word mentioned by LE or media about the BOLO, the man or the car. 

And then Shaniya's body was found. 

All interesting timing re the three McNeill's.  Are they all involved with this case?  Dunno yet.  Wouldn't be at all surprised tho.

IMO. 


Just a guess, but Mario may have had help disposing of the body. Like, maybe where a good place might be. He doesn't exactly look like a deer hunter to me, so maybe he didn't know about the place she was left. JMO

I agree Miss Fanny.  I think we are not seeing anymore charges right now because they are investigating the human trafficking angle and also the child prostitution angle.  I think the jurisdiction has to do with the Feds as well as State and Local LE.  NC is supposed to be a huge stop on the human trafficking train..so they may have gotten this info from other RSO's being interviewed.  I didn't see where they had interviewed any..but I would be amazed to find they didn't.  I also think picking up the other McNeils was so they could question them too about all this.  They may also have evidence of other men abusing this child. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 02:19:32 PM
In the interview with his son, the dad mentions Shaniya running into his BMW with her bike. 

Pic below is of interview in front of the dad's home. 

Nice home, nice car. 

Memorial fund for Shaniya set up.  Has it been mentioned by any of them yet to what charity (if any) those funds will be going? 


(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Shaniya/Shaniya_dad-in-front-of-his-home.jpg)





Don't know about any one else, and I am saying this as a fence sitter, but the remark about the BMW sounded odd to me. Wouldn't you just normally say she ran into my car with her scooter and I will never have it fixed? JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 02:22:38 PM
Snips taken from:

http://fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953110
Published: 06:38 AM, Wed Nov 18, 2009

<snipped>

"Lockhart is a contractor who often works out of state. He said Shaniya had been staying with her mother since Oct. 9 while he was gone. His sister, Carey Lockhart-Davis, said Shaniya had split her time between her and Antoinette Davis since then.

Those caring for Lockhart's older children say he knew Davis' home was not safe for Shaniya and that he should not have allowed her to stay there.

Tim Allen has been caring for Lockhart's 17-year-old daughter, Cheyenne, since July. Cheyenne lives with Allen and his daughters, with whom she attends Pine Forest High School. Allen said Lockhart agreed Oct. 1 to let Shaniya stay with his family at night while Lockhart was gone and for her to spend the days at a day care run by Allen's mother. A day later, Allen said, Lockhart told him he had changed his mind.

"He said he knew she wasn't supposed to be over there, but he wanted to give her biological mother a chance," Allen said. On Oct. 3, Lockhart left town, Allen said, returning the day Shaniya went missing.
"

<snipped>

"We've had a lot of tragedy in our family," said Byron Coleman, Vickie Sue Lockhart's father.

Coleman said he was angry about Shaniya's death.

"He knew the situation with this girl," Coleman said. "He knew the kind of environment.

"Why take Shaniya back to a woman like that? That's the stupidest thing I ever heard."

The Colemans and Brad Lockhart have been on opposing sides in several lawsuits in recent years, most of which were dismissed. A case filed in 1998 resulted in the Colemans being granted custody of their grandchildren and child support in 2007, according to court files.

Before Shaniya's death, Lockhart was paying child support on three children, including Shaniya and two of the children from his marriage.

"I would have kept Shaniya, but he never asked me," Phyllis Coleman said. "After all, I kept his (other) three children.''


<snipped>

"Neighbor Scott Rollston said a memorial page has been set up on Facebook and a foundation has been established in Shaniya's name. Donations can be made at the Wachovia Bank on Morganton Road.

Shaniya's funeral arrangements will be made through McLaughlin Chapel, the Lockhart family church, Rollston said."


http://fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953110


(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Smilies/nocomment.gif)





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 02:25:35 PM
In the interview with his son, the dad mentions Shaniya running into his BMW with her bike. 

Pic below is of interview in front of the dad's home. 

Nice home, nice car. 

Memorial fund for Shaniya set up.  Has it been mentioned by any of them yet to what charity (if any) those funds will be going? 


(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Shaniya/Shaniya_dad-in-front-of-his-home.jpg)





Don't know about any one else, and I am saying this as a fence sitter, but the remark about the BMW sounded odd to me. Wouldn't you just normally say she ran into my car with her scooter and I will never have it fixed? JMO


(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Smilies/sad_yes.gif)  (http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Smilies/sad_yes.gif)



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 02:38:52 PM
Rumor?  posted in the comment section:

http://www.wral.com/golo/blogpost/6444425/

11:01 PM
Nov 17, 2009

Brad was also 28 at the time, his wife was murdered and he had four kids to raise by himself without a mother for them. I want you all to understand this, he saw how much his children missed having a mother and when Shaniya was born he hoped her mother would rise to the occasion and try to be a mother to Shaniya. He did that for Shaniya. The mother was not someone he picked up in a bar, she was a former babysitter of his kids. They had a very, very brief encounter and Shaniya was made. Brad loved Shaniya and always was protective of her, but he wanted her to also feel she had a mother, unlike his older children. Please, stop your judgements till you've walked in someones shoes.




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 18, 2009, 02:48:49 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 02:49:40 PM
Info about Antoinette's housing history.. found at WS:


09CVM6630 Ejectment 8/6/2009 Served 8/10/2009 L& S RENTALS DAVIS,ANTOINETTE WALL ST

09CVM3353 Writ of Possession 5/22/2009 Served 6/1/2009 L&S RENTALS DAVIS,ANTOINETTE WALL ST

09CVM3353 Ejectment 4/23/2009 Served 4/27/2009 L&S RENTALS DAVIS,ANTOINETTE WALL ST

08CVM10832 Writ of Possession 12/29/2008 Served 1/6/2009 FAYETTEVILLE METRO HOUSING AUTHORITY DAVIS,ANTOINETTE MELVIN PL

08CVM10832 Ejectment 12/3/2008 Served 12/5/2008 FAYETTEVILLE METRO HOUSING AUTH DAVIS,ANTOINETTE N MELVIN PL

07CVM2494 Ejectment 4/2/2007 Served 4/3/2007 FAY METRO HOUSING AUTHORITY DAVIS,ANTOINETTE N MELVIN PL

http://www.ccsonc.org/data/civil/civilname.asp



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 18, 2009, 02:53:50 PM
Seems to me the aunt loved having her and was taking very good care of her. She spoke of a special bond she shared with Shaniya, I wonder why that didn't count to the father. I bet she would have kept her if she could have. So sad. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 18, 2009, 03:05:23 PM
Rumor?  posted in the comment section:

http://www.wral.com/golo/blogpost/6444425/

11:01 PM
Nov 17, 2009

Brad was also 28 at the time, his wife was murdered and he had four kids to raise by himself without a mother for them. I want you all to understand this, he saw how much his children missed having a mother and when Shaniya was born he hoped her mother would rise to the occasion and try to be a mother to Shaniya. He did that for Shaniya. The mother was not someone he picked up in a bar, she was a former babysitter of his kids. They had a very, very brief encounter and Shaniya was made. Brad loved Shaniya and always was protective of her, but he wanted her to also feel she had a mother, unlike his older children. Please, stop your judgements till you've walked in someones shoes.



Obviously, I disagree wholeheartedly.  No protective parent leaves his child with someone he barely knows.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 18, 2009, 03:05:32 PM
The dad has said that Shaniya was a product from "a one-night stand".  Makes sense if Antoinette actually was a hooker 5-6 years ago. 

Just trying to wrap my mind around a one-night stand who would come after the baby daddy, then agree to share the raising of that child.  Perhaps it's just naive of me to think this doesn't happen very often. 

Perhaps there is some truth in that rumor posted above, that Antoinette had been Bradley's babysitter after the death of his wife.  Maybe I've read too many romance novels, yet am wondering if that's true..... then perhaps, after several years, Antoinette may have had some stars in her eyes re Bradley and a possible future with him?  And perhaps on realizing a permanent thing wasn't gonna happen, got a bit ticked off at him? 

Could the selling of, misuse, abuse and death of Shaniya all be part of a huge FU to Brad? 

JMO. 
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 03:06:51 PM
Rumor?  posted in the comment section:

http://www.wral.com/golo/blogpost/6444425/

11:01 PM
Nov 17, 2009

Brad was also 28 at the time, his wife was murdered and he had four kids to raise by himself without a mother for them. I want you all to understand this, he saw how much his children missed having a mother and when Shaniya was born he hoped her mother would rise to the occasion and try to be a mother to Shaniya. He did that for Shaniya. The mother was not someone he picked up in a bar, she was a former babysitter of his kids. They had a very, very brief encounter and Shaniya was made. Brad loved Shaniya and always was protective of her, but he wanted her to also feel she had a mother, unlike his older children. Please, stop your judgements till you've walked in someones shoes.




don't know how much of the above is true...didn't the father himself say that they had no relationship, that she was a one night stand and that they hardly knew each other? Which kids would she have baby sat? and why would he have her babysit??? not buying the above...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 03:08:44 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.

Rachcresp,

The nursing home screened that greedy mother, an extensive background search, and her history was perfect...

If Brad did a background search he would have had the same results...her record was spotless.

Antonnette is a greedy and ugly humor being, that isn't on the record search.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 03:13:08 PM
so dad must have had a child prior to his marriage to Vicki? cause it was said that they had 3 children together...and why does his son not have his last name? why didn't Shaniya have his last name...just things that make me go hmmmm...
I have heard that he has 5 kids and I have heard that he has 5 other children besides Shaniya...anyone know for sure? Byron lives with the grand father..the daughter lives with a family friend...where are the rest of them living? did any of his kids live with him?

did anyone do a background check on the dad? like I said before, I tried but every site that I pulled up wanted to charge me $29.95....anyone else have access to background checks?
just be nosy....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 18, 2009, 03:16:59 PM
I wonder if charges are pending due to the autospy report giving a day and time of death?

I think MM was transporting this child from one perv to another or to a person that bought her. Obviously no one knows and we are all giving it our best guess. I actually hope I am wrong. The thought of this child being passed around like a bag of chips is too much to handle.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 18, 2009, 03:19:06 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.

Rachcresp,

The nursing home screened that greedy mother, an extensive background search, and her history was perfect...

If Brad did a background search he would have had the same results...her record was spotless.

Antonnette is a greedy and ugly humor being, that isn't on the record search.


That's true. Maybe a screening wouldn't have helped. I guess I just have a lot of resentment for the father. Weren't there drug charges against the mother in the past though? That wouldn't show up on her record?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 18, 2009, 03:23:45 PM
Am I the only won that thinks that maybe just maybe mm did NOT kill shaniya. I just don't see anyone who had done something so horrific turning themselves in. I just don't think a murderer would walk in and turn hisself in. And say here I am and yes I kidnapped shaniya. But I did not kill her. Idk jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 03:26:24 PM
I think they are waiting to file charges until they determine time and cause of death as well as jurisdiction.

This morning they said that the crime started in Fayetteville and proceeded to other areas,
so it is possible that Fayetteville could prosecute parts of the crime and other agencies could
prosecute other parts.

They mentioned a whole string of counties and law enforcement agencies involved, including the FBI.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 03:26:42 PM
So this is why McNeil admitted to kidnapping Shaniya. He admits guilt to the lesser crime and then only serves part of the sentence that he actually should be serving, just like he is used to doing. If they can't prove that he actually killed the girl, then they will just convict him on kidnapping.
Hi Rach, I have said several times that I don't think there was a hand off, the one in jail is the one. He admitted to the kidnapping to try to dodge the rape murder of a child. The latter charge results in certain death, by the state or fellow inmates, one way or another, he will die for it, the kidnapping is a lesser charge and I think he was going to blame the mother fully.. a "no, she gave me the kid to take to so and so, said they was gonna watch her" something like that. that explains the smirk on his nasty face. it was his thoughts of  "I am smarter then you, you can't prove anything more then I carried her in and out of there, but I know what I did" . He only admitted to that to get the results I have been seeing, "he wouldn't have admitted to kidnapping if he killed her". Yes he would, it is a lesser charge and one that any good defense attorney could get him out of.

Hi sis! Maybe his DNA on the wrong place on her body might take the smirk right off his face.

I sure hope so. I hope they have so much DNA/ physical evidence against him that he has not even room to wiggle is little toe.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 18, 2009, 03:28:51 PM
Am I the only won that thinks that maybe just maybe mm did NOT kill shaniya. I just don't see anyone who had done something so horrific turning themselves in. I just don't think a murderer would walk in and turn hisself in. And say here I am and yes I kidnapped shaniya. But I did not kill her. Idk jmo

I really think he did it in his own defense. Maybe he found out about the Amber Alert and knew that he would be caught. By that time he was already on CNN and probably would be on America's Most Wanted by Saturday. Maybe he didn't want to go on the run and knew there was little evidence against him. He seems to have a history of getting away with things. Maybe he thought he could play the system for a fool again.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 03:32:49 PM
Janet - You're welcome! 

It *could be* that MMs family is involved, LE hasn't said.  And the other two McNeill's that have recently been arrested, I don't know yet if they are related to MM or not. 

I find it interesting tho that one McNeill (age 56) was arrested the same day as MM (on the 13th), with no mention about him in this case.  (petty violation charges, no bond). 

Then MM, altho being "extremely uncooperative" with LE, admitted to the kidnapping and "gave some info" to LE. 

Three days later after MMs arrest, (on the 16th), the BOLO was put out to the public, with barely enough info for the public to know what they were looking for.  ("a man about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota".)

Then the next day (on the 17th) the other McNeill was arrested, (age 51), with no mention about him in this case.  (petty violation charges, no bond). 

After that, not another word mentioned by LE or media about the BOLO, the man or the car. 

And then Shaniya's body was found. 

All interesting timing re the three McNeill's.  Are they all involved with this case?  Dunno yet.  Wouldn't be at all surprised tho.

IMO. 


Just a guess, but Mario may have had help disposing of the body. Like, maybe where a good place might be. He doesn't exactly look like a deer hunter to me, so maybe he didn't know about the place she was left. JMO

I agree Miss Fanny.  I think we are not seeing anymore charges right now because they are investigating the human trafficking angle and also the child prostitution angle.  I think the jurisdiction has to do with the Feds as well as State and Local LE.  NC is supposed to be a huge stop on the human trafficking train..so they may have gotten this info from other RSO's being interviewed.  I didn't see where they had interviewed any..but I would be amazed to find they didn't.  I also think picking up the other McNeils was so they could question them too about all this.  They may also have evidence of other men abusing this child. 
I think they want to make sure they have an air tight case due to the case being as it is, you know, such a disgusting act and all.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 03:36:26 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.

Rachcresp,

The nursing home screened that greedy mother, an extensive background search, and her history was perfect...

If Brad did a background search he would have had the same results...her record was spotless.

Antonnette is a greedy and ugly humor being, that isn't on the record search.

That was what the nursing home "said" they did. She had a record and it wasn't spotless. And I doubt if the father did one either, IF she was a baby sitter. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 18, 2009, 03:37:07 PM
This story is so hard...As we all sit here and read we can all surly see how this could have been prevented and it sickens us. We can all plainly see the dad made a very poor choice, some would call it stupid, I will say it was reckless at best. Poor little girl. But you know, her dad didn't sell her or rape her or kidnap her or killer her. It appears from what we know now, he didn't really do that much for her and he sucked as a father.
Finding blame is natural, we all need to know who to blame and why so it will seem we have some kind of control so it never happens to someone we love.  I think I am not placing blaming with him because I ask myself this question. If he had known then what he knows now would he have done something differently or still sent her? I think not because his daughter died and it is obvious he didn't want that to happen. I ask myself that same question about the mom and MM and I truly think the only thing they would have done differently is to change what made them get caught. They had not one ounce of regard for this child. they used her, they sold her, they made money off her body. I don't think they could give a rats bottom she is dead. That is who I blame.
The dad? He should not have anymore children, he really is not good at it. A vasectomy maybe in order for him. jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 18, 2009, 03:38:04 PM
Yeah maybe so I just don't understand why le would say sex trafficking and that other stuff. I mean did someone tell le that is what was going on? If not why not just say kidnapping and murder since he had her. I don't mean to seem dumb just asking so maybe I can get a better understanding.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 03:40:08 PM
Has this been posted?

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7125838

Scammer raising money in Shaniya's Name
Updated at 03:11 PM today
Investigation


FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- The Fayetteville Police Department says it's investigating a tip that a scammer is attempting to raise money in the name of Shaniya Davis.

The man was seen in the area of McPherson Church Road and Skibo Road. He's described as a white male wearing a grey sweatshirt and a dark hat who was holding a piece of cardboard which said he was collecting money for Shaniya.

Police said he was attempting to collect money from passing motorists. When asked, he told one motorist that he was collecting money for the Fayetteville Police Department. The motorist noted that the man stuttered.

The Fayetteville Police Department says it's not collecting money on behalf of Shaniya Davis.

It's asking anybody that knows the identity of the man to call the Fayetteville Police Department at (910) 433-1585 or Crimestoppers at (910) 483-TIPS.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 03:40:51 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.

Rachcresp,

The nursing home screened that greedy mother, an extensive background search, and her history was perfect...

If Brad did a background search he would have had the same results...her record was spotless.

Antonnette is a greedy and ugly humor being, that isn't on the record search.

That was what the nursing home "said" they did. She had a record and it wasn't spotless. And I doubt if the father did one either, IF she was a baby sitter. JMO

I'll bet a pretty that she has a street name and a family name.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 18, 2009, 03:47:53 PM
This story is so hard...As we all sit here and read we can all surly see how this could have been prevented and it sickens us. We can all plainly see the dad made a very poor choice, some would call it stupid, I will say it was reckless at best. Poor little girl. But you know, her dad didn't sell her or rape her or kidnap her or killer her. It appears from what we know now, he didn't really do that much for her and he sucked as a father.
Finding blame is natural, we all need to know who to blame and why so it will seem we have some kind of control so it never happens to someone we love.  I think I am not placing blaming with him because I ask myself this question. If he had known then what he knows now would he have done something differently or still sent her? I think not because his daughter died and it is obvious he didn't want that to happen. I ask myself that same question about the mom and MM and I truly think the only thing they would have done differently is to change what made them get caught. They had not one ounce of regard for this child. they used her, they sold her, they made money off her body. I don't think they could give a rats bottom she is dead. That is who I blame.
The dad? He should not have anymore children, he really is not good at it. A vasectomy maybe in order for him. jmo

You've got a great point. I am not going to place blame anymore. This whole situation angers me so much but you are right, placing blame on the dad isn't going to bring her back.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 18, 2009, 03:57:53 PM
I did not know this, but evidently Brad is engaged, did anyone else read that or hear that? If true maybe the fiance didn't want Shaniya around, that may be a reason why Brad was going to give Shaniya's mom a chance of being a mom. That chance of being a mom doesn't make to much sense, since she was already being a mom to a seven year old. And it appears that the aunt carried for and loved Shania so I don't know.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 04:01:35 PM
Am I the only won that thinks that maybe just maybe mm did NOT kill shaniya. I just don't see anyone who had done something so horrific turning themselves in. I just don't think a murderer would walk in and turn hisself in. And say here I am and yes I kidnapped shaniya. But I did not kill her. Idk jmo

I think the surveillance pics were already out by the time he turned himself in. So he couldn't get out of the kidnapping part. The look on his face says "Prove it" as far as the murder in his booking picture. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 04:03:11 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.

Rachcresp,

The nursing home screened that greedy mother, an extensive background search, and her history was perfect...

If Brad did a background search he would have had the same results...her record was spotless.

Antonnette is a greedy and ugly humor being, that isn't on the record search.

That was what the nursing home "said" they did. She had a record and it wasn't spotless. And I doubt if the father did one either, IF she was a baby sitter. JMO

I'll bet a pretty that she has a street name and a family name.

Sure to have had many alias. She wasn't a hooker and a druggie for that long with no record. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 04:03:25 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.

Rachcresp,

The nursing home screened that greedy mother, an extensive background search, and her history was perfect...

If Brad did a background search he would have had the same results...her record was spotless.

Antonnette is a greedy and ugly humor being, that isn't on the record search.

That was what the nursing home "said" they did. She had a record and it wasn't spotless. And I doubt if the father did one either, IF she was a baby sitter. JMO
Sis, with everything happening, I just noticed you've changed!!!  Where is your butt?? I need that diet!!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 04:06:11 PM
Am I the only won that thinks that maybe just maybe mm did NOT kill shaniya. I just don't see anyone who had done something so horrific turning themselves in. I just don't think a murderer would walk in and turn hisself in. And say here I am and yes I kidnapped shaniya. But I did not kill her. Idk jmo

I think the surveillance pics were already out by the time he turned himself in. So he couldn't get out of the kidnapping part. The look on his face says "Prove it" as far as the murder in his booking picture. JMO

I agree Fanny


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 04:14:44 PM
Am I the only won that thinks that maybe just maybe mm did NOT kill shaniya. I just don't see anyone who had done something so horrific turning themselves in. I just don't think a murderer would walk in and turn hisself in. And say here I am and yes I kidnapped shaniya. But I did not kill her. Idk jmo

I think the surveillance pics were already out by the time he turned himself in. So he couldn't get out of the kidnapping part. The look on his face says "Prove it" as far as the murder in his booking picture. JMO

Ok, Im getting skeered.. we have agreed on a lot in this case, including this. are you reading my notes again  ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 18, 2009, 04:15:56 PM
Originally Posted by momof2boys 
I just wanted to post this to let you guys know I have been down in Fayetteville all day today trying to figure this out and been to courthouse and looked at all the stuff that is public knowledge and this is what I have found.

Brenda Adell Davis is the Aunt. DOB 6/7/89 The address on Wall Street that was raided was 119 Wall. This lady does not have a criminal record at all. She owns no vehicles.

Carey Lockhart address is 295 Shadsford Blvd and is the correct school district for Morganton Elem. She owns this house as well as 2004 Jeep.

Brad Lockhart as we know lives on Lester. He owns a 05 Yukon and 93 Cadi. Has a criminal history that also past of domestic violence.

Mr. Mcneil has extensive criminal history and owns 5 vehicles so this is how both Mom and Aunt got around.

I have talked to alot of folks here and lots of people are thinking there is alot more to the story than is being release. Some think Mom has nothing to do with this and McNeil took the child. I am not sure I just dont want to guess and make assumtions only the truth. Hope this helps.  ( from ws)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 04:24:28 PM
Hi guys this is the sickest one yet IMO
I'm still back on the first thread catching up but what i have noticed is the pics:
she is definitely wearing some type of shoe and to me they look to be almost netted like jelly shoes like these ones but with a more criss cross hole design
http://www.zappos.com/skechers-kids-s-lights-jujees-toddler-youth-clear-pvc
as far as the number on the elevator i think it is a 5 ... maybe a 3 but definitely a single digit and it should have braile next to it (i think it is a law)
and as far as how this all went down i am not convinced that the guy carrying her was the one that raped her... actual sex trafficking is set up thru agent type people and someone gets in touch with a pimp and arranges the meeting... and when it is actual child trafficking it is not the same type of pimping as regular adult prostitutes these johns are almost always high up in society...
as far as the mother here is my take on it and no i have not read all the articles or facts but.... i think she came across someone who facilitates these child sex encounters and he said blah blah blah better money in kids... i think she knew months ahead of time exactly what she was going to do when she got shaniya... and i think that the fbi was called in to break the ring... these are not regular people that partake in child trafficking it is a very organized enterprise and the guy carrying her was probably the "driver" so to speak. I want to know who they were meeting there...
back to the pics i'm on the fence with the timing... the middle one is definitely at a different time then the other 2
reasons i think middle is on the way in.... sleepy look and wearing shoes and doesn't look like she is carrying any animal
and the other 2 pics she is crossing her ankles possibly from vaginal pain but i can't decide because she is lightly touching his shoulder as though she trusts him (or rather doesn't distrust him yet is better wording) and is looking up at the elevator in anticipation like she is wondering where they are going
as far as the guy carrying her i just saw his court appearance and the f it look on his face kind of like yeah it happened but what can i say let's move on look i also see that same aura(?) in him in the 2 end pictures where as in the middle picture it almost looks by his body motion(?) that he is looking at her with sympathy for what he is about to do/// it kind of seems to me he thinks he is not guilty because he was just doing his job and he is just a driver...
this case reminds me of "gardens of the night" a movie with tom arnold in it all about child sex trade.... disgusting
there have been times that i had almost hoped that the plot in the movie was what happened to haleigh cummings but after thinkiing it over i'd rather hope she is with god...
i hope these people rot in hell
and if i am right about them meeting a 3rd person in the hotel room and those are bruises on her face (it makes me sick saying this but maybe she was putting up a fight and the john went to far beating her about the head area to make her calm down and that is what lead to her death then you can bet your money that this john will be punished for drawing attention to the sex ring
also especially in children head trauma's lead to concusions at best and usually vomitting

i read that she was found in shirt only so where are the shoes... please don't tell me this sick bastard kept them... i don't see him or her carrying them and i just looked again and in fact i think i just changed my mind about coming and going
JERSEY
what is she wearing as under garment in the pic with shoes that comes halfway down her thigh... about 2 shades lighter then her skin...

sorry for the rambling guys


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 18, 2009, 04:27:49 PM
Probably posted already.... I am slow  ::Baseball::
Published: 01:03 PM, Wed Nov 18, 2009
Police warn of scam involving Shaniya Davis caseBy Drew Brooks
Staff writer

 Fayetteville police are warning residents about a scam involving subjects soliciting money in the name of Shaniya Davis.

Police said a man in the area of McPherson Church and Skibo roads was holding a sign indicating he was collecting money for Shaniya from passing motorists.

"It's just a play on people's sympathy," said Sgt. John Somerindyke. "There's a lot of interest in the case. These scam artists know that and are going to try and take advantage of it."

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953325


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 18, 2009, 04:33:58 PM
I don't know if any one asked these question's.  I have been trying to get approved on this site.  So hello everyone!  I think scared monkey checks more than some parents.
I am trying to make sense of giving this lovely child to the mom.  I can't.  I don't understand why any of this happened.
1.  They didn't know she was not going to school?  Didn't anyone ask "hey what did you do in school this week? Learn any new songs, homework or friends?"  Don't we all love those silly songs?
2.  What did the dads friend mean when he said a "way out" of giving child to mom?  Strange choice of words to me.  What was he trying to get a "way  out" of?
3.  How could dad kick the daughter out?  The grandparents were raising her I thought.
4.  Everyone knew mom prostitute but dad still give daughter?  Lets see the brother, sister, friend and children's grandparent all knew this.  The dad still thought give mom a chance why?  That just seems that is a bad situation for a child to be thrown into.
5.  What was that about on NG?  Coming out not to talk just hang on son?
Just my thoughts on another senseless crime against yet another child.
 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 04:33:58 PM
Am I the only won that thinks that maybe just maybe mm did NOT kill shaniya. I just don't see anyone who had done something so horrific turning themselves in. I just don't think a murderer would walk in and turn hisself in. And say here I am and yes I kidnapped shaniya. But I did not kill her. Idk jmo

I think the surveillance pics were already out by the time he turned himself in. So he couldn't get out of the kidnapping part. The look on his face says "Prove it" as far as the murder in his booking picture. JMO

Ok, Im getting skeered.. we have agreed on a lot in this case, including this. are you reading my notes again  ::MonkeyKiss::
i agree with both of you... he has a definite look of prove it or "i just delivered her"


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 04:35:26 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.

Rachcresp,

The nursing home screened that greedy mother, an extensive background search, and her history was perfect...

If Brad did a background search he would have had the same results...her record was spotless.

Antonnette is a greedy and ugly humor being, that isn't on the record search.

That was what the nursing home "said" they did. She had a record and it wasn't spotless. And I doubt if the father did one either, IF she was


Fanny Mae,

Do you have evidence that AD at 20 yrs. old she had a record when he hired her to babysit?
You must know something more...did you work at the nursing home?  You must have ESP!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 18, 2009, 04:37:55 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 04:44:02 PM
I don't know if any one asked these question's.  I have been trying to get approved on this site.  So hello everyone!  I think scared monkey checks more than some parents.
I am trying to make sense of giving this lovely child to the mom.  I can't.  I don't understand why any of this happened.
1.  They didn't know she was not going to school?  Didn't anyone ask "hey what did you do in school this week? Learn any new songs, homework or friends?"  Don't we all love those silly songs?
2.  What did the dads friend mean when he said a "way out" of giving child to mom?  Strange choice of words to me.  What was he trying to get a "way  out" of?
3.  How could dad kick the daughter out?  The grandparents were raising her I thought.
4.  Everyone knew mom prostitute but dad still give daughter?  Lets see the brother, sister, friend and children's grandparent all knew this.  The dad still thought give mom a chance why?  That just seems that is a bad situation for a child to be thrown into.
5.  What was that about on NG?  Coming out not to talk just hang on son?


.
Just my thoughts on another senseless crime against yet another child.
 





Good questions, Michelle,

AD and Aunt Carrie, apparently, didn't see eye to eye, maybe, AD didn't accept her phone calls. AD may have had caller ID
a cell phone, so Carrie wasn't able to ask "Shaniya did you learn anything at Kindergarden?"

Why someone didn't call for "wellness visit" from the Cops is bewildering or call the a custodian, anyone, neighbors, it is
so easy to call neighbors with reverse addresses.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 04:45:42 PM
I don't know if any one asked these question's.  I have been trying to get approved on this site.  So hello everyone!  I think scared monkey checks more than some parents.
I am trying to make sense of giving this lovely child to the mom.  I can't.  I don't understand why any of this happened.
1.  They didn't know she was not going to school?  Didn't anyone ask "hey what did you do in school this week? Learn any new songs, homework or friends?"  Don't we all love those silly songs?
2.  What did the dads friend mean when he said a "way out" of giving child to mom?  Strange choice of words to me.  What was he trying to get a "way  out" of?
3.  How could dad kick the daughter out?  The grandparents were raising her I thought.
4.  Everyone knew mom prostitute but dad still give daughter?  Lets see the brother, sister, friend and children's grandparent all knew this.  The dad still thought give mom a chance why?  That just seems that is a bad situation for a child to be thrown into.
5.  What was that about on NG?  Coming out not to talk just hang on son?
Just my thoughts on another senseless crime against yet another child.
 


hi and welcome...
not definite answers but my take on some of your questions:
where i come from prostitutes get their babies back from dss all the time... we know that dad litterally had custody but maybe not legally???? unless they went to court on it already which i have no clue but unless they did then technically the mother has the physical custodial rights and dad has no visitation rights... maybe she was saying how together she had it and she would take shaniya legally unless he cooperated and handed her over... if she was on the straight and narrow she could have built a good case to gain full custody and he might end up with slim to no visits... dss never cares about a persons past only the current
maybe he figured she would get sick of the burden and would return her????
as far as him not talking to ng i am glad he hasn't at least nancy can't persecute him this way... she is being nice now and hasn't touched on all the why did you let her go questions but she would.... whatever his reason for sending her there he made the biggest mistake ever and he will know it for the rest of his life... even if he did it for selfish reasons he has paid the ultimate price and it should just be left at that... i hope everyone leaves him alone


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 04:51:16 PM
Maybe he should start doing a background check on his babysitters.

Rachcresp,

The nursing home screened that greedy mother, an extensive background search, and her history was perfect...

If Brad did a background search he would have had the same results...her record was spotless.

Antonnette is a greedy and ugly humor being, that isn't on the record search.

That was what the nursing home "said" they did. She had a record and it wasn't spotless. And I doubt if the father did one either, IF she was a baby sitter. JMO
Sis, with everything happening, I just noticed you've changed!!!  Where is your butt?? I need that diet!!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked::

O/T Never fear. The butt's still here. That is Gertrude and Albert, my concrete geese that have more clothes than I do. ::MonkeyDevil2::

They are mad about what happened to Shaniya too. Even geese have more sense than some humans.  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 05:05:19 PM
Am I the only won that thinks that maybe just maybe mm did NOT kill shaniya. I just don't see anyone who had done something so horrific turning themselves in. I just don't think a murderer would walk in and turn hisself in. And say here I am and yes I kidnapped shaniya. But I did not kill her. Idk jmo

I think the surveillance pics were already out by the time he turned himself in. So he couldn't get out of the kidnapping part. The look on his face says "Prove it" as far as the murder in his booking picture. JMO

Ok, Im getting skeered.. we have agreed on a lot in this case, including this. are you reading my notes again  ::MonkeyKiss::
i agree with both of you... he has a definite look of prove it or "i just delivered her"

Now I'm getting skeered! Even KLAAS agreed with me. I am not used to having so many Monkeys agreeing with me.  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/runcircles.gif)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 18, 2009, 05:13:52 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 18, 2009, 05:22:28 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 05:34:05 PM
OT: just got a tweet.. Elizabeth Olten's killer is named, and will stand trial as an adult! http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,575590,00.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 05:44:05 PM
OT: just got a tweet.. Elizabeth Olten's killer is named, and will stand trial as an adult! http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,575590,00.html

Eeerrr, I think you need to visit her thread.  ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 05:53:35 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

This tells me there was no hand off as I suspected. sick sick sick people they are. I hope they rot in he11 for what was done to that baby girl.. I am sure the big boys in prison will show him what it feels like to be assaulted like that. They will change his name for him to ben dover.
hhhm
 i disagree it says the opposite tome and does suggest a hand off
it says she sold her to a man for sexual servitude translation... sex slave ... the owner owns the slave and the slave works for the owner by making money thru other johns... if it was him that was having sex with her then it would have been the mother charged with forcing sexual servitude


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 05:57:53 PM
OT: just got a tweet.. Elizabeth Olten's killer is named, and will stand trial as an adult! http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,575590,00.html

Eeerrr, I think you need to visit her thread.  ::MonkeyDevil2::

Day late n dollar short??  I couldn't, I have so many windows open I cant keep up as it is...research ya know.. ugggg


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 06:03:28 PM
Rumor?  posted in the comment section:

http://www.wral.com/golo/blogpost/6444425/

11:01 PM
Nov 17, 2009

Brad was also 28 at the time, his wife was murdered and he had four kids to raise by himself without a mother for them. I want you all to understand this, he saw how much his children missed having a mother and when Shaniya was born he hoped her mother would rise to the occasion and try to be a mother to Shaniya. He did that for Shaniya. The mother was not someone he picked up in a bar, she was a former babysitter of his kids. They had a very, very brief encounter and Shaniya was made. Brad loved Shaniya and always was protective of her, but he wanted her to also feel she had a mother, unlike his older children. Please, stop your judgements till you've walked in someones shoes.



Obviously, I disagree wholeheartedly.  No protective parent leaves his child with someone he barely knows.

She was a babysitter by day and what hooker by night? Or did daddy get a two for one deal? Or he just hit on the babysitter...I wouldn't have used that example to try and polish up his Image...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 18, 2009, 06:04:28 PM
Mother of Slain 5-Year-Old Is Pregnant
Antoinette Davis is accused of selling her daughter as a sex slave


Newser) – The North Carolina woman accused of selling her 5-year-old girl into sexual slavery—the girl's body was found yesterday—is pregnant. Antoinette Davis, 25, is being isolated from other prisoners as a result, reports WTVD. She has not entered a plea to charges of human trafficking, prostitution, and child abuse. Police say she sold young Shaniya to a man for "sexual servitude." Volunteers found Shaniya's body yesterday, and the man remains in custody, though not yet charged.

http://www.newser.com/story/74256/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-is-pregnant.html

This tells me there was no hand off as I suspected. sick sick sick people they are. I hope they rot in he11 for what was done to that baby girl.. I am sure the big boys in prison will show him what it feels like to be assaulted like that. They will change his name for him to ben dover.
hhhm
 i disagree it says the opposite tome and does suggest a hand off
it says she sold her to a man for sexual servitude translation... sex slave ... the owner owns the slave and the slave works for the owner by making money thru other johns... if it was him that was having sex with her then it would have been the mother charged with forcing sexual servitude
The mother *was* charged with sexual servitude, wasn't she?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 06:04:44 PM
Allalone, do you mean add charges for taking drugs while pregnant?  There is no such crime as far as I know.


Endangering the life of a fetus is a crime in some states, I think.
yup but only after 20 weeks ( i think)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 06:06:35 PM
Endangering the life of a fetus hasn't been a crime since Roe v. Wade.
right but it is illegal to abort after a certain week of pregnancy (i think 20)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 06:08:48 PM
OT: just got a tweet.. Elizabeth Olten's killer is named, and will stand trial as an adult! http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,575590,00.html

Eeerrr, I think you need to visit her thread.  ::MonkeyDevil2::

Day late n dollar short??  I couldn't, I have so many windows open I cant keep up as it is...research ya know.. ugggg

I know what you mean about too many windows. Some days are slow as molasses but this hasn't been one of them.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 06:09:59 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

Did you notice the hug/slash choke hold daddy had on his boy last night, looked like a not so gentle reminder to me....although I don't see him as an abuser I would guess he could be a bit of a bully.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 18, 2009, 06:12:44 PM
Good Morning Monks.  I am really confused about Brad......when his son was on NG last night and he came out and put his arms around his son I got that Hinky feeling. Then after the break he was sitting in a chair next to his son but didn't talk. I got the impression he was there to make sure his son didn't say something he wasn't supposed to say. I felt he had been sitting inside watching the show and something his son said raised an alarm with him. It was just freaking weird to see him strolling up behind his son while the show was going on...hugging and kissing this 20 yo over and over.  I have not commented on my feeling about Brad, mainly because I am not sure what I think....but this really made the hairs on my arms stand up and say WTF.



The father came out shortly after his son made this statement.....maybe the son was giving too much info..........

And my father recently gave her -- Antoinette a chance to -- give the mother a second chance to raise her daughter. I mean, because everybody deserves a second chance. Just like a convicted felon, I mean, he deserves a second chance because he could have changed. You never know.


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/17/ng.01.html


I'm getting the impression that the father may have just decided to let that filthy mother take care of Shaniya and now is trying to evade responsibility for doing that....

Thanks N2W

Just wanted to say I agree with both of you on this.  It reminded me of Ron and Misty.  Then the part of him giving Antoinette a second chance, what is that about, except control.  It's not really up to him whether she got a second chance(Is he using something to control her).  Wouldn't that be up to a court to decide and if not, then why not? I want to know when did he give her the first chance and did she blow it.  I'm not defending the Mom but the human trafficking issue is really puzzling because that is a huge business and we are not seeing the whole picture.  Human traffickers are getting filthy rich off their filthy deeds.  When I look at this situation overall I get the feeling that some are a whole lot better off than the deplorable conditions of others and what are the connections between the two ends of the spectrum. How would such a bright, beautiful, innocent little girl all of a sudden end up in such a disgusting and deplorable situation?  Sorry if I have offended anyone but the whole thing is not a pretty picture it just gets uglier with each passing day.   I do believe some that some very hard questions are going to be asked in order to get to the truth. I have many more questions but will let it rest for now.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sweets7881 on November 18, 2009, 06:19:45 PM
I believe trhat this mother had this planned from the begining. She knew what she was doing. I'm just so puzzeled at the fact Shanaia's father let this crazy mother have custody of her. If everything was going so well with her in his custody, why put that huge change in the little girls life. And another thing, did anyone think the way he acted on Nancy Grace last night was kind of "set up"? I mean he knew his son was doing the interview plently of time before he came out. I think he know's more than he is letting on. (I hope im not going over board here). I just have a bad feeling about him?? Can anyone else way in on this, because I may be thinking totally offtrack!?!  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sweets7881 on November 18, 2009, 06:23:13 PM
Good Morning Monks.  I am really confused about Brad......when his son was on NG last night and he came out and put his arms around his son I got that Hinky feeling. Then after the break he was sitting in a chair next to his son but didn't talk. I got the impression he was there to make sure his son didn't say something he wasn't supposed to say. I felt he had been sitting inside watching the show and something his son said raised an alarm with him. It was just freaking weird to see him strolling up behind his son while the show was going on...hugging and kissing this 20 yo over and over.  I have not commented on my feeling about Brad, mainly because I am not sure what I think....but this really made the hairs on my arms stand up and say WTF.

Guess I should have read further down! It seem's im not the only one feeling this way! I got that same feeling too! And the son, (which I think had abosolutly nothing to do with this) just kept looking back at his dad like "what are you doing"? Weird!! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 06:36:53 PM
I don't know if any one asked these question's.  I have been trying to get approved on this site.  So hello everyone!  I think scared monkey checks more than some parents.
I am trying to make sense of giving this lovely child to the mom.  I can't.  I don't understand why any of this happened.
1.  They didn't know she was not going to school?  Didn't anyone ask "hey what did you do in school this week? Learn any new songs, homework or friends?"  Don't we all love those silly songs?
2.  What did the dads friend mean when he said a "way out" of giving child to mom?  Strange choice of words to me.  What was he trying to get a "way  out" of?
3.  How could dad kick the daughter out?  The grandparents were raising her I thought.
4.  Everyone knew mom prostitute but dad still give daughter?  Lets see the brother, sister, friend and children's grandparent all knew this.  The dad still thought give mom a chance why?  That just seems that is a bad situation for a child to be thrown into.
5.  What was that about on NG?  Coming out not to talk just hang on son?
Just my thoughts on another senseless crime against yet another child.
 



Welcome  ::MonkeyAngel:: michelle1111, and all the new Monkeys..
I can't make sense of anything, my mom used to say an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, in this case the outcome was tragic. I have only really addressed the hands off disinterested approach of her primary care giver. They will be living in their own hell though.
As for the egg donor and her cohorts I would be banned forever if I began to expound on these pieces of filth.
You came to the right site though a burden shared is a burden halved, I don't know what I would do if I couldn't come here and rant.

Love my Monkeys  ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 06:37:19 PM
The 911 call on NG right now, I swore when AD was describing what Shaniya was wearing she started to say "she was wearing a blue velvet..... a blue shirt"

I think she damn well knew she was wearing the blue velvet dress we are seeing in the elevator images as she dressed up nice and pretty. 
i don't know anything as to if that is a dress but i thought it strange that she started to give detail about the underwear she said white with little pink and then stopped and said actually i can't remember some design on them... i have never known what underwear my kids were wearing even when i was the one to dress them... makes me wonder if she remembered the white with pink design because it was what was requested she wear


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sweets7881 on November 18, 2009, 06:39:18 PM
Rumor?  posted in the comment section:

http://www.wral.com/golo/blogpost/6444425/

11:01 PM
Nov 17, 2009

Brad was also 28 at the time, his wife was murdered and he had four kids to raise by himself without a mother for them. I want you all to understand this, he saw how much his children missed having a mother and when Shaniya was born he hoped her mother would rise to the occasion and try to be a mother to Shaniya. He did that for Shaniya. The mother was not someone he picked up in a bar, she was a former babysitter of his kids. They had a very, very brief encounter and Shaniya was made. Brad loved Shaniya and always was protective of her, but he wanted her to also feel she had a mother, unlike his older children. Please, stop your judgements till you've walked in someones shoes.



Obviously, I disagree wholeheartedly.  No protective parent leaves his child with someone he barely knows.

She was a babysitter by day and what hooker by night? Or did daddy get a two for one deal? Or he just hit on the babysitter...I wouldn't have used that example to try and polish up his Image...

Yeah Im in agreeance with the last 2 posts, I know I would not leave my child with anyone I don't trust with my childs life. Yes a tragedy the other childrens mother died, but why break the little girl away from the normal life she knew with her siblings? I think taking her out of that situation would be worse for her? And he knew what this woman was and what she was about. That's why he had custody of her in the first place right?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 06:40:26 PM
Jesus! how many times does the mom <<<used loosely>>> have to tell 911 that Shaniya knew how to unlock the doors! NG  just said it ! she must be logged onto here! tee hee!

anyways...I believe that the mom meant the 5:30 p.m. time till the operator corrected her...someone else on here had said this earlier as well...
or when she is asked if the doors were unlocked and she says no but she could reach them... the op was clearly asking if they were unlocked in the am ... but the mother just kept saying no they were locked but she can reach and unlock it....what did she unlock the doors and then lock them behind her after she left....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 06:49:17 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 06:50:38 PM
I believe trhat this mother had this planned from the begining. She knew what she was doing. I'm just so puzzeled at the fact Shanaia's father let this crazy mother have custody of her. If everything was going so well with her in his custody, why put that huge change in the little girls life. And another thing, did anyone think the way he acted on Nancy Grace last night was kind of "set up"? I mean he knew his son was doing the interview plently of time before he came out. I think he know's more than he is letting on. (I hope im not going over board here). I just have a bad feeling about him?? Can anyone else way in on this, because I may be thinking totally offtrack!?!  ::MonkeyConfused::


I agree, she may well have had this planned from the moment she said "you will never see her again" As she was pregnant and couldn't work she decided to "pimp" her daughter. I hope her little boy wasn't mishandled like that, this is someone who should be sterilized just in case some do gooder lets her out in 15 years.
What a filthy wretch of a so called mother.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 06:57:47 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.


Wonder where they got those deer carcasses?  Only doe season is open here.  Maybe somebody
worked at a processor where they dressed deer for hunters who had killed them.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 18, 2009, 06:58:39 PM
The 911 call on NG right now, I swore when AD was describing what Shaniya was wearing she started to say "she was wearing a blue velvet..... a blue shirt"

I think she damn well knew she was wearing the blue velvet dress we are seeing in the elevator images as she dressed up nice and pretty. 
i don't know anything as to if that is a dress but i thought it strange that she started to give detail about the underwear she said white with little pink and then stopped and said actually i can't remember some design on them... i have never known what underwear my kids were wearing even when i was the one to dress them... makes me wonder if she remembered the white with pink design because it was what was requested she wear

I thought the same thing.  When my kiddos were little, I would have been hard put most of the time to tell anyone exactly what they were wearing on a given day... even if I dressed them ... precisely as you said.  And certainly not their underwear.... it just wasn't something worth noting every day.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: N2WISHN on November 18, 2009, 06:59:51 PM
4getUnot

How would such a bright, beautiful, innocent little girl all of a sudden end up in such a disgusting and deplorable situation?  Sorry if I have offended anyone but the whole thing is not a pretty picture it just gets uglier with each passing day.   I do believe some that some very hard questions are going to be asked in order to get to the truth. I have many more questions but will let it rest for now.


And your question is really haunting me too......


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: N2WISHN on November 18, 2009, 07:01:21 PM
JVM is talking about all the negative remarks made by family and friends.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 07:01:43 PM
http://www.examiner.com/x-28599-Crime--Media-Examiner~y2009m11d17-Shaniya-Davis-searcher-describes-finding-body

The searcher make this statement that they heard "the guy admitted to killing her and dumping her somewhere near deer carcasses and trash".

So maybe he- MAM admitted to it but will not give further info to not implicate anyone else?  But if there is anyone else's DNA on her body I bet they are worried right about now.

Sick SOB's I hope they all rot.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sweets7881 on November 18, 2009, 07:03:08 PM
I believe trhat this mother had this planned from the begining. She knew what she was doing. I'm just so puzzeled at the fact Shanaia's father let this crazy mother have custody of her. If everything was going so well with her in his custody, why put that huge change in the little girls life. And another thing, did anyone think the way he acted on Nancy Grace last night was kind of "set up"? I mean he knew his son was doing the interview plently of time before he came out. I think he know's more than he is letting on. (I hope im not going over board here). I just have a bad feeling about him?? Can anyone else way in on this, because I may be thinking totally offtrack!?!  ::MonkeyConfused::


I agree, she may well have had this planned from the moment she said "you will never see her again" As she was pregnant and couldn't work she decided to "pimp" her daughter. I hope her little boy wasn't mishandled like that, this is someone who should be sterilized just in case some do gooder lets her out in 15 years.
What a filthy wretch of a so called mother.


Yes, you hit that on the head, saying what a filthy wretch of a so called mother!! Anywho, was it actually stated that she (the egg donor) was a prositute? I am a full time nursing student, and as much as i would love to be UTD on everything, some things I miss. It just boggles my mind, how a person that calls themself a mother, can think of prostituting her lil baby, and be okay with it? I mean jeez, have people not heard of actually working a REAL job? And I know I have heard the speculations, but was she a drug addict?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on November 18, 2009, 07:03:43 PM
The 911 call on NG right now, I swore when AD was describing what Shaniya was wearing she started to say "she was wearing a blue velvet..... a blue shirt"

I think she damn well knew she was wearing the blue velvet dress we are seeing in the elevator images as she dressed up nice and pretty. 
i don't know anything as to if that is a dress but i thought it strange that she started to give detail about the underwear she said white with little pink and then stopped and said actually i can't remember some design on them... i have never known what underwear my kids were wearing even when i was the one to dress them... makes me wonder if she remembered the white with pink design because it was what was requested she wear

I thought the same thing.  When my kiddos were little, I would have been hard put most of the time to tell anyone exactly what they were wearing on a given day... even if I dressed them ... precisely as you said.  And certainly not their underwear.... it just wasn't something worth noting every day.

Actually if she really was only sent with 2 days clothes, she was probably been wearing the same pair for weeks. By then those cretons may remember the dirty, filthy pair of white and pink undies. Makes me mad just to think of it


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 07:03:52 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.


Wonder where they got those deer carcasses?  Only doe season is open here.  Maybe somebody
worked at a processor where they dressed deer for hunters who had killed them.

I can imagine them stacking the deer carcasses around her to try and put the dogs off the scent but dogs trained to sniff out decomposing human bodies aren't fooled by that, I would think that an inexperienced handler may be inclined to pull the dogs away though when a visual inspection showed an animal carcass. Good job it didn't work.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 07:06:33 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.


That made me wonder if Shaniya was in a trash bag.  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 07:07:51 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.


Wonder where they got those deer carcasses?  Only doe season is open here.  Maybe somebody
worked at a processor where they dressed deer for hunters who had killed them.

2009 North Carolina Deer Hunting Season
Archery -    September 12 - October 2
Muzzle loading Firearm - October 10 - 16
Rifle Season -  October 17 - January 1

http://www.northeasternhunting.com/prices.html

I don't know why trash bags or if they actually mistook that for simply trash after reading the other articles about where she was found.  From the pictures Searching posted it almost looks like this was a hole dug to purposely put the carcasses in?  JMO 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 07:11:14 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.


Wonder where they got those deer carcasses?  Only doe season is open here.  Maybe somebody
worked at a processor where they dressed deer for hunters who had killed them.

I can imagine them stacking the deer carcasses around her to try and put the dogs off the scent but dogs trained to sniff out decomposing human bodies aren't fooled by that, I would think that an inexperienced handler may be inclined to pull the dogs away though when a visual inspection showed an animal carcass. Good job it didn't work.

yup, but see my other post where they heard he admitted to sticking her with deer carcasses?  The searcher said they knew of the spot and after visually not seeing her pulled the dogs away until they heard. 

So exactly what you said until they heard he admitted to it?  That's what I hear on that video and the way it went down it looks valid to me.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 07:17:48 PM
Does HLN have the guy from the "Intervention" show on?  omg.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 07:19:16 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.


Wonder where they got those deer carcasses?  Only doe season is open here.  Maybe somebody
worked at a processor where they dressed deer for hunters who had killed them.

I can imagine them stacking the deer carcasses around her to try and put the dogs off the scent but dogs trained to sniff out decomposing human bodies aren't fooled by that, I would think that an inexperienced handler may be inclined to pull the dogs away though when a visual inspection showed an animal carcass. Good job it didn't work.

yup, but see my other post where they heard he admitted to sticking her with deer carcasses?  The searcher said they knew of the spot and after visually not seeing her pulled the dogs away until they heard. 

So exactly what you said until they heard he admitted to it?  That's what I hear on that video and the way it went down it looks valid to me.

Ooops..didn't see that, so the dogs were right the first go round. I didn't know it was a handler problem...

Thank you for pointing that out  fatcatlurker   ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 07:27:56 PM
Good Evening Monkeys & Guests,

Has this been posted?


snip.


Police searched McNeill's car, a 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, and took a black and yellow abblebottom jacket, size four, a pair of jeans, size 24 months, a plastic straw, swabbings, and soil samples.

According to search warrangs, McNeill admitted taking Davis from the front of her house to a hotel in Sanford.

It is unknown at this time what McNeill's connection is to the child, police say. April Autry tells NBC17 that she is McNeill's girlfriend and is friends with Shaniya's aunt.

McNeilll was on unsupervised probation when Davis went missing. McNeill has been charged multiple times since 2001. The charges include assault inflicting serious bodily injury, possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use and hitting a police officer with his car


snip.
http://news.mync.com/site/news/story/44291/amber-alert-authorities-search-for-missing-5-year-old-girl/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 07:29:00 PM
Welcome MICHELLE1111 & ANY OTHER NEW MONKEY I HAVE MISSED!!! ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 07:30:40 PM
Good Evening Monkeys & Guests,

Has this been posted?


snip.


Police searched McNeill's car, a 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, and took a black and yellow abblebottom jacket, size four, a pair of jeans, size 24 months, a plastic straw, swabbings, and soil samples.

According to search warrangs, McNeill admitted taking Davis from the front of her house to a hotel in Sanford.

It is unknown at this time what McNeill's connection is to the child, police say. April Autry tells NBC17 that she is McNeill's girlfriend and is friends with Shaniya's aunt.

McNeilll was on unsupervised probation when Davis went missing. McNeill has been charged multiple times since 2001. The charges include assault inflicting serious bodily injury, possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use and hitting a police officer with his car


snip.
http://news.mync.com/site/news/story/44291/amber-alert-authorities-search-for-missing-5-year-old-girl/

I don't remember seeing this before. Thanks!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 18, 2009, 07:32:43 PM
thanks for welcome.  Learning how to post no great


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 07:34:59 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.

New Monkey,

Could you give us your "source", please, about the Dad and your information? TIA


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 07:38:36 PM
Good Evening Monkeys & Guests,

Has this been posted?


snip.


Police searched McNeill's car, a 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, and took a black and yellow abblebottom jacket, size four, a pair of jeans, size 24 months, a plastic straw, swabbings, and soil samples.

According to search warrangs, McNeill admitted taking Davis from the front of her house to a hotel in Sanford.

It is unknown at this time what McNeill's connection is to the child, police say. April Autry tells NBC17 that she is McNeill's girlfriend and is friends with Shaniya's aunt.

McNeilll was on unsupervised probation when Davis went missing. McNeill has been charged multiple times since 2001. The charges include assault inflicting serious bodily injury, possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use and hitting a police officer with his car


snip.
http://news.mync.com/site/news/story/44291/amber-alert-authorities-search-for-missing-5-year-old-girl/

I don't remember seeing this before. Thanks!

Your welcome, I gleaned it from another site:)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 18, 2009, 07:43:24 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.

New Monkey,

Could you give us your "source", please, about the Dad and your information? TIA

Someone posted above about going to Fayetteville today and checking out the "players" in this nightmare.  This person either posted directly here or took something from over on WS and brought it here.  This person said she found where the father had a criminal background and domestic violence was included in that background.  It should be in this thread somewhere before I posted about it. 

Obviously, it is hearsay.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 18, 2009, 07:49:09 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.

New Monkey,

Could you give us your "source", please, about the Dad and your information? TIA

Page 18


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 18, 2009, 07:51:45 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

I may get banned for this but it's my opinion. It's seems like your on his jury, he's being tried and convicted, without proof. Since when do we convict on hearsay? This devil manipulated him, bs'd him, until I hear different, I'll not put him on trial.  Do you know for a fact Brad knew Shaniya was gonna be staying at that sewage pond? JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 18, 2009, 08:00:13 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.

New Monkey,

Could you give us your "source", please, about the Dad and your information? TIA

Someone posted above about going to Fayetteville today and checking out the "players" in this nightmare.  This person either posted directly here or took something from over on WS and brought it here.  This person said she found where the father had a criminal background and domestic violence was included in that background.  It should be in this thread somewhere before I posted about it. 

Obviously, it is hearsay.

Thanks...WS is strict about the truth, I will check over there..I hate BS...because it is so distracts from real information.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 18, 2009, 08:00:13 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

I may get banned for this but it's my opinion. It's seems like your on his jury, he's being tried and convicted, without proof. Since when do we convict on hearsay? This devil manipulated him, bs'd him, until I hear different, I'll not put him on trial.  Do you know for a fact Brad knew Shaniya was gonna be staying at that sewage pond? JMO
I'm entitled to my opinion the same as you.  Why do you continue to berate folks with differing opinions?  I'm not dissing you for yours.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 08:03:13 PM
Now I have a good question (IMO) Why is it that parents are just allowed to withdraw their kids from school without proving a child will be being homeschooled (with a curriculum plan as proof) or without the school that the child is being transferred to faxing for the request for information?  There have been far too many abuse cases out there where parents withdraw their kids, say they are moving, sometimes they do sometimes they don't, and the kid is beaten to death or starved to death or locked up for years, etc.  I mean I have heard so many cases of it I just have issues that there isn't some kind of law to protect the kids who have actually been enrolled from being in this type of situation again.  A lady I know,who has had so many CPS cases open, has had her kids removed twice, decided she was going to move and didn't want anyone to know where she was going so she withdrew her kids and didn't leave any type of forwarding to anybody, she didn't even tell her landlord she was moving, just up and did it.  I asked the school why they let her do that and they said that they couldn't stop her.  I was thinking that there should be something in place to help LE and CPS monitor these at risk kids and help protect those who haven't been discovered to be at risk yet but are at risk without us knowing.
you do not by law have to be in school until age 6... however when you are and then not it should ring bells and set off red flags


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 18, 2009, 08:05:43 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

I may get banned for this but it's my opinion. It's seems like your on his jury, he's being tried and convicted, without proof. Since when do we convict on hearsay? This devil manipulated him, bs'd him, until I hear different, I'll not put him on trial.  Do you know for a fact Brad knew Shaniya was gonna be staying at that sewage pond? JMO
I'm entitled to my opinion the same as you.  Why do you continue to berate folks with differing opinions?  I'm not dissing you for yours.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

I apologize if sounding like that.  My heart goes out to him, for his loss. I just want the truth. I didn't mean to be rude, sorry.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 08:07:51 PM
anybody know who  or what relation the guy they showed on Hln was to the family that talked about cigarette burns on a child?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 18, 2009, 08:18:05 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

I may get banned for this but it's my opinion. It's seems like your on his jury, he's being tried and convicted, without proof. Since when do we convict on hearsay? This devil manipulated him, bs'd him, until I hear different, I'll not put him on trial.  Do you know for a fact Brad knew Shaniya was gonna be staying at that sewage pond? JMO
I'm entitled to my opinion the same as you.  Why do you continue to berate folks with differing opinions?  I'm not dissing you for yours.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

I apologize if sounding like that.  My heart goes out to him, for his loss. I just want the truth. I didn't mean to be rude, sorry.

I think if it were my child I would know every inch of the home where my child would be staying but that's the type person I am,it just bothered me to see the nice home he lived in and what Shaniya was living in....I feel for the family and their loss....but it makes me angry that the dad was not more aware of the environment that his daughter was subject to.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 08:18:22 PM
anybody know who  or what relation the guy they showed on Hln was to the family that talked about cigarette burns on a child?

I think one of them was the father of Vicky, Brad's wife who was killed in the home invasion.
He and his wife had raised the children from that marriage.
The other man is a neighbor who Cheyenne lives with.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 18, 2009, 08:18:26 PM
In an affidavit for a warrant to search McNeill's 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, investigators said McNeill told them he picked Shaniya up in front of her home and drove her to the hotel. Investigators also said they found feces smeared on the outside door handle of the front door to the home and on the handrail of the steps to the front porch.

Police recovered 11 pieces of trace evidence, such as hair and fibers, from the car, as well as clothes, a belt, a straw, a cell phone and a portable GPS system, according to the search warrant.   ::MonkeyEek::  That's new, I never heard that McNeill picked Shaniya up in front of her home.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 18, 2009, 08:20:37 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

I may get banned for this but it's my opinion. It's seems like your on his jury, he's being tried and convicted, without proof. Since when do we convict on hearsay? This devil manipulated him, bs'd him, until I hear different, I'll not put him on trial.  Do you know for a fact Brad knew Shaniya was gonna be staying at that sewage pond? JMO

You won't get banned for having an opinion, mine is opposite to yours but we would defend your right to have your own beliefs. Even if I don't agree ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 18, 2009, 08:22:39 PM
In an affidavit for a warrant to search McNeill's 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, investigators said McNeill told them he picked Shaniya up in front of her home and drove her to the hotel. Investigators also said they found feces smeared on the outside door handle of the front door to the home and on the handrail of the steps to the front porch.

Police recovered 11 pieces of trace evidence, such as hair and fibers, from the car, as well as clothes, a belt, a straw, a cell phone and a portable GPS system, according to the search warrant.   ::MonkeyEek::  That's new, I never heard that McNeill picked Shaniya up in front of her home.

Very interesting....thank you for posting  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 08:24:06 PM
http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=002-8.flv

Here is the video.  Now the stuff comes out.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 08:26:14 PM
Seahorse Thank you for bringing that forward.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 18, 2009, 08:26:36 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

I may get banned for this but it's my opinion. It's seems like your on his jury, he's being tried and convicted, without proof. Since when do we convict on hearsay? This devil manipulated him, bs'd him, until I hear different, I'll not put him on trial.  Do you know for a fact Brad knew Shaniya was gonna be staying at that sewage pond? JMO

You won't get banned for having an opinion, mine is opposite to yours but we would defend your right to have your own beliefs. Even if I don't agree ::MonkeyDevil2::

I was not trying to start a monkey war  ::MonkeyDevil2:: ::MonkeyDevil2::when I posted about the fathers home..my emotions as well as other monkeys have been on overtime ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cecilita on November 18, 2009, 08:28:29 PM
Hello Monkeys...
Why NG says that the father did not know about the mother's addcition to maihuana....when the father's teen daughter told NG that she knew that she smoked pot.... and the teen was not to close to her...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 18, 2009, 08:29:22 PM
http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=002-8.flv

Here is the video.  Now the stuff comes out.
Thank-you


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 18, 2009, 08:31:34 PM
Hello Monkeys...
Why NG says that the father did not know about the mother's addcition to maihuana....when the father's teen daughter told NG that she knew that she smoked pot.... and the teen was not to close to her...

If i am not mistaken she also said that she did cocaine.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 08:32:39 PM
After listening to the father, his sister, his children, friend, and ex father -in-law I know longer feel sorry for Shaniya dad.. The father apparently having 5 children who he does not seem to have the time or quality time for them.. His father-in-law, Brad friend who now has taken in Cheyenne were willing to take in Shaniya then let her go live with the druggie prostitute and her trash of friends but Brad disregard the safety and well being of his daughter and let Shaniya go... What was going on in Brad's life to make this uncareing , selfish decision? Why would he not let Shaniya go to his friend's home or his ex Father-In-Law home? Apparently  brad you weren''t even checking in on Shaniya because you stated you did'nt even know she wasn't attending school..I have to agree with the father-in-law and say to Brad .. Shaniya would be here today but she isn't because of your hasty, careless, selfish, unloving decision to let her go live with the trash...This is something you will have to live with every minute of everyday of you life..
yet another time i wish i didn't post before i was totally caught up...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 18, 2009, 09:02:44 PM
testing  ::MonkeyJnBox:: where did everybody go ?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 18, 2009, 09:05:31 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

I may get banned for this but it's my opinion. It's seems like your on his jury, he's being tried and convicted, without proof. Since when do we convict on hearsay? This devil manipulated him, bs'd him, until I hear different, I'll not put him on trial.  Do you know for a fact Brad knew Shaniya was gonna be staying at that sewage pond? JMO

You won't get banned for having an opinion, mine is opposite to yours but we would defend your right to have your own beliefs. Even if I don't agree ::MonkeyDevil2::

I was not trying to start a monkey war  ::MonkeyDevil2:: ::MonkeyDevil2::when I posted about the fathers home..my emotions as well as other monkeys have been on overtime ::MonkeyAngel::

I agree, maybe I should go beat up on Alyssa.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 09:08:20 PM
Hi Penny,

I was really upset when I wrote that comment about the father..
We as parents are to suppose to make the right decision for our children as they are too young to make a decisions ... To protect them, guide them and keep them safe.. Shaniya was safe,healthy, she had Carey take great care of her, Shaniya was getting blue stickers for her doing good in school , smiling and happy, she had love and  a foundation.. Why would the father take a chance and let the POS have her .. Just to let her be a mother?.. I dont by it...

God Bless Shaniya..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 18, 2009, 09:10:16 PM
Before you leave let me welcome you to the cage.

Welcome razzzy1


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on November 18, 2009, 09:11:51 PM
In an affidavit for a warrant to search McNeill's 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, investigators said McNeill told them he picked Shaniya up in front of her home and drove her to the hotel. Investigators also said they found feces smeared on the outside door handle of the front door to the home and on the handrail of the steps to the front porch.

Police recovered 11 pieces of trace evidence, such as hair and fibers, from the car, as well as clothes, a belt, a straw, a cell phone and a portable GPS system, according to the search warrant.   ::MonkeyEek::  That's new, I never heard that McNeill picked Shaniya up in front of her home.

IF true that he picked her up at the curb it will go directly to mom sending her out there. She's already said that she was up early, maybe she sends the poor baby out in the cold all messed up with the filthy blanket, MM gets a wiff of the stench and goes to the neighbors and throws the thing away. Sick, sick   
                                                                                                                                                                                 ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 09:12:03 PM
Good Evening Monkeys & Guests,

Has this been posted?


snip.


Police searched McNeill's car, a 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, and took a black and yellow abblebottom jacket, size four, a pair of jeans, size 24 months, a plastic straw, swabbings, and soil samples.

According to search warrangs, McNeill admitted taking Davis from the front of her house to a hotel in Sanford.

It is unknown at this time what McNeill's connection is to the child, police say. April Autry tells NBC17 that she is McNeill's girlfriend and is friends with Shaniya's aunt.

McNeilll was on unsupervised probation when Davis went missing. McNeill has been charged multiple times since 2001. The charges include assault inflicting serious bodily injury, possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use and hitting a police officer with his car


snip.
http://news.mync.com/site/news/story/44291/amber-alert-authorities-search-for-missing-5-year-old-girl/

I think the straw would account for the stoned look on his face whenever we see him?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 09:13:40 PM
Welcome aboard new Monkey's... ::MonkeyCheer3:: ::MonkeyCheer3::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 09:14:11 PM
Good Evening Monkeys & Guests,

Has this been posted?


snip.


Police searched McNeill's car, a 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, and took a black and yellow abblebottom jacket, size four, a pair of jeans, size 24 months, a plastic straw, swabbings, and soil samples.

According to search warrangs, McNeill admitted taking Davis from the front of her house to a hotel in Sanford.

It is unknown at this time what McNeill's connection is to the child, police say. April Autry tells NBC17 that she is McNeill's girlfriend and is friends with Shaniya's aunt.

McNeilll was on unsupervised probation when Davis went missing. McNeill has been charged multiple times since 2001. The charges include assault inflicting serious bodily injury, possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use and hitting a police officer with his car


snip.
http://news.mync.com/site/news/story/44291/amber-alert-authorities-search-for-missing-5-year-old-girl/

I think the straw would account for the stoned look on his face whenever we see him?

BBM  I am sure they used the lights and all on the car, so those swabbings will hang him I hope.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 09:18:09 PM
Searching I got my fingers crossed!  And Thank you for the other thing,   I hear you!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on November 18, 2009, 09:19:18 PM
Interesting dad has domestic violence charges in the past.  I think we're going to learn much more about ole pop.

I feel the sorriest for the Aunt.  She had children of her own to think about or I bet she would have done whatever it took to get Shaniya out of that situation with her egg donor. . . including taking her and leaving the area.  Hard to do when you have little ones (or even highschool aged children) of your own.
I'm afraid you may be right about dad.

If that is dads house he is standing in front of I wonder if he feels guilty  that he lived in a very nice home while Shaniya lived in a mobile home backed up with sewage..I really do not see how he will be able to sleep at night ::MonkeyMad::

I may get banned for this but it's my opinion. It's seems like your on his jury, he's being tried and convicted, without proof. Since when do we convict on hearsay? This devil manipulated him, bs'd him, until I hear different, I'll not put him on trial.  Do you know for a fact Brad knew Shaniya was gonna be staying at that sewage pond? JMO

You won't get banned for having an opinion, mine is opposite to yours but we would defend your right to have your own beliefs. Even if I don't agree ::MonkeyDevil2::

I was not trying to start a monkey war  ::MonkeyDevil2:: ::MonkeyDevil2::when I posted about the fathers home..my emotions as well as other monkeys have been on overtime ::MonkeyAngel::

I agree, maybe I should go beat up on Alyssa.

  ::MonkeyHaHa::  she deserves it!   I always head back to Caylee's thread, safe among all that mostly are united in belief of her guilt and the family insanity!

High emotions in here, so much blame to go around. I guess we all allow a rock bottom expectation for the pimps and druggies and abusers but it's hard to reconcile that a well dressed, well spoken, professional guy could be so lax about his child.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 09:19:37 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on November 18, 2009, 09:24:59 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.

He's goin down, ya know what I'm sayin       ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 09:27:26 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.


Not a day over 16......and she his baby mama.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 09:30:17 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.

That's not AD's sister, is it?? I thought she was his girlfriend.   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 09:30:30 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.

i read that earlier and it made me wonder if it was a clean up highway crew that just tossed the road debris in the woods after dder accidents on the highway... or possibly a hunter but why bag and leave your kill there... i do not think it was placed there around her on purpose but i do think she was placed there on purpose... maybe in hopes of animals getting rid of the evidence... around here it is all convicts that clean our highways... ones that are on good behavior and get to be on work duty and they get paid for it in prison... mm was in prison and according to the way the judge praises him he was on such good behavior on probation maybe he earned himself highway detail and remembered the dead animal ditch spot from then


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 09:32:24 PM
He's goin down - I like that! 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 18, 2009, 09:32:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.

That's not AD's sister, is it?? I thought she was his girlfriend.   ::MonkeyConfused::

I think Brenda Davis is Antionette's sister.  I have not seen a picture of her, but heard she
visited AD on Sunday.  Brenda used to chill with MAM according to April.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 18, 2009, 09:33:10 PM
Searching I got my fingers crossed!  And Thank you for the other thing,   I hear you!

No need for thanks, truth is truth but you are welcome. You are a smart monkey.   ::MonkeyKiss::

I have my fingers toes and eyes crossed, if I could cross my ears I would.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 09:34:41 PM
I'm not taking either side because if you think about it the people who saw burn marks on her also had an obligation to report it.  We can either do something about it or do nothing and live with the consequences we all have choices to make in life.

It just sad all around like so many we see. jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 09:35:27 PM
The 911 call on NG right now, I swore when AD was describing what Shaniya was wearing she started to say "she was wearing a blue velvet..... a blue shirt"

I think she damn well knew she was wearing the blue velvet dress we are seeing in the elevator images as she dressed up nice and pretty. 
i don't know anything as to if that is a dress but i thought it strange that she started to give detail about the underwear she said white with little pink and then stopped and said actually i can't remember some design on them... i have never known what underwear my kids were wearing even when i was the one to dress them... makes me wonder if she remembered the white with pink design because it was what was requested she wear

I thought the same thing.  When my kiddos were little, I would have been hard put most of the time to tell anyone exactly what they were wearing on a given day... even if I dressed them ... precisely as you said.  And certainly not their underwear.... it just wasn't something worth noting every day.
yeah it was the first thing i noticed that stuck out to me about the call... it was like she almost did elaborate on exactly the pattern and then realized it was strange that she would know that and then stopped herself...
i never know what my kids are wearing but i did start taking walking out the door pictures anytime they have a field trip at school just in case i god for bid needed a current photo... even when we do know what they were wearing by description descriptions aren't good enough (like hanna montanna  shirt jeans etc.)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 09:35:59 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.

That's not AD's sister, is it?? I thought she was his girlfriend.   ::MonkeyConfused::

I understood her to be Mario's current girlfriend.  I believe Mario was an ex boyfriend of Brenda Davis.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 09:38:46 PM
Did you guys see this article where it states the deer carcasses where in bags?  That means they were carried there and potentially touched/moved to place around Shaniya? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/18/crimesider/entry5696345.shtml?tag=latest

A dog trainer who helped look for the missing North Carolina 5-year-old says searchers overlooked her body at first because all they saw were deer carcasses in trash bags.

i read that earlier and it made me wonder if it was a clean up highway crew that just tossed the road debris in the woods after dder accidents on the highway... or possibly a hunter but why bag and leave your kill there... i do not think it was placed there around her on purpose but i do think she was placed there on purpose... maybe in hopes of animals getting rid of the evidence... around here it is all convicts that clean our highways... ones that are on good behavior and get to be on work duty and they get paid for it in prison... mm was in prison and according to the way the judge praises him he was on such good behavior on probation maybe he earned himself highway detail and remembered the dead animal ditch spot from then

You know the first thing I thought with the deer carcasses was BEAR! 

Oh good thoughts on that jail time detail, could be.  He doesn't strike me as a hunter and to randomly go in the woods 100 yards and luck out with a ditch with deer carcasses is a bit much for me to believe.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 18, 2009, 09:42:00 PM
Sorry if this was already posted but they caught the guy that was using Shaniya as a scam to make money.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953325


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 09:51:49 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.


Not a day over 16......and she his baby mama.
well at least i feel a little better about the size 24 months jeans they found in his car... as shaniya was not a size 24 mos and i was starting to worry if there are other victims... for now i am guessing they are his daughter's his baby mama says there were no signs of molestation with their daughter...
although i guess it is possible that she could be lying for him...
there have been studies done and i don't have the link and i do not want to sound racist but non-reported molestation especially within family members is higher in the black community... not that it matters because she is a pos either way but the fact that the mothers family is standing up for her makes me wonder what went on in the mothers childhood that made her be a hooker and think it is okay for her 5 year old to be one


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 09:52:08 PM
I was checking incident reports.. November 13, 2009 12.03 pm

Agency Name
Fayetteville Police Department  Incident/Investigation
Report OCA
2009-039649 
ORI
NC 0260100
 Date/Time Reported: Friday 
 
Month Day Yr Time Hrs
11 13 2009 12:03:37 PM 12
#1
 Crime/Incident(s)
2030 -   Attempt
 Complete  At Found: Friday 
 Last Known Secure: Friday 
 
Month
11  Day
13  Yr
2009  Time
12:03:37 PM  Hrs
12  Month
11 Day
13 Yr
2009 Time
12:02:00 PM  Hrs
12 
#2 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Location of Incident
922 WASHINGTON DR
FAYETTEVILLE, NC  Offense Tract
8602-03 
#3 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Premise Type
HOME OF VICTIM - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING  Victim Residence Type
 Single Family
 Multi Family 
 How attacked or committed
VICTIM IS BEING NEGLECTED BY SUSPECT  Forcible
 Yes
 N/A
 No Weapon/Tools
Crime #1: PERSONAL WEAPONS (HANDS, FEET, TEETH, ETC.) 
 # of Victims
1  Type:  Person  Business
 Society  Government
 Financial Institute  Religious
 L.E. Officer Line of Duty  Unknown  Injury  None  Minor  Loss of Teeth
 Broken Bones  Severe Lacerations
 Internal  Unconscious  Other Major  Drug/Alcohol Use:
 Yes  Unknown
 No  N/A 
V1 Victim Business Name (Last, First, Middle)
 AUTRY, AMARI    Victom of Crime #

2030
 DOB/Age
00  Race
B  Sex
Relationship to Offender
Child

 Resident Status
 Resident
 Non-Resident
 Unknown 
Home Address

Apt #
,    Home Phone 
Employer Name/Address


,    Business Phone 
VYR  Make  Model  Style  Lic/Lis  VIN 
 STATUS           L-Lost      S-Stolen      R-Recovered      D-Damaged      Z-Seized      B-Burned      C-Counterfeit/Forged      F-Found
 (Check "OJ" column if recovered for other jurisdiction) 
 Victim # DCI Status Value OJ Qty Property Description Make/Model Serial Number
                 
Number of Vehicles Stolen:   Number of Vehicles Recovered:   
 
 Officer Name/ID#
SANDBERG, DEBRA L  Officer Signature  Supervisor Signature 
 Complainant Signature  Case Status
 Further Investigation
 Inactive
 Closed/Cleared
 Closed/Leads Exhausted  Case Disposition
 Unfounded  Juvenille/No Custody  Extradiction Declined
 Cleared by Arrest  Refuse to Cooperate
 Cleared by Arrest by Another Agency
 Death of Offender  Prosecution Declined

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/print_report_page1.asp


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 09:58:25 PM
So April Autry is 22 could of fooled me.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 18, 2009, 09:59:17 PM
I was checking incident reports.. November 13, 2009 12.03 pm

Agency Name
Fayetteville Police Department  Incident/Investigation
Report OCA
2009-039649 
ORI
NC 0260100
 Date/Time Reported: Friday 
 
Month Day Yr Time Hrs
11 13 2009 12:03:37 PM 12
#1
 Crime/Incident(s)
2030 -   Attempt
 Complete  At Found: Friday 
 Last Known Secure: Friday 
 
Month
11  Day
13  Yr
2009  Time
12:03:37 PM  Hrs
12  Month
11 Day
13 Yr
2009 Time
12:02:00 PM  Hrs
12 
#2 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Location of Incident
922 WASHINGTON DR
FAYETTEVILLE, NC  Offense Tract
8602-03 
#3 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Premise Type
HOME OF VICTIM - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING  Victim Residence Type
 Single Family
 Multi Family 
 How attacked or committed
VICTIM IS BEING NEGLECTED BY SUSPECT  Forcible
 Yes
 N/A
 No Weapon/Tools
Crime #1: PERSONAL WEAPONS (HANDS, FEET, TEETH, ETC.) 
 # of Victims
1  Type:  Person  Business
 Society  Government
 Financial Institute  Religious
 L.E. Officer Line of Duty  Unknown  Injury  None  Minor  Loss of Teeth
 Broken Bones  Severe Lacerations
 Internal  Unconscious  Other Major  Drug/Alcohol Use:
 Yes  Unknown
 No  N/A 
V1 Victim Business Name (Last, First, Middle)
 AUTRY, AMARI    Victom of Crime #

2030
 DOB/Age
00  Race
B  Sex
Relationship to Offender
Child

 Resident Status
 Resident
 Non-Resident
 Unknown 
Home Address

Apt #
,    Home Phone 
Employer Name/Address


,    Business Phone 
VYR  Make  Model  Style  Lic/Lis  VIN 
 STATUS           L-Lost      S-Stolen      R-Recovered      D-Damaged      Z-Seized      B-Burned      C-Counterfeit/Forged      F-Found
 (Check "OJ" column if recovered for other jurisdiction) 
 Victim # DCI Status Value OJ Qty Property Description Make/Model Serial Number
                 
Number of Vehicles Stolen:   Number of Vehicles Recovered:   
 
 Officer Name/ID#
SANDBERG, DEBRA L  Officer Signature  Supervisor Signature 
 Complainant Signature  Case Status
 Further Investigation
 Inactive
 Closed/Cleared
 Closed/Leads Exhausted  Case Disposition
 Unfounded  Juvenille/No Custody  Extradiction Declined
 Cleared by Arrest  Refuse to Cooperate
 Cleared by Arrest by Another Agency
 Death of Offender  Prosecution Declined

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/print_report_page1.asp


I can't maks sense of this.  What does it mean?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 10:01:14 PM
I was checking incident reports.. November 13, 2009 12.03 pm

Agency Name
Fayetteville Police Department  Incident/Investigation
Report OCA
2009-039649 
ORI
NC 0260100
 Date/Time Reported: Friday 
 
Month Day Yr Time Hrs
11 13 2009 12:03:37 PM 12
#1
 Crime/Incident(s)
2030 -   Attempt
 Complete  At Found: Friday 
 Last Known Secure: Friday 
 
Month
11  Day
13  Yr
2009  Time
12:03:37 PM  Hrs
12  Month
11 Day
13 Yr
2009 Time
12:02:00 PM  Hrs
12 
#2 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Location of Incident
922 WASHINGTON DR
FAYETTEVILLE, NC  Offense Tract
8602-03 
#3 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Premise Type
HOME OF VICTIM - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING  Victim Residence Type
 Single Family
 Multi Family 
 How attacked or committed
VICTIM IS BEING NEGLECTED BY SUSPECT  Forcible
 Yes
 N/A
 No Weapon/Tools
Crime #1: PERSONAL WEAPONS (HANDS, FEET, TEETH, ETC.) 
 # of Victims
1  Type:  Person  Business
 Society  Government
 Financial Institute  Religious
 L.E. Officer Line of Duty  Unknown  Injury  None  Minor  Loss of Teeth
 Broken Bones  Severe Lacerations
 Internal  Unconscious  Other Major  Drug/Alcohol Use:
 Yes  Unknown
 No  N/A 
V1 Victim Business Name (Last, First, Middle)
 AUTRY, AMARI    Victom of Crime #

2030
 DOB/Age
00  Race
B  Sex
Relationship to Offender
Child

 Resident Status
 Resident
 Non-Resident
 Unknown 
Home Address

Apt #
,    Home Phone 
Employer Name/Address


,    Business Phone 
VYR  Make  Model  Style  Lic/Lis  VIN 
 STATUS           L-Lost      S-Stolen      R-Recovered      D-Damaged      Z-Seized      B-Burned      C-Counterfeit/Forged      F-Found
 (Check "OJ" column if recovered for other jurisdiction) 
 Victim # DCI Status Value OJ Qty Property Description Make/Model Serial Number
                 
Number of Vehicles Stolen:   Number of Vehicles Recovered:   
 
 Officer Name/ID#
SANDBERG, DEBRA L  Officer Signature  Supervisor Signature 
 Complainant Signature  Case Status
 Further Investigation
 Inactive
 Closed/Cleared
 Closed/Leads Exhausted  Case Disposition
 Unfounded  Juvenille/No Custody  Extradiction Declined
 Cleared by Arrest  Refuse to Cooperate
 Cleared by Arrest by Another Agency
 Death of Offender  Prosecution Declined

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/print_report_page1.asp

jersey i am kind of dumb and i always go uuuugghh when you post these posts i know they are great finds but i get pizzed cuz i never know what the hell they say lol...
can you translate this to english for me pleeeeez
and i asked you a question earlier about her middle pic... do you see the 2 shade lighter garment she has on halfway down her thigh and how he seems to be staring at her crotch area... and i still think she was wearing clear jelly shoes and i would like to know where they are and her stuffed animal.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 18, 2009, 10:02:17 PM
bananas don't feel bad i can't either....
i was just posting the same


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 10:04:51 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.

That's not AD's sister, is it?? I thought she was his girlfriend.   ::MonkeyConfused::

I understood her to be Mario's current girlfriend.  I believe Mario was an ex boyfriend of Brenda Davis.

And Coe (wasn't that his name?) was Antoinette's ex. They seemed to have "man" problems.  ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 10:06:48 PM
This was an incident report file... Neglected by offender of a child..
Child name is Amari Autry. Go to the link it explains better...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 10:07:21 PM
Sorry if this was already posted but they caught the guy that was using Shaniya as a scam to make money.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953325

Good!  Thanks for posting!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 10:07:41 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953074

I cannot believe McNeil's arrest record.  To shoot someone several times and get off on probation is beyond belief.  So what he sat in jail for 2 yrs than off on supervised probation for the rest?  whoop de doo.  Unbelievable.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 10:07:49 PM
this case just gets sadder and sadder the  more that we hear and read...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 18, 2009, 10:08:33 PM
bananas don't feel bad i can't either....
i was just posting the same
PENNY, I saw the shoes too, and possibly some thigh high stockings in the middle picture.
We had a debate about it the other night. Magnolia and I were about the only ones that saw them, the rest said they couldn't even with the magnifyer. I believe personally that the middle picture was the going in pic, and the barefoot ones were the going out, but not everyone agrees with me. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 10:11:04 PM
bananas don't feel bad i can't either....
i was just posting the same
PENNY, I saw the shoes too, and possibly some thigh high stockings in the middle picture.
We had a debate about it the other night. Magnolia and I were about the only ones that saw them, the rest said they couldn't even with the magnifyer. I believe personally that the middle picture was the going in pic, and the barefoot ones were the going out, but not everyone agrees with me. JMO


I saw shoes as well...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 10:11:16 PM
Penny.. The POS Mcneill g/f name is April Autry who have a child named Amari...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 10:12:41 PM
bananas don't feel bad i can't either....
i was just posting the same
PENNY, I saw the shoes too, and possibly some thigh high stockings in the middle picture.
We had a debate about it the other night. Magnolia and I were about the only ones that saw them, the rest said they couldn't even with the magnifyer. I believe personally that the middle picture was the going in pic, and the barefoot ones were the going out, but not everyone agrees with me. JMO


I saw shoes as well...

I might add I brought the shoes up and noticed them...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 10:13:34 PM
bananas don't feel bad i can't either....
i was just posting the same
PENNY, I saw the shoes too, and possibly some thigh high stockings in the middle picture.
We had a debate about it the other night. Magnolia and I were about the only ones that saw them, the rest said they couldn't even with the magnifyer. I believe personally that the middle picture was the going in pic, and the barefoot ones were the going out, but not everyone agrees with me. JMO


I saw shoes as well...

I might add I brought the shoes up and noticed them...

yep  you did....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 18, 2009, 10:24:10 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953074

I cannot believe McNeil's arrest record.  To shoot someone several times and get off on probation is beyond belief.  So what he sat in jail for 2 yrs than off on supervised probation for the rest?  whoop de doo.  Unbelievable.

Hi Monkeys!

fatcat, I can't believe it either! He should have been put away a long, long, time! Certainly long enough for Shaniya to be a full grown woman!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 18, 2009, 10:25:09 PM
Where are the pictures of that monster with little Shaniya in the motel?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 18, 2009, 10:30:50 PM
Where are the pictures of that monster with little Shaniya in the motel?

Here's one of them, bananas!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 10:34:53 PM
Three pic's together.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 18, 2009, 10:35:03 PM
thanks cbb... they were all 3 posted somewhere earlier.... anyone know where?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 10:35:50 PM
Another incident.. November 13th, 2009 10:40 am- April Autry

AIncident/Investigation
Report OCA
2009-039644 
ORI
NC 0260100
 Date/Time Reported: Friday 
 
Month Day Yr Time Hrs
11 13 2009 10:44:00 AM 10
#1
 Crime/Incident(s)
0510 -   Attempt
 Complete  At Found: Friday 
 Last Known Secure: Friday 
 
Month
11  Day
13  Yr
2009  Time
10:43:00 AM  Hrs
10  Month
11 Day
13 Yr
2009 Time
10:42:00 AM  Hrs
10 
#2 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Location of Incident
922 WASHINGTON DR
FAYETTEVILLE, NC  Offense Tract
8602-03 
#3 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Premise Type
HOME OF VICTIM - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING  Victim Residence Type
 Single Family
 Multi Family 
 How attacked or committed
LISTED SUSPECT AND A UNKNOWN SUSPECT KICKED IN THE FRONT DOOR AND THEN RAN WHEN HE SAW THE VICTIM  Forcible
 Yes
 N/A
 No Weapon/Tools
Crime #1: PERSONAL WEAPONS (HANDS, FEET, TEETH, ETC.) 
 # of Victims
1  Type:  Person  Business
 Society  Government
 Financial Institute  Religious
 L.E. Officer Line of Duty  Unknown  Injury  None  Minor  Loss of Teeth
 Broken Bones  Severe Lacerations
 Internal  Unconscious  Other Major  Drug/Alcohol Use:
 Yes  Unknown
 No  N/A 
V1 Victim Business Name (Last, First, Middle)
 AUTRY, APRIL   Victom of Crime #

0510
 DOB/Age
22  Race
B  Sex
F  Relationship to Offender

    Acquaintance
 Resident Status
 Resident
 Non-Resident
 Unknown 
Home Address

Apt #
,    Home Phone 
Employer Name/Address


,    Business Phone 
VYR  Make  Model  Style  Lic/Lis  VIN 
 STATUS           L-Lost      S-Stolen      R-Recovered      D-Damaged      Z-Seized      B-Burned      C-Counterfeit/Forged      F-Found
 (Check "OJ" column if recovered for other jurisdiction) 
 Victim # DCI Status Value OJ Qty Property Description Make/Model Serial Number
1  71  D  $500.00    1  FRONT DOOR TO RESIDENCE     
                 
Number of Vehicles Stolen:   Number of Vehicles Recovered:   
 
 Officer Name/ID#
TAYLOR, MATTHEW J  Officer Signature  Supervisor Signature 
 Complainant Signature  Case Status
Further Investigation
 Inactive
 Closed/Cleared
 Closed/Leads Exhausted  Case Disposition
 Unfounded  Juvenille/No Custody  Extradiction Declined
 Cleared by Arrest  Refuse to Cooperate
 Cleared by Arrest by Another Agency
 Death of Offender  Prosecution Declined 

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/print_report_page1.asp


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 18, 2009, 10:36:06 PM
yes... that is what I was looking for... thx fatcatlurker ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 18, 2009, 10:42:08 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 18, 2009, 10:42:43 PM
Where are the pictures of that monster with little Shaniya in the motel?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/Picture0003-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 10:44:49 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........

I know it's heartbreaking and I just want to pound that creep!  Way bad.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2009, 10:45:44 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........


I know!! I am haunted by these pictures, truly!

with that...have a good night all..talk with you in the morning...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 18, 2009, 10:47:53 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........


I know!! I am haunted by these pictures, truly!

with that...have a good night all..talk with you in the morning...

Good night Cookie!  Shaniya is in a good place now with peace all around her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Blumonkey on November 18, 2009, 10:49:19 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........

I feel the same way, CBB.  ::MonkeyTears::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 18, 2009, 10:50:00 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........


I know!! I am haunted by these pictures, truly!

with that...have a good night all..talk with you in the morning...

Me too Cooike.. Good Night.... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Shell on November 18, 2009, 10:50:36 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.


Not a day over 16......and she his baby mama.
well at least i feel a little better about the size 24 months jeans they found in his car... as shaniya was not a size 24 mos and i was starting to worry if there are other victims... for now i am guessing they are his daughter's his baby mama says there were no signs of molestation with their daughter...
although i guess it is possible that she could be lying for him...
there have been studies done and i don't have the link and i do not want to sound racist but non-reported molestation especially within family members is higher in the black community... not that it matters because she is a pos either way but the fact that the mothers family is standing up for her makes me wonder what went on in the mothers childhood that made her be a hooker and think it is okay for her 5 year old to be one

I have been trying for 15 min to reply without sounding racist, so I will not reply. Except to say, it might be higher in some communities, but it is disturbingly happening across the board.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 18, 2009, 10:50:40 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........


I know!! I am haunted by these pictures, truly!

with that...have a good night all..talk with you in the morning...

These pictures don't get easier to look at... actually harder to stomach every time.  That poor bably... so innocent and how oh how can someone do such horrible things.  It is just tearing me up and I can't get over this.  What we are doing with criminals isn't working.  We just keep putting them back on the streets to do harm to the public.  Why?  Our justice system isn't working!   ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Shell on November 18, 2009, 10:52:26 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........

I feel the same way, CBB.  ::MonkeyTears::
Just reading the words of it was disturbing enough, the pictures shatter my heart.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 18, 2009, 11:23:03 PM
Just saw this:

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953211


Police: Mom may have used girl to pay debt

Detectives are looking into allegations that Antoinette Davis used her 5-year-old daughter, Shaniya, to pay off a debt.

"That's an avenue of the investigation we're looking at," Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine said Wednesday.

He did not elaborate.

Davis and a Fayetteville man have been charged in Shaniya's disappearance. No new charges will be filed until authorities decide which law enforcement agency has jurisdiction.

Investigators have yet to say how Shaniya died. The results of an autopsy have not been released.

Shaniya's body was found Monday afternoon off Walker Road in Lee County, just south of the Carolina Trace community. It ended a weeklong search for the child.

Her mother reported her missing at 6:53 a.m. on Nov. 10 from her residence in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park in Fayetteville. Shaniya was last seen alive on surveillance video from the Comfort Suites hotel in Sanford. The footage was time stamped 6:11 a.m.

She was with a man police have identified as 29-year-old Mario Andrette McNeill. He is charged with first-degree kidnapping.

Antoinette Davis told police she last saw the girl about 5:30 a.m. that day.

She is charged with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation.

Investigators have declined to say what prompted the trafficking charge, an offense that has rarely been filed in Cumberland County.

"It's a highly unusual charge," Sgt. John Somerindyke said.

But it goes hand-in-hand with the child abuse involving prostitution offense, he said.

The state's human trafficking law says anyone who "knowingly recruits, entices, harbors, transports, provides, or obtains by any means another person with the intent that the other person be held in involuntary servitude or sexual servitude" can be charged with that offense.

Davis' arrest warrant alleged she allowed McNeill to take the girl "with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude."

Bergamine held a media briefing Wednesday morning at which he offered no new information.

"This is a very complex case and an ongoing investigation between multiple law enforcement agencies," Bergamine said. "Some details will have an impact that will determine jurisdiction."

If Shaniya died in Lee County, that investigation could be claimed by the Lee County Sheriff's Office or the Sanford Police Department.

City police have laid claim to the death investigation since the chain of events began, saying Shaniya's death was the result of closely timed criminal actions starting in Fayetteville.

Prosecutors from Lee and Cumberland counties met Wednesday to discuss the venue for the case.

Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis said his staff has been meeting mornings and afternoons to get updates on the case from the Police Department and the State Bureau of Investigation.

"We're awaiting issues involving laboratory work from the investigation," Grannis said.

Wednesday's police briefing ended abruptly after a reporter asked Bergamine whether the criminal justice system had worked in this case.

Court records show that McNeill, who has a criminal record and previous probation violations, had his probation terminated less than three weeks before Shaniya disappeared.

"Let me say that the city of Fayetteville has had a couple of horrific events over the past couple of weeks," Bergamine said, referring to the murder-suicide deaths of prominent businessman Billy Maxwell, his wife and two children.

"These are issues that police, the criminal justice system and the community must address,'' he said.

Bergamine left when asked if Shaniya's kidnapping and death could have been prevented.

Shaniya will be remembered today during a prayer service at the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road, where she stayed with her mother. Residents have scheduled the service for 7 p.m.

Residents will meet at 1202 Sleepy Hollow Drive, which is across the street from the Davis home.

Staff writer Nick Needham contributed to this report.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Shell on November 19, 2009, 01:02:51 AM

One more thought, and this might have been brought up already. Why does the child look so passive in the reflection? If a strange man picked up my 5 year old, I doubt they would not be kicking and screaming. Does anyone think the child might have been drugged?

Poor baby, God rest her soul.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Louisiana5487 on November 19, 2009, 01:15:29 AM
This is from the Fayetteville ******* Re: McNeil's record

Published: 11:06 PM, Tue Nov 17, 2009
Probation ended early for suspect in Shaniya Davis case By Greg Barnes
Staff writer

 Three weeks before Shaniya Davis disappeared, the Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping her was allowed to end his supervised probation six months early.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, was on unsupervised probation when police say he kidnapped 5-year-old Shaniya on Nov. 10, according to Cumberland County court records.

At 6:11 that morning, video surveillance at the Comfort Suites in Sanford captured a man police identified as McNeill carrying Shaniya into the motel.

Shaniya's body was found Monday in woods off a rural road south of Sanford.

McNeill appears to have been treated with leniency for years by an overburdened court system.

On June 17, 2001, court documents show, McNeill shot Roland Lee Mays in the face, neck, shoulder, chest and stomach. The records indicate that McNeill injured two other people that day, as well. He was charged with multiple counts of assault inflicting serious bodily injury.

A year later, apparently while awaiting trial in the shootings, McNeill was charged with possessing marijuana and trying to manufacture and sell it.

The charges from the two cases were consolidated, records show, and McNeill was allowed to plead guilty to lesser counts. He was sentenced to 40 to 50 months of supervised probation in June 2003, the records show.

Two months later, in August 2003, McNeill violated terms of his probation by failing to notify probation officers of his whereabouts. He was sent to prison. Records show that he entered the prison system in October 2003 and was released in May 2006.

It didn't take long for McNeill to get into trouble again. Three months after his release, records show, McNeill was charged with possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use.

The records show that McNeill pleaded guilty to reduced charges - a misdemeanor offense of maintaining a vehicle for drug use - and again was placed on supervised probation, on Jan. 1, 2007.

As part of the plea deal, District Court Judge Kim Tucker told McNeill that he could go on unsupervised probation if he tested negative for drugs three consecutive times, records show.

While still on supervised probation, McNeill was charged in April 2007 with possessing cocaine, records show. He was charged again in September 2007 - this time with hitting Fayetteville police officer R. Grimm with his vehicle while trying to flee from the corner of Bragg Boulevard and Ames Street. Records indicate Grimm was injured, but they don't say how badly. McNeill was charged that day with trying to elude arrest, reckless driving and assault on a government official.

Two months later - on Nov. 30, 2007 - Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson allowed McNeill's probation status to be changed from supervised to unsupervised, records show.

Wayne Marshburn, who oversees the probation office in Cumberland County, said he had not fully reviewed McNeill's probation documents.

But Marshburn said people who behave while on probation typically serve only about half of their term.

McNeill was six months shy of 24 months on supervised probation when a judge agreed to place him on unsupervised probation. It's unclear from the records which judge made that decision.

"He had done well on probation," Marshburn said. "He had done everything he needed to do."

In many cases, Marshburn said, probation officers make recommendations to the court on whether someone's probation should be terminated.

But in 2007, he said, his office wasn't always notified when a person on probation had been charged with another crime.

That is much less likely to happen now, Marshburn said, in part because of the slaying of UNC student president Eve Carson in March 2008.

Since then, the state's probation department has come under intense scrutiny because one of the men accused of Carson's murder should have gone before a judge on a probation violation months before she was shot to death.

Laws that go into effect in December will further address problems with the state's parole and probation system, Marshburn said.

He called Shaniya's death a horrible tragedy, but he said there is no guarantee that she would still be alive today had McNeill remained on supervised probation.

"Hindsight is always very clear," he said. "People do bad things while being supervised. That provides solace to nobody. That's not what I would want to hear. But it's a fact.

"The bottom line, I still am satisfied with how our office handled the case."

Staff writer Greg Barnes can be reached at barnesg@fayobserver.com or 486-3525.
Get your complete news report daily in The Fayetteville *******:

very interesting, Magnolia. Eve Carson was a friend of mine - her birthday is tomorrow so please everyone think of her and her family during this time.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Louisiana5487 on November 19, 2009, 01:17:37 AM

One more thought, and this might have been brought up already. Why does the child look so passive in the reflection? If a strange man picked up my 5 year old, I doubt they would not be kicking and screaming. Does anyone think the child might have been drugged?

Poor baby, God rest her soul.

Ugh :( I was thinking the exact same thing...poor little girl...they must have drugged her for her to be that calm...I almost hope she was drugged so that she never felt any pain. All parties involved in hurting this little girl deserve the WORST.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 19, 2009, 03:34:17 AM

One more thought, and this might have been brought up already. Why does the child look so passive in the reflection? If a strange man picked up my 5 year old, I doubt they would not be kicking and screaming. Does anyone think the child might have been drugged?

Poor baby, God rest her soul.

I don't think she was drugged. I think she had just woken up and was probably groggy, but not shocked. At that point nothing was happening to her other than some man was carrying her. It's possible she'd seen him before and he probably talked to her prior to the hotel.

Not all kids are screamers.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Mary on November 19, 2009, 04:24:09 AM
Since Fayetteville is satified with the way they have handled MM, that the way he
has walked on everything, I have never heard of getting probation for shooting
someone, plus everything else he has got probation for. They are debating what county to charge him in???? I thought what they were doing to a baby was a Federal offence. Settle it boys, let the FBI take over and charge them in federal
court. THAT SHOULD TAKE THE GRIN OFF MM'S FACE!!!!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 19, 2009, 04:38:57 AM
Just saw this:

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953211


Police: Mom may have used girl to pay debt

Detectives are looking into allegations that Antoinette Davis used her 5-year-old daughter, Shaniya, to pay off a debt.

"That's an avenue of the investigation we're looking at," Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine said Wednesday.

He did not elaborate.

Davis and a Fayetteville man have been charged in Shaniya's disappearance. No new charges will be filed until authorities decide which law enforcement agency has jurisdiction.

Investigators have yet to say how Shaniya died. The results of an autopsy have not been released.

Shaniya's body was found Monday afternoon off Walker Road in Lee County, just south of the Carolina Trace community. It ended a weeklong search for the child.

Her mother reported her missing at 6:53 a.m. on Nov. 10 from her residence in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park in Fayetteville. Shaniya was last seen alive on surveillance video from the Comfort Suites hotel in Sanford. The footage was time stamped 6:11 a.m.

She was with a man police have identified as 29-year-old Mario Andrette McNeil. He is charged with first-degree kidnapping.

Antoinette Davis told police she last saw the girl about 5:30 a.m. that day.

She is charged with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation.

Investigators have declined to say what prompted the trafficking charge, an offense that has rarely been filed in Cumberland County.

"It's a highly unusual charge," Sgt. John Somerindyke said.

But it goes hand-in-hand with the child abuse involving prostitution offense, he said.

The state's human trafficking law says anyone who "knowingly recruits, entices, harbors, transports, provides, or obtains by any means another person with the intent that the other person be held in involuntary servitude or sexual servitude" can be charged with that offense.

Davis' arrest warrant alleged she allowed McNeil to take the girl "with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude."

Bergamine held a media briefing Wednesday morning at which he offered no new information.

"This is a very complex case and an ongoing investigation between multiple law enforcement agencies," Bergamine said. "Some details will have an impact that will determine jurisdiction."

If Shaniya died in Lee County, that investigation could be claimed by the Lee County Sheriff's Office or the Sanford Police Department.

City police have laid claim to the death investigation since the chain of events began, saying Shaniya's death was the result of closely timed criminal actions starting in Fayetteville.

Prosecutors from Lee and Cumberland counties met Wednesday to discuss the venue for the case.

Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis said his staff has been meeting mornings and afternoons to get updates on the case from the Police Department and the State Bureau of Investigation.

"We're awaiting issues involving laboratory work from the investigation," Grannis said.

Wednesday's police briefing ended abruptly after a reporter asked Bergamine whether the criminal justice system had worked in this case.

Court records show that McNeil, who has a criminal record and previous probation violations, had his probation terminated less than three weeks before Shaniya disappeared.

"Let me say that the city of Fayetteville has had a couple of horrific events over the past couple of weeks," Bergamine said, referring to the murder-suicide deaths of prominent businessman Billy Maxwell, his wife and two children.

"These are issues that police, the criminal justice system and the community must address,'' he said.

Bergamine left when asked if Shaniya's kidnapping and death could have been prevented.

Shaniya will be remembered today during a prayer service at the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road, where she stayed with her mother. Residents have scheduled the service for 7 p.m.

Residents will meet at 1202 Sleepy Hollow Drive, which is across the street from the Davis home.

Staff writer Nick Needham contributed to this report.


Fayetteville Police Chief Bergamine must have been hurt very deeply when asked by the reporter if he thought Shaniya's kidnapping and death could have been prevented.  I believe he had addressed that question in his statement just prior to the reporter's question.  His department and countless others worked tirelessly as we have all witnessed to try to find Shaniya before it was too late, but sadly that was not the outcome.  Now as we wait for information they are doing their very best to cover all the bases so that justice will be served.  Then like us they have to wait to see what the court decides.  They have to wait to see if they are going to have to go out and face these monsters in the streets again.  I don't believe the problem lies with law enforcement. In the case of McNeil , as in many cases,  LE has gone out to face these monsters, the same ones in the streets over and over again.  They deal with them daily.  They see the lives that are destroyed and the trail of blood and tears these monsters leave behind.  Yet when these cases get to court the monsters have been cleaned up and are in chains surrounded by officers and don't look much like monsters anymore.  IMO it is there in the courtroom where justice is not being served.  The penalties are not fitting the crimes and probation is a joke.  Our phone calls and petitions seem to be getting nowhere while our society becomes more dangerous, not only to our children, but for all of us as well.

Thank you Monkeys for letting me get this off my chest. 

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 07:29:28 AM
Since Fayetteville is satified with the way they have handled MM, that the way he
has walked on everything, I have never heard of getting probation for shooting
someone, plus everything else he has got probation for. They are debating what county to charge him in???? I thought what they were doing to a baby was a Federal offence. Settle it boys, let the FBI take over and charge them in federal
court. THAT SHOULD TAKE THE GRIN OFF MM'S FACE!!!!!!

Hi Mary...good morning all monkeys...

they most certainly need to settle this and get on with the charges so that the bail/bond on these 2 waste of air parasites will get raised! right now as stated on NG show last night, all the bio Ho needs is $5,000 to get out and the other parasite only needs $10,000 I believe...they could bond out while the LE are trying to decide which county is going to prosecute them! outrageous that the bond is that low for what these 2 scum bags did to that poor baby..
anyone who could do this horrendous thing to a child has no heart! I don't want them out to harm anyone else, ever!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 07:38:53 AM

One more thought, and this might have been brought up already. Why does the child look so passive in the reflection? If a strange man picked up my 5 year old, I doubt they would not be kicking and screaming. Does anyone think the child might have been drugged?

Poor baby, God rest her soul.

Ugh :( I was thinking the exact same thing...poor little girl...they must have drugged her for her to be that calm...I almost hope she was drugged so that she never felt any pain. All parties involved in hurting this little girl deserve the WORST.


Shell, My answer is yes, I do think she was drugged in some fashion. The child seemed to have that dazed look and don't think it was from lack of sleep.

OT

I read where Feces were on the railing and doorknob, plus, backporch or frontporch, tub.
Shell, any idea how Feces got on the doorknobs if this is correct, railing, too?  I can't understand Feces on the railing or doorknob.
Feces anywhere is unimaginable, why did they have a cat litter box for theirselves?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 07:49:41 AM
http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=002-8.flv

Here is the video.  Now the stuff comes out.
Thank-you

No Rose,

I don't believe the video, my "guess" is there was a dispute over his daughters will, this is my theory, why the father-in-law has come out with this garbage...follow the money. If any of this was true these people need to be in jail for not reporting this to DCF or not taking photos. 


Brad said Shaniya had an ailment my cousin had the same ailment on her insides of the arms and back of the legs your needed I think Calamine lotion. The corner of the eye burn?  These people should have called the cops for a visit to stupid Antonette, how could they not if it was true?  My opinion.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 19, 2009, 08:30:55 AM

One more thought, and this might have been brought up already. Why does the child look so passive in the reflection? If a strange man picked up my 5 year old, I doubt they would not be kicking and screaming. Does anyone think the child might have been drugged?

Poor baby, God rest her soul.

Or worse yet... she knew him and trusted him.... yuk...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 09:39:54 AM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 19, 2009, 09:40:10 AM
This is from the Fayetteville ******* Re: McNeil's record

Published: 11:06 PM, Tue Nov 17, 2009
Probation ended early for suspect in Shaniya Davis case By Greg Barnes
Staff writer

 Three weeks before Shaniya Davis disappeared, the Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping her was allowed to end his supervised probation six months early.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, was on unsupervised probation when police say he kidnapped 5-year-old Shaniya on Nov. 10, according to Cumberland County court records.

At 6:11 that morning, video surveillance at the Comfort Suites in Sanford captured a man police identified as McNeill carrying Shaniya into the motel.

Shaniya's body was found Monday in woods off a rural road south of Sanford.

McNeill appears to have been treated with leniency for years by an overburdened court system.

On June 17, 2001, court documents show, McNeill shot Roland Lee Mays in the face, neck, shoulder, chest and stomach. The records indicate that McNeill injured two other people that day, as well. He was charged with multiple counts of assault inflicting serious bodily injury.

A year later, apparently while awaiting trial in the shootings, McNeill was charged with possessing marijuana and trying to manufacture and sell it.

The charges from the two cases were consolidated, records show, and McNeill was allowed to plead guilty to lesser counts. He was sentenced to 40 to 50 months of supervised probation in June 2003, the records show.

Two months later, in August 2003, McNeill violated terms of his probation by failing to notify probation officers of his whereabouts. He was sent to prison. Records show that he entered the prison system in October 2003 and was released in May 2006.

It didn't take long for McNeill to get into trouble again. Three months after his release, records show, McNeill was charged with possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use.

The records show that McNeill pleaded guilty to reduced charges - a misdemeanor offense of maintaining a vehicle for drug use - and again was placed on supervised probation, on Jan. 1, 2007.

As part of the plea deal, District Court Judge Kim Tucker told McNeill that he could go on unsupervised probation if he tested negative for drugs three consecutive times, records show.

While still on supervised probation, McNeill was charged in April 2007 with possessing cocaine, records show. He was charged again in September 2007 - this time with hitting Fayetteville police officer R. Grimm with his vehicle while trying to flee from the corner of Bragg Boulevard and Ames Street. Records indicate Grimm was injured, but they don't say how badly. McNeill was charged that day with trying to elude arrest, reckless driving and assault on a government official.

Two months later - on Nov. 30, 2007 - Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson allowed McNeill's probation status to be changed from supervised to unsupervised, records show.

Wayne Marshburn, who oversees the probation office in Cumberland County, said he had not fully reviewed McNeill's probation documents.

But Marshburn said people who behave while on probation typically serve only about half of their term.

McNeill was six months shy of 24 months on supervised probation when a judge agreed to place him on unsupervised probation. It's unclear from the records which judge made that decision.

"He had done well on probation," Marshburn said. "He had done everything he needed to do."

In many cases, Marshburn said, probation officers make recommendations to the court on whether someone's probation should be terminated.

But in 2007, he said, his office wasn't always notified when a person on probation had been charged with another crime.

That is much less likely to happen now, Marshburn said, in part because of the slaying of UNC student president Eve Carson in March 2008.

Since then, the state's probation department has come under intense scrutiny because one of the men accused of Carson's murder should have gone before a judge on a probation violation months before she was shot to death.

Laws that go into effect in December will further address problems with the state's parole and probation system, Marshburn said.

He called Shaniya's death a horrible tragedy, but he said there is no guarantee that she would still be alive today had McNeill remained on supervised probation.

"Hindsight is always very clear," he said. "People do bad things while being supervised. That provides solace to nobody. That's not what I would want to hear. But it's a fact.

"The bottom line, I still am satisfied with how our office handled the case."

Staff writer Greg Barnes can be reached at barnesg@fayobserver.com or 486-3525.
Get your complete news report daily in The Fayetteville *******:

very interesting, Magnolia. Eve Carson was a friend of mine - her birthday is tomorrow so please everyone think of her and her family during this time.

hugs to you, Louisiana.

Eve was a beautiful girl with a bright and shining future.  An absolute travesty that she was taken from this earth.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: jill on November 19, 2009, 09:41:53 AM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.

if she was actually diagnosed with excema, there would be medical records, I would think.

also, my .02 about the probation system in that area:  are they idiots??  Lord in heaven.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 09:42:09 AM
bananas don't feel bad i can't either....
i was just posting the same
PENNY, I saw the shoes too, and possibly some thigh high stockings in the middle picture.
We had a debate about it the other night. Magnolia and I were about the only ones that saw them, the rest said they couldn't even with the magnifyer. I believe personally that the middle picture was the going in pic, and the barefoot ones were the going out, but not everyone agrees with me. JMO


I saw shoes as well...

I might add I brought the shoes up and noticed them...
yup and i concur... except i don't think they are silver slip ons i think they are clear plastic jelly shoes with a criss cross netting design and that is why people can still see her toes.... and they are not the pigmentation of her skin if you look at the pic it is too high up her foot for that... i realize that the sides of her feet are lighter due to her race but this marking is too straight and is about a quarter of the way across the top of her foot not just the side... don't know if you answered already but what do you think the thing half way down her thigh is .. i know a poster thinks thigh high stockings but i disagree i think more like stretch shorts... not trying to be graphic but we all know that she is in front of an elevatot on the 3rd floor and the button to go down is pressed... this is definitely them leaving the third floor to return to a lower floor... (LE said they have not released the pics of them leaving that could mean the parking lot pics because they are clearly exiting the 3rd floor in the middle pic) If we assume and i think it is a safe assumption that she was raped/molested then there would most likely be bleeding i think that is why she has on whatever theis undergarment is and why it seems that he is staring at her crotch


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 09:46:17 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

This is April Autry - MAM's girlfriend, how old is she 15?  Probably not but she sure looks it.


Not a day over 16......and she his baby mama.
well at least i feel a little better about the size 24 months jeans they found in his car... as shaniya was not a size 24 mos and i was starting to worry if there are other victims... for now i am guessing they are his daughter's his baby mama says there were no signs of molestation with their daughter...
although i guess it is possible that she could be lying for him...
there have been studies done and i don't have the link and i do not want to sound racist but non-reported molestation especially within family members is higher in the black community... not that it matters because she is a pos either way but the fact that the mothers family is standing up for her makes me wonder what went on in the mothers childhood that made her be a hooker and think it is okay for her 5 year old to be one

I have been trying for 15 min to reply without sounding racist, so I will not reply. Except to say, it might be higher in some communities, but it is disturbingly happening across the board.
yeah i didn't know whether i should post that but studies have been done and iirc oprah even talked on the issue that inner family molestation and turning a blind eye to it is alarmingly higher in the african community... it definitely does happen across the board tho


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 19, 2009, 10:01:15 AM
I just dont understand why some people are coming out now and saying all this stuff about what a bad idea it was for the Father to leave Shaniya with her Mother? 
 
 If they all knew this before then why didnt they do something then, before this harm came to her, I know some are gonna use the same argument that no one had custody and this was her Mother , but come on, would you let that stop you if if you thought for one minute that something bad was gonna happen, I wouldnt, do you actually think if someone had went over there to that trailer and asked to see Shaniya and the Mother said no......then you say ok,,,,,Ill just call the Police and wait right here for them to get her, then what, I can bet you that the Mother didnt want any cops around,

 What Im trying to say is.......if all these people were so concerned why did they do nothing, why come out now and talk about it , its not only the father that made mistakes it eveyone of them to, I say if your own doorstep is dirty, dont throw mud on someone elses.......IMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 10:07:25 AM
Since Fayetteville is satified with the way they have handled MM, that the way he
has walked on everything, I have never heard of getting probation for shooting
someone, plus everything else he has got probation for. They are debating what county to charge him in???? I thought what they were doing to a baby was a Federal offence. Settle it boys, let the FBI take over and charge them in federal
court. THAT SHOULD TAKE THE GRIN OFF MM'S FACE!!!!!!

Hi Mary...good morning all monkeys...

they most certainly need to settle this and get on with the charges so that the bail/bond on these 2 waste of air parasites will get raised! right now as stated on NG show last night, all the bio Ho needs is $5,000 to get out and the other parasite only needs $10,000 I believe...they could bond out while the LE are trying to decide which county is going to prosecute them! outrageous that the bond is that low for what these 2 scum bags did to that poor baby..
anyone who could do this horrendous thing to a child has no heart! I don't want them out to harm anyone else, ever!

I agree.  I have worried all along that the bond was so low.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:18:05 AM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.
OMG I can offer valid info for this!!!
Last winter I noticed that where my knee high leather boots come up to (right below my knee) and on the back of my leg a perfectly round patch of dry skin on both legs... at first I figured it was just irritated from my boots or something so I blew it off then one day I actually looked at it in the mirror and noticed it was perfectly round ring and I freaked out because I thought OMG I have ring worm (didn't really know what it was but knew it caused rings under the skin) so I went to my doctor and she said it was probably eczema def not ring worm and to use eucerine cream...
also when I was a teenager i had some sort of random skin bacteria/fungus that caused me to have pure white perfect circles the size of a pencil eraser on my upper arms... it was weird and the doctor told me to treat it with get this head and shoulders shampoo and it went away...
the leg circles looked like cigar burns and the arm thing could have passed as chic pox or cig burn scars... just saying it is not that unprobable that this could be true about the eczema and unless it is sever they do not prescribe actual medication...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:28:15 AM
http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=002-8.flv

Here is the video.  Now the stuff comes out.
Thank-you

No Rose,

I don't believe the video, my "guess" is there was a dispute over his daughters will, this is my theory, why the father-in-law has come out with this garbage...follow the money. If any of this was true these people need to be in jail for not reporting this to DCF or not taking photos. 


Brad said Shaniya had an ailment my cousin had the same ailment on her insides of the arms and back of the legs your needed I think Calamine lotion. The corner of the eye burn?  These people should have called the cops for a visit to stupid Antonette, how could they not if it was true?  My opinion.
one time my mother who is not allowed to smoke around my kids was babysitting and my kid who was i think 4 at the time was taking a nap and woke up... my mom was on the porch smoking and my kid thought it would be good to sneak up and scare her... my mother was sitting in a chair and had her cigg in her hand at the height of the chair armrest... my kid turned the corner crouched down a little and walked right into the cig as my mother was returning her arm to the armrest after taking a drag so it kind of came at her with force and it basicly got put out on her face... right above the outer edge of her eyebrow... when my friends asked my kid what happened she said nonny burned me with her ciggarette... my friends knew that my mother would never intentionally do that so it was no big deal but if you asked my kid where she got it that would be her response... just saying not making excuses but just saying and i believe the eczema round patch thing because i have that


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:33:47 AM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.

if she was actually diagnosed with excema, there would be medical records, I would think.

also, my .02 about the probation system in that area:  are they idiots??  Lord in heaven.
my opinion about the probation....
in some areas like mine the prisons are way too overcrowded and filled with a bunch of cry babies that expect top notch med treatment education opportunities etc. also when you are on probation you usually have monthly probation fees... quite possibly the court system is more interested in collecting fees rather then paying for room and board...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: allalone on November 19, 2009, 10:38:50 AM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.
OMG I can offer valid info for this!!!
Last winter I noticed that where my knee high leather boots come up to (right below my knee) and on the back of my leg a perfectly round patch of dry skin on both legs... at first I figured it was just irritated from my boots or something so I blew it off then one day I actually looked at it in the mirror and noticed it was perfectly round ring and I freaked out because I thought OMG I have ring worm (didn't really know what it was but knew it caused rings under the skin) so I went to my doctor and she said it was probably eczema def not ring worm and to use eucerine cream...
also when I was a teenager i had some sort of random skin bacteria/fungus that caused me to have pure white perfect circles the size of a pencil eraser on my upper arms... it was weird and the doctor told me to treat it with get this head and shoulders shampoo and it went away...
the leg circles looked like cigar burns and the arm thing could have passed as chic pox or cig burn scars... just saying it is not that unprobable that this could be true about the eczema and unless it is sever they do not prescribe actual medication...

I would also like to add that when my son was about 2 1/2 or 3 one morning after waking up I was taking off his pj's, you know the kind that the shirt snaps to the bottoms at the waist well he had perfectly round sores that could have passed as cig burns. I took him right away to the Dr and it was discovered that he suddenly became allergic to the metal in the snaps. After that, I had to always cover any snap or metal button that touched his skin. During this time he also had eczema so I can def see where Shaniya could have had eczema and people thought they were burns....imo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: N2WISHN on November 19, 2009, 10:39:56 AM
I just dont understand why some people are coming out now and saying all this stuff about what a bad idea it was for the Father to leave Shaniya with her Mother? 
 
 If they all knew this before then why didnt they do something then, before this harm came to her, I know some are gonna use the same argument that no one had custody and this was her Mother , but come on, would you let that stop you if if you thought for one minute that something bad was gonna happen, I wouldnt, do you actually think if someone had went over there to that trailer and asked to see Shaniya and the Mother said no......then you say ok,,,,,Ill just call the Police and wait right here for them to get her, then what, I can bet you that the Mother didnt want any cops around,

 What Im trying to say is.......if all these people were so concerned why did they do nothing, why come out now and talk about it , its not only the father that made mistakes it eveyone of them to, I say if your own doorstep is dirty, dont throw mud on someone elses.......IMO



I can’t explain why but I tend to believe those saying that they warned the father not to send Shaniya to live with the monster. Could they have done more? Possibly, but for whatever reasons, they didn’t. However, listening to the words of the father and then also to the son when he was on NG made things a little more clear. The son compared Antoinette to a felon that had done his time and was now being given a second chance……Is it possible that it is really that simple and that is why the precious baby was allowed to live with the mom? Maybe the father really thought she had changed and was getting her life together or he just wanted a break from the responsibility of his child. Granted, he should have checked things out more thoroughly and not given his trust so freely because it is a mistake he will have to live with and take responsibility for the rest of his life. Would I have given her a second chance, no way.  In my eyes he failed in his judgement and his child paid the ultimate price. Another thing also bothers me, and I hope I’m wrong…..but what if the mom really put the pressure on the dad because she had plans to make money off her daughter….no telling what lies were told in order for her to get possession of Shaniya. ……many people let Shaniya down and failed to protect her. May she rest in peace.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:43:35 AM
discoid or nummular eczema both cause small round red scabby patches


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 10:47:21 AM
And maybe the autopsy has revealed whether the marks are burns or not.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gizzie on November 19, 2009, 10:47:31 AM
Question. Since AD has a bail, and she hasn't been charged with the murder, what could LE do to prevent her from being bonded out, and running? Anything?

I didn't see an answer, so thought I'd ask again. Not that I think she could actually come up with the money needed, but I am curious of the possibility. TIA


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 10:49:29 AM
Question. Since AD has a bail, and she hasn't been charged with the murder, what could LE do to prevent her from being bonded out, and running? Anything?

I didn't see an answer, so thought I'd ask again. Not that I think she could actually come up with the money needed, but I am curious of the possibility. TIA
I don't think they could do too much if she was able to bail out, maybe family is putting money together to bail her out, but that is a lot of money when you don't have much, so hopefully they won't be able to bail her out.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: FishstickKitty on November 19, 2009, 10:49:42 AM
If she has 2 brain cells she should just stay in jail...for her own safety at this point.

Question. Since AD has a bail, and she hasn't been charged with the murder, what could LE do to prevent her from being bonded out, and running? Anything?

I didn't see an answer, so thought I'd ask again. Not that I think she could actually come up with the money needed, but I am curious of the possibility. TIA


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 10:57:00 AM
If the bio hag was related to me and did this to her child, I wouldn't bail her out of jail even if I had a get out of jail free card!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:58:58 AM
i think everyone regardless of their crime if it is something that you could face actual jail time for should be gps 'ed if bailed out... screw the innocent until proven guilty bs not saying that they should be on house arrest or not allowed to travel as normal just saying we should know where they are in case they try to jump bail


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 11:01:20 AM
This is from the Fayetteville ******* Re: McNeil's record

Published: 11:06 PM, Tue Nov 17, 2009
Probation ended early for suspect in Shaniya Davis case By Greg Barnes
Staff writer

 Three weeks before Shaniya Davis disappeared, the Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping her was allowed to end his supervised probation six months early.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, was on unsupervised probation when police say he kidnapped 5-year-old Shaniya on Nov. 10, according to Cumberland County court records.

At 6:11 that morning, video surveillance at the Comfort Suites in Sanford captured a man police identified as McNeill carrying Shaniya into the motel.

Shaniya's body was found Monday in woods off a rural road south of Sanford.

McNeill appears to have been treated with leniency for years by an overburdened court system.

On June 17, 2001, court documents show, McNeill shot Roland Lee Mays in the face, neck, shoulder, chest and stomach. The records indicate that McNeill injured two other people that day, as well. He was charged with multiple counts of assault inflicting serious bodily injury.

A year later, apparently while awaiting trial in the shootings, McNeill was charged with possessing marijuana and trying to manufacture and sell it.

The charges from the two cases were consolidated, records show, and McNeill was allowed to plead guilty to lesser counts. He was sentenced to 40 to 50 months of supervised probation in June 2003, the records show.

Two months later, in August 2003, McNeill violated terms of his probation by failing to notify probation officers of his whereabouts. He was sent to prison. Records show that he entered the prison system in October 2003 and was released in May 2006.

It didn't take long for McNeill to get into trouble again. Three months after his release, records show, McNeill was charged with possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use.

The records show that McNeill pleaded guilty to reduced charges - a misdemeanor offense of maintaining a vehicle for drug use - and again was placed on supervised probation, on Jan. 1, 2007.

As part of the plea deal, District Court Judge Kim Tucker told McNeill that he could go on unsupervised probation if he tested negative for drugs three consecutive times, records show.

While still on supervised probation, McNeill was charged in April 2007 with possessing cocaine, records show. He was charged again in September 2007 - this time with hitting Fayetteville police officer R. Grimm with his vehicle while trying to flee from the corner of Bragg Boulevard and Ames Street. Records indicate Grimm was injured, but they don't say how badly. McNeill was charged that day with trying to elude arrest, reckless driving and assault on a government official.

Two months later - on Nov. 30, 2007 - Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson allowed McNeill's probation status to be changed from supervised to unsupervised, records show.

Wayne Marshburn, who oversees the probation office in Cumberland County, said he had not fully reviewed McNeill's probation documents.

But Marshburn said people who behave while on probation typically serve only about half of their term.

McNeill was six months shy of 24 months on supervised probation when a judge agreed to place him on unsupervised probation. It's unclear from the records which judge made that decision.

"He had done well on probation," Marshburn said. "He had done everything he needed to do."

In many cases, Marshburn said, probation officers make recommendations to the court on whether someone's probation should be terminated.

But in 2007, he said, his office wasn't always notified when a person on probation had been charged with another crime.

That is much less likely to happen now, Marshburn said, in part because of the slaying of UNC student president Eve Carson in March 2008.

Since then, the state's probation department has come under intense scrutiny because one of the men accused of Carson's murder should have gone before a judge on a probation violation months before she was shot to death.

Laws that go into effect in December will further address problems with the state's parole and probation system, Marshburn said.

He called Shaniya's death a horrible tragedy, but he said there is no guarantee that she would still be alive today had McNeill remained on supervised probation.

"Hindsight is always very clear," he said. "People do bad things while being supervised. That provides solace to nobody. That's not what I would want to hear. But it's a fact.

"The bottom line, I still am satisfied with how our office handled the case."

Staff writer Greg Barnes can be reached at barnesg@fayobserver.com or 486-3525.
Get your complete news report daily in The Fayetteville *******:

very interesting, Magnolia. Eve Carson was a friend of mine - her birthday is tomorrow so please everyone think of her and her family during this time.

I am sorry for your loss, Louisiana.  God bless Eve on her birthday and everyday.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gizzie on November 19, 2009, 11:03:22 AM
Question. Since AD has a bail, and she hasn't been charged with the murder, what could LE do to prevent her from being bonded out, and running? Anything?

I didn't see an answer, so thought I'd ask again. Not that I think she could actually come up with the money needed, but I am curious of the possibility. TIA
I don't think they could do too much if she was able to bail out, maybe family is putting money together to bail her out, but that is a lot of money when you don't have much, so hopefully they won't be able to bail her out.

Yea, I don't think so either. Was just kinda curious, I guess. I think she would only need $5000.00, plus some property? But it doesn't even look like they would have that much in property anyway. In my mind, there's always the what if's. Just thinking to myself if there is something bigger, and someone wouldn't want her to talk, ......

And FSK, you're right, she'd be safer in jail. Someone will get to her, in time. Thanks for answering!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gizzie on November 19, 2009, 11:04:13 AM
If the bio hag was related to me and did this to her child, I wouldn't bail her out of jail even if I had a get out of jail free card!

Me either! Let her rot for all I care!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 11:04:45 AM
If the bio hag was related to me and did this to her child, I wouldn't bail her out of jail even if I had a get out of jail free card!

I believe that if her family intended to bail her out they would have done so.  They can put up the
deed to a house....assuming one of them has a house that isn't mobile.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 11:04:48 AM
if my theory about bio moms childhood is right then they will try to get her out before she spills the beans about who molested/raped her... she will get a defense team because this is so heinous that her trial will make for good tv ratings and she will get a pro bono lawyer... her past childhood traumas will come out and there is no statute of limits on child abuse... if they get her out it is only to shut her up... there is no way that her family didn't know what a scumbag mm was


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 11:13:15 AM
If the bio hag was related to me and did this to her child, I wouldn't bail her out of jail even if I had a get out of jail free card!
I would and the punishment i would give them  myself would involve phirranna's raw hamburg and 3 orrifices between the 2 of them... just saying


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 11:15:44 AM
If the bio hag was related to me and did this to her child, I wouldn't bail her out of jail even if I had a get out of jail free card!

I believe that if her family intended to bail her out they would have done so.  They can put up the
deed to a house....assuming one of them has a house that isn't mobile.
not always ... in order to do that you have to go thru a bail bonds men and not all areas have them and even if they do have one in the area it is at the discretion of the bail man to except your collateral ... how much is a crappy trailer overflowing with sewerage even worth anyways.... not much


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 11:17:05 AM
If the bio hag was related to me and did this to her child, I wouldn't bail her out of jail even if I had a get out of jail free card!
I would and the punishment i would give them  myself would involve phirranna's raw hamburg and 3 orrifices between the 2 of them... just saying

there ya go! good thought! this is one woman that I would enjoy seeing being publicly stoned!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 11:18:21 AM
If the bio hag was related to me and did this to her child, I wouldn't bail her out of jail even if I had a get out of jail free card!
I would and the punishment i would give them  myself would involve phirranna's raw hamburg and 3 orrifices between the 2 of them... just saying

there ya go! good thought! this is one woman that I would enjoy seeing being publicly stoned!

to clarify,,,stoned not in drugs...stoned as in rock throwing... boulders to be exact!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 11:31:17 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!  ::HelloKitty::

This case seems to have inspired the creativity in some of us!   ::MonkeyRoll::

I'm with you! I must admit that the hamburger scenario takes first place in my book!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 11:34:16 AM
If the bio hag was related to me and did this to her child, I wouldn't bail her out of jail even if I had a get out of jail free card!
I would and the punishment i would give them  myself would involve phirranna's raw hamburg and 3 orrifices between the 2 of them... just saying

there ya go! good thought! this is one woman that I would enjoy seeing being publicly stoned!

to clarify,,,stoned not in drugs...stoned as in rock throwing... boulders to be exact!

Ohhhh, just saw this, Cookie! Boulders are good, too!  :smt045


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 11:43:58 AM
Just had a comment about the eczema. My kids both had eczema has babies in the cold weather especially. I guess it is possible that it could have been mistaken. I am just curious though, why did the girl say that it was something that her grandma did?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 11:45:18 AM
discoid or nummular eczema both cause small round red scabby patches

Thanks Penny, it was Eczema (I believe) it was stated on TV, sorry, don't remember which show.

I remember pink Calamine lotion was used behind the legs and inside the arms, the Eczema is itchy if I remember correctly.

Aunt Carrie would never sent Shaniya back over for a visit if she found any tell tale sign.

The family members seem like decent people, one fatal judgement and they lost a sparkling child, the world lost a sparkling child.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 11:59:55 AM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.

Thanks, NRCG, it may have been excema more..shame his F-I-L for statements it was cigerette burns if he didn't
have a doctor check out the child?  I really find that guy obnoxious to go and make these claims when he didn't do anything
about it.  I still think it is money, money, money...I wonder if he was left out of daughters estate? IMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 12:01:14 PM
Just had a comment about the eczema. My kids both had eczema has babies in the cold weather especially. I guess it is possible that it could have been mistaken. I am just curious though, why did the girl say that it was something that her grandma did?
the eye burn could have been an accidental burn... not saying it was but she was at the right height to where she could have walked into a lit cigg that the gma was holding...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 12:07:03 PM
Sorry if this was already posted but they caught the guy that was using Shaniya as a scam to make money.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953325

Good!  Thanks for posting!

Is that guy the one claiming to be the step-brother or step-sister with a phone number?

I am leary about Shaniya memorial, (forgive me), what is a memorial?  Brad looks more than capable of footing the bill for Shaniya.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 12:11:39 PM
the FIL/grandfather is raising Brad's kids from his first marriage...he seems like a decent guy who stepped up to  the plate and played daddy to some kids who needed it jmo...maybe he was told by someone that Shaniya was burnt by cigarettes and maybe he did report it...we don't know at this point...I tend to believe that his heart is/was in the right place and that he would have taken Shaniya in a heart beat to live with him and the other kids...jmo...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 12:14:20 PM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.

Thanks, NRCG, it may have been excema more..shame his F-I-L for statements it was cigerette burns if he didn't
have a doctor check out the child?  I really find that guy obnoxious to go and make these claims when he didn't do anything
about it.  I still think it is money, money, money...I wonder if he was left out of daughters estate? IMO
i get what you mean about don't complain now if you didn't inertveine then... but i don't get what you mean about the money ... why would he have ben in his daughters estate anyways... it is not normal for healthy married adults with 3 kids to include their parents in their will... most people expect to outlive their parents...
the father seemed bitter about him having sex with this bio mom maybe he found it to be disgraceful to his daughters memory that while they are raising the grandkids the dad is out boinking trashy hookers and having babies with them... if i was raising some ones kids to help out with a tragedy and that person just turns around and has 2 more kids i would probably be a little miffed too...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 12:17:48 PM
I think everyone who suspects abuse with any child should call and report it. We are hearing one side of the story though.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 12:19:25 PM
the FIL/grandfather is raising Brad's kids from his first marriage...he seems like a decent guy who stepped up to  the plate and played daddy to some kids who needed it jmo...maybe he was told by someone that Shaniya was burnt by cigarettes and maybe he did report it...we don't know at this point...I tend to believe that his heart is/was in the right place and that he would have taken Shaniya in a heart beat to live with him and the other kids...jmo...
Maybe someone remembers because I don't  ::MonkeyConfused:: It was either the son of Brad, or the FIL that made a comment that out of Shaniya's mouth when asked, that her mother's friends did that to her, in reference to the cigarette burn/burns. I know that I heard or read that, just hoping someone remembers so it doesn't look like I'm spreading rumors. Because I remember thinking to myself, if Shaniya said that, a little five year old isn't making things up such as this. Also it was the son or FIL that made a comment about Shaniya being leary around men. I'm sure hoping someone remembers this, thanks.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 19, 2009, 12:22:20 PM
the FIL/grandfather is raising Brad's kids from his first marriage...he seems like a decent guy who stepped up to  the plate and played daddy to some kids who needed it jmo...maybe he was told by someone that Shaniya was burnt by cigarettes and maybe he did report it...we don't know at this point...I tend to believe that his heart is/was in the right place and that he would have taken Shaniya in a heart beat to live with him and the other kids...jmo...
Maybe someone remembers because I don't  ::MonkeyConfused:: It was either the son of Brad, or the FIL that made a comment that out of Shaniya's mouth when asked, that her mother's friends did that to her, in reference to the cigarette burn/burns. I know that I heard or read that, just hoping someone remembers so it doesn't look like I'm spreading rumors. Because I remember thinking to myself, if Shaniya said that, a little five year old isn't making things up such as this. Also it was the son or FIL that made a comment about Shaniya being leary around men. I'm sure hoping someone remembers this, thanks.
Hey Rose, it was the son that said that about Shaniya not liking men she didnt know on NG the other night....I just watched again and thats what he said.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 12:24:04 PM
brad's son Byron made the comment about Shaniya being leary of men on the NG interview...from what I recall..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 12:25:40 PM
Good Evening Monkeys & Guests,

Has this been posted?


snip.


Police searched McNeill's car, a 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, and took a black and yellow abblebottom jacket, size four, a pair of jeans, size 24 months, a plastic straw, swabbings, and soil samples.

According to search warrangs, McNeill admitted taking Davis from the front of her house to a hotel in Sanford.

It is unknown at this time what McNeill's connection is to the child, police say. April Autry tells NBC17 that she is McNeill's girlfriend and is friends with Shaniya's aunt.

McNeilll was on unsupervised probation when Davis went missing. McNeill has been charged multiple times since 2001. The charges include assault inflicting serious bodily injury, possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use and hitting a police officer with his car


snip.
http://news.mync.com/site/news/story/44291/amber-alert-authorities-search-for-missing-5-year-old-girl/

I don't remember seeing this before. Thanks!

Your welcome, I gleaned it from another site:)

I tend to think there is always a hint of truth in a lie....The mom kept saying over and over again she was afraid Shaniya wandered outside, why would she say this? So I find it interesting about the claim MM took Shaniya from the front of her house. I have wondered if she had to sleep in the bathtub and when it had the sewage problem she moved to the couch and then mom put her on the porch and that is how the fecal matter was on the couch and the porch.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 12:28:41 PM
brad's son Byron made the comment about Shaniya being leary of men on the NG interview...from what I recall..

For the most part she was being raised by a female relative that was unmarried, not strange a young child would be leary of men.

Are there any other pressers scheduled?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 12:31:50 PM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.

Thanks, NRCG, it may have been excema more..shame his F-I-L for statements it was cigerette burns if he didn't
have a doctor check out the child?  I really find that guy obnoxious to go and make these claims when he didn't do anything
about it.  I still think it is money, money, money...I wonder if he was left out of daughters estate? IMO

There seems to be a lot of water under the bridge between these people, that is foresure.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 12:32:02 PM
when I read that MM said that he took Shaniya from the front of her house that he was meaning the front room or living room where the bio said that she had put Shaniya at 5:30 which I think is not the correct time...

maybe MM took Shaniya the night before for whatever evil the bio and he intended and was supposed to return her the next morning early...when he didn't, that is why she called 911...she was pizzed that he had not returned the child when he was supposed to...she might have had a new trick lined up for the next morning..God it pains me to even type that let alone think about what this little 5 yr old was subjected to...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 12:36:15 PM
This was an incident report file... Neglected by offender of a child..
Child name is Amari Autry. Go to the link it explains better...

The link didn't work. Did it work for anyone else? Can someone explain this reports details?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 12:37:12 PM
the FIL/grandfather is raising Brad's kids from his first marriage...he seems like a decent guy who stepped up to  the plate and played daddy to some kids who needed it jmo...maybe he was told by someone that Shaniya was burnt by cigarettes and maybe he did report it...we don't know at this point...I tend to believe that his heart is/was in the right place and that he would have taken Shaniya in a heart beat to live with him and the other kids...jmo...

I think the mere fact of both of those men offering to take Shaniya in says a lot.
IMO, that was all they knew to do, and they were sincere.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 19, 2009, 12:40:21 PM


I tend to think there is always a hint of truth in a lie....The mom kept saying over and over again she was afraid Shaniya wandered outside, why would she say this? So I find it interesting about the claim MM took Shaniya from the front of her house. I have wondered if she had to sleep in the bathtub and when it had the sewage problem she moved to the couch and then mom put her on the porch and that is how the fecal matter was on the couch and the porch.

I think mommy dearest shot herself in the foot when she made that 911 call, and I believe her when she said she last seen Shaniya @ 5:30. I mapquest'ed the distance between the Sleepy Hollow mobile home park and The Comfort Inn, and the distance is approximately 45 mins. AD claimed she last seen Shaniya at 5:30 am. McNeill & Shaniya are seen arriving at the Comfort Inn at 6:11 am. Almost exactly the time it would take to drive from the mobile home park to the hotel. What are the odds AD would just happen to see Shaniya at the exact moment she went missing? Unless of course- she was there at the moment of the 'kidnapping'. She may have woken her up and brought her to the car where MM was waiting..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 12:42:15 PM
when I read that MM said that he took Shaniya from the front of her house that he was meaning the front room or living room where the bio said that she had put Shaniya at 5:30 which I think is not the correct time...

maybe MM took Shaniya the night before for whatever evil the bio and he intended and was supposed to return her the next morning early...when he didn't, that is why she called 911...she was pizzed that he had not returned the child when he was supposed to...she might have had a new trick lined up for the next morning..God it pains me to even type that let alone think about what this little 5 yr old was subjected to...

Cookie I wonder if we will ever be told what happened that night/morning. I pray she was not as abused as my imagination seems to be pointing to and I also pray this poor baby went quickly and painlessly.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 12:45:07 PM
The following quote of Carey Lockart-Davis speaks volumes to me.  Why was there no contact with her niece for almost five weeks?  The father did not talk to his little girl in that five week period she was with her mother.  Shanyia's siblings  ... who have express concerns regarding AD's life style on Nancy Grace ... did not talk to their sister in that five week period.   Something is not right with the family dynamics.

Janet

++++++

Nancy Grace - November 17, 2009

CAREY LOCKHART-DAVIS, SHANIYA DAVIS` AUNT: The last time I saw Shaniya was four weeks ago on a Friday. I went to visit her mother. I packed her with two days` worth of clothes. I got her out of the car, and I kissed her good-bye, and I told her to be a good girl. She turned back to me and said, "I love you, Aunt Carey, and see you later."

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/17/ng.01.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 12:48:21 PM
the FIL/grandfather is raising Brad's kids from his first marriage...he seems like a decent guy who stepped up to  the plate and played daddy to some kids who needed it jmo...maybe he was told by someone that Shaniya was burnt by cigarettes and maybe he did report it...we don't know at this point...I tend to believe that his heart is/was in the right place and that he would have taken Shaniya in a heart beat to live with him and the other kids...jmo...
Maybe someone remembers because I don't  ::MonkeyConfused:: It was either the son of Brad, or the FIL that made a comment that out of Shaniya's mouth when asked, that her mother's friends did that to her, in reference to the cigarette burn/burns. I know that I heard or read that, just hoping someone remembers so it doesn't look like I'm spreading rumors. Because I remember thinking to myself, if Shaniya said that, a little five year old isn't making things up such as this. Also it was the son or FIL that made a comment about Shaniya being leary around men. I'm sure hoping someone remembers this, thanks.
Hey Rose, it was the son that said that about Shaniya not liking men she didnt know on NG the other night....I just watched again and thats what he said.
Thanks, and thanks Cookie, I thought I heard this.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 12:49:24 PM


I tend to think there is always a hint of truth in a lie....The mom kept saying over and over again she was afraid Shaniya wandered outside, why would she say this? So I find it interesting about the claim MM took Shaniya from the front of her house. I have wondered if she had to sleep in the bathtub and when it had the sewage problem she moved to the couch and then mom put her on the porch and that is how the fecal matter was on the couch and the porch.

I think mommy dearest shot herself in the foot when she made that 911 call, and I believe her when she said she last seen Shaniya @ 5:30. I mapquest'ed the distance between the Sleepy Hollow mobile home park and The Comfort Inn, and the distance is approximately 45 mins. AD claimed she last seen Shaniya at 5:30 am. McNeill & Shaniya are seen arriving at the Comfort Inn at 6:11 am. Almost exactly the time it would take to drive from the mobile home park to the hotel. What are the odds AD would just happen to see Shaniya at the exact moment she went missing? Unless of course- she was there at the moment of the 'kidnapping'. She may have woken her up and brought her to the car where MM was waiting..


Somewhere in their 2 stories lies the truth. How did the mess get on the couch and the porch? I really do wonder if this child was forced to sleep in the bathtub and was laying in the filth.

You know, if AD owed MM money, he could have gone to collect it and when there was none, grabbed the girl or the mom could have said to take her. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 19, 2009, 12:52:40 PM
the FIL/grandfather is raising Brad's kids from his first marriage...he seems like a decent guy who stepped up to  the plate and played daddy to some kids who needed it jmo...maybe he was told by someone that Shaniya was burnt by cigarettes and maybe he did report it...we don't know at this point...I tend to believe that his heart is/was in the right place and that he would have taken Shaniya in a heart beat to live with him and the other kids...jmo...
Maybe someone remembers because I don't  ::MonkeyConfused:: It was either the son of Brad, or the FIL that made a comment that out of Shaniya's mouth when asked, that her mother's friends did that to her, in reference to the cigarette burn/burns. I know that I heard or read that, just hoping someone remembers so it doesn't look like I'm spreading rumors. Because I remember thinking to myself, if Shaniya said that, a little five year old isn't making things up such as this. Also it was the son or FIL that made a comment about Shaniya being leary around men. I'm sure hoping someone remembers this, thanks.

Supposedly it was Shaniya who said her Grandma burned her by the eye with a cigarette told by her half sister I think. This will all come out I guess, if true.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 19, 2009, 12:54:27 PM
seahorse, Brad is saying Shaniya suffered from excema, and others are saying cigarette burns. There is a huge difference in appearance between the two. I have no idea what Shaniya had, maybe the aunt could say if she had excema, and then this could be put to rest. I would hate to think she had cigarette burns, and I really believe the aunt took good care of her and would have been able to tell the difference. And definitely, if people saw abuse, they should have spoken up to authorities.
OMG I can offer valid info for this!!!
Last winter I noticed that where my knee high leather boots come up to (right below my knee) and on the back of my leg a perfectly round patch of dry skin on both legs... at first I figured it was just irritated from my boots or something so I blew it off then one day I actually looked at it in the mirror and noticed it was perfectly round ring and I freaked out because I thought OMG I have ring worm (didn't really know what it was but knew it caused rings under the skin) so I went to my doctor and she said it was probably eczema def not ring worm and to use eucerine cream...
also when I was a teenager i had some sort of random skin bacteria/fungus that caused me to have pure white perfect circles the size of a pencil eraser on my upper arms... it was weird and the doctor told me to treat it with get this head and shoulders shampoo and it went away...
the leg circles looked like cigar burns and the arm thing could have passed as chic pox or cig burn scars... just saying it is not that unprobable that this could be true about the eczema and unless it is sever they do not prescribe actual medication...

My youngest daughter has exzema, had it since she was born, most people thought she was just not bathed well when she had break outs, thank God on her first break out I went straight to the pediatrician with her and was diagnosed as exzema , so never had any issues with allegations. they told me to use selsyn blu on her and gave me a special soft bristle brush to use to scrub the areas with the selsyn blu , and had to follow up with a cream/lotion after she was dried off. She still has break outs and yes, they start in perfect circles like ring worm. You probably had exzema in the early years as well hence the head n shoulders treatment. It is difficult to see on a child that has the break outs on their head, hers main areas were her head and arms, and if you don't catch it when it starts, it can form 'encrustations',as I learned when she got older and would not let me check her head daily for signs of break outs. I learned the pattern quickly though, if she scratched her head, she was breaking out.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 01:23:43 PM
the FIL/grandfather is raising Brad's kids from his first marriage...he seems like a decent guy who stepped up to  the plate and played daddy to some kids who needed it jmo...maybe he was told by someone that Shaniya was burnt by cigarettes and maybe he did report it...we don't know at this point...I tend to believe that his heart is/was in the right place and that he would have taken Shaniya in a heart beat to live with him and the other kids...jmo...
Maybe someone remembers because I don't  ::MonkeyConfused:: It was either the son of Brad, or the FIL that made a comment that out of Shaniya's mouth when asked, that her mother's friends did that to her, in reference to the cigarette burn/burns. I know that I heard or read that, just hoping someone remembers so it doesn't look like I'm spreading rumors. Because I remember thinking to myself, if Shaniya said that, a little five year old isn't making things up such as this. Also it was the son or FIL that made a comment about Shaniya being leary around men. I'm sure hoping someone remembers this, thanks.

Supposedly it was Shaniya who said her Grandma burned her by the eye with a cigarette told by her half sister I think. This will all come out I guess, if true.

Grm could have burned her without malice, meaning, gma may have held Shaniya in her arms with a cigerette, coffee, phone...
smokers have cigerettes burns on theirselves,too... smokers are careless sometimes and that is the truth.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 01:27:53 PM
I can't help but think about what the 7 year old little boy witnessed day in and day out. ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

I'm praying he is ok.  ::MonkeyAngel::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 01:33:01 PM
I can't help but think about what the 7 year old little boy witnessed day in and day out. ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

I'm praying he is ok.  ::MonkeyAngel::


I am also, and I just bet that little guy told the police a lot of things  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 01:44:58 PM
I can't help but think about what the 7 year old little boy witnessed day in and day out. ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

I'm praying he is ok.  ::MonkeyAngel::


I am also, and I just bet that little guy told the police a lot of things  ::MonkeyNoNo::

yes...I am betting that he saw plenty in his short little life...sadly..
this is one of the most heartbreaking cases ....in fact, they seem to get worse and worse with each child that goes missing doesn't it? just plain mean self indulgent people having babies that they don't want..this includes bio dads AND moms...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 02:15:14 PM
I can't help but think about what the 7 year old little boy witnessed day in and day out. ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

I'm praying he is ok.  ::MonkeyAngel::


I am also, and I just bet that little guy told the police a lot of things  ::MonkeyNoNo::

yes...I am betting that he saw plenty in his short little life...sadly..
this is one of the most heartbreaking cases ....in fact, they seem to get worse and worse with each child that goes missing doesn't it? just plain mean self indulgent people having babies that they don't want..this includes bio dads AND moms...

Has Fayetteville PD said anything about when the next presser will be?  I'm anxious.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 02:23:36 PM
Good Afternoon Monkeys & Guests:

Has this information been posted?


snip

Police recovered 11 pieces of trace evidence, such as hair and fibers, from the car, as well as clothes, a belt, a straw, a cell phone and a portable GPS system, according to the search warrant.

snip

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

The GPS system should be helpful in the investigation if he was using it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 02:28:40 PM
Good Afternoon Monkeys & Guests:

Has this information been posted?


snip

Police recovered 11 pieces of trace evidence, such as hair and fibers, from the car, as well as clothes, a belt, a straw, a cell phone and a portable GPS system, according to the search warrant.

snip

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

The GPS system should be helpful in the investigation if he was using it.

Seahorse..the info was posted before, however what you mention about the GPS being useful has not to my knowledge been discussed...great point!! really really great point...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 19, 2009, 02:35:12 PM
ARE THEY LOOKING FOR MORE EVIDENCE THAT MAYBE SOMEONE ELSE WAS IN THE CAR WITH MM AND SHANIYA...BECAUSE HE DID SAY HE PICKED HER UP OUTSIDE OF THE HOUSE..I AM JUST ASKING SO I WILL BETTER UNDERSTAND..AND WHAT IS UP WITH SAYING HE PICKED HER UP OUTSIDE THE HOUSE????DID HER POS EGG DONOR PUT HER OUT THERE..IMO I THINK THAT SHE WAS GONE AT  5 30 THAT EVENING BEFORE NOT 5 30 THAT MORNING..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 02:38:26 PM
ARE THEY LOOKING FOR MORE EVIDENCE THAT MAYBE SOMEONE ELSE WAS IN THE CAR WITH MM AND SHANIYA...BECAUSE HE DID SAY HE PICKED HER UP OUTSIDE OF THE HOUSE..I AM JUST ASKING SO I WILL BETTER UNDERSTAND..AND WHAT IS UP WITH SAYING HE PICKED HER UP OUTSIDE THE HOUSE????DID HER POS EGG DONOR PUT HER OUT THERE..IMO I THINK THAT SHE WAS GONE AT  5 30 THAT EVENING BEFORE NOT 5 30 THAT MORNING..

I think so too...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 19, 2009, 02:46:04 PM
Three pic's together.

These pictures just break my heart. I know how this ends for Shaniya, but everytime I see them, I just want to somehow just jump in the picture, snatch her away from that SOB and bring her into safety! At the moment these images were captured, there was still a chance for intervention.........
I know huh?  :*(  The middle one is just a killer. . . she looks so scared to me in that one.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 19, 2009, 02:48:49 PM
Omg you guys sorry bout the caps


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 19, 2009, 02:48:50 PM

very interesting, Magnolia. Eve Carson was a friend of mine - her birthday is tomorrow so please everyone think of her and her family during this time.
I am very sorry for your loss. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 02:49:35 PM
Good Afternoon Monkeys & Guests:

Has this information been posted?


snip

Police recovered 11 pieces of trace evidence, such as hair and fibers, from the car, as well as clothes, a belt, a straw, a cell phone and a portable GPS system, according to the search warrant.

snip

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

The GPS system should be helpful in the investigation if he was using it.

The GPS and the cell phone records will show something. I have a question about a GPS though, does it keep a record of where you have been regardless of asking it for direction. Sorry I don't have one, we use maps, lol.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 19, 2009, 02:51:49 PM
Yes the gps will tell where you have been. It will give you the option to go to previous.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 03:09:44 PM
 ::MonkeyEek::
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/953645


SBI Crime lab waiting on evidence in Shaniya Davis case
A staff report

Analysts at the State Bureau of Investigation crime lab are waiting for evidence in the Shaniya Davis case to arrive.

"The crime lab has not yet received evidence in this case but will process it as soon as the evidence is submitted to the lab," Noelle Talley, an SBI spokeswoman, said in an e-mail today.

Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis said Wednesday night that issues involving lab work were needed before a decision could be made as to whether the death investigation of the 5-year-old girl would be handled by Grannis or Lee County District Attorney Susan Doyle.

~~~~~snipped~~~~~



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 19, 2009, 03:17:22 PM
Yes the gps will tell where you have been. It will give you the option to go to previous.

Even if you did not use the GPS system for directions in going there?  I know you can pull up previous planned tracking, but if you didn't use to get you there, would it know anyway?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 19, 2009, 03:34:33 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 03:42:37 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473

Justagirl, thank you for bringing that over here. It must have been difficult for the poster to go there, if they are reading, thank you for your efforts.

It is very interesting about the carpet, so that make it obvious he was not on the first floor with her. This again makes me wonder if someone else was at that hotel he "visited" with her.
I wish we could find out just why he used that hotel and not a cheaper, more slimmy type, why this one. I would imagine the price per room would be around 50-100?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 19, 2009, 03:44:02 PM
Info on Shaniya's dad, including a completely different name he has used (alias). 

DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SHANIYA'S DAD.  SHANIYA'S DAD IS 38/39 YRS OLD.


Lockhart, Bradley Fitzgerald

Alias used:
Meadows, Benny Frank 

Charges:
DWI - 4/1994
Resisting Officer - 4/1994
Assault on Policeman - 4/1994

Sentence:
jail, probation, no prison time


http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1 (http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1)



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 03:46:52 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473


Thank You!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 03:50:40 PM
::MonkeyEek::
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/953645


SBI Crime lab waiting on evidence in Shaniya Davis case
A staff report

Analysts at the State Bureau of Investigation crime lab are waiting for evidence in the Shaniya Davis case to arrive.

"The crime lab has not yet received evidence in this case but will process it as soon as the evidence is submitted to the lab," Noelle Talley, an SBI spokeswoman, said in an e-mail today.

Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis said Wednesday night that issues involving lab work were needed before a decision could be made as to whether the death investigation of the 5-year-old girl would be handled by Grannis or Lee County District Attorney Susan Doyle.

~~~~~snipped~~~~~


It sure would be great if they put a rush on the evidence going to the crime lab  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 03:55:50 PM
After reading the WS article above, we now know those elevator pics are from the 3rd floor as there is no carpet in front of the lobby elevators.  So those pics show them leaving the hotel I assume. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 03:56:29 PM
::MonkeyEek::
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/953645


SBI Crime lab waiting on evidence in Shaniya Davis case
A staff report

Analysts at the State Bureau of Investigation crime lab are waiting for evidence in the Shaniya Davis case to arrive.

"The crime lab has not yet received evidence in this case but will process it as soon as the evidence is submitted to the lab," Noelle Talley, an SBI spokeswoman, said in an e-mail today.

Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis said Wednesday night that issues involving lab work were needed before a decision could be made as to whether the death investigation of the 5-year-old girl would be handled by Grannis or Lee County District Attorney Susan Doyle.

~~~~~snipped~~~~~


It sure would be great if they put a rush on the evidence going to the crime lab  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Wouldn't it?  Especially with the upcoming holiday!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 04:02:23 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473

Justagirl, thank you for bringing that over here. It must have been difficult for the poster to go there, if they are reading, thank you for your efforts.

It is very interesting about the carpet, so that make it obvious he was not on the first floor with her. This again makes me wonder if someone else was at that hotel he "visited" with her.
I wish we could find out just why he used that hotel and not a cheaper, more slimmy type, why this one. I would imagine the price per room would be around 50-100?

yes thanks for that...MM more than likely went into a side door...this was already planned and set up imo...he may have been picking her up from the previous night on the pictures of him with Shaniya...sadly..

Wyks...interesting that dad had an alias...Why would he need one?
Interesting that his first wife was murdered...home invasion? and when his son started talking about it on NG, did dad come out to comfort son or did he come out to make sure that son didn't say too much about that murder? not trying to make anything out of it necessarily, however, everything  needs to be looked into imo...until we get all the facts of what happened to Shaniya, any related to her who has a past needs to be examined..jmo




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 04:04:12 PM
Cell phone records could prove very interesting in regards to the happenings encompassing the morning Shaniya went missing.

When it is considered that MM arrived at the hotel with Shaniya at 6:11 AM ... I suspect that AD was referring to 5:30 AM.  At this time of year at 5:30 AM it is still very dark and ... maybe this is why AD made referrence to "last night".  The distance of 40 miles between home and the hotel would imply approximately a 30 - 40 minute drive.

I suspect that AD would not have made that 911 call if it had not been for the insistence of her worried sister who woke up unexpected ... her worried sister who did not have a clue what was going on.

Maybe MM was suppose to bring Shanyia back by 8:00 AM but ... AD calls him in a panic and warned him about the 911 call she was forced to make and ... damage control dictated that a short distance past the hotel Shaniya was silenced and disposed of like trash.  However ... the observant hotel clerk and ... hotel security cameras had not been anticipated.  This is why MM turns himself in.

1.  Could it be that MM ... made a plea deal with LE and ... that is the reason that Shanyia's remains were located?

2.  Could it be that AD confessed all and ... that accounts for the charges against her?

3.  Could it be that something was going on in that hotel room involving pornography which may have involved others?  Think about it.  Two other McNeills were arrested.

Just speculating.  I am anticipating a news conference.  What is taking so long?

 ::MonkeyMad::

Would a mod please put the map in the following link ... ... the map which shows the route between the hotel and the location of Shanyia's remains ... in the map thread of this forum.  Thank you.

Janet

+++++


Police say they're looking for body of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis
THE FAYETTEVILLE *******, N.C. | Mon, Nov 16, 11:57 AM


At a press briefing at 10:30 a.m., Chance said people have been turning out in droves to offer help but no more volunteer searchers are currently needed. She said civilians who want to help can call the police at 433-1820 to volunteer.

Meantime, the State Highway Patrol issued a 'be on the lookout for' advisory this morning, saying that they're looking for a man who had been spotted with Davis. The man is believed to be about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota, according to an official with the Highway patrol. He may be in the vicinity of Raeford Road or Cliffdale Road.

Chance said police are following up any and all tips but are still concentrating their search for Shaniya on Walker Road.

At a press conference at the search site at 9 a.m. today, Chance said police had received some tips.

She said Mario Andrette McNeill, who has admitted to kidnapping Shaniya and is in custody, has been "extremely uncooperative" but has given some information to police.

Chance said McNeill is known to frequent Sanford. He was arrested Thursday after being identified as being with Shaniya Tuesday morning at the Comfort Suites hotel in Sanford. The two were seen on a surveillance tape at 6:11 a.m. Chance said police know McNeill left the motel with Shaniya at about 7:30 a.m. but they don't know what condition Shaniya was in at that point

http://dailyme.com/story/2009111600004240/police-body-5-year-old-shaniya-davis.html


klaasend
Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5 Fayetteville, NC Missing 11/10/09-Ambert Alert Issued
« Reply #1584 on: November 17, 2009, 01:03:20 AM »


Map:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.msg1015157#msg1015157



Date Arrested             Name

November 17, 2009    Mcneill, Samuel
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Dustrus Willis
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Mario Andrette

Just go to this link and type in the last name McNeill :

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 04:04:30 PM
Good Afternoon Monkeys & Guests:

Has this information been posted?


snip

Police recovered 11 pieces of trace evidence, such as hair and fibers, from the car, as well as clothes, a belt, a straw, a cell phone and a portable GPS system, according to the search warrant.

snip

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6444454/

The GPS system should be helpful in the investigation if he was using it.

Seahorse..the info was posted before, however what you mention about the GPS being useful has not to my knowledge been discussed...great point!! really really great point...
yeah it caught my attention too and
1) i wonder how many random hotels he needed directions to and
2) it could be stolen and useless because you have to pay for the service to keep it working


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 19, 2009, 04:07:03 PM
Brad lockhart is going to be on Oprah


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on November 19, 2009, 04:09:30 PM
After reading the WS article above, we now know those elevator pics are from the 3rd floor as there is no carpet in front of the lobby elevators.  So those pics show them leaving the hotel I assume. ::MonkeyCool::

I think so too.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 04:11:07 PM
After reading the WS article above, we now know those elevator pics are from the 3rd floor as there is no carpet in front of the lobby elevators.  So those pics show them leaving the hotel I assume. ::MonkeyCool::
i figured that as well... i was recently at a sheraton and spinning drunk... i was noticing the tacky loud pattern carpet and realized most hotels have that on room floors but not in the lobby... my friend said they use the pattern to help disguise stains and i commented on how it was such a busy and ugly design that i wanted to puke on it


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 04:13:39 PM
Info on Shaniya's dad, including a completely different name he has used (alias). 


Lockhart, Bradley Fitzgerald

Alias used:
Meadows, Benny Frank 

Charges:
DWI - 4/1994
Resisting Officer - 4/1994
Assault on Policeman - 4/1994

Sentence:
jail, probation, no prison time


http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1 (http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1)



Wyks ... you are amazing!

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 04:17:07 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473

Justagirl, thank you for bringing that over here. It must have been difficult for the poster to go there, if they are reading, thank you for your efforts.

It is very interesting about the carpet, so that make it obvious he was not on the first floor with her. This again makes me wonder if someone else was at that hotel he "visited" with her.
I wish we could find out just why he used that hotel and not a cheaper, more slimmy type, why this one. I would imagine the price per room would be around 50-100?

yes thanks for that...MM more than likely went into a side door...this was already planned and set up imo...he may have been picking her up from the previous night on the pictures of him with Shaniya...sadly..

Wyks...interesting that dad had an alias...Why would he need one?
Interesting that his first wife was murdered...home invasion? and when his son started talking about it on NG, did dad come out to comfort son or did he come out to make sure that son didn't say too much about that murder? not trying to make anything out of it necessarily, however, everything  needs to be looked into imo...until we get all the facts of what happened to Shaniya, any related to her who has a past needs to be examined..jmo



i wondered about the wife's character as well iirc she and her 19 year old sister and others were shot during the home invasion... home invasion/robberies usually aren't random and are usually drug related


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:19:38 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473

Justagirl, thank you for bringing that over here. It must have been difficult for the poster to go there, if they are reading, thank you for your efforts.

It is very interesting about the carpet, so that make it obvious he was not on the first floor with her. This again makes me wonder if someone else was at that hotel he "visited" with her.
I wish we could find out just why he used that hotel and not a cheaper, more slimmy type, why this one. I would imagine the price per room would be around 50-100?

yes thanks for that...MM more than likely went into a side door...this was already planned and set up imo...he may have been picking her up from the previous night on the pictures of him with Shaniya...sadly..

Wyks...interesting that dad had an alias...Why would he need one?
Interesting that his first wife was murdered...home invasion? and when his son started talking about it on NG, did dad come out to comfort son or did he come out to make sure that son didn't say too much about that murder? not trying to make anything out of it necessarily, however, everything  needs to be looked into imo...until we get all the facts of what happened to Shaniya, any related to her who has a past needs to be examined..jmo




Does anyone have the hotel information available? Does it say that the hotel clerk said he checked in with a girl matching the description? This is the impression I have, if that is incorrect then I need to rethink a few things. I can't seem to find the post with this information can anyone help? 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 04:20:00 PM
Brad lockhart is going to be on Oprah

already? his daughter isn't even  out of the morgue yet! geez!
whatever will he talk about? he won't be able to say much due to pending charges and not being able to talk about this or that...
.when is the book coming out? sorry if I sound like a biotch right now...but I guess that is how I am feeling for some reason...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:21:15 PM
Info on Shaniya's dad, including a completely different name he has used (alias). 

DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SHANIYA'S DAD.  SHANIYA'S DAD IS 38/39 YRS OLD.


Lockhart, Bradley Fitzgerald

Alias used:
Meadows, Benny Frank 

Charges:
DWI - 4/1994
Resisting Officer - 4/1994
Assault on Policeman - 4/1994

Sentence:
jail, probation, no prison time


http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1 (http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1)



Wykes can I ask if you are thinking the dad has something to do with this as well as the mom?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:22:29 PM
After reading the WS article above, we now know those elevator pics are from the 3rd floor as there is no carpet in front of the lobby elevators.  So those pics show them leaving the hotel I assume. ::MonkeyCool::
i figured that as well... i was recently at a sheraton and spinning drunk... i was noticing the tacky loud pattern carpet and realized most hotels have that on room floors but not in the lobby... my friend said they use the pattern to help disguise stains and i commented on how it was such a busy and ugly design that i wanted to puke on it

lol, too funny


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 04:22:39 PM
how far did the bio hag live from the dad? anyone know right off the bat? thanks  bunches..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:24:57 PM
Brad lockhart is going to be on Oprah

already? his daughter isn't even  out of the morgue yet! geez!
whatever will he talk about? he won't be able to say much due to pending charges and not being able to talk about this or that...
.when is the book coming out? sorry if I sound like a biotch right now...but I guess that is how I am feeling for some reason...

I suppose he will talk about Shaniya, her death and so on. I think it is great that this story is getting national attention. It may help save another child in this situation.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 19, 2009, 04:26:24 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 04:29:37 PM
Brad lockhart is going to be on Oprah

already? his daughter isn't even  out of the morgue yet! geez!
whatever will he talk about? he won't be able to say much due to pending charges and not being able to talk about this or that...
.when is the book coming out? sorry if I sound like a biotch right now...but I guess that is how I am feeling for some reason...


I feel just the same, Cookie.  I have no sympathy for Mr. Lockhart.  I didn't when he was doing all of that
squalling just for show and I don't now.  He is a low life.  He is almost as much to blame as Antionette.
He sold his daughter down the river when he allowed her to go live in that filthy trailer.  If he didn't know
the conditions of that trailer, he should have.  It was his responsibility as a parent.
Now he wants to profit from this tragedy.  He should be hanging his head in shame.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 04:30:09 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Ya done good michelle.  Thank you.

Maybe a press conference is forthcoming.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 04:31:03 PM
how far did the bio hag live from the dad? anyone know right off the bat? thanks  bunches..

IIRC - 11.5 miles


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 04:32:10 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorcarpetcompare.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 04:33:57 PM
Brad lockhart is going to be on Oprah

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:35:39 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorcarpetcompare.jpg)

Would you mind doing a side by side with all 3 pics??? That would be great.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 04:36:16 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473

Thanks!

So the pictures we have seen of Mario carrying Shaniya are on the 3rd floor and have to be leaving, not coming.  Wonder if that's why they are now admitting that Shaniya was alive when they left the hotel?

3rd Floor Elevator pics from WS poster at the link above:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/ComfortInn3rd.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/ComfortInn3rdFl.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:36:46 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Is that the county for the hotel or the trailer?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 04:37:39 PM
Info on Shaniya's dad, including a completely different name he has used (alias). 

DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SHANIYA'S DAD.  SHANIYA'S DAD IS 38/39 YRS OLD.


Lockhart, Bradley Fitzgerald

Alias used:
Meadows, Benny Frank 

Charges:
DWI - 4/1994
Resisting Officer - 4/1994
Assault on Policeman - 4/1994

Sentence:
jail, probation, no prison time


http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1 (http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1)



Hi Wyks,

Your work is wonderful, I hope you don't mind me questioning, are you SURE this is the right Bradley Lockhart?

I believe this guy no.1 is not our Bradley, please, will you make sure so we can delete it if its not?  TIA.

1.  LOCKHART, BRADLEY  F
Age: 45

Associated names:
LOCKHART, BRADLY

 ROSEDALE, VA
PINEY CREEK, NC
CARET, VA
 
------------------------------------------------

2. LOCKHART, BRADLEY  WAYNE
Age: 39

Associated names:
LOCKHART, BRAD W

 FAYETTEVILLE, NC
LEXINGTON PARK, MD
OCEANSIDE, CA
COMPTON, MD
SAN CLEMENTE, CA
CAMP LEJEUNE, NC
CAMP PENDLETON, CA
VISTA, CA

  LOCKHART, VICKIE  S (Age 55)
LOCKHART, CAREY  GEORG (Age 38


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 04:37:49 PM
Info on Shaniya's dad, including a completely different name he has used (alias). 

DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SHANIYA'S DAD.  SHANIYA'S DAD IS 38/39 YRS OLD.

Lockhart, Bradley Fitzgerald

Alias used:
Meadows, Benny Frank 

Charges:
DWI - 4/1994
Resisting Officer - 4/1994
Assault on Policeman - 4/1994

Sentence:
jail, probation, no prison time


http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1 (http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1)



The name Benny Frank Meadows fits him. IMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 04:38:33 PM
guys he had to have had the room fom the night before monday 11/9...
normal check in time is 2pm and check out is 11am... of course you could check in at 5am but you would definitely draw attention to yourself if you did...
i found this regarding typical monday night charges for rooms and it seems that no matter what type of romm it is 99.99 plus tax approx 110 total and the i read the only review of the hotel and almost chit myself...
i was reading it to see the comments about house keeping because thinking to myself i'm sure there was tons of dna all over the place (c'mon it's a hotel) and wondering how and why they could possibly be done analyzing all the room because there has got to be a lot of disgusting dna stains (ever see that i think 20/20 episode where they take a black light to a hotel room ... gross)
anyways you need to read the 1 and only review listed and dated july of 2009


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 04:39:20 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473

Thank you for bringing this forward!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 04:40:10 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 04:42:00 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Is that the county for the hotel or the trailer?

trailer


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 19, 2009, 04:42:15 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Is that the county for the hotel or the trailer?
Idk hoping someone would have that info


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:42:43 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Thanks so much. Look at the patterns, do they match to you? I think they are a little off.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 04:45:13 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorcarpetcompare.jpg)
not trying to nit pick guys but i think the carpet looks slightly different... in the poster pic it looks like the purple line is smaller... hotels do use similar carpets with slight variations on different floors i've noticed.... is it possible that what we thought was a 3 is actually a 2?
another thing is the hotel is non smoking... i wonder if mm took any outdoor in front of camera cig breaks


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:46:11 PM
The 2nd pic shows the carpets pattern not up against the wall as it shows in the webslueths pic and the pattern is different. The WS pic, is that the same elevator on that floor? Are there maybe two?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 04:47:07 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Is that the county for the hotel or the trailer?

The trailer.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 04:47:22 PM
I came by this on another board and thought it was interesting..

Description and Photos of the Comfort Suites Hotel in Sanford from a local posting at WS:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4458095&postcount=473

Thanks!

So the pictures we have seen of Mario carrying Shaniya are on the 3rd floor and have to be leaving, not coming.  Wonder if that's why they are now admitting that Shaniya was alive when they left the hotel?

3rd Floor Elevator pics from WS poster at the link above:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/ComfortInn3rd.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/ComfortInn3rdFl.jpg)
they never said she wasn't alive they said her condition was unknown... doesn't necessarily mean dead or alive they could have meant we don't know if she was raped yet or drugged or beaten etc etc


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 04:47:43 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Thanks so much. Look at the patterns, do they match to you? I think they are a little off.

I don't know if my eyes are playing tricks on me or not, it looks a little off - could it be the different camera angles and distance?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 04:49:14 PM
The 2nd pic shows the carpets pattern not up against the wall as it shows in the webslueths pic and the pattern is different. The WS pic, is that the same elevator on that floor? Are there maybe two?

That's what I thought about the second pic - I believe it's the baseboard making it look that way. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 19, 2009, 04:53:59 PM
Brad lockhart is going to be on Oprah

already? his daughter isn't even  out of the morgue yet! geez!
whatever will he talk about? he won't be able to say much due to pending charges and not being able to talk about this or that...
.when is the book coming out? sorry if I sound like a biotch right now...but I guess that is how I am feeling for some reason...

UGH!! Who could do this before their baby was even buried, I notice he had a memorial set up a day or two after she was found...No true caring in this guy...just makes me angry and sad for Shaniya poor sweet baby.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 04:54:11 PM
Info on Shaniya's dad, including a completely different name he has used (alias). 

DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SHANIYA'S DAD.  SHANIYA'S DAD IS 38/39 YRS OLD.

Lockhart, Bradley Fitzgerald

Alias used:
Meadows, Benny Frank 

Charges:
DWI - 4/1994
Resisting Officer - 4/1994
Assault on Policeman - 4/1994

Sentence:
jail, probation, no prison time


http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1 (http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1)



Hi Wyks,

Your work is wonderful, I hope you don't mind me questioning, are you SURE this is the right Bradley Lockhart?

I believe this guy no.1 is not our Bradley, please, will you make sure so we can delete it if its not?  TIA.

1.  LOCKHART, BRADLEY  F
Age: 45

Associated names:
LOCKHART, BRADLY

 ROSEDALE, VA
PINEY CREEK, NC
CARET, VA
 
------------------------------------------------

2. LOCKHART, BRADLEY  WAYNE
Age: 39

Associated names:
LOCKHART, BRAD W

 FAYETTEVILLE, NC
LEXINGTON PARK, MD
OCEANSIDE, CA
COMPTON, MD
SAN CLEMENTE, CA
CAMP LEJEUNE, NC
CAMP PENDLETON, CA
VISTA, CA

  LOCKHART, VICKIE  S (Age 55)
LOCKHART, CAREY  GEORG (Age 38

i would say it is not since he was 28 when his wife was murdered 10 years ago


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 04:55:47 PM
Here are pictures of Lockhart's wife who was murdered along with her sister and the Epps man.

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=murder1998.jpg


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 04:56:01 PM
The following segments of an article imply that the father has been ruled out as a suspect and ... the room that Shaniya was taken to was waiting for her arriving ... there was no checking in on that fateful morning.

Could the plan have been for MM to bring a drugged Shaniya back home with no memory of her experience and ... that is why the presence of security cameras was never a concern.  However ... the unexpected 911 call to authorities by AD changed everything.

Janet

+++++++


Shaniya Davis is Missing: Man Admits Kidnapping; 5-Year-Old Still Missing
November 13, 2009


Her father was out of town. Police ruled him out as a suspect, while the mother and a 7-year-old old boy spent most of Tuesday talking with police ...

Mario Andrette McNeill was seen on video carrying Shaniya Davis into the Sanford hotel Tuesday morning. A hotel worker called police when he recognized the girl as matching the description of missing Shaniya Davis, but by the time the police arrived, McNeill had left.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2388488/shaniya_davis_is_missing_man_admits.html?cat=9

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:56:21 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Thanks so much. Look at the patterns, do they match to you? I think they are a little off.

I don't know if my eyes are playing tricks on me or not, it looks a little off - could it be the different camera angles and distance?

Lets see if I can say this without confusing myself.

See on the WS photo, the white curlyque? Now before that you have the pattern. I would think that to be about 12 inches or so? Given the size of the design and the size of the person in the other pics, that seems about right to me. Now if you look at the 2nd pic, there is not that much space between the wall, the floorboard and the carpet design and the whole first part of the design before the curlyque does not show. Ok did anyone understand that, lol. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 04:58:51 PM
The following segments of an article imply that the father has been ruled out as a suspect and ... the room that Shaniya was taken to was waiting for her arriving ... there was no checking in on that fateful morning.

Could the plan have been for MM to bring a drugged Shaniya back home with no memory of her experience and ... that is why the presence of security cameras was never a concern.  However ... the unexpected 911 call to authorities by AD changed everything.

Janet

+++++++


Shaniya Davis is Missing: Man Admits Kidnapping; 5-Year-Old Still Missing
November 13, 2009


Her father was out of town. Police ruled him out as a suspect, while the mother and a 7-year-old old boy spent most of Tuesday talking with police ...

Mario Andrette McNeill was seen on video carrying Shaniya Davis into the Sanford hotel Tuesday morning. A hotel worker called police when he recognized the girl as matching the description of missing Shaniya Davis, but by the time the police arrived, McNeill had left.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2388488/shaniya_davis_is_missing_man_admits.html?cat=9

 

There was an article that said about checking in or that he was staying there? There have been so many. Thanks for looking though.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 04:58:52 PM
I think its the difference between a good camera and a surveillance camara, I think these are leaving pictures. jmo

Also on NG someone said the black and white thing is a blanket, I guess a baby blankie, and I really believe the white thing is a diaper.

So who is the law expert here?  Would the jurisdiction have anything to do with the charges?  Meaning higher sentence in Cumberland for Trafficing vs Murder in Clay County?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 04:58:55 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Is that the county for the hotel or the trailer?

trailer
i know we are speculating about why it matters which county because we are assuming that they are going with where she died... they are currently only going on a kidnapping and sale of sex slave both those crimes happened where she lived at the trailor this does not necessarily mean that this is where she died


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 05:02:23 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Thanks so much. Look at the patterns, do they match to you? I think they are a little off.

I don't know if my eyes are playing tricks on me or not, it looks a little off - could it be the different camera angles and distance?

Lets see if I can say this without confusing myself.

See on the WS photo, the white curlyque? Now before that you have the pattern. I would think that to be about 12 inches or so? Given the size of the design and the size of the person in the other pics, that seems about right to me. Now if you look at the 2nd pic, there is not that much space between the wall, the floorboard and the carpet design and the whole first part of the design before the curlyque does not show. Ok did anyone understand that, lol. 

You are right, you explained it a lot better than I could have. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 05:02:36 PM
Brad lockhart is going to be on Oprah

already? his daughter isn't even  out of the morgue yet! geez!
whatever will he talk about? he won't be able to say much due to pending charges and not being able to talk about this or that...
.when is the book coming out? sorry if I sound like a biotch right now...but I guess that is how I am feeling for some reason...


I feel just the same, Cookie.  I have no sympathy for Mr. Lockhart.  I didn't when he was doing all of that
squalling just for show and I don't now.  He is a low life.  He is almost as much to blame as Antionette.
He sold his daughter down the river when he allowed her to go live in that filthy trailer.  If he didn't know
the conditions of that trailer, he should have.  It was his responsibility as a parent.
Now he wants to profit from this tragedy.  He should be hanging his head in shame.


I am glad I am not the only monkey swinging from that vine ...I feel  the same way, and I think when the mom said 5:30 at night she let the cat out of the bag, but when the dispatcher said 5:30 in the morning she said  yea like it chimed in that sounds better. I wonder if MM had her out all night.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 05:03:31 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Is that the county for the hotel or the trailer?

trailer
i know we are speculating about why it matters which county because we are assuming that they are going with where she died... they are currently only going on a kidnapping and sale of sex slave both those crimes happened where she lived at the trailor this does not necessarily mean that this is where she died

I think they are going by which county is better equipped to handle to trial and investigation, since all of the
other information will have to come out at trial.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 05:04:07 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Is that the district that the body was located?

Janet

++++++

klaasend
Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5 Fayetteville, NC Missing 11/10/09-Ambert Alert Issued
« Reply #1584 on: November 17, 2009, 01:03:20 AM »

Map:


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.msg1015157#msg1015157


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 05:04:31 PM
I think its the difference between a good camera and a surveillance camara, I think these are leaving pictures. jmo

Also on NG someone said the black and white thing is a blanket, I guess a baby blankie, and I really believe the white thing is a diaper.

So who is the law expert here?  Would the jurisdiction have anything to do with the charges?  Meaning higher sentence in Cumberland for Trafficing vs Murder in Clay County?
I think the white article is a towel..jmo ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:06:16 PM
Jess Star is an attorney...

thanks for all the answers to questions everyone! you monks are the very best!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 05:06:50 PM
I think its the difference between a good camera and a surveillance camara, I think these are leaving pictures. jmo

Also on NG someone said the black and white thing is a blanket, I guess a baby blankie, and I really believe the white thing is a diaper.

So who is the law expert here?  Would the jurisdiction have anything to do with the charges?  Meaning higher sentence in Cumberland for Trafficing vs Murder in Clay County?
I think the white article is a towel..jmo ::MonkeyConfused::

The black and white article looks to stiff for a blanket the blanket would be floppy..again jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 05:07:48 PM
Don' tknow if posted.  jurisdiction finally cumberland.  dont know how to link
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941

Is that the county for the hotel or the trailer?

The trailer.

Thanks! They probably just choice the county the crime(s) originated from then at least for these two people?

Now would other people who have raped this little girl be tried in that county or cumberland? I would think it would be the county their crime happened in unless they are going to put everyone on trial at the same time?   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 05:09:38 PM
I think its the difference between a good camera and a surveillance camara, I think these are leaving pictures. jmo

Also on NG someone said the black and white thing is a blanket, I guess a baby blankie, and I really believe the white thing is a diaper.

So who is the law expert here?  Would the jurisdiction have anything to do with the charges?  Meaning higher sentence in Cumberland for Trafficing vs Murder in Clay County?
I think the white article is a towel..jmo ::MonkeyConfused::

The black and white article looks to stiff for a blanket the blanket would be floppy..again jmo
To me, it looks like the black and white thing is a stuffed animal and the white cloth is a towel or some kind of cloth.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 05:10:11 PM
the pics are defionitely different areas and i thought that the ws poster said there was only 1 elevator there are a lot of diffrences the main one being the purple line and yes i get crappy camera vs good camera but this is 2 thin purple lines vs one thick one here is a better pic


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 05:15:02 PM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:15:29 PM
I think the white thing is a towel.  I don't think that any of them would be so considerate to give this child a blankie for comfort...arse holes that they are!



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:17:12 PM
Penny....ask the hotel if their carpeting is different in patches, areas...I have seen this...don't like it, but have seen it before...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 05:17:53 PM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing

Gotta luv a monkey with ba!!s ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 05:18:09 PM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing

 ::MonkeyDevil:: Good luck!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:20:21 PM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing

Gotta luv a monkey with ba!!s ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

or without ba !!s in this case...lol!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 05:20:25 PM
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/17/ng.01.html

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Hi, Nancy. I would like to ask a question about the surveillance when they was getting into the elevator. It looked like Shaniya was holding a blanket. Is that the blanket that they found in the trash can?

GRACE: Good question. What do we know about that, Marlaina Schiavo? I don`t think it`s the same one.

MARLAINA SCHIAVO, NANCY GRACE PRODUCER: You`re right, Nancy. It`s not the same blanket because that blanket was taken into evidence. And we also know that that blanket was covered in feces and was not a clean blanket, like the one shown in the surveillance.


Of course they can always be wrong too!  JMO



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 05:21:21 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Thanks so much. Look at the patterns, do they match to you? I think they are a little off.

I don't know if my eyes are playing tricks on me or not, it looks a little off - could it be the different camera angles and distance?
It just dawned on me and I am shaking right now, while looking again at carpet patterns and stuffed animals, no matter what floor they are on, no matter what she is holding, this is the face of a little girl who was just raped. This case has really gotten to me, these pics are horrible to see. God Bless her and keep her close
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:23:08 PM
I am wondering if the white thing whatever it is was found with Shaniya? otherwise, what would he have done with it? thrown it along the road or into a dumpster? possible..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:25:12 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Thanks so much. Look at the patterns, do they match to you? I think they are a little off.

I don't know if my eyes are playing tricks on me or not, it looks a little off - could it be the different camera angles and distance?
It just dawned on me and I am shaking right now, while looking again at carpet patterns and stuffed animals, no matter what floor they are on, no matter what she is holding, this is the face of a little girl who was just raped. This case has really gotten to me, these pics are horrible to see. God Bless her and keep her close
 

I know TracyG...it is horrible isn't it? it is haunting me day and night seeing those pictures..she is the first thing that I thought of this morning...that lovely little girl...my heart is broken...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 05:26:09 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Thanks so much. Look at the patterns, do they match to you? I think they are a little off.

I don't know if my eyes are playing tricks on me or not, it looks a little off - could it be the different camera angles and distance?
It just dawned on me and I am shaking right now, while looking again at carpet patterns and stuffed animals, no matter what floor they are on, no matter what she is holding, this is the face of a little girl who was just raped. This case has really gotten to me, these pics are horrible to see. God Bless her and keep her close
 

Very sad....also in one picture her little legs are crossed tighter than the other pic with her legs crossed...shows a sign of fear  ::MonkeyMad::::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 19, 2009, 05:28:12 PM
I am wondering if the white thing whatever it is was found with Shaniya? otherwise, what would he have done with it? thrown it along the road or into a dumpster? possible..
maybe hand towel from hotel?  maybe drowling from drugs?  crying?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 05:31:34 PM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing

Gotta luv a monkey with ba!!s ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

or without ba !!s in this case...lol!
yup that's me i amalsoo the one whocalled and got lisa croslins vm on her cell when we were trying to figure out if it was still in service lol
okay so get this i just called and let it ring for 10 minutes no one answered!!!
this is the number i found for it without having to use an 800#
1891 Bragg Street
Sanford, NC 27330
(919) 842-5600
also has anyone read the frickin review i posted from orbitz dated 3 months ago
i am surprised no one has commented as alot of parts jump out to me
here is what it says Bold and italic by me:

room was nice. pool was small and hot tub did not work and had small scalding ports. Maids did not clean our room and claimed ...  that we had the did not disturb sign posted and that we did not answer when they knocked. lazy house keeping so who knows if all evidence was destroyed if this place is not busy what are the odds that the sheets were even changedWe had already left to visit our family early and the sign was inside the room. Morning breakfast was good. Second night my teens were intimidated by some black guests and one of my party was black herself, she is implying that there were some scary ass black people loitering in the halls and she is not just racist as she says she had a black person with her they left the area. Small children ran the hallways at 2-3am unattended by parents. makes my blood run cold It was a new motel with many needed amentities such as friendly and intelligent staff. to me implies that the staff was not attentive and clueless about stuff Expensive for town of Sanford, North Carolina.
here is the link to it
http://www.orbitz.com/App/shared/pagedef/results/hotelDetailsStandalone.jsp?z=c25&r=1q&z=c26&r=1r&lastPage=interstitial


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 05:32:02 PM
Info on Shaniya's dad, including a completely different name he has used (alias). 


Lockhart, Bradley Fitzgerald

Alias used:
Meadows, Benny Frank 

Charges:
DWI - 4/1994
Resisting Officer - 4/1994
Assault on Policeman - 4/1994

Sentence:
jail, probation, no prison time


http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1 (http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0244665&searchLastName=Lockhart&searchFirstName=Bradley&listurl=pagelistoffendersearchresults&listpage=1)



hi Wykes..

I believe Bradley middle name is Wayne..  Bradley Wayne Lockhart


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 05:32:22 PM
I am wondering if the white thing whatever it is was found with Shaniya? otherwise, what would he have done with it? thrown it along the road or into a dumpster? possible..
maybe hand towel from hotel?  maybe drowling from drugs?  crying?

I would bet my paycheck she was drugged...I guess we will know soon. She does not even look like herself in these pics ::MonkeyMad::I pray the good Lord numbed her to what was happening to her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:34:01 PM
dad going to be on Oprah tomorrow!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 05:35:19 PM
Some good news, maybe, out of this case.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/952890

Shaniya Davis case adds to calls for probation reform By Greg Barnes
Staff writer

 State Sen. Tony Rand said the criminal history of a Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping 5-year-old Shaniya Davis demonstrates the need for more tools to help probation officers do their jobs.

"That's why I have been raising hell and why we have put together this pilot project," said Rand, who announced this month that he is stepping down as Senate majority leader to become head of the state's parole and probation system.

The pilot program, being set up in Raleigh, provides a database that allows law enforcement, probation officers, court clerks, district attorneys, magistrates and others easy access to all criminal records. Rand said the system should be operating by spring.

"If somebody is arrested, they can check to see if any other arrest warrants are out there," Rand said.

Under the current system, government officials aren't always able to share all the criminal information on one person.

The new system may have helped in the case of Mario Andrette McNeill, a Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping Shaniya on Nov. 10. Shaniya's body was found Monday in woods south of Sanford. Law officials say more charges are pending.

McNeill has had a criminal history since 2001, when he was charged with shooting three people. He was sentenced to supervised probation for the shootings as well as drug charges.

McNeill violated the terms of his probation and stayed in prison from October 2003 to May 2006.

He was charged with drug offenses shortly after getting out and was again sentenced to supervised probation. As part of the sentence, McNeill was required to stay free of illegal drugs.

While on supervised probation, McNeill was charged with possessing cocaine and, a few months later, with striking a police officer with his vehicle while trying to flee.

Despite those charges, a judge in November 2007 changed the status of McNeill's probation to unsupervised.

Wayne Marshburn, head of the probation system for Cumberland County, said probation officers may not have known about the pending charges against McNeill when he was allowed to go on unsupervised probation.

In April 2008, Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson put McNeill back on supervised probation for hitting the officer and the cocaine charge. Court records show that Judge E. Lynn Johnson terminated that probation on Oct. 22, six months before it was set to expire.

Nineteen days later, police say, McNeill was captured on video carrying Shaniya into a Sanford motel. Her body was found less than a week later.

Rand said he did not know the particulars of McNeill's case. But under the pilot system, he said, everyone involved in the judicial system would have been able to share McNeill's history and could have made a different determination of whether his probation status should have been changed or terminated.

"I think this kind of thing, more clearly than anything else, points out the needs to have this kind of information," Rand said. "What we're trying to do is make everybody aware of the data we have concerning a person's record or lack of record."

Rand was the sponsor of a new law that will give probation officers access to a person's juvenile records and makes drug screenings a regular part of probation. The law will give investigators the power to make warrantless searches in certain cases involving people on probation. The law takes effect Dec. 1.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 05:36:13 PM
Published: 05:02 PM, Thu Nov 19, 2009
Shaniya Davis case adds to calls for probation reform
By Greg Barnes
Staff writer

State Sen. Tony Rand said the criminal history of a Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping 5-year-old Shaniya Davis demonstrates the need for more tools to help probation officers do their jobs.

"That's why I have been raising hell and why we have put together this pilot project," said Rand, who announced this month that he is stepping down as Senate majority leader to become head of the state's parole and probation system.

The pilot program, being set up in Raleigh, provides a database that allows law enforcement, probation officers, court clerks, district attorneys, magistrates and others easy access to all criminal records. Rand said the system should be operating by spring.

"If somebody is arrested, they can check to see if any other arrest warrants are out there," Rand said.

Under the current system, government officials aren't always able to share all the criminal information on one person.

The new system may have helped in the case of Mario Andrette McNeill, a Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping Shaniya on Nov. 10. Shaniya's body was found Monday in woods south of Sanford. Law officials say more charges are pending.

McNeill has had a criminal history since 2001, when he was charged with shooting three people. He was sentenced to supervised probation for the shootings as well as drug charges.

McNeill violated the terms of his probation and stayed in prison from October 2003 to May 2006.

He was charged with drug offenses shortly after getting out and was again sentenced to supervised probation. As part of the sentence, McNeill was required to stay free of illegal drugs.

While on supervised probation, McNeill was charged with possessing cocaine and, a few months later, with striking a police officer with his vehicle while trying to flee.

Despite those charges, a judge in November 2007 changed the status of McNeill's probation to unsupervised.

Wayne Marshburn, head of the probation system for Cumberland County, said probation officers may not have known about the pending charges against McNeill when he was allowed to go on unsupervised probation.

In April 2008, Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson put McNeill back on supervised probation for hitting the officer and the cocaine charge. Court records show that Judge E. Lynn Johnson terminated that probation on Oct. 22, six months before it was set to expire.

Nineteen days later, police say, McNeill was captured on video carrying Shaniya into a Sanford motel. Her body was found less than a week later.

Rand said he did not know the particulars of McNeill's case. But under the pilot system, he said, everyone involved in the judicial system would have been able to share McNeill's history and could have made a different determination of whether his probation status should have been changed or terminated.

"I think this kind of thing, more clearly than anything else, points out the needs to have this kind of information," Rand said. "What we're trying to do is make everybody aware of the data we have concerning a person's record or lack of record."

Rand was the sponsor of a new law that will give probation officers access to a person's juvenile records and makes drug screenings a regular part of probation. The law will give investigators the power to make warrantless searches in certain cases involving people on probation. The law takes effect Dec. 1.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/952890



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 05:36:20 PM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing

Gotta luv a monkey with ba!!s ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

or without ba !!s in this case...lol!
yup that's me i amalsoo the one whocalled and got lisa croslins vm on her cell when we were trying to figure out if it was still in service lol
okay so get this i just called and let it ring for 10 minutes no one answered!!!
this is the number i found for it without having to use an 800#
1891 Bragg Street
Sanford, NC 27330
(919) 842-5600
also has anyone read the frickin review i posted from orbitz dated 3 months ago
i am surprised no one has commented as alot of parts jump out to me
here is what it says Bold and italic by me:

room was nice. pool was small and hot tub did not work and had small scalding ports. Maids did not clean our room and claimed ...  that we had the did not disturb sign posted and that we did not answer when they knocked. lazy house keeping so who knows if all evidence was destroyed if this place is not busy what are the odds that the sheets were even changedWe had already left to visit our family early and the sign was inside the room. Morning breakfast was good. Second night my teens were intimidated by some black guests and one of my party was black herself, she is implying that there were some scary ass black people loitering in the halls and she is not just racist as she says she had a black person with her they left the area. Small children ran the hallways at 2-3am unattended by parents. makes my blood run cold It was a new motel with many needed amentities such as friendly and intelligent staff. to me implies that the staff was not attentive and clueless about stuff Expensive for town of Sanford, North Carolina.
here is the link to it
http://www.orbitz.com/App/shared/pagedef/results/hotelDetailsStandalone.jsp?z=c25&r=1q&z=c26&r=1r&lastPage=interstitial



MM could have known the hotel clerk slipped him some drugs for a free room...not implying the clerk that said he saw them, MM could even known someone that worked in housekeeping and let him in a room for free for an hour.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 05:41:59 PM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing

Gotta luv a monkey with ba!!s ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

or without ba !!s in this case...lol!
yup that's me i amalsoo the one whocalled and got lisa croslins vm on her cell when we were trying to figure out if it was still in service lol
okay so get this i just called and let it ring for 10 minutes no one answered!!!
this is the number i found for it without having to use an 800#
1891 Bragg Street
Sanford, NC 27330
(919) 842-5600
also has anyone read the frickin review i posted from orbitz dated 3 months ago
i am surprised no one has commented as alot of parts jump out to me
here is what it says Bold and italic by me:

room was nice. pool was small and hot tub did not work and had small scalding ports. Maids did not clean our room and claimed ...  that we had the did not disturb sign posted and that we did not answer when they knocked. lazy house keeping so who knows if all evidence was destroyed if this place is not busy what are the odds that the sheets were even changedWe had already left to visit our family early and the sign was inside the room. Morning breakfast was good. Second night my teens were intimidated by some black guests and one of my party was black herself, she is implying that there were some scary ass black people loitering in the halls and she is not just racist as she says she had a black person with her they left the area. Small children ran the hallways at 2-3am unattended by parents. makes my blood run cold It was a new motel with many needed amentities such as friendly and intelligent staff. to me implies that the staff was not attentive and clueless about stuff Expensive for town of Sanford, North Carolina.
here is the link to it
http://www.orbitz.com/App/shared/pagedef/results/hotelDetailsStandalone.jsp?z=c25&r=1q&z=c26&r=1r&lastPage=interstitial


Yes I think that is very odd.  I bet you LE asked questions about this (hopefully) after receiving the surveilance video.  Especially about kids wondering about or being brought in and out of there by the same person.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 05:42:12 PM
SBI crime lab receives evidence in Shaniya Davis case

Nancy McCleary
Staff writer

 Fayetteville police have just delivered evidence from the Shaniya Davis case to the State Bureau of Investigation, a spokeswoman said in an e-mail this afternoon.

The delivery means that officials in Cumberland and Lee counties may have reached a decision as to where the case will be tried.

Fayetteville police Chief Tom Bergamine has said no additional charges would be filed until the venue issue was settled.

Ed Grannis, the Cumberland County district attorney, said Wednesday night that prosecutors were waiting on some SBI lab results before making a decision on where the case would be tried.

Shaniya was reported missing from her home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road on Nov. 10.

She was seen on surveillance video at a Sanford hotel being carried by a man police have identified as Mario Andrette McNeill.

Police have said the 5-year-old girl was alive when she left the hotel about 11/2

Her body was found Monday in woods along Walker Road in Lee County, about six miles south of Sanford.

McNeill is charged with first-degree kidnapping in the case.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation.

Residents of the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park are having a prayer service at 7 tonight. They will meet at 1202 Sleepy Hollow Drive, which is across the street from the Davis home.


http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/953645



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 05:44:48 PM
KCJackie I was waiting to see if you posted that next!  We were on the same page at the same time.  too funny! 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 05:45:10 PM
Penny....ask the hotel if their carpeting is different in patches, areas...I have seen this...don't like it, but have seen it before...
i don't understand what you mean... but about how many elevators that thing above the button is a floor layout and i am trying to find another one so we can find out how many elevators... i don't want to seem to cooky cuz i really want them to cough up the room number so i am not going to ask about the carpet... also with hotel rooms you have to leave a credit card on file so that there is a way to charge you if you damage it and if you don't have one they require a large deposit that you can get back at check out... so the chances that this was put under a fake name with matching photo id is improbable to me... after the review i posted i am seriously wondering if small children being pimped by scary black men has not been going on there on a regular basis... i do not think mm was the one raping her and i do think this is a ring not just mm and shaniya...
also the cops said that they had him on video but never mentioned that they were at a room registered to him... tells me that he was not there under his name also he is a repeated criminal and when people have warrants and check into a hotel they are tracked by police (at least where i live) so i doubt that he would put a room in his name because for all he knows he might have warrants he doesn't know about and since a ws poster said the camera locations... it is possible that the police had surmized what floor he was on but not which room and i am now wondering if it could even be a company that has a certain amount of rooms always rented in case they need them for clients... my work does that
i said it before and i mean it child sex trades are common among affluent people and the business of it all is an enterprise ran like a company...
i hope they catch all the bastards involved


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 19, 2009, 05:47:18 PM
Wyks,

You have the wrong Bradley Lockhart, you better get that information off before he sues you for slander.


IT'S TAKEN CARE OF


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:53:02 PM
snipped from above article:


She was seen on surveillance video at a Sanford hotel being carried by a man police have identified as Mario Andrette McNeill.

Police have said the 5-year-old girl was alive when she left the hotel about 11/2


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 05:54:50 PM
snipped from above article:


She was seen on surveillance video at a Sanford hotel being carried by a man police have identified as Mario Andrette McNeill.

Police have said the 5-year-old girl was alive when she left the hotel about 11/2

sorry...trying to emphasize the second sentence....^^^ am on a new netbook computer and the keys are new to me...much smaller!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 19, 2009, 05:55:58 PM
Wyks,

You have the wrong Bradley Lockhart, you better get that information off before he sues you for slander.


This may have been better if you had emailed Klaas rather than blurt this out.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 05:57:30 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 05:58:38 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 06:00:05 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:00:14 PM
I KNOW THE ROOM NUMBER FOR A FACT SHOULD I POST IT?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 06:02:56 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol

ha ha! not gonna  bother...you did so well

what do you think about posting the room # here...we don't want the clerk to get into trouble...but I an curious and it might help us to figure out when the pictures of the perp was taken....leaving or arriving...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 06:03:14 PM
I KNOW THE ROOM NUMBER FOR A FACT SHOULD I POST IT?

Penny.. Ask 1 of the sweet mods...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:05:32 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?
according to posters yes and i will say this it was the second floor or rather the number of the room was in the 200's and i just called the hotel agfain like a loon and said i was coming with a lot of people in wheel chairs and i needed to know if there are rooms available on the ground level floor... i did that because i wanted to know if since the lobby is floor 1 and not L would the rooms on the second floor be in the 100's or 200's
IT WAS THE SECOND FLOOR and they do have an exact room as they are not releasing it yet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 06:06:40 PM
HLN is talking about Shaniya now...cops say that bio bag sold Shaniya to pay off a drug debt....Shaniya's  body has not been released to her family yet...
but Dad is going to be on Oprah tomorrow..... ::MonkeyEek::   why does that bug me so much?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 06:07:40 PM
snipped from above article:


She was seen on surveillance video at a Sanford hotel being carried by a man police have identified as Mario Andrette McNeill.

Police have said the 5-year-old girl was alive when she left the hotel about 11/2

sorry...trying to emphasize the second sentence....^^^ am on a new netbook computer and the keys are new to me...much smaller!

O/T but are you in luv with it yet?  I love mine!  It's so cute and cool!  Enjoy.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 06:09:28 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?
according to posters yes and i will say this it was the second floor or rather the number of the room was in the 200's and i just called the hotel agfain like a loon and said i was coming with a lot of people in wheel chairs and i needed to know if there are rooms available on the ground level floor... i did that because i wanted to know if since the lobby is floor 1 and not L would the rooms on the second floor be in the 100's or 200's
IT WAS THE SECOND FLOOR and they do have an exact room as they are not releasing it yet

Penny do you think it is possible that the POS book one room and travel on to another floor to meet another POS who had a room book on another floor???


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 06:10:11 PM
snipped from above article:


She was seen on surveillance video at a Sanford hotel being carried by a man police have identified as Mario Andrette McNeill.

Police have said the 5-year-old girl was alive when she left the hotel about 11/2

sorry...trying to emphasize the second sentence....^^^ am on a new netbook computer and the keys are new to me...much smaller!

O/T but are you in luv with it yet?  I love mine!  It's so cute and cool!  Enjoy.

I love it yes I do...I got a red one...it fits in some of my purses! but right now I am not using the mouse so I am not as handy...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:11:19 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol

ha ha! not gonna  bother...you did so well

what do you think about posting the room # here...we don't want the clerk to get into trouble...but I an curious and it might help us to figure out when the pictures of the perp was taken....leaving or arriving...
I am more concerned with the case getting f'ed up by any other possible employees that didn't know the room number because we all know if i post it it will be on some other sites within seconds (and ng 2 months later lol) i don't see how the room number would help you to determine if they were leaving or not.. they were leaving...
\chit i feel like i am bursting with a secret i want to say but i will wait for mods to tell me if i should i don't really know how toask so can someone ask a mod for me and if anyone can get me a layout of the rooms maybe from a fire safety plan or something... i am so glad that they know the exact room that means they have a name it was registered to etc etc


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 06:13:38 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?
according to posters yes and i will say this it was the second floor or rather the number of the room was in the 200's and i just called the hotel agfain like a loon and said i was coming with a lot of people in wheel chairs and i needed to know if there are rooms available on the ground level floor... i did that because i wanted to know if since the lobby is floor 1 and not L would the rooms on the second floor be in the 100's or 200's
IT WAS THE SECOND FLOOR and they do have an exact room as they are not releasing it yet

Cool!  Brave woman you are.  I'm very glad they have the exact room and are obviously checking it all over for evidence.  So now I wonder if the room was in his name?  Has to be right?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:15:24 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?
according to posters yes and i will say this it was the second floor or rather the number of the room was in the 200's and i just called the hotel agfain like a loon and said i was coming with a lot of people in wheel chairs and i needed to know if there are rooms available on the ground level floor... i did that because i wanted to know if since the lobby is floor 1 and not L would the rooms on the second floor be in the 100's or 200's
IT WAS THE SECOND FLOOR and they do have an exact room as they are not releasing it yet

Penny do you think it is possible that the POS book one room and travel on to another floor to meet another POS who had a room book on another floor???
i am still considering that but the room they are not releasing is on the second floor soooo i don't know maybe he was on 3rd and traveled down is what i guess you are implying ... possible seeing as without a doubt the elevator button was pressed in for down... and it did seem to me that it was a 3 on the elevator but the pics of carpet are different so it could have been a 2 which i had considered even before knowing this....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 06:16:57 PM
HLN is talking about Shaniya now...cops say that bio bag sold Shaniya to pay off a drug debt....Shaniya's  body has not been released to her family yet...
but Dad is going to be on Oprah tomorrow..... ::MonkeyEek::   why does that bug me so much?

I don't buy paying off a drug debt, I think there was a sicko waiting for Shaniya to be delivered to them...and it could be they used her for photos there are some sick child porno freaks in this world, she was so pretty and she would be a money maker for these AHOLes


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: fatcatlurker on November 19, 2009, 06:16:58 PM
On another site they are convinced it is two also.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 06:17:49 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?
according to posters yes and i will say this it was the second floor or rather the number of the room was in the 200's and i just called the hotel agfain like a loon and said i was coming with a lot of people in wheel chairs and i needed to know if there are rooms available on the ground level floor... i did that because i wanted to know if since the lobby is floor 1 and not L would the rooms on the second floor be in the 100's or 200's
IT WAS THE SECOND FLOOR and they do have an exact room as they are not releasing it yet

Penny do you think it is possible that the POS book one room and travel on to another floor to meet another POS who had a room book on another floor???
i am still considering that but the room they are not releasing is on the second floor soooo i don't know maybe he was on 3rd and traveled down is what i guess you are implying ... possible seeing as without a doubt the elevator button was pressed in for down... and it did seem to me that it was a 3 on the elevator but the pics of carpet are different so it could have been a 2 which i had considered even before knowing this....

Actually I was thing the 4th floor POS Mcneill was on at one time..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:18:24 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?
according to posters yes and i will say this it was the second floor or rather the number of the room was in the 200's and i just called the hotel agfain like a loon and said i was coming with a lot of people in wheel chairs and i needed to know if there are rooms available on the ground level floor... i did that because i wanted to know if since the lobby is floor 1 and not L would the rooms on the second floor be in the 100's or 200's
IT WAS THE SECOND FLOOR and they do have an exact room as they are not releasing it yet

Cool!  Brave woman you are.  I'm very glad they have the exact room and are obviously checking it all over for evidence.  So now I wonder if the room was in his name?  Has to be right?
yeah well after jersey's post i am wondering if this was his room or the room he traveled to and i cannot call backthe clerk because i think she is on to me after my wheel chair inquirysomeone else needs to call tomorrow and ask them how many rooms per floor .. tell them you are flying in a chit load of people for a wedding and you want them all on the same floor


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:20:05 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?
according to posters yes and i will say this it was the second floor or rather the number of the room was in the 200's and i just called the hotel agfain like a loon and said i was coming with a lot of people in wheel chairs and i needed to know if there are rooms available on the ground level floor... i did that because i wanted to know if since the lobby is floor 1 and not L would the rooms on the second floor be in the 100's or 200's
IT WAS THE SECOND FLOOR and they do have an exact room as they are not releasing it yet

Penny do you think it is possible that the POS book one room and travel on to another floor to meet another POS who had a room book on another floor???
i am still considering that but the room they are not releasing is on the second floor soooo i don't know maybe he was on 3rd and traveled down is what i guess you are implying ... possible seeing as without a doubt the elevator button was pressed in for down... and it did seem to me that it was a 3 on the elevator but the pics of carpet are different so it could have been a 2 which i had considered even before knowing this....

Actually I was thing the 4th floor POS Mcneill was on at one time..
i dunno i always thought a 2,3 or 5 in the pic but there is no 5 and i never thought 4


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:20:47 PM
On another site they are convinced it is two also.
it is 2 for a fact


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 06:22:09 PM
On another site they are convinced it is two also.
it is 2 for a fact

Great Job Penny... ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 06:22:13 PM
so ok..the second floor...what were they doing on the 3rd floor then if the elevator number was correct which I  believe it was a 3...I lost my rationale on why I could figure out why they would be coming or leaving.....the police said that they were leaving or that she was alive when the cameras caught MM and Shaniya...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 19, 2009, 06:23:22 PM
On another site they are convinced it is two also.
it is 2 for a fact

they probably read it over here first!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 19, 2009, 06:23:49 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol

ha ha! not gonna  bother...you did so well

what do you think about posting the room # here...we don't want the clerk to get into trouble...but I an curious and it might help us to figure out when the pictures of the perp was taken....leaving or arriving...
I am more concerned with the case getting f'ed up by any other possible employees that didn't know the room number because we all know if i post it it will be on some other sites within seconds (and ng 2 months later lol) i don't see how the room number would help you to determine if they were leaving or not.. they were leaving...
\chit i feel like i am bursting with a secret i want to say but i will wait for mods to tell me if i should i don't really know how toask so can someone ask a mod for me and if anyone can get me a layout of the rooms maybe from a fire safety plan or something... i am so glad that they know the exact room that means they have a name it was registered to etc etc
Penny you are awesome!......great work.......anyone have one of those monkey trophy gold star things like grandma monkey used to give out?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 06:26:42 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol

ha ha! not gonna  bother...you did so well

what do you think about posting the room # here...we don't want the clerk to get into trouble...but I an curious and it might help us to figure out when the pictures of the perp was taken....leaving or arriving...
I am more concerned with the case getting f'ed up by any other possible employees that didn't know the room number because we all know if i post it it will be on some other sites within seconds (and ng 2 months later lol) i don't see how the room number would help you to determine if they were leaving or not.. they were leaving...
\chit i feel like i am bursting with a secret i want to say but i will wait for mods to tell me if i should i don't really know how toask so can someone ask a mod for me and if anyone can get me a layout of the rooms maybe from a fire safety plan or something... i am so glad that they know the exact room that means they have a name it was registered to etc etc
Penny you are awesome!......great work.......anyone have one of those monkey trophy gold star things like grandma monkey used to give out?

Ask Brandi she gives out the gold stars...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: HopeForAll on November 19, 2009, 06:27:05 PM
 ::MonkeySkate::FYI the nursing home where momster worked is very upscale. :king:


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:27:18 PM
OMG I DID IT ...
i called and spoke with someone i won't say her name because i do not want her to get in trouble... i said hi i am looking to book a particular room for a famous psychic that i will not mention by name as she travels under an alias.. i said it is the room that the shaniya incident happened in and obviously she would be willing to book it around the availability of it at their convenience... and she said there is a one problem sweetheart we haven't released that room yet and i said oh disappointedly and asked when they would she said next week some time and i said well thank you and when i call back next week should i speak with a manager and she said yes she will be in at 8am tomorrow couldn't really understand the name...something tomsom i repeated thompson and she said tomsom then i said well which room# is it i should request and she said off the record with a little hesitance and i said oh yes absolutely and she told me ... IT IS NOT THE 3RD FLOOR i know what it is but should i post it?

Hi Penny... Isn't there a 4th floor?
according to posters yes and i will say this it was the second floor or rather the number of the room was in the 200's and i just called the hotel agfain like a loon and said i was coming with a lot of people in wheel chairs and i needed to know if there are rooms available on the ground level floor... i did that because i wanted to know if since the lobby is floor 1 and not L would the rooms on the second floor be in the 100's or 200's
IT WAS THE SECOND FLOOR and they do have an exact room as they are not releasing it yet

Cool!  Brave woman you are.  I'm very glad they have the exact room and are obviously checking it all over for evidence.  So now I wonder if the room was in his name?  Has to be right?
she said that the hotel is not releasing it yet not that the police had not released it... could be that they don't want a flood of people stalking the room... could be that the police haven't released it but the way she said it implied that the hotel has not made it available...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:29:10 PM
so ok..the second floor...what were they doing on the 3rd floor then if the elevator number was correct which I  believe it was a 3...I lost my rationale on why I could figure out why they would be coming or leaving.....the police said that they were leaving or that she was alive when the cameras caught MM and Shaniya...
yeah but the rugs don't match for it to be the 3rd floor...
we need to know how many elevators and how many rooms per floor and preferably a fir evacuation plan... they have toregister that with some where and it should be public knowledge


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 19, 2009, 06:29:29 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol

ha ha! not gonna  bother...you did so well

what do you think about posting the room # here...we don't want the clerk to get into trouble...but I an curious and it might help us to figure out when the pictures of the perp was taken....leaving or arriving...
I am more concerned with the case getting f'ed up by any other possible employees that didn't know the room number because we all know if i post it it will be on some other sites within seconds (and ng 2 months later lol) i don't see how the room number would help you to determine if they were leaving or not.. they were leaving...
\chit i feel like i am bursting with a secret i want to say but i will wait for mods to tell me if i should i don't really know how toask so can someone ask a mod for me and if anyone can get me a layout of the rooms maybe from a fire safety plan or something... i am so glad that they know the exact room that means they have a name it was registered to etc etc
Penny you are awesome!......great work.......anyone have one of those monkey trophy gold star things like grandma monkey used to give out?

Ask Brandi she gives out the gold stars...
cool ...thanx ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 06:30:42 PM
 ::MonkeyCheer3:: ::MonkeyCheer3:: ::MonkeyCheer3:: For Penny good work  ::MonkeyCheer4:: ::MonkeyCheer4::


Maybe MM got off on the wrong floor and was on 3 at one time I saw it clear as day MSNBC news on Tues. He could have pushed the wrong button...probably high on something and was not the brightest POS


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:30:45 PM
KLAAS I see you!!!
 do i post the room number or not?
I do not care about the clerk getting in trouble io guess I am looking for a moral answer in regards to the investigation


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:31:50 PM
On another site they are convinced it is two also.
it is 2 for a fact

they probably read it over here first!
well are they talking about the loon that actually called for a psychic lol


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 06:31:54 PM
I think its the difference between a good camera and a surveillance camara, I think these are leaving pictures. jmo

Also on NG someone said the black and white thing is a blanket, I guess a baby blankie, and I really believe the white thing is a diaper.

So who is the law expert here?  Would the jurisdiction have anything to do with the charges?  Meaning higher sentence in Cumberland for Trafficing vs Murder in Clay County?

I agree


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 06:33:50 PM
FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- ABC11 Eyewitness News has learned that Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis will take jurisdiction in the Shaniya Davis case.

That according to sources close to the investigation.

The 5-year-old disappeared last Tuesday from her Fayetteville home. Her body was found days later in a wooded area south of Sanford in Lee County.

Mario McNeill, 29, is charged with kidnapping the child, Shaniya's mother Antoinette Davis, 25, is also jailed on charges of prostituting her daughter.

So far, no one has been charged with killing the young girl. But officials say they will hold a press conference at 8 p.m. to discuss the latest events surrounding the case.

Sources tell ABC11 Eyewitness News that officials will announce that McNeill will be charged with first degree murder.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:34:14 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol

ha ha! not gonna  bother...you did so well

what do you think about posting the room # here...we don't want the clerk to get into trouble...but I an curious and it might help us to figure out when the pictures of the perp was taken....leaving or arriving...
I am more concerned with the case getting f'ed up by any other possible employees that didn't know the room number because we all know if i post it it will be on some other sites within seconds (and ng 2 months later lol) i don't see how the room number would help you to determine if they were leaving or not.. they were leaving...
\chit i feel like i am bursting with a secret i want to say but i will wait for mods to tell me if i should i don't really know how toask so can someone ask a mod for me and if anyone can get me a layout of the rooms maybe from a fire safety plan or something... i am so glad that they know the exact room that means they have a name it was registered to etc etc
Penny you are awesome!......great work.......anyone have one of those monkey trophy gold star things like grandma monkey used to give out?
i'm already wearing one on my forehead literally lol it was my reward for being good at the dentist... my kid gave it to me


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 06:34:47 PM
I KNOW THE ROOM NUMBER FOR A FACT SHOULD I POST IT?

I'm not sure what it could hurt?  Nobody is going to get in the room anyway until LE releases it.  There's the possibility that the person at Comfort Suites is BSing you too.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 06:35:47 PM
On another site they are convinced it is two also.
it is 2 for a fact

they probably read it over here first!
well are they talking about the loon that actually called for a psychic lol

2nd Floor? What was the room number?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 19, 2009, 06:37:41 PM
I wonder who else it shows coming and going on the video tape? I really hope that they look back to check in time the day before too


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 06:38:46 PM
I wonder who else it shows coming and going on the video tape? I really hope that they look back to check in time the day before too

I hope they check for the last 5 weeks....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 19, 2009, 06:38:48 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol

ha ha! not gonna  bother...you did so well

what do you think about posting the room # here...we don't want the clerk to get into trouble...but I an curious and it might help us to figure out when the pictures of the perp was taken....leaving or arriving...
I am more concerned with the case getting f'ed up by any other possible employees that didn't know the room number because we all know if i post it it will be on some other sites within seconds (and ng 2 months later lol) i don't see how the room number would help you to determine if they were leaving or not.. they were leaving...
\chit i feel like i am bursting with a secret i want to say but i will wait for mods to tell me if i should i don't really know how toask so can someone ask a mod for me and if anyone can get me a layout of the rooms maybe from a fire safety plan or something... i am so glad that they know the exact room that means they have a name it was registered to etc etc
Penny you are awesome!......great work.......anyone have one of those monkey trophy gold star things like grandma monkey used to give out?
i'm already wearing one on my forehead literally lol it was my reward for being good at the dentist... my kid gave it to me
How funny!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 06:39:10 PM
I think its the difference between a good camera and a surveillance camara, I think these are leaving pictures. jmo

Also on NG someone said the black and white thing is a blanket, I guess a baby blankie, and I really believe the white thing is a diaper.

So who is the law expert here?  Would the jurisdiction have anything to do with the charges?  Meaning higher sentence in Cumberland for Trafficing vs Murder in Clay County?

According to the following map ... Shaniya's remains were found in Lee County.

Janet

+++++

klaasend
Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5 Fayetteville, NC Missing 11/10/09-Ambert Alert Issued
« Reply #1584 on: November 17, 2009, 01:03:20 AM »

Map:[/
b]

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.msg1015157#msg1015157


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 06:40:10 PM
okay cookie the staff is dumb and guilable so now you call and ask about the carpet lol

ha ha! not gonna  bother...you did so well

what do you think about posting the room # here...we don't want the clerk to get into trouble...but I an curious and it might help us to figure out when the pictures of the perp was taken....leaving or arriving...
I am more concerned with the case getting f'ed up by any other possible employees that didn't know the room number because we all know if i post it it will be on some other sites within seconds (and ng 2 months later lol) i don't see how the room number would help you to determine if they were leaving or not.. they were leaving...
\chit i feel like i am bursting with a secret i want to say but i will wait for mods to tell me if i should i don't really know how toask so can someone ask a mod for me and if anyone can get me a layout of the rooms maybe from a fire safety plan or something... i am so glad that they know the exact room that means they have a name it was registered to etc etc
Penny you are awesome!......great work.......anyone have one of those monkey trophy gold star things like grandma monkey used to give out?
i'm already wearing one on my forehead literally lol it was my reward for being good at the dentist... my kid gave it to me

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/penny.gif)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 06:43:59 PM
FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- ABC11 Eyewitness News has learned that Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis will take jurisdiction in the Shaniya Davis case.

That according to sources close to the investigation.

The 5-year-old disappeared last Tuesday from her Fayetteville home. Her body was found days later in a wooded area south of Sanford in Lee County.

Mario McNeill, 29, is charged with kidnapping the child, Shaniya's mother Antoinette Davis, 25, is also jailed on charges of prostituting her daughter.

So far, no one has been charged with killing the young girl. But officials say they will hold a press conference at 8 p.m. to discuss the latest events surrounding the case.

Sources tell ABC11 Eyewitness News that officials will announce that McNeill will be charged with first degree murder.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941


 ::MonkeyEek:: Press conference tonight?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 06:45:46 PM
Thanks for the updates, and thanks Penny  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:46:02 PM
I KNOW THE ROOM NUMBER FOR A FACT SHOULD I POST IT?

I'm not sure what it could hurt?  Nobody is going to get in the room anyway until LE releases it.  There's the possibility that the person at Comfort Suites is BSing you too.
no she wasn't i could tell and when i called back and asked about the wheel chair thing she sounded alittle alarmed like oh chit i just told a reporter what room #


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:51:31 PM
I KNOW THE ROOM NUMBER FOR A FACT SHOULD I POST IT?

I'm not sure what it could hurt?  Nobody is going to get in the room anyway until LE releases it.  There's the possibility that the person at Comfort Suites is BSing you too.
whoa i just overlooked you because i didn't recognize you lol
okay guys room #201 (doesn't mean it was near the elevator) and since the poster at ws said that the layout was one straight line of rooms and the elevator was not directly in the middle it suggests it would actually be the furthest one away
now lets see how long it takes for that to hit everywhere else...
hhhhm art too bad you didn't cover this case or you could have a bombshell courtesy of the gorilla with a star on it's head LOL


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 06:56:16 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6457986/

Police to file new charges in 5-year-old's death
Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 4:23 p.m.
Updated: 6 minutes ago

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Fayetteville police have scheduled an 8 p.m. news conference to announce new charges in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

Watch the news conference LIVE on WRAL.com.

Shaniya was reported missing from her home, at 1116-A Sleepy Hollow Drive in Fayetteville, by her mother on Nov. 10. Volunteer searchers found her body Monday afternoon in the woods off N.C. Highway 87 near the Lee-Harnett county line.

No cause of death has been released.

Prosecutors in Cumberland and Lee counties met for four hours Wednesday to discuss how to handle the case. They must prove where the girl was killed to establish legal jurisdiction to prosecute someone on a murder charge.

Fayetteville police and Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis met again Thursday to discuss the case.

A source close to the investigation told WRAL News that there's a strong likelihood Cumberland County will handle the case.
(snipped)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 19, 2009, 06:57:55 PM
Penny you are a very brave and super clever monkey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 ::MonkeyCheer2:: ::MonkeyCheer3:: ::MonkeyCheer4::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 06:58:08 PM
I KNOW THE ROOM NUMBER FOR A FACT SHOULD I POST IT?

I'm not sure what it could hurt?  Nobody is going to get in the room anyway until LE releases it.  There's the possibility that the person at Comfort Suites is BSing you too.
whoa i just overlooked you because i didn't recognize you lol
okay guys room #201 (doesn't mean it was near the elevator) and since the poster at ws said that the layout was one straight line of rooms and the elevator was not directly in the middle it suggests it would actually be the furthest one away
now lets see how long it takes for that to hit everywhere else...
hhhhm art too bad you didn't cover this case or you could have a bombshell courtesy of the gorilla with a star on it's head LOL

TY Penny ~ you are awesome! ::MonkeyCheer3::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 06:58:30 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/953645

Published: 06:11 PM, Thu Nov 19, 2009
Police update on Shaniya Davis case set for 8 p.m.
By Nancy McCleary
Staff writer

 

The Fayetteville Police Department has scheduled a news conference for 8 tonight to discuss additional charges in the Shaniya Davis case.

The news conference will be in front of the Police Department.

Police are expected to discuss the latest in the investigation of the 5-year-old's death.

Fayetteville police delivered evidence from the case to the State Bureau of Investigation earlier today, a spokeswoman said in an e-mail.

The delivery means officials in Cumberland and Lee counties may have reached a decision as to where the case will be tried.
(snipped)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 06:58:45 PM
kind of feel bad now because the clerk was nice... and now if her job checks here they will no she missed a call when i let it ring for 10 minutes and that she spilled the beans...
funny i didn't feel bad calling lisa croslin LOL
we need to find out how many rooms per floor i found out how many in the hotel but i cannot just divide by 4 because obviosly the 1st floor has less....
can someone call and ask to book a whole floor for a wedding in june?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:03:33 PM
kind of feel bad now because the clerk was nice... and now if her job checks here they will no she missed a call when i let it ring for 10 minutes and that she spilled the beans...
funny i didn't feel bad calling lisa croslin LOL
we need to find out how many rooms per floor i found out how many in the hotel but i cannot just divide by 4 because obviosly the 1st floor has less....
can someone call and ask to book a whole floor for a wedding in june?

whats the link for the phone number...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:03:58 PM
your welcome guys
JERSEY i get what you mean about the traveling to another floor but another thing i noticed is that the pic was def not the 4th floor because there is an up button on the elevator panel and there is no 5th floor so there would not be an up button if they were on the top floor could be floor #2 going down to lobby or could be floor number 3 going down to 2 or lobby but not unless there is more then one elevator because the rugs are absolutely different


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:06:22 PM
your welcome guys
JERSEY i get what you mean about the traveling to another floor but another thing i noticed is that the pic was def not the 4th floor because there is an up button on the elevator panel and there is no 5th floor so there would not be an up button if they were on the top floor could be floor #2 going down to lobby or could be floor number 3 going down to 2 or lobby but not unless there is more then one elevator because the rugs are absolutely different

Do we have pic of the 4th floor?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:06:43 PM
kind of feel bad now because the clerk was nice... and now if her job checks here they will no she missed a call when i let it ring for 10 minutes and that she spilled the beans...
funny i didn't feel bad calling lisa croslin LOL
we need to find out how many rooms per floor i found out how many in the hotel but i cannot just divide by 4 because obviosly the 1st floor has less....
can someone call and ask to book a whole floor for a wedding in june?

whats the link for the phone number...
google the street address 1891 briggs street and the zip you will see a generic heading with no mention of the hotel the number is 919-842-5600... if you are calling to ask them something you might want to wait a little bit till a possible shift change because i got the same person 3 times and her hinky meter probably just exploded


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 07:08:05 PM
FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- ABC11 Eyewitness News has learned that Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis will take jurisdiction in the Shaniya Davis case.

That according to sources close to the investigation.

The 5-year-old disappeared last Tuesday from her Fayetteville home. Her body was found days later in a wooded area south of Sanford in Lee County.

Mario McNeill, 29, is charged with kidnapping the child, Shaniya's mother Antoinette Davis, 25, is also jailed on charges of prostituting her daughter.

So far, no one has been charged with killing the young girl. But officials say they will hold a press conference at 8 p.m. to discuss the latest events surrounding the case.

Sources tell ABC11 Eyewitness News that officials will announce that McNeill will be charged with first degree murder.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941


Jerseygirl ... thanks.

Would the 8:00 PM be eastern time?

Janet



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 07:08:07 PM
FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- ABC11 Eyewitness News has learned that Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis will take jurisdiction in the Shaniya Davis case.

That according to sources close to the investigation.

The 5-year-old disappeared last Tuesday from her Fayetteville home. Her body was found days later in a wooded area south of Sanford in Lee County.

Mario McNeill, 29, is charged with kidnapping the child, Shaniya's mother Antoinette Davis, 25, is also jailed on charges of prostituting her daughter.

So far, no one has been charged with killing the young girl. But officials say they will hold a press conference at 8 p.m. to discuss the latest events surrounding the case.

Sources tell ABC11 Eyewitness News that officials will announce that McNeill will be charged with first degree murder.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941


Thank you for posting. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:10:08 PM
your welcome guys
JERSEY i get what you mean about the traveling to another floor but another thing i noticed is that the pic was def not the 4th floor because there is an up button on the elevator panel and there is no 5th floor so there would not be an up button if they were on the top floor could be floor #2 going down to lobby or could be floor number 3 going down to 2 or lobby but not unless there is more then one elevator because the rugs are absolutely different

Do we have pic of the 4th floor?
not that i know of but in the serveilance picture there is an up button so they could not have been on the 4th floor kwim
and the rug that ws poster posted of floor 3 is not the same as serveilance rugs so by elimination the serveilance pic is not floor 3 or 4 or 1 since they are going down... i know your a smart monkey i just wanted to clarify that for anyone who was not caught up or didn't believe me


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:10:26 PM
FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- ABC11 Eyewitness News has learned that Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis will take jurisdiction in the Shaniya Davis case.

That according to sources close to the investigation.

The 5-year-old disappeared last Tuesday from her Fayetteville home. Her body was found days later in a wooded area south of Sanford in Lee County.

Mario McNeill, 29, is charged with kidnapping the child, Shaniya's mother Antoinette Davis, 25, is also jailed on charges of prostituting her daughter.

So far, no one has been charged with killing the young girl. But officials say they will hold a press conference at 8 p.m. to discuss the latest events surrounding the case.

Sources tell ABC11 Eyewitness News that officials will announce that McNeill will be charged with first degree murder.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941


Jerseygirl ... thanks.

Would the 8:00 PM be eastern time?

Janet



yes Also it will be on on HLN..  press conference


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:11:49 PM
your welcome guys
JERSEY i get what you mean about the traveling to another floor but another thing i noticed is that the pic was def not the 4th floor because there is an up button on the elevator panel and there is no 5th floor so there would not be an up button if they were on the top floor could be floor #2 going down to lobby or could be floor number 3 going down to 2 or lobby but not unless there is more then one elevator because the rugs are absolutely different

Do we have pic of the 4th floor?
not that i know of but in the serveilance picture there is an up button so they could not have been on the 4th floor kwim
and the rug that ws poster posted of floor 3 is not the same as serveilance rugs so by elimination the serveilance pic is not floor 3 or 4 or 1 since they are going down... i know your a smart monkey i just wanted to clarify that for anyone who was not caught up or didn't believe me

I believe ys about room #201.. I have a hinky meter POS Mcneill was on another floor also...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 07:13:37 PM
On another site they are convinced it is two also.
it is 2 for a fact

you are a brave monkey, If I knew how I would give you another star! how about a flower? Here is a flower :flower:


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:19:38 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 07:24:14 PM
your welcome guys
JERSEY i get what you mean about the traveling to another floor but another thing i noticed is that the pic was def not the 4th floor because there is an up button on the elevator panel and there is no 5th floor so there would not be an up button if they were on the top floor could be floor #2 going down to lobby or could be floor number 3 going down to 2 or lobby but not unless there is more then one elevator because the rugs are absolutely different

Do we have pic of the 4th floor?
not that i know of but in the serveilance picture there is an up button so they could not have been on the 4th floor kwim
and the rug that ws poster posted of floor 3 is not the same as serveilance rugs so by elimination the serveilance pic is not floor 3 or 4 or 1 since they are going down... i know your a smart monkey i just wanted to clarify that for anyone who was not caught up or didn't believe me

I believe ys about room #201.. I have a hinky meter POS Mcneill was on another floor also...

Jersey I think he got off of the wrong floor and was caught on camera on the third floor then went to the 2 floor...jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 19, 2009, 07:27:04 PM
I think its the difference between a good camera and a surveillance camara, I think these are leaving pictures. jmo

Also on NG someone said the black and white thing is a blanket, I guess a baby blankie, and I really believe the white thing is a diaper.

So who is the law expert here?  Would the jurisdiction have anything to do with the charges?  Meaning higher sentence in Cumberland for Trafficing vs Murder in Clay County?

I agree

Good evening!  I suppose I'm a bit of a law expert.   ::MonkeyRoll::  Criminals must be charged and tried in the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred.  It doesn't have anything to do with higher sentences, etc.  It's merely a legal, due process requirement.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:30:24 PM
your welcome guys
JERSEY i get what you mean about the traveling to another floor but another thing i noticed is that the pic was def not the 4th floor because there is an up button on the elevator panel and there is no 5th floor so there would not be an up button if they were on the top floor could be floor #2 going down to lobby or could be floor number 3 going down to 2 or lobby but not unless there is more then one elevator because the rugs are absolutely different

Do we have pic of the 4th floor?
not that i know of but in the serveilance picture there is an up button so they could not have been on the 4th floor kwim
and the rug that ws poster posted of floor 3 is not the same as serveilance rugs so by elimination the serveilance pic is not floor 3 or 4 or 1 since they are going down... i know your a smart monkey i just wanted to clarify that for anyone who was not caught up or didn't believe me

I believe ys about room #201.. I have a hinky meter POS Mcneill was on another floor also...
i didn't mean  that you didn't believe me but klaas made a comment that the clerk could have been lying to me and she wasn't i could tell... she is biting her nails right now wondering who she just spilled it to... so i wanted to emphasis to any nay sayers that even by reasonable deduction it is the 2nd floor in the pics... and i agree about the room even if not another floor definitely another room maybe even an adjoining one but i really think he was just the delivery guy so to speak and i doubt he stood and watched...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:33:10 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:34:39 PM
your welcome guys
JERSEY i get what you mean about the traveling to another floor but another thing i noticed is that the pic was def not the 4th floor because there is an up button on the elevator panel and there is no 5th floor so there would not be an up button if they were on the top floor could be floor #2 going down to lobby or could be floor number 3 going down to 2 or lobby but not unless there is more then one elevator because the rugs are absolutely different

Do we have pic of the 4th floor?
not that i know of but in the serveilance picture there is an up button so they could not have been on the 4th floor kwim
and the rug that ws poster posted of floor 3 is not the same as serveilance rugs so by elimination the serveilance pic is not floor 3 or 4 or 1 since they are going down... i know your a smart monkey i just wanted to clarify that for anyone who was not caught up or didn't believe me

I believe ys about room #201.. I have a hinky meter POS Mcneill was on another floor also...
i didn't mean  that you didn't believe me but klaas made a comment that the clerk could have been lying to me and she wasn't i could tell... she is biting her nails right now wondering who she just spilled it to... so i wanted to emphasis to any nay sayers that even by reasonable deduction it is the 2nd floor in the pics... and i agree about the room even if not another floor definitely another room maybe even an adjoining one but i really think he was just the delivery guy so to speak and i doubt he stood and watched...
Ok The young girl was very nice.. she wanted my c/c to book the 4 rooms for 119.00 anight with double beds.. I told her I would call her back.. I am going to caal back and ask next how many rooms on the floor.. ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:35:55 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....

LOL I told her we had a pink birthday theme and wanted to make sure it all goes together... ::MonkeyBike::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 07:41:14 PM

http://www.allgetaways.com/hotels/hotel-detail.asp?hotelid=126906

I googled and this link gave 4 floors and 74 rooms  Comfort Inn Sanford NC


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:47:59 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....

OK I called back and she N---i  stated I needed to talk to Angela her manager  tomorrow for anymore details....Hmmmm


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:51:33 PM

http://www.allgetaways.com/hotels/hotel-detail.asp?hotelid=126906

I googled and this link gave 4 floors and 74 rooms  Comfort Inn Sanford NC
yeah i know but they have a lobby and an area for their breakfast buffet so the 1st floor has less rooms then the other 3 floors i would like to figure out how many on floor 2


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:53:32 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....

OK I called back and she N---i  stated I needed to talk to Angela her manager  tomorrow for anymore details....Hmmmm
well mrs. tomsom will be in at 8 lol
i think i got her hinky up with the wheelchair inquiry
what were you going to ask her now?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 07:55:16 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....

OK I called back and she N---i  stated I needed to talk to Angela her manager  tomorrow for anymore details....Hmmmm
well mrs. tomsom will be in at 8 lol
i think i got her hinky up with the wheelchair inquiry
what were you going to ask her now?

All I ask her was how many rooms on the 4th floor....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 07:56:37 PM
I think its the difference between a good camera and a surveillance camara, I think these are leaving pictures. jmo

Also on NG someone said the black and white thing is a blanket, I guess a baby blankie, and I really believe the white thing is a diaper.

So who is the law expert here?  Would the jurisdiction have anything to do with the charges?  Meaning higher sentence in Cumberland for Trafficing vs Murder in Clay County?

I agree

Good evening!  I suppose I'm a bit of a law expert.   ::MonkeyRoll::  Criminals must be charged and tried in the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred.  It doesn't have anything to do with higher sentences, etc.  It's merely a legal, due process requirement.


Yep Jess you are the law expert! So tell me, would all crimes commeted against Shaynia be tried in that particular county? So then if he kidnapped her in one county and prostituted her in another, would their be 2 counties involved or does it go back to where the original crime was committed?

Also, If there are other men/woman involved in raping this child but the crime happened in another county, where would they be charged? Does it go back to where she was taken from or where that particular crime took place?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:57:29 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....

OK I called back and she N---i  stated I needed to talk to Angela her manager  tomorrow for anymore details....Hmmmm
guess this would be the room decor of your slumber party if on floor 4 (taken from site)



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 07:57:47 PM
I have one more scenario I want to run past. If he already had a room, he would have a key that would slide in the lock that would open the side door not going past the lobby. He could have taken the stairs, and the picture that I think shows her with shoes could have been walking past the elevator on the third floor or going to another floor, getting ready to go to the room. In the other two, where she looks different and is barefooted is where they are leaving.

The accomodations part of their website says "elevator(s)" which I take as more than one. I have stayed at a motel where there is actually a work elevator for the maids to take their carts up, and it is behind a door, generally near the stairs, so it look like just another room. I wonder if he was a frequent visitor there and knew this and used it to carry her in, and not the stairs.

I really do believe we are seeing two different times in the three pictures we have seen. And I think the one where she is barefooted and about to be slaughtered is the one with the white towel, diaper, blanket or whatever it is around her.  JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: can on November 19, 2009, 07:58:20 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/953645

Published: 06:11 PM, Thu Nov 19, 2009
Police update on Shaniya Davis case set for 8 p.m.
By Nancy McCleary
Staff writer

 

The Fayetteville Police Department has scheduled a news conference for 8 tonight to discuss additional charges in the Shaniya Davis case.

The news conference will be in front of the Police Department.

Police are expected to discuss the latest in the investigation of the 5-year-old's death.

Fayetteville police delivered evidence from the case to the State Bureau of Investigation earlier today, a spokeswoman said in an e-mail.

The delivery means officials in Cumberland and Lee counties may have reached a decision as to where the case will be tried.
(snipped)

Thanks Klaas.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 07:58:44 PM
Link to the press conference:

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/livenow?id=7122856


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 07:58:51 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....

OK I called back and she N---i  stated I needed to talk to Angela her manager  tomorrow for anymore details....Hmmmm
well mrs. tomsom will be in at 8 lol
i think i got her hinky up with the wheelchair inquiry
what were you going to ask her now?

All I ask her was how many rooms on the 4th floor....
what is wrong with that?
i told you her hinky meter exploded lol


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 08:00:07 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....

OK I called back and she N---i  stated I needed to talk to Angela her manager  tomorrow for anymore details....Hmmmm
guess this would be the room decor of your slumber party if on floor 4 (taken from site)



There would of been a nice PJ /birthday party that evening....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 08:00:29 PM
OK.. I just called for a PJ party for 15 girls.. The 4th floor bedroom has purple decor- Rugs are purple, brown and burgandy...
lmfao am i invited? ... did you get a woman with an accent and a 5 letter name
why the interest in the bedroom decor? please don't say to match up to pre existing shaniya photos....

Wouldn't rhyme with "motel" would it? ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 08:01:43 PM
Link to the press conference:

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/livenow?id=7122856


 ::MonkeyMad::

asphyxiation - did you hear them say that?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 19, 2009, 08:03:24 PM
hey monkeys im still 7pgs behind, but i have a Q about the 911 op
the 911 op asked about the underwear, WHY?
 in june we lost a kid at the park for a 1/2 hr or so and you dont know how scary
that is. anyway after 10min search we call 911 for help, and i just asked the mom
and she said the 911 op did not ask about underwear

the girl was found in car playing with a toy, like 50ft away from us, she is 5
we just never thought to look in the car, because we were in panic mode i guess


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 08:03:36 PM
Jurisdiction will remain in Cumberland county

Cause of death homicide - asphyxiation preliminary

Filing first degree murder/rape of a child against Mario McNeill


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 08:03:48 PM
I have one more scenario I want to run past. If he already had a room, he would have a key that would slide in the lock that would open the side door not going past the lobby. He could have taken the stairs, and the picture that I think shows her with shoes could have been walking past the elevator on the third floor or going to another floor, getting ready to go to the room. In the other two, where she looks different and is barefooted is where they are leaving.

The accomodations part of their website says "elevator(s)" which I take as more than one. I have stayed at a motel where there is actually a work elevator for the maids to take their carts up, and it is behind a door, generally near the stairs, so it look like just another room. I wonder if he was a frequent visitor there and knew this and used it to carry her in, and not the stairs.

I really do believe we are seeing two different times in the three pictures we have seen. And I think the one where she is barefooted and about to be slaughtered is the one with the white towel, diaper, blanket or whatever it is around her.  JMO
i agree about the different times in the photos i do not agree about different floors tho because of the purple line on the rug... and about it possibly being a service elevator it is not behind any doors or hidden away because you can see decorative wall light fixture that indicates regular public hallway and from what i can tell if you exit the elevators the emergency/regular stairs are to your left at the end of the hall.. hope that helps a little


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 08:04:38 PM
hey monkeys im still 7pgs behind, but i have a Q about the 911 op
the 911 op asked about the underwear, WHY?
 in june we lost a kid at the park for a 1/2 hr or so and you dont know how scary
that is. anyway after 10min search we call 911 for help, and i just asked the mom
and she said the 911 op did not ask about underwear

the girl was found in car playing with a toy, like 50ft away from us, she is 5
we just never thought to look in the car, because we were in panic mode i guess
because it is all she was wearing as "bottoms"


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 08:05:27 PM
I can't hear, my store is too noisy right now!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 08:07:18 PM
Link to the press conference:

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/livenow?id=7122856


 ::MonkeyMad::

asphyxiation - did you hear them say that?

Sorry, I heard them talking before it started.  I didn't want you monkeys to think I was deaf. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 08:09:03 PM
Link to the press conference:

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/livenow?id=7122856


 ::MonkeyMad::

asphyxiation - did you hear them say that?

Sorry, I heard them talking before it started.  I didn't want you monkeys to think I was deaf. ::MonkeyTongue::

Yeah, I heard one of the reporters say that too before it started


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 08:10:23 PM
Link to the press conference:

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/livenow?id=7122856


 ::MonkeyMad::

asphyxiation - did you hear them say that?

.... and rape.

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:12:49 PM
I guess that answers one of my questions, anyway. I wondered if little Shaniya had succumbed to injuries or was murdered independently from what she had been put through.    ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 19, 2009, 08:14:40 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:18:00 PM
O/T (kinda)

NG has a real sharpness to her spitting out those words tonight!   ::MonkeyEek::

I'd be skeered to call her!

"We'll be Taking YOUR Calls.........  "   :smt103


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 08:18:46 PM
The current charges on AD are standing as there are right now   ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 19, 2009, 08:19:42 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::
omg!! I wanted to believe I didn't see the face of a child rapist on the Tv I wanted to believe he was a poor excuse of a human being nothing more than a mule for a more evil individual....I truly hope he gets what he deserves for what he did to that baby!!! WE NEED STIFFER PUNISHMENTS FOR PEDOPHILES!!! There is no rehabilitation for that kind of human! :( 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 08:19:48 PM
Since this is a high profile case - will smirky @ss MF'er be witheld from general population? ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:20:09 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

I know NR. It's just more than I can comprehend.....    :smt022


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 08:23:35 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/shanaya5.gif)
Prayers to you sweet baby girl.

I had to look at this pic again


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:23:53 PM
Since this is a high profile case - will smirky @ss MF'er be witheld from general population? ::MonkeyWaa::

I hope not............... Oh, I hope not! He'll be turned into a favorite "little girl" in prison immediately and the guards will look the other way. I'd pay inmates to chant the name Shaniya in his ear while he's "busy".     ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 08:24:22 PM
Since this is a high profile case - will smirky @ss MF'er be witheld from general population? ::MonkeyWaa::

They will love his long dreds in prison


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 19, 2009, 08:24:26 PM
Since this is a high profile case - will smirky @ss MF'er be witheld from general population? ::MonkeyWaa::

Don't I hope so !!!  ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 19, 2009, 08:26:05 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

and I won't even say how I think he asphyxiated her  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 08:26:30 PM
So Mario is the guy we see carry her ?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 08:26:35 PM
The current charges on AD are standing as there are right now   ::MonkeyEek::

Scum of the earth, she needs to do life if not killed.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 08:27:46 PM
So Mario is the guy we see carry her ?


Yes Edward it is.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 08:27:51 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

and I won't even say how I think he asphyxiated her  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I thought the same, Nut.
I can't think of any punishment bad enough for that POS


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:27:55 PM
So Mario is the guy we see carry her ?


Yes, that's Mario.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 19, 2009, 08:28:28 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

and I won't even say how I think he asphyxiated her  ::MonkeyNoNo::

First Degree Rape (14-27.2)
A person is guilty of rape in the first degree if the person engages in vaginal intercourse:

With a victim who is a child under the age of 13 years and the defendant is at least 12 years old and is at least four years older than the victim; or
With another person by force and against the will of the other person, and:
a. Employs or displays a dangerous or deadly weapon ... ; or
b. Inflicts serious ... injury ...; or
c. The person commits the offense aided or abetted by one or more other persons.
Classification: Class B1 Felony (40 years and/or fine)

http://www.ncsu.edu/police/Information/NCLaw.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 08:28:42 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

and I won't even say how I think he asphyxiated her  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Or when, poor baby, she was only 5! WTF


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 08:29:09 PM
Did they ever say whether or not she was alive when they left the hotel? I am wondering if he killed her in the car or the hotel. They said they were still looking for another crime scene but how would they be able to find evidence if she died like that?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:29:17 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

and I won't even say how I think he asphyxiated her  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I thought the same, Nut.
I can't think of any punishment bad enough for that POS

OMG! I can't even think about it.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 08:30:05 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:30:16 PM
Did they ever say whether or not she was alive when they left the hotel? I am wondering if he killed her in the car or the hotel. They said they were still looking for another crime scene but how would they be able to find evidence if she died like that?

In the press conference, they said they didn't think she was killed at the hotel.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 08:30:18 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

and I won't even say how I think he asphyxiated her  ::MonkeyNoNo::
OMG, I don't even think I want to know, I was thinking with his bare hands  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 08:30:40 PM
So Mario is the guy we see carry her ?


Yes, that's Mario.

LE did not say where the murder took place did they ?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 08:31:27 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...


So did I, and why did he go that far to a hotel, when he could have gone to a sleazy joint closer?  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:32:16 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



I don't get that either. The rates are approx $100.00 a night at that hotel, and they were there for an hour. If rape was the objective, why a hotel? Why would the scum spend the money?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 08:32:54 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

and I won't even say how I think he asphyxiated her  ::MonkeyNoNo::
OMG, I don't even think I want to know, I was thinking with his bare hands  ::MonkeyNoNo::
::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::
Me either.... I thought maybe he suffocated her with a pillow so he would not see her face.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:33:37 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::

and I won't even say how I think he asphyxiated her  ::MonkeyNoNo::
OMG, I don't even think I want to know, I was thinking with his bare hands  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I was thinking a pillow, but I've decided not to think about it at all right now.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 19, 2009, 08:34:13 PM
NC police add charges in case of girl who perished

Associated Press - November 19, 2009 7:55 PM ET

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. (AP) - Police in North Carolina say they will bring new charges in the case of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found nearly a week after a man is accused of kidnapping her from her Fayetteville home.

Fayetteville police scheduled a news conference for Thursday night. A statement released by the department indicated additional charges were being filed in the case.

A search warrant says the man charged with kidnapping Shaniya Davis picked her up in front of the home and drove her to a hotel where she was last seen alive. The girl's body was found Monday off a road near Sanford.

Mario McNeill is accused of kidnapping the child. Antoinette Davis is charged with trafficking her daughter and child abuse involving prostitution.

http://www.wmbfnews.com/Global/story.asp?S=11541489


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 08:34:18 PM
This will haunts us for a long time... Seeing an innocent beautiful child in the arms of a evil druggie Pedophile POS and there was nothing none at the time could do to rescue her... ::MonkeyTears::

God Bless Shanyia  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 08:34:58 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



I don't get that either. The rates are approx $100.00 a night at that hotel, and they were there for an hour. If rape was the objective, why a hotel? Why would the scum spend the money?

I posted earlier maybe MM knew someone that worked at Comfort Inn and let him have a room for exchange for drugs, maybe someone in maintenance or housekeeping


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 08:36:05 PM
Didn't they say he had ties to Sanford? Like he worked there or something? I wonder if he knew someone who worked at the hotel? Maybe he got the room for or cheap? I am also thinking that someone may have known him because they caught that video of the little girl very quickly. Most times you don't see surveilence video show up for a few days but this was on the news within hours of her disappearance. Do we know what name he registered the room under?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 08:38:32 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



I don't get that either. The rates are approx $100.00 a night at that hotel, and they were there for an hour. If rape was the objective, why a hotel? Why would the scum spend the money?

I posted earlier maybe MM knew someone that worked at Comfort Inn and let him have a room for exchange for drugs, maybe someone in maintenance or housekeeping

Wow, I swear I was typing that before I read your comment. I think you are right though. I don't think he would have paid for the room or driven that far without a reason


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 08:38:53 PM
My understand is that only MM and AD are being charged with the happenings that led to Shaniya's demise.

In response to one of the questions ... the spokesperson for the investigation stated that there were pertinent cell phone records to check out.  Cell phone records could prove very interesting in regards to the chain of events on the morning Shaniya went missing.

When it is considered that MM arrived at the hotel with Shaniya at 6:11 AM ... the implication would be that that Shaniya was taken as planned from her Mother's home at 5:30 AM.  The distance of 40 miles between home and the hotel would imply approximately 40 minute drive.

1.  Could it be that the 911 call place by AD at 7:00 AM call was not part of the plan?  Could it have happened at the urging of her worried sister who woke up unexpectedly ... her worried sister who did not have a clue what was going on?

2.  Could it be that MM was suppose to bring a drugged Shanyia ... who would have no recollection that she had been raped ...  back by 8:00 AM but AD calls him in a panic and warns him about the 911 call that she was forced to make?

3.  Could it be that damage control dictated that MM panicked and ... a short distance past the hotel a drugged Shaniya is silenced and disposed of like trash?

4.  Could it be that the observant hotel clerk and ... hotel security cameras had not been anticipated.  This is why MM turns himself in?

5.  Could it be that MM ... made a plea deal with LE regarding his participation and ... that is why the search was focused in the area where Shaniya remains were located?

6.  Could it be that AD confessed her participation and ... that accounts for the charges brought against her?

Just speculating.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet





 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 08:42:00 PM
We see him leave with her.. She is alive. 
she has her hand on him while waiting for the elevator.....
She does not appear to be crying or in fear of him at the time the image is taken.

Something happens after they are at the motel. He must have met a person who was staying at the motel. Later he rapes her, possibly in the vehicle and suffocates her.
 Finding the deer carcass in a bag was a convenient location for disposal. To draw off search animals.

He has done this before.
jmho


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 08:42:34 PM
i didn't watch did they mention if rape was added because of dna evidence or just because he was the last one wit her....
i could be wrong and jess answer me if you know but...
when anything happens during a felony that causes bodily harm or death it is all parties involved fault... like you and me rob a bank but i shoot the clerk we can both be charged with murder even tho i did it spur of the moment and you had nothing to do with it... is he being charged with all crimes like rape and murder because he kidnapped/trafficked her or do they have legit dna evidence against him...
 i don't know why but my gut is telling me he didn't actually do the raping


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:42:53 PM
I would be interested to learn the approx time of death. I wonder how long he kept her after taking her to the hotel. How many days was it between the 911 call and his arrest? I can't remember......


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 08:44:57 PM
Pretty good speculation Janet.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:45:19 PM
We see him leave with her.. She is alive. 
she has her hand on him while waiting for the elevator.....
She does not appear to be crying or in fear of him at the time the image is taken.

Something happens after they are at the motel. He must have met a person who was staying at the motel. Later he rapes her, possibly in the vehicle and suffocates her.
 Finding the deer carcass in a bag was a convenient location for disposal. To draw off search animals.

He has done this before.
jmho


Edward? I think she looks dazed in the images at the elevator. From drugs or from trauma, I don't know, but I think she looks dazed.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 08:46:54 PM
I would be interested to learn the approx time of death. I wonder how long he kept her after taking her to the hotel. How many days was it between the 911 call and his arrest? I can't remember......

The 911 call was Tuesday morning
He turned himself in on Friday morning after some of his folks told him about the video at the hotel.
They charged Antoinette on Saturday

I think??


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:46:58 PM
What do you all think................ did he kill her because of the publicity and the heat that brings?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 08:47:21 PM
She could be dazed or drugged..So True


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:47:50 PM
I would be interested to learn the approx time of death. I wonder how long he kept her after taking her to the hotel. How many days was it between the 911 call and his arrest? I can't remember......

The 911 call was Tuesday morning
He turned himself in on Friday morning after some of his folks told him about the video at the hotel.
They charged Antoinette on Saturday

I think??

Thank you Magnolia!   ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 08:49:08 PM
asphyxiation means death due to lack of oxygen are both suffocation and strangulation considered asphyxiation?
i want to know why her blanket was in the neighbors trash... someone put it there and it wasn't the neighbor even if not on the same day why dispose of it in the neighbors trash?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 08:50:53 PM
asphyxiation means death due to lack of oxygen are both suffocation and strangulation considered asphyxiation?
i want to know why her blanket was in the neighbors trash... someone put it there and it wasn't the neighbor even if not on the same day why dispose of it in the neighbors trash?
That's the question I was wondering, are suffocation and strangulation considered asphyxiation.  And he picked Shaniya up from outside the trailer, did her mom just shove her out the door to wait for him?  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 08:51:07 PM
So she could have been used by many over many days..

That is a disturbing thought..


The mother must have hated the child.. Sad but True.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:51:50 PM
asphyxiation means death due to lack of oxygen are both suffocation and strangulation considered asphyxiation?
i want to know why her blanket was in the neighbors trash... someone put it there and it wasn't the neighbor even if not on the same day why dispose of it in the neighbors trash?

asphyxiation could mean either, penny. I don't have an answer about the blanket. Sorry!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 08:54:05 PM
as⋅phyx⋅i⋅ate  /ćsˈfɪksiˌeɪt/  Show Spelled Pronunciation [as-fik-see-eyt]  Show IPA verb, -at⋅ed, -at⋅ing.
Use asphyxiation in a Sentence
See web results for asphyxiation
See images of asphyxiation
–verb (used with object) 1. to produce asphyxia in.
2. to cause to die or lose consciousness by impairing normal breathing, as by gas or other noxious agents; choke; suffocate; smother.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 08:54:13 PM
We see him leave with her.. She is alive. 
she has her hand on him while waiting for the elevator.....
She does not appear to be crying or in fear of him at the time the image is taken.

Something happens after they are at the motel. He must have met a person who was staying at the motel. Later he rapes her, possibly in the vehicle and suffocates her.
 Finding the deer carcass in a bag was a convenient location for disposal. To draw off search animals.

He has done this before.
jmho


I know they are probably not related but when you said that it reminded me of what my husband said. Years ago in Fayetteville, there were a lot of kids going missing that they never found. There were around 4 or 5 kids that went missing around 2000, 2001.
















Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 08:56:00 PM
as⋅phyx⋅i⋅ate  /ćsˈfɪksiˌeɪt/  Show Spelled Pronunciation [as-fik-see-eyt]  Show IPA verb, -at⋅ed, -at⋅ing.
Use asphyxiation in a Sentence
See web results for asphyxiation
See images of asphyxiation
–verb (used with object) 1. to produce asphyxia in.
2. to cause to die or lose consciousness by impairing normal breathing, as by gas or other noxious agents; choke; suffocate; smother.

Thank-you


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 08:56:28 PM
So Mario is the guy we see carry her ?


Yes


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 08:57:57 PM
Dumb question but can they force a prisoner to give dna?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
So Mario is the guy we see carry her ?


Yes

Klaas, you look quite fetching.... and your little doggie too.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 08:59:56 PM
What do you all think................ did he kill her because of the publicity and the heat that brings?
do we even know if she was killed that morning or day even ... when did they find her body again?
i think it is possible that he killed her due to the mother calling 911 and i don't think that was part of the plan... i wonder if she was smothered with the blanket
can someone do a time line...
day reported missing
day reported by hotel clerk
day found
it is possible that he drove by the cops at the mothers as he was supposed to be dropping her back off and panicked and it is also possible tat the blanket found and feces on door etc was meant to be a setup by the mother against him... think about it you owe someone money you agree to give them your kid instead and then either remorse from changing your mind or simply to cover your own ass you put evidence on the door handle and in your neighbors trash to indicate the child left or he had the blanket and dumped it near the moms house to make it look like the mom did it
reason for the call could have been that she figured if she said he kidnapped her he wold go to jail and she would get shaniya back and he wouldn't be able to screw with her because he would be in jail...
i dunno but this is the first case where i've seen surveilance so incriminating and still had so many questions....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 09:00:01 PM
I can see where he might use the girl himself and then let other males use her for some time $$$$ or Drugs or Favors..
 and in the end she is murdered to keep any of the males from being implicated...

Mom knows what the final outcome would be..



I hate them.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 09:00:02 PM
Dumb question but can they force a prisoner to give dna?

Yes. They can come into a cell and take a cheek swab or cut some hair.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: lady on November 19, 2009, 09:00:02 PM
Didnt they say at some point there were cameras outside someones mobile home? If so wouldnt they have seen her out there waiting to be picked up??


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 09:01:22 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



I don't get that either. The rates are approx $100.00 a night at that hotel, and they were there for an hour. If rape was the objective, why a hotel? Why would the scum spend the money?

I posted earlier maybe MM knew someone that worked at Comfort Inn and let him have a room for exchange for drugs, maybe someone in maintenance or housekeeping

Wow, I swear I was typing that before I read your comment. I think you are right though. I don't think he would have paid for the room or driven that far without a reason

And thus my comment about coming in on a freight elevator. I don't think pENNY exactly understood my post. And I have a toothache, and I am in almost too much pain to post. My later I can make myself clearer.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 09:03:24 PM
What do you all think................ did he kill her because of the publicity and the heat that brings?
do we even know if she was killed that morning or day even ... when did they find her body again?
i think it is possible that he killed her due to the mother calling 911 and i don't think that was part of the plan... i wonder if she was smothered with the blanket
can someone do a time line...
day reported missing
day reported by hotel clerk
day found
it is possible that he drove by the cops at the mothers as he was supposed to be dropping her back off and panicked and it is also possible tat the blanket found and feces on door etc was meant to be a setup by the mother against him... think about it you owe someone money you agree to give them your kid instead and then either remorse from changing your mind or simply to cover your own ass you put evidence on the door handle and in your neighbors trash to indicate the child left or he had the blanket and dumped it near the moms house to make it look like the mom did it
reason for the call could have been that she figured if she said he kidnapped her he wold go to jail and she would get shaniya back and he wouldn't be able to screw with her because he would be in jail...
i dunno but this is the first case where i've seen surveilance so incriminating and still had so many questions....


Didnt the mother originally say it was Coe that took the kid though?





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 09:04:59 PM
asphyxiation means death due to lack of oxygen are both suffocation and strangulation considered asphyxiation?
i want to know why her blanket was in the neighbors trash... someone put it there and it wasn't the neighbor even if not on the same day why dispose of it in the neighbors trash?

To be graphic, I think she was give an enema to get her ready for what happened to her, and the bio was the one that prepped her. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 09:05:10 PM
So Mario is the guy we see carry her ?


Yes

Klaas, you look quite fetching.... and your little doggie too.

Thank you!  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 19, 2009, 09:06:08 PM

FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- Fayetteville police announced Thursday night that 29-year-old Mario McNeill is charged
with 5-year-old Shaniya Davis' murder.

Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine said during a press conference that officials have ruled Davis' death
as a homicide.

The 5-year-old disappeared last Tuesday from her Fayetteville home. Her body was found days later in a wooded
area south of Sanford in Lee County.

Preliminary reports reveal that she most likely died of asphyxiation, but testing has not yet been completed
so a final autopsy report has not been released.



Story: McNeill picked up Shaniya in front of home
Police say they do not believe Davis was killed at the Sanford hotel where she was last spotted on surveillance
video with McNeill -the same morning her mother reported her missing.

McNeill is now charged with first degree murder and first degree rape of a child. He was already charged with
kidnapping Davis. McNeill is currently being held in the Cumberland County Detention Center under no bond.

Shaniya's mother 25-year-old Antoinette Davis is also in jail on charges of prostituting her daughter.

Early Thursday, it was revealed that Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis will take jurisdiction in
 the Shaniya Davis case.

The investigation is on-going, therefore officials say they are not releasing further details about the case at
this time.
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7127941


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 09:06:27 PM
We see him leave with her.. She is alive. 
she has her hand on him while waiting for the elevator.....
She does not appear to be crying or in fear of him at the time the image is taken.

Something happens after they are at the motel. He must have met a person who was staying at the motel. Later he rapes her, possibly in the vehicle and suffocates her.
 Finding the deer carcass in a bag was a convenient location for disposal. To draw off search animals.

He has done this before.
jmho


Edward? I think she looks dazed in the images at the elevator. From drugs or from trauma, I don't know, but I think she looks dazed.

Please don't take this the wrong way, but I sure hope she was drugged. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pdh3 on November 19, 2009, 09:07:34 PM
Dumb question but can they force a prisoner to give dna?

Yes. They can come into a cell and take a cheek swab or cut some hair.




They can get a court order if he refuses. But since he's in custody, they can get his DNA from a toothbrush, a cup, his sheets, clothes, underwear.....anything like that. They can also get it from his car, which the cops also have in their possession. They've probably searched his house too. I'm sure they already have his DNA without having to get a court order for it. But maybe they will, just to be sure they have him cold, and no evidence gets thrown out.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 09:08:11 PM
The mom put the blanket in the trash...

It is absolute in my mind..  She hated the child.
She sent the child off to be used and murdered.







Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 09:08:24 PM
So she could have been used by many over many days..That is a disturbing thought..


The mother must have hated the child.. Sad but True.

Edward this thought has kept me up for the past, almost week now. I look at this child's face in the photos at the hotel and I am shaken beyond belief. As a mother, I see fear, trauma, shock, pain, my heart tells me she suffered. I wish I could go into that pic and take her from him and carry her away, all the while holding her tightly and letting her know she will be OK now and not to worry. This case is killing me. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 19, 2009, 09:08:26 PM
Brad lockhart is going to be on Oprah
Oh for the love of everything holy. . .  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 09:10:09 PM
We see him leave with her.. She is alive. 
she has her hand on him while waiting for the elevator.....
She does not appear to be crying or in fear of him at the time the image is taken.

Something happens after they are at the motel. He must have met a person who was staying at the motel. Later he rapes her, possibly in the vehicle and suffocates her.
 Finding the deer carcass in a bag was a convenient location for disposal. To draw off search animals.

He has done this before.
jmho


Edward? I think she looks dazed in the images at the elevator. From drugs or from trauma, I don't know, but I think she looks dazed.

Please don't take this the wrong way, but I sure hope she was drugged. ::MonkeyCool::

I hope so too.  What they literally did was torture her to death, in the worst possible way.
I hate them all.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 09:10:11 PM
Someone asked for a timeline, and I remembered that cw618 had done a great one!

timeline, sorry long
on 11-10-09: @6:53am mom calls in and reports Shaniya missing
Shaniya Davis is a 5-year-old girl who went missing from a Fayetteville, N.C., trailer park early Tuesday morning.
Her mother reports last seeing her at 5:30 a.m. that morning, and foul play is suspected in her case.
 
On Wednesday,11-11-09 at 11 p.m.,
police arrested Clarence Coe, 30, and charged him with first-degree kidnapping.
Coe maintains his innocence, but police argue that this was not a random arrest.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, was arrested Friday 11-13-09
for the kidnapping of Shaniya Davis. Investigators are still
trying to determine McNeill's connection to Shaniya. Authorities were able to arrest McNeill because of footage
found of him on a hotel surveillance video, where McNeill is seen carrying Shaniya.

hotel surveillance video date time
11-10-09:
6:11am Mario is seen on video carrying Shaniya into hotel
11-10-09:7:30am Mario is know to exit hotel w/Shaniya
the videos aired THURSDAY, November 12, 2009

Antoinette Nicole Davis arrested,11-14-09Shaniya Davis' mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, was arrested and charged authorities said Saturday night for
human trafficking and other offenses. She has been accused of offering her daughter for prostitution.
Antoinette says she doesn't know where her daughter is, but she was also charged with felony child abuse,
 prostitution and filing a false police report. Authorities still haven't been able to locate Shaniya.

11/16/09
The body of Shaniya Davis has been found along a North Carolina highway


link to 911 audio
http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/6439590/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a more detailed timeline i snipped from
http://crimeseekers.net/forums/showthread.php?p=10623

TimeLine For Missing Shaniya Davis

TUESDAY, November 10, 2009

3:00 AM: Neighbor, Andrea Moore, described hearing noises outside her mobile home

5:30 AM: Mother put Shaniya Davis on sofa and last time she saw her child

6:11 AM: Shaniya observed on survellience video at hotel 40 miles from home in the arms of Mario McNeill waiting
 on elevator

6:53 AM: Antoinette Davis calls LE to report her daughter missing

• Law enforcement search the mobile home park and find a blanket covered in feces in garbage pail of neighbor,
Andrea Moore. Blanket believed to be that of Shaniya. Theresa Chance, Fayetteville Police spokesperson stated
Ms. Moore is not a suspect.

• Back porch and railing of home Davis family lives in is covered in feces.

• Ms. Davis, her 7-year-old son, Davis' sister and another child are removed from the home and not allowed to
return due to extensive sewage leak.

• The N.C. Offender Registry lists two sex offenders who live in the mobile home park.

WEDNESDAY, November 11, 2009

• Clarence Coe, boyfriend of Antoinette Davis, is arrested for the kidnapping of Shaniya. Reports provided to
LE state he was seen leaving the mobile home park with Shaniya.

• Clarence Coe said he did not take Shaniya.

THURSDAY, November 12, 2009

• Still images from a Sanford hotel survellience video aired nationally of Mario Andrette McNeill, ex-boyfriend
 of Antoinette Davis' SISTER, carrying Shaniya Davis to the hotel's elevator.

FRIDAY, November 13, 2009

• Mario McNeill turned himself into police early morning after seeing the hotel images.

• Clarence Coe was released from jail and kidnapping charges dropped.

• Mario McNeill charged with kidnapping Shaniya Davis. Hotel survellience video confirmed him with Shaniya on
Tuesday morning. McNeill stated he took Shaniya but denies that he kidnapped her.

• The whereabouts of Shaniya are unknown. FBI and U.S. Marshalls are involved in the nationwide search for
Shaniya.

• Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, arrived in Fayetteville and went on national TV begging for the return of
his daughter who has lived with him for about 3-4 years, but only lived with her mother for the last three weeks
.

• Clarence Coe, boyfriend of Antoinette Davis, is said to be more upset about Shaniya's disappearance than her
mother...as per a neighbor intervewed by local news station.

SATURDAY, November 14, 2009

• Late Saturday, Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, was charged with human trafficking, felony child
abuse/prostitution, filing a false police report and resist, delay or obstruct.

• Police said Davis was being held at the Cumberland County Jail on $51,000 secured bond and is scheduled to
appear in court Monday morning.

• Still no sign of Shaniya Davis.

SUNDAY, November 15, 2009

• Authorities acting on a tip are scouring a portion of south-central North Carolina for a 5-year-old girl
reported missing by her mother. Multiple agencies have been searching for Shaniya Davis since 8 a.m.

• SANFORD, NC (WTVD) -- Fayetteville police confirmed Sunday that they were searching on the ground for a
missing 5-year-old girl between Fayetteville and Sanford. Chopper 11 confirms a Fayetville forensics truck is
 on the scene and officers are searching near Walker Road off Highway 87 in the Sanford area.Witnesses told
ABC11 Eyewitness News they saw officers searching a ravine in that area around 10 a.m.

• Sanford is about 40 miles north of Fayetteville. Police did not say if they were looking for a body or if they
 hoped to find Shaniya Davis alive.

• The father of a missing 5-year-old North Carolina girl says he never should have allowed her to go back to her
 mother.

• Another day gone by. A long day of searching wrapped up at 5:00 PM with still no sign of Shaniya.

MONDAY, November 16, 2009

• Search for Shaniya remains in the area on Walker Road. Over 200 searchers are combing the long stretch of
road and 100 yds off the road on each side. This search is based on a tip that her body was dumped along Walker
Road off Hwy. 87.

• Lockhart and his sister, who live out of state, cared for Shaniya until last month.

• Anyone wishing to help with the search was asked to e-mail their name and contact numbers to
Shaniyavolunteer@ci.fay.nc.us to be added to a central list so police can coordinate volunteer efforts.


• The body of little Shaniya has been found. News of the discovery of her remains found on Walker Road came in
around 1:30 PM.


• Davis' 7-year-old son was taken into protective custody last week and placed into foster care.

• According to the non-profit agency, Child of the Night, Shaniya's case is very rare. Typically, child are in
the age range of 11 to 17 when entered into the world of human trafficking/prostitution. When a child is
prostituted or sold by a parent it's usually involving drugs.

TUESDAY, November 17, 2009

• "Lord, I come to you with open arms, and it is hard. It is hard," Bradley Lockhart said at a vigil in a store
parking lot, according to The Associated Press. "Don't give up on me and don't give up on Shaniya. She's right
there with you."


• Lockhart attended a prayer vigil last night for his daughter and broke down while speaking to the crowd.


• "The investigation at this point indicates that Shaniya Davis was alive at the time she left the Sanford hotel
," police said in the statement Tuesday.

• Shaniya's half-sister, Cheyenne Lockhart, told HLN's "Nancy Grace" Monday that she found it difficult to
believe Davis had treated her daughter so poorly. "She seemed like the sweetest woman. She didn't come from much
, but ... she had the sweetest voice, she had the sweetest personality, and especially toward me. I would never
think that she would do anything like that," said Lockhart, who shared a father with Shaniya.

• The aunt of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found off a rural North Carolina road says she had a hard time
letting the girl live for a while at her mother's house.

• Carey Lockhart-Davis said Tuesday that the mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, neglected her children.
Lockart-Davis is the sister of the girl's father, Bradley Lockhart, and helped raise her. The girl went to stay
 with her mother a month ago.

• Jeff Riccio of Tarheel Canine Training Inc. said Tuesday his team returned after getting information that the
body of Shaniya (shuh-NY-ah) Davis might be near the carcasses. The searchers found the body Monday afternoon
underneath kudzu along a rural highway southeast of Sanford.


link to 911 audio
http://www.wral.com/news/local/audio/6439590/








Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 09:10:23 PM
Didnt they say at some point there were cameras outside someones mobile home? If so wouldnt they have seen her out there waiting to be picked up??
Exactly, so I'm wondering if that is on the cameras?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 09:12:11 PM
Murder Charges Filed in Shaniya Davis Case
Staff Writer
November 19, 2009


FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. - Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, has been charged with first degree murder and first degree rape for the death of Shaniya Davis. The cause of death is asphyxiation, according to Fayetteville Police Thursday night.

After a weeklong search authorities found the body of the 5-year-old girl in a rural, wooded area southeast of Sanford on Monday, Nov. 15.

A search warrant said that McNeill picked up Shaniya Davis from her house and brought her to a Sanford hotel, where surveillance videos showed McNeill carrying the girl.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, 25, was charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse involving prostitution and filing a false police report. Davis appeared in court on Monday

http://www.myfox8.com/news/wghp-shaniya-davis-charges-091119,0,7918402.story



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pdh3 on November 19, 2009, 09:13:18 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...





I wondered if they were filming kiddie porn in that room.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 19, 2009, 09:13:32 PM
the pics are defionitely different areas and i thought that the ws poster said there was only 1 elevator there are a lot of diffrences the main one being the purple line and yes i get crappy camera vs good camera but this is 2 thin purple lines vs one thick one here is a better pic

I agree, the pattern appears to be a little off, but it's evident the patterns have the same general design details. They could be slightly different on each floor.?
Either way, I read several Comfort Inn reviews where customers made various comments on the tiling on the main floor. It makes you wonder...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 09:16:04 PM
Didnt they say at some point there were cameras outside someones mobile home? If so wouldnt they have seen her out there waiting to be picked up??

I did read somewhere that security camera picked up AD and her sister appearing to be searching for Shaniya outside the home prior to the 911 call being placed.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Edward on November 19, 2009, 09:17:13 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...





I wondered if they were filming kiddie porn in that room.....

Oh My God.. You may be correct.
LE had better identfy the person in that room if this idiot M did not rent it himself..



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 09:18:24 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...





I wondered if they were filming kiddie porn in that room.....

That has come across my mind...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 19, 2009, 09:19:42 PM
Murder Charges Filed in Shaniya Davis Case
Staff Writer
November 19, 2009


FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. - Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, has been charged with first degree murder and first degree rape for the death of Shaniya Davis. The cause of death is asphyxiation, according to Fayetteville Police Thursday night.

After a weeklong search authorities found the body of the 5-year-old girl in a rural, wooded area southeast of Sanford on Monday, Nov. 15.

A search warrant said that McNeill picked up Shaniya Davis from her house and brought her to a Sanford hotel, where surveillance videos showed McNeill carrying the girl.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, 25, was charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse involving prostitution and filing a false police report. Davis appeared in court on Monday

http://www.myfox8.com/news/wghp-shaniya-davis-charges-091119,0,7918402.story



Thanks Tamikosmom!  ::MonkeyWink::

Getting back to basics.........  the charges against AD are :
human trafficking, felony child abuse involving prostitution and filing a false police report

That indicates to me that they know 1) HUMAN TRAFFICKING = Mom "sold" Shaniya   2) FELONY CHILD ABUSE INVOLVING PROSTITUTION = Mom sold Shaniya to be used for the purpose of sex  3) Mom planned the 911 call to cover her azz for not being able to ever produce Shaniya again.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 19, 2009, 09:22:49 PM

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/video?id=7126791


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 09:23:04 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



I don't get that either. The rates are approx $100.00 a night at that hotel, and they were there for an hour. If rape was the objective, why a hotel? Why would the scum spend the money?

I posted earlier maybe MM knew someone that worked at Comfort Inn and let him have a room for exchange for drugs, maybe someone in maintenance or housekeeping

Wow, I swear I was typing that before I read your comment. I think you are right though. I don't think he would have paid for the room or driven that far without a reason

And thus my comment about coming in on a freight elevator. I don't think pENNY exactly understood my post. And I have a toothache, and I am in almost too much pain to post. My later I can make myself clearer.
no i understood your post about maybe having a connection to a service elevator i was just implying that the pics we saw were not a service elevator that is all... sorry about your tooth i was at the dentist today... hate tooth pain


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 19, 2009, 09:24:11 PM
Prior to today's press conference ... I suspected that maybe Mario was passing Shaniya off to somebody else in that room and ... possibly it was all about child pornography.  However ... the rape charge tells me that Mario was the person who was the pedophile.

IMO.

Janet

+++++++

Murder Charges Filed in Shaniya Davis Case
Staff Writer
November 19, 2009


FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. - Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, has been charged with first degree murder and first degree rape for the death of Shaniya Davis. The cause of death is asphyxiation, according to Fayetteville Police Thursday night.

http://www.myfox8.com/news/wghp-shaniya-davis-charges-091119,0,7918402.story



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 19, 2009, 09:28:42 PM
well that didnt work
http://<object id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268">
<param name="movie" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd&section=&mediaId=7126791&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=" ></param>
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param>
<param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<embed id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true"
src="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd&section=&mediaId=7126791&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=">
</embed>
</object>


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 09:28:50 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...


that is why i freaked when you asked about the room decor and you said you thought he was on the 4th floor before ... i thought you were implying you came across pics showing her in a hotel room before...
not to sound disgusting but if this guy gets off from little girls he had at least one of his own that we know about... why not just do it with her? why except a child as payment from someone else that owes you money then spend more money on a hotel room just to do what you could have gotten for free at home... if she was taken as payment for debt then he planned to recoupe that money somehow and he would not be charging himself money to have sex with her so i am in full belief that it was kiddie porn or a waiting john... this guy is a scumbag but for some reason i don't think he was the one that raped her



I wondered if they were filming kiddie porn in that room.....

That has come across my mind...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 09:29:26 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...


that is why i freaked when you asked about the room decor and you said you thought he was on the 4th floor before ... i thought you were implying you came across pics showing her in a hotel room before...
not to sound disgusting but if this guy gets off from little girls he had at least one of his own that we know about... why not just do it with her? why except a child as payment from someone else that owes you money then spend more money on a hotel room just to do what you could have gotten for free at home... if she was taken as payment for debt then he planned to recoupe that money somehow and he would not be charging himself money to have sex with her so i am in full belief that it was kiddie porn or a waiting john... this guy is a scumbag but for some reason i don't think he was the one that raped her



I wondered if they were filming kiddie porn in that room.....

That has come across my mind...
that is why i freaked when you asked about the room decor and you said you thought he was on the 4th floor before ... i thought you were implying you came across pics showing her in a hotel room before...
not to sound disgusting but if this guy gets off from little girls he had at least one of his own that we know about... why not just do it with her? why except a child as payment from someone else that owes you money then spend more money on a hotel room just to do what you could have gotten for free at home... if she was taken as payment for debt then he planned to recoupe that money somehow and he would not be charging himself money to have sex with her so i am in full belief that it was kiddie porn or a waiting john... this guy is a scumbag but for some reason i don't think he was the one that raped her


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 19, 2009, 09:33:42 PM
Penny, do we know yet that she was raped, or what all was done to her, I havent heard, sorry..
 
Also, I think MM was planning on staying with Shaniya at that Motel room until someone met with him and when he got there and turned on the TV he saw what was going on and knew he had to leave, I dont think whatever he had planned for her that day ever happened because he didnt know that the egg donor was gonna call LE that fast...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 19, 2009, 09:48:27 PM
Penny, do we know yet that she was raped, or what all was done to her, I havent heard, sorry..
 
Also, I think MM was planning on staying with Shaniya at that Motel room until someone met with him and when he got there and turned on the TV he saw what was going on and knew he had to leave, I dont think whatever he had planned for her that day ever happened because he didnt know that the egg donor was gonna call LE that fast...
MM has been charged with first degree rape, and first degree murder.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 19, 2009, 09:48:57 PM
Shaniya Davis case adds to calls for probation reform By Greg Barnes
Staff writer

 State Sen. Tony Rand said the criminal history of a Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping 5-year-old Shaniya
 Davis demonstrates the need for more tools to help probation officers do their jobs.

"That's why I have been raising hell and why we have put together this pilot project," said Rand, who announced
 this month that he is stepping down as Senate majority leader to become head of the state's parole and probation
system.

The pilot program, being set up in Raleigh, provides a database that allows law enforcement, probation officers,
 court clerks, district attorneys, magistrates and others easy access to all criminal records. Rand said the
system should be operating by spring.

"If somebody is arrested, they can check to see if any other arrest warrants are out there," Rand said.

Under the current system, government officials aren't always able to share all the criminal information on one
person.

The new system may have helped in the case of Mario Andrette McNeill, a Fayetteville man accused of kidnapping
Shaniya on Nov. 10. Shaniya's body was found Monday in woods south of Sanford. Law officials say more charges
are pending.

McNeill has had a criminal history since 2001, when he was charged with shooting three people. He was sentenced
to supervised probation for the shootings as well as drug charges.

McNeill violated the terms of his probation and stayed in prison from October 2003 to May 2006.

He was charged with drug offenses shortly after getting out and was again sentenced to supervised probation. As
part of the sentence, McNeill was required to stay free of illegal drugs.

While on supervised probation, McNeill was charged with possessing cocaine and, a few months later, with striking
 a police officer with his vehicle while trying to flee.

Despite those charges, a judge in November 2007 changed the status of McNeill's probation to unsupervised.

Wayne Marshburn, head of the probation system for Cumberland County, said probation officers may not have known
about the pending charges against McNeill when he was allowed to go on unsupervised probation.

In April 2008, Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson put McNeill back on supervised probation for hitting the officer
 and the cocaine charge. Court records show that Judge E. Lynn Johnson terminated that probation on Oct. 22, six
months before it was set to expire.

Nineteen days later, police say, McNeill was captured on video carrying Shaniya into a Sanford motel. Her body
was found less than a week later.

Rand said he did not know the particulars of McNeill's case. But under the pilot system, he said, everyone
involved in the judicial system would have been able to share McNeill's history and could have made a different
determination of whether his probation status should have been changed or terminated.

"I think this kind of thing, more clearly than anything else, points out the needs to have this kind of
information," Rand said. "What we're trying to do is make everybody aware of the data we have concerning a person's
 record or lack of record."

Rand was the sponsor of a new law that will give probation officers access to a person's juvenile records and
makes drug screenings a regular part of probation. The law will give investigators the power to make warrantless
 searches in certain cases involving people on probation. The law takes effect Dec. 1.

Staff writer Greg Barnes can be reached at barnesg@fayobserver.com or 486-3525.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/952890


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 19, 2009, 09:50:12 PM
Penny, do we know yet that she was raped, or what all was done to her, I havent heard, sorry..
 
Also, I think MM was planning on staying with Shaniya at that Motel room until someone met with him and when he got there and turned on the TV he saw what was going on and knew he had to leave, I dont think whatever he had planned for her that day ever happened because he didnt know that the egg donor was gonna call LE that fast...
MM has been charged with first degree rape, and first degree murder.
Oh...ok Thanks Rose,  I didnt know this...been busy with my problem here and didnt read that Thanks


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 09:50:34 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniyamariocharged.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 19, 2009, 09:52:15 PM
<object id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268">
<param name="movie" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd§ion=&mediaId=7126791&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=" ></param>
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param>
<param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<embed id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
   allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true"
   src="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd§ion=&mediaId=7126791&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=">
</embed>
</object>

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/video?id=7126791

this vid may explain his smuggness
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6519.msg1018889#msg1018889


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sugarBabies on November 19, 2009, 09:53:39 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



I don't get that either. The rates are approx $100.00 a night at that hotel, and they were there for an hour. If rape was the objective, why a hotel? Why would the scum spend the money?

I posted earlier maybe MM knew someone that worked at Comfort Inn and let him have a room for exchange for drugs, maybe someone in maintenance or housekeeping
My guess is someone else was there and a video was made


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 09:54:06 PM
Remember back when the mom was arrested, LE said that this would prove to be human trafficking on a large scale? I did read that right? Anyone else recall this?



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 19, 2009, 09:56:12 PM
<object id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268">
<param name="movie" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd§ion=&mediaId=7126791&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=" ></param>
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param>
<param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<embed id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
   allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true"
   src="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd§ion=&mediaId=7126791&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=">
</embed>
</object>

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/video?id=7126791

sorry sometimes it works sometimes not
http://<object id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268">
<param name="movie" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd&section=&mediaId=7126791&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=" ></param>
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param>
<param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<embed id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true"
src="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=wtvd&section=&mediaId=7126791&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&site=">
</embed>
</object>

this vid may explain his smuggness
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6519.msg1018889#msg1018889


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 09:56:29 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



I don't get that either. The rates are approx $100.00 a night at that hotel, and they were there for an hour. If rape was the objective, why a hotel? Why would the scum spend the money?

I posted earlier maybe MM knew someone that worked at Comfort Inn and let him have a room for exchange for drugs, maybe someone in maintenance or housekeeping
My guess is someone else was there and a video was made

Obviously there is a connection to this hotel. I doubt he drove to it just by chance. Either he has used it before, someone told him to go there, or whatever.
I am anxious to know if anyone else will be charged.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: lady on November 19, 2009, 09:57:59 PM
This angers me..This POS touched some mans daughter how would he like if someone like him touched his daughter?? Sick just Sick


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 09:58:48 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniyamariocharged.jpg)

Is this the mug shoot of when he was arrested last week?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 19, 2009, 09:59:30 PM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniyamariocharged.jpg)

This piece of trash sob, makes me sick to my stomach. This creature violated and then killed that beautiful little child.

Even hell is too good for this worthless piece of chit and that puke that had so much hatred for her own child!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:00:17 PM
link with info about the particular gps that was taken from his car into evidence... i saw the name of it in the vid posted a page back
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?pID=31655&ra=true#nuvi350


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 19, 2009, 10:01:11 PM
You know no one can tell me this is from drugs, this is not from drugs, it is from pure evil.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cecilita on November 19, 2009, 10:01:33 PM
Hello Monkeys,
I think that he did not know that the mother called 911...I do not think that it was in the news minutes after she reported shaniya missing.
I believe that somebody in the hotel saw something suspicious and two days after shaniya disappearance he saw shaniya's picture on TV and recognized her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 19, 2009, 10:01:46 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...





I wondered if they were filming kiddie porn in that room.....

I wondered about this too. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: sugarBabies on November 19, 2009, 10:06:09 PM
This angers me..This POS touched some mans daughter how would he like if someone like him touched his daughter?? Sick just Sick
He's the kind that would touch his daughter himself


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 19, 2009, 10:12:43 PM
Tracygirl- those are great questions. For o'neill, there will be only one trial on all charges. His lawyers will waive any venue challenge, otherwise he'd face multiple trials arising out of the same series of transactions, and he don't want that!  On the other question, again, it depends on where the crime occurred. That would be the proper venue for the trial, unless venue is waived by the defendant.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:15:21 PM
You know no one can tell me this is from drugs, this is not from drugs, it is from pure evil.
well he is a right handed coke head
11 ziploc baggies found with traces of it
clear straw
and $1 in is right back pocket..probably rolled up and it is hard to put things in your right back pocket if you are left handed...
jacket was size 4
jeans were 24 months
he has had a variety of children in that car


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:16:36 PM
Tracygirl- those are great questions. For o'neill, there will be only one trial on all charges. His lawyers will waive any venue challenge, otherwise he'd face multiple trials arising out of the same series of transactions, and he don't want that!  On the other question, again, it depends on where the crime occurred. That would be the proper venue for the trial, unless venue is waived by the defendant.
can he be held accountable for the rape and murder since it happened while in the process of a felony even if he didn't do it


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:20:15 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 19, 2009, 10:20:20 PM
You know no one can tell me this is from drugs, this is not from drugs, it is from pure evil.
well he is a right handed coke head
11 ziploc baggies found with traces of it
clear straw
and $1 in is right back pocket..probably rolled up and it is hard to put things in your right back pocket if you are left handed...
jacket was size 4
jeans were 24 months
he has had a variety of children in that car

When MM was first arrested, I read a  reader's comment who said that he was a friend, an ex inmate that served time with MM who stated that MM has a child (daughter) around the same age of Shaniya.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 19, 2009, 10:20:54 PM
Sorry OT....Klass, can we start a thread for him....another one in Florida


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 19, 2009, 10:21:12 PM
http://www.wesh.com/news/21670161/detail.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 10:22:51 PM
I'm sure this was discussed already but they must have phone records showing calls from and to his cell to find out whether or not the mother was in contact with him around the time of the crime.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:22:58 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list
to whoever posted the helicopter shots of the body finding scene can you find out if you could access this area by a vehicle?
wonder what they saw that required 3 swabs from inside the car?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:24:55 PM
You know no one can tell me this is from drugs, this is not from drugs, it is from pure evil.
well he is a right handed coke head
11 ziploc baggies found with traces of it
clear straw
and $1 in is right back pocket..probably rolled up and it is hard to put things in your right back pocket if you are left handed...
jacket was size 4
jeans were 24 months
he has had a variety of children in that car

When MM was first arrested, I read a  reader's comment who said that he was a friend, an ex inmate that served time with MM who stated that MM has a child (daughter) around the same age of Shaniya.
i know he has at least one with autry and by her myspace from 08 it is a chunky baby hard to tell age... wasn't sure if he had more then one


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 19, 2009, 10:24:59 PM
http://www.wesh.com/news/21670161/detail.html


I still don't understand why parents leave their kids out of their site. I know he was in his own back yard but it's still dangerous. Especially that young.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:27:38 PM
HEART
what do you know about the location of the body
as in accessibility etc?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 10:28:00 PM
I bet MM knows more people in the underground world than we have monkeys in this cage.

I also posted earlier today I think will be related to child porn...or maybe I have watched to much Dateline Shows,


I feel like this is  a message from above that its time to change the laws....We thought we could see no worse than Caylee Anthony...we see more crime and more unbelievable crimes. ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyWaa::


You monkeys may think I am nuts to say this...if Obama believes its time for "change" this would be good place to make changes..staring with first time crime against a child LIFE IN Prison with no parole.When will the victims have rights and the criminals pay ?




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:29:25 PM
http://www.wesh.com/news/21670161/detail.html
okay i know we talked about a chit load of kids going missing in fl more then oter states on another thread before... but has the pace picked upthis year? how many is this for 2009 alone?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 10:30:33 PM
He took her to a motel ? Why ? Why not take her to his home ?

He is married ?  There is a reason WHY she is taken to a motel..

I thought he was delivering her to the motel to be used by another male...



I don't get that either. The rates are approx $100.00 a night at that hotel, and they were there for an hour. If rape was the objective, why a hotel? Why would the scum spend the money?

I posted earlier maybe MM knew someone that worked at Comfort Inn and let him have a room for exchange for drugs, maybe someone in maintenance or housekeeping

Wow, I swear I was typing that before I read your comment. I think you are right though. I don't think he would have paid for the room or driven that far without a reason

And thus my comment about coming in on a freight elevator. I don't think pENNY exactly understood my post. And I have a toothache, and I am in almost too much pain to post. My later I can make myself clearer.
no i understood your post about maybe having a connection to a service elevator i was just implying that the pics we saw were not a service elevator that is all... sorry about your tooth i was at the dentist today... hate tooth pain

I'll try again. I am not inferring that the pics were taken at the freight elevator. I am saying he came up to that floor another way, and the middle pic is him bringing her to the room, either using the 3 floor elevator, or passing it and was caught on video. She does not look the same in the other two pictures to me, and I think they were taken later as he was leaving with her, wrapped in a blanket, towel, or something else. I don't think all three pics were at the same time. I wish we had a time stamp. 

You have my sympathy about you dental trip.  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:31:58 PM
I hate all of her family members right now and I hope this guy is fried even if he didn't kill or rape her he no doubt delivered this poor little girl to her death


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 10:32:16 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tams on November 19, 2009, 10:33:50 PM
Remember back when the mom was arrested, LE said that this would prove to be human trafficking on a large scale? I did read that right? Anyone else recall this?



Yes, Tracygirl -  I do remember that, & it has stuck in my mind, too.


I truly believe that smug MM was a broker/delivery boy for something much larger - - - either he had done it before, or hung out with others who did - and was probably making good money at it. (Thus the scheme proposed to AD for a way to make $ / pay off a debt.) That hotel I would bet has been a destination for "deliveries" before - and perhaps even not just by him. It is very possible (IMHO) that a child pornography/prostitution ring was based there (or at least in the area) - a room set up for filming, etc. I think there is ever so much more that is going to come out - and many more involved.

By making it appear as though MM is the only one involved/being charged, hopefully LE will be able to smoke out any other scum involved. Charging MM with rape backs him against a wall to make him squeal against others - to name names. Can't imagine he is willing to take the fall for all of it. (I, too, think he is just a smug thug that has escalated from selling drugs to brokering children in the huge money-making underworld that is Child Porn.)

All simply speculation & IMHO, of course.

I feel like I need a shower. How disgusting to even have to form such thoughts. How does LE do it without falling apart?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 19, 2009, 10:36:48 PM
http://www.wesh.com/news/21670161/detail.html

Done.  It's in the regular MP area for now

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6548.0


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Lenie on November 19, 2009, 10:36:50 PM
JMO I think that MM was a snitch and that is why he walked on so many of the other things that he did. I think that is the reason he is smirking in his court appearance, thinking that once again that he will walk for this because he thinks he is so valuable to the cops. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 19, 2009, 10:38:04 PM
http://www.wesh.com/news/21670161/detail.html

Done.  It's in the regular MP area for now

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6548.0
Thank You......my brother lives in Deland, right by Daytona......I hate this is happening again .....hope they find him very soon...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 10:38:30 PM
Hello Monkeys,
I think that he did not know that the mother called 911...I do not think that it was in the news minutes after she reported shaniya missing.
I believe that somebody in the hotel saw something suspicious and two days after shaniya disappearance he saw shaniya's picture on TV and recognized her.

I believe the bio knew that she wasn't coming back, and called the LE in Fayetteville for a kidnapping because she knew the dad would soon be back, and Shaniya had been too damaged to go back home. I think the 911 call was a rouse to bring the attention to her, and not to Sanford. She knew all the time she was not coming back. We've seen the "grieving mama" too many times. Way too many times.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 19, 2009, 10:38:35 PM
HEART
what do you know about the location of the body
as in accessibility etc?

Nada penny,  I have not had a lot of free time in the past couple of weeks to keep up with the case, let alone do any research.

However I see you are doing a great job at it.  Keep up the good work.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cecilita on November 19, 2009, 10:39:14 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list
\Did it say taping?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 19, 2009, 10:41:31 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list
\Did it say taping?
i think so


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 10:41:32 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 10:43:14 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list
to whoever posted the helicopter shots of the body finding scene can you find out if you could access this area by a vehicle?
wonder what they saw that required 3 swabs from inside the car?

That was SEARCHING that posted them. There had been four-wheelers there before, but unsure of a car. It was about 40 ft off the road, just past the power lines. With all the deer carcasses there, I would expect there would be firm ground and some sort of access. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 19, 2009, 10:43:57 PM
I think he took Shaniya to the hotel to meet someone to tape her being brutalized and something went wrong

I think he has done this before and they use the hotel room so if the police get the tapes then they can not identify the room

I think he needs his gonads sliced off sliver by sliver with no anesthetic

To the monkey that asked about the Garmin Nuvi GPS, that is the same one I use for Geocaching so if you have questions about it I will try my best to answer them.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 10:45:41 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

TY wonder what kind of business that is?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cecilita on November 19, 2009, 10:47:16 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

TY wonder what kind of business that is?
Maybe LE will find pictures or videos on his cell


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 10:48:27 PM
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/indexphp5.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 10:48:54 PM
Hello Monkeys,
I think that he did not know that the mother called 911...I do not think that it was in the news minutes after she reported shaniya missing.
I believe that somebody in the hotel saw something suspicious and two days after shaniya disappearance he saw shaniya's picture on TV and recognized her.

I believe the bio knew that she wasn't coming back, and called the LE in Fayetteville for a kidnapping because she knew the dad would soon be back, and Shaniya had been too damaged to go back home. I think the 911 call was a rouse to bring the attention to her, and not to Sanford. She knew all the time she was not coming back. We've seen the "grieving mama" too many times. Way too many times.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Then she tried to pin it on Coe...stupid POS


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 10:50:44 PM
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/indexphp3.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 10:52:05 PM
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/indexphp4.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: higherhopes on November 19, 2009, 10:55:19 PM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 19, 2009, 10:57:26 PM
Thanks for bringing the images forward Fanny.  In the last one you can see vehicles right in there off the road.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:02:34 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

Looks like a house on Google maps. I can't post a pic.  I could have sworn somewhere I saw that he worked for a nursing facility too. Ugh!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:04:43 PM
Thanks for bringing the images forward Fanny.  In the last one you can see vehicles right in there off the road.


It also looks like somewhat of a path back to the carcass site. I hate to say Shaniya's dumping site.  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 19, 2009, 11:07:22 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

Looks like a house on Google maps. I can't post a pic.  I could have sworn somewhere I saw that he worked for a nursing facility too. Ugh!

That address is the house he was living in with Autry.  It only shows the business name not the address for the business he is associated with. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 11:07:51 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

Looks like a house on Google maps. I can't post a pic.  I could have sworn somewhere I saw that he worked for a nursing facility too. Ugh!

I remember reading the same, Fanny.  I think it was the same facility where Antoinette worked.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 19, 2009, 11:10:44 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

Looks like a house on Google maps. I can't post a pic.  I could have sworn somewhere I saw that he worked for a nursing facility too. Ugh!

That address is the house he was living in with Autry.  It only shows the business name not the address for the business he is associated with. ::MonkeyWink::

myn

In SSS (Simplified Spelling Society) this stands for 'mine'.

Short version of 'mine' folowing, 'mynd, blynd, dying, crying', etc.
That's not urs, that's myn!!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=myn&defid=1746038


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 11:12:13 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

Looks like a house on Google maps. I can't post a pic.  I could have sworn somewhere I saw that he worked for a nursing facility too. Ugh!

That address is the house he was living in with Autry.  It only shows the business name not the address for the business he is associated with. ::MonkeyWink::

myn

In SSS (Simplified Spelling Society) this stands for 'mine'.

Short version of 'mine' folowing, 'mynd, blynd, dying, crying', etc.
That's not urs, that's myn!!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=myn&defid=1746038

Ty NR


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:12:33 PM
I bet MM knows more people in the underground world than we have monkeys in this cage.

I also posted earlier today I think will be related to child porn...or maybe I have watched to much Dateline Shows,


I feel like this is  a message from above that its time to change the laws....We thought we could see no worse than Caylee Anthony...we see more crime and more unbelievable crimes. ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyWaa::


You monkeys may think I am nuts to say this...if Obama believes its time for "change" this would be good place to make changes..staring with first time crime against a child LIFE IN Prison with no parole.When will the victims have rights and the criminals pay ?




AMEN MYMONKEY!

We all get on the threads and rail and rant when something like this happens. What can we do? Why can we rally to get something done about this? Everyone knows there is a problem, and what it is. These perverts are roaming the streets, let out time after time, and our precious children are their prey. We all know this. The politicians know this. The LE knows this.  The psychologist and counselors know this. Why in Heaven's name and all the blood that has been spilled and lives that have been ruined can't we do something as Americans and human beings to stop this??  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 19, 2009, 11:13:47 PM
mymonkey - I don't get some of these new urban terms so have that dictionary bookmarked   ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:16:32 PM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

Looks like a house on Google maps. I can't post a pic.  I could have sworn somewhere I saw that he worked for a nursing facility too. Ugh!

I remember reading the same, Fanny.  I think it was the same facility where Antoinette worked.

And that is just what I thought too, but I have not dug back in the threads to find it. When I saw that I thought that is the connection with bio and him. I would not be surprised to see that the sister works at the same facility. I will shoot myself in the head before I go into a nursing facility, and I hope I can live long enough to keep my hubby out of one. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 11:17:56 PM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

Where is the link?

I been trying to figure this MYN URS


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 19, 2009, 11:18:56 PM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

I coming... I was trying to figure this MYN URS out


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 11:20:12 PM
mymonkey - I don't get some of these new urban terms so have that dictionary bookmarked   ::MonkeyJnBox::

LOL I am a country girl and I don't get any of them...took me forever to figure out what all the abbreviations on here were I would keep repeating the letters  to myself until it came to...sometimes it would take days ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: NCMike on November 19, 2009, 11:20:59 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list
to whoever posted the helicopter shots of the body finding scene can you find out if you could access this area by a vehicle?
wonder what they saw that required 3 swabs from inside the car?

That was SEARCHING that posted them. There had been four-wheelers there before, but unsure of a car. It was about 40 ft off the road, just past the power lines. With all the deer carcasses there, I would expect there would be firm ground and some sort of access. JMO

Four wheelers, cars and farm equipment would not have any difficulty getting to the location where Shaniya was found. 

My .02 on the location and the deer carcasses.

Deer season has been open in NC since the first week of September if a hunter chooses to hunt during each season, ie, bow, muzzleloader, and rifle seasons.  The land between Walker Rd. and 82(?) appears to be typical of rural areas in NC near interstates.  Some of the land is used for agriculture, and the forest zones act as a buffer.  With this land being bounded so close on all sides by roadways it is not a safe place to hunt.  Although it would be an ideal place for hunters to leave carcasses.

Many hunters in NC will butcher their own deer rather than take the animal to a processor and incur more cost.  This leaves the hunter with one issue, disposing of the carcass in a manner that is not offensive to neighbors or the community.  Areas of land like this would be known by local hunters as a place where disposing of carcasses would not interfere with others hunting areas or the general public. 

They have stated that the carcasses were in trash bags.  It might help if you remember that the carcasses would no longer be whole, or fully attached.  Graphic Alert -- After butching the deer you are generaly left with the rib cage, the head (if it is not a trophy), and the leg bones from the 4 quarters.  The butchering process disarticulates these area so it is much easier to place them in a bag to be disposed of. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 11:23:03 PM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

Where is the link?

I been trying to figure this MYN URS

Could be MINE and Yours? maybe he was self employed (selling drugs)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:25:44 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list
to whoever posted the helicopter shots of the body finding scene can you find out if you could access this area by a vehicle?
wonder what they saw that required 3 swabs from inside the car?

That was SEARCHING that posted them. There had been four-wheelers there before, but unsure of a car. It was about 40 ft off the road, just past the power lines. With all the deer carcasses there, I would expect there would be firm ground and some sort of access. JMO

Four wheelers, cars and farm equipment would not have any difficulty getting to the location where Shaniya was found. 

My .02 on the location and the deer carcasses.

Deer season has been open in NC since the first week of September if a hunter chooses to hunt during each season, ie, bow, muzzleloader, and rifle seasons.  The land between Walker Rd. and 82(?) appears to be typical of rural areas in NC near interstates.  Some of the land is used for agriculture, and the forest zones act as a buffer.  With this land being bounded so close on all sides by roadways it is not a safe place to hunt.  Although it would be an ideal place for hunters to leave carcasses.

Many hunters in NC will butcher their own deer rather than take the animal to a processor and incur more cost.  This leaves the hunter with one issue, disposing of the carcass in a manner that is not offensive to neighbors or the community.  Areas of land like this would be known by local hunters as a place where disposing of carcasses would not interfere with others hunting areas or the general public. 

They have stated that the carcasses were in trash bags.  It might help if you remember that the carcasses would no longer be whole, or fully attached.  Graphic Alert -- After butching the deer you are generaly left with the rib cage, the head (if it is not a trophy), and the leg bones from the 4 quarters.  The butchering process disarticulates these area so it is much easier to place them in a bag to be disposed of. 



McNeil didn't look like a typical deer hunter to me. Therefore, the possibility of having help disposing of Shaniya. And I am still wondering if her body was left in a plastic garbage bag along with the rest of the rotting meat. I would think that she would be, because other deer hunters might come along and see a body. Maybe that will lead to some evidence.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 11:27:02 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list
to whoever posted the helicopter shots of the body finding scene can you find out if you could access this area by a vehicle?
wonder what they saw that required 3 swabs from inside the car?

That was SEARCHING that posted them. There had been four-wheelers there before, but unsure of a car. It was about 40 ft off the road, just past the power lines. With all the deer carcasses there, I would expect there would be firm ground and some sort of access. JMO

Four wheelers, cars and farm equipment would not have any difficulty getting to the location where Shaniya was found. 

My .02 on the location and the deer carcasses.

Deer season has been open in NC since the first week of September if a hunter chooses to hunt during each season, ie, bow, muzzleloader, and rifle seasons.  The land between Walker Rd. and 82(?) appears to be typical of rural areas in NC near interstates.  Some of the land is used for agriculture, and the forest zones act as a buffer.  With this land being bounded so close on all sides by roadways it is not a safe place to hunt.  Although it would be an ideal place for hunters to leave carcasses.

Many hunters in NC will butcher their own deer rather than take the animal to a processor and incur more cost.  This leaves the hunter with one issue, disposing of the carcass in a manner that is not offensive to neighbors or the community.  Areas of land like this would be known by local hunters as a place where disposing of carcasses would not interfere with others hunting areas or the general public. 

They have stated that the carcasses were in trash bags.  It might help if you remember that the carcasses would no longer be whole, or fully attached.  Graphic Alert -- After butching the deer you are generaly left with the rib cage, the head (if it is not a trophy), and the leg bones from the 4 quarters.  The butchering process disarticulates these area so it is much easier to place them in a bag to be disposed of. 



An excellent explaination, NCMike. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 19, 2009, 11:29:03 PM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

Where is the link?

I been trying to figure this MYN URS

Could be MINE and Yours? maybe he was self employed (selling drugs)


Sounds like automobile detailing to me.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Anna on November 19, 2009, 11:29:17 PM
It could also mean "Mind Yours" as in mind your own business?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: NCMike on November 19, 2009, 11:36:48 PM
here is evidence from car and his body list
to whoever posted the helicopter shots of the body finding scene can you find out if you could access this area by a vehicle?
wonder what they saw that required 3 swabs from inside the car?

That was SEARCHING that posted them. There had been four-wheelers there before, but unsure of a car. It was about 40 ft off the road, just past the power lines. With all the deer carcasses there, I would expect there would be firm ground and some sort of access. JMO

Four wheelers, cars and farm equipment would not have any difficulty getting to the location where Shaniya was found. 

My .02 on the location and the deer carcasses.

Deer season has been open in NC since the first week of September if a hunter chooses to hunt during each season, ie, bow, muzzleloader, and rifle seasons.  The land between Walker Rd. and 82(?) appears to be typical of rural areas in NC near interstates.  Some of the land is used for agriculture, and the forest zones act as a buffer.  With this land being bounded so close on all sides by roadways it is not a safe place to hunt.  Although it would be an ideal place for hunters to leave carcasses.

Many hunters in NC will butcher their own deer rather than take the animal to a processor and incur more cost.  This leaves the hunter with one issue, disposing of the carcass in a manner that is not offensive to neighbors or the community.  Areas of land like this would be known by local hunters as a place where disposing of carcasses would not interfere with others hunting areas or the general public. 

They have stated that the carcasses were in trash bags.  It might help if you remember that the carcasses would no longer be whole, or fully attached.  Graphic Alert -- After butching the deer you are generaly left with the rib cage, the head (if it is not a trophy), and the leg bones from the 4 quarters.  The butchering process disarticulates these area so it is much easier to place them in a bag to be disposed of. 



McNeil didn't look like a typical deer hunter to me. Therefore, the possibility of having help disposing of Shaniya. And I am still wondering if her body was left in a plastic garbage bag along with the rest of the rotting meat. I would think that she would be, because other deer hunters might come along and see a body. Maybe that will lead to some evidence.

Fanny - I was under the assumption that the searcher that found Shaniya stated she was only wearing that long t-shirt, I may be wrong.  If he was that specific then I don't think he touched a bag to find Shaniya, she was visible. (Sorry) 

I am in full agreement that he either had help, ie, someone told him where to place her or someone he knows is either a local hunter from the Sanford area or at least an aquaintence that is familiar with the habits of local hunters.  I would be interested to know exactly who he knew in Sanford.

Then again, there is such a thing as dumb luck, at least from MM's point of view.  He may have just known the area was somewhat difficult to walk due to the areas of kudzu and felt that it was far enough from the main road that he could dispose of her without being seen or at least noticed.  It does look as though he did take some time to make sure that she was placed in the kudzu. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 19, 2009, 11:40:54 PM
Where I live you see dead deer on the side of the road after  being struck by a automobile....maybe MM put a dead

deer in a bag with her to throw the dogs off ...sorry to be graphic..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:41:47 PM

Fanny - I was under the assumption that the searcher that found Shaniya stated she was only wearing that long t-shirt, I may be wrong.  If he was that specific then I don't think he touched a bag to find Shaniya, she was visible. (Sorry) 

I am in full agreement that he either had help, ie, someone told him where to place her or someone he knows is either a local hunter from the Sanford area or at least an aquaintence that is familiar with the habits of local hunters.  I would be interested to know exactly who he knew in Sanford.

Then again, there is such a thing as dumb luck, at least from MM's point of view.  He may have just known the area was somewhat difficult to walk due to the areas of kudzu and felt that it was far enough from the main road that he could dispose of her without being seen or at least noticed.  It does look as though he did take some time to make sure that she was placed in the kudzu. 



True, but actually in the video where they found her, the dog and the handler were down in the carcasses and it looked to me like they were having to open bags to see what was inside. The guy that came running out and flagging everyone was not who really found her. The guy with the dog said something to him. It was the dog and the handler that finally found her. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:45:38 PM
I am really interested in who the man was that said in the parking lot that Shaniya was killed and left with the deer carcasses as relayed by the searcher. I don't think it was MM who told them that. I don't think he gave up anything.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 19, 2009, 11:47:35 PM

Wykes can I ask if you are thinking the dad has something to do with this as well as the mom?

Hey TG! - No, not in the sense that he was in cahoots with her, re what happened with Shaniya.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

More along the lines that it seems that he hasn't been the involved daddy he perhaps would like the world to believe.  And I think there's more we'll learn about the conflict within his own family, as time goes by.  Stuff like that. 


Hi Janet! - You're welcome, and thank you too.  Klaas doesn't think it's the same person as the dad tho.  So strike that info.  Seems like I'm batting 1000 these days.  lol


O/T:  My comp is giving me fits these past few days, so I won't be posting much.  Can barely get a page to friggin turn in here.  And while typing this, I got a "timed out" message.  A signed in 'forever', WTH??  Whatever, am tired of it.  Will be reading as am able. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:49:40 PM

Wykes can I ask if you are thinking the dad has something to do with this as well as the mom?

Hey TG! - No, not in the sense that he was in cahoots with her, re what happened with Shaniya.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

More along the lines that it seems that he hasn't been the involved daddy he perhaps would like the world to believe.  And I think there's more we'll learn about the conflict within his own family, as time goes by.  Stuff like that. 


Hi Janet! - You're welcome, and thank you too.  Klaas doesn't think it's the same person as the dad tho.  So strike that info.  Seems like I'm batting 1000 these days.  lol


O/T:  My comp is giving me fits these past few days, so I won't be posting much.  Can barely get a page to friggin turn in here.  And while typing this, I got a "timed out" message.  A signed in 'forever', WTH??  Whatever, am tired of it.  Will be reading as am able. 



Ive been timed out too. It may not be your computer. And the reloading has been slow too, BTW.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 19, 2009, 11:51:12 PM
I see you in the rafters SIS! I snagged your pics from the other night. I hope you don't mind.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 19, 2009, 11:56:48 PM
I  just think these two don't look like they could mastermind anything. Imo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ISpy on November 20, 2009, 12:01:28 AM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Stopping in to check this thread- Evening, all.  I hesitate to say this, but don't like the way Shaniya's hands are in the middle pic.  To me, they appear to be bound.  Can anyone else clean it up and enlarge it to see?  ITA with those of you who think this was a production for kiddie porn.  I don't feel good about the previously posted review of children running up and down the halls unsupervised at 2-3 in the morning.  I find it really hard to believe that management wouldn't have addressed that as disturbing the peace.  IMO, Shaniya was drugged. ITA that the spotted item was a stuffed animal and the white thing was a diaper/pull-up.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 20, 2009, 12:05:09 AM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Stopping in to check this thread- Evening, all.  I hesitate to say this, but don't like the way Shaniya's hands are in the middle pic.  To me, they appear to be bound.  Can anyone else clean it up and enlarge it to see?  ITA with those of you who think this was a production for kiddie porn.  I don't feel good about the previously posted review of children running up and down the halls unsupervised at 2-3 in the morning.  I find it really hard to believe that management wouldn't have addressed that as disturbing the peace.  IMO, Shaniya was drugged. ITA that the spotted item was a stuffed animal and the white thing was a diaper/pull-up.

Good to see you ISPY.  ::MonkeyAngel:: Glad to see you posting here. I think the pic you are referring to is her going to her fate in the motel room. I have used the magnifyer on every speck on that picture, but I have not focused on her hands.

Did we have a post here about the kids running up and down the halls? I must have missed it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ISpy on November 20, 2009, 12:08:40 AM
Sorry to post and run, but I need to scoot.  Took me quite a while to catch up here and need to take care of a few things still.  Hope you have a better evening and God bless you!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 20, 2009, 12:09:03 AM
ISPY, I am saying hmmm to your post. Because now that I really look closely, I am seeing what you are. Are you seeing shoes on her feet in the same picture too?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 20, 2009, 12:14:28 AM
Family, friends remember slain girl

Nick Needham
Staff writer

 A quiet neighborhood came together Thursday to honor the memory of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

A candlelight prayer vigil, held in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road, joined Shaniya's friends, family and neighbors as well as some saddened strangers. They gathered outside the home from which Davis disappeared more than a week ago.

The Rev. Annie Thornton led the service. She spoke of the legacy Shaniya leaves behind, of understanding why she was taken at such a young age, and even forgiveness.

"We all bleed God's blood," Thornton said. "Payday is judgment day."

Shaniya was reported missing by her mother, Antoinette Davis, on Nov. 10 at 6:53 a.m.

Surveillance video taken at 6:11 a.m. that same morning shows Shaniya getting on an elevator at the Comfort Suites in Sanford with Mario Andrette McNeill.

McNeill was charged Thursday night with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He previously was charged with first-degree kidnapping.

Spc. Michael Creighton had just stepped off the plane bringing him home from Iraq when he learned what had happened.

Creighton, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division's 3rd Brigade Combat Team, didn't know Shaniya.

"I just couldn't rest when I heard the news," Creighton said. "This let me know that war is just not over in Iraq."

Longtime neighbors who spoke to the crowd said the community has a long history as a peaceful, quiet place.

The park opened in 1978. Today, it has nearly 100 properties.

City Councilman Charles Evans told the group that even if we don't like our neighbors, we must love them and watch out for them.

"Truly, we are our brother's keeper," Evans said.

Encouraged by the crowd after a rendition of "Jesus Loves the Little Children," Taquaysha Miles emerged to speak.

Miles is the 16-year-old sister of Antionette Davis.

Davis is charged with felony child abuse and human trafficking related to prostitution.

"Antionette, I love you and I miss my niece," Miles said.

Miles said she decided to speak publicly after being harassed at her school in the days following her sister's arrest.

"I keep beating myself up over this," said Miles, who described Shaniya as a beautiful and happy child.

"The last time I saw her was Monday after school," Miles said. "Everyone seemed fine and happy."

Andrea Moore, the neighbor in whose trash can police found Shaniya's soiled blanket, was still searching for answers as to why someone would harm her.

"I flipped; I didn't know what to do," Moore said. "Today was my birthday, and I prayed that Shaniya would come home alive today."

Miles said regardless of what happens to her sister in court, she'll stand by her.

"Don't worry about what anyone says," Miles said. "I'll be right here."



http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/20/953853


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:17:05 AM
I think he took Shaniya to the hotel to meet someone to tape her being brutalized and something went wrong

I think he has done this before and they use the hotel room so if the police get the tapes then they can not identify the room

I think he needs his gonads sliced off sliver by sliver with no anesthetic

To the monkey that asked about the Garmin Nuvi GPS, that is the same one I use for Geocaching so if you have questions about it I will try my best to answer them.

I agree about the slivers and about the hotel room. There is a very concrete reason he went to this place, I doubt it was just the next hotel off the freeway, just far enough but not too far.
So as far as the GPS goes, does it track where you go automatically or do you have to put in an address for it to track or keep a record of? So in other words, does it always log everywhere you go?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:18:04 AM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

TY wonder what kind of business that is?

Does that say, Mine and yours?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Deenie on November 20, 2009, 12:24:29 AM
Good Evening Monkeys ...

I found this and I don't if anyone else had. First let me say that this case is so heartbreaking. Sigh. It's just inconceivable. 

I was looking up any info that I could find on " Satan" Mario McNeill. I found this address for him and I believe its him. I am sure Monkey's have found his known addresses.
I found this address that was posted as of 2003 on Zaba Search.
http://www.zabasearch.com/maps/?sname1=MARIO%20MCNEILL&sname=MARIO%20%20MCNEILL&first=MARIO&last=MCNEILL&middle=&state=NC&address=4104%20CROSS%20CREEK%20CT&city=RALEIGH&zipcode=27607&&cm=02&cy=2003&phone=&int_var=3

4104 CROSS CREEK CT  RALEIGH, NC 27607

I chased the address and it comes up as A Private Daycare
Itty Bitty Childcare
http://youngmothersnetwork.tripod.com/
snipped from the home page:

Young Mothers Network Services was formed in September of 2005 with a vision to have mothers ages 16-35 to have a place to turn to for support and fellowship. Since then great friendships have been formed. In the future more services will be offered such as educational classes, scholarships, and transportation services

I do not know where AD has lived prior to the mobile home park. But could it be possible that she utilized this Day Care with Shaniya.
The dates make sense. Shaniya was born on Feb 14, 2004.  In Sept 05 Shinaya would have been around 17 mos old. There has not been any entries on the daycare site since Aug 08.

Just seems strange that his name and address points to a daycare/center for Women who are basically minors having children or for women who have little resources.... with all the speculation that he may have been hurting Shaniya previously and or even other children.

Justice for Shaniya  ::MonkeyHeart:: ( she was born on Valentines Day awe)




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:24:32 AM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

Looks like a house on Google maps. I can't post a pic.  I could have sworn somewhere I saw that he worked for a nursing facility too. Ugh!

That address is the house he was living in with Autry.  It only shows the business name not the address for the business he is associated with. ::MonkeyWink::

myn

In SSS (Simplified Spelling Society) this stands for 'mine'.

Short version of 'mine' folowing, 'mynd, blynd, dying, crying', etc.
That's not urs, that's myn!!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=myn&defid=1746038

I am so behind the times, no gps and I don't text either. I was thinking a license plate, lol.

I tried doing a business search and nothing comes up so I don't think it is an actual job, unless it is the cover name. I can dig some more if you all want.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ISpy on November 20, 2009, 12:29:01 AM
Fanny Mae-I keep looking for your old pic...are you in the Witness Protection program?  LOL!  Good to see you too!  I hope everything is alright in your corner of the world, as you're not usually here this late.

I'm on the fence about the shoe issue.  Can't get a clear enough pic to see.  If I went with the shoe theory, I'm thinking little girls clear plastic dress-up shoe with what appears to be a clear (light-colored?) heel (as in "princess" type shoes) OR light pink/clear jelly type shoe popular this summer at Target and other retailers.  I have to admit though, her feet do appear different to me in that middle pic.  She also appears to be minus the stuffed animal or whatever the spotted thing was.  I wonder if it: was a lovey that appeared in family pics and is now missing or if it was used as a gift-lure or promised reward (like giving a child candy/money/asking them to find or see a puppy). ::MonkeyNoNo::

Also noticed the amenities for the hotel included high speed internet services.  Made me wonder if this attack became a live-stream feed.

The Size 4 Jacket in the car could also have been Shaniya's.  Some size 4's run big and it could have been used to wrap her in to take her early in the morning (or late in the evening).

Well, need to go.  Take care everyone!  Those of you with kiddos, sneak in, kiss them goodnight, and pray over them.  We live in a crazy world.  No wonder we have so many Sex Offenders...has anyone seen the garbage being sold on "regular" websites like Amazon & Overstock?!!! 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:30:55 AM
here is evidence from car and his body list
to whoever posted the helicopter shots of the body finding scene can you find out if you could access this area by a vehicle?
wonder what they saw that required 3 swabs from inside the car?

That was SEARCHING that posted them. There had been four-wheelers there before, but unsure of a car. It was about 40 ft off the road, just past the power lines. With all the deer carcasses there, I would expect there would be firm ground and some sort of access. JMO

Four wheelers, cars and farm equipment would not have any difficulty getting to the location where Shaniya was found. 

My .02 on the location and the deer carcasses.

Deer season has been open in NC since the first week of September if a hunter chooses to hunt during each season, ie, bow, muzzleloader, and rifle seasons.  The land between Walker Rd. and 82(?) appears to be typical of rural areas in NC near interstates.  Some of the land is used for agriculture, and the forest zones act as a buffer.  With this land being bounded so close on all sides by roadways it is not a safe place to hunt.  Although it would be an ideal place for hunters to leave carcasses.

Many hunters in NC will butcher their own deer rather than take the animal to a processor and incur more cost.  This leaves the hunter with one issue, disposing of the carcass in a manner that is not offensive to neighbors or the community.  Areas of land like this would be known by local hunters as a place where disposing of carcasses would not interfere with others hunting areas or the general public. 

They have stated that the carcasses were in trash bags.  It might help if you remember that the carcasses would no longer be whole, or fully attached.  Graphic Alert -- After butching the deer you are generaly left with the rib cage, the head (if it is not a trophy), and the leg bones from the 4 quarters.  The butchering process disarticulates these area so it is much easier to place them in a bag to be disposed of. 



McNeil didn't look like a typical deer hunter to me. Therefore, the possibility of having help disposing of Shaniya. And I am still wondering if her body was left in a plastic garbage bag along with the rest of the rotting meat. I would think that she would be, because other deer hunters might come along and see a body. Maybe that will lead to some evidence.

Maybe this is where the blue car comes into play?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ISpy on November 20, 2009, 12:30:58 AM
Fanny Mae- Forgot the link to the hotel review.  You can find the discussion here  Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 « Reply #634 on: Today at 04:31:34 PM  .  Sorry, can't remember how to link it tonight and too tired to hunt for it.  Sorry!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:31:50 AM
It could also mean "Mind Yours" as in mind your own business?

Wow that is a good one


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Deenie on November 20, 2009, 12:32:30 AM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.



When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

TY wonder what kind of business that is?

Does that say, Mine and yours?

HI TG  ::ElfMonkey::  You know what that says to me... as when young ppl text and make up shortened words ... its says to me. " Minors" ...........  omg. That's his Business " Minors".


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 20, 2009, 12:32:33 AM
I think he took Shaniya to the hotel to meet someone to tape her being brutalized and something went wrong

I think he has done this before and they use the hotel room so if the police get the tapes then they can not identify the room

I think he needs his gonads sliced off sliver by sliver with no anesthetic

To the monkey that asked about the Garmin Nuvi GPS, that is the same one I use for Geocaching so if you have questions about it I will try my best to answer them.

I agree about the slivers and about the hotel room. There is a very concrete reason he went to this place, I doubt it was just the next hotel off the freeway, just far enough but not too far.
So as far as the GPS goes, does it track where you go automatically or do you have to put in an address for it to track or keep a record of? So in other words, does it always log everywhere you go?

I have a Garmin GPS as well and it keeps a record of places that you travel just like a cell phone keeps your recent calls. As long as he didn't delete the location out of the GPS it will still be in there.








Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:35:50 AM

Wykes can I ask if you are thinking the dad has something to do with this as well as the mom?

Hey TG! - No, not in the sense that he was in cahoots with her, re what happened with Shaniya.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

More along the lines that it seems that he hasn't been the involved daddy he perhaps would like the world to believe.  And I think there's more we'll learn about the conflict within his own family, as time goes by.  Stuff like that. 


Hi Janet! - You're welcome, and thank you too.  Klaas doesn't think it's the same person as the dad tho.  So strike that info.  Seems like I'm batting 1000 these days.  lol


O/T:  My comp is giving me fits these past few days, so I won't be posting much.  Can barely get a page to friggin turn in here.  And while typing this, I got a "timed out" message.  A signed in 'forever', WTH??  Whatever, am tired of it.  Will be reading as am able. 


Wykes take care of yourself! Go get your nails done and a nice relaxing pedi. Take advantage of a non working computer!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 20, 2009, 12:37:40 AM
Sorry Tracy, I just re-read your question and realized my answer wasn't the one that you were looking for. I don't think that there is a way to track where you went unless you actually put an address in. I could be wrong.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 20, 2009, 12:41:32 AM
The POS Mcneill  he was into drugs and prostitution then he was most  likely into pornography..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 20, 2009, 12:44:10 AM
Family, friends remember slain girl

Nick Needham
Staff writer

 A quiet neighborhood came together Thursday to honor the memory of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

A candlelight prayer vigil, held in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road, joined Shaniya's friends, family and neighbors as well as some saddened strangers. They gathered outside the home from which Davis disappeared more than a week ago.

The Rev. Annie Thornton led the service. She spoke of the legacy Shaniya leaves behind, of understanding why she was taken at such a young age, and even forgiveness.

"We all bleed God's blood," Thornton said. "Payday is judgment day."

Shaniya was reported missing by her mother, Antoinette Davis, on Nov. 10 at 6:53 a.m.

Surveillance video taken at 6:11 a.m. that same morning shows Shaniya getting on an elevator at the Comfort Suites in Sanford with Mario Andrette McNeill.

McNeill was charged Thursday night with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He previously was charged with first-degree kidnapping.

Spc. Michael Creighton had just stepped off the plane bringing him home from Iraq when he learned what had happened.

Creighton, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division's 3rd Brigade Combat Team, didn't know Shaniya.

"I just couldn't rest when I heard the news," Creighton said. "This let me know that war is just not over in Iraq."

Longtime neighbors who spoke to the crowd said the community has a long history as a peaceful, quiet place.

The park opened in 1978. Today, it has nearly 100 properties.

City Councilman Charles Evans told the group that even if we don't like our neighbors, we must love them and watch out for them.

"Truly, we are our brother's keeper," Evans said.

Encouraged by the crowd after a rendition of "Jesus Loves the Little Children," Taquaysha Miles emerged to speak.

Miles is the 16-year-old sister of Antionette Davis.

Davis is charged with felony child abuse and human trafficking related to prostitution.

"Antionette, I love you and I miss my niece," Miles said.

Miles said she decided to speak publicly after being harassed at her school in the days following her sister's arrest.

"I keep beating myself up over this," said Miles, who described Shaniya as a beautiful and happy child.

"The last time I saw her was Monday after school," Miles said. "Everyone seemed fine and happy."

Andrea Moore, the neighbor in whose trash can police found Shaniya's soiled blanket, was still searching for answers as to why someone would harm her.

"I flipped; I didn't know what to do," Moore said. "Today was my birthday, and I prayed that Shaniya would come home alive today."

Miles said regardless of what happens to her sister in court, she'll stand by her.

"Don't worry about what anyone says," Miles said. "I'll be right here."



http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/20/953853

Sorry to quote my own post - but does this mean AD's sister lives with them in the trailer?  or maybe she was just visiting? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:46:40 AM
I think he took Shaniya to the hotel to meet someone to tape her being brutalized and something went wrong

I think he has done this before and they use the hotel room so if the police get the tapes then they can not identify the room

I think he needs his gonads sliced off sliver by sliver with no anesthetic

To the monkey that asked about the Garmin Nuvi GPS, that is the same one I use for Geocaching so if you have questions about it I will try my best to answer them.

I agree about the slivers and about the hotel room. There is a very concrete reason he went to this place, I doubt it was just the next hotel off the freeway, just far enough but not too far.
So as far as the GPS goes, does it track where you go automatically or do you have to put in an address for it to track or keep a record of? So in other words, does it always log everywhere you go?

I have a Garmin GPS as well and it keeps a record of places that you travel just like a cell phone keeps your recent calls. As long as he didn't delete the location out of the GPS it will still be in there.







Then this should be helpful. I guess I am really worried that they will not look further into the possibility she was prostituted out to other men. I want everyone that touched this child to go to prison.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:48:07 AM
The POS Mcneill  he was into drugs and prostitution then he was most  likely into pornography..

Did his record show he was a pimp? Where did we get that from?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:50:51 AM
Family, friends remember slain girl

Nick Needham
Staff writer

 A quiet neighborhood came together Thursday to honor the memory of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

A candlelight prayer vigil, held in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road, joined Shaniya's friends, family and neighbors as well as some saddened strangers. They gathered outside the home from which Davis disappeared more than a week ago.

The Rev. Annie Thornton led the service. She spoke of the legacy Shaniya leaves behind, of understanding why she was taken at such a young age, and even forgiveness.

"We all bleed God's blood," Thornton said. "Payday is judgment day."

Shaniya was reported missing by her mother, Antoinette Davis, on Nov. 10 at 6:53 a.m.

Surveillance video taken at 6:11 a.m. that same morning shows Shaniya getting on an elevator at the Comfort Suites in Sanford with Mario Andrette McNeill.

McNeill was charged Thursday night with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He previously was charged with first-degree kidnapping.

Spc. Michael Creighton had just stepped off the plane bringing him home from Iraq when he learned what had happened.

Creighton, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division's 3rd Brigade Combat Team, didn't know Shaniya.

"I just couldn't rest when I heard the news," Creighton said. "This let me know that war is just not over in Iraq."

Longtime neighbors who spoke to the crowd said the community has a long history as a peaceful, quiet place.

The park opened in 1978. Today, it has nearly 100 properties.

City Councilman Charles Evans told the group that even if we don't like our neighbors, we must love them and watch out for them.

"Truly, we are our brother's keeper," Evans said.

Encouraged by the crowd after a rendition of "Jesus Loves the Little Children," Taquaysha Miles emerged to speak.

Miles is the 16-year-old sister of Antionette Davis.

Davis is charged with felony child abuse and human trafficking related to prostitution.

"Antionette, I love you and I miss my niece," Miles said.

Miles said she decided to speak publicly after being harassed at her school in the days following her sister's arrest.

"I keep beating myself up over this," said Miles, who described Shaniya as a beautiful and happy child.

"The last time I saw her was Monday after school," Miles said. "Everyone seemed fine and happy."

Andrea Moore, the neighbor in whose trash can police found Shaniya's soiled blanket, was still searching for answers as to why someone would harm her.

"I flipped; I didn't know what to do," Moore said. "Today was my birthday, and I prayed that Shaniya would come home alive today."

Miles said regardless of what happens to her sister in court, she'll stand by her.

"Don't worry about what anyone says," Miles said. "I'll be right here."



http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/20/953853

Sorry to quote my own post - but does this mean AD's sister lives with them in the trailer?  or maybe she was just visiting? ::MonkeyConfused::

This family needs to just shut the hell up. If my sister did this, I would be the first one in line to throw her to the wolves. This was her neice she sold, her niece! I would check her out too. Everyone that comes out to speak in favor of either one of these monsters need to be investigated. Girl on girl sex is very popular, especially an older woman with a younger girl.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 20, 2009, 12:55:57 AM
Family, friends remember slain girl

Nick Needham
Staff writer

 A quiet neighborhood came together Thursday to honor the memory of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

A candlelight prayer vigil, held in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road, joined Shaniya's friends, family and neighbors as well as some saddened strangers. They gathered outside the home from which Davis disappeared more than a week ago.

The Rev. Annie Thornton led the service. She spoke of the legacy Shaniya leaves behind, of understanding why she was taken at such a young age, and even forgiveness.

"We all bleed God's blood," Thornton said. "Payday is judgment day."

Shaniya was reported missing by her mother, Antoinette Davis, on Nov. 10 at 6:53 a.m.

Surveillance video taken at 6:11 a.m. that same morning shows Shaniya getting on an elevator at the Comfort Suites in Sanford with Mario Andrette McNeill.

McNeill was charged Thursday night with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He previously was charged with first-degree kidnapping.

Spc. Michael Creighton had just stepped off the plane bringing him home from Iraq when he learned what had happened.

Creighton, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division's 3rd Brigade Combat Team, didn't know Shaniya.

"I just couldn't rest when I heard the news," Creighton said. "This let me know that war is just not over in Iraq."

Longtime neighbors who spoke to the crowd said the community has a long history as a peaceful, quiet place.

The park opened in 1978. Today, it has nearly 100 properties.

City Councilman Charles Evans told the group that even if we don't like our neighbors, we must love them and watch out for them.

"Truly, we are our brother's keeper," Evans said.

Encouraged by the crowd after a rendition of "Jesus Loves the Little Children," Taquaysha Miles emerged to speak.

Miles is the 16-year-old sister of Antionette Davis.

Davis is charged with felony child abuse and human trafficking related to prostitution.

"Antionette, I love you and I miss my niece," Miles said.

Miles said she decided to speak publicly after being harassed at her school in the days following her sister's arrest.

"I keep beating myself up over this," said Miles, who described Shaniya as a beautiful and happy child.

"The last time I saw her was Monday after school," Miles said. "Everyone seemed fine and happy."

Andrea Moore, the neighbor in whose trash can police found Shaniya's soiled blanket, was still searching for answers as to why someone would harm her.

"I flipped; I didn't know what to do," Moore said. "Today was my birthday, and I prayed that Shaniya would come home alive today."

Miles said regardless of what happens to her sister in court, she'll stand by her.

"Don't worry about what anyone says," Miles said. "I'll be right here."



http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/20/953853

Sorry to quote my own post - but does this mean AD's sister lives with them in the trailer?  or maybe she was just visiting? ::MonkeyConfused::

This family needs to just shut the hell up. If my sister did this, I would be the first one in line to throw her to the wolves. This was her neice she sold, her niece! I would check her out too. Everyone that comes out to speak in favor of either one of these monsters need to be investigated. Girl on girl sex is very popular, especially an older woman with a younger girl.

I agree, I just didn't realize AD had a 16 year old sister.  How many sister's does she have? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 20, 2009, 12:56:21 AM
Fanny Mae- Forgot the link to the hotel review.  You can find the discussion here  Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 « Reply #634 on: Today at 04:31:34 PM  .  Sorry, can't remember how to link it tonight and too tired to hunt for it.  Sorry!

Thanks, ISPY. I looked at the review, and went to the website. I will admit to even calling the Motel personally to ask some questions of my own.  ::MonkeyDevil2::

Good night, good to see you again.  ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 20, 2009, 12:58:15 AM
Family, friends remember slain girl

Nick Needham
Staff writer

 A quiet neighborhood came together Thursday to honor the memory of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

A candlelight prayer vigil, held in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park off Murchison Road, joined Shaniya's friends, family and neighbors as well as some saddened strangers. They gathered outside the home from which Davis disappeared more than a week ago.

The Rev. Annie Thornton led the service. She spoke of the legacy Shaniya leaves behind, of understanding why she was taken at such a young age, and even forgiveness.

"We all bleed God's blood," Thornton said. "Payday is judgment day."

Shaniya was reported missing by her mother, Antoinette Davis, on Nov. 10 at 6:53 a.m.

Surveillance video taken at 6:11 a.m. that same morning shows Shaniya getting on an elevator at the Comfort Suites in Sanford with Mario Andrette McNeill.

McNeill was charged Thursday night with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He previously was charged with first-degree kidnapping.

Spc. Michael Creighton had just stepped off the plane bringing him home from Iraq when he learned what had happened.

Creighton, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division's 3rd Brigade Combat Team, didn't know Shaniya.

"I just couldn't rest when I heard the news," Creighton said. "This let me know that war is just not over in Iraq."

Longtime neighbors who spoke to the crowd said the community has a long history as a peaceful, quiet place.

The park opened in 1978. Today, it has nearly 100 properties.

City Councilman Charles Evans told the group that even if we don't like our neighbors, we must love them and watch out for them.

"Truly, we are our brother's keeper," Evans said.

Encouraged by the crowd after a rendition of "Jesus Loves the Little Children," Taquaysha Miles emerged to speak.

Miles is the 16-year-old sister of Antionette Davis.

Davis is charged with felony child abuse and human trafficking related to prostitution.

"Antionette, I love you and I miss my niece," Miles said.

Miles said she decided to speak publicly after being harassed at her school in the days following her sister's arrest.

"I keep beating myself up over this," said Miles, who described Shaniya as a beautiful and happy child.

"The last time I saw her was Monday after school," Miles said. "Everyone seemed fine and happy."

Andrea Moore, the neighbor in whose trash can police found Shaniya's soiled blanket, was still searching for answers as to why someone would harm her.

"I flipped; I didn't know what to do," Moore said. "Today was my birthday, and I prayed that Shaniya would come home alive today."

Miles said regardless of what happens to her sister in court, she'll stand by her.

"Don't worry about what anyone says," Miles said. "I'll be right here."



http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/20/953853

Sorry to quote my own post - but does this mean AD's sister lives with them in the trailer?  or maybe she was just visiting? ::MonkeyConfused::

This family needs to just shut the hell up. If my sister did this, I would be the first one in line to throw her to the wolves. This was her neice she sold, her niece! I would check her out too. Everyone that comes out to speak in favor of either one of these monsters need to be investigated. Girl on girl sex is very popular, especially an older woman with a younger girl.

I agree, I just didn't realize AD had a 16 year old sister.  How many sister's does she have? ::MonkeyCool::

She has at least one more, Brenda who the trailer was supposed to be rented to.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 01:12:59 AM
Watching NG, she has the press conference from today playing. I feel so badly for the officers. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 20, 2009, 01:16:09 AM
Omg I am just now seeing nancy grace. And watching now. I am so upset like I am sitting hear crying so hard. He raped her. And strangled her. Wth did the mom give shaniya to HIM to clear up a debt. Oh man I am so sick of these people thinking they can do whatever they want to do to these kids. Oh my god. I can't stand it no more.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: HopeForAll on November 20, 2009, 01:16:49 AM
 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyMad:: I think this whole inhumane act was solely between MM and AD for whatever reason and that is was planned Shaniya would not becoming back. I think when the video of MM and Shaniya was televised that all hell broke loose.Looking at MM in the court video what I see is an expression as in "the cat  who swallowed the canary." Pure evil ::MonkeyMad::
















Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 20, 2009, 01:21:44 AM
We see him leave with her.. She is alive. 
she has her hand on him while waiting for the elevator.....
She does not appear to be crying or in fear of him at the time the image is taken.

Something happens after they are at the motel. He must have met a person who was staying at the motel. Later he rapes her, possibly in the vehicle and suffocates her.
 Finding the deer carcass in a bag was a convenient location for disposal. To draw off search animals.

He has done this before.
jmho

Thank you Edward, I said the same thing the other day.. this was not his first rodeo, but hopefully it was his last.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 20, 2009, 01:26:42 AM
I think he took Shaniya to the hotel to meet someone to tape her being brutalized and something went wrong

I think he has done this before and they use the hotel room so if the police get the tapes then they can not identify the room

I think he needs his gonads sliced off sliver by sliver with no anesthetic

To the monkey that asked about the Garmin Nuvi GPS, that is the same one I use for Geocaching so if you have questions about it I will try my best to answer them.

I agree about the slivers and about the hotel room. There is a very concrete reason he went to this place, I doubt it was just the next hotel off the freeway, just far enough but not too far.
So as far as the GPS goes, does it track where you go automatically or do you have to put in an address for it to track or keep a record of? So in other words, does it always log everywhere you go?

I will find the manual and see what the factory settings are.  I know you can set it to track your trips but am not sure if it retains them after you power it off/turn off the vehicle.  I have downloaded special software to mine that updates the geocaching sites and removes the ones we have visited once we log them so not sure what it has done to the other settings on it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 01:28:37 AM
Wow NG is very PO'ed. Yikes watch out you two, she is not going to give this one up.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 20, 2009, 01:34:19 AM
Ok since they got mm for murder 1 and rape. Does that mean that there is proof that he did it like dna. I don't know that is why I am asking please don't think I am stupid lol. But I would think that they do have some kind of dna right? Omg they should just let them out in public and let us all stone them both to DEATH. Sorry just the way I feel


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 01:50:03 AM
dont know if posted here but there is someone arrested yesterday indecent liberties with child 25000 bond.  his name is in the R's.  wonder if has anything with this case? http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 01:57:47 AM
dont know if posted here but there is someone arrested yesterday indecent liberties with child 25000 bond.  his name is in the R's.  wonder if has anything with this case? http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx

The one below him was arrested on a conspiracy charge. Jess can you tell what he conspired to do? the charge is this
F:RWDW/F:CONSP RWDW Does this mean anything to you?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 02:00:33 AM
dont know if posted here but there is someone arrested yesterday indecent liberties with child 25000 bond.  his name is in the R's.  wonder if has anything with this case? http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx

The one below him was arrested on a conspiracy charge. Jess can you tell what he conspired to do? the charge is this
F:RWDW/F:CONSP RWDW Does this mean anything to you?
robbery with deadly weapon


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 20, 2009, 02:20:44 AM
I was out a lot today and had to catch up... omg... took a loooong time.... you monkeys have been very busy.

My hubby says they should tie mario up and turn him over and dangle it into a large ant mound and leave him there.   ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 20, 2009, 03:20:24 AM
The POS Mcneill  he was into drugs and prostitution then he was most  likely into pornography..

Did his record show he was a pimp? Where did we get that from?

I'm wondering the same thing. This guy had no sexual offenses on his record from what I saw on NG.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 20, 2009, 03:25:05 AM
Ok since they got mm for murder 1 and rape. Does that mean that there is proof that he did it like dna. I don't know that is why I am asking please don't think I am stupid lol. But I would think that they do have some kind of dna right? Omg they should just let them out in public and let us all stone them both to DEATH. Sorry just the way I feel

I'm guessing they've got his DNA. This dude doesn't seem very bright (going into a well known hotel chain with a 5 year old girl without covering his face) so I doubt he wore protection *shudders*.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 20, 2009, 03:32:10 AM
(http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/8968/shaniya.th.jpg) (http://img21.imageshack.us/i/shaniya.jpg/)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 20, 2009, 07:02:56 AM
I bet MM knows more people in the underground world than we have monkeys in this cage.

I also posted earlier today I think will be related to child porn...or maybe I have watched to much Dateline Shows,


I feel like this is  a message from above that its time to change the laws....We thought we could see no worse than Caylee Anthony...we see more crime and more unbelievable crimes. ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyWaa::


You monkeys may think I am nuts to say this...if Obama believes its time for "change" this would be good place to make changes..staring with first time crime against a child LIFE IN Prison with no parole.When will the victims have rights and the criminals pay ?




Never happen. This country has perverted the Constitution to mean that everyone gets the same - and that means that guilty people get freedom just like the honest people. Add to that the need to "punish" only crimes that hurt "important" people and I really believe nothing will be done by the current administration. I do think that we, as individuals, have a duty to fight for the protection of the innocent, and fight for punishment of the guilty - this is going to mean, IMO, taking things into our own hands - personal protection and protection of those weaker than us.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 20, 2009, 07:27:27 AM
Ok since they got mm for murder 1 and rape. Does that mean that there is proof that he did it like dna. I don't know that is why I am asking please don't think I am stupid lol. But I would think that they do have some kind of dna right? Omg they should just let them out in public and let us all stone them both to DEATH. Sorry just the way I feel

I'm guessing they've got his DNA. This dude doesn't seem very bright (going into a well known hotel chain with a 5 year old girl without covering his face) so I doubt he wore protection *shudders*.

ok, here goes, this is what I think fwiw. Every one is wondering about the hotel and a lot of people think he met a third person there, which I never thought he did. I think the hotel was because this one was 'special'. monkeys, I am telling you, she was not his first, but she was 'special'. I do think he allowed his other victims to live and that they were older then Shaniya, that is what made Shaniya special, she was his first that young and she would be his first kill. I do think he was a serial in the making tbh. Had he not been caught, there would be more to follow her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 20, 2009, 07:32:21 AM
Ok since they got mm for murder 1 and rape. Does that mean that there is proof that he did it like dna. I don't know that is why I am asking please don't think I am stupid lol. But I would think that they do have some kind of dna right? Omg they should just let them out in public and let us all stone them both to DEATH. Sorry just the way I feel

I'm guessing they've got his DNA. This dude doesn't seem very bright (going into a well known hotel chain with a 5 year old girl without covering his face) so I doubt he wore protection *shudders*.

ok, here goes, this is what I think fwiw. Every one is wondering about the hotel and a lot of people think he met a third person there, which I never thought he did. I think the hotel was because this one was 'special'. monkeys, I am telling you, she was not his first, but she was 'special'. I do think he allowed his other victims to live and that they were older then Shaniya, that is what made Shaniya special, she was his first that young and she would be his first kill. I do think he was a serial in the making tbh. Had he not been caught, there would be more to follow her.
might I add, that is why he chose a nicer hotel as apposed to a ratty one local, not to mention, he was distancing himself from the area, giving himself (in his mind) less risk of being seen just in case something went wrong and more time to play with his prize. I do believe the 5:30 p.m was the accurate time tbo, but could be wrong, she said it more then once iirc until the dispatcher corrected her to a.m.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 07:42:47 AM
here is evidence from car and his body list
to whoever posted the helicopter shots of the body finding scene can you find out if you could access this area by a vehicle?
wonder what they saw that required 3 swabs from inside the car?

That was SEARCHING that posted them. There had been four-wheelers there before, but unsure of a car. It was about 40 ft off the road, just past the power lines. With all the deer carcasses there, I would expect there would be firm ground and some sort of access. JMO
thanks fanny... hope you are feeling better...i was wondering if they had anything to compare the 4 exterrior swabs of the car to... 4 tells me 1 swab per tire maybe


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 07:45:31 AM
I think he took Shaniya to the hotel to meet someone to tape her being brutalized and something went wrong

I think he has done this before and they use the hotel room so if the police get the tapes then they can not identify the room

I think he needs his gonads sliced off sliver by sliver with no anesthetic

To the monkey that asked about the Garmin Nuvi GPS, that is the same one I use for Geocaching so if you have questions about it I will try my best to answer them.

it wasn't me that asked but i think the question was in it useful asa locator even if you are not using it...like if it is in your car does it automaticly know where your car has been even if you are not using it at the time


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 20, 2009, 08:13:03 AM
You know no one can tell me this is from drugs, this is not from drugs, it is from pure evil.
well he is a right handed coke head
11 ziploc baggies found with traces of it
clear straw
and $1 in is right back pocket..probably rolled up and it is hard to put things in your right back pocket if you are left handed...
jacket was size 4
jeans were 24 months
he has had a variety of children in that car

When MM was first arrested, I read a  reader's comment who said that he was a friend, an ex inmate that served time with MM who stated that MM has a child (daughter) around the same age of Shaniya.

That was "11 sealed baggies with trace tapings" not cocaine.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 08:27:35 AM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

I coming... I was trying to figure this MYN URS out
is there a local city/town/county that would be abreviated MYN that could indicate a branch office because I found this for URS
http://www.urs-keepmore.com/UtilityAudits.htm


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 08:32:51 AM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

I coming... I was trying to figure this MYN URS out
found this too
http://www.myn.net/
both seem to do somewhat with telecommunications


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 08:36:26 AM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

I coming... I was trying to figure this MYN URS out
found this too
http://www.myn.net/
both seem to do somewhat with telecommunications

I found this company :) they also have a branch local in NC Here is linkto page

http://www.urscorp.com/Offices/index.php


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 08:37:20 AM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

Where is the link?

I been trying to figure this MYN URS

Could be MINE and Yours? maybe he was self employed (selling drugs)
guys i think this is a legit company... these posts are usually what you find via their tax records and are usually abbreviated or fall under your companies tax identification name... i don't think it is something you enter information into on your own


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 08:40:15 AM
Jersey...r u here....if so I need your help in the new missinf 5 year old Thread..

I coming... I was trying to figure this MYN URS out
found this too
http://www.myn.net/
both seem to do somewhat with telecommunications

I found this company :) they also have a branch local in NC Here is linkto page

http://www.urscorp.com/Offices/index.php

Address of local branch

Fayetteville, NC      4740 Corporation Drive     Lear Siegler Services, Inc.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 08:45:52 AM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Stopping in to check this thread- Evening, all.  I hesitate to say this, but don't like the way Shaniya's hands are in the middle pic.  To me, they appear to be bound.  Can anyone else clean it up and enlarge it to see?  ITA with those of you who think this was a production for kiddie porn.  I don't feel good about the previously posted review of children running up and down the halls unsupervised at 2-3 in the morning.  I find it really hard to believe that management wouldn't have addressed that as disturbing the peace.  IMO, Shaniya was drugged. ITA that the spotted item was a stuffed animal and the white thing was a diaper/pull-up.
I am totally speculating here but what bothered me the most about that wasn't exactly that kids might be running it was more along the lines of what may have made her think that... hotels rug is really padded and you usually can't hear footsteps even if it is running so what made her think that... unless she was actually in the hall and saw the kids then i would assume it was audio... screaming yelling and sounds that seem near then far hence the running back and forth... really hope these were sounds of playful kids with unattentive parents and not the sounds of kids screaming in protest while their mouths are trying to be muffled


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 08:48:42 AM
(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/shaniya3rdfloorallthree.jpg)

Stopping in to check this thread- Evening, all.  I hesitate to say this, but don't like the way Shaniya's hands are in the middle pic.  To me, they appear to be bound.  Can anyone else clean it up and enlarge it to see?  ITA with those of you who think this was a production for kiddie porn.  I don't feel good about the previously posted review of children running up and down the halls unsupervised at 2-3 in the morning.  I find it really hard to believe that management wouldn't have addressed that as disturbing the peace.  IMO, Shaniya was drugged. ITA that the spotted item was a stuffed animal and the white thing was a diaper/pull-up.

Good to see you ISPY.  ::MonkeyAngel:: Glad to see you posting here. I think the pic you are referring to is her going to her fate in the motel room. I have used the magnifyer on every speck on that picture, but I have not focused on her hands.

Did we have a post here about the kids running up and down the halls? I must have missed it.
i posted it ... it was a review by someone that had stayed there in july of this year and she talks about intimidating black men scaring her kids and small children running a muck at 2 and 3 am with no parents... i don't have the link handy but it was a review on the orbitz website... the link is a couple pages back i think and i even posted a screen shot of it if that helps


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 20, 2009, 08:49:34 AM
Fanny Mae- Forgot the link to the hotel review.  You can find the discussion here  Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 « Reply #634 on: Today at 04:31:34 PM  .  Sorry, can't remember how to link it tonight and too tired to hunt for it.  Sorry!

Does anyone have a link to this discussion?  I'd really like to read it.  TYA


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 08:56:53 AM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing

Gotta luv a monkey with ba!!s ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

or without ba !!s in this case...lol!

yup that's me i amalsoo the one whocalled and got lisa croslins vm on her cell when we were trying to figure out if it was still in service lol
okay so get this i just called and let it ring for 10 minutes no one answered!!!
this is the number i found for it without having to use an 800#
1891 Bragg Street
Sanford, NC 27330
(919) 842-5600
also has anyone read the frickin review i posted from orbitz dated 3 months ago
i am surprised no one has commented as alot of parts jump out to me
here is what it says Bold and italic by me:

room was nice. pool was small and hot tub did not work and had small scalding ports. Maids did not clean our room and claimed ...  that we had the did not disturb sign posted and that we did not answer when they knocked. lazy house keeping so who knows if all evidence was destroyed if this place is not busy what are the odds that the sheets were even changedWe had already left to visit our family early and the sign was inside the room. Morning breakfast was good. Second night my teens were intimidated by some black guests and one of my party was black herself, she is implying that there were some scary ass black people loitering in the halls and she is not just racist as she says she had a black person with her they left the area. Small children ran the hallways at 2-3am unattended by parents. makes my blood run cold It was a new motel with many needed amentities such as friendly and intelligent staff. to me implies that the staff was not attentive and clueless about stuff Expensive for town of Sanford, North Carolina.
here is the link to it
http://www.orbitz.com/App/shared/pagedef/results/hotelDetailsStandalone.jsp?z=c25&r=1q&z=c26&r=1r&lastPage=interstitial


Is this the topic you were looking for Gypsy DD ?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:01:30 AM
Fanny Mae- Forgot the link to the hotel review.  You can find the discussion here  Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 « Reply #634 on: Today at 04:31:34 PM  .  Sorry, can't remember how to link it tonight and too tired to hunt for it.  Sorry!

Thanks, ISPY. I looked at the review, and went to the website. I will admit to even calling the Motel personally to ask some questions of my own.  ::MonkeyDevil2::

Good night, good to see you again.  ::MonkeyKiss::
ooo what did you ask them?... and as far as that review i think police need to track that post and ask that lady exactly what she saw could be the link they need to figure out if this was a ring... security footage wouldn't date back that far but an eye witness would and they could find out what room she was in etc etc


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 20, 2009, 09:08:52 AM
here are some of MM offenses in the last couple of yrs, i dont see pimp
 snipped from the article i posted
whole article i post here
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/952890

McNeill has had a criminal history since 2001, when he was charged with shooting three people. He was sentenced
to supervised probation for the shootings as well as drug charges.

McNeill violated the terms of his probation and stayed in prison from October 2003 to May 2006.

He was charged with drug offenses shortly after getting out and was again sentenced to supervised probation. As
part of the sentence, McNeill was required to stay free of illegal drugs.

While on supervised probation, McNeill was charged with possessing cocaine and, a few months later, with striking
 a police officer with his vehicle while trying to flee.

Despite those charges, a judge in November 2007 changed the status of McNeill's probation to unsupervised.

Wayne Marshburn, head of the probation system for Cumberland County, said probation officers may not have known
about the pending charges against McNeill when he was allowed to go on unsupervised probation.

In April 2008, Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson put McNeill back on supervised probation for hitting the officer
 and the cocaine charge. Court records show that Judge E. Lynn Johnson terminated that probation on Oct. 22, six
months before it was set to expire.

Nineteen days later, police say, McNeill was captured on video carrying Shaniya into a Sanford motel. Her body
was found less than a week later.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:09:53 AM
You know no one can tell me this is from drugs, this is not from drugs, it is from pure evil.
well he is a right handed coke head
11 ziploc baggies found with traces of it
clear straw
and $1 in is right back pocket..probably rolled up and it is hard to put things in your right back pocket if you are left handed...
jacket was size 4
jeans were 24 months
he has had a variety of children in that car

When MM was first arrested, I read a  reader's comment who said that he was a friend, an ex inmate that served time with MM who stated that MM has a child (daughter) around the same age of Shaniya.

That was "11 sealed baggies with trace tapings" not cocaine.
yeah but trace tapings is what they do to remove trace evidence... i don't know what else you would need 11 baggies of and a straw and a $1 dollar bill...  maybe heroin i guess JMO tho they were removing trace evidence from 11 sealed (ziploc) baggies


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:16:58 AM
Fanny Mae- Forgot the link to the hotel review.  You can find the discussion here  Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 « Reply #634 on: Today at 04:31:34 PM  .  Sorry, can't remember how to link it tonight and too tired to hunt for it.  Sorry!

Does anyone have a link to this discussion?  I'd really like to read it.  TYA
no link but here is the review we are discussing
it can be found on the orbitz website
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 09:17:59 AM
here are some of MM offenses in the last couple of yrs, i dont see pimp
 snipped from the article i posted
whole article i post here
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/952890

McNeill has had a criminal history since 2001, when he was charged with shooting three people. He was sentenced
to supervised probation for the shootings as well as drug charges.

McNeill violated the terms of his probation and stayed in prison from October 2003 to May 2006.

He was charged with drug offenses shortly after getting out and was again sentenced to supervised probation. As
part of the sentence, McNeill was required to stay free of illegal drugs.

While on supervised probation, McNeill was charged with possessing cocaine and, a few months later, with striking
 a police officer with his vehicle while trying to flee.

Despite those charges, a judge in November 2007 changed the status of McNeill's probation to unsupervised.

Wayne Marshburn, head of the probation system for Cumberland County, said probation officers may not have known
about the pending charges against McNeill when he was allowed to go on unsupervised probation.

In April 2008, Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson put McNeill back on supervised probation for hitting the officer
 and the cocaine charge. Court records show that Judge E. Lynn Johnson terminated that probation on Oct. 22, six
months before it was set to expire.

Nineteen days later, police say, McNeill was captured on video carrying Shaniya into a Sanford motel. Her body
was found less than a week later.


This really Pizzes me off people are serving time for smoking pot and selling pot and at the same time you can

get medical marijuana but this thug is walking the streets . ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::


Not only the people that was to protect Shaniya fail her the system failed her by letting MM walk free. ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:treets and is a endangerment to everyone....not only did the
                                 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 20, 2009, 09:20:02 AM
(http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/8968/shaniya.th.jpg) (http://img21.imageshack.us/i/shaniya.jpg/)

Oh,  that looks like her first day of school.  This is just so sad, a sweet little life cut short so unnecessarily. I hope they execute the people responsible, including the mother if she let her child be put in that situation on purpose.  I am fluctuating between anger and sadness.

Bless you sweet Shaniya.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 09:21:18 AM
I need to say  sorry for making such a  mess of my post ::ElfMonkey::I need to start doing a preview if I am going to hang with monkeys. ::DancingSantaMonkey1::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:21:29 AM
good morning everyone it is early for me to be posting today...
i think someone should alert the police to the orbitz review... i spent last night looking for more reviews but all i could find is a bunch i'm guessing made by the hotel itself boasting how wonderful they are... they had a recent renovation and that is what they do to promote new customers to let them now that now they are great


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 20, 2009, 09:23:58 AM
Sorry Penny and good morning.  I think I dozed off, woke right back up and hit the button before I explained myself.  When reading about the things/evidence collected from car I was under the impression that the baggies were just holding taping samples (such as trace hair from seats, etc.).  Sometimes LE notes that the bags are consistent with dope type sales if that is what they think the perp was using them for.  I'm probably wrong as usual.  I sometimes like to pretend I have something to offer lol lol here to the Great Monkeys.  You all know I'm a lurker and always in awe of the beautiful minds here at work!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:27:18 AM
Sorry Penny and good morning.  I think I dozed off, woke right back up and hit the button before I explained myself.  When reading about the things/evidence collected from car I was under the impression that the baggies were just holding taping samples (such as trace hair from seats, etc.).  Sometimes LE notes that the bags are consistent with dope type sales if that is what they think the perp was using them for.  I'm probably wrong as usual.  I sometimes like to pretend I have something to offer lol lol here to the Great Monkeys.  You all know I'm a lurker and always in awe of the beautiful minds here at work!
oh okay iget it now like they tokk 11 trace tapings and then put thhem into sealed evidence baggies... hhhmmm now i don't knwo about the baggies...
but i am sure he does coke by past record and straw etc etc


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 20, 2009, 09:29:43 AM
skipping ahead about 3 pages and then I will go back and catch up but I wanted to mention this and I apologize if it has been said previously...
the guy who found Shaniya was on Larry King Live last night...this won't be word for word but the transcripts should be out there..I tried getting the transcripts but had no luck...also went to hulu and it wasn't on there...
remember, not word for word, just going from memory...

He said that he he overheard another searcher female I believe say that there was a tip (?) that her body was in the woods with deer carcasses around the area....He and the dog and some others went in there and they found her body...Larry asked him if what condition the body was in and the guy said that he didn't get that good of a look...he saw what he needed to see to know that it was her and he alerted the others...it didn't sound like to me that Shaniya was concealed by anything...from listening to this guy.....He was visibly upset at what he had found but glad that she was found and at least people knew where she was...

also, just wanted to add that the politicians and the higher ups don't make stricter laws for pedo s in my opinion because it isn't happening in their neighborhoods or to their children...movie stars who have lots of money and could make a difference, it isn't happening to their kids either...otherwise there would be a big big push for better laws...as soon as something touches one of their families being cancer, parkinsons, becoming paralyzed etc...there is a big rally to raise money for it....why not for keeping child sexual predators behind bars?
sorry for the rant...but I could not sleep last night for thinking of Shaniya...my beautiful 6 yr old grand daughter spent the night with us last night and just looking at her playing and being a happy little protected child, made me angry all over again that anyone could hurt a sweet innocent child for their own sick pleasure! grrrrr.....

oh, and good morning monkey friends!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 09:33:11 AM
Sorry Penny and good morning.  I think I dozed off, woke right back up and hit the button before I explained myself.  When reading about the things/evidence collected from car I was under the impression that the baggies were just holding taping samples (such as trace hair from seats, etc.).  Sometimes LE notes that the bags are consistent with dope type sales if that is what they think the perp was using them for.  I'm probably wrong as usual.  I sometimes like to pretend I have something to offer lol lol here to the Great Monkeys.  You all know I'm a lurker and always in awe of the beautiful minds here at work!

Good morning....I feel like I get scrolled right by because I do not have the input that the Smart Monkeys here have but always feel welcomed ..

 I can say I have really been educated on life since joining this forum all the threads are packed with good information. ::MonkeyBike::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:36:11 AM
does anyone know what color his i think gallant (the car searched) was


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:40:05 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 20, 2009, 09:46:40 AM
Sorry Penny and good morning.  I think I dozed off, woke right back up and hit the button before I explained myself.  When reading about the things/evidence collected from car I was under the impression that the baggies were just holding taping samples (such as trace hair from seats, etc.).  Sometimes LE notes that the bags are consistent with dope type sales if that is what they think the perp was using them for.  I'm probably wrong as usual.  I sometimes like to pretend I have something to offer lol lol here to the Great Monkeys.  You all know I'm a lurker and always in awe of the beautiful minds here at work!

Good morning....I feel like I get scrolled right by because I do not have the input that the Smart Monkeys here have but always feel welcomed ..

 I can say I have really been educated on life since joining this forum all the threads are packed with good information. ::MonkeyBike::

I always read your posts...
there is so much info and monkeys post so fast that it is impossible to comment to everyones posts, but you are being heard... ::MonkeyKiss::

switching gears, I think that Shaniya was taken there for kiddie porn...by MM....not sure that he actually did the rape yet...but he provided this baby for someone else to do it and therefore just as guilty of the act imo....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 09:47:21 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

So this Quality Inn is the former Comfort Inn?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:49:34 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

So this Quality Inn is the former Comfort Inn?
from what i can tell yes


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 20, 2009, 09:50:37 AM
Penny--I agree with the drugs and he probably used during his time with Shaniya to heighten his pleasure.  5 friggin minutes is all I need with this POS.  I too hope beyond all hope she was drugged just because of the pain she would have endured.  I hope all senses were completely numbed!  I'm so sick in my stomach from this. 

MyMonkey--Me too.  I'm always in awe of the Monkeys and too feel warm and welcomed.  OT again but I've asked some stupid questions of the Mods (computer type) and they so graciously help me with what ever! 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 20, 2009, 09:52:57 AM
Penny--I agree with the drugs and he probably used during his time with Shaniya to heighten his pleasure.  5 friggin minutes is all I need with this POS.  I too hope beyond all hope she was drugged just because of the pain she would have endured.  I hope all senses were completely numbed!  I'm so sick in my stomach from this. 

MyMonkey--Me too.  I'm always in awe of the Monkeys and too feel warm and welcomed.  OT again but I've asked some stupid questions of the Mods (computer type) and they so graciously help me with what ever! 

me too! the horror of it all is just beyond comprehension. ::MonkeyTears::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 09:53:14 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

So this Quality Inn is the former Comfort Inn?
from what i can tell yes

All I can say is EWWWW If I saw what that person describes in my hotel room I would not be staying the night !!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 09:53:30 AM
Sorry Penny and good morning.  I think I dozed off, woke right back up and hit the button before I explained myself.  When reading about the things/evidence collected from car I was under the impression that the baggies were just holding taping samples (such as trace hair from seats, etc.).  Sometimes LE notes that the bags are consistent with dope type sales if that is what they think the perp was using them for.  I'm probably wrong as usual.  I sometimes like to pretend I have something to offer lol lol here to the Great Monkeys.  You all know I'm a lurker and always in awe of the beautiful minds here at work!

Good morning....I feel like I get scrolled right by because I do not have the input that the Smart Monkeys here have but always feel welcomed ..

 I can say I have really been educated on life since joining this forum all the threads are packed with good information. ::MonkeyBike::

I always read your posts...
there is so much info and monkeys post so fast that it is impossible to comment to everyones posts, but you are being heard... ::MonkeyKiss::

switching gears, I think that Shaniya was taken there for kiddie porn...by MM....not sure that he actually did the rape yet...but he provided this baby for someone else to do it and therefore just as guilty of the act imo....

Thank You ::ElfMonkey::



This thought came to me last night...I still feel a third person...what if the third person said get rid of Shaniya or your own daughter will be in danger..maybe threatened MM family if he talked.MM could have been part of the filming in the kiddie porn...as in doing something to Shaniya as it was being filmed by the third party...uggg ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 20, 2009, 09:55:31 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

Penny, this review concerns me a lot more than the children running in the hall.  This indicates that the room may have been used by a non customer, hense it was not cleaned.  I would have asked for a new room pronto.  The customer is even speculating it may have been a crime scene.....scary stuff.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 20, 2009, 09:56:07 AM
okay dammit i'm gonna call the hotel and tell them i am looking to book the room for a famous psychic that will pay top dollar to be in the last room that shaniya was known to be in... cooky yes but maybe the mention of a lot of money will get them to tell me the room number... here goes nothing

Gotta luv a monkey with ba!!s ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

or without ba !!s in this case...lol!

yup that's me i amalsoo the one whocalled and got lisa croslins vm on her cell when we were trying to figure out if it was still in service lol
okay so get this i just called and let it ring for 10 minutes no one answered!!!
this is the number i found for it without having to use an 800#
1891 Bragg Street
Sanford, NC 27330
(919) 842-5600
also has anyone read the frickin review i posted from orbitz dated 3 months ago
i am surprised no one has commented as alot of parts jump out to me
here is what it says Bold and italic by me:

room was nice. pool was small and hot tub did not work and had small scalding ports. Maids did not clean our room and claimed ...  that we had the did not disturb sign posted and that we did not answer when they knocked. lazy house keeping so who knows if all evidence was destroyed if this place is not busy what are the odds that the sheets were even changedWe had already left to visit our family early and the sign was inside the room. Morning breakfast was good. Second night my teens were intimidated by some black guests and one of my party was black herself, she is implying that there were some scary ass black people loitering in the halls and she is not just racist as she says she had a black person with her they left the area. Small children ran the hallways at 2-3am unattended by parents. makes my blood run cold It was a new motel with many needed amentities such as friendly and intelligent staff. to me implies that the staff was not attentive and clueless about stuff Expensive for town of Sanford, North Carolina.
here is the link to it
http://www.orbitz.com/App/shared/pagedef/results/hotelDetailsStandalone.jsp?z=c25&r=1q&z=c26&r=1r&lastPage=interstitial


Is this the topic you were looking for Gypsy DD ?

Yes thank you


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:57:54 AM
found this it is a virtual tour with 8 pics instead of 4
http://showhotel.com/comfort/2733001/flash/slideshow.htm


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 09:59:43 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

Penny, this review concerns me a lot more than the children running in the hall.  This indicates that the room may have been used by a non customer, hense it was not cleaned.  I would have asked for a new room pronto.  The customer is even speculating it may have been a crime scene.....scary stuff.
it is difficult to tell if she stayed at the "new or old" comfort inn... it used to be called quality inn i guess and is now comfort inn suites... not sure what year they did renovations


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 10:02:31 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

So this Quality Inn is the former Comfort Inn?
from what i can tell yes
actually the other way around .. quality is now comfort


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 20, 2009, 10:03:23 AM
Somebody help me here a minute...isn't there footage from the mobile home park of MM leaving?  It wasn't stated when, if in am or pm, was it?  I believe he took her at 5:30 pm and plan was to report her missing the next morn but didn't realize he was dumb enough to not notice the security cameras everywhere in the hotel.  What about the 60 yo guy?  Any info released lately?  Unless the commode backed up and her blanket was used to mop up feces and just flung out the back door someone had the theory she was given an enema to prep her and I hate to say ITA with this.  It would make sense. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 10:07:19 AM
skipping ahead about 3 pages and then I will go back and catch up but I wanted to mention this and I apologize if it has been said previously...
the guy who found Shaniya was on Larry King Live last night...this won't be word for word but the transcripts should be out there..I tried getting the transcripts but had no luck...also went to hulu and it wasn't on there...
remember, not word for word, just going from memory...

He said that he he overheard another searcher female I believe say that there was a tip (?) that her body was in the woods with deer carcasses around the area....He and the dog and some others went in there and they found her body...Larry asked him if what condition the body was in and the guy said that he didn't get that good of a look...he saw what he needed to see to know that it was her and he alerted the others...it didn't sound like to me that Shaniya was concealed by anything...from listening to this guy.....He was visibly upset at what he had found but glad that she was found and at least people knew where she was...

also, just wanted to add that the politicians and the higher ups don't make stricter laws for pedo s in my opinion because it isn't happening in their neighborhoods or to their children...movie stars who have lots of money and could make a difference, it isn't happening to their kids either...otherwise there would be a big big push for better laws...as soon as something touches one of their families being cancer, parkinsons, becoming paralyzed etc...there is a big rally to raise money for it....why not for keeping child sexual predators behind bars?
sorry for the rant...but I could not sleep last night for thinking of Shaniya...my beautiful 6 yr old grand daughter spent the night with us last night and just looking at her playing and being a happy little protected child, made me angry all over again that anyone could hurt a sweet innocent child for their own sick pleasure! grrrrr.....

oh, and good morning monkey friends!

I think with Shaniya father being on Oprah will bring awareness to a lot of the money people...will have to wait and see..this has affected us because it unfolded right before our eyes..I still say there is a higher power trying to give us a message that this needs to be on top of the list in changes in our laws ..because as we post this same thing is happening to another child. I  know I was shocked to find out the stats on how many children are prostituted.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 10:10:59 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

So this Quality Inn is the former Comfort Inn?
from what i can tell yes
actually the other way around .. quality is now comfort

Not to argue but it reads formerly Comfort Inn when I went to link... ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Gypsy DD on November 20, 2009, 10:11:33 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

So this Quality Inn is the former Comfort Inn?
from what i can tell yes
actually the other way around .. quality is now comfort

But I thought that they were at the Comfort Suites on Bragg St..not this one ..could be wrong though.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 20, 2009, 10:14:20 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

Different hotel/address but in the same town.  Used to be a Comfort Inn but the one we want is on Bragg. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 20, 2009, 10:19:40 AM
found this it is a virtual tour with 8 pics instead of 4
http://showhotel.com/comfort/2733001/flash/slideshow.htm

Looks like the whole theme of the hotel is purple/brown and gold.  All the rooms must look like that. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 10:19:47 AM
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g49512-d94795-r17193101-Quality_Inn-Sanford_North_Carolina.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
another review i found says:
I was there for a wedding party. When I checked into my room, the first thing I noticed was the carpet was not vacummed and the table was sticky and dirty. That didnt bother me as much as the blood stain sheets that were put on the bed. I asked for new linean and housekeeping came right away with fresh sheets. As I continued to inspect the room, there was blood stain on the back of the bathroom door and ceiling. ( I wont go into details about the amount of mold that covered the tub and wallpaper) I was so outdone with the amount of blood everywhere that I went to the local family dollar store and purchased wipes and lysol to disinfect the room myself. I wonder if this room was a crime scene. That was the bad part.
The good part. The staff is absolutely wonderful, from the front desk to the housekeeping department. Everybody was very accommadating and the breakfast was plentiful and delicious. I really enjoyed the "fresh" eggs that were served( I usually see powered or liquid when I travel)

The outdoor pool was a nice place for the family to gather and socialize and over all it really was a nice and pleasant stay(once we got the room cleaned to our satisfaction). If it wasnt for the outstanding service I wouldnt recommend this property based on the condition of the room.

So this Quality Inn is the former Comfort Inn?
from what i can tell yes
actually the other way around .. quality is now comfort

Not to argue but it reads formerly Comfort Inn when I went to link... ::MonkeyKiss::
yeah it is confusing as hell but for certain the last review that i did a screen shot of where the children were running around was 100% the same exact hotel on briggs st...
i can't make heads or tails about the other one... maybe comfort sold the old one to quality and made a whole new one on briggs?.... i dunno


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 10:21:40 AM
sorry to be misleading guys as of now this is the only valid review i have found for that exact hotel


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 10:23:53 AM
sorry to be misleading guys as of now this is the only valid review i have found for that exact hotel

No need to be sorry you have worked overtime on this case to keep us informed ::ElfMonkey::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 10:28:35 AM
shot in the dark but i wonder if he was tere the night before if he ate at the pizza hut next door


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 10:30:13 AM
If he was doing cocaine he probably was not even hungry just needing his fix ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 10:31:33 AM
shot in the dark but i wonder if he was tere the night before if he ate at the pizza hut next door

I bet he bought a pack of Newport ciggys at a store with a cam.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 10:48:02 AM
If he was doing cocaine he probably was not even hungry just needing his fix ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::
yeah you are probright...i'm sure at 6 am he was not awake early and probably still up from night before


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 11:00:10 AM
If he was doing cocaine he probably was not even hungry just needing his fix ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::
yeah you are probright...i'm sure at 6 am he was not awake early and probably still up from night before

I am curious of how much cash MM had on him when arrested...probably gave his money to his baby mama...surely there is some kind of money trail


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 11:05:35 AM
If he was doing cocaine he probably was not even hungry just needing his fix ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::
yeah you are probright...i'm sure at 6 am he was not awake early and probably still up from night before

I am curious of how much cash MM had on him when arrested...probably gave his money to his baby mama...surely there is some kind of money trail


LOL at me that was a stupid question...he turned himself in...with a quarter to call someone that cared  ::MonkeyDevil2::::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 20, 2009, 11:28:53 AM
Has this been posted?
snip...


The Colemans and Brad Lockhart have been on opposing sides in several lawsuits in recent years, most of which were dismissed. A case filed in 1998 resulted in the Colemans being granted custody of their grandchildren and child support in 2007, according to court files.


snip...
http://fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953110


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 20, 2009, 11:35:39 AM
You know no one can tell me this is from drugs, this is not from drugs, it is from pure evil.
well he is a right handed coke head
11 ziploc baggies found with traces of it
clear straw
and $1 in is right back pocket..probably rolled up and it is hard to put things in your right back pocket if you are left handed...
jacket was size 4
jeans were 24 months
he has had a variety of children in that car

When MM was first arrested, I read a  reader's comment who said that he was a friend, an ex inmate that served time with MM who stated that MM has a child (daughter) around the same age of Shaniya.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

MM's G.F,April talking about letting Mario changing her babies diapers.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TvPolice on November 20, 2009, 11:51:24 AM
I am going to ask a question if someone can answer please.TIA

Did MM have a job ?...I know the egg donor worked in the kitchen of a assisted living home.

MYN ..can stand for
map your neighborhood
meet your neighbor
muslin youth network


When I looked up his info at People Finders it sometimes show's the company you own or are associated with.   This is what it shows...


(http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr319/kcjackie/shaniya%20davis/mariopossemp.jpg)

Looks like a house on Google maps. I can't post a pic.  I could have sworn somewhere I saw that he worked for a nursing facility too. Ugh!

That address is the house he was living in with Autry.  It only shows the business name not the address for the business he is associated with. ::MonkeyWink::

myn

In SSS (Simplified Spelling Society) this stands for 'mine'.

Short version of 'mine' folowing, 'mynd, blynd, dying, crying', etc.
That's not urs, that's myn!!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=myn&defid=1746038


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TvPolice on November 20, 2009, 11:53:44 AM
sorry got inside that
 
I was saying
the MYN could be
map your neighborhood
meet your neighbor
muslin youth network


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 12:17:06 PM
Link to MM's girlfriends/baby momma myspace page April Autry

http://www.myspace.com/sonnskee


Not much on it but take a look at her #3 friends Mood /status...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 20, 2009, 12:21:30 PM
Sanford, North Carolina Welcomes Dipak Patel's New Comfort Suites Hotel

Jul. 24, 2009--SANFORD -- Hotel rooms in Sanford are relatively easy to come by on most weekends. But visit town on a Monday or a Wednesday, and you might not be so lucky.

Area hotel managers say that's because a large portion of their business comes from corporate travel.

With Sanford being home to businesses like 3M, Caterpillar, Static Control, and Wyeth -- all of whom have country-wide or even world-wide reach -- it's not surprising that most of the people traveling here are doing so for business purposes.

"It is very much business travel," said Dipak Patel, who owns the Days Inn in Sanford and the city's new Comfort Suites, which hosted its ribbon-cutting ceremony Thursday.

MORE...

http://www.hotel-online.com/News/PR2009_3rd/Jul09_PatelComfort.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 20, 2009, 12:29:01 PM
Link to MM's girlfriends/baby momma myspace page April Autry

http://www.myspace.com/sonnskee


Not much on it but take a look at her #3 friends Mood /status...
Thank-you, what a cute baby, I pray he didn't touch her  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 12:31:34 PM
Link to MM's girlfriends/baby momma myspace page April Autry

http://www.myspace.com/sonnskee


Not much on it but take a look at her #3 friends Mood /status...
Thank-you, what a cute baby, I pray he didn't touch her  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I second that !  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 20, 2009, 12:38:01 PM
Link to MM's girlfriends/baby momma myspace page April Autry

http://www.myspace.com/sonnskee


Not much on it but take a look at her #3 friends Mood /status...
Thank-you, what a cute baby, I pray he didn't touch her  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Is that his chid by April?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 12:43:03 PM
Link to MM's girlfriends/baby momma myspace page April Autry

http://www.myspace.com/sonnskee


Not much on it but take a look at her #3 friends Mood /status...
Thank-you, what a cute baby, I pray he didn't touch her  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Is that his chid by April?

Have no clue?In her about me section she says it is a old pic and her last log in date is like 2008 .And is the reports are true that said he had a daughter the about the same age of Shaniya it could be.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 12:44:18 PM
You know no one can tell me this is from drugs, this is not from drugs, it is from pure evil.
well he is a right handed coke head
11 ziploc baggies found with traces of it
clear straw
and $1 in is right back pocket..probably rolled up and it is hard to put things in your right back pocket if you are left handed...
jacket was size 4
jeans were 24 months
he has had a variety of children in that car

When MM was first arrested, I read a  reader's comment who said that he was a friend, an ex inmate that served time with MM who stated that MM has a child (daughter) around the same age of Shaniya.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XCU620xZwI

MM's G.F,April talking about letting Mario changing her babies diapers.
she says the the girl's sister she's about to have a baby by my brother....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:48:18 PM
I am still not convinced this hotel was just choosen out of the blue. I think the theory of it being special is a good one or it was far away, but why choose something in an area it is said he has ties in? I wonder what the ties are with this area? I don't think he ever lived there, right? Someone that is good at looking up old stories, I never have luck with that, would you mind checking if there is heavy prostitution, porn, pedophile activity in that area?

I think I recall reading someone posted MM is/was AD's pimp. I think that is where we got that from, that he is a pimp.

I wonder what the BOLO was the day they were searching for Shaniya? I wonder if MM told them who dropped off her body and what they were driving? What we know is he is 60 years old, no idea what race he is, and he drives a blue toyota. Did they release the race? I don't think they did. Why not release what race? Surely they would know that, if they know he is 60, they would know what race he is.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jennifer34 on November 20, 2009, 12:49:09 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

I guess they got that from the time of death from the autopsy?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 12:51:16 PM
Sanford, North Carolina Welcomes Dipak Patel's New Comfort Suites Hotel

Jul. 24, 2009--SANFORD -- Hotel rooms in Sanford are relatively easy to come by on most weekends. But visit town on a Monday or a Wednesday, and you might not be so lucky.

Area hotel managers say that's because a large portion of their business comes from corporate travel.

With Sanford being home to businesses like 3M, Caterpillar, Static Control, and Wyeth -- all of whom have country-wide or even world-wide reach -- it's not surprising that most of the people traveling here are doing so for business purposes.

"It is very much business travel," said Dipak Patel, who owns the Days Inn in Sanford and the city's new Comfort Suites, which hosted its ribbon-cutting ceremony Thursday.

MORE...

http://www.hotel-online.com/News/PR2009_3rd/Jul09_PatelComfort.html
thanks


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 12:57:22 PM
can anyone post at ws and tell the hotel visitor that took the pics to go back? i want to know exactly where 201 is...
also if a hotel can they will attempt to put people with kids away from the rest so not to disturb other guests
and as far as the article about the hotel i knew that about mondays and wednesdays cheapest days to fly and usually when corporates will schedule outings... the extra days at the hotel will be cheaper then the extra money spent on a flight and especially so if you have regular room already rented on a regular basis ... my work maintains 3 suites and 5 rms year round at a local hotel in case they need to fly people in....
and i still say child sex trade is for the business man


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 12:57:39 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

I guess they got that from the time of death from the autopsy?

God rest her soul


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 12:59:36 PM
Link to MM's girlfriends/baby momma myspace page April Autry

http://www.myspace.com/sonnskee


Not much on it but take a look at her #3 friends Mood /status...
Thank-you, what a cute baby, I pray he didn't touch her  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Is that his chid by April?

Have no clue?In her about me section she says it is a old pic and her last log in date is like 2008 .And is the reports are true that said he had a daughter the about the same age of Shaniya it could be.
i still don't like why there was 2 different size girls clothing 4t and 24mos found in his car
did the aunt ever say which clothes she packed for her?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 01:01:07 PM
I did a sex offender search for the state of NC using the same last name as Mario (cause usually pedophilia is a family thing) not sure if any could be relation but here they are

MCNEIL,DENNIS EARL      Not Mappable     52 FONDUS LANE
TAR HEEL, NC 28392    NC
MCNEILL,ALEX    Not Mappable    NC DEPT OF CORRECTION
RALEIGH, NC 27604    NC
MCNEILL,ANDREA    Mappable    7022 TWISTED OAKS DR
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28312    NC
MCNEILL,ANTWAN DERRELL    Mappable    1107 MADONNA DR
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28311    NC
MCNEILL,BYRON AUGUSTAS    Mappable    1702 SILVERCITY STREET
RAEFORD, NC 28376    NC
MCNEILL,CHRISTOPHER M    Mappable    23 SOPHIA LANE
SANFORD, NC 27332    NC
MCNEILL,CURTIS CARROLL JR    Mappable    1203 SIMPSON ST
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305    NC
MCNEILL,ELBERT TOJUAN    Not Mappable    NC DEPT OF CORRECTION
RALEIGH, NC 27604    NC
MCNEILL,ERNEST LEE    Mappable    5704 CHINOOK CT
RALEIGH, NC 27610    NC
MCNEILL,JAMES E    Mappable    6074 PINEY WOODS RD
WATHA, NC 28478    NC
MCNEILL,JOE ISAAC    Not Mappable    NC DEPT OF CORRECTION
RALEIGH, NC 27604    NC
MCNEILL,LAMONT    Not Mappable    NC DEPT OF CORRECTION
RALEIGH, NC 27604    NC
MCNEILL,LEBRON MALIK    Mappable    1210 DUNBAR DRIVE
LAURINBURG, NC 28352    NC
MCNEILL,MECHELL H    Mappable    2449 OVERHILLS RD
BUNNLEVEL, NC 28323    NC
MCNEILL,TILLMAN JESSE    Mappable    3114 UTAH PLACE
GREENSBORO, NC 27405    NC

here is link to site http://www.familywatchdog.us/ShowNameList.asp


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 20, 2009, 01:07:59 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

I guess they got that from the time of death from the autopsy?

God rest her soul

Hi Monkeys!

I had wondered how long she survived the ordeal. I think I'm glad that if he was going to kill her, he didn't put her through anymore days of Hell than she had already been through. This whole case just breaks my heart. No child should endure what she did. Shaniya had adults in her life and it was their obligation to take care of her. Knowing she was killed that day makes those pictures at the elevator even harder to look at. Those who did this, and those who contributed to the opportunity for this to happen, need to be held accountable. I want them held accountable in such a way to ring loudly and clearly with other scumbags that would hurt or neglect a child. I want the very word "Shaniya" to strike fear in their hearts!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: TiskTisk on November 20, 2009, 01:09:48 PM
 ::MonkeyShocked:: 374 offenders in Cumberland County alone


http://sexoffender.ncdoj.gov/stats.aspx


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pinkbanana on November 20, 2009, 01:24:15 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

I guess they got that from the time of death from the autopsy?

Poor baby.... ::MonkeyWaa::  ::MonkeyWaa::  ::MonkeyMad::
God BLESS Baby Shaniya  ::MonkeyWaa::

pb


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 01:27:04 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

I guess they got that from the time of death from the autopsy?

Jennifer ... when the location of where Shaniya'a remains were located in relation to the hotel was revealed ... it was my immediate suspicion that this little girl was murdered within minutes of being taken from the hotel by MM.

My understanding ... following yesterday's press conference ... is that only MM and AD are being charged with the happenings that led to Shaniya's demise.

In response to one of the questions ... the spokesperson for the investigation stated that there were pertinent cell phone records to check out.  Cell phone records could prove very interesting in regards to the chain of events on the morning Shaniya went missing.


SPECULATIVE CHAIN OF EVENTS:

1.  MM arrived at the hotel with Shaniya at 6:11 AM.  The implication would be that that Shaniya was taken as planned from her Mother's home at 5:30 AM.  The distance of 40 miles between home and the hotel would imply approximately 40 minute drive.

2.  The 911 call placed by AD at 7:00 AM call was not part of the plan?  The call was placed at the urging of a worried sister who woke up unexpectedly ... a worried sister who did not have a clue what was going on?

3.  AD then calls MM and warns him about the 911 call that she was forced to make.  The plan was that MM would bring a drugged Shaniya back home by 8:00 AM ... a drugged Shaniya who would have no recollection of the abuse.

4.  MM panicks ... leaves the hotel at 7:30 AM and ... a short distance past the hotel a drugged Shaniya is silenced and disposed of like trash?

5.  The observant hotel clerk and ... hotel security cameras had not been anticipated.  When the video's surface MM turns himself in?

6.  MM made a plea deal with LE regarding his participation.  He reveals the area where Shaniya remains can be located?

7.  AD makes a plea deal with LE and confesses her role.

IMO

+++++++

klaasend
Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5 Fayetteville, NC Missing 11/10/09-Ambert Alert Issued
« Reply #1584 on: November 17, 2009, 01:03:20 AM »


Map:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.msg1015157#msg1015157



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 01:27:24 PM
::MonkeyShocked:: 374 offenders in Cumberland County alone


http://sexoffender.ncdoj.gov/stats.aspx
And what a list of McNeils that county has their work cut out for them ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 01:29:56 PM
::MonkeyShocked:: 374 offenders in Cumberland County alone


http://sexoffender.ncdoj.gov/stats.aspx
And what a list of McNeils that county has their work cut out for them ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 01:30:39 PM
::MonkeyShocked:: 374 offenders in Cumberland County alone


http://sexoffender.ncdoj.gov/stats.aspx
And what a list of McNeils that county has their work cut out for them ::MonkeyEek::

Or I should say the state of NC


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on November 20, 2009, 02:11:20 PM
Name:   MCNEILL, MARIO ANDRETTE 
Booking ID: 120088
Date Arrested: November 13, 2009
Charge: F: 1ST DEG MURDER
Bond: $0.00
Age: 29
Race: Black 
Sex: Male 

Name:   MCNEILL, MARIO ANDRETTE 
Booking ID: 120088
Date Arrested: November 13, 2009
Charge: F: 1ST DEG RAPE CHILD
Bond: $100,000.00
Age: 29
Race: Black 
Sex: Male 

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on November 20, 2009, 02:14:22 PM
Released: 11/19/2009

Fayetteville Police Department
Additional Charges Filed in Shaniya Davis Case 
Earlier this evening, members of the Shaniya Davis Task Force received confirmation from the State Medical Examiner’s office ruling the manner of death for Shaniya Davis as homicide.  The preliminary test results show asphyxiation as the cause of death, however, all examinations and testing have not been completed therefore a final report has not been issued. 

After further discussion with the District Attorney’s office, the Fayetteville Police Department has filed the following additional charges against Mario Andrette McNeill:

 

o       First Degree Murder

o       First Degree Rape of a Child 

 
Mr. McNeill received no bond for the above mentioned charges.  He remains in the Cumberland County Detention Center at this time.

The criminal investigation surrounding this unfortunate tragedy continues as the task force follows up on leads and gathers additional information pertaining to the investigation.  As such, in an effort to protect the integrity of the investigation and not jeopardize the criminal prosecution of any pending charges, we will not discuss any further details of this investigation.
 
 
http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/pressreleases.aspx?do=display&id=11202009111955


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 02:15:30 PM
I have a question, I am under the impression she was found near her home, is that correct? or was she found near the hotel? I am sorry, I am directionally challenged.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on November 20, 2009, 02:16:53 PM
Figures this would happen!!!

Released: 11/18/2009

Fayetteville Police Department
Scam Artist Attempting to Raise Money in Shaniya's Name 
The Fayetteville Police Department has received information that this morning there was a subject in the area of McPherson Church Road and Skibo Road attempting to solicit money in the name of Shaniya Davis.  The subject was described as a white male wearing a grey sweatshirt and a dark hat.  He was holding a piece of cardboard which said he was collecting money for Shaniya.  He was attempting to collect money from passing motorists.  When asked he told one motorist that he was collecting money for the Fayetteville Police Department.  The motorist noted that the man stuttered.

 
No member or representative of the Fayetteville Police Department is collecting money on behalf of Shaniya Davis.  Before donating money to any cause one should make efforts to verify the authenticity of the organization.

 
We are asking anybody that knows the identity of the abovementioned subject attempting to collect funds to call the Fayetteville Police Department at (910)433-1585 or Crimestoppers at (910)483-TIPS.
 

 
http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/pressreleases.aspx?do=display&id=11202009113306


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 02:18:13 PM
Shaniya Davis' mother pregnant

<snipped>

FAYETTEVILLE, NC (WTVD) -- ABC11 Eyewitness News confirmed Tuesday that the mother of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis is pregnant. Jail officials in Cumberland County said for that reason, Antoinette Davis, 25, was being kept separate from the rest of the prison population.

News of the pregnancy came a day after volunteers found the body of the missing girl in a wooded area near Sanford. She had been the focus of a nationwide Amber Alert since last week.
Antoinette Davis is accused of human trafficking, prostitution and felony child abuse in her daughter's disappearance. Warrants say she provided her daughter with intent that the girl be held in sexual servitude.

Davis showed no emotion during a court appearance in Fayetteville Monday afternoon and she did not enter a plea to the charges.

Shaniya's body was found in an area bordered by Highway 87 south and Walker Road - just south of Sanford - during a second day of searching.

Fayetteville police spokesperson Theresa Chance said the body of a child was located about 100 feet off the road. The state medical examiner positively identified the body Tuesday afternoon.

Authorities are releasing few details about the findings or a cause of death.

Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, spoke with reporters from the front porch of his home Tuesday afternoon. He asked everyone to remember his daughter, and to work to prevent a similar tragedy from happening again.

"My heart bleeds and hopes and prays that this community, this country can unite as one to possibly prevent something like this from happening again, to another special angel. I ask that everyone makes it a point not to ignore or look past a situation where a person, a child, or anybody might be in danger," he said.

Lockhart thanked all the law enforcement officers and volunteers who put in countless hours in the search for his daughter.

"It's not the result I wanted, or any father would want, but God has a greater calling for all of us," he said.

MORE....

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7123252

Answering my own question


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on November 20, 2009, 02:18:22 PM
Released: 11/18/2009 Who do I contact?
Public Information Officer

 
Update - Scam Artist Arrested 
Fayetteville Police Officers patrolling the area apprehended Donald Roddy, Jr. (36 years old, 7300 block of Hypony Trail, Parkton) for attempting to scam passing motorists out of money he was allegedly collecting for Shaniya Davis.  Roddy was charged by detectives with Obtaining Property By False Pretenses.  He is currently at the Cumberland County Detention Center under a $2000 bond.

 
Wachovia bank has a memorial trust fund set up in the name of Shaniya Davis for those wishing to donate money.  Just go by any Wachovia bank to donate to the fund.  Again, nobody from the Fayetteville Police Department is collecting money on behalf of Shaniya Davis.

 
Today’s Booking Room photograph of Roddy is attached to this release.


 

 
 http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/pressreleases.aspx?do=display&id=11202009112138
 
   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on November 20, 2009, 02:27:20 PM
Dad: Shaniya's Mom Trafficked Her to Settle Drug Debt
Antoinette Davis, Charged With Child Prostitution, Is Pregnant Again
By SARAH NETTER
Nov. 20, 2009 

The father of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis told Oprah Winfrey today that the girl's mother trafficked the child to pay off a drug debt.

Police have charged Mario O'Neill with the kidnapping, rape and murder of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis. The little girl's body was found near a North Carolina highway this week.

The allegation by Bradley Lockhart came a day after Mario Andrette O'Neill was charged with the rape and murder of Shaniya. O'Neill is the man police say is shown on a Sanford, N.C., hotel surveillance camera carrying Shaniya into a hotel room shortly after she was reported missing. He is being held without bond.

The girl's mother, Antoinette Davis, has been arrested and charged with child prostitution. Raleigh's ABC affiliate WTVD confirmed this week that Davis is again pregnant. Davis' other child, a 7-year-old boy, was removed from her home last week, Fayetteville Police spokeswoman Theresa Chance told ABCNews.com, and is now in foster care.

Related
Autopsy Confirms Child's Body is Shaniya Davis Mother of Missing 5-Year-Old NC Girl ChargedPolice: Man Admitted Kidnapping Missing NC GirlLockhart, appeared on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" today via satellite and said he was told that Antoinette Davis had trafficked their daughter to pay off a drug debt.

Lockhart told Winfrey that the child was the result of a one-night stand and that Davis had raised Shaniya for the first year of her life before asking him to provide a more stable environment.

Custody, he said, "was a verbal agreement between Antoinette and I."

Shaniya's aunt, Carey Lockhart-Davis told Winfrey, "I am disgusted, but yet in so much pain at this point. She was such a vibrant child and such an important part of my life. And it's hard at this point to understand why someone would take this sweet blessing away from me."

Preliminary autopsy reports indicate Shaniya died from asphyxiation, according to the Fayetteville Police Department, though authorities are still waiting on a series of tests results before making a final conclusion.


http://abcnews.go.com/WN/accused-shaniya-davis-kidnapper-charged-murder-rape/story?id=9136407


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 20, 2009, 02:27:47 PM
I am still not convinced this hotel was just choosen out of the blue. I think the theory of it being special is a good one or it was far away, but why choose something in an area it is said he has ties in? I wonder what the ties are with this area? I don't think he ever lived there, right? Someone that is good at looking up old stories, I never have luck with that, would you mind checking if there is heavy prostitution, porn, pedophile activity in that area?

I think I recall reading someone posted MM is/was AD's pimp. I think that is where we got that from, that he is a pimp.

I wonder what the BOLO was the day they were searching for Shaniya? I wonder if MM told them who dropped off her body and what they were driving? What we know is he is 60 years old, no idea what race he is, and he drives a blue toyota. Did they release the race? I don't think they did. Why not release what race? Surely they would know that, if they know he is 60, they would know what race he is.


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.1100

Man said to have been seen with McNeil.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 02:29:38 PM
Shaniya Davis' mother pregnant

<snipped>

FAYETTEVILLE, NC (WTVD) -- ABC11 Eyewitness News confirmed Tuesday that the mother of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis is pregnant. Jail officials in Cumberland County said for that reason, Antoinette Davis, 25, was being kept separate from the rest of the prison population.

News of the pregnancy came a day after volunteers found the body of the missing girl in a wooded area near Sanford. She had been the focus of a nationwide Amber Alert since last week.

Antoinette Davis is accused of human trafficking, prostitution and felony child abuse in her daughter's disappearance. Warrants say she provided her daughter with intent that the girl be held in sexual servitude.

Davis showed no emotion during a court appearance in Fayetteville Monday afternoon and she did not enter a plea to the charges.

Shaniya's body was found in an area bordered by Highway 87 south and Walker Road - just south of Sanford - during a second day of searching.  

Fayetteville police spokesperson Theresa Chance said the body of a child was located about 100 feet off the road. The state medical examiner positively identified the body Tuesday afternoon.

Authorities are releasing few details about the findings or a cause of death.

Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, spoke with reporters from the front porch of his home Tuesday afternoon. He asked everyone to remember his daughter, and to work to prevent a similar tragedy from happening again.

"My heart bleeds and hopes and prays that this community, this country can unite as one to possibly prevent something like this from happening again, to another special angel. I ask that everyone makes it a point not to ignore or look past a situation where a person, a child, or anybody might be in danger," he said.

Lockhart thanked all the law enforcement officers and volunteers who put in countless hours in the search for his daughter.

"It's not the result I wanted, or any father would want, but God has a greater calling for all of us," he said.

MORE....

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7123252

Tracygirl

It my understanding of the map is correct ... Shaniya's remains were located on a direct route leading away from the hotel.

Janet

+++++


klaasend
Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5 Fayetteville, NC Missing 11/10/09-Ambert Alert Issued
« Reply #1584 on: November 17, 2009, 01:03:20 AM »


Map:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.msg1015157#msg1015157


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 20, 2009, 02:34:34 PM
How do law enforcement deal with all this horror and remain sane?  I am getting very depressed since I started reading so much about all of this.  I think I am going to have to lay off it and get my head in better place for a while.....  ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 02:40:25 PM
I am still not convinced this hotel was just choosen out of the blue. I think the theory of it being special is a good one or it was far away, but why choose something in an area it is said he has ties in? I wonder what the ties are with this area? I don't think he ever lived there, right? Someone that is good at looking up old stories, I never have luck with that, would you mind checking if there is heavy prostitution, porn, pedophile activity in that area?

I think I recall reading someone posted MM is/was AD's pimp. I think that is where we got that from, that he is a pimp.

I wonder what the BOLO was the day they were searching for Shaniya? I wonder if MM told them who dropped off her body and what they were driving? What we know is he is 60 years old, no idea what race he is, and he drives a blue toyota. Did they release the race? I don't think they did. Why not release what race? Surely they would know that, if they know he is 60, they would know what race he is.


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.1100

Man said to have been seen with McNeil.

snipped from the link above..

BOL:
Meantime, the State Highway Patrol issued a 'be on the lookout for' advisory this morning, saying that they're looking for a man who have been spotted with Davis. The man is believed to be about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota, according to an official with the Highway patrol. He may be in the vicinity of Raeford Road or Cliffdale Road.


Does this mean he was seen with a little girl that looked like Shaniya? so it was probably a tip that came in about a possible spotting of Shaniya that morning? Well I am not sure if this would apply now, we know she died on the day she was taken.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 20, 2009, 02:46:18 PM
I am still not convinced this hotel was just choosen out of the blue. I think the theory of it being special is a good one or it was far away, but why choose something in an area it is said he has ties in? I wonder what the ties are with this area? I don't think he ever lived there, right? Someone that is good at looking up old stories, I never have luck with that, would you mind checking if there is heavy prostitution, porn, pedophile activity in that area?

I think I recall reading someone posted MM is/was AD's pimp. I think that is where we got that from, that he is a pimp.

I wonder what the BOLO was the day they were searching for Shaniya? I wonder if MM told them who dropped off her body and what they were driving? What we know is he is 60 years old, no idea what race he is, and he drives a blue toyota. Did they rele
ase the race? I don't think they did. Why not release what race? Surely they would know that, if they know he is 60, they would know what race he is.


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.1100

Man said to have been seen with McNeil.

snipped from the link above..

BOL:
Meantime, the State Highway Patrol issued a 'be on the lookout for' advisory this morning, saying that they're looking for a man who have been spotted with Davis. The man is believed to be about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota, according to an official with the Highway patrol. He may be in the vicinity of Raeford Road or Cliffdale Road.


Does this mean he was seen with a little girl that looked like Shaniya? so it was probably a tip that came in about a possible spotting of Shaniya that morning? Well I am not sure if this would apply now, we know she died on the day she was taken.

I am not sure that we know exactly what day Shaniya died.  If that has been verified, I have missed it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 02:48:23 PM
The following article does not state when this man who is around 60 years old was spotted with AD.  Do either of the other McNeills who were arrested reside in the "the vicinity of Raeford Road or Cliffdale Road"?  Where are these roads located?

Thanks
 
Janet

+++++++

Police say they're looking for body of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis
THE FAYETTEVILLE *******, N.C. | Mon, Nov 16, 11:57 AM


Meantime, the State Highway Patrol issued a 'be on the lookout for' advisory this morning, saying that they're looking for a man who had been spotted with Davis. The man is believed to be about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota, according to an official with the Highway patrol. He may be in the vicinity of Raeford Road or Cliffdale Road.

http://dailyme.com/story/2009111600004240/police-body-5-year-old-shaniya-davis.html



Date Arrested             Name

November 17, 2009    Mcneill, Samuel
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Dustrus Willis
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Mario Andrette

Just go to this link and type in the last name McNeill :

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on November 20, 2009, 02:49:24 PM
O/T

If one of the mods could help me.....searching updates about Shaniya, I found this about alittle girl and Ive searced to see if I could find if she has a thread... Her name is Pilar Rodriguez....

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/florida-cops-reopen-decade-cold-case-pilar-rodriguez/story?id=8997302

Also if someone can tell me where to find out how to upload pictures, maps and such to my posts... please and tyvm


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 02:59:35 PM
Has the arrest warrants documents for AD and MM been released?  I would appreciate links.

Thank you.

Janet

++++++


Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: 59 minutes ago


FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He is scheduled to appear in court on the charges at 2:15 p.m. Friday.

Antoinette Nicole Davis reported her 5-year-old daughter missing from their Fayetteville home on Nov. 10. The girl's body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

Arrest warrants state Shaniya was assaulted and killed on Nov. 10.

She died of asphyxiation, according to preliminary autopsy results.

Her funeral is scheduled for 3 p.m. Sunday at Manna Church, 517 Cliffdale Road in Fayetteville.

McNeill has been held in isolation at the Cumberland County Detention Center on a first-degree kidnapping charge since his initial arrest a week ago. He surrendered to police after the release of hotel security video from a Comfort Suites in Sanford that appears to show him carrying Shaniya on the morning of her disappearance.

In an affidavit for a warrant to search McNeill's 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, investigators said McNeill told them he picked Shaniya up in front of her home and drove her to the hotel.

Davis, 25, was arrested Saturday and charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

Police haven't said whether Davis could face additional charges or whether anyone else could be arrested in the case.

McNeill was taken off probation on Oct. 28 – six months early – following an April 28 conviction for drug possession, speeding to elude arrest and assaulting a government official. Officials said he had complied with all requirements while under supervision, and a judge agreed with a recommendation that he be released early from probation.

He also was convicted in 2003 for a triple shooting and in 2007 for another drug offense.

Fayetteville police said the investigation of Shaniya's death has taken an emotional toll on all who have been involved in the case.

"It's still emotional. It's one of those things (that's been) the hardest thing I've ever had to do, and I've seen a lot of stuff," Capt. Mark Bridgeman said.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 20, 2009, 03:23:31 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 03:29:56 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today
wow he could afford attorney.  wonder if judge wanted to beat him?  I do


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Irish Monkey on November 20, 2009, 03:31:52 PM
As the mother of two beautiful daughters, and as a HUMAN BEING, I am beyond sickened by this evil.  I can't even wrap my head around this at all...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 03:32:41 PM
The following article does not state when this man who is around 60 years old was spotted with AD.  Do either of the other McNeills who were arrested reside in the "the vicinity of Raeford Road or Cliffdale Road"?  Where are these roads located?

Thanks
 
Janet

+++++++

Police say they're looking for body of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis
THE FAYETTEVILLE *******, N.C. | Mon, Nov 16, 11:57 AM


Meantime, the State Highway Patrol issued a 'be on the lookout for' advisory this morning, saying that they're looking for a man who had been spotted with Davis. The man is believed to be about 60 years old and driving a blue Toyota, according to an official with the Highway patrol. He may be in the vicinity of Raeford Road or Cliffdale Road.

http://dailyme.com/story/2009111600004240/police-body-5-year-old-shaniya-davis.html



Date Arrested             Name

November 17, 2009    Mcneill, Samuel
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Dustrus Willis
November 13, 2009    Mcneill, Mario Andrette

Just go to this link and type in the last name McNeill :

http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx





Interesting Janet, I was thinking they were speaking of Shaniya, but as you worded it, maybe it was the mom? She was in jail on the day they searched, maybe they meant the on Nov 10?
Honestly it was the worse BOL I have ever heard of.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: MunkeyMunk on November 20, 2009, 03:35:52 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today
wow he could afford attorney.  wonder if judge wanted to beat him?  I do


POS wasn't smirking today was he ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 03:40:57 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today
wow he could afford attorney.  wonder if judge wanted to beat him?  I do

Wow his own lawyer? hmmm wonder if he is paying, someone else is paying or if this attorney is trying to make a name for his self?  Is this a matter of public record? Who pays for the attorney costs, how much they are and so on?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 03:42:49 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today
wow he could afford attorney.  wonder if judge wanted to beat him?  I do


POS wasn't smirking today was he ::MonkeyMad::

He look empty, nothing. I was hoping I would see him shaking, nothing.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 03:57:45 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today
wow he could afford attorney.  wonder if judge wanted to beat him?  I do

Wow his own lawyer? hmmm wonder if he is paying, someone else is paying or if this attorney is trying to make a name for his self?  Is this a matter of public record? Who pays for the attorney costs, how much they are and so on?
Mr. rogers is he laywer.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 04:00:10 PM
too bad not real Mr. rogers he would probably say kill SOB


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 04:09:24 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today
wow he could afford attorney.  wonder if judge wanted to beat him?  I do

Wow his own lawyer? hmmm wonder if he is paying, someone else is paying or if this attorney is trying to make a name for his self?  Is this a matter of public record? Who pays for the attorney costs, how much they are and so on?
Mr. rogers is he laywer.

Yes I was asking if we can find out who is paying for the attorney, whether or not it is MM.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: rachcresp on November 20, 2009, 04:13:00 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today
wow he could afford attorney.  wonder if judge wanted to beat him?  I do

Wow his own lawyer? hmmm wonder if he is paying, someone else is paying or if this attorney is trying to make a name for his self?  Is this a matter of public record? Who pays for the attorney costs, how much they are and so on?

I'm betting it is just someone trying to make a name for himself. It's a very high profile case. He is going to be one the most hated men in America for taking on this case though. Bad choice in my opinion.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Northern Rose on November 20, 2009, 04:14:36 PM
Brad and Carey are on Oprah


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 20, 2009, 04:18:03 PM
http://www.michellesigona.com/2009/11/20/exclusive-inside-shaniyas-home/              Pics from inside the trailer.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 04:22:36 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6465928/   Video of McNeill in court today
so dec 9th is next court date and why did he ask the lawyer if he was limited to district court? he will most likely be up for death penalty and you have to have a certain number of murder trials under your belt before you can try a death penalty case don't you?
i hope when it comes down to it they don't drag it out and cry about needing a new lawyer later


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 20, 2009, 04:24:35 PM
Cigarette burns,Carey saw scrapes on knees, she was told that the burns were accidents, bumped into a cig & another time a heater. From Oprah show


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 04:30:27 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 20, 2009, 04:31:41 PM
Cigarette burns,Carey saw scrapes on knees, she was told that the burns were accidents, bumped into a cig & another time a heater. From Oprah show

How's Oprah reacting to them?  Oprah was molested by someone when she was a child.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 04:31:43 PM
http://www.michellesigona.com/2009/11/20/exclusive-inside-shaniyas-home/              Pics from inside the trailer.
disgusting but not half as bad as i was expecting...
why is there a living room type chair taking up pretty much their entire kitchen?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 04:35:26 PM
http://www.michellesigona.com/2009/11/20/exclusive-inside-shaniyas-home/              Pics from inside the trailer.

I can't get the darn thing to download. Did you see the pics? Can you tell us about them?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 20, 2009, 04:35:30 PM
This article is a few days old, but I haven't seen it posted here:

---------------------------------

McNeill was convicted in April 2008 of drug possession, speeding to elude arrest and assaulting a government official. He was placed on probation for two years but was taken off probation in October – six months early, according to Wayne Marshburn, the Cumberland County director for the state Division of Community Corrections.

Marshburn said McNeill did everything he was supposed to do while under supervision, so probation officers recommended that he be released early and a judge agreed. Cumberland County has 56 probation officers to keep tabs on about 3,500 people, Marshburn said, so they have to move people off probation who are complying with the rules to take on new cases.


"I'm satisfied, as far as that particular issue, that we did what we needed to do in the case," he said. "I don't think anyone who ever worked with him would have anticipated this event."

Teachers at Pauline Jones Elementary School likely wouldn't have expected it either. McNeill was seen as a promising student there and was placed in a program for academically gifted children.

He also attended Hillcrest Middle School and Terry Sanford High School before starting a small electrical company, according to his sister, Tijuana McNeill.

"I feel bad for the other side, and I feel bad he is caught up in it," Tijuana McNeill said.

Mario McNeill was convicted in 2003 of three counts of assault in connection with a triple shooting and several drug charges and was placed on probation, according to state Department of Correction records. He violated probation and was in prison from October 2003 to May 2006.

He also was placed on probation following a January 2007 conviction on another drug charge.

"People that we supervise, in spite of everything we do, they're still going to commit crimes," Marshburn said. "That's disturbing."
DSS investigated mother

A search of court records turned up no previous criminal charges against Davis, but she lived at a home on Wall Street in July that police raided. Officers found "narcotics manufacturing materials" in the house, but no one was charged, according to an incident report.

Neighbors said McNeill was frequently seen with Davis on Mary Street, where Davis lived with her mother before moving to Sleepy Hollow Drive.

The Cumberland County Department of Social Services previously investigated Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son, not Shaniya, according to her uncle, Michael Davis. The case was closed, and Antoinette Davis was able to retain custody of the boy, her uncle said.

DSS Director Brenda Jackson declined to comment on her agency's involvement with the Davis family, citing the criminal investigation into Shaniya's death as well as confidentiality rules for child protective services cases.

Shaniya lived with her father, Bradley Lockhart, and his sister until early October, when Lockhart agreed to let her live with her mother. He said Davis had been trying to improve her life and wanted to be a mother to Shaniya.

About that same time, Shaniya was pulled out of the kindergarten at Morganton Road Elementary School. She wasn't re-enrolled at another public school in Fayetteville, officials said.

http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/6444454/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 20, 2009, 04:36:21 PM
MM's sisters Myspace: http://www.myspace.com/tijuana_aka_tiny


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 04:40:36 PM
http://www.michellesigona.com/2009/11/20/exclusive-inside-shaniyas-home/              Pics from inside the trailer.
I dont see sewage backup.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 20, 2009, 04:46:38 PM
http://www.michellesigona.com/2009/11/20/exclusive-inside-shaniyas-home/              Pics from inside the trailer.

I can't get the darn thing to download. Did you see the pics? Can you tell us about them?
(http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/1579/buggedinsideshaniyacom5.jpg)
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/2074/buggedinsideshaniyacom2.jpg)
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8246/buggedinsideshaniyacom4.jpg)
(http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/1862/buggedinsideshaniyacom6.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
http://www.michellesigona.com/2009/11/20/exclusive-inside-shaniyas-home/              Pics from inside the trailer.

I can't get the darn thing to download. Did you see the pics? Can you tell us about them?
(http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/1579/buggedinsideshaniyacom5.jpg)
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/2074/buggedinsideshaniyacom2.jpg)
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8246/buggedinsideshaniyacom4.jpg)
(http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/1862/buggedinsideshaniyacom6.jpg)

Thanks! Guess they didn't take the time to clean up..ever?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 20, 2009, 04:53:36 PM
http://www.myspace.com/mondrail
Is this Mario?  Looks like him to me.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 04:57:39 PM
http://www.myspace.com/mondrail
Is this Mario?  Looks like him to me.
I thought it looked like him too.  same age


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 05:03:36 PM
O/T How do people know who myspaces are who's?  i always wondered.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 20, 2009, 05:04:48 PM
http://www.myspace.com/mondrail
Is this Mario?  Looks like him to me.

I thought the same thing earlier. I put their faces side by side and they look almost identical. Same age and HS, too. However, I did a search on Mondrail Myrick and quite a bit of legitimate information came up (including a Fayetteville University alumni-program). 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 05:05:35 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I know that Brad and Carey were not directly responsible for what happened to Shaniya.  However ... love for child dictates you do not send her to live with low life in an disgusting environment reflected in the above images and ... not contact her ... check up on her ... even once on almost five weeks.  For crying out loud.  Shaniya was just a five year old little girl who could not look out for herself.  She needed an advocate in her Daddy and Auntie who resided less than 12 miles away from her Mother's "home".

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 05:09:25 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I know that Brad and Carey were not directly responsible for what happened to Shaniya.  However ... love for child dictates you do not send her to live with low life in an disgusting environment reflected in the above images and ... not contact her ... check up on her ... even once on almost five weeks.  For crying out loud.  Shaniya was just a five year old little girl who could not look out for herself.  She needed an advocate in her Daddy and Auntie who resided less than 12 miles away from her Mother's "home".

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet

I am just sick about this.  My grandson is 6 & I would die if not talked to him for a week leta alone a month.  Those songs they learn the things they did are so new and exciting to them and love to listen to it all.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 20, 2009, 05:12:35 PM
http://www.myspace.com/ogfrom93

Marios brother ms


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 20, 2009, 05:15:42 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I know that Brad and Carey were not directly responsible for what happened to Shaniya.  However ... love for child dictates you do not send her to live with low life in an disgusting environment reflected in the above images and ... not contact her ... check up on her ... even once on almost five weeks.  For crying out loud.  Shaniya was just a five year old little girl who could not look out for herself.  She needed an advocate in her Daddy and Auntie who resided less than 12 miles away from her Mother's "home".

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet


I agree with this. I can't imagine handing my child/niece over to just anyone simply because they share the same bloodline. I think their carelessness (esp. dads) with that precious baby girls life is just..terrible. That said, my ANGER lies where it belongs: Shaniyas so called mother, and the monster that took her life.
It really tore me up to read this: "Shaniya loved her mother very much, and she did want to be with her." :( :(


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 05:16:17 PM
http://www.myspace.com/ogfrom93

Marios brother ms
well he says you can ask him anything.  soooooo didn't you call hotel?  maybe you should talk to him?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 20, 2009, 05:19:16 PM
http://www.myspace.com/ogfrom93

Marios brother ms
well he says you can ask him anything.  soooooo didn't you call hotel?  maybe you should talk to him?

Nah.... I'll pass....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: MunkeyMunk on November 20, 2009, 05:22:06 PM
http://www.myspace.com/ogfrom93

Marios brother ms
well he says you can ask him anything.  soooooo didn't you call hotel?  maybe you should talk to him?

Nah.... I'll pass....


Yeah, probably not a good idea....::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 05:38:39 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I know that Brad and Carey were not directly responsible for what happened to Shaniya.  However ... love for child dictates you do not send her to live with low life in an disgusting environment reflected in the above images and ... not contact her ... check up on her ... even once on almost five weeks.  For crying out loud.  Shaniya was just a five year old little girl who could not look out for herself.  She needed an advocate in her Daddy and Auntie who resided less than 12 miles away from her Mother's "home".

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet


I agree with this. I can't imagine handing my child/niece over to just anyone simply because they share the same bloodline. I think their carelessness (esp. dads) with that precious baby girls life is just..terrible. That said, my ANGER lies where it belongs: Shaniyas so called mother, and the monster that took her life.
It really tore me up to read this: "Shaniya loved her mother very much, and she did want to be with her." :( :(

I am just going to say this and if offends others let me say I am sorry. All of the religious talk coming from him is bothering me. He wants to keep his heart pure? The lord will forgive MM if he repents...WTH? His daughter was just raped and killed! I just don't understand that POV. If anyone should not be given a chance to stay out of hell, it should be child rapist and murders.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 05:42:51 PM
I am watching Oprah and Aunt Carey just said that Shaniya loved her mother and that she liked going over there.....So I am thinking that AD  saw Shaniya enough for her to be comfortable around her and that would explain maybe why Aunt Carey did not walk her up to the door....Soooo with Coe not being out of jail very long I am thinking that when Brenda broke up with Mc Niell that AD hooked up with him. I guess the sister did not care as long as he was bringing drugs into the home for them...I think I remember reading somewhere that Brendas new boyfriend was there that night. It looks to me like AD and Mcneill have the same hairstyle I think that even though she is PG with Coe's baby that she was with Mcneill and they decided to throw him under the bus. They said on NG last night that the rent was way overdue and that an eviction notice had been served so that might explain why they did not call for the sewer to be fixed. With Brenda needing money for rent and Coe needing money for medical and AD expecting a baby , Mc Neill and AD may have made this plan.....She calls and says that she is going to keep Shaniya and checks her out of school, tells the dads sister that she is never going to see her again so mow she is isolated from anyone to talk to that might could save her....what I can't figure out is why DCF did not take the boy from the home during the first investigation simply because of the lack of cleaning.....I bet there is not much food in that house either.....trying to make sense of all of this......not to place blame but I wonder when were they  going to try to see little Shaniya again....you would think that at best it would be a real transition for Shaniya and that they would try to see her a lot at first to give her a sense of security...ugh i don't know.....It seems to me that it always leads back to one thing.....DCF dropped the ball again..... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 05:49:02 PM
I am watching Oprah and Aunt Carey just said that Shaniya loved her mother and that she liked going over there.....So I am thinking that AD  saw Shaniya enough for her to be comfortable around her and that would explain maybe why Aunt Carey did not walk her up to the door....Soooo with Coe not being out of jail very long I am thinking that when Brenda broke up with Mc Niell that AD hooked up with him. I guess the sister did not care as long as he was bringing drugs into the home for them...I think I remember reading somewhere that Brendas new boyfriend was there that night. It looks to me like AD and Mcneill have the same hairstyle I think that even though she is PG with Coe's baby that she was with Mcneill and they decided to throw him under the bus. They said on NG last night that the rent was way overdue and that an eviction notice had been served so that might explain why they did not call for the sewer to be fixed. With Brenda needing money for rent and Coe needing money for medical and AD expecting a baby , Mc Neill and AD may have made this plan.....She calls and says that she is going to keep Shaniya and checks her out of school, tells the dads sister that she is never going to see her again so mow she is isolated from anyone to talk to that might could save her....what I can't figure out is why DCF did not take the boy from the home during the first investigation simply because of the lack of cleaning.....I bet there is not much food in that house either.....trying to make sense of all of this......not to place blame but I wonder when were they  going to try to see little Shaniya again....you would think that at best it would be a real transition for Shaniya and that they would try to see her a lot at first to give her a sense of security...ugh i don't know.....It seems to me that it always leads back to one thing.....DCF dropped the ball again..... ::MonkeyConfused::well they say she was visiting and then giving her chance to be mom?  which one mom or weekend?  they are confusing too (brad & carrie)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 05:49:51 PM
I am watching Oprah and Aunt Carey just said that Shaniya loved her mother and that she liked going over there.....So I am thinking that AD  saw Shaniya enough for her to be comfortable around her and that would explain maybe why Aunt Carey did not walk her up to the door....Soooo with Coe not being out of jail very long I am thinking that when Brenda broke up with Mc Niell that AD hooked up with him. I guess the sister did not care as long as he was bringing drugs into the home for them...I think I remember reading somewhere that Brendas new boyfriend was there that night. It looks to me like AD and Mcneill have the same hairstyle I think that even though she is PG with Coe's baby that she was with Mcneill and they decided to throw him under the bus. They said on NG last night that the rent was way overdue and that an eviction notice had been served so that might explain why they did not call for the sewer to be fixed. With Brenda needing money for rent and Coe needing money for medical and AD expecting a baby , Mc Neill and AD may have made this plan.....She calls and says that she is going to keep Shaniya and checks her out of school, tells the dads sister that she is never going to see her again so mow she is isolated from anyone to talk to that might could save her....what I can't figure out is why DCF did not take the boy from the home during the first investigation simply because of the lack of cleaning.....I bet there is not much food in that house either.....trying to make sense of all of this......not to place blame but I wonder when were they  going to try to see little Shaniya again....you would think that at best it would be a real transition for Shaniya and that they would try to see her a lot at first to give her a sense of security...ugh i don't know.....It seems to me that it always leads back to one thing.....DCF dropped the ball again..... ::MonkeyConfused::
well they say she was visiting and then giving her chance to be mom?  which one mom or weekend?  they are confusing too (brad & carrie)
oops sry in your post


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 05:50:23 PM
Also I think that the living room chair is in the kitchen to make room for the mattress that is propped up against the bedroom door to be laid down and make a bed....way too many people staying in this tiny trailer.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 05:51:46 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I know that Brad and Carey were not directly responsible for what happened to Shaniya.  However ... love for child dictates you do not send her to live with low life in an disgusting environment reflected in the above images and ... not contact her ... check up on her ... even once on almost five weeks.  For crying out loud.  Shaniya was just a five year old little girl who could not look out for herself.  She needed an advocate in her Daddy and Auntie who resided less than 12 miles away from her Mother's "home".

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet


I agree with this. I can't imagine handing my child/niece over to just anyone simply because they share the same bloodline. I think their carelessness (esp. dads) with that precious baby girls life is just..terrible. That said, my ANGER lies where it belongs: Shaniyas so called mother, and the monster that took her life.
It really tore me up to read this: "Shaniya loved her mother very much, and she did want to be with her." :( :(

Of course Shaniya loved her Mom.  Of course Shaniya wanted to be with her.  However ... Shaniya was a child and ... could not decern whether a situation or environment was negative or positive in regards to her well-being.  Shaniya thinks like a child.  This little girl had been entrusted to Brad and Carey for most of her life and ... these two adults had a God-given responsibility to make wise choices to protect her.  Both father and aunt failed this child.

My eleven year old grandson wants to go Japan next summer for two week to participate in a Karate competition.  However ... unless Mom or Dad can justify the expense ... accompany him and ... check out the billeting arrangement ... it is not going to happen.  Is he happy about not being given the go ahead.  Not by a long shot.  However ... that's the breaks.  He does not understand that he is way too precious to his parents to take a chance.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 05:52:33 PM
I am watching Oprah and Aunt Carey just said that Shaniya loved her mother and that she liked going over there.....So I am thinking that AD  saw Shaniya enough for her to be comfortable around her and that would explain maybe why Aunt Carey did not walk her up to the door....Soooo with Coe not being out of jail very long I am thinking that when Brenda broke up with Mc Niell that AD hooked up with him. I guess the sister did not care as long as he was bringing drugs into the home for them...I think I remember reading somewhere that Brendas new boyfriend was there that night. It looks to me like AD and Mcneill have the same hairstyle I think that even though she is PG with Coe's baby that she was with Mcneill and they decided to throw him under the bus. They said on NG last night that the rent was way overdue and that an eviction notice had been served so that might explain why they did not call for the sewer to be fixed. With Brenda needing money for rent and Coe needing money for medical and AD expecting a baby , Mc Neill and AD may have made this plan.....She calls and says that she is going to keep Shaniya and checks her out of school, tells the dads sister that she is never going to see her again so mow she is isolated from anyone to talk to that might could save her....what I can't figure out is why DCF did not take the boy from the home during the first investigation simply because of the lack of cleaning.....I bet there is not much food in that house either.....trying to make sense of all of this......not to place blame but I wonder when were they  going to try to see little Shaniya again....you would think that at best it would be a real transition for Shaniya and that they would try to see her a lot at first to give her a sense of security...ugh i don't know.....It seems to me that it always leads back to one thing.....DCF dropped the ball again..... ::MonkeyConfused::
well they say she was visiting and then giving her chance to be mom?  which one mom or weekend?  they are confusing too (brad & carrie)
oops sry in your post
Yes the whole thing is confusing.....I am not quite sure that all is being told .....hummmm


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 05:55:17 PM
The dad confuses me. The aunt, well I figure she was the aunt, not the legal guardian or the mother, she has to do what the dad and mom wanted. From what she has said , her and the mom didn't really see eye to eye.
I think the aunt was the only reasonable person in the child's life. Everyone else seems either drug addicted or off their rocker.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 05:58:54 PM
The dad confuses me. The aunt, well I figure she was the aunt, not the legal guardian or the mother, she has to do what the dad and mom wanted. From what she has said , her and the mom didn't really see eye to eye.
I think the aunt was the only reasonable person in the child's life. Everyone else seems either drug addicted or off their rocker.
maybe the aunt met someone & he was white and didn't approe of walking around with  shanyia?  just a thought.  Grasping at straws


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 06:41:00 PM
MM's sisters Myspace: http://www.myspace.com/tijuana_aka_tiny
well if true then mm's brother
or at least mm's sister's brother
http://www.myspace.com/ogfrom93


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 06:43:29 PM
Im not trying to get racial.  I am white my husband is not.  My family happy for me his family was not.  I am just saying this happens maybe one of them met someone that could not accept?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 06:49:32 PM
http://www.myspace.com/ogfrom93

Marios brother ms
this guy's wife... (mm's sis in law)
the only reason i am posting these links is because they are public and they show pictures of kids and vehicles


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 06:52:03 PM
Also I think that the living room chair is in the kitchen to make room for the mattress that is propped up against the bedroom door to be laid down and make a bed....way too many people staying in this tiny trailer.
whoa at first i thought you were being sarcastic then i realized you're probably right


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 06:56:18 PM
http://www.myspace.com/ogfrom93

Marios brother ms
well he says you can ask him anything.  soooooo didn't you call hotel?  maybe you should talk to him?
geez exactly how many people called the hotel?
what did you ask?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 20, 2009, 07:06:06 PM
MM's sisters Myspace: http://www.myspace.com/tijuana_aka_tiny
well if true then mm's brother
or at least mm's sister's brother
http://www.myspace.com/ogfrom93


Could be! I didn't post his because I wasn't sure.. sometimes my friends & I call eachother brother/sister. You're probably right, though.
I posted Tijuana's Myspace in reference to my post above. Until I read that article, I didn't even know he had a sister. Aside from her, his family has been awfully quiet. My guess is that they're embarrassed & ashamed....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 07:06:40 PM
Also I think that the living room chair is in the kitchen to make room for the mattress that is propped up against the bedroom door to be laid down and make a bed....way too many people staying in this tiny trailer.
whoa at first i thought you were being sarcastic then i realized you're probably right
I am thinking Brenda and her Bf in one bdrm and AD and whoever in her bdrm and all of the kids or extras on the mattress in the floor


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 07:07:52 PM
O/T JVM covering Casey Anthony case


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 20, 2009, 07:35:32 PM
This article is a few days old, but I haven't seen it posted here:

---------------------------------

McNeill was convicted in April 2008 of drug possession, speeding to elude arrest and assaulting a government official. He was placed on probation for two years but was taken off probation in October – six months early, according to Wayne Marshburn, the Cumberland County director for the state Division of Community Corrections.

Marshburn said McNeill did everything he was supposed to do while under supervision, so probation officers recommended that he be released early and a judge agreed. Cumberland County has 56 probation officers to keep tabs on about 3,500 people, Marshburn said, so they have to move people off probation who are complying with the rules to take on new cases.


"I'm satisfied, as far as that particular issue, that we did what we needed to do in the case," he said. "I don't think anyone who ever worked with him would have anticipated this event."

Teachers at Pauline Jones Elementary School likely wouldn't have expected it either. McNeill was seen as a promising student there and was placed in a program for academically gifted children.

He also attended Hillcrest Middle School and Terry Sanford High School before starting a small electrical company, according to his sister, Tijuana McNeill.

"I feel bad for the other side, and I feel bad he is caught up in it," Tijuana McNeill said.

Mario McNeill was convicted in 2003 of three counts of assault in connection with a triple shooting and several drug charges and was placed on probation, according to state Department of Correction records. He violated probation and was in prison from October 2003 to May 2006.

He also was placed on probation following a January 2007 conviction on another drug charge.

"People that we supervise, in spite of everything we do, they're still going to commit crimes," Marshburn said. "That's disturbing."
DSS investigated mother

A search of court records turned up no previous criminal charges against Davis, but she lived at a home on Wall Street in July that police raided. Officers found "narcotics manufacturing materials" in the house, but no one was charged, according to an incident report.

Neighbors said McNeill was frequently seen with Davis on Mary Street, where Davis lived with her mother before moving to Sleepy Hollow Drive.

The Cumberland County Department of Social Services previously investigated Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son, not Shaniya, according to her uncle, Michael Davis. The case was closed, and Antoinette Davis was able to retain custody of the boy, her uncle said.

DSS Director Brenda Jackson declined to comment on her agency's involvement with the Davis family, citing the criminal investigation into Shaniya's death as well as confidentiality rules for child protective services cases.

Shaniya lived with her father, Bradley Lockhart, and his sister until early October, when Lockhart agreed to let her live with her mother. He said Davis had been trying to improve her life and wanted to be a mother to Shaniya.

About that same time, Shaniya was pulled out of the kindergarten at Morganton Road Elementary School. She wasn't re-enrolled at another public school in Fayetteville, officials said.

http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/6444454/
so when and how long did she start going to the new school if ever?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 07:55:42 PM
O/T JVM covering Casey Anthony case
did you see trying to blame it crunk?  supposedly ducked taped ex GF's it said???? idk if true


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 07:58:09 PM
O/T JVM covering Casey Anthony case
did you see trying to blame it crunk?  supposedly ducked taped ex GF's it said???? idk if true
forgot to add how much I hate Jose puke makes me sick


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 08:11:02 PM
on NG they are saying coe really cared for Shanyia and he is distraught.  Maybe he did see momstrer to get info?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 08:16:06 PM
on NG they are saying coe really cared for Shanyia and he is distraught.  Maybe he did see momstrer to get info?
Maybe....because I think that they said that he was at his house that night where he was suppose to be


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 08:18:15 PM
I  wonder if bio dad gave AD any child support for the month of October? Or if the aunt ever took anymore clothes to her?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 08:21:47 PM
I  wonder if bio dad gave AD any child support for the month of October? Or if the aunt ever took anymore clothes to her?
never heard but I feel like Im being such a b**ch just for thinking they are wrong for dropping off and not looking back.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 20, 2009, 08:23:58 PM
PENNY, you asked me last night about my calling the Comfort Inn in Sanford, NC. I didn't see your question until today. Actually, I called the wrong one. I thought at the time it was the Comfort Inn on Horner, and found out afterwards the correct one was on Bragg. I was asking about how many elevators, and how many stories, and how there room numbers ran. Since it was the wrong motel, I just never mention it on the thread since it was irrelevant after all.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 08:34:03 PM
my house looks nowhere near what his house looks like but no way I would drop off my child to live there and not contact her.  It does say in reports nieghbor called to tell brad about shanyia but is that his nieghbor or moms nieghbor?  and he was on phone with aunt while police came to her door.  I just wonder if the moms nieghbor why didn't they tell how bad house was?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 08:35:58 PM
NG show ...landlord saying that there was a lot of traffic at that trailer.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 08:37:39 PM
my house looks nowhere near what his house looks like but no way I would drop off my child to live there and not contact her.  It does say in reports nieghbor called to tell brad about shanyia but is that his nieghbor or moms nieghbor?  and he was on phone with aunt while police came to her door.  I just wonder if the moms nieghbor why didn't they tell how bad house was?
So the neighbor of AD called Brad before police got to his house to tell him?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 08:41:38 PM
NG show ...landlord saying that there was a lot of traffic at that trailer.....
They did have cameras at entrance of trailer park in pics I saw but I never saw images from them.  Maybe just for show


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 08:42:46 PM
my house looks nowhere near what his house looks like but no way I would drop off my child to live there and not contact her.  It does say in reports nieghbor called to tell brad about shanyia but is that his nieghbor or moms nieghbor?  and he was on phone with aunt while police came to her door.  I just wonder if the moms nieghbor why didn't they tell how bad house was?
So the neighbor of AD called Brad before police got to his house to tell him?
as far as read they got aunts name from school as contact


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: New Monkey on November 20, 2009, 08:44:35 PM

HI TG  ::ElfMonkey::  You know what that says to me... as when young ppl text and make up shortened words ... its says to me. " Minors" ...........  omg. That's his Business " Minors".
Holy Mother of God, I gasped when I read this.  I think you are bang on.   ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 20, 2009, 08:49:19 PM
Oh my Gosh...NG...there were 4 children in the home when Shaniya went missing ...Shaniya and her 7 yr old brother and Brendas infant and 2 yr old toddler... ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 20, 2009, 08:52:03 PM
Likely already posted:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

Warrants: Girl abducted, raped, killed on same day
Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: Today at 6:48 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He said little and showed no emotion during a brief court appearance Friday afternoon.

After the hearing, he was transferred from the Cumberland County Detention Center to Central Prison in Raleigh, where he was being kept in a special cell for his protection.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 08:52:05 PM
Oh my Gosh...NG...there were 4 children in the home when Shaniya went missing ...Shaniya and her 7 yr old brother and Brendas infant and 2 yr old toddler... ::MonkeyShocked::
Im sad this almost makes the anthonys look good.  They are just so sick.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 09:05:20 PM
you know if you search you get more from mm than Shanyia.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 20, 2009, 09:30:47 PM
Likely already posted:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

Warrants: Girl abducted, raped, killed on same day
Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: Today at 6:48 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He said little and showed no emotion during a brief court appearance Friday afternoon.

After the hearing, he was transferred from the Cumberland County Detention Center to Central Prison in Raleigh, where he was being kept in a special cell for his protection.

In another video at that same link, there is a long report about mario being transferred to Central Prison in Raleigh.
Antoinette's mother, the lovely and articulate Ann Summers, says that mario: "ain't nuttin' but a maggot" and
that her daughter took good care of her children.  (those photos of that trailer prove otherwise)
The reporter says that Antoinette has a long history of prostitution, but has never been prosecuted.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 09:31:32 PM
I dont recall reading one way or another about if they spoke to her while at AD's or not, has that been released? I wish that detail would be if not, it would give a better understanding of that time. If the dad didn't, that is wrong, wrong, wrong. Another detail I want to know is why when AD threatened to not give Shaniya back, did the dad call and ask what was up? We have one side of a story and I want the other side.

michelle1111
you know if you search you get more from mm than Shanyia


What do you mean?



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 09:34:38 PM
Likely already posted:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

Warrants: Girl abducted, raped, killed on same day
Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: Today at 6:48 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He said little and showed no emotion during a brief court appearance Friday afternoon.

After the hearing, he was transferred from the Cumberland County Detention Center to Central Prison in Raleigh, where he was being kept in a special cell for his protection.

In another video at that same link, there is a long report about mario being transferred to Central Prison in Raleigh.
Antoinette's mother, the lovely and articulate Ann Summers, says that mario: "ain't nuttin' but a maggot" and
that her daughter took good care of her children.  (those photos of that trailer prove otherwise)
The reporter says that Antoinette has a long history of prostitution, but has never been prosecuted.
Apparently her standards are a bit lower then mine would be. If any of my children grew up to do drugs, had babies from several different men, was a prostitute, lived in filth, I would not be so proud! I would especially not stand up and proclaim her to be a good mother when my grandchild lay dead in a morg.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 20, 2009, 09:35:46 PM
Likely already posted:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

Warrants: Girl abducted, raped, killed on same day
Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: Today at 6:48 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He said little and showed no emotion during a brief court appearance Friday afternoon.

After the hearing, he was transferred from the Cumberland County Detention Center to Central Prison in Raleigh, where he was being kept in a special cell for his protection.

In another video at that same link, there is a long report about mario being transferred to Central Prison in Raleigh.
Antoinette's mother, the lovely and articulate Ann Summers, says that mario: "ain't nuttin' but a maggot" and
that her daughter took good care of her children.  (those photos of that trailer prove otherwise)
The reporter says that Antoinette has a long history of prostitution, but has never been prosecuted.
Apparently her standards are a bit lower then mine would be. If any of my children grew up to do drugs, had babies from several different men, was a prostitute, lived in filth, I would not be so proud! I would especially not stand up and proclaim her to be a good mother when my grandchild lay dead in a morg.

Amen to that!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 20, 2009, 09:37:21 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I know that Brad and Carey were not directly responsible for what happened to Shaniya.  However ... love for child dictates you do not send her to live with low life in an disgusting environment reflected in the above images and ... not contact her ... check up on her ... even once on almost five weeks.  For crying out loud.  Shaniya was just a five year old little girl who could not look out for herself.  She needed an advocate in her Daddy and Auntie who resided less than 12 miles away from her Mother's "home".

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet

I am just sick about this.  My grandson is 6 & I would die if not talked to him for a week leta alone a month.  Those songs they learn the things they did are so new and exciting to them and love to listen to it all.

agree with both of you on this..

TracyGirl...I think that one of your posts said something about the father and the religion bit and about forgiving blah blah blah...I felt exactly as you stated above when I heard him say all of that...how could someone not want to rip the head off of the man and woman who had just raped and murdered your 5 yr old daughter???


that trailer was filthy...did anyone see the picture on the counter that looked like it was Jesus? how sacrilegious of them all! a picture of Jesus  in the house with all the evil that went on there!
the landlord said on NG that the sister was on the list to be kicked out of the trailer court cause of all the traffic and for lying to her about who was really living there...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 20, 2009, 09:39:45 PM
Likely already posted:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

Warrants: Girl abducted, raped, killed on same day
Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: Today at 6:48 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He said little and showed no emotion during a brief court appearance Friday afternoon.

After the hearing, he was transferred from the Cumberland County Detention Center to Central Prison in Raleigh, where he was being kept in a special cell for his protection.

In another video at that same link, there is a long report about mario being transferred to Central Prison in Raleigh.
Antoinette's mother, the lovely and articulate Ann Summers, says that mario: "ain't nuttin' but a maggot" and
that her daughter took good care of her children.  (those photos of that trailer prove otherwise)
The reporter says that Antoinette has a long history of prostitution, but has never been prosecuted.
Apparently her standards are a bit lower then mine would be. If any of my children grew up to do drugs, had babies from several different men, was a prostitute, lived in filth, I would not be so proud! I would especially not stand up and proclaim her to be a good mother when my grandchild lay dead in a morg.

Amen to that!

Amen is right! however, AD's mother might have had a similar lifestyle so she sees nothing wrong with it  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 20, 2009, 09:45:13 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I know that Brad and Carey were not directly responsible for what happened to Shaniya.  However ... love for child dictates you do not send her to live with low life in an disgusting environment reflected in the above images and ... not contact her ... check up on her ... even once on almost five weeks.  For crying out loud.  Shaniya was just a five year old little girl who could not look out for herself.  She needed an advocate in her Daddy and Auntie who resided less than 12 miles away from her Mother's "home".

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet

I am just sick about this.  My grandson is 6 & I would die if not talked to him for a week leta alone a month.  Those songs they learn the things they did are so new and exciting to them and love to listen to it all.

agree with both of you on this..

TracyGirl...I think that one of your posts said something about the father and the religion bit and about forgiving blah blah blah...I felt exactly as you stated above when I heard him say all of that...how could someone not want to rip the head off of the man and woman who had just raped and murdered your 5 yr old daughter???

that trailer was filthy...did anyone see the picture on the counter that looked like it was Jesus? how sacrilegious of them all! a picture of Jesus  in the house with all the evil that went on there!
the landlord said on NG that the sister was on the list to be kicked out of the trailer court cause of all the traffic and for lying to her about who was really living there...

Well I am glad it didn't offend you Cookie. I believe in God and all,  but come on already! He seems to be a bit fanantical about it. Who would answer that question that way? If he repents the lord will forgive (not a direct quote) nice thought until you realize he is talking about the man that a week and a half ago raped and killed his 5 year old daughter!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 20, 2009, 09:50:03 PM
here you can read oprah show with brad.  I am not sure if whole interview.
 http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I know that Brad and Carey were not directly responsible for what happened to Shaniya.  However ... love for child dictates you do not send her to live with low life in an disgusting environment reflected in the above images and ... not contact her ... check up on her ... even once on almost five weeks.  For crying out loud.  Shaniya was just a five year old little girl who could not look out for herself.  She needed an advocate in her Daddy and Auntie who resided less than 12 miles away from her Mother's "home".

 ::MonkeyMad::

Janet

I am just sick about this.  My grandson is 6 & I would die if not talked to him for a week leta alone a month.  Those songs they learn the things they did are so new and exciting to them and love to listen to it all.

agree with both of you on this..

TracyGirl...I think that one of your posts said something about the father and the religion bit and about forgiving blah blah blah...I felt exactly as you stated above when I heard him say all of that...how could someone not want to rip the head off of the man and woman who had just raped and murdered your 5 yr old daughter???

that trailer was filthy...did anyone see the picture on the counter that looked like it was Jesus? how sacrilegious of them all! a picture of Jesus  in the house with all the evil that went on there!
the landlord said on NG that the sister was on the list to be kicked out of the trailer court cause of all the traffic and for lying to her about who was really living there...

Well I am glad it didn't offend you Cookie. I believe in God and all,  but come on already! He seems to be a bit fanantical about it. Who would answer that question that way? If he repents the lord will forgive (not a direct quote) nice thought until you realize he is talking about the man that a week and a half ago raped and killed his 5 year old daughter!

I believe that to forgive the unforgivable only means that you have joined the side of evil. Some things can not and should not be forgiven.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 09:50:07 PM
Likely already posted:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

Warrants: Girl abducted, raped, killed on same day
Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: Today at 6:48 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He said little and showed no emotion during a brief court appearance Friday afternoon.

After the hearing, he was transferred from the Cumberland County Detention Center to Central Prison in Raleigh, where he was being kept in a special cell for his protection.

In another video at that same link, there is a long report about mario being transferred to Central Prison in Raleigh.
Antoinette's mother, the lovely and articulate Ann Summers, says that mario: "ain't nuttin' but a maggot" and
that her daughter took good care of her children.  (those photos of that trailer prove otherwise)
The reporter says that Antoinette has a long history of prostitution, but has never been prosecuted.
Oh like the mom never knew the daughter dated him?  losers imo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 20, 2009, 09:50:13 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 09:53:53 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 20, 2009, 10:00:46 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 20, 2009, 10:07:08 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...

I totally agree.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 20, 2009, 10:10:47 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 20, 2009, 10:32:02 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 20, 2009, 10:33:19 PM
dont know if posted here but there is someone arrested yesterday indecent liberties with child 25000 bond.  his name is in the R's.  wonder if has anything with this case? http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx

The one below him was arrested on a conspiracy charge. Jess can you tell what he conspired to do? the charge is this
F:RWDW/F:CONSP RWDW Does this mean anything to you?

hi Tracygirl! Sorry for the late response--it's been a long day.  This is conspiracy to commit robbery with a deadly weapon.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 10:35:48 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?

I was confused on that one too Tina.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 20, 2009, 10:36:24 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...

I totally agree.

Every time I see Brads house on NG I just shudder to think she  went from his house to a filthy environment,even a five year would know the difference...sorry to say this but I looked at the pic of the trailer and just wonder about rodents and roaches, not to mention the ciggy butts laying on the kitchen cabinet...and when they say she got accidentally burned with cig. that alone would be enough for to never let her return to her egg donor think of all the second hand smoke she was exposed to. Does anyone remember in the beginning that the 7yr had cig. burns also ?    ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 20, 2009, 10:46:52 PM
Likely already posted:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/

Warrants: Girl abducted, raped, killed on same day
Shaniya Nicole Davis

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: Today at 6:48 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He said little and showed no emotion during a brief court appearance Friday afternoon.

After the hearing, he was transferred from the Cumberland County Detention Center to Central Prison in Raleigh, where he was being kept in a special cell for his protection.

WTH.......... his protection
ill protect him all the way to the gates of heii
he gave up his rights to protection, when he committed rape and murder of a 5yr old
innocent child IMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 20, 2009, 11:01:20 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?

I was confused on that one too Tina.

Janet


I stopped going on the Nancy Grace facebook fan page site because everyone on there is starting to bring up race and it makes me ill. Apparently only people of color are on welfare (not my words, but if anyone goes on the NG fb page you'll see what I'm talking about.)

What does race have to do with this? Shaniya's dad is white and her mom is black, big deal. A little girl lost her life and all people can talk about is the color of peoples skin and why who slept with who.

As a black woman I'm starting to get offended.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 11:01:41 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

The issue is not the difference between a $240,000 home and a $2,000 trailer.  The issue is the  lifestyle of the mother ... the issue is the filthy environment.  Shaniya's needs ... physical ... spiritual and ... emotional could have been met in that small trailer home by a loving mother.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 20, 2009, 11:08:29 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?

I was confused on that one too Tina.

Janet


I stopped going on the Nancy Grace facebook fan page site because everyone on there is starting to bring up race and it makes me ill. Apparently only people of color are on welfare (not my words, but if anyone goes on the NG fb page you'll see what I'm talking about.)

What does race have to do with this? Shaniya's dad is white and her mom is black, big deal. A little girl lost her life and all people can talk about is the color of peoples skin and why who slept with who.

As a black woman I'm starting to get offended.

Tina

Prior to Michelle's remark ... I did not think that the discussion on this forum was racist at all.  The issue has been a beautiful little girl named Shaniya.  It would not matter to me what race AD and MM were.  They are despicable human beings.  It would not matter what race ... Brad and his sister are.  They were entrusted by God to care for a little girl and ... they failed her miserably.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 20, 2009, 11:23:30 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

The issue is not the difference between a $240,000 home and a $2,000 trailer.  The issue is the  lifestyle of the mother ... the issue is the filthy environment.  Shaniya's needs ... physical ... spiritual and ... emotional could have been met in that small trailer home by a loving mother.

Janet

That is so true! My aunt lived in a mobile home and I loved being over there with my cousins. All you really need is love *and of course money* to raise well rounded children and it's obvious that Shaniya's mother didn't love her (enough).

No person could live in that type of filth if they're of sound mind. Keep in mind the toilet was backed up too. Gross.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 20, 2009, 11:29:05 PM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?

I was confused on that one too Tina.

Janet


I stopped going on the Nancy Grace facebook fan page site because everyone on there is starting to bring up race and it makes me ill. Apparently only people of color are on welfare (not my words, but if anyone goes on the NG fb page you'll see what I'm talking about.)

What does race have to do with this? Shaniya's dad is white and her mom is black, big deal. A little girl lost her life and all people can talk about is the color of peoples skin and why who slept with who.

As a black woman I'm starting to get offended.

Tina

Prior to Michelle's remark ... I did not think that the discussion on this forum was racist at all.  The issue has been a beautiful little girl named Shaniya.  It would not matter to me what race AD and MM were.  They are despicable human beings.  It would not matter what race ... Brad and his sister are.  They were entrusted by God to care for a little girl and ... they failed her miserably.

Janet

The Scaremonkeys board has been race free (besides those odd comments that poster michelle keeps making). I just can't believe that Nancy Grace or the person who runs her facebook page is allowing those people to spew their hatred against an entire race based on what a few have done.

I don't know anyone like Mario McNeil or Antoinette Davis and I hope to NEVER meet them. Drugs didn't just do this to them. Not having a soul and not being able to worry about anyone but themselves did this.

I can't say that the dad failed Shaniya. I don't believe that in my heart. I think he was trying to do the right thing and it blew up in his face.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 21, 2009, 12:03:35 AM
Yes he did blow it. He and a few other people had there doubts but decided to let shaniya go anyway. Makes no sence. And what really makes no sence to me is how n the he** do you not go in the place you are dropping shaniya off at. No way in this world would I EVER do that.I do believe that the dad and aunt will always for the rest of there life regret ever ever giving that egg donor a chance to b a mom. Just how I feel. Imo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 21, 2009, 12:24:52 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?

I was confused on that one too Tina.

Janet


I stopped going on the Nancy Grace facebook fan page site because everyone on there is starting to bring up race and it makes me ill. Apparently only people of color are on welfare (not my words, but if anyone goes on the NG fb page you'll see what I'm talking about.)

What does race have to do with this? Shaniya's dad is white and her mom is black, big deal. A little girl lost her life and all people can talk about is the color of peoples skin and why who slept with who.

As a black woman I'm starting to get offended.

Tina

Prior to Michelle's remark ... I did not think that the discussion on this forum was racist at all.  The issue has been a beautiful little girl named Shaniya.  It would not matter to me what race AD and MM were.  They are despicable human beings.  It would not matter what race ... Brad and his sister are.  They were entrusted by God to care for a little girl and ... they failed her miserably.

Janet

The Scaremonkeys board has been race free (besides those odd comments that poster michelle keeps making). I just can't believe that Nancy Grace or the person who runs her facebook page is allowing those people to spew their hatred against an entire race based on what a few have done.

I don't know anyone like Mario McNeil or Antoinette Davis and I hope to NEVER meet them. Drugs didn't just do this to them. Not having a soul and not being able to worry about anyone but themselves did this.

I can't say that the dad failed Shaniya. I don't believe that in my heart. I think he was trying to do the right thing and it blew up in his face.

This message is for Michelle1111

Drop the race issue.  Also drop the trailer (mobile home) talk as well.  I have many friends that are of mixed race and I'm offended by anyone thinking that in this day and age, it would make a difference.  My inlaws used to live in a very nice double wide mobile home out here in Calif.  Here's a mobile home for sale in Huntington Beach for $95,000.

http://www.trulia.com/property/1080849176-21851-Newland-St-Huntington-Beach-CA-92646

You are new to SM so I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.  Please stick to the crime and not the race.  TIA


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ISpy on November 21, 2009, 01:07:46 AM
sorry to be misleading guys as of now this is the only valid review i have found for that exact hotel

I hope I'm wrong, but the first thought that ran through my mind upon reading this review was maybe the small children running through the hallways unattended by adults at 2-3 a.m. were trying to escape from somebody.  You better believe if I saw small children running around anywhere at 2-3 a.m. unattended, I'd call Hotel Security first and Police second... Child negligence at best, criminal at worst.  My personal philosophy is if a situation doesn't look/feel right after some observation, I call the Police and let them sort it out.  Did I mention I am sincerely grateful and thankful for my Police Dept.?  They are excellent! 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 21, 2009, 01:18:08 AM
The dad confuses me. The aunt, well I figure she was the aunt, not the legal guardian or the mother, she has to do what the dad and mom wanted. From what she has said , her and the mom didn't really see eye to eye.
I think the aunt was the only reasonable person in the child's life. Everyone else seems either drug addicted or off their rocker.
maybe the aunt met someone & he was white and didn't approe of walking around with  shanyia?  just a thought.  Grasping at straws

Wow. That thought never even crossed my mind.  ::MonkeyEek::
I highly doubt that would be the case... Carey comes across as genuine, imo. Certainly not the type that would send a child they loved and cared for (very well, might I add) away because of something so ridiculously asinine...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 21, 2009, 01:27:05 AM
Hopefully no one thinks I was talking about race! I don't give a darn what color skin a person has, how much money they have or what God they have chosen to believe it. We are all in this together. My hatred for people that sell, rape and murder children goes beyond the color of their skin or what is in their bank accounts.

This is not about race however, it is about a little girl who was stunningly beautiful,  who died far too young at the hands of a man who doesn't deserve to take his next breath and a mother who sadly didn't realize just how precious her daughter was and how far better she was then the drugs she sold her for.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 21, 2009, 01:28:36 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?

I was confused on that one too Tina.

Janet


I stopped going on the Nancy Grace facebook fan page site because everyone on there is starting to bring up race and it makes me ill. Apparently only people of color are on welfare (not my words, but if anyone goes on the NG fb page you'll see what I'm talking about.)

What does race have to do with this? Shaniya's dad is white and her mom is black, big deal. A little girl lost her life and all people can talk about is the color of peoples skin and why who slept with who.

As a black woman I'm starting to get offended.

As a white woman who was raised by white parents on welfare, I take offense to those types of comments as well. This isn't directed to anyone specific here- but in general. I have no desire to read NG's Facebook because I have zero tolerance for that type of arrogant ignorance.
You're absolutely right... What is important is this sweet little girl that lost her life and the system that has failed her. :(


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Blumonkey on November 21, 2009, 01:33:41 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

The issue is not the difference between a $240,000 home and a $2,000 trailer.  The issue is the  lifestyle of the mother ... the issue is the filthy environment.  Shaniya's needs ... physical ... spiritual and ... emotional could have been met in that small trailer home by a loving mother.

Janet

Janet, you are so right. When I was a child I loved to spend time with my grandparents who lived a very simple, humble lifestyle. They always had time to make me feel safe and special. My grandmother told me more than once "Not everyone can be rich, but everyone in America can be clean." The adults in Shaniya's life failed her on so many levels. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 21, 2009, 01:38:51 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

The issue is not the difference between a $240,000 home and a $2,000 trailer.  The issue is the  lifestyle of the mother ... the issue is the filthy environment.  Shaniya's needs ... physical ... spiritual and ... emotional could have been met in that small trailer home by a loving mother.

Janet

Perfectly said Janet.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ISpy on November 21, 2009, 02:53:38 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

The issue is not the difference between a $240,000 home and a $2,000 trailer.  The issue is the  lifestyle of the mother ... the issue is the filthy environment.  Shaniya's needs ... physical ... spiritual and ... emotional could have been met in that small trailer home by a loving mother.

Janet

Janet, you are so right. When I was a child I loved to spend time with my grandparents who lived a very simple, humble lifestyle. They always had time to make me feel safe and special. My grandmother told me more than once "Not everyone can be rich, but everyone in America can be clean." The adults in Shaniya's life failed her on so many levels. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Janet- Well said! Rich people are often emotionally and spiritually poor and financially poor people are often the richest.

O/T Blumonkey- ITA!  Recently, I had the opportunity to eat at a community Hunter's Supper with relatives in my father's "poor" hometown.  I finished eating and while I waited on my relatives, I took a few minutes to listen to the constant hum of folks visiting together and sharing news. I was struck by the sense of community, the easy comradery that comes with knowing your neighbor.  I observed the sea of camouflage, worn by simple people...just as acceptable as more the fashionable outfits worn by a few.  I thought about several other people I know (who would invariably look down on these community members) and felt sorry for them.  These "poor" people were richer by far.  The proud people were the "poor" ones, IMO.

While I feel for Shaniya's father (no one should have to go through this), I'd like to know what he was thinking too.  It's not like AD had been stable and a constant in Shaniya's life for years.  When Brad says it was a one night stand, did he hire a prostitute?  Not saying he did, just asking the question.  I can understand wanting to give the mom a chance, but that should have begun with AD coming to his house for supervised visits for a loooong time, followed by AD taking Shaniya out on supervised jaunts to the park/ice cream parlor/playground.  Then, supervised visits to AD's home for a looong time.  All of this, hopefully coupled with, discreet inquiries to AD's neighborhood police officer regarding drug activity in the immediate neighborhood...at the least.  Not trying to condemn the man, just saying.  MO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ISpy on November 21, 2009, 02:54:21 AM
Time to head out.  Have a good evening and take care.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: michelle1111 on November 21, 2009, 03:10:18 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?
I wondered if she had met someone that was white and maybe that is why they sent Shanyia off & tuff on relationship.  only because I can't make any sense of this and looking for reason that the aunt walked.  not that anyone has to answer to me but my own head just is trying to justify this & no price of house means nothing but higher price usually = lower crime better schools in most cases.


Michelle1111 I just wanted to be certain you saw this message to you from Klaasend, the administrator of this forum.  You would do well to heed her warning. MuffyBee


Drop the race issue.  Also drop the trailer (mobile home) talk as well.  I have many friends that are of mixed race and I'm offended by anyone thinking that in this day and age, it would make a difference.  My inlaws used to live in a very nice double wide mobile home out here in Calif.  Here's a mobile home for sale in Huntington Beach for $95,000.

http://www.trulia.com/property/1080849176-21851-Newland-St-Huntington-Beach-CA-92646

You are new to SM so I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.  Please stick to the crime and not the race.  TIA


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 21, 2009, 03:15:07 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

The issue is not the difference between a $240,000 home and a $2,000 trailer.  The issue is the  lifestyle of the mother ... the issue is the filthy environment.  Shaniya's needs ... physical ... spiritual and ... emotional could have been met in that small trailer home by a loving mother.

Janet

Janet, you are so right. When I was a child I loved to spend time with my grandparents who lived a very simple, humble lifestyle. They always had time to make me feel safe and special. My grandmother told me more than once "Not everyone can be rich, but everyone in America can be clean." The adults in Shaniya's life failed her on so many levels. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Janet- Well said! Rich people are often emotionally and spiritually poor and financially poor people are often the richest.

O/T Blumonkey- ITA!  Recently, I had the opportunity to eat at a community Hunter's Supper with relatives in my father's "poor" hometown.  I finished eating and while I waited on my relatives, I took a few minutes to listen to the constant hum of folks visiting together and sharing news. I was struck by the sense of community, the easy comradery that comes with knowing your neighbor.  I observed the sea of camouflage, worn by simple people...just as acceptable as more the fashionable outfits worn by a few.  I thought about several other people I know (who would invariably look down on these community members) and felt sorry for them.  These "poor" people were richer by far.  The proud people were the "poor" ones, IMO.

While I feel for Shaniya's father (no one should have to go through this), I'd like to know what he was thinking too.  It's not like AD had been stable and a constant in Shaniya's life for years.  When Brad says it was a one night stand, did he hire a prostitute?  Not saying he did, just asking the question.  I can understand wanting to give the mom a chance, but that should have begun with AD coming to his house for supervised visits for a loooong time, followed by AD taking Shaniya out on supervised jaunts to the park/ice cream parlor/playground.  Then, supervised visits to AD's home for a looong time.  All of this, hopefully coupled with, discreet inquiries to AD's neighborhood police officer regarding drug activity in the immediate neighborhood...at the least.  Not trying to condemn the man, just saying.  MO

I agree with everything you wrote! It's not about the price of your house or clothes the only thing that truly matters is what's in your heart.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 21, 2009, 03:21:30 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?
I wondered if she had met someone that was white and maybe that is why they sent Shanyia off & tuff on relationship.  only because I can't make any sense of this and looking for reason that the aunt walked.  not that anyone has to answer to me but my own head just is trying to justify this & no price of house means nothing but higher price usually = lower crime better schools in most cases.

I don't know many people in this day and age who would think like that. I'm not saying it doesn't happen. Bradley Lockhart seems to have multiple mixed race children and his family seems to love them unconditionally. He most likely came from a background where race doesn't matter.

As an aunt if some man walked into my life and said he couldn't accept my niece or nephew because of their race I'd send him walking. No one gets in the way of my family.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 03:58:28 AM
O/T 
Had a couple of trojans in my comp, did a system restore.  Took all day to get things adjusted and am back up and running, good as new. 


On Topic...........
I saw the pic taken by the one who went to the hotel, of the carpet pattern.  As some in here have said, it looks like the same pattern on the carpet, but off a bit somehow. 

For those monkeys who are good with pics, could you check out the following, if you haven't already?  Seems that one or more of the three pics we've already been looking at, may have been flipped.  That *could* account for why the pattern on the carpet seems a bit off.  But my main reason in thinking that is because of the elevator seen in the pic taken by that person vs. the three we already had. 

The number of the elevator is inside the doorframe (near where the doors open).  In the 3 pics we've been looking at, when it can be seen, that number is on the left.  But in the 4th and newer pic, that number is on the right.  Can you guys flip the pics with that number shown, so they are the same, then compare side by side?  Hope this makes sense!  The carpet pattern might even match up, who knows?  lol 

And I agree with those who are thinking that of the three pics that LE released, it seems that at least one is of Shaniya being carried 'out', while at least one is of her being carried 'in'.  She just looks sooooo different in the middle pic.  IMO.  Why LE would say they are all three of her being carried in, if they actually weren't, I dunno.   



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 04:05:16 AM

Someone mentioned there was internet access, was that access within the rooms, or out in the lobby?  If within the rooms, am hoping that LE has checked that room's comp. for a history of live streaming, cam, etc.   

Child porn crosses my mind, as does Shaniya's death having possibly been made into a "snuff film".   ::MonkeyWaa::

The reason I'm wondering all that... is because of the "robbery" that was at McNeill and gf's home (was it the same day he was arrested or in the days following?), and an E-machine was taken, or attempted?  I know there was some discussion in here earlier on. 

Could there be something accessed on the net in the hotel's comp that has to do with something similiar in that E-machine at McNeil's home? 

Just wondering if someone really really REALLY didn't want whatever may have been on that E-machine to be taken as evidence in Shaniya's case, so staged a robbery to make it go missing. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 05:24:47 AM
Obituary


Published: 12:00 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
Shaniya N. Davis


FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

Shaniya was a happy, loving and friendly little girl. She was a good little helper around the house. She loved to play dress up and do girly things like fixing hair and playing with her Barbie dolls. She loved playing outside and riding her scooter. Pink and yellow were her favorite colors. She was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School.

You came into our lives

for a little while.

You left footprints on

our hearts, and we will

never be the same!

She leaves behind to cherish her memories her father, Bradley W. Lockhart of Fayetteville; her mother, Antoinette Davis of Fayetteville; paternal grandparents, William and Stephanie Raynor of Lexington Park, Md.; maternal grandparents, Carl and Priscilla Summers; maternal great-grandmother, Sarah Davis; maternal great-great-grandmother, Hunter Blue; four brothers, Byron Coleman of Charlotte, Alijah Fogle of Titusville, Fla., Chavez Lockhart and Joe Davis, both of Fayetteville; two sisters, Michele Coleman of Michigan and Cheyenne Lockhart of Fayetteville; two aunts, Brenda Davis and Sara Davis; four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell; six great-uncles, Mike Davis, Levon Davis, Derrick Davis, Sylvester Davis, Larry Mitchell and Arthur Cromartie of Fayetteville; her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives.

The family will receive friends from 5 to 9 p.m. today, Nov. 21, 2009, at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, 500 Ramsey St., Fayetteville.

Funeral services will be conducted at 3 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at Manna Church with the Rev. Johnny C. Davis officiating. She will be laid to rest at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery.

Pallbearers will be Mike Owens, Joseph Santiago, Byron Coleman and Chavez Lockhart. Honorary pallbearers will be Steve Gilliam, Joe McGee, Tony Eason and her kindergarten class at Morganton Road Elementary School.

Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304.

Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/21/954064


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on November 21, 2009, 07:43:28 AM
http://www.duniyalive.com/?p=75246
Shaniya Davis’ father appears on ‘Oprah Winfrey Show’
Posted on November 21st, 2009 in America
New York: Shaniya Davis’s father Bradley Lockhart appeared in the ‘Oprah infrey Show’ on Friday. Lockhart and his sister, Carey appeared in the interview.

Shaniya Davis was a 5-year-old girl, whose dead body was recovered from Fayetteville area. The girl went missing from a local hotel last week.

Shaniya’s dead body was located in an area bordered by Highway 87 south and Walker Road - just south of Sanford - during a second day of searching.

Meanwhile, Shaniya’s mother Antoinette Nicole Davis was charged with human trafficking, child abuse and prostitution. She has been arrested on several charges.

According to the reports, Nicole Davis is being questioned by the Fayetteville police in extensive way. According to the Fayetteville police, Shaniya was last seen with 29-year-old Mario McNeill, with whom she went out.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tams on November 21, 2009, 08:55:54 AM
Obituary


Published: 12:00 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
Shaniya N. Davis


FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

Shaniya was a happy, loving and friendly little girl. She was a good little helper around the house. She loved to play dress up and do girly things like fixing hair and playing with her Barbie dolls. She loved playing outside and riding her scooter. Pink and yellow were her favorite colors. She was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School.

You came into our lives

for a little while.

You left footprints on

our hearts, and we will

never be the same!

She leaves behind to cherish her memories her father, Bradley W. Lockhart of Fayetteville; her mother, Antoinette Davis of Fayetteville; paternal grandparents, William and Stephanie Raynor of Lexington Park, Md.; maternal grandparents, Carl and Priscilla Summers; maternal great-grandmother, Sarah Davis; maternal great-great-grandmother, Hunter Blue; four brothers, Byron Coleman of Charlotte, Alijah Fogle of Titusville, Fla., Chavez Lockhart and Joe Davis, both of Fayetteville; two sisters, Michele Coleman of Michigan and Cheyenne Lockhart of Fayetteville; two aunts, Brenda Davis and Sara Davis; four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell; six great-uncles, Mike Davis, Levon Davis, Derrick Davis, Sylvester Davis, Larry Mitchell and Arthur Cromartie of Fayetteville; her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives.

The family will receive friends from 5 to 9 p.m. today, Nov. 21, 2009, at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, 500 Ramsey St., Fayetteville.

Funeral services will be conducted at 3 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at Manna Church with the Rev. Johnny C. Davis officiating. She will be laid to rest at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery.

Pallbearers will be Mike Owens, Joseph Santiago, Byron Coleman and Chavez Lockhart. Honorary pallbearers will be Steve Gilliam, Joe McGee, Tony Eason and her kindergarten class at Morganton Road Elementary School.

Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304.

Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/21/954064


. . . Where is Aunt Carey Lockhart-Davis mentioned?! How very odd . . . especially given that she was her primary caretaker.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 21, 2009, 09:02:05 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

The issue is not the difference between a $240,000 home and a $2,000 trailer.  The issue is the  lifestyle of the mother ... the issue is the filthy environment.  Shaniya's needs ... physical ... spiritual and ... emotional could have been met in that small trailer home by a loving mother.

Janet

Perfectly said Janet.

yes...well said...any comments that I may or may not have made about the bio does not have anything to do with her living in a mobile home vs a frame home...it has to do with the WAY that she lived in that home...she could have lived in a home like the dad lives in and it could have still been a pit! which it was! my mother lives in a very very nice mobile home and it is clean and tidy...so no criticism from me on that issue....but trash is trash no matter where one lives...just because someone lives in a not so fancy house doesn't mean that it can't be clean and kept up..there is no excuse for the way that that home of bio's looked inside except for pure laziness...jmo



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tams on November 21, 2009, 09:14:09 AM

Someone mentioned there was internet access, was that access within the rooms, or out in the lobby?  If within the rooms, am hoping that LE has checked that room's comp. for a history of live streaming, cam, etc.   

Child porn crosses my mind, as does Shaniya's death having possibly been made into a "snuff film".   ::MonkeyWaa::

The reason I'm wondering all that... is because of the "robbery" that was at McNeill and gf's home (was it the same day he was arrested or in the days following?), and an E-machine was taken, or attempted?  I know there was some discussion in here earlier on. 

Could there be something accessed on the net in the hotel's comp that has to do with something similiar in that E-machine at McNeil's home? 

Just wondering if someone really really REALLY didn't want whatever may have been on that E-machine to be taken as evidence in Shaniya's case, so staged a robbery to make it go missing. 


Hi Wyks!  ::CowWave::

I completely agree with you re: this was all for child porn of some sort- perhaps even something much larger than just him acting alone. MM is just a thug who has been involved in a number of 'enterprising' activities, including theft and drug dealing; playing broker or delivery guy in the world of child trafficking/porn would not be a stretch of the imagination.

I must have missed the robbery at McNeill's thing though . . . certainly would sound an alarm, I should think. Shall try to go back and find that. (I also confess to not knowing what an 'E machine' is - assuming it is a computer/data storage or transfer device of some sort - LOL.) Will go google that now. . . Thanks for the info, Wyks.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 21, 2009, 09:16:53 AM
Obituary


Published: 12:00 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
Shaniya N. Davis


FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

Shaniya was a happy, loving and friendly little girl. She was a good little helper around the house. She loved to play dress up and do girly things like fixing hair and playing with her Barbie dolls. She loved playing outside and riding her scooter. Pink and yellow were her favorite colors. She was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School.

You came into our lives

for a little while.

You left footprints on

our hearts, and we will

never be the same!

She leaves behind to cherish her memories her father, Bradley W. Lockhart of Fayetteville; her mother, Antoinette Davis of Fayetteville; paternal grandparents, William and Stephanie Raynor of Lexington Park, Md.; maternal grandparents, Carl and Priscilla Summers; maternal great-grandmother, Sarah Davis; maternal great-great-grandmother, Hunter Blue; four brothers, Byron Coleman of Charlotte, Alijah Fogle of Titusville, Fla., Chavez Lockhart and Joe Davis, both of Fayetteville; two sisters, Michele Coleman of Michigan and Cheyenne Lockhart of Fayetteville; two aunts, Brenda Davis and Sara Davis; four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell; six great-uncles, Mike Davis, Levon Davis, Derrick Davis, Sylvester Davis, Larry Mitchell and Arthur Cromartie of Fayetteville; her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives.

The family will receive friends from 5 to 9 p.m. today, Nov. 21, 2009, at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, 500 Ramsey St., Fayetteville.

Funeral services will be conducted at 3 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at Manna Church with the Rev. Johnny C. Davis officiating. She will be laid to rest at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery.

Pallbearers will be Mike Owens, Joseph Santiago, Byron Coleman and Chavez Lockhart. Honorary pallbearers will be Steve Gilliam, Joe McGee, Tony Eason and her kindergarten class at Morganton Road Elementary School.

Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304.

Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/21/954064


. . . Where is Aunt Carey Lockhart-Davis mentioned?! How very odd . . . especially given that she was her primary caretaker.


I might not have the right to say  this but no way on Gods green earth would have listed the mother that was in fact just as responsible for the death of her child she sold her child for drugs and sold her own soul to the devil...this is very upsetting to me...and not to mention aunt Carey the one person that seems to have really loved Shaniya is not in orbit. ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 09:33:41 AM
O.T.

The reason for the Feces on the doorknobs, railing, backporch, tub, etc. is for the landlord,this is only a theory of mine.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tams on November 21, 2009, 09:34:27 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

The issue is not the difference between a $240,000 home and a $2,000 trailer.  The issue is the  lifestyle of the mother ... the issue is the filthy environment.  Shaniya's needs ... physical ... spiritual and ... emotional could have been met in that small trailer home by a loving mother.

Janet

Perfectly said Janet.

yes...well said...any comments that I may or may not have made about the bio does not have anything to do with her living in a mobile home vs a frame home...it has to do with the WAY that she lived in that home...she could have lived in a home like the dad lives in and it could have still been a pit! which it was! my mother lives in a very very nice mobile home and it is clean and tidy...so no criticism from me on that issue....but trash is trash no matter where one lives...just because someone lives in a not so fancy house doesn't mean that it can't be clean and kept up..there is no excuse for the way that that home of bio's looked inside except for pure laziness...jmo



Good Morning Cookie!   :smt006

Your reply is spot on, IMO . . . and, in addition to the physical filth, these poor children were surrounded by an environment filled with drugs, prostitution, and all the lack of values and conscience that accompanies such an emotionally filthy lifestyle. Money/assets & social standing alone do not make a loving & nurturing environment for raising children. History is filled with stories of people raised to become productive, accomplished adults with little more than love, attention, & devotion.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: MuffyBee on November 21, 2009, 09:47:59 AM
When ole Brad said on Oprah "that he tried to keep his heart pure" I thought I would puke.

I would have more respect for him if he was on the jailhouse steps demanding a hanging.
god help me nut you have a 240000 house and you drop a child in a maybe 2000 trailer. I am sorry you wrong imo

I know right? Shaniya goes from Brad's home to live in that junk house and he doesn't think that it might affect her? did no one walk this little girl up to that trailer and look around once the door was opened? The dad said that AD had not lived in very good neighborhoods...so he allowed his daughter to go there? would he have stayed in that trailer but he allowed Shaniya to go there? and Carrie too...I believe that she loved Shaniya probably more than anyone...I am thinking that Brad would have let her keep Shaniya if she wanted to...what did she think when driving away from that nasty hole that she had just dropped this little girl off at? I don't think that I could live with myself if I was any of these people...my guilt and grief would be too overpowering...
oh wait if we listen to cheyeene(sp) he didn't take care of any kids so what does the sisters house look like?  and does she hsve mixed kids too?

What does having mixed kids have to do with anything?
I wondered if she had met someone that was white and maybe that is why they sent Shanyia off & tuff on relationship.  only because I can't make any sense of this and looking for reason that the aunt walked.  not that anyone has to answer to me but my own head just is trying to justify this & no price of house means nothing but higher price usually = lower crime better schools in most cases.


Michelle1111 I just wanted to be certain you saw this message to you from Klaasend, the administrator of this forum.  You would do well to heed her warning. MuffyBee


Drop the race issue.  Also drop the trailer (mobile home) talk as well.  I have many friends that are of mixed race and I'm offended by anyone thinking that in this day and age, it would make a difference.  My inlaws used to live in a very nice double wide mobile home out here in Calif.  Here's a mobile home for sale in Huntington Beach for $95,000.

http://www.trulia.com/property/1080849176-21851-Newland-St-Huntington-Beach-CA-92646

You are new to SM so I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.  Please stick to the crime and not the race.  TIA

Bumping this up to be certain it's seen.  MuffyBee


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 21, 2009, 10:00:07 AM
May have already been posted:

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/20/953940

Published: 05:07 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
McNeil told he may get death penalty
By Nick Needham
Staff writer


Mario Andrette McNeill could receive the death penalty if convicted of killing 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

That was what Judge George Franks told McNeill during a hearing Friday at the Cumberland County Detention Center.

McNeill, 29, of the 2600 block of Pine Springs Drive, was charged Thursday night with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He faces life in prison without parole on the rape charge.

McNeill attended the short hearing with his lawyer, Allen Rodgers, by his side.

McNeill's mother also attended the hearing. She made no comments to the media.

McNeill was already in jail, charged with first-degree kidnapping of Shaniya, whose body was found Monday off Walker Road in Lee County.

Following Friday's hearing, McNeill was transferred to Central Prison in Raleigh for safekeeping until his next court date on Dec. 9.

Rodgers didn't indicate whether McNeill would plead not guilty to the charges.

"The only thing he's admitting to at this time is that he's the man with the child in the surveillance video," Rogers said last week.

Shaniya was reported missing from her home off Murchison Road on Nov. 10. McNeill is accused of taking the girl and traveling to a Sanford hotel with her.

Shaniya was last seen alive leaving the motel with McNeill about 11/2hours later, police say.

McNeill turned himself in to police Nov. 13 and was charged with kidnapping Shaniya.

Police searched McNeill's car the same day for any evidence that Shaniya might have been in the car.

The following day, Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, 25, of the 1100 block of Sleepy Hollow Road, was charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution, obstructing an investigation and filling a false police report.

Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, told TV host Oprah Winfrey on Friday that he learned how his daughter died from a Fayetteville police detective before the information was released to the media.

Oprah asked Lockhart if he thought Davis was a good mother.

"I felt in my heart she had the intentions to be.... I never seen any anger or hatred toward Shaniya,'' Lockhart said.

Davis' mother, Ann Summers, was waiting to see when she could visit her daughter, who is in jail.

Summers said that she has faith in her daughter and that McNeill was wrong for doing what he is accused of - kidnapping, raping and killing Shaniya.

"Life had just started for that child," she said.

Davis was not involved in drugs or prostitution, Summer said, and she provided a safe environment for Shaniya.

"She wouldn't hurt her children; my daughter is a good mother," Summers said.

A sheriff's spokeswoman said Davis had been arrested in the past on drug and prostitution charges, but she was not convicted.

Davis, whose lawyer is D.W. Bray, remains in jail with bail set at $51,000.

Shaniya's family will receive friends from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. Saturday at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home on Ramsey Street.

Her funeral will be at Manna Church at 3 p.m. Sunday. She will be buried at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 21, 2009, 10:23:25 AM
Thank-you for all the updates. I've read, but don't know if it is true, that Brad is engaged, maybe part of the reason he let Shaniya go there to stay longer is the new fiancee didn't want kids around.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 10:28:40 AM
May have already been posted:

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/20/953940

Published: 05:07 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
McNeil told he may get death penalty
By Nick Needham
Staff writer


Mario Andrette McNeill could receive the death penalty if convicted of killing 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

That was what Judge George Franks told McNeill during a hearing Friday at the Cumberland County Detention Center.

McNeill, 29, of the 2600 block of Pine Springs Drive, was charged Thursday night with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He faces life in prison without parole on the rape charge.

McNeill attended the short hearing with his lawyer, Allen Rodgers, by his side.

McNeill's mother also attended the hearing. She made no comments to the media.

McNeill was already in jail, charged with first-degree kidnapping of Shaniya, whose body was found Monday off Walker Road in Lee County.

Following Friday's hearing, McNeill was transferred to Central Prison in Raleigh for safekeeping until his next court date on Dec. 9.

Rodgers didn't indicate whether McNeill would plead not guilty to the charges.

"The only thing he's admitting to at this time is that he's the man with the child in the surveillance video," Rogers said last week.

Shaniya was reported missing from her home off Murchison Road on Nov. 10. McNeill is accused of taking the girl and traveling to a Sanford hotel with her.

Shaniya was last seen alive leaving the motel with McNeill about 11/2hours later, police say.

McNeill turned himself in to police Nov. 13 and was charged with kidnapping Shaniya.

Police searched McNeill's car the same day for any evidence that Shaniya might have been in the car.

The following day, Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, 25, of the 1100 block of Sleepy Hollow Road, was charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution, obstructing an investigation and filling a false police report.

Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, told TV host Oprah Winfrey on Friday that he learned how his daughter died from a Fayetteville police detective before the information was released to the media.

Oprah asked Lockhart if he thought Davis was a good mother.

"I felt in my heart she had the intentions to be.... I never seen any anger or hatred toward Shaniya,'' Lockhart said.

Davis' mother, Ann Summers, was waiting to see when she could visit her daughter, who is in jail.

Summers said that she has faith in her daughter and that McNeill was wrong for doing what he is accused of - kidnapping, raping and killing Shaniya.

"Life had just started for that child," she said.

Davis was not involved in drugs or prostitution, Summer said, and she provided a safe environment for Shaniya.

"She wouldn't hurt her children; my daughter is a good mother," Summers said.

A sheriff's spokeswoman said Davis had been arrested in the past on drug and prostitution charges, but she was not convicted.

Davis, whose lawyer is D.W. Bray, remains in jail with bail set at $51,000.

Shaniya's family will receive friends from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. Saturday at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home on Ramsey Street.

Her funeral will be at Manna Church at 3 p.m. Sunday. She will be buried at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery.

Casey Anthony was a good mother", Ted Bundy was a good son. People are greedy, did A.D. have an Insurance Policy
on her child?  MM and AD hatch a plan at the nursing home to make money off her child?  Why would MM think it was OK
for him to do what he did? 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Mary on November 21, 2009, 11:16:54 AM
Questions:
Why was Aunt Carey left off obituary?
I see that he has 7 kids? (busy guy)
I don't believe that MM rented that room, nobody has said he was checked in?
I don't know how they can prove he raped her, because after that many days
the DNA would have been to degraded, unless he confessed or bugs where tested
(I didn't want to say maggots)
I'm sorry but I believe that MM has had help from someone in LE or court system
from his first conviction when he got probation on a very serious charge?
I also think thats why he smirks in his pictures, its like he's saying prove it.
I wish the FBI was in charge of this. I don't trust the locals at all.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 21, 2009, 11:18:47 AM
Obituary


Published: 12:00 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
Shaniya N. Davis


FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

Shaniya was a happy, loving and friendly little girl. She was a good little helper around the house. She loved to play dress up and do girly things like fixing hair and playing with her Barbie dolls. She loved playing outside and riding her scooter. Pink and yellow were her favorite colors. She was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School.

You came into our lives

for a little while.

You left footprints on

our hearts, and we will

never be the same!

She leaves behind to cherish her memories her father, Bradley W. Lockhart of Fayetteville; her mother, Antoinette Davis of Fayetteville; paternal grandparents, William and Stephanie Raynor of Lexington Park, Md.; maternal grandparents, Carl and Priscilla Summers; maternal great-grandmother, Sarah Davis; maternal great-great-grandmother, Hunter Blue; four brothers, Byron Coleman of Charlotte, Alijah Fogle of Titusville, Fla., Chavez Lockhart and Joe Davis, both of Fayetteville; two sisters, Michele Coleman of Michigan and Cheyenne Lockhart of Fayetteville; two aunts, Brenda Davis and Sara Davis; four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell; six great-uncles, Mike Davis, Levon Davis, Derrick Davis, Sylvester Davis, Larry Mitchell and Arthur Cromartie of Fayetteville; her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives.

The family will receive friends from 5 to 9 p.m. today, Nov. 21, 2009, at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, 500 Ramsey St., Fayetteville.

Funeral services will be conducted at 3 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at Manna Church with the Rev. Johnny C. Davis officiating. She will be laid to rest at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery.

Pallbearers will be Mike Owens, Joseph Santiago, Byron Coleman and Chavez Lockhart. Honorary pallbearers will be Steve Gilliam, Joe McGee, Tony Eason and her kindergarten class at Morganton Road Elementary School.

Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304.

Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/21/954064


. . . Where is Aunt Carey Lockhart-Davis mentioned?! How very odd . . . especially given that she was her primary caretaker.

I agree.

Janet

++++++


Questions swirl after girl's body discovered
Police have mother in custody on sex-trafficking and abuse charges, but aren't detailing suspicions.
Posted: Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009


Carey Lockhart had been the girl's primary guardian because her father, Bradley Lockhart, worked long stretches as a building contractor at out-of-state jobs ...

Last Tuesday, Lockhart rang his sister with bizarre news. A neighbor called him to say that police were looking for Shaniya.

As they were talking on the phone, police knocked on Carey Lockhart's door. They had found her name listed as a guardian at Shaniya's elementary school.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/408/story/1060102.html



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 21, 2009, 11:25:17 AM
 I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 21, 2009, 11:28:38 AM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.
Good Morning NRCG....I bet aunt Carry is stunned also...I am stunned that AD was in the obituary..jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: texasmom on November 21, 2009, 11:31:04 AM
Has Sara Davis been mentioned before?  Perhaps Sara is actually Aunt Carey's first name?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 21, 2009, 11:34:54 AM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.
Good Morning NRCG....I bet aunt Carry is stunned also...I am stunned that AD was in the obituary..jmo
Good Morning,  OMG that woman helped take care of Shaniya, like a mother  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: texasmom on November 21, 2009, 11:38:37 AM
I found this, do we know how old Aunt Carey's kids are?

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/02/948717

Quote
Sara Davis, Fayetteville

Jeers to an elementary school for letting my 5-year-old sit in pain and tears because of a "no pick-up after 1:30 p.m." rule. By the time she got off the bus, it was closer to 3 p.m. and too late to get her in to her doctor, leaving us waiting for hours with an Emergency Department visit. I would think if a child is in severe pain, the parents would still be called no matter what to come pick the child up as soon as possible.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 21, 2009, 12:06:15 PM
http://www.duniyalive.com/?p=75246
Shaniya Davis’ father appears on ‘Oprah Winfrey Show’
Posted on November 21st, 2009 in America
New York: Shaniya Davis’s father Bradley Lockhart appeared in the ‘Oprah infrey Show’ on Friday. Lockhart and his sister, Carey appeared in the interview.

Shaniya Davis was a 5-year-old girl, whose dead body was recovered from Fayetteville area. The girl went missing from a local hotel last week.

Shaniya’s dead body was located in an area bordered by Highway 87 south and Walker Road - just south of Sanford - during a second day of searching.

Meanwhile, Shaniya’s mother Antoinette Nicole Davis was charged with human trafficking, child abuse and prostitution. She has been arrested on several charges.

According to the reports, Nicole Davis is being questioned by the Fayetteville police in extensive way. According to the Fayetteville police, Shaniya was last seen with 29-year-old Mario McNeill, with whom she went out.

Who is Nicole Davis?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 21, 2009, 12:07:27 PM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.
Good Morning NRCG....I bet aunt Carry is stunned also...I am stunned that AD was in the obituary..jmo
Good Morning,  OMG that woman helped take care of Shaniya, like a mother  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Why would the moms name be on there? That is crazy. I wonder like someone else said if Carry goes by another first name.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 21, 2009, 12:11:43 PM
http://www.duniyalive.com/?p=75246
Shaniya Davis’ father appears on ‘Oprah Winfrey Show’
Posted on November 21st, 2009 in America
New York: Shaniya Davis’s father Bradley Lockhart appeared in the ‘Oprah infrey Show’ on Friday. Lockhart and his sister, Carey appeared in the interview.

Shaniya Davis was a 5-year-old girl, whose dead body was recovered from Fayetteville area. The girl went missing from a local hotel last week.

Shaniya’s dead body was located in an area bordered by Highway 87 south and Walker Road - just south of Sanford - during a second day of searching.

Meanwhile, Shaniya’s mother Antoinette Nicole Davis was charged with human trafficking, child abuse and prostitution. She has been arrested on several charges.

According to the reports, Nicole Davis is being questioned by the Fayetteville police in extensive way. According to the Fayetteville police, Shaniya was last seen with 29-year-old Mario McNeill, with whom she went out.

Who is Nicole Davis?

I meant to add, is this the mom or another person?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 21, 2009, 12:16:25 PM
I believe that article is talking about the mom, they forgot, I guess to put in her first name, and just used Nicole Davis.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: can on November 21, 2009, 12:20:13 PM
Anyone know who prepared the obit.?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 21, 2009, 12:33:16 PM
Anyone know who prepared the obit.?
No I haven't read anywhere who did.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 21, 2009, 12:44:03 PM
Obituary


Published: 12:00 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
Shaniya N. Davis


FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

::MonkeyEek::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: can on November 21, 2009, 12:44:28 PM
Anyone know who prepared the obit.?
No I haven't read anywhere who did.

Thanks no rose.  Wonder if it was the Davis side of the family and Aunt Carey was left out unintentionally.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 21, 2009, 12:57:03 PM
May have already been posted:

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/20/953940

Published: 05:07 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
McNeil told he may get death penalty
By Nick Needham
Staff writer


Following Friday's hearing, McNeill was transferred to Central Prison in Raleigh for safekeeping until his next court date on Dec. 9.



If only HE would have afforded little Shaniya that same right! This makes me sick, sick, sick!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 21, 2009, 12:59:22 PM
Obituary


Published: 12:00 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
Shaniya N. Davis


FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

::MonkeyEek::



 ::MonkeyShocked::

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: 59 minutes ago

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He is scheduled to appear in court on the charges at 2:15 p.m. Friday.

Antoinette Nicole Davis reported her 5-year-old daughter missing from their Fayetteville home on Nov. 10. The girl's body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

Arrest warrants state Shaniya was assaulted and killed on Nov. 10.

She died of asphyxiation, according to preliminary autopsy results.

Her funeral is scheduled for 3 p.m. Sunday at Manna Church, 517 Cliffdale Road in Fayetteville.

McNeill has been held in isolation at the Cumberland County Detention Center on a first-degree kidnapping charge since his initial arrest a week ago. He surrendered to police after the release of hotel security video from a Comfort Suites in Sanford that appears to show him carrying Shaniya on the morning of her disappearance.

In an affidavit for a warrant to search McNeill's 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, investigators said McNeill told them he picked Shaniya up in front of her home and drove her to the hotel.

Davis, 25, was arrested Saturday and charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

Police haven't said whether Davis could face additional charges or whether anyone else could be arrested in the case.

McNeill was taken off probation on Oct. 28 – six months early – following an April 28 conviction for drug possession, speeding to elude arrest and assaulting a government official. Officials said he had complied with all requirements while under supervision, and a judge agreed with a recommendation that he be released early from probation.

He also was convicted in 2003 for a triple shooting and in 2007 for another drug offense.

Fayetteville police said the investigation of Shaniya's death has taken an emotional toll on all who have been involved in the case.

"It's still emotional. It's one of those things (that's been) the hardest thing I've ever had to do, and I've seen a lot of stuff," Capt. Mark Bridgeman said.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 21, 2009, 01:05:52 PM
Has Sara Davis been mentioned before?  Perhaps Sara is actually Aunt Carey's first name?

Maybe this is her??

http://www.myspace.com/459038165


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 01:31:39 PM
Has Sara Davis been mentioned before?  Perhaps Sara is actually Aunt Carey's first name?

I think Sarah Davis is Antoinette's 16 year old youngest sister.

I am worried that Antoinette's family will be given the body for burial, due to the fact of Brad never legally
being named the father.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 21, 2009, 01:54:30 PM
Good Afternoon Monkeys !!!!!!!!!!!

I was shocked that Aunt Carey was mentioned also.  After some digging I think she is mentioned but only in a subtle way.  Here is what I found


her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives.

Lockhart, Carey Georg
Possible Aka's:
DAVIS, CAREY G
DAVSI, CAREY
 38  Irvine, CA
Oceanside, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Kaneohe, HI
California, MD
Lexington Park, MD
Camp Lejeune, NC
Fayetteville, NC
Beaufort, SC
 Available  Davis, Rodney Earl  <---------------- see below his connection to a Turner
Davis, Kevin Lee
Lockhart, Bradley Wayne
Lockhart, Vickie S
--------------------
Davis, Rodney D

Possible Aka's:
DAVIS, RODDY
DAVIS, RODNEY E
 53  Longwood, FL
Orlando, FL
Fayetteville, NC
Raeford, NC
 Available  Turnerdavis, Marie W    <---------------- maybe this is the Turners mentioned in the orbit
Davis, Rodney E
Davis, Rodney 

Maybe this is the family connection but I don't know why they wouldn't have just named Aunt Carey as we all have seen how much she loved Shaniya!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 21, 2009, 01:57:03 PM
Shaniya N. Davis

FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009. Shaniya was a happy, loving and friendly little girl. She was a good little helper around the house. She loved to play dress up and do girly things like fixing hair and playing with her Barbie dolls. She loved playing outside and riding her scooter. Pink and yellow were her favorite colors. She was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School. You came into our lives for a little while. You left footprints on our hearts, and we will never be the same! She leaves behind to cherish her memories her father, Bradley W. Lockhart of Fayetteville; her mother, Antoinette Davis of Fayetteville; paternal grandparents, William and Stephanie Raynor of Lexington Park, Md.; maternal grandparents, Carl and Priscilla Summers; maternal great-grandmother, Sarah Davis; maternal great-great-grandmother, Hunter Blue; four brothers, Byron Coleman of Charlotte, Alijah Fogle of Titusville, Fla., Chavez Lockhart and Joe Davis, both of Fayetteville; two sisters, Michele Coleman of Michigan and Cheyenne Lockhart of Fayetteville; two aunts, Brenda Davis and Sara Davis; four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell; six great-uncles, Mike Davis, Levon Davis, Derrick Davis, Sylvester Davis, Larry Mitchell and Arthur Cromartie of Fayetteville; her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives. The family will receive friends from 5 to 9 p.m. today, Nov. 21, 2009, at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, 500 Ramsey St., Fayetteville. Funeral services will be conducted at 3 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at Manna Church with the Rev. Johnny C. Davis officiating. She will be laid to rest at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery. Pallbearers will be Mike Owens, Joseph Santiago, Byron Coleman and Chavez Lockhart. Honorary pallbearers will be Steve Gilliam, Joe McGee, Tony Eason and her kindergarten class at Morganton Road Elementary School. Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304. Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.


Published in Fayetteville ******* on November 21, 2009

++++++

Guestbook

Shaniya N. Davis This Guest Book will remain online until 12/21/2009

http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookid=7443314528791&cid=full





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 21, 2009, 02:00:21 PM
Sorry I kind of messed that up I should have said "Aunt Carey wasn't mentioned"

Also this part was from the orbit posted by Jerseygirl -her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 21, 2009, 02:01:30 PM
Mary, DNA takes years and years to degrade.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 21, 2009, 02:08:27 PM
Anyone know who prepared the obit.?

I was thinking the same thing Can.  Recently my FIL passed away.  My husband wrote the Obit for him and could have said anything he wanted.  He (my husband) could have left out his stepsisters and their side entirely but of course he included them.  Just saying that anything can be said in a Obit.  My guess is that it was either written by the mom's side of the family OR it was an oversight.  By the way, in my area an obit like that in our local paper would probably cost about $450 or more.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 02:11:58 PM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.

So am I. I even went back and read it again thinking I missed her name.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: can on November 21, 2009, 02:12:11 PM
Anyone know who prepared the obit.?

I was thinking the same thing Can.  Recently my FIL passed away.  My husband wrote the Obit for him and could have said anything he wanted.  He (my husband) could have left out his stepsisters and their side entirely but of course he included them.  Just saying that anything can be said in a Obit.  My guess is that it was either written by the mom's side of the family OR it was an oversight.  By the way, in my area an obit like that in our local paper would probably cost about $450 or more.


Thanks Klaas and I agree with you.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 02:15:38 PM
Obituary


Published: 12:00 AM, Sat Nov 21, 2009
Shaniya N. Davis


FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

::MonkeyEek::



 ::MonkeyShocked::

Posted: Today at 12:09 p.m.
Updated: 59 minutes ago

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He is scheduled to appear in court on the charges at 2:15 p.m. Friday.

Antoinette Nicole Davis reported her 5-year-old daughter missing from their Fayetteville home on Nov. 10. The girl's body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

Arrest warrants state Shaniya was assaulted and killed on Nov. 10.

She died of asphyxiation, according to preliminary autopsy results.

Her funeral is scheduled for 3 p.m. Sunday at Manna Church, 517 Cliffdale Road in Fayetteville.

McNeill has been held in isolation at the Cumberland County Detention Center on a first-degree kidnapping charge since his initial arrest a week ago. He surrendered to police after the release of hotel security video from a Comfort Suites in Sanford that appears to show him carrying Shaniya on the morning of her disappearance.

In an affidavit for a warrant to search McNeill's 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, investigators said McNeill told them he picked Shaniya up in front of her home and drove her to the hotel.

Davis, 25, was arrested Saturday and charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

Police haven't said whether Davis could face additional charges or whether anyone else could be arrested in the case.

McNeill was taken off probation on Oct. 28 – six months early – following an April 28 conviction for drug possession, speeding to elude arrest and assaulting a government official. Officials said he had complied with all requirements while under supervision, and a judge agreed with a recommendation that he be released early from probation.

He also was convicted in 2003 for a triple shooting and in 2007 for another drug offense.

Fayetteville police said the investigation of Shaniya's death has taken an emotional toll on all who have been involved in the case.

"It's still emotional. It's one of those things (that's been) the hardest thing I've ever had to do, and I've seen a lot of stuff," Capt. Mark Bridgeman said.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/


Even though we 'knew' this is what happened it is still shocking, disgusting and hard to read. When even the police are shocked...it's bad!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 21, 2009, 02:25:14 PM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.

So am I. I even went back and read it again thinking I missed her name.

I think Aunt Carey is part of her second family mentioned in the orbit and they just mentioned the whole family instead of listing them all seperately.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: can on November 21, 2009, 02:39:27 PM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.

So am I. I even went back and read it again thinking I missed her name.

I think Aunt Carey is part of her second family mentioned in the orbit and they just mentioned the whole family instead of listing them all seperately.
Yes, thank you.  It's too bad that someone that played such a pivotal roll
in Shaniya's life, loved and was loved by Shaniya, was not mentioned by name. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 21, 2009, 02:52:31 PM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.

So am I. I even went back and read it again thinking I missed her name.

I think Aunt Carey is part of her second family mentioned in the orbit and they just mentioned the whole family instead of listing them all seperately.
Yes, thank you.  It's too bad that someone that played such a pivotal roll
in Shaniya's life, loved and was loved by Shaniya, was not mentioned by name. 

ITA in fact she probably should have been mentioned instead of the bio mom.  Carey seems to me the only one who truly cared for Shaniya's well being and also the one who had the least control over what happened to her.  I pray for God to comfort Aunt Carey in the depths of grief and loss she must feel.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 21, 2009, 03:04:15 PM
OUR NATIONAL EPIDEMIC-CHILD STEALING & MURDER

November 19, 2009 05:33 PM EST (Updated: November 20, 2009 04:14 PM EST)


I am so heartsick at the most recent kidnapping and murder of Shaniya Davis.

Then there's the 2 recent missing children: Elizabeth Olten and Somer Thompson. These kids were kidnapped and murdered within 2 days of each other.

That's three kids all in the last 5 weeks or less.  There's so many that I can't even keep these kids' names straight because they all blend into one-and that's not fair to the poor victims.

The sheer volume of missing & murdered children week after week makes this an epidemic that we can't ignore.

Then, of course, little Caylee Anthony last year...and little Haleigh Cummings some months back who is still missing.

When has it become open season on little kids anyway? Why have they become a 'disposable' commodity in someone's sick mind?

 

                              THIS HAS TRULY BECOME A NATIONAL EPIDEMIC


What can I do as a citizen to help? I would certainly hate to think that we will all become immune to these almost daily stories because they are becoming so common place! It may happen you know. Sort of the kidnapping du jour becoming something we ignore or turn the channel-not a very comforting thought.

Seems to me the pedophiles and perverts are getting awfully brazen and too comfortable in being able to steal a kid just steps from their homes without being seen. They are bold and intend to commit these crimes regardless of consequences.

I know there's a special place in Hell for the evil people who torture and murder children but that really doesn't make me feel better. I think the parents who do harm to their own kids (as in the case of Antoinette Davis and Casey Anthony) definitely have a perverted evil inside of them and will suffer the consequences for breaking the trust of their own precious babies.

I am sure we only hear about a mere fraction of the kidnappings & murders happening around the country.

In my area we've had a lot of close calls lately, with reports of suspicious individuals trying to lure young kids into cars. It's happening more frequently because these perverts scope out the areas where parents are not around. At which point will it go farther and a child disappears? I shudder to think about that.

I am grateful not to have young kids at home, I'd be a basket case every time they walked out the front door-no matter how much I thought I prepared them, I'd be scared to death to let them out of my sight!

Please keep your kids close. Talk to them, talk to them and talk to them again about the dangers of walking alone and not keeping their eyes open.

Teenagers too, they think nothing could possibly happen to them, but there we have the young woman who disappeared at that concert 3 weeks ago and then of course Natalie Holloway in Aruba on her senior trip a couple of years ago...

 

Any thoughts? Are you as upset by this rash of child stealing as I am?

Let me know your thoughts. I'm having a real tough time with all this ugly news lately.

 

S. Goryan

November 18, 2009
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977909239&grpId=3659174697244816&nav=Groupspace


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 21, 2009, 03:28:05 PM
Shaniya N. Davis

FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009. Shaniya was a happy, loving and friendly little girl. She was a good little helper around the house. She loved to play dress up and do girly things like fixing hair and playing with her Barbie dolls. She loved playing outside and riding her scooter. Pink and yellow were her favorite colors. She was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School. You came into our lives for a little while. You left footprints on our hearts, and we will never be the same! She leaves behind to cherish her memories her father, Bradley W. Lockhart of Fayetteville; her mother, Antoinette Davis of Fayetteville; paternal grandparents, William and Stephanie Raynor of Lexington Park, Md.; maternal grandparents, Carl and Priscilla Summers; maternal great-grandmother, Sarah Davis; maternal great-great-grandmother, Hunter Blue; four brothers, Byron Coleman of Charlotte, Alijah Fogle of Titusville, Fla., Chavez Lockhart and Joe Davis, both of Fayetteville; two sisters, Michele Coleman of Michigan and Cheyenne Lockhart of Fayetteville; two aunts, Brenda Davis and Sara Davis; four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell; six great-uncles, Mike Davis, Levon Davis, Derrick Davis, Sylvester Davis, Larry Mitchell and Arthur Cromartie of Fayetteville; her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives. The family will receive friends from 5 to 9 p.m. today, Nov. 21, 2009, at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, 500 Ramsey St., Fayetteville. Funeral services will be conducted at 3 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at Manna Church with the Rev. Johnny C. Davis officiating. She will be laid to rest at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery. Pallbearers will be Mike Owens, Joseph Santiago, Byron Coleman and Chavez Lockhart. Honorary pallbearers will be Steve Gilliam, Joe McGee, Tony Eason and her kindergarten class at Morganton Road Elementary School. Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304. Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.


Published in Fayetteville ******* on November 21, 2009

++++++

Guestbook

Shaniya N. Davis This Guest Book will remain online until 12/21/2009

http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookid=7443314528791&cid=full





Little innocent, 5 years old Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and murdered by a heartless scum of humanity on Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

She did not just pass away. 

 ::MonkeyTears:: ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: can on November 21, 2009, 03:42:06 PM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.

So am I. I even went back and read it again thinking I missed her name.

I think Aunt Carey is part of her second family mentioned in the orbit and they just mentioned the whole family instead of listing them all seperately.
Yes, thank you.  It's too bad that someone that played such a pivotal roll
in Shaniya's life, loved and was loved by Shaniya, was not mentioned by name. 

ITA in fact she probably should have been mentioned instead of the bio mom.  Carey seems to me the only one who truly cared for Shaniya's well being and also the one who had the least control over what happened to her.  I pray for God to comfort Aunt Carey in the depths of grief and loss she must feel.

It seems that way.  So very sad.

R. I. P little Shaniya.   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 21, 2009, 03:45:14 PM
Shaniya N. Davis

FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009. Shaniya was a happy, loving and friendly little girl. She was a good little helper around the house. She loved to play dress up and do girly things like fixing hair and playing with her Barbie dolls. She loved playing outside and riding her scooter. Pink and yellow were her favorite colors. She was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School. You came into our lives for a little while. You left footprints on our hearts, and we will never be the same! She leaves behind to cherish her memories her father, Bradley W. Lockhart of Fayetteville; her mother, Antoinette Davis of Fayetteville; paternal grandparents, William and Stephanie Raynor of Lexington Park, Md.; maternal grandparents, Carl and Priscilla Summers; maternal great-grandmother, Sarah Davis; maternal great-great-grandmother, Hunter Blue; four brothers, Byron Coleman of Charlotte, Alijah Fogle of Titusville, Fla., Chavez Lockhart and Joe Davis, both of Fayetteville; two sisters, Michele Coleman of Michigan and Cheyenne Lockhart of Fayetteville; two aunts, Brenda Davis and Sara Davis; four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell; six great-uncles, Mike Davis, Levon Davis, Derrick Davis, Sylvester Davis, Larry Mitchell and Arthur Cromartie of Fayetteville; her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives. The family will receive friends from 5 to 9 p.m. today, Nov. 21, 2009, at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, 500 Ramsey St., Fayetteville. Funeral services will be conducted at 3 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at Manna Church with the Rev. Johnny C. Davis officiating. She will be laid to rest at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery. Pallbearers will be Mike Owens, Joseph Santiago, Byron Coleman and Chavez Lockhart. Honorary pallbearers will be Steve Gilliam, Joe McGee, Tony Eason and her kindergarten class at Morganton Road Elementary School. Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304. Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.


Published in Fayetteville ******* on November 21, 2009

++++++

Guestbook

Shaniya N. Davis This Guest Book will remain online until 12/21/2009

http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookid=7443314528791&cid=full





Little innocent, 5 years old Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and murdered by a heartless scum of humanity on Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

She did not just pass away. 

 ::MonkeyTears:: ::MonkeyMad::

Are they sure they wish to use the words, "charish her memories" along side the person who sold her to the person that raped and killed her? Are they serious? They don't care about this child in my opinion.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: can on November 21, 2009, 03:45:32 PM
Shaniya N. Davis

FAYETTEVILLE - Miss Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5, of 7935 Lester Drive, passed away Monday, Nov. 16, 2009. Shaniya was a happy, loving and friendly little girl. She was a good little helper around the house. She loved to play dress up and do girly things like fixing hair and playing with her Barbie dolls. She loved playing outside and riding her scooter. Pink and yellow were her favorite colors. She was a kindergarten student at Morganton Road Elementary School. You came into our lives for a little while. You left footprints on our hearts, and we will never be the same! She leaves behind to cherish her memories her father, Bradley W. Lockhart of Fayetteville; her mother, Antoinette Davis of Fayetteville; paternal grandparents, William and Stephanie Raynor of Lexington Park, Md.; maternal grandparents, Carl and Priscilla Summers; maternal great-grandmother, Sarah Davis; maternal great-great-grandmother, Hunter Blue; four brothers, Byron Coleman of Charlotte, Alijah Fogle of Titusville, Fla., Chavez Lockhart and Joe Davis, both of Fayetteville; two sisters, Michele Coleman of Michigan and Cheyenne Lockhart of Fayetteville; two aunts, Brenda Davis and Sara Davis; four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell; six great-uncles, Mike Davis, Levon Davis, Derrick Davis, Sylvester Davis, Larry Mitchell and Arthur Cromartie of Fayetteville; her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives. The family will receive friends from 5 to 9 p.m. today, Nov. 21, 2009, at Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, 500 Ramsey St., Fayetteville. Funeral services will be conducted at 3 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at Manna Church with the Rev. Johnny C. Davis officiating. She will be laid to rest at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery. Pallbearers will be Mike Owens, Joseph Santiago, Byron Coleman and Chavez Lockhart. Honorary pallbearers will be Steve Gilliam, Joe McGee, Tony Eason and her kindergarten class at Morganton Road Elementary School. Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304. Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.


Published in Fayetteville ******* on November 21, 2009

++++++

Guestbook

Shaniya N. Davis This Guest Book will remain online until 12/21/2009

http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookid=7443314528791&cid=full





Little innocent, 5 years old Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and murdered by a heartless scum of humanity on Monday, Nov. 16, 2009.

She did not just pass away. 

 ::MonkeyTears:: ::MonkeyMad::

 ::MonkeyTears:: ::MonkeyTears:: ::MonkeyTears::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 03:48:58 PM
I sure hope that is a mistake and the obituary will be redone, with Carry's name on their as her aunt  ::MonkeyEek:: I'm stunned.

So am I. I even went back and read it again thinking I missed her name.

I think Aunt Carey is part of her second family mentioned in the orbit and they just mentioned the whole family instead of listing them all seperately.

Thanks...I am going to read it again. I am just a bit stunned that she was the one who took cared of and obviously loved Shaniya
and wasn't named and that scum of a biomon was.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 21, 2009, 04:12:57 PM
I do believe that Shaniya's obituary should have been proofread more carefully.
 
The obituary states that the death of Shaniya took place on Monday, November 16th.  The suspect charged with her murder and rape was arrested on November 13th.

According to the LE ... Shaniya was raped and murdered on the day she was taken from her mother's home ... NOVEMBER 10, 2009.

It could be that the family is acknowledging the date Shaniya's little body was located but ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++

Warrants: Girl abducted, raped, killed on same day
 Posted: Nov. 20, 2009
Updated: Nov. 20 6:48 p.m


FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — Shaniya Nicole Davis was raped and killed the same day she was taken from her Fayetteville home, according to arrest warrants released Friday.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, was charged late Thursday with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He is scheduled to appear in court on the charges at 2:15 p.m. Friday.

Antoinette Nicole Davis reported her 5-year-old daughter missing from their Fayetteville home on Nov. 10. The girl's body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

Arrest warrants state Shaniya was assaulted and killed on Nov. 10.

She died of asphyxiation, according to preliminary autopsy results.

Her funeral is scheduled for 3 p.m. Sunday at Manna Church, 517 Cliffdale Road in Fayetteville.

McNeill has been held in isolation at the Cumberland County Detention Center on a first-degree kidnapping charge since his initial arrest a week ago. He surrendered to police after the release of hotel security video from a Comfort Suites in Sanford that appears to show him carrying Shaniya on the morning of her disappearance.

In an affidavit for a warrant to search McNeill's 1997 Mitsubishi Galant, investigators said McNeill told them he picked Shaniya up in front of her home and drove her to the hotel.

Davis, 25, was arrested Saturday and charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

Police haven't said whether Davis could face additional charges or whether anyone else could be arrested in the case.

McNeill was taken off probation on Oct. 28 – six months early – following an April 28 conviction for drug possession, speeding to elude arrest and assaulting a government official. Officials said he had complied with all requirements while under supervision, and a judge agreed with a recommendation that he be released early from probation.

He also was convicted in 2003 for a triple shooting and in 2007 for another drug offense.

Fayetteville police said the investigation of Shaniya's death has taken an emotional toll on all who have been involved in the case.

"It's still emotional. It's one of those things (that's been) the hardest thing I've ever had to do, and I've seen a lot of stuff," Capt. Mark Bridgeman said.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6464217/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 21, 2009, 04:40:52 PM
O/T 
Had a couple of trojans in my comp, did a system restore.  Took all day to get things adjusted and am back up and running, good as new. 


On Topic...........
I saw the pic taken by the one who went to the hotel, of the carpet pattern.  As some in here have said, it looks like the same pattern on the carpet, but off a bit somehow. 

For those monkeys who are good with pics, could you check out the following, if you haven't already?  Seems that one or more of the three pics we've already been looking at, may have been flipped.  That *could* account for why the pattern on the carpet seems a bit off.  But my main reason in thinking that is because of the elevator seen in the pic taken by that person vs. the three we already had. 

The number of the elevator is inside the doorframe (near where the doors open).  In the 3 pics we've been looking at, when it can be seen, that number is on the left.  But in the 4th and newer pic, that number is on the right.  Can you guys flip the pics with that number shown, so they are the same, then compare side by side?  Hope this makes sense!  The carpet pattern might even match up, who knows?  lol 

And I agree with those who are thinking that of the three pics that LE released, it seems that at least one is of Shaniya being carried 'out', while at least one is of her being carried 'in'.  She just looks sooooo different in the middle pic.  IMO.  Why LE would say they are all three of her being carried in, if they actually weren't, I dunno.   


okay as far as the pics being flipped.. no ... the hallway (more noticeable on the bottom) is the same in all... as far as the 2 on the side of the elevator door jam so to speak ... i think it would be on both sides
here is a pic of the halway framing i guess you could call it... and from the ws pics i counted 20 rms on floor 3 from the safety escape plaque... i would assume 2nd floor would be the same... when you get off the elevator 6 to your left and four to your right by reason of things usually going from left to right then rm 201 should be last one down furthest from the elevator either 200-205 to your left and 206-209 to your right
or 200-211 to your left and  212-219 to your right
either way... furthest from elevator


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 21, 2009, 04:42:50 PM
O/T 
Had a couple of trojans in my comp, did a system restore.  Took all day to get things adjusted and am back up and running, good as new. 


On Topic...........
I saw the pic taken by the one who went to the hotel, of the carpet pattern.  As some in here have said, it looks like the same pattern on the carpet, but off a bit somehow. 

For those monkeys who are good with pics, could you check out the following, if you haven't already?  Seems that one or more of the three pics we've already been looking at, may have been flipped.  That *could* account for why the pattern on the carpet seems a bit off.  But my main reason in thinking that is because of the elevator seen in the pic taken by that person vs. the three we already had. 

The number of the elevator is inside the doorframe (near where the doors open).  In the 3 pics we've been looking at, when it can be seen, that number is on the left.  But in the 4th and newer pic, that number is on the right.  Can you guys flip the pics with that number shown, so they are the same, then compare side by side?  Hope this makes sense!  The carpet pattern might even match up, who knows?  lol 

And I agree with those who are thinking that of the three pics that LE released, it seems that at least one is of Shaniya being carried 'out', while at least one is of her being carried 'in'.  She just looks sooooo different in the middle pic.  IMO.  Why LE would say they are all three of her being carried in, if they actually weren't, I dunno.   



the pic in the middle shows his face maybe tat is why? i don't know


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 04:44:14 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2009, 05:40:44 PM
I am a little troubled by the families posting of  their own personal pictures on her Legacy website with the funeral notice.  The pictures should just be of Shaniya, and they have posted all the relatives pictures.  I have never seen that done.  Very few pictures of Shaniya, and they must have more than that of her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 21, 2009, 05:55:06 PM
Maybe "Great Aunt Caroline Davis" is really Aunt Carey Lockhart-Davis?  Anyone that can check that out for us.  I don't think she would be a great aunt either would she?  I can't fathom their leaving her off the obit. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pdh3 on November 21, 2009, 06:04:24 PM
I am a little troubled by the families posting of  their own personal pictures on her Legacy website with the funeral notice.  The pictures should just be of Shaniya, and they have posted all the relatives pictures.  I have never seen that done.  Very few pictures of Shaniya, and they must have more than that of her.

I agree. It should be about this beautiful child who was murdered, not her family. I'm as disgusted by the family of Shaniya, as I was by the behavior of Caylee's family.

I'm also troubled by this.....

Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304.

Why is there a trust fund? No money is needed to fund a search, and the perps are in jail. The father is not destitute. He is well able to pay for a funeral, if that's the intent, and Shaniya has other family who maybe could contribute something. Why are they collecting money?
I hope someone outside the family is responsible for the accounting and distribution of funds. I just don't get the need for a trust fund in this case. It's too late to help Shaniya now.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 06:04:26 PM
I am a little troubled by the families posting of  their own personal pictures on her Legacy website with the funeral notice.  The pictures should just be of Shaniya, and they have posted all the relatives pictures.  I have never seen that done.  Very few pictures of Shaniya, and they must have more than that of her.

AZ,

Who on the earth would post smiley photos of theirselves at a time like this?  The Angel photo's are just lovely.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 06:08:11 PM
I am a little troubled by the families posting of  their own personal pictures on her Legacy website with the funeral notice.  The pictures should just be of Shaniya, and they have posted all the relatives pictures.  I have never seen that done.  Very few pictures of Shaniya, and they must have more than that of her.

I agree. It should be about this beautiful child who was murdered, not her family. I'm as disgusted by the family of Shaniya, as I was by the behavior of Caylee's family.

I'm also troubled by this.....

Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304.

Why is there a trust fund? No money is needed to fund a search, and the perps are in jail. The father is not destitute. He is well able to pay for a funeral, if that's the intent, and Shaniya has other family who maybe could contribute something. Why are they collecting money?
I hope someone outside the family is responsible for the accounting and distribution of funds. I just don't get the need for a trust fund in this case. It's too late to help Shaniya now.

I questioned the memorial donations yesterday, people are too timid to ask, not us.  If the money is going to help prevent child
trafficing that would be a blessing.  I guess they didn't have any insurance on Shaniya? 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 06:15:50 PM
Maybe "Great Aunt Caroline Davis" is really Aunt Carey Lockhart-Davis?  Anyone that can check that out for us.  I don't think she would be a great aunt either would she?  I can't fathom their leaving her off the obit. 

Melisb,

Could it be that Carey requested not to be in the Obit?  Privacy? 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 21, 2009, 06:28:37 PM
I am a little troubled by the families posting of  their own personal pictures on her Legacy website with the funeral notice.  The pictures should just be of Shaniya, and they have posted all the relatives pictures.  I have never seen that done.  Very few pictures of Shaniya, and they must have more than that of her.

I agree. It should be about this beautiful child who was murdered, not her family. I'm as disgusted by the family of Shaniya, as I was by the behavior of Caylee's family.

I'm also troubled by this.....

Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304.

Why is there a trust fund? No money is needed to fund a search, and the perps are in jail. The father is not destitute. He is well able to pay for a funeral, if that's the intent, and Shaniya has other family who maybe could contribute something. Why are they collecting money?
I hope someone outside the family is responsible for the accounting and distribution of funds. I just don't get the need for a trust fund in this case. It's too late to help Shaniya now.
not sure if this is the case but a lot of times when regular people die the family takes donations instead of flowers then gives the money to a charity or sets up a scholarship. my family did this when my grandfather died and we were not trying to collect money. we and especially him would have hated to see all the money spent on people sending flowers that would die also... it is just a waste... think about it all those endless stuffed animals at the caylee memorials... cute but they usually just get thrown out or donated so whats the point get the money and do something useful.... we spent the money on a plaque with his name at the church he went to... it makes sense i don't think the dad is after money he seems to have enough
seeing as how shaniya has touche dso many hearts people will want to send gifts... gifts are a waste send the money instead and hope he does something good with it in shaniya's name


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 06:51:25 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 07:08:53 PM
Banana pudding and Fried Chicken what a beautiful gift.  The griefing could eat the pudding for breakfast or dessert.
People around here send Bagel platters with cream cheese, I'm sure it depends on the person who brings sends what.
A neighbor once sent a Tuna Casserole and I thought that was great.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 21, 2009, 07:19:31 PM
I can appreciate that Carey Lockhart-Davis had only so much control in regards to the informal custody arrangement between Shaniya's father and mother but ... considering her genuine apprehension regarding AD's history ...love for her niece should have dictated periodic check-up visits regarding Shaniya's well being in that almost five week separation.  While her brother was out-of-town ... as an advocate for her niece ... maybe Carey would have learned that Shaniya was not enrolled in kindergarten.  As an advocate for her niece ... maybe Carey would have observed the squalored conditions that her niece was living in.  As an advocate for Shaniya ... maybe this aunt could have contacted CPS.

Then there is Brad Lockhart.  He also failed his daughter miserably.  If Carey had apprehension in regards to placing Shaniya in her mother's care ... there is no way that her brother was not aware of these concerns.   However ... this father felt that the mother of his precious child should be given a chance to prove herself worthy.  Brad gambled ... took a chance ... with his little girl at stake and ... lost big time.

What was Shaniya Davis subjected to in that almost five week period?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

It should not have happened.  It could have been prevented.  The red flags were there.  I am so angry!!

Janet

++++++

Slain N.C. girl’s aunt says mom was neglectful 
Vigils held after body of missing 5-year-old is found, mother charged


updated 6:37 p.m. PT, Tues., Nov . 17, 2009
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. - The aunt of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found off a rural North Carolina road said Tuesday that she had a hard time letting the girl live temporarily at her mother's house because she believed the woman neglected her children.

Shaniya Davis had gone last month to stay for a while with her mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, as part of an informal agreement with the father, Bradley Lockhart. Lockhart's sister said she helped raise the girl and was concerned about her moving in with her mother.

"Antoinette and I never really got along because of the way that she neglected her children," Carey Lockhart-Davis said. "I feel robbed. I feel that Shaniya was robbed."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33989586/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 07:26:20 PM
Banana pudding and Fried Chicken what a beautiful gift.  The griefing could eat the pudding for breakfast or dessert.
People around here send Bagel platters with cream cheese, I'm sure it depends on the person who brings sends what.
A neighbor once sent a Tuna Casserole and I thought that was great.

We don't much know from Bagels in the South. We do biscuits.  But the church ladies all get together and prepare the
food for the family gathering after the funeral.  I love tuna casserole.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2009, 07:42:58 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.

Would that be a banana pudding made with vanilla wafers?  My Dad made that every time we visited. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2009, 07:46:21 PM
Banana pudding and Fried Chicken what a beautiful gift.  The griefing could eat the pudding for breakfast or dessert.
People around here send Bagel platters with cream cheese, I'm sure it depends on the person who brings sends what.
A neighbor once sent a Tuna Casserole and I thought that was great.

When my husband died, one of my neighbors brought over a beautiful brown sugar crusted to ham that was pre sliced.  Perfect for 6 kids and their familys to nibble on when they were hungry.  It saved a lot of cooking. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 07:50:18 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.

Would that be a banana pudding made with vanilla wafers?  My Dad made that every time we visited. 

Yes, it would, and with meringue on the top.  If the family is Episcopalian, we can take a bottle of wine.
But never take wine to the Baptist or the Methodist.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 07:57:20 PM
I am not trying to be disrespectful to Shaniya.
 
I am so sad about this child's death and I feel that so many let her down.
I think maybe this is the saddest of all the missing child stories that I have heard.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 08:08:23 PM
Boy.. Does this picture look like there is alot of tension...JMO

Thank You Carey- Davis Lockhart for taking the time, care, and the love you gave Shanyia..

(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/Careylockhartdavis.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Mary on November 21, 2009, 08:15:24 PM
In the article in the paper it said that Brad Lockhart was the brother of Carey Lockhart-
Davis. Also Brad was not registered as Shaniya's father, he said thats why he couldn't
take her legally. If any money is sent in, won't that go to the mother, or the grandmother of Shaniya? I have never before in my life seen an article on how to
behave at a funeral. There are a lot of mad people down there, I would guess there will
be a police presence there.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 21, 2009, 08:16:41 PM
I am a little troubled by the families posting of  their own personal pictures on her Legacy website with the funeral notice.  The pictures should just be of Shaniya, and they have posted all the relatives pictures.  I have never seen that done.  Very few pictures of Shaniya, and they must have more than that of her.

They have gone Facebook, Myspace crazy. No respect what so ever. They don't even know the meaning of the word respect.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 08:19:00 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.

Would that be a banana pudding made with vanilla wafers?  My Dad made that every time we visited. 

Yes, it would, and with meringue on the top.  If the family is Episcopalian, we can take a bottle of wine.
But never take wine to the Baptist or the Methodist.

Magnolia,

I love wine, excellent idea, everyone needs a little pick me up.
I love Tuna Casserole too, it is underated with a nice bread crumbs on top is excellent.

AZ...The baked Ham what a nice gesture, you must have been an excellent neighbor and had such a wonderful husband to have
a neighbor to bake a ham for you and your family.  I gave a (cheesy) Cranberry Bunt cake,once, made with whole cranberry sauce, delicious.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Heart on November 21, 2009, 08:20:12 PM
Boy.. Does this picture look like there is alot of tension...JMO

Thank You Carey- Davis Lockhart for taking the time, care, and the love you gave Shanyia..

(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/Careylockhartdavis.jpg)
JG, I have thought the same thing since I first saw the two together on an interview.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 08:25:43 PM
I am a little troubled by the families posting of  their own personal pictures on her Legacy website with the funeral notice.  The pictures should just be of Shaniya, and they have posted all the relatives pictures.  I have never seen that done.  Very few pictures of Shaniya, and they must have more than that of her.

They have gone Facebook, Myspace crazy. No respect what so ever. They don't even know the meaning of the word respect.

Heart,

It is just as well that Shaniya's photos are not on the sites, the web-sites would may eventually sell the photos, we give up all rights when we posts photo's, it is a business, my opinion. I love the angels on Legacy, soothing.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 08:30:52 PM
In the article in the paper it said that Brad Lockhart was the brother of Carey Lockhart-
Davis. Also Brad was not registered as Shaniya's father, he said thats why he couldn't
take her legally. If any money is sent in, won't that go to the mother, or the grandmother of Shaniya? I have never before in my life seen an article on how to
behave at a funeral. There are a lot of mad people down there, I would guess there will
be a police presence there.

Mary, (LOL) I never saw an article how to behave a Funeral either, geez.  I would say just bring your own Kleenex, I didn't and next thing I know Kleenex was being passed from one person to the other down the line for me weeping at my Uncle funeral.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 21, 2009, 08:33:41 PM
wow.... View full Guest Book (3849 entries)
http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookid=7443314528791&cid=full


Where do you see all the photos discussed above??
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/fayettevilleobserver/obituary.aspx?n=shaniya-n-davis&pid=136204823


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 21, 2009, 08:37:00 PM
In the article in the paper it said that Brad Lockhart was the brother of Carey Lockhart-
Davis. Also Brad was not registered as Shaniya's father, he said thats why he couldn't
take her legally. If any money is sent in, won't that go to the mother, or the grandmother of Shaniya?

I have never before in my life seen an article on how to
behave at a funeral. There are a lot of mad people down there, I would guess there will
be a police presence there.



Mary

A lot of people are angry in regards to many aspects encompassing the demise of Shaniya.  I believe the words of the article are just a reminder that out of respect for Shaniya ... the memorial/funeral is an opportunity to put aside that anger for very a short time and ... honor her short life. 

Janet

++++++

Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday
November 21, 12:27 PM
Surry County CPS Examiner Lisa Nixon


http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 09:10:27 PM
That's the first thing that jumped out at me regarding Shaniya's obit, was that I couldn't find Aunt Carey's name listed.  If it's in there, it seems disguised to the public, perhaps not to family/friends.  It feels like a slap in the face to her. 

Even and especially *if* the last part mentioned somehow 'includes' Aunt Carey.  Because of what we've learned has been her role in Shaniya's life.  To have mentioned various other family members (many cousins etc) before that last part about a second family (if that includes Aunt Carey) could be seen as a slap if not worse, because it might feel like an after thought. 

SO MANY family members on both sides were carefully mentioned, one by one with relationship to Shaniya.  Seems they included everyone but the family pets, if any. 

My second thought was anger that Antoinette was listed second in the obit, as if she had such a special place in Shaniya's heart.  The one who 'acted as' mother ought to have had IMO, the honor of that respect. 

Antoinette could have been mentioned as an afterthought, if at all.  IMO   ::MonkeyMad::

This obit had to have been expensive, the longer one is, the more it will cost to put in the paper.  Have helped write a few before. 
   
Seems that with such detail on each person mentioned, a list could have been made by both sides of the family, then included together in order as ready to publish.  That's the way I've seen it handled before.   

But honestly, it seems the only one capable of paying attention with such detail, would be Aunt Carey.  So it's hard to wrap my mind around this one. 

 ::MonkeyConfused::

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 09:21:17 PM
I wonder if this is the same thing as the "foundation" that dad mentioned has been established? 

from the obit:
Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 09:23:03 PM
In the article in the paper it said that Brad Lockhart was the brother of Carey Lockhart-
Davis. Also Brad was not registered as Shaniya's father, he said thats why he couldn't
take her legally. If any money is sent in, won't that go to the mother, or the grandmother of Shaniya?

I have never before in my life seen an article on how to
behave at a funeral. There are a lot of mad people down there, I would guess there will
be a police presence there.



Mary

A lot of people are angry in regards to many aspects encompassing the demise of Shaniya.  I believe the words of the article are just a reminder that out of respect for Shaniya ... the memorial/funeral is an opportunity to put aside that anger for very a short time and ... honor her short life. 

Janet

++++++

Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday
November 21, 12:27 PM
Surry County CPS Examiner Lisa Nixon


http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday


Good Evening Monks...try to get caught up.   Thanks for the link.  Has it been stated what the monies collected for the memorial fund will be used for?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 09:30:17 PM

Someone mentioned there was internet access, was that access within the rooms, or out in the lobby?  If within the rooms, am hoping that LE has checked that room's comp. for a history of live streaming, cam, etc.   

Child porn crosses my mind, as does Shaniya's death having possibly been made into a "snuff film".   ::MonkeyWaa::

The reason I'm wondering all that... is because of the "robbery" that was at McNeill and gf's home (was it the same day he was arrested or in the days following?), and an E-machine was taken, or attempted?  I know there was some discussion in here earlier on. 

Could there be something accessed on the net in the hotel's comp that has to do with something similiar in that E-machine at McNeil's home? 

Just wondering if someone really really REALLY didn't want whatever may have been on that E-machine to be taken as evidence in Shaniya's case, so staged a robbery to make it go missing. 


Hi Wyks!  ::CowWave::

I completely agree with you re: this was all for child porn of some sort- perhaps even something much larger than just him acting alone. MM is just a thug who has been involved in a number of 'enterprising' activities, including theft and drug dealing; playing broker or delivery guy in the world of child trafficking/porn would not be a stretch of the imagination.

I must have missed the robbery at McNeill's thing though . . . certainly would sound an alarm, I should think. Shall try to go back and find that. (I also confess to not knowing what an 'E machine' is - assuming it is a computer/data storage or transfer device of some sort - LOL.) Will go google that now. . . Thanks for the info, Wyks.

Hi Tams! 

Well at first some of us were thinking there was a 'hand-off' at the hotel.  On realizing McNeill went in there, then left with Shaniya, there must have been some other reason.  IMO.  I mean, I agree with many of you who think if it was just McNeill involved and no hand-off, then why the hotel?  A place with cams in the hallway, whether he knew that for sure or not?  It doesn't make much sense. 

But if this was porn or a snuff film, he may have wanted a place for that away from his own home.  Very hard, trying to understand what seems to be a sick and evil mind. 

The robbery at McNeil's home, yeah, am trying to find my notes on that.  Curious timing, if anything else.  IMO. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 21, 2009, 09:38:17 PM
That's the first thing that jumped out at me regarding Shaniya's obit, was that I couldn't find Aunt Carey's name listed.  If it's in there, it seems disguised to the public, perhaps not to family/friends.  It feels like a slap in the face to her. 

Even and especially *if* the last part mentioned somehow 'includes' Aunt Carey.  Because of what we've learned has been her role in Shaniya's life.  To have mentioned various other family members (many cousins etc) before that last part about a second family (if that includes Aunt Carey) could be seen as a slap if not worse, because it might feel like an after thought. 

SO MANY family members on both sides were carefully mentioned, one by one with relationship to Shaniya.  Seems they included everyone but the family pets, if any. 

My second thought was anger that Antoinette was listed second in the obit, as if she had such a special place in Shaniya's heart.  The one who 'acted as' mother ought to have had IMO, the honor of that respect. 

Antoinette could have been mentioned as an afterthought, if at all.  IMO   ::MonkeyMad::

This obit had to have been expensive, the longer one is, the more it will cost to put in the paper.  Have helped write a few before. 
   
Seems that with such detail on each person mentioned, a list could have been made by both sides of the family, then included together in order as ready to publish.  That's the way I've seen it handled before.   

But honestly, it seems the only one capable of paying attention with such detail, would be Aunt Carey.  So it's hard to wrap my mind around this one. 

 ::MonkeyConfused::

 

I see a Caroline listed as a great aunt - bet that is her. I agree on the egg donor - she did not act like a mother so she tore up her parent card in my book. I might have listed her as "prior to her death  Shaniya lost her mother to stupidity and drugs."   But then again I am known as a bit of a bioch!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 09:45:45 PM
It's so hard when someone dies and there are mixed feelings in one side of the family, the other, or between both. 

When the person who called herself my adoptive mother passed away, I did not go to the funeral.  She had been 'mommie dearest' to me, OMG abusive.  Yet my adoptive father, who I have called 'daddy' for 50 years now, and who was not abusive to me, loved her, in his own disconnected way.  I did have to go and view her gravesite later on.  Just to assure myself that she was gone.  My dad had put this on her gravestone:  "Beloved wife and devoted mother." 

I was livid!!!!!!!!  She may have been a devoted wife, but she was NO devoted mother!  It took several years to realize that 'in my dad's eyes', she had been.  Sigh. 

So whoever wrote Shaniya's obit, may have included feelings and such that may not be true for some of the family, yet for some it very likely is.  The funeral will likely be a very tense couple of hours, considering how Shaniya died, and the events that led up to that.  Am kind of hoping for all their sakes that it's private, not open to the whole public.  I don't have the need to watch a possible implosion between and within the families.  Added media and public would likely make things even more tense. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pdh3 on November 21, 2009, 09:50:07 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 09:56:48 PM
I knew I shouldn't have gone by memory on the obit, coulda shoulda went back and looked. 

Am correcting myself on an earlier post when I said that 'many cousins etc.' were mentioned before the last part about the second family.  It's the other way around, sorry.   

"and her second family, Tyrongella Davis and the Turner family of Raeford. She had a host of other cousins and relatives.

Still and all... am thinking in those last two lines, Aunt Carey was mentioned somehow in disguise. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pdh3 on November 21, 2009, 09:58:28 PM
Banana pudding and Fried Chicken what a beautiful gift.  The griefing could eat the pudding for breakfast or dessert.
People around here send Bagel platters with cream cheese, I'm sure it depends on the person who brings sends what.
A neighbor once sent a Tuna Casserole and I thought that was great.

We don't much know from Bagels in the South. We do biscuits.  But the church ladies all get together and prepare the
food for the family gathering after the funeral.  I love tuna casserole.


Good Grief.....I live in Alabama, and I have eaten bagels all my life. There is a restaurant that serves bagels and lox in Mountain Brook, and I ate there all the time as a child.
When my Dad passed away...people brought lasagna, salad, and garlic bread.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 21, 2009, 09:59:23 PM
That's the first thing that jumped out at me regarding Shaniya's obit, was that I couldn't find Aunt Carey's name listed.  If it's in there, it seems disguised to the public, perhaps not to family/friends.  It feels like a slap in the face to her. 

Even and especially *if* the last part mentioned somehow 'includes' Aunt Carey.  Because of what we've learned has been her role in Shaniya's life.  To have mentioned various other family members (many cousins etc) before that last part about a second family (if that includes Aunt Carey) could be seen as a slap if not worse, because it might feel like an after thought. 

SO MANY family members on both sides were carefully mentioned, one by one with relationship to Shaniya.  Seems they included everyone but the family pets, if any. 

My second thought was anger that Antoinette was listed second in the obit, as if she had such a special place in Shaniya's heart.  The one who 'acted as' mother ought to have had IMO, the honor of that respect. 

Antoinette could have been mentioned as an afterthought, if at all.  IMO   ::MonkeyMad::

This obit had to have been expensive, the longer one is, the more it will cost to put in the paper.  Have helped write a few before. 
   
Seems that with such detail on each person mentioned, a list could have been made by both sides of the family, then included together in order as ready to publish.  That's the way I've seen it handled before.   

But honestly, it seems the only one capable of paying attention with such detail, would be Aunt Carey.  So it's hard to wrap my mind around this one. 

 ::MonkeyConfused::

 

I see a Caroline listed as a great aunt - bet that is her. I agree on the egg donor - she did not act like a mother so she tore up her parent card in my book. I might have listed her as "prior to her death  Shaniya lost her mother to stupidity and drugs."   But then again I am known as a bit of a bioch!

I posted earlier that AD sold her soul to the devil when she traded her child for a drug debt....it rally pizzed me off that she was mentioned at all in the orbit and as someone else stated she did not pass away she was murdered...I think the whole thing was a mess but who I am...besides a  ranting monkey ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 09:59:58 PM
Incident report.. November 13th...April Autry

Agency Name
Fayetteville Police Department  Incident/Investigation
Report OCA
2009-039644 
ORI
NC 0260100
 Date/Time Reported: Friday 
 
Month Day Yr Time Hrs
11 13 2009 10:44:00 AM 10
#1
 Crime/Incident(s)
0510 -   Attempt
 Complete  At Found: Friday 
 Last Known Secure: Friday 
 
Month
11  Day
13  Yr
2009  Time
10:43:00 AM  Hrs
10  Month
11 Day
13 Yr
2009 Time
10:42:00 AM  Hrs
10 
#2 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Location of Incident
922 WASHINGTON DR
FAYETTEVILLE, NC  Offense Tract
8602-03 
#3 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Premise Type
HOME OF VICTIM - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING  Victim Residence Type
 Single Family
 Multi Family 
 How attacked or committed
LISTED SUSPECT AND A UNKNOWN SUSPECT KICKED IN THE FRONT DOOR AND THEN RAN WHEN HE SAW THE VICTIM  Forcible
 Yes
 N/A
 No Weapon/Tools
Crime #1: PERSONAL WEAPONS (HANDS, FEET, TEETH, ETC.) 
 # of Victims
1  Type:  Person  Business
 Society  Government
 Financial Institute  Religious
 L.E. Officer Line of Duty  Unknown  Injury  None  Minor  Loss of Teeth
 Broken Bones  Severe Lacerations
 Internal  Unconscious  Other Major  Drug/Alcohol Use:
 Yes  Unknown
 No  N/A 
V1 Victim Business Name (Last, First, Middle)
AUTRY, APRIL   Victom of Crime #

0510
 DOB/Age
22  Race
B  Sex
F  Relationship to Offender

Acquaintance
 Resident Status
 Resident
 Non-Resident
 Unknown 
Home Address

Apt #
,    Home Phone 
Employer Name/Address


,    Business Phone 
VYR  Make  Model  Style  Lic/Lis  VIN 
 STATUS           L-Lost      S-Stolen      R-Recovered      D-Damaged      Z-Seized      B-Burned      C-Counterfeit/Forged      F-Found
 (Check "OJ" column if recovered for other jurisdiction) 
 Victim # DCI Status Value OJ Qty Property Description Make/Model Serial Number
1  71  D  $500.00    1  FRONT DOOR TO RESIDENCE     
                 
Number of Vehicles Stolen:   Number of Vehicles Recovered:   
 
 Officer Name/ID#
TAYLOR, MATTHEW J  Officer Signature  Supervisor Signature 
 Complainant Signature  Case Status
 Further Investigation
 Inactive
 Closed/Cleared
 Closed/Leads Exhausted  Case Disposition
 Unfounded  Juvenille/No Custody  Extradiction Declined
 Cleared by Arrest  Refuse to Cooperate
 Cleared by Arrest by Another Agency
 Death of Offender  Prosecution Declined 

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/print_report_page1.asp


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 10:01:01 PM

I see a Caroline listed as a great aunt - bet that is her. I agree on the egg donor - she did not act like a mother so she tore up her parent card in my book. I might have listed her as "prior to her death  Shaniya lost her mother to stupidity and drugs."   But then again I am known as a bit of a bioch!

Hmmm, that sure could be! 

I like your idea of the way to list the egg donor!  Hehe....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 21, 2009, 10:06:14 PM

I posted earlier that AD sold her soul to the devil when she traded her child for a drug debt....it rally pizzed me off that she was mentioned at all in the orbit and as someone else stated she did not pass away she was murdered...I think the whole thing was a mess but who I am...besides a  ranting monkey ::MonkeyMad::

yeah.. "passed away" just minimizes the horror of it all for Shaniya.  IMO.   ::MonkeyMad::

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 10:06:21 PM
Incident/Investigation
Report OCA
2009-039649 
ORI
NC 0260100
 Date/Time Reported: Friday 
 
Month Day Yr Time Hrs
11 13 2009 12:03:37 PM 12
#1
 Crime/Incident(s)
2030 -   Attempt
 Complete  At Found: Friday 
 Last Known Secure: Friday 
 
Month
11  Day
13  Yr
2009  Time
12:03:37 PM  Hrs
12  Month
11 Day
13 Yr
2009 Time
12:02:00 PM  Hrs
12 
#2 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Location of Incident
922 WASHINGTON DR
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 
Offense Tract
8602-03 
#3 Crime/Incident(s)
  Attempt
 Complete  Premise Type
HOME OF VICTIM - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING  Victim Residence Type
 Single Family
 Multi Family 
 How attacked or committed
VICTIM IS BEING NEGLECTED BY SUSPECT
 Forcible
 Yes
  N/A
 No Weapon/Tools
Crime #1: PERSONAL WEAPONS (HANDS, FEET, TEETH, ETC.) 
 # of Victims
1  Type:  Person  Business
 Society  Government
 Financial Institute  Religious
 L.E. Officer Line of Duty  Unknown  Injury  None  Minor  Loss of Teeth
 Broken Bones  Severe Lacerations
 Internal  Unconscious  Other Major  Drug/Alcohol Use:
 Yes  Unknown
 No  N/A 
V1 Victim Business Name (Last, First, Middle)
 AUTRY, AMARI    Victom of Crime #

2030
 DOB/Age
00  Race
B  Sex
Relationship to Offender
Child 

Resident Status
 Resident
 Non-Resident
 Unknown 
Home Address

Apt #
,    Home Phone 
Employer Name/Address


,    Business Phone 
VYR  Make  Model  Style  Lic/Lis  VIN 
 STATUS           L-Lost      S-Stolen      R-Recovered      D-Damaged      Z-Seized      B-Burned      C-Counterfeit/Forged      F-Found
 (Check "OJ" column if recovered for other jurisdiction) 
 Victim # DCI Status Value OJ Qty Property Description Make/Model Serial Number
                 
Number of Vehicles Stolen:   Number of Vehicles Recovered:   
 
 Officer Name/ID#
SANDBERG, DEBRA L  Officer Signature  Supervisor Signature 
 Complainant Signature  Case Status
 Further Investigation
 Inactive
 Closed/Cleared
 Closed/Leads Exhausted  Case Disposition
 Unfounded  Juvenille/No Custody  Extradiction Declined
 Cleared by Arrest  Refuse to Cooperate
 Cleared by Arrest by Another Agency
 Death of Offender  Prosecution Declined 

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/print_report_page1.asp


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2009, 10:17:57 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I don't believe she was talking about the funeral, just food to comfort the family.  In my experience, food was always taken to the family so they wouldn't have to cook while they were dealing with all the other issues.  Certainly true in my Georgia family. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 10:18:30 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

PHD3,

I am sorry, I hope you are not offended, I understood that Fried Chicken, Potato Salad and (wonderful) Banana Pudding was a tradition of the South, and I respect tradition, especially, if the person was elderly and the mourners were of the same age,
the chicken, potatoe salad and pudding would be great comfort food.  I like all kinds of food myself, I am grateful that the
monkeys share their world of experiences. P.S. I bet monkeys would love the banana pudding:)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 10:18:43 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 21, 2009, 10:23:07 PM
Jerseygirl - I'm just catching up but is that Mario's girlfriend that has made those police reports? 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 10:27:07 PM
Jerseygirl - I'm just catching up but is that Mario's girlfriend that has made those police reports? 

Yes Klaas.. Sorry I was doing some more research...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 21, 2009, 10:28:08 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 

Magnolia,

I can't sleep, dreaming of Banana Pudding with Meringe on top, how elegant. I need to pick up vanilla wafers tomorrow, I have
everything else. God Bless Shaniya, I am sorry I am off topic.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 10:29:57 PM
Hi Wykes..

I know you had  interest on Raeford rd... There is an Autry that lives on that rd  according to incident reports..But I dont know if he is related to POS Mcneill G/F..

XXXX RAEFORD RD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2009, 10:31:05 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 

 This is OT  but...PDH3...not sure what pushed your button, but no one was intentionally trying to do that.    I am also remembering my daughter about 10 years ago having moved from very urban Seattle, where spa cusine and upscale dining was the norm for everything, to marrying and moving to Indiana.  She said Mom, if I go to one more wedding where they serve chicken, mashed potatoes and corn for a wedding dinner, I am moving back to the normal world. She didn't move back, and seems to have adjusted very well.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 10:33:33 PM
Jerseygirl - I'm just catching up but is that Mario's girlfriend that has made those police reports? 

Yes Klaas.. Sorry I was doing some more research...

jerseygirl...can you simplify those reports for this tired monk??  thanks


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 21, 2009, 10:36:53 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 

Magnolia,

I can't sleep, dreaming of Banana Pudding with Meringe on top, how elegant. I need to pick up vanilla wafers tomorrow, I have
everything else. God Bless Shaniya, I am sorry I am off topic.

I'd have put "As a result of her mother's criminal addiction to drugs and total disregard for the life of the child she sold into slavery Shaniya died......"  I don't know what to think of Shaniya's father and the rest of that bunch.  There is obvious tension between the father and his sister.  I should think the sister is mad as he!! that she had to relinquish Shaniya from her safe and clean home to live in that filth.  And I don't just mean the dirty trailer, I mean the people in it.

And speaking of banana pudding, try putting Nutter Butters instead of vanilla wafers.  Words can't describe.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 10:37:01 PM


    I am also remembering my daughter about 10 years ago having moved from very urban Seattle, where spa cusine and upscale dining was the norm for everything, to marrying and moving to Indiana.  She said Mom, if I go to one more wedding where they serve chicken, mashed potatoes and corn for a wedding dinner, I am moving back to the normal world. She didn't move back, and seems to have adjusted very well.

All this talk of down home food is making me drool! I'd kill for some fried chicken, mashed tater, corn and banana puddin' right now!!  Make my salad for dinner look SAD!  LOL  Hi AZ!!!!  Glad your daughtr adjusted !   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 10:39:47 PM
Jerseygirl - I'm just catching up but is that Mario's girlfriend that has made those police reports? 

Yes Klaas.. Sorry I was doing some more research...

jerseygirl...can you simplify those reports for this tired monk??  thanks

1st incident report on November 13th in the morning ..

Someone kicked in the  door... Mcneill's g/f home

2nd report November 13th..12.03pm

Victim is reported neglected by suspect
Child
Amari- McNeills daughter and G/F

You can read it here.. Just put name in..and date.. I posted this twice now...

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/policereports.aspx







Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 10:41:13 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 

 This is OT  but...PDH3...not sure what pushed your button, but no one was intentionally trying to do that.    I am also remembering my daughter about 10 years ago having moved from very urban Seattle, where spa cusine and upscale dining was the norm for everything, to marrying and moving to Indiana.  She said Mom, if I go to one more wedding where they serve chicken, mashed potatoes and corn for a wedding dinner, I am moving back to the normal world. She didn't move back, and seems to have adjusted very well.

I grew up in Birmingham and I have eaten at Brody's in Mountain Brook many times.  I have also eaten
lasagna and salad.   I live in the country now and the food I mentioned is the norm around here.  The
people are loving and caring and want to help in any way they can when there is a tragedy.  It is just
a matter of doing whatever you can to comfort a grieving family.  I meant no harm.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 10:41:17 PM
My DIL asked me a question tonight and I didn't know the answer....so HELP

AD was charge with selling Shaniya for sex...trafficking even before Shaniya was found.....how did the LE know what had happened?  I missed a lot of the earlier posts so.... What in the heck am I missing?



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2009, 10:41:35 PM
Hi SunnyinTex...  ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 10:42:26 PM
Jerseygirl - I'm just catching up but is that Mario's girlfriend that has made those police reports? 

Yes Klaas.. Sorry I was doing some more research...

jerseygirl...can you simplify those reports for this tired monk??  thanks

i hope you dont take it the wrong way when I put down I posted this twice now..I just read the reply and it came out wrong... so sorry


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 10:43:25 PM
Jerseygirl - I'm just catching up but is that Mario's girlfriend that has made those police reports? 

Yes Klaas.. Sorry I was doing some more research...

jerseygirl...can you simplify those reports for this tired monk??  thanks

1st incident report on November 13th in the morning ..

Someone kicked in the  door... Mcneill's g/f home

2nd report November 13th..12.03pm

Victim is reported neglected by suspect
Child
Amari- McNeills daughter and G/F

You can read it here.. Just put name in..and date.. I posted this twice now...

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/policereports.aspx

jerseygirl...thanks for simpling this for me and for posting the link....I didn't see it the first time.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 10:48:43 PM
Jerseygirl - I'm just catching up but is that Mario's girlfriend that has made those police reports? 

Yes Klaas.. Sorry I was doing some more research...

jerseygirl...can you simplify those reports for this tired monk??  thanks

i hope you dont take it the wrong way when I put down I posted this twice now..I just read the reply and it came out wrong... so sorry

Nope not at all...my mind is fried tonight..I am getting things with cases messed up in my mind.....I took no offense!!  Again thanks for posting it again and simpling it. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 10:48:55 PM
My DIL asked me a question tonight and I didn't know the answer....so HELP

AD was charge with selling Shaniya for sex...trafficking even before Shaniya was found.....how did the LE know what had happened?  I missed a lot of the earlier posts so.... What in the heck am I missing?



At the time Antoinette was arrested, McNeil was already in jail.  The police were questioning
Antionette off and on...as they put it, she was in and out of police headquarters.
I have wondered if McNeil talked or if Antoinette confessed to selling Shaniya.
I don't think we know yet.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pdh3 on November 21, 2009, 10:49:56 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I don't believe she was talking about the funeral, just food to comfort the family.  In my experience, food was always taken to the family so they wouldn't have to cook while they were dealing with all the other issues.  Certainly true in my Georgia family. 

I understood that completely.
That's also what I was talking about...I was disputing the KINDS of food, not the occasion. I didn't like the stereotyping....fried chicken? No bagels in the South?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 10:50:57 PM
oh mercy I typed simpling ...time to sign off...Good Night Monks....justice will come for all these children ...BELIEVE!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 21, 2009, 10:52:48 PM
oh mercy I typed simpling ...time to sign off...Good Night Monks....justice will come for all these children ...BELIEVE!!

Good Nite Sunny...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 21, 2009, 10:53:12 PM
My DIL asked me a question tonight and I didn't know the answer....so HELP

AD was charge with selling Shaniya for sex...trafficking even before Shaniya was found.....how did the LE know what had happened?  I missed a lot of the earlier posts so.... What in the heck am I missing?



At the time Antoinette was arrested, McNeil was already in jail.  The police were questioning
Antionette off and on...as they put it, she was in and out of police headquarters.
I have wondered if McNeil talked or if Antoinette confessed to selling Shaniya.
I don't think we know yet.

thanks Magnolia...I thought it was Coe that was in jail....and McNeil turned himself in...oh well...see I told you I was confused!!  Thanks!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2009, 10:56:31 PM
My DIL asked me a question tonight and I didn't know the answer....so HELP

AD was charge with selling Shaniya for sex...trafficking even before Shaniya was found.....how did the LE know what had happened?  I missed a lot of the earlier posts so.... What in the heck am I missing?



At the time Antoinette was arrested, McNeil was already in jail.  The police were questioning
Antionette off and on...as they put it, she was in and out of police headquarters.
I have wondered if McNeil talked or if Antoinette confessed to selling Shaniya.
I don't think we know yet.

thanks Magnolia...I thought it was Coe that was in jail....and McNeil turned himself in...oh well...see I told you I was confused!!  Thanks!!

I think...but I dont want to spead no myths...that Coe has been released by the time Antoinette was
arrested.  If I remember, it was Saturday night that they arrested Antoinette.

They were also questioning Brenda Davis during that time, so Breand may have told all.  IDK


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 21, 2009, 11:10:29 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 

 This is OT  but...PDH3...not sure what pushed your button, but no one was intentionally trying to do that.    I am also remembering my daughter about 10 years ago having moved from very urban Seattle, where spa cusine and upscale dining was the norm for everything, to marrying and moving to Indiana.  She said Mom, if I go to one more wedding where they serve chicken, mashed potatoes and corn for a wedding dinner, I am moving back to the normal world. She didn't move back, and seems to have adjusted very well.

I grew up in Birmingham and I have eaten at Brody's in Mountain Brook many times.  I have also eaten
lasagna and salad.   I live in the country now and the food I mentioned is the norm around here.  The
people are loving and caring and want to help in any way they can when there is a tragedy.  It is just
a matter of doing whatever you can to comfort a grieving family.  I meant no harm.

OT again but AZ you are not spreading 'myths'.  It is an unwritten tradition for us southerners to take any kind of food to the home a greiving family.  I do it anytime someone passes.  I usually prepare a whole meal so at least one night is taken care of and they don't have to cook.  Don't shoot me Mods but gals I have a banana pudding square recipe (has cream cheese in it) that I will post in that section tomorrow.  I gotta run before the Mods come after me.  Just had to speak up for a lovely gesture that all families appreciate at that time.  I too wanna know what the bank fund will go to.  Is there someone appointed to over see that kind of thing or is it just to help the family?  If it was going to AD's family I am sure the bank wouldn't have considered it.  That would be a little bad advert for them I would think.  But I could see a greedy member of AD's fam trying it!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 21, 2009, 11:11:42 PM

1st incident report on November 13th in the morning ..

Someone kicked in the  door... Mcneill's g/f home

2nd report November 13th..12.03pm

Victim is reported neglected by suspect
Child
Amari- McNeills daughter and G/F

You can read it here.. Just put name in..and date.. I posted this twice now...

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/policereports.aspx


Published: 06:53 AM, Fri Nov 20, 2009
McNeill charged with rape, murder in 5-year-old's deathBy Nancy McCleary
Staff writer


On Nov. 11, police arrested Clarence Coe and charged him with kidnapping Shaniya. Coe was identified as the kidnapper by Davis, who was his girlfriend.

The next day, investigators got their first break when a hotel worker in Sanford reported seeing a girl resembling Shaniya with a man at the Comfort Suites.

That led to the discovery of surveillance video of Shaniya being carried by a man police have identified as McNeill. The video was time stamped 6:11 a.m.

Police have said Shaniya was alive when she left the hotel about 11/2hours later.

Early on Nov. 13 - a Friday - McNeill turned himself in to police and admitted he had taken the girl.

In an affidavit for a warrant to search McNeill's Mitsubishi Galant, investigators said McNeill told them he picked Shaniya up in front of her home and drove her to the hotel.

McNeill's confession resulted in the dismissal of the charges against Coe. McNeill was charged with first-degree kidnapping.

Davis was arrested on Nov. 14. She is charged with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation. Investigators are looking into allegations that Davis used her 5-year-old daughter to pay off a debt ...

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/19/953846



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 21, 2009, 11:56:19 PM
wow.... View full Guest Book (3849 entries)
http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookid=7443314528791&cid=full


Where do you see all the photos discussed above??
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/fayettevilleobserver/obituary.aspx?n=shaniya-n-davis&pid=136204823

Now I am confused..who are all these people in the photos..first time I have seen more pics of other people  and very few of the person that the funeral is for..(Shaniya) ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ChiChi on November 22, 2009, 12:21:54 AM
Anyone know who prepared the obit.?

I was thinking the same thing Can.  Recently my FIL passed away.  My husband wrote the Obit for him and could have said anything he wanted.  He (my husband) could have left out his stepsisters and their side entirely but of course he included them.  Just saying that anything can be said in a Obit.  My guess is that it was either written by the mom's side of the family OR it was an oversight.  By the way, in my area an obit like that in our local paper would probably cost about $450 or more.


on the link on page

Okay, am I missing something? Or did they revise it? cause I see this from the obit link on page 63 I think ...,four great-aunts, Patricia Davis, Leona Davis, Caroline Davis and Yvonne Mitchell


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 22, 2009, 12:36:40 AM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 

What's to apologize for? You didn't spread any myths. Generalizing would be to say " All people in the south bring ____ to funerals." Your claim that it is etiquette to bring 'comfort food', is spot on in my (and many others) experiences. Some do, some don't. :]


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 22, 2009, 12:39:02 AM
wow.... View full Guest Book (3849 entries)
http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookid=7443314528791&cid=full


Where do you see all the photos discussed above??
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/fayettevilleobserver/obituary.aspx?n=shaniya-n-davis&pid=136204823

Now I am confused..who are all these people in the photos..first time I have seen more pics of other people  and very few of the person that the funeral is for..(Shaniya) ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

I'm assuming they are from people [random strangers expressing condolences, or family/friends] who have submitted guestbook entries.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 12:59:12 AM
I am a little troubled by the families posting of  their own personal pictures on her Legacy website with the funeral notice.  The pictures should just be of Shaniya, and they have posted all the relatives pictures.  I have never seen that done.  Very few pictures of Shaniya, and they must have more than that of her.

I thought that too AZSunny.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 22, 2009, 01:08:15 AM
JG - thank you SO much for reposting those reports, that's part of what I was looking for in my notes! 

The other part am looking for is where the E-machine was taken from their house.  Not on the report, or am I blind as well as tired?  lol 

Am looking in notes also to see where that was discussed.  Thought in here, but if not, then over at WS.  An interesting discussion.  Yet now, if a rumor not fact. 

Somebody take my keyboard, am typing with my eyes closed cuz I'm so tired.  Good thing I can type even in the dark.  But am not so sure am making any sense. 

See ya's all laterzzzz.. Nite!

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 22, 2009, 06:19:23 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/22/954080

How did McNeill's hopeful start go so wrong?

McNeill, accused of raping and murdering a 5-year-old girl, has a mother. You forget that sometimes when a defendant is charged with heinous crimes. He was once 5 and represented the hopes of his mother.

At 3 p.m. today, an angry, grief-stricken community will gather at Manna Church to remember the girl with the effervescent smile.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 06:36:11 AM
Trust fund at bank
A memorial trust fund has been set up at Wachovia bank in memory of Shaniya. It was done by family friend Vaughn Eason.

Eason said the family of Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, had no insurance for the girl and any money raised would help cover the cost of her funeral and burial services.

"Any money left over after that will go to local and national charities for neglected children," Eason said.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 22, 2009, 08:07:19 AM
Trust fund at bank
A memorial trust fund has been set up at Wachovia bank in memory of Shaniya. It was done by family friend Vaughn Eason.

Eason said the family of Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, had no insurance for the girl and any money raised would help cover the cost of her funeral and burial services.

"Any money left over after that will go to local and national charities for neglected children," Eason said.


Thank-you, Magnolia,

I am looking for to the B.P. Recipe on the other site.  If any new Monkeys are interested if it OK to post recipe link:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=38.0

This is just a wonderful site and I am so happy to be monkey.

Bradley didn't have insurance for the child...where did Shaniya go to preschool?  She had a jazzy guaduation outfit on and it
didn't look like a paper hat?  What stinks is Bradley could have saved this child by stepping up to the plate and registrating him-
self as the father, IMO. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 08:46:55 AM
Trust fund at bank
A memorial trust fund has been set up at Wachovia bank in memory of Shaniya. It was done by family friend Vaughn Eason.

Eason said the family of Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, had no insurance for the girl and any money raised would help cover the cost of her funeral and burial services.

"Any money left over after that will go to local and national charities for neglected children," Eason said.


Thank-you, Magnolia,

I am looking for to the B.P. Recipe on the other site.  If any new Monkeys are interested if it OK to post recipe link:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=38.0

This is just a wonderful site and I am so happy to be monkey.

Bradley didn't have insurance for the child...where did Shaniya go to preschool?  She had a jazzy guaduation outfit on and it
didn't look like a paper hat?  What stinks is Bradley could have saved this child by stepping up to the plate and registrating him-
self as the father, IMO. 

I noticed that several newspapers in the area are printing directions to the church for the funeral...some as
far away as Raleigh and Chapel Hill.
The church is one of those mega-churches with 5,000 members, so it should be able to accomodate
a large crowd.  One article said they expect hundreds and maybe thousands of people to attend.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 22, 2009, 09:18:01 AM

Shaniya should have a small and beautiful funeral not this public show.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 09:33:04 AM

Shaniya should have a small and beautiful funeral not this public show.




I agree with you.  This will be a spectacle I am afraid.

Here is a sad comparision from Shaniya's first day of school to the day in the hotel.

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=SHANIYAsent.jpg


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2009, 10:42:59 AM

Shaniya should have a small and beautiful funeral not this public show.




I agree with you.  This will be a spectacle I am afraid.

Here is a sad comparision from Shaniya's first day of school to the day in the hotel.

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=SHANIYAsent.jpg

There are more pictures of Shaniya on this website than there on the obituary page.  That smile of hers melts my heart. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 22, 2009, 10:52:46 AM
another vid police say shanyia died same day


http://<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2sig0W6TvDw&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2sig0W6TvDw&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 22, 2009, 11:00:57 AM
How did McNeill's hopeful start go so wrong?Myron Pitts


 Minutes before a judge read the charges against Mario Andrette McNeill on Friday, I was reminded of something.

McNeill, accused of raping and murdering a 5-year-old girl, has a mother. You forget that sometimes when a
defendant is charged with heinous crimes. He was once 5 and represented the hopes of his mother.

You wonder how things came so far.

McNeill's mother came quietly into the viewing area in the tiny courtroom at the Cumberland County Detention
Center. She wore shades and was dressed neatly in an orange blouse.

She took a seat across from where the reporters sat. The seat gave her the best view of her son through the glass
window.

McNeill, in an orange jump suit, stood next to his lawyer. He wore a neutral expression.

Facing the judge, his right side was turned to his mother. He glanced slightly to the right, but his eyes did not
 appear to make it all the way to her.

She listened as Judge George Franks asked if McNeill understood he could face the death penalty and life
imprisonment if convicted. He answered that he understood, and he was soon led out of the room.

A sheriff's deputy led McNeill's mother from the viewing area, ahead of reporters. In the parking lot, we follow
ed her to her car, but she did not speak to anyone. I did not get her name.

We knew she was McNeill's mother only because the Sheriff's Office spokeswoman told us.

A short while later, Ann Summers, mother of Antoinette Davis, came into the parking lot. She was at the detention
center to set up visits with her daughter.

Antoinette Davis is the mother of the slain angel, Shaniya Davis. The mother is charged with selling her own
daughter for sex.

Summers told reporters Antoinette Davis was innocent.

"She took great care of her children," she said.

She took questions and later spelled out her name and gave reporters her number.

She reserved all her anger for McNeill. Someone asked what she would say if she could speak to him. "I don't want
to," she said, shaking her head. "He ain't nothing but a maggot."

She said of Shaniya's death: "It's wrong. She didn't get her life started. Her life ended for no reason."

Shaniya's body was found in Lee County, at a spot where hunters dump deer carcasses. She died of asphyxiation,
according to an initial autopsy.

Police say surveillance video at a Sanford hotel shows McNeill holding the girl. He faces kidnapping charges,
too.

At 3 p.m. today, an angry, grief-stricken community will gather at Manna Church to remember the girl with the
effervescent smile.

The same community is asking questions.

Did the state's adult probation division fail in letting McNeill, who has a long criminal history, back onto the
 streets?

Did the Department of Social Services, which reportedly investigated Antoinette Davis, drop the ball?

After Shaniya was born June 14, 2004, at Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, her birth notice in the newspaper
followed the normal form: "Antoinette Davis, Fayetteville, a girl, Shaniya Nicole." The simple wording is full of
promise. You wonder again how it all went wrong.

Columnist Myron B. Pitts can be reached at pittsm@fayobserver.com or 486-3559.

link to video that didnt work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sig0W6TvDw&feature=player_embedded


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 22, 2009, 11:07:01 AM

Shaniya should have a small and beautiful funeral not this public show.




I agree with you.  This will be a spectacle I am afraid.

Here is a sad comparision from Shaniya's first day of school to the day in the hotel.

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=SHANIYAsent.jpg

There are more pictures of Shaniya on this website than there on the obituary page.  That smile of hers melts my heart. 

This melts anyones heart.

If the wishy washy father put his name on the birth certificate he would have parental rights, it may have prevented this funeral.

Shaniya started Kindergarden in this photo?  Did dad or aunt enrole Shaniya into school?  Wouldn't they be first to be told of

being taken out of school by her mother?  A $pectacle, yes, where is the families dignity? There no dignity for a sweet child who

suffered so much and here to put this funeral for display:(


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 22, 2009, 11:29:45 AM
JG - thank you SO much for reposting those reports, that's part of what I was looking for in my notes! 

The other part am looking for is where the E-machine was taken from their house.  Not on the report, or am I blind as well as tired?  lol 

Am looking in notes also to see where that was discussed.  Thought in here, but if not, then over at WS.  An interesting discussion.  Yet now, if a rumor not fact. 

Somebody take my keyboard, am typing with my eyes closed cuz I'm so tired.  Good thing I can type even in the dark.  But am not so sure am making any sense. 

See ya's all laterzzzz.. Nite!

 

This may sound dumb but what is an e-machine?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2009, 11:51:09 AM
JG - thank you SO much for reposting those reports, that's part of what I was looking for in my notes! 

The other part am looking for is where the E-machine was taken from their house.  Not on the report, or am I blind as well as tired?  lol 

Am looking in notes also to see where that was discussed.  Thought in here, but if not, then over at WS.  An interesting discussion.  Yet now, if a rumor not fact. 

Somebody take my keyboard, am typing with my eyes closed cuz I'm so tired.  Good thing I can type even in the dark.  But am not so sure am making any sense. 

See ya's all laterzzzz.. Nite!

 

This may sound dumb but what is an e-machine?

I don't have a clue, and I have never heard that term before.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2009, 11:52:57 AM
JG - thank you SO much for reposting those reports, that's part of what I was looking for in my notes! 

The other part am looking for is where the E-machine was taken from their house.  Not on the report, or am I blind as well as tired?  lol 

Am looking in notes also to see where that was discussed.  Thought in here, but if not, then over at WS.  An interesting discussion.  Yet now, if a rumor not fact. 

Somebody take my keyboard, am typing with my eyes closed cuz I'm so tired.  Good thing I can type even in the dark.  But am not so sure am making any sense. 

See ya's all laterzzzz.. Nite!

 

This may sound dumb but what is an e-machine?

I don't have a clue, and I have never heard that term before.

OK,  they are a brand of low cost PC's (thank you google)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 22, 2009, 11:54:42 AM
JG - thank you SO much for reposting those reports, that's part of what I was looking for in my notes! 

The other part am looking for is where the E-machine was taken from their house.  Not on the report, or am I blind as well as tired?  lol 

Am looking in notes also to see where that was discussed.  Thought in here, but if not, then over at WS.  An interesting discussion.  Yet now, if a rumor not fact. 

Somebody take my keyboard, am typing with my eyes closed cuz I'm so tired.  Good thing I can type even in the dark.  But am not so sure am making any sense. 

See ya's all laterzzzz.. Nite!

 

This may sound dumb but what is an e-machine?

I don't have a clue, and I have never heard that term before.

OK,  they are a brand of low cost PC's (thank you google)

Oh Thank You AZSunny.. I was baffled.. ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 11:55:59 AM
My DIL asked me a question tonight and I didn't know the answer....so HELP

AD was charge with selling Shaniya for sex...trafficking even before Shaniya was found.....how did the LE know what had happened?  I missed a lot of the earlier posts so.... What in the heck am I missing?



At the time Antoinette was arrested, McNeil was already in jail.  The police were questioning
Antionette off and on...as they put it, she was in and out of police headquarters.
I have wondered if McNeil talked or if Antoinette confessed to selling Shaniya.
I don't think we know yet.

thanks Magnolia...I thought it was Coe that was in jail....and McNeil turned himself in...oh well...see I told you I was confused!!  Thanks!!

I think...but I dont want to spead no myths...that Coe has been released by the time Antoinette was
arrested.  If I remember, it was Saturday night that they arrested Antoinette.

They were also questioning Brenda Davis during that time, so Breand may have told all.  IDK

Good Morning Monks....Magnolia thanks....I sure would love to know who told what!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 12:00:09 PM
Trust fund at bank
A memorial trust fund has been set up at Wachovia bank in memory of Shaniya. It was done by family friend Vaughn Eason.

Eason said the family of Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, had no insurance for the girl and any money raised would help cover the cost of her funeral and burial services.

"Any money left over after that will go to local and national charities for neglected children," Eason said.


Magnolia, thanks. I was wonder what the monies were to be used for. I think I am getting a jaded view of memorial funds after seeing the Anthony's and their greed.!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 12:02:37 PM

Shaniya should have a small and beautiful funeral not this public show.




I agree with you.  This will be a spectacle I am afraid.

Here is a sad comparision from Shaniya's first day of school to the day in the hotel.

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=SHANIYAsent.jpg

Mercy....that smacks you right in the face....she should never have been in that place....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: N2WISHN on November 22, 2009, 12:08:21 PM

Shaniya should have a small and beautiful funeral not this public show.




I agree with you.  This will be a spectacle I am afraid.

Here is a sad comparision from Shaniya's first day of school to the day in the hotel.

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=SHANIYAsent.jpg



The comparison is absolutely heartbreaking


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 22, 2009, 12:10:24 PM
'Morning, Monkeys.  I wonder if George and Cindy Anthony will make their way up to the funeral today.  After all, they have a lot in common with the Davises.  Shaniya's mother was instrumental in Shaniya's death.  Caylee's mother killed her. They should feel right at home with them.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 22, 2009, 02:08:57 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 

 This is OT  but...PDH3...not sure what pushed your button, but no one was intentionally trying to do that.    I am also remembering my daughter about 10 years ago having moved from very urban Seattle, where spa cusine and upscale dining was the norm for everything, to marrying and moving to Indiana.  She said Mom, if I go to one more wedding where they serve chicken, mashed potatoes and corn for a wedding dinner, I am moving back to the normal world. She didn't move back, and seems to have adjusted very well.

I grew up in Birmingham and I have eaten at Brody's in Mountain Brook many times.  I have also eaten
lasagna and salad.   I live in the country now and the food I mentioned is the norm around here.  The
people are loving and caring and want to help in any way they can when there is a tragedy.  It is just
a matter of doing whatever you can to comfort a grieving family.  I meant no harm.

OT again but AZ you are not spreading 'myths'.  It is an unwritten tradition for us southerners to take any kind of food to the home a greiving family.  I do it anytime someone passes.  I usually prepare a whole meal so at least one night is taken care of and they don't have to cook.  Don't shoot me Mods but gals I have a banana pudding square recipe (has cream cheese in it) that I will post in that section tomorrow.  I gotta run before the Mods come after me.  Just had to speak up for a lovely gesture that all families appreciate at that time.  I too wanna know what the bank fund will go to.  Is there someone appointed to over see that kind of thing or is it just to help the family?  If it was going to AD's family I am sure the bank wouldn't have considered it.  That would be a little bad advert for them I would think.  But I could see a greedy member of AD's fam trying it!

I am a drooling monkey....who has the recipe for banana pudding with Meringe? OK...cream cheese to good. TIA.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 22, 2009, 02:31:06 PM

Shaniya should have a small and beautiful funeral not this public show.




I agree with you.  This will be a spectacle I am afraid.

Here is a sad comparision from Shaniya's first day of school to the day in the hotel.

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=SHANIYAsent.jpg



The comparison is absolutely heartbreaking

N2,
 

Why didn't he put his name on the birth certificate?  The child was in Limbo, she had two parents and a zillion relatives
and no one knew she was in living in a mess?

Carey didn't have any legal guardianship to remove the child from the circumstances, they didn't have any authority
 because the courts didn't know he was the father?  I still say someone could have been sent over to that Trailer,
to have checked it out, dress someone up like the Cable guy, have him knock, peek around and say sorry wrong address.

I can not believe they stuck her there and did nothin'. 




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2009, 02:33:32 PM
This is a link to southern livings banana pudding.  Almost the same as mine, but I make a different vanilla pudding.

http://find.myrecipes.com/recipes/recipefinder.dyn?action=displayRecipe&recipe_id=401168


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 22, 2009, 02:49:31 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: N2WISHN on November 22, 2009, 03:38:10 PM

Shaniya should have a small and beautiful funeral not this public show.




I agree with you.  This will be a spectacle I am afraid.

Here is a sad comparision from Shaniya's first day of school to the day in the hotel.

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis/?action=view&current=SHANIYAsent.jpg



The comparison is absolutely heartbreaking

N2,
 

Why didn't he put his name on the birth certificate?  The child was in Limbo, she had two parents and a zillion relatives
and no one knew she was in living in a mess?

Carey didn't have any legal guardianship to remove the child from the circumstances, they didn't have any authority
 because the courts didn't know he was the father?  I still say someone could have been sent over to that Trailer,
to have checked it out, dress someone up like the Cable guy, have him knock, peek around and say sorry wrong address.

I can not believe they stuck her there and did nothin'. 





I can't get over the fact that there was really no one around to protect this baby.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2009, 04:00:34 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 22, 2009, 04:10:52 PM
God Bless You Shaniya..

(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/Angels-2.gif)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Searching on November 22, 2009, 04:14:45 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::

you are welcome.  ::CowboySmiley::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 22, 2009, 04:24:09 PM
Two things I want to bring up.  Just because Brad had a nicer home doesn't mean anything.  Of course it was more comfortable and better but that doesn't make a home.  I am a CNA working for home health and I go from home to home and I promise you I have met some of the most down to earth poor people living in worse than that little trailer you see AD living in.  What makes a home is the love and care you give someone.  I still love to go see some of my little old people I've met over the years.  The second thing is about the birth cert..  The lady came around unexpectedly to fill out info for the birth cert. and my husband was at work.  I named him but because he wasn't able to sign for it they couldn't add him so we did all that about 1 yr later when things were a bit better.  My son was so sick to begin with.  But Dad did make it later to the vital stat office to fix.  Brad probably just didn't make it to fill it out and we don't really know when he found out he was a Daddy do we.  He may not have worried about it cause he had her 90% of the time and didn't think it would be an issue.  To some that paper doesn't matter.  To us it did.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 22, 2009, 04:29:55 PM
God Bless You Shaniya..

(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/Angels-2.gif)

Tears rolling...this is so beautiful and so appropriate.  Thank you JG.  This hit home with me!  I don't know these children we keep losing but I feel so much for them.  Thank God they are in Heaven where there is no pain and sorrow.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 04:33:37 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::

you are welcome.  ::CowboySmiley::

Thanks Searching.  I watched the whole thing.
I felt sad for Carey.  From what I gathered Carey has three boys and was happy to have a
little girl in her life.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 04:42:11 PM
IMO this case is about ethics and values, the trailer didn't matter but the living conditions within the trailer did.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2009, 04:46:06 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Shaniya%20Nicole%20Davis/33ehmj6-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 22, 2009, 04:58:26 PM
I can appreciate that Carey Lockhart-Davis had only so much control in regards to the informal custody arrangement between Shaniya's father and mother but ... considering her genuine apprehension regarding AD's history ...love for her niece should have dictated periodic check-up visits regarding Shaniya's well being in that almost five week separation.  While her brother was out-of-town ... as an advocate for her niece ... maybe Carey would have learned that Shaniya was not enrolled in kindergarten.  As an advocate for her niece ... maybe Carey would have observed the squalored conditions that her niece was living in.  As an advocate for Shaniya ... maybe this aunt could have contacted CPS.

Then there is Brad Lockhart.  He also failed his daughter miserably.  If Carey had apprehension in regards to placing Shaniya in her mother's care ... there is no way that her brother was not aware of these concerns.   However ... this father felt that the mother of his precious child should be given a chance to prove herself worthy.  Brad gambled ... took a chance ... with his little girl at stake and ... lost big time.

What was Shaniya Davis subjected to in that almost five week period?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

It should not have happened.  It could have been prevented.  The red flags were there.  I am so angry!!

Janet

++++++

Slain N.C. girl’s aunt says mom was neglectful 
Vigils held after body of missing 5-year-old is found, mother charged


updated 6:37 p.m. PT, Tues., Nov . 17, 2009
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. - The aunt of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found off a rural North Carolina road said Tuesday that she had a hard time letting the girl live temporarily at her mother's house because she believed the woman neglected her children.

Shaniya Davis had gone last month to stay for a while with her mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, as part of an informal agreement with the father, Bradley Lockhart. Lockhart's sister said she helped raise the girl and was concerned about her moving in with her mother.

"Antoinette and I never really got along because of the way that she neglected her children," Carey Lockhart-Davis said. "I feel robbed. I feel that Shaniya was robbed."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33989586/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/


I just watched the funeral and started reading this board. Your maybe, Carey would have learned, maybe Aunt Carey would have observed, maybe this Aunt could have. Maybe you should have watched Aunt Carey speak at Shayina's funeral, only 2 people are responsible for Shaniya's death, devilmama, and Mcneill. Her devilmama had a choice to keep her safe and send her home safely and she chose not too. You can't blame others for her discusting behavior to do this to her own child, who would ever think this could, would ever happen?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 05:01:49 PM
I am watching a replay of the funeral, lets see how far into it I get, I am already crying.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 05:11:03 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching...I was out but would have watched it had I been home. I hope it was beautiful and respectful.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 05:11:56 PM
God Bless You Shaniya..

(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/Angels-2.gif)

jersey...this is beautiful. Shaniya is playing with the Angels and knows nothing but love.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 05:13:50 PM
Two things I want to bring up.  Just because Brad had a nicer home doesn't mean anything.  Of course it was more comfortable and better but that doesn't make a home.  I am a CNA working for home health and I go from home to home and I promise you I have met some of the most down to earth poor people living in worse than that little trailer you see AD living in.  What makes a home is the love and care you give someone.  I still love to go see some of my little old people I've met over the years.  The second thing is about the birth cert..  The lady came around unexpectedly to fill out info for the birth cert. and my husband was at work.  I named him but because he wasn't able to sign for it they couldn't add him so we did all that about 1 yr later when things were a bit better.  My son was so sick to begin with.  But Dad did make it later to the vital stat office to fix.  Brad probably just didn't make it to fill it out and we don't really know when he found out he was a Daddy do we.  He may not have worried about it cause he had her 90% of the time and didn't think it would be an issue.  To some that paper doesn't matter.  To us it did.

I hope your son is healthy now.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 22, 2009, 05:14:23 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching...I was out but would have watched it had I been home. I hope it was beautiful and respectful.

Actually it was nice except that guy who didn't have the decency to put his suspenders on while leading the choir, just left them hanging, very distracting.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 05:15:22 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Shaniya%20Nicole%20Davis/33ehmj6-1.jpg)

Thanks...she really was a beautiful child and now a beautiful angel ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 05:16:35 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::

you are welcome.  ::CowboySmiley::

Thanks Searching.  I watched the whole thing.
I felt sad for Carey.  From what I gathered Carey has three boys and was happy to have a
little girl in her life.

Magnolia would you mind post the highlights for those of us who didn't get to see it?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 05:19:46 PM
I am watching a replay of the funeral, lets see how far into it I get, I am already crying.

tracy, would you please post the link to watch the replay?  Thanks


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 05:20:35 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching...I was out but would have watched it had I been home. I hope it was beautiful and respectful.

Actually it was nice except that guy who didn't have the decency to put his suspenders on while leading the choir, just left them hanging, very distracting.

thanks Razzy


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 05:22:56 PM
Have we seen this?  http://www.facebook.com/people/Victo...00000055561722

This is Bradley Lockhart's other babymama.  She lives in Florida  Baby listed in Obit as one of Shaniya's brothers.

Also Bradley was on wedding channel listed as the groom to be of Tyrongella Davis.  it has been removed.
They were suppose to marry April 2010.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: islandmonkey on November 22, 2009, 05:24:02 PM

Hello Monkeys and Guests,

I wasn't aware of Funeral Etiquette:(



Shaniya Davis' funeral scheduled for Sunday

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m11d21-Shaniya-Davis-funeral-scheduled-for-Sunday



Funeral Etiquette

http://www.mountcastle.net/funeral.htm


In the South, the etiquette is to take fried chicken and potato salad and a banana pudding to
the family as soon as you hear of the death.


I was born and raised in the Deep South, and I have never taken those food items anywhere. Please don't generalize, or spread myths. Southerners take all kinds of food  on all kinds of occasions. I have been to funerals where the deceased person's family had a caterer take care of the food.

I apologize PDH3.  I did not mean to spread myths. 

 This is OT  but...PDH3...not sure what pushed your button, but no one was intentionally trying to do that.    I am also remembering my daughter about 10 years ago having moved from very urban Seattle, where spa cusine and upscale dining was the norm for everything, to marrying and moving to Indiana.  She said Mom, if I go to one more wedding where they serve chicken, mashed potatoes and corn for a wedding dinner, I am moving back to the normal world. She didn't move back, and seems to have adjusted very well.

I have been reading and following all these heartbreaking cases, but must say that when Eli passed everyone brought all the above foods plus many more the entire week, if they hadn't I'm not sure we would have even eaten and just last week a friend's mother passed and I took a ham, potato salad, banana pudding and a casserole to the family as soon as I heard about the death.......I thought it was customary to do so.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 05:24:13 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::

you are welcome.  ::CowboySmiley::

Thanks Searching.  I watched the whole thing.
I felt sad for Carey.  From what I gathered Carey has three boys and was happy to have a
little girl in her life.

Magnolia would you mind post the highlights for those of us who didn't get to see it?

Now you know that is just asking for trouble. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: islandmonkey on November 22, 2009, 05:24:54 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Shaniya%20Nicole%20Davis/33ehmj6-1.jpg)

Beautiful memorial photo.......thanks TM ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 05:28:05 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::

you are welcome.  ::CowboySmiley::

Thanks Searching.  I watched the whole thing.
I felt sad for Carey.  From what I gathered Carey has three boys and was happy to have a
little girl in her life.

Magnolia would you mind post the highlights for those of us who didn't get to see it?

Now you know that is just asking for trouble. ::MonkeyHaHa::


????? not sure what you mean, but will take your word on it ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 05:29:16 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching...I was out but would have watched it had I been home. I hope it was beautiful and respectful.

Actually it was nice except that guy who didn't have the decency to put his suspenders on while leading the choir, just left them hanging, very distracting.

And I kept wanting to hear the choir sing Jesus Loves Me or some song appropriate for little children.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 05:30:22 PM
I am watching a replay of the funeral, lets see how far into it I get, I am already crying.

tracy, would you please post the link to watch the replay?  Thanks

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/

Very sad. I just listened to her Aunt Carry read a poem, very touching and moving. Her dad spoke about God being good, and people need to get help for those who can't help themselves. Very moving and both are in so much pain


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Mary on November 22, 2009, 05:30:28 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2009, 05:31:18 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::

you are welcome.  ::CowboySmiley::

Thanks Searching.  I watched the whole thing.
I felt sad for Carey.  From what I gathered Carey has three boys and was happy to have a
little girl in her life.

Magnolia would you mind post the highlights for those of us who didn't get to see it?

Now you know that is just asking for trouble. ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 05:32:10 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::

you are welcome.  ::CowboySmiley::

Thanks Searching.  I watched the whole thing.
I felt sad for Carey.  From what I gathered Carey has three boys and was happy to have a
little girl in her life.

Magnolia would you mind post the highlights for those of us who didn't get to see it?

Now you know that is just asking for trouble. ::MonkeyHaHa::


????? not sure what you mean, but will take your word on it ::MonkeyWink::

I would not give rave reviews and that might offend some.  But it was better than I expected.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 05:49:52 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6474571/

Watch Shaniya's funeral on WRAL.com LIVE at 3 p.m.

Thanks Searching!   ::MonkeyCool::

you are welcome.  ::CowboySmiley::

Thanks Searching.  I watched the whole thing.
I felt sad for Carey.  From what I gathered Carey has three boys and was happy to have a
little girl in her life.

Magnolia would you mind post the highlights for those of us who didn't get to see it?

Now you know that is just asking for trouble. ::MonkeyHaHa::


????? not sure what you mean, but will take your word on it ::MonkeyWink::

I would not give rave reviews and that might offend some.  But it was better than I expected.

It is nice just a little different from other funerals I have seen or been to. Very focused on Jesus and God rather then Shaniya, not that that is bad, just more talk about how this is a test etc... I would like to hear more about Shaniya but maybe that is what I am used to, don't know. It is nice though. I can't see the casket though, I think it is gray?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 05:52:55 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 05:54:52 PM
That was very nicely put, Tracy.  I missed Shaniya at the funeral too.

I thought the casket was mahogany, but couldn't be sure.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 06:00:17 PM
Thank you Magnolia, I tried


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 06:03:13 PM
And if I didn't hit the enter key and make the post, I would have continued to say.....


I tried to explain it without insulting anyone.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 22, 2009, 06:09:15 PM
And if I didn't hit the enter key and make the post, I would have continued to say.....


I tried to explain it without insulting anyone.

I understand what your saying, a few times I felt preached at, alittle odd for a child's funeral, especially since it was a murder. Bless her soul. RIP Shaniya


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 06:32:50 PM
That was very nicely put, Tracy.  I missed Shaniya at the funeral too.

I thought the casket was mahogany, but couldn't be sure.

Yea me too. I have written out a few different thoughts and each time deleting them. I will just keep my thoughts to myself for now.

God Bless this little girl. I will remember you always.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 22, 2009, 06:50:10 PM
This is a link to southern livings banana pudding.  Almost the same as mine, but I make a different vanilla pudding.

http://find.myrecipes.com/recipes/recipefinder.dyn?action=displayRecipe&recipe_id=401168

AZSunny,

Thank-you!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 07:25:54 PM


I would not give rave reviews and that might offend some.  But it was better than I expected.

Ok...I gotcha now.....DUH!! I am going to watch it in a few.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 07:34:01 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



It won't play for me...might be my computer though


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 07:35:33 PM


I would not give rave reviews and that might offend some.  But it was better than I expected.

It is nice just a little different from other funerals I have seen or been to. Very focused on Jesus and God rather then Shaniya, not that that is bad, just more talk about how this is a test etc... I would like to hear more about Shaniya but maybe that is what I am used to, don't know. It is nice though. I can't see the casket though, I think it is gray?

Thanks to both of you...perhaps it's good that I can't get it to play ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 22, 2009, 07:37:05 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



Thank you Tracygirl.

Who was the woman who gave a tribute to "Daddy" towards the end of the service?

For the most part ... I believe the words spoken from the pulpit.  I know those words come right from the Word of God.  However ... I wish I understood why a loving God would use an innocent little child to get "our attention" to bring about good in regards to the social needs within our society.  I guess if I understood God's ways ... He would not be God.  It is times like this that my trust and faith in the ways of my Heavenly Father is tested.

Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya ... possesses faith that I fail to comprehend but ... wish I did.

Janet

+++++

Romans 8:28
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

Jeremiah 17:7
Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord and has made the Lord his hope and confidence.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2009, 08:02:43 PM
That was very nicely put, Tracy.  I missed Shaniya at the funeral too.

I thought the casket was mahogany, but couldn't be sure.

Yea me too. I have written out a few different thoughts and each time deleting them. I will just keep my thoughts to myself for now.

God Bless this little girl. I will remember you always.

I am upset about this lovely child and all of the people who failed her. ::MonkeyAngel::

Rather than tie myself in knots about their tribute to Shaniya, I keep thinking....
Magnolia, it wasn't for you.  It was for them and it was their way of doing things


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2009, 08:31:36 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



It won't play for me...might be my computer though

I can't get it to play either.  From what I heard, it is OK.  I already went to church today once.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I would have preferred to hear they highlighted the joy of Shaniya in there lives. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 22, 2009, 08:32:46 PM

Also Bradley was on wedding channel listed as the groom to be of Tyrongella Davis.  it has been removed.
They were suppose to marry April 2010.

The rest of it has been removed, but this is still there:

http://registry.weddingchannel.com/cs/searchresults.action?sortField=registrantsNames&isReverse=true&currentPageNr=1&retailer_uid=&cm_mmc=Affiliate-_-WC-_-Search-_-Reg&rfn=BRADLEY+&rln=+LOCKHART&em=-1&ey=-1&search_adv.x=25&search_adv.y=7



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 22, 2009, 08:34:51 PM
And now there is really nothing else that can be done except to celebrate the eternal life of Shaniya.  She is in the arms of Jesus now.  I cried like a little baby and the poems were hard to hear and watch.  God bless all those who are hurting in her family.  And God bless beautiful little Shaniya. ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 08:34:56 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



Thank you Tracygirl.

Who was the woman who gave a tribute to "Daddy" towards the end of the service?

For the most part ... I believe the words spoken from the pulpit.  I know those words come right from the Word of God.  However ... I wish I understood why a loving God would use an innocent little child to get "our attention" to bring about good in regards to the social needs within our society.  I guess if I understood God's ways ... He would not be God.  It is times like this that my trust and faith in the ways of my Heavenly Father is tested.

Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya ... possesses faith that I fail to comprehend but ... wish I did.

Janet

+++++

Romans 8:28
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

Jeremiah 17:7
Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord and has made the Lord his hope and confidence.

Janet, I know what you mean..... ::MonkeyTears::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 08:36:47 PM
That was very nicely put, Tracy.  I missed Shaniya at the funeral too.

I thought the casket was mahogany, but couldn't be sure.

Yea me too. I have written out a few different thoughts and each time deleting them. I will just keep my thoughts to myself for now.

God Bless this little girl. I will remember you always.

I am upset about this lovely child and all of the people who failed her. ::MonkeyAngel::

Rather than tie myself in knots about their tribute to Shaniya, I keep thinking....
Magnolia, it wasn't for you.  It was for them and it was their way of doing things

Magnolia..... :smt058


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 08:39:04 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



It won't play for me...might be my computer though

I can't get it to play either.  From what I heard, it is OK.  I already went to church today once.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I would have preferred to hear they highlighted the joy of Shaniya in there lives. 

me too.....I detest funerals but I really detest one where I am being preached at...... ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 22, 2009, 08:44:55 PM
Honestly, I don't see how anyone can be mad about a funeral.... my God... give it a break.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 22, 2009, 08:49:46 PM
Honestly, I don't see how anyone can be mad about a funeral.... my God... give it a break.

I wasn't referring to Shaniya's funeral..I didn't get to see it....I was referring to something personal...my mistake...but if anyone feels anger or is upset or simply disagrees over what was or wasn't said or done...I certainly wouldn't chastise them for it ::MonkeyWink::

Good Night Monks....and don't for get to BELIEVE!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2009, 08:54:33 PM
Honestly, I don't see how anyone can be mad about a funeral.... my God... give it a break.

I wasn't referring to Shaniya's funeral..I didn't get to see it....I was referring to something personal...my mistake...but if anyone feels anger or is upset or simply disagrees over what was or wasn't said or done...I certainly wouldn't chastise them for it ::MonkeyWink::

Good Night Monks....and don't for get to BELIEVE!!

Good night SunnyinTx!   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bikerbev on November 22, 2009, 09:33:32 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



Thank you Tracygirl.

Who was the woman who gave a tribute to "Daddy" towards the end of the service?

For the most part ... I believe the words spoken from the pulpit.  I know those words come right from the Word of God.  However ... I wish I understood why a loving God would use an innocent little child to get "our attention" to bring about good in regards to the social needs within our society.  I guess if I understood God's ways ... He would not be God.  It is times like this that my trust and faith in the ways of my Heavenly Father is tested.

Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya ... possesses faith that I fail to comprehend but ... wish I did.

Janet

+++++

Romans 8:28
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

Jeremiah 17:7
Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord and has made the Lord his hope and confidence.
I don't think God 'made' this happen to Shaniya, but that man in his sinful nature did this to Shaniya.   However, Romans 8:28, as you've quoted, tells us that God will work this for the good to those who love Him according to His purpose. 

I would have liked to have heard more about Shaniya, too, but just think of how many lost souls were sitting in that church that doesn't have a personal relationship with God, yet there they were.  Shaniya, in death brought those people together to hear the Word.  Maybe that's the first step in God will to turn this ugly into something good or those who are lost.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 22, 2009, 09:44:00 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



Thank you Tracygirl.

Who was the woman who gave a tribute to "Daddy" towards the end of the service?

For the most part ... I believe the words spoken from the pulpit.  I know those words come right from the Word of God.  However ... I wish I understood why a loving God would use an innocent little child to get "our attention" to bring about good in regards to the social needs within our society.  I guess if I understood God's ways ... He would not be God.  It is times like this that my trust and faith in the ways of my Heavenly Father is tested.

Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya ... possesses faith that I fail to comprehend but ... wish I did.

Janet

+++++

Romans 8:28
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

Jeremiah 17:7
Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord and has made the Lord his hope and confidence.
I don't think God 'made' this happen to Shaniya, but that man in his sinful nature did this to Shaniya.   However, Romans 8:28, as you've quoted, tells us that God will work this for the good to those who love Him according to His purpose. 

I would have liked to have heard more about Shaniya, too, but just think of how many lost souls were sitting in that church that doesn't have a personal relationship with God, yet there they were.  Shaniya, in death brought those people together to hear the Word.  Maybe that's the first step in God will to turn this ugly into something good or those who are lost.

And a big AMEN to that..  Let Shaniya's passing not be in vain..... let something good come from it.  This tragedy affected a lot of people as if they knew this beautiful little girl.....I am still trying to recover from the great sadness...... ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 22, 2009, 09:49:22 PM
I didn't watch the funeral, for several reasons, but I can tell you that on one forum it literally wound up with fighting, about the funeral. I don't think I have ever seen a funeral that was  inappropriate, but some people sure thought that it was. I suppose what ever a family plans for a funeral it is appropriate for them and that's what counts.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 22, 2009, 09:51:04 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



Thank you Tracygirl.

Who was the woman who gave a tribute to "Daddy" towards the end of the service?

For the most part ... I believe the words spoken from the pulpit.  I know those words come right from the Word of God.  However ... I wish I understood why a loving God would use an innocent little child to get "our attention" to bring about good in regards to the social needs within our society.  I guess if I understood God's ways ... He would not be God.  It is times like this that my trust and faith in the ways of my Heavenly Father is tested.

Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya ... possesses faith that I fail to comprehend but ... wish I did.

Janet

+++++

Romans 8:28
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

Jeremiah 17:7
Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord and has made the Lord his hope and confidence.
I don't think God 'made' this happen to Shaniya, but that man in his sinful nature did this to Shaniya.   However, Romans 8:28, as you've quoted, tells us that God will work this for the good to those who love Him according to His purpose. 

I would have liked to have heard more about Shaniya, too, but just think of how many lost souls were sitting in that church that doesn't have a personal relationship with God, yet there they were.  Shaniya, in death brought those people together to hear the Word.  Maybe that's the first step in God will to turn this ugly into something good or those who are lost.

And a big AMEN to that..  Let Shaniya's passing not be in vain..... let something good come from it.  This tragedy affected a lot of people as if they knew this beautiful little girl.....I am still trying to recover from the great sadness...... ::MonkeyWaa::

As my pastor would say if one soul was saved today then Shaniya did not die in vain.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 22, 2009, 09:55:03 PM
I didn't watch the funeral, for several reasons, but I can tell you that on one forum it literally wound up with fighting, about the funeral. I don't think I have ever seen a funeral that was  inappropriate, but some people sure thought that it was. I suppose what ever a family plans for a funeral it is appropriate for them and that's what counts.

Your right NRCG...it is up to the family and we should be glad we were able to see the funeral for those that wanted to....I did not watch either. The hard part for the family will be if this goes to trial.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 22, 2009, 10:09:13 PM
Tracy: do you have a link.    Thank-you

Here it is again.

http://www.wral.com/news/video/6475163/



Thank you Tracygirl.

Who was the woman who gave a tribute to "Daddy" towards the end of the service?

For the most part ... I believe the words spoken from the pulpit.  I know those words come right from the Word of God.  However ... I wish I understood why a loving God would use an innocent little child to get "our attention" to bring about good in regards to the social needs within our society.  I guess if I understood God's ways ... He would not be God.  It is times like this that my trust and faith in the ways of my Heavenly Father is tested.

Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya ... possesses faith that I fail to comprehend but ... wish I did.

Janet

+++++

Romans 8:28
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

Jeremiah 17:7
Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord and has made the Lord his hope and confidence.
I don't think God 'made' this happen to Shaniya, but that man in his sinful nature did this to Shaniya.   However, Romans 8:28, as you've quoted, tells us that God will work this for the good to those who love Him according to His purpose. 

I would have liked to have heard more about Shaniya, too, but just think of how many lost souls were sitting in that church that doesn't have a personal relationship with God, yet there they were.  Shaniya, in death brought those people together to hear the Word.  Maybe that's the first step in God will to turn this ugly into something good or those who are lost.

I do not think so either.  However ... God did allow the chain of events to unfold for a greater purpose.  I realize that at the moment it is my lack of faith ...  my lack of trust ... that is the problem but ... it just bothers me that a little girl was forced to go through a H--- on Earth to teach others out there valuable lessons in regards to the consequences of unwise choices.

The adults entrusted with Shaniya care ... may have loved her in their own way but ... when all is said and done ... they all failed to make the choices necessary to protect her from what ultimately happened.  There were red flags in regards to the lifestyle of the mother but ... they were ignorned.  Brad believed the mother deserved "a chance" for the mother to redeem herself.  That was a betrayal to Shaniya.  Aunt Carey failed to check on her niece's welfare once in that five week period despite her misgivings.  That was neglect.

Bikerbev ... I agree in regards to the service.  At times the focus tended to drift from Shaniya but ... there was not one person who left that service that was not aware of ... The Way ... The Truth and ... The Life.

Janet

++++++


Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home
Updated: Nov. 19 10:35 am


http://wake.mync.com/site/wake/news/story/44620/some-claim-shaniya-davis-was-at-risk-and-needed-a-better-home


Slain N.C. girl’s aunt says mom was neglectful 
updated 6:37 p.m. PT, Tues., Nov . 17, 2009


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33989586/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 22, 2009, 10:12:18 PM
I didn't watch the funeral, for several reasons, but I can tell you that on one forum it literally wound up with fighting, about the funeral. I don't think I have ever seen a funeral that was  inappropriate, but some people sure thought that it was. I suppose what ever a family plans for a funeral it is appropriate for them and that's what counts.

I agree.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 22, 2009, 10:12:33 PM
I didn't watch the funeral, for several reasons, but I can tell you that on one forum it literally wound up with fighting, about the funeral. I don't think I have ever seen a funeral that was  inappropriate, but some people sure thought that it was. I suppose what ever a family plans for a funeral it is appropriate for them and that's what counts.

Your right NRCG...it is up to the family and we should be glad we were able to see the funeral for those that wanted to....I did not watch either. The hard part for the family will be if this goes to trial.
How true what a nightmare for a family, no wonder some families break up when such horrible crimes happen, the pain and stress must be intolerable.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 22, 2009, 10:14:27 PM
On that Wedding Channel site link someone posted it says that Lockhart is going to marry someone named Tyrongella Davis.  Another woman named Davis?  Wonder if she is related to Antoinette.  I recently learned that a good friend's first husband was the cousin of her second husband.  I guess she dumped the first one. So her children are not only half siblings, but cousins too I think.  It's hard to keep all these people straight, but it does appear that Brad Lockhart has a thing for people named Davis.  Coincidentally, his sister Carey married someone named Davis. This doesn't mean anything in particular, just odd.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 22, 2009, 10:16:02 PM
I didn't watch the funeral, for several reasons, but I can tell you that on one forum it literally wound up with fighting, about the funeral. I don't think I have ever seen a funeral that was  inappropriate, but some people sure thought that it was. I suppose what ever a family plans for a funeral it is appropriate for them and that's what counts.

I agree.

Janet

I agree with that, too, No Rose.  Whatever they want to do is appropriate for them.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 10:22:50 PM
NRCG I think it was just different from the funerals or memorials most have seen. There is no denying this family is very religious. The last preacher even commented that the father had more of a conviction then he and he was surprised at it. What I think people may be feeling, and this is coming from a several people I have had conversations/debates with today, not necessarily my opinion, But her death is being exploited to further a POV as if her life on earth had no meaning. I had one person tell me, as the person who killed her used her body, the religious fanatics are using her soul for their own purpose and she, the little girl was outright ignored her during her funeral. That was extreme but thought I would share.
I think for me, it is not my place to say whether it was too religious or not or if that is right or not as every family does things differently.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 22, 2009, 10:28:13 PM
On that Wedding Channel site link someone posted it says that Lockhart is going to marry someone named Tyrongella Davis.  Another woman named Davis?  Wonder if she is related to Antoinette.  I recently learned that a good friend's first husband was the cousin of her second husband.  I guess she dumped the first one. So her children are not only half siblings, but cousins too I think.  It's hard to keep all these people straight, but it does appear that Brad Lockhart has a thing for people named Davis.  Coincidentally, his sister Carey married someone named Davis. This doesn't mean anything in particular, just odd.

And extremely confusing!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 22, 2009, 10:36:42 PM
evening Monkeys....
I am disgusted that the bio mom was mentioned in the obit for this baby...::MonkeyConfused:: sorry, but I just about puked when I say her name up there, right along with the father...and the Aunt  Carrie was not even mentioned??? the only one who probably did love this child the most...so very very wrong imo...
I have not brought myself to see the funeral yet...


Just to mention, the other night on one of the talk shows, Pat Brown the profiler said that the father  was negligent for allowing this child to be with this mother..,.,so it isn't just Monkeys on here and other people on the boards that think this way...It seems that everyone in Shaniya's family failed this beautiful child...I am so upset about this happening to her...it never should have happened to her...it could have been prevented..and I am just so sad over this..and angry !



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 22, 2009, 10:43:20 PM
evening Monkeys....
I am disgusted that the bio mom was mentioned in the obit for this baby...::MonkeyConfused:: sorry, but I just about puked when I say her name up there, right along with the father...and the Aunt  Carrie was not even mentioned??? the only one who probably did love this child the most...so very very wrong imo...
I have not brought myself to see the funeral yet...


Just to mention, the other night on one of the talk shows, Pat Brown the profiler said that the father  was negligent for allowing this child to be with this mother..,.,so it isn't just Monkeys on here and other people on the boards that think this way...It seems that everyone in Shaniya's family failed this beautiful child...I am so upset about this happening to her...it never should have happened to her...it could have been prevented..and I am just so sad over this..and angry !



Cookie the Aunt read a poem she had writen about her relation with her, it was very touching. You can tell she loved her very much.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 22, 2009, 10:47:05 PM
evening Monkeys....
I am disgusted that the bio mom was mentioned in the obit for this baby...::MonkeyConfused:: sorry, but I just about puked when I say her name up there, right along with the father...and the Aunt  Carrie was not even mentioned??? the only one who probably did love this child the most...so very very wrong imo...
I have not brought myself to see the funeral yet...


Just to mention, the other night on one of the talk shows, Pat Brown the profiler said that the father  was negligent for allowing this child to be with this mother..,.,so it isn't just Monkeys on here and other people on the boards that think this way...It seems that everyone in Shaniya's family failed this beautiful child...I am so upset about this happening to her...it never should have happened to her...it could have been prevented..and I am just so sad over this..and angry !



Cookie the Aunt read a poem she had writen about her relation with her, it was very touching. You can tell she loved her very much.

no doubt in my mind that she loved her bunches...she is the one person that I can say is sincere in her grief and love for that little girl....so very sad..I wish that she would have had custody of Shaniya..it must pain her very much to have to think about the horror that Shaniya went through...this will haunt her for the rest of her life...she is going to miss Shaniya...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 22, 2009, 10:48:25 PM
I plan on looking at the funeral tomorrow...I just don't want to see it right before I go to bed...too sad...

I bid you all a pleasant evening ...will talk with you all tomorrow...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Babybear on November 22, 2009, 11:30:07 PM
I won't be looking at the funeral at all.  I, too, am disgusted that the mother, who sold this beautiful child into slavery for a drug hit was even mentioned in the obit.
I have to say that looking at all of the pictures of Shaniya, she is always so meticulously dressed and looks so well taken care of.  With the exception of the white picture, where she looks so pretty and I think was in a studio, the background of the pictures shows homes and lawns well taken care of and nice places for Shaniya to be.  I think her aunt Carey is responsible for this and obviously took very, very good care of her.  I think she loved her very much and had no control over Shaniya going to her mother.  If Shaniya's father had knowledge of what went on in that trailer and allowed her to go without a court battle, then he also bears some blame for her fate. But not knowing the whole story, and if it is true that his name was not on Shaniya's birth certificate as the father, I don't think he could control what the so-called mother decided to do with Shaniya.  Courts do favor bio mothers and maybe he thought it would be better to avoid a court battle and let Shaniya visit that dreadful place.  He certainly should have gone inside, if he didn't, and not let Shaniya stay there if he could help it.  There are so many unknowns.  However, we do know who killed her and brutalized her and we know who sold her into that fate.  So for now, I blame those two monsters, Antoinette Davis and Mario Macneil and I hope they get what is coming to them in this world and the next.  As for the others, I'll just wait and see what develops before judging them guilty.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 22, 2009, 11:40:28 PM
Ot but there was an amber alert issued in nc for a 2month old baby. Has anyone heard about it. I can't find no info on it. And I live in nc


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 22, 2009, 11:46:25 PM
Just found out 2 month old baby girl. In conover.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 22, 2009, 11:47:50 PM
Ot but there was an amber alert issued in nc for a 2month old baby. Has anyone heard about it. I can't find no info on it. And I live in nc


http://addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pub=IMDAdmin

luvmyboys I googled amber alert nc and found this

I hope it works for you..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 22, 2009, 11:57:26 PM
Ot but there was an amber alert issued in nc for a 2month old baby. Has anyone heard about it. I can't find no info on it. And I live in nc


http://addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pub=IMDAdmin

luvmyboys I googled amber alert nc and found this

I hope it works for you..

wrong link


luvmyboys
Try this link



http://www2.wnct.com/nct/news/state_regiona

http://addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pub=IMDAdminl/article/amber_alert_issued_for_missing_north_carolina_infant/77701/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on November 23, 2009, 12:13:34 AM
Ty mymonkey


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 23, 2009, 12:32:16 AM
Ty mymonkey
[/quote

yw ::MonkeyBike::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on November 23, 2009, 12:35:20 AM
Here is Aunt Carey's eulogy/poem if anyone's interested..
------------------

"Shaniya truly was a blessing.
She has touched a lot of us, but I've written something very private and special, and this is particularly for me and Shaniya- and the few people who sit right here before me because they all understand what I was talking about when I read what I'm about to read to you.

This is called, "My Life With Shaniya"

The love we shared was rare in form
We shared something special from the day that bond was born
That very first Christmas we put up our tree
You smiled so big as you looked up at me
I saw your eyes as they sparkled so bright
I pulled out the box and added more light
Shortly came after- Spring, then fall
You loved to color, while I sat and draw
I remember the nights when I'd rock you to sleep
You'd rub on my earlobe, til you fell fast asleep

We never had to do nothing at all
Everyone who knew us, this they saw
Before I knew it- before I could see
There you were- the age of three
I came with a cake and balloons and all
Those things didn't matter, cuz it was 'me' you saw
You hugged me so tight- and smiled and said:
"Guess what Aunt Carey- I'm three!"
You held up your hand- and said "one, two, three"
I giggled, you laughed- as you looked so happy and carefree

Now we go on to sing our ABC's
You asked to call your daddy so he could see what you have achieved
I pick up the phone, and dial away
I hear you say "Hey daddy", and there you go- and sing away
You loved your daddy, this I can say
Aunt Carey knew this in every single way

Along came four, oh wow- now you're five
I'm so thankful- now I have this Angel by my side
Ty was there to help you along your way
You both shared a love simply deep I must say

I remember your first trip when you went away
Off with your cousins to Uncle Kevin's to play
I still hear your laughter
William, Kelly and Anthony say: "They miss that sweet melody in every way"
They loved you- this I can truly say
I could feel this when I heard the four of you play

Jump, jump, jump away
The trampoline was your favorite place to play
I watched you for hours just to hear you say:
"Aunt Carey! Aunt Carey!" I'd look, and you'd begin to flip away

I remember every moment- this is true I can say
Every last moment took my breath away
Now I sit where we once played
I could feel the wind blow, and see the wind sway
I close my eyes, then I hear you say:
"Aunt Carey, Aunt Carey! Come on, let's go play!"

The moments we shared, Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
I remember every moment as I watched you grow tall
You were my left- and I was your right
Yes, we were so very tight
Every moment with you, I remember them all
They fill up my soul, my heart- this can't control

We were two souls, twined one in time
I was your soul mate, and you were mine
I protected you the best I could
And now your my guardian Angel and this is understood
I always told you to stand up tall
To hold your head up, your shoulders and all
Now I have you- just in case I fall

I truly know now, that I have been blessed
Some things are so special- I felt your love the best
I no longer worry, nor do I grieve
Because God has my sweet angel to protect over me
Now I give you to the Lord above
Watch over my Angel, my sweet precious love


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ChiChi on November 23, 2009, 02:58:07 AM
On that Wedding Channel site link someone posted it says that Lockhart is going to marry someone named Tyrongella Davis.  Another woman named Davis?  Wonder if she is related to Antoinette.  I recently learned that a good friend's first husband was the cousin of her second husband.  I guess she dumped the first one. So her children are not only half siblings, but cousins too I think.  It's hard to keep all these people straight, but it does appear that Brad Lockhart has a thing for people named Davis.  Coincidentally, his sister Carey married someone named Davis. This doesn't mean anything in particular, just odd.

And extremely confusing!

I think there are a lot of oddities in this family/case.  I keep thinking about the step brother Byron, on NG he said that his father decided to to give the mother AD a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.But I hear Shaniya's father say maybe on NG too that he has never been extremely concerned about leaving Shaniya with her mother, indicating regular concerns yes... serious concerns, no.  Those statements are in conflict.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: KCJackie on November 23, 2009, 03:08:08 AM
Here is Aunt Carey's eulogy/poem if anyone's interested..
------------------

"Shaniya truly was a blessing.
She has touched a lot of us, but I've written something very private and special, and this is particularly for me and Shaniya- and the few people who sit right here before me because they all understand what I was talking about when I read what I'm about to read to you.

This is called, "My Life With Shaniya"

The love we shared was rare in form
We shared something special from the day that bond was born
That very first Christmas we put up our tree
You smiled so big as you looked up at me
I saw your eyes as they sparkled so bright
I pulled out the box and added more light
Shortly came after- Spring, then fall
You loved to color, while I sat and draw
I remember the nights when I'd rock you to sleep
You'd rub on my earlobe, til you fell fast asleep

We never had to do nothing at all
Everyone who knew us, this they saw
Before I knew it- before I could see
There you were- the age of three
I came with a cake and balloons and all
Those things didn't matter, cuz it was 'me' you saw
You hugged me so tight- and smiled and said:
"Guess what Aunt Carey- I'm three!"
You held up your hand- and said "one, two, three"
I giggled, you laughed- as you looked so happy and carefree

Now we go on to sing our ABC's
You asked to call your daddy so he could see what you have achieved
I pick up the phone, and dial away
I hear you say "Hey daddy", and there you go- and sing away
You loved your daddy, this I can say
Aunt Carey knew this in every single way

Along came four, oh wow- now you're five
I'm so thankful- now I have this Angel by my side
Ty was there to help you along your way
You both shared a love simply deep I must say

I remember your first trip when you went away
Off with your cousins to Uncle Kevin's to play
I still hear your laughter
William, Kelly and Anthony say: "They miss that sweet melody in every way"
They loved you- this I can truly say
I could feel this when I heard the four of you play

Jump, jump, jump away
The trampoline was your favorite place to play
I watched you for hours just to hear you say:
"Aunt Carey! Aunt Carey!" I'd look, and you'd begin to flip away

I remember every moment- this is true I can say
Every last moment took my breath away
Now I sit where we once played
I could feel the wind blow, and see the wind sway
I close my eyes, then I hear you say:
"Aunt Carey, Aunt Carey! Come on, let's go play!"

The moments we shared, Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
I remember every moment as I watched you grow tall
You were my left- and I was your right
Yes, we were so very tight
Every moment with you, I remember them all
They fill up my soul, my heart- this can't control

We were two souls, twined one in time
I was your soul mate, and you were mine
I protected you the best I could
And now your my guardian Angel and this is understood
I always told you to stand up tall
To hold your head up, your shoulders and all
Now I have you- just in case I fall

I truly know now, that I have been blessed
Some things are so special- I felt your love the best
I no longer worry, nor do I grieve
Because God has my sweet angel to protect over me
Now I give you to the Lord above
Watch over my Angel, my sweet precious love

I just watched the funeral and balled my eyes out during Carey's poem.  I thought the funeral was good - trying to unite the families instead of an all out war - IMO.  I felt sad for Byron who couldn't speak because of the tears and I thought AD's brother did good too - he even made a comment to Brad that he was a much better man than he could be during this. ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Maven on November 23, 2009, 03:15:30 AM
Here is Aunt Carey's eulogy/poem if anyone's interested..
------------------

"Shaniya truly was a blessing.
She has touched a lot of us, but I've written something very private and special, and this is particularly for me and Shaniya- and the few people who sit right here before me because they all understand what I was talking about when I read what I'm about to read to you.

This is called, "My Life With Shaniya"

The love we shared was rare in form
We shared something special from the day that bond was born
That very first Christmas we put up our tree
You smiled so big as you looked up at me
I saw your eyes as they sparkled so bright
I pulled out the box and added more light
Shortly came after- Spring, then fall
You loved to color, while I sat and draw
I remember the nights when I'd rock you to sleep
You'd rub on my earlobe, til you fell fast asleep

We never had to do nothing at all
Everyone who knew us, this they saw
Before I knew it- before I could see
There you were- the age of three
I came with a cake and balloons and all
Those things didn't matter, cuz it was 'me' you saw
You hugged me so tight- and smiled and said:
"Guess what Aunt Carey- I'm three!"
You held up your hand- and said "one, two, three"
I giggled, you laughed- as you looked so happy and carefree

Now we go on to sing our ABC's
You asked to call your daddy so he could see what you have achieved
I pick up the phone, and dial away
I hear you say "Hey daddy", and there you go- and sing away
You loved your daddy, this I can say
Aunt Carey knew this in every single way

Along came four, oh wow- now you're five
I'm so thankful- now I have this Angel by my side
Ty was there to help you along your way
You both shared a love simply deep I must say

I remember your first trip when you went away
Off with your cousins to Uncle Kevin's to play
I still hear your laughter
William, Kelly and Anthony say: "They miss that sweet melody in every way"
They loved you- this I can truly say
I could feel this when I heard the four of you play

Jump, jump, jump away
The trampoline was your favorite place to play
I watched you for hours just to hear you say:
"Aunt Carey! Aunt Carey!" I'd look, and you'd begin to flip away

I remember every moment- this is true I can say
Every last moment took my breath away
Now I sit where we once played
I could feel the wind blow, and see the wind sway
I close my eyes, then I hear you say:
"Aunt Carey, Aunt Carey! Come on, let's go play!"

The moments we shared, Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
I remember every moment as I watched you grow tall
You were my left- and I was your right
Yes, we were so very tight
Every moment with you, I remember them all
They fill up my soul, my heart- this can't control

We were two souls, twined one in time
I was your soul mate, and you were mine
I protected you the best I could
And now your my guardian Angel and this is understood
I always told you to stand up tall
To hold your head up, your shoulders and all
Now I have you- just in case I fall

I truly know now, that I have been blessed
Some things are so special- I felt your love the best
I no longer worry, nor do I grieve
Because God has my sweet angel to protect over me
Now I give you to the Lord above
Watch over my Angel, my sweet precious love

 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa:: this case is just so sad


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 23, 2009, 03:29:41 AM
Ot but there was an amber alert issued in nc for a 2month old baby. Has anyone heard about it. I can't find no info on it. And I live in nc

O/T but I live in NC as well.  The amber alert has been cancelled maybe because it is a parent abduction.  As far as I know the child is still missing but I haven't been able to find more info.  Below is the link with pictures of the child and the abductor.

http://www.nccrimecontrol.org/Index2.cfm?a=000003,000014,000081,001628


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 23, 2009, 08:21:26 AM
Two things I want to bring up.  Just because Brad had a nicer home doesn't mean anything.  Of course it was more comfortable and better but that doesn't make a home.  I am a CNA working for home health and I go from home to home and I promise you I have met some of the most down to earth poor people living in worse than that little trailer you see AD living in.  What makes a home is the love and care you give someone.  I still love to go see some of my little old people I've met over the years.  The second thing is about the birth cert..  The lady came around unexpectedly to fill out info for the birth cert. and my husband was at work.  I named him but because he wasn't able to sign for it they couldn't add him so we did all that about 1 yr later when things were a bit better.  My son was so sick to begin with.  But Dad did make it later to the vital stat office to fix.  Brad probably just didn't make it to fill it out and we don't really know when he found out he was a Daddy do we.  He may not have worried about it cause he had her 90% of the time and didn't think it would be an issue.  To some that paper doesn't matter.  To us it did.

I hope your son is healthy now.
TY Sunny and yes he is!  OT but I will tell a little...he was 2.4lbs and born at 25 weeks.  He is missing his Corpus Callosum in his brain (the bundle of nerves conneting the lt and rt brain) and I was told he probably would be a vegetable.  I never left his side for 3mos while in NICU and kept my hand on him when they finally let me touch him. He is a true testament IMO to the power of God in my eyes.   His Father and I call him the miracle baby.  I wasn't suppose to have children and he came, he wasn't suppose to thrive and he is a happy, healthy, well adjusted young man.  There have been delays, road blocks, and very hard times but those doctors were wrong.  He is absolutely fine.  Turns out you and I could be missing the same part of brain and be normal and some it can completely debilitate them.  These people that have all these children for welfare and tax rebates make me sick!  Children are a gift from the Man Above and I treat mine as such.  I don't let him out of my sight and some posters have chastised me for that but they don't understand my child won't be one we are ever blogging about.  It is my responsibility and duty to watch and care for him.  Yes, there are things I can't control that could happen but it won't be on my watch!  I would step in front of a bullet for him.  Too bad other parents won't put their children first.  If AD really cared about Shaniya she wouldn't have even asked to move her until school was out.  Why disrupt that babys life unless she had this all planned out ahead of time.  I just heard on Today that MM is under suicide watch.  He damn well better not get away with it.  I want him to have his day in court or better yet let Bubba get hold of that molester in jail. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 23, 2009, 09:46:27 AM
i wanted to post but i really have nothing to say... thi sis a disgusting case and i guess the cops have their man and he will be found guilty and maybe even get death... what more could you ask for really?
i still havce my thoughts that this is a much huger ring and even if it is and further arrests are made from the ring we will hear about the bust of the ring possibly but will probably not be told how they developeed info to make the bust...
so waht else is there to say shaniya is dead and buried and i hope the mother and mm rot in hell... as far as the dad he dropped the ball big time and all his repenting will save him from hell... so i guess this will be my last post
i'll keep checking for updates and will watch the trial if it is on tv ...
other then that i have nothing left to add... i wonder if it was a one time deal did it happen before was she sold permanently was she sold for an hour....
none of it matters shaniya is gone


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 23, 2009, 09:47:54 AM

TY Sunny and yes he is!  OT but I will tell a little...he was 2.4lbs and born at 25 weeks.  He is missing his Corpus Callosum in his brain (the bundle of nerves conneting the lt and rt brain) and I was told he probably would be a vegetable.  I never left his side for 3mos while in NICU and kept my hand on him when they finally let me touch him. He is a true testament IMO to the power of God in my eyes.   His Father and I call him the miracle baby.  I wasn't suppose to have children and he came, he wasn't suppose to thrive and he is a happy, healthy, well adjusted young man.  There have been delays, road blocks, and very hard times but those doctors were wrong.  He is absolutely fine.  Turns out you and I could be missing the same part of brain and be normal and some it can completely debilitate them.  These people that have all these children for welfare and tax rebates make me sick!  Children are a gift from the Man Above and I treat mine as such.  I don't let him out of my sight and some posters have chastised me for that but they don't understand my child won't be one we are ever blogging about.  It is my responsibility and duty to watch and care for him.  Yes, there are things I can't control that could happen but it won't be on my watch!  I would step in front of a bullet for him.  Too bad other parents won't put their children first.  If AD really cared about Shaniya she wouldn't have even asked to move her until school was out.  Why disrupt that babys life unless she had this all planned out ahead of time.  I just heard on Today that MM is under suicide watch.  He damn well better not get away with it.  I want him to have his day in court or better yet let Bubba get hold of that molester in jail. 

WOW....your son is truly a miracle child. I am so glad for him and you and your family.

MM is the worst kind of animal that walks this earth and AD is right behind him....JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 23, 2009, 10:01:53 AM
i wanted to post but i really have nothing to say... thi sis a disgusting case and i guess the cops have their man and he will be found guilty and maybe even get death... what more could you ask for really?
i still havce my thoughts that this is a much huger ring and even if it is and further arrests are made from the ring we will hear about the bust of the ring possibly but will probably not be told how they developeed info to make the bust...
so waht else is there to say shaniya is dead and buried and i hope the mother and mm rot in hell... as far as the dad he dropped the ball big time and all his repenting will save him from hell... so i guess this will be my last post
i'll keep checking for updates and will watch the trial if it is on tv ...
other then that i have nothing left to add... i wonder if it was a one time deal did it happen before was she sold permanently was she sold for an hour....
none of it matters shaniya is gone
I am with you on all that you said. And yes, none of it is going to bring Shaniya back, all of this is just horrible.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 23, 2009, 10:09:19 AM
Two things I want to bring up.  Just because Brad had a nicer home doesn't mean anything.  Of course it was more comfortable and better but that doesn't make a home.  I am a CNA working for home health and I go from home to home and I promise you I have met some of the most down to earth poor people living in worse than that little trailer you see AD living in.  What makes a home is the love and care you give someone.  I still love to go see some of my little old people I've met over the years.  The second thing is about the birth cert..  The lady came around unexpectedly to fill out info for the birth cert. and my husband was at work.  I named him but because he wasn't able to sign for it they couldn't add him so we did all that about 1 yr later when things were a bit better.  My son was so sick to begin with.  But Dad did make it later to the vital stat office to fix.  Brad probably just didn't make it to fill it out and we don't really know when he found out he was a Daddy do we.  He may not have worried about it cause he had her 90% of the time and didn't think it would be an issue.  To some that paper doesn't matter.  To us it did.

I hope your son is healthy now.
TY Sunny and yes he is!  OT but I will tell a little...he was 2.4lbs and born at 25 weeks.  He is missing his Corpus Callosum in his brain (the bundle of nerves conneting the lt and rt brain) and I was told he probably would be a vegetable.  I never left his side for 3mos while in NICU and kept my hand on him when they finally let me touch him. He is a true testament IMO to the power of God in my eyes.   His Father and I call him the miracle baby.  I wasn't suppose to have children and he came, he wasn't suppose to thrive and he is a happy, healthy, well adjusted young man.  There have been delays, road blocks, and very hard times but those doctors were wrong.  He is absolutely fine.  Turns out you and I could be missing the same part of brain and be normal and some it can completely debilitate them.  These people that have all these children for welfare and tax rebates make me sick!  Children are a gift from the Man Above and I treat mine as such.  I don't let him out of my sight and some posters have chastised me for that but they don't understand my child won't be one we are ever blogging about.  It is my responsibility and duty to watch and care for him.  Yes, there are things I can't control that could happen but it won't be on my watch!  I would step in front of a bullet for him.  Too bad other parents won't put their children first.  If AD really cared about Shaniya she wouldn't have even asked to move her until school was out.  Why disrupt that babys life unless she had this all planned out ahead of time.  I just heard on Today that MM is under suicide watch.  He damn well better not get away with it.  I want him to have his day in court or better yet let Bubba get hold of that molester in jail. 

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 23, 2009, 10:14:20 AM
After reading the poem that Aunt Carrie wrote for Shaniya...I won't be viewing the funeral at all!! my heart could not take it...
I think that poem was the most beautiful thing that I have ever read and it is truly from her heart...it saddens me to no end for the pain that Shaniya must have suffered for no darn good reason except for another persons sick sick pleasure...and now her suffering is over sadly, and the rest who are left will now do the suffering...senseless...all of it...
I think that Carrie's hands were tied...if Brad said that Shaniya was going to her bio's...no matter how much Carrie would plea and cry, if she did, it would not have mattered if Brad said that she must go..
I think that Brad could have bought the bio off with money to keep Shaniya from going there and meanwhile get the court proceedings going to get permanent custody of Shaniya with supervised visits with the bio and this would have never happened...jmo....if Brad gave bio enough money a month she would not have wanted this baby...she would have been happier with the money for her drug use ..Shaniya was cash for the bio...not a child to love and cherish...Brad could have kept Shaniya safe with Carrie and Shaniya would have had her life...I am beyond angry at all of this


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 23, 2009, 10:29:49 AM
After reading the poem that Aunt Carrie wrote for Shaniya...I won't be viewing the funeral at all!! my heart could not take it...
I think that poem was the most beautiful thing that I have ever read and it is truly from her heart...it saddens me to no end for the pain that Shaniya must have suffered for no darn good reason except for another persons sick sick pleasure...and now her suffering is over sadly, and the rest who are left will now do the suffering...senseless...all of it...
I think that Carrie's hands were tied...if Brad said that Shaniya was going to her bio's...no matter how much Carrie would plea and cry, if she did, it would not have mattered if Brad said that she must go..
I think that Brad could have bought the bio off with money to keep Shaniya from going there and meanwhile get the court proceedings going to get permanent custody of Shaniya with supervised visits with the bio and this would have never happened...jmo....if Brad gave bio enough money a month she would not have wanted this baby...she would have been happier with the money for her drug use ..Shaniya was cash for the bio...not a child to love and cherish...Brad could have kept Shaniya safe with Carrie and Shaniya would have had her life...I am beyond angry at all of this
I can't argue with anything you just posted, this is beyond tragic.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 23, 2009, 11:35:47 AM
After reading the poem that Aunt Carrie wrote for Shaniya...I won't be viewing the funeral at all!! my heart could not take it...
I think that poem was the most beautiful thing that I have ever read and it is truly from her heart...it saddens me to no end for the pain that Shaniya must have suffered for no darn good reason except for another persons sick sick pleasure...and now her suffering is over sadly, and the rest who are left will now do the suffering...senseless...all of it...
I think that Carrie's hands were tied...if Brad said that Shaniya was going to her bio's...no matter how much Carrie would plea and cry, if she did, it would not have mattered if Brad said that she must go..
I think that Brad could have bought the bio off with money to keep Shaniya from going there and meanwhile get the court proceedings going to get permanent custody of Shaniya with supervised visits with the bio and this would have never happened...jmo....if Brad gave bio enough money a month she would not have wanted this baby...she would have been happier with the money for her drug use ..Shaniya was cash for the bio...not a child to love and cherish...Brad could have kept Shaniya safe with Carrie and Shaniya would have had her life...I am beyond angry at all of this
I can't argue with anything you just posted, this is beyond tragic.

ITA Cookie.. Why take chance and let this beautiful child stay with the monster when Carey has taken great care of Shaniya, Shaniya just started school -meeting friends ,in a safe inviroment, she was happy , smiling and  just like Byron stated ..IMO There is more than meets the eye why Brad let her stay there @ the POS monster home. There were red flags flying everywhere...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tater on November 23, 2009, 11:46:55 AM
Hello sweet monkeys!! Again and again the assault goes on with children being the targets.This was such a beautiful child.I saw the Aunt this morning giving an interview and she seemed so misplaced.I couldn't help but cry listening to her.I didn't watch the funeral and don't plan too.It's sad enough already..:( This world is an ugly place and the cesspool grows everyday..:(


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 23, 2009, 11:49:54 AM
After reading the poem that Aunt Carrie wrote for Shaniya...I won't be viewing the funeral at all!! my heart could not take it...
I think that poem was the most beautiful thing that I have ever read and it is truly from her heart...it saddens me to no end for the pain that Shaniya must have suffered for no darn good reason except for another persons sick sick pleasure...and now her suffering is over sadly, and the rest who are left will now do the suffering...senseless...all of it...
I think that Carrie's hands were tied...if Brad said that Shaniya was going to her bio's...no matter how much Carrie would plea and cry, if she did, it would not have mattered if Brad said that she must go..
I think that Brad could have bought the bio off with money to keep Shaniya from going there and meanwhile get the court proceedings going to get permanent custody of Shaniya with supervised visits with the bio and this would have never happened...jmo....if Brad gave bio enough money a month she would not have wanted this baby...she would have been happier with the money for her drug use ..Shaniya was cash for the bio...not a child to love and cherish...Brad could have kept Shaniya safe with Carrie and Shaniya would have had her life...I am beyond angry at all of this
I can't argue with anything you just posted, this is beyond tragic.

ITA Cookie.. Why take chance and let this beautiful child stay with the monster when Carey has taken great care of Shaniya, Shaniya just started school -meeting friends ,in a safe inviroment, she was happy , smiling and  just like Byron stated ..IMO There is more than meets the eye why Brad let her stay there @ the POS monster home. There were red flags flying everywhere...

 ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyKiss::

Rosie and JG...the pictures of Shaniya with MM are permanently ingrained in my brain and my heart...
I just keep telling myself over and over..this did not need to happen, this did not need to happen to this little girl...I shut my eyes at night and I see her in his arms...I wake up in the mornings and I see it...I wake up during the night and I see it...sigh....this one has really hit me hard....I suppose just seeing the images of her and knowing what was about to happen to her and perhaps seeing her after that happened to her is depressingly sad to me...I am really having a hard time with the senselessness of all of it...how can anyone do this to an innocent child...my heart breaks....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 23, 2009, 12:00:17 PM
Monkeys Hugs for everyone...

(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/monkeyhugs.gif)
 




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 23, 2009, 12:02:44 PM
Monkeys Hugs for everyone...

(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/monkeyhugs.gif)
 




Thanks!  I think we all need hugs... there are a lot of raw feelings and emotions in here.... this particular crime has touched me like no other and so hard to get over.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 23, 2009, 12:06:21 PM
I was wondering about Byron.....was he a child that vicki had before that she married Brad or does he belong to Brad? I am asking because his name is Coleman and Cheyennes is Lockhart....Did  the grandparents adopt him? ....I can't imagine them adopting Byron and not Cheyenne....I am wondering if he decided to change his name from Lockhart to Coleman after he turned 18?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 23, 2009, 12:09:21 PM
Also I keep thinking about the stuffed animal that Shaniya  was holding.....She did not have it when she went in but had it when she came out....If they look at the comings and goings of the guests they may find someone carrying the animal in into the hotel...or if there is a nearby store that carries that animal then the 3rd party may be on that store camara???


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 23, 2009, 12:31:01 PM
The nationwide crackdown on child pornography and other sex offenses has created severe manpower shortages and technology challenges for probation officers, police and federal agents struggling to track offenders who are jumping online with cellphones and portable game systems and flocking to social networking and other sites, where children or pornography can easily be found.

There are more than 716,000 registered sex offenders nationwide, according to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, a 78 percent increase since 2001, and that does not include all offenders because some crimes do not require registration. Sex-offender registries have grown even faster in the Washington area, with more than 24,000 people listed. Not all receive the scrutiny given to such offenders as Shelton.

The focus on crimes against children that began in the Bush administration shows no sign of abating under President Obama. Federal child sexual exploitation prosecutions are up 147 percent since 2002, and the Justice Department is hiring 81 more prosecutors for these cases. Funding for task forces that bring charges in state courts rose this year from $16 million to $75 million.

But many of those offenders are now leaving prison, even as revenue-strapped states are cutting the budgets of probation departments. In Virginia, probation and parole cuts this year totaled nearly $10 million, including $500,000 for electronic monitoring of sexually violent predators. Maryland also has cut its budget.

"The burden on probation and parole officers is going to explode," said Ernie Allen, the national center's president.

The monitoring of virtually all sex offenders is required by law when they are on probation or parole.

The problem has gained national attention with the discovery of 10 bodies and a skull at a registered sex offender's home in Cleveland and revelations that Jaycee Lee Dugard was kidnapped at age 11 in 1991 and allegedly held captive at a California sex offender's house until her reappearance in August. Officers had visited both homes and noticed nothing wrong.

Those cases underscore a troubled registry system that has been the public face of sex-offender monitoring. An estimated 100,000 offenders do not comply with registration requirements. Law enforcement doesn't know where many of them are.

continued..

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34103715/ns/technology_and_science-washington_post/#storyContinued


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 23, 2009, 12:32:32 PM
Monkeys Hugs for everyone...

(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/monkeyhugs.gif)
 




Thanks!  I think we all need hugs... there are a lot of raw feelings and emotions in here.... this particular crime has touched me like no other and so hard to get over.....

agreed..
thanks for the Monkey hug...needed that JG...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 23, 2009, 01:04:23 PM
This case is so sad..oh Cookie :smt056 I am so sorry you are having such a difficult time.

I think the ones with video's are the hardest, remember Sandra and Tori? We saw both of them minutes or hours before they died, same with little Shaniya. But this is different, we see her being carried by the man accused of this horrible crime. Never had I seen the look of a child who had been assulted and the fear on her face...ugh makes my heart sick. It brings out my instincts I suppose because I want to go into that pic and take her back!

I am struggling inside because I have so much anger at so many people in the family of AD who have spoken out and with Brad. I feel I can't say anything because I don't want it to be taken wrong, so I am finding myself very frustrated by this whole thing.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Irish Monkey on November 23, 2009, 01:13:29 PM
This case is so sad..oh Cookie :smt056 I am so sorry you are having such a difficult time.

I think the ones with video's are the hardest, remember Sandra and Tori? We saw both of them minutes or hours before they died, same with little Shaniya. But this is different, we see her being carried by the man accused of this horrible crime. Never had I seen the look of a child who had been assulted and the fear on her face...ugh makes my heart sick. It brings out my instincts I suppose because I want to go into that pic and take her back!

I am struggling inside because I have so much anger at so many people in the family of AD who have spoken out and with Brad. I feel I can't say anything because I don't want it to be taken wrong, so I am finding myself very frustrated by this whole thing.



I am right there on that branch with you.  I am torn because I know how I would react to someone harming my child, and trying to be objective and remember that not everyone processes or feels things the way I do.   Hug to you, honey!   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 23, 2009, 01:20:40 PM
evening Monkeys....
I am disgusted that the bio mom was mentioned in the obit for this baby...::MonkeyConfused:: sorry, but I just about puked when I say her name up there, right along with the father...and the Aunt  Carrie was not even mentioned??? the only one who probably did love this child the most...so very very wrong imo...
I have not brought myself to see the funeral yet...


Just to mention, the other night on one of the talk shows, Pat Brown the profiler said that the father  was negligent for allowing this child to be with this mother..,.,so it isn't just Monkeys on here and other people on the boards that think this way...It seems that everyone in Shaniya's family failed this beautiful child...I am so upset about this happening to her...it never should have happened to her...it could have been prevented..and I am just so sad over this..and angry !



lol, Pat Brown was wrong about Elizabeth Olten, she said it was gonna be a soft kill.( so did NG )

IMO, There's 2 people who are responsible, the evil devilmama (and McNeill) who wanted Shaniya for a reason, why take her out of school? for what reason?, then keep it secret? I do not believe she was ever on that couch that morning. How did she know she didn't have her shoe's so quickly? Did she look for them before calling 911? Nope, she wanted to make it look like a kidnapping. I believe the devileggdonor planned this and prostituted her the whole time she had her. In hindsight, of course Brad should have gotten legal custody, but would that have saved Shaniya if her mom had visitation rights?IMO No, Shaniya was only useful for 1 reason to her. My x had unsupervised visitation, I tried to fight it, crying didn't help, he didn't have to prove he could even care for her, had anything for a baby. He molested her(not intercourse), and I couldn't do anything to the judge, but hate him and the judge. He had to sign away his parental rights or get prosecuted. So IMO the only 2 that failed her was her devil of a egg donor and the rapist/murderer. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 23, 2009, 01:31:57 PM
evening Monkeys....
I am disgusted that the bio mom was mentioned in the obit for this baby...::MonkeyConfused:: sorry, but I just about puked when I say her name up there, right along with the father...and the Aunt  Carrie was not even mentioned??? the only one who probably did love this child the most...so very very wrong imo...
I have not brought myself to see the funeral yet...


Just to mention, the other night on one of the talk shows, Pat Brown the profiler said that the father  was negligent for allowing this child to be with this mother..,.,so it isn't just Monkeys on here and other people on the boards that think this way...It seems that everyone in Shaniya's family failed this beautiful child...I am so upset about this happening to her...it never should have happened to her...it could have been prevented..and I am just so sad over this..and angry !



lol, Pat Brown was wrong about Elizabeth Olten, she said it was gonna be a soft kill.( so did NG )

IMO, There's 2 people who are responsible, the evil devilmama (and McNeill) who wanted Shaniya for a reason, why take her out of school? for what reason?, then keep it secret? I do not believe she was ever on that couch that morning. How did she know she didn't have her shoe's so quickly? Did she look for them before calling 911? Nope, she wanted to make it look like a kidnapping. I believe the devileggdonor planned this and prostituted her the whole time she had her. In hindsight, of course Brad should have gotten legal custody, but would that have saved Shaniya if her mom had visitation rights?IMO No, Shaniya was only useful for 1 reason to her. My x had unsupervised visitation, I tried to fight it, crying didn't help, he didn't have to prove he could even care for her, had anything for a baby. He molested her(not intercourse), and I couldn't do anything to the judge, but hate him and the judge. He had to sign away his parental rights or get prosecuted. So IMO the only 2 that failed her was her devil of a egg donor and the rapist/murderer. JMO

OMG Razzy... my heart goes out to you.  You have been through a lot but now your baby is safe?  God Bless you. ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 23, 2009, 01:36:59 PM
As the primary care givers to children with screwed up other parents we have the obligation and responsibility to take extra precautions to protect our children. This woman had a history of drugs, the dad says he didn't know this..well this proves my point, why and how could he not know this! That argument doesn't play with me. It was his responsibility to know this.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Irish Monkey on November 23, 2009, 01:39:18 PM
As the primary care givers to children with screwed up other parents we have the obligation and responsibility to take extra precautions to protect our children. This woman had a history of drugs, the dad says he didn't know this..well this proves my point, why and how could he not know this! That argument doesn't play with me. It was his responsibility to know this.


Yup.  I'm with ya on this one.     


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 23, 2009, 01:47:39 PM
Razzy1, I am so sorry for the problems you and your child have had. You stood up and tried and fought for your child. God only knows what could have happened if you didn't.

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 23, 2009, 01:51:52 PM
This case is so sad..oh Cookie :smt056 I am so sorry you are having such a difficult time.

I think the ones with video's are the hardest, remember Sandra and Tori? We saw both of them minutes or hours before they died, same with little Shaniya. But this is different, we see her being carried by the man accused of this horrible crime. Never had I seen the look of a child who had been assulted and the fear on her face...ugh makes my heart sick. It brings out my instincts I suppose because I want to go into that pic and take her back!

I am struggling inside because I have so much anger at so many people in the family of AD who have spoken out and with Brad. I feel I can't say anything because I don't want it to be taken wrong, so I am finding myself very frustrated by this whole thing.


o/t but sandra cantu the one with the woman sex predator iirc the boyfriend was involved and they both took part in the molestation/rape?
was there video taping involved... i guess what i am trying to say is were they trying to make kiddie porn? tia if anyone knows... i haven't followed that case and can't checkj her thread cuz i'm at work and my computer is waaaaay too slow


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 23, 2009, 01:51:53 PM
evening Monkeys....
I am disgusted that the bio mom was mentioned in the obit for this baby...::MonkeyConfused:: sorry, but I just about puked when I say her name up there, right along with the father...and the Aunt  Carrie was not even mentioned??? the only one who probably did love this child the most...so very very wrong imo...
I have not brought myself to see the funeral yet...


Just to mention, the other night on one of the talk shows, Pat Brown the profiler said that the father  was negligent for allowing this child to be with this mother..,.,so it isn't just Monkeys on here and other people on the boards that think this way...It seems that everyone in Shaniya's family failed this beautiful child...I am so upset about this happening to her...it never should have happened to her...it could have been prevented..and I am just so sad over this..and angry !



lol, Pat Brown was wrong about Elizabeth Olten, she said it was gonna be a soft kill.( so did NG )

IMO, There's 2 people who are responsible, the evil devilmama (and McNeill) who wanted Shaniya for a reason, why take her out of school? for what reason?, then keep it secret? I do not believe she was ever on that couch that morning. How did she know she didn't have her shoe's so quickly? Did she look for them before calling 911? Nope, she wanted to make it look like a kidnapping. I believe the devileggdonor planned this and prostituted her the whole time she had her. In hindsight, of course Brad should have gotten legal custody, but would that have saved Shaniya if her mom had visitation rights?IMO No, Shaniya was only useful for 1 reason to her. My x had unsupervised visitation, I tried to fight it, crying didn't help, he didn't have to prove he could even care for her, had anything for a baby. He molested her(not intercourse), and I couldn't do anything to the judge, but hate him and the judge. He had to sign away his parental rights or get prosecuted. So IMO the only 2 that failed her was her devil of a egg donor and the rapist/murderer. JMO

OMG Razzy... my heart goes out to you.  You have been through a lot but now your baby is safe?  God Bless you. ::MonkeyAngel::


Thank You Bananas, she is doing fine, she's now 20 and wants to be a detective. She was to young to testify, she was 3. That why we couldn't prosecute. He signed away his parental rights, he failed a poly. I still blame the judge. Well both him and the judge. She didn't even realize what she was telling. He still lives local, if I ever see him in the mall I will walk up and punch him in the face been waiting years to do that. Then call my daughter for bail, lol


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 23, 2009, 02:12:23 PM
Razzy1, I am so sorry for the problems you and your child have had. You stood up and tried and fought for your child. God only knows what could have happened if you didn't.

 
I agree with you Tracygirl. Razzy1  ::MonkeyAngel::   I'm curious what other charges AD may get, let's hope there are more charges, but I have no idea.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 23, 2009, 02:26:14 PM
As the primary care givers to children with screwed up other parents we have the obligation and responsibility to take extra precautions to protect our children. This woman had a history of drugs, the dad says he didn't know this..well this proves my point, why and how could he not know this! That argument doesn't play with me. It was his responsibility to know this.


How would Brad know what she does when Shaniya hasn't been there? He wasn't even notified she was taken out of school and I'm sure he and Aunt Carey were on the emergency cards. There's a lawsuit waiting to happen. If her name wasn't on the emergency card I don't think she could remove her from school. I know in Mi. you have to go to the Board Of Education in the school's district to remove them from school or transfer them.


p.s per your other post, thnaks, I did fight for her, it fell on deaf ears. I found out if someone wants to hide anything about themselves they certainly can. Not that he was a prior pedo( I don't know) , but he was a big ugly liar and prone to violence, and hid it.LOL my pregnancy by him lasted longer than the marriage,  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 23, 2009, 02:32:35 PM
This case is so sad..oh Cookie :smt056 I am so sorry you are having such a difficult time.

I think the ones with video's are the hardest, remember Sandra and Tori? We saw both of them minutes or hours before they died, same with little Shaniya. But this is different, we see her being carried by the man accused of this horrible crime. Never had I seen the look of a child who had been assulted and the fear on her face...ugh makes my heart sick. It brings out my instincts I suppose because I want to go into that pic and take her back!

I am struggling inside because I have so much anger at so many people in the family of AD who have spoken out and with Brad. I feel I can't say anything because I don't want it to be taken wrong, so I am finding myself very frustrated by this whole thing.


o/t but sandra cantu the one with the woman sex predator iirc the boyfriend was involved and they both took part in the molestation/rape?
was there video taping involved... i guess what i am trying to say is were they trying to make kiddie porn? tia if anyone knows... i haven't followed that case and can't checkj her thread cuz i'm at work and my computer is waaaaay too slow

HI, just Melissa Huckaby is charged with Sandra's heinous murder. She drugged some guy but all I have read is they can't find him. Haven't read of any video tape involved. But I do think Melissa is trying to ACT mentally ill, won't work, IMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 23, 2009, 02:50:08 PM
As the primary care givers to children with screwed up other parents we have the obligation and responsibility to take extra precautions to protect our children. This woman had a history of drugs, the dad says he didn't know this..well this proves my point, why and how could he not know this! That argument doesn't play with me. It was his responsibility to know this.


How would Brad know what she does when Shaniya hasn't been there? He wasn't even notified she was taken out of school and I'm sure he and Aunt Carey were on the emergency cards. There's a lawsuit waiting to happen. If her name wasn't on the emergency card I don't think she could remove her from school. I know in Mi. you have to go to the Board Of Education in the school's district to remove them from school or transfer them.


p.s per your other post, thnaks, I did fight for her, it fell on deaf ears. I found out if someone wants to hide anything about themselves they certainly can. Not that he was a prior pedo( I don't know) , but he was a big ugly liar and prone to violence, and hid it.LOL my pregnancy by him lasted longer than the marriage,  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Well that was his responsibility to check it out. How do I know what my ex does and doesn't do, where he lives and the conditions of such, I find out. If his story is true (there has been a few different things said), but if it is true that she has not been much of a mother to Shaniya, she gave her up so Shaniya could have a better environment, well that in itself would warrant a visit by dad to check things out, talk with her, sit down and see what he was sending his daughter into. Why didn't he know she had been taken out of school? I sure would know if my child had been taken out, how? by calling and checking in with my child and yes, even the school. When transition times comes for my children, I contact the teacher to inform them and then also check up to see how they are doing. I don't think that is something most people wouldn't do, at least the ones who don't simply entrust God to protect their children. That is not hind sight (spelling?) in my opinion that is common sense and a sense of the god given responsibility we have as parents. Did he rape and kill her, no. But he dropped the ball with this little girl and as badly as I feel for him I can no longer pretend he didn't.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 23, 2009, 02:52:43 PM
Regarding Sandra cantu and the video, I was speaking of the video which showes precious Sandra carefreely skipping down the road. It was heartbreaking.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 23, 2009, 03:14:47 PM
Regarding Sandra cantu and the video, I was speaking of the video which showes precious Sandra carefreely skipping down the road. It was heartbreaking.

oh, ooops, there's another video that's so hard to watch.

Gotta run General Hospital is on. BBL


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 23, 2009, 03:18:39 PM
Regarding Sandra cantu and the video, I was speaking of the video which showes precious Sandra carefreely skipping down the road. It was heartbreaking.
yeah i knew what you meant i just was trying to figure out how many loones do this out of the blue and if their motive is kiddie porn... o/t but i read an article that i found disturbing and might be a contributing factor as to why so many of these pigs get away or slip thru the cracks... the government has been running a little fishing expedition so to speak... the article i read was about a guy (normal seeming) that liked to look at porn and he clicked on something that said sexy teens etc etc... which most guys would assuming that they are 18 (these are not seedy porn sites they are legit porn company like vivid etc) anyways because he did that (and all people in those films were 18) he was targeted by the government who spammed the hell out of him with kiddie porn to the point where he had over 10,000 porn thing on his computer in a matter of 1 week and only found out about them even being there when he had to get the comp fixed because it was now running so slow and the comp store turned him in.... my point is i think their tactical outlook is ridiculous and most of the perps get off on entrapment which lets other legit perps use the entrapment card also... i really hope if this is a ring that le works to break it down instead of just using shaniya as a statistic to get funding to go after them when their methods of doing so are flat out stupid and do more harm then good...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 23, 2009, 03:22:36 PM
Regarding Sandra cantu and the video, I was speaking of the video which showes precious Sandra carefreely skipping down the road. It was heartbreaking.
yeah i knew what you meant i just was trying to figure out how many loones do this out of the blue and if their motive is kiddie porn... o/t but i read an article that i found disturbing and might be a contributing factor as to why so many of these pigs get away or slip thru the cracks... the government has been running a little fishing expedition so to speak... the article i read was about a guy (normal seeming) that liked to look at porn and he clicked on something that said sexy teens etc etc... which most guys would assuming that they are 18 (these are not seedy porn sites they are legit porn company like vivid etc) anyways because he did that (and all people in those films were 18) he was targeted by the government who spammed the hell out of him with kiddie porn to the point where he had over 10,000 porn thing on his computer in a matter of 1 week and only found out about them even being there when he had to get the comp fixed because it was now running so slow and the comp store turned him in.... my point is i think their tactical outlook is ridiculous and most of the perps get off on entrapment which lets other legit perps use the entrapment card also... i really hope if this is a ring that le works to break it down instead of just using shaniya as a statistic to get funding to go after them when their methods of doing so are flat out stupid and do more harm then good...

I think all porn sites are seedy.... JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 23, 2009, 07:34:36 PM
as far as I know, we have never been told who took Shaniya out of her school...for all we know, Brad or Carrie could have taken her out...if Shaniya was going to live with her bio as Brad has stated, then it would make sense for him to have unenrolled Shaniya at her school...jmo...also, I doubt that bio mom would even know what school Shaniya was in let alone getting herself together enough to even think about calling the school to unenroll her...jmo...

also, if Brad's older children both said and knew that bio was into drugs, why wouldn't Brad have known? that doesn't make sense to me...He knew..he is just trying to make it seem that his mistake wasn't as obvious as it was...Not taking away from the fact that bio and MM are the 2 who did the awful thing to Shaniya...Dad has some culpability...he should have checked to see if Shaniya was happy in her new school, how she was adjusting  since her move...it sounded like he had not talked or seen Shaniya since she had gone to live with bio...how does that happen? how could you not be depressed and missing that little girl that you would not want to call her everyday that she wasn't with him? just to hear her little voice...she was only 5 years old... ::MonkeyTears:: she deserved so much more...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 23, 2009, 07:59:09 PM
as far as I know, we have never been told who took Shaniya out of her school...for all we know, Brad or Carrie could have taken her out...if Shaniya was going to live with her bio as Brad has stated, then it would make sense for him to have unenrolled Shaniya at her school...jmo...also, I doubt that bio mom would even know what school Shaniya was in let alone getting herself together enough to even think about calling the school to unenroll her...jmo...

also, if Brad's older children both said and knew that bio was into drugs, why wouldn't Brad have known? that doesn't make sense to me...He knew..he is just trying to make it seem that his mistake wasn't as obvious as it was...Not taking away from the fact that bio and MM are the 2 who did the awful thing to Shaniya...Dad has some culpability...he should have checked to see if Shaniya was happy in her new school, how she was adjusting  since her move...it sounded like he had not talked or seen Shaniya since she had gone to live with bio...how does that happen? how could you not be depressed and missing that little girl that you would not want to call her everyday that she wasn't with him? just to hear her little voice...she was only 5 years old... ::MonkeyTears:: she deserved so much more...

Both the Dad and Aunt Carey said they were not aware she had been pulled from school.    I think the Dad was in Oregon working when all of this took place.  I too find it hard to believe that there were not telephone conversations with her during that 5 weeks.  It just doesn't make sense. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2009, 08:10:30 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6482373/

State to review DSS' contact with slain girl's family
Posted: Today at 5:01 p.m.
Updated: Today at 6:55 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. —A state team of experts will examine any contact the Cumberland County Department of Social Services had with the family of a 5-year-old Fayetteville girl who was killed and whose mother has been accused of prostituting her.

Shaniya Nicole Davis was reported missing from her home on Nov. 10. Her body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

She died of asphyxiation, according to preliminary autopsy results.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, has been charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape of a child and first-degree kidnapping in the case. Police have characterized him as a family acquaintance.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, 25, has been charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

DSS looked at Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son, not Shaniya, according to her uncle, Michael Davis. The case was closed, and Antoinette Davis was able to retain custody of the boy, her uncle said.

DSS Director Brenda Jackson has declined to comment on the agency's involvement with the Davis family, citing the criminal investigation into Shaniya's death as well as confidentiality rules for child protective services cases.

The state plans to appoint a review team to investigate any DSS contact with the Davis family, and the team's findings will be turned over to the state Child Fatality Task Force. The task force studies all child deaths in North Carolina to make recommendations to legislators on changes to state laws and administrative polices to prevent future deaths.

"You just say, 'How in the world did this happen?' and 'How could it have gotten to this end place?' and 'We need to do better,'" said Tom Vitaglione, co-chairman of the task force.

Fifty-eight children in the state were homicide victims in 2008, according to advocacy group Action for Children North Carolina.

Rob Thompson, executive director of another advocacy group, The Covenant With North Carolina's Children, said giving the public more information about tragedies like Shaniya's death could help prevent similar incidents.

"I think just having a better picture of what happened would allow us to see all of things that may have had a role in this horrible situation," Thompson said. "In cases where you're not jeopardizing the privacy of a victim, I think it is more appropriate to be as transparent as possible."

Vitaglione said Cumberland County DSS workers "are devastated" by Shaniya's death, and the fact that child protective services is overburdened and underfunded in the state doesn't ease their distress.

DSS agencies are federally mandated and funded but are run by individual counties and overseen by the state.

"In some ways, it's an impossible task that we've asked them to do," he said.

Last year, DSS agencies received 127,192 reports of child abuse and neglect statewide, and workers were able to substantiate abuse or neglect in less than 10 percent of the reports, according to Action for Children.

"I think the most important thing is that we really try and reduce that caseload both through proper training, proper oversight and proper supervision (as well as through) proper funding," Thompson said.

Reporter: Amanda Lamb
Photographer: Terry Cantrell
Web Editor: Matthew Burns


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 23, 2009, 08:19:50 PM
as far as I know, we have never been told who took Shaniya out of her school...for all we know, Brad or Carrie could have taken her out...if Shaniya was going to live with her bio as Brad has stated, then it would make sense for him to have unenrolled Shaniya at her school...jmo...also, I doubt that bio mom would even know what school Shaniya was in let alone getting herself together enough to even think about calling the school to unenroll her...jmo...

also, if Brad's older children both said and knew that bio was into drugs, why wouldn't Brad have known? that doesn't make sense to me...He knew..he is just trying to make it seem that his mistake wasn't as obvious as it was...Not taking away from the fact that bio and MM are the 2 who did the awful thing to Shaniya...Dad has some culpability...he should have checked to see if Shaniya was happy in her new school, how she was adjusting  since her move...it sounded like he had not talked or seen Shaniya since she had gone to live with bio...how does that happen? how could you not be depressed and missing that little girl that you would not want to call her everyday that she wasn't with him? just to hear her little voice...she was only 5 years old... ::MonkeyTears:: she deserved so much more...

If the school would have notified the parent who enrolled her, or a parent on the emergency list, or called and verified that it was ok that Shaniya was being withdrawn from school this would have never happened. I don't really trust anything that Cheyanne says ( she has a tude with daddy imo), she said devilmom was sweet, smoked weed, and I think she said maybe did coke. How long ago was this? years ago? 1 yr? 4 yrs? How many sweet moms sell their child to be raped and murdered.ICK  Many children live with dads who have to travel alot and have to be away from home alot, many live with the quality time with with dads. From pics I seen, seems Shaniya had quality time with and family. If Brad would have told that devileggdonor no, you can't have her for an extended period of time, wonder how fast she would have ran to court.JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 23, 2009, 08:52:45 PM
AZSunny....thanks for the reply about the school unenrollment info...I had not read that the dad or aunt were unaware...doesn't make sense to me though...both are intelligent people and don't you think that they would wonder why the school had not called them to wonder where Shaniya was? and if Shaniya was indeed going to live with bio, why wouldn't either Brad or Carrie not have called the school to let them know that Shaniya would not be back and to collect her things at school? and that brings up another point, why didn't the school call them to come and get Shaniya's things from school ? things don't make sense in this case at all...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 23, 2009, 09:00:54 PM
as far as I know, we have never been told who took Shaniya out of her school...for all we know, Brad or Carrie could have taken her out...if Shaniya was going to live with her bio as Brad has stated, then it would make sense for him to have unenrolled Shaniya at her school...jmo...also, I doubt that bio mom would even know what school Shaniya was in let alone getting herself together enough to even think about calling the school to unenroll her...jmo...

also, if Brad's older children both said and knew that bio was into drugs, why wouldn't Brad have known? that doesn't make sense to me...He knew..he is just trying to make it seem that his mistake wasn't as obvious as it was...Not taking away from the fact that bio and MM are the 2 who did the awful thing to Shaniya...Dad has some culpability...he should have checked to see if Shaniya was happy in her new school, how she was adjusting  since her move...it sounded like he had not talked or seen Shaniya since she had gone to live with bio...how does that happen? how could you not be depressed and missing that little girl that you would not want to call her everyday that she wasn't with him? just to hear her little voice...she was only 5 years old... ::MonkeyTears:: she deserved so much more...

If the school would have notified the parent who enrolled her, or a parent on the emergency list, or called and verified that it was ok that Shaniya was being withdrawn from school this would have never happened. I don't really trust anything that Cheyanne says ( she has a tude with daddy imo), she said devilmom was sweet, smoked weed, and I think she said maybe did coke. How long ago was this? years ago? 1 yr? 4 yrs? How many sweet moms sell their child to be raped and murdered.ICK  Many children live with dads who have to travel alot and have to be away from home alot, many live with the quality time with with dads. From pics I seen, seems Shaniya had quality time with and family. If Brad would have told that devileggdonor no, you can't have her for an extended period of time, wonder how fast she would have ran to court.JMO

Hey Razzy...honestly, if Brad would have told the devileggdonor no, that she couldn't have Shaniya, I don't think that devileggdonor would have done a darn thing...I don't think that she would have taken Brad to court at all...she would have backed down in my opinion...and if she would have taken him to court, then he should have said, bring it on. he could have proven that her home was not fit for Shaniya to be there...he could have shown that he was more able to support Shaniya, he had decent care for Shaniya while he had to travel for work, he had a stable home for this little girl  and on and on...jmo of course....He could have rolled the dice and seen what happened...Shaniya would have had a better chance than she got by him just turning Shaniya over to bio without a fight...my opinion was that he just didn't want to have the day to day  responsibility of a child any longer. None of his children lived with him other than Shaniya...so if she went with bio,,he would have his freedom and not have a child to worry about...Carrie deserved this baby ....she loved her madly...I can feel her connection with her. She will have the worst time getting over this imo....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 23, 2009, 10:29:17 PM
http://blackpoliticalthought.blogspot.com/2009/11/mario-andrette-mcneill-charged-with.html

another P#$% off person from N.C.

Mario Andrette McNeill Charged with First Degree Murder,
First Degree Rape of a Child in the Death of Shaniya Davis, 5
Posted by Janet Shan | 9:05 PM

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, deserves to be gassed immediately for what he did to five year old Shaniya Davis.
He has been charged with first degree murder and rape in the death of this precious child. The child died of
asphyxiation, according to preliminary autopsy results released tonight. Charges have not been  upgraded against
 the child's mother, scumbag Antoinette Davis, who is also pregnant. What is reprehensible is that the state of
North Carolina has failed its residents. Three weeks before Shaniya Davis disappeared on November 10, Superior
Court Judge Jack Thompson allowed McNeill  to end his supervised probation six months early. There is no reason
this man should have been walking free because of his long rap sheet. He deserves the death penalty for the
heinous acts he committed against this precious child.

McNeill appears to have been treated with leniency for years by an overburdened court system. This child rapist
has a rap sheet as the freeway running through Fayetteville, North Carolina, and he should never have been a
free man roaming the streets. McNeill shot Roland Lee Mays in the face, neck, shoulder, chest and stomach on
June 17, 2001. The court records indicate that he injured two other people that day. He was charged with
multiple counts of assault inflicting serious bodily injury. A year later, while awaiting trial in the shootings
, he was charged with possessing marijuana and trying to manufacture and sell it. The charges from the two cases
 were consolidated and he was allowed to plead guilty to lesser counts. He was sentenced to 40 to 50 months of
supervised probation in June 2003.

McNeill violated terms of his probation in August 2003 by failing to notify probation officers of his whereabouts.
 He was sent to prison. Records show that he entered the prison system in October 2003 and was released in May 2006.
 He got in trouble shortly thereafter. Records show that three months after his release, he was charged with
possession with intent to sell marijuana and cocaine and with maintaining a vehicle for drug use. He pleaded
guilty to reduced charges - a misdemeanor offense of maintaining a vehicle for drug use - and again was placed
on supervised probation, on Jan. 1, 2007. As part of the plea deal, District Court Judge Kim Tucker told McNeill
 that he could go on unsupervised probation if he tested negative for drugs three consecutive times. He still
managed to get in trouble again, while on probation. He was charged in April 2007 with possessing cocaine and
was charged in September 2007 with hitting Fayetteville police officer R. Grimm with his vehicle while trying to
 flee from a street corner. McNeill was charged that day with trying to elude arrest, reckless driving and
assault on a government official. Two months later, on Nov. 30, 2007, another judge gave him a slap on the wrist
. Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson allowed McNeill's probation status to be changed from supervised to
unsupervised, records show.

Could someone please tell me why this vile POS was still out on the streets? People have done far less and have
been incarcerated for far longer. Something drastic has to be done to reform sentencing guidelines and probation
 in this country. Former Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) was given a 13 year sentence for corruption, but this
POS was just slapped on the wrists for repeatedly breaking the law. This scumbag had no reason to be given a
light sentence by any judge. He deserved the maximum sentence, considering he was a repeat offender.  Sorry, but
 the judges who let Mario McNeill off the hook with these light sentences are enablers and are complicit is his
 continued criminal behavior. My heart breaks for this child and the fate she met. She was failed by too many
people, including the Department of Children's Services that has had an encounter with the family before.

comments

Teena  3 days ago   

I get goose bumps and want to fall to my knees over this, Poor Poor Baby Girl, I just hope God Numbed her while
she had to endure what her mother and this man put her through, I can scream and yell at the television all I
want, I can cuss and wish the worse for the mother and this man, but nothing that they do to these two INHUMANE
SICK IN THE HEAD PERVERTS, will every justify what this little Beautiful Baby had to go through...The Needle not
hing will be me hurtful than what she had to deal with, in my opinion this Country is suppose to run off of an
"Eye for an Eye and a Tooth for a Tooth" how is giving him a quick needle going to do anything, if you want to
put our ''COUNTRIES" Motto into effect you need to let bubba have at him in prison every day for the rest of his
 life, to have his little tight behind ripped apart, so he knows just how this precious baby felt... Nothing we
can do or say Will ever compare to what this child had to go through......

Janet Shan  3 days ago in reply to Konrad 

Konrad -- I am sure many share your sentiments. The man is lower than dirt. He is a vile POS that doesn't deserve
to live among humans. I am waiting to see if the public defender will argue murder by reason of insanity. This
dirtbag has a long rap sheet and he should never have been given probation in the first place. It's time to go a
fter these judges who left these hardened criminals out on the streets to reoffend and commit even more heinous
crimes. Remember Eve Carson? If I am not mistakened, one of the criminals was from the same county as McNeill
and let out of prison with a slap on the wrist.

I am waiting to see if the public defender will argue murder by reason of insanity.
i had not thought of this defense, and i thought i read he hired a lawyer
cant belive with that rap sheet he walked as a free man, how can the courts justify
turning these criminals loose on society



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 23, 2009, 11:37:39 PM
I was wondering about Byron.....was he a child that vicki had before that she married Brad or does he belong to Brad? I am asking because his name is Coleman and Cheyennes is Lockhart....Did  the grandparents adopt him? ....I can't imagine them adopting Byron and not Cheyenne....I am wondering if he decided to change his name from Lockhart to Coleman after he turned 18?

Yes, Byron Coleman is Vickie's son from a previous relationship before she married Brad.  At some point after they married, Byron changed his last name from Coleman to Lockhart.   Brad and Vickie divorced in 1996, she retained custody of the kids.  (hers and their 3). 

Two years later, in 1998, Vickie and her sister were at the home of a friend when there was a home invasion, Vickie and her sister were killed.  In his mom's obit, Byron was listed with the last name Lockhart. 

After her death the kids went to live with her parents, who then went to court to get legal custody.  At some point after Vickie's death, Byron changed his name back to Coleman.

Just to confuse things a bit more.. hehe.. This makes three Byron Coleman's:

Byron Coleman Sr. = Vickie Coleman/Lockhart's father
Byron Coleman Jr.  = Vickie's brother, who died in 1990/1991 aboard the USS Roosevelt 
Byron Coleman = Vickie's son

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 23, 2009, 11:51:29 PM
I was wondering about Byron.....was he a child that vicki had before that she married Brad or does he belong to Brad? I am asking because his name is Coleman and Cheyennes is Lockhart....Did  the grandparents adopt him? ....I can't imagine them adopting Byron and not Cheyenne....I am wondering if he decided to change his name from Lockhart to Coleman after he turned 18?

Yes, Byron Coleman is Vickie's son from a previous relationship before she married Brad.  At some point after they married, Byron changed his last name from Coleman to Lockhart.   Brad and Vickie divorced in 1996, she retained custody of the kids.  (hers and their 3). 

Two years later, in 1998, Vickie and her sister were at the home of a friend when there was a home invasion, Vickie and her sister were killed.  In his mom's obit, Byron was listed with the last name Lockhart. 

After her death the kids went to live with her parents, who then went to court to get legal custody.  At some point after Vickie's death, Byron changed his name back to Coleman.

Just to confuse things a bit more.. hehe.. This makes three Byron Coleman's:

Byron Coleman Sr. = Vickie Coleman/Lockhart's father
Byron Coleman Jr.  = Vickie's brother, who died in 1990/1991 aboard the USS Roosevelt 
Byron Coleman = Vickie's son

 

Thanks for that info I was wondering if they were seperated or divorced before her death.  I Think her (Vickie's) obituary also stated she had 2 daughters, Cheyenne Lockhart and Michelle Coleman.  That would mean possibly she had 2 children before her and Brad got married.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 23, 2009, 11:55:46 PM
Shaniya's dad, Bradley, has 3 siblings, an older sister, an older brother, and Carey, who is a year younger than Brad.  None of his three siblings were mentioned in Shaniya's obit. 

Carey is not the great-aunt Caroline Davis, as some have thought.  Carey is Shaniya's aunt, not great-aunt, and has had the name Carey since birth. 

Have been working more today on a who's who in this case.   ::MonkeyConfused:: 








Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 24, 2009, 12:00:21 AM
Shaniya's dad, Bradley, has 3 siblings, an older sister, an older brother, and Carey, who is a year younger than Brad.  None of his three siblings were mentioned in Shaniya's obit. 

Carey is not the great-aunt Caroline Davis, as some have thought.  Carey is Shaniya's aunt, not great-aunt, and has had the name Carey since birth. 

Have been working more today on a who's who in this case.   ::MonkeyConfused:: 








Thanks Wyks.  I suspect that obit was written by members of Antoinettes side of the family.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 24, 2009, 12:04:55 AM
Shaniya's dad, Bradley, has 3 siblings, an older sister, an older brother, and Carey, who is a year younger than Brad.  None of his three siblings were mentioned in Shaniya's obit. 

Carey is not the great-aunt Caroline Davis, as some have thought.  Carey is Shaniya's aunt, not great-aunt, and has had the name Carey since birth. 

Have been working more today on a who's who in this case.   ::MonkeyConfused:: 

Ty for your research...that was a job I am sure...now why is the Davis name so popular in this mix...whowas Brad to marry by the last name Davis?







Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 24, 2009, 12:08:42 AM
Shaniya's dad, Bradley, has 3 siblings, an older sister, an older brother, and Carey, who is a year younger than Brad.  None of his three siblings were mentioned in Shaniya's obit. 

Carey is not the great-aunt Caroline Davis, as some have thought.  Carey is Shaniya's aunt, not great-aunt, and has had the name Carey since birth. 

Have been working more today on a who's who in this case.   ::MonkeyConfused:: 








I've been keeping some notes on who's who as well so if I cna help you please let me know.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Fanny Mae on November 24, 2009, 12:46:02 AM
Shaniya's dad, Bradley, has 3 siblings, an older sister, an older brother, and Carey, who is a year younger than Brad.  None of his three siblings were mentioned in Shaniya's obit. 

Carey is not the great-aunt Caroline Davis, as some have thought.  Carey is Shaniya's aunt, not great-aunt, and has had the name Carey since birth. 

Have been working more today on a who's who in this case.   ::MonkeyConfused:: 








O/T
WYKES, I left you some more smileys on Elizabeth's thread.  ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 24, 2009, 12:52:03 AM
I was wondering about Byron.....was he a child that vicki had before that she married Brad or does he belong to Brad? I am asking because his name is Coleman and Cheyennes is Lockhart....Did  the grandparents adopt him? ....I can't imagine them adopting Byron and not Cheyenne....I am wondering if he decided to change his name from Lockhart to Coleman after he turned 18?

Yes, Byron Coleman is Vickie's son from a previous relationship before she married Brad.  At some point after they married, Byron changed his last name from Coleman to Lockhart.   Brad and Vickie divorced in 1996, she retained custody of the kids.  (hers and their 3). 

Two years later, in 1998, Vickie and her sister were at the home of a friend when there was a home invasion, Vickie and her sister were killed.  In his mom's obit, Byron was listed with the last name Lockhart. 

After her death the kids went to live with her parents, who then went to court to get legal custody.  At some point after Vickie's death, Byron changed his name back to Coleman.

Just to confuse things a bit more.. hehe.. This makes three Byron Coleman's:

Byron Coleman Sr. = Vickie Coleman/Lockhart's father
Byron Coleman Jr.  = Vickie's brother, who died in 1990/1991 aboard the USS Roosevelt 
Byron Coleman = Vickie's son

 

Thanks for that info I was wondering if they were seperated or divorced before her death.  I Think her (Vickie's) obituary also stated she had 2 daughters, Cheyenne Lockhart and Michelle Coleman.  That would mean possibly she had 2 children before her and Brad got married.



You're welcome, 4getUnot! 

It appears that Michele Coleman is one of Brad/Vickie's 3 kids.  She may have changed her last name when Byron did.  Only two of Brad/Vickie's kids have the last name Lockhart. 
 
From obit, Shaniya's siblings...

brothers:
Byron Coleman
Chavez Lockhart
Joe Davis
Alijah Fogle

sisters:
Michele Coleman
Cheyenne Lockhart


obit:
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/fayettevilleobserver/obituary.aspx?n=shaniya-n-davis&pid=136204823 (http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/fayettevilleobserver/obituary.aspx?n=shaniya-n-davis&pid=136204823)



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 24, 2009, 01:23:57 AM
Thanks Wyks.  I suspect that obit was written by members of Antoinettes side of the family.


You're welcome, Klaas!  And yes, sure seems like it! 



Ty for your research...that was a job I am sure...now why is the Davis name so popular in this mix...whowas Brad to marry by the last name Davis?


You're welcome, Mymonkey!  Yeppers, it's a job and a half.  Still not done, have been reading thru media interviews etc til my eyes are blurred, lol.  Have read from locals that the Davis name is as common in that area as is Smith/Jones elsewhere.  Same with the McNeil name.  Some of these Davis folks are not related in any way, some perhaps by marriage.  The fun part is figuring em all out.   Brad's former fiance is Tyrongella (Ty) Nekia Judd Davis.  She wasn't 'born' a Davis, she is related to a Davis by marriage, either hers or her mom's.  Her mom is now or has been, a Turner.    ::MonkeyConfused::



I've been keeping some notes on who's who as well so if I cna help you please let me know.


4getUnot - Awesome!  If you and any other monkey wants to compare notes on this, please email me at Myst_Wyks@yahoo.com .  When we have a list that's as confirmed as possible, we can make a Who's Who thread, then update in there as needed.   ::MonkeyWink::



O/T
WYKES, I left you some more smileys on Elizabeth's thread.  ::MonkeyKiss::


Fanny - On my way!  Thanks, my monkey friend!   ::DancingSantaMonkey1:: 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 24, 2009, 02:29:39 AM
Thanks Wyks.  I suspect that obit was written by members of Antoinettes side of the family.


You're welcome, Klaas!  And yes, sure seems like it! 



Ty for your research...that was a job I am sure...now why is the Davis name so popular in this mix...whowas Brad to marry by the last name Davis?


You're welcome, Mymonkey!  Yeppers, it's a job and a half.  Still not done, have been reading thru media interviews etc til my eyes are blurred, lol.  Have read from locals that the Davis name is as common in that area as is Smith/Jones elsewhere.  Same with the McNeil name.  Some of these Davis folks are not related in any way, some perhaps by marriage.  The fun part is figuring em all out.   Brad's former fiance is Tyrongella (Ty) Nekia Judd Davis.  She wasn't 'born' a Davis, she is related to a Davis by marriage, either hers or her mom's.  Her mom is now or has been, a Turner.    ::MonkeyConfused::



I've been keeping some notes on who's who as well so if I cna help you please let me know.


4getUnot - Awesome!  If you and any other monkey wants to compare notes on this, please email me at Myst_Wyks@yahoo.com .  When we have a list that's as confirmed as possible, we can make a Who's Who thread, then update in there as needed.   ::MonkeyWink::



O/T
WYKES, I left you some more smileys on Elizabeth's thread.  ::MonkeyKiss::


Fanny - On my way!  Thanks, my monkey friend!   ::DancingSantaMonkey1:: 



Wyks I'm ready when you are so - you have nanners!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 08:31:49 AM
Morning all...
Wyks...that would be awesome if you can compile the list of who is who in Shaniya's family tree...You and a few other monkeys did that for Haleigh Cummings and it was so useful to go back and look at to see who was who in her life... ::MonkeyKiss::

one thing is bothering me about Brad/Carrie saying that neither of them knew that Shaniya was taken out of her school...Did they specifically say that they did not know that she was unenrolled in her school that she had been attending or did they say that they did not know that she was not attending school while with the bio or both? Cause if they had talked with Shaniya at all in the 5 weeks since she had gone to the bio's, wouldn't they have asked Shaniya about her new school and how she liked it? or asked bio how Shaniya liked her new school? Or did they assume that the bio mom was commuting Shaniya to her old school every morning and picking her up? did they ever ask? I don't even know this bio and I can tell you that she does not appear to be the type of "mom" who would get her butt out of bed every morning to take Shaniya to school...sigh....
I thought that I heard Brad say that he had not talked to Shaniya since she went to live with the bio...that would have been 5 weeks since he had talked with her...and now he will never hear her voice again ::MonkeyTears::  Shaniya must have felt so lonely and abandoned...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 24, 2009, 08:49:43 AM
Brad on the Today show right now and M. Viera asking him if he thought that in hindsight does he think he might have had some culpability in Shaniya's murder by not checking into egg donor a little more and all he can say is sometimes we make bad decisions.  Bad decision?  Yeah, no, ya think?  I paraphrased all this but that's all I gathered and he threw the Lord's name around again.  Wonder if he was a God fearing man before all this?  I know it's a good thing to find God but I have always had a problem with people who find him AFTER they have done wrong.  Prisoners always find God behind bars!  If He was in their life before maybe they wouldn't have committed a crime.  Feeling Snarky today...too many beautiful children gone and there's bio dad doing the media tour a la Anthony.  What next, a foundation?  Just help and support all those excellent missing and exploited children foundations already in existence.  I'd like to see one parent not get in it for the dough!  I'm going to work before nanners get pitched at me all the way down here in FL!  See ya'll later.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 09:00:22 AM
Brad on the Today show right now and M. Viera asking him if he thought that in hindsight does he think he might have had some culpability in Shaniya's murder by not checking into egg donor a little more and all he can say is sometimes we make bad decisions.  Bad decision?  Yeah, no, ya think?  I paraphrased all this but that's all I gathered and he threw the Lord's name around again.  Wonder if he was a God fearing man before all this?  I know it's a good thing to find God but I have always had a problem with people who find him AFTER they have done wrong.  Prisoners always find God behind bars!  If He was in their life before maybe they wouldn't have committed a crime.  Feeling Snarky today...too many beautiful children gone and there's bio dad doing the media tour a la Anthony.  What next, a foundation?  Just help and support all those excellent missing and exploited children foundations already in existence.  I'd like to see one parent not get in it for the dough!  I'm going to work before nanners get pitched at me all the way down here in FL!  See ya'll later.

no nanners from me! right there with ya! I also had wondered if Brad was into religion before this happened? if so, he talked the talk but did not walk the walk in my opinion....
I also agree with you about the media tours etc. and  why not contribute any money to the foundations already established as well...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: seahorse on November 24, 2009, 09:12:24 AM
Thanks Wyks.  I suspect that obit was written by members of Antoinettes side of the family.


You're welcome, Klaas!  And yes, sure seems like it! 



Ty for your research...that was a job I am sure...now why is the Davis name so popular in this mix...whowas Brad to marry by the last name Davis?


You're welcome, Mymonkey!  Yeppers, it's a job and a half.  Still not done, have been reading thru media interviews etc til my eyes are blurred, lol.  Have read from locals that the Davis name is as common in that area as is Smith/Jones elsewhere.  Same with the McNeil name.  Some of these Davis folks are not related in any way, some perhaps by marriage.  The fun part is figuring em all out.   Brad's former fiance is Tyrongella (Ty) Nekia Judd Davis.  She wasn't 'born' a Davis, she is related to a Davis by marriage, either hers or her mom's.  Her mom is now or has been, a Turner.    ::MonkeyConfused::



I've been keeping some notes on who's who as well so if I cna help you please let me know.


4getUnot - Awesome!  If you and any other monkey wants to compare notes on this, please email me at Myst_Wyks@yahoo.com .  When we have a list that's as confirmed as possible, we can make a Who's Who thread, then update in there as needed.   ::MonkeyWink::



O/T
WYKES, I left you some more smileys on Elizabeth's thread.  ::MonkeyKiss::


Fanny - On my way!  Thanks, my monkey friend!   ::DancingSantaMonkey1:: 



Goodmorning Monkeys and Guests,

St.Mary's County, Maryland, info on Aunt C. (2003 domestic) it would be tacty to post it before the funeral, so I waited.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 24, 2009, 09:45:29 AM
I really wish Brad would back away from his tv appearances, he doesn't help himself in the least, imo.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 24, 2009, 11:30:02 AM
as far as I know, we have never been told who took Shaniya out of her school...for all we know, Brad or Carrie could have taken her out...if Shaniya was going to live with her bio as Brad has stated, then it would make sense for him to have unenrolled Shaniya at her school...jmo...also, I doubt that bio mom would even know what school Shaniya was in let alone getting herself together enough to even think about calling the school to unenroll her...jmo...

also, if Brad's older children both said and knew that bio was into drugs, why wouldn't Brad have known? that doesn't make sense to me...He knew..he is just trying to make it seem that his mistake wasn't as obvious as it was...Not taking away from the fact that bio and MM are the 2 who did the awful thing to Shaniya...Dad has some culpability...he should have checked to see if Shaniya was happy in her new school, how she was adjusting  since her move...it sounded like he had not talked or seen Shaniya since she had gone to live with bio...how does that happen? how could you not be depressed and missing that little girl that you would not want to call her everyday that she wasn't with him? just to hear her little voice...she was only 5 years old... ::MonkeyTears:: she deserved so much more...

If the school would have notified the parent who enrolled her, or a parent on the emergency list, or called and verified that it was ok that Shaniya was being withdrawn from school this would have never happened. I don't really trust anything that Cheyanne says ( she has a tude with daddy imo), she said devilmom was sweet, smoked weed, and I think she said maybe did coke. How long ago was this? years ago? 1 yr? 4 yrs? How many sweet moms sell their child to be raped and murdered.ICK  Many children live with dads who have to travel alot and have to be away from home alot, many live with the quality time with with dads. From pics I seen, seems Shaniya had quality time with and family. If Brad would have told that devileggdonor no, you can't have her for an extended period of time, wonder how fast she would have ran to court.JMO

Hey Razzy...honestly, if Brad would have told the devileggdonor no, that she couldn't have Shaniya, I don't think that devileggdonor would have done a darn thing...I don't think that she would have taken Brad to court at all...she would have backed down in my opinion...and if she would have taken him to court, then he should have said, bring it on. he could have proven that her home was not fit for Shaniya to be there...he could have shown that he was more able to support Shaniya, he had decent care for Shaniya while he had to travel for work, he had a stable home for this little girl  and on and on...jmo of course....He could have rolled the dice and seen what happened...Shaniya would have had a better chance than she got by him just turning Shaniya over to bio without a fight...my opinion was that he just didn't want to have the day to day  responsibility of a child any longer. None of his children lived with him other than Shaniya...so if she went with bio,,he would have his freedom and not have a child to worry about...Carrie deserved this baby ....she loved her madly...I can feel her connection with her. She will have the worst time getting over this imo....

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

It seems to me the school should have asked to see a judgement of custody since she didn't enroll her. Can any parent just walk in a school with a birth certificate and remove a child who doesn't have custody just because their name is on it? As for devilmama going to court I think she would have. Take my word for it rarely do people have to prove anything to a judge, they let a scum of the earth have custody, or unsupervised visitation, then are exempt from lawsuits when they make a wrong decision.JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 24, 2009, 11:59:57 AM
Morning all...
Wyks...that would be awesome if you can compile the list of who is who in Shaniya's family tree...You and a few other monkeys did that for Haleigh Cummings and it was so useful to go back and look at to see who was who in her life... ::MonkeyKiss::

one thing is bothering me about Brad/Carrie saying that neither of them knew that Shaniya was taken out of her school...Did they specifically say that they did not know that she was unenrolled in her school that she had been attending or did they say that they did not know that she was not attending school while with the bio or both? Cause if they had talked with Shaniya at all in the 5 weeks since she had gone to the bio's, wouldn't they have asked Shaniya about her new school and how she liked it? or asked bio how Shaniya liked her new school? Or did they assume that the bio mom was commuting Shaniya to her old school every morning and picking her up? did they ever ask? I don't even know this bio and I can tell you that she does not appear to be the type of "mom" who would get her butt out of bed every morning to take Shaniya to school...sigh....
I thought that I heard Brad say that he had not talked to Shaniya since she went to live with the bio...that would have been 5 weeks since he had talked with her...and now he will never hear her voice again ::MonkeyTears::  Shaniya must have felt so lonely and abandoned...

It seems to me that the school would have called when Shaniya missed school.  My children's school did that.
Maybe Carey told the school that Shaniya had gone to live with her mother.
I remember reading somewhere that there was a meeting scheduled on Wednesday, Nov12, to see why Shaniya
was not enrolled in school.  Kindergarten is mandatory in NC if the child is 5 by Sept 1st.

Brad makes me sick.  I think he should be charged with child neglect at the least.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Lenie on November 24, 2009, 12:30:16 PM
JMO I am just gonna throw this out there. I know for a fact that in the state of Ohio if a parentage DNA test is done and no father is listed on the birth certificate, then if that test comes back and shows that man A is the father then his name is put on the birth certificate. Could Brad not have been the father of Shaniya? Could he be afraid of Shinaya being taken away from him for good by AD? Remember this was just suppose to have been a one time thing and AD was reportedly rather loose with her goods. It just seems rather strange that Brad or Carrie either one could have registered her in school as legally neither of them were relatives. I personally think that if AD went into the school and said this is my daughter, his name is not on the birth certificate she could have done about anything that she wanted.

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 12:56:41 PM
There are a lot of lessons to be learned from Shaniya's death. I hope they don't fall short or on deaf ears because people don't want to see what could have been done to prevent this. The dad screwed up first by not taking this woman to court to gain full custody and 2nd by not doing his due diligance in checking out this situation.

Does anyone recall Aunt Carrie said the mom called (so there is proof there was a phone) and said she would not see Shaniya again? I want to know what happened after that? Was this told to the dad and if so what did he do about it? Did he try to contact her?

In regards to school. I don't think the aunt or the dad could have signed Shaniya up for school without the mom signing since they didn't have legal guardianship. This makes sense that she could just dis-enroll her.

He said he made a mistake? A bad decision? Ok, yeah considering the child is dead I suppose you can say he made a bad decision but I think it started a long time ago.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 24, 2009, 01:08:05 PM
Considering Carey Lockhart-Davis was the designated guardian of Shaniya ... I would have assumed that she would have been contacted the first day that Shaniya did not turn up to kindergarden.

My youngest son and wife are teachers in the public school system in our district.  Two of my grandkids attend an independent school  In both systems ... there is a protocol in regards to students who are absent. 

1.  Parents/guardians are required to phone in prior to the beginning of class if the child in their care will not be attending school that day.
2.  Taking attendance is the first thing on the morning agenda for teachers.
3.  Absentee students are listed and ... the list is sent to the office.
4.  The list is then compared with the list of phoned-in absentee students.
5.  The caregiver of any absentee student who was not been reported absent is then contacted.

Considering Carey did not know that Shaniyia was not attending kindergarten ... she may have assumed that AD had enrolled her in a kindergarten class locally.

If Carey had contacted Shaniya once in that five week period and inquired about the little girl's activities ... the truth would have been revealed.

Janet

++++++

Questions swirl after girl's body discovered
Police have mother in custody on sex-trafficking and abuse charges, but aren't detailing suspicions.
Posted: Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009


Carey Lockhart had been the girl's primary guardian because her father, Bradley Lockhart, worked long stretches as a building contractor at out-of-state jobs ...

Last Tuesday, Lockhart rang his sister with bizarre news. A neighbor called him to say that police were looking for Shaniya.

As they were talking on the phone, police knocked on Carey Lockhart's door. They had found her name listed as a guardian at Shaniya's elementary school.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/408/story/1060102.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 24, 2009, 01:18:36 PM
The following quote of Carey Lockart-Davis speaks volumes to me.  Why was there no contact with her niece for almost five weeks?  The father did not talk to his little girl in that five week period she was with her mother.  Shanyia's siblings  ... who have express concerns regarding AD's life style on Nancy Grace ... did not talk to their sister in that five week period.   Something is not right with the family dynamics.

When AD informed Carey that she was not sending Shaniya back to her after a two day visit ... I assume Brad was contacted and ... Carey was told to let it be.  However ... I cannot comprehend why Carey never took over Shaniya's clothes and belongings that would be required for an extended stay?

There are so many aspects of the Shaniya story that does not make sense.

Janet

++++++

Nancy Grace - November 17, 2009

CAREY LOCKHART-DAVIS, SHANIYA DAVIS` AUNT: The last time I saw Shaniya was four weeks ago on a Friday. I went to visit her mother. I packed her with two days` worth of clothes. I got her out of the car, and I kissed her good-bye, and I told her to be a good girl. She turned back to me and said, "I love you, Aunt Carey, and see you later."

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/17/ng.01.html


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 01:18:51 PM
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/34124816#34124816

Video from the todays shows interview.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 01:22:53 PM
Janet I agree there are pieces missing in this story. In the interview I posted from the today show the dad says when he said good-bye to Shaniya on 10/2 he told her to be a good girl and call him every night.

So was she calling him every night and if she wasn't did this worry him?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 01:23:12 PM
Brad was on the Today show...he said that he didn't really see/miss any red flags about the bio mom.. ::MonkeyConfused:: and Meredith asked him about Carrie's having concerns about the bio mom...Brad says that Carrie had not expressed that to him and that Carrie's concerns were probably not that bad or she would have mentioned it to him... ::MonkeyConfused::  <<<< again! He last talked to Shaniya on October 2nd..about 7-8 days later she went to live with the bio...what happened in those 7-8 days that he decided to give her to the bio? I still say that Brad wanted to be done with his responsibility for awhile with Shaniya...he is engaged now, works out of town and he wanted to be more carefree....where does the fiancee live at? out of town? he appeared on the show with his attorney...Maybe he is going to be charged with something as well...like neglect...jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 01:26:04 PM
Janet I agree there are pieces missing in this story. In the interview I posted from the today show the dad says when he said good-bye to Shaniya on 10/2 he told her to be a good girl and call him every night.

So was she calling him every night and if she wasn't did this worry him?

Tracygirl...too funny! you were posting this info the same time that I was...glad that you provided the clip for others to see, just in case my typing it out from memory wasn't spot on...
there definitely are pieces to this story missing!!! totally agree!  He said that October 2nd was the LAST time that he had spoken with Shaniya if I recall so that would mean that he/she had not spoken by phone imo.... :smt011


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 01:29:03 PM
Brad was on the Today show...he said that he didn't really see/miss any red flags about the bio mom.. ::MonkeyConfused:: and Meredith asked him about Carrie's having concerns about the bio mom...Brad says that Carrie had not expressed that to him and that Carrie's concerns were probably not that bad or she would have mentioned it to him... ::MonkeyConfused::  <<<< again! He last talked to Shaniya on October 2nd..about 7-8 days later she went to live with the bio...what happened in those 7-8 days that he decided to give her to the bio? I still say that Brad wanted to be done with his responsibility for awhile with Shaniya...he is engaged now, works out of town and he wanted to be more carefree....where does the fiancee live at? out of town? he appeared on the show with his attorney...Maybe he is going to be charged with something as well...like neglect...jmo

You know what he did in that interview? He made it clear that the aunt was not responsible for Shaniya by admitting she allowed him to make the decisions for his daughter.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 01:32:04 PM
Brad was on the Today show...he said that he didn't really see/miss any red flags about the bio mom.. ::MonkeyConfused:: and Meredith asked him about Carrie's having concerns about the bio mom...Brad says that Carrie had not expressed that to him and that Carrie's concerns were probably not that bad or she would have mentioned it to him... ::MonkeyConfused::  <<<< again! He last talked to Shaniya on October 2nd..about 7-8 days later she went to live with the bio...what happened in those 7-8 days that he decided to give her to the bio? I still say that Brad wanted to be done with his responsibility for awhile with Shaniya...he is engaged now, works out of town and he wanted to be more carefree....where does the fiancee live at? out of town? he appeared on the show with his attorney...Maybe he is going to be charged with something as well...like neglect...jmo

You know what he did in that interview? He made it clear that the aunt was not responsible for Shaniya by admitting she allowed him to make the decisions for his daughter.

Yes! he did, didn't he!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 01:34:49 PM
Yes and then he went on to say that we make decisions and others with bad intentions get in the way...First he takes responsibility and then he throws it out.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 01:38:50 PM
snip from Razzy's post above to avoid stacking posts:

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

Jazzy...Brad has said himself that he was letting Shaniya go live with the bio so that she could have a chance to be a mother..and just to add, he had not spoken to Shaniya since he dropped her off at aunt Carries house on October 2nd...7-8 days later, she was sent over to bio's house while Brad was still out of town...Carrie took her...what happened in those 7-8 days for Brad to decide to send her over to bio's mom when she was perfectly fine with Carrie? ...couldn't it have waited till he got back into town? what was the big hurry to get her over to the bio's house?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 01:39:26 PM
snip from Razzy's post above to avoid stacking posts:

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

Razzy...Brad has said himself that he was letting Shaniya go live with the bio so that she could have a chance to be a mother..and just to add, he had not spoken to Shaniya since he dropped her off at aunt Carries house on October 2nd...7-8 days later, she was sent over to bio's house while Brad was still out of town...Carrie took her...what happened in those 7-8 days for Brad to decide to send her over to bio's mom when she was perfectly fine with Carrie? ...couldn't it have waited till he got back into town? what was the big hurry to get her over to the bio's house?
edited my own quote to correct Razzy....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 02:20:06 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 24, 2009, 02:35:36 PM
Brad on the Today show right now and M. Viera asking him if he thought that in hindsight does he think he might have had some culpability in Shaniya's murder by not checking into egg donor a little more and all he can say is sometimes we make bad decisions.  Bad decision?  Yeah, no, ya think?  I paraphrased all this but that's all I gathered and he threw the Lord's name around again.  Wonder if he was a God fearing man before all this?  I know it's a good thing to find God but I have always had a problem with people who find him AFTER they have done wrong.  Prisoners always find God behind bars!  If He was in their life before maybe they wouldn't have committed a crime.  Feeling Snarky today...too many beautiful children gone and there's bio dad doing the media tour a la Anthony.  What next, a foundation?  Just help and support all those excellent missing and exploited children foundations already in existence.  I'd like to see one parent not get in it for the dough!  I'm going to work before nanners get pitched at me all the way down here in FL!  See ya'll later.

No nanners getting pitched from me! 

And as to the part above I bolded........ ermmmm... yeah.

Neighbor Scott Rollston said a memorial page has been set up on Facebook and a foundation has been established in Shaniya's name. Donations can be made at the Wachovia Bank on Morganton Road.
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/18/953110


from the obit:
Memorial donations may be made to The Shaniya Davis Trust Fund, c/o Wachovia Bank, 4200 Morganton Road, Fayetteville, NC 28304. Services entrusted to Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, of Fayetteville.
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/fayettevilleobserver/obituary.aspx?n=shaniya-n-davis&pid=136204823


 ::MonkeyRoll::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 24, 2009, 02:43:18 PM
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/34124816#34124816

Video from the todays shows interview.



Thanks Tracygirl.

 ::MonkeyMad::

I believe that Carey Lockhart-Davis let Shaniya down but ... when I listen to Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya Dave ... I want to scream ...

"BRAD ... BOW ... COME CLEAN AND ... SAY IT HOW IT IS!!! YOU DID NOT MAKE A MISTAKE.  IN YOUR OWN WORDS ... YOU ADMITTED YOU TOOK A CHANCE.   YOU LOST BIG TIME WHEN YOU GAMBLED ... WHEN YOU TOOK A CHANCE ... WITH A PRICELESS TREASURE ... A TREASURE BEYOND WORTH.   HEY ... YOU MAY HAVE LOST BIG TIME BUT ... SHANIYA LOST SO MUCH MORE.  THIS LITTLE GIRL'S GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO LIFE WAS STOLEN.  IF YOU DID NOT KNOW THE LIFESTYLE AND THE DEPLORABLE CONDITIONS YOU ABANDONED YOUR DAUGHTER TO FOR ALMOST FIVE WEEKS ... YOU SHOULD HAVE."

Janet


+++++

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home
Nov. 19, 2009


Fayetteville, N.C.
 
Several people who were close to 5-year-old Shaniya Davis and her father Brad Lockhart say they tried to intervene in the child's life because they felt the little girl was at risk.

A close friend of Brad's, and his ex-father-in-law both say they offered to take in Shaniya rather than let her live with her mother, because they say when the child was in the custody of her mother, bad things happened to her.

"My wife says she saw cigarette burns on Shaniya's arms," said Brad's friend Tim Allen, who says he is very angry over what happened.

Byron Coleman, Brad's ex-father-in-law, said Shaniya "had burns on her legs, arms and things" after visits with her mother.

"She had a cigarette burn on the corner of her eye, which she claimed her grandma did when she went over there," added Shaniya's half sister Cheyenne Lockhart.

The three all claimed that the 5-year-old suffered physical abuse while in the custody of her mother.

"When you wanted sex that's where you went," Coleman said. "You knew what the girl was doing. You knew what she associated with, so why place your daughter in that situation?"

Because of that, Coleman blames Lockhart for Shaniya's death.

"To me Shaniya would be alive today if she wasn't placed in that situation," Coleman claims.

Coleman says he offered to give Shaniya a home, but says Brad declined his offer.

Allen tells a similar story.

"He had an alternative, I gave him a way out," Allen explained; however Lockhart would not let Allen take care of Shaniya.

"I'm fighting mad. All this could have been avoided," Allen said.

Allen had already taken in Shaniya's half sister Cheyenne, because she said her dad wouldn't take care of her.

And Cheyenne says Brad did not provide for Shaniya.

"He didn't take care of her, his girlfriends took care of her," she said. "He loved her, but she was raised by other people. He hasn't been in her life."

Meanwhile, the Cumberland County Department of Social Services said it can not comment on what it was doing in regard to Shaniya because those comments might compromise the on-going criminal investigation
 
http://wake.mync.com/site/wake/news/story/44620/some-claim-shaniya-davis-was-at-risk-and-needed-a-better-home


Slain N.C. girl’s aunt says mom was neglectful 
Nov . 17, 2009


The aunt of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found off a rural North Carolina road said Tuesday that she had a hard time letting the girl live temporarily at her mother's house because she believed the woman neglected her children.

"Antoinette and I never really got along because of the way that she neglected her children," Carey Lockhart-Davis said. "I feel robbed. I feel that Shaniya was robbed."
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33989586/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/


Nancy Grace - November 19, 2009

BYRON COLEMAN, SHANIYA DAVIS` HALF-BROTHER:  My father recently gave her, Antoinette, a chance to give the mother a second chance to raise her daughter, I mean, because everybody deserves a second chance. Just like a convicted felon, I mean, he deserves a second chance because he could have changed.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/18/ng.01.html



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 24, 2009, 03:02:41 PM
4getUnot - Thanks for the nanners, the more help the better!  Sorting thru who's who in Shaniya's life, am amazed to find how many folks there actually are in her family, on both sides.  She was surrounded by an incredible amount of family. 


Seahorse - Thanks for that info on Carey, interesting!  From that we are able to confirm who she married, which helps in sorting out the Davis names.  Thanks again! 


Cookie - Thanks!  And yeppers, with this much family on each side, a who's who will sure help us to keep things straight.  Still confirming some names/relationships before posting this very longgggggggggggg list of folks.   Am glad to know this was helpful in other cases.  It's fun working together with other monkeys, pulling all of what we are finding together in one place. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 24, 2009, 03:05:50 PM
This pig raped a 5 year old girl.   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad::
omg!! I wanted to believe I didn't see the face of a child rapist on the Tv I wanted to believe he was a poor excuse of a human being nothing more than a mule for a more evil individual....I truly hope he gets what he deserves for what he did to that baby!!! WE NEED STIFFER PUNISHMENTS FOR PEDOPHILES!!! There is no rehabilitation for that kind of human! :( 

No empathy for the perp?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 24, 2009, 03:07:47 PM
I really wish Brad would back away from his tv appearances, he doesn't help himself in the least, imo.

I totally agree Rosie!!  He seems to be doing himself NO favors by constantly being in the public eye.  Makes me wonder sometimes.. ya know?  I wish for him that he could/would take some time to quietly grieve.  Not sure how much grieving can be done with all these appearances/interviews etc.  Of course, everyone grieves in their own way.  And yet... I cannot think this will be a healthy thing for him, for long.  Carey seems determined to be at his side, and she is looking more and more like she's about to crash and burn.  Sigh. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ScareyCarrie on November 24, 2009, 03:18:05 PM
Sorry for the O/T but I see you in the rafters Nut and u r a mod correct?? well i am not sure but is it ok to post a minors name who is not related to the crime/case being discussed, as in not been charged in the crime?? if this is not ok then u may want to head over to Elizabeth's thread, thanks again sorry for O/T


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 24, 2009, 03:42:28 PM
Sorry for the O/T but I see you in the rafters Nut and u r a mod correct?? well i am not sure but is it ok to post a minors name who is not related to the crime/case being discussed, as in not been charged in the crime?? if this is not ok then u may want to head over to Elizabeth's thread, thanks again sorry for O/T

Thanks Scarey - I took care of it  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 24, 2009, 03:54:06 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 24, 2009, 03:54:11 PM
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/34124816#34124816

Video from the todays shows interview.



Thanks Tracygirl.

 ::MonkeyMad::

I believe that Carey Lockhart-Davis let Shaniya down but ... when I listen to Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya Dave ... I want to scream ...

"BRAD ... BOW ... COME CLEAN AND ... SAY IT HOW IT IS!!! YOU DID NOT MAKE A MISTAKE.  IN YOUR OWN WORDS ... YOU ADMITTED YOU TOOK A CHANCE.   YOU LOST BIG TIME WHEN YOU GAMBLED ... WHEN YOU TOOK A CHANCE ... WITH A PRICELESS TREASURE ... A TREASURE BEYOND WORTH.   HEY ... YOU MAY HAVE LOST BIG TIME BUT ... SHANIYA LOST SO MUCH MORE.  THIS LITTLE GIRL'S GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO LIFE WAS STOLEN.  IF YOU DID NOT KNOW THE LIFESTYLE AND THE DEPLORABLE CONDITIONS YOU ABANDONED YOUR DAUGHTER TO FOR ALMOST FIVE WEEKS ... YOU SHOULD HAVE."

Janet


+++++

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home
Nov. 19, 2009


Fayetteville, N.C.
 
Several people who were close to 5-year-old Shaniya Davis and her father Brad Lockhart say they tried to intervene in the child's life because they felt the little girl was at risk.

A close friend of Brad's, and his ex-father-in-law both say they offered to take in Shaniya rather than let her live with her mother, because they say when the child was in the custody of her mother, bad things happened to her.

"My wife says she saw cigarette burns on Shaniya's arms," said Brad's friend Tim Allen, who says he is very angry over what happened.

Byron Coleman, Brad's ex-father-in-law, said Shaniya "had burns on her legs, arms and things" after visits with her mother.

"She had a cigarette burn on the corner of her eye, which she claimed her grandma did when she went over there," added Shaniya's half sister Cheyenne Lockhart.

The three all claimed that the 5-year-old suffered physical abuse while in the custody of her mother.

"When you wanted sex that's where you went," Coleman said. "You knew what the girl was doing. You knew what she associated with, so why place your daughter in that situation?"

Because of that, Coleman blames Lockhart for Shaniya's death.

"To me Shaniya would be alive today if she wasn't placed in that situation," Coleman claims.

Coleman says he offered to give Shaniya a home, but says Brad declined his offer.

Allen tells a similar story.

"He had an alternative, I gave him a way out," Allen explained; however Lockhart would not let Allen take care of Shaniya.

"I'm fighting mad. All this could have been avoided," Allen said.

Allen had already taken in Shaniya's half sister Cheyenne, because she said her dad wouldn't take care of her.

And Cheyenne says Brad did not provide for Shaniya.

"He didn't take care of her, his girlfriends took care of her," she said. "He loved her, but she was raised by other people. He hasn't been in her life."

Meanwhile, the Cumberland County Department of Social Services said it can not comment on what it was doing in regard to Shaniya because those comments might compromise the on-going criminal investigation
 
http://wake.mync.com/site/wake/news/story/44620/some-claim-shaniya-davis-was-at-risk-and-needed-a-better-home


Slain N.C. girl’s aunt says mom was neglectful 
Nov . 17, 2009


The aunt of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found off a rural North Carolina road said Tuesday that she had a hard time letting the girl live temporarily at her mother's house because she believed the woman neglected her children.

"Antoinette and I never really got along because of the way that she neglected her children," Carey Lockhart-Davis said. "I feel robbed. I feel that Shaniya was robbed."
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33989586/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/


Nancy Grace - November 19, 2009

BYRON COLEMAN, SHANIYA DAVIS` HALF-BROTHER:  My father recently gave her, Antoinette, a chance to give the mother a second chance to raise her daughter, I mean, because everybody deserves a second chance. Just like a convicted felon, I mean, he deserves a second chance because he could have changed.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/18/ng.01.html







Not to mention the TORTURE  Shaniya endured in the last hours of her life .Maybe Brad is trying to make himself feel better, if it were me the guilt would take  over me and I would not be able to cope at all much less be on TV..thats jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 24, 2009, 03:59:20 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 

God may have taken a precious gift back from Brad that he gave him...because Shaniya was not cherished as she should have been.jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ScareyCarrie on November 24, 2009, 04:00:39 PM
Sorry for the O/T but I see you in the rafters Nut and u r a mod correct?? well i am not sure but is it ok to post a minors name who is not related to the crime/case being discussed, as in not been charged in the crime?? if this is not ok then u may want to head over to Elizabeth's thread, thanks again sorry for O/T

Thanks Scarey - I took care of it  ::MonkeyCool::

tHANK YOU  ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 05:03:50 PM
Snipped from Wykes post...

If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

I am with you on this one, let me tell you it has my angry and the only thing I can think of is he is trying to deflect his god given responsibility back on to God himself! It is frustrating to me. I want to hear him say, yes I made a mistake, I screwed up, I feel awful, I should never have sent her there, I should have protected her....nothing, we get nothing other then we make decisions and pray they are the best but sometimes bad intentions get in the way! What? Ugh he frustrates me! Makes me wonder if he relied simply on prayer to give him the answers and he didn't check anything out for himself. To me, prayer is great, I pray for goodness sakes but I also stand on my own two feet and do what I have to and need to, to protect my children.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 24, 2009, 05:15:43 PM
Snipped from Wykes post...

If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

I am with you on this one, let me tell you it has my angry and the only thing I can think of is he is trying to deflect his god given responsibility back on to God himself! It is frustrating to me. I want to hear him say, yes I made a mistake, I screwed up, I feel awful, I should never have sent her there, I should have protected her....nothing, we get nothing other then we make decisions and pray they are the best but sometimes bad intentions get in the way! What? Ugh he frustrates me! Makes me wonder if he relied simply on prayer to give him the answers and he didn't check anything out for himself. To me, prayer is great, I pray for goodness sakes but I also stand on my own two feet and do what I have to and need to, to protect my children.

I agree with all you said, Tracy.  Brad is not accepting any responsibility and he has "Lawyered Up".
I think that he is scared to death of being charged, possibably with more than negligence.
The lawyer said that he had to wait and see what the police were going to do.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: AZSunny on November 24, 2009, 05:16:29 PM
snip from Razzy's post above to avoid stacking posts:

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

Jazzy...Brad has said himself that he was letting Shaniya go live with the bio so that she could have a chance to be a mother..and just to add, he had not spoken to Shaniya since he dropped her off at aunt Carries house on October 2nd...7-8 days later, she was sent over to bio's house while Brad was still out of town...Carrie took her...what happened in those 7-8 days for Brad to decide to send her over to bio's mom when she was perfectly fine with Carrie? ...couldn't it have waited till he got back into town? what was the big hurry to get her over to the bio's house?

Carey said he thought it was just for the weekend.  She packed two days worth of clothes for her.  When did the  'having a chance to be a mother" conversation take place?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 24, 2009, 05:19:23 PM
Snipped from Wykes post...

If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

I am with you on this one, let me tell you it has my angry and the only thing I can think of is he is trying to deflect his god given responsibility back on to God himself! It is frustrating to me. I want to hear him say, yes I made a mistake, I screwed up, I feel awful, I should never have sent her there, I should have protected her....nothing, we get nothing other then we make decisions and pray they are the best but sometimes bad intentions get in the way! What? Ugh he frustrates me! Makes me wonder if he relied simply on prayer to give him the answers and he didn't check anything out for himself. To me, prayer is great, I pray for goodness sakes but I also stand on my own two feet and do what I have to and need to, to protect my children.

God allows us to make choices and to me Brad made some wrong choices...as I said before I think Brad would like to blame anyone but himself for the bad choices he made with Shaniya and also with his other children.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 05:20:11 PM
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/34124816#34124816

Video from the todays shows interview.



Thanks Tracygirl.

 ::MonkeyMad::

I believe that Carey Lockhart-Davis let Shaniya down but ... when I listen to Brad Lockhart ... the father of Shaniya Dave ... I want to scream ...

"BRAD ... BOW ... COME CLEAN AND ... SAY IT HOW IT IS!!! YOU DID NOT MAKE A MISTAKE.  IN YOUR OWN WORDS ... YOU ADMITTED YOU TOOK A CHANCE.   YOU LOST BIG TIME WHEN YOU GAMBLED ... WHEN YOU TOOK A CHANCE ... WITH A PRICELESS TREASURE ... A TREASURE BEYOND WORTH.   HEY ... YOU MAY HAVE LOST BIG TIME BUT ... SHANIYA LOST SO MUCH MORE.  THIS LITTLE GIRL'S GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO LIFE WAS STOLEN.  IF YOU DID NOT KNOW THE LIFESTYLE AND THE DEPLORABLE CONDITIONS YOU ABANDONED YOUR DAUGHTER TO FOR ALMOST FIVE WEEKS ... YOU SHOULD HAVE."

Janet


+++++

Some Claim Shaniya Davis Was At Risk And Needed A Better Home
Nov. 19, 2009


Fayetteville, N.C.
 
Several people who were close to 5-year-old Shaniya Davis and her father Brad Lockhart say they tried to intervene in the child's life because they felt the little girl was at risk.

A close friend of Brad's, and his ex-father-in-law both say they offered to take in Shaniya rather than let her live with her mother, because they say when the child was in the custody of her mother, bad things happened to her.

"My wife says she saw cigarette burns on Shaniya's arms," said Brad's friend Tim Allen, who says he is very angry over what happened.

Byron Coleman, Brad's ex-father-in-law, said Shaniya "had burns on her legs, arms and things" after visits with her mother.

"She had a cigarette burn on the corner of her eye, which she claimed her grandma did when she went over there," added Shaniya's half sister Cheyenne Lockhart.

The three all claimed that the 5-year-old suffered physical abuse while in the custody of her mother.

"When you wanted sex that's where you went," Coleman said. "You knew what the girl was doing. You knew what she associated with, so why place your daughter in that situation?"

Because of that, Coleman blames Lockhart for Shaniya's death.

"To me Shaniya would be alive today if she wasn't placed in that situation," Coleman claims.

Coleman says he offered to give Shaniya a home, but says Brad declined his offer.

Allen tells a similar story.

"He had an alternative, I gave him a way out," Allen explained; however Lockhart would not let Allen take care of Shaniya.

"I'm fighting mad. All this could have been avoided," Allen said.

Allen had already taken in Shaniya's half sister Cheyenne, because she said her dad wouldn't take care of her.

And Cheyenne says Brad did not provide for Shaniya.

"He didn't take care of her, his girlfriends took care of her," she said. "He loved her, but she was raised by other people. He hasn't been in her life."

Meanwhile, the Cumberland County Department of Social Services said it can not comment on what it was doing in regard to Shaniya because those comments might compromise the on-going criminal investigation
 
http://wake.mync.com/site/wake/news/story/44620/some-claim-shaniya-davis-was-at-risk-and-needed-a-better-home


Slain N.C. girl’s aunt says mom was neglectful 
Nov . 17, 2009


The aunt of a 5-year-old girl whose body was found off a rural North Carolina road said Tuesday that she had a hard time letting the girl live temporarily at her mother's house because she believed the woman neglected her children.

"Antoinette and I never really got along because of the way that she neglected her children," Carey Lockhart-Davis said. "I feel robbed. I feel that Shaniya was robbed."
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33989586/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/


Nancy Grace - November 19, 2009

BYRON COLEMAN, SHANIYA DAVIS` HALF-BROTHER:  My father recently gave her, Antoinette, a chance to give the mother a second chance to raise her daughter, I mean, because everybody deserves a second chance. Just like a convicted felon, I mean, he deserves a second chance because he could have changed.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/18/ng.01.html



I agree Janet, He gambled and lost. You know considering his lack of acknowlegdment for his part in this whole thing to the point in admitting he shouldnt have sent the child there, maybe he is stubbern and bull headed. That type of person is not easy to get along with. I wonder if Carey kept quiet and didn't push because she didn't want Brad to take her away from her. Or she talked but he refused to listen. According to many people he was told there was something not quite right.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 05:30:52 PM
This is not your typical parent mistake or parental bad choice like allowing a child to walk down the street alone or allowing a child to walk home from school, this to me is far, far worse. Can he be charged with something?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 05:33:48 PM
snip from Razzy's post above to avoid stacking posts:

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

Jazzy...Brad has said himself that he was letting Shaniya go live with the bio so that she could have a chance to be a mother..and just to add, he had not spoken to Shaniya since he dropped her off at aunt Carries house on October 2nd...7-8 days later, she was sent over to bio's house while Brad was still out of town...Carrie took her...what happened in those 7-8 days for Brad to decide to send her over to bio's mom when she was perfectly fine with Carrie? ...couldn't it have waited till he got back into town? what was the big hurry to get her over to the bio's house?

Carey said he thought it was just for the weekend.  She packed two days worth of clothes for her.  When did the  'having a chance to be a mother" conversation take place?

When in deed...because of the cloths and given the fact we know there was a phone call between the aunt and the mom which ended with AD saying she would not see Shaniya again, is it safe to assume this is when AD asked for a chance and to keep Shaniya?
What was that fight over, AD had to punish Shaniya or the aunt had to punish Shaniya for fighting with the cousins.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 06:02:57 PM
Hi Guys
back reading and i said i wouldn't be posting but here is my take...
brad had no legal right to shaniya what so ever
he was not on the birth cert and obviously no dna test had taken place otherwise he would have been... as far as the mother... if she was on any type of welfare she would have been asked to name the fathers of the kids and she could have just said i don't know... if she said it is so and so but he is not on the cert then they would have forced him to take a dna so that they could recoup some welfare money... i don't know if she was on welfare for a fact but i am assuming she was ... not because she was black and not because she lived in a trailer but because she saw her daughter as a monetary asset and she is a chit bag...
anyways back to my point ... i think brad rescued his daughter from her way back when and knew he had no legal right to her... why wasn't he on the cert 2 theories either he was unsure if he was the actual father and didn't want to risk losing her to the mom forever or he didn't want to pay support if he was (i firmly believe if she could have collected money from him she would have taken her back as an income and used it on drugs so if brad didn't want to pay i don't blame him) that saying let sleeping dogs lie applies here he had it good he had his daughter and no risk of losing her this way... since there was no legal custody exchange she was probably happy being able to collect welfare for shaniya and let brad raise her...
as far as the school... you do not have to prove legal guardianship to enroll a child you do have to prove residence tho to decide school district and that can be done with a license or utility bill etc...
carey may not have been actually listed as "guardian" but rather an emergency contact which says if there is an emergency contact so and so in case medical decisions need to be made.
brad was between a rock and a hard place and we are judging him on 2 different levels when in reality there wasn't jack chit he could have done to stop the bio from getting her... if they had put up a fight then bio could have had aunt carey or brad arrested for kidnapping and she would have still gotten shaniya. there was nothing he could have done even if they called dss she would have been placed with a fam member...probably the bio's sis which wouldn't have changed anything... quite honestly guys i would really doubt brad even being the bio going by chit bags track record... just saying no matter how he says it like a bad decision to let her go or trying to let the mom get better to take custody he had no leg to stand on legally in this one at all so when you hear him say bad decision that is his guilt talking... it was never even his decision to begin with


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 24, 2009, 06:19:31 PM
Hi Guys
back reading and i said i wouldn't be posting but here is my take...
brad had no legal right to shaniya what so ever
he was not on the birth cert and obviously no dna test had taken place otherwise he would have been... as far as the mother... if she was on any type of welfare she would have been asked to name the fathers of the kids and she could have just said i don't know... if she said it is so and so but he is not on the cert then they would have forced him to take a dna so that they could recoup some welfare money... i don't know if she was on welfare for a fact but i am assuming she was ... not because she was black and not because she lived in a trailer but because she saw her daughter as a monetary asset and she is a chit bag...
anyways back to my point ... i think brad rescued his daughter from her way back when and knew he had no legal right to her... why wasn't he on the cert 2 theories either he was unsure if he was the actual father and didn't want to risk losing her to the mom forever or he didn't want to pay support if he was (i firmly believe if she could have collected money from him she would have taken her back as an income and used it on drugs so if brad didn't want to pay i don't blame him) that saying let sleeping dogs lie applies here he had it good he had his daughter and no risk of losing her this way... since there was no legal custody exchange she was probably happy being able to collect welfare for shaniya and let brad raise her...
as far as the school... you do not have to prove legal guardianship to enroll a child you do have to prove residence tho to decide school district and that can be done with a license or utility bill etc...
carey may not have been actually listed as "guardian" but rather an emergency contact which says if there is an emergency contact so and so in case medical decisions need to be made.
brad was between a rock and a hard place and we are judging him on 2 different levels when in reality there wasn't jack chit he could have done to stop the bio from getting her... if they had put up a fight then bio could have had aunt carey or brad arrested for kidnapping and she would have still gotten shaniya. there was nothing he could have done even if they called dss she would have been placed with a fam member...probably the bio's sis which wouldn't have changed anything... quite honestly guys i would really doubt brad even being the bio going by chit bags track record... just saying no matter how he says it like a bad decision to let her go or trying to let the mom get better to take custody he had no leg to stand on legally in this one at all so when you hear him say bad decision that is his guilt talking... it was never even his decision to begin with

It seems there are too many unknowns and too many variables to place any blame on the Lockhart family.  All the scenarios are assumed and that means there are just not enough facts to place blame.  JMO.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 06:24:33 PM
Hi Guys
back reading and i said i wouldn't be posting but here is my take...
brad had no legal right to shaniya what so ever
he was not on the birth cert and obviously no dna test had taken place otherwise he would have been... as far as the mother... if she was on any type of welfare she would have been asked to name the fathers of the kids and she could have just said i don't know... if she said it is so and so but he is not on the cert then they would have forced him to take a dna so that they could recoup some welfare money... i don't know if she was on welfare for a fact but i am assuming she was ... not because she was black and not because she lived in a trailer but because she saw her daughter as a monetary asset and she is a chit bag...
anyways back to my point ... i think brad rescued his daughter from her way back when and knew he had no legal right to her... why wasn't he on the cert 2 theories either he was unsure if he was the actual father and didn't want to risk losing her to the mom forever or he didn't want to pay support if he was (i firmly believe if she could have collected money from him she would have taken her back as an income and used it on drugs so if brad didn't want to pay i don't blame him) that saying let sleeping dogs lie applies here he had it good he had his daughter and no risk of losing her this way... since there was no legal custody exchange she was probably happy being able to collect welfare for shaniya and let brad raise her...
as far as the school... you do not have to prove legal guardianship to enroll a child you do have to prove residence tho to decide school district and that can be done with a license or utility bill etc...
carey may not have been actually listed as "guardian" but rather an emergency contact which says if there is an emergency contact so and so in case medical decisions need to be made.
brad was between a rock and a hard place and we are judging him on 2 different levels when in reality there wasn't jack chit he could have done to stop the bio from getting her... if they had put up a fight then bio could have had aunt carey or brad arrested for kidnapping and she would have still gotten shaniya. there was nothing he could have done even if they called dss she would have been placed with a fam member...probably the bio's sis which wouldn't have changed anything... quite honestly guys i would really doubt brad even being the bio going by chit bags track record... just saying no matter how he says it like a bad decision to let her go or trying to let the mom get better to take custody he had no leg to stand on legally in this one at all so when you hear him say bad decision that is his guilt talking... it was never even his decision to begin with
forgot to add that when she was investigated about her son dss wants to know about all kids like if i beat my son they will now investigate my daughter as well... anyways when this happened it is possible she said oh well shaniya doesn't live here she lives with so and so dss is a state run biz and so is welfare word would have gotten back to welfare that shaniya didn't live there and the school records would have proved it and she would not have been aable to get welf for shaniya any more ... it may have taken a couple of months for welf to catch on to it but that is what would have happened... could be a reason she was pulled from school too .. like brad i need her in my district or else i am going to lose my money no where to live my other kid state will take him etc etc (and again brad had nolegal right to shaniya) also i do remember reading that she was enrolled at another school afterward and was trying to find out if she ever showed up but i definitely read that she was enrolled at a new one... that would have proved residency with the mother as far as welfare is concerned
another thing that wyks brought to my attention is the fact that the dead wifes kids took brad name even tho not bio... up here in order to do that you need to actually adopt the kid to get a name change and if he and his wife divorced he was probably paying child support on her other kids since he was technically now the legal guardian as well.... that says to me that brad was not avoiding responsibility by not being on shaniya birth cert and rather was probably scared to lose her by not being actual bio dad because bio mom was a slore...
brad is taking the resposibilty of his bad decision but again he never had the decision to make this was out of his hands no matter whether we like it or not and there are some posters that will say if i was him i would have taken her and ran no matter what blah blah that is nice in theory but you probably wouldn't have .... how many posters here have shared their stories of having to hand over their kids to ex's that molested abused them etc etc legally and in reality there was nothing brad could have done it all comes down to legalities and brad had no rights


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 06:35:24 PM
Hi Guys
back reading and i said i wouldn't be posting but here is my take...
brad had no legal right to shaniya what so ever
he was not on the birth cert and obviously no dna test had taken place otherwise he would have been... as far as the mother... if she was on any type of welfare she would have been asked to name the fathers of the kids and she could have just said i don't know... if she said it is so and so but he is not on the cert then they would have forced him to take a dna so that they could recoup some welfare money... i don't know if she was on welfare for a fact but i am assuming she was ... not because she was black and not because she lived in a trailer but because she saw her daughter as a monetary asset and she is a chit bag...
anyways back to my point ... i think brad rescued his daughter from her way back when and knew he had no legal right to her... why wasn't he on the cert 2 theories either he was unsure if he was the actual father and didn't want to risk losing her to the mom forever or he didn't want to pay support if he was (i firmly believe if she could have collected money from him she would have taken her back as an income and used it on drugs so if brad didn't want to pay i don't blame him) that saying let sleeping dogs lie applies here he had it good he had his daughter and no risk of losing her this way... since there was no legal custody exchange she was probably happy being able to collect welfare for shaniya and let brad raise her...
as far as the school... you do not have to prove legal guardianship to enroll a child you do have to prove residence tho to decide school district and that can be done with a license or utility bill etc...
carey may not have been actually listed as "guardian" but rather an emergency contact which says if there is an emergency contact so and so in case medical decisions need to be made.
brad was between a rock and a hard place and we are judging him on 2 different levels when in reality there wasn't jack chit he could have done to stop the bio from getting her... if they had put up a fight then bio could have had aunt carey or brad arrested for kidnapping and she would have still gotten shaniya. there was nothing he could have done even if they called dss she would have been placed with a fam member...probably the bio's sis which wouldn't have changed anything... quite honestly guys i would really doubt brad even being the bio going by chit bags track record... just saying no matter how he says it like a bad decision to let her go or trying to let the mom get better to take custody he had no leg to stand on legally in this one at all so when you hear him say bad decision that is his guilt talking... it was never even his decision to begin with

It seems there are too many unknowns and too many variables to place any blame on the Lockhart family.  All the scenarios are assumed and that means there are just not enough facts to place blame.  JMO.
i agree but no matter the variables brad cannot be held for blame he had no legal rights to shaniya and when push comes to shove the bio would have gotten her what i listed above are just scenarios as to why but it is fact that he had no legal right to her... he is not on tv saying well i couldn't have done nothing about it and i always knew bio was a dirtbag etc etc he is on tv saying it was my bad decision and not speaking bad of anyone which i state again it was not even his decision to make... he is being as good of a person as he can be by not speaking ill of anyone and confessing his moral guilt yet tere are posters still bashing him (not just here) he is the most stand up parent we have seen yet and is taking the blame for something he had no control over in real life yet we are still on him like white on rice.... people should be praising him for taking in a child that he didn't have to he tried to save shaniya and so did the aunt .... they just couldn't.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 24, 2009, 06:37:14 PM
I think we have all heard Brad say with his own lips that he wanted to give Antioinette a chance.
"wanted to" being the operative words.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 06:41:42 PM
I think we have all heard Brad say with his own lips that he wanted to give Antioinette a chance.
"wanted to" being the operative words.

I agree. I also agree we don't know enough about the details to make assumptions either way about certain things.

Do we know he is not on the birth cert forsure?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 06:51:12 PM
Penny I completely disagree with your posting

You know, all we know is he and AD had a casual custody arrangement.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 24, 2009, 06:56:20 PM
snip from Razzy's post above to avoid stacking posts:

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

Jazzy...Brad has said himself that he was letting Shaniya go live with the bio so that she could have a chance to be a mother..and just to add, he had not spoken to Shaniya since he dropped her off at aunt Carries house on October 2nd...7-8 days later, she was sent over to bio's house while Brad was still out of town...Carrie took her...what happened in those 7-8 days for Brad to decide to send her over to bio's mom when she was perfectly fine with Carrie? ...couldn't it have waited till he got back into town? what was the big hurry to get her over to the bio's house?

Carey said he thought it was just for the weekend.  She packed two days worth of clothes for her.  When did the  'having a chance to be a mother" conversation take place?

AZSunny ... I think that conversation took place when his sister contacted him after AD refused to send Shaniya home after a two day visit  Considering Brad was out of town and determined he could not do much about the situation ... could it be that he thought it best to just let it be until he got home.  In other words ... give AD a chance.  Considering Shaniya was not her child, Carey probably felt she had no choice but to comply.

I would not be so hard on Brad and Carey IF there had been constant contact with Shaniya in that five week period.  If just once Carey had visited her niece ... brought her clothes, possessions and hugs and ... observed for herself the lifestyle and the living conditions.  Carey would have learned that her niece was not in school.  She could have then contacted Brad.  Maybe ... for the sake of Shaniya ... she could have then contacted CPS.

Although I do not believe for a minute that Brad and Carey considered Shaniya would be at risk as far as physical or sexual abused was concerned ... a five week abandonment  ... under ANY circumstances ... is inexcusable.

Janet

+++++++

The Oprah Winfrey Show
The Shaniya Davis Tragedy


Bradley, a contractor, says he last saw Shaniya on October 2, 2009, just before he had to leave for an out-of-town job. "When he's gone, Shaniya's with me. And on October 9, Antoinette had called me and asked me if she could visit with Shaniya," Carey says. "Shaniya loved her mother very much, and she did want to be with her."

As she had many times before, Carey says she dropped Shaniya off at her mother's house. "I gave her a kiss goodbye and I told her to be a good girl for Aunt Carey," she says. "As she ran off to her mom, she turned back and looked at me and said, 'I love you, Aunt Carey, and I'll see you later.' And that was the last time I've seen Shaniya."

http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis/3
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 24, 2009, 06:58:05 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.


Good questions .....I have wondered some of the same myself.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Lenie on November 24, 2009, 07:04:07 PM
JMO I am just gonna throw this out there. I know for a fact that in the state of Ohio if a parentage DNA test is done and no father is listed on the birth certificate, then if that test comes back and shows that man A is the father then his name is put on the birth certificate. Could Brad not have been the father of Shaniya? Could he be afraid of Shinaya being taken away from him for good by AD? Remember this was just suppose to have been a one time thing and AD was reportedly rather loose with her goods. It just seems rather strange that Brad or Carrie either one could have registered her in school as legally neither of them were relatives. I personally think that if AD went into the school and said this is my daughter, his name is not on the birth certificate she could have done about anything that she wanted.

 

And just maybe now that Shaniya has been murdered and is no longer with us he did not wish to dirty her name and say "AD said this is probably not my daughter so I had to turn her over to her". Maybe he is keeping the belief that he was her father. How would you all feel if he said "I loved this little girl but AD said she wasn't mine so I am not helping pay for the funeral or anything else"?  I so agree that something is being held back, but I don't think it is something that would make BL look bad.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 07:05:47 PM
I think we have all heard Brad say with his own lips that he wanted to give Antioinette a chance.
"wanted to" being the operative words.
again letting sleeping dogs lie... he has never said what a chit bag ad is either... i think he is taking the higher ground and putting the ordeal to bed so to speak he did say he wanted to and to me that just says even more what a christian he is.. i am not trying to praise him as jesus himself or anything but what good does going on tv and saying yeah i had no legal rights the bio was trash i knew it all along do... i just think he is taking the high road on this one... carey did say they were going to seek legal options when brad returned etc. i bet if you asked carey who has not been silent in her opinion of bio you would get the same answer there was nothing brad could have done whether we all like it or not
we are judging him or a moral level when unfortunately law and legalities trumps that every time...
there was nothing he could have done guys nothing at all and even if there was it would have taken months... shaniya would have had the same fate in the meantime... just saying


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: my2cents on November 24, 2009, 07:05:49 PM
JVM covering Shaniya's case right now


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 07:17:53 PM
Penny I completely disagree with your posting

You know, all we know is he and AD had a casual custody arrangement.
well for my theory to be wrong then you would have to say that ad was never on welfare food stamps public housing or anything else since her first child was born 8 yrs ago since you can go for assistance when pregnant and they would chase all bio dads after... if you have someone on the birth cert they will go after him for the money... say i have 2 kids 1st kid i get welfare for 2nd kid i never try to get welfare for if welfare finds out who baby daddy # 2 is then they will force me to go after him for child support for kid #2 to boost my income hence less welfare for baby#1... also when dss investigates theyencourage people who are not on welfare to try and get it
so again for my post to be so wrong then you would have to take as fact that ad has never received any public assistance what so ever since pregnancy of first baby... do you think that she wouldn't have been? i would think that a scum bag wo would exploit her daughters body would have first exploited the welfare system at some point... just saying...
you also bring up the casual custody agreement that means no legal agreement if he was taken to court for child support at any time they would have addressed the issue of custody at the same time and even visits so unless brad went to court and said he did not want visits their custody agreement would have been more then casual says to me they never went to court says to me he was not on birth cert otherwise the state would have taken him to court and dss would have also investigated him as bio dad of shaniya when her son was investigated... dss cannot investigate you if you are not legal guardian
again i doubt someone who would sell their daughter as a sex slave did not at some point go after welfare


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 07:18:36 PM
Brad was on the Today show...he said that he didn't really see/miss any red flags about the bio mom.. ::MonkeyConfused:: and Meredith asked him about Carrie's having concerns about the bio mom...Brad says that Carrie had not expressed that to him and that Carrie's concerns were probably not that bad or she would have mentioned it to him... ::MonkeyConfused::  <<<< again! He last talked to Shaniya on October 2nd..about 7-8 days later she went to live with the bio...what happened in those 7-8 days that he decided to give her to the bio? I still say that Brad wanted to be done with his responsibility for awhile with Shaniya...he is engaged now, works out of town and he wanted to be more carefree....where does the fiancee live at? out of town? he appeared on the show with his attorney...Maybe he is going to be charged with something as well...like neglect...jmo

Hi Cookie.. Something is not adding up.. Byron Coleman Sr and Tim Allen stated on
October 2nd Shaniya was going to live with her mother. Both stated that Brad had an alternative that one of them would take Shaniya in...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 07:19:24 PM
We don't know for sure that Brad is not on the birth certificate do we? I have only seen it surmised on here..
Carrie is on HLN...I feel really sorry for her...she is suffering....
interesting...someone, a caller on HLN is saying that the community does not believe the father and the aunt has clean hands in all of this... questioning the red flags....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 07:21:11 PM
Brad was on the Today show...he said that he didn't really see/miss any red flags about the bio mom.. ::MonkeyConfused:: and Meredith asked him about Carrie's having concerns about the bio mom...Brad says that Carrie had not expressed that to him and that Carrie's concerns were probably not that bad or she would have mentioned it to him... ::MonkeyConfused::  <<<< again! He last talked to Shaniya on October 2nd..about 7-8 days later she went to live with the bio...what happened in those 7-8 days that he decided to give her to the bio? I still say that Brad wanted to be done with his responsibility for awhile with Shaniya...he is engaged now, works out of town and he wanted to be more carefree....where does the fiancee live at? out of town? he appeared on the show with his attorney...Maybe he is going to be charged with something as well...like neglect...jmo

Hi Cookie.. Something is not adding up.. Byron Coleman Sr and Tim Allen stated on
October 2nd Shaniya was going to live with her mother. Both stated that Brad had an alternative that one of them would take Shaniya in...

I know JG...this is all going to come out...there is a lot more to this story...I just don't understand why Carrie could not have taken care of Shaniya like she always had...why did Brad want to ship her off to an unfit mother??? never will I understand that! are you listening to JVM?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 07:21:36 PM
We don't know for sure that Brad is not on the birth certificate do we? I have only seen it surmised on here..
Carrie is on HLN...I feel really sorry for her...she is suffering....
interesting...someone, a caller on HLN is saying that the community does not believe the father and the aunt has clean hands in all of this... questioning the red flags....

sorry..this is on JVM....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 07:23:52 PM
Penny I completely disagree with your posting

You know, all we know is he and AD had a casual custody arrangement.
well for my theory to be wrong then you would have to say that ad was never on welfare food stamps public housing or anything else since her first child was born 8 yrs ago since you can go for assistance when pregnant and they would chase all bio dads after... if you have someone on the birth cert they will go after him for the money... say i have 2 kids 1st kid i get welfare for 2nd kid i never try to get welfare for if welfare finds out who baby daddy # 2 is then they will force me to go after him for child support for kid #2 to boost my income hence less welfare for baby#1... also when dss investigates theyencourage people who are not on welfare to try and get it
so again for my post to be so wrong then you would have to take as fact that ad has never received any public assistance what so ever since pregnancy of first baby... do you think that she wouldn't have been? i would think that a scum bag wo would exploit her daughters body would have first exploited the welfare system at some point... just saying...
you also bring up the casual custody agreement that means no legal agreement if he was taken to court for child support at any time they would have addressed the issue of custody at the same time and even visits so unless brad went to court and said he did not want visits their custody agreement would have been more then casual says to me they never went to court says to me he was not on birth cert otherwise the state would have taken him to court and dss would have also investigated him as bio dad of shaniya when her son was investigated... dss cannot investigate you if you are not legal guardian
again i doubt someone who would sell their daughter as a sex slave did not at some point go after welfare

she might have been on welfare for her son but she wouldn't have been on welfare for Shaniya since she did not live with her right? wouldn't she have had to live with her and not Brad to collect welfare for her...also, I read on here that Brad was paying bio child support for Shaniya...do we know if that is true?
t


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 07:28:51 PM
snip from Razzy's post above to avoid stacking posts:

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

Jazzy...Brad has said himself that he was letting Shaniya go live with the bio so that she could have a chance to be a mother..and just to add, he had not spoken to Shaniya since he dropped her off at aunt Carries house on October 2nd...7-8 days later, she was sent over to bio's house while Brad was still out of town...Carrie took her...what happened in those 7-8 days for Brad to decide to send her over to bio's mom when she was perfectly fine with Carrie? ...couldn't it have waited till he got back into town? what was the big hurry to get her over to the bio's house?

Carey said he thought it was just for the weekend.  She packed two days worth of clothes for her.  When did the  'having a chance to be a mother" conversation take place?

AZSunny ... I think that conversation took place when his sister contacted him after AD refused to send Shaniya home after a two day visit  Considering Brad was out of town and determined he could not do much about the situation ... could it be that he thought it best to just let it be until he got home.  In other words ... give AD a chance.  Considering Shaniya was not her child, Carey probably felt she had no choice but to comply.

I would not be so hard on Brad and Carey IF there had been constant contact with Shaniya in that five week period.  If just once Carey had visited her niece ... brought her clothes, possessions and hugs and ... observed for herself the lifestyle and the living conditions.  Carey would have learned that her niece was not in school.  She could have then contacted Brad.  Maybe ... for the sake of Shaniya ... she could have then contacted CPS.

Although I do not believe for a minute that Brad and Carey considered Shaniya would be at risk as far as physical or sexual abused was concerned ... a five week abandonment  ... under ANY circumstances ... is inexcusable.

Janet

+++++++

The Oprah Winfrey Show
The Shaniya Davis Tragedy


Bradley, a contractor, says he last saw Shaniya on October 2, 2009, just before he had to leave for an out-of-town job. "When he's gone, Shaniya's with me. And on October 9, Antoinette had called me and asked me if she could visit with Shaniya," Carey says. "Shaniya loved her mother very much, and she did want to be with her."

As she had many times before, Carey says she dropped Shaniya off at her mother's house. "I gave her a kiss goodbye and I told her to be a good girl for Aunt Carey," she says. "As she ran off to her mom, she turned back and looked at me and said, 'I love you, Aunt Carey, and I'll see you later.' And that was the last time I've seen Shaniya."

http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis/3
 

what could he have done whether out of state or not... he could have called cops (who don't like to get involved with custody issues even when they are a legit matter they usually defer you to family court) and at best they would have said okay she won't give you back the kid so meet us there with your court doc proving you have custody and we will get her ... brad didn't have that again there was nothing he could have done even if at that point they decided to go for legal custody it would have taken months if not years depending on how much of a fight bio mom put up


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 07:31:34 PM
We don't know for sure that Brad is not on the birth certificate do we? I have only seen it surmised on here..
Carrie is on HLN...I feel really sorry for her...she is suffering....
interesting...someone, a caller on HLN is saying that the community does not believe the father and the aunt has clean hands in all of this... questioning the red flags....

sorry..this is on JVM....

Got it on now.. Thanks


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 24, 2009, 07:33:26 PM
Other than the first year ... why would Brad be paying AD child support.  The way things work today ... the non-custodial parent pays the child support.  Somehow ... I do not think that there was any financial support coming Brad's way from AD.

Janet

+++++

The Oprah Winfrey Show
The Shaniya Davis Tragedy


Bradley says Shaniya was born from a brief relationship with Davis. "Antoinette did care for Shaniya her first year when she was first born. After that, she felt that it was best that Shaniya stayed with me as I was able to provide and give her a better environment," he says. "Any time Antoinette asked to see her, I made arrangements that she was able to spend time with her daughter."

http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis/3


Police: McNeill raped, strangled Shaniya Davis
Saturday, November 21, 2009


Brad Lockhart says he never looked at Antoinette Davis as a bad parent.

"Antoinette never lived in the best neighborhoods and of course there was always that concern," he said. "But I never was concerned about her caring for her as a mother for the weekends she would keep her."

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7129274


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 24, 2009, 07:38:34 PM
I think we have all heard Brad say with his own lips that he wanted to give Antioinette a chance.
"wanted to" being the operative words.

I agree. I also agree we don't know enough about the details to make assumptions either way about certain things.

Do we know he is not on the birth cert forsure?

No, I don't think we do know that.   But, I would bet that if at any time during the last five years,
Brad had offered Antoinette $1,000, she would have signed over full custody to him, without thinking twice about it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 07:39:58 PM
I think we have all heard Brad say with his own lips that he wanted to give Antioinette a chance.
"wanted to" being the operative words.

I agree. I also agree we don't know enough about the details to make assumptions either way about certain things.

Do we know he is not on the birth cert forsure?

No, I don't think we do know that.   But, I would bet that if at any time during the last five years,
Brad had offered Antoinette $1,000, she would have signed over full custody to him, without thinking twice about it.

I agree with that Mags!! she would have taken the money and run! jmo


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 24, 2009, 07:40:16 PM

AZSunny ... I think that conversation took place when his sister contacted him after AD refused to send Shaniya home after a two day visit  Considering Brad was out of town and determined he could not do much about the situation ... could it be that he thought it best to just let it be until he got home.  In other words ... give AD a chance.  Considering Shaniya was not her child, Carey probably felt she had no choice but to comply.

I would not be so hard on Brad and Carey IF there had been constant contact with Shaniya in that five week period.  If just once Carey had visited her niece ... brought her clothes, possessions and hugs and ... observed for herself the lifestyle and the living conditions.  Carey would have learned that her niece was not in school.  She could have then contacted Brad.  Maybe ... for the sake of Shaniya ... she could have then contacted CPS.

Although I do not believe for a minute that Brad and Carey considered Shaniya would be at risk as far as physical or sexual abused was concerned ... a five week abandonment  ... under ANY circumstances ... is inexcusable.

Janet

+++++++

The Oprah Winfrey Show
The Shaniya Davis Tragedy


Bradley, a contractor, says he last saw Shaniya on October 2, 2009, just before he had to leave for an out-of-town job. "When he's gone, Shaniya's with me. And on October 9, Antoinette had called me and asked me if she could visit with Shaniya," Carey says. "Shaniya loved her mother very much, and she did want to be with her."

As she had many times before, Carey says she dropped Shaniya off at her mother's house. "I gave her a kiss goodbye and I told her to be a good girl for Aunt Carey," she says. "As she ran off to her mom, she turned back and looked at me and said, 'I love you, Aunt Carey, and I'll see you later.' And that was the last time I've seen Shaniya."

http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis/3
 

what could he have done whether out of state or not... he could have called cops (who don't like to get involved with custody issues even when they are a legit matter they usually defer you to family court) and at best they would have said okay she won't give you back the kid so meet us there with your court doc proving you have custody and we will get her ... brad didn't have that again there was nothing he could have done even if at that point they decided to go for legal custody it would have taken months if not years depending on how much of a fight bio mom put up

Considering Shaniya's living arrangements for the past four years with the mother's consent ... consider the lifestyle of AD and deplorable conditions at her home ... I do not think that Brad ... as the father ... would have had any problems getting legal custody of Shaniya.

Could somebody please bump those images of the inside of the mother's trailer home?

Thank you.

Janet

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 07:41:55 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 07:43:48 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....

OPPPPS sorry Penny forgot your post..

snipped from penny..

what could he have done whether out of state or not... he could have called cops (who don't like to get involved with custody issues even when they are a legit matter they usually defer you to family court) and at best they would have said okay she won't give you back the kid so meet us there with your court doc proving you have custody and we will get her ... brad didn't have that again there was nothing he could have done even if at that point they decided to go for legal custody it would have taken months if not years depending on how much of a fight bio mom put up


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 07:50:19 PM
Penny you are making a lot of assumptions, not to be disrespectful to you or anything but you are writing an entire story based on what little we know.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 08:03:46 PM
snip from Razzy's post above to avoid stacking posts:

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

Jazzy...Brad has said himself that he was letting Shaniya go live with the bio so that she could have a chance to be a mother..and just to add, he had not spoken to Shaniya since he dropped her off at aunt Carries house on October 2nd...7-8 days later, she was sent over to bio's house while Brad was still out of town...Carrie took her...what happened in those 7-8 days for Brad to decide to send her over to bio's mom when she was perfectly fine with Carrie? ...couldn't it have waited till he got back into town? what was the big hurry to get her over to the bio's house?

Carey said he thought it was just for the weekend.  She packed two days worth of clothes for her.  When did the  'having a chance to be a mother" conversation take place?

AZSunny ... I think that conversation took place when his sister contacted him after AD refused to send Shaniya home after a two day visit  Considering Brad was out of town and determined he could not do much about the situation ... could it be that he thought it best to just let it be until he got home.  In other words ... give AD a chance.  Considering Shaniya was not her child, Carey probably felt she had no choice but to comply.

I would not be so hard on Brad and Carey IF there had been constant contact with Shaniya in that five week period.  If just once Carey had visited her niece ... brought her clothes, possessions and hugs and ... observed for herself the lifestyle and the living conditions.  Carey would have learned that her niece was not in school.  She could have then contacted Brad.  Maybe ... for the sake of Shaniya ... she could have then contacted CPS.

Although I do not believe for a minute that Brad and Carey considered Shaniya would be at risk as far as physical or sexual abused was concerned ... a five week abandonment  ... under ANY circumstances ... is inexcusable.

Janet

+++++++

The Oprah Winfrey Show
The Shaniya Davis Tragedy


Bradley, a contractor, says he last saw Shaniya on October 2, 2009, just before he had to leave for an out-of-town job. "When he's gone, Shaniya's with me. And on October 9, Antoinette had called me and asked me if she could visit with Shaniya," Carey says. "Shaniya loved her mother very much, and she did want to be with her."

As she had many times before, Carey says she dropped Shaniya off at her mother's house. "I gave her a kiss goodbye and I told her to be a good girl for Aunt Carey," she says. "As she ran off to her mom, she turned back and looked at me and said, 'I love you, Aunt Carey, and I'll see you later.' And that was the last time I've seen Shaniya."

http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis/3
 

what could he have done whether out of state or not... he could have called cops (who don't like to get involved with custody issues even when they are a legit matter they usually defer you to family court) and at best they would have said okay she won't give you back the kid so meet us there with your court doc proving you have custody and we will get her ... brad didn't have that again there was nothing he could have done even if at that point they decided to go for legal custody it would have taken months if not years depending on how much of a fight bio mom put up

Well considering the outcome of his doing nothing, the alternative may have turned out diffently. I know for me, I would rather learn that he fought tooth and nail to get his daughter back, he jumped on a plane and flew home at the threat of her not coming back. I would love to learn that he sent the cops over to the house to do a well child check to only run into the brick wall so many of us have. I would love to learn something other then what it appears to be, he handed over this child with no transition plan or any type of due diligence on his part.

So I am sorry if I am not holding him up in high praise simply because he utters the name of God and talks about Gods plan blah, blah, blah because when he took Shaniyal into his home to raise and keep, he became a guardian to her. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 08:12:52 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....
guys i hate that this girl went from riches to raggs so to speak and what the outcome was but
i doubt ad would have let anyone in to check on shaniya she was already at battle with aunt carey so why would she let anyone in to see shaniya... the cops would not have done anything unless they have suspected proof of a crime taking place
dss would have fielded a complaint and investigated (not immediately) but since they cleared her once with the son tey probably would have cleared her again...
and the school would not have released attendance info to anyone other then the bio mom if that was who enrolled her in the new school...
i stick to my guns on this one there was nothing he could have done in regards to getting her out of there
this is a case where you have to read between the lines and when we heard about cig burns what that said is no signs of sex abuse noticed by dad or aunt prior... why would he have assumed sex crimes... no one wants to assume that... and there was no reason to up until now


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 08:20:59 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....
guys i hate that this girl went from riches to raggs so to speak and what the outcome was but
i doubt ad would have let anyone in to check on shaniya she was already at battle with aunt carey so why would she let anyone in to see shaniya... the cops would not have done anything unless they have suspected proof of a crime taking place
dss would have fielded a complaint and investigated (not immediately) but since they cleared her once with the son tey probably would have cleared her again...
and the school would not have released attendance info to anyone other then the bio mom if that was who enrolled her in the new school...
i stick to my guns on this one there was nothing he could have done in regards to getting her out of there
this is a case where you have to read between the lines and when we heard about cig burns what that said is no signs of sex abuse noticed by dad or aunt prior... why would he have assumed sex crimes... no one wants to assume that... and there was no reason to up until now

Penny.. I have to disagree.. The Father In law stated if you wanted sex that was the place to go to... DSS was there. Now LE want the records.. Tim Allen was Brad's friend didnt want Shaniya to go there.. Why did everyone know there was an issue but Brad...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 08:21:09 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....

See this is the thing I am trying to say..He didn't do anything. I sure wish Jess would chime in regarding the legal issues of custody in this case because I would like to know if there is an assumed guardianship because Shaniya lived with her father full time. There has to be some kind of protection for the child.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 08:22:23 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....

See this is the thing I am trying to say..He didn't do anything. I sure wish Jess would chime in regarding the legal issues of custody in this case because I would like to know if there is an assumed guardianship because Shaniya lived with her father full time. There has to be some kind of protection for the child.

ITA....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 08:24:00 PM
snip from Razzy's post above to avoid stacking posts:

Good Morning! Brad didn't have day to day responsibilities for Shaniya.  I do believe he did want her to have a relationship with her mother, but I don't believe he was sending her there for good or he would have sent her with more of her clothes, and her favorate personal belongings. Since the devileggdonor seems to be a liar, perhaps she told Brad she didn't have a cell phone and used other peoples cell(even I don't have one) to contact him. Aunt Carey may have left messages with devilmoms family members for Shaniya to call ( just speculation ) I believe if Aunt Carey was really concerned something was wrong(not knowing about school, or hearing from Shaniya) she definitley would have called the police in a NY moment.

Jazzy...Brad has said himself that he was letting Shaniya go live with the bio so that she could have a chance to be a mother..and just to add, he had not spoken to Shaniya since he dropped her off at aunt Carries house on October 2nd...7-8 days later, she was sent over to bio's house while Brad was still out of town...Carrie took her...what happened in those 7-8 days for Brad to decide to send her over to bio's mom when she was perfectly fine with Carrie? ...couldn't it have waited till he got back into town? what was the big hurry to get her over to the bio's house?

Carey said he thought it was just for the weekend.  She packed two days worth of clothes for her.  When did the  'having a chance to be a mother" conversation take place?

AZSunny ... I think that conversation took place when his sister contacted him after AD refused to send Shaniya home after a two day visit  Considering Brad was out of town and determined he could not do much about the situation ... could it be that he thought it best to just let it be until he got home.  In other words ... give AD a chance.  Considering Shaniya was not her child, Carey probably felt she had no choice but to comply.

I would not be so hard on Brad and Carey IF there had been constant contact with Shaniya in that five week period.  If just once Carey had visited her niece ... brought her clothes, possessions and hugs and ... observed for herself the lifestyle and the living conditions.  Carey would have learned that her niece was not in school.  She could have then contacted Brad.  Maybe ... for the sake of Shaniya ... she could have then contacted CPS.

Although I do not believe for a minute that Brad and Carey considered Shaniya would be at risk as far as physical or sexual abused was concerned ... a five week abandonment  ... under ANY circumstances ... is inexcusable.

Janet

+++++++

The Oprah Winfrey Show
The Shaniya Davis Tragedy


Bradley, a contractor, says he last saw Shaniya on October 2, 2009, just before he had to leave for an out-of-town job. "When he's gone, Shaniya's with me. And on October 9, Antoinette had called me and asked me if she could visit with Shaniya," Carey says. "Shaniya loved her mother very much, and she did want to be with her."

As she had many times before, Carey says she dropped Shaniya off at her mother's house. "I gave her a kiss goodbye and I told her to be a good girl for Aunt Carey," she says. "As she ran off to her mom, she turned back and looked at me and said, 'I love you, Aunt Carey, and I'll see you later.' And that was the last time I've seen Shaniya."

http://www.oprah.com/article/oprahshow/20091120-tows-shaniya-davis/3
 

what could he have done whether out of state or not... he could have called cops (who don't like to get involved with custody issues even when they are a legit matter they usually defer you to family court) and at best they would have said okay she won't give you back the kid so meet us there with your court doc proving you have custody and we will get her ... brad didn't have that again there was nothing he could have done even if at that point they decided to go for legal custody it would have taken months if not years depending on how much of a fight bio mom put up

Well considering the outcome of his doing nothing, the alternative may have turned out diffently. I know for me, I would rather learn that he fought tooth and nail to get his daughter back, he jumped on a plane and flew home at the threat of her not coming back. I would love to learn that he sent the cops over to the house to do a well child check to only run into the brick wall so many of us have. I would love to learn something other then what it appears to be, he handed over this child with no transition plan or any type of due diligence on his part.

So I am sorry if I am not holding him up in high praise simply because he utters the name of God and talks about Gods plan blah, blah, blah because when he took Shaniyal into his home to raise and keep, he became a guardian to her. 
like you said tried things that many of you have and hit a brick wall... maybe this was a case of needing to stay friendly with the bio mom until his ducks were in a row legally maybe she would have gotten sick of shaniya maybe he could have gained legal custody later on maybe he knew that any of the things that you all tried would have been just that a brick wall...
if she was denied to the mother kidnapping charges could have been brought and no one that i know of gets custody of a kid they previously jidnapped
if he had called the police for a well check best scenario a cop that cared would have deemed the house unliveable and she would have been placed with davis' family and davis would still have her...
the school would not have released info to him if it was ad that enrolled her
i feel you guys and like i said we all like to say there was something that could have been done and we would have never handed her over... unfortunately brad really didn't have a choice
and any lawyer would have told him the same...
the only thing that could have been done is an ex parte (emergency) hearing but you would  have to prove serious just cause as to why shaniya should have been immediately removed and prove with dna that he was bio dad even if he was on birth cert the mother could have said well i lied on birth cert and he is not bio that is why any lawyer would not have even done an ex parte unless they had dna proof


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 08:29:12 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....
guys i hate that this girl went from riches to raggs so to speak and what the outcome was but
i doubt ad would have let anyone in to check on shaniya she was already at battle with aunt carey so why would she let anyone in to see shaniya... the cops would not have done anything unless they have suspected proof of a crime taking place
dss would have fielded a complaint and investigated (not immediately) but since they cleared her once with the son tey probably would have cleared her again...
and the school would not have released attendance info to anyone other then the bio mom if that was who enrolled her in the new school...
i stick to my guns on this one there was nothing he could have done in regards to getting her out of there
this is a case where you have to read between the lines and when we heard about cig burns what that said is no signs of sex abuse noticed by dad or aunt prior... why would he have assumed sex crimes... no one wants to assume that... and there was no reason to up until now

Penny.. I have to disagree.. The Father In law stated if you wanted sex that was the place to go to... DSS was there. Now LE want the records.. Tim Allen was Brad's friend didnt want Shaniya to go there.. Why did everyone know there was an issue but Brad...
i am not saying that brad thought everything was fine there i am saying that unless he was on birth cert with valid court docs saying he was legally the dad then there was nothing he could do and my take on the fil statement was hey you knew she was a slut well not all sluts are bad moms and sell their children.. i'm sure that ex fil was not happy with brad in general for other reasons as well... he had custody of his other kids not him and i'm sure there was some sort of pre existing animosity
even te posters here that have had their own problems with ex's whether abuse or actual molestation that in hind sight you may have said it doesn't surprise me tat he molested my kid... would any of you ave assumed tat your kid was being sold by your ex into prostitution?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 08:30:38 PM
1. As they were talking on the phone, police knocked on Carey Lockhart's door. They had found her name listed as a guardian at Shaniya's elementary school.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/408/story/1060102.html

2. Every police call has to be answer..

.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 08:31:29 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....

See this is the thing I am trying to say..He didn't do anything. I sure wish Jess would chime in regarding the legal issues of custody in this case because I would like to know if there is an assumed guardianship because Shaniya lived with her father full time. There has to be some kind of protection for the child.
i am not jess or a lawyer but i am familiar with how dss and welfare and custody works... it would have definitely helped alot in the custody case if there was one but just because you have had a kid in your posession for x ammount of time does not automatically make you the guardian


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 08:34:53 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....

See this is the thing I am trying to say..He didn't do anything. I sure wish Jess would chime in regarding the legal issues of custody in this case because I would like to know if there is an assumed guardianship because Shaniya lived with her father full time. There has to be some kind of protection for the child.
i am not jess or a lawyer but i am familiar with how dss and welfare and custody works... it would have definitely helped alot in the custody case if there was one but just because you have had a kid in your posession for x ammount of time does not automatically make you the guardian
1. As they were talking on the phone, police knocked on Carey Lockhart's door. They had found her name listed as a guardian at Shaniya's elementary school.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/408/story/1060102.html




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 08:41:50 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....

See this is the thing I am trying to say..He didn't do anything. I sure wish Jess would chime in regarding the legal issues of custody in this case because I would like to know if there is an assumed guardianship because Shaniya lived with her father full time. There has to be some kind of protection for the child.
i am not jess or a lawyer but i am familiar with how dss and welfare and custody works... it would have definitely helped alot in the custody case if there was one but just because you have had a kid in your posession for x ammount of time does not automatically make you the guardian
[/color]

nor does being the bio parent automatically make you the one that will get the child if police were called, as you have stated that the bio mom would have gotten custody over the father who had been her guardian for most of her life...jmo...at the very least a welfare check could have been done and if nothing else Shaniya would have possibly ended up in foster care till the mess was straightened out but at least she would be safe now and not in a grave...jmo....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 08:41:50 PM
The day Brad agreed to raise this child was the day he took responsibily for her well being and safety. If what you say is true, he thought well if I say something or rock the boat too much AD will keep her forever and that is a bad thing, then why on earth would he roll over so easily when she refused to give her back? Dont' ya think if he was acting nice to keep her he would have then fought to get her back? That is where in my opinion your argument falls apart.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 24, 2009, 08:44:21 PM
Good Evening Everyone!!
I live in North Carolina and I know a little about how they do things in my county and some surrounding counties.  Social services expects children in a home to each have their own bed for one thing.  A couch doesn't qualify as a bed.  You also cannot put two siblings in the same room together if they are the same sex.  Children are not allowed to sleep in the same bed with a parent.  I think social services could have really thrown the book at AD if they had wanted too.  Also there must be food in the house.  I don't know the size of the mobile home but given what we know of all that were staying there they could not have met those requirements IMO.  I also wonder about AD "allowing" Brad to have Shaniya for so long.  Would that qualify as abandonment.  I don't know because I've heard of cases where someone just dropped their kids off with a friend or even with the grandparents and didn't come back for an extended period of time (don't know how long of a time if years would qualify.  Seems as long as the parent knew the child was taken care of they could go on their merry little way without even so much as a phone call to the child.  The child then becomes the responsibility of the caretaker.  It does seem like Brad could have obtained custody as it doesn't seem like AD was able to provide even the most basic necessities.IMO

This whole mess also gives rise to another legal question I have about this whole thing.  Assuming (keyword here) that Brad was not on the birth certificate then the question was what is the difference between AD letting Shaniya go live with a man for 3 or 4 years or go for a weekend.  See the dilemma here????  WTH is going on in this case??????  IMO how does the law know or make that distinction.  I guess what I'm asking is if Shaniya had not died what was going on.  Her death has she shed a lot of light on some very important issues.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 08:47:20 PM
Good Evening Everyone!!
I live in North Carolina and I know a little about how they do things in my county and some surrounding counties.  Social services expects children in a home to each have their own bed for one thing.  A couch doesn't qualify as a bed.  You also cannot put two siblings in the same room together if they are the same sex.  Children are not allowed to sleep in the same bed with a parent.  I think social services could have really thrown the book at AD if they had wanted too.  Also there must be food in the house.  I don't know the size of the mobile home but given what we know of all that were staying there they could not have met those requirements IMO.  I also wonder about AD "allowing" Brad to have Shaniya for so long.  Would that qualify as abandonment.  I don't know because I've heard of cases where someone just dropped their kids off with a friend or even with the grandparents and didn't come back for an extended period of time (don't know how long of a time if years would qualify.  Seems as long as the parent knew the child was taken care of they could go on their merry little way without even so much as a phone call to the child.  The child then becomes the responsibility of the caretaker.  It does seem like Brad could have obtained custody as it doesn't seem like AD was able to provide even the most basic necessities.IMO

This whole mess also gives rise to another legal question I have about this whole thing.  Assuming (keyword here) that Brad was not on the birth certificate then the question was what is the difference between AD letting Shaniya go live with a man for 3 or 4 years or go for a weekend.  See the dilemma here????  WTH is going on in this case??????  IMO how does the law know or make that distinction.  I guess what I'm asking is if Shaniya had not died what was going on.  Her death has she shed a lot of light on some very important issues.



Very good post...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 08:49:26 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....

See this is the thing I am trying to say..He didn't do anything. I sure wish Jess would chime in regarding the legal issues of custody in this case because I would like to know if there is an assumed guardianship because Shaniya lived with her father full time. There has to be some kind of protection for the child.
i am not jess or a lawyer but i am familiar with how dss and welfare and custody works... it would have definitely helped alot in the custody case if there was one but just because you have had a kid in your posession for x ammount of time does not automatically make you the guardian
1. As they were talking on the phone, police knocked on Carey Lockhart's door. They had found her name listed as a guardian at Shaniya's elementary school.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/408/story/1060102.html




I don't know how reliable this is but here is a link to what a legal guardian is. I am thinking a parent can assign a legal guardian in the case that parent can't take over. Now I wonder and if Jess is around maybe he can answer, I wonder if by giving Shaniya to Brad he was then given or granted legal guardianship of Shaniya.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 08:49:41 PM
Good Evening Everyone!!
I live in North Carolina and I know a little about how they do things in my county and some surrounding counties.  Social services expects children in a home to each have their own bed for one thing.  A couch doesn't qualify as a bed.  You also cannot put two siblings in the same room together if they are the same sex.  Children are not allowed to sleep in the same bed with a parent.  I think social services could have really thrown the book at AD if they had wanted too.  Also there must be food in the house.  I don't know the size of the mobile home but given what we know of all that were staying there they could not have met those requirements IMO.  I also wonder about AD "allowing" Brad to have Shaniya for so long.  Would that qualify as abandonment.  I don't know because I've heard of cases where someone just dropped their kids off with a friend or even with the grandparents and didn't come back for an extended period of time (don't know how long of a time if years would qualify.  Seems as long as the parent knew the child was taken care of they could go on their merry little way without even so much as a phone call to the child.  The child then becomes the responsibility of the caretaker.  It does seem like Brad could have obtained custody as it doesn't seem like AD was able to provide even the most basic necessities.IMO

This whole mess also gives rise to another legal question I have about this whole thing.  Assuming (keyword here) that Brad was not on the birth certificate then the question was what is the difference between AD letting Shaniya go live with a man for 3 or 4 years or go for a weekend.  See the dilemma here????  WTH is going on in this case??????  IMO how does the law know or make that distinction.  I guess what I'm asking is if Shaniya had not died what was going on.  Her death has she shed a lot of light on some very important issues.



Very good post...

DSS could of check the management company of the complex and their name was not on the lease..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 08:50:13 PM
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-legal-guardian.htm

Oops here is the link. I have read several others about this today, but just posting this one as it is one of the easier to understand.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 24, 2009, 08:55:56 PM
Good Evening Everyone!!
I live in North Carolina and I know a little about how they do things in my county and some surrounding counties.  Social services expects children in a home to each have their own bed for one thing.  A couch doesn't qualify as a bed.  You also cannot put two siblings in the same room together if they are the same sex.  Children are not allowed to sleep in the same bed with a parent.  I think social services could have really thrown the book at AD if they had wanted too.  Also there must be food in the house.  I don't know the size of the mobile home but given what we know of all that were staying there they could not have met those requirements IMO.  I also wonder about AD "allowing" Brad to have Shaniya for so long.  Would that qualify as abandonment.  I don't know because I've heard of cases where someone just dropped their kids off with a friend or even with the grandparents and didn't come back for an extended period of time (don't know how long of a time if years would qualify.  Seems as long as the parent knew the child was taken care of they could go on their merry little way without even so much as a phone call to the child.  The child then becomes the responsibility of the caretaker.  It does seem like Brad could have obtained custody as it doesn't seem like AD was able to provide even the most basic necessities.IMO

This whole mess also gives rise to another legal question I have about this whole thing.  Assuming (keyword here) that Brad was not on the birth certificate then the question was what is the difference between AD letting Shaniya go live with a man for 3 or 4 years or go for a weekend.  See the dilemma here????  WTH is going on in this case??????  IMO how does the law know or make that distinction.  I guess what I'm asking is if Shaniya had not died what was going on.  Her death has she shed a lot of light on some very important issues.



Very interesting points. Geez this whole thing is a train wreck. That is why I said there are a lot of lessons to be learned from this little girls life and death.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 09:02:19 PM
guys i'm not going to reply to any one post on this but here is my take... if cops were called they would have at best taken her into dcf custody that night or next day after an investigation you can put 2 siblings of different sex in the same bed if there is an age difference of less then 4 years and a couch could constitute as a bed and just because she did not have a bed at the time of a 911 call it would not be grounds for the cops to take her into custody and before placing a child into foster care they try to place them with fam members and yes unliveable conditions like tolet all over the house could have constitued immediate removal but all she would have had to do is say no problem the toilet thing just happened we'll go stay at my mom's...
i agree brad would have most likely been granted custody in te long run and the key woord there is LONG run it would have taken months if not longer and there would have been nothing to stop the bio mom from taking off with shaniya if she really wanted her and got wind that brad was making plans to even go for custody later on... just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 24, 2009, 09:06:16 PM
Good Evening Everyone!!
I live in North Carolina and I know a little about how they do things in my county and some surrounding counties.  Social services expects children in a home to each have their own bed for one thing.  A couch doesn't qualify as a bed.  You also cannot put two siblings in the same room together if they are the same sex.  Children are not allowed to sleep in the same bed with a parent.  I think social services could have really thrown the book at AD if they had wanted too.  Also there must be food in the house.  I don't know the size of the mobile home but given what we know of all that were staying there they could not have met those requirements IMO.  I also wonder about AD "allowing" Brad to have Shaniya for so long.  Would that qualify as abandonment.  I don't know because I've heard of cases where someone just dropped their kids off with a friend or even with the grandparents and didn't come back for an extended period of time (don't know how long of a time if years would qualify.  Seems as long as the parent knew the child was taken care of they could go on their merry little way without even so much as a phone call to the child.  The child then becomes the responsibility of the caretaker.  It does seem like Brad could have obtained custody as it doesn't seem like AD was able to provide even the most basic necessities.IMO

This whole mess also gives rise to another legal question I have about this whole thing.  Assuming (keyword here) that Brad was not on the birth certificate then the question was what is the difference between AD letting Shaniya go live with a man for 3 or 4 years or go for a weekend.  See the dilemma here????  WTH is going on in this case??????  IMO how does the law know or make that distinction.  I guess what I'm asking is if Shaniya had not died what was going on.  Her death has she shed a lot of light on some very important issues.



Very good post...
::MonkeyAngel::

TY JG 
One more thing idnow in NC you just about have to video your husband in the act in order to get a divorce for adultery.  That makes me wonder how they charged AD for "allowing or pemitting an act of prostitution". Can't remember the exact wording but how did they know that.  She was charged before they found the body wasn't she???????????  I just have a bunch of questions.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 09:08:36 PM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 09:09:11 PM
snipped from Penny..

Brad could of tried to get in touch with his daughter and if he couldn't he could of called the police for well check... He could of call someone to go physically and check on Shaniya..Then he could of called DSS.. He could of called the school to see if she was attending. IMO there was alot Brad could of done to make sure Shaniya was ok and safe.. Brad knew about the enviroment and was not such a good area.. I know if that was my daughter who I love so much I would of made sure she was safe but then again I would of never gave the POS monster a second chance....

See this is the thing I am trying to say..He didn't do anything. I sure wish Jess would chime in regarding the legal issues of custody in this case because I would like to know if there is an assumed guardianship because Shaniya lived with her father full time. There has to be some kind of protection for the child.
i am not jess or a lawyer but i am familiar with how dss and welfare and custody works... it would have definitely helped alot in the custody case if there was one but just because you have had a kid in your posession for x ammount of time does not automatically make you the guardian
1. As they were talking on the phone, police knocked on Carey Lockhart's door. They had found her name listed as a guardian at Shaniya's elementary school.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/408/story/1060102.html




I don't know how reliable this is but here is a link to what a legal guardian is. I am thinking a parent can assign a legal guardian in the case that parent can't take over. Now I wonder and if Jess is around maybe he can answer, I wonder if by giving Shaniya to Brad he was then given or granted legal guardianship of Shaniya.
not unless there was legal docs to substantiate that he was her legal guardian .. he could have gone to court and made it official but the fact that dss had already evaluated and cleared bio mom is actually a plus in her corner...
and something everyone should know is that even if you have a will that says i have custody of my kids but if i die i want my parents to have legal custody it doesn't matter bio parent can swoop in from the rafters and assume guardianship even if he has never even met the child and until the grandparents and bio have a hearing on it bio dad would have custody unless ruled otherwise...
if you want to read some f'ed up scenarios of how legal custody vs moral decisions something similar.. look up nathaniel turner worcester mass... saddest story ever


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 09:09:55 PM
guys i'm not going to reply to any one post on this but here is my take... if cops were called they would have at best taken her into dcf custody that night or next day after an investigation you can put 2 siblings of different sex in the same bed if there is an age difference of less then 4 years and a couch could constitute as a bed and just because she did not have a bed at the time of a 911 call it would not be grounds for the cops to take her into custody and before placing a child into foster care they try to place them with fam members and yes unliveable conditions like tolet all over the house could have constitued immediate removal but all she would have had to do is say no problem the toilet thing just happened we'll go stay at my mom's...
i agree brad would have most likely been granted custody in te long run and the key woord there is LONG run it would have taken months if not longer and there would have been nothing to stop the bio mom from taking off with shaniya if she really wanted her and got wind that brad was making plans to even go for custody later on... just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

Penny do you know how many people were living in that home.. 6 people in a 2 bedromm and POS AD was not on the lease.. LE condemed that home.. Did you see the mattress off the kitchen from the pics....The home was a disgrace..JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 09:13:12 PM
"There have been major DSS issues with this family – who has custody, switching back and forth," Chance said.

Chance said it's unknown whether the child's disappearance is related to those issues. Police said Shaniya's father flew in from out of state Tuesday afternoon and was talking to investigators.


http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/11/crimesider/entry5614023.shtml


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 09:14:07 PM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
i know what you mean cookie but what i am saying is that some of the things you guys are suggesting would not have worked and would  have actually counted against him in a custody battle later on... maybe he was going the realistic route rather then the emotional route maybe he had his eye on the bigger picture of hopes to gain legal custody of her and hence be able to protect her permanently...  no one would have guessed that this would have been her fate maybe not even the bio mom... and i don't mean she didn't doit i mean we don't know for a fact that ahead of time the plan was to rape once and kill right after... i'm sure when this was concocted her being killed was not part of the original plan


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 09:18:43 PM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
i know what you mean cookie but what i am saying is that some of the things you guys are suggesting would not have worked and would  have actually counted against him in a custody battle later on... maybe he was going the realistic route rather then the emotional route maybe he had his eye on the bigger picture of hopes to gain legal custody of her and hence be able to protect her permanently...  no one would have guessed that this would have been her fate maybe not even the bio mom... and i don't mean she didn't doit i mean we don't know for a fact that ahead of time the plan was to rape once and kill right after... i'm sure when this was concocted her being killed was not part of the original plan

respect to you and your opinion...
I don't think that the plan was for Shaniya to end up dead either.....but she did..God bless her soul...
I still think that Brad was ready to move on with his life without Shaniya..that is why he so easily gave bio this child after so many years...he didn't even check where Shaniya would be living...she must have been so sad and so lonely...jmo...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 09:19:41 PM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
i know what you mean cookie but what i am saying is that some of the things you guys are suggesting would not have worked and would  have actually counted against him in a custody battle later on... maybe he was going the realistic route rather then the emotional route maybe he had his eye on the bigger picture of hopes to gain legal custody of her and hence be able to protect her permanently...  no one would have guessed that this would have been her fate maybe not even the bio mom... and i don't mean she didn't doit i mean we don't know for a fact that ahead of time the plan was to rape once and kill right after... i'm sure when this was concocted her being killed was not part of the original plan

Shaniya Davis Found Dead Mother Antoinette Davis Charged With Prostitution Selling Child For Sex..

http://www.theinsider.com/news/3072387_Shaniya_Davis_Found_Dead_Mother_Antoinette_Davis_Charged_With_Prostitution_Selling_Child_For_Sex


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 09:29:51 PM
guys i'm not going to reply to any one post on this but here is my take... if cops were called they would have at best taken her into dcf custody that night or next day after an investigation you can put 2 siblings of different sex in the same bed if there is an age difference of less then 4 years and a couch could constitute as a bed and just because she did not have a bed at the time of a 911 call it would not be grounds for the cops to take her into custody and before placing a child into foster care they try to place them with fam members and yes unliveable conditions like tolet all over the house could have constitued immediate removal but all she would have had to do is say no problem the toilet thing just happened we'll go stay at my mom's...
i agree brad would have most likely been granted custody in te long run and the key woord there is LONG run it would have taken months if not longer and there would have been nothing to stop the bio mom from taking off with shaniya if she really wanted her and got wind that brad was making plans to even go for custody later on... just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

Penny do you know how many people were living in that home.. 6 people in a 2 bedromm and POS AD was not on the lease.. LE condemed that home.. Did you see the mattress off the kitchen from the pics....The home was a disgrace..JMO
i know it was disgusting and condemed but my point is if the cops came that night she could have said okay fine i will take my kids and go stay somewhere else.. cops would have let her and dss would have been called but later on...
cops do well child checks not home living checks and unless brad or carey reported a crime or physical immediate danger then the cops would have not gone into the home... well child check would have been followed upby dss ... say if carey called and said omg my niece is in danger her mother is a crackhead and is acting irrational etc they could have gone to the home and met wit both child and mom on front porch... there was no current crime being commited to where the cops would have been even granted access to the inside of the home...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 09:54:34 PM
guys i'm not going to reply to any one post on this but here is my take... if cops were called they would have at best taken her into dcf custody that night or next day after an investigation you can put 2 siblings of different sex in the same bed if there is an age difference of less then 4 years and a couch could constitute as a bed and just because she did not have a bed at the time of a 911 call it would not be grounds for the cops to take her into custody and before placing a child into foster care they try to place them with fam members and yes unliveable conditions like tolet all over the house could have constitued immediate removal but all she would have had to do is say no problem the toilet thing just happened we'll go stay at my mom's...
i agree brad would have most likely been granted custody in te long run and the key woord there is LONG run it would have taken months if not longer and there would have been nothing to stop the bio mom from taking off with shaniya if she really wanted her and got wind that brad was making plans to even go for custody later on... just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

Penny do you know how many people were living in that home.. 6 people in a 2 bedromm and POS AD was not on the lease.. LE condemed that home.. Did you see the mattress off the kitchen from the pics....The home was a disgrace..JMO
i know it was disgusting and condemed but my point is if the cops came that night she could have said okay fine i will take my kids and go stay somewhere else.. cops would have let her and dss would have been called but later on...
cops do well child checks not home living checks and unless brad or carey reported a crime or physical immediate danger then the cops would have not gone into the home... well child check would have been followed upby dss ... say if carey called and said omg my niece is in danger her mother is a crackhead and is acting irrational etc they could have gone to the home and met wit both child and mom on front porch... there was no current crime being commited to where the cops would have been even granted access to the inside of the home...

Exactly.. brad made No calls no well checks...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 10:14:26 PM
guys i'm not going to reply to any one post on this but here is my take... if cops were called they would have at best taken her into dcf custody that night or next day after an investigation you can put 2 siblings of different sex in the same bed if there is an age difference of less then 4 years and a couch could constitute as a bed and just because she did not have a bed at the time of a 911 call it would not be grounds for the cops to take her into custody and before placing a child into foster care they try to place them with fam members and yes unliveable conditions like tolet all over the house could have constitued immediate removal but all she would have had to do is say no problem the toilet thing just happened we'll go stay at my mom's...
i agree brad would have most likely been granted custody in te long run and the key woord there is LONG run it would have taken months if not longer and there would have been nothing to stop the bio mom from taking off with shaniya if she really wanted her and got wind that brad was making plans to even go for custody later on... just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

Penny do you know how many people were living in that home.. 6 people in a 2 bedromm and POS AD was not on the lease.. LE condemed that home.. Did you see the mattress off the kitchen from the pics....The home was a disgrace..JMO
i know it was disgusting and condemed but my point is if the cops came that night she could have said okay fine i will take my kids and go stay somewhere else.. cops would have let her and dss would have been called but later on...
cops do well child checks not home living checks and unless brad or carey reported a crime or physical immediate danger then the cops would have not gone into the home... well child check would have been followed upby dss ... say if carey called and said omg my niece is in danger her mother is a crackhead and is acting irrational etc they could have gone to the home and met wit both child and mom on front porch... there was no current crime being commited to where the cops would have been even granted access to the inside of the home...

Exactly.. brad made No calls no well checks...
wow jerz i think this is the first time you and i have disagreed on something...
i mis worded that what it should have said was even if there was a well child cop call... what would the crime or immediate danger have been to report?
this is why i stopped posting on this thread (albeit for a day) i didn't want to argue with posters on a mute point
i would never try to dictate to a poster what they should discuss but unless we are sleuthing mm and ad and possible underground connections they had to porn sex rings etc then this is a dead issue for me whether you guys think he could  have prevented this or not doesn't really matter now and i do not want to bash a loving father who has just lost his daughter in a heinous way... back to the rafters i go...
love you monkeys  ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 24, 2009, 10:17:50 PM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
i know what you mean cookie but what i am saying is that some of the things you guys are suggesting would not have worked and would  have actually counted against him in a custody battle later on... maybe he was going the realistic route rather then the emotional route maybe he had his eye on the bigger picture of hopes to gain legal custody of her and hence be able to protect her permanently...  no one would have guessed that this would have been her fate maybe not even the bio mom... and i don't mean she didn't doit i mean we don't know for a fact that ahead of time the plan was to rape once and kill right after... i'm sure when this was concocted her being killed was not part of the original plan

respect to you and your opinion...
I don't think that the plan was for Shaniya to end up dead either.....but she did..God bless her soul...
I still think that Brad was ready to move on with his life without Shaniya..that is why he so easily gave bio this child after so many years...he didn't even check where Shaniya would be living...she must have been so sad and so lonely...jmo...
if that was the case then why didn't he pawn her off on the neighbor or ex fil... now it is snowballing into you think he kind of wanted to get rid of her?
really?
i'm just going to go now


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: pdh3 on November 24, 2009, 10:23:14 PM
My DIL asked me a question tonight and I didn't know the answer....so HELP

AD was charge with selling Shaniya for sex...trafficking even before Shaniya was found.....how did the LE know what had happened?  I missed a lot of the earlier posts so.... What in the heck am I missing?



At the time Antoinette was arrested, McNeil was already in jail.  The police were questioning
Antionette off and on...as they put it, she was in and out of police headquarters.
I have wondered if McNeil talked or if Antoinette confessed to selling Shaniya.
I don't think we know yet.

thanks Magnolia...I thought it was Coe that was in jail....and McNeil turned himself in...oh well...see I told you I was confused!!  Thanks!!




You're correct. McNeil did turn himself in. Coe was the first one picked up, then he was later released after the hotel employee called LE. The videotapes surfaced, and they knew Coe wasn't the man they had on the hotel surveillance tapes. Once McNeil realized he was on the tape, and it became public knowledge, he turned himself in.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 10:23:17 PM
guys i'm not going to reply to any one post on this but here is my take... if cops were called they would have at best taken her into dcf custody that night or next day after an investigation you can put 2 siblings of different sex in the same bed if there is an age difference of less then 4 years and a couch could constitute as a bed and just because she did not have a bed at the time of a 911 call it would not be grounds for the cops to take her into custody and before placing a child into foster care they try to place them with fam members and yes unliveable conditions like tolet all over the house could have constitued immediate removal but all she would have had to do is say no problem the toilet thing just happened we'll go stay at my mom's...
i agree brad would have most likely been granted custody in te long run and the key woord there is LONG run it would have taken months if not longer and there would have been nothing to stop the bio mom from taking off with shaniya if she really wanted her and got wind that brad was making plans to even go for custody later on... just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

Penny do you know how many people were living in that home.. 6 people in a 2 bedromm and POS AD was not on the lease.. LE condemed that home.. Did you see the mattress off the kitchen from the pics....The home was a disgrace..JMO
i know it was disgusting and condemed but my point is if the cops came that night she could have said okay fine i will take my kids and go stay somewhere else.. cops would have let her and dss would have been called but later on...
cops do well child checks not home living checks and unless brad or carey reported a crime or physical immediate danger then the cops would have not gone into the home... well child check would have been followed upby dss ... say if carey called and said omg my niece is in danger her mother is a crackhead and is acting irrational etc they could have gone to the home and met wit both child and mom on front porch... there was no current crime being commited to where the cops would have been even granted access to the inside of the home...

Exactly.. brad made No calls no well checks...
wow jerz i think this is the first time you and i have disagreed on something...
i mis worded that what it should have said was even if there was a well child cop call... what would the crime or immediate danger have been to report?
this is why i stopped posting on this thread (albeit for a day) i didn't want to argue with posters on a mute point
i would never try to dictate to a poster what they should discuss but unless we are sleuthing mm and ad and possible underground connections they had to porn sex rings etc then this is a dead issue for me whether you guys think he could  have prevented this or not doesn't really matter now and i do not want to bash a loving father who has just lost his daughter in a heinous way... back to the rafters i go...
love you monkeys  ::MonkeyKiss::

To agree to disagree. That's how we learn... ::MonkeyTease:: ::MonkeyTease::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 10:24:04 PM
Penny...I think that we are all so fed up with parents who take their children's safety for granted...
this case is especially maddening because it could have so easily not happened imo...She had a nice home with a guardian aunt who loved her...there was no reason to give this baby over to the bio without a fight from Dad...that is what is so insanely maddening to me! He was negligent in my eyes...I realize that he is suffering, but it is partly due to his own choices...that he will have to live with...If he would at least own his part in all of this, I might be softer hearted towards him, but to say that he didn't see any red flags, that he didn't know about bio's drug use in the past, the warnings from others not to send Shaniya over to that pit and even downplaying his own sister's concerns for Shaniya's safety is telling me that he was not as deligent in his role as a father as he should have been...jmo.....that is my point in all of this...he is partly to blame for what happened and so far, he hasn't done much to help his public perception from what I have read and seen...
no need to go back to any rafters...this is a discussion that needs to have all different views in my opinion..we don't have to all agree... ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 24, 2009, 10:26:41 PM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
i know what you mean cookie but what i am saying is that some of the things you guys are suggesting would not have worked and would  have actually counted against him in a custody battle later on... maybe he was going the realistic route rather then the emotional route maybe he had his eye on the bigger picture of hopes to gain legal custody of her and hence be able to protect her permanently...  no one would have guessed that this would have been her fate maybe not even the bio mom... and i don't mean she didn't doit i mean we don't know for a fact that ahead of time the plan was to rape once and kill right after... i'm sure when this was concocted her being killed was not part of the original plan

respect to you and your opinion...
I don't think that the plan was for Shaniya to end up dead either.....but she did..God bless her soul...
I still think that Brad was ready to move on with his life without Shaniya..that is why he so easily gave bio this child after so many years...he didn't even check where Shaniya would be living...she must have been so sad and so lonely...jmo...

And SCARED.... ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 10:28:49 PM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
i know what you mean cookie but what i am saying is that some of the things you guys are suggesting would not have worked and would  have actually counted against him in a custody battle later on... maybe he was going the realistic route rather then the emotional route maybe he had his eye on the bigger picture of hopes to gain legal custody of her and hence be able to protect her permanently...  no one would have guessed that this would have been her fate maybe not even the bio mom... and i don't mean she didn't doit i mean we don't know for a fact that ahead of time the plan was to rape once and kill right after... i'm sure when this was concocted her being killed was not part of the original plan

respect to you and your opinion...
I don't think that the plan was for Shaniya to end up dead either.....but she did..God bless her soul...
I still think that Brad was ready to move on with his life without Shaniya..that is why he so easily gave bio this child after so many years...he didn't even check where Shaniya would be living...she must have been so sad and so lonely...jmo...
if that was the case then why didn't he pawn her off on the neighbor or ex fil... now it is snowballing into you think he kind of wanted to get rid of her?
really?
i'm just going to go now

not get rid of her like get rid of her...like in her dying of course not..
but he must have had a reason for all of a sudden wanting her to go live with her bio after all this time..there was no good reason to have her go live with her bio in my opinion...Are you agreeing that his story that he wanted to give bio a chance to be a mother to Shaniya was his chief reason for sending her off to live with someone that he knew was not stable?really? 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 24, 2009, 10:51:14 PM
I agree.  I do not think the plan for Shaniya to end up dead.  Think about it.  Nobody knows what Shaniya was subjected to over that five week period ... that five week period than Daddy or Auntie failed to check up on here ... that five week period she did not attend kindergarten.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++

SPECULATIVE CHAIN OF EVENTS:

1.  MM arrived at the hotel with Shaniya at 6:11 AM.  The implication would be that that Shaniya was taken as planned from her Mother's home at 5:30 AM.  The distance of 40 miles between home and the hotel would imply approximately 40 minute drive.

2.  The plan was that MM brings a drugged Shaniya back home by 8:00 AM ... a drugged Shaniya who would have no recollection of the abuse.

2.  The 911 call placed by AD at 7:00 AM was not part of the plan?  The call was placed at the urging of a worried sister who woke up unexpectedly ... a worried sister who did not have a clue what was going on ... a worried sister who was caught on security camera searching outside the trailer home.

3.  AD then calls MM and warns him about the 911 call that she was forced to make.  Spokesperson on press conference stated that cell phone records of calls placed that morning are being investigated.
 
4.  MM panicks ... damage control is where it is at.  He knows he cannot be caught with the now missing Shaniya.  What is  heto do?

5.  MM leaves the hotel at 7:30 AM and ... a short distance past the hotel a drugged Shaniya is silenced and disposed of like trash?  See map below.

6.  AD implicates Clarence Coe.  Clarence Coe is arrested.

5.  The observant hotel clerk and ... hotel security cameras was not anticipated.  When the video's surfaces MM turns himself in?

6.  AD makes a plea deal with LE and confesses her role and ... is charged.

7.  MM makes a plea deal with LE regarding his participation.  He reveals the area where Shaniya remains can be located?  MM is charged with kidnapping.

8.  Shaniya's remains are found.  MM is charged with rape and murder.

IMO

+++++++

klaasend
Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5 Fayetteville, NC Missing 11/10/09-Ambert Alert Issued
« Reply #1584 on: November 17, 2009, 01:03:20 AM »

Map
:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6471.msg1015157#msg1015157


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 24, 2009, 10:57:13 PM
IMO many people failed Shaniya, especially those closest to her including her father.  I do feel for his loss but he failed her and so did everyone else.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 24, 2009, 11:04:01 PM
IMO many people failed Shaniya, especially those closest to her including her father.  I do feel for his loss but he failed her and so did everyone else.

my feelings too.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 24, 2009, 11:35:15 PM
jmo
the only person that could have, prevented this tragedy,was AD by not giving MM the child
 since she didnt, MM would be next, since he didnt, now there is a raped and murdered child
by MM hands, that the mother, could have prevented, from happening,

scenario
dad and mom, have not been to court to get legal custody of child
( and just because one parent has the child, that does not mean legal custody, by most states laws)
so either one could and would have to fight a child custody
battle, if they want to be the legal guardian/custodial parent
and since you brought it before the court, the courts would then be
forced to decide, which parent should have legal custody.

so maybe dad was, trying to show court he never harbored ill feelings
towards the mother, because he let her, have her when she was, ABLE to take
and care for her, so maybe he was using the trade back and forth, and living conditions
as part of his evidence, for his case to gain custody, which is not an easy task for the
fathers in these cases.

i dont think dad will ever say anymore on his decision, for why he let the mother, have her
for that time. i dont think dad or anyone, could have forsaw this tragedy
i know everyone wants to try and figure out how this could have been prevented
the answer is

Antoinette Nicole Davis



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 25, 2009, 12:57:06 AM

respect to you and your opinion...
I don't think that the plan was for Shaniya to end up dead either.....but she did..God bless her soul...
I still think that Brad was ready to move on with his life without Shaniya..that is why he so easily gave bio this child after so many years...he didn't even check where Shaniya would be living...she must have been so sad and so lonely...jmo...
if that was the case then why didn't he pawn her off on the neighbor or ex fil... now it is snowballing into you think he kind of wanted to get rid of her?
really?
i'm just going to go now

Penny..... Cookie isn't the only monkey who feels this way, who have begun to think these things.  I stand with her on this.  My thoughts tonight are with Shaniya and how alone, frightened, and abandoned she very likely felt, in the last weeks/moments of her life.  IMO, Shaniya was let down by many who supposedly loved and cared about her.  That's an injustice, in and of itself.  IMO. 

   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 25, 2009, 12:59:32 AM
Hi wyks
You got more nanners!!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tina Bee on November 25, 2009, 03:47:57 AM
I was at the grocery store last night and the cashier's were talking about Shaniya's case and how sad it was. I live in Sacramento, Ca so I was surprised, but yes indeed everyone I know is talking about this tragedy too. This little girl's death has touched people all around the country (maybe even the world) profoundly.

I hope everyone has a safe Thanksgiving.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 25, 2009, 03:51:29 AM
Hmmm.. Well my last post is taking the scenic tour.   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

Anyway, sorry if this double posts. 

4getUnot - thanks!! 


And who do we thank for these new cuties?  Klaas?  Have you been busy again?  To you, or whomever, thanks!  Love em! 


 ::DancingSantaMonkey1::   ::ElfMonkey::   ::CowboySmiley::   ::MonkeyReindeer:: 


Tiptoes across sleeping monkeys to my monkey bunkey.. Nite everyone! 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on November 25, 2009, 07:15:15 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/24/955235
Published: 06:55 AM, Wed Nov 25, 2009
Shaniya investigation continues; Davis moved to Raleigh prison
By Nick Needham
Staff writer
A week after discovering the body of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis, police say they are still following multiple leads in the case.

Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine said Tuesday that tips continue to come in anonymously to the task force assigned to the case.

"There are a plethora of leads that we're following up on," Bergamine said.

About 20 people are assigned to the task force, Bergamine said. They are working hand and glove with the District Attorney's Office.

When asked if there were any new suspects in the case, Bergamine said several teams continue to work leads every day, and the case is ongoing.

On Tuesday, Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, was transferred to the North Carolina Correctional Center for Women in Raleigh for safekeeping.

Debbie Tanna, a spokeswoman for the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, said Davis was moved to make sure she wasn't harmed by herself or others.

"She is pregnant, so special precautions had to be taken," Tanna said.

Davis is charged with human trafficking and felony child abuse involving prostitution. Her bail was set at $51,000.

Shaniya's body was found Nov. 16 off Walker Road in Sanford. She was reported missing by her mother from their home off Murchison Road on Nov. 10.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29 - an acquaintance of Davis' - is charged with first-degree murder, rape and kidnapping in Shaniya's case.

McNeill was transferred from the Cumberland County Detention Center to a safekeeping unit at Central Prison in Raleigh last week until his court date Dec. 9.
Bergamine said Tuesday it was too early to comment on what role the Department of Social Services had with the Davis family.

A state task force from the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services announced this week it will review any involvement the county DSS agency had with Antoinette Davis and her children.
Dad speaks on 'Today'

Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, said during an interview on NBC's "Today" show Tuesday that he regrets how the decision to let Shaniya stay with her mother turned out, but he thought he was making the right choice at the time.

"We obviously make decisions in life that sometimes have repercussions or adverse situations that drift from our decision," he said. "We just have to continue to believe in God and hope that our decisions are the correct ones."

Lockhart said he last saw Shaniya in early October as he left for an out-of-state work assignment. Shaniya moved in with her mother about a week later after initially staying with Lockhart's sister, he said.

Bergamine said it was still unclear to investigators why Shaniya was pulled out of school in October.

Shaniya had been enrolled at Morganton Road Elementary School. Her aunt, Carey Lockhart-Davis, lives in the district.

Bergamine said he wanted the task force to leave no stone unturned.

"It's very important as we prepare the case for the District Attorney's Office that we cover everything that's possible," he said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Staff writer Nick Needham can be reached at needhamn@fayobserver.com or 486-3572.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 25, 2009, 08:27:38 AM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
i know what you mean cookie but what i am saying is that some of the things you guys are suggesting would not have worked and would  have actually counted against him in a custody battle later on... maybe he was going the realistic route rather then the emotional route maybe he had his eye on the bigger picture of hopes to gain legal custody of her and hence be able to protect her permanently...  no one would have guessed that this would have been her fate maybe not even the bio mom... and i don't mean she didn't doit i mean we don't know for a fact that ahead of time the plan was to rape once and kill right after... i'm sure when this was concocted her being killed was not part of the original plan

respect to you and your opinion...
I don't think that the plan was for Shaniya to end up dead either.....but she did..God bless her soul...
I still think that Brad was ready to move on with his life without Shaniya..that is why he so easily gave bio this child after so many years...he didn't even check where Shaniya would be living...she must have been so sad and so lonely...jmo...
if that was the case then why didn't he pawn her off on the neighbor or ex fil... now it is snowballing into you think he kind of wanted to get rid of her?
really?
i'm just going to go now

not get rid of her like get rid of her...like in her dying of course not..
but he must have had a reason for all of a sudden wanting her to go live with her bio after all this time..there was no good reason to have her go live with her bio in my opinion...Are you agreeing that his story that he wanted to give bio a chance to be a mother to Shaniya was his chief reason for sending her off to live with someone that he knew was not stable?really? 

This is IMOO - but I wonder if egg donor had something on him - or was threatening him with child support if he did not let her have the baby. I know in Michigan, if you have an order of filliation, the mother can get you for child support back to the birth of the child if the child is under 15. I just can not imagine any other reason to give this baby up.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 25, 2009, 08:40:27 AM
snip from above article:

Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, said during an interview on NBC's "Today" show Tuesday that he regrets how the decision to let Shaniya stay with her mother turned out, but he thought he was making the right choice at the time.

"We obviously make decisions in life that sometimes have repercussions or adverse situations that drift from our decision," he said. "We just have to continue to believe in God and hope that our decisions are the correct ones."

so, if someone decides not to strap their child into her car seat cause they don't  want to take that extra minute it would take to do so cause they are  in a hurry..... they believe in God and hope that their  decision is the correct one, they get into an accident...not their fault, another car ran a red light but God forbid, child does not survive the crash because she was not buckled in her safety seat....since they  believed in God that the not so good of a decision was a correct one, none of it was their fault? oh, ok then....
where does common sense and responsibility kick in here? with the person who didn't strap the kid into the car seat or the person who ran the red light? red light person could say, well, the child would not have died if she had been strapped into her car seat...even if I ran the red light...Red light person is of course more at fault, but ..........
sigh....hope this isn't a bad analogy...trying hard to express my frustration with this dad...wish he would just shut up.....I can't even begin to express my feelings for POS bio and MM!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 25, 2009, 10:02:56 AM
I can believe that Aunt Carey's hands were tied in the decision of dropping Shaniya off but I bet you deep down she really blames her brother.  We are all human but I wouldn't make the mistake he did and I would be screaming at him for his role in this.  I know he didn't cause it but he could have put AD off till he got done with his out of town job.  I just know that we will eventually hear Carey turn on him.  I think think I heard a slip up and I'm going back to look at the Today interview.  BRB


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 25, 2009, 10:27:00 AM
I can believe that Aunt Carey's hands were tied in the decision of dropping Shaniya off but I bet you deep down she really blames her brother.  We are all human but I wouldn't make the mistake he did and I would be screaming at him for his role in this.  I know he didn't cause it but he could have put AD off till he got done with his out of town job.  I just know that we will eventually hear Carey turn on him.  I think think I heard a slip up and I'm going back to look at the Today interview.  BRB

Okay, I went back and watched.  Viera asked the atty for Brad if he thinks he had and role in this and atty said that would be up to the prosecutors.  I think Viera was asking what I am thinking that maybe some neglect on his part and I think the atty answered that but at the same time deflected and went to thanking LE and saying Brad would cooperate in any way needed.  Just scratching the surface of that slippery subject  but they have been thinking about it.  Hence the attorney.  As a parent you can't drop the ball at any time.  Look what happened.  Heard on national news some woman left her 1 mo strapped in a car to run into the Post ofc for 5 mins and someone stole the car with child in it.  Her fault?  Damn right!  Never ever, ever leave a child unattended. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 25, 2009, 10:46:09 AM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
All I'm going to add is, Brad is the one that will have to live with his conscience, and I know if I were Brad I would not be able to live with myself. To me this would be a horrible punishment.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 25, 2009, 11:23:30 AM
I believe that if Brad had called the Fayetteville or Raeford Police Dept after Antionette told Carey that she
would never see Shaniya again, the police would have done something to gurantee the safety of
Shaniya.
Everybody except Brad knew that Antoinette had drug and prostitution issues.
Shaniya was enrolled in kindergarten near Carey's home, in Raeford, and no where near Antoinette's home.
That says a lot.
I do not believe that the police would have ignored the warning signs. There were too many of them. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 25, 2009, 12:10:25 PM
I believe that if Brad had called the Fayetteville or Raeford Police Dept after Antionette told Carey that she
would never see Shaniya again, the police would have done something to gurantee the safety of
Shaniya.
Everybody except Brad knew that Antoinette had drug and prostitution issues.
Shaniya was enrolled in kindergarten near Carey's home, in Raeford, and no where near Antoinette's home.
That says a lot.
I do not believe that the police would have ignored the warning signs. There were too many of them. JMO

agreed!

Rosie:  Yes, the punishment for Brad is horrible...and for Carrie and all who loved Shaniya...I couldn't live with myself if I was him either....

Melisb:  agree with you on Carrie...her hands were tied cause Brad had made up his mind/decision..
She will turn on him if she hasn't already...how could she not? she had her reservations about this bio already, and Brad downplayed her feelings...now this....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 25, 2009, 12:12:36 PM
I was at the grocery store last night and the cashier's were talking about Shaniya's case and how sad it was. I live in Sacramento, Ca so I was surprised, but yes indeed everyone I know is talking about this tragedy too. This little girl's death has touched people all around the country (maybe even the world) profoundly.

I hope everyone has a safe Thanksgiving.

The Shaniya's case has touched my heart in a way that no other missing child case.  Something akin to some parents of other missing children ... Brad took "took a chance" with Shaniya's well-being despite the potential risks.  However ... the evil that must lurk inside a mother who would throw their child into the lions' den for her own financial benefit is something I cannot comprehend.  As another poster said and I agree ... "I would take a bullet to protect my child from harm".

Tina ... I hope you and other American Monkeys have a nice Thanksgiving.

This Canadian Monkey and her hubby will be taking the short drive across the line and celebrating the occassion at the home of youngest son's Dutch American inlaws.  I am hoping the border lineups are not too long.  We have been invited to spend the night but ... I like my own bed.

Janet


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 25, 2009, 12:17:14 PM
I was at the grocery store last night and the cashier's were talking about Shaniya's case and how sad it was. I live in Sacramento, Ca so I was surprised, but yes indeed everyone I know is talking about this tragedy too. This little girl's death has touched people all around the country (maybe even the world) profoundly.

I hope everyone has a safe Thanksgiving.

The Shaniya's case has touched my heart in a way that no other missing child case.  Something akin to some parents of other missing children ... Brad took "took a chance" with Shaniya's well-being despite the potential risks.  However ... the evil that must lurk inside a mother who would throw their child into the lions' den for her own financial benefit is something I cannot comprehend.  As another poster said and I agree ... "I would take a bullet to protect my child from harm".

Tina ... I hope you and other American Monkeys have a nice Thanksgiving.

This Canadian Monkey and her hubby will be taking the short drive across the line and celebrating the occassion at the home of youngest son's Dutch American inlaws.  I am hoping the border lineups are not too long.  We have been invited to spend the night but ... I like my own bed.

Janet


Janet, have a wonderful Thanksgiving.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on November 25, 2009, 01:06:09 PM
jmo
the only person that could have, prevented this tragedy,was AD by not giving MM the child
 since she didnt, MM would be next, since he didnt, now there is a raped and murdered child
by MM hands, that the mother, could have prevented, from happening,

scenario
dad and mom, have not been to court to get legal custody of child
( and just because one parent has the child, that does not mean legal custody, by most states laws)
so either one could and would have to fight a child custody
battle, if they want to be the legal guardian/custodial parent
and since you brought it before the court, the courts would then be
forced to decide, which parent should have legal custody.

so maybe dad was, trying to show court he never harbored ill feelings
towards the mother, because he let her, have her when she was, ABLE to take
and care for her, so maybe he was using the trade back and forth, and living conditions
as part of his evidence, for his case to gain custody, which is not an easy task for the
fathers in these cases.

i dont think dad will ever say anymore on his decision, for why he let the mother, have her
for that time. i dont think dad or anyone, could have forsaw this tragedy
i know everyone wants to try and figure out how this could have been prevented
the answer is

Antoinette Nicole Davis





I don't think dad could have for seen these circumstances...I don't think they would have occurred to him in any way....and that's not a good thing.
First most of us would have checked out the situation before we sent our baby off, especially if the mother was a drug addicted part time hooker. In fact I think most would have fought for custody before this ever became an issue. Most people would fight to the end and he had the resources to do it too.
Second, family and friends said, well before her final weeks with her mother, that there was abuse going on, so he knew or had some idea things were far from safe for his baby. People were so concerned they offered to take over the care of this little girl...the father declined.
He nor anyone else checked the living conditions they were sending her into, one look at the outside of the trailer was an immediate red flag and an internal visit + a refusal to leave her there was warranted. If the mother refused to let the aunt look inside a call to the police would have seen them check the trailer and declare it unfit for human habitation.

There is no way she should have been with her mom at any time and everyone knows it.

Her life was in daddy's hands and he failed her miserably.

As for the perpetrators of these heinous acts on Shaniya, they are scum and nothing is expected of them, they are the filth we try to protect our babies from.

IMHO Only daddy could have saved her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 25, 2009, 02:16:03 PM
O/T where does everyone get the flags from?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 25, 2009, 02:30:41 PM
O/T where does everyone get the flags from?

Tracygirl, I think Brandi has been making the flags  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 25, 2009, 02:48:52 PM
thanks klass!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 25, 2009, 02:59:07 PM
snip from Penny post:

just saying there was nothing brad could  have done that would have happened in time for her to be saved...

all due respect Penny, but he could have tried... ::MonkeyTears::
i know what you mean cookie but what i am saying is that some of the things you guys are suggesting would not have worked and would  have actually counted against him in a custody battle later on... maybe he was going the realistic route rather then the emotional route maybe he had his eye on the bigger picture of hopes to gain legal custody of her and hence be able to protect her permanently...  no one would have guessed that this would have been her fate maybe not even the bio mom... and i don't mean she didn't doit i mean we don't know for a fact that ahead of time the plan was to rape once and kill right after... i'm sure when this was concocted her being killed was not part of the original plan

respect to you and your opinion...
I don't think that the plan was for Shaniya to end up dead either.....but she did..God bless her soul...
I still think that Brad was ready to move on with his life without Shaniya..that is why he so easily gave bio this child after so many years...he didn't even check where Shaniya would be living...she must have been so sad and so lonely...jmo...
if that was the case then why didn't he pawn her off on the neighbor or ex fil... now it is snowballing into you think he kind of wanted to get rid of her?
really?
i'm just going to go now

not get rid of her like get rid of her...like in her dying of course not..
but he must have had a reason for all of a sudden wanting her to go live with her bio after all this time..there was no good reason to have her go live with her bio in my opinion...Are you agreeing that his story that he wanted to give bio a chance to be a mother to Shaniya was his chief reason for sending her off to live with someone that he knew was not stable?really? 
i was saying you meant he wanted her dead but you did make it sound like he was more than happy to have her live elsewhere and i just don't thiink that is the case i really stand by my sayingf that legally he had no choice butto return her to the bio mom who in reality had legal full custody of her... that is all i don't think he ever said he thought it was the best idea in the world he did say he was giving her a chance but it wasn't even his decision to begin with there was nothing he could do to prevent it .... let's say he didn't let her go... all mom would have to do is call the police and she would have gotten her and he probably would have had kidnapping charges pressed against him... then who would have been there to try and protect shaniya?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on November 25, 2009, 04:22:29 PM
Brandi, I heard a rumor that you were going to make me a Justice for Nevaeh flag.    ::MonkeyRoll::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 25, 2009, 04:46:17 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 

God may have taken a precious gift back from Brad that he gave him...because Shaniya was not cherished as she should have been.jmo

I find this post offensive.I read it yesterday but had to let it go for awhile but couldn't. Are you just razzin` me? So the God you believe in ( certainly not mine)
kinda led Mcneil to brutally rape and murder Shaniya to punish and be a Indian giver with Shainya because Brad didn't cherish her enough according to your standards? Was this same God responsible for Somer Thompsons death to punish her mom because she had to walk home from school? or making John Couey rape and bury alive Jessica Lunsford to punish her dad for not being home that night and spent the night at his g/f? or punish Elizabeth Olten father and brother because they are in prison and used Alyssa to punish them? Did they not cherish them enough?

 Should we blame God for the slaughter at Ft. Hood? or blame the shooter, or the military who actually had red flags for years. God had nothing to do with Shaniya's death or any other child's, nor did Brad, but EVIL did and it goes by the name of baby seller devileggdonor and evil, vile, discusting rapist/ murderer. And I am believer in the death penality, mostly when it comes to crimes against children. IMO

RAZZY - I don't agree with everyone in the forum either but I don't let others beliefs get to me.   You are out of line attacking the poster, please restrain yourself next time.

In my opinion for whatever reason Shaniya's dad let her down.  It didn't make sense to give Antoinette a chance at being a mom.  Sounds like it was well known in the family that Antoinette had substance abuse problems, so is that where you want to leave your 5yr old girl?  So why did he?  I'm affraid we'll never know but it was Shaniya that paid the ultimate price for his lack of judgement.  Everyone in Shaniya's life let her down.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 25, 2009, 05:12:07 PM
o/t but just goes to show how close you have to keep your kids these days
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 25, 2009, 05:19:43 PM
o/t but just goes to show how close you have to keep your kids these days
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116

My goodness...what is this world coming to??? that poor little kid....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on November 25, 2009, 05:27:29 PM
Oh my god a dressing room? That poor kid, wth is wrong with people!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 25, 2009, 07:20:55 PM
Don't miss Dana Pretzer at 9pm ET tonight!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/Pretzer112509.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 25, 2009, 08:43:51 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 

God may have taken a precious gift back from Brad that he gave him...because Shaniya was not cherished as she should have been.jmo

I find this post offensive.I read it yesterday but had to let it go for awhile but couldn't. Are you just razzin` me? So the God you believe in ( certainly not mine)
kinda led Mcneil to brutally rape and murder Shaniya to punish and be a Indian giver with Shainya because Brad didn't cherish her enough according to your standards? Was this same God responsible for Somer Thompsons death to punish her mom because she had to walk home from school? or making John Couey rape and bury alive Jessica Lunsford to punish her dad for not being home that night and spent the night at his g/f? or punish Elizabeth Olten father and brother because they are in prison and used Alyssa to punish them? Did they not cherish them enough?

 Should we blame God for the slaughter at Ft. Hood? or blame the shooter, or the military who actually had red flags for years. God had nothing to do with Shaniya's death or any other child's, nor did Brad, but EVIL did and it goes by the name of baby seller devileggdonor and evil, vile, discusting rapist/ murderer. And I am believer in the death penality, mostly when it comes to crimes against children. IMO

RAZZY - I don't agree with everyone in the forum either but I don't let others beliefs get to me.   You are out of line attacking the poster, please restrain yourself next time.

In my opinion for whatever reason Shaniya's dad let her down.  It didn't make sense to give Antoinette a chance at being a mom.  Sounds like it was well known in the family that Antoinette had substance abuse problems, so is that where you want to leave your 5yr old girl?  So why did he?  I'm affraid we'll never know but it was Shaniya that paid the ultimate price for his lack of judgement.  Everyone in Shaniya's life let her down.


 You're the one who blamed God, I have every right to disagree and defend him/her (whoever you choose to worship/believe in). Do not NOT chastize me( that's up to the mods), it was not against you, it was against your post. And I did restrain myself, I can make the devil's ears burn hotter when I'm mad. God does not punish children through rape and murder and take them away because the parent did not "cherish " them enough".What gives you the right to second guess any decision a parent makes whether it's right or wrong? Do you have any idea how many parents who lost a child because of a bad choice they made pray 24/7 they could go back and change it? Adam Walsh's mom who thought is was ok to leave Adam in the toy dept. I never blamed them. I don't kick hearts when they are broken and shattered. I'm done with this discussion. I had my say.

 I said what I wanted to. I feel better. I do honestly wish you and all Monkeys a Happy Thanksgivings. IMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 25, 2009, 08:49:24 PM
errr...Razzy....the Red print was from Klaas, who  is Admin/Monkey in charge and all of that....just to let you know...
peace
 and hope that you have a nice Thanksgiving as well...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 25, 2009, 08:55:56 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 

God may have taken a precious gift back from Brad that he gave him...because Shaniya was not cherished as she should have been.jmo

I find this post offensive.I read it yesterday but had to let it go for awhile but couldn't. Are you just razzin` me? So the God you believe in ( certainly not mine)
kinda led Mcneil to brutally rape and murder Shaniya to punish and be a Indian giver with Shainya because Brad didn't cherish her enough according to your standards? Was this same God responsible for Somer Thompsons death to punish her mom because she had to walk home from school? or making John Couey rape and bury alive Jessica Lunsford to punish her dad for not being home that night and spent the night at his g/f? or punish Elizabeth Olten father and brother because they are in prison and used Alyssa to punish them? Did they not cherish them enough?

 Should we blame God for the slaughter at Ft. Hood? or blame the shooter, or the military who actually had red flags for years. God had nothing to do with Shaniya's death or any other child's, nor did Brad, but EVIL did and it goes by the name of baby seller devileggdonor and evil, vile, discusting rapist/ murderer. And I am believer in the death penality, mostly when it comes to crimes against children. IMO

RAZZY - I don't agree with everyone in the forum either but I don't let others beliefs get to me.   You are out of line attacking the poster, please restrain yourself next time.

In my opinion for whatever reason Shaniya's dad let her down.  It didn't make sense to give Antoinette a chance at being a mom.  Sounds like it was well known in the family that Antoinette had substance abuse problems, so is that where you want to leave your 5yr old girl?  So why did he?  I'm affraid we'll never know but it was Shaniya that paid the ultimate price for his lack of judgement.  Everyone in Shaniya's life let her down.


 You're the one who blamed God, I have every right to disagree and defend him/her (whoever you choose to worship/believe in). Do not NOT chastize me( that's up to the mods), it was not against you, it was against your post. And I did restrain myself, I can make the devil's ears burn hotter when I'm mad. God does not punish children through rape and murder and take them away because the parent did not "cherish " them enough".What gives you the right to second guess any decision a parent makes whether it's right or wrong? Do you have any idea how many parents who lost a child because of a bad choice they made pray 24/7 they could go back and change it? Adam Walsh's mom who thought is was ok to leave Adam in the toy dept. I never blamed them. I don't kick hearts when they are broken and shattered. I'm done with this discussion. I had my say.

 I said what I wanted to. I feel better. I do honestly wish you and all Monkeys a Happy Thanksgivings. IMO

Razzy - I'm chastizing you for chastizing another poster.  It was me not her that chastized you and I DO have every right to do that as ADMIN here at SM.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 25, 2009, 08:56:25 PM
Don't miss Dana Pretzer at 9pm ET tonight!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/Pretzer112509.jpg)


Click on the link below:

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/radio.m3u


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 25, 2009, 09:05:26 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 

God may have taken a precious gift back from Brad that he gave him...because Shaniya was not cherished as she should have been.jmo

I find this post offensive.I read it yesterday but had to let it go for awhile but couldn't. Are you just razzin` me? So the God you believe in ( certainly not mine)
kinda led Mcneil to brutally rape and murder Shaniya to punish and be a Indian giver with Shainya because Brad didn't cherish her enough according to your standards? Was this same God responsible for Somer Thompsons death to punish her mom because she had to walk home from school? or making John Couey rape and bury alive Jessica Lunsford to punish her dad for not being home that night and spent the night at his g/f? or punish Elizabeth Olten father and brother because they are in prison and used Alyssa to punish them? Did they not cherish them enough?

 Should we blame God for the slaughter at Ft. Hood? or blame the shooter, or the military who actually had red flags for years. God had nothing to do with Shaniya's death or any other child's, nor did Brad, but EVIL did and it goes by the name of baby seller devileggdonor and evil, vile, discusting rapist/ murderer. And I am believer in the death penality, mostly when it comes to crimes against children. IMO

RAZZY - I don't agree with everyone in the forum either but I don't let others beliefs get to me.   You are out of line attacking the poster, please restrain yourself next time.

In my opinion for whatever reason Shaniya's dad let her down.  It didn't make sense to give Antoinette a chance at being a mom.  Sounds like it was well known in the family that Antoinette had substance abuse problems, so is that where you want to leave your 5yr old girl?  So why did he?  I'm affraid we'll never know but it was Shaniya that paid the ultimate price for his lack of judgement.  Everyone in Shaniya's life let her down.


 You're the one who blamed God, I have every right to disagree and defend him/her (whoever you choose to worship/believe in). Do not NOT chastize me( that's up to the mods), it was not against you, it was against your post. And I did restrain myself, I can make the devil's ears burn hotter when I'm mad. God does not punish children through rape and murder and take them away because the parent did not "cherish " them enough".What gives you the right to second guess any decision a parent makes whether it's right or wrong? Do you have any idea how many parents who lost a child because of a bad choice they made pray 24/7 they could go back and change it? Adam Walsh's mom who thought is was ok to leave Adam in the toy dept. I never blamed them. I don't kick hearts when they are broken and shattered. I'm done with this discussion. I had my say.

 I said what I wanted to. I feel better. I do honestly wish you and all Monkeys a Happy Thanksgivings. IMO

Razzy - I'm chastizing you for chastizing another poster.  It was me not her that chastized you and I DO have every right to do that as ADMIN here at SM.

I stand corrected, I apologize. I didn't realize I was chastizing her. It was her post that offended me. I apologize to mymonkey and the board. I didn't see your name on the post. anyone feel free to give me eyerolls or whack me with a hammer. I have my big girl pants on, I can take it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 25, 2009, 09:13:03 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 

God may have taken a precious gift back from Brad that he gave him...because Shaniya was not cherished as she should have been.jmo

I find this post offensive.I read it yesterday but had to let it go for awhile but couldn't. Are you just razzin` me? So the God you believe in ( certainly not mine)
kinda led Mcneil to brutally rape and murder Shaniya to punish and be a Indian giver with Shainya because Brad didn't cherish her enough according to your standards? Was this same God responsible for Somer Thompsons death to punish her mom because she had to walk home from school? or making John Couey rape and bury alive Jessica Lunsford to punish her dad for not being home that night and spent the night at his g/f? or punish Elizabeth Olten father and brother because they are in prison and used Alyssa to punish them? Did they not cherish them enough?

 Should we blame God for the slaughter at Ft. Hood? or blame the shooter, or the military who actually had red flags for years. God had nothing to do with Shaniya's death or any other child's, nor did Brad, but EVIL did and it goes by the name of baby seller devileggdonor and evil, vile, discusting rapist/ murderer. And I am believer in the death penality, mostly when it comes to crimes against children. IMO

RAZZY - I don't agree with everyone in the forum either but I don't let others beliefs get to me.   You are out of line attacking the poster, please restrain yourself next time.

In my opinion for whatever reason Shaniya's dad let her down.  It didn't make sense to give Antoinette a chance at being a mom.  Sounds like it was well known in the family that Antoinette had substance abuse problems, so is that where you want to leave your 5yr old girl?  So why did he?  I'm affraid we'll never know but it was Shaniya that paid the ultimate price for his lack of judgement.  Everyone in Shaniya's life let her down.


I posted that and maybe did not use the right wording.....Never do I doubt the love God has for a human being, I never ment to offend anyone.....lesson learned I will never discuss God again or politics. ::MonkeyBike::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 25, 2009, 09:18:13 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 

God may have taken a precious gift back from Brad that he gave him...because Shaniya was not cherished as she should have been.jmo

I find this post offensive.I read it yesterday but had to let it go for awhile but couldn't. Are you just razzin` me? So the God you believe in ( certainly not mine)
kinda led Mcneil to brutally rape and murder Shaniya to punish and be a Indian giver with Shainya because Brad didn't cherish her enough according to your standards? Was this same God responsible for Somer Thompsons death to punish her mom because she had to walk home from school? or making John Couey rape and bury alive Jessica Lunsford to punish her dad for not being home that night and spent the night at his g/f? or punish Elizabeth Olten father and brother because they are in prison and used Alyssa to punish them? Did they not cherish them enough?

 Should we blame God for the slaughter at Ft. Hood? or blame the shooter, or the military who actually had red flags for years. God had nothing to do with Shaniya's death or any other child's, nor did Brad, but EVIL did and it goes by the name of baby seller devileggdonor and evil, vile, discusting rapist/ murderer. And I am believer in the death penality, mostly when it comes to crimes against children. IMO

RAZZY - I don't agree with everyone in the forum either but I don't let others beliefs get to me.   You are out of line attacking the poster, please restrain yourself next time.

In my opinion for whatever reason Shaniya's dad let her down.  It didn't make sense to give Antoinette a chance at being a mom.  Sounds like it was well known in the family that Antoinette had substance abuse problems, so is that where you want to leave your 5yr old girl?  So why did he?  I'm affraid we'll never know but it was Shaniya that paid the ultimate price for his lack of judgement.  Everyone in Shaniya's life let her down.


I posted that and maybe did not use the right wording.....Never do I doubt the love God has for a human being, I never ment to offend anyone.....lesson learned I will never discuss God again or politics. ::MonkeyBike::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 25, 2009, 09:23:57 PM
    razzy...Let me just add I was only discussing Shaniya's case not all the ones you mentioned and I will stand firm that Shaniya was let down by the people that was responsible for her well being..and the last thing I want is a monkey mud slinging with another member of sm.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Razzy1 on November 25, 2009, 10:02:54 PM
Cookie I think he said he last saw her on that day, not sure if he spoke to her or not after that. He told her to not forget to call him or something like that.

Why did he send her over to the moms, that is the million dollar question I think. When did he make the decision to allow AD the chance of being a mother to Shaniya? Was it while he was away? Was it before that? Why did the aunt only pack cloths for 2 days, is that what she was told? Was she under the impression she was only going for 2 days? Obviously that was the case or she would have packed more cloths. When did that change? Is this when AD expressed she would like the chance to be a mom, once Shaniya was already there? Was this after AD told the aunt she would not see Shaniya again? I have a feeling there is a piece of this intentionally being kept away from the public because it will cast light on a lack of responsibility Brad had and he is not willing to take responsibility for his role in this whole thing.



Good questions, TG!  Many of us have puzzled over these as well. 

Ya know, at first, I totally empathized with the dad.  Until some of what he said in one interview didn't quite match up with what he said in another.  Neither did some of it match up to what Carey was saying in her interviews.  And when that continued to happen, I had to take a closer look at all of what they both have been saying.  As well as body language etc.  As a result, I feel as you have said, that there is a piece of this intentionally being kept from the public.  I can feel it, can see the tension between Brad and Carey.  IMO, they do not seem to be the united front that Brad seems to need them to appear as. 

Am very curious as to why Ty has been so very silent in the public.  Has anyone heard anything from her?  And yet..... she seems to have played an important role in Shaniya's life, for an unknown amount of time anyway. 

We've wondered.... what happened that made Brad seem to suddenly come to a decision to let Antoinette have a chance to be a mother to Shaniya.  Why now?  Why such a seemingly quick decision?  Was his decision discussed with those who were actually taking care of Shaniya?  Were they in agreement?  Or was this totally Brad's decision without discussion with Carey/Ty?  Did he suddenly announce to them what he had decided and were they horrified, but realizing they didn't have a legal leg to stand on, to stop any of it?  And if so, was that the reason for the break-up between Brad and Ty?  Why does Carey stand by him?  He doesn't seem to come and stand by her when she was being interviewed and having a hard time, but she sure does that for him. 

Many questions.  But am thinking that if/when we can understand the dynamics between Brad/Carey/Ty, we may have our answers as to how such a sweet little girl ended up in the pits of hell.  So very differently than how she had seemed to have been living.  Am I laying blame at Brad's door?  Not for all that happened to Shaniya, no.  For her being over there in the first place, yes.  And THAT, in my opinion, ought to at the very least, come with a charge of negligence.  If even some of what I am thinking is what actually happened with Brad, then until he accepts the responsibility for THAT, then I don't want to hear preaching from him or anything else. 

But no matter what the actual truths are in this case.. I especially do not want to hear again from Brad that "God Did This for a Reason".  Errrrmmmm no He did not!! 



 

God may have taken a precious gift back from Brad that he gave him...because Shaniya was not cherished as she should have been.jmo

I find this post offensive.I read it yesterday but had to let it go for awhile but couldn't. Are you just razzin` me? So the God you believe in ( certainly not mine)
kinda led Mcneil to brutally rape and murder Shaniya to punish and be a Indian giver with Shainya because Brad didn't cherish her enough according to your standards? Was this same God responsible for Somer Thompsons death to punish her mom because she had to walk home from school? or making John Couey rape and bury alive Jessica Lunsford to punish her dad for not being home that night and spent the night at his g/f? or punish Elizabeth Olten father and brother because they are in prison and used Alyssa to punish them? Did they not cherish them enough?

 Should we blame God for the slaughter at Ft. Hood? or blame the shooter, or the military who actually had red flags for years. God had nothing to do with Shaniya's death or any other child's, nor did Brad, but EVIL did and it goes by the name of baby seller devileggdonor and evil, vile, discusting rapist/ murderer. And I am believer in the death penality, mostly when it comes to crimes against children. IMO

RAZZY - I don't agree with everyone in the forum either but I don't let others beliefs get to me.   You are out of line attacking the poster, please restrain yourself next time.

In my opinion for whatever reason Shaniya's dad let her down.  It didn't make sense to give Antoinette a chance at being a mom.  Sounds like it was well known in the family that Antoinette had substance abuse problems, so is that where you want to leave your 5yr old girl?  So why did he?  I'm affraid we'll never know but it was Shaniya that paid the ultimate price for his lack of judgement.  Everyone in Shaniya's life let her down.


I posted that and maybe did not use the right wording.....Never do I doubt the love God has for a human being, I never ment to offend anyone.....lesson learned I will never discuss God again or politics. ::MonkeyBike::
[/quote

____________

ok mymonkey that's a deal, we won't discuss either of them. I took your words to heart and let them get to me, I shouldn't have, I apologize. Boy Klass snuck up on me, I thought it was you replying. Coldwater got me the  1/first time I went to the political board, ACK. Never again. I'm OT. Wonder if and when devilmama's gonna be charged with murder?

 ::MonkeyAngel:: HAPPY THANKSGIVING ::DancingSantaMonkey1::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 25, 2009, 10:07:54 PM
peace to all you good monkeys!
hope that everyone has a blessed Thanksgiving! I am turning in  for tonight but I will check in here tomorrow for any news....take care everyone! night!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 25, 2009, 10:11:55 PM
Happy Thanks Giving to all My Sweet Monkey's  Mods, Monkey  Friends and Future Monkey's..

I Give Thanks to meeting all of you whether we agree to disagree as we are all here for Justice to be Served... God Bless you All..


(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/1650405l65x26opn3.gif)





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on November 25, 2009, 11:24:46 PM
razzy

Shaniya being raped and murdered has been the most emotional case I have seen in my life,
   
we all watched it unfold before our own eyes and that has taken a toll on many. I wish she was as

 well watched over by the adults in her life as she has been on this forum ::MonkeyWaa:: we all want justice for Shaniya and I am afraid that will be long time coming. One more thing that grinds on me is when it is reported that MM and AD have been moved to another location for their safety...I think about how Shaniya did not have a chance to be moved for her protection, so many failed this angel ::MonkeyAngel::





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 26, 2009, 01:36:08 AM
NBA great Shaquille O'Neal pays for Shaniya's funeral
 
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/26/955599



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 26, 2009, 01:41:41 AM
NBA great Shaquille O'Neal pays for Shaniya's funeral
 
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/26/955599



from the above link:


Share this story:  Add to Yahoo Bookmarks   Add to Facebook   Add to Delicious   Add to Twitter   Add to Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon   Add to Digg   Add to MySpace   Add to Google Bookmarks
Who would you like us to say this is from?   
What is your email address?   
What email address would you like us to send it to?   
   
Published: 10:39 PM, Wed Nov 25, 2009
NBA great Shaquille O'Neal pays for Shaniya's funeral
By Nick Needham
Staff writer

 

The story of what happened to Shaniya Davis has affected thousands of people, including NBA star Shaquille O'Neal, who paid for the slain 5-year-old child's funeral.

"He was very touched by the story, and requested how to get in touch with the family," said a Cleveland Cavaliers spokesperson, who confirmed Wednesday that O'Neal paid for the service.

More than 2,000 people attended Shaniya's funeral at Manna Church on Sunday. She was buried at Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery.

Corey Breece, of Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, would not reveal Wednesday the cost of the child's service. However, he said the cost of a child's funeral "averages around $4,500."

Bradley Lockhart, 39, the child's father, could not be reached for comment. A family friend, Vaughn Eason, said the family was out of town for the holidays.

<snip>

Bradley Lockhart and his family had setup a trust fund in memory of Shaniya to help raise money to pay for the funeral.

Eason said last week that any leftover funds earmarked for Shaniya's funeral would go to local charities, groups and agencies that help neglected or abused children.

"Being a law enforcement guy that investigates crimes against children, I wanted to be able to help in some way," Shaq told the Cleveland newspaper.

Shaq completed reserve officer's training when he lived in Los Angeles and Miami, the Cavaliers spokesperson said Wednesday. His last certification was in 2005.

Performing random acts of kindness is nothing new for Shaq.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 26, 2009, 02:13:34 AM
o/t but just goes to show how close you have to keep your kids these days
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116

Thanks Penny, I found this too be very interesting especially because of the last name, it could belong over in Sandra Cantu's thread.

Klass Do you think this should alos be posted on Sandra's thread.  Note the offender's last name.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: no rose colored glasses on November 26, 2009, 09:44:23 AM
NBA great Shaquille O'Neal pays for Shaniya's funeral
 
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/26/955599


Shaquille is a good guy, that was very thoughtful of him to do that  ::MonkeyAngel::       I also believe all in Shaniya's life let her down, but like I said yesterday, the consciences of the people that let her down, will forever eat away at them.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: klaasend on November 26, 2009, 09:55:33 AM
o/t but just goes to show how close you have to keep your kids these days
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116

Thanks Penny, I found this too be very interesting especially because of the last name, it could belong over in Sandra Cantu's thread.

Klass Do you think this should alos be posted on Sandra's thread.  Note the offender's last name.

Good idea, I'll copy it over there  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on November 26, 2009, 10:22:28 AM
Happy Thanksgiving everyone!  My only wish not able to come true is that these babies should be here right now.  God Bless ya'll and your families and the families of the missing and deceased.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: joesamas mama on November 26, 2009, 10:49:46 AM
NBA great Shaquille O'Neal pays for Shaniya's funeral
 
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/26/955599


Shaquille is a good guy, that was very thoughtful of him to do that  ::MonkeyAngel::       I also believe all in Shaniya's life let her down, but like I said yesterday, the consciences of the people that let her down, will forever eat away at them.
ITA No Rose, Shaq is a great person, plus he is very funny and personable. Cheers to you Shaqdaddy for helping with the funeral.

Happy Thanksgiving Monkeys. JSM and Josef


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 26, 2009, 01:02:37 PM
Happy Thanks Giving to all My Sweet Monkey's  Mods, Monkey  Friends and Future Monkey's..

I Give Thanks to meeting all of you whether we agree to disagree as we are all here for Justice to be Served... God Bless you All..


(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/1650405l65x26opn3.gif)





thank you and Happy Thanks Giving to you and all the rest of the monkeys


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 26, 2009, 01:09:06 PM
NBA great Shaquille O'Neal pays for Shaniya's funeral
 
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/26/955599


Shaquille is a good guy, that was very thoughtful of him to do that  ::MonkeyAngel::       I also believe all in Shaniya's life let her down, but like I said yesterday, the consciences of the people that let her down, will forever eat away at them.

that was very kind of Shaq...

wonder where the money will go now if any was collected for Shaniya's funeral....I can only hope that the funds will go to help other missing or exploited children or towards a playground at a children's center with Shaniya's name on it...something so that she will treasured and honored...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cw618 on November 26, 2009, 01:28:42 PM
Quote
Reply #1572 on: Today at 01:09:06 PM
cookie said

that was very kind of Shaq...

wonder where the money will go now if any was collected for Shaniya's funeral....I can only hope that the funds
will go to help other missing or exploited children or towards a playground at a children's center with Shaniya's
 name on it...something so that she will treasured and honored...

i thought i had read here or on the net that, left over money would be for a foundation
in Shaniya's name, or money would go to the missing network
i could have that wrong to many cases, to follow in the last to months
may have been another childs fund, that said that
but i like the idea of a permanet marker for her


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 26, 2009, 01:31:00 PM
Quote
Reply #1572 on: Today at 01:09:06 PM
cookie said

that was very kind of Shaq...

wonder where the money will go now if any was collected for Shaniya's funeral....I can only hope that the funds
will go to help other missing or exploited children or towards a playground at a children's center with Shaniya's
 name on it...something so that she will treasured and honored...

i thought i had read here or on the net that, left over money would be for a foundation
in Shaniya's name, or money would go to the missing network
i could have that wrong to many cases, to follow in the last to months
may have been another childs fund, that said that
but i like the idea of a permanet marker for her
::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::  me too!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: ISpy on November 27, 2009, 01:26:15 AM
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116 (http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116)   O.k., I am livid here!  Since when do suspects get to determine where they will be questioned because they feel embarrassed?!!!   ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::

Days like this I am almost sure authority, logic, common sense, and intelligence are nearly dead in America...or at least in the Judicial system!  Have we become such a touchy-feely, wimpy, spineless, politically correct, sniveling, afraid group of people that we bow down to everyone's demands?  I cannot respect a judge who allows suspects to control when and in what manner they will be questioned, who control both judge and courtroom.  We are reaping the dumbing down of our society.  Wonder what Mr. Suspect is soooo afraid of?  Couldn't be deportation because we don't do that anymore...that's so mean, don't you know.  We just legalize them and give them free healthcare. ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyMad:: Yes, sarcasm intended.  (Whiny Voice)  "Why can't we just all get along?"   Newsflash:  Didn't we learn anything in Kindergarten? Not everyone is nice, obeys the rules, and is kind to one another= plays nice or fair.  It is utter foolishness to pacify and molly-coddle suspects/criminals with kid gloves because "we might offend someone".  Well, I'm sure that young man in the JC Penney's fitting room was mighty offended when he was attacked and molested!  Somehow, he doesn't seem to matter or count.  Mr. Suspect needs to appear in court and answer the charges against him, whether he likes it or not.  Having a relative that worked for them, JC Penney most likely has video of the young man entering the dressing room doorway and the associate (aka suspect) entering after him.  Likewise, I would nearly bet a paycheck there's video of both exiting the dressing room doorway that will more than likely show the young man's demeanor after the attack (not to mention various surveillance cameras on the way to the exits, as well).  If he's guilty, there are no stairwells to hide in in prison.  He might want to think about that for awhile.

On that note, I'm out of here.  Sorry if this is a little strong.  I personally have waaaaaay too many friends this stuff has happened to.  The stats on sexual abuse are so skewed because far more goes unreported.   When it is reported, it's likely to get plea bargained down, particularly if it's a first-offense (like a perp should get some kind of gold star or free pass for only having one offense?!).  Some days I think Justice is not only voluntarily blind, but voluntarily deaf, dumb, and stupid as well.  **No offense intended to anyone with any kind of disability.  I hope none taken.**


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: theboyzmom on November 27, 2009, 08:29:18 AM
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116 (http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116)   O.k., I am livid here!  Since when do suspects get to determine where they will be questioned because they feel embarrassed?!!!   ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::

Days like this I am almost sure authority, logic, common sense, and intelligence are nearly dead in America...or at least in the Judicial system!  Have we become such a touchy-feely, wimpy, spineless, politically correct, sniveling, afraid group of people that we bow down to everyone's demands?  I cannot respect a judge who allows suspects to control when and in what manner they will be questioned, who control both judge and courtroom.  We are reaping the dumbing down of our society.  Wonder what Mr. Suspect is soooo afraid of?  Couldn't be deportation because we don't do that anymore...that's so mean, don't you know.  We just legalize them and give them free healthcare. ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyMad:: Yes, sarcasm intended.  (Whiny Voice)  "Why can't we just all get along?"   Newsflash:  Didn't we learn anything in Kindergarten? Not everyone is nice, obeys the rules, and is kind to one another= plays nice or fair.  It is utter foolishness to pacify and molly-coddle suspects/criminals with kid gloves because "we might offend someone".  Well, I'm sure that young man in the JC Penney's fitting room was mighty offended when he was attacked and molested!  Somehow, he doesn't seem to matter or count.  Mr. Suspect needs to appear in court and answer the charges against him, whether he likes it or not.  Having a relative that worked for them, JC Penney most likely has video of the young man entering the dressing room doorway and the associate (aka suspect) entering after him.  Likewise, I would nearly bet a paycheck there's video of both exiting the dressing room doorway that will more than likely show the young man's demeanor after the attack (not to mention various surveillance cameras on the way to the exits, as well).  If he's guilty, there are no stairwells to hide in in prison.  He might want to think about that for awhile.

On that note, I'm out of here.  Sorry if this is a little strong.  I personally have waaaaaay too many friends this stuff has happened to.  The stats on sexual abuse are so skewed because far more goes unreported.   When it is reported, it's likely to get plea bargained down, particularly if it's a first-offense (like a perp should get some kind of gold star or free pass for only having one offense?!).  Some days I think Justice is not only voluntarily blind, but voluntarily deaf, dumb, and stupid as well.  **No offense intended to anyone with any kind of disability.  I hope none taken.**


I just read the story and the line about him getting to stand in a stairwell struck me too. Wonder if he gave half that much thought to the little boy when he attacked him?  I am so tired of good people having to bow to the evil of this world. I know the guy is not convicted yet but really? I am sure this fool would appeal a conviction if the little boy did not appear in open court to testify against him - but yet this animal is special and needs to be protected. Let me protect him - I will make sure that he is not afraid of gen pop - he would be glad to get there when I got done protecting him!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 27, 2009, 10:23:01 AM
ISpy.....You speak for me too in your above post!!! grrrrrrr.....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 27, 2009, 02:47:17 PM
o/t but just goes to show how close you have to keep your kids these days
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116

Thanks Penny, I found this too be very interesting especially because of the last name, it could belong over in Sandra Cantu's thread.

Klass Do you think this should alos be posted on Sandra's thread.  Note the offender's last name.
what? why? i don't get it...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 27, 2009, 02:54:13 PM
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116 (http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116)   O.k., I am livid here!  Since when do suspects get to determine where they will be questioned because they feel embarrassed?!!!   ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::

Days like this I am almost sure authority, logic, common sense, and intelligence are nearly dead in America...or at least in the Judicial system!  Have we become such a touchy-feely, wimpy, spineless, politically correct, sniveling, afraid group of people that we bow down to everyone's demands?  I cannot respect a judge who allows suspects to control when and in what manner they will be questioned, who control both judge and courtroom.  We are reaping the dumbing down of our society.  Wonder what Mr. Suspect is soooo afraid of?  Couldn't be deportation because we don't do that anymore...that's so mean, don't you know.  We just legalize them and give them free healthcare. ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyMad:: Yes, sarcasm intended.  (Whiny Voice)  "Why can't we just all get along?"   Newsflash:  Didn't we learn anything in Kindergarten? Not everyone is nice, obeys the rules, and is kind to one another= plays nice or fair.  It is utter foolishness to pacify and molly-coddle suspects/criminals with kid gloves because "we might offend someone".  Well, I'm sure that young man in the JC Penney's fitting room was mighty offended when he was attacked and molested!  Somehow, he doesn't seem to matter or count.  Mr. Suspect needs to appear in court and answer the charges against him, whether he likes it or not.  Having a relative that worked for them, JC Penney most likely has video of the young man entering the dressing room doorway and the associate (aka suspect) entering after him.  Likewise, I would nearly bet a paycheck there's video of both exiting the dressing room doorway that will more than likely show the young man's demeanor after the attack (not to mention various surveillance cameras on the way to the exits, as well).  If he's guilty, there are no stairwells to hide in in prison.  He might want to think about that for awhile.

On that note, I'm out of here.  Sorry if this is a little strong.  I personally have waaaaaay too many friends this stuff has happened to.  The stats on sexual abuse are so skewed because far more goes unreported.   When it is reported, it's likely to get plea bargained down, particularly if it's a first-offense (like a perp should get some kind of gold star or free pass for only having one offense?!).  Some days I think Justice is not only voluntarily blind, but voluntarily deaf, dumb, and stupid as well.  **No offense intended to anyone with any kind of disability.  I hope none taken.**

well he will most likely end up in the worcester house of correction and if he does he knows what he is in for.... i know a total criminal since i was in grammar school was in there for selling drugs or gun charges or something.. anyways they keep the pervs in protective custody but they pass by reg inmates in halls divided by chain link fence... my "friend" "shanked 4 of them while they were walking by thru the fence... if they want you they will get to you.. this is also the same prison where all the guards are high school buddies with the inmates and there was even some emt lady having sex with all the studs a while back... my point being... he will get whats coming to him so let him avoid the cameras all he wants


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on November 27, 2009, 04:16:52 PM
o/t but just goes to show how close you have to keep your kids these days
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116

Thanks Penny, I found this too be very interesting especially because of the last name, it could belong over in Sandra Cantu's thread.

Klass Do you think this should alos be posted on Sandra's thread.  Note the offender's last name.
what? why? i don't get it...

In Sandra's case a Timothy Lawless was arrested about the same time Melissa Huckaby was and had similar horrible charges against him.  A thread was started to see if those two were related.  There is a lot of research done over there.  The last name of the offender in the article you found had come up numerous times over there.  If you look the last thread in Sandra's case it may explain better than I can.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on November 27, 2009, 04:50:21 PM
o/t but just goes to show how close you have to keep your kids these days
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091125/NEWS/911259988/1116

Thanks Penny, I found this too be very interesting especially because of the last name, it could belong over in Sandra Cantu's thread.

Klass Do you think this should alos be posted on Sandra's thread.  Note the offender's last name.
what? why? i don't get it...

In Sandra's case a Timothy Lawless was arrested about the same time Melissa Huckaby was and had similar horrible charges against him.  A thread was started to see if those two were related.  There is a lot of research done over there.  The last name of the offender in the article you found had come up numerous times over there.  If you look the last thread in Sandra's case it may explain better than I can.
okay gotcha...
although gomes is like a hispanic smith and worcester mass is clear across the country from sandra
i had just posted it as an example of no matter how careful you think you are it is never enough when people have a more sinister plan that involves your child.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Sister on November 27, 2009, 06:45:42 PM
Shaq Pays for Funeral of NC GirlAP
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. (Nov. 26) Basketball star Shaquille O'Neal paid for the funeral of a 5-year-old North Carolina girl after being moved by national news coverage of the case of Shaniya Davis, who police say was kidnapped and killed.
The Cleveland Cavaliers player was touched by the stories he saw and got in touch with the family to see what he could do to help, a spokeswoman for O'Neal said Thursday.
More than 2,000 people attended the girl's funeral Sunday. Her body was found Nov. 16 beside a rural road.
Her mother, Antionette Davis, who had reported the child missing six days earlier, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution. Mario McNeill is charged with murder, rape and kidnapping in the case.
``I was sitting at home watching it on the news and the story brought a tear to my eye,'' O'Neal told The Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper.
Corey Breece, of Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, which handled the service, declined to tell the Fayetteville ******* newspaper how much it cost but added that a child's funeral ``averages around $4,500.''
A man who answered the phone at the funeral home Thursday told the AP that only the owner could comment and that he was away.
Shaniya Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, and his family had set up a trust fund in memory of Shaniya to help raise money to pay for the funeral. Lockhart was not available to talk Thursday, said a man who answered the phone at his home.
O'Neal is recovering from a shoulder injury that has sidelined him for six straight games since getting hurt Nov. 12 against Miami.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 27, 2009, 09:50:58 PM
I haven't seen this posted yet.  It's a video by the police chief.  My POS internet service that goes slower than a hamster in a wheel, is refusing to load it.  Anyone want to watch and give the run down on it?  Thanks in advance!   ::MonkeyKiss:: 


Fayetteville police chief reflects on month

Wednesday - 4:06pm

Fayetteville police continue to follow up on leads in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Nicole Davis, Chief Tom Bergamine said Wednesday.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6497955/ (http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6497955/)







Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 27, 2009, 10:27:06 PM
I haven't seen this posted yet.  It's a video by the police chief.  My POS internet service that goes slower than a hamster in a wheel, is refusing to load it.  Anyone want to watch and give the run down on it?  Thanks in advance!   ::MonkeyKiss:: 


Fayetteville police chief reflects on month

Wednesday - 4:06pm

Fayetteville police continue to follow up on leads in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Nicole Davis, Chief Tom Bergamine said Wednesday.



http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6497955/ (http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6497955/)







Watched the video and I like the chief!!

Does not expect any more suspects to be arrested, but they are getting lots of tips and are following up
on all the leads that they get.
Reporter asked if there would be additional charges anainst AD.  Chief said:  No comment
The chief said that even hardened police officers have had a hard time dealing with the charges against AD.
Chief is proud of all of the law enforcement bodies involved.  All have worked together to help solve the case.
Reporter asked the chief if they ever considered putting Antoinette on TV to appeal to the public for the
safe return of Shaniya.  Chief got a sly grin on his face and said: NO!
Reporter asked about Shaniya not being in school.....chief said that is all part of the investigation.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on November 28, 2009, 07:21:10 AM
http://www.afro.com/tabId/551/itemId/5405/Father-of-Slain-NC-Girl-Speaks-Out.aspx

Father of Slain N.C. Girl Speaks Out
Last Updated Nov 2009
Printer Friendly Version

By AFRO Staff
(November 27, 2009) - The father of a five-year-old North Carolina deeply regrets his decision to send the child to live with her mother, according to an Associated Press report.

Bradley Lockhart sent his daughter, Shaniya Davis, to live with her mother in early October just before leaving for an out-of-state business trip. Antoinette Davis reported her daughter missing on Nov. 10.

But police have charged Davis with prostituting the child, and Lockhart believes she was trafficked to settle one of her mother’s drug debts, according to ABC News. Police believe Shaniya Davis was raped and killed the same day she went missing.

“We obviously make decisions in life that sometimes have repercussions or adverse situations that drift from our decision,” Lockhart told the AP. “We just have to continue to believe in God and hope that our decisions are the correct ones.”

One of Davis’ acquaintances, Mario McNeill, is charged with the murder, rape, and kidnapping of the 5-year-old girl.

Lockhart said he had no reason to believe Shaniya wouldn’t be safe with her mother.

“I don’t think I really missed any [warning signs],” Lockhart said. “Of course there’s always speculation. There are always things you could look at and say, well maybe, maybe not.”

The North Carolina Child Fatality Task Force will review their records on Davis, who also has a seven-year-old son and is currently pregnant with another child.

“This is a family that was already known to social service workers down there,” task force co-chairman Tom Vitaglione said. “[The workers] are all very distraught about the whole thing.”
The task force will determine when local social services workers first contacted the family, the status of their case in that system and whether proper procedures were followed.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on November 28, 2009, 05:56:59 PM
I haven't seen this posted yet.  It's a video by the police chief.  My POS internet service that goes slower than a hamster in a wheel, is refusing to load it.  Anyone want to watch and give the run down on it?  Thanks in advance!   ::MonkeyKiss:: 


Fayetteville police chief reflects on month

Wednesday - 4:06pm

Fayetteville police continue to follow up on leads in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Nicole Davis, Chief Tom Bergamine said Wednesday.



http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6497955/ (http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6497955/)







Watched the video and I like the chief!!

Does not expect any more suspects to be arrested, but they are getting lots of tips and are following up
on all the leads that they get.
Reporter asked if there would be additional charges anainst AD.  Chief said:  No comment
The chief said that even hardened police officers have had a hard time dealing with the charges against AD.
Chief is proud of all of the law enforcement bodies involved.  All have worked together to help solve the case.
Reporter asked the chief if they ever considered putting Antoinette on TV to appeal to the public for the
safe return of Shaniya.  Chief got a sly grin on his face and said: NO!
Reporter asked about Shaniya not being in school.....chief said that is all part of the investigation.

Thanks Magnolia!  Wonder what kind of tips they are getting?  Sounds like Shaniya stole the hearts of LE as well!  I saw the reporter for HLN when they found her, had tears in his eyes. 
Thanks again for letting us know what was on this video!   ::DancingSantaMonkey1::


   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on November 29, 2009, 12:18:45 AM
I haven't seen this posted yet.  It's a video by the police chief.  My POS internet service that goes slower than a hamster in a wheel, is refusing to load it.  Anyone want to watch and give the run down on it?  Thanks in advance!   ::MonkeyKiss:: 


Fayetteville police chief reflects on month

Wednesday - 4:06pm

Fayetteville police continue to follow up on leads in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Nicole Davis, Chief Tom Bergamine said Wednesday.



http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6497955/ (http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/6497955/)







Watched the video and I like the chief!!

Does not expect any more suspects to be arrested, but they are getting lots of tips and are following up
on all the leads that they get.
Reporter asked if there would be additional charges anainst AD.  Chief said:  No comment
The chief said that even hardened police officers have had a hard time dealing with the charges against AD.
Chief is proud of all of the law enforcement bodies involved.  All have worked together to help solve the case.
Reporter asked the chief if they ever considered putting Antoinette on TV to appeal to the public for the
safe return of Shaniya.  Chief got a sly grin on his face and said: NO!
Reporter asked about Shaniya not being in school.....chief said that is all part of the investigation.

Thanks Magnolia!  Wonder what kind of tips they are getting?  Sounds like Shaniya stole the hearts of LE as well!  I saw the reporter for HLN when they found her, had tears in his eyes. 
Thanks again for letting us know what was on this video!   ::DancingSantaMonkey1::


   


The Chief did not elaborate on what kind of tips, but he did say they have come in from tip lines
and Crime Watch.
He made it seem like they knew what had happened to Shaniya after just a few hours.
It seems that all of the different law enforcement groups have worked closely together on
the case because Shaniya did touch their hearts.
Seems like LE there thinks the same about the people involved as most Monkeys do.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2009, 09:04:32 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!

This case just continues to rip my heart. I understand the reasons, but I wish that LE would answer more questions.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on November 29, 2009, 09:41:42 AM
http://primewriter.com/news-1246-headlines/?p=1164
Shaniya Davis investigation causes state of North Carolina to review DSS contact with Antoinette Davis
Posted by Melissa Finlay  On November - 28 - 2009
Shaniya Davis investigation causes state of North Carolina to review DSS contact with Antoinette Davis

The Shaniya Davis investigation focuses on contact that DSS had with the slain girl’s family. The little five-year-old went missing from her Fayetteville, North Carolina home on November 10, 2009. Her body was discovered in a wooded area on November 16, 2009. Shaniya Davis had been raped and asphyxiated and Mario McNeill has been charged with her kidnapping, rape, and murder. However, her mother, Antoinette Davis faces charges that she sold her daughter into prostitution. Now, DSS wants to see how they missed signs that Antoinette Davis was an unfit mother.


According to reports, DSs had previously investigated Antoinette Davis regarding her care for her seven year old son. The case was closed and Antoinette was allowed to keep custody of her son. Though DSS officials refuse to comment publicly on the case as it is an ongoing criminal investigation, they have stated that are going to review all DSS contact with Antoinette Davis and will provide those results to the North Carolina Child Fatality Task Force. The North Carolina Child Fatality Task Force documents child deaths in the state of Florida then makes appropriate recommendations based upon the findings. The information is used to create laws that help protect children.
Though Mario McNeill has been arrested and charged, as well as Shaniya Davis’ mother Antoinette Davis, the investigation continues and authorities continue to follow up on leads in the case. The case will be prosecuted through Cumberland County, North Carolina and authorities are working to ensure that they leave no stone unturned.


Shaniya Davis’ father is scheduled to have a one on one interview with HLN’s Nancy Grace on Monday, November 30, 2009.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cece on November 29, 2009, 03:27:20 PM
(http://i732.photobucket.com/albums/ww328/seasidecece/davis505.jpg)

Lighting a candle for Shaniya:

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=snd


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on November 29, 2009, 07:59:02 PM
Levi Page Show.11/29/2009 10:00 PM     

It Happens Every Day: Inside the World of a Sex Crimes D. A." Robin will also give the prosecutors perspective on the explosive crime stories in the news, including the Shaniya Davis & Caylee Anthony cases.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/levipage/2009/11/30/inside-the-life-of-a-sex-crimes-da


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2009, 08:06:38 PM
Brad Lockhart is on Nancy Grace (HLN) right now.

Janet
5:05 PM PT



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 30, 2009, 08:21:50 PM
Brad Lockhart is on Nancy Grace (HLN) right now.

Janet
5:05 PM PT



what was said? I missed it I guess cause they are talking about Tiger Woods now...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 30, 2009, 08:56:07 PM
Brad is on the show now..not really saying too much...NG is blubbering all over him..not asking him any hard questions so far...he seems to be coping well...is now talking with others in trying to stop child trafficking...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 30, 2009, 09:03:57 PM
I think Brad is suffering plenty without being attacked... JMO.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 30, 2009, 09:10:31 PM
OT please ignore as I am testing how to do this stuff  ::MonkeyShovel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on November 30, 2009, 09:21:33 PM
I think Brad is suffering plenty without being attacked... JMO.

attacked by whom?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on November 30, 2009, 09:40:47 PM
I think Brad is suffering plenty without being attacked... JMO.

attacked by whom?


By Nancy Grace is what I meant.......  ::MonkeyBike::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on December 01, 2009, 09:43:31 AM
O/t but I posted in luke finch thread. I just found out that the coast guard found him in the water. That is all the email said. It came from wesh I just don't get why just someone tell me why?  Jeez


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: luvmyboys on December 01, 2009, 09:49:20 AM
Wait a minute. I am sorry he may be ok. It says that he was found did not say dead or alive. So sorry. I feel like a dummy


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on December 01, 2009, 10:35:33 AM
I think Brad is suffering plenty without being attacked... JMO.

I think she was very rude to Brads attorney (Freed?). That little crack: "You're a very good lawyer because you change your subjects", was uncalled for. I like what NG stands for, but she has a LOT of misguided anger...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 01, 2009, 11:14:29 AM
O/t but I posted in luke finch thread. I just found out that the coast guard found him in the water. That is all the email said. It came from wesh I just don't get why just someone tell me why?  Jeez

Here's Luke's thread:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6586.new#new (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6586.new#new)



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 01, 2009, 11:27:06 AM
I think Brad is suffering plenty without being attacked... JMO.

I think she was very rude to Brads attorney (Freed?). That little crack: "You're a very good lawyer because you change your subjects", was uncalled for. I like what NG stands for, but she has a LOT of misguided anger...

I agree about NG.  Seems she gets worse as time goes by.  Am thinking it's long past time for her to bow out of that show, get a replacement (Mike Brooks etc), and get herself into some much needed therapy.  IMO.

Hmmm.. Brad's attorney is Freed?  Somer Thompson's mom has an attorney with that last name too.     Very weird if it's the same attorney, considering they aren't even in the same state!  ::MonkeyEek::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 01, 2009, 11:43:56 AM
Shaq Pays for Funeral of NC GirlAP
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. (Nov. 26) Basketball star Shaquille O'Neal paid for the funeral of a 5-year-old North Carolina girl after being moved by national news coverage of the case of Shaniya Davis, who police say was kidnapped and killed.
The Cleveland Cavaliers player was touched by the stories he saw and got in touch with the family to see what he could do to help, a spokeswoman for O'Neal said Thursday.
More than 2,000 people attended the girl's funeral Sunday. Her body was found Nov. 16 beside a rural road.
Her mother, Antionette Davis, who had reported the child missing six days earlier, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution. Mario McNeill is charged with murder, rape and kidnapping in the case.
``I was sitting at home watching it on the news and the story brought a tear to my eye,'' O'Neal told The Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper.
Corey Breece, of Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, which handled the service, declined to tell the Fayetteville ******* newspaper how much it cost but added that a child's funeral ``averages around $4,500.''
A man who answered the phone at the funeral home Thursday told the AP that only the owner could comment and that he was away.
Shaniya Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, and his family had set up a trust fund in memory of Shaniya to help raise money to pay for the funeral. Lockhart was not available to talk Thursday, said a man who answered the phone at his home.
O'Neal is recovering from a shoulder injury that has sidelined him for six straight games since getting hurt Nov. 12 against Miami.


 Hi everyone, just catching up on all the threads after being awol for the holiday.
It was a  generous gesture for O'Neal to pay for the funeral but I sure don't see why the family accepted or even asked for donations. Might be petty of me but the house, cars and look of dad's lifestyle didn't appear to be one of being the least bit needy. Sometimes these tragedies seem to confuse me. Shaniyas dad is sort of a victim in a sense (and I don't want to start the dad debate again) BUT, ultimately he didn't see or check for her well being, it seems like paying for her funeral should have been his responsibility, he isn't living near the poverty line. oh well, guess it's not the real issue, making sure that the rapists/pimps/killers pay for the crime is. Shaniya deserves that.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 01, 2009, 02:54:35 PM
Shaq Pays for Funeral of NC GirlAP
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. (Nov. 26) Basketball star Shaquille O'Neal paid for the funeral of a 5-year-old North Carolina girl after being moved by national news coverage of the case of Shaniya Davis, who police say was kidnapped and killed.
The Cleveland Cavaliers player was touched by the stories he saw and got in touch with the family to see what he could do to help, a spokeswoman for O'Neal said Thursday.
More than 2,000 people attended the girl's funeral Sunday. Her body was found Nov. 16 beside a rural road.
Her mother, Antionette Davis, who had reported the child missing six days earlier, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution. Mario McNeill is charged with murder, rape and kidnapping in the case.
``I was sitting at home watching it on the news and the story brought a tear to my eye,'' O'Neal told The Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper.
Corey Breece, of Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, which handled the service, declined to tell the Fayetteville ******* newspaper how much it cost but added that a child's funeral ``averages around $4,500.''
A man who answered the phone at the funeral home Thursday told the AP that only the owner could comment and that he was away.
Shaniya Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, and his family had set up a trust fund in memory of Shaniya to help raise money to pay for the funeral. Lockhart was not available to talk Thursday, said a man who answered the phone at his home.
O'Neal is recovering from a shoulder injury that has sidelined him for six straight games since getting hurt Nov. 12 against Miami.


 Hi everyone, just catching up on all the threads after being awol for the holiday.
It was a  generous gesture for O'Neal to pay for the funeral but I sure don't see why the family accepted or even asked for donations. Might be petty of me but the house, cars and look of dad's lifestyle didn't appear to be one of being the least bit needy. Sometimes these tragedies seem to confuse me. Shaniyas dad is sort of a victim in a sense (and I don't want to start the dad debate again) BUT, ultimately he didn't see or check for her well being, it seems like paying for her funeral should have been his responsibility, he isn't living near the poverty line. oh well, guess it's not the real issue, making sure that the rapists/pimps/killers pay for the crime is. Shaniya deserves that.

mizjay...I agree.. don't know why this family had asked for donations...I had kindof thought at the time that by Brad paying for her final resting place would be something that her family would want to do for her....but I guess if Shaq really wanted to do it for Shaniya, how could the family turn him down? hopefully Brad and his family will pay it forward and help another child's family out who might need it....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on December 01, 2009, 03:07:39 PM
I think Brad is suffering plenty without being attacked... JMO.

I think she was very rude to Brads attorney (Freed?). That little crack: "You're a very good lawyer because you change your subjects", was uncalled for. I like what NG stands for, but she has a LOT of misguided anger...

I agree about NG.  Seems she gets worse as time goes by.  Am thinking it's long past time for her to bow out of that show, get a replacement (Mike Brooks etc), and get herself into some much needed therapy.  IMO.

Hmmm.. Brad's attorney is Freed?  Somer Thompson's mom has an attorney with that last name too.     Very weird if it's the same attorney, considering they aren't even in the same state!  ::MonkeyEek::




I didn't realize- he's the same guy- Mike Freed.

Diena & Freed on 'Today'
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/33881227#33881227

^ Skip to 2:48

Brad & Freed on NG

http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/crime/2009/12/01/ng.father.speaks.cnn.html



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 01, 2009, 03:13:16 PM
wonder if Somer's mom reached out to Brad when Shaniya was found and things sortof went from there about the attorneys? talking, exchanging support for one another....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 01, 2009, 03:20:16 PM
Shaq Pays for Funeral of NC GirlAP
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. (Nov. 26) Basketball star Shaquille O'Neal paid for the funeral of a 5-year-old North Carolina girl after being moved by national news coverage of the case of Shaniya Davis, who police say was kidnapped and killed.
The Cleveland Cavaliers player was touched by the stories he saw and got in touch with the family to see what he could do to help, a spokeswoman for O'Neal said Thursday.
More than 2,000 people attended the girl's funeral Sunday. Her body was found Nov. 16 beside a rural road.
Her mother, Antionette Davis, who had reported the child missing six days earlier, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution. Mario McNeill is charged with murder, rape and kidnapping in the case.
``I was sitting at home watching it on the news and the story brought a tear to my eye,'' O'Neal told The Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper.
Corey Breece, of Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, which handled the service, declined to tell the Fayetteville ******* newspaper how much it cost but added that a child's funeral ``averages around $4,500.''
A man who answered the phone at the funeral home Thursday told the AP that only the owner could comment and that he was away.
Shaniya Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, and his family had set up a trust fund in memory of Shaniya to help raise money to pay for the funeral. Lockhart was not available to talk Thursday, said a man who answered the phone at his home.
O'Neal is recovering from a shoulder injury that has sidelined him for six straight games since getting hurt Nov. 12 against Miami.


 Hi everyone, just catching up on all the threads after being awol for the holiday.
It was a  generous gesture for O'Neal to pay for the funeral but I sure don't see why the family accepted or even asked for donations. Might be petty of me but the house, cars and look of dad's lifestyle didn't appear to be one of being the least bit needy. Sometimes these tragedies seem to confuse me. Shaniyas dad is sort of a victim in a sense (and I don't want to start the dad debate again) BUT, ultimately he didn't see or check for her well being, it seems like paying for her funeral should have been his responsibility, he isn't living near the poverty line. oh well, guess it's not the real issue, making sure that the rapists/pimps/killers pay for the crime is. Shaniya deserves that.

mizjay...I agree.. don't know why this family had asked for donations...I had kindof thought at the time that by Brad paying for her final resting place would be something that her family would want to do for her....but I guess if Shaq really wanted to do it for Shaniya, how could the family turn him down? hopefully Brad and his family will pay it forward and help another child's family out who might need it....

 COOKIE   Well, I would tend to agree that Shaq's offer to kindly relieve them of that burden would be hard to refuse but IIRC the fund was already set up before his help was given. I don't know why it irritates me, I was one of the big dad supporters in the beginning but somehow I feel like it exploits her death by becoming financially needy after your child has been murdered when prior to that the family appeared to live very comfortably. Especially when Shaniya's death would most likely not happened had there been more concern for the situation she was delivered into, personally I would've felt so much responsibility for it, as my terrible final parental act to her I would want to pay for her services.
So, I guess I'll try to let it quit annoying me and hope like you said they'll pay it forward for somebody else in need.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 01, 2009, 03:57:36 PM
mizjay's post:

COOKIE   Well, I would tend to agree that Shaq's offer to kindly relieve them of that burden would be hard to refuse but IIRC the fund was already set up before his help was given. I don't know why it irritates me, I was one of the big dad supporters in the beginning but somehow I feel like it exploits her death by becoming financially needy after your child has been murdered when prior to that the family appeared to live very comfortably. Especially when Shaniya's death would most likely not happened had there been more concern for the situation she was delivered into, personally I would've felt so much responsibility for it, as my terrible final parental act to her I would want to pay for her services.
So, I guess I'll try to let it quit annoying me and hope like you said they'll pay it forward for somebody else in need.

mizjay...I totally get you and what you are feeling and saying...a lot of my own feelings expressed by you...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Miki Monkey on December 01, 2009, 04:23:47 PM
Shaq Pays for Funeral of NC GirlAP
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. (Nov. 26) Basketball star Shaquille O'Neal paid for the funeral of a 5-year-old North Carolina girl after being moved by national news coverage of the case of Shaniya Davis, who police say was kidnapped and killed.
The Cleveland Cavaliers player was touched by the stories he saw and got in touch with the family to see what he could do to help, a spokeswoman for O'Neal said Thursday.
More than 2,000 people attended the girl's funeral Sunday. Her body was found Nov. 16 beside a rural road.
Her mother, Antionette Davis, who had reported the child missing six days earlier, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution. Mario McNeill is charged with murder, rape and kidnapping in the case.
``I was sitting at home watching it on the news and the story brought a tear to my eye,'' O'Neal told The Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper.
Corey Breece, of Rogers and Breece Funeral Home, which handled the service, declined to tell the Fayetteville ******* newspaper how much it cost but added that a child's funeral ``averages around $4,500.''
A man who answered the phone at the funeral home Thursday told the AP that only the owner could comment and that he was away.
Shaniya Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, and his family had set up a trust fund in memory of Shaniya to help raise money to pay for the funeral. Lockhart was not available to talk Thursday, said a man who answered the phone at his home.
O'Neal is recovering from a shoulder injury that has sidelined him for six straight games since getting hurt Nov. 12 against Miami.


 Hi everyone, just catching up on all the threads after being awol for the holiday.
It was a  generous gesture for O'Neal to pay for the funeral but I sure don't see why the family accepted or even asked for donations. Might be petty of me but the house, cars and look of dad's lifestyle didn't appear to be one of being the least bit needy. Sometimes these tragedies seem to confuse me. Shaniyas dad is sort of a victim in a sense (and I don't want to start the dad debate again) BUT, ultimately he didn't see or check for her well being, it seems like paying for her funeral should have been his responsibility, he isn't living near the poverty line. oh well, guess it's not the real issue, making sure that the rapists/pimps/killers pay for the crime is. Shaniya deserves that.

mizjay...I agree.. don't know why this family had asked for donations...I had kindof thought at the time that by Brad paying for her final resting place would be something that her family would want to do for her....but I guess if Shaq really wanted to do it for Shaniya, how could the family turn him down? hopefully Brad and his family will pay it forward and help another child's family out who might need it....

 COOKIE   Well, I would tend to agree that Shaq's offer to kindly relieve them of that burden would be hard to refuse but IIRC the fund was already set up before his help was given. I don't know why it irritates me, I was one of the big dad supporters in the beginning but somehow I feel like it exploits her death by becoming financially needy after your child has been murdered when prior to that the family appeared to live very comfortably. Especially when Shaniya's death would most likely not happened had there been more concern for the situation she was delivered into, personally I would've felt so much responsibility for it, as my terrible final parental act to her I would want to pay for her services.
So, I guess I'll try to let it quit annoying me and hope like you said they'll pay it forward for somebody else in need.

Thank you for saying what I didn't have the courage to say...I think the least daddy could do was pay for his little girls funeral expenses, no fund was needed IMO.  If he had done his job in the first place he wouldn't be begging for cash now..It isn't like he is even close to being needy unless it's the need to get in front of a camera and perform. Can't believe people feel sorry for him. If this was a mother she would have been pilloried. Why is everyone giving him a free pass. He needs to own up to his neglect. As for Shaq, he is and always will be a very gracious human being.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 01, 2009, 04:48:39 PM
MIKI      At this point in the tragedy that should never have happened in the first place, i totally agree with you. He should man up and accept his responsibility and his culpability
for what happened. I would respect him for owning up to his poor choice, I would feel sympathy for his anguishing guilt, I would know that he recognized his failure but it rings hollow to me all this talk of forgiveness and being such a big hearted fellow to want to give Antoinette a crack (pun intended) at being a mother.
I would be crazy with guilt and anger.  Maybe when the camera isn't rolling he feels that way or he has mastered all of these hateful impulses that I would have??  I do admire peaceful, turn the other cheek folks but in a situation like this I don't understand it. I don't want to come across like a heathen or anything but ....

Question~ why does Brad appear with a lawyer now? I've kinda stopped watching NG, my heathen impulses make me want to smack her sometimes.  ::MonkeyCool::   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: annemarie on December 01, 2009, 06:13:32 PM
I think Brad is suffering plenty without being attacked... JMO.

I think she was very rude to Brads attorney (Freed?). That little crack: "You're a very good lawyer because you change your subjects", was uncalled for. I like what NG stands for, but she has a LOT of misguided anger...

I agree about NG.  Seems she gets worse as time goes by.  Am thinking it's long past time for her to bow out of that show, get a replacement (Mike Brooks etc), and get herself into some much needed therapy.  IMO.

Hmmm.. Brad's attorney is Freed?  Somer Thompson's mom has an attorney with that last name too.     Very weird if it's the same attorney, considering they aren't even in the same state!  ::MonkeyEek::


The lawyer is from Jacksonville Fla, I think...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 01, 2009, 10:51:13 PM
Annemarie - Thanks!  Seems weird to me that Brad got an atty from so far away from him.  And for that matter, weird that he got an atty from anywhere.  IMO.   


Justagirl - Thanks for finding those links!  So it is the same atty.  Hmmm..  Am wondering what the heck he needs an atty for. 


Cookie - Could be what you are wondering, perhaps Somer's did contact Brad.  Seem to remember something like that in the media, her offering support to him or some such.   It just surprises me that anyone who hasn't been accused of breaking the law would hire an atty. 

But I live under a rock anyway, what do I know..  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on December 01, 2009, 11:10:54 PM
Annemarie - Thanks!  Seems weird to me that Brad got an atty from so far away from him.  And for that matter, weird that he got an atty from anywhere.  IMO.   


Justagirl - Thanks for finding those links!  So it is the same atty.  Hmmm..  Am wondering what the heck he needs an atty for. 


Cookie - Could be what you are wondering, perhaps Somer's did contact Brad.  Seem to remember something like that in the media, her offering support to him or some such.   It just surprises me that anyone who hasn't been accused of breaking the law would hire an atty. 
But I live under a rock anyway, what do I know..  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Media representative, maybe?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on December 02, 2009, 12:03:22 AM
I think media representative is probably most likely.  To make sure he doesn't say anything that could be misconstrued to the media?  He is not a public speaker and the public will take the least thing said incorrectly and jump all over it!!  Before you know it.... everything is blown out of proportion.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: HopeForAll on December 02, 2009, 07:19:38 PM
 ::MonkeyMad::Common sense tells me that if a man is going to be a serious father he would do the right thing from the beginning , such as, putting his name on the birth certificate, getting legal custody or at least a legal agreement between  mom and dad.  IMO there is no real reason as to why he would not have put her in Carey's custody. That would have been the best choice for HER.... unless he didn't want to be legally responsible for his child.  ::MonkeyMad::I too feel Carey will turn on Brad. His motive for letting Shaniya go to AD instead of other family members is suspect. I am implying that  he may have been thinking  only of HIMSELF when he made this "bad decision" and no more. :shock:


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 02, 2009, 07:23:06 PM
::MonkeyMad::Common sense tells me that if a man is going to be a serious father he would do the right thing from the beginning , such as, putting his name on the birth certificate, getting legal custody or at least a legal agreement between  mom and dad.  IMO there is no real reason as to why he would not have put her in Carey's custody. That would have been the best choice for HER.... unless he didn't want to be legally responsible for his child.  ::MonkeyMad::I too feel Carey will turn on Brad. His motive for letting Shaniya go to AD instead of other family members is suspect. I am implying that  he may have been thinking  only of HIMSELF when he made this "bad decision" and no more. :shock:

yeppers....agreed....
Carey has probably already turned on him...jmo..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2009, 07:38:48 PM
I think media representative is probably most likely.  To make sure he doesn't say anything that could be misconstrued to the media?  He is not a public speaker and the public will take the least thing said incorrectly and jump all over it!!  Before you know it.... everything is blown out of proportion.

I think he has an attorney to broker the best deals.  I think Brad is out to make a buck anyway he can.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 03, 2009, 12:28:31 AM
I think media representative is probably most likely.  To make sure he doesn't say anything that could be misconstrued to the media?  He is not a public speaker and the public will take the least thing said incorrectly and jump all over it!!  Before you know it.... everything is blown out of proportion.

I think he has an attorney to broker the best deals.  I think Brad is out to make a buck anyway he can.
It does seem interesting/vulgar that the latest trend for parents of murdered children is to "join the club nobody wants to sign up for" and then set out on a media blitz. What happened to dignity and healing privately from the most traumatic event possible? It appears all of them strive to be the next John Walsh, not realizing that his respect and fame as a child advocate has come through years of dedication, first to find his son's murderer and then to help others.  The story of Tim Miller is a good example also. Grief and determination set him on a  life course , yes he does have some national recognition but BECAUSE of his tireless, selfless work, not because he goes and blabs it up on every talk shows couch.
As we've seen with the likes of the Anthonys, some see the huge goldmine that is easy to tap into because people are horrified about the mayhem that's going on and generously donate. Other's may rationalize that talking about their tragedy will help prevent another, but in this particular case, the prevention was as clear as day and solely on Lockhart's shoulders.   As always JMO.   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mymonkey on December 03, 2009, 09:25:34 AM
I think media representative is probably most likely.  To make sure he doesn't say anything that could be misconstrued to the media?  He is not a public speaker and the public will take the least thing said incorrectly and jump all over it!!  Before you know it.... everything is blown out of proportion.

I think he has an attorney to broker the best deals.  I think Brad is out to make a buck anyway he can.
It does seem interesting/vulgar that the latest trend for parents of murdered children is to "join the club nobody wants to sign up for" and then set out on a media blitz. What happened to dignity and healing privately from the most traumatic event possible? It appears all of them strive to be the next John Walsh, not realizing that his respect and fame as a child advocate has come through years of dedication, first to find his son's murderer and then to help others.  The story of Tim Miller is a good example also. Grief and determination set him on a  life course , yes he does have some national recognition but BECAUSE of his tireless, selfless work, not because he goes and blabs it up on every talk shows couch.
As we've seen with the likes of the Anthonys, some see the huge goldmine that is easy to tap into because people are horrified about the mayhem that's going on and generously donate. Other's may rationalize that talking about their tragedy will help prevent another, but in this particular case, the prevention was as clear as day and solely on Lockhart's shoulders.   As always JMO.   

Very good post...I think you summed it up perfectly ::santawink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: melisb on December 03, 2009, 10:34:24 AM
You know it didn't dawn on me till the other day that when Brad's daughter (she's the one I remember first being interviewed on the Today Show) was speaking that everything she said was a dig to Brad!!  Wasn't it stated somewhere that Brad's best friend took her in because she or they didn't think he was raising her right?  Even she knew that egg donor did drugs.  Apparently they all knew but the poor Aunt's hands were tied due to lack of custodial agreement.  I feel so bad for her and what deep down anger she must feel towards her brother.  I was hoping that the atty was to defend Brad against some neglect charges but cough, cough, let me clear my throat appearantly it's for media brokering!  I really wish he would prove us wrong and do good things with the money collected on behalf of Shaniya.  God rest her soul.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 03, 2009, 10:36:14 AM
I think media representative is probably most likely.  To make sure he doesn't say anything that could be misconstrued to the media?  He is not a public speaker and the public will take the least thing said incorrectly and jump all over it!!  Before you know it.... everything is blown out of proportion.

I think he has an attorney to broker the best deals.  I think Brad is out to make a buck anyway he can.
It does seem interesting/vulgar that the latest trend for parents of murdered children is to "join the club nobody wants to sign up for" and then set out on a media blitz. What happened to dignity and healing privately from the most traumatic event possible? It appears all of them strive to be the next John Walsh, not realizing that his respect and fame as a child advocate has come through years of dedication, first to find his son's murderer and then to help others.  The story of Tim Miller is a good example also. Grief and determination set him on a  life course , yes he does have some national recognition but BECAUSE of his tireless, selfless work, not because he goes and blabs it up on every talk shows couch.
As we've seen with the likes of the Anthonys, some see the huge goldmine that is easy to tap into because people are horrified about the mayhem that's going on and generously donate. Other's may rationalize that talking about their tragedy will help prevent another, but in this particular case, the prevention was as clear as day and solely on Lockhart's shoulders.   As always JMO.   

excellent excellent post there Mizjay!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 03, 2009, 10:41:08 AM
You know it didn't dawn on me till the other day that when Brad's daughter (she's the one I remember first being interviewed on the Today Show) was speaking that everything she said was a dig to Brad!!  Wasn't it stated somewhere that Brad's best friend took her in because she or they didn't think he was raising her right?  Even she knew that egg donor did drugs.  Apparently they all knew but the poor Aunt's hands were tied due to lack of custodial agreement.  I feel so bad for her and what deep down anger she must feel towards her brother.  I was hoping that the atty was to defend Brad against some neglect charges but cough, cough, let me clear my throat appearantly it's for media brokering!  I really wish he would prove us wrong and do good things with the money collected on behalf of Shaniya.  God rest her soul.

amen ..God bless her little soul...

would like it if dad did prove us wrong...
did anyone notice that he kept looking around to see where the camera was on his last interview on NG? 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 03, 2009, 11:10:48 AM
Does/did Antoinette have a court appearance today? 





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 03, 2009, 11:20:11 AM
Does/did Antoinette have a court appearance today? 





hey Wykkers!
could be...seems like the 4th is ringing a bell with me..but I could have it mixed up with some other criminal.. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 03, 2009, 11:43:54 AM
Does/did Antoinette have a court appearance today? 





hey Wykkers!
could be...seems like the 4th is ringing a bell with me..but I could have it mixed up with some other criminal.. ::MonkeyNoNo::

I keep mixing em up too, Cookie!  Am thinking it was for today, cuz Mario supposedly had an appearance yesterday, on the kidnapping charges, and I thought hers was the day after his.

But I can't find any news coverage on an appearance for him for yesterday!  So maybe I had the wrong day in mind?  He's due back in court on the 9th or 10th on the rape/murder charges.

What happened to this case in the media?  First everyone is trying to cover it, now no one?   ::MonkeyConfused::

 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 03, 2009, 01:06:23 PM
Does/did Antoinette have a court appearance today? 





hey Wykkers!
could be...seems like the 4th is ringing a bell with me..but I could have it mixed up with some other criminal.. ::MonkeyNoNo::

I keep mixing em up too, Cookie!  Am thinking it was for today, cuz Mario supposedly had an appearance yesterday, on the kidnapping charges, and I thought hers was the day after his.

But I can't find any news coverage on an appearance for him for yesterday!  So maybe I had the wrong day in mind?  He's due back in court on the 9th or 10th on the rape/murder charges.

What happened to this case in the media?  First everyone is trying to cover it, now no one?   ::MonkeyConfused::

 

 Umm, very good point WYKS. Maybe that's part of the big picture problem with all these horrible crimes. In the beginning it's all shock and bombshells about the under belly of society, all the gore and fear. Everybody wants to watch the train wreck sort of but then once the adrenalin is down, it's on to the next headliner. Look at NG, her whole premise is victim's right person, but right in the middle of all these on going cases she spends days yakkin about balloonboy or Tiger Woods. don't get it either.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 03, 2009, 01:07:59 PM
Does/did Antoinette have a court appearance today? 





hey Wykkers!
could be...seems like the 4th is ringing a bell with me..but I could have it mixed up with some other criminal.. ::MonkeyNoNo::
::MonkeyHaHa::  so many!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 03, 2009, 03:11:02 PM
 
Antoinette Davis moved to Raleigh's Correctional Institution for Women 2.44 miles from Mario McNeill




Antoinette Nicole Davis moved six days ago from the Cumberland County Detention Center to Raleigh's North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women for her own safety.  The move was slowly leaked to media sources after Antoinette Davis had left the Cumberland County Detention Center.  However, the latest Antoinette Davis update should be no surprise.

North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women is located on 1304 Bragg Street in Raleigh, just 2.44 miles from Raleigh's Central Prison where Mario McNeill is being held.  If Antoinette Davis had been sent to Raleigh's Correctional Center for Women on State Street she would have only been 2.34 miles from Raleigh's Central Prison.  However, both prisons are equipped to keep inmates highly monitored.

Antoinette Davis, 25, was charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse involving prostitution of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis, filing a false police report, and interfering with an investigation resulting in two felony and two misdemeanor charges.

Mario McNeill has been charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape of a child, and first-degree kidnapping of Shaniya Davis.  Mario McNeill faces the death penalty or life without the possibility of parole.

The next court appearance for Antoinette Davis will be held on December 3, 2009.  Mario McNeill's next court appearance will be held on December 9, 2009.


http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d1-Antoinette-Davis-in-NCs-Correctional-Institution-for-Women-just-244-miles-from-Mario-McNeill


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 03, 2009, 03:14:39 PM
Could Mario McNeill escape?

Raleigh's Central Prison has been well monitored.  Go to WebApps6.doc.nc.state.nc.us link to view the list of inmates who have escaped and not been found.  Notice that the amount of inmates on the run compared to the amount of entries is a low number.  If Mario McNeill remains at Raleigh's Central Prison the chances of him escaping and not being found is highly unlikely.

Mario McNeill has been in prison before.  For a listing of Mario Andrette McNeill's records through visit N.C. Offender Public Information.  Travel down to the center of the page and you will find that Mario "McNeail" is actually Mario McNeill (just to note).

There is no fascination, nor should there be, over Mario McNeill's entry into Raleigh's Central Prison.  However, keeping up with the facts on the basis surrounding the case in the murder of Shaniya Davis is important.

Mario McNeill's next court appearance will be in a Cumberland County courtroom on December 9, 2009


http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m11d23-Raleighs-Central-Prison--Mario-McNeill-enters-while-another-inmate-is-found-dead


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 03, 2009, 03:33:39 PM
Im finding this somewhat interesting....I am not finding Davis or Mcneill in the court quieries Ive been doing....Here is the calender pages....Do you think they arent listing them to keep some from knowing when they will be there?

http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars/Criminal.jsp?county=CUMBERLAND


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 03, 2009, 03:35:41 PM
ooops spoke to soon....I have found Davis another way.....

Arraigned Offenses for Case Number:     2009065834 CR
Arraigned Defendant Name:    DAVIS,ANTONIETTE
County:    CUMBERLAND
Court Date:    12/03/2009
Session:    AM
Court Room:    002B

Offense Code Description Statute
 1151  Felony HUMAN TRAFFICKING CHILD VICTIM  14-43.11(A) 
 3836  Felony FELONY CHILD ABUSE-PROSTITUTN   14-318.4(A1) 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 03, 2009, 03:37:06 PM
ooops spoke to soon....I have found Davis another way.....

Arraigned Offenses for Case Number:     2009065834 CR
Arraigned Defendant Name:    DAVIS,ANTONIETTE
County:    CUMBERLAND
Court Date:    12/03/2009
Session:    AM
Court Room:    002B

Offense Code Description Statute
 1151  Felony HUMAN TRAFFICKING CHILD VICTIM  14-43.11(A) 
 3836  Felony FELONY CHILD ABUSE-PROSTITUTN   14-318.4(A1) 




Arraigned Offenses for Case Number:     2009065835 CR
Arraigned Defendant Name:    DAVIS,ANTONIETTE
County:    CUMBERLAND
Court Date:    12/03/2009
Session:    AM
Court Room:    002B

Offense Code Description Statute
 5310  Misdemeanor RESISTING PUBLIC OFFICER   14-223 
 5362  Misdemeanor FALSE REPORT TO POLICE STATION  14-225 



http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars.Offense.do?submit=submit&case=2502009065835&court=CR&defendant=DAVIS,ANTONIETTE&courtDate=12/03/2009&county=CUMBERLAND&session=AM&courtRoom=002B


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 03, 2009, 04:04:12 PM


Thanks for all the info SloSthrnStyle      ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 03, 2009, 04:07:10 PM


OOps!   Guess the first one DID go thru       ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 03, 2009, 10:05:24 PM
why should these 2 goons be moved for their own safety??? Shaniya sure was not moved for her own safety!!! ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: grrrrrrrr..,


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 03, 2009, 11:34:23 PM
ooops spoke to soon....I have found Davis another way.....

Arraigned Offenses for Case Number:     2009065834 CR
Arraigned Defendant Name:    DAVIS,ANTONIETTE
County:    CUMBERLAND
Court Date:    12/03/2009
Session:    AM
Court Room:    002B

Offense Code Description Statute
 1151  Felony HUMAN TRAFFICKING CHILD VICTIM  14-43.11(A) 
 3836  Felony FELONY CHILD ABUSE-PROSTITUTN   14-318.4(A1) 




Arraigned Offenses for Case Number:     2009065835 CR
Arraigned Defendant Name:    DAVIS,ANTONIETTE
County:    CUMBERLAND
Court Date:    12/03/2009
Session:    AM
Court Room:    002B

Offense Code Description Statute
 5310  Misdemeanor RESISTING PUBLIC OFFICER   14-223 
 5362  Misdemeanor FALSE REPORT TO POLICE STATION  14-225 



http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars.Offense.do?submit=submit&case=2502009065835&court=CR&defendant=DAVIS,ANTONIETTE&courtDate=12/03/2009&county=CUMBERLAND&session=AM&courtRoom=002B


SloSthrnStyle - thanks so much for posting the articles and court info!   ::MonkeyKiss::

Did we already hear about these last charges for Antoinette?  I swear my brain is fried, cuz I don't remember em if we did.  Maybe she got charged with em today? 

Am not sure how to put this.  Am thinking that because of what she 'allegedly' has done, Shaniya ended up dead.  Doesn't she then need to share the murder charge along with the accused?  Sigh.  It's a good thing am not on the jury.   Am just so angry and disgusted with what do know about those who were 'supposed to' love and care for Shaniya.   



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 03, 2009, 11:35:50 PM
why should these 2 goons be moved for their own safety??? Shaniya sure was not moved for her own safety!!! ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: grrrrrrrr..,

100% agree!!!!   ::MonkeyMad::   ::MonkeyMad:: 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 03, 2009, 11:43:31 PM

I keep mixing em up too, Cookie!  Am thinking it was for today, cuz Mario supposedly had an appearance yesterday, on the kidnapping charges, and I thought hers was the day after his.

But I can't find any news coverage on an appearance for him for yesterday!  So maybe I had the wrong day in mind?  He's due back in court on the 9th or 10th on the rape/murder charges.

What happened to this case in the media?  First everyone is trying to cover it, now no one?   ::MonkeyConfused::

 

 Umm, very good point WYKS. Maybe that's part of the big picture problem with all these horrible crimes. In the beginning it's all shock and bombshells about the under belly of society, all the gore and fear. Everybody wants to watch the train wreck sort of but then once the adrenalin is down, it's on to the next headliner. Look at NG, her whole premise is victim's right person, but right in the middle of all these on going cases she spends days yakkin about balloonboy or Tiger Woods. don't get it either.

Oh gosh, how true that is!!  It's like it's more about entertainment and ratings for NG, than it is about the rights of a crime victim.  She's got to be #1 of 'the most hated, but cannot bear not to watch in case she does finally show something' show.   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on December 04, 2009, 01:13:25 AM
I am a long time fan of Nancy Grace but I have to say... I have been recording the show then fastforwarding through all the muck like balloon boy and tiger.  Lately, there is very little about the crime victims and missing.... it is frustrating.  It is always about money... what brings in the money... sensationalism.  Bah! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: HopeForAll on December 04, 2009, 04:13:52 AM
 :evil: I would assume the state wants these two monsters kept alive so they can be prosecuted, not so much for their safety. I went by the cemetery where Shaniya is buried Thurs. It all just seems so surreal. It  happened so close and its so hard to absorb the reality  of this horror. The iron gates are closed and I don't know if the cemetery can be entered at will. At some point I would like to visit her grave.  :cry:


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 04, 2009, 08:22:32 AM
snip from Wyks quote:

Am not sure how to put this.  Am thinking that because of what she 'allegedly' has done, Shaniya ended up dead.  Doesn't she then need to share the murder charge along with the accused?  Sigh.  It's a good thing am not on the jury.   Am just so angry and disgusted with what do know about those who were 'supposed to' love and care for Shaniya.   


Wykkers....NG keeps saying, when she talks about it, that a crime that was committed that she was a part of and it turns to death, then she would/could face the same charges as the perp who actually did the crime....<<<not the exact words, but the general idea.....sortof like if a person is part of a robbery and one person ends up shooting a person, both are guilty of murder if the victim dies...that type of thing is how I imagine it would be ....someone else can probably explain it better but that is the gist that I get....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 04, 2009, 09:07:00 AM
I am a long time fan of Nancy Grace but I have to say... I have been recording the show then fastforwarding through all the muck like balloon boy and tiger.  Lately, there is very little about the crime victims and missing.... it is frustrating.  It is always about money... what brings in the money... sensationalism.  Bah! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have to agree.....and JVM's show is more like the Skank version of Entertainment Tonight. Pathetic. Who gives a crap about celebrities cheating on their wives  ::MonkeyNoNo::  like it's a new concept :roll: BFD!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on December 04, 2009, 10:32:10 AM
I think media representative is probably most likely.  To make sure he doesn't say anything that could be misconstrued to the media?  He is not a public speaker and the public will take the least thing said incorrectly and jump all over it!!  Before you know it.... everything is blown out of proportion.

I think he has an attorney to broker the best deals.  I think Brad is out to make a buck anyway he can.
It does seem interesting/vulgar that the latest trend for parents of murdered children is to "join the club nobody wants to sign up for" and then set out on a media blitz. What happened to dignity and healing privately from the most traumatic event possible? It appears all of them strive to be the next John Walsh, not realizing that his respect and fame as a child advocate has come through years of dedication, first to find his son's murderer and then to help others.  The story of Tim Miller is a good example also. Grief and determination set him on a  life course , yes he does have some national recognition but BECAUSE of his tireless, selfless work, not because he goes and blabs it up on every talk shows couch.
As we've seen with the likes of the Anthonys, some see the huge goldmine that is easy to tap into because people are horrified about the mayhem that's going on and generously donate. Other's may rationalize that talking about their tragedy will help prevent another, but in this particular case, the prevention was as clear as day and solely on Lockhart's shoulders.   As always JMO.   


I understand what you're saying (I totally agree in some instances: the Anothonys etc.) But I think it's wonderful that these parents are using the media as outlets for child advocacy. God knows this world needs all the John Walsh's/Marc Klaas's we can get. I can not relate to the pain of losing a child, and hopefully never will, so I can only imagine what they must be going through. Nothing they will ever do, no amount of tears/guilt will ever bring their babies back. But by fighting for a cause, in a sense, they are keeping them alive. I know I could not- would not ever want to let go, and I would try to reach out to as many people as possible.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Justagirl on December 04, 2009, 10:36:55 AM
You know it didn't dawn on me till the other day that when Brad's daughter (she's the one I remember first being interviewed on the Today Show) was speaking that everything she said was a dig to Brad!!  Wasn't it stated somewhere that Brad's best friend took her in because she or they didn't think he was raising her right?  Even she knew that egg donor did drugs.  Apparently they all knew but the poor Aunt's hands were tied due to lack of custodial agreement.  I feel so bad for her and what deep down anger she must feel towards her brother.  I was hoping that the atty was to defend Brad against some neglect charges but cough, cough, let me clear my throat appearantly it's for media brokering!  I really wish he would prove us wrong and do good things with the money collected on behalf of Shaniya.  God rest her soul.

I find it very telling that Carey and I have 2 'common friends' on Facebook: Brad & Byron. Not Cheyenne. ?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 04, 2009, 12:28:15 PM
Antoinette Davis Dec. 3, 2009 Update: Davis returns to court, motion requested
December 4, 9:46 AM
 
 
 
Dec. 3, 2009 - Antoinette Nicole Davis returned to District 12 Cumberland County Courthouse yesterday with a motion to continue.  Motion has been entered.  However, anyone requesting a motion to continue who is facing a felony must go through a panel process before another court date is released according to the Cumberland County District Attorney's office.  Antoinette Davis is facing two felonies and two misdemeanors.  No trial date has been set at this time.

When speaking to the District Attorney's office, they assured that when a date is set the information will be released.  This process is not active in lower offenses.  However, this is a high-profile double felony case and could take days or weeks to reach a trial date.

Antoinette Davis' motion to continue was expected on Dec. 3.

Antoinette Davis remains in Raleigh's Correctional Institution for Women.  For more on that story visit Antoinette Davis Moved to the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women.

Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report, and interfering with an investigation surrounding the death of Shaniya Davis.

Mario McNeill has been charged with first-degree kidnapping, first-degree rape, and first-degree murder in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

Mario McNeill is to return from Raleigh's Central Prison to the Cumberland County Courthouse on December 9, 2009.  Mario McNeill's motion to continue remains to be seen.

Shaniya Davis was found on November 16, 2009 next to Walker Road hidden in the woods of Lee County, North Carolina.  Approximately 250 people, including local authorities, searched for the little girl ever since Antoinette Davis reported her missing a week earlier.

The case against Antoinette Davis is strong.  Allegedly, Antoinette Davis allowed Mario McNeill to take Shaniya Davis, her biological daughter, in exchange for money due and sexual transfer.  Shaniya Davis' autopsy proved that 5-year-old Shaniya Davis had been raped and murdered on the day she was reported missing.

With the help of a GPS, a Sanford video camera and other substantial leads, Fayetteville police arrested Mario McNeill with Shaniya Davis' murder.

Mario McNeill was already being held in Cumberland County when the murder charges surfaced.  Mario McNeill was transfered after appearing in court to Raleigh's Central Prison and placed on suicide watch.  For more on that story visit Mario McNeill Enters Raleigh's Central Prison.

Antoinette Davis was also been placed in a safekeeping cell and away from other inmates upon entry into North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women.

There have been no new charges filed against Antoinette Davis, as of yet.  The media did not release much information surrounding Davis' Dec 3 court appearance due to the motion to continue.

http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 04, 2009, 12:55:21 PM
Published: 07:31 AM, Wed Dec 02, 2009
Child's death leaves questions unansweredBill Kirby


 
The dots don't all connect.

Not for me.

Not for many of us who have followed the horrific death of Shaniya Davis, the 5-year-old Fayetteville girl who was found dead Nov. 16 in a wooded area off N.C. 87 near Sanford.

"I'm still filtering through it," Bradley Lockhart, 39, told Nancy Grace on Monday night as he appeared in person on CNN's HLN network telecast from Atlanta.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, is charged by city police with kidnapping, raping and killing the child.

Antoinette Davis, 25, the little girl's mother, is charged with felony child abuse and human trafficking, i.e., selling her daughter for prostitution.

Lockhart told Grace that he has his moments of emotion in trying to understand why this tragedy happened.

"I think about her all the time," he said, recalling how the energetic child liked to climb onto his lap as he sat in his recliner, color, play with dolls, play dress-up and learn to ride her scooter.

This is an egregious crime.

It has affected those from the mobile home park where this child was allegedly abducted to as far away as the woman who called me from Japan, saying these acts of inhumanity and injustice must cease.

It tugs at your heart.

It gnaws at your gut.

It interrupts your sleep.

It weighs on your mind.

It eats you up, because this crime should not have happened.

"Children need a voice," Lockhart told Nancy Grace, explaining his involvement in Stop Child Trafficking Now, an organization focused on targeting child predators for sexual abuse. "I'm trying to be that voice."

But where was his voice of reason - or better said, his voice of responsibility - when Bradley Lockhart said yes to allowing this child to live with this mother who previously had been investigated by Cumberland County Social Services?

He, by his account, wanted to give Antoinette Davis a chance to share in parenting their child.

She was gainfully employed. She was, by his account, demonstrating stability.

But being cared for by an aunt in a well-regarded neighborhood or a father living in a $248,000 home is not the same as living in a 12-by-40 trailer with dirty dishes and unkempt bedrooms.

"A pigsty," says Barbara Davenport, manager of the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park, where Antoinette Davis' sister lived and where Shaniya's mother said she discovered her child missing near dawn on Nov. 10.

Lockhart now questions his judgment and, in part, blames himself in this child's tragedy.

He points a finger at Cumberland County Social Services, wishing the agency had informed him about its previous probe into the mother's home life. And, if true, well he should.

"It seems so unreal," the father, accompanied by Michael Freed, a Florida lawyer, told Nancy Grace.

For now, everybody is lawyered up as criminal and social welfare investigators, along with those of us watching from afar, try to connect the dots in the name of an innocent little girl who could not fend for herself and whose tomorrows are no more.

Bill Kirby can be reached at kirbyb@fayobserver.com

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/02/956907


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 04, 2009, 01:07:38 PM
I dont know how to upload documents and such...in case we dont have them here is the link to arrest warrants.

Arrest warrant McNeill
http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2009/11/20/6465298/mcneillwarrants.pdf

Arrest warrant for Kidnapping McNeill:
http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2009/11/17/6440061/mcneill.pdf

Search warrant for his car:
http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2009/11/20/6464128/mcneillsearchwarrant.swf

Arrest warrant for Davis:
http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2009/11/17/6440077/davis.pdf

http://www.wral.com/news/local/asset_gallery/6459827/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 04, 2009, 01:22:06 PM
For all of us that watch Nancy Grace and have complaints....check this artical out.  This has to do with Shaniya and the workings of NG.  Rather lengthy...I think worth the read.

If mods think it all should be posted that is great!!!

http://www.sanfordherald.com/pages/full_story/push?article-LIGGETT-+My+15+seconds+of+fame%20&id=4673371-LIGGETT-+My+15+seconds+of+fame


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 04, 2009, 01:50:20 PM
snip from Wyks quote:

Am not sure how to put this.  Am thinking that because of what she 'allegedly' has done, Shaniya ended up dead.  Doesn't she then need to share the murder charge along with the accused?  Sigh.  It's a good thing am not on the jury.   Am just so angry and disgusted with what do know about those who were 'supposed to' love and care for Shaniya.   


Wykkers....NG keeps saying, when she talks about it, that a crime that was committed that she was a part of and it turns to death, then she would/could face the same charges as the perp who actually did the crime....<<<not the exact words, but the general idea.....sortof like if a person is part of a robbery and one person ends up shooting a person, both are guilty of murder if the victim dies...that type of thing is how I imagine it would be ....someone else can probably explain it better but that is the gist that I get....


The last I have heard is the police are still investigating numerous tips and they are keeping additional charges close to the vest.

IMO: I have a feeling deals are going to be made, in which the egg donor will be testifing against McNeill.....BUT I sure hope the heck not.  She should be charged with murder, she sent her child to be raped and was murder...She should have the exact same charges of Murder.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 04, 2009, 03:26:32 PM
For all of us that watch Nancy Grace and have complaints....check this artical out.  This has to do with Shaniya and the workings of NG.  Rather lengthy...I think worth the read.

If mods think it all should be posted that is great!!!

http://www.sanfordherald.com/pages/full_story/push?article-LIGGETT-+My+15+seconds+of+fame%20&id=4673371-LIGGETT-+My+15+seconds+of+fame

This exactly how I'd pictured it would be.  I'd be quaking in my boots waiting on my turn with NG!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 04, 2009, 03:48:53 PM
I think media representative is probably most likely.  To make sure he doesn't say anything that could be misconstrued to the media?  He is not a public speaker and the public will take the least thing said incorrectly and jump all over it!!  Before you know it.... everything is blown out of proportion.

I think he has an attorney to broker the best deals.  I think Brad is out to make a buck anyway he can.
It does seem interesting/vulgar that the latest trend for parents of murdered children is to "join the club nobody wants to sign up for" and then set out on a media blitz. What happened to dignity and healing privately from the most traumatic event possible? It appears all of them strive to be the next John Walsh, not realizing that his respect and fame as a child advocate has come through years of dedication, first to find his son's murderer and then to help others.  The story of Tim Miller is a good example also. Grief and determination set him on a  life course , yes he does have some national recognition but BECAUSE of his tireless, selfless work, not because he goes and blabs it up on every talk shows couch.
As we've seen with the likes of the Anthonys, some see the huge goldmine that is easy to tap into because people are horrified about the mayhem that's going on and generously donate. Other's may rationalize that talking about their tragedy will help prevent another, but in this particular case, the prevention was as clear as day and solely on Lockhart's shoulders.   As always JMO.   


I understand what you're saying (I totally agree in some instances: the Anothonys etc.) But I think it's wonderful that these parents are using the media as outlets for child advocacy. God knows this world needs all the John Walsh's/Marc Klaas's we can get. I can not relate to the pain of losing a child, and hopefully never will, so I can only imagine what they must be going through. Nothing they will ever do, no amount of tears/guilt will ever bring their babies back. But by fighting for a cause, in a sense, they are keeping them alive. I know I could not- would not ever want to let go, and I would try to reach out to as many people as possible.


JUSTAGIRl   you and I are on the same page about wanting the faces of innocence never to be forgotten and hopefully interest and money to fight and prevent these crimes.
 ::MonkeyAngel::

It's my own bias I think to be too judgemental about some of ones who anoint themselves as spokesmen for whichever group. When a person does almost everything right as a parent and the unthinkable happens, the spokesperson hat seems to fit easily but hypothetically if a parent regularly left the kids alone or regularly had skeezy men folk (or woman folk) over or sent an 8 yr. old to the store at 10 at night  etc,etc when something horrible happens it's almost not shocking. When kids are routinely put in harms way by parents, the pervert or killer is to blame but that victim would never had been in their clutches if not for the neglect or lack of concern from home. My long drawn out point is, somehow I don't want to hear from a parent that I don't respect, I don't want to hear the "protect our babies" message from parents who didn't even try.
This isn't directed at Lockhart necessarily but I admit there is a smidge of it in my heart.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 04, 2009, 10:19:40 PM
me too Mizjay! me too!^^^^^^


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Blumonkey on December 05, 2009, 12:05:15 AM
Mizjay, so well said and I could not agree with you more. I resent anyone who tells others what to do when they themselves have ignored the voice of reason. The time for Mr. Lockhart to be a voice for children at risk has passed. He was not the protector that his own daughter deserved. It is a little late to be concerned when your child has suffered the ultimate torture that a little girl can experience at the hand of the one you willingly handed her over to. Shaniya needed her dad's voice to say "no, you may be the mom, but you cannot have her." At least not until she was proven to be an appropriate and safe caregiver. JMO


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on December 05, 2009, 06:51:57 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/05/957902
Published: 05:49 AM, Sat Dec 05, 2009
Many share blame in failing Shaniya
By Bill Kirby
Connie Biddle of Little Rock, Ark., says many are part and parcel to blame in the abduction, rape and death of a 5-year-old Fayetteville child.

You'll find more comments on my blog, The Gospel Truth, I Think, at www.fayobserver.com.

Keep your phone calls and e-mails coming.

I'm listening.

Your turn: "It has broken my heart, and I cry every day for this poor child," Biddle writes about Shaniya Davis. "I think that everyone failed her. Her father and mother first. The social services office and social worker, the kindergarten that should have been looking for her and most of all the criminal justice system that let someone like Mario McNeill out of jail, even though he had run down a cop and attempted to kill someone. God Bless Shaniya Davis. Her life was way too short, but her story has touched our hearts and we will remember her forever."

My turn: We don't know all of the facts, Ms. Biddle, but on the surface it appears that many share blame in failing this child who was taken from her mother's home on Nov. 10 and found six days later raped and dead in Lee County. You don't have to be Dick Tracy to reach that conclusion. As for Mario McNeill, 29, who is charged with the kidnapping, rape and murder, you are right about his criminal background. It is another reason I'll keep harping on the need for more police officers and more jail space in this community.

Your turn: "You're back!" Pam Wrench of Stedman writes. "I love the satire columns (Nov. 25) you do on city and county officials. If the last election provided the material, then bring on the next election. Thanks for all the good laughs, and I'm eagerly waiting for the next one."

My turn: I get a kick out of 'em, too, Ms. Wrench. But it is easier to lampoon a public official than to be one.
Your turn: "I am writing to ask if anyone knows why the City of Fayetteville is cutting the mounted patrol from service by the end of the year?" Sharon A. Osborne writes. "I recently took my grandsons to the mounted patrol barn for an informative tour and learned that the city is cutting the mounted patrol by the end of the year. What a sad loss for the City of Fayetteville ... . The funds that run the barn and all expenses come from confiscated drug money and no taxpayer dollars. Where is the confiscated drug money being diverted to that will better serve the people of Fayetteville? The mounted patrol performs a valuable service and the horses have a calming effect on everyone. If the City of Fayetteville cuts the mounted patrol now, they will never bring them back and that is a very sad day."

My turn: I like the mounted patrol, too, Mrs. Osborne. But the cost of maintaining the horses, the officers who ride them, the stable attendant and the stable cost the city almost $390,000 last fiscal year, according to the Police Department. A consulting firm has recommended abolishment of the mounted patrol to save money - money that can be better used to hire additional police officers in the wake of growing crime. City Council will address the issue in January or February, according to City Manager Dale Iman.
Bill Kirby can be reached at kirbyb@fayobserver.com or 323-4848, ext. 486.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 05, 2009, 12:39:34 PM
Am I reading this right?  Antoinette has been rescheduled til FEB 18th??   ::MonkeyShocked::

And if so..... wth??  That's over 2 months away!!  Why such a long time?  Here I was expecting new charges for her anyday now.  Geeeeez. 

http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars.Offense.do?submit=submit&case=2502009065835&court=CR&defendant=DAVIS,ANTONIETTE&courtDate=02/18/2010&county=CUMBERLAND&session=AM&courtRoom=002B (http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars.Offense.do?submit=submit&case=2502009065835&court=CR&defendant=DAVIS,ANTONIETTE&courtDate=02/18/2010&county=CUMBERLAND&session=AM&courtRoom=002B)

It looks like Mario will be in court on Dec 9th for the rape/murder charges.  Then on Jan 10th for the kidnapping charge. 

Weird!  Seems the kidnapping charge ought to go first, but whatever....  Wanna bet his Dec 9th appearance gets rescheduled til after the Jan 10th one? 

Let's just play the delay game.  Is that what they are doing? 

 :2brickwall:


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on December 05, 2009, 02:45:28 PM
snip from Wyks quote:

Am not sure how to put this.  Am thinking that because of what she 'allegedly' has done, Shaniya ended up dead.  Doesn't she then need to share the murder charge along with the accused?  Sigh.  It's a good thing am not on the jury.   Am just so angry and disgusted with what do know about those who were 'supposed to' love and care for Shaniya.   


Wykkers....NG keeps saying, when she talks about it, that a crime that was committed that she was a part of and it turns to death, then she would/could face the same charges as the perp who actually did the crime....<<<not the exact words, but the general idea.....sortof like if a person is part of a robbery and one person ends up shooting a person, both are guilty of murder if the victim dies...that type of thing is how I imagine it would be ....someone else can probably explain it better but that is the gist that I get....


The last I have heard is the police are still investigating numerous tips and they are keeping additional charges close to the vest.

IMO: I have a feeling deals are going to be made, in which the egg donor will be testifing against McNeill.....BUT I sure hope the heck not.  She should be charged with murder, she sent her child to be raped and was murder...She should have the exact same charges of Murder.

What you are thinking of is felony murder.  What that means is that a murder committed during the commission of a felony constitutes murder in the first degree as a matter of law for all those who participated in the commission of the felony, whether or not the crime of murder was intended or not.  Here, a strong legal argument can be made that AD is guilty of felony murder as her daughter was murdered during the commission of a felony--child trafficking and prostitution.

Someone asked why McNeill's arraignment on the kidnapping charge has been "delayed" beyond his other charges.  The reason, I suppose, is that it will be the most difficult to prove.  Why?  Because he allegedly had the mother's consent to take Shaniya.  So query whether a kidnapping occurred at all.  And to be honest with you, it's a throw-away charge.  They don't need it.  They have him for murder and rape of a child.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 05, 2009, 04:18:26 PM
snip from Wyks quote:

Am not sure how to put this.  Am thinking that because of what she 'allegedly' has done, Shaniya ended up dead.  Doesn't she then need to share the murder charge along with the accused?  Sigh.  It's a good thing am not on the jury.   Am just so angry and disgusted with what do know about those who were 'supposed to' love and care for Shaniya.   


Wykkers....NG keeps saying, when she talks about it, that a crime that was committed that she was a part of and it turns to death, then she would/could face the same charges as the perp who actually did the crime....<<<not the exact words, but the general idea.....sortof like if a person is part of a robbery and one person ends up shooting a person, both are guilty of murder if the victim dies...that type of thing is how I imagine it would be ....someone else can probably explain it better but that is the gist that I get....


The last I have heard is the police are still investigating numerous tips and they are keeping additional charges close to the vest.

IMO: I have a feeling deals are going to be made, in which the egg donor will be testifing against McNeill.....BUT I sure hope the heck not.  She should be charged with murder, she sent her child to be raped and was murder...She should have the exact same charges of Murder.

What you are thinking of is felony murder.  What that means is that a murder committed during the commission of a felony constitutes murder in the first degree as a matter of law for all those who participated in the commission of the felony, whether or not the crime of murder was intended or not.  Here, a strong legal argument can be made that AD is guilty of felony murder as her daughter was murdered during the commission of a felony--child trafficking and prostitution.

Someone asked why McNeill's arraignment on the kidnapping charge has been "delayed" beyond his other charges.  The reason, I suppose, is that it will be the most difficult to prove.  Why?  Because he allegedly had the mother's consent to take Shaniya.  So query whether a kidnapping occurred at all.  And to be honest with you, it's a throw-away charge.  They don't need it.  They have him for murder and rape of a child.



Jess...I was hoping that you would come along explain this to us! thanks a bunch.... ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 05, 2009, 04:29:09 PM
Mizjay, so well said and I could not agree with you more. I resent anyone who tells others what to do when they themselves have ignored the voice of reason. The time for Mr. Lockhart to be a voice for children at risk has passed. He was not the protector that his own daughter deserved. It is a little late to be concerned when your child has suffered the ultimate torture that a little girl can experience at the hand of the one you willingly handed her over to. Shaniya needed her dad's voice to say "no, you may be the mom, but you cannot have her." At least not until she was proven to be an appropriate and safe caregiver. JMO

BLUMONKEY    Thanks, and the last line of your post is the whole point. Exactly. Even if the "new" home wasn't in a rough neighborhood, even if the place didn't look like a sty, even if there wasn't a crowd of people living there,  didn't she deserve to be able to transition into the radically different environment?  If it was fact that she was only sent with clothes for a couple of days and  if the mother said she wasn't gonna let her go home, that wouldn't be worth the flight home? Red flags were everywhere. Maybe women/mothers are naturally more protective than men?  Anyway, you're right, the voice of reason was ignored.

COOKIE      ::MonkeyWink:: glad we're of same mind (was worried it sounded too harsh) 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on December 06, 2009, 10:07:08 AM
snip from Wyks quote:

Am not sure how to put this.  Am thinking that because of what she 'allegedly' has done, Shaniya ended up dead.  Doesn't she then need to share the murder charge along with the accused?  Sigh.  It's a good thing am not on the jury.   Am just so angry and disgusted with what do know about those who were 'supposed to' love and care for Shaniya.   


Wykkers....NG keeps saying, when she talks about it, that a crime that was committed that she was a part of and it turns to death, then she would/could face the same charges as the perp who actually did the crime....<<<not the exact words, but the general idea.....sortof like if a person is part of a robbery and one person ends up shooting a person, both are guilty of murder if the victim dies...that type of thing is how I imagine it would be ....someone else can probably explain it better but that is the gist that I get....


The last I have heard is the police are still investigating numerous tips and they are keeping additional charges close to the vest.

IMO: I have a feeling deals are going to be made, in which the egg donor will be testifing against McNeill.....BUT I sure hope the heck not.  She should be charged with murder, she sent her child to be raped and was murder...She should have the exact same charges of Murder.

What you are thinking of is felony murder.  What that means is that a murder committed during the commission of a felony constitutes murder in the first degree as a matter of law for all those who participated in the commission of the felony, whether or not the crime of murder was intended or not.  Here, a strong legal argument can be made that AD is guilty of felony murder as her daughter was murdered during the commission of a felony--child trafficking and prostitution.

Someone asked why McNeill's arraignment on the kidnapping charge has been "delayed" beyond his other charges.  The reason, I suppose, is that it will be the most difficult to prove.  Why?  Because he allegedly had the mother's consent to take Shaniya.  So query whether a kidnapping occurred at all.  And to be honest with you, it's a throw-away charge.  They don't need it.  They have him for murder and rape of a child.


thanks jess for clearing tat up...i was thinking felony murder scenario for ad too...
o/t but these are the types of people into kid porn
http://www.telegram.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091205/NEWS/912050358
he got to stay home with his mommy and daddy so he could go to therapy.... chit bag


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 06, 2009, 12:19:54 PM
Mizjay, so well said and I could not agree with you more. I resent anyone who tells others what to do when they themselves have ignored the voice of reason. The time for Mr. Lockhart to be a voice for children at risk has passed. He was not the protector that his own daughter deserved. It is a little late to be concerned when your child has suffered the ultimate torture that a little girl can experience at the hand of the one you willingly handed her over to. Shaniya needed her dad's voice to say "no, you may be the mom, but you cannot have her." At least not until she was proven to be an appropriate and safe caregiver. JMO

BLUMONKEY    Thanks, and the last line of your post is the whole point. Exactly. Even if the "new" home wasn't in a rough neighborhood, even if the place didn't look like a sty, even if there wasn't a crowd of people living there,  didn't she deserve to be able to transition into the radically different environment?  If it was fact that she was only sent with clothes for a couple of days and  if the mother said she wasn't gonna let her go home, that wouldn't be worth the flight home? Red flags were everywhere. Maybe women/mothers are naturally more protective than men?  Anyway, you're right, the voice of reason was ignored.

COOKIE      ::MonkeyWink:: glad we're of same mind (was worried it sounded too harsh) 

same mind on this...good thoughtful posts from you in my opinion..but maybe cause your thoughts are my thoughts ...lol!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: annemarie on December 06, 2009, 06:44:13 PM
Am I reading this right?  Antoinette has been rescheduled til FEB 18th??   ::MonkeyShocked::

And if so..... wth??  That's over 2 months away!!  Why such a long time?  Here I was expecting new charges for her anyday now.  Geeeeez. 

http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars.Offense.do?submit=submit&case=2502009065835&court=CR&defendant=DAVIS,ANTONIETTE&courtDate=02/18/2010&county=CUMBERLAND&session=AM&courtRoom=002B (http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars.Offense.do?submit=submit&case=2502009065835&court=CR&defendant=DAVIS,ANTONIETTE&courtDate=02/18/2010&county=CUMBERLAND&session=AM&courtRoom=002B)

It looks like Mario will be in court on Dec 9th for the rape/murder charges.  Then on Jan 10th for the kidnapping charge. 

Weird!  Seems the kidnapping charge ought to go first, but whatever....  Wanna bet his Dec 9th appearance gets rescheduled til after the Jan 10th one? 

Let's just play the delay game.  Is that what they are doing? 

 :2brickwall:

This might be the reason for the delay...

In 2005 Congress mandated that due to the BRAC (Base Realignment and Closure) effort Fort Bragg would gain several new commands. The Army will be closing down United States Forces Command and the United States Reserve Command in Atlanta and moving them to Fort Bragg. This move is expected to relocate over 30,000 people to the area as a result of the command changes and businesses that will move to support the command. FORSCOM awards over $300 billion in contracts annually. Fayetteville ******* BRAC: Developers Place Bets on Growth


...multi-million dollar contracts wont happen so easily if there is a notorious case going on in the area!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 06, 2009, 07:26:56 PM
This might be the reason for the delay...

In 2005 Congress mandated that due to the BRAC (Base Realignment and Closure) effort Fort Bragg would gain several new commands. The Army will be closing down United States Forces Command and the United States Reserve Command in Atlanta and moving them to Fort Bragg. This move is expected to relocate over 30,000 people to the area as a result of the command changes and businesses that will move to support the command. FORSCOM awards over $300 billion in contracts annually. Fayetteville ******* BRAC: Developers Place Bets on Growth


...multi-million dollar contracts wont happen so easily if there is a notorious case going on in the area!!

Thanks for that info, Annemarie! 

On the one hand, makes sense for why they are delaying, and also for why it seems everything is getting hushed up in the media.   On the other hand, with that kind of project in the works, they surely don't want a high-profile case such as this mucking up their plans.  Might make the area around Ft. Bragg seem 'unsafe' somehow.  Certainly not something they will want their future military/civilian residents to feel when moving to the area.  Pffffft. 

From what I understand, the mobile home park is very close to the main gate at Ft. Bragg?  If so, the mhp will likely will be torn down to be replaced by more upscale housing, or a new mall, etc.  Anything but leaving it there to remind folks of what happened.  Likely there will be no park or playground somewhere in the memory of Shaniya either.   

Politics and money have an evil way of replacing quick justice.   IMO.

::MonkeyNoNo::






Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 06, 2009, 07:31:55 PM


"The case against Antoinette Davis is strong.  Allegedly, Antoinette Davis allowed Mario McNeill to take Shaniya Davis, her biological daughter, in exchange for money due and sexual transfer.  Shaniya Davis' autopsy proved that 5-year-old Shaniya Davis had been raped and murdered on the day she was reported missing."

http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time (http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time)





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 06, 2009, 07:37:38 PM


(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Shaniya/ShaniyaRIP.jpg)




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 06, 2009, 07:48:14 PM
what a beautiful little child she was....makes me sad to think about her and what happened to her...and mad ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: MuffyBee on December 06, 2009, 09:18:38 PM
what a beautiful little child she was....makes me sad to think about her and what happened to her...and mad ::MonkeyMad::


ITA cookie, ITA.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 07, 2009, 01:54:30 PM
Have just added the Who's Who thread for Shaniya.  This info has been pulled from many different sources, by many monkeys and others.  Thank you all for your help! 

If anyone has info that is not included, plz add/update in there as needed.  Plz bring any discussion over here, not in that thread.  Thanks! 


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6639.new#new (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6639.new#new)





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: MuffyBee on December 07, 2009, 02:01:49 PM
Have just added the Who's Who thread for Shaniya.  This info has been pulled from many different sources, by many monkeys and others.  Thank you all for your help! 

If anyone has info that is not included, plz add/update in there as needed.  Plz bring any discussion over here, not in that thread.  Thanks! 


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6639.new#new (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6639.new#new)





Thanks Wyks.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 07, 2009, 03:01:24 PM
trimmonthelake:  I've been reading Bill Kirby's articles and the comments as well.  In another article they were discussing who's to blame and a lot of posters were making some negative comments about the MHP and then the manager of the MHP made some interesting comments in defense of the MHP.

Barbara Davenport Says:
December 1st, 2009 at 10:09 am
C. Pons,
Then stop making statements you have no factual knowledge of.
You stated “Sleepy Hollow is in an area known as “Fayette-Nam” and rife with prostitution
/ drugs / violence”.

I think my priorities are just fine, thank you very much. Would you like it if everyone
started spouting gossip and false statements about you or something you’ve worked hard
for? My primary focus has been on the people who failed that child and this neighborhood
had nothing to do with what happened to her.

http://blogs.fayobserver.com/kirby/2009/11/20/102/

She made some other comments too and IMO she went maybe a little over the top about what a nice place it was to live.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 07, 2009, 03:03:18 PM
I made a list of everyone in the mobile home park from the info given in white pages.  I can give you the whole list if you want it.  I went through the list looking to see if there might be anyone we already have info on.  I did find some people with last names that might be of interest but don't know at this point if there may be a connection or just coincidence. I'm not assuming or implying anything just noting the coincidence of the names.

Remember Andrea Moore, the neighbor where the blanket was found in the garbage can?  I didn't find her name listed as a resident, but found two other Moore's listed as residents, one is the owner of the mobile home park.  Am wondering if Andrea is related to either of these in some way.

Mario McNeill's gf is April Autry.  I found an Autry living in the mobile home park. 

There is another Davis, besides Brenda and Antoinette, living in the mobile home park.

Brad's former wife was Vickie Coleman Lockhart, now deceased.  In her obituary, her grandmother was mentioned, Patsy Mack.  There are two Mack's living in the mobile home park. 

Vickie's maiden name was Coleman, her parents got custody of and raised Vickie's four children, three with Brad.  There are two Coleman's living in the mobile home park. 
 
The article about Vickie's death mentions another person who was injured in that home invasion, a Tyrone Parker.  There are three Parker's living in the mobile home park. 

Judge Tal Baggett was the judge in Antoinette's arraignment hearing.  There is a Baggett living in the mobile home park.

Ty (Tyrongella) Davis was supposedly the former fiance of Brad, they were to marry next April, now supposedly broken up.  Ty's family may include a McLaughlin.  The funeral for Shaniya was held at the McLaughlin Chapel. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 07, 2009, 03:50:41 PM


"The case against Antoinette Davis is strong.  Allegedly, Antoinette Davis allowed Mario McNeil to take Shaniya Davis, her biological daughter, in exchange for money due and sexual transfer.  Shaniya Davis' autopsy proved that 5-year-old Shaniya Davis had been raped and murdered on the day she was reported missing."

http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time (http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time)




Makes me wonder if this is the first and only time Antoinette did this...  and was Mcneil accustomed to accepting sex with children as payment for debts?  Antoinette's uncle said she had been living in apartments and motels (??) before winding up at the mobile home park.  I'd really like to know what kind of motels or hotels and if she was opearting her "business" out of them.  It keeps going through my head that the video of McNeil was him going into the hotel with Shaniya at 6:11am.  Going into the hotel????  Most folks are checking out in the morning not checking in.  In the pics from the video McNeil sure didn't look as if he was the least bit afraid of arousing any suspicion.  Wouldn't that arouse suspicion?  If not, why not?  Was that room rented for a long period of time (days, weeks, months???)  and by whom?  Did Brad and Antoinette share a one night stand in a similar setting five years ago or did he just pick her up in a bar one night? 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 07, 2009, 06:52:30 PM


"The case against Antoinette Davis is strong.  Allegedly, Antoinette Davis allowed Mario McNeil to take Shaniya Davis, her biological daughter, in exchange for money due and sexual transfer.  Shaniya Davis' autopsy proved that 5-year-old Shaniya Davis had been raped and murdered on the day she was reported missing."

http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time (http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time)




Makes me wonder if this is the first and only time Antoinette did this...  and was Mcneil accustomed to accepting sex with children as payment for debts?  Antoinette's uncle said she had been living in apartments and motels (??) before winding up at the mobile home park.  I'd really like to know what kind of motels or hotels and if she was opearting her "business" out of them.  It keeps going through my head that the video of McNeil was him going into the hotel with Shaniya at 6:11am.  Going into the hotel????  Most folks are checking out in the morning not checking in.  In the pics from the video McNeil sure didn't look as if he was the least bit afraid of arousing any suspicion.  Wouldn't that arouse suspicion?  If not, why not?  Was that room rented for a long period of time (days, weeks, months???)  and by whom?  Did Brad and Antoinette share a one night stand in a similar setting five years ago or did he just pick her up in a bar one night? 

Wow 4getunot!  great work on the mobile home residents.
Yeah, I've always had a huge question about why MM seemed so calm about taking aa child into the hotel. Not a care in the world it seemed. Disgusting. Could explain the mother's new desire to "be a mom", if she was needing a little girl as a debit card for her drugs.  All those family names are interesting, some of them not particularly common. I'm going to be even madder if Brad was familiar with the goings on at the park and still he let her be  dropped off there AND let her stay there without a fight. I could go on but I won't.    ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 07, 2009, 08:59:08 PM

SBI to probe possible DSS cover-up in girl's death

Posted: Today at 10:07 a.m.

Fayetteville, N.C. — Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis and Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine have asked the State Bureau of Investigation to look into whether social workers have turned over all of their records in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Nicole Davis.

<snipped>

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6564577/ (http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6564577/)

 ::MonkeyEek::   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 07, 2009, 09:10:09 PM
I would think that if Shaniya was being tricked out by the bio before the weekend that she was murdered, that there would  be signs of sexual abuse on her little body that Carrey or someone would notice when helping her with her bath...or otherwise...wouldn't Shaniya have told Carrey about what was going on?
I am thinking that when Shaniya went to "live" with the bio, that is when the abuse started...then Shaniya wouldn't be telling Carrey anything and Carrey wouldn't know? jmo...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 07, 2009, 09:20:40 PM
Have just added the Who's Who thread for Shaniya.  This info has been pulled from many different sources, by many monkeys and others.  Thank you all for your help! 

If anyone has info that is not included, plz add/update in there as needed.  Plz bring any discussion over here, not in that thread.  Thanks! 


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6639.new#new (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6639.new#new)





Thanks Wyks.   ::MonkeyCool::

You're welcome, Muffy!   ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 07, 2009, 09:55:17 PM

SBI to probe possible DSS cover-up in girl's death

Posted: Today at 10:07 a.m.

Fayetteville, N.C. — Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis and Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine have asked the State Bureau of Investigation to look into whether social workers have turned over all of their records in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Nicole Davis.

<snipped>

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6564577/ (http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6564577/)

 ::MonkeyEek::   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 







Thanks for this great catch!!!  Wonder what info DSS is holding back?

snipped from the article-
 "Chief Bergamine has requested the SBI's assistance to determine if Fayetteville police have received complete and accurate records from Cumberland County DSS regarding this case," Grannis wrote. "Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues, I share their concern, and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard."

Now that really makes it sound like the police have information that disputes DSS. (perhaps the autopsy report??)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 07, 2009, 09:58:10 PM
trimmonthelake:  I've been reading Bill Kirby's articles and the comments as well.  In another article they were discussing who's to blame and a lot of posters were making some negative comments about the MHP and then the manager of the MHP made some interesting comments in defense of the MHP.

Barbara Davenport Says:
December 1st, 2009 at 10:09 am
C. Pons,
Then stop making statements you have no factual knowledge of.
You stated “Sleepy Hollow is in an area known as “Fayette-Nam” and rife with prostitution
/ drugs / violence”.

I think my priorities are just fine, thank you very much. Would you like it if everyone
started spouting gossip and false statements about you or something you’ve worked hard
for? My primary focus has been on the people who failed that child and this neighborhood
had nothing to do with what happened to her.

http://blogs.fayobserver.com/kirby/2009/11/20/102/

She made some other comments too and IMO she went maybe a little over the top about what a nice place it was to live.


Interesting!  I've read rumors all over the net about the negatives of that mobile home park, mostly from those posting as locals, who IMO, ought to know.  Had those rumors been posted in say only one or two places, I might think they were just that, negative rumors.  Yet it does seem that it's a general consensus of those locals who are on the net anyway.  If that mhp and area is actually a nice place to live, I'd think there would be more than just one person posting the positives and feeling the need to be defensive. 

On the other hand, it could very well be that the area already has had a bad reputation and this mhp manager had been trying very hard to do her part in cleaning up that area.  In that case, I can understand why she might be trying extra hard to convince the world that it's a great area.  I dunno, just trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. 

Actually, what this reminds me a lot of, is Elizabeth Olten's case, and how the school spokesperson came out immediately defending the school etc.  'Didn't happen here, this is a great place, etc etc.'  Yet the locals there were on the net with rumors about what an awful place the school is, blah blah..

It's just interesting to me when someone seems to be going overboard in being defensive.  While it may be true that the murder/s didn't happen in these places perse, the victim/s spent time there while alive.  Seems they just do not want the negative publicity to ruin whatever good impressions about these places they may be trying for. 

Why does it seem that when something negative happens, so many folks concentrate on 'cover your azz', rather than on 'justice for the victim'?? 

Edit to add "park", per Wyks.  MB


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 07, 2009, 10:01:34 PM
The first line in my post just above *ought to* include the word park:

"I've read rumors all over the net about the negatives of that mobile home park"..... not just about the mobile home itself.  lol

Fixed it.  MB



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 07, 2009, 10:19:11 PM
Wyks...thanks for the who is who thread for Shaniya...
the one that you and others did for Haleigh Cummings/family was so handy...
great work .....to all...xxxx


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 07, 2009, 10:21:56 PM


"The case against Antoinette Davis is strong.  Allegedly, Antoinette Davis allowed Mario McNeil to take Shaniya Davis, her biological daughter, in exchange for money due and sexual transfer.  Shaniya Davis' autopsy proved that 5-year-old Shaniya Davis had been raped and murdered on the day she was reported missing."

http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time (http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d4-Anointette-Davis-Dec-3-2009-Update--Davis-returned-to-court-no-trial-date-set-at-this-time)




Makes me wonder if this is the first and only time Antoinette did this...  and was Mcneil accustomed to accepting sex with children as payment for debts?  Antoinette's uncle said she had been living in apartments and motels (??) before winding up at the mobile home park.  I'd really like to know what kind of motels or hotels and if she was opearting her "business" out of them.  It keeps going through my head that the video of McNeil was him going into the hotel with Shaniya at 6:11am.  Going into the hotel????  Most folks are checking out in the morning not checking in.  In the pics from the video McNeil sure didn't look as if he was the least bit afraid of arousing any suspicion.  Wouldn't that arouse suspicion?  If not, why not?  Was that room rented for a long period of time (days, weeks, months???)  and by whom?  Did Brad and Antoinette share a one night stand in a similar setting five years ago or did he just pick her up in a bar one night? 

Wow 4getunot!  great work on the mobile home residents.
Yeah, I've always had a huge question about why MM seemed so calm about taking aa child into the hotel. Not a care in the world it seemed. Disgusting. Could explain the mother's new desire to "be a mom", if she was needing a little girl as a debit card for her drugs.  All those family names are interesting, some of them not particularly common. I'm going to be even madder if Brad was familiar with the goings on at the park and still he let her be  dropped off there AND let her stay there without a fight. I could go on but I won't.    ::MonkeyNoNo::

Thank you Mizjay!  That picture of the monster carrying Shaniya away will haunt me forever.  Maybe we've seen, not just a monster, but glimpsed the under belly of a huge beast!!!



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 07, 2009, 10:28:27 PM
I made a list of everyone in the mobile home park from the info given in white pages.  I can give you the whole list if you want it.  I went through the list looking to see if there might be anyone we already have info on.  I did find some people with last names that might be of interest but don't know at this point if there may be a connection or just coincidence. I'm not assuming or implying anything just noting the coincidence of the names.

Remember Andrea Moore, the neighbor where the blanket was found in the garbage can?  I didn't find her name listed as a resident, but found two other Moore's listed as residents, one is the owner of the mobile home park.  Am wondering if Andrea is related to either of these in some way.

Mario McNeill's gf is April Autry.  I found an Autry living in the mobile home park. 

There is another Davis, besides Brenda and Antoinette, living in the mobile home park.

Brad's former wife was Vickie Coleman Lockhart, now deceased.  In her obituary, her grandmother was mentioned, Patsy Mack.  There are two Mack's living in the mobile home park. 

Vickie's maiden name was Coleman, her parents got custody of and raised Vickie's four children, three with Brad.  There are two Coleman's living in the mobile home park. 
 
The article about Vickie's death mentions another person who was injured in that home invasion, a Tyrone Parker.  There are three Parker's living in the mobile home park. 

Judge Tal Baggett was the judge in Antoinette's arraignment hearing.  There is a Baggett living in the mobile home park.

Ty (Tyrongella) Davis was supposedly the former fiance of Brad, they were to marry next April, now supposedly broken up.  Ty's family may include a McLaughlin.  The funeral for Shaniya was held at the McLaughlin Chapel. 

4getUnot - Thanks for your hard work on those living in the mhp!!  I imagine that took a lot of time to gather and sort thru. 

The names you've pulled out, my gosh!!!!!!!!!!!  One or two might be considered coincidental, but this many?   ::MonkeyNoNo::  Not coincidental, IMO.  As MizJay said, some of these names are not particularly common.  It's gonna be interesting to watch and see if any of them connect. 



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 07, 2009, 11:11:11 PM

Thank you Mizjay!  That picture of the monster carrying Shaniya away will haunt me forever.  Maybe we've seen, not just a monster, but glimpsed the under belly of a huge beast!!!



I agree! 

Just as in Sandra Cantu's threads, there is a pic of a family member of the alleged perp, looking into the camera.  Those eyes chill me to the bone, much more so than Sandra's alleged perp has ever done.  I will forever be haunted by that as well.  Much research was done in that case, as to a connection with something much larger than one perp, one victim, one murder.  Time may tell in that case, just as with this case.  Just am hoping those doing the actual investigations are looking into all the possibilities for these cases. 

Am not on a witch hunt for human traffickers, etc.  When the facts as reported, along with info found while investigating, seem to begin pointing in that direction, that's when my hinky meter sets off.   

For those of us who have followed different cases, we can start getting 'a feel' of these different case, if that makes sense at all.  Some seem to be a definite slam-dunk as to the alleged perp.  Yet IMO, some cases just scream of something even more evil, if it's possible to place evil on some kind of scale.  Shaniya's case, Sandra's case, perhaps a few others as well.   Leaves me with the feeling of evilness that no amount of showers can wash away.  And very scared for our future as a 'civilized' society. 

IMO.
     


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 12:14:49 AM
Cookie - Thanks!  Am glad the Who's Who threads are so helpful.  When cases like this has so many folks on each side of the families etc, it can get confusing in a fast hurry! 

I agree with what you've posted about when the abuse likely began for Shaniya. 

We haven't really gotten one consistent explanation that match up, from Brad and Carey.  The details have changed from interview to interview, then they both hushed up. 

From what the story 'seems to be', Shaniya likely didn't see anyone on her dad's side of the family after mid-October.   After that is when I think the abuse began for her.  Am thinking if she could have, Shaniya very likely would have told Carey.  As others have mentioned, could have been part of why Antoinette allegedly said to Carey in that supposed phone call, that she'll never see Shaniya again. 

What I just cannot wrap my mind around is why Carey didn't immediately respond with going over there and sitting on Antoinette's doorstep with cam in hand, if nothing else.  That just sounds soooo threatening.  Custody/guardianship being as shaky as it seems, I'd still be yelling for a wellness check etc. 

Hindsight being 20/20 and all, am betting that Carey and Brad both are beating themselves up more than anyone.  I would be anyway.  They have to live with the choices they made, and/or didn't make.  The "if onlys"....... 

I also have to wonder what, if anything, Brenda knew about this.  Kind of hard to believe that she woke up that morning knowing nothing, not hearing anything.  Not with the reported and rumored amount of feces in and around that home.  With little to no info coming from Brenda, or about her, makes me wonder if perhaps she is doing a lot of talking with LE.  Maybe even cutting a deal for herself in exchange for info?  Dunno. 

Yet after all, (or despite all), it was on Antoinette's "watch" that Shaniya was abused and died.  She's the one who needs to pay the price, along with McNeill.  IMO. 

This case is so mind-boggling!   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 08, 2009, 12:30:00 AM
Wyks  I do want to say thank you for the Who's Who thread.  Your organizational skills are superb!

I'm not on a witch hunt either but would like to point out that Cumberland County is no stranger to child sex crimes.  I checked out some of the other inmates in the jail while McNeil and Davis were incarcerated.  I have included links to the stories below.

Some of the alledged despicable characters in who are/were in Cumberland Co jail -

Timothy DesJardins
 Spring Lake man charged with child sex crimes
http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/5654729/

Bryan Scott DeJarlais
 Man faces 133 sex charges involving minors
http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/4632422/

Todd Lanford and Tonia Powers
 Mother, boyfriend charged in child maiming
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=6509784

Barney Keester Pauze
 Man, 62, engaged in child prostitution, police say
 On The WebNC Wanted: Read more crime news or report a tip
 Site Search 
Man charged with seeking sex from minors
http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/3427875/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 01:06:13 AM
O/T 

Here in Nebraska, we are hunkered down for more snow.  We've gotten several inches already, expecting another foot or so overnight.  School's are closed, appts cancelled.  It's 16 degrees out, feels like 9.  My doxie, whose chest is an inch off the ground, is none to thrilled at wading in snow higher than his head just to go potty.  Poor baby.  Gotta get him some stilts.  lol

Hoping the weather is better for the rest of ya! 
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 08, 2009, 01:09:03 AM
<snipped> from Penny for your thoughts
o/t but these are the types of people into kid porn
http://www.telegram.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091205/NEWS/912050358
he got to stay home with his mommy and daddy so he could go to therapy.... chit bag

Penny  This seems to be a disturbing trend almost as if it's OK to look as long as your not doing it yourself.  IMO Looking at the disturbing images of a crime being perpetrated on an innocent child and taking some sort of sick and twisted delight in it is as bad as doing it.  Not to mention that it is the sickos like this who support and don't report the child exploitation industry.  They actually pay for these videos!!! I beleive they are no less guilty than the ones doing it for heaven's sake!!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 08, 2009, 01:12:17 AM
O/T 

Here in Nebraska, we are hunkered down for more snow.  We've gotten several inches already, expecting another foot or so overnight.  School's are closed, appts cancelled.  It's 16 degrees out, feels like 9.  My doxie, whose chest is an inch off the ground, is none to thrilled at wading in snow higher than his head just to go potty.  Poor baby.  Gotta get him some stilts.  lol

Hoping the weather is better for the rest of ya! 
 

Sorry for another O/T but pictured that doxie on stilts, hilarious!!!!!   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 01:21:49 AM

SBI to probe possible DSS cover-up in girl's death

Posted: Today at 10:07 a.m.

Fayetteville, N.C. — Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis and Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine have asked the State Bureau of Investigation to look into whether social workers have turned over all of their records in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Nicole Davis.

<snipped>

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6564577/ (http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6564577/)

 ::MonkeyEek::   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 


Thanks for this great catch!!!  Wonder what info DSS is holding back?

snipped from the article-
 "Chief Bergamine has requested the SBI's assistance to determine if Fayetteville police have received complete and accurate records from Cumberland County DSS regarding this case," Grannis wrote. "Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues, I share their concern, and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard."

Now that really makes it sound like the police have information that disputes DSS. (perhaps the autopsy report??)


4getUnot - You're welcome!  I'm surprised that the media reported it!  lol  Seems so much is hush-hush in these cases lately.  Am grateful for any crumbs tossed by the media. 

Seems the statement in the article above was very carefully worded by the Chief.  It does sound like LE has info that disputes what they have gotten from DSS.  That, or maybe DSS made things sound so rosy, but it flies in the face of the fact that Shaniya is dead.  Could be as you mention, the autopsy report.  Maybe something said to LE by the 7 yr old boy, might not be the same as what DSS reported.  Who knows, but it sure must be something.  Wonder if we'll ever hear the results of the further help by the SBI?  That info being confidential and all. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 01:23:54 AM
O/T 

Here in Nebraska, we are hunkered down for more snow.  We've gotten several inches already, expecting another foot or so overnight.  School's are closed, appts cancelled.  It's 16 degrees out, feels like 9.  My doxie, whose chest is an inch off the ground, is none to thrilled at wading in snow higher than his head just to go potty.  Poor baby.  Gotta get him some stilts.  lol

Hoping the weather is better for the rest of ya! 
 

Sorry for another O/T but pictured that doxie on stilts, hilarious!!!!!   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyTongue::   



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 08, 2009, 01:32:36 AM
Wyks - Hopefully the reporter is going to be very aggressive and not let this rest.  I would think if there has been some major wrong done in the case of DSS that there would be an arrest or someone may lose their job.  It could be that folks are getting tired of hearing the same old lame excuses about how understaffed DSS is.  Fine line between understaffed and total disregard.  Know what I mean???  None the less I'll be waiting to hear more about this.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 01:35:56 AM
Wyks  I do want to say thank you for the Who's Who thread.  Your organizational skills are superb!

I'm not on a witch hunt either but would like to point out that Cumberland County is no stranger to child sex crimes.  I checked out some of the other inmates in the jail while McNeil and Davis were incarcerated.  I have included links to the stories below.

Some of the alledged despicable characters in who are/were in Cumberland Co jail -

Timothy DesJardins
 Spring Lake man charged with child sex crimes
http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/5654729/

Bryan Scott DeJarlais
 Man faces 133 sex charges involving minors
http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/4632422/

Todd Lanford and Tonia Powers
 Mother, boyfriend charged in child maiming
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=6509784

Barney Keester Pauze
 Man, 62, engaged in child prostitution, police say
 On The WebNC Wanted: Read more crime news or report a tip
 Site Search 
Man charged with seeking sex from minors
http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/3427875/

You're welcome!  Couldn't have done that without the help from a whole team of monkeys!  Including you and TracyGirl.   ::MonkeyWink::

And what you've found above.........   ::MonkeyShocked:: 

Seems there has been a war declared on children .. in our own country.  Deal with THAT, O'Bama!   :gaah:



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 08, 2009, 01:39:48 AM
Wyks - I know you're probably ready to take a break from the Who's Who but I found another link for the triple murder of Brad's first wife.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/124131/



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 01:44:23 AM
Wyks - Hopefully the reporter is going to be very aggressive and not let this rest.  I would think if there has been some major wrong done in the case of DSS that there would be an arrest or someone may lose their job.  It could be that folks are getting tired of hearing the same old lame excuses about how understaffed DSS is.  Fine line between understaffed and total disregard.  Know what I mean???  None the less I'll be waiting to hear more about this.

I totally agree!  The newest excuse I've heard is from Florida.  Found out that FL (as well as other states) outsource their casework for children.   What is most precious to us is being outsourced!!!!!!!   Who even supervises and oversees the credentials etc, of those who end up actually working with the children?   Think of how much easier it will be for them to pass the buck (and the blame) now!   Dunno if it's this way in NC tho.  ::MonkeyMad:: 


Heading for the monkey bunkey... See ya's later!  Night........  ::HelloKitty::





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 08, 2009, 01:49:04 AM
I don't know either about NC but it is personal info that they are outsourcing which should be a major concern to all.

Nite Wyks  ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 08, 2009, 07:52:41 AM
4getUnot  thanks for all the info! great stuff!

Wyks..... I agree 100% with your post farther up..didn't quote to avoid stacking....

also, in Illinois we are expecting a huge storm coming our way with lots of snow too! My dog is dragging in the snow as well...he is really low to the ground...he has to kindof hop to get to where he is going...funny to watch...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 08, 2009, 01:11:56 PM

Thank you Mizjay!  That picture of the monster carrying Shaniya away will haunt me forever.  Maybe we've seen, not just a monster, but glimpsed the under belly of a huge beast!!!



I agree! 

Just as in Sandra Cantu's threads, there is a pic of a family member of the alleged perp, looking into the camera.  Those eyes chill me to the bone, much more so than Sandra's alleged perp has ever done.  I will forever be haunted by that as well.  Much research was done in that case, as to a connection with something much larger than one perp, one victim, one murder.  Time may tell in that case, just as with this case.  Just am hoping those doing the actual investigations are looking into all the possibilities for these cases. 

Am not on a witch hunt for human traffickers, etc.  When the facts as reported, along with info found while investigating, seem to begin pointing in that direction, that's when my hinky meter sets off.   

For those of us who have followed different cases, we can start getting 'a feel' of these different case, if that makes sense at all.  Some seem to be a definite slam-dunk as to the alleged perp.  Yet IMO, some cases just scream of something even more evil, if it's possible to place evil on some kind of scale.  Shaniya's case, Sandra's case, perhaps a few others as well.   Leaves me with the feeling of evilness that no amount of showers can wash away.  And very scared for our future as a 'civilized' society. 

IMO.
     
  WYKS~  thanks also for the who's who.
Your comment about our future as a civilized society is IMO so true and a little scary. It sure seems like the most innocent of our kind, children, are being used, abused and discarded more and more frequently. Instead of outrage and fear of what "we're" becoming, the whole thing is treated like just another terrible crime, which it is but seems like there should be more efforts by us ( LE/judicial/media/educators/everybody) to stop this. Hope one day, history doesn't show that the unraveling of the society was hastened by the lax attitude about pedophile porn , child rape, child neglect, etc. 
The system that we have for child protection is seriously in trouble. There's not enough CPS agents to handle the load, it's not a high enough priority to pay for more. The courts have been cowed by lawyers who make money by challenging common sense, case after case of kids at risk being court ordered to be placed back in the custody of irresponsible parents. Case after case of lawyers fighting on behalf of perverts, returning them to neighborhoods to hurt again.
Everything's backwards, the criminals are the focus. It's all about them. Helping them, rehabilitating them, protecting their rights and only small attention paid to their victims.
It makes me want to do something but I'm at a loss as to what?? Sit here and rant and rave I guess!
                                                                                                                                               ::MonkeyMad::   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 11:07:01 PM
Wyks - I know you're probably ready to take a break from the Who's Who but I found another link for the triple murder of Brad's first wife.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/124131/



Thanks!  Interesting that a third person arrested in that case was a soldier at Ft. Bragg at the time.  Bet that didn't make the Army too happy. 
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 11:10:59 PM
4getUnot  thanks for all the info! great stuff!

Wyks..... I agree 100% with your post farther up..didn't quote to avoid stacking....

also, in Illinois we are expecting a huge storm coming our way with lots of snow too! My dog is dragging in the snow as well...he is really low to the ground...he has to kindof hop to get to where he is going...funny to watch...

Ugh!  Seems like it's snowing in many places then!  We are in the middle of blizzard now, and snowed in.  Nothing moving out there but the poor snowplows, doing their best to show where the roads might be.  Funny sounding with your dog too.  Not funny for the poor doggies tho.  lol  Mine has lil snow boots, hates em, but still lays down and sticks all four feet up for me to put them on.  Then walking in them, he looks like a drunken ballerina.   ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 08, 2009, 11:28:52 PM

  WYKS~  thanks also for the who's who.
Your comment about our future as a civilized society is IMO so true and a little scary. It sure seems like the most innocent of our kind, children, are being used, abused and discarded more and more frequently. Instead of outrage and fear of what "we're" becoming, the whole thing is treated like just another terrible crime, which it is but seems like there should be more efforts by us ( LE/judicial/media/educators/everybody) to stop this. Hope one day, history doesn't show that the unraveling of the society was hastened by the lax attitude about pedophile porn , child rape, child neglect, etc. 
The system that we have for child protection is seriously in trouble. There's not enough CPS agents to handle the load, it's not a high enough priority to pay for more. The courts have been cowed by lawyers who make money by challenging common sense, case after case of kids at risk being court ordered to be placed back in the custody of irresponsible parents. Case after case of lawyers fighting on behalf of perverts, returning them to neighborhoods to hurt again.
Everything's backwards, the criminals are the focus. It's all about them. Helping them, rehabilitating them, protecting their rights and only small attention paid to their victims.
It makes me want to do something but I'm at a loss as to what?? Sit here and rant and rave I guess!
                                                                                                                                               ::MonkeyMad::   

You're welcome!  And I agree with what you've said.  I dunno what the answer is either.  Seems that it's not gonna work with just a few of us so concerned.  Likely it's gonna take more than a few, and at many levels all the way up, of folks saying 'enough is enough!'  Seems there is a need to figure out how to take back the rights of innocent folks everywhere.  As you say, seems everything has become backwards, the rights of criminals ought not be the main focus. 

I do know that CPS out in California has had it backwards for many many years.  They have been known to tell kids as young as 7 yrs old, "Your parents cannot touch you!  Here's our card, call us if/when they do".  Do ya know what kind of power trip they handed those kids?   And took away any sense of respect for authority. 

Maybe that's where it begins?  I don't mean parents ought to be allowed to beat their kids, gosh sakes no!  However, when I was growing up, I had a healthy sense of fear of the consequences if I did or said something out of line.  Just didn't cross that line.  Seems today most kids don't have that healthy sense of fear.  And we wonder why many grow into teens/adults who don't seem to give a rat's azz about anyone other than themselves.  I don't know what the answers are.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on December 09, 2009, 12:48:32 AM
May there be Justice and  for those who have been found deceased..


(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/heartbreaking.jpg)




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 09, 2009, 02:27:50 AM
Jerseygirl  Wow!  What a poignant expression of the burden in our hearts.  Words could not have said it better...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 09, 2009, 10:59:57 AM
Jerseygirl  Wow!  What a poignant expression of the burden in our hearts.  Words could not have said it better...


truly!  picture says it all...

Justice for the children


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 09, 2009, 11:49:01 AM
Published: 06:55 AM, Tue Dec 08, 2009
Fayetteville police question DSS cooperation in Shaniya Davis caseBy Nancy McCleary
Staff writer

 
The State Bureau of Investigation has agreed to look into the Cumberland County Department of Social Services' handling of the Shaniya Davis case.

The 5-year-old girl was taken from her home off Murchison Road on Nov. 10 and raped and murdered before her body was dumped in rural Lee County.

The request for assistance from the SBI came from District Attorney Ed Grannis after a meeting Friday with Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine and investigators.

Bergamine voiced concern about whether DSS had turned over complete and accurate records, according to a letter to County Manager James Martin.

"Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues, I share their concern and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard," Grannis wrote.

A spokeswoman for DSS said the agency and the county first learned of the Police Department's concerns on Friday.

Brenda Jackson, the DSS director, "will see that DSS personnel fully cooperate with the authorities in resolving this matter," said a statement Monday from county spokeswoman Sally Shutt.

Jackson and the agency's board chairman met behind closed doors with the county Board of Commissioners for 12 minutes Monday morning.

Jackson could not be reached for comment, and an e-mail sent to her had not been returned late Monday.

Commissioner Kenneth Edge, the board's liaison to the DSS, said he learned of the letter Monday morning.

He said he did not know what kind of records were kept and had never heard complaints in his two years as the liaison.

Shaniya was taken from her home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park on Nov. 10.

She was last seen alive that same day in surveillance video from a hotel in Sanford. A man seen carrying Shaniya in the video, Mario Andrette McNeill, has been charged with her kidnapping, rape and murder.

Shaniya's body was found Nov. 16 in woods along Walker Road off N.C. 87 in Lee County. A preliminary autopsy report said she died of asphyxiation.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, 25, is charged with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation.

The state Child Fatality Task Force said Nov. 23 that it planned to look into the contact between DSS and Antoinette Davis and her children.

Tom Vitaglione, co-chairman of the task force, could not be reached Monday to determine the status of that investigation.

A family member has said that DSS investigated Davis regarding her 7-year-old son. Davis was allowed to keep her son when the investigation was completed.

Staff writer Francis X. Gilpin contributed to this report.

Staff writer Nancy McCleary can be reached at mcclearyn@fayobserver.com

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/07/958494


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 09, 2009, 11:51:52 AM

~snippet~

DSS Director Brenda Jackson has previously declined to comment on the agency's involvement with the Davis family, citing the investigation into Shaniya's death as well as confidentiality rules for child welfare cases.

Grannis sent a letter Friday to Cumberland County Manager James Martin to notify him that he and Bergamine have requested an SBI investigation of DSS.

"Chief Bergamine has requested the SBI's assistance to determine if Fayetteville police have received complete and accurate records from Cumberland County DSS regarding this case," Grannis wrote. "Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues, I share their concern, and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard."

In a statement released by Cumberland County spokeswoman Sally Shutt, Jackson said she would ensure that her office cooperates with authorities to resolve the matter.

Neither Jackson nor Grannis returned phone calls Monday seeking further comment.

Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, declined to comment. The girl lived with him and his sister until early October, when he allowed her to go live with Antoinette Davis.

Authorities with the state Child Fatality Task Force already are looking into any DSS contact with the Davis family. The task force studies all child deaths in North Carolina to make recommendations to legislators on changes to state laws and administrative polices to prevent future deaths.

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6564577/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 09, 2009, 11:57:30 AM
D.A and Police Department ask the SBI to investigate Cumberland County DSS
December 7, 12:11 PMSurry County CPS ExaminerLisa Nixon
 
 
According to a letter from Cumberland County District Attorney, Ed Grannis to Cumberland County Manager, James Martin, the District Attorney’s Office and the Fayetteville Police Department are both questioning whether the Cumberland County Department of Social Services has disclosed a “complete and accurate record” regarding the case of murdered 5-year-old, Shaniya Davis.

In the letter dated December 4, 2009, District Attorney, Ed Grannis writes,
 
“This afternoon I met with Chief Bergamine and the members of the investigative team investigating the death of Shaniya Davis.
Following the presentation by the investigators with the Fayetteville Police Department, Chief Bergamine has requested the SBI’s assistance to determine if Fayetteville Police have received complete and accurate records from Cumberland County DSS regarding this case. Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues, I share their concern and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard.”
 
Although North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902  permits disclosure to the public in Child fatality or near fatality cases when DSS has been involved, Cumberland County DSS has refused to release any information to the public about their connection or involvement with Shaniya Davis and her family to the public, citing the ongoing investigation.
In a press release issued November 20th Cumberland County DSS stated the following:
 
 Department of Social Services’ Statement On Davis Information Requests
 
FAYETTEVILLE, NC – The Cumberland County Department of Social Services has received numerous requests to release information regarding any connection the department has to Shaniya Davis and her family.
 
In response, the department is releasing the following statement explaining why those requests for information will be denied:
 
The Cumberland County Department of Social Services, through our County Attorney’s Office, consulted with the District Attorney’s Office of the 12th Prosecutorial District, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902(d).
 
The District Attorney has concluded pursuant to North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902(d)(3) and (5) that the release of any information at this time is likely to jeopardize the State’s ability to prosecute the defendant and also is likely to undermine an ongoing or future criminal investigation.
 
As a result, we will deny any request related to the release of information in the child fatality of Shaniya Davis.
 
“We extend our heartfelt sympathy to the family and the community,” said Director Brenda Jackson. “Our focus continues to be on assisting law enforcement in any way possible.”
 
Apparently, the District Attorney’s office and the Fayetteville Police Department are both now questioning whether the focus of CCDSS is indeed assisting law enforcement in any possible way and whether DSS has released all the information they have to local law enforcement and the District Attorney.
 
According to WRAL.com, DSS director Brenda Jackson has said, in a statement released by Cumberland County spokeswoman Sally Shutt, “that she would ensure that her office cooperates with authorities to resolve the matter.”
 
The state Child Fatality Task Force is already reviewing any contact CCDSS had with Shaniya Davis’ family.
A Failure, by Cumberland County DSS, to provide accurate and complete information to the authorities in this case, could affect not only the criminal case, but the findings of the Task Force as well.
This is a perfect example of why there needs to be accountability and transparency in DSS.  Open these departments up to public scrutiny so they cannot hide evidence, their mistakes, or the full extent of their involvement with families.
Allowing DSS to keep their records confidential, prevents full disclosure in many harmful ways and enables them to keep their failures, mistakes and in some cases their law breaking from being discovered.

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m12d7-DA-and-Police-Department-ask-the-SBI-to-investigate-Cumberland-County-DSS
 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 09, 2009, 12:12:45 PM
I know I have posted alot on the request into Child services  but I think its important,  I have posted this particular link in the "Links" thread, here it is for this thread.

Official Request letter from DA to investigate child services handling of information:

http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2009/12/07/6564754/DA_Letter_to_County_Manager.swf


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2009, 01:16:59 PM
Hope this isn't a repeat.....

Published: 12:37 PM, Wed Dec 09, 2009
Lawyer for Shaniya Davis' accused killer withdraws from case
A staff report

 The man accused of killing 5-year-old Shaniya Davis will be assigned a new lawyer.

Mario Andrette McNeill had been represented by Fayetteville lawyer Allen Rogers.

During a brief court appearance today, Rogers withdrew from the case and McNeill was told a lawyer from the North Carolina Office of the Capital Defender would be assigned to the case. The office handles capital cases for the indigent.

Rogers said the state defender office could provide McNeill more resources to work the case than he could.

McNeill, 29, of the 2600 block of Pine Springs Drive is charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape and kidnapping.

Shaniya was taken from her mother's home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park on Nov. 10. Video surveillance captured images of her that morning being carried into a Sanford Hotel by McNeill.

Six days later, her body was found in woods off N.C. 87 between Fayetteville and Sanford.

Shaniya's 25-year-old mother, Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation.

McNeill's next court date is set for Jan. 27.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/09/959210


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 09, 2009, 07:16:34 PM
D.A and Police Department ask the SBI to investigate Cumberland County DSS
December 7, 12:11 PMSurry County CPS ExaminerLisa Nixon
 
<snipped>
 
The state Child Fatality Task Force is already reviewing any contact CCDSS had with Shaniya Davis’ family.
A Failure, by Cumberland County DSS, to provide accurate and complete information to the authorities in this case, could affect not only the criminal case, but the findings of the Task Force as well.
This is a perfect example of why there needs to be accountability and transparency in DSS.  Open these departments up to public scrutiny so they cannot hide evidence, their mistakes, or the full extent of their involvement with families.
Allowing DSS to keep their records confidential, prevents full disclosure in many harmful ways and enables them to keep their failures, mistakes and in some cases their law breaking from being discovered.
http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m12d7-DA-and-Police-Department-ask-the-SBI-to-investigate-Cumberland-County-DSS
 

Thanks for these articles.  I find the part I bolded above to be of particular concern especially in the light of the death of Shaniya, and the circumstances surrounding her death.  I'm glad they are taking a closer look.  IMO this chain of events backs up family members and a friend who spoke out against Shaniya's father alledging the cigarette burns, etc.  Maybe the autopsy report revealed the cigarette burns and other signs that cooborate the family's stories.  This would put Brad Lockhart in a negative light IMO as well as DSS.  If that is the case and those allegations are true then it begs the question, why would Brad Lockhart knowingly and willingly put his child in harm's way?  I'm not trying to judge him just trying to figure out the meaning of the above actions by the LE agencies involved and DSS's reaction.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 09, 2009, 07:21:30 PM
Hope this isn't a repeat.....

Published: 12:37 PM, Wed Dec 09, 2009
Lawyer for Shaniya Davis' accused killer withdraws from case
A staff report

 The man accused of killing 5-year-old Shaniya Davis will be assigned a new lawyer.

Mario Andrette McNeill had been represented by Fayetteville lawyer Allen Rogers.

During a brief court appearance today, Rogers withdrew from the case and McNeill was told a lawyer from the North Carolina Office of the Capital Defender would be assigned to the case. The office handles capital cases for the indigent.

Rogers said the state defender office could provide McNeill more resources to work the case than he could.

McNeill, 29, of the 2600 block of Pine Springs Drive is charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape and kidnapping.

Shaniya was taken from her mother's home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park on Nov. 10. Video surveillance captured images of her that morning being carried into a Sanford Hotel by McNeill.

Six days later, her body was found in woods off N.C. 87 between Fayetteville and Sanford.

Shaniya's 25-year-old mother, Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation.

McNeill's next court date is set for Jan. 27.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/09/959210

I thought in the court video we saw McNeil sign the waiver for a court appointed attorney in order to hire Roger's.  Of course that doesn't matter I guess if Rogers withdraws from the case.  Wonder if it is too close to home for him to defend this POS.  MOO, of course!!!



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: 4getUnot on December 09, 2009, 07:29:07 PM
I know I have posted alot on the request into Child services  but I think its important,  I have posted this particular link in the "Links" thread, here it is for this thread.

Official Request letter from DA to investigate child services handling of information:

http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2009/12/07/6564754/DA_Letter_to_County_Manager.swf

ITA  This is very serious if DSS if hiding, covering up, and refusing to disclose info in a Human Trafficking case.  Who, why, when, and how long???  This sure doesn't look good on them, does it???   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 09, 2009, 09:08:59 PM
I know I have posted alot on the request into Child services  but I think its important,  I have posted this particular link in the "Links" thread, here it is for this thread.

Official Request letter from DA to investigate child services handling of information:

http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2009/12/07/6564754/DA_Letter_to_County_Manager.swf

ITA  This is very serious if DSS if hiding, covering up, and refusing to disclose info in a Human Trafficking case.  Who, why, when, and how long???  This sure doesn't look good on them, does it???   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

no it doesn't look good for them at all...
why can't the public see it? if everything was as it should have been, then why can't they disclose what they found or what they knew?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Wyks on December 10, 2009, 12:40:53 AM
Hmmm... IIRC, seems that all I've read/heard about until now, is that DSS was only involved with Antoinette re her 7 yr old son... that Shaniya wasn't involved in that investigation... that perhaps DSS wasn't even aware of Shaniya before, possibly due to Antoinette having not reported that Shaniya visited/lived with her.     

But the letter in the article upthread says that the Police Chief "requested the SBI’s assistance to determine if Fayetteville Police have received complete and accurate records from Cumberland County DSS regarding this case."

Regarding this case?  If DSS had no involvement with Antoinette and Shaniya before her death, wouldn't they have simply said that to LE, and that would have been that?  But it seems they didn't.  It seems that DSS met with LE on Monday, and it took them 12 minutes to say that they "deny any request related to the release of information in the child fatality of Shaniya Davis."  Oh.... really? 

-- Which must mean that DSS *does have* info re Shaniya that they are refusing to release..

-- Which must mean that what DSS already reported to LE was incomplete and/or inaccurate, which prompted LE to call in the SBI.

-- Which must mean that LE has info or thinks that DSS had already been involved with Antoinette/Shaniya before her death.

How else would DSS have records 'regarding this case'? 

And another thought....
-- Is it possible that LE has info or thinks that Antoinette's 7 yr old son may also have been abused in some way, along with Shaniya, before her death? 

Am very tired tonight.. hope this made sense!  Going nite nite.. see ya all tomorrow. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 10, 2009, 12:44:27 AM
 I'm not a big fan of hers but when Hillary Clinton said that it takes a village to raise a child I'm sure that she didn't mean a village of idiots. Seems like Shaniya's father felt very comfortable farming out his kids. His circumstances were difficult at times but still he had resources that many don't. it's a fortunate thing that the older kids were left in permanent care of stable loving family members.  Poor Shaniya pulled the unlucky parents card and paid for it with her life.      ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 10, 2009, 07:22:52 AM
I'm not a big fan of hers but when Hillary Clinton said that it takes a village to raise a child I'm sure that she didn't mean a village of idiots. Seems like Shaniya's father felt very comfortable farming out his kids. His circumstances were difficult at times but still he had resources that many don't. it's a fortunate thing that the older kids were left in permanent care of stable loving family members.  Poor Shaniya pulled the unlucky parents card and paid for it with her life.      ::MonkeyWaa::

Yes...agree...
he had choices that others did not have...
Shaniya was the youngest.....the others were already farmed out...she was the only one left..his last responsibility...
Not sure yet why he didn't just let Carey have this baby...I feel that she would have taken Shaniya in a heartbeat... ::MonkeyMad::
I hope that he doesn't procreate  any more children..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: trimmonthelake on December 10, 2009, 07:40:14 AM
http://www.dailycomet.com/article/20091210/APN/912100858
New attorney for NC man charged in girl's slaying
The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, December 10, 2009 at 5:07 a.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, December 10, 2009 at 5:07 a.m.
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. - A judge has appointed a new attorney for the North Carolina man charged with slaying a 5-year-old girl.

Multiple media outlets report that a capital public defender was appointed Wednesday for 29-year-old Mario McNeill after his attorney withdrew from the case.

McNeill is charged with murder, rape and kidnapping in the death of Shaniya Davis.

The Fayetteville girl was reported missing by her mother on Nov. 10. Authorities say McNeill picked the girl up in front of her home and drove her more than 30 miles to a hotel in Sanford, where she was last seen alive. Surveillance video captured McNeill carrying the girl in the building.

Shaniya's mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 10, 2009, 12:35:08 PM
I'm not a big fan of hers but when Hillary Clinton said that it takes a village to raise a child I'm sure that she didn't mean a village of idiots. Seems like Shaniya's father felt very comfortable farming out his kids. His circumstances were difficult at times but still he had resources that many don't. it's a fortunate thing that the older kids were left in permanent care of stable loving family members.  Poor Shaniya pulled the unlucky parents card and paid for it with her life.      ::MonkeyWaa::

Yes...agree...
he had choices that others did not have...
Shaniya was the youngest.....the others were already farmed out...she was the only one left..his last responsibility...
Not sure yet why he didn't just let Carey have this baby...I feel that she would have taken Shaniya in a heartbeat... ::MonkeyMad::
I hope that he doesn't procreate  any more children..
Cookie~  I'm going to put a disclaimer on this comment before I write it~ Not A Judgement But Just An Observation

It looks like (from the outside anyway) that Brad immersed himself in the black community. His way of talking even changes when he has been filmed when he's been in the comfort zone of his church friends and others. Or it could be that his way of talking changes when he's giving updates to news ppl. Whichever way it is, I wonder if he didn't want Shanya to be raised in a  black community however I think I remember one of his good friends, a black gentleman, who offered to care for her. He apparently didn't take the guy up on the offer. Possibly he felt Carey couldn't give Shaniya enough exposure to her cultural heritage??
We will probably never know and for sure never understand why he made the decisions that he did but I'm with you on hoping he doesn't make any more babies.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 10, 2009, 01:09:44 PM
Hope this isn't a repeat.....

Published: 12:37 PM, Wed Dec 09, 2009
Lawyer for Shaniya Davis' accused killer withdraws from case
A staff report

 The man accused of killing 5-year-old Shaniya Davis will be assigned a new lawyer.

Mario Andrette McNeill had been represented by Fayetteville lawyer Allen Rogers.

During a brief court appearance today, Rogers withdrew from the case and McNeill was told a lawyer from the North Carolina Office of the Capital Defender would be assigned to the case. The office handles capital cases for the indigent.

Rogers said the state defender office could provide McNeill more resources to work the case than he could.

McNeill, 29, of the 2600 block of Pine Springs Drive is charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape and kidnapping.

Shaniya was taken from her mother's home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park on Nov. 10. Video surveillance captured images of her that morning being carried into a Sanford Hotel by McNeill.

Six days later, her body was found in woods off N.C. 87 between Fayetteville and Sanford.

Shaniya's 25-year-old mother, Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking, child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing an investigation.

McNeill's next court date is set for Jan. 27.

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/09/959210

I thought in the court video we saw McNeil sign the waiver for a court appointed attorney in order to hire Roger's.  Of course that doesn't matter I guess if Rogers withdraws from the case.  Wonder if it is too close to home for him to defend this POS.  MOO, of course!!!



Im not quite sure, Im not schooled in the fine arts of the Law or the legal system...But I wonder if "Capital Defender" means that they will be going for the death penalty in this case and that the lawyer he had is not well equipped in Capital Cases?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 10, 2009, 01:18:31 PM
Here is another article from Bill Kirby, In my opinion he will stay on this case and fight for Shaniya and all other children:

Published: 07:52 AM, Wed Dec 09, 2009
Red flags prompt closer look at DSSBill Kirby


 
Tom Bergamine has raised a red flag. He's the city police chief.

So has Ed Grannis. He's the county district attorney.

They are concerned about whether the Cumberland County Department of Social Services isfullycooperating with police in the investigation of slain 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

"Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues," Grannis writes to County Manager James Martin, "I share their concern, and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard."

Brenda Jackson is director of the Social Services agency that a family member of Antoinette Davis says previously investigated Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son.

Davis is the mother, too, of Shaniya, who was allegedly abducted Nov. 10 from her home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park and found six days later raped and asphyxiated in Lee County.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, is charged with kidnapping, rape and murder in the case. Antoinette Davis, 25, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.

Jackson has been tight-lipped about her agency's investigative involvement with the mother, citing confidentiality restrictions. She said earlier that her agency was assisting Fayetteville police in the case.

Evidently, the chief and his investigators do not believe Jackson and her agency are cooperating, or cooperating as they should. Neither does the district attorney.

That's your red flag, Mrs. Jackson.

That's why Grannis has called in the State Bureau of Investigation.

The wheels of justice turn slowly, but when it comes to neglect or abused children, this is a zero-tolerance district attorney with zero-tolerance assistants, notably Margaret "Buntie" Russ, by his side.

The death of a Spring Lake child in March 2006, and that town's poor police investigation of the case, is what prompted Grannis' role in the ultimate demise and reconstruction of the Spring Lake Police Department.

Apparently, Grannis got the attention Monday of Jackson and Chet Oehme, the Social Services board chairman, as well as county commissioners.

Jacksonnow"will see that DSS personnel fully cooperate with the authorities in resolving this matter," we learn through Sally Shutt, a county spokeswoman.

Well and good, but this is about the abduction, rape and murder of a child who was brutally violated, her breath constricted out of her fragile 40-pound body.

I expect to hear from the Social Services director and just how her agency will cooperate with investigators. Chet Oehme and DSS board members Lyn Green, George Hendricks, Mary Deyampert-McCall and Marvin Rouse and county commissioners should expect as much.

We all can respect confidentiality in child abuse cases, but we also can expect assurances from the Social Services director - not a spokeswoman - that she and her case workers are assisting investigators and helping identify events or suspicions that may have led to this awful crime.

I'll not rest.

Not as long as there are red flags, and not until there is justice for this child.

Bill Kirby can be reached at kirbyb@fayobserver.com

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/09/959017


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 10, 2009, 01:22:50 PM
 Shaniya Davis Case Update: Mario McNeill Dec. 9 court appearance, future date has been set
December 9, 1:20 PM Loretta Arnold
 
 
Dec. 9, 2009 - The new information surrounding Mario McNeill's court appearance brings Mario McNeill back into the spotlight.  In today's news Mario McNeill is closer to his verdict.  With new dates set the trial of murdered Shaniya Davis is right around the bend.

Mario McNeill has been charged with first-degree kidnapping, first-degree rape and first-degree murder in the death of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

Mario McNeill will return to court on January 20, 2010 surrounding the kidnapping charges.  The criminal division on the Cumberland County Courthouse has updated their system this afternoon offering details on the next date Mario McNeill will appear over the rape and murder charges.  That court date will be January 27, 2010 in courtroom 2B at the Cumberland County Courthouse.

Antoinette Davis is currently located in the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women, just 2.44 miles from where Mario McNeill is located.  Mario McNeill remains in Raleigh's Central Prison.

On December 3rd Davis requested for a motion to continue.  That next court date will be on January 18, 2010 also in courtroom 2B.  A process for felony offenders to travel through when requesting a motion to continue depends upon the court's panel.

It's a legal waiting game that is necessary.

5-year-old Shaniya Davis was reported missing by her biological mother Antoinette Davis.  A week later Shaniya Davis was found dead in a wooded area off of Walker Road in Lee County.  The authorities closed in on Antoinette Davis and Mario McNeill before the young North Carolina girls had been found.

The Fayetteville Police Department charged Antoinette Davis with human trafficking, felony child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and interfering with an investigation resulting in two felonies and two misdemeanors.

Mario McNeill was first charged with first-degree kidnapping.  However, after Shaniya Davis was found the autopsy proved a swift change in charges.  Mario McNeill was then charged with first-degree rape and first-degree murder to add to the first-degree kidnapping charge.

Shaniya Davis will always be remembered as a shy fun loving little girl.  Question is, will Antoinette Davis receive the 25 plus years in prison for handing over Shaniya Davis to Mario McNeill contributing to Shaniya's death?  Will Mario McNeill receive life in prison without the possibility of parole or the death penalty?

Stay tuned for more on the latest developments, Mario McNeill updates, and Antoinette Davis updates surrounding the Shaniya Davis case.

As for the upcoming court dates for Mario McNeill and Antoinette Davis the world is watching in a waiting game of verdicts.


http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m12d9-Shaniya-Davis-Update--Mario-McNeill-Dec-9-court-appearance


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: SloSthrnStyle on December 10, 2009, 01:32:40 PM
Seems to me there alot of question regarding North Carolina's Dept of Children Services..Im going to give a couple of links here for reading if you would like....the first is from the examiner, I posted yesterday, but if you look to the right and down for blogs you will see a list of stories:

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m12d7-DA-and-Police-Department-ask-the-SBI-to-investigate-Cumberland-County-DSS


This particular link is for another case in North Carolina....
http://stopcorruptdss.wordpress.com/


In our country we are having a problem with DSS, DCS or whatever the agency is called in certain areas of the US.  From outsourcing, to being just overworked, to who cares...to who knows what else.  I could say alot more but it would be just opinion...but we have a real problem.





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: mizjay on December 10, 2009, 02:08:29 PM
Here is another article from Bill Kirby, In my opinion he will stay on this case and fight for Shaniya and all other children:

Published: 07:52 AM, Wed Dec 09, 2009
Red flags prompt closer look at DSSBill Kirby


 
Tom Bergamine has raised a red flag. He's the city police chief.

So has Ed Grannis. He's the county district attorney.

They are concerned about whether the Cumberland County Department of Social Services isfullycooperating with police in the investigation of slain 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

"Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues," Grannis writes to County Manager James Martin, "I share their concern, and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard."

Brenda Jackson is director of the Social Services agency that a family member of Antoinette Davis says previously investigated Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son.

Davis is the mother, too, of Shaniya, who was allegedly abducted Nov. 10 from her home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park and found six days later raped and asphyxiated in Lee County.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, is charged with kidnapping, rape and murder in the case. Antoinette Davis, 25, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.

Jackson has been tight-lipped about her agency's investigative involvement with the mother, citing confidentiality restrictions. She said earlier that her agency was assisting Fayetteville police in the case.

Evidently, the chief and his investigators do not believe Jackson and her agency are cooperating, or cooperating as they should. Neither does the district attorney.

That's your red flag, Mrs. Jackson.

That's why Grannis has called in the State Bureau of Investigation.

The wheels of justice turn slowly, but when it comes to neglect or abused children, this is a zero-tolerance district attorney with zero-tolerance assistants, notably Margaret "Buntie" Russ, by his side.

The death of a Spring Lake child in March 2006, and that town's poor police investigation of the case, is what prompted Grannis' role in the ultimate demise and reconstruction of the Spring Lake Police Department.

Apparently, Grannis got the attention Monday of Jackson and Chet Oehme, the Social Services board chairman, as well as county commissioners.

Jacksonnow"will see that DSS personnel fully cooperate with the authorities in resolving this matter," we learn through Sally Shutt, a county spokeswoman.

Well and good, but this is about the abduction, rape and murder of a child who was brutally violated, her breath constricted out of her fragile 40-pound body.

I expect to hear from the Social Services director and just how her agency will cooperate with investigators. Chet Oehme and DSS board members Lyn Green, George Hendricks, Mary Deyampert-McCall and Marvin Rouse and county commissioners should expect as much.

We all can respect confidentiality in child abuse cases, but we also can expect assurances from the Social Services director - not a spokeswoman - that she and her case workers are assisting investigators and helping identify events or suspicions that may have led to this awful crime.

I'll not rest.

Not as long as there are red flags, and not until there is justice for this child.

Bill Kirby can be reached at kirbyb@fayobserver.com

http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/12/09/959017
::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::  This is what we need. Someone who will keep up a fight for justice.
Thanks for the article SloSthrnStyle


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 10, 2009, 02:10:17 PM
I'm not a big fan of hers but when Hillary Clinton said that it takes a village to raise a child I'm sure that she didn't mean a village of idiots. Seems like Shaniya's father felt very comfortable farming out his kids. His circumstances were difficult at times but still he had resources that many don't. it's a fortunate thing that the older kids were left in permanent care of stable loving family members.  Poor Shaniya pulled the unlucky parents card and paid for it with her life.      ::MonkeyWaa::

Yes...agree...
he had choices that others did not have...
Shaniya was the youngest.....the others were already farmed out...she was the only one left..his last responsibility...
Not sure yet why he didn't just let Carey have this baby...I feel that she would have taken Shaniya in a heartbeat... ::MonkeyMad::
I hope that he doesn't procreate  any more children..
Cookie~  I'm going to put a disclaimer on this comment before I write it~ Not A Judgement But Just An Observation

It looks like (from the outside anyway) that Brad immersed himself in the black community. His way of talking even changes when he has been filmed when he's been in the comfort zone of his church friends and others. Or it could be that his way of talking changes when he's giving updates to news ppl. Whichever way it is, I wonder if he didn't want Shanya to be raised in a  black community however I think I remember one of his good friends, a black gentleman, who offered to care for her. He apparently didn't take the guy up on the offer. Possibly he felt Carey couldn't give Shaniya enough exposure to her cultural heritage??
We will probably never know and for sure never understand why he made the decisions that he did but I'm with you on hoping he doesn't make any more babies.

I had noticed that as well! He does change the way that he speaks...why is that?

but like you say, we will probably never understand why he made the decisions that he made...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: penny for your thoughts on December 10, 2009, 03:40:03 PM
I know I have posted alot on the request into Child services  but I think its important,  I have posted this particular link in the "Links" thread, here it is for this thread.

Official Request letter from DA to investigate child services handling of information:

http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2009/12/07/6564754/DA_Letter_to_County_Manager.swf

ITA  This is very serious if DSS if hiding, covering up, and refusing to disclose info in a Human Trafficking case.  Who, why, when, and how long???  This sure doesn't look good on them, does it???   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

no it doesn't look good for them at all...
why can't the public see it? if everything was as it should have been, then why can't they disclose what they found or what they knew?
as far as i know and i could be wrong but once the person is dead all their private records can be released at the will of the legally bound entity... like if you kill yourself your shrink can now talk about your issues and your medical records can usually be released i would think dss records would be the same... those laws are to protect the party that they are about and once the party is dead there is no "legal contract" binding the party to secrecy


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on December 10, 2009, 04:32:10 PM
 ::MonkeyAngel:: Prayers for you sweet angel girl.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Lenie on December 10, 2009, 10:39:02 PM
IMO they need to do something here with the charges. How can they say that AD gave the child away (the trafficking charge) and in the same breath say that he kidnapped her??? I am not saying that either should get off with anything please do not think that, but if I were one or the others lawyer I would definitely be bringing that up. I really see a conflict of the cases coming on here and am afraid that one of them will walk on certain charges if they don't hurry up with her charges, or change his from kidnapping.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 11, 2009, 12:06:25 AM
IMO they need to do something here with the charges. How can they say that AD gave the child away (the trafficking charge) and in the same breath say that he kidnapped her??? I am not saying that either should get off with anything please do not think that, but if I were one or the others lawyer I would definitely be bringing that up. I really see a conflict of the cases coming on here and am afraid that one of them will walk on certain charges if they don't hurry up with her charges, or change his from kidnapping.

Lenie...I get what you are saying...I had wondered the same...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on December 11, 2009, 02:43:28 PM
Good afternoon!  Believe it or not, there is no conflict in the charges regarding the kidnapping. First, to believe a kidnapping didn't occur, you have to believe the perp. To believe it did occur you have to believe the "mom."  However, putting that aside for a moment, remember that the police stated Shaniya left the hotel alive. Under no theory of consent did the killer have "permission" to take her from the hotel and kill her. Therein lies the kidnapping. You have to look at every event separately, not bunch them together into a single event.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cookie on December 11, 2009, 02:53:20 PM
Good afternoon!  Believe it or not, there is no conflict in the charges regarding the kidnapping. First, to believe a kidnapping didn't occur, you have to believe the perp. To believe it did occur you have to believe the "mom."  However, putting that aside for a moment, remember that the police stated Shaniya left the hotel alive. Under no theory of consent did the killer have "permission" to take her from the hotel and kill her. Therein lies the kidnapping. You have to look at every event separately, not bunch them together into a single event.

AHHHHHHHHhuh!! thanks for clearing that up Jess... ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on December 12, 2009, 09:06:54 AM
Good afternoon!  Believe it or not, there is no conflict in the charges regarding the kidnapping. First, to believe a kidnapping didn't occur, you have to believe the perp. To believe it did occur you have to believe the "mom."  However, putting that aside for a moment, remember that the police stated Shaniya left the hotel alive. Under no theory of consent did the killer have "permission" to take her from the hotel and kill her. Therein lies the kidnapping. You have to look at every event separately, not bunch them together into a single event.

AHHHHHHHHhuh!! thanks for clearing that up Jess... ::MonkeyKiss::

You Bet!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Tracygirl on December 13, 2009, 02:37:17 AM
beautiful pics Jess...Little Naveah and Sandra are both are such beautiful little girls


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on December 13, 2009, 10:42:00 AM
beautiful pics Jess...Little Naveah and Sandra are both are such beautiful little girls

Thank you Tracygirl.  They are beautiful.  Sometimes my heart gets so darn heavy and I have such a hard time dealing with all of this evil.  They're all children, for God's sake.  Precious beyond compare, gifts from God, like all of us are to our parents.  I just don't understand. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: Sister on December 13, 2009, 12:45:45 PM
JessStar, those pictures are breathtaking.  I do praise God for receiving in His embrace these beautiful gifts.  I share your pain and your agony -- as well as others -- I will never understand on this earthly journey why it rains on the just and the unjust.  I do however stand with you and others in believing we will see the precious ones again and what a delight it will be to skip down the road with Sandra.
Blessings.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: JessStar on December 13, 2009, 11:27:18 PM
JessStar, those pictures are breathtaking.  I do praise God for receiving in His embrace these beautiful gifts.  I share your pain and your agony -- as well as others -- I will never understand on this earthly journey why it rains on the just and the unjust.  I do however stand with you and others in believing we will see the precious ones again and what a delight it will be to skip down the road with Sandra.
Blessings.

Thank you Sister. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cece on December 16, 2009, 01:34:15 PM
http://rippdemup.blogspot.com/2009/12/christmas-gift-for-shaniya-davis.html

A Christmas Gift for Shaniya Davis
Tuesday, December 15, 2009


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: cece on December 16, 2009, 01:40:09 PM
R.i.p Shaniya Davis

http://www.youtube.com/v/rN8ElfIerag&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2
Post by: bananas on December 17, 2009, 01:35:22 AM
http://rippdemup.blogspot.com/2009/12/christmas-gift-for-shaniya-davis.html

A Christmas Gift for Shaniya Davis
Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Thank you for sharing this!  I have even posted it on my web site and expect it will most likely generate quite a number of signatures. ::DancingSantaMonkey1:: ::DancingSantaMonkey1::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: penny for your thoughts on December 17, 2009, 03:10:30 PM
hi guys O/T but i did mention this case here before so i thought i'd post an update... this is the saddest local (to me) case i've heard of...
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091217/NEWS/912170626/0/FRONTPAGE
perfect text book example of child murder where dss looks the other way to past records and the courts places a child with bio parent that was never involved in the childs life and within weeks the child is dead at the hands of bio dad... also this happened a long time ago and he is just now being indicted...
i hope this sob gets what's coming to him and just in time for christmas


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: bananas on December 18, 2009, 01:19:30 AM
hi guys O/T but i did mention this case here before so i thought i'd post an update... this is the saddest local (to me) case i've heard of...
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091217/NEWS/912170626/0/FRONTPAGE
perfect text book example of child murder where dss looks the other way to past records and the courts places a child with bio parent that was never involved in the childs life and within weeks the child is dead at the hands of bio dad... also this happened a long time ago and he is just now being indicted...
i hope this sob gets what's coming to him and just in time for christmas

Thanks for the update Penny.... I hope you take the time to send the electronic letter to stop child trafficking in hotels in the US.  It only takes a moment!  I hope all monkeys will take a few moments to do this.  ::santawink::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on December 18, 2009, 09:12:48 AM
hi guys O/T but i did mention this case here before so i thought i'd post an update... this is the saddest local (to me) case i've heard of...
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091217/NEWS/912170626/0/FRONTPAGE
perfect text book example of child murder where dss looks the other way to past records and the courts places a child with bio parent that was never involved in the childs life and within weeks the child is dead at the hands of bio dad... also this happened a long time ago and he is just now being indicted...
i hope this sob gets what's coming to him and just in time for christmas


grrrr ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: this pizzes me off so badly..
He had a good home with his gramma...so sad...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: penny for your thoughts on December 18, 2009, 07:24:23 PM
hi guys O/T but i did mention this case here before so i thought i'd post an update... this is the saddest local (to me) case i've heard of...
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091217/NEWS/912170626/0/FRONTPAGE
perfect text book example of child murder where dss looks the other way to past records and the courts places a child with bio parent that was never involved in the childs life and within weeks the child is dead at the hands of bio dad... also this happened a long time ago and he is just now being indicted...
i hope this sob gets what's coming to him and just in time for christmas


grrrr ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: this pizzes me off so badly..
He had a good home with his gramma...so sad...
and on fathers day too... chit bag


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: penny for your thoughts on December 18, 2009, 07:27:20 PM
hi guys O/T but i did mention this case here before so i thought i'd post an update... this is the saddest local (to me) case i've heard of...
http://www.telegram.com/article/20091217/NEWS/912170626/0/FRONTPAGE
perfect text book example of child murder where dss looks the other way to past records and the courts places a child with bio parent that was never involved in the childs life and within weeks the child is dead at the hands of bio dad... also this happened a long time ago and he is just now being indicted...
i hope this sob gets what's coming to him and just in time for christmas


grrrr ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad:: this pizzes me off so badly..
He had a good home with his gramma...so sad...
and on fathers day too... chit bag
this is why i tend to doubt that bio mom would have had a hard time getting sole custody of shaniya and that bio dad knew not to rock the boat with her too much...
bio parent on record trumps all it seems and if he wasn't on birth cert he would have had to prove it with waiting on a dna test in the meantime shaniya would have stayed with bio mom or bio mom relative


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cece on December 19, 2009, 01:50:37 PM
SBI begins investigation into Cumberland County Department of Social Services

http://www.examiner.com/x-29636-Surry-County-CPS-Examiner~y2009m12d19-SBI-begins-investigation-into-Cumberland-County-Department-of-Social-Services

The North Carolina SBI has began their investigation into whether or not the Cumberland County Department of Social Services released incomplete records to the District Attorney and Police Department in the case of Shanyia Davis.

Cumberland County Department of Social Services had been involved with the Davis family before Shaniya's murder on November 10, 2009.  The extent of their involvement remains unknown since the Cumberland County DSS has refused to release any information to the public, citing the criminal case.

In a press release issued November 20th, the Cumberland County DSS stated the following:

 

 


    Department of Social Services’ Statement On Davis Information Requests

    FAYETTEVILLE, NC – The Cumberland County Department of Social Services has received numerous requests to release information regarding any connection the department has to Shaniya Davis and her family.

    In response, the department is releasing the following statement explaining why those requests for information will be denied:

    The Cumberland County Department of Social Services, through our County Attorney’s Office, consulted with the District Attorney’s Office of the 12th Prosecutorial District, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902(d).

    The District Attorney has concluded pursuant to North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902(d)(3) and (5) that the release of any information at this time is likely to jeopardize the State’s ability to prosecute the defendant and also is likely to undermine an ongoing or future criminal investigation.

    As a result, we will deny any request related to the release of information in the child fatality of Shaniya Davis.

    “We extend our heartfelt sympathy to the family and the community,” said Director Brenda Jackson. “Our focus continues to be on assisting law enforcement in any way possible.”

 

North Carolina General Statute §7B-2902 does provide for the disclosure of information in child fatality or near fatality cases, where the child or family has been a part of a DSS investigation, except when the District Attorney feels that the release of that information could damaged their case against the offender.

On December 4th, 2009,  Cumberland County District Attorney, Ed Grannis and Fayetteville Police Chief, Tom Bergamine both requested that the SBI investigate the Cumberland County Department of Social Services, because they believed that DSS had failed to release complete records to them regarding their involvement with the Davis family. 

In a letter written by Ed Grannis to Cumberland County Manager, James Martin earlier this month, Grannis states: 

    “This afternoon I met with Chief Bergamine and the members of the investigative team investigating the death of Shaniya Davis.

    Following the presentation by the investigators with the Fayetteville Police Department, Chief Bergamine has requested the SBI’s assistance to determine if Fayetteville Police have received complete and accurate records from Cumberland County DSS regarding this case. Based upon the information provided to me and my senior staff by the Fayetteville Police Department concerning these issues, I share their concern and I have requested the assistance of the SBI to assist us in this regard.”
     

According to the SBI's official Website, "The SBI has statewide jurisdiction and investigates homicides, robberies, property crimes, and other serious cases. Involvement is at the request of the local department that maintains original jurisdiction over the case."

It is unclear, as of yet, what action will be taken against the Cumberland County Department of Social Services, if they are indeed found to have withheld this information.  Criminal charges could be pressed against those involved.

According to WRAL.com, DSS director Brenda Jackson has said, in a statement released by Cumberland County spokeswoman Sally Shutt, “that she would ensure that her office cooperates with authorities to resolve the matter.”


The state Child Fatality Task Force is already reviewing any contact CCDSS had with Shaniya Davis’ family.


A Failure, by Cumberland County DSS, to provide accurate and complete information to the authorities in this case, could affect not only the criminal case, but the findings of the Task Force as well.


Shaniya was reported missing from her home located at 1116-A Sleepy Hollow Drive, Tuesday, November 10 at around 6:53 a.m.


Shaniya's body was found November 16, around 1 p.m. in a wooded area Near Highway 87 in Lee County, 6 miles from Sanford and not far from the Comfort Inn hotel where she was last seen alive by a witness.

Surveillance video from the hotel shows Shaniya being carried by Mario Andrette McNeill through the hotel, and into a room, on the morning of her disappearance. The video is time stamped 6:11 a.m.
Police believe that Shaniya was still alive at about 7:30a.m., when she left the hotel.
 

Mario Andrette McNeill has been charged with Kidnapping, First Degree Murder, and First Degree Rape of Shaniya Davis.


It is unknown if Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis will also face additional charges in her daughter's death. Davis has been charged with, Human Trafficking, Felony Child Abuse – Prostitution, Filing a False Police. Report, and Resist, Delay, or Obstruct.


Davis, who is pregnant, is being held in protective custody, for her safety, at the state woman's prison in Raleigh.


The investigation into the events surrounding Shaniya Davis’ death is still ongoing.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on December 20, 2009, 11:58:09 PM
Justice for Shaniya.. ::MonkeyJustice::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on December 21, 2009, 10:51:45 PM
Justice for Shaniya.. ::MonkeyJustice::

I second that with all my heart!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on December 24, 2009, 03:37:53 PM
Happy Holiday to all my SM friends.. I pray the New Year will bring us justice for those who are no longer with us but will always be remembered in our hearts .. Answers to those who are missing and we will keep their names out there and not be forgotten until they are found.

God Bless You All...


(http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt126/jerseygirl12345/HappyHoliday.gif)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Heart on December 27, 2009, 12:13:31 AM
December 26, 2009
A cause worth fighting for
By Jamie Freeze

As you celebrated the Christmas season with your family, I'm sure you reflected on the importance of family and friends. Perhaps you watched anxiously as your children opened gifts, and you were thrilled by their cries of excitement and joy. Perhaps as you gathered with family and friends around a holiday meal, you were thankful for a roof over your head, food on the table, and the clothes on your back. Perhaps you took a moment to pray for our troops who were separated from their families this Christmas. Perhaps you reflected on how much your freedom means to you. However, as you enjoyed time with your family and friends in the Land of the Free, men, women, boys and girls around the world were enslaved. And those already enslaved were being used. Unfortunately, human trafficking never takes a holiday.

According to the International Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, human trafficking is the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons by the threat or use of kidnapping, force, fraud, deception or coercion, or by the giving or receiving of unlawful payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, and for the purpose of sexual exploitation or forced labor.

A recent study indicated that 225,000 Haitian children are used as domestic slaves in Haiti. Typically, these children are "sold" by their own parents out of poverty's desperation. Of the children, two-thirds are girls. Since unemployment has reached 70% in Haiti and people live on less than $2 a day, human trafficking and organized crime have become a large problem. Human trafficking is also a problem in Palestine where women are forced into prostitution and are often cruelly beaten. Tales of horror are beginning to emerge from the war-torn region, yet the trafficking continues. Earlier this month, 107 people were rescued in Mexico City after being used as slave laborers. Of the victims, ages 14-70, some had been tortured and sexually abused. According to officials, the victims were forced to work sixteen hour days with only a thirty minute break in which to eat (this means no bathroom breaks). This was not an isolated incident. A recent study found that 10,000 people are trafficked annually in Mexico. Slave labor is rampant in underdeveloped countries. Last year, Brazil freed 4,634 victims who used in slave labor. People in Pakistan are also falling victim to slavery due to the desperation of poverty.

Many people think human trafficking is an anomaly or just something that occurs in developing countries. However, each year, 17,500 (60,000 by other estimates) individuals are brought to the United States and held against their will. Many of these victims are sexually abused and exploited. As a matter of fact, it is estimated that between 100,000-300,000 American are victims of sexual trafficking annually. The victims of trafficking are typically the poorest and most vulnerable in society: children, women, migrants, runaways, and the poor.

In 2000, it became a federal crime in the United States to engage in human trafficking, yet as we see, human trafficking is still a huge problem — even internationally. But what can we do? First of all, don't fall into the trap of thinking it only occurs in other countries. Clearly, human trafficking is a serious problem in the United States. Don't let human trafficking become an "out of sight, out of mind" issue. Second, we need to advocate for the victims of human trafficking, especially those who are victims of sex trafficking. Currently, our laws say that children cannot consent to sex, yet they can often be charged for selling sex. This must change. Police often misidentify human trafficking and call it prostitution, truancy or curfew violations. Victims (even adult victims) of human trafficking should not be penalized for being victims. They only people who should be treated as criminals are the buyers and sellers of human beings. It is to our shame that we allow the victims of trafficking to be treated as criminals in our court system, when they were never the criminals.

If you still want to reject that human trafficking is a real threat, consider the following case. Back in early November, a beautiful five-year-old girl was raped, murdered, and dumped on the roadside in Fayetteville, NC. Her mother was charged with human trafficking after allegedly prostituting her little girl. Little Shaniya Davis lived a short life filled with unspeakable horror and pain. Hopefully, justice will be served on her mother and her murderer, but that justice cannot bring back Shaniya. A little life snuffed out because of the evils of human trafficking. We can sit back and act like this kind of stuff doesn't happen. Or, we can let the horror and disgust motivate us to advocate for the victims of human trafficking. Perhaps you can make the difference in a man, woman, boy or girl's life. Perhaps you are their last hope. Don't let this issue fall to the wayside like other New Year's Resolutions; make a thoughtful effort to combat human trafficking. Write to your legislators. Write letters to the editor. Volunteer at crisis centers. Donate items to rescue groups. Go to law enforcement agencies and advocate for these victims. After all, nothing is more sacred than human life and dignity — be it life at home or abroad.

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/freeze/091226


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on December 27, 2009, 10:12:03 AM
sad read above Heart...it is unbelievable that crimes like that go on right here in the good ole USA! really disgusting and sad...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: mizjay on December 29, 2009, 03:47:06 PM
sad read above Heart...it is unbelievable that crimes like that go on right here in the good ole USA! really disgusting and sad...

Totally agree....so sad....and scary.....
Hope you had a great holiday COOKIE


HEART  thanks for bringing that article, some of it so surprising.  Hope you had a blessed holiday also.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sdb on December 29, 2009, 09:10:04 PM
How can I keep the "frame" on the right...with the "headlines" from resizing constantly? I just can't read here anymore because the webpage jumps  and I lose my place. It gives me a headache and makes me nervous.::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 29, 2009, 09:36:32 PM
Sdb-Try this please:

In the upper right hand corner of your screen left click on  PAGE.
                                      Click on Compatability Settings. To the left side of your screen a
                                      box pops up.
                                      Look at the bottom left of the box and click on Display all websites
                                      in Compatability View. A blue checkmark will appear. Click on Close.


Keeping my fingers crossed that it works.   ::CowboySmiley::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Ciana on December 29, 2009, 10:02:53 PM
Hello.  ::MonkeyWink::

As a Fayetteville resident, this case continues to piss me off, disgust me, and break my heart all at the same time. I'm pissed off by the fact that Antoinette Davis disregarded her role as a mother and betrayed her child in the worst imaginable way. I'm pissed off by the fact that Antoinette Davis and Mario McNeill played judge and jury for Shaniya when it was not their place. I'm pissed off by the fact that Mario McNeill took something that was not his to take. I'm pissed off by the fact that 1.)Mario McNeill refused to disclose the whereabouts of Shaniya when it was discovered that he was involved thus allowing the families to continue to hold on to hope in an already hopeless situation. and 2.) Mario McNeill has yet to man up and admit to what it's painfully obvious that he did. But then I suppose a real man wouldn't rape a five year old little girl anyway. I'm pissed off by the fact that the Cumberland County justice system played Russian Roulette with the safety and lives of its citizens by merely slapping Mario McNeill's wrist every time he got into trouble even though he proved, with his first crime, that he had no regard for human life and no respect for the laws of society. Lastly, i'm pissed off by the fact that these two individuals either didn't care or think to count up the costs of their actions beforehand. Because if they had, they may have reflected on the pain that they were about to cause the Lockhart family and the Coleman family and the Davis family and the McNeill family and so many people that had never and would never have known Shaniya. Perhaps, Mario would have reflected on the heart ache that his children will inevitably feel when they are old enough to feel the gravity of the fact that their father is a rapist and murderer, of a five year old no less. By a long shot, if Mario had taken the time to let his mind wander that far, he may have realized that he was about to add to the overwhelming number of black children that are without their father.


And now that i've gotten THAT off of my chest...

I know that the the justice system operates under the "Innocent until proven guilty." code so it may sound a tad presumptuous for me to assert that Mario should confess to Shaniya's rape and murder. BUT, I want to elaborate on that. Mario McNeill is a pervert. And if there's one thing that I have learned from simply watching true crime shows on television and reason, when someone is raped and murdered, if you find the rapist, you've found the killer. Now, Fayetteville is an army town so there's a lot of people here but it's still a small town in many ways. I've actually met one of Mario's baby mommas(not talking about April) and I believe she is either 16 or 17, pretty sure she's not 18 though. Now, the age of consent is 16 in North Carolina but I don't care about that. As far as i'm concerned, there is nothing acceptable or natural about a 29 year old man having a child with a teenager and this is why I call him a pervert. So, knowing what I know, I have little doubt in my mind that Mario took the opportunity to rape Shaniya when Antoinette handed her over. And after raping her, why wouldn't he kill her? She was five so she was old enough to talk which means she probably would have told someone that it happened and that he did it.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on December 29, 2009, 11:31:28 PM

Ciana...good post and welcome!

MizJay...I had a wonderful holiday...how bout you?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: bananas on December 30, 2009, 03:56:00 AM
Hello.  ::MonkeyWink::

As a Fayetteville resident, this case continues to piss me off, disgust me, and break my heart all at the same time. I'm pissed off by the fact that Antoinette Davis disregarded her role as a mother and betrayed her child in the worst imaginable way. I'm pissed off by the fact that Antoinette Davis and Mario McNeill played judge and jury for Shaniya when it was not their place. I'm pissed off by the fact that Mario McNeill took something that was not his to take. I'm pissed off by the fact that 1.)Mario McNeill refused to disclose the whereabouts of Shaniya when it was discovered that he was involved thus allowing the families to continue to hold on to hope in an already hopeless situation. and 2.) Mario McNeill has yet to man up and admit to what it's painfully obvious that he did. But then I suppose a real man wouldn't rape a five year old little girl anyway. I'm pissed off by the fact that the Cumberland County justice system played Russian Roulette with the safety and lives of its citizens by merely slapping Mario McNeill's wrist every time he got into trouble even though he proved, with his first crime, that he had no regard for human life and no respect for the laws of society. Lastly, i'm pissed off by the fact that these two individuals either didn't care or think to count up the costs of their actions beforehand. Because if they had, they may have reflected on the pain that they were about to cause the Lockhart family and the Coleman family and the Davis family and the McNeill family and so many people that had never and would never have known Shaniya. Perhaps, Mario would have reflected on the heart ache that his children will inevitably feel when they are old enough to feel the gravity of the fact that their father is a rapist and murderer, of a five year old no less. By a long shot, if Mario had taken the time to let his mind wander that far, he may have realized that he was about to add to the overwhelming number of black children that are without their father.


And now that i've gotten THAT off of my chest...

I know that the the justice system operates under the "Innocent until proven guilty." code so it may sound a tad presumptuous for me to assert that Mario should confess to Shaniya's rape and murder. BUT, I want to elaborate on that. Mario McNeill is a pervert. And if there's one thing that I have learned from simply watching true crime shows on television and reason, when someone is raped and murdered, if you find the rapist, you've found the killer. Now, Fayetteville is an army town so there's a lot of people here but it's still a small town in many ways. I've actually met one of Mario's baby mommas(not talking about April) and I believe she is either 16 or 17, pretty sure she's not 18 though. Now, the age of consent is 16 in North Carolina but I don't care about that. As far as i'm concerned, there is nothing acceptable or natural about a 29 year old man having a child with a teenager and this is why I call him a pervert. So, knowing what I know, I have little doubt in my mind that Mario took the opportunity to rape Shaniya when Antoinette handed her over. And after raping her, why wouldn't he kill her? She was five so she was old enough to talk which means she probably would have told someone that it happened and that he did it.

Cianna, I am pissed off right along with you.... what I feel for the people who took Shaniya away from this world is downright rage!  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on December 30, 2009, 08:26:52 AM
http://www.examiner.com/x-9472-DC-Womens-Issues-Examiner~y2009m12d29-Local-Organization-Makes-a-Global-Difference
Local Organization Makes a Global Difference
December 29, 6:57 PMDC Women's Issues ExaminerKristina Gilchrist

In recent news, 5 year old Shaniya Davis of North Carolina was reported missing. As the story unfolded we learned that Shaniya had actually been sold into prostitution by her mother. The nation was outraged at the thought of such a beautiful little girl being prostituted. With our eyes glued to our T.V. screens we watched the surveillance video showing Shaniya holding on to her soon to be pimp with the trusting embrace of a child as they entered into a motel.

Perhaps we could sleep better at night if we knew that this was just some sort of random occurrence, an act of a deranged parent. Unfortunately, Shaniya is one of thousands of little girls being exploited daily in the U.S. and abroad. Thousands of innocent girls are being kidnapped and sold into this million dollar “business” and forgotten by the rest of the world until a face like Shaniya’s appears on our daily news and even then, we shake our heads in disbelief and tuck our kids in bed safely and soundly as we go on living our lives normally until it happens to us.

One Washington, D.C. organization has decided to not stand by and continue shaking its head. In D.C., sex trafficking is a $100 million annual business. Innocents at Risk realizes that it takes action, partnerships and a voice loud enough to speak for those that cannot speak for themselves.
Innocents at Risk – a 501 (c)(3) organization was founded by Deborah S. Sigmund to fight human trafficking and child exploitation. Its mission is to “educate citizens about the horrific global and local problem of human trafficking and work to prevent it”.
By partnering with the Department of State, Department of Justice, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, Department of Homeland Security, ICE, Custom Border Patrol and the D.C. Task Force, Innocents at Risk has been able to raise awareness and increase the realization of the severity of the issue of sex trafficking.

Recently I had the honor of attending a Cocktail Reception at the Mexican Cultural Institute, celebrating the partnership between Innocents at Risk and Airline Ambassadors. This partnership will not only expand the visibility and awareness of this issue but it will save many lives from this horrible reality. By equipping flight attendants with the proper resources to recognize passengers that are being trafficked, many young girls will be saved.

In addition to the aforementioned partnerships, Innocents at Risk has joined forces with Courtney’s House in raising money to establish a shelter in Washington, D.C. to protect children 18 and under that have been trafficked.

Even with multiple partnerships and new and innovative ways to fight sex trafficking, Innocents at Risk and other organizations like it still need the help of every woman and man that has Shaniya’s face embedded in their hearts and minds.

“To see but not to see. To see but to deny. To see but not act is a crime against a child. You can all do something. You can make a difference. Save a child”.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cece on December 30, 2009, 12:00:20 PM
Good morning Monkeys.  Thank you for the updates on Shaniya.  She has been in my thoughts over the holidays.

Great post, China and welcome!

(http://i732.photobucket.com/albums/ww328/seasidecece/GREETINGS/april-winter-welcome.gif)

I hope everyone is well & keeping warm!



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: JessStar on December 31, 2009, 10:28:45 PM
Working to fight trafficking of children needs to start right here at home in the great ole US of A. An unintended consequence of the federal statute that criminalizes the act of traveling abroad to engage in sex with underage children has been to drive this heinous crime deeper underground here at home. In other words, rather than the perps traveling abroad, the child victims are brought here. Atlanta, having the nation's busiest airport, is the worst city in the country for child sex trafficking. So, it's not a crime of the impoverished, centered in impoverished nations. It's a crime right here at home. Our government should be ashamed of itself for not doing more. While it chastizes China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea and other countries for their less than desirous human rights records, our government works to make it appear that stuff like this doesn't happen here. Well, bulls@@@.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on January 01, 2010, 02:08:55 AM
Working to fight trafficking of children needs to start right here at home in the great ole US of A. An unintended consequence of the federal statute that criminalizes the act of traveling abroad to engage in sex with underage children has been to drive this heinous crime deeper underground here at home. In other words, rather than the perps traveling abroad, the child victims are brought here. Atlanta, having the nation's busiest airport, is the worst city in the country for child sex trafficking. So, it's not a crime of the impoverished, centered in impoverished nations. It's a crime right here at home. Our government should be ashamed of itself for not doing more. While it chastizes China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea and other countries for their less than desirous human rights records, our government works to make it appear that stuff like this doesn't happen here. Well, bulls@@@.



It sure the heck should not be happening here in our country! it is disgusting in any area, unacceptable and it should be stopped everywhere! It makes me sick to think of it....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2010, 02:25:51 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Shaniya%20Nicole%20Davis/33ehmj6-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: mizjay on January 03, 2010, 05:46:23 PM

Ciana...good post and welcome!

MizJay...I
 had a wonderful holiday...how bout you?

Cookie, it was great and without trying to sound all corny, after  keeping up with all these horrific cases I often would think how very lucky I was.
j


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on January 03, 2010, 05:58:51 PM
Sdb-Try this please:

In the upper right hand corner of your screen left click on  PAGE.
                                      Click on Compatability Settings. To the left side of your screen a
                                      box pops up.
                                      Look at the bottom left of the box and click on Display all websites
                                      in Compatability View. A blue checkmark will appear. Click on Close.


Keeping my fingers crossed that it works.   ::CowboySmiley::

ot...Muffers..does this work when using Mozilla firefox? I am not seeing Page in the upper right hand ..anyplace else that I could try that from? thanks...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2010, 09:14:03 AM
http://www.witn.com/home/headlines/80565837.html
Posted: 4:28 AM Jan 4, 2010
January To Be Named Human Trafficking Awareness Month
Greenville Mayor Pat Dunn is drawing attention to human trafficking
The crime of human trafficking will be back in the spotlight Monday.

According to the group Eastern NC Stop Human Trafficking Now, Greenville Mayor Pat Dunn in scheduled to proclaim January as Human Trafficking Awareness Month, Monday.

The crime of human trafficking started getting a lot of attention after five-year-old Shaniya Davis of Fayetteville was killed last year. Her mother's accused of human trafficking, for prostituting her young daughter.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2010, 12:17:57 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/01/09/966820
Published: 07:02 AM, Sat Jan 09, 2010
Don't blame DSS for child's murder
Bill Kirby

Martha Waldrep isn't sure what to make of the district attorney calling in the State Bureau of Investigation with regard to Cumberland County Social Services' cooperation, or lack thereof, in the Nov. 16 death of a 5-year-old child.

You'll find more comments on my blog, The Gospel Truth, I Think, at www.fayobserver.com.

Keep your phone calls and e-mails coming.

I'm listening.
Your turn: "I am confused about the 'red flag' issue you discussed in your Dec. 9 column," Waldrep writes. "DSS is being investigated by the SBI due to cooperating or not cooperating with the police department on the Shaniya Davis murder? From what I have read in The Fayetteville *******, Antoinette Davis was investigated with regard to her 7-year-old son. What does that investigation have to do with Shaniya? It appeared to me from the various articles in the paper that Shaniya did not live with her mother at the time of the investigation in regard to Ms. Davis' son. So did DSS even know about the existence of Shaniya? And even if they did know about her, why would they have notified Mr. (Brad) Lockhart about their investigation? I'm sure the social worker had no idea that Shaniya's father was going to let the child move in with her mother. Did Mr. Lockhart call DSS before he took Shaniya to her mother? Did he call any experts on child behavior to see how it could affect a small child to move her from a $250,000 house in a nice neighborhood to a dirty, single-wide trailer with a leaky sewage problem? DSS is not perfect (I worked there for 20 years, but not as a social worker. Welfare fraud was my area.) But let's not try to blame DSS for the death of Shaniya. If they messed up on the investigation of Ms. Davis' son, that is a problem But if they did not know of Shaniya's existence, then leave them alone."

My turn: No one, Mrs. Waldrep, is blaming DSS for the death of Shaniya Davis. Nor could I begin to answer all of your questions about DSS Director Brenda Jackson or her agency's involvement regarding Antoinette Davis' son or Mr. Lockhart's decision to allow his daughter to live with her mother. Here's what I do know. Tom Bergamine, the police chief, was concerned that DSS was not fully cooperating, or cooperating as it should, with his department in the investigation of little Shaniya's murder. Ed Grannis, the district attorney, agreed and registered his concerns with James Martin, the county manager. Grannis, who is a no-nonsense prosecutor when it comes to abused children, called in the SBI to look into the matter. As a result, Jackson says her agency will fully assist police in the investigation. Shaniya Davis' death was a heinous crime, and we should all be grateful that the police chief and the district attorney complained to the county manager and took action. All agencies investigating this tragedy should be working together in the name of this innocent child and others who could be victims. Thanks for your questions and concerns, Mrs. Waldrep.
Bill Kirby can be reached at kirbyb@fayobserver.com or 323-4848, ext. 486.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on January 11, 2010, 09:16:23 PM
thanks Trimm...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2010, 08:50:20 AM
http://www.waff.com/Global/story.asp?S=11804590
Huntsville woman spreads awareness of human trafficking
Posted: Jan 11, 2010 5:22 PM CST Updated: Jan 11, 2010 5:27 PM CST
By Trang Do - Bio | Email

HUNTSVILLE, AL (WAFF) - Human trafficking in North Alabama is not as far fetched as you might think, according to one local activist.

Pat McKay organized Madison County's first-ever Human Trafficking Awareness Day and she has the support of several Madison County leaders.

McKay hoped to further spread the word on this issue at an event held Monday evening at Trinity United Methodist Church in Huntsville.

Human trafficking is usually a crime associated with war and poverty in Third World countries. But McKay said  the selling and kidnapping of people into sexual slavery is happening right here in North Alabama.

"It's an ever growing problem in the international scene," she said. "But unfortunately, it's becoming more of an issue here locally."

In December of 2009, 30-year-old Manuel Enrique Zelaya of Florence was indicted on federal sex trafficking charges involving a 15-year-old girl.

"When it becomes that close, it becomes personal," McKay said.
The issue made national headlines in November following the rape and murder of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis, a North Carolina girl whose mother is now charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.

Mckay said traffickers will often prey on the vulnerable.

"Unfortunately, it's children and women, as it is in a lot of other crimes," she said.

She's gotten Huntsville Mayor Tommy Battle to sign a proclamation declaring January 11th Human Trafficking Awareness Day in Madison County.

"I wanted to make sure that my neighbors were informed and that's my mission today," McKay said.

Leaders from Huntsville, Madison, Madison County, and Redstone Arsenal attended the awareness event.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2010, 02:29:41 PM
Autopsy confirms Shaniya Davis raped
Updated at 01:34 PM today

CHAPEL HILL (WTVD) -- The North Carolina Office of the Chief Medical Examiner released its autopsy report Tuesday in the murder of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

It confirmed what investigators had already said - that the girl was raped and strangled.

Shaniya disappeared from her Fayetteville home on November 10, and her body was found days later in a wooded area just south of Sanford.

According to court documents, 29-year-old Mario McNeill killed the girl the same day she was reported missing.

Shaniya's mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7214019


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2010, 04:43:57 PM
Thanks Nut.    ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Ciana on January 12, 2010, 05:31:35 PM
This article has more details ,if anyone wants them, than the one on ABC.

http://fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/01/12/967609


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on January 12, 2010, 06:39:00 PM
I hope that the guards turn their backs, and let the other prisoners have at him, that way I will feel confident that this monster Mario Andrette McNeill, gets what is coming to him  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Heart on January 12, 2010, 06:41:55 PM
Autopsy: Slain girl was sexually assaulted
Shaniya Nicole Davis


Posted: Today at 1:10 p.m.

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — A 5-year-old Fayetteville girl who was kidnapped and killed two months ago was sexually assaulted, according to an autopsy report released Tuesday.

Shaniya Nicole Davis was reported missing from her home on Nov. 10. Her body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

An autopsy determined she died of asphyxiation and that injuries she suffered were consistent with a sexual assault. The autopsy report noted she was wearing only an adult-sized black sweatshirt and panties when her body was found.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, has been charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape of a child and first-degree kidnapping in the case. Police have characterized him as a family acquaintance.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, 25, has been charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/6791748/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Heart on January 12, 2010, 06:45:30 PM
This article has more details ,if anyone wants them, than the one on ABC.

http://fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/01/12/967609

Thanks Ciana and welcome!

Autopsy report: Shaniya Davis' injuries consistent with sex assault

By Nick Needham
Staff writer

Injuries suffered by 5-year-old Shaniya Davis are consistent with a sexual assault, according to an autopsy report released this afternoon by the N.C. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.

The report lists asphyxiation as the likely cause of Shaniya's death.

Shaniya went missing from her home off Murchison Road on Nov. 10.

Surveillance cameras show McNeill holding Shaniya at a Sanford motel that morning. The child's body was found Nov. 16 in woods near Walker Road and N.C. 87 in Lee County.

The autopsy report says Shaniya's body was in the early stages of decomposition when it was found, covered in leaves, twigs and vines.

Bruises were found around her sexual organs, as well as one on her face, according to the report.

Shaniya's clothes and a hair taken from her left elbow were given to the Fayetteville Police Department as evidence, the report says.

Shaniya's mother, Antoniette Davis, 25, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution in her case.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, is charged with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child in Shaniya's death.

Davis and McNeill are being held in isolation cells at Central Prison in Raleigh until their next scheduled court appearances.

http://fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/01/12/967609


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2010, 06:45:36 PM
I hope that the guards turn their backs, and let the other prisoners have at him, that way I will feel confident that this monster Mario Andrette McNeill, gets what is coming to him  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I'm with you on that one.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Heart on January 12, 2010, 06:49:17 PM
I hope that the guards turn their backs, and let the other prisoners have at him, that way I will feel confident that this monster Mario Andrette McNeill, gets what is coming to him  ::MonkeyNoNo::
And I hope that the inmates are not in a rush, I hope that they are extremely slow and methodical if you know what I mean. 

May the wheel of inmate justice turn oh so slowly.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on January 12, 2010, 08:51:43 PM
I hope that the guards turn their backs, and let the other prisoners have at him, that way I will feel confident that this monster Mario Andrette McNeill, gets what is coming to him  ::MonkeyNoNo::
And I hope that the inmates are not in a rush, I hope that they are extremely slow and methodical if you know what I mean. 

May the wheel of inmate justice turn oh so slowly.

I agree...
I am so angry over this..this should have never happened to this or any other little child...my heart breaks....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: mymonkey on January 12, 2010, 09:22:28 PM
I hope that the guards turn their backs, and let the other prisoners have at him, that way I will feel confident that this monster Mario Andrette McNeill, gets what is coming to him  ::MonkeyNoNo::
And I hope that the inmates are not in a rush, I hope that they are extremely slow and methodical if you know what I mean. 

May the wheel of inmate justice turn oh so slowly.

What he gets in prison will be nothing compared to the eternal hell he faces after death.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on January 12, 2010, 09:31:16 PM
I hope that the guards turn their backs, and let the other prisoners have at him, that way I will feel confident that this monster Mario Andrette McNeill, gets what is coming to him  ::MonkeyNoNo::
And I hope that the inmates are not in a rush, I hope that they are extremely slow and methodical if you know what I mean. 

May the wheel of inmate justice turn oh so slowly.

What he gets in prison will be nothing compared to the eternal hell he faces after death.
Very true


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Ciana on January 12, 2010, 09:41:07 PM
If these two sorry SOBs have anything remotely close to a soul left, they KNOW that they deserve to die a slow and painful death for this.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cece on January 18, 2010, 10:44:38 AM
http://sanfordherald.com/pages/full_story/push?article-Program+teaches+children+self-defense%20&id=5580103&instance=homesecondleft

Program teaches children self-defense

SANFORD — After the death of Shaniya Davis, Gene Vining wanted to do something to help the community.

Vining, owner and instructor of Brick City Martial Arts Academy, decided to organize a child safety program for Lee County families and received support from law enforcement, local organizations and retailers for Saturday’s expo at Grace Chapel Church.

“After Shaniya Davis was killed, I decided I wanted to do something to educate the children,” he said. “This was all in response to Shaniya. To be honest, she didn’t have a chance.”

He wanted to make sure other children would know what to do if in a situation like Davis’. Vining taught basic self-defense moves to a group of about 15 children who showed up to the program Saturday. Parents listened and watched their children as Vining provided tips.

(snipped)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 19, 2010, 06:46:28 AM


Shaniya's suffering and betrayal from the one person who should have been her ultimate advocate shakes me to the core to this day.

 ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on January 19, 2010, 07:39:01 PM


Shaniya's suffering and betrayal from the one person who should have been her ultimate advocate shakes me to the core to this day.

 ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::




me too Bearly.....hard to get that video of her and the murderer by the elevator out of my head....will never forget that image as long as I live...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on January 21, 2010, 07:43:53 PM

Shaniya's suffering and betrayal from the one person who should have been her ultimate advocate shakes me to the core to this day.

 ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::


The only thing that keeps me from going completely mad when thinking about these precious children is my firm belief God has rescued them from their earthly hell.  I believe though her earthly body was tortured, He had already retrieved her spirit with His far-reaching hand.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 23, 2010, 06:05:23 PM
http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2010m1d19-Shaniya-Davis-Case-Updates--Antoinette-Davis-February-court-date
Shaniya Davis Case Updates: Antoinette Davis' February court date
January 19, 5:27 PMRaleigh Headlines ExaminerLoretta Arnold
Antoinette Nicole Davis is scheduled to appear in the Cumberland County Courthouse on February 18, 2010.  Many have been confused about court dates surrounding the Shaniya Davis case.

The North Carolina Court System website has offered little in detail, if any at all, sending mixed signals to researchers of the Shaniya Davis case.  However, the District Attorney's office has confirmed that the next court date for Antoinette Davis will be February 18, 2010 in the Cumberland County Courthouse.

Antoinette Davis, 25,  was charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse involving prostitution, filing a false police report and interfering with a police investigation.  Davis has not been charged with the murder of Shaniya Davis, her biological daughter.

Antoinette Davis remains in the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women in Raleigh just 2.44 miles from Central Prison where Mario McNeill is located.

Mario McNeill, 29, was charged with first-degree kidnapping, first-degree rape and first-degree murder.  McNeill's next court date will be tomorrow in courtroom 2B surrounding the kidnapping charges as it too may not bring new updates to the case surrounding murdered Shaniya Davis.  His second February court date will be on February 27th.

You can view Mario McNeill's arrest warrant and Antoinette Davis' arrest warrant as offered through Wral.com.

5-year-old Shaniya Davis was found on the second day of search by one of the approximate 250 people involved in the search, including local and non-local authorities.  Autopsy results concluded that Shaniya Davis was raped and murdered on the day Shaniya was reported missing.  Shaniya Davis' body was found less than one week after being reported missing by Antoinette Davis on November 10, 2009
Antoinette Davis was granted permission by Shaniya Davis' father, Bradley Lockhart, to care for her biological daughter as Davis claimed she could be a responsible mother.  Many still question why Lockhart placed his daughter into a deadly situation.  However, Mr. Lockhart's "angel" will always be inside of his heart claims those close to Lockhart.

The District Attorney's office remains focused on the Davis case as they plan on not leaving any stone unturned.  Time will share their true efforts in the Shaniya Davis case.

When Antoinette Davis or Mario McNeill updates and new developments occur we will pass them along.  As for McNeill's court appearance tomorrow it most likely will only pass along a new date.  Patience is key.  The case surrounding murdered Shaniya Davis slowly continues to bring justice to both Antoinette Davis and Mario McNeill.

Special thanks to the D.A.'s office in assistance.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 28, 2010, 07:00:42 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/01/27/971520
Published: 12:29 AM, Thu Jan 28, 2010
Search warrants in Shaniya Davis case unsealed; phone had explicit photos

By Drew Brooks
Staff writer
Police investigating the disappearance of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis found explicit pictures of a child on a phone belonging to the suspect in the child's murder, according to unsealed court documents.

Mario Andrette McNeil's phone was seized by police after his arrest Nov. 19, the warrants say. The Fayetteville man is charged with kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya.

Search warrants in the case were unsealed this week by a Cumberland County Superior Court judge. According to an affidavit attached to one warrant, Detective Jason Sondergaard "observed photographs of a sexually explicit nature and some of the photographs appeared to be that of a female juvenile under 10 years of age."

The warrant says Sondergaard contacted a doctor who specializes in developmental and forensics pediatrics to help identify the approximate age of the girl in the photographs. A precise age could not be determined..

But the doctor confirmed that the explicit photos were of a young black girl.

Shaniya, who was black, was reported missing by her mother, who lived in a trailer park off Murchison Road. Video footage from a Sanford motel showed McNeil carrying the child into the motel on the morning she disappeared. Shaniya's body was later found in woods near Sanford. Her mother has been charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.
Senior Resident Superior Court Judge E. Lynn Johnson ordered nine search warrants unsealed Monday. The documents had been sealed since mid-November at the request of Fayetteville police, who thought the information could compromise the investigation.

The warrants covered searches of cameras and computers belonging to McNeil and Shaniya's mother, Antoniette Davis, along with searches of McNeil's home, two cell phones, a GPS system and two searches of Davis' trailer on Sleepy Hollow Drive.

Davis, 25, and McNeil, 29, are being held in a state prison in Raleigh until their trials.
Brother's statement

In an affidavit for another search warrant, written by Detective Terrance Phillips, investigators say they interviewed Shaniya's 7-year-old brother the day Shaniya was reported missing.

The child told detectives that he saw a black man with dreadlocks whom he did not recognize inside the home. He said he heard loud stomping noises, then went to sleep.

The affidavit says none of the adults in the residence mentioned the man with dreadlocks. McNeil, who was not linked to the case until the surveillance video was uncovered at the Sanford motel, had dreadlocks at the time of his arrest.

According to the warrants, investigators seized numerous items, including computer data from the various electronics; clothing that could fit a young child; soil samples; a plastic straw; and swabbings from a 1997 Mitsubishi Galant belonging to McNeil.

A report from an autopsy on Shaniya's body concluded that her injuries were consistent with a sexual assault. The report, by the N.C. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, lists asphyxiation as the likely cause of death.
A medical examiner's notes say Davis "reportedly owed money to McNeil and offered the daughter in exchange for forgiveness of her debt."

The State Bureau of Investigation is involved with the case at the request of District Attorney Ed Grannis. Grannis asked the SBI to look into record-keeping at the Cumberland County Department of Social Services, which had been involved with Antoniette Davis and her children before Shaniya's death.
Staff writer Drew Brooks can be reached at brooksd@fayobserver.com or 486-3567


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 28, 2010, 07:02:25 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/01/28/971675
Published: 09:14 PM, Wed Jan 27, 2010
Child abuse reports up by 32 percent in Cumberland County


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on January 28, 2010, 10:45:29 AM
I pray those photos on that monster's phone, is only on that phone, and not out there for other monsters to view  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on January 28, 2010, 11:57:18 AM
I pray those photos on that monster's phone, is only on that phone, and not out there for other monsters to view  ::MonkeyMad::

sickening isn't it???


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on January 28, 2010, 01:08:20 PM
I pray those photos on that monster's phone, is only on that phone, and not out there for other monsters to view  ::MonkeyMad::

sickening isn't it???
I'm physically ill over all this. I pray this pictures aren't all over being viewed   ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 30, 2010, 08:55:51 AM
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/311239.html
Explicit photos found on phone
 BY DREW BROOKS - The Fayetteville *******
Published Fri, Jan 29, 2010 02:00 AM
Modified Fri, Jan 29, 2010 07:14 AM
FAYETTEVILLE -- Police investigating the disappearance of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis found explicit pictures of a child on a phone belonging to the suspect in the child's murder, according to unsealed court documents.

Mario Andrette McNeil's phone was seized by police after his arrest Nov. 19, the warrants say. The Fayetteville man is charged with kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya.

Search warrants in the case were unsealed this week by a Cumberland County Superior Court judge. According to an affidavit attached to one warrant, Detective Jason Sondergaard "observed photographs of a sexually explicit nature, and some of the photographs appeared to be that of a female juvenile under 10 years of age."


The warrant says Sondergaard contacted a doctor who specializes in developmental and forensic pediatrics to help identify the approximate age of the girl in the photographs. A precise age could not be determined, but the doctor confirmed that the explicit photos were of a young black girl.

Shaniya, who was black, was reported missing Nov. 10 by her mother, who lived in a trailer park off Murchison Road. Video footage from a Sanford motel showed McNeil carrying the child into the motel on the morning she disappeared.

Shaniya's body was found Nov. 16 in woods near Sanford. Her mother has been charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.

Senior Resident Superior Court Judge E. Lynn Johnson ordered nine search warrants unsealed Monday. The documents had been sealed since mid-November at the request of Fayetteville police, who thought the information could compromise the investigation.

The warrants covered searches of cameras and computers belonging to McNeil and Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, along with searches of McNeil's home, two cell phones, a GPS system and two searches of Davis' trailer on Sleepy Hollow Drive.

Davis, 25, and McNeil, 29, are being held in a state prison in Raleigh until their trials.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on January 30, 2010, 05:48:01 PM
I have had to stay away from this case, I just can't handle thinking of what this little girl had gone through. She was not treasured as the gift she was and it makes me so angry.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on February 24, 2010, 03:38:45 PM
  http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/7110123/  Shaniya Davis's mom is out on bail  ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on February 24, 2010, 03:39:37 PM
Mother of slain child bonds out

Updated at 03:10 PM today
FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- Antoinette Davis - mother of slain 5-year-old Shaniya Davis - has bonded out of jail.

Shaniya disappeared from her Fayetteville home on November 10, and her body was found days later in a wooded area just south of Sanford.

According to court documents, 29-year-old Mario McNeill killed the girl the same day she was reported missing.

He is charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape, and kidnapping.

Shaniya's mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.

Davis had been held at Central State Prison in Raleigh, but a Department of Correction spokesperson said she was released on a $51,000 bond and was transferred back to Cumberland County by deputies.
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7295574


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 24, 2010, 04:01:53 PM
I'm not even gonna say what I hope happens to her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on February 24, 2010, 04:08:58 PM
I'm not even gonna say what I hope happens to her.
And she is pregnant also, isn't she?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 24, 2010, 04:24:56 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/state/story/7111086/

Mother of slain 5-year-old gets out of NC jail

Posted: 17 minutes ago

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — A North Carolina woman charged with human trafficking in the disappearance of her 5-year-old daughter is out of jail.

Cumberland County Sheriff spokeswoman Debbie Tanna said on Wednesday that Antoinette Davis was released Sunday night on a $51,000 bond.

Davis has been charged with filing a false police report, trafficking her daughter and child abuse involving prostitution. Shaniya Davis was found dead several days after her disappearance in November.

Mario McNeill has been charged with the girl's murder, rape and kidnapping. A search warrant says McNeill picked up Shaniya in front of her home and drove her to a hotel where she was last seen alive.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 24, 2010, 04:28:04 PM
I'm not even gonna say what I hope happens to her.
And she is pregnant also, isn't she?

She was when this article was posted.  http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/15/952410


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on February 24, 2010, 04:38:15 PM
WTF???? what is this baby killer doing out of jail? why wasn't she in jail on a higher bond??? I am so angry right ! Hopefully this woman will get what she deserves while she is out of jail..hopefully she won't be near any other children...I am just dumbfounded...I truly am...People who push/sell drugs are in jail on really high bond and this idiot is out of jail!  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: KCJackie on February 24, 2010, 04:49:49 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/state/story/7111086/

Mother of slain 5-year-old gets out of NC jail

Posted: 17 minutes ago

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. — A North Carolina woman charged with human trafficking in the disappearance of her 5-year-old daughter is out of jail.

Cumberland County Sheriff spokeswoman Debbie Tanna said on Wednesday that Antoinette Davis was released Sunday night on a $51,000 bond.

Davis has been charged with filing a false police report, trafficking her daughter and child abuse involving prostitution. Shaniya Davis was found dead several days after her disappearance in November.

Mario McNeill has been charged with the girl's murder, rape and kidnapping. A search warrant says McNeill picked up Shaniya in front of her home and drove her to a hotel where she was last seen alive.

 ::MonkeyMad:: Unbelievable!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on February 24, 2010, 05:03:08 PM
I'm not even gonna say what I hope happens to her.
And she is pregnant also, isn't she?

She was when this article was posted.  http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2009/11/15/952410
Thank-you  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Heart on February 24, 2010, 05:43:06 PM
(http://www.ncwanted.com/wralasset/news/local/2009/11/16/6431724/90395-antoinette-300x225.jpg)
Antoinette Davis

Slain Fayetteville girl's mother released on bond

http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/7110123/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 24, 2010, 05:43:22 PM
http://www.witn.com/stateregional/headlines/85246607.html
Updated: 4:52 PM Feb 24, 2010
Mother Of Shaniya Davis Is Out Of Jail
A North Carolina woman charged with human trafficking in the disappearance of her 5-year-old daughter who was later found dead is out of jail.
Posted: 4:48 PM Feb 24, 2010
A North Carolina woman charged with human trafficking in the disappearance of her 5-year-old daughter is out of jail.

Cumberland County Sheriff spokeswoman Debbie Tanna said on Wednesday that Antoinette Davis was released Sunday night on a $51,000 bond.

Davis has been charged with filing a false police report, trafficking her daughter and child abuse involving prostitution. Shaniya Davis was found dead several days after her disappearance in November.

Mario McNeill has been charged with the girl's murder, rape and kidnapping. A search warrant says McNeill picked up Shaniya in front of her home and drove her to a hotel where she was last seen alive.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 24, 2010, 05:44:59 PM
http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/7110123/
Slain Fayetteville girl's mother released on bond

Posted: Today at 2:56 p.m.
Updated: 30 minutes ago
Fayetteville, N.C. — The Fayetteville woman accused of prostituting her 5-year-old daughter, who was then killed, has been released on bond, authorities said Wednesday.

Antoinette Nicole Davis, 25, was released Sunday from North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women, where she was held in a safe-keeping cell, on a $51,000 bond. Cumberland County deputies then returned her to Fayetteville, authorities said.

Shaniya Nicole Davis was reported missing from her home on Nov. 10. Her body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

Antoinette Davis is charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

Her bond was initially set in November at $50,000 on the human trafficking and child abuse charges and $1,000 on the obstruction and false report charges, attorney D.W. Bray said Wednesday. A family member posted the bond this weekend, he said.
Antoinette Davis was staying Wednesday with an aunt on Mary Street, off Ramsey Street, in Fayetteville. Her uncle, Arthur Cromartie, said she was "doing fine."

"She just wants to rest and get herself together," Cromartie said. "It's hard being behind bars."

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, is charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape of a child and first-degree kidnapping in the case. Police have characterized him as a family acquaintance.

McNeill is being held without bond in a safe-keeping cell at Central Prison.

An autopsy determined that Shaniya died of asphyxiation and that injuries she suffered were consistent with a sexual assault. A medical examiner noted in the autopsy that investigators believe the girl was used to pay off a drug debt.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 24, 2010, 05:46:17 PM
"She just wants to rest and get herself together," Cromartie said. "It's hard being behind bars."


Pure trash.Period.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on February 24, 2010, 05:46:47 PM

"She just wants to rest and get herself together," Cromartie said. "It's hard being behind bars."  ::MonkeyNoNo::  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Heart on February 24, 2010, 05:50:34 PM
"She just wants to rest and get herself together," Cromartie said. "It's hard being behind bars."


Pure trash.Period.
Trash is too good of a word for these creatures. Trash can be put to good use for something. But not these evil creatures. They need to be put out of their misery instantly.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Ciana on February 24, 2010, 05:59:07 PM
IDK. It's probably harder, as a five year old, to be raped by grown man. You can never be sure though so I don't wanna make assumptions. Of course, I don't wanna trivialize the hardships of being in jail...in protective custody. Or inhaling oxygen when you don't deserve to be alive and in good health in the first place. Yeah, she's got it tuff.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 24, 2010, 06:41:35 PM
http://www.thesunnews.com/2010/02/24/1334329/mother-of-slain-5-year-old-gets.html

Wednesday, Feb. 24, 2010
Mother of slain 5-year-old gets out of NC jail
The Associated Press


FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. -- A North Carolina woman charged with human trafficking in the disappearance of her 5-year-old daughter is out of jail.

Cumberland County Sheriff spokeswoman Debbie Tanna said on Wednesday that Antoinette Davis was released Sunday night on a $51,000 bond.

Davis has been charged with filing a false police report, trafficking her daughter and child abuse involving prostitution. Shaniya Davis was found dead several days after her disappearance in November.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: AmandaReckonwith on February 24, 2010, 07:33:28 PM
It's hard being behind bars.

I bet it's harder being a baby who's been raped to death.

I hope she walks in front of a train.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on February 24, 2010, 09:40:38 PM
It's hard being behind bars.

I bet it's harder being a baby who's been raped to death.

I hope she walks in front of a train.

Agreed!
It's hard being behind bars!
Yeah..it's even harder being a 5 yr old who is now dead! I sincerely hate this woman who gave birth to Shaniya...and I don't say that about too many people , but I do hate her...If I was Shaniya's aunt Carrie,who cared and took care of her, I would be in jail cause I would be beating this woman's arse! ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on February 24, 2010, 09:41:30 PM
IDK. It's probably harder, as a five year old, to be raped by grown man. You can never be sure though so I don't wanna make assumptions. Of course, I don't wanna trivialize the hardships of being in jail...in protective custody. Or inhaling oxygen when you don't deserve to be alive and in good health in the first place. Yeah, she's got it tuff.

Hi...yeah that beast has it so hard doesn't she? She needs to be tortured imo!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 25, 2010, 07:08:51 AM
http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Raleigh-Headlines-Examiner~y2010m2d24-Shaniya-Davis-Case-Update--Antoinette-Davis-is-Released-From-Jail
Shaniya Davis Case Update: Antoinette Davis is Released From Jail
February 24, 8:14 PMRaleigh Headlines ExaminerLoretta Arnold
In a surprising twist in the Shaniya Davis murder case Antoinette Davis is released from jail.  Antoinette Davis' family posted bond to have her released from jail until the next court date of April 15, 2010.  The latest development means that Antoinette Davis can leave North Carolina's Correctional Institute for Women, but must return to the Cumberland County Courthouse when required.

Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse involving prostitution, resisting a police officer, and filing a false police report.  However, Antoinette Davis has not been charged with the murder of her biological daughter, Shaniya Davis.

Antoinette Davis reported 5-year-old Shaniya Davis missing.  One week later the news headlines read Shaniya Davis Found in Lee County.  Shaniya Davis' body was located out of view in a wooded area.

Soon after Shaniya's disappearance Mario McNeill was charged with first-degree, first-degree kidnapping and first-degree murder based on a Sanford hotel surveillance video, Shaniya Davis' autopsy and other evidence.  Shaniya Davis died of asphyxiation.

The latest Antoinette Davis update may cause further debate.

With Antoinette Davis released many are outraged of the fact that Davis can receive rights after contributing to Shaniya Davis' death.  Some see it as "if Antoinette had not handed Shaniya over to McNeill, Shaniya may still be alive today."  This is understandable.  However, if a posted bond is successful in exchange an inmate has the right to leave under special conditions.

$50,000 bond reported by NBC 17, $51,000 bond reported by Wral's NC Wanted, would be the amount(s) in allowing Antoinette Davis her temporary freedom.  Antoinette Davis' family posted bond on Saturday.  In some cases it takes days before the bond process is complete.

When posting bond of this magnitude in a case this intense the authorities usually take precautions to assure no one takes off, including house arrest.  Whether or not Antoinette Davis is on house arrest has not been released.  But it is most likely.
Antoinette Davis is scheduled to return to 2B at the Cumberland Courthouse on April 15, 2010 according to Cumberland County Courthouse records.

Source(s):  NBC 17, Davis' Mother Released From Jail, MyNC.com; Wral, NC Wanted


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 25, 2010, 08:51:25 AM
http://www2.journalnow.com/content/2010/feb/25/250015/regional-briefs/
JOURNAL STAFF AND WIRE REPORT
Published: February 25, 2010
Updated: 02/25/2010 12:15 am
Mother accused of trafficking 5-year-old daughter makes bond

FAYETTEVILLE -- A North Carolina woman charged with human trafficking in the disappearance of her 5-year-old daughter is out of jail.

Antoinette Davis was released Sunday night on a $51,000 bond, Debbie Tanna, a spokeswoman for the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, said yesterday.

Davis has been charged with filing a false police report, trafficking her daughter, and child abuse involving prostitution.

Shaniya Davis was found dead several days after her disappearance in November.

Mario McNeill has been charged with murder, rape and kidnapping in the girl's death.

A search warrant says that McNeill picked up Shaniya in front of her home and drove her to a hotel, where she was last seen alive.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on February 25, 2010, 08:53:44 AM
http://www2.journalnow.com/content/2010/feb/25/250015/regional-briefs/
JOURNAL STAFF AND WIRE REPORT
Published: February 25, 2010
Updated: 02/25/2010 12:15 am
Mother accused of trafficking 5-year-old daughter makes bond

FAYETTEVILLE -- A North Carolina woman charged with human trafficking in the disappearance of her 5-year-old daughter is out of jail.

Antoinette Davis was released Sunday night on a $51,000 bond, Debbie Tanna, a spokeswoman for the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, said yesterday.

Davis has been charged with filing a false police report, trafficking her daughter, and child abuse involving prostitution.

Shaniya Davis was found dead several days after her disappearance in November.

Mario McNeill has been charged with murder, rape and kidnapping in the girl's death.

A search warrant says that McNeill picked up Shaniya in front of her home and drove her to a hotel, where she was last seen alive.

so what did mom do? push Shaniya out on the front porch to await her fate while she went back to bed to sleep ? I don't even have words for this creature..I am so mad about all of this ....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on February 25, 2010, 10:17:38 AM
I don't understand a lot of things, but this is right up at the top of my list of things I don't understand.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Ciana on February 25, 2010, 12:38:25 PM
If one of my family members had allowed their five year old to be taken from their home with the knowledge that they was going to be sexually assaulted and then murdered, bailing them out of jail would be the last thing I would do for them. They would be lucky if I didn't disown their sorry ***. Like her aunt said, Antoinette has to pay the price. What she did is unforgivable. What this person(whoever bailed her out) did is unacceptable.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 25, 2010, 01:14:29 PM
http://www.examiner.com/x-24740-Norfolk-Human-Rights-Examiner~y2010m2d25-Global-human-trafficking-news-roundup---Feb-25-2010
Global human trafficking news roundup ( Feb. 25, 2010)
February 25, 8:56 AMNorfolk Human Rights ExaminerYoungbee Kim


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on February 25, 2010, 06:14:41 PM
I don't understand a lot of things, but this is right up at the top of my list of things I don't understand.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::
I couldn't agree more -- to have such a paltry bail in the first place -- her actions resulted in a death -- her baby's death for goodness sakes!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: N2WISHN on February 25, 2010, 07:25:22 PM
I don't understand a lot of things, but this is right up at the top of my list of things I don't understand.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::



This is nothing less than a Travesty of Justice. I don't have enough words to express my disillusionment of the system..........



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: faith1109 on February 25, 2010, 07:38:59 PM
I truly cannot believe that they did not kill this wench while she was in jail.  Even the lowliest of the low in the prison system detest those who rape babies or make that possible for others.  Just now on JVM  ,the daddy said she should have stayed behind bars because a lot of people want to hurt her.  Here here.  Crying tears of rage and pain for this precious baby.  Some things are just too much to take and they go straight to the heart.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: my2cents on February 25, 2010, 07:46:46 PM
I have to say that I am ashamed of the justice system in this instance  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on February 25, 2010, 07:49:34 PM
"She just wants to rest and get herself together," Cromartie said. "It's hard being behind bars."


Pure trash.Period.
Trash is too good of a word for these creatures. Trash can be put to good use for something. But not these evil creatures. They need to be put out of their misery instantly.

"It's hard being behind bars". What about what Shaniya had to endure before her life was taken from her...This is just unbelieveable...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on February 26, 2010, 02:32:31 PM
Out of jail???? Are you kidding me? Her family bailed her out? I am shocked, just shocked! WTH???



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: mizjay on February 26, 2010, 05:19:44 PM
What a bunch of chit. For  a mere 5k, a woman who effectively handed over her child to be raped, who cares whether she had any idea that rape would include the end result, murder, gets to go home, pick up her drug habit and relax. Pathetic trash, justice system? I dunno, justice for who? 
                                                                                                                                                                     :gaah:
                                                                                                                                                                 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cw618 on February 26, 2010, 07:22:43 PM
What a bunch of chit. For  a mere 5k, a woman who effectively handed over her child to be raped, who cares whether she had any idea that rape would include the end result, murder, gets to go home, pick up her drug habit and relax. Pathetic trash, justice system? I dunno, justice for who? 
                                                                                                                                                                     :gaah:
                                                                                                                                                                 

agreed, our justice system needs an overhaul big time


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on February 26, 2010, 09:54:03 PM
What a bunch of chit. For  a mere 5k, a woman who effectively handed over her child to be raped, who cares whether she had any idea that rape would include the end result, murder, gets to go home, pick up her drug habit and relax. Pathetic trash, justice system? I dunno, justice for who? 
                                                                                                                                                                     :gaah:
                                                                                                                                                                 

agreed, our justice system needs an overhaul big time

yep! ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: AnnetteInMn on February 27, 2010, 03:57:25 AM
Absolutely insane that her release was allowed to happen!  Who the hell cares if she may be on house arrest?  She didn't leave the house when she arranged for Shaniya's fate.  If someone will put their own child through something like that they are capable of doing anything.  I certainly hope there are no children wherever she is staying.  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: HopeForAll on February 27, 2010, 08:26:06 AM
The bail for Davis is $51,000 not $5,000. I live in Fayetteville, NC. That is  what local news has been reporting since the story broke. :2brickwall:


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: HopeForAll on February 27, 2010, 08:49:19 AM
Sorry about old info, my bad for not reading up. I should have known that scared monkees have correct info. :smt105


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on February 27, 2010, 10:43:28 AM
Hope, no problems, I do it all the time.
 :-?
The bail should have had lots of zeros behind the numbers.
 :scratch:


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on February 27, 2010, 03:25:10 PM
Hope, no problems, I do it all the time.
 :-?
The bail should have had lots of zeros behind the numbers.
 :scratch:


no kidding Sister~


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: mizjay on February 27, 2010, 11:17:45 PM
Sorry about old info, my bad for not reading up. I should have known that scared monkees have correct info. :smt105

Hope~  I could have been wrong. I was reading that on the fly and figured the 10% to get her out would have been about 5K,  I'm just now checking back in here, so if I was incorrect, apollys!   Even if it was 50000000000000 , she has no business out in the world IYAM


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on February 28, 2010, 10:06:27 AM
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=7298788
Father of slain child upset mother released on bond
02/25/10
FAYETTEVILLE (WTVD) -- The mother of Shaniya Davis is out of jail after someone helped her make bond.

Shaniya Davis disappeared from her Fayetteville home on November 10, and her body was found days later in a wooded area just south of Sanford.
According to court documents, 29-year-old Mario McNeill killed the 5-year-old girl the same day she was reported missing. He is charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape and kidnapping.

Shaniya's mother, 25-year-old Antoinette Davis, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution.

Investigators suspect McNeill was given the child to pay for a drug debt.

Davis had been held at Central State Prison in Raleigh, but a Department of Correction spokesperson said she was released on a $51,000 bond and was transferred back to Cumberland County by deputies Sunday.

Sources say the money for bail was put up by a private bondsman.

Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, says he is angry about her release.

"I'm pretty much speechless," he said. "I'm angry at the way this whole thing has preceded. I am angry that she is out, angry I have to keep reliving this."
 Lockhart says he thinks Antoinette Davis should have remained behind bars, where she's been since her arrest last November. He says Davis shares the blame for Shaniya's death.

"At the beginning of all this I said justice and God would be the judge, and I see the justice system has kind of let us down," Lockhart said.

He also vehemently denies rumors he helped pay for Davis' bail.

"That rumor is absolutely not true," he said. "I'm still paying for Shaniya's headstone, just like there was rumors that there was thousands of dollars put out there for Shaniya's case, most of that was footed by me."

Davis' lawyer and the private bondsman who put up her bond aren't saying where the money came from.

ABC11 Eyewitness News tried to contact Antoinette Davis, but relatives say she is in seclusion, and on the advice of her attorney is not talking.

Davis' next court appearance is in early April.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on February 28, 2010, 10:14:35 AM
I am glad to see that Brad is taking more of an assertive stand against the monster who helped with Shaniya's death..before he was like milk toast... like when he said something like, God will take care of it, Antoinette wanted to be a mother etc. etc...now he is acting like the father of a murdered child...imo....hope that makes sense what I am trying to say...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: bananas on March 02, 2010, 03:08:07 AM
I cannot even find the words for how the release of this monster makes me feel.  Shaniya suffered more than any child should ever have to know and AD is the one responsible for this horror.  This is wrong on so many levels!   ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 02, 2010, 08:23:06 AM
I cannot even find the words for how the release of this monster makes me feel.  Shaniya suffered more than any child should ever have to know and AD is the one responsible for this horror.  This is wrong on so many levels!   ::MonkeyMad::

totally agree bananas!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Wyks on March 03, 2010, 04:13:10 PM
I have to agree as well!   ::MonkeyMad::

IMO, she never *should have* been allowed a bond amount, her child died from what she knew about ahead of time and allowed to happen, then seems to have done all she could in obstructing LE afterward.   Only reason I didn't protest too much about the bond when it was set was because I didn't think anyone in her family etc could come up with it anyway.

Would love to know who posted the bond.  And for pete's sake.... WHY?????????? 

Is she pregnant?  If so, what happens to this next baby when s/he is born?  Surely the courts will not allow her to keep said child, or her family?  The justice system seems to have dropped the ball in so many wrong ways in this situation already, I wouldn't doubt if they didn't allow her or her family to keep the baby, and wish them well.  <horrible thought>

Her next hearing is in April.  Anyone think that she's actually going to make it?  She can allow what she did with her own daughter, she seems like a great candidate for flight-risk.  Hope whoever bonded her out has her under their thumb, watching her every move, at least until the hearing. 

Reading that she is "in seclusion" pisses me off as well.  As if........ what?  She needs/deserves to have that?????? 

Grrrrrrrrrr.   ::MonkeyMad::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Wyks on March 03, 2010, 04:29:15 PM
I mean.... what could she possibly say in explanation.. (as to her reasons for knowing about ahead of time and seemingly allowing this to happen to Shaniya).. that the world will go... 'oh ok, we understand it all now, thanks for explaining'. 

Nuttin!  She's got nuttin!  Nothing she could say will ever help us to understand why.  Not even if she ends up saying that everything that happened was against her will and he had a gun pointed at her head when he took off with Shaniya.   I'm a mom, there's nothing in the world that could stand between me and my child.  I'd take a bullet before anyone touched my child, they'd have to do it over my dead body.  And I bet most if not all of you would do the same. 

She's got no defense.  IMO.   

She's free to roam around, do whatever.  Be "in seclusion" if she pleases. 

::MonkeyNoNo::


Justice For Shaniya!!!! 




Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 04, 2010, 07:30:40 AM
Wyks...this egg donor is beyond contempt...she knew that Shaniya was going to be raped...She might not have known that she was going to be murdered, but she knew about the rape...who could do that to any child, let alone your own baby girl who only asked or wanted to be loved by her mama?  ::MonkeyNoNo::  I am really surprised that she called LE about Shaniya being missing...Her sister or someone must have asked her where Shaniya was and when she told them that she didn't know, they told her to call the police..otherwise, Shaniya might not have been reported missing until God knows when...by that time, the video of the rapist with Shaniya would have been erased (?) or the rapist would have taken off or raped another child in the meanwhile...
this woman should not be out of jail...she needs to be in general population of the jail and let the chips fall where they may jmo....
This should have never happened... ::MonkeyMad:: egg donor should have never had this child without supervised visits..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: fatcatlurker on March 04, 2010, 01:22:33 PM
And she should be spayed IMO.  This POS does not deserve to bear more children.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 04, 2010, 08:05:53 PM
And she should be spayed IMO.  This POS does not deserve to bear more children.


AGREED!!!! the sooner the better!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Wyks on March 05, 2010, 04:22:46 AM
Yep, I agree with both of you! 

And am totally surprised and disgusted that she's been allowed to bond out.  This is outrageous! 

 ::MonkeyMad::



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 05, 2010, 09:23:53 AM
Comment from Bossip

It’s unbelievable that this woman is free after sending her own child into “sexual servitude.” Even worse, Antoinette Davis was pregnant at the time of her arrest. Can you imagine any court allowing her to mother another child after this? We can’t fathom a jury finding her not guilty of these atrocities — but law enforcement had better keep an eye on her — pregnant or not, this woman could definitely pose a flight risk.

http://bossip.com/221387/mother-of-slain-five-year-old-shaniya-davis-released-on-51000-bond/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More comments from readers at wint.com
http://www.witn.com/home/headlines/85246607.html?storySection=comments


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Mary on March 07, 2010, 05:01:03 AM
So poor Brad did not help with the bail, sorry I find that questionable. He says that
he had to pay for the headstone, well how much was that??? Shaq paid for the
funeral and personally I wonder if Shaq paid for the headstone also.
Brad if you had not past that poor child back to this so called mother this would not
have happened. I blame you for giving that poor child back to her. Also she is having
a baby to a man that is HIV positive. What does that do for the health of the baby.
I hope you feel guilty every day of your life. Your sister would have taken Shaniya
in a heartbeat and you know it. She loved that little girl and will probably feel the
same way we do.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 07, 2010, 10:17:54 AM
So poor Brad did not help with the bail, sorry I find that questionable. He says that
he had to pay for the headstone, well how much was that??? Shaq paid for the
funeral and personally I wonder if Shaq paid for the headstone also.
Brad if you had not past that poor child back to this so called mother this would not
have happened. I blame you for giving that poor child back to her. Also she is having
a baby to a man that is HIV positive. What does that do for the health of the baby.
I hope you feel guilty every day of your life. Your sister would have taken Shaniya
in a heartbeat and you know it. She loved that little girl and will probably feel the
same way we do.

yep...lots of adults in Shaniya's family failed her...
and, don't most parents pay for the headstone of their beloved child's grave? most even pay for the funeral....
..Brad in my opinion, did not want the responsibility of caring for Shaniya any longer...even though Carrie would have taken her...from what we read, he was on the road a lot, had a new fiancee...didn't have any of his children living with him except Shaniya...he was moving on imo....dump her at her egg donors house...all just my opinion! I don't like Brad for his part in all of this...worse hatred for her murderer and for Antoinette for being an accessory to her murder...she needs to still be in jail! this case makes my blood boil every time I think about it! ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Jerseygirl345 on March 07, 2010, 03:34:04 PM
So poor Brad did not help with the bail, sorry I find that questionable. He says that
he had to pay for the headstone, well how much was that??? Shaq paid for the
funeral and personally I wonder if Shaq paid for the headstone also.
Brad if you had not past that poor child back to this so called mother this would not
have happened. I blame you for giving that poor child back to her. Also she is having
a baby to a man that is HIV positive. What does that do for the health of the baby.
I hope you feel guilty every day of your life. Your sister would have taken Shaniya
in a heartbeat and you know it. She loved that little girl and will probably feel the
same way we do.

yep...lots of adults in Shaniya's family failed her...
and, don't most parents pay for the headstone of their beloved child's grave? most even pay for the funeral....
..Brad in my opinion, did not want the responsibility of caring for Shaniya any longer...even though Carrie would have taken her...from what we read, he was on the road a lot, had a new fiancee...didn't have any of his children living with him except Shaniya...he was moving on imo....dump her at her egg donors house...all just my opinion! I don't like Brad for his part in all of this...worse hatred for her murderer and for Antoinette for being an accessory to her murder...she needs to still be in jail! this case makes my blood boil every time I think about it! ::MonkeyMad::

I agree Cookie...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 08, 2010, 09:04:06 AM
Hi JG!

I can't let go of my anger in this case!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Ciana on March 09, 2010, 01:32:51 AM
I find it questionable that people are even speculating that Brad helped with Antoinette's bail. That sounds kind of ridiculous. Regardless of what kind of parent people think Brad was, there's no reason to make unfounded accusations like that.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: bananas on March 09, 2010, 01:46:41 AM
Hi JG!

I can't let go of my anger in this case!

I agree Cookie... I cannot let go of the anger either... however, my anger is not aimed at Brad even though he made poor decisions.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 09, 2010, 09:49:47 AM
Hi JG!

I can't let go of my anger in this case!

I agree Cookie... I cannot let go of the anger either... however, my anger is not aimed at Brad even though he made poor decisions.

hi bananas....I am mad at all of them! but that is just me...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: islandmonkey on March 09, 2010, 03:26:03 PM
Hi JG!

I can't let go of my anger in this case!

I agree Cookie... I cannot let go of the anger either... however, my anger is not aimed at Brad even though he made poor decisions.

hi bananas....I am mad at all of them! but that is just me...

::MonkeyNoNo:: No, I doubt it's just you.......I will never understand WTH he was thinking giving Antoinette custody, IMO he is guilty of negligence for handing that precious baby over to a dope head ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 09, 2010, 09:12:29 PM
Hi JG!

I can't let go of my anger in this case!

I agree Cookie... I cannot let go of the anger either... however, my anger is not aimed at Brad even though he made poor decisions.

hi bananas....I am mad at all of them! but that is just me...

::MonkeyNoNo:: No, I doubt it's just you.......I will never understand WTH he was thinking giving Antoinette custody, IMO he is guilty of negligence for handing that precious baby over to a dope head ::MonkeyMad::

IM...I will never understand what he was thinking either...what any of the idiots were thinking... ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: AnnetteInMn on March 14, 2010, 05:29:41 PM
I was just thinking about all the injustices done to this child and I am so saddened by it.  On the other hand though I am SO VERY VERY angry with her mother.  I just can not comprehend how a mother could knowingly put her child in the hands of someone she KNEW was going to sexually molest her daughter.  And to think that our justice system let this monster out on bond!  Something needs to change.  As far as I am concerned she should never see the light of day again.  I just have to keep in mind that Shaniya's justice will eventually come and she's safe with Jesus now.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 14, 2010, 09:00:10 PM
I was just thinking about all the injustices done to this child and I am so saddened by it.  On the other hand though I am SO VERY VERY angry with her mother.  I just can not comprehend how a mother could knowingly put her child in the hands of someone she KNEW was going to sexually molest her daughter.  And to think that our justice system let this monster out on bond!  Something needs to change.  As far as I am concerned she should never see the light of day again.  I just have to keep in mind that Shaniya's justice will eventually come and she's safe with Jesus now.

 ::MonkeyAngel::  Hi Annette...nice to meet you...I agree with you!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cecilita on March 16, 2010, 10:51:49 PM
Shaniiya had HIV?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 16, 2010, 11:00:05 PM
Shaniiya had HIV?

huh? where did you read that at Cecilita?  the father of the baby that Antoinette is expecting was said to have HIV if I recall correctly, but I have not heard that Shaniya had HIV...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cecilita on March 18, 2010, 08:20:26 PM
Shaniiya had HIV?

huh? where did you read that at Cecilita?  the father of the baby that Antoinette is expecting was said to have HIV if I recall correctly, but I have not heard that Shaniya had HIV...
Hi cookie,
I would like to know if shaniya was tested for HIV. If she was infected it means that she was abused for the boyfriend too. It is weird that shaniya went to doctor's visit.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 18, 2010, 10:26:25 PM
Shaniiya had HIV?

huh? where did you read that at Cecilita?  the father of the baby that Antoinette is expecting was said to have HIV if I recall correctly, but I have not heard that Shaniya had HIV...
Hi cookie,
I would like to know if shaniya was tested for HIV. If she was infected it means that she was abused for the boyfriend too. It is weird that shaniya went to doctor's visit.

hmmmm...would not put it past that crowd, but I had not heard about HIV or the doctor visit in regards to Shaniya...
poor baby girl...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 23, 2010, 07:49:16 PM
Hi JG!

I can't let go of my anger in this case!

Me either, Cookie!  This case haunts me.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 23, 2010, 11:45:08 PM
Hi JG!

I can't let go of my anger in this case!

Me either, Cookie!  This case haunts me.

haunts me too Mags...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on March 25, 2010, 10:43:40 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/03/24/985965
Published: 07:00 AM, Thu Mar 25, 2010
Man gets probation in Shaniya Davis donations case
By Drew Brooks
Staff writer
A Cumberland County man who was charged with misleading the public while collecting donations for Shaniya Davis has been placed on probation.

Donald Lee Roddy Jr. and his lawyer, Larry McGlothlin, said a misunderstanding led to Roddy's arrest on Nov.18.

Roddy was originally charged with obtaining property by false pretenses, a felony. On Wednesday, that charge was reduced to attempted misdemeanor larceny.

McGlothlin said Roddy never pleaded guilty to the charge, but he didn't resist a verdict. Effectively, that equates to a guilty plea in the eyes of the court, he said.

Roddy was sentenced to one year of unsupervised probation and 10 hours of community service, McGlothlin said. He also must pay a $100 fine and $125 in court costs.

Roddy, 37, of the 7300 block of Hypony Trail, was charged days after Shaniya's body was found in Lee County.

Fayetteville police said he was soliciting roadside donations in their name. A police spokesman said at the time that Roddy did not have permission to use the department's name, nor did he have any affiliation with the police.

McGlothlin said Roddy did not believe he was doing anything wrong and was only trying to help.
oddy collected $27 while standing near the corner of Skibo and Yadkin roads. He said he hoped the money could have gone toward paying for Shaniya's funeral.

That funeral was ultimately paid for by basketball superstar Shaquille O'Neal.

Roddy called the sentence "fair" and said he was shocked when police arrested him.

"I am not a scam artist. I am not a liar," he said. "I figured 'How many people have life insurance on a 5-year-old? Nobody.' So I took it upon myself to try and raise money."

Following his arrest, family members said Roddy thought he was doing the right thing.

His sister said Roddy suffered from several mental disorders that affect his judgment.

"In his mind, he was doing what was right and what was good," she said.
Offers to help

Shaniya disappeared Nov. 10 from her mother's home in the Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park. Her body was found Nov.16 in woods south of Sanford.

Roddy, a dog trainer, said he has lost several customers since he was charged.

His involvement with the Shaniya case began the night she went missing, when he says he offered the services of two of his dogs - a yellow lab named Abby and a Belgium Malinois named Lucas.

Those services were declined, according to Fayetteville police.

Later, when authorities were searching for Shaniya's body, Roddy said he was allowed to help.

Roddy said the Shaniya case struck a chord with him and he wanted to help in any way he could.

He also donated a hand-crafted mirror with an image of Shaniya on it to the family, his
awyer said.

McGlothlin said he was contacted by Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, and told the family did not wish to prosecute Roddy.

McGlothlin became involved because he knew Roddy through Roddy's uncle. He said his client never should have been charged with a felony.

"He was really upset (about being charged)," McGlothlin said. "He just wanted to do what he could to help out."

Two people were charged in Shaniya's disappearance and murder.

Mario Andrette McNeil was charged with killing and raping Shaniya.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, is accused of prostituting her daughter.
Staff writer Drew Brooks can be reached at brooksd@fayobserver.com or 486-3567


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on March 27, 2010, 09:45:17 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/03/24/985500
Published: 06:54 AM, Wed Mar 24, 2010
Impromptu shrine to Shaniya Davis grows at site body found
By Nancy McCleary
Staff writer
SANFORD -- Less than a half-mile off busy N.C. 87 on Walker Road is a memorial to a little girl whose brutal death sent shock waves through the Cape Fear region and beyond.

Stuffed animals, cards, candles and messages of love have been piled into two makeshift shrines for Shaniya Davis.

This is where the body of the 5-year-old girl was found six days after her mother reported her missing from her home in Fayetteville.

An autopsy report revealed that Shaniya had been raped and strangled.

Her mother, Antoinette Davis, has been charged with prostituting her daughter.

Mario Andrette McNeil, also of Fayetteville, is charged with killing and raping Shaniya.

Most of the people who have paid homage to Shaniya never knew her.

But they have been touched by the tragedy that made national headlines.
Memorials
The two makeshift shrines have been set up on the winding, rural road just south of Carolina Trace.

Stuffed animals, at least 100 total, are piled on the ground around wooden pallets converted into rustic altars.

Heavy plastic covers most of them.

It looks more like a yard sale than a memorial.

Until you look more closely and see pictures of Shaniya and the cards and letters with her name on them.

A smiling ceramic snowman stands atop the roadside pallet. "Merry Christmas, From: Olivia Gang" is written across his belly.

A weather-beaten copy of "The Night Before Christmas" and a stuffed Grinch have been placed on the ground.

There's a picture of three little girls, each with her hands clasped in prayer and wearing angel wings.

Beneath it are the words of Matthew 18:20: "For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I in the midst of them."

To the right of that is a white metal cross with a pink heart in its center and Shaniya's picture at the top. On the back it reads: "Sanford Muffler, Fabricated and painted by Erik Donithan and Jordan Coggins."

Some dolls have been stuffed between the boards of a pallet atop a set of table legs. A message is written across the boards: "No mosters (sic) now. Your in a safer place. You will never get hurt again. R.I.P. Shaniya. We Love You!"

It's signed "Kayla, Danielle, Kelly and Quay'Veon."
It's still hard for some of the people living nearby to see the reminders, said one woman, who did not want to be identified.

A lot of the residents took part in the two-day search for Shaniya along Walker Road.

"It still breaks your heart," the woman said. "I admire the people who put them up, and it's touched a lot of people."

But maybe it's time to take them down, she said.

"Every time I go by there, I can't help but visualize her face."
Staff writer Nancy McCleary can be reached at mcclearyn@fayobserver.com or 486-3568.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: JessStar on March 28, 2010, 09:11:20 AM
A NATION wide petition asking for a ONE STRIKE LAW for child sex offenders! As parents, grandparents, aunts & uncles, we need to take a minute and sign our names!! How can anyone disagree??

Put in your zip code at the beginning & it will pull up your representatives & emails are sent to them on your behalf!!


http://www.rallycongress.com/one-strike-for-sex-offenders/2961/go/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on March 28, 2010, 01:30:06 PM
done JessStar! thank you for providing the link...I was the 20th person from Illinois to send the email...!  we need more!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: jammsnana on March 28, 2010, 01:37:07 PM
 ::MonkeyMad::

How very SAD! I ws only the 5th person from NORTH CAROLINA ...the very state Shaniya is from..to send these letters to the Government! Please, Ya'll...do this for Shaniya!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on March 29, 2010, 02:00:59 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/03/26/986158
Published: 06:45 AM, Fri Mar 26, 2010
Event underscores need to eliminate child abuse
By Gregory Phillips
Staff writer
Howard Loughlin remembers one mother whose words summed up the problem of child abuse better than any he had ever heard.

The woman's baby had been badly shaken and barely survived a stay in pediatric intensive care.

"All of a sudden it dawned on her," Loughlin said, "that her children would never be safe until all children were safe."

Loughlin, a Fayetteville physician who works with severely abused children, spoke Thursday at the 2010 Break the Chain event at the Crown Expo Center. The gathering symbolized the community's commitment to tackle child abuse and neglect and has been taking place annually in Fayetteville for more than 20 years. It heralds Child Abuse Prevention Month in April.

"As a community, we need to do more," said Rosemary Zimmerman, chairman of the Child Advocacy Center.

Students from across Cumberland County and Fort Bragg sang songs and performed a skit for a crowd of about 400 parents, teachers, law enforcement, court personnel, elected leaders and child advocates from across a range of agencies.

Child abuse in Fayetteville became national news last year with the kidnap, rape and murder of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis, which prompted an outcry and brought child abuse and the response of social services under the scrutiny of national media and the State Bureau of Investigation.
Despite the best efforts of child advocates, reported instances of child abuse have remained high.


Between July 2009 and February this year, the Cumberland County Department of Social Services investigated 2,513 reports of child abuse or neglect. That's 156 more than the same period a year earlier. Of those, 115 were substantiated as involving severe sexual, physical or emotional abuse. A further 308 were found in need of family assessment services, where social workers work to protect the child while keeping their families intact. Of the rest, some investigations found families didn't need services or only warranted a recommendation for services, according to Heather Skeens, the department's assistant director for children's services.

Additionally, some families where problems were reported couldn't be found, other cases lacked evidence and some involved false allegations, Skeens said.

"Certainly the numbers are high, but we're catching things earlier," said Loughlin, who works at the Southern Regional Area Health Education Center. "I think we're better at recognizing it now and making reports earlier in the course of abuse."

Thursday's ceremony culminated in the breaking of a paper chain representing the chain of abuse. The chain looped all the way around the edges of the cavernous Expo Center, held up by the hundreds of children, parents, teachers and child advocates.

Upon the signal, the chain was ripped, children tearing through the links with particular glee.
Staff writer Gregory Phillips can be reached at phillipsg@fayobserver.com or 486-3596.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on March 29, 2010, 02:01:51 PM
A NATION wide petition asking for a ONE STRIKE LAW for child sex offenders! As parents, grandparents, aunts & uncles, we need to take a minute and sign our names!! How can anyone disagree??

Put in your zip code at the beginning & it will pull up your representatives & emails are sent to them on your behalf!!


http://www.rallycongress.com/one-strike-for-sex-offenders/2961/go/

Thank you JessStar.     ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Mary on April 05, 2010, 05:17:35 PM
I bet I'm the first from Canada, they have a E-mail addy, so I sent that. I told them
it was far overdue. That far to many of their children were being harmed and killed
everyday and this law should be passed ASAP.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on April 07, 2010, 02:14:21 PM
http://www.examiner.com/x-32312-Amber-Alerts-Examiner~y2010m4d6-Amber-Alerts-Shaniya-Davis-mother-to-head-back-to-court-video-photos
Amber Alerts: Shaniya Davis’ mother to head back to court (video, photos)
April 6, 9:55 PMAmber Alerts ExaminerCharisse Van Horn

Shaniya Davis’ mother, Antoinette Davis has been charged with human trafficking, filing a false police report, felony child abuse/prostitution, and obstruction of police. People were shocked, however, that with all of the charges against Antoinette that she was released from the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women on a $51,000 bond. She will appear in court on April 15, 2010.


An Amber Alert had been issued for Shaniya Davis, but it was soon discovered that Shaniya had not been abducted like her mother, Antoinette Davis claimed, but rather Antoinette sold Shaniya to the man now charged with her rape and murder: Mario McNeill.

 
An autopsy had revealed that little Shaniya, only 5-years-old, had been raped before she was murdered; she died from asphyxiation. The case has drawn light to a horrific crime: child prostitution and sex slavery.


Shaniya Davis’ aunt, Corey Lockhart-Davis was outraged that Antoinette Davis has been released from jail. She spoke out to WRAL. You may see the interview in the video player below.
Video at link.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on April 27, 2010, 11:54:44 PM
A NATION wide petition asking for a ONE STRIKE LAW for child sex offenders! As parents, grandparents, aunts & uncles, we need to take a minute and sign our names!! How can anyone disagree??

Put in your zip code at the beginning & it will pull up your representatives & emails are sent to them on your behalf!!


http://www.rallycongress.com/one-strike-for-sex-offenders/2961/go/

Thank you JessStar.     ::HelloKitty::

Im the11th from Maryland.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on April 28, 2010, 10:22:30 AM
A NATION wide petition asking for a ONE STRIKE LAW for child sex offenders! As parents, grandparents, aunts & uncles, we need to take a minute and sign our names!! How can anyone disagree??

Put in your zip code at the beginning & it will pull up your representatives & emails are sent to them on your behalf!!


http://www.rallycongress.com/one-strike-for-sex-offenders/2961/go/

Thank you JessStar.     ::HelloKitty::

Im the11th from Maryland.

every signature counts!  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cecilita on May 07, 2010, 12:41:23 AM
I serched for shaniya and i found "0" news about her. It is so sad....I still remeber the sad picture of the little angel with her killer :(


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on May 08, 2010, 12:07:34 PM
I serched for shaniya and i found "0" news about her. It is so sad....I still remeber the sad picture of the little angel with her killer :(

me too...that picture of her with that monster will haunt me forever...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Heart on May 08, 2010, 10:39:35 PM
Shaniya’s Mother, Antoinette Davis, to Appear in Court June 3
http://thisblksistaspage.wordpress.com/2010/05/08/shaniyas-mother-antoinette-davis-to-appear-in-court-june-3/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: AnnetteInMn on May 10, 2010, 03:36:19 PM
Shaniya’s Mother, Antoinette Davis, to Appear in Court June 3
http://thisblksistaspage.wordpress.com/2010/05/08/shaniyas-mother-antoinette-davis-to-appear-in-court-june-3/

Thanks for the information Heart!  It seems like this case fell off the face of the earth and I so badly want justice handed down in a BIG way in this case.  I wonder if the evil mother had the new baby yet.  I sure hope Social Services steps it and strips her of any parental rights to this child!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: bananas on May 10, 2010, 05:06:37 PM
A NATION wide petition asking for a ONE STRIKE LAW for child sex offenders! As parents, grandparents, aunts & uncles, we need to take a minute and sign our names!! How can anyone disagree??

Put in your zip code at the beginning & it will pull up your representatives & emails are sent to them on your behalf!!


http://www.rallycongress.com/one-strike-for-sex-offenders/2961/go/
Thanks!  Done!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Missiontoconvict on June 03, 2010, 11:05:11 AM
06/03/2010 06:57 AM
Mother accused of trafficking daughter to appear in court - video

By: News 14 Carolina Staff

FAYETTEVILLE – Antoinette Davis, a Fayetteville mother accused of prostituting her 5-year-old daughter, is scheduled to appear in court Thursday.

Davis is charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse, prostitution and filing a false police report.

In November, Davis reported her daughter, Shaniya Davis, missing. The girl's body was found a few days later in a ditch in Lee County.

Mario Andrette McNeill is charged with kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya Davis.

http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/sandhills/626627/mother-accused-of-trafficking-daughter-to-appear-in-court


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Gizzie on June 03, 2010, 06:01:39 PM
http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/triangle/626627/antoinette-davis-court-appearance-continued

Updated 1:50 PM

Antoinette Davis court appearance continued

FAYETTEVILLE -- The scheduled court appearance of a Fayetteville mother accused of prostituting her 5-year old daughter, who ended up dead, has been continued until Aug. 11.

Antoinette Davis is charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse-prostiution and filing a false police report.

Davis reported her daughter, Shaniya, missing in November. The girl's body was found a few days later in a ditch in Lee County.

Mario Andrette McNeill is charged with kidnapping, raping and killing the girl.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on June 03, 2010, 08:35:56 PM
damn! what takes so darn long to get these court cases heard???


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on June 04, 2010, 02:37:03 PM
Published: 09:00 PM, Mon May 31, 2010
Shaniya's dad to speak at June 12 program

The father of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis is expected to return to Cumberland County next week to speak at an awareness program in remembrance of his slain daughter.

Bradley Lockhart and the nonprofit group GOTDAD will serve as hosts of a day of activities and events scheduled for June 12 and aimed at bringing awareness to violence and sexual crimes against children.

The event is being called Shaniya Speaks Day, Keeping the Promise. It will be at the John D. Fuller Sr. Recreational Complex on Old Bunce Road.

Joe McGee is founder of GOTDAD - Giving Opportunities Through Dedication And Devotion - a nonprofit organization that helps busy fathers figure out how to spend more time with their children. He said the day was chosen because Shaniya would have celebrated her sixth birthday on June 14.

"Keeping the promise was the message from Brad at her funeral," McGee said. "We want to keep our pledge and take Shaniya's message to the streets."

Lockhart, 39, who moved to Alabama a couple of months after his daughter's death, is expected to be in town for the events.

Shaniya was reported missing on the morning of Nov. 10 by her mother, Antoinette Davis.

Video surveillance at a Sanford motel recorded 29-year-old Mario Andrette McNeill getting in an elevator with Shaniya in his arms.

Six days later, her body was found in woods off Walker Road in Lee County.

Davis, 25, is out on bond awaiting trial on charges of human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution after investigators say she sold her child into sex slavery to pay off a debt.

McNeill is charged with first-degree murder and first-degree rape of a child. He is being held at Central Prison in Raleigh awaiting trial.

McGee said he doesn't want to open old wounds. Instead, he wants to bring the community closer through awareness and empowerment.

The number of child abuse and neglect reports were up 46 percent in Cumberland County for March, according to data from the county Department of Social Services.

"A sad thing is happening in our community," McGee said. "We need to come together to discuss how we can stop this from happening to our children."

The event will include live bands and guest speakers, information booths on health issues, rape prevention, child abuse and home safety.

"We want to show people that they don't have to depend on the system for support," McGee said. "We need to support each other."

The program, where Lockhart will speak, is at 4 p.m. Lockhart's message will be of reinforcement and personal responsibility, McGee said.

Lockhart has established a foundation, Shaniya Speaks.org, with the money raised in the wake of Shaniya's death. It is dedicated to raising awareness about child abuse.

"People are too quick to mind their own business in our society," McGee said. "It's time we started being our brother's keeper again."

http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2010/06/01/1001768?sac=Home



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on June 04, 2010, 02:38:25 PM
It sure does take forever to get and keep the ball rolling...indeed. American Injustice ....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on June 04, 2010, 02:39:31 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock5.gif)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Heart on June 12, 2010, 10:43:31 AM
Family event honors memory of slain Fayetteville girl

By: News 14 Carolina Web Staff

(http://images.news14.com/media/2010/6/12/images/shaniyaf6f71544-d0d7-4a9a-9344-13d8d1c19dba.jpg)

FAYETTEVILLE -- The Fayetteville community will come together Saturday in memory of a 5-year old girl last fall. Follow News 14 Carolina's coverage of the Shaniya Davis story.

Shaniya Davis' body was found in a ditch in Lee County in November after she was reported missing nearly a week earlier. Her mother, Antoinette Davis, is accused of prostituting the young girl.

Mario Andrette McNeill is charged with kidnapping, raping and murdering her.

Davis’ father, Brad Lockhart, will join the community Saturday for Shaniya Speaks Day, an effort to stop crimes against children. The event features guest speakers and information on rape prevention and child abuse as well as fun family activities including live music, entertainment and games.

It all takes place at the John D. Fuller, Sr. Recreational Complex from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.

http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/sandhills/627006/family-event-honors-memory-of-slain-fayetteville-girl


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on June 12, 2010, 01:47:25 PM
thanks for the article Heart..,.
Shaniya is a very special little girl...it makes me angry every time I think about what happened to this sweet little child..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: bananas on July 02, 2010, 02:36:40 AM
http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/triangle/626627/antoinette-davis-court-appearance-continued

Updated 1:50 PM

Antoinette Davis court appearance continued

FAYETTEVILLE -- The scheduled court appearance of a Fayetteville mother accused of prostituting her 5-year old daughter, who ended up dead, has been continued until Aug. 11.

Antoinette Davis is charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse-prostiution and filing a false police report.

Davis reported her daughter, Shaniya, missing in November. The girl's body was found a few days later in a ditch in Lee County.

Mario Andrette McNeill is charged with kidnapping, raping and killing the girl.

The slowness of the hand of justice is infuriating!!!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: annemarie on July 09, 2010, 01:31:42 PM
http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/triangle/626627/antoinette-davis-court-appearance-continued

Updated 1:50 PM

Antoinette Davis court appearance continued

FAYETTEVILLE -- The scheduled court appearance of a Fayetteville mother accused of prostituting her 5-year old daughter, who ended up dead, has been continued until Aug. 11.

Antoinette Davis is charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse-prostiution and filing a false police report.

Davis reported her daughter, Shaniya, missing in November. The girl's body was found a few days later in a ditch in Lee County.

Mario Andrette McNeill is charged with kidnapping, raping and killing the girl.

The slowness of the hand of justice is infuriating!!!!!

So true!!!! I know everyone talks about getting "ducks in a row" but this is ridiculous!!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 15, 2010, 07:50:55 AM
I can't copy this.....Mario is due in court today.
http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/sandhills/628136/man-accused-of-raping--killing-5-year-old-due-in-court


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on July 29, 2010, 02:07:15 AM
It has taken me about 13 days to get up the courage to come into the thread. This one has haunted me since I saw this little girl in the picture being held by a strange man. I don't think I can ever forget that look on her face. I hate this case and I hope both criminals are put to death.

RIP beautiful little girl. I know you are in the arms of Angels.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on July 29, 2010, 09:11:53 AM
It has taken me about 13 days to get up the courage to come into the thread. This one has haunted me since I saw this little girl in the picture being held by a strange man. I don't think I can ever forget that look on her face. I hate this case and I hope both criminals are put to death.

RIP beautiful little girl. I know you are in the arms of Angels.

right there with ya Tracy...I can not get that picture out of my mind whenever I think of Shaniya...
I hope that both of her perpetrators are put to death too!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Tina Bee on August 04, 2010, 11:42:28 PM
RIP Shaniya. I was thinking about you today.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: AnnetteInMn on August 13, 2010, 01:46:29 AM
Wasn't Antoinette Davis scheduled to be in court August 11th?  I can not find any information on this.  I have searched the internet looking for any kind of information pertaining to her court date and what happened.  Does anyone have any information on this?  Shaniya deserves her justice!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 16, 2010, 07:58:59 PM
Wasn't Antoinette Davis scheduled to be in court August 11th?  I can not find any information on this.  I have searched the internet looking for any kind of information pertaining to her court date and what happened.  Does anyone have any information on this?  Shaniya deserves her justice!!

I haven't found anything either.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on September 14, 2010, 11:08:11 PM
Wasn't Antoinette Davis scheduled to be in court August 11th?  I can not find any information on this.  I have searched the internet looking for any kind of information pertaining to her court date and what happened.  Does anyone have any information on this?  Shaniya deserves her justice!!

I haven't found anything either.


This will be the first time I have posted something with a link.  I hope I am doing it correctly.

Basically, it is an update on the upcoming court dates of both Antoinette and Mario.


http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-raleigh/shaniya-davis-case-update-court-dates-resolving-confusion-remembering-shaniya

MarMario McNeill's next court date is scheduled for Oct. 28, 2010 at the Cumberland County Courthouse in room 2B surrounding first-degree rape and murder charges.  The Central Prison inmate will face his next court date for first-degree kidnapping on Nov. 4, 2010 at the Cumberland County Courthouse in, again, 2B.

Antoinette Nicole Davis, on the other hand, is charged with human trafficking of a child, child abuse-prostitution, resisting a public officer and filing a false report.  The next Cumberland County court date for Antoinette Davis is scheduled for Sept. 29, 2010 in room 2B for both felonies and both misdemeanors


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on September 15, 2010, 10:23:41 PM
Wasn't Antoinette Davis scheduled to be in court August 11th?  I can not find any information on this.  I have searched the internet looking for any kind of information pertaining to her court date and what happened.  Does anyone have any information on this?  Shaniya deserves her justice!!

I haven't found anything either.


This will be the first time I have posted something with a link.  I hope I am doing it correctly.

Basically, it is an update on the upcoming court dates of both Antoinette and Mario.


http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-raleigh/shaniya-davis-case-update-court-dates-resolving-confusion-remembering-shaniya

MarMario McNeill's next court date is scheduled for Oct. 28, 2010 at the Cumberland County Courthouse in room 2B surrounding first-degree rape and murder charges.  The Central Prison inmate will face his next court date for first-degree kidnapping on Nov. 4, 2010 at the Cumberland County Courthouse in, again, 2B.

Antoinette Nicole Davis, on the other hand, is charged with human trafficking of a child, child abuse-prostitution, resisting a public officer and filing a false report.  The next Cumberland County court date for Antoinette Davis is scheduled for Sept. 29, 2010 in room 2B for both felonies and both misdemeanors

both of these people are bottom feeders...they deserve to be put to death...in a horrible manner jmo.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on September 16, 2010, 03:18:00 PM
Wasn't Antoinette Davis scheduled to be in court August 11th?  I can not find any information on this.  I have searched the internet looking for any kind of information pertaining to her court date and what happened.  Does anyone have any information on this?  Shaniya deserves her justice!!

I haven't found anything either.


This will be the first time I have posted something with a link.  I hope I am doing it correctly.

Basically, it is an update on the upcoming court dates of both Antoinette and Mario.


http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-raleigh/shaniya-davis-case-update-court-dates-resolving-confusion-remembering-shaniya

MarMario McNeill's next court date is scheduled for Oct. 28, 2010 at the Cumberland County Courthouse in room 2B surrounding first-degree rape and murder charges.  The Central Prison inmate will face his next court date for first-degree kidnapping on Nov. 4, 2010 at the Cumberland County Courthouse in, again, 2B.

Antoinette Nicole Davis, on the other hand, is charged with human trafficking of a child, child abuse-prostitution, resisting a public officer and filing a false report.  The next Cumberland County court date for Antoinette Davis is scheduled for Sept. 29, 2010 in room 2B for both felonies and both misdemeanors

both of these people are bottom feeders...they deserve to be put to death...in a horrible manner jmo.
Terri -- thanks for the update.
Cookie, they give bottom feeders a bad name!!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on September 16, 2010, 10:03:49 PM
You' re welcome.  I am so hopeful justice will be served....especially for the mother. 

Terri


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on September 17, 2010, 03:57:59 PM
lol Sister..you are right, they do give bottom feeders a bad name...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on September 18, 2010, 09:54:59 PM
lol Sister..you are right, they do give bottom feeders a bad name...
yes, bottom feeders serve a purpose (disgusting as it may be), this POS is using our air to inhale and exhale!
(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/WEATHER/furby-halo2-1.gif)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: AnnetteInMn on September 19, 2010, 12:42:49 PM
Wasn't Antoinette Davis scheduled to be in court August 11th?  I can not find any information on this.  I have searched the internet looking for any kind of information pertaining to her court date and what happened.  Does anyone have any information on this?  Shaniya deserves her justice!!

I haven't found anything either.




This will be the first time I have posted something with a link.  I hope I am doing it correctly.

Basically, it is an update on the upcoming court dates of both Antoinette and Mario.


http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-raleigh/shaniya-davis-case-update-court-dates-resolving-confusion-remembering-shaniya

MarMario McNeill's next court date is scheduled for Oct. 28, 2010 at the Cumberland County Courthouse in room 2B surrounding first-degree rape and murder charges.  The Central Prison inmate will face his next court date for first-degree kidnapping on Nov. 4, 2010 at the Cumberland County Courthouse in, again, 2B.

Antoinette Nicole Davis, on the other hand, is charged with human trafficking of a child, child abuse-prostitution, resisting a public officer and filing a false report.  The next Cumberland County court date for Antoinette Davis is scheduled for Sept. 29, 2010 in room 2B for both felonies and both misdemeanors

Thank you so much for the information!  The wheels of justice in this case are just not turning quickly enough for my liking.  Everytime I think of Shaniya, I am sickened by the actions of her so-called mother.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on September 23, 2010, 08:27:28 AM
You're welcome.

Until recently I worked for child protective services (12 years ).  With that experience and the forums on this site, I have come to believe there really is no justice for children.  It's as if they are expendable.  Unless the crime is as horrendous as the murdered family in Connecticut, by the time of the trial, the victim is forgotten and the murderer is front and center, sobbing, with their entire life before them.

The life and character of the murderer is used to make excuses or to show what a great person they are.  The children have not lived long enough for people to come to their aid.  It boils down to this;

- sweet, innocent child murdered and taken from their family forever

but

-murderer had a rough childhood and still has a chance to live a productive life.  It would be cruel to make them suffer any longer.

If Shaniya's mother has not been beat to death while out of jail, that proves her peers do not judge her.


MOO

Terri



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on September 23, 2010, 09:03:14 PM
Terri..I think that you are correct with your above post..sad but true..


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on September 28, 2010, 05:41:58 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/8333219/
Posted: September 22

Cumberland DA wants deeper probe of DSS in girl's death
Fayetteville, N.C. — Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis said Wednesday that he's dissatisfied with a state investigation into the county's social services department after a 5-year-old girl was kidnapped, raped and killed last year.

"I do not feel that the crucial issues involved in this investigation have been sufficiently answered," Grannis said in a letter to the State Bureau of Investigation. "I am, therefore, requesting the assistance of the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office to assist me in resolving remaining questions which I have concerning the Cumberland County Department of Social Services."

Grannis and Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine requested the SBI investigation last December after questions were raised about the county’s contact with the family of Shaniya Davis before her disappearance. The SBI turned its findings over to Grannis last Friday.

Shaniya was reported missing from her Fayetteville home on Nov. 10. Her body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

An autopsy determined that she died of asphyxiation and that injuries she suffered were consistent with a sexual assault. A medical examiner noted in the autopsy that investigators believe the girl was used to pay off a drug debt.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, has been charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape of a child and first-degree kidnapping in the case. Police have characterized him as a family acquaintance.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, 25, has been charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

The Cumberland County Department of Social Services previously looked at Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son, not Shaniya, according to her uncle, Michael Davis. The case was closed, and Antoinette Davis was able to retain custody of the boy, her uncle said.

Grannis and Bergamine expressed concerns that DSS case workers were withholding information in the case.

DSS Director Brenda Jackson has previously declined to comment on the agency's involvement with the family, citing the investigation into the death and confidentiality rules for child welfare cases.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on September 28, 2010, 10:33:28 PM
this case really really bothers me a bunch..can not believe what happened to this baby...and with her own mother a part of it... ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on September 29, 2010, 12:59:36 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/8369102/
Posted: 10:54 a.m. today
Cumberland DA to discuss DSS conduct in probe of girl's death
Fayetteville, N.C. — Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis will hold a news conference Thursday to address the conduct of the county's social services department in the investigation of the death of Shaniya Davis last year.

The 5-year-old girl was reported missing from her Fayetteville home on Nov. 10. Her body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

An autopsy determined that she died of asphyxiation and that injuries she suffered were consistent with a sexual assault. A medical examiner noted in the autopsy that investigators believe the girl was used to pay off a drug debt.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, has been charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape of a child and first-degree kidnapping in the case. Police have characterized him as a family acquaintance.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, 25, has been charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

The Cumberland County Department of Social Services previously looked at Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son, not Shaniya, according to her uncle, Michael Davis. The case was closed, and Antoinette Davis was able to retain custody of the boy, her uncle said.

Grannis and Bergamine expressed concerns that DSS case workers were withholding information during the investigation of Shaniya's death, and they asked for a state investigation.

Last week, Grannis said he wanted Cumberland County deputies to look into DSS' actions, saying the state investigation left questions unanswered.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on September 29, 2010, 01:32:58 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/8369102/
Posted: 10:54 a.m. today
Cumberland DA to discuss DSS conduct in probe of girl's death
Fayetteville, N.C. — Cumberland County District Attorney Ed Grannis will hold a news conference Thursday to address the conduct of the county's social services department in the investigation of the death of Shaniya Davis last year.

The 5-year-old girl was reported missing from her Fayetteville home on Nov. 10. Her body was found in a patch of kudzu off a rural road near the Lee-Harnett County line six days later.

An autopsy determined that she died of asphyxiation and that injuries she suffered were consistent with a sexual assault. A medical examiner noted in the autopsy that investigators believe the girl was used to pay off a drug debt.

Mario Andrette McNeill, 29, of 2613 Pine Springs Drive, has been charged with first-degree murder, first-degree rape of a child and first-degree kidnapping in the case. Police have characterized him as a family acquaintance.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Nicole Davis, 25, has been charged with human trafficking, felony child abuse–prostitution, filing a false police report and obstructing a police investigation. Arrest warrants state that Davis "did knowingly provide Shaniya with the intent that she be held in sexual servitude" and "did permit an act of prostitution with Shaniya."

The Cumberland County Department of Social Services previously looked at Davis with regard to her 7-year-old son, not Shaniya, according to her uncle, Michael Davis. The case was closed, and Antoinette Davis was able to retain custody of the boy, her uncle said.

Grannis and Bergamine expressed concerns that DSS case workers were withholding information during the investigation of Shaniya's death, and they asked for a state investigation.

Last week, Grannis said he wanted Cumberland County deputies to look into DSS' actions, saying the state investigation left questions unanswered.

This I do not understand.  During a situation like this, all agencies work together.  When a court orders disclosure, wouldn't the CPS immediately begin copying all records for the court?  Admittedly people are going to try to CYA but that is done in meetings, etc.  Paperwork is generally turned over and the worker and the supervisor are left to take the fall, not the agency.  There would be no reason to withhold anything as the agency always has scapegoats.

MOO.

Terri


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on September 30, 2010, 11:22:18 AM
HEre is another link w/ conference info to follow up on.....
http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/sandhills/630955/news-conference-to-be-held-on-shaniya-davis-case


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on September 30, 2010, 02:57:11 PM
The look the officer is giving her expresses my sentiments precisely.
 :-x


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on September 30, 2010, 06:50:18 PM
http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/sandhills/630955/news-conference-to-be-held-on-shaniya-davis-case

DSS not to face any charges . . . for the love of all that is good . . . when we will require folks be responsible for their actions.
DSS deleted e-mails, etc. so "the media" couldn't get them.  Give me a break!!!
So now LE doesn't trust them anymore . . . and that helps exactly how in this case???


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on September 30, 2010, 06:51:32 PM
Shaniya, I am so sorry people care more about covering their butts then brining justice to your terrible death.
We won't forget!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on September 30, 2010, 09:10:04 PM
Shaniya, I am so sorry people care more about covering their butts then brining justice to your terrible death.
We won't forget!

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on September 30, 2010, 11:20:14 PM
I am very very confused.  If LE cannot trust DDS to give all info, why is DDS allowed to continue unabated?  Again, I only have my agency experience but honestly, we were called in ASAP if there were a media case...every note, every conversation was analyzed.  We had a saying, "if it isn't documented, it did not happen" i.e.  do not say had a phone call with someone and said A, B, and C.  If it was not documented within 24 hours of the event, it is your word against yours.  And if you did not document every detail, then the agency could not adequately defend you.  In other words, do your work do it right, and document it well. 

If LE and the court cannot trust the agency, then why does it exist?  Wouldn't a complete overhaul be mandatory? 

I can honestly say this....the old school social workers were more detailed and "on it" when it came to child safety.  The newer supervisors, workers, etc. have differnt views.  I know one view was sometimes you go into a home looking all around, and sometimes you go in with tunnel vision. You investigate the actual allegation, rather than the entire family and risks factors.  In other words, if you are there to investigate abuse, do not look for neglect issues..you are just making more work for yourself.  I used to say I had to check my morals at the door in order to support my family....I no longer work there and cannot imagine ever going back.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on October 01, 2010, 08:19:09 AM
I am very very confused.  If LE cannot trust DDS to give all info, why is DDS allowed to continue unabated?  Again, I only have my agency experience but honestly, we were called in ASAP if there were a media case...every note, every conversation was analyzed.  We had a saying, "if it isn't documented, it did not happen" i.e.  do not say had a phone call with someone and said A, B, and C.  If it was not documented within 24 hours of the event, it is your word against yours.  And if you did not document every detail, then the agency could not adequately defend you.  In other words, do your work do it right, and document it well. 

If LE and the court cannot trust the agency, then why does it exist?  Wouldn't a complete overhaul be mandatory? 

I can honestly say this....the old school social workers were more detailed and "on it" when it came to child safety.  The newer supervisors, workers, etc. have differnt views.  I know one view was sometimes you go into a home looking all around, and sometimes you go in with tunnel vision. You investigate the actual allegation, rather than the entire family and risks factors.  In other words, if you are there to investigate abuse, do not look for neglect issues..you are just making more work for yourself.  I used to say I had to check my morals at the door in order to support my family....I no longer work there and cannot imagine ever going back.

agreed!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on October 01, 2010, 10:53:35 AM
I am very very confused.  If LE cannot trust DDS to give all info, why is DDS allowed to continue unabated?  Again, I only have my agency experience but honestly, we were called in ASAP if there were a media case...every note, every conversation was analyzed.  We had a saying, "if it isn't documented, it did not happen" i.e.  do not say had a phone call with someone and said A, B, and C.  If it was not documented within 24 hours of the event, it is your word against yours.  And if you did not document every detail, then the agency could not adequately defend you.  In other words, do your work do it right, and document it well. 

If LE and the court cannot trust the agency, then why does it exist?  Wouldn't a complete overhaul be mandatory? 

I can honestly say this....the old school social workers were more detailed and "on it" when it came to child safety.  The newer supervisors, workers, etc. have differnt views.  I know one view was sometimes you go into a home looking all around, and sometimes you go in with tunnel vision. You investigate the actual allegation, rather than the entire family and risks factors.  In other words, if you are there to investigate abuse, do not look for neglect issues..you are just making more work for yourself.  I used to say I had to check my morals at the door in order to support my family....I no longer work there and cannot imagine ever going back.

Terri, I agree with you so much . . . what courage to stand up for what is right and not merely what is done, i.e. tunnel vision.
O/T Cookie, you are looking good!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on October 03, 2010, 08:15:58 PM
 ::MonkeyKiss:: thanks Sis!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: AmandaReckonwith on October 09, 2010, 05:55:50 PM
ADDED TODAY: Section for the alleged DSS failures in the Shaniya Davis case.
It is all contained on Page 1. I don't know what to think, but what a load.
Who DIDN'T fail Shaniya?

The Shaniya Davis archive album:
http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/Shaniya%20Davis%20%20-NC-/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on October 09, 2010, 08:32:04 PM
thanks Amanda...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on October 26, 2010, 05:57:17 PM
Shaniya,

Thinking of you often but glad you are resting safe.
Terri


I pray Shaniya is at peace and snuggling with the angels.  I pray she is so happy she does not care about the earthly justice that so many of us crave. 

Terri


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 07, 2010, 05:47:11 AM
By Nancy McCleary and Francis X. Gilpin
Staff writers
Published: 01:00 AM, Sun Nov 07, 2010   

One year later:
Will there be justice for Shaniya?

Five-year-old Shaniya Davis had barely begun to live when she was raped and strangled and her body dumped on the side of a road near the Harnett-Lee county line in November 2009.

But the ramifications of her horrific death continue to reverberate in the community and in the agencies that investigated her case.

A year later, the fallout continues.

Cumberland County's Department of Social Services, accused of not cooperating with police in the tension-filled days immediately after Shaniya's disappearance, was the subject of an investigation sought by District Attorney Ed Grannis.

The investigation came to a close in September, and Grannis has decided not to prosecute DSS officials on charges of obstruction of justice.

But the circumstances surrounding Shaniya's death have led to the resignation of Chet Oehme, chairman of the Social Services Board, and continue to shine a spotlight on Social Services Director Brenda Reid Jackson, who has been at the center of a firestorm of criticism.

Cumberland County commissioners are now considering replacing Oehme with one of their own in an effort to provide better oversight.

A year after Shaniya's death, one big question remains: Can Social Services, Fayetteville police, the Board of Commissioners and the District Attorney's Office put aside their differences and work together?

At 6:53 a.m. on Nov. 10, Antoniette Davis called Fayetteville police to say her daughter, Shaniya, was missing from her home in Sleepy Hollow Mobile Home Park.

An Amber Alert went out just after noon for Shaniya, who had last been seen wearing a blue sleep shirt and pink panties.

Davis and her 7-year-old son spent that afternoon at the police station, answering investigators' questions.

Two days later, police released surveillance video, taken the morning Shaniya was reported missing, showing a man holding her in his arms in front of an elevator at a Sanford hotel. The video was time-stamped 6:11 a.m.

The man in the video was identified as Mario Andrette McNeill, who turned himself in to police Nov. 13 and was charged with kidnapping.

The next day, Shaniya's mother was charged with human trafficking and prostituting her child, filing a false police report and obstructing justice.

The search continued for Shaniya as law enforcement and dozens of volunteers combed the woods and swamps in the area of southern Lee and northern Harnett counties.

The search ended about 1 p.m. Nov. 16, when Shaniya's body was found among the thick kudzu vines that covered woods off N.C. 87 near Carolina Trace.

On Nov. 20, McNeill was charged with raping and murdering Shaniya.

Shaniya was buried in Fayetteville Memorial Cemetery on Nov. 22 after a funeral attended by nearly 2,000 people.

By then, the case had become a national story on television news channels. That's how NBA star Shaquille O'Neal learned of Shaniya's death. He paid for her funeral.

A week after Shaniya's abduction, Social Services Director Brenda Reid Jackson met with homicide investigators at the District Attorney's Office to review what her department knew about Antoniette Davis and her children.

The exact nature of the department's relationship with Davis' family still isn't known. Jackson has used state privacy statutes to keep records of the case out of public view.

But one of Shaniya's uncles, Michael Davis, told reporters that, before Shaniya's death, the DSS investigated her mother concerning her 7-year-old son.

Shortly after Shaniya died, the co-chairman of a state task force on child fatalities said a team would be sent to Fayetteville to find out when the DSS first made contact with the family, the status of that case at the time of the killing, and whether proper procedures were followed.

Last week, almost a year later, a spokesman for the state task force said no date has been set for the beginning of that review.

Little else about how Social Services handled the case had become public, either, until Grannis held a rare news conference in September.

During the conference, Grannis said police repeatedly had to go to court to force Jackson to give up DSS records that he said eventually proved useful to the murder investigation.

Even with the court orders, Grannis said, the DSS held back records.

The first indication of that came within a day of Shaniya's disappearance.

A police detective was told by a DSS employee dealing with Shaniya's brother that "law enforcement is not getting everything, that they are not being told everything and that there is more to this," Grannis said at his news conference.

After police figured out that an initial batch of records was incomplete and the county supplied a second batch, a DSS employee told a detective that she was being forced to delete all e-mails related to Shaniya's case, Grannis said.

Grannis decided not to prosecute DSS officials for obstructing justice because, he said, the e-mails weren't destroyed but printed out and slipped into case files before they were deleted.

That maneuver, Grannis said, was motivated by Jackson's desire to keep the e-mails away from reporters, who might obtain them under the state public records law. Everything in DSS case files usually is considered a state secret.

Fayetteville Police Chief Tom Bergamine brought the DSS foot-dragging to the attention of Grannis.

In December, Grannis requested that the SBI look into the county's cooperation with the murder investigation.

The SBI investigation cast a shadow over the DSS for months.

Jackson wrote Grannis in March, seeking an update on what the SBI had found. When Grannis ignored the letter, the county Social Services Board sent another one in August.

Jackson, who had been briefed on the SBI's preliminary results by a bureau agent, believed the DSS would be cleared.

Grannis finally responded to the DSS letters in September.

Instead of exonerating the DSS, however, Grannis told Oehme, then the Social Services Board chairman, that he was dissatisfied with the SBI report. Grannis asked Sheriff Moose Butler to take a second look at the report.

Butler's internal-affairs investigators spent less than two weeks on the case.

On Sept. 30, Grannis called his news conference at Butler's office.

"To say we were not happy with the quality of the SBI report would be an understatement," Grannis told reporters. "In my 40 years, I've never seen anything from the SBI that bothered me this much."

Grannis, who is retiring at the end of the year, recounted how an SBI agent told his aides that Jackson said a Fayetteville police officer attempted to break into the DSS building on Ramsey Street. She later changed that account, saying a newspaper reporter had tried to break in, Grannis said.

The district attorney was skeptical. The Social Services Board later issued a statement in which Jackson "unequivocally" denied saying any such thing. "This incident never occurred," the statement read.

On Oct. 8, the board called Jackson in for a closed-door chat. Emerging from the private meeting, the board issued a statement of support for Jackson. It noted she now is meeting regularly with Bergamine, the police chief.

A few days after the board's statement, Oehme submitted his resignation, effective immediately.

Last week, Oehme said he wasn't interested in talking about Shaniya's case in any depth.

"I feel that Social Services did what they were supposed to do," Oehme said. "And we're just waiting for the outcome of the perpetrator and the mother."

Shaniya's father, Bradley Wayne Lockhart, still is angry at how DSS handled the investigation.

"I'm angry with DSS for withholding information that could have prevented all this," Lockhart said in a telephone interview from Georgia, where he now lives.

Lockhart said no one from DSS contacted him after police searched Davis' home in July and found drugs.

"Why couldn't they call me and tell me they had raided the house and she (Davis) was under investigation?" Lockhart said.

He said he also was upset that Oehme referred to him as a "deadbeat" in his October resignation letter.

But Lockhart said he isn't dwelling on his anger. Instead, he's trying to channel it into something positive.

"We can spend most of our time finding fault and pointing fingers, but unless we find the root cause and change it, we won't fix the problem," he said.

Asked if DSS could have done more to prevent Shaniya's death, Grannis replied: "I don't think you can say that."

He drew a parallel with the 2009 murder of Eve Carson, the UNC student-body president who was slain during a robbery in 2008. One of the men accused in Carson's death was on parole at the time.

"I think DSS has a monumental task trying to deal with a lot of broken situations," Grannis said. "They certainly don't fix them all, and I don't think the rest of us can."

A year after Shaniya's death, her mother and McNeill have yet to be indicted.

Antoniette Davis remains out of jail on $51,000 bail.

Davis was pregnant when she was arrested. She has since given birth, and the child has been put in foster care, a source close to the family said.

McNeill is being held at Central Prison in Raleigh for safekeeping until his trial. No date has been set.

Grannis said the case is in good hands, with a trio of proven deputy assistants to handle the prosecution.

Bergamine would not speak about Shaniya's case or the department's relationship with Social Services. But he did issue a statement through department spokesman Dan Grubb.

"Unfortunately," the statement read, "Police Department personnel cannot comment regarding an ongoing investigation, but we trust and expect that the Fayetteville Police Department and the Department of Social Services will work together in a professional manner as need arises without regard to any individual case."

In an e-mail last week, Jackson said DSS and police lawyers have begun to work together on court orders for records.

She added: "We continue to extend heartfelt sympathy to the family of Shaniya Davis and our community which was affected by this tragedy."

Shaniya's father has started Shaniya Speaks, a nonprofit group that works to raise awareness of sexual crimes against children.

The group's name represents what Lockhart said he is trying to be: his daughter's voice.

He plans to attend a memorial service, sponsored by the organization, on Nov. 16 in the parking lot of the Family Dollar store on Murchison Road.

Grannis said he hopes the case serves as a lesson about cooperation between agencies in any investigation involving a child.

"I think we saw in this case how important that can be," Grannis said. "You would like to think that with everything that occurred in this child's case, there will be more of an effort in that regard."

http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2010/11/07/1045231?sac=Home


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on November 13, 2010, 06:42:51 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2010/11/12/1047522?sac=Home
Published: 05:56 PM, Fri Nov 12, 2010
Memorial service planned for slain 5-year-old Shaniya Davis
A memorial service to mark a year since Shaniya Davis' death is scheduled Tuesday at 6:30 p.m.

The service will be held in the Freedom International Ministries parking lot off Murchison Road.

Shaniya's mother, Antoinette Davis, reported at 6:53 a.m. Nov. 10, 2009, that her 5-year-old daughter was missing.

Two days later, surveillance video from a camera at Sanford motel showed a man in front of an elevator there holding Shaniya in his arms.

On Nov. 15, 2009, Shaniya's body was found in woods off N.C. 87 near Carolina Trace. She had been raped and strangled.

Mario Andrette McNeil , the man in the video, was charged with kidnapping and murder and Davis was charged with human trafficking and prostituting her child.
Both are awaiting trial.

The memorial service will feature speakers, including Shaniya's father, Bradley Lockhart, according to Joe McGee, director of Giving Opportunities Through Dedication and Devotion (GOTDAD) Inc., a Fayetteville nonprofit that is sponsoring the event.

Freedom International Ministries is in the Pamalee Plaza shopping center


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on November 15, 2010, 10:39:47 AM
Thank you Nut and Trimm....this case hangs on me like no other.

IMOO   How in the world is that mother allowed to walk among society?  How does that B...  live with herself?  I would think the general public would have such anger and animousity towards that woman she would not be safe.  Years ago I lived in a place where people sometimes got drunk and run off the side of the road.  Not saying it is right, just that is one part of human nature...

I'm sorry and if this post is too ugly then I understand if it needs to be removed.

Terri


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 15, 2010, 02:25:03 PM
No need to remove it. I feel the same way, as do so many here.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on November 15, 2010, 11:38:21 PM
No need to remove it. I feel the same way, as do so many here.


yeppers...I am right there with you all...



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on November 16, 2010, 03:42:55 PM
Thank you Nut and Trimm....this case hangs on me like no other.

IMOO   How in the world is that mother allowed to walk among society?  How does that B...  live with herself?  I would think the general public would have such anger and animousity towards that woman she would not be safe.  Years ago I lived in a place where people sometimes got drunk and run off the side of the road.  Not saying it is right, just that is one part of human nature...

I'm sorry and if this post is too ugly then I understand if it needs to be removed.

Terri

Terri, the longer I am a monkey, the closer I get to wanting to take justice in my own hands.  Sometimes it is scary, because I really think I could do it and walk away and not feel guilty.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Gizzie on November 16, 2010, 07:31:07 PM
Thank you Nut and Trimm....this case hangs on me like no other.

IMOO   How in the world is that mother allowed to walk among society?  How does that B...  live with herself?  I would think the general public would have such anger and animousity towards that woman she would not be safe.  Years ago I lived in a place where people sometimes got drunk and run off the side of the road.  Not saying it is right, just that is one part of human nature...

I'm sorry and if this post is too ugly then I understand if it needs to be removed.

Terri

Terri, the longer I am a monkey, the closer I get to wanting to take justice in my own hands.  Sometimes it is scary, because I really think I could do it and walk away and not feel guilty.

 :smt045



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on November 17, 2010, 04:28:13 PM
It is not only the people involved, I am also disgusted with those that would talk to her, be her "friend" etc.  Where is shunning, where is the big Scarlet A?

Given that my family is filled with addicts, you cannot convince me the mother is not still using.  I have heard all of the excuses an addict uses, they are never responsible for anything or what happens to those they "love". 

As you said,  the longer you are a monkey.....

In my area there is a missing family of three.  They found the fourth victim, a thirteen year old girl, bound and gagged in a basement.  The person responsible is sitting warm in jail while everyone is out searching for the missing three...I can HONESTLY tell you I think it should be legal to torture him until he tells the whereabouts of the family, living or dead. 

Terri


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on November 18, 2010, 07:48:34 AM
It is not only the people involved, I am also disgusted with those that would talk to her, be her "friend" etc.  Where is shunning, where is the big Scarlet A?

Given that my family is filled with addicts, you cannot convince me the mother is not still using.  I have heard all of the excuses an addict uses, they are never responsible for anything or what happens to those they "love". 

As you said,  the longer you are a monkey.....

In my area there is a missing family of three.  They found the fourth victim, a thirteen year old girl, bound and gagged in a basement.  The person responsible is sitting warm in jail while everyone is out searching for the missing three...I can HONESTLY tell you I think it should be legal to torture him until he tells the whereabouts of the family, living or dead. 

Terri

yep..agree with you


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on November 20, 2010, 08:17:11 AM
It is not only the people involved, I am also disgusted with those that would talk to her, be her "friend" etc.  Where is shunning, where is the big Scarlet A?

Given that my family is filled with addicts, you cannot convince me the mother is not still using.  I have heard all of the excuses an addict uses, they are never responsible for anything or what happens to those they "love". 

As you said,  the longer you are a monkey.....

In my area there is a missing family of three.  They found the fourth victim, a thirteen year old girl, bound and gagged in a basement.  The person responsible is sitting warm in jail while everyone is out searching for the missing three...I can HONESTLY tell you I think it should be legal to torture him until he tells the whereabouts of the family, living or dead. 

Terri

yep..agree with you

Terri, I agree too.  And look what happened . . . the three were found dead and dismembered.  This is so mucked up!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 25, 2011, 07:48:27 PM
http://humantrafficking.change.org/blog/view/2010s_top_10_victories_in_the_fight_against_human_trafficking
2010's Top 10 Victories in the Fight Against Human Trafficking
December 30, 2010

2010 has been a banner year for the fight against human trafficking. Activists from across the country and around the world have come together to hold companies accountable for slavery in their supply chains, fought to end the sale of sex trafficking victims online, and worked to make the American food industry slave-free. And as a result, laws have been passed, corporate policies have been changed, and traffickers have fewer places to advertise for trafficked people. Check out the top ten victories won in the fight against human trafficking in 2010.(snipped)

 (There are 10 listed in case someone wants to read the entire list, but I've snipped the one that came about as a result of the crimes against Shaniya Davis)

(snipped)
10. Choice Hotels took action to prevent child prostitution. The tragic death of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis after being sold into prostitution at a Comfort Inn prompted a campaign asking parent company Choice Hotels to prevent child prostitution in their hotels. After receiving letters from over 4,200 Change.org members, they agreed to incorporate child trafficking into their employee training.(snipped)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 25, 2011, 07:54:15 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2010/12/30/1056208?sac=Home
New district attorney faces big challenges
December 30, 2010

When Billy West is sworn in as Cumberland County's first new district attorney in more than 35 years on Saturday, he'll likely have little time to bask in his new position.

West, 36, will inherit several high-profile cases and the task of dealing with other issues facing the office, such as budget constraints and a crowded jail.

The cases include the prosecution of suspected serial rapist Aaron Pernell and those charged in the disappearance and death of 5-year-old Shaniya Davis.

Pernell, a Fort Bragg soldier, is accused in a series of rapes and other crimes in Cumberland and Hoke counties. In December, he was convicted on Fort Bragg and sentenced to 50 years in a military prison for a rape that took place on post. His civilian charges are pending.

In the Shaniya Davis case, Mario Andrette McNeil has been charged with kidnapping, rape and murder. The girl's mother, Antoniette Davis, is charged with human trafficking and child abuse involving prostitution. Neither has been indicted.

West also could determine when the Spring Lake Police Department has its felony arrest powers reinstated.

The department has been without those powers since 2007, when judicial officials stripped those abilities because of the botched investigation of a child's death. Town officers were stripped of their misdemeanor arrest powers in May 2009, following the arrests of two supervising officers on charges that included embezzlement, breaking and entering, and obstruction of justice.

Spring Lake police regained their misdemeanor powers earlier this year, and Police Chief Troy McDuffie hopes to regain some of the felony arrest powers in mid-2011. Neither current District Attorney Ed Grannis nor West have commented on the town's plan.

In interviews last month, courthouse officials and lawyers discussed some of the challenges West will face when he takes over for Grannis.

He is expected to see a continuously growing backlog of cases, ongoing growth related to changes on Fort Bragg that could continue to stretch law enforcement and the judicial system, and a strict budget that has been outpaced by workloads in recent years.

When asked about the challenges that he's inheriting, West was quick to reference budget shortfalls and community growth, both of which would put additional strains on his office as the number of cases is expected to continue to grow.

West said he plans to continue and expand on changes made by Grannis to integrate technology, reduce office supply costs and streamline work.

"Technology is one way to try to combat the growing caseload," he said.

West said his biggest challenge would be the community's growth with the military's Base Closure and Realignment process.

"Cumberland County continues to grow," West said. "The military expects quality law enforcement. The District Attorney's Office has a critical role to play."

Although West has worked in the District Attorney's Office for a while, he will have adjustments to make.

As a prosecutor, Chief District Court Judge Beth Keever said, he could emphasize individual cases. But as the district attorney, he is responsible for the entire system.

He has to know law enforcement and case trends, Keever said.

West's grooming for the position under Grannis will be a plus as he makes the transition into the leadership position, she said.

Lawyer and former Superior Court Judge Coy Brewer said that on top of the professional challenges, West also will have the challenge of overcoming his relatively young age.

Brewer speaks from experience. He was sworn in as a judge at age 30. He said the bias some in the courthouse will have against a young district attorney is real, even though West "has a maturity beyond his age."

But Brewer said he doesn't expect that to bother West for long.

"He has a lot of energy and that will be a lot of help to the office moving forward," he said. "The one thing about being young and facing the challenge of youth is that time will ultimately solve that problem."

West said he doesn't believe his age will be an issue because of his experience and knowledge of the office. He has worked under Grannis for more than 10 years, he said.

"Everything from seatbelt tickets to murder cases, I've been involved with at some point," he said. "My experience will make it a smoother transition."

Lawyer Jerry Beaver said West's most difficult task outside of a stingy legislature will be changing the way the District Attorney's Office has operated.

"The hardest thing for him will be to effect changes," he said.

Still, Beaver believes West will win that battle in the end.

"He's gregarious, outgoing, friendly and very pleasant," Beaver said. "But you shouldn't be put off by his easygoing manner. He won't roll over and give the courthouse away."

**********************8
BBM

 ::MonkeyShocked::  I had no earthly idea neither Mario Andrette McNeil nor Shaniya's (sorry excuse for a)mother Antoinette Davis haven't been indicted. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: espresso lover on January 27, 2011, 10:59:54 AM
Court info. :

2010012999 CR
Arraigned Defendant Name: COE,CLARENCE,DARRIELL
County: CUMBERLAND
Court Date: 01/24/2011
Session: AM
...Court Room: 002A

Offense Code Description Statute
2322 Misdemeanor MISDEMEANOR LARCENY 14-72(A)



2009065834 CR
Arraigned Defendant Name: DAVIS,ANTONIETTE
County: CUMBERLAND
Court Date: 02/02/2011
Session: AM
...Court Room: 002B

Offense Code Description Statute
1151 Felony HUMAN TRAFFICKING CHILD VICTIM 14-43.11(A)
3836 Felony FELONY CHILD ABUSE-PROSTITUTN 14-318.4(A1


MCNEIL,MARIO,ANDRETTE 04/30/1980 03/01/2011 002B AM 2009CR065760
MCNEIL,MARIO,ANDRETTE 04/30/1980 03/01/2011 002B AM 2009CR066040
MCNEIL,MARIO,ANDRETTE 04/30/1980 03/01/2011 002B AM 2009CR066041


http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=362450742963&ref=mf#!/group.php?gid=362450742963&v=wall


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 27, 2011, 11:30:30 AM
Thank you so much for the information espresso lover.   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: espresso lover on January 27, 2011, 11:35:46 AM
Your quite welcome Muffy! I am a fly by poster but always read as much as I can....


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 27, 2011, 11:43:12 AM
Your quite welcome Muffy! I am a fly by poster but always read as much as I can....

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on January 27, 2011, 07:36:43 PM
Finally!!!   I pray this case is closely followed.  The mother should be shown no mercy in the systerm and out.

Terri


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on January 29, 2011, 09:12:43 PM
Finally!!!   I pray this case is closely followed.  The mother should be shown no mercy in the systerm and out.

Terri
::MonkeyHang::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on March 30, 2011, 10:17:59 AM
Please  say a prayer and light a candle for Shaniya, may she rest in peace.
http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=snd



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on April 16, 2011, 12:06:44 PM
The court hearing is fast approaching...may both adults pay the ultimate price.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on April 16, 2011, 12:13:03 PM
The court hearing is fast approaching...may both adults pay the ultimate price.

 ::rhino:: ::rhino::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on May 11, 2011, 03:47:54 PM
UPDATE 20th April 2011
Antoinette Nicole Davis & Mario McNeil are scheduled to appear in court on Tuesday, 24th May 2011.  I do not have a time yet, only that it is AM.  Will update as and when
DAVIS,ANTONIETTE dob – 07/03/1984 date of appearance 05/24/2011 court room 002B AM case number 2009CR065834 & 2009CR065835 

MCNEIL,MARIO,ANDRETTE dob – 04/30/1980 date of appearance 05/24/2011 court room 002B AM case number -2009CR065760  & 2009CR066040 & 2009CR066041



http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/update-on-shaniya-davis-case-2/

Someone on the aboved noted site asked why the case of Caylee Anthony is getting so much press compared to that of Shaniya.  Interesting.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: SuzieQ on May 19, 2011, 10:09:24 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/05/18/1095116?sac=Home

Published: 07:08 AM, Thu May 19, 2011
Man accused of murdering Shaniya Davis wants to be released from prison

The man accused of kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya Davis wants to be released from Central Prison in Raleigh, where he is awaiting trial.

The letter, received by the Clerk of Superior Court's office in January, is three lines long.

It says "To whom this may concern; Release me. It's easiest."

It's signed by Mario A. McNeill, written in cursive and printed beneath that signature.

 ::snipping2::

Neither McNeill nor Davis has yet been indicted by the grand jury, which must happen before the cases can be tried.




What is wrong with this picture?





Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on May 27, 2011, 07:27:57 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/05/18/1095116?sac=Home

Published: 07:08 AM, Thu May 19, 2011
Man accused of murdering Shaniya Davis wants to be released from prison

The man accused of kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya Davis wants to be released from Central Prison in Raleigh, where he is awaiting trial.

The letter, received by the Clerk of Superior Court's office in January, is three lines long.

It says "To whom this may concern; Release me. It's easiest."

It's signed by Mario A. McNeill, written in cursive and printed beneath that signature.

 ::snipping2::

Neither McNeill nor Davis has yet been indicted by the grand jury, which must happen before the cases can be tried.




What is wrong with this picture?






What in the world does he mean?  That someone on the outside will kill him?  Crazy.

Terri


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: texasmom on May 27, 2011, 10:48:50 PM
Looks like the next court appearance is 7/26/2011 for both of them.

What's taking so long????   ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyMad::


http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars/CriminalQuery.html

District    DAVIS,ANTONIETTE    07/03/1984    07/26/2011    002B    AM    2009CR065834   
 District    DAVIS,ANTONIETTE    07/03/1984    07/26/2011    002B    AM    2009CR065835

District    MCNEIL,MARIO,ANDRETTE    04/30/1980    07/26/2011    002B    AM    2009CR065760   
 District    MCNEIL,MARIO,ANDRETTE    04/30/1980    07/26/2011    002B    AM    2009CR066040   
 District    MCNEIL,MARIO,ANDRETTE    04/30/1980    07/26/2011    002B    AM    2009CR066041   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: texasmom on May 27, 2011, 10:50:05 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Shaniya%20Nicole%20Davis/33ehmj6-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on May 28, 2011, 01:26:42 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Shaniya%20Nicole%20Davis/33ehmj6-1.jpg)

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: SuzieQ on June 07, 2011, 11:34:30 PM
http://triad.news14.com/content/local_news/triangle/642052/shaniya-davis-murder-indictments-could-happen-this-summer
   

Updated 06/06/2011 05:42 PM
Shaniya Davis murder indictments could happen this summer
By: Amanda Weber


FAYETTEVILLE – It has been nearly two years since the case began and there's still been no trial or formal indictments have been filed in the case of Shaniya Davis.

Her mother Antoinette Davis is out on bond with charges of human trafficking and felony child abuse-prostitution. The man accused of kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya, Mario McNeill, sits in the Cumberland County jail awaiting trial.

"The Fayetteville Police Department had to compile the interviews, the reports, the test etc. from all of those agencies. That investigative file that they have created is in excess of 5,000 pages,” said Cumberland County District Attorney William West.

 ::snipping2::


Video at site



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Wyks on June 09, 2011, 11:09:36 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/05/18/1095116?sac=Home

Published: 07:08 AM, Thu May 19, 2011
Man accused of murdering Shaniya Davis wants to be released from prison

The man accused of kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya Davis wants to be released from Central Prison in Raleigh, where he is awaiting trial.

The letter, received by the Clerk of Superior Court's office in January, is three lines long.

It says "To whom this may concern; Release me. It's easiest."

It's signed by Mario A. McNeill, written in cursive and printed beneath that signature.

 ::snipping2::

Neither McNeill nor Davis has yet been indicted by the grand jury, which must happen before the cases can be tried.


What is wrong with this picture?


In the article it says that he is being held at that location for his own protection.  Sounds to me like he'd rather face the wrath of the public than jail/prison general population.  Maybe a death wish on his part? 

And second, what has taken so friggin long?  Didn't know there hasn't even been an indictment yet!!!  They better step on it if that has to be done before trial, since the next hearing is in July. 

How is he even still being held and charged without an indictment??  And what of Shaniya's mother, where is she? 

Will we ever see Justice for Shaniya?? 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on June 10, 2011, 08:24:22 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/05/18/1095116?sac=Home

Published: 07:08 AM, Thu May 19, 2011
Man accused of murdering Shaniya Davis wants to be released from prison

The man accused of kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya Davis wants to be released from Central Prison in Raleigh, where he is awaiting trial.

The letter, received by the Clerk of Superior Court's office in January, is three lines long.

It says "To whom this may concern; Release me. It's easiest."

It's signed by Mario A. McNeill, written in cursive and printed beneath that signature.

 ::snipping2::

Neither McNeill nor Davis has yet been indicted by the grand jury, which must happen before the cases can be tried.


What is wrong with this picture?


In the article it says that he is being held at that location for his own protection.  Sounds to me like he'd rather face the wrath of the public than jail/prison general population.  Maybe a death wish on his part? 

And second, what has taken so friggin long?  Didn't know there hasn't even been an indictment yet!!!  They better step on it if that has to be done before trial, since the next hearing is in July. 

How is he even still being held and charged without an indictment??  And what of Shaniya's mother, where is she? 

Will we ever see Justice for Shaniya?? 



Wyks, here's an article SuzieQ posted that covers some of your questions:


http://triad.news14.com/content/local_news/triangle/642052/shaniya-davis-murder-indictments-could-happen-this-summer
 ::snipping2::
Her mother Antoinette Davis is out on bond with charges of human trafficking and felony child abuse-prostitution. The man accused
of kidnapping, raping and murdering Shaniya, Mario McNeill, sits in the Cumberland County jail awaiting trial.

"The Fayetteville Police Department had to compile the interviews, the reports, the test etc. from all of those agencies. That investigative file that they have created is in excess of 5,000 pages,” said Cumberland County District Attorney William West.
 ::snipping2::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on June 11, 2011, 08:57:03 PM
this breaks my heart..the egg donor is out on bail...she needs to be in prison.
McNeill didn't really kidnap Shaniya, her mother let him have her! and yet she is out on bail...will never ever understand that..I am really surprised that someone has not beat the crap out of her or murdered her yet.. ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MOMDET on June 14, 2011, 01:18:05 PM
This is so ludicrous.  I know that the egg donor was pregnant.  God, please tell me she is not parenting another child while she is out on bond, with charges of child trafficking!  What is the hold up here?  I read the article about the 5,000 pages, but if that were the case noone would ever be indicted.  They have Mario taking that baby into a hotel room On VIDEO!!!!  Where is Shaniya's biological father?  Why isn't he demanding justice.  I am disgusted @ our justice system for CHILDREN.  These two would have already been sentenced and serving if this were a drug charge.   ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on June 17, 2011, 03:12:08 PM
Just checking in.  For me, this case is one of the WORST travesty of justice ever.  We KNOW what happened and yet this mother is free.  I am beyond disgusted.   And the fact that she still has family and friends speaks volumes as to the different sub cultures in our society.

Terri
Ohio


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: CarolynV on July 06, 2011, 06:12:47 PM
This is bittersweet today, but...

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/9826518/


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MOMDET on July 07, 2011, 01:05:22 PM
CarolynV, Thanks for sharing.  This case haunts me.  I cannot believe this woman was free for so long, being involved in such heinous crime against a child.  It sickens me that these so called, "MOTHERS" literally get away with murder.  I pray that a jury is found in this case that is more vested in this case then in poor "CAYLEE's".  I feel that jury was just out to make a buck and could have cared less about that poor baby and what she suffered.  I guess it is how our law is written, "Tried by your peers,"  I don't know how they did it but these jurors couldn't have been more K.C.'s peer's if they tried.  May God have Mercy on their souls, but may they live with the knowledge that they set a baby killer free everyday.  Okay, I digress, I pray that both of Shaniya's murders get their "just dues" here on earth and in eternity, however her mother, her protector should pay the greatest debt as she is the one who was blessed with this beautiful baby.  I believe Mario is a Monster, but Antoinette is PURE EVIL and SOULESS! ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on July 12, 2011, 03:41:07 PM
Thank you so much for the update....If either of them get off, I will literally say I am done with the system. 

Terri


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on July 17, 2011, 04:51:53 PM
Thank you so much for the update....If either of them get off, I will literally say I am done with the system. 

Terri

me too!
after Casey got off for murdering her daughter, nothing will surprise me after that one!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on July 18, 2011, 09:05:05 AM
Thank you so much for the update....If either of them get off, I will literally say I am done with the system. 

Terri

me too!
after Casey got off for murdering her daughter, nothing will surprise me after that one!
I agree, it will take a lot of shock me anymore -- and that's not good!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: bananas on July 25, 2011, 04:04:05 PM
This is bittersweet today, but...

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/9826518/

FINALLY!  I still cry for Shaniya..... These demons need to pay for what they did to her.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on July 27, 2011, 10:44:01 AM
This is bittersweet today, but...

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/9826518/

FINALLY!  I still cry for Shaniya..... These demons need to pay for what they did to her.

me too...haunts me all the time...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: KittyMom on July 29, 2011, 08:01:06 AM
This is one case I had to step away from.  The images of that sweet baby being carried in the monster's arms in that hotel are just haunting.  I do not understand what the hold up is.  We know what happened.  McNeill needs to have his crimes laid out in public for the world to see and then be sent to a prison to live the rest of his life being treated like a piece of meat the same way he treated Shaniya.  As far as the egg donor goes, she should be in a jail cell to face murder charges.  She knew she'd never see her child again and she didn't care beyond her next fix.  She needs her reproductive organs removed through her nose.

 ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: KittyMom on July 29, 2011, 08:12:18 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/07/06/1106653?sac=Home

Shaniya Davis' mother indicted on murder, other charges
Quote
"It was long overdue," said Bradley Lockhart, Shaniya's father. "Now, may justice be served.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on July 29, 2011, 10:30:32 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/07/06/1106653?sac=Home

Shaniya Davis' mother indicted on murder, other charges
Quote
"It was long overdue," said Bradley Lockhart, Shaniya's father. "Now, may justice be served.

It's about time!
 ::MonkeyHang::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Gypsy DD on July 29, 2011, 11:11:19 AM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/07/06/1106653?sac=Home

Shaniya Davis' mother indicted on murder, other charges
Quote
"It was long overdue," said Bradley Lockhart, Shaniya's father. "Now, may justice be served.


ITA.



Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on July 29, 2011, 12:03:59 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/07/06/1106653?sac=Home

Shaniya Davis' mother indicted on murder, other charges
Quote
"It was long overdue," said Bradley Lockhart, Shaniya's father. "Now, may justice be served.


ITA.



ITA too. 


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on July 29, 2011, 01:12:49 PM
http://www.fayobserver.com/articles/2011/07/06/1106653?sac=Home

Shaniya Davis' mother indicted on murder, other charges
Quote
"It was long overdue," said Bradley Lockhart, Shaniya's father. "Now, may justice be served.


ITA.



ITA too. 

add me to the long list of ITA!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on August 18, 2011, 07:09:25 PM
Good afternoon Shaniya...you are always in my heart.   


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on September 02, 2011, 09:25:10 PM
Shaniya, thinking of you.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on September 03, 2011, 03:44:48 PM
Shaniya, thinking of you.

Me too Terri.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on September 15, 2011, 04:22:19 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock5.gif)

Right Muffy.....or does it?


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on September 15, 2011, 04:30:34 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock5.gif)

Right Muffy.....or does it?

Yes,  I think it should lock at 100, and then start the next thread, (#3) which will go to 50.  ::rhino::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on September 19, 2011, 05:36:03 PM
I think of you often Shaniya...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on September 21, 2011, 05:41:53 PM
Just sending the only note I can....love to you baby girl.   I am so sorry for your last hours on earth.

This is the one thread I just keep returning.   Isn't there a way her bio mother has to pay every second of the day?  Maybe I am so hard because I have a little boy that I cherish,  that drives me crazy, that at the ripe old age of six has decided he should be allowed to cuss, that does cartwheels off my sofa, and is the center of my universe.   I know we have all said it, but I KNOW it,  I would destroy anyone hurting my child, I cannot imagine literally handing over a child knowing for what she was to be used. 

Sorry to be so negative and graphic, but as I said,  I just keep coming back here, wanting to make it all better.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Terri on December 06, 2011, 04:03:23 PM

Info copied from the Face book feed for Justice For Shaniya.   Maybe NOW we are going to get this started!!! 


2011009135 CRS
Arraigned Defendant Name: DAVIS,ANTOINETTE,NICOLE
County: CUMBERLAND
Court Date: 12/06/2011
Session: AM
... Court Room: 004A

Offense Code Description Statute
0935 Felony FIRST DEGREE MURDER 14-17
1120 Felony FIRST DEGREE RAPE CHILD 14-27.2(A)(1)
3636 Felony SEXUAL OFFENSE WITH A CHILD 14-27.4A(A)
1155 Felony SEXUAL SERVITUDE CHILD VICTIM 14-43.13(A)
3837 Felony FELONY CHILD ABUSE -SEXUAL ACT 14-318.4(A2)
1118 Felony INDECENT LIBERTIES WITH CHILD 14-202.1

http://www.facebook.com/justiceforshaniya


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cartfly on December 06, 2011, 04:45:35 PM

Info copied from the Face book feed for Justice For Shaniya.   Maybe NOW we are going to get this started!!! 


2011009135 CRS
Arraigned Defendant Name: DAVIS,ANTOINETTE,NICOLE
County: CUMBERLAND
Court Date: 12/06/2011
Session: AM
... Court Room: 004A

Offense Code Description Statute
0935 Felony FIRST DEGREE MURDER 14-17
1120 Felony FIRST DEGREE RAPE CHILD 14-27.2(A)(1)
3636 Felony SEXUAL OFFENSE WITH A CHILD 14-27.4A(A)
1155 Felony SEXUAL SERVITUDE CHILD VICTIM 14-43.13(A)
3837 Felony FELONY CHILD ABUSE -SEXUAL ACT 14-318.4(A2)
1118 Felony INDECENT LIBERTIES WITH CHILD 14-202.1

http://www.facebook.com/justiceforshaniya
Thanks Terri for the update. This case still haunts me. After Shaniya was found I couldn't return to this thread because the details were just to horrific for me to handle.

 ::MonkeyAngel::Rest in peace little Shaniya, there will be justice for you baby girl! ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: labubske on December 06, 2011, 05:00:45 PM
This is the one case that I just could not follow.  The images of evil carrying her around just sent chills all over me.  I pray that all of those involved pay and they pay a thousand times worse than she did.  This is a good reason that God made hell.


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on December 06, 2011, 09:30:28 PM
This is the one case that I just could not follow.  The images of evil carrying her around just sent chills all over me.  I pray that all of those involved pay and they pay a thousand times worse than she did.  This is a good reason that God made hell.

 ::rhino::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: KittyMom on December 06, 2011, 11:52:29 PM
It is past time for Shaniya to have justice!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cw618 on December 09, 2011, 10:41:08 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/shanaya5.gif)
always in my thoughts


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 09, 2011, 10:41:51 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/shanaya5.gif)
always in my thoughts

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Sister on December 10, 2011, 10:56:39 AM
This is the one case that I just could not follow.  The images of evil carrying her around just sent chills all over me.  I pray that all of those involved pay and they pay a thousand times worse than she did.  This is a good reason that God made hell.
I agree with you completely!


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: cookie on December 10, 2011, 05:14:06 PM
that photo of Shaniya being carried by that pedo murderer haunts me too..
I did follow her case very closely. It saddens me every time that I think of her.
she deserved so much more...


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 02, 2012, 12:25:58 PM
Close enough for me


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 02, 2012, 12:26:22 PM
Let's start the new year with a fresh thread


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 02, 2012, 12:26:34 PM
ok


Title: Re: Shaniya Nicole Davis #2 11/17/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 02, 2012, 12:28:08 PM
(http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5093/5435599482_8cf4eaf2dc_o.gif)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=6530.0