Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Missing Persons - High Profile => Missing Persons - High Profile - Archives => Topic started by: Nut44x4 on December 20, 2010, 02:22:58 PM



Title: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 - 1/14/11
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 20, 2010, 02:22:58 PM
(http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x166/Nut44x4/CAYLEE/nitecaylee.jpg)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 04, 2011, 06:54:20 PM
Dang went to post over on other thread and it cut me off. 

[/quote]

This is the same defense that was asking that the Jib Jab video not be shown in court. They are reaching for anything at this point, IMO.
[/quote]

I think they should play that video on a background screen throughout the whole trial.  LOL. 

I thikn they filed a motion on that stupid tape to show the judge what is going on out on the interwebs, like the judge can control what people post on forums.  You know, his poor client cannot get a fair trial cause everybody hates her.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 04, 2011, 06:58:25 PM
 ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 04, 2011, 06:59:37 PM
 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 04, 2011, 07:00:23 PM
Dang went to post over on other thread and it cut me off. 


This is the same defense that was asking that the Jib Jab video not be shown in court. They are reaching for anything at this point, IMO.
[/quote]

I think they should play that video on a background screen throughout the whole trial.  LOL. 

I thikn they filed a motion on that stupid tape to show the judge what is going on out on the interwebs, like the judge can control what people post on forums.  You know, his poor client cannot get a fair trial cause everybody hates her.
[/quote]

I saw Judge Perry get a big belly laugh when Mason was reading the post where the blogger said he was an idiot. I kept backing that part over and over.  ::piggy::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 04, 2011, 07:01:00 PM
That was me :cool: We lock on 50 pages.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 04, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Defense To Pay $583 In Court Costs
Court Hearing Scheduled For Wednesday Afternoon

POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:56 pm EST January 4, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense attorneys will be in court again on Wednesday, one day after her attorneys were ordered to pay nearly $600 in sanctions for failure to comply with a court order.

Judge Belvin Perry ordered Anthony's defense to pay the sanctions in a Monday hearing, saying the attorneys failed to provide the prosecution with details regarding defense witnesses by a court ordered deadline in December.

The prosecution said the cost to pursue the motion for sanctions was $583.73. The defense team can appeal the amount.

Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 04, 2011, 07:33:22 PM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 04, 2011, 07:39:14 PM
I like that idea about the video, Zoo.

I suspect Bozo didn't like that he was one of the stars of the video and that's the reason he wanted that idiotic thing excluded.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 04, 2011, 08:03:51 PM
O/T New docs in Zahra Baker's case.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2011, 08:24:50 PM
Don't miss the Dana Pretzer show tonight at 9pm ET:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/2011Jan/Pretzer010411.png)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 04, 2011, 08:25:17 PM
O/T New docs in Zahra Baker's case.



good to hear! she is in heaven with caylee.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 04, 2011, 09:12:05 PM
O/T New docs in Zahra Baker's case.

I hope somebody pays for her murder.  I was just reading a story about a 10yo boy who shot his mother in the back of her head because he had to do chores.  first, why does a 10yo have a gun with accessible bullets available in his room? Second, is life so meaningless that a 10yo just shoots his mother so he does not have to do his chores?  OT I know.  Just this world is so sad sometimes.  This kid ruined his life now.  Ruined his sister/brothers lives, his mother is dead.  No idea where daddy is.  My littlest is 10, and I cannot imagine him having a weapon, never mind having one hanging in his room or him just having access to both parts of it w/o my okay, or him just going to get it to shoot me in the head.  I might be wrong, but something is wrong in this world.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 04, 2011, 09:14:58 PM
I like that idea about the video, Zoo.

I suspect Bozo didn't like that he was one of the stars of the video and that's the reason he wanted that idiotic thing excluded.

You are probably right.  Most defense laywers could care less what forums are saying about him or their client.  They are too busy you know taking depos, looking at evidence, trying to save their client's life, but not Bozo.  He sits on Scared Monkeys reading posts.  Maybe he thinks Caylee's nonexistant nanny posts here, or maybe her kidnapper/muderer/dumper right up the block from his client's home is posting here, and dang it, he is going to catch them.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 04, 2011, 09:19:09 PM
That was me :cool: We lock on 50 pages.

I know, I just never was at the last post of the 50 pages before.  Silly me should have checked before trying to post.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 04, 2011, 09:22:38 PM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Defense To Pay $583 In Court Costs
Court Hearing Scheduled For Wednesday Afternoon

POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:56 pm EST January 4, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense attorneys will be in court again on Wednesday, one day after her attorneys were ordered to pay nearly $600 in sanctions for failure to comply with a court order.

Judge Belvin Perry ordered Anthony's defense to pay the sanctions in a Monday hearing, saying the attorneys failed to provide the prosecution with details regarding defense witnesses by a court ordered deadline in December.

The prosecution said the cost to pursue the motion for sanctions was $583.73. The defense team can appeal the amount.

Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.

Wow, if that is how much it costs to file a motion, so Bozo and company filed what 23 on the 31st, so what was that, about $13,340.00 in one day.  No wonder he needs more JAC funds.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Gizzie on January 04, 2011, 09:36:32 PM
I read this over at the Hinky, and although I don't have a link to the actual conversations, I do remember reading this before.  Mush Mouth Mason really needs to read up on this case I think!  ::MonkeyRoll::

Quote
Q Like he said you seem like a pretty bright person okay. You're here willingly, right?

A Uh huh (Afirmative)

Q You're here 'cause you want, you're here to try to help, right?

A Oh absolutely

And this one

Quote
(from the Universal interview on July 16:)

Q-Let me, let me just go ahead, because this is still running, I noticed it. Raise your right hand for me.
Just like this morning.
A-Yeah.
Q-You swear everything you’ve told me is the truth now about the lies and…
A-Yes.
Q-…everything else? Okay.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Gizzie on January 04, 2011, 09:53:42 PM
Well dang, I should have read the next few posts there because if this is true, looks like her statements MAY be an issue after all. Capp?

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1012&start=550

Jolynna is a person who posts here and at WS . She asked a lawyer this question and got this answer


I always thought that Casey's text to Tony on July 16 at 7:01 a.m. was a fib.
“I was put in handcuffs for almost 10 minutes and sat in the back of a cop car. The best thing and the most important person in my life is mi”

Today, if I understood him correctly, Cheney Mason said that Casey was handcuffed while being driven around.

Considering what is known about Casey's LE interview at Universal, will the latest defense motion to get that interview thrown out be successful?

AZLawyer replied :
I think Casey was likely telling the truth about 10 minutes in handcuffs. By 7 am on the 16th, the officers were suspicious enough of her that they would not have wanted to risk her running off, and they might also have wanted to scare her with the seriousness of the situation in hopes of getting her to talk. The Universal trip was after the text to Tony, so we don't have any information directly from Casey about whether she was handcuffed for that trip. I suspect she was not handcuffed for the actual Universal interview, but that's just based on the tone of the interview.

Here's what I said about the Universal interview last March when someone asked this question:

------------------------------------------------------------------
It is definitely possible to get a "voluntary" confession thrown out. The question will be whether she was "in custody" at that time--if so, they needed to give her the Miranda warning (and her statements will be no good without it) even if she really, truly, voluntarily wanted to talk to them. Whether she was "in custody" will depend on the facts, especially whether she would have reasonably felt free to leave. My gut feeling is that the questioning that took place at the home was probably OK, but the questioning that took place at Universal worries me a little.

It's possible that the officers considered the risk that anything Casey said would be thrown out as evidence if they did not give a Miranda warning, but decided the risk was worth it in order to try to get her to "crack" and tell where Caylee was (alive or dead). After all, if she had confessed and led them to the body at that time, they could have used the information from her confession to direct their investigation--e.g., to know what kind of forensic evidence to look for--even if they couldn't use the confession itself.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

If she was in handcuffs during the ride to Universal, that would only strengthen her impression that she was "in custody" and not free to leave. I mean, what are the chances that the cops are really going to let you leave if they drove you somewhere in handcuffs--even if they say you're free to leave? And, of course, she was arrested immediately after the Universal interview, so, in reality, she was not free to leave. And didn't Yuri tell George before they left for Universal that he should be prepared that Casey might not be coming back to the house? All in all, I think the Universal statement should be suppressed. And now I feel like I just wrote another defense brief. Maybe JB will share his $3/hr with me.

But on the bright side, all the major lies from the Universal interview are in Casey's other statements as well...her statements to the 911 operator, her handwritten statement, and her statement to Yuri at the house. Not to mention her statements to her family and friends. This girl is a talker.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 04, 2011, 09:56:28 PM
Unbelievable that casey still thinks that she is going to walk. She doesnt seem at all worried. I get the feeling or should I say impression that she is so laid back/relaxed because those two clowns have given her a false sense of security. I think bozo is going to get a rude awakening once this trial is over.
He may just have to sell his expensive suits on ebay! but than who wants to buy something that belongs to an inept lawyer. The name he wanted to make for himself is far from the name is is getting. He thinks people  on the blogs are dumb! many are way more intelligent than him. He is just a clown in a suit! It is not going to be worthy of making any money even on ebay!! all people care about is justice for caylee! something the grandparents have forgotten!!
Casey deserves a lawyer like him! I cannot wait to see the look on their faces when she is found guilty of murder!! we all know she is guilty but to hear it come out of the foreman or judges mouth is priceless!!!
I want her to keep primping and continue to sit there cold hearted!! it will serve to convict her in the eyes of the jury!!She will be what she portrays cold and heartless and a baby killer.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 04, 2011, 10:12:05 PM
Well dang, I should have read the next few posts there because if this is true, looks like her statements MAY be an issue after all. Capp?

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1012&start=550

Jolynna is a person who posts here and at WS . She asked a lawyer this question and got this answer


I always thought that Casey's text to Tony on July 16 at 7:01 a.m. was a fib.
“I was put in handcuffs for almost 10 minutes and sat in the back of a cop car. The best thing and the most important person in my life is mi”

Today, if I understood him correctly, Cheney Mason said that Casey was handcuffed while being driven around.

Considering what is known about Casey's LE interview at Universal, will the latest defense motion to get that interview thrown out be successful?

AZLawyer replied :
I think Casey was likely telling the truth about 10 minutes in handcuffs. By 7 am on the 16th, the officers were suspicious enough of her that they would not have wanted to risk her running off, and they might also have wanted to scare her with the seriousness of the situation in hopes of getting her to talk. The Universal trip was after the text to Tony, so we don't have any information directly from Casey about whether she was handcuffed for that trip. I suspect she was not handcuffed for the actual Universal interview, but that's just based on the tone of the interview.

Here's what I said about the Universal interview last March when someone asked this question:

------------------------------------------------------------------
It is definitely possible to get a "voluntary" confession thrown out. The question will be whether she was "in custody" at that time--if so, they needed to give her the Miranda warning (and her statements will be no good without it) even if she really, truly, voluntarily wanted to talk to them. Whether she was "in custody" will depend on the facts, especially whether she would have reasonably felt free to leave. My gut feeling is that the questioning that took place at the home was probably OK, but the questioning that took place at Universal worries me a little.

It's possible that the officers considered the risk that anything Casey said would be thrown out as evidence if they did not give a Miranda warning, but decided the risk was worth it in order to try to get her to "crack" and tell where Caylee was (alive or dead). After all, if she had confessed and led them to the body at that time, they could have used the information from her confession to direct their investigation--e.g., to know what kind of forensic evidence to look for--even if they couldn't use the confession itself.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

If she was in handcuffs during the ride to Universal, that would only strengthen her impression that she was "in custody" and not free to leave. I mean, what are the chances that the cops are really going to let you leave if they drove you somewhere in handcuffs--even if they say you're free to leave? And, of course, she was arrested immediately after the Universal interview, so, in reality, she was not free to leave. And didn't Yuri tell George before they left for Universal that he should be prepared that Casey might not be coming back to the house? All in all, I think the Universal statement should be suppressed. And now I feel like I just wrote another defense brief. Maybe JB will share his $3/hr with me.

But on the bright side, all the major lies from the Universal interview are in Casey's other statements as well...her statements to the 911 operator, her handwritten statement, and her statement to Yuri at the house. Not to mention her statements to her family and friends. This girl is a talker.

She was NOT in custody at that time, she was arrested AFTER the trip to Universal, so IMHO it is not getting thrown out.  Regardless, it is recorded that she was willing to speak to them all thru the first and second round of the wild goose chase where when she realized the jig was up she confessed she was lying.  Remember this is Casey's account which could be a complete fabrication & regardless if she was not told she was being arrested at that time & released she was not "in custody."     I strongly doubt that these experienced detectives would make such a careless mistake knowing what they were dealing with pretty much immediately, if anything we all have seen them utilize extreme patience & restraint in dealing with her & her lousy family.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 04, 2011, 10:13:48 PM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Defense To Pay $583 In Court Costs
Court Hearing Scheduled For Wednesday Afternoon

POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:56 pm EST January 4, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense attorneys will be in court again on Wednesday, one day after her attorneys were ordered to pay nearly $600 in sanctions for failure to comply with a court order.

Judge Belvin Perry ordered Anthony's defense to pay the sanctions in a Monday hearing, saying the attorneys failed to provide the prosecution with details regarding defense witnesses by a court ordered deadline in December.

The prosecution said the cost to pursue the motion for sanctions was $583.73. The defense team can appeal the amount.

Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.

Wow, if that is how much it costs to file a motion, so Bozo and company filed what 23 on the 31st, so what was that, about $13,340.00 in one day.  No wonder he needs more JAC funds.

They should consider themselves fortunate, pay up & wise up...could have been much steeper for the defense & it was put to them sternly that next time it will be much more severe (my words, not quoted).


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 04, 2011, 10:16:27 PM
Plus on the handcuffed for 10 minutes in the car, I have seen many a "Cop" show where they handcuff somebody for their safety while doing a pull over or something like that, before being in custody.  I don't think she was in custody on the drive around to where she worked (pulease, this girl thinks work is waking up) and the invisinanny's house.  Who know what the judge will rule though.  He has to give them a win every so often, I would assume.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Girlzrock on January 04, 2011, 10:17:55 PM
I like that idea about the video, Zoo.

I suspect Bozo didn't like that he was one of the stars of the video and that's the reason he wanted that idiotic thing excluded.

You are probably right.  Most defense laywers could care less what forums are saying about him or their client.  They are too busy you know taking depos, looking at evidence, trying to save their client's life, but not Bozo.  He sits on Scared Monkeys reading posts.  Maybe he thinks Caylee's nonexistant nanny posts here, or maybe her kidnapper/muderer/dumper right up the block from his client's home is posting here, and dang it, he is going to catch them.

LOL.... you mean real work?  Not looking for a Nanny, I bet.  He just likes to feel er ..."famous", maybe.  " Look how they all talk about me... "  " Can't get enough of me..."  blah blah.  Reminds me of Casey.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: starwynn on January 04, 2011, 11:04:07 PM
O/T New docs in Zahra Baker's case.

I hope somebody pays for her murder.  I was just reading a story about a 10yo boy who shot his mother in the back of her head because he had to do chores.  first, why does a 10yo have a gun with accessible bullets available in his room? Second, is life so meaningless that a 10yo just shoots his mother so he does not have to do his chores?  OT I know.  Just this world is so sad sometimes.  This kid ruined his life now.  Ruined his sister/brothers lives, his mother is dead.  No idea where daddy is.  My littlest is 10, and I cannot imagine him having a weapon, never mind having one hanging in his room or him just having access to both parts of it w/o my okay, or him just going to get it to shoot me in the head.  I might be wrong, but something is wrong in this world.

Daddy left a couple of days/weeks ago.  Mom and dad were fighting because the guns (yes, plural) in the little boy's room, on the gunrack on his wall permanently, were his grandfather's guns - given to him by the father.

Apparently, the mom and son had been arguing that day about him not wanting to bring the firewood in. IMHO, if you allow your child to have guns up on his wall (at 10 that's hardly trust earned yet - they should be heirlooms in a special place, like locked away in a gun cabinet) and you do so to mom in front of the child, undermining her authority, you'll end up closer to a sitution like this.  Add to that the fact the boy had apparently been having aggression and control problems (a bus incident, for example - likely acting out because of tensions at home) and according to the same uncle, the mom with her love for the boy just couldn't see the bad that he was doing.  She didn't handle the situation, and this is how it ended.

The whole thing is just scary.  Kids apparently aren't safe with parents, and parents aren't safe with kids!  What has the world come to?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 04, 2011, 11:16:16 PM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.

Mason needs to listen to the Universal interview tape- it starts off with LE saying that the door is closed only for privacy purposes, and that Casey is free to leave at any time, they ask her does she understand and she says she does, and goes on with her BS stories like they were going to believe her.  At that point she was still being interviewd with a view to finding her missing child, so there was no need to Mirandize her.
As soon as they did arrest her she got lawyered-up pdq - she  obviously didin't feel like sh ewas being detained at Universal,or she would have asked for one then.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 04, 2011, 11:19:33 PM
All I can say about this defence team is that they are truly heaven sent.
Casey deserves them.  When you compare the way Mason and Baez act to the articulate polished way that Ashton and Drane-Burdick act it's embarrassing to watch.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 04, 2011, 11:27:05 PM
O/T New docs in Zahra Baker's case.

I hope somebody pays for her murder.  I was just reading a story about a 10yo boy who shot his mother in the back of her head because he had to do chores.  first, why does a 10yo have a gun with accessible bullets available in his room? Second, is life so meaningless that a 10yo just shoots his mother so he does not have to do his chores?  OT I know.  Just this world is so sad sometimes.  This kid ruined his life now.  Ruined his sister/brothers lives, his mother is dead.  No idea where daddy is.  My littlest is 10, and I cannot imagine him having a weapon, never mind having one hanging in his room or him just having access to both parts of it w/o my okay, or him just going to get it to shoot me in the head.  I might be wrong, but something is wrong in this world.

Daddy left a couple of days/weeks ago.  Mom and dad were fighting because the guns (yes, plural) in the little boy's room, on the gunrack on his wall permanently, were his grandfather's guns - given to him by the father.

Apparently, the mom and son had been arguing that day about him not wanting to bring the firewood in. IMHO, if you allow your child to have guns up on his wall (at 10 that's hardly trust earned yet - they should be heirlooms in a special place, like locked away in a gun cabinet) and you do so to mom in front of the child, undermining her authority, you'll end up closer to a sitution like this.  Add to that the fact the boy had apparently been having aggression and control problems (a bus incident, for example - likely acting out because of tensions at home) and according to the same uncle, the mom with her love for the boy just couldn't see the bad that he was doing.  She didn't handle the situation, and this is how it ended.

The whole thing is just scary.  Kids apparently aren't safe with parents, and parents aren't safe with kids!  What has the world come to?

I agree 100%.  I am just probably in the minority on what I think his punishment should be.  I personally do not give a hoot that he is only 10.  I think he should get adult punishment, maybe not DP if available, which it is in Ohio, but he should get more than a slap on his hands until he is 21.  If he could flip now about having to bring in firewood, I do not think any therapy can erase that hair trigger he has.  He is dangerous IMO.   

Back on topic, Casey is a skank and she is going to spend a very long time in those nice accomodations she has, only general pop will be nicer for her. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Blumonkey on January 04, 2011, 11:55:45 PM
O/T New docs in Zahra Baker's case.

I hope somebody pays for her murder.  I was just reading a story about a 10yo boy who shot his mother in the back of her head because he had to do chores.  first, why does a 10yo have a gun with accessible bullets available in his room? Second, is life so meaningless that a 10yo just shoots his mother so he does not have to do his chores?  OT I know.  Just this world is so sad sometimes.  This kid ruined his life now.  Ruined his sister/brothers lives, his mother is dead.  No idea where daddy is.  My littlest is 10, and I cannot imagine him having a weapon, never mind having one hanging in his room or him just having access to both parts of it w/o my okay, or him just going to get it to shoot me in the head.  I might be wrong, but something is wrong in this world.

Daddy left a couple of days/weeks ago.  Mom and dad were fighting because the guns (yes, plural) in the little boy's room, on the gunrack on his wall permanently, were his grandfather's guns - given to him by the father.

Apparently, the mom and son had been arguing that day about him not wanting to bring the firewood in. IMHO, if you allow your child to have guns up on his wall (at 10 that's hardly trust earned yet - they should be heirlooms in a special place, like locked away in a gun cabinet) and you do so to mom in front of the child, undermining her authority, you'll end up closer to a sitution like this.  Add to that the fact the boy had apparently been having aggression and control problems (a bus incident, for example - likely acting out because of tensions at home) and according to the same uncle, the mom with her love for the boy just couldn't see the bad that he was doing.  She didn't handle the situation, and this is how it ended.

The whole thing is just scary.  Kids apparently aren't safe with parents, and parents aren't safe with kids!  What has the world come to?

I agree 100%.  I am just probably in the minority on what I think his punishment should be.  I personally do not give a hoot that he is only 10.  I think he should get adult punishment, maybe not DP if available, which it is in Ohio, but he should get more than a slap on his hands until he is 21.  If he could flip now about having to bring in firewood, I do not think any therapy can erase that hair trigger he has.  He is dangerous IMO.   

Back on topic, Casey is a skank and she is going to spend a very long time in those nice accomodations she has, only general pop will be nicer for her. 
I agree that he is dangerous but I do not think he should be tried as an adult. A 10 year old's brain is still developing and has poor impulse control. I hold the parents responsible for making a gun with ammo readily available. My son had 2 firearms that were heirlooms given to him from his grandfather. They were stored in a locked gun case and I had the key until he turned 18. This boy is at an age when he can learn to control his impulses and anger, but not locked up with hardened criminals.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 12:26:40 AM
I was reading the states response to the motions and for the lying and stealing motion, I loved this line.

  (http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/8717/lovthis.png) (http://img638.imageshack.us/i/lovthis.png/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)

Because Miss Anthony's lying was so pervasive, we understand Bozo's inability to single out particular lying episodes, lol.  Too much lying going on.

http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26367692/detail.html

Page 3, paragraph c. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 12:39:46 AM
O/T New docs in Zahra Baker's case.

I hope somebody pays for her murder.  I was just reading a story about a 10yo boy who shot his mother in the back of her head because he had to do chores.  first, why does a 10yo have a gun with accessible bullets available in his room? Second, is life so meaningless that a 10yo just shoots his mother so he does not have to do his chores?  OT I know.  Just this world is so sad sometimes.  This kid ruined his life now.  Ruined his sister/brothers lives, his mother is dead.  No idea where daddy is.  My littlest is 10, and I cannot imagine him having a weapon, never mind having one hanging in his room or him just having access to both parts of it w/o my okay, or him just going to get it to shoot me in the head.  I might be wrong, but something is wrong in this world.

Daddy left a couple of days/weeks ago.  Mom and dad were fighting because the guns (yes, plural) in the little boy's room, on the gunrack on his wall permanently, were his grandfather's guns - given to him by the father.

Apparently, the mom and son had been arguing that day about him not wanting to bring the firewood in. IMHO, if you allow your child to have guns up on his wall (at 10 that's hardly trust earned yet - they should be heirlooms in a special place, like locked away in a gun cabinet) and you do so to mom in front of the child, undermining her authority, you'll end up closer to a sitution like this.  Add to that the fact the boy had apparently been having aggression and control problems (a bus incident, for example - likely acting out because of tensions at home) and according to the same uncle, the mom with her love for the boy just couldn't see the bad that he was doing.  She didn't handle the situation, and this is how it ended.

The whole thing is just scary.  Kids apparently aren't safe with parents, and parents aren't safe with kids!  What has the world come to?

I agree 100%.  I am just probably in the minority on what I think his punishment should be.  I personally do not give a hoot that he is only 10.  I think he should get adult punishment, maybe not DP if available, which it is in Ohio, but he should get more than a slap on his hands until he is 21.  If he could flip now about having to bring in firewood, I do not think any therapy can erase that hair trigger he has.  He is dangerous IMO.   

Back on topic, Casey is a skank and she is going to spend a very long time in those nice accomodations she has, only general pop will be nicer for her. 
I agree that he is dangerous but I do not think he should be tried as an adult. A 10 year old's brain is still developing and has poor impulse control. I hold the parents responsible for making a gun with ammo readily available. My son had 2 firearms that were heirlooms given to him from his grandfather. They were stored in a locked gun case and I had the key until he turned 18. This boy is at an age when he can learn to control his impulses and anger, but not locked up with hardened criminals.

I don't know where I think he should be locked up, no not with like serial killers or the adult population.  I agree on the parents blame here, but nobody should die because of stupidity.  Gosh, if that were the case, I would be dead a zillion times over already. 

I guess what bothers me most about this is the mom was found face down, shot in the back of the head, if I am reading correctly the articles, to that means mom was not facing him, and he went after her after getting the gun or she was trying to get away from him. 

10, again, my little guy, my little angel (yeah right) is 10, and for the life of me I cannot envision this at all.  My daughter maybe cause she is at the she knows it all, she is the best, leave me alone, I don't have to listen to you, you suck stage, but my 10yo son, no way no how. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 05, 2011, 12:49:32 AM
O/T New docs in Zahra Baker's case.

I hope somebody pays for her murder.  I was just reading a story about a 10yo boy who shot his mother in the back of her head because he had to do chores.  first, why does a 10yo have a gun with accessible bullets available in his room? Second, is life so meaningless that a 10yo just shoots his mother so he does not have to do his chores?  OT I know.  Just this world is so sad sometimes.  This kid ruined his life now.  Ruined his sister/brothers lives, his mother is dead.  No idea where daddy is.  My littlest is 10, and I cannot imagine him having a weapon, never mind having one hanging in his room or him just having access to both parts of it w/o my okay, or him just going to get it to shoot me in the head.  I might be wrong, but something is wrong in this world.

I don't know if we are talking about the same case but if the family I saw was the right one I am not really surprised. It is a community think in some areas. We go to the housing projects and help kids learn to read and you would never believe what I hear from kids as young as 7 or 8 years old. One boy who could not have been over 8 told me if I made him spell that word one more time "he was going to pop a cap in my azz"  I was shocked. I would backhand my 15 year old if he used the cuss words I heard out of these young boy's mouths. I could have accepted it somewhat if they had been teens trying to act big, but these are little kids who talk and act out these things. It was not just the under educated kids we were working with but all of them in that area. They live and breathe that kind of talk and my guess is a 10 year old having been exposed to that for years just fired that gun with no idea of the results. Or it may be they see so much violence in their area with the drug deals that he did know what he was doing and did it deliberately. Either way it very shocking to me.

I wonder if KC being exposed to violence in her home as told by many had the same mind set. If someone hacks you off just shut them up permanently.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 05, 2011, 12:55:38 AM
Why is Bozo filing all these motions? All he has to do is produce the Nanny, case is solved and KC can call a taxi to go home. Wouldn't that be the most logical solution for him instead of getting into all this trouble?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 12:56:08 AM
I am very antigun, very, but I am in a sort of a moral dilemma.  My older son, who is 12, is in Boyscouts, and they are very weapon oriented.  My son has already qualified on a range, don't ask me what kind of gun, cause I don't know and don't care to know, assume he is using the scoutmaster's weapons or boyscout's weapons, but I envision him shooting this thing on the range and I go a horrible feeling in my belly.  We don't have any guns in our home and never will, but hubby has been taking him to all these events for the boyscouts, and I guess you cannot be a boyscout and not do these things, but I am having a hard time with it.  He is always talking about knives and guns and his newest obsession is a bow and arrow.  I guess they take up that task next in boyscouts. 

I shot a gun once in my life.  My ex-BF had a cop for a brother and he took us out to the gun range once.  I shot one single bullet and hated it.  I felt so not in control.  It kicked back and I could have accidentally shot somebody around me. 

What happened to helping the needy and helping old ladies cross the street? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 05, 2011, 01:00:08 AM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.

Mason needs to listen to the Universal interview tape- it starts off with LE saying that the door is closed only for privacy purposes, and that Casey is free to leave at any time, they ask her does she understand and she says she does, and goes on with her BS stories like they were going to believe her.  At that point she was still being interviewd with a view to finding her missing child, so there was no need to Mirandize her.
As soon as they did arrest her she got lawyered-up pdq - she  obviously didin't feel like sh ewas being detained at Universal,or she would have asked for one then.

My guess is that neither Mason nor Bozo have ever even listened to those tapes. NO attorney in their right mind would file that motion and take a chance on pissing of a judge with those tapes available if they had reviewed them.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 01:09:40 AM
Why is Bozo filing all these motions? All he has to do is produce the Nanny, case is solved and KC can call a taxi to go home. Wouldn't that be the most logical solution for him instead of getting into all this trouble?

Yeah, remember the statement that we would all understand at trial, that she is innocent and they have proof that never materialized.  I could not understand if he had evidence that cleared her of murder, why he would let her sit in prison waiting for a trial.  Surely there has to be a way, if you find out a suspect is innocent, of going to the judge with the evidence that clears them before trial and getting the person out of jail.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 05, 2011, 01:51:56 AM
I am very antigun, very, but I am in a sort of a moral dilemma.  My older son, who is 12, is in Boyscouts, and they are very weapon oriented.  My son has already qualified on a range, don't ask me what kind of gun, cause I don't know and don't care to know, assume he is using the scoutmaster's weapons or boyscout's weapons, but I envision him shooting this thing on the range and I go a horrible feeling in my belly.  We don't have any guns in our home and never will, but hubby has been taking him to all these events for the boyscouts, and I guess you cannot be a boyscout and not do these things, but I am having a hard time with it.  He is always talking about knives and guns and his newest obsession is a bow and arrow.  I guess they take up that task next in boyscouts. 

I shot a gun once in my life.  My ex-BF had a cop for a brother and he took us out to the gun range once.  I shot one single bullet and hated it.  I felt so not in control.  It kicked back and I could have accidentally shot somebody around me. 

What happened to helping the needy and helping old ladies cross the street? 

Sorry for the O/T here but...............

We are opposites on this one. I have been hunting since I was about 8 years old. (maybe even younger) ALL I wanted for Christmas when I was 9 was a 410 shotgun. Every time my parents would try to talk me into something else I would have no part of it. My kids all were gun proficient by age 10 and my youngest (now 15) was the youngest kid ever in the state to pass the Hunter Safety course. I am a safety freak about guns as are most people who are hunters. My guns are never loaded and they are cleaned before they are put on the rack in my house so there can never be a bullet left in one by accident. The ammo is not where a child could get it even if they could load the guns. Many kids in rough areas have guns today and if you ask me it is amazing there are not more gun deaths than there are in those areas. What has always bothered me is they way they do statistics on gun deaths. They include all the deaths done by drive by shooters and in crimes, so they are really skewed as to the numbers. It also bothers me that there are no statistics on the number of lives saved by guns and how many crimes prevented because a responsible person had a gun available. There are thousands of women and children not abducted and victims of crimes because some mother knew how to use a gun. With all the home invasions in some states, it amazes me that everyone would not want to be proficient with a gun. Be glad your son is learning the proper way to use a firearm because someday it might be the only thing which saves his and other lives.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 05, 2011, 01:56:12 AM
Plus on the handcuffed for 10 minutes in the car, I have seen many a "Cop" show where they handcuff somebody for their safety while doing a pull over or something like that, before being in custody.  I don't think she was in custody on the drive around to where she worked (pulease, this girl thinks work is waking up) and the invisinanny's house.  Who know what the judge will rule though.  He has to give them a win every so often, I would assume.

Well this is one I don't want him to give them. It would set her free.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: yuknomenot on January 05, 2011, 02:54:20 AM
Plus on the handcuffed for 10 minutes in the car, I have seen many a "Cop" show where they handcuff somebody for their safety while doing a pull over or something like that, before being in custody.  I don't think she was in custody on the drive around to where she worked (pulease, this girl thinks work is waking up) and the invisinanny's house.  Who know what the judge will rule though.  He has to give them a win every so often, I would assume.

Well this is one I don't want him to give them. It would set her free.
IMHO, if there was even the slightest chance that Bozo, et al thought it a remote possibility that it might appear to even the Joy Wrays of the world that Casey could possibly have been detained by LE for a fraction of a second the DUHfense would have been screaming about it from the beginning.  They are all about public perception and even this one escaped their notice, it should be a  non-issue.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 03:44:32 AM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.

Mason needs to listen to the Universal interview tape- it starts off with LE saying that the door is closed only for privacy purposes, and that Casey is free to leave at any time, they ask her does she understand and she says she does, and goes on with her BS stories like they were going to believe her.  At that point she was still being interviewd with a view to finding her missing child, so there was no need to Mirandize her.
As soon as they did arrest her she got lawyered-up pdq - she  obviously didin't feel like sh ewas being detained at Universal,or she would have asked for one then.

My guess is that neither Mason nor Bozo have ever even listened to those tapes. NO attorney in their right mind would file that motion and take a chance on pissing of a judge with those tapes available if they had reviewed them.

Maybe Colonel Crusty didnt but Bozo clearly did because very early on in the case he referred to statements made by his client in defense of her.

Which means  when they further attempt to character assassinate law enforcement (and that is their plan), they will have already lost the battle with  CJBP over this total farce. The jury will see right thru it as well.    This defense team should learn what they need to cut their losses on.  This is without merit & a total misrepresentation of what took place.   I totally disagree with the person's opinion over at WS on this issue & it is obvious to me that they did not read the transcripts or listen to the entire recordings of Casey's pre-arrest interviews that she volunteered to continue.  Are they kidding with counting on their client's word for this to be fact, the recordings clearly indicate otherwise.  Considering their client is a self-admitted liar (several times over) they should have been working on begging for a plea bargain that I can assure you almost with absolute certainty will not be occurring now. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 03:51:16 AM
Plus on the handcuffed for 10 minutes in the car, I have seen many a "Cop" show where they handcuff somebody for their safety while doing a pull over or something like that, before being in custody.  I don't think she was in custody on the drive around to where she worked (pulease, this girl thinks work is waking up) and the invisinanny's house.  Who know what the judge will rule though.  He has to give them a win every so often, I would assume.

Well this is one I don't want him to give them. It would set her free.

She was not in custody, its right on tape that they were shutting the door in a room at Universal but she was free to leave at any time but prior to her admitting she lied about working there.   Her arrest took place thereafter & she was mirandized after her arrest.   And no, the judge is under no obligation to "give them a win" ever, a judge's rulings are set on what is presented before them with merit & applied to the law, period.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 06:02:08 AM
I am very antigun, very, but I am in a sort of a moral dilemma.  My older son, who is 12, is in Boyscouts, and they are very weapon oriented.  My son has already qualified on a range, don't ask me what kind of gun, cause I don't know and don't care to know, assume he is using the scoutmaster's weapons or boyscout's weapons, but I envision him shooting this thing on the range and I go a horrible feeling in my belly.  We don't have any guns in our home and never will, but hubby has been taking him to all these events for the boyscouts, and I guess you cannot be a boyscout and not do these things, but I am having a hard time with it.  He is always talking about knives and guns and his newest obsession is a bow and arrow.  I guess they take up that task next in boyscouts. 

I shot a gun once in my life.  My ex-BF had a cop for a brother and he took us out to the gun range once.  I shot one single bullet and hated it.  I felt so not in control.  It kicked back and I could have accidentally shot somebody around me. 

What happened to helping the needy and helping old ladies cross the street? 

Sorry for the O/T here but...............

We are opposites on this one. I have been hunting since I was about 8 years old. (maybe even younger) ALL I wanted for Christmas when I was 9 was a 410 shotgun. Every time my parents would try to talk me into something else I would have no part of it. My kids all were gun proficient by age 10 and my youngest (now 15) was the youngest kid ever in the state to pass the Hunter Safety course. I am a safety freak about guns as are most people who are hunters. My guns are never loaded and they are cleaned before they are put on the rack in my house so there can never be a bullet left in one by accident. The ammo is not where a child could get it even if they could load the guns. Many kids in rough areas have guns today and if you ask me it is amazing there are not more gun deaths than there are in those areas. What has always bothered me is they way they do statistics on gun deaths. They include all the deaths done by drive by shooters and in crimes, so they are really skewed as to the numbers. It also bothers me that there are no statistics on the number of lives saved by guns and how many crimes prevented because a responsible person had a gun available. There are thousands of women and children not abducted and victims of crimes because some mother knew how to use a gun. With all the home invasions in some states, it amazes me that everyone would not want to be proficient with a gun. Be glad your son is learning the proper way to use a firearm because someday it might be the only thing which saves his and other lives.

Hey, guns are not for everybody, certainly not for me, but you sound like you handle them and their use very respectfully and teach your kids the same.  I am not somebody who thinks nobody should have a gun.  I know I could not carefully handle one, nor do I want to have to try.  They can just do too much damage from 1 little accident. 

They should probably do some studies on how many lives were saved, but the way the world works is glass half empty thing, always looking at the bad, never the good.  I personally do not think I or family would be safer if we had a gun in the house.  I would not sleep knowing the kids may find the gun key or the ammo, and somehow shoot each other in the stomach playing with the thing, and the time it would take me to get, load and shoot an intruder does not make me think they would save my life.

A kid who used to live behind me, who moved a year or 2 ago, who went to my son's school and he considered a friend, shot himself last year in the head.  His family is whacked, sell drugs, have buyers coming to their home all the time, so it did not surprise me they had guns, but supposedly the kid was kidding around saying I am going to shoot myself in the head, and put it to his head and did just that.  I don't know if he knew if it was loaded or not, but just too many worries for me to ever feel comfortable with them. 

But I know many people do have weapons and do safely teach gun safely and the kids respect them and you are one of them.  unfortunately the ones who don't, outweight the ones who do, at least in the media.

And I am sorry for the OT.  Back on topic for me, Bozo, Bozo, Bozo and Company are putzes.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 06:07:30 AM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.

Mason needs to listen to the Universal interview tape- it starts off with LE saying that the door is closed only for privacy purposes, and that Casey is free to leave at any time, they ask her does she understand and she says she does, and goes on with her BS stories like they were going to believe her.  At that point she was still being interviewd with a view to finding her missing child, so there was no need to Mirandize her.
As soon as they did arrest her she got lawyered-up pdq - she  obviously didin't feel like sh ewas being detained at Universal,or she would have asked for one then.

My guess is that neither Mason nor Bozo have ever even listened to those tapes. NO attorney in their right mind would file that motion and take a chance on pissing of a judge with those tapes available if they had reviewed them.

If they had listened to them, that would mean they were somewhat prepared and we cannot have that.  They must uphold their reps.  They also like to piss of JP, and I like watching the beatdowns.  I just want to hear Judge slip and call Bayez Bozo just once.  That would make my year.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: theboyzmom on January 05, 2011, 07:05:12 AM
I am very antigun, very, but I am in a sort of a moral dilemma.  My older son, who is 12, is in Boyscouts, and they are very weapon oriented.  My son has already qualified on a range, don't ask me what kind of gun, cause I don't know and don't care to know, assume he is using the scoutmaster's weapons or boyscout's weapons, but I envision him shooting this thing on the range and I go a horrible feeling in my belly.  We don't have any guns in our home and never will, but hubby has been taking him to all these events for the boyscouts, and I guess you cannot be a boyscout and not do these things, but I am having a hard time with it.  He is always talking about knives and guns and his newest obsession is a bow and arrow.  I guess they take up that task next in boyscouts. 

I shot a gun once in my life.  My ex-BF had a cop for a brother and he took us out to the gun range once.  I shot one single bullet and hated it.  I felt so not in control.  It kicked back and I could have accidentally shot somebody around me. 

What happened to helping the needy and helping old ladies cross the street? 

Sorry for the O/T here but...............

We are opposites on this one. I have been hunting since I was about 8 years old. (maybe even younger) ALL I wanted for Christmas when I was 9 was a 410 shotgun. Every time my parents would try to talk me into something else I would have no part of it. My kids all were gun proficient by age 10 and my youngest (now 15) was the youngest kid ever in the state to pass the Hunter Safety course. I am a safety freak about guns as are most people who are hunters. My guns are never loaded and they are cleaned before they are put on the rack in my house so there can never be a bullet left in one by accident. The ammo is not where a child could get it even if they could load the guns. Many kids in rough areas have guns today and if you ask me it is amazing there are not more gun deaths than there are in those areas. What has always bothered me is they way they do statistics on gun deaths. They include all the deaths done by drive by shooters and in crimes, so they are really skewed as to the numbers. It also bothers me that there are no statistics on the number of lives saved by guns and how many crimes prevented because a responsible person had a gun available. There are thousands of women and children not abducted and victims of crimes because some mother knew how to use a gun. With all the home invasions in some states, it amazes me that everyone would not want to be proficient with a gun. Be glad your son is learning the proper way to use a firearm because someday it might be the only thing which saves his and other lives.

Hey, guns are not for everybody, certainly not for me, but you sound like you handle them and their use very respectfully and teach your kids the same.  I am not somebody who thinks nobody should have a gun.  I know I could not carefully handle one, nor do I want to have to try.  They can just do too much damage from 1 little accident. 

They should probably do some studies on how many lives were saved, but the way the world works is glass half empty thing, always looking at the bad, never the good.  I personally do not think I or family would be safer if we had a gun in the house.  I would not sleep knowing the kids may find the gun key or the ammo, and somehow shoot each other in the stomach playing with the thing, and the time it would take me to get, load and shoot an intruder does not make me think they would save my life.

A kid who used to live behind me, who moved a year or 2 ago, who went to my son's school and he considered a friend, shot himself last year in the head.  His family is whacked, sell drugs, have buyers coming to their home all the time, so it did not surprise me they had guns, but supposedly the kid was kidding around saying I am going to shoot myself in the head, and put it to his head and did just that.  I don't know if he knew if it was loaded or not, but just too many worries for me to ever feel comfortable with them. 

But I know many people do have weapons and do safely teach gun safely and the kids respect them and you are one of them.  unfortunately the ones who don't, outweight the ones who do, at least in the media.

And I am sorry for the OT.  Back on topic for me, Bozo, Bozo, Bozo and Company are putzes.

I am with Turbo on this one - I have grown up with guns, and carry one routinely. Teaching kids gun safety is important - vital.  My kids know that if you shoot it you eat it - and I will cook almost anything.  But it goes back, for me, to teaching our kids responsibility. Something that Cin and GA NEVER did with KC.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 07:17:34 AM
We can start another thread to discuss guns if you want.  It is a hot topic in itself.  We don't want to have JP coming in to remind us what the topic is.  Please get back to our little angel, Caylee.  Thanks!



(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/Monkey%20Cases/5caylee1.jpg)


It's about me, Caylee, please don't forget me!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 07:33:32 AM
We can start another thread to discuss guns if you want.  It is a hot topic in itself.  We don't want to have JP coming in to remind us what the topic is.  Please get back to our little angel, Caylee.  Thanks!



(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/Monkey%20Cases/5caylee1.jpg)


It's about me, Caylee, please don't forget me!



I sowwy!!  What an angelic picture of her.  She is so cute.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 07:42:14 AM

We all do it, ZooMom, no worries.  

 ::MonkeyCool::


She is adorable.  The trust and goodness in her eyes melts me.

 ::MonkeyAngel::




Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 07:43:51 AM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26365808/detail.html
Attorneys To Meet Judge In Casey Case
Anthony Not Expected To Attend

POSTED: 2:02 pm EST January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:30 am EST January 5, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- A hearing has been set in the case against Casey Anthony at 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday at the Orange County Courthouse.

Anthony is not expected to be present.

At the hearing, Judge Belvin Perry is expected to hear a motion from Anthony's defense asking for a subpoena to look at Joe Jordan's computer files, including photographs.
READ: Defense Motion  http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365821/detail.html
READ: Motion To Strike   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365873/detail.html
LISTEN: Joe Jordan Phone Interview   http://www.wesh.com/video/25103873/detail.html

Jordan was a volunteer with Texas EquuSearch who once said he searched the same area off of Suburban Drive where Caylee Anthony's remains were later found months later.

The defense claims Jordan said during a Dec. 8 deposition that he was a blogger on various websites discussing the Anthony case and the search for her daughter. Two blogger sites posted photos allegedly taken by Jordan of Suburban Drive and linked them to his personal blog.

Because the photos show the area where Caylee Anthony's remains were later found, the defense wants access to them along with anything Jordan posted online regarding the case.

Jordan's attorneys filed a motion asking that the court strike the defense motion.

WESH.com will provide live coverage of Wednesday's hearing.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 07:49:33 AM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/190463/Casey-Anthony-team-wants-blogger-to-turn-over-photos-from-Caylee-remains-site
Casey Anthony team wants blogger to turn over photos from Caylee remains site
Last Updated: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:24 AM
ORLANDO --

The case against Casey Anthony heads back to court Wednesday for the second time in three days.

Casey's lawyers said this time, they want Judge Belvin Perry to force a former volunteer with Texas EquuSearch to turn over photographs that were taken near the wooded area where the body of Casey's 2-year-old daughter, Caylee, was found in December 2008.

Defense attorneys said the photos ended up on two websites, and on the volunteer's personal blog.

Wednesday's hearing is scheduled to start at 1:30 p.m. Casey Anthony is not expected to attend.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 07:52:17 AM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Hearing To Focus On Photos
Casey Anthony Charged With Murder In Death Of Daughter
POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:49 am EST January 5, 2011

<snipped>
Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.

Watch Local 6 News for more on this story.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: theboyzmom on January 05, 2011, 07:57:26 AM
We can start another thread to discuss guns if you want.  It is a hot topic in itself.  We don't want to have JP coming in to remind us what the topic is.  Please get back to our little angel, Caylee.  Thanks!



(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/Monkey%20Cases/5caylee1.jpg)


It's about me, Caylee, please don't forget me!



Sorry - I am back to what is important now!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 08:38:45 AM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/190463/Casey-Anthony-team-wants-blogger-to-turn-over-photos-from-Caylee-remains-site
Casey Anthony team wants blogger to turn over photos from Caylee remains site
Last Updated: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:24 AM
ORLANDO --

The case against Casey Anthony heads back to court Wednesday for the second time in three days.

Casey's lawyers said this time, they want Judge Belvin Perry to force a former volunteer with Texas EquuSearch to turn over photographs that were taken near the wooded area where the body of Casey's 2-year-old daughter, Caylee, was found in December 2008.

Defense attorneys said the photos ended up on two websites, and on the volunteer's personal blog.

Wednesday's hearing is scheduled to start at 1:30 p.m. Casey Anthony is not expected to attend.


I don't understand why they are so adamant on getting Joe Jordan's stuff.  Are they going to try to pin the tail on Joe Jordan now, since Kronk didn't work too well for them?  He had no pictures, that I remember anyway, of the area where Caylee was found. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 08:43:41 AM


Thanks, TBM.

I pray for justice for Caylee!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 08:43:43 AM
And they wonder why it is so hard to get volunteers any more.  Because defense teams are allowed to do this to them.  Who wants to be bothered with this kind of carp. It is much easier to just stay home. 

I wonder if JJ has been volunteering since Caylee Anthony?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 08:47:51 AM
And they wonder why it is so hard to get volunteers any more.  Because defense teams are allowed to do this to them.  Who wants to be bothered with this kind of carp. It is much easier to just stay home. 

I wonder if JJ has been volunteering since Caylee Anthony?

I understand your frustration.  The pendulum has to swing the other way.  How will our children be found?  How do we deter these horrible crimes?

 ::FlyingFrog::



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 08:50:23 AM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.

Mason needs to listen to the Universal interview tape- it starts off with LE saying that the door is closed only for privacy purposes, and that Casey is free to leave at any time, they ask her does she understand and she says she does, and goes on with her BS stories like they were going to believe her.  At that point she was still being interviewd with a view to finding her missing child, so there was no need to Mirandize her.
As soon as they did arrest her she got lawyered-up pdq - she  obviously didin't feel like sh ewas being detained at Universal,or she would have asked for one then.

Capp and Westy, I agree whole heartedly.  The biggest problem with the duhfense is they don't do their homework and they don't communicate with each other.  We have seen with our own eyes in the transcripts and videos that momster was willingly leading them on a trail of lies hoping they would fall for it.  It failed, she lawyered up.  End of story.  I can hear mason jar now, "but that happened before I was involved in this case."  Where is that tape where he was interviewed and said she was lying, etc.  (my words).  Help Trimm . . . it was an interview with another lawyer and a reporter!  It's a classic.  Now that would be something I wouldn't want seen in court if I were him.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 08:54:45 AM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Hearing To Focus On Photos
Casey Anthony Charged With Murder In Death Of Daughter
POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:49 am EST January 5, 2011

<snipped>
Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.

Watch Local 6 News for more on this story.

I wonder why the media is saying Skanky won't be in court today. Judge Perry was very emphatic by saying if there were motions heard, she would have to be there. Did I dream that?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 08:55:05 AM
And they wonder why it is so hard to get volunteers any more.  Because defense teams are allowed to do this to them.  Who wants to be bothered with this kind of carp. It is much easier to just stay home. 

I wonder if JJ has been volunteering since Caylee Anthony?

I understand your frustration.  The pendulum has to swing the other way.  How will our children be found?  How do we deter these horrible crimes?

 ::FlyingFrog::



I know.  It just seems to me that volunteers should have some protection from coonhounds sniffing out suspects, although on the rare occasion, a volunteer is the murderer/rapist/kidnapper, trying to stay out of the focus of the cops by volunteering.  It just seems very unfair to be targeted because you wanted to help.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 08:56:12 AM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Hearing To Focus On Photos
Casey Anthony Charged With Murder In Death Of Daughter
POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:49 am EST January 5, 2011

<snipped>
Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.

Watch Local 6 News for more on this story.

I wonder why the media is saying Skanky won't be in court today. Judge Perry was very emphatic by saying if there were motions heard, she would have to be there. Did I dream that?

No idea, I thought she had to be there too.  Guess somehow Bozo swindled a no need to show card. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 09:02:53 AM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Hearing To Focus On Photos
Casey Anthony Charged With Murder In Death Of Daughter
POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:49 am EST January 5, 2011

<snipped>
Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.

Watch Local 6 News for more on this story.

I wonder why the media is saying Skanky won't be in court today. Judge Perry was very emphatic by saying if there were motions heard, she would have to be there. Did I dream that?

No idea, I thought she had to be there too.  Guess somehow Bozo swindled a no need to show card. 

I'm betting she'll be there.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 09:09:08 AM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.

Mason needs to listen to the Universal interview tape- it starts off with LE saying that the door is closed only for privacy purposes, and that Casey is free to leave at any time, they ask her does she understand and she says she does, and goes on with her BS stories like they were going to believe her.  At that point she was still being interviewd with a view to finding her missing child, so there was no need to Mirandize her.
As soon as they did arrest her she got lawyered-up pdq - she  obviously didin't feel like sh ewas being detained at Universal,or she would have asked for one then.

Capp and Westy, I agree whole heartedly.  The biggest problem with the duhfense is they don't do their homework and they don't communicate with each other.  We have seen with our own eyes in the transcripts and videos that momster was willingly leading them on a trail of lies hoping they would fall for it.  It failed, she lawyered up.  End of story.  I can hear mason jar now, "but that happened before I was involved in this case."  Where is that tape where he was interviewed and said she was lying, etc.  (my words).  Help Trimm . . . it was an interview with another lawyer and a reporter!  It's a classic.  Now that would be something I wouldn't want seen in court if I were him.

Since Jar said she was guilty way back when, you know before he had his awakening and joined the dufense team, has he uttered she is not guilty since?  I know he puffs up his chest and says the state has no case, but has he come out and uttered Casey is not guilty, and will be found not guilty. He knows she is as guilty as sin. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 09:10:57 AM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.

Mason needs to listen to the Universal interview tape- it starts off with LE saying that the door is closed only for privacy purposes, and that Casey is free to leave at any time, they ask her does she understand and she says she does, and goes on with her BS stories like they were going to believe her.  At that point she was still being interviewd with a view to finding her missing child, so there was no need to Mirandize her.
As soon as they did arrest her she got lawyered-up pdq - she  obviously didin't feel like sh ewas being detained at Universal,or she would have asked for one then.

Capp and Westy, I agree whole heartedly.  The biggest problem with the duhfense is they don't do their homework and they don't communicate with each other.  We have seen with our own eyes in the transcripts and videos that momster was willingly leading them on a trail of lies hoping they would fall for it.  It failed, she lawyered up.  End of story.  I can hear mason jar now, "but that happened before I was involved in this case."  Where is that tape where he was interviewed and said she was lying, etc.  (my words).  Help Trimm . . . it was an interview with another lawyer and a reporter!  It's a classic.  Now that would be something I wouldn't want seen in court if I were him.

http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/09/14/cayleecasey-anthony-case-cheney-mason-predicted-caseys-conviction-after-caylee-was-recovered/
Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Cheney Mason Predicted Casey’s Conviction AFTER Caylee Was Recovered

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/18268796/detail.html
<snipped>
Experts Discuss Discovery Of Remains

Pipitone also discussed the finding with a former prosecutor and a defense attorney, and the impact the discovery could have on the Casey Anthony case.

"What does it do to the state's case now that there' s a body?" Pipitone asked former prosecutor Elizabeth Rahter.

"Oh, it hugely bolsters the case. A jury is always a little reluctant to convict because they don't want to convict an innocent person. Absolutely you would not want to do that. So now, there's going to be no doubt that she's dead," Rahter said.

Defense attorney Cheney Mason said claims made by Casey Anthony and Baez that Caylee was alive will now work against them at trial.

"Then all the talking, all the press interviews and the parents going on this show and that show and the lawyer going on different shows establishes they have no credibility whatsoever," Mason said.

The testing of the remains could be the key to the case.

"The most important thing is how did she die?" Mason said. "It could have been an accidental death -- and we've talked before -- an improper disposal, it could have been a brutal homicide. We don't know, and until the medical examiner is finished and renders a report, no one is going to know."

Rahter said an accidental death would be hard to believe.

"What would a reasonable person do in the case of an accident? Call 911 or call your parents or call a close friend. Do you go borrow a shovel from a neighbor, probably not?" Rahter said.

Mason said an insanity defense would be even more difficult to prove, Rahter said.

"It's really difficult to be not criminally responsible. You have to prove they know right from wrong and they understand the consequences of their actions. Obviously, Casey understood the consequences of her actions because she worked really hard to cover it up," Rahter said.

If the case plays out how many think, the experts agree on what will likely happen.

"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.

"Yeah," Rahter said.
12/12/08
LAW EXPERT DISCUSS REMAINS FOUND NEAR THE ANTHONY HOME    ::MonkeyCool::
http://www.youtube.com/v/gWb_ZztZOKM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 09:15:45 AM
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/anthony_case/010511-casey-anthony-hearing
Casey Anthony hearing today
Updated: Wednesday, 05 Jan 2011, 9:03 AM EST
Published : Wednesday, 05 Jan 2011, 6:21 AM EST

ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. (WOFL FOX 35) - The case against  Casey Anthony heads back to court today for a hearing in the murder case. Anthony will not be in the courtroom for the hearing.

Anthony, 24, is charged with first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie. She has pleaded not guilty, claiming a babysitter kidnapped her toddler. Caylee was last seen in June of 2008, but she was not reported missing until a month later. Her remains were found in woods near the family's home in December 2008.

Her defense team wants to get a subpoena for items belonging to Joseph Jordan who was a volunteer for Texas EquuSearch , the search and recovery organization that helped search for Caylee. Anthony’s attorneys say Jordan is a blogger who had pictures on his website of the Caylee search area and talked about the case. The defense says it's crucial to their case but they need a subpoena to get the information.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 09:17:05 AM
Thanks so much Trimm . . . and he joined the "circus" . . . how I wish this could be shown at trial.
 ::rhino::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 09:29:09 AM
Quote
<snipped>
"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.




Yes, but if the defense pleas her out, Mason wouldn't have national venue to posture and give his "good ole boy" routine. They are there for the circus and the show. Notoriety and money is what it's all about and I think Skanky doesn't realize yet that she is the goose with her head on the chopping block. Her flirty palsey-walsey actions in court last Monday says to me she is buying the whole dog and pony show. Several times she practically had to bite her cheeks to keep from laughing during the proceedings. She had a serious look on her face a some of time. One was in the discussion about the "Diary of Days." Otherwise, I think her stern looks were more in response to the distain she has for Judge Perry and the DA's. She still thinks she is getting off and she is a star and the center of attention. She lives for this.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 09:35:24 AM
Quote
<snipped>
"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.


Yes, but if the defense pleas her out, Mason wouldn't have national venue to posture and give his "good ole boy" routine. They are there for the circus and the show. Notoriety and money is what it's all about and I think Skanky doesn't realize yet that she is the goose with her head on the chopping block. Her flirty palsey-walsey actions in court last Monday says to me she is buying the whole dog and pony show. Several times she practically had to bite her cheeks to keep from laughing during the proceedings. She had a serious look on her face a some of time. One was in the discussion about the "Diary of Days." Otherwise, I think her stern looks were more in response to the distain she has for Judge Perry and the DA's. She still thinks she is getting off and she is a star and the center of attention. She lives for this.
Fanny, there is not a remorseful thought in her being.  I don't think there ever has been.  She is the same as always . . . she has just changed her address.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 09:40:00 AM
Quote
<snipped>
"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.


Yes, but if the defense pleas her out, Mason wouldn't have national venue to posture and give his "good ole boy" routine. They are there for the circus and the show. Notoriety and money is what it's all about and I think Skanky doesn't realize yet that she is the goose with her head on the chopping block. Her flirty palsey-walsey actions in court last Monday says to me she is buying the whole dog and pony show. Several times she practically had to bite her cheeks to keep from laughing during the proceedings. She had a serious look on her face a some of time. One was in the discussion about the "Diary of Days." Otherwise, I think her stern looks were more in response to the distain she has for Judge Perry and the DA's. She still thinks she is getting off and she is a star and the center of attention. She lives for this.
Fanny, there is not a remorseful thought in her being.  I don't think there ever has been.  She is the same as always . . . she has just changed her address.

And she gets a respite from Spindy yammering at her all the time. It is is worth being in jail for her. Bad as it must be there, she gets some feeling of control being in jail. I think she hates Spindy that much. I have always thought killing Caylee was a spite thing for Skanky, and it was to get back at Spindy as much as it was to rid herself of a burden.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 09:45:34 AM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/01/moving-along-casey-anthonys-attorneys.html
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Moving Along, Casey Anthony's Attorneys Argue The Motions


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 10:41:25 AM
I know this has been posted, but I love seeing our name in the media :cool:

Posted: 9:34 a.m. Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2011
Casey Anthony hearing to focus on photos of lot where her daughter's remains were found
A new hearing has been set for Wednesday in the Casey Anthony case.

The hearing, set for 1:30 p.m., will deal with the defense team's motion to subpoena photos of Suburban Drive related to the murder case and supposedly taken by Joseph S. Jordan.

The document states that a Dec. 8, deposition of Jordan, a state witness, showed that he was an online blogger, who visited and blogged on various websites discussing the Casey Anthony case and the search for Caylee Anthony.

Two sites, "Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community Forum" and "Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum" :cool: both posted photos taken by Jordan and linked to his personal website, according to the motion.

"Some of the photographs illustrated areas searched that were near or on Suburban Drive," the motion states. "These photographs are material to the preparation of the defense in this cause."

The defense wants "any and all photographs related to this case in Joseph S. Jordan's possession and the production of all content posted on the worldwide web by Joseph S. Jordan regarding this case."

However, a separate pleading by Jordan attorney William McClellan states that defense attorneys Jose Baez and Cheney Mason "at no time" in the deposition inquired about photos Jordan took related to the case.

"There has been no attempt to depose Mr. Jordan in regards to the issue of photographs," McClellan stated in his motion for a protective order. "Defense counsel, without any evidence, has made assumptions concerning what he viewed on a website and made a determination that Mr. Jordan is somehow responsible for the photographs."

The items sought by the defense cannot be obtained through normal discovery. It is asking the court to enter an order authorizing Casey Anthony's defense team to issue a special subpoena, allowing the defense to collect the photos.

Anthony, 24, is charged with first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie, whose body was found in a heavily wooded area near the Anthony home months after she was reported missing. The woman faces the death penalty if convicted. Her trial is set to start in May.

The wooded area off Suburban Drive was part of an intense search during the summer of 2008.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/casey-anthony-hearing-to-focus-on-photos-of-1164831.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 10:42:31 AM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/01/moving-along-casey-anthonys-attorneys.html
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Moving Along, Casey Anthony's Attorneys Argue The Motions


Wow, whoever writes this blog, explained everything so clearly for me.  Thanks for the link, will have to put it in my favs for future use. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 05, 2011, 10:46:20 AM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/01/moving-along-casey-anthonys-attorneys.html
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Moving Along, Casey Anthony's Attorneys Argue The Motions


Wow, whoever writes this blog, explained everything so clearly for me.  Thanks for the link, will have to put it in my favs for future use. 

Yeah. I agree, Zoo. It was most excellent.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 10:46:44 AM
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68343630/20110104-SA-Affidavit-of-Attorneys-Fees

In this Affidavit of attorney's fees it says that "annual salary and benefits, broken down to an hour rate, equals $83.39 per hour."  so, take that multiply by 40 her per week, comes to $3335.60 or so per week, then multiply by 52 weeks, their salary is roughly $173,451 bux a year.  Not too shabby at all. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 10:51:21 AM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-hearing-wednesday-20110104,0,3458593.story
Casey Anthony hearing today will focus on photos of lot where Caylee's remains were found
Defense team wants Suburban Drive photos

By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

8:15 a.m. EST, January 5, 2011
A new hearing has been set for today in the Casey Anthony case.

The hearing, set for 1:30 p.m., will deal with the defense team's motion to subpoena photos of Suburban Drive related to the murder case and supposedly taken by Joseph S. Jordan.

The document states that a Dec. 8, deposition of Jordan, a state witness, showed that he was an online blogger, who visited and blogged on various websites discussing the Casey Anthony case and the search for Caylee Anthony.

Two sites, "Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community Forum" and "Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum" both posted photos taken by Jordan and linked to his personal website, according to the motion
"Some of the photographs illustrated areas searched that were near or on Suburban Drive," the motion states. "These photographs are material to the preparation of the defense in this cause."

The defense wants "any and all photographs related to this case in Joseph S. Jordan's possession and the production of all content posted on the worldwide web by Joseph S. Jordan regarding this case."

However, a separate pleading by Jordan attorney William McClellan states that defense attorneys Jose Baez and Cheney Mason "at no time" in the deposition inquired about photos Jordan took related to the case.

"There has been no attempt to depose Mr. Jordan in regards to the issue of photographs," McClellan stated in his motion for a protective order. "Defense counsel, without any evidence, has made assumptions concerning what he viewed on a website and made a determination that Mr. Jordan is somehow responsible for the photographs."

The items sought by the defense cannot be obtained through normal discovery. It is asking the court to enter an order authorizing Casey Anthony's defense team to issue a special subpoena, allowing the defense to collect the photos.

Anthony, 24, is charged with first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie, whose body was found in a heavily wooded area near the Anthony home months after she was reported missing. The woman faces the death penalty if convicted. Her trial is set to start in May.
The wooded area off Suburban Drive was part of an intense search during the summer of 2008.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 10:56:10 AM
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68343630/20110104-SA-Affidavit-of-Attorneys-Fees

In this Affidavit of attorney's fees it says that "annual salary and benefits, broken down to an hour rate, equals $83.39 per hour."  so, take that multiply by 40 her per week, comes to $3335.60 or so per week, then multiply by 52 weeks, their salary is roughly $173,451 bux a year.  Not too shabby at all. 

I agree they are totally worth it, I'm sure they would love to have a 40 hour work week.  The majority of attorneys I knew and/or worked for put in 60 as a basic standard, plus or minus.  Of course, I didn't know bozo or mason jar (thank you Lord!).


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 10:56:12 AM
Bozo and Colonel Crusty....the short of it is you know dang well Casey was NOT, in any shape, way or form "essentially in custody" as you stated in your motion.   You both cannot be this stuck on stupid that you as attorneys are not familiar with when an individual should be mirandized.  Casey was not under arrest nor even named as a suspect in a felony.   Your client volunteered to take the detectives on a wild goose chase not one but two days (of which she had freedom to go home).  They have every right to question her regarding a reported missing child or anything else as a person of interest, victim or witness.   If they continued to question her & she wasnt willing to answer AFTER she was arrested that is entirely different & you know that morons.  Your client was stupid enough to lie her horseface off & didnt know to keep her trap shut....ask what that merry go round ride she went on was worth it now...sorry about your luck.

Mason needs to listen to the Universal interview tape- it starts off with LE saying that the door is closed only for privacy purposes, and that Casey is free to leave at any time, they ask her does she understand and she says she does, and goes on with her BS stories like they were going to believe her.  At that point she was still being interviewd with a view to finding her missing child, so there was no need to Mirandize her.
As soon as they did arrest her she got lawyered-up pdq - she  obviously didin't feel like sh ewas being detained at Universal,or she would have asked for one then.

Capp and Westy, I agree whole heartedly.  The biggest problem with the duhfense is they don't do their homework and they don't communicate with each other.  We have seen with our own eyes in the transcripts and videos that momster was willingly leading them on a trail of lies hoping they would fall for it.  It failed, she lawyered up.  End of story.  I can hear mason jar now, "but that happened before I was involved in this case."  Where is that tape where he was interviewed and said she was lying, etc.  (my words).  Help Trimm . . . it was an interview with another lawyer and a reporter!  It's a classic.  Now that would be something I wouldn't want seen in court if I were him.

http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/09/14/cayleecasey-anthony-case-cheney-mason-predicted-caseys-conviction-after-caylee-was-recovered/
Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Cheney Mason Predicted Casey’s Conviction AFTER Caylee Was Recovered

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/18268796/detail.html
<snipped>
Experts Discuss Discovery Of Remains

Pipitone also discussed the finding with a former prosecutor and a defense attorney, and the impact the discovery could have on the Casey Anthony case.

"What does it do to the state's case now that there' s a body?" Pipitone asked former prosecutor Elizabeth Rahter.

"Oh, it hugely bolsters the case. A jury is always a little reluctant to convict because they don't want to convict an innocent person. Absolutely you would not want to do that. So now, there's going to be no doubt that she's dead," Rahter said.

Defense attorney Cheney Mason said claims made by Casey Anthony and Baez that Caylee was alive will now work against them at trial.

"Then all the talking, all the press interviews and the parents going on this show and that show and the lawyer going on different shows establishes they have no credibility whatsoever," Mason said.

The testing of the remains could be the key to the case.

"The most important thing is how did she die?" Mason said. "It could have been an accidental death -- and we've talked before -- an improper disposal, it could have been a brutal homicide. We don't know, and until the medical examiner is finished and renders a report, no one is going to know."

Rahter said an accidental death would be hard to believe.

"What would a reasonable person do in the case of an accident? Call 911 or call your parents or call a close friend. Do you go borrow a shovel from a neighbor, probably not?" Rahter said.

Mason said an insanity defense would be even more difficult to prove, Rahter said.

"It's really difficult to be not criminally responsible. You have to prove they know right from wrong and they understand the consequences of their actions. Obviously, Casey understood the consequences of her actions because she worked really hard to cover it up," Rahter said.

If the case plays out how many think, the experts agree on what will likely happen.

"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.

"Yeah," Rahter said.
12/12/08
LAW EXPERT DISCUSS REMAINS FOUND NEAR THE ANTHONY HOME    ::MonkeyCool::
http://www.youtube.com/v/gWb_ZztZOKM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US


It might not be shown during trial but I'd wager it will resurface in some manner & this pompous loud hypocrite will have egg on his face.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 11:00:28 AM
(http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/4448/confronted.jpg) (http://img211.imageshack.us/i/confronted.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)

What a dweeb Bayezzzz is.  She was not "confronted" or any other such ridiculous action by the members of the police.  They were trying to help her find her child. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 11:01:07 AM
(http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/4448/confronted.jpg) (http://img211.imageshack.us/i/confronted.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)

What a dweeb Bayezzzz is.  She was not "confronted" or any other such ridiculous action by the members of the police.  They were trying to help her find her child. 

Oops forgot link:  http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26367661/detail.html

Page 1, paragraph 1. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 11:04:19 AM
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68343630/20110104-SA-Affidavit-of-Attorneys-Fees

In this Affidavit of attorney's fees it says that "annual salary and benefits, broken down to an hour rate, equals $83.39 per hour."  so, take that multiply by 40 her per week, comes to $3335.60 or so per week, then multiply by 52 weeks, their salary is roughly $173,451 bux a year.  Not too shabby at all. 

I agree they are totally worth it, I'm sure they would love to have a 40 hour work week.  The majority of attorneys I knew and/or worked for put in 60 as a basic standard, plus or minus.  Of course, I didn't know bozo or mason jar (thank you Lord!).

Yeah, I know, was just a quick thing, get a ballpark figure.  I was just curious.  I know they are salaried so any overtime is not paid extra.  They are definitely worth it.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 11:15:13 AM
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68343630/20110104-SA-Affidavit-of-Attorneys-Fees

In this Affidavit of attorney's fees it says that "annual salary and benefits, broken down to an hour rate, equals $83.39 per hour."  so, take that multiply by 40 her per week, comes to $3335.60 or so per week, then multiply by 52 weeks, their salary is roughly $173,451 bux a year.  Not too shabby at all. 

I agree they are totally worth it, I'm sure they would love to have a 40 hour work week.  The majority of attorneys I knew and/or worked for put in 60 as a basic standard, plus or minus.  Of course, I didn't know bozo or mason jar (thank you Lord!).

Yeah, I know, was just a quick thing, get a ballpark figure.  I was just curious.  I know they are salaried so any overtime is not paid extra.  They are definitely worth it.

Yes, Zoo, totally worth it.  Curious to know in the private sector in that area, the going rate.  I am sure it is much more.  Not all, but most of the folks like Ashton and Burdick do it for the sake of justice IMO.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 11:22:48 AM
Over at InSessions, a member named Wilkie, calls CA, Her Inmateship, and her mother Cindy, Her Cynthiaship. 

Just thought those were hilarious. 

http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?375863-caylee-anthony-1-4-11&p=14723228#post14723228

Post #585.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 11:39:35 AM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 11:44:23 AM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: 4 Donks on January 05, 2011, 12:10:04 PM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 12:12:29 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26365808/detail.html
Attorneys To Meet Judge In Casey Case
Anthony Not Expected To Attend

POSTED: 2:02 pm EST January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 11:51 am EST January 5, 2011

Video at link
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A hearing has been set in the case against Casey Anthony at 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday at the Orange County Courthouse.
The focus of the hearing will be photographs of the area where Caylee Anthony's body was found that were supposedly taken by a search volunteer three months before the toddler's body was discovered.

Anthony's attorneys want Judge Belvin Perry to issue a subpeona to give them access to the photos, which could potentially support the defenses' argument that someone other than Anthony placed Caylee's body there after the area was searched.
READ: Defense Motion   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365821/detail.html
READ: Motion To Strike   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365873/detail.html
LISTEN: Joe Jordan Phone Interview   http://www.wesh.com/video/25103873/detail.html
The volunteer who is believed to have taken the photos, Joe Jordan, told investigators early in the case that Caylee's body was not in the woods, but he later recanted and said the area was too flooded for him to get to the spot where the body was eventually found.

Jordan's attorney has filed papers with the court seeking to block Anthony's attorney's from getting the photos. Jordan claims the defense has no evidence that the photos, which were posted on at least two crime blogs, were even taken by him.

Anthony has waived her right to appear at Wednesday's hearing. WESH.com will provide a livestream from the courthouse.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 05, 2011, 12:23:33 PM
I don't think I'll be home from work on time.
Hope they replay the video later.
Denied, denied, denied.

I'm pretty sure I aw Marinade brain sitting in the same row as Sindy at the Mon. hearing.
I'm curious if she'll be there, now that MOTY is going to make an appearance.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 12:40:27 PM
http://www.wesh.com/slideshow/caseyanthony/19590190/detail.html
Images: Many Looks Of Casey Anthony


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 12:44:56 PM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/



Thank you!

I remember those now.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 12:45:57 PM
I want to know wtf their defense is going to be? (I know they have none, but they must have something in mind to use) ...they know the Nanny did it story won't fly now. If all they intend to do is make it seem like someone else did it....it ain't gonna fly. Jurors will want to know what Casey's story is.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 12:47:26 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26365808/detail.html
Attorneys To Meet Judge In Casey Case
Anthony Not Expected To Attend

POSTED: 2:02 pm EST January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 11:51 am EST January 5, 2011

Video at link
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A hearing has been set in the case against Casey Anthony at 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday at the Orange County Courthouse.
The focus of the hearing will be photographs of the area where Caylee Anthony's body was found that were supposedly taken by a search volunteer three months before the toddler's body was discovered.

Anthony's attorneys want Judge Belvin Perry to issue a subpeona to give them access to the photos, which could potentially support the defenses' argument that someone other than Anthony placed Caylee's body there after the area was searched.
READ: Defense Motion   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365821/detail.html
READ: Motion To Strike   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365873/detail.html
LISTEN: Joe Jordan Phone Interview   http://www.wesh.com/video/25103873/detail.html
The volunteer who is believed to have taken the photos, Joe Jordan, told investigators early in the case that Caylee's body was not in the woods, but he later recanted and said the area was too flooded for him to get to the spot where the body was eventually found.

Jordan's attorney has filed papers with the court seeking to block Anthony's attorney's from getting the photos. Jordan claims the defense has no evidence that the photos, which were posted on at least two crime blogs, were even taken by him.

Anthony has waived her right to appear at Wednesday's hearing. WESH.com will provide a livestream from the courthouse.

See, I can't understand this either.  If I was charged with a crime I didn't commit, I would be at every hearing.  I would want to know first hand what was being said.  Oh, that's right . . . if it was a crime I didn't commit . . . that let's out momster.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 12:49:08 PM
I want to know wtf their defense is going to be? (I know they have none, but they must have something in mind to use) ...they know the Nanny did it story won't fly now. If all they intend to do is make it seem like someone else did it....it ain't gonna fly. Jurors will want to know what Casey's story is.
what day is it . . . who is standing in front of them . . . that the momster's story.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 12:49:26 PM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Hearing To Focus On Photos
Casey Anthony Charged With Murder In Death Of Daughter
POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 12:25 pm EST January 5, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense attorneys will be in court again on Wednesday, one day after her attorneys were ordered to pay nearly $600 in sanctions for failure to comply with a court order.

Judge Belvin Perry ordered Anthony's defense to pay the sanctions in a Monday hearing, saying the attorneys failed to provide the prosecution with details regarding defense witnesses by a court ordered deadline in December.

The prosecution said the cost to pursue the motion for sanctions was $583.73. The defense team can appeal the amount.

Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.
<snipped>


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 12:57:22 PM
I don't think I'll be home from work on time.
Hope they replay the video later.
Denied, denied, denied.

I'm pretty sure I aw Marinade brain sitting in the same row as Sindy at the Mon. hearing.
I'm curious if she'll be there, now that MOTY is going to make an appearance.

I thought I saw him sitting in a wheelchair last Monday. Has he always been in a wheelchair? I haven't recalled seeing him in one before.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 12:59:31 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26365808/detail.html
Attorneys To Meet Judge In Casey Case
Anthony Not Expected To Attend

POSTED: 2:02 pm EST January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 11:51 am EST January 5, 2011

Video at link
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A hearing has been set in the case against Casey Anthony at 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday at the Orange County Courthouse.
The focus of the hearing will be photographs of the area where Caylee Anthony's body was found that were supposedly taken by a search volunteer three months before the toddler's body was discovered.

Anthony's attorneys want Judge Belvin Perry to issue a subpeona to give them access to the photos, which could potentially support the defenses' argument that someone other than Anthony placed Caylee's body there after the area was searched.
READ: Defense Motion   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365821/detail.html
READ: Motion To Strike   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365873/detail.html
LISTEN: Joe Jordan Phone Interview   http://www.wesh.com/video/25103873/detail.html
The volunteer who is believed to have taken the photos, Joe Jordan, told investigators early in the case that Caylee's body was not in the woods, but he later recanted and said the area was too flooded for him to get to the spot where the body was eventually found.

Jordan's attorney has filed papers with the court seeking to block Anthony's attorney's from getting the photos. Jordan claims the defense has no evidence that the photos, which were posted on at least two crime blogs, were even taken by him.

Anthony has waived her right to appear at Wednesday's hearing. WESH.com will provide a livestream from the courthouse.

I didn't think she had the right to waive her appearance. Wasn't she brought to court one day by the judge's orders after she said she wouldn't be there? I wonder what makes this time differenct.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 01:04:48 PM
http://livewire.wesh.com/Event/Casey_Anthony_Hearing_Jan_5_2011?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=caseyupdates
Casey Anthony Hearing: Jan. 5, 2011 LIVE 215 watchers
A hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m. ET on a motion in the case against Casey Anthony.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 01:07:36 PM
http://livewire.wesh.com/Event/Casey_Anthony_Hearing_Jan_5_2011?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=caseyupdates
Casey Anthony Hearing: Jan. 5, 2011 LIVE 215 watchers
A hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m. ET on a motion in the case against Casey Anthony.

Click Orlando will be live streaming.
http://www.clickorlando.com/video/19046963/index.html

Here is another link.
http://mfile.akamai.com/12893/live/reflector:57420.asx


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 01:11:20 PM
http://livewire.wesh.com/Event/Casey_Anthony_Hearing_Jan_5_2011?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=caseyupdates
Casey Anthony Hearing: Jan. 5, 2011 LIVE 215 watchers
A hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m. ET on a motion in the case against Casey Anthony.

Click Orlando will be live streaming.
http://www.clickorlando.com/video/19046963/index.html

Here is another link.
http://mfile.akamai.com/12893/live/reflector:57420.asx

CNN says they are going to cover the hearing live.
http://live.cnn.com/


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:18:37 PM
http://livewire.wesh.com/Event/Casey_Anthony_Hearing_Jan_5_2011?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=caseyupdates
Casey Anthony Hearing: Jan. 5, 2011 LIVE 215 watchers
A hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m. ET on a motion in the case against Casey Anthony.

Click Orlando will be live streaming.
http://www.clickorlando.com/video/19046963/index.html

Here is another link.
http://mfile.akamai.com/12893/live/reflector:57420.asx

CNN says they are going to cover the hearing live.
http://live.cnn.com/

Stream here also: http://www.myfoxorlando.com/subindex/our_programs/live


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: 4 Donks on January 05, 2011, 01:23:19 PM
Brandi and Northern Rose screen shots and commentary PLEASE..PLEASE...PLEASE     TIA


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:26:57 PM
Brandi and Northern Rose screen shots and commentary PLEASE..PLEASE...PLEASE     TIA

(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Casey%20Anthony/Image32-5.png)

They are getting ready to start.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:27:24 PM
 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 01:28:57 PM
::MonkeyCool::

I see Jim the movie man is rubbing elbows with the defense.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:29:20 PM
JP just got there


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:29:26 PM
Here we go....live now http://livewire.wesh.com/Event/Casey_Anthony_Hearing_Jan_5_2011?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=caseyupdates


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:30:01 PM
Bobo said a factual background is in order .  Having the word factual come out of Bobo's mouth made me laugh


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:30:53 PM
As far as I see it they are going to make fools of themselves on this issue too.   These pictures are NOT in the area & they wont prove a dang blessed thing other than this defense is laughable


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:35:40 PM
(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Casey%20Anthony/Image33.png)

The state speaks.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:37:42 PM
(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Casey%20Anthony/Image33.png)

The state speaks.

Is that not JJ's lawyer?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:39:34 PM
JP just reminder Bobo that JJ is a citizen and you need something called probable cause to get a search warrant.

Asking Bobo if he is going on a general fishing expedition.

JP can not give Bobo a license to fish.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:39:38 PM
CJBP is putting Bozo in a box as to what EXACT was said regarding specific location, date etc Jordan's pictures were taken as opposed to speculation, discussion etc.

CJBP "Did Joe Jordan affirmatively say in a blog that he took pictures at Suburban Dr"
H
  Ha ha  judge said "I cannot give you a license to fish."


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:39:38 PM
(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Casey%20Anthony/Image33.png)

The state speaks.

Is that not JJ's lawyer?

Ahhh .yes, I believe he is.

Sorry for my confusion.

In the meantime, Baez is being asked pointedly by Perry if he is going on a fishing expedition.

 ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:40:07 PM
(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Casey%20Anthony/Image33.png)

The state speaks.

Is that not JJ's lawyer?

believe so


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:40:35 PM
JP - Does JJ say he have photographs or does some other person say he has photos?

Bobo - neither.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:41:24 PM
JP - Does JJ say he have photographs or does some other person say he has photos?

Bobo - neither.

Judge isnt going to compel anything & he knows its a fishing expedition


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:41:55 PM
Bobo- because of JJ's pattern of conduct and of what we found from researching him......


WTH?

Bobo - JJ says he did not the exact spot of where Caylee was found.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:42:34 PM
JP - Does JJ say he have photographs or does some other person say he has photos?

Bobo - neither.

Judge isnt going to compel anything & he knows its a fishing expedition

Ohhh .. this is good. Love that Perry!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Scatty on January 05, 2011, 01:43:11 PM
Baez is lying through his teeth. How can the judge let him get away with this?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:43:12 PM
NO NO NO, show me the transcript   Cite the dam page that Jordan reportedly said it.    This is BS, where is it in black and white?

General vicinity does not count & Bozo  JUST LIED HIS ARSE OFF   20, 30 feet is NOT what Jordan EVER said


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:44:37 PM
JP - in the depo with JJ did you use photographs and ask him where he searched?

Bobo - yes, he was in the general vicinity

JP - what do you mean?

Bobo - he was within 20 - 30 feet

Bobo - because he is an interesting individual there is a strong possibility that he has potential evidence

JP - what evidence?

Bobo - possible photo's

JP - did you ask him during depo if he had photos's

Bobo - no because we were unaware until started looking at blogs


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 01:45:07 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26365808/detail.html
Attorneys To Meet Judge In Casey Case
Anthony Not Expected To Attend

POSTED: 2:02 pm EST January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 11:51 am EST January 5, 2011

Video at link
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A hearing has been set in the case against Casey Anthony at 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday at the Orange County Courthouse.
The focus of the hearing will be photographs of the area where Caylee Anthony's body was found that were supposedly taken by a search volunteer three months before the toddler's body was discovered.

Anthony's attorneys want Judge Belvin Perry to issue a subpeona to give them access to the photos, which could potentially support the defenses' argument that someone other than Anthony placed Caylee's body there after the area was searched.
READ: Defense Motion   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365821/detail.html
READ: Motion To Strike   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365873/detail.html
LISTEN: Joe Jordan Phone Interview   http://www.wesh.com/video/25103873/detail.html
The volunteer who is believed to have taken the photos, Joe Jordan, told investigators early in the case that Caylee's body was not in the woods, but he later recanted and said the area was too flooded for him to get to the spot where the body was eventually found.

Jordan's attorney has filed papers with the court seeking to block Anthony's attorney's from getting the photos. Jordan claims the defense has no evidence that the photos, which were posted on at least two crime blogs, were even taken by him.

Anthony has waived her right to appear at Wednesday's hearing. WESH.com will provide a livestream from the courthouse.

I didn't think she had the right to waive her appearance. Wasn't she brought to court one day by the judge's orders after she said she wouldn't be there? I wonder what makes this time differenct.

It was my understanding that the only time she could refuse to be present is at 'Status Update hearings'. So why is it her right not to attend? Good question Fanny.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: 4 Donks on January 05, 2011, 01:45:13 PM
Is JJ there or only his Attorney ?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:45:17 PM
Now Bobo is saying he feels that JJ deleted stuff off of various the blogs


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:45:33 PM
Is JJ there or only his Attorney ?

attorney


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:46:13 PM
O hell to the no, it has NOT been determined that Joe Jordan commited a felony & Bozo has NO right to make such an affirmative statement when it was not ejudicated as such.   He is a defense attorney that argues "alleged" daily.   He should be admonished for that inandofitself


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:46:33 PM
Bobo - all we have is an email he sent to LE and TE records


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:46:55 PM
(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Casey%20Anthony/Image34-4.png)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:47:29 PM
Now Bobo is saying he feels that JJ deleted stuff off of various the blogs

Well, no one can delete stuff off of other public blogs that he is not an administrator of that the site doesnt allow otherwise.   


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:47:38 PM
DENIED   without prejudice  ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::     ::MonkeyGavel::   


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 01:47:46 PM
JP - in the depo with JJ did you use photographs and ask him where he searched?

Bobo - yes, he was in the general vicinity

JP - what do you mean?

Bobo - he was within 20 - 30 feet

Bobo - because he is an interesting individual there is a strong possibility that he has potential evidence

JP - what evidence?

Bobo - possible photo's

JP - did you ask him during depo if he had photos's

Bobo - no because we were unaware until started looking at blogs

DENIED!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:47:50 PM
Denied (without prejudice)

 ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:47:53 PM
DENIED without prejudice (as expected)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 05, 2011, 01:48:24 PM
denied w/o prejudice at this time


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:48:30 PM
Now Bobo is saying he feels that JJ deleted stuff off of various the blogs

Well, no one can delete stuff off of other public blogs that he is not an administrator of that the site doesnt allow otherwise.   

don't forget this is coming from the dream team that told a judge LOL means Lots of Luck ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Scatty on January 05, 2011, 01:48:34 PM
Denied without prejudice. I hope the state does their homework and finds out that Baez is lying.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 01:49:42 PM
IMO she has NO RIGHTS....she is in jail :roll:


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:50:07 PM
Mr Ashton wants an earlier date for the report from the Cadaver dog expert from Bobo so he has time to read it before the depo with him in Jan


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 05, 2011, 01:51:13 PM
Is Cindy there?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:51:26 PM
Bobo saying he has papers he will be filing about issues.  He feels it is crossing the line to ask experts to rush to put reports together.

Bobo has uncovered research he is in process of doing


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:51:46 PM
Is Cindy there?

not seen her


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 05, 2011, 01:52:58 PM
I soooo love J Perry!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:53:01 PM
JP - I would have hoped both sides would have worked together, but I have no problem setting schedules.  I have one item on my desk and then I can start on this.  It will be something you will not like as I believe there are 7 days in a week.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:53:01 PM
Ooooo Bozo just gave away that his experts have little to nothing & he's already concerned about what they will face on cross by stating that their reports would be thin at best as rushed under court order

It just keeps getting more ludicrous but at the same time better and better


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:53:16 PM
Is Cindy there?

Haven't seen her.

Probably not, since Casey isn't.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 01:53:57 PM
O hell to the no, it has NOT been determined that Joe Jordan commited a felony & Bozo has NO right to make such an affirmative statement when it was not ejudicated as such.   He is a defense attorney that argues "alleged" daily.   He should be admonished for that inandofitself

When is JP going to hold Baez in Contempt of Court for being an idiot?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:54:30 PM
Bobo saying he has papers he will be filing about issues.  He feels it is crossing the line to ask experts to rush to put reports together.

Bobo has uncovered research he is in process of doing


Blah blah blah excuses & stalls abound....no Bozo face it you are full of horse manure, your client is guilty & you have nada that even remotely is to be considered exculpatory or exonerating


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:55:44 PM
JP - at 3:00 today I will be formulating the order and be setting the schedule.  I am surprised that expert witness would have nothing.  They come to conclusions and write notes.  They have rough notes that get translated into reports as they deal with more than one case.

I leave it at that.

done for the day


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:55:51 PM
Hearing is over.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:56:47 PM
Bobo saying he has papers he will be filing about issues.  He feels it is crossing the line to ask experts to rush to put reports together.

Bobo has uncovered research he is in process of doing

I for one can not wait to see these "papers" Bobo is preparing about crossing the line.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 05, 2011, 01:56:54 PM
Baez got schooled again, as usual. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Motion Denied! ::MonkeyGavel::



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 05, 2011, 01:57:08 PM
Is Cindy there?

Haven't seen her.

Probably not, since Casey isn't.
Oh that's right.....if she showed up, then it would look as if she was there in support of Caylee and that is NEVER gonna happen!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 01:57:27 PM
Brandi.....your little love monkey in Sig line is too cute!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 01:57:29 PM
Leaving.  Bobo looks flustered, Jar look pizzed


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 01:57:41 PM
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/teehee-1.gif)  I need a cigarette.....  ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 01:57:43 PM
http://wdbo.com/localnews/2011/01/blog-casey-anthony-hearing-ove.html
WDBO Local News      
Breaking: No subpoena for Casey Anthony blogger

By
Joe Ruble
@ January 5, 2011 1:41 PM Permalink | Comments (0)
A blogger who took interest in the Casy Anthony murder case will not have to turn over photographs and posts on his website that's no longer on the Internet.

Attorney Jose Baez argued before Judge Belvin Perry that Joseph Jordan has inserted himself into the case with his writings, tips given to police and other actions.

Jordan was deposed by the defense team last December 8 and told them he searched areas near where the body of Caylee Anthony was eventually found..

Perry wanted to know if the defense team has evidence from that deposition that requires him to issue a subpoena for the photos and writings.

Perry cautioned Baez "is this a fishing expedition? I cannot give you a license to fish."

Jordan's attorney, William McClellan, argued that his client was simply a person with an opinion and is not an expert witness in this case.

Perry denied the defense's motion.

Anthony is accused of murdering her two-year-old daughter Caylee and stands trial this May.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 01:58:21 PM
Brandi.....your little love monkey in Sig line is too cute!

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 05, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Bobo saying he has papers he will be filing about issues.  He feels it is crossing the line to ask experts to rush to put reports together.

Bobo has uncovered research he is in process of doing

I for one can not wait to see these "papers" Bobo is preparing about crossing the line.
They will never appear. We will most likely see more delays attributed to these papers and then the issue will go poof.....just like everything else.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 01:58:38 PM
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/teehee-1.gif)  I need a cigarette.....  ::MonkeyDevil::

 :smt033


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 01:59:20 PM
Is Cindy there?

Haven't seen her.

Probably not, since Casey isn't.
Here's hoping she was too busy finally out getting suitable & fitted brazieres!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 01:59:30 PM
Casey has to know her Dream Team has morphed into a Drone Team :roll: She knows she's going down.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 05, 2011, 02:00:00 PM
Leaving.  Bobo looks flustered, Jar look pizzed
Baez is begging JA to get together to work out their own schedule, something that should have already been done. He's scared of JP and he wants to look in control.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 02:00:06 PM
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/teehee-1.gif)  I need a cigarette.....  ::MonkeyDevil::

 :smt033

Coming to court has really gotten satisfying, hasn't it? (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/smiley_emoticons_stevieh_ordilove.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 02:00:51 PM
Did you see bozo actually turn his backside toward His Honor while Judge Perry was speaking?
Another slap down today
 ::piggy::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 05, 2011, 02:01:08 PM
Ooooo Bozo just gave away that his experts have little to nothing & he's already concerned about what they will face on cross by stating that their reports would be thin at best as rushed under court order

It just keeps getting more ludicrous but at the same time better and better

I think we'll see some experts removed from the duhfenses list. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 02:01:24 PM
Baez got schooled again, as usual. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Motion Denied! ::MonkeyGavel::



I like how JP said he would deny it without prejudice in case they could come up with some sort of evidence to prove their motion.  Guess Bobo will be on the blogs looking for that evidence. 

Hey Bobo - you have a bald spot in the back of your head that can be seen  now that you have that spiffy new buzz cut from Discount Haircuts.  Is that a symptom of ugly coping?  LOL (Lots of Luck)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 02:02:23 PM
Is Cindy there?

Haven't seen her.

Probably not, since Casey isn't.
Here's hoping she was too busy finally out getting suitable & fitted brazieres!
Looked like she was chewing her cud yesterday . . . must be on a lot of doggie downers which give her dry mouth.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 02:02:35 PM
You are the King of Denial, Oh Honorable Judge Perry!
 ::MonkeyGavel::
I missed a portion of the hearing, but I did get the feeling that the good Judge has had just about enough of the Doofus Patrol.  I also think he knows that Baez has Nada, Nil, Zilch, in a word, NOTHING from his "Experts" that can exonerate Casey.  His skepticism and repetition of the fact that experts are professionals who must have some opinion about what they are going to testify to, and they take notes on that opinion shows me that Judge P. has his number.  Oh, and guess what, Baez and Co.?  I think your number is up.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 02:03:01 PM
Ooooo Bozo just gave away that his experts have little to nothing & he's already concerned about what they will face on cross by stating that their reports would be thin at best as rushed under court order

It just keeps getting more ludicrous but at the same time better and better

I think we'll see some experts removed from the duhfenses list. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hahaha!

Quite a few, I bet!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 02:05:57 PM
Breaking: No subpoena for Casey Anthony blogger

A blogger who took interest in the Casy Anthony murder case will not have to turn over photographs and posts on his website that's no longer on the Internet.

Attorney Jose Baez argued before Judge Belvin Perry that Joseph Jordan has inserted himself into the case with his writings, tips given to police and other actions.

Jordan was deposed by the defense team last December 8 and told them he searched areas near where the body of Caylee Anthony was eventually found..

Perry wanted to know if the defense team has evidence from that deposition that requires him to issue a subpoena for the photos and writings.

Perry cautioned Baez saying, "Is this a fishing expedition? I cannot give you a license to fish."


Jordan's attorney, William McClellan, argued that his client was simply a person with an opinion and is not an expert witness in this case.

Perry denied the defense's motion.

Anthony is accused of murdering her two-year-old daughter Caylee and stands trial this May

http://wdbo.com/localnews/2011/01/blog-casey-anthony-hearing-ove.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 05, 2011, 02:06:38 PM
NO NO NO, show me the transcript   Cite the dam page that Jordan reportedly said it.    This is BS, where is it in black and white?

General vicinity does not count & Bozo  JUST LIED HIS ARSE OFF   20, 30 feet is NOT what Jordan EVER said



So we are blessed with the presence of cown and co! meaning that they are hitting these blogs to build a case come on gimmie a break!! they have made such  fools of themselves. Mason has ruined his rep! and baez never had one not a good one that is. Great posts today glad the honorable judge isnt giving them any credit. Dern fools are fishing with no bait! pretty drastic when you have to go online to fish. laughable


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 05, 2011, 02:09:32 PM
NO NO NO, show me the transcript   Cite the dam page that Jordan reportedly said it.    This is BS, where is it in black and white?

General vicinity does not count & Bozo  JUST LIED HIS ARSE OFF   20, 30 feet is NOT what Jordan EVER said



So we are blessed with the presence of cown and co! meaning that they are hitting these blogs to build a case come on gimmie a break!! they have made such  fools of themselves. Mason has ruined his rep! and baez never had one not a good one that is. Great posts today glad the honorable judge isnt giving them any credit. Dern fools are fishing with no bait! pretty drastic when you have to go online to fish. laughable

Sounds like they are not very prepared when giving depositions either. LOL

Laughable indeed!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 02:11:17 PM
Casey Anthony team denied subpoena for blogger's photos
Judge Belvin Perry expresses concern that Anthony's team wanted a 'fishing expedition' for Joe Jordan's photos.

Casey Anthony's defense attorneys suffered another blow today when they were denied a subpoena for a blogger's photos of the vacant lot where her daughter's remains were found in 2008.

Judge Belvin Perry this afternoon denied a defense motion to subpoena Joe Jordan's blog and internet photos, finding no factual basis to compel those items that may have appeared online.

Perry was not satisfied they would reveal meaningful evidence and he expressed concerns that the defense was going on a "fishing expedition."

Anthony, 24, is charged with first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie, whose body was found in a lot off Suburban Drive near the Anthony home months after she was reported missing.

The woman faces the death penalty if convicted. Her trial is set to start in May.

The wooded lot was part of an intense search during the summer of 2008.

The defense motion stated that a Dec. 8, deposition of Jordan, a state witness, showed that he was an online blogger, who visited and blogged on various websites discussing the Casey Anthony case and the search for Caylee Anthony.

Two sites, "Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community Forum" and "Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum" both posted photos taken by Jordan and linked to his personal website, according to the motion.

"Some of the photographs illustrated areas searched that were near or on Suburban Drive," the motion states. "These photographs are material to the preparation of the defense in this cause."

The defense wanted "any and all photographs related to this case in Joseph S. Jordan's possession and the production of all content posted on the worldwide web by Joseph S. Jordan regarding this case."

This is a developing news story. Check back later for updates.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-joseph-jordan-20110105,0,6204060.story


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 02:12:48 PM
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/anthony_case/010511-casey-anthony-hearing

Casey Anthony hearing held

Updated: Wednesday, 05 Jan 2011, 2:02 PM EST
Published : Wednesday, 05 Jan 2011, 6:21 AM EST


ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. (WOFL FOX 35) - The case against  Casey Anthony was back in court Wednesday for a hearing in the murder case. Anthony was not in the courtroom for the hearing.

Anthony, 24, is charged with first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie. She has pleaded not guilty, claiming a babysitter kidnapped her toddler. Caylee was last seen in June of 2008, but she was not reported missing until a month later. Her remains were found in woods near the family's home in December 2008.

Her defense team wanted to get a subpoena for items belonging to Joseph Jordan who was a volunteer for Texas EquuSearch , the search and recovery organization that helped search for Caylee. Anthony’s attorneys say Jordan is a blogger who had pictures on his website of the Caylee search area and talked about the case. The defense says it's crucial to their case but they need a subpoena to get the information.

Judge Belvin Perry denied the motion without prejudice


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 02:14:41 PM
Back to the drawing board for the Dream Team


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 02:15:00 PM
JP - at 3:00 today I will be formulating the order and be setting the schedule.  I am surprised that expert witness would have nothing.  They come to conclusions and write notes.  They have rough notes that get translated into reports as they deal with more than one case.

I leave it at that.

done for the day

Considering I have 9 years of hands-on experience having had worked for a forensic psychiatrist that was a highly sought expert witness, after records were sent to us (sometimes boxes worth) & a battery of testing when dictated was done, start to finish we had a report within 2-3 weeks on average & some were rather lengthy (as much as 120 pgs in quite a few), not to mention most were delivered within weeks to months in advance of a trial.   In my other previous career experience I can easily state that this clown isnt the first defense attorney attempting to not show their hand.  I can assure you from hearing thousands of different type of cases that all it ends up being is a stall tactic & rings the bell for the prosecution to be ready to crucify said "defense expert witness."


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 02:21:26 PM
Baez got schooled again, as usual. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Motion Denied! ::MonkeyGavel::


I like how JP said he would deny it without prejudice in case they could come up with some sort of evidence to prove their motion.  Guess Bobo will be on the blogs looking for that evidence. 

Hey Bobo - you have a bald spot in the back of your head that can be seen  now that you have that spiffy new buzz cut from Discount Haircuts.  Is that a symptom of ugly coping?  LOL (Lots of Luck)
:smt046 :smt046 :smt046 :smt046 :smt046 :smt046 :smt046 :smt046 :smt046 :smt046


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 02:21:47 PM
NO NO NO, show me the transcript   Cite the dam page that Jordan reportedly said it.    This is BS, where is it in black and white?

General vicinity does not count & Bozo  JUST LIED HIS ARSE OFF   20, 30 feet is NOT what Jordan EVER said



So we are blessed with the presence of cown and co! meaning that they are hitting these blogs to build a case come on gimmie a break!! they have made such  fools of themselves. Mason has ruined his rep! and baez never had one not a good one that is. Great posts today glad the honorable judge isnt giving them any credit. Dern fools are fishing with no bait! pretty drastic when you have to go online to fish. laughable

I am not sure why Baez needs Jordan's pictures.  He has hundreds of witnesses that were at that spot, why doesn't he just call them to testify?



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Blink34 on January 05, 2011, 02:22:00 PM
Back to the drawing board for the Dream Team

ROTFL


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 02:23:13 PM
 Bozo is totally not getting the fact that Judge Perry has his number and is not putting up with the defense bluffing. Bozo really didn't get it at Monday's hearing. He'll probably take a few more smacks upside the head. :smt021 :smt021 :smt021


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Blink34 on January 05, 2011, 02:23:49 PM
NO NO NO, show me the transcript   Cite the dam page that Jordan reportedly said it.    This is BS, where is it in black and white?

General vicinity does not count & Bozo  JUST LIED HIS ARSE OFF   20, 30 feet is NOT what Jordan EVER said



So we are blessed with the presence of cown and co! meaning that they are hitting these blogs to build a case come on gimmie a break!! they have made such  fools of themselves. Mason has ruined his rep! and baez never had one not a good one that is. Great posts today glad the honorable judge isnt giving them any credit. Dern fools are fishing with no bait! pretty drastic when you have to go online to fish. laughable

I am not sure why Baez needs Jordan's pictures.  He has hundreds of witnesses that were at that spot, why doesn't he just call them to testify?



He does not need anything from Jordan. This was a backdoor approach to start more online witch hunts for sites, and forums that know more about his case than he does.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 02:23:59 PM
Back to the drawing board for the Dream Team

ROTFL

Like a shark outta water  :smt082


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 02:24:45 PM
Bobo saying he has papers he will be filing about issues.  He feels it is crossing the line to ask experts to rush to put reports together.

Bobo has uncovered research he is in process of doing

It appears he spends a lot of time working to file papers to get out of work.  Why doesn't he just do the work he is asked to do, wouldn't that be easier and cause him less stress?



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 02:25:04 PM
LMAO NR!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 02:33:15 PM


Be careful when you go fishing, you never know where that fish hook will end up.

                                 (http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/wpa0122l.jpg)



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 02:33:18 PM
NO NO NO, show me the transcript   Cite the dam page that Jordan reportedly said it.    This is BS, where is it in black and white?

General vicinity does not count & Bozo  JUST LIED HIS ARSE OFF   20, 30 feet is NOT what Jordan EVER said



So we are blessed with the presence of cown and co! meaning that they are hitting these blogs to build a case come on gimmie a break!! they have made such  fools of themselves. Mason has ruined his rep! and baez never had one not a good one that is. Great posts today glad the honorable judge isnt giving them any credit. Dern fools are fishing with no bait! pretty drastic when you have to go online to fish. laughable

I am not sure why Baez needs Jordan's pictures.  He has hundreds of witnesses that were at that spot, why doesn't he just call them to testify?



He does not need anything from Jordan. This was a backdoor approach to start more online witch hunts for sites, and forums that know more about his case than he does.

You'd think by now the defense upon reading would realize that the general public isnt buying their bull & certainly dont consider them in an ounce of courteous respect.  Bozo & team are so delusional as to what fame & fortune this case can provide them that they refuse to recognize that in the process they are making absolute fools of themselves...these tools dont have an ounce of Johnny Cocharan in their pinkies, not even close.   In fact what they are doing is assuring their client will be convicted, albeit they may manage to save her from the needle.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 02:35:02 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26377859/detail.html
Perry Denies Casey Defense Motion For Subpoena
Perry Says He Won't Issue 'License To Fish'

POSTED: 2:14 pm EST January 5, 2011
UPDATED: 2:22 pm EST January 5, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Judge Belvin Perry denied a defense motion on Wednesday that asked for a witness in the case against Casey Anthony to hand over photographs of an area off of Suburban Drive.

Anthony was not present at the Wednesday hearing.

Defense attorney Jose Baez claimed that Joe Jordan, a Texas EquuSearch volunteer, has photographs of areas off of Suburban Drive
Caylee Anthony's remains were found in December 2008 in that area by former meter reader Roy Kronk.

"There is a very strong possibility that [Jordan] potentially does have evidence," Baez said.

Perry asked Baez if Jordan stated in his deposition whether or not he took photographs of the area in question that might have relevance to the case. Baez said he never asked Jordan because he was not aware of the photographs at the time of his deposition.

"The only way that we're able to see if he has photographs is to get a subpoena," Baez said.

"I cannot give you a license to fish," Perry said at the hearing.

Anthony's defense team said it learned in April 2010 that Jordan e-mailed detectives at one point to say he and others thoroughly searched the exact spot off of Suburban Drive where the remains were found. Jordan later said that was not his claim.
Baez admitted at Wednesday's hearing that Jordan said he had only searched the "general vicinity" where the remains were found and not the exact spot. Baez said Jordan searched 20 to 30 feet away from the exact spot.

Attorneys also discussed deadlines in the case relating to the defense's written statements from its expert witnesses.

On Monday, Perry said the defense had committed willful violations by not submitting proper documentation and agreed to sanction the defense.

Perry said he would submit an order on the issue later on Wednesday afternoon and cautioned defense attorneys and the prosecution to send him feedback on a time line for the expert statements before he issues an order.

"I would like your input, but I do not need your input," said Perry, who has often reminded the defense and prosecution that he has no problem setting time lines himself.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 02:41:25 PM


Be careful when you go fishing, you never know where that fish hook will end up.

                                 (http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/wpa0122l.jpg)


perfect!!!!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: 4 Donks on January 05, 2011, 02:50:37 PM
Thank you Brandi and Northern Rose for the screen shots. Special thanks for all the great monkey commentary. You guys ROCK !!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 02:53:41 PM
Baez admitted at Wednesday's hearing that Jordan said he had only searched the "general vicinity" where the remains were found and not the exact spot. Baez said Jordan searched 20 to 30 feet away from the exact spot.   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::

At the rate they are going anyone that was in Florida at the time would be considered having "evidence"


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 02:53:43 PM
Thank you Brandi and Northern Rose for the screen shots. Special thanks for all the great monkey commentary. You guys ROCK !!!

You included 4 Donks...everyone has something to contribute & all are appreciated.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 02:55:53 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  I've got a question for you all...Is there going to be any investigation of Laura Buchanan?  Baez mentioned that the defense found out about Joe Jordan through her.  (A really stupid move on his part for bringing it up, since she is the one who allegedly fabricated the TES document.)  Are we going to hear anything more about her involvement? I hate it when they start something up and then, poof! it goes away.  (For example, Dominic Casey's investigative interview, or Mallory's deposition, or Mark Hawkings, for that matter.)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 02:56:43 PM
Baez admitted at Wednesday's hearing that Jordan said he had only searched the "general vicinity" where the remains were found and not the exact spot. Baez said Jordan searched 20 to 30 feet away from the exact spot.   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::

At the rate they are going anyone that was in Florida at the time would be considered having "evidence"
I grew up in Tallahassee...Do you think they'll be contacting me?
 ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 05, 2011, 02:56:54 PM
Thanks to all monkeys.
Missed it but got the jist of what went down on the duhfense's head today.

Foghorn: can you say LOL?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 03:01:44 PM
Thanks to all monkeys.
Missed it but got the jist of what went down on the duhfense's head today.

Foghorn: can you say LOL?
That was a giggle, Curly.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 03:02:16 PM
Baez admitted at Wednesday's hearing that Jordan said he had only searched the "general vicinity" where the remains were found and not the exact spot. Baez said Jordan searched 20 to 30 feet away from the exact spot.   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::

At the rate they are going anyone that was in Florida at the time would be considered having "evidence"
I grew up in Tallahassee...Do you think they'll be contacting me?
 ::MonkeyJnBox::

and you post on a blog   ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 03:03:24 PM
Just had to dig this one out after the DENIED this morning.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Puzzler on January 05, 2011, 03:08:32 PM
NO NO NO, show me the transcript   Cite the dam page that Jordan reportedly said it.    This is BS, where is it in black and white?

General vicinity does not count & Bozo  JUST LIED HIS ARSE OFF   20, 30 feet is NOT what Jordan EVER said



So we are blessed with the presence of cown and co! meaning that they are hitting these blogs to build a case come on gimmie a break!! they have made such  fools of themselves. Mason has ruined his rep! and baez never had one not a good one that is. Great posts today glad the honorable judge isnt giving them any credit. Dern fools are fishing with no bait! pretty drastic when you have to go online to fish. laughable

Sounds like they are not very prepared when giving depositions either. LOL

Laughable indeed!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I thought to run a murder trial, the defense has to be extremely organized, prepared, and on the ball with plenty of stamina!!
 ::MonkeyTongue::

 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 03:09:54 PM
Baez admitted at Wednesday's hearing that Jordan said he had only searched the "general vicinity" where the remains were found and not the exact spot. Baez said Jordan searched 20 to 30 feet away from the exact spot.   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::

At the rate they are going anyone that was in Florida at the time would be considered having "evidence"
I grew up in Tallahassee...Do you think they'll be contacting me?
 ::MonkeyJnBox::

and you post on a blog   ::MonkeyDevil::
Okay, I'll go quietly--Gee, I wonder if Baez and Mason will be happy to see me?  I have called both of them idiots...


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 03:11:12 PM
Just had to dig this one out after the DENIED this morning.
If I were going to attend the trial, I swear I would have that put on a T-shirt and wear it proudly.  Or a hat...


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 03:11:13 PM
Something just hit me.  Bobo said this morning he needed the supeona because you have to sign up on  the blogs to see the images.  For this site if you attach images rather than point to a photobucket you can not see them without logging in.  How very frustrating it must be for the firsthispaniclawyertodefendahighprofilecasewithuglycopingandwhenyouallknowthetruthyouwillseemyclientisinnocentnothenannydiditnothemeterreaderdiditnoitwasthebartenderinthelobbywithacandlestickthatdiditandIliketogofishingwithablindfoldoninthemiddleofthedesertwithmarblesinmymouthandsomeinamasonjar  defense team.  Welcome.  Should you not be preparing your case to meet deadlines rather than reading blogs?

I want to add Mr Ashton was his usual dapper and professional self this morning.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 05, 2011, 03:12:27 PM
Baez admitted at Wednesday's hearing that Jordan said he had only searched the "general vicinity" where the remains were found and not the exact spot. Baez said Jordan searched 20 to 30 feet away from the exact spot.   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::

At the rate they are going anyone that was in Florida at the time would be considered having "evidence"
I grew up in Tallahassee...Do you think they'll be contacting me?
 ::MonkeyJnBox::

and you post on a blog   ::MonkeyDevil::
Okay, I'll go quietly--Gee, I wonder if Baez and Mason will be happy to see me?  I have called both of them idiots...

And I'm almost positive you wished them LOL (lot's of luck).


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 03:12:41 PM
Just had to dig this one out after the DENIED this morning.
If I were going to attend the trial, I swear I would have that put on a T-shirt and wear it proudly.  Or a hat...
How funny it would be to have a whole row of people wearing that shirt during trial   ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 03:13:16 PM
Something just hit me.  Bobo said this morning he needed the supeona because you have to sign up on  the blogs to see the images.  For this site if you attach images rather than point to a photobucket you can not see them without logging in.  How very frustrating it must be for the firsthispaniclawyertodefendahighprofilecasewithuglycopingandwhenyouallknowthetruthyouwillseemyclientisinnocentnothenannydiditnothemeterreaderdiditnoitwasthebartenderinthelobbywithacandlestickthatdiditandIliketogofishingwithablindfoldoninthemiddleofthedesertwithmarblesinmymouthandsomeinamasonjar  defense team.  Welcome.  Should you not be preparing your case to meet deadlines rather than reading blogs?

I want to add Mr Ashton was his usual dapper and professional self this morning.
Okay, now that was spit out my green tea on the computer screen funny!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 03:13:17 PM
Baez admitted at Wednesday's hearing that Jordan said he had only searched the "general vicinity" where the remains were found and not the exact spot. Baez said Jordan searched 20 to 30 feet away from the exact spot.   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::

At the rate they are going anyone that was in Florida at the time would be considered having "evidence"
I grew up in Tallahassee...Do you think they'll be contacting me?
 ::MonkeyJnBox::

and you post on a blog   ::MonkeyDevil::
Okay, I'll go quietly--Gee, I wonder if Baez and Mason will be happy to see me?  I have called both of them idiots...

And I'm almost positive you wished them LOL (lot's of luck).

 ::MonkeyHaHa::    ::MonkeyHaHa::    ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 03:14:23 PM
Baez admitted at Wednesday's hearing that Jordan said he had only searched the "general vicinity" where the remains were found and not the exact spot. Baez said Jordan searched 20 to 30 feet away from the exact spot.   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::

At the rate they are going anyone that was in Florida at the time would be considered having "evidence"
I grew up in Tallahassee...Do you think they'll be contacting me?
 ::MonkeyJnBox::

and you post on a blog   ::MonkeyDevil::
Okay, I'll go quietly--Gee, I wonder if Baez and Mason will be happy to see me?  I have called both of them idiots...

And I'm almost positive you wished them LOL (lot's of luck).
You betcha!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 03:15:56 PM
Thank you Brandi and Northern Rose for the screen shots. Special thanks for all the great monkey commentary. You guys ROCK !!!

   :smt035 :smt045 :smt045 :smt041



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 05, 2011, 03:21:12 PM
Thank you Brandi and Northern Rose for the screen shots. Special thanks for all the great monkey commentary. You guys ROCK !!!

   :smt035 :smt045 :smt045 :smt041


Could I piggyback on this sentiment? 
 ::MonkeyHeart::
Lovin' me some Monkeys! (Especially on hearing days!)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 03:24:06 PM

DENIED!  DENIED!  DENIED!

I am starting to think I know why one of the defense lawyers had to go to those sex classes. 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 05, 2011, 03:26:25 PM
Just had to dig this one out after the DENIED this morning.
..

Love it, he looked ticked on the way out today...I still wonder how Casey gets away with not being there for a motion after the ruling we all heard way back ago.  Typical status hearings are different & understandable but not motions.   And is it indeed Casey not wanting to attend or bozo convincing her she doesnt have to be there cuz he knows a) he will be lying his butt off 2) he will be denied.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 03:31:45 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-joseph-jordan-20110105,0,6204060.story
Casey Anthony team denied subpoena for blogger's photos
Judge Belvin Perry expresses concern that Anthony's team wanted a 'fishing expedition' for Joe Jordan's photos.
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

3:15 p.m. EST, January 5, 2011

Casey Anthony's defense attorneys suffered another blow today when they were denied a subpoena to collect what they suspect are a blogger's photos of the vacant, wooded area where her daughter's remains were found in 2008.

Judge Belvin Perry this afternoon denied a defense motion to subpoena searcher Joe Jordan's blog and internet photos, finding no factual basis to compel those items that may have appeared online.

Perry was not satisfied they would reveal meaningful "tangible" evidence and he expressed concerns that the defense was going on a "fishing expedition."

"I cannot give you a license to fish," Perry said soon before issuing his ruling today.

Perry did, however, deny the motion without prejudice, meaning the defense attorneys could revisit the issue if they can make a more compelling argument for the obtaining the information they seek.
Anthony, 24, is charged with first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie, whose body was found in a lot off Suburban Drive near the Anthony home months after she was reported missing.

The woman faces the death penalty if convicted. Her trial is set to start in May.

The wooded lot was part of an intense search during the summer of 2008.

The defense motion stated that a Dec. 8, deposition of Jordan, a state witness, showed that he was an online blogger, who visited and blogged on various websites discussing the Casey Anthony case and the search for Caylee Anthony.

Two sites, "Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community Forum" and "Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum" both posted photos taken by Jordan and linked to his personal website, according to the motion.

"Some of the photographs illustrated areas searched that were near or on Suburban Drive," the motion states. "These photographs are material to the preparation of the defense in this cause."

In court today, defense attorney Jose Baez that these photos are no longer found online, but were out there and public at one time.

"I think this witness has relevant information," Baez said, noting that Jordan has been involved with the case for some time by communicating with law enforcement and expressing opinions online.
Baez also said today that during the December deposition Jordan indicated that he has searched within 20 or 30 feet of where Caylee's remains were found.

"He potentially does have evidence that would be useful to the defense," said Baez, particularly if Jordan holds photos of the immediate areas where he searched.

The defense team has tried to show that the area where Caylee's remains were found was passable and not under water when searchers scoured the area off Suburban Drive in the summer of 2008, suggesting that the child's body was placed where it was found at a later time. Showing this would help undermine the prosecution's case.

The child's remains were ultimately found in December 2008.

Jordan attorney William McClellan, however, said the defense has made assumptions about Jordan being responsible for the photographs. McClellan said the defense proved "no factual basis" to grant the motion for the subpoena.

"There's no evidence Mr. Jordan is in possession of any photographs or took any photographs," McClellan said.

He suggested that the defense efforts to obtain any of his online opinions about the case or other materials amounted to "harassment."

The defense had wanted "any and all photographs related to this case in Joseph S. Jordan's possession and the production of all content posted on the worldwide web by Joseph S. Jordan regarding this case."

Following today's hearing, defense attorney Cheney Mason said they are still very much interested in seeing the photos and recognized that Judge Perry left the door open to seek them out later. He is unsure what they will show, but suggested they could be quite helpful to the defense if they show the immediate area where the remains were found.

"We're trying to get them to find out what they show," Mason said. "We don't know without seeing them."
In another development, Judge Perry encouraged the prosecution and the defense to discuss timeframes for future depositions of expert witnesses for the defense and the sharing of discovery information about those witnesses.

The two side met briefly after the hearing to talk those issues over, but had no immediate comment on what was agreed to.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Samarie on January 05, 2011, 03:40:15 PM
The defense team is really railing against us no-life bloggers of late. Before you know it SM will be code for Zanny the Nanny.

I think they're jealous because on many sites Bozo and Marblemouth Mason are referred to as idiots. Of course, I would never do such a thing, and while I'm here I would like to thank those monkeys that have attended a hearing or 2 and shared first hand knowledge about how great SA Jeff Ashton smells.

Comparing the cheesehead defense team and SAO is like trying to compare limburger to brie!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 05, 2011, 03:48:58 PM
NO NO NO, show me the transcript   Cite the dam page that Jordan reportedly said it.    This is BS, where is it in black and white?

General vicinity does not count & Bozo  JUST LIED HIS ARSE OFF   20, 30 feet is NOT what Jordan EVER said



So we are blessed with the presence of cown and co! meaning that they are hitting these blogs to build a case come on gimmie a break!! they have made such  fools of themselves. Mason has ruined his rep! and baez never had one not a good one that is. Great posts today glad the honorable judge isnt giving them any credit. Dern fools are fishing with no bait! pretty drastic when you have to go online to fish. laughable

Sounds like they are not very prepared when giving depositions either. LOL

Laughable indeed!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I thought to run a murder trial, the defense has to be extremely organized, prepared, and on the ball with plenty of stamina!!
 ::MonkeyTongue::

 



Clearly  baez should have neverrrrr been allowed to take this case. He has made a mockery out of the judicial system with his lack of knowledge.I am so sick of him coming to court unprepared because he is too lazy to do his work/research. Unbelievable his lack of experience shows through and through!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 05, 2011, 03:50:28 PM
The defense team is really railing against us no-life bloggers of late. Before you know it SM will be code for Zanny the Nanny.

I think they're jealous because on many sites Bozo and Marblemouth Mason are referred to as idiots. Of course, I would never do such a thing, and while I'm here I would like to thank those monkeys that have attended a hearing or 2 and shared first hand knowledge about how great SA Jeff Ashton smells.

Comparing the cheesehead defense team and SAO is like trying to compare limburger to brie!




Come on now what lawyer builds a case off of what is said on the internet! had he off left the media alone he wouldnt be so hated! he has harassed with his arrogance and now its pay back time.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: flamom on January 05, 2011, 03:54:09 PM
Hi Monks! Thanks for the updates. missed this hearing.
I have believed for a long time that BoBo is clueless and just flubbing his way. This sucker really has no clue as to what he is doing, what needs to be done. He has no sense of priorities or order or what happens in a courtroom.  Even an amateur like me thinks it would have made more sense to get her a deal saying it was an 'accident'. She will be convicted but my gut tells me that she will qualify for the ineffective counsel pass to a new trial....


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 05, 2011, 04:41:03 PM
Hi Monks! Thanks for the updates. missed this hearing.
I have believed for a long time that BoBo is clueless and just flubbing his way. This sucker really has no clue as to what he is doing, what needs to be done. He has no sense of priorities or order or what happens in a courtroom.  Even an amateur like me thinks it would have made more sense to get her a deal saying it was an 'accident'. She will be convicted but my gut tells me that she will qualify for the ineffective counsel pass to a new trial....
She has to prove that the outcome would be different....not guilty.    That's just not going to happen no matter how many times this case goes to trial.  moo


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 04:41:18 PM
I've got news for Bozo. You don't have to be a member to READ on SM or on many other websites. And I don't mind calling him and Mason idiots, because they are.  ::piggy::  LOL! (Lots of luck!) Idiot!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 04:41:40 PM

Put a fork in him.....



It makes me angry to watch the incompetence in this case.  Caylee deserves better.  She deserves a fair trial.  She is an innocent babe, and the antics of the defense takes away from the importance of the life of this sweetheart.

She deserves a fight.  Is she that unimportant to this family they could go and hire someone who is as arrogant, inefficient, and ineffective as Baez?  It makes a joke out of the whole process.

Caylee stole my heart.  Thank God she has people who really care about her.  I can see the way the prosecutors care and put their heart and soul into defending her.

She is in the arms of our Lord and our Savior, there is no better place.  She should have been allowed to live her life with a real family, a family who cared about her and did not use her as a weapon in their battles.

George, I hope you are thinking hard about your choices.  Caylee needs someone from her family on her side.  It is never too late to break away and do the right thing for her.  Do it for Caylee!

 ::MonkeyAngel::




Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 04:42:49 PM
Hi Monks! Thanks for the updates. missed this hearing.
I have believed for a long time that BoBo is clueless and just flubbing his way. This sucker really has no clue as to what he is doing, what needs to be done. He has no sense of priorities or order or what happens in a courtroom.  Even an amateur like me thinks it would have made more sense to get her a deal saying it was an 'accident'. She will be convicted but my gut tells me that she will qualify for the ineffective counsel pass to a new trial....
She has to prove that the outcome would be different....not guilty.    That's just not going to happen no matter how many times this case goes to trial.  moo

No way the 31 days and duct tape can be explained away.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 04:46:08 PM
Hi Monks! Thanks for the updates. missed this hearing.
I have believed for a long time that BoBo is clueless and just flubbing his way. This sucker really has no clue as to what he is doing, what needs to be done. He has no sense of priorities or order or what happens in a courtroom.  Even an amateur like me thinks it would have made more sense to get her a deal saying it was an 'accident'. She will be convicted but my gut tells me that she will qualify for the ineffective counsel pass to a new trial....
She has to prove that the outcome would be different....not guilty.    That's just not going to happen no matter how many times this case goes to trial.  moo

No way the 31 days and duct tape can be explained away.

Professor gadget is probably at his computer right now trying to find out how to throw any mention of words starting with d, out of court, just so he doesn't tip his hand and let out his super secret decoder ring secrets to the blogosphere.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: 4 Donks on January 05, 2011, 04:46:59 PM
I am assuming that the defense handles their depositions in the same manner they do their motions. Thoughtlessly without preparation.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 05, 2011, 04:48:35 PM
I am assuming that the defense handles their depositions in the same manner they do their motions. Thoughtlessly without preparation.

Probably late and unprepared, can't imagine it any different.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 04:49:32 PM

Put a fork in him.....



It makes me angry to watch the incompetence in this case.  Caylee deserves better.  She deserves a fair trial.  She is an innocent babe, and the antics of the defense takes away from the importance of the life of this sweetheart.

She deserves a fight.  Is she that unimportant to this family they could go and hire someone who is as arrogant, inefficient, and ineffective as Baez?  It makes a joke out of the whole process.

Caylee stole my heart.  Thank God she has people who really care about her.  I can see the way the prosecutors care and put their heart and soul into defending her.

She is in the arms of our Lord and our Savior, there is no better place.  She should have been allowed to live her life with a real family, a family who cared about her and did not use her as a weapon in their battles.

George, I hope you are thinking hard about your choices.  Caylee needs someone from her family on her side.  It is never too late to break away and do the right thing for her.  Do it for Caylee!

 ::MonkeyAngel::




I am not God so I don't have to forgive George. It is way, way too late for George. The only way he would ever come over to Caylee's side is to save his own bu*t. He has already done too much damage and doesn't have the character or morals. I know Caylee needs someone in her family standing up for her but her family let her down in life, and they are doing it now after her murder. He will only do what is in his best interest. I gave up on George a long, long time ago. I guess we sad bloggers, media people like Kathi and the prosecution will have to be on Caylee's side. At least we are still here and haven't budged.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 05, 2011, 04:50:12 PM
I can see the skank at the 11th hour in May firing Bozo's @ss. Judge will have to appoint a public defender and delay the trial until he/she can get up to speed.
I put nothing passed her or her circus clowns.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 04:50:57 PM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::

I know some folks do not ejoy MD.  I don't have an opinion on him, didn't read his site much.  Just posted the link cause of the pics and that is where I found them, but not by directly going to his site, I was googling Joseph Jordan and wound up there. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 05, 2011, 04:53:57 PM
I am assuming that the defense handles their depositions in the same manner they do their motions. Thoughtlessly without preparation.

Probably late and unprepared, can't imagine it any different.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::



Bozo clearly did not do his homework/research before deposing J. Jordan, and now he thinks he's entitled to a do-over. Tough sh!t Bozo! You're a day late and a dollar short. (or 3 dollars in your case)

Bozo is an embarrassment not only to his profession, but to humanity!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 04:55:46 PM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::

I know some folks do not ejoy MD.  I don't have an opinion on him, didn't read his site much.  Just posted the link cause of the pics and that is where I found them, but not by directly going to his site, I was googling Joseph Jordan and wound up there. 

It isn't a problem for me. The link is posted quite often.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 05, 2011, 04:56:56 PM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::

I know some folks do not ejoy MD.  I don't have an opinion on him, didn't read his site much.  Just posted the link cause of the pics and that is where I found them, but not by directly going to his site, I was googling Joseph Jordan and wound up there. 

Those pictures were posted here as well Zoo, by many members. The point is those items photographed were not found on Suburban Drive. Bozo can say they were til hell freezes over, but they were NOT!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 05:00:23 PM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::

I know some folks do not ejoy MD.  I don't have an opinion on him, didn't read his site much.  Just posted the link cause of the pics and that is where I found them, but not by directly going to his site, I was googling Joseph Jordan and wound up there. 

Those pictures were posted here as well Zoo, by many members. The point is those items photographed were not found on Suburban Drive. Bozo can say they were til hell freezes over, but they were NOT!



At the time JJ was first brought up, I went back and read all of his posts. I don't think he ever said he was 20-30 feet from where Caylee's body was found. At least not here on SM.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 05, 2011, 05:09:49 PM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::

I know some folks do not ejoy MD.  I don't have an opinion on him, didn't read his site much.  Just posted the link cause of the pics and that is where I found them, but not by directly going to his site, I was googling Joseph Jordan and wound up there. 

Those pictures were posted here as well Zoo, by many members. The point is those items photographed were not found on Suburban Drive. Bozo can say they were til hell freezes over, but they were NOT!



At the time JJ was first brought up, I went back and read all of his posts. I don't think he ever said he was 20-30 feet from where Caylee's body was found. At least not here on SM.

I don't recall him saying that either.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 05:14:10 PM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::

I know some folks do not ejoy MD.  I don't have an opinion on him, didn't read his site much.  Just posted the link cause of the pics and that is where I found them, but not by directly going to his site, I was googling Joseph Jordan and wound up there. 

Those pictures were posted here as well Zoo, by many members. The point is those items photographed were not found on Suburban Drive. Bozo can say they were til hell freezes over, but they were NOT!



Absolutley right, I remembered seeing them back when, but had not seen them recently so was looking.  I remembered them looking like just junk thrown in the forrest, and that is still what they look like.  I posted over and over how guilty Beotchface is, wonder if i will be subpeoned soon?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 05:15:54 PM
Smackdown 2011.  The year of Caylee Anthony.  This is turning out to be quite a good year, minus the fact that my hubby lost his job yesterday.  Hopefully out with the old and in with the new brings a better one soon.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 05:20:37 PM
Anybody find out why Beotchface was allowed to not attend court today? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 05, 2011, 05:25:54 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26368610/detail.html
Subpoena For Photos Denied In Casey Case
Posted: 5:40 pm EST January 4, 2011Updated: 4:27 pm EST January 5, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the Case against Casey Anthony, Judge Belvin Perry denied a subpoena on Wednesday, requested by the defense, to collect photos belonging to a Texas Equusearch volunteer.
During a hearing, Casey's attorney, Jose Baez, argued searcher Joe Jordan had pictures of the wooded area where Caylee's remains were found in 2008. Baez said the pictures were posted on a blog, but have since been removed.

The defense wants to see if the pictures were taken before the remains were discovered, but the judge said the defense was unable prove those photos exist.

"I'm trying to establish whether you are going on a fishing expedition or whether or not there is something specific that can lead to tangible evidence," Perry said.

Casey's defense team is trying to prove the area where Caylee's remains were found was not underwater when searchers were in the area. Though the judge denied the motion, the defense could revisit the issue if they can bring forward new information and make a more compelling argument.

Meanwhile, defense expert, botanist Dr. Jane Bock will be deposed on January 18. Defense bug expert Dr. Tim Huntington will be questioned under oath on January 28.

The experts have been ordered by the judge to provide written reports before the depositions.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 05:28:20 PM
I hate that most motions are denied w/o prejudice.  That allows the idiot to refile motions 50 million times if they wish, wasting taxpayer money yet again.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 05, 2011, 05:35:39 PM
I hate that most motions are denied w/o prejudice.  That allows the idiot to refile motions 50 million times if they wish, wasting taxpayer money yet again.
Zoo, I hear you.  But bozo better be sure what he's talking about (which is impossible imo) or he won't get a smack down from His Honor, he will get a knock down.  bozo should be learning (which he isn't) Judge Perry is wise to his smoke and screen dance.  He wants facts, not fish.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 05:39:54 PM
How long do Bozo and Co have to pay the fines levied by JP for their willful noncompliance?  Anybody know? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 05, 2011, 05:41:09 PM
I hate that most motions are denied w/o prejudice.  That allows the idiot to refile motions 50 million times if they wish, wasting taxpayer money yet again.
Zoo, I hear you.  But bozo better be sure what he's talking about (which is impossible imo) or he won't get a smack down from His Honor, he will get a knock down.  bozo should be learning (which he isn't) Judge Perry is wise to his smoke and screen dance.  He wants facts, not fish.

JP has mentioned that he is part of the innocence board and today he mentioned he was ruling on a custody case.  It is clear he believes in his oaths, the law and just plain cares. I am so happy that Team Bobo got Strickland out because IMO had they not, when ever this would have gone to trial under JS it would have been appealed anyway and we would be watching JP regardless as the senior Judge on round two of the trial.  They did Caylee a favour and have sped up the inevitable and JP is ensuring everything is fair so there will be no mistrial based on process and the law.  I have no doubt that JP will ensure this proceeds accordingly will all respect for the law and process. IMO


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 05:51:12 PM
OK this is weird and it is a true story..it just happened.

I was playing online scrabble and my new letters came to my tray.....

DYSOONKC  in that order in my tray  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 05, 2011, 05:55:26 PM
OK this is weird and it is a true story..it just happened.

I was playing online scrabble and my new letters came to my tray.....

DYSOONKC  in that order in my tray  ::MonkeyEek::

(http://bestsmileys.com/scared/3.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Green Eyes on January 05, 2011, 05:57:50 PM
OK this is weird and it is a true story..it just happened.

I was playing online scrabble and my new letters came to my tray.....

DYSOONKC  in that order in my tray  ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyEek:: Wishful thinking Nutt or a sign of things to come. ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2011, 05:58:26 PM
YUP MUFFY


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 05, 2011, 06:15:35 PM
OK this is weird and it is a true story..it just happened.

I was playing online scrabble and my new letters came to my tray.....

DYSOONKC  in that order in my tray  ::MonkeyEek::

Freaky!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Blink34 on January 05, 2011, 06:20:10 PM
Does anyone see a link to the video of the hearing today? I am not seeing it. TIA

Shout out to my Klaasend ::dogwag::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: klaasend on January 05, 2011, 06:28:19 PM
Does anyone see a link to the video of the hearing today? I am not seeing it. TIA

Shout out to my Klaasend ::dogwag::

Hi Blink!  I'm feeling a little better so I looked around and I haven't found it yet.  I did see the screen shot of the jibjab monster mash (pretty funny).


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 05, 2011, 06:39:02 PM
No, I've been looking. Doesn't seem like they plan to put one up.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 05, 2011, 07:39:13 PM
You know how Bozo usually does some type of media thing after a court hearing to act like what happened was no big deal or to dispute articles the  media prints?  Has he done any media since his smackdown?  I have not seen any. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Rowanvamp0 on January 05, 2011, 09:00:17 PM
Quote
<snipped>
"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.


Yes, but if the defense pleas her out, Mason wouldn't have national venue to posture and give his "good ole boy" routine. They are there for the circus and the show. Notoriety and money is what it's all about and I think Skanky doesn't realize yet that she is the goose with her head on the chopping block. Her flirty palsey-walsey actions in court last Monday says to me she is buying the whole dog and pony show. Several times she practically had to bite her cheeks to keep from laughing during the proceedings. She had a serious look on her face a some of time. One was in the discussion about the "Diary of Days." Otherwise, I think her stern looks were more in response to the distain she has for Judge Perry and the DA's. She still thinks she is getting off and she is a star and the center of attention. She lives for this.
Fanny, there is not a remorseful thought in her being.  I don't think there ever has been.  She is the same as always . . . she has just changed her address.

And she gets a respite from Spindy yammering at her all the time. It is is worth being in jail for her. Bad as it must be there, she gets some feeling of control being in jail. I think she hates Spindy that much. I have always thought killing Caylee was a spite thing for Skanky, and it was to get back at Spindy as much as it was to rid herself of a burden.

You know Fanny your not the only one I though too that from day one it was a spite issue with Casey..Caylee was a pawn and Casey played her till finally it worked no more and she(Casey) was going to get the last word in on this issue between mother and daughter..I think the rage in Casey blew and poor defenseless Caylee got the brunt of it. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Rowanvamp0 on January 05, 2011, 09:30:36 PM
Does anyone have the links for the video of the motion hearing today..I did get my text that said Casey didn't appear..dugghh hate having to play catch up I wanted to see it live.  All in all was it a good day??  Trying to read and play catch up now..


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 09:36:46 PM
Does anyone have the links for the video of the motion hearing today..I did get my text that said Casey didn't appear..dugghh hate having to play catch up I wanted to see it live.  All in all was it a good day??  Trying to read and play catch up now..

I never saw a link posted for a video for today. I'll go look and see if I can find one. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/bye.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 09:43:38 PM
Does anyone have the links for the video of the motion hearing today..I did get my text that said Casey didn't appear..dugghh hate having to play catch up I wanted to see it live.  All in all was it a good day??  Trying to read and play catch up now..

I've not found one in the obvious places. It didn't last very long, not that it means anything. Sorry.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 05, 2011, 09:47:09 PM
Quote
<snipped>
"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.


Yes, but if the defense pleas her out, Mason wouldn't have national venue to posture and give his "good ole boy" routine. They are there for the circus and the show. Notoriety and money is what it's all about and I think Skanky doesn't realize yet that she is the goose with her head on the chopping block. Her flirty palsey-walsey actions in court last Monday says to me she is buying the whole dog and pony show. Several times she practically had to bite her cheeks to keep from laughing during the proceedings. She had a serious look on her face a some of time. One was in the discussion about the "Diary of Days." Otherwise, I think her stern looks were more in response to the distain she has for Judge Perry and the DA's. She still thinks she is getting off and she is a star and the center of attention. She lives for this.
Fanny, there is not a remorseful thought in her being.  I don't think there ever has been.  She is the same as always . . . she has just changed her address.

And she gets a respite from Spindy yammering at her all the time. It is is worth being in jail for her. Bad as it must be there, she gets some feeling of control being in jail. I think she hates Spindy that much. I have always thought killing Caylee was a spite thing for Skanky, and it was to get back at Spindy as much as it was to rid herself of a burden.

You know Fanny your not the only one I though too that from day one it was a spite issue with Casey..Caylee was a pawn and Casey played her till finally it worked no more and she(Casey) was going to get the last word in on this issue between mother and daughter..I think the rage in Casey blew and poor defenseless Caylee got the brunt of it. 


Casey hated cindy
more than she loved caylee
in the words of her grandmother shirley plasea.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: cookie on January 05, 2011, 09:48:25 PM
If I was Cindy I would be at every court appearance whether Casey was there or not..where has George been lately?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 05, 2011, 09:51:18 PM
Quote
<snipped>
"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.


Yes, but if the defense pleas her out, Mason wouldn't have national venue to posture and give his "good ole boy" routine. They are there for the circus and the show. Notoriety and money is what it's all about and I think Skanky doesn't realize yet that she is the goose with her head on the chopping block. Her flirty palsey-walsey actions in court last Monday says to me she is buying the whole dog and pony show. Several times she practically had to bite her cheeks to keep from laughing during the proceedings. She had a serious look on her face a some of time. One was in the discussion about the "Diary of Days." Otherwise, I think her stern looks were more in response to the distain she has for Judge Perry and the DA's. She still thinks she is getting off and she is a star and the center of attention. She lives for this.
Fanny, there is not a remorseful thought in her being.  I don't think there ever has been.  She is the same as always . . . she has just changed her address.

And she gets a respite from Spindy yammering at her all the time. It is is worth being in jail for her. Bad as it must be there, she gets some feeling of control being in jail. I think she hates Spindy that much. I have always thought killing Caylee was a spite thing for Skanky, and it was to get back at Spindy as much as it was to rid herself of a burden.

You know Fanny your not the only one I though too that from day one it was a spite issue with Casey..Caylee was a pawn and Casey played her till finally it worked no more and she(Casey) was going to get the last word in on this issue between mother and daughter..I think the rage in Casey blew and poor defenseless Caylee got the brunt of it. 


Casey hated cindy
more than she loved caylee
in the words of her grandmother shirley plasea.

Yep, and she said it well, didn't she?   :smt045


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 05, 2011, 09:54:23 PM
If I was Cindy I would be at every court appearance whether Casey was there or not..where has George been lately?

I've been wondering the same thing, Cookie. Maybe he just chooses to enjoy his time away from Cindy's leash?

I think it's possible that George took Casey's musings in the letter (re: sexual contact) badly. If untrue, I would have!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 05, 2011, 09:54:50 PM
If I was Cindy I would be at every court appearance whether Casey was there or not..where has George been lately?

Probably hiding under the bed.  ::piggy::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Magic Eyes on January 05, 2011, 10:06:30 PM
Does anyone have the links for the video of the motion hearing today..I did get my text that said Casey didn't appear..dugghh hate having to play catch up I wanted to see it live.  All in all was it a good day??  Trying to read and play catch up now..

I've not found one in the obvious places. It didn't last very long, not that it means anything. Sorry.

I was finally well enough to take down the tree and decorations and missed the trial.  I have a Christmas cold that seems to be a never ending cold.  I have looked everywhere for the trial too and can't find it.  So irritating, that they think it isn't important enough to show the video because it was short.  I have not missed one day in court until today and it makes me so sad. 

It wasn't because I wasn't thinking of you, sweet baby Caylee.  You and my monkeys are always on my mind.  The fact that we just had such a big trial and this darn cold and lots to do kept me away.  I am so glad this craziness was denied.  Bozo and Jar need to be so ashamed but I won't be holding my breath. 

Thank you all so much for all of the posts and pictures of the trial, even though I haven't been able to see it, I feel very informed.  I adore each and everyone of you.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: cookie on January 05, 2011, 10:09:37 PM
hope you are feeling a bit better Magic...lots of nasty illnesses going around right now...xxxx


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 05, 2011, 10:25:29 PM
Quote
<snipped>
"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.


Yes, but if the defense pleas her out, Mason wouldn't have national venue to posture and give his "good ole boy" routine. They are there for the circus and the show. Notoriety and money is what it's all about and I think Skanky doesn't realize yet that she is the goose with her head on the chopping block. Her flirty palsey-walsey actions in court last Monday says to me she is buying the whole dog and pony show. Several times she practically had to bite her cheeks to keep from laughing during the proceedings. She had a serious look on her face a some of time. One was in the discussion about the "Diary of Days." Otherwise, I think her stern looks were more in response to the distain she has for Judge Perry and the DA's. She still thinks she is getting off and she is a star and the center of attention. She lives for this.
Fanny, there is not a remorseful thought in her being.  I don't think there ever has been.  She is the same as always . . . she has just changed her address.

And she gets a respite from Spindy yammering at her all the time. It is is worth being in jail for her. Bad as it must be there, she gets some feeling of control being in jail. I think she hates Spindy that much. I have always thought killing Caylee was a spite thing for Skanky, and it was to get back at Spindy as much as it was to rid herself of a burden.

You know Fanny your not the only one I though too that from day one it was a spite issue with Casey..Caylee was a pawn and Casey played her till finally it worked no more and she(Casey) was going to get the last word in on this issue between mother and daughter..I think the rage in Casey blew and poor defenseless Caylee got the brunt of it. 


Casey hated cindy
more than she loved caylee
in the words of her grandmother shirley plasea.

Yep, and she said it well, didn't she?   :smt045






She sho did!  evil begets evil and those that know her know what she is capable of!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 05, 2011, 10:27:37 PM
Quote
<snipped>
"You can pretty well predict there's going to be a life sentence, either a plea and get it over with or have a circus trial and then be convicted and get life," Mason said.


Yes, but if the defense pleas her out, Mason wouldn't have national venue to posture and give his "good ole boy" routine. They are there for the circus and the show. Notoriety and money is what it's all about and I think Skanky doesn't realize yet that she is the goose with her head on the chopping block. Her flirty palsey-walsey actions in court last Monday says to me she is buying the whole dog and pony show. Several times she practically had to bite her cheeks to keep from laughing during the proceedings. She had a serious look on her face a some of time. One was in the discussion about the "Diary of Days." Otherwise, I think her stern looks were more in response to the distain she has for Judge Perry and the DA's. She still thinks she is getting off and she is a star and the center of attention. She lives for this.
Fanny, there is not a remorseful thought in her being.  I don't think there ever has been.  She is the same as always . . . she has just changed her address.

And she gets a respite from Spindy yammering at her all the time. It is is worth being in jail for her. Bad as it must be there, she gets some feeling of control being in jail. I think she hates Spindy that much. I have always thought killing Caylee was a spite thing for Skanky, and it was to get back at Spindy as much as it was to rid herself of a burden.

You know Fanny your not the only one I though too that from day one it was a spite issue with Casey..Caylee was a pawn and Casey played her till finally it worked no more and she(Casey) was going to get the last word in on this issue between mother and daughter..I think the rage in Casey blew and poor defenseless Caylee got the brunt of it. 


Casey hated cindy
more than she loved caylee
in the words of her grandmother shirley plasea.

Yep, and she said it well, didn't she?   :smt045


u bet she called it as she seen it!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Rowanvamp0 on January 05, 2011, 11:05:17 PM
Does anyone have the links for the video of the motion hearing today..I did get my text that said Casey didn't appear..dugghh hate having to play catch up I wanted to see it live.  All in all was it a good day??  Trying to read and play catch up now..

I never saw a link posted for a video for today. I'll go look and see if I can find one. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/bye.gif)

Thanks Fanny I thought I was losing it cause I checked all my links and no video updates either..so I'll just have to do with the screen shots from today..Thanks again so much for everything!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 06, 2011, 12:09:55 AM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::

I know some folks do not ejoy MD.  I don't have an opinion on him, didn't read his site much.  Just posted the link cause of the pics and that is where I found them, but not by directly going to his site, I was googling Joseph Jordan and wound up there. 

I have all his pictures and the location labeled on my other computer. There is NONE on Suburban or anywhere close to there. The closest to Suburban was off Econ Trail but it was miles away. I hate it that they are trying to use JJ like this. That man spent every day he was off for months looking for Caylee. IMO he was one of the most dedicated searchers there was for her.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 06, 2011, 12:11:58 AM
I am assuming that the defense handles their depositions in the same manner they do their motions. Thoughtlessly without preparation.

Probably late and unprepared, can't imagine it any different.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::



Bozo clearly did not do his homework/research before deposing J. Jordan, and now he thinks he's entitled to a do-over. Tough sh!t Bozo! You're a day late and a dollar short. (or 3 dollars in your case)

Bozo is an embarrassment not only to his profession, but to humanity!

He is spending money on these things because they are paid for by the state and he KNOWS there are none on Suburban because he asked that in depositions. This is MORE SMOKE & MIRRORS at taxpayer expense.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 06, 2011, 12:23:09 AM
The defense team is really railing against us no-life bloggers of late. Before you know it SM will be code for Zanny the Nanny.

I think they're jealous because on many sites Bozo and Marblemouth Mason are referred to as idiots. Of course, I would never do such a thing, and while I'm here I would like to thank those monkeys that have attended a hearing or 2 and shared first hand knowledge about how great SA Jeff Ashton smells.

Comparing the cheesehead defense team and SAO is like trying to compare limburger to brie!

I have called all of them idiots and worse at times. Maybe they are talking about me, but I don't think I am alone in my evaluations of their ability to defend a client in a capital case. If they want my opinion in person, I will be more than willing to give it to them and the judge and give them my rendition of all their screw ups in this case. That might take a day or two of court time, but I think the judge would get the drift of my allegations.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 06, 2011, 12:32:45 AM
Baez got schooled again, as usual. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Motion Denied! ::MonkeyGavel::



I like how JP said he would deny it without prejudice in case they could come up with some sort of evidence to prove their motion.  Guess Bobo will be on the blogs looking for that evidence. 

Hey Bobo - you have a bald spot in the back of your head that can be seen  now that you have that spiffy new buzz cut from Discount Haircuts.  Is that a symptom of ugly coping?  LOL (Lots of Luck)

I don't think Bozo bringing in a post off a blog will be considered evidence by this court. Bozo is doing the pooch on this one.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 06, 2011, 12:37:19 AM

I am not God so I don't have to forgive George. It is way, way too late for George. The only way he would ever come over to Caylee's side is to save his own bu*t. He has already done too much damage and doesn't have the character or morals. I know Caylee needs someone in her family standing up for her but her family let her down in life, and they are doing it now after her murder. He will only do what is in his best interest. I gave up on George a long, long time ago. I guess we sad bloggers, media people like Kathi and the prosecution will have to be on Caylee's side. At least we are still here and haven't budged.

I am thinking when trail time comes Cindy's family will be there on Caylee's side. I also believe there might be some from George's family who will be there to represent Caylee's interest. I can understand why they don't want to get involved now, but I am betting that Cindy's family will cross her and be right there for Caylee.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 06, 2011, 12:37:44 AM

I am not God so I don't have to forgive George. It is way, way too late for George. The only way he would ever come over to Caylee's side is to save his own bu*t. He has already done too much damage and doesn't have the character or morals. I know Caylee needs someone in her family standing up for her but her family let her down in life, and they are doing it now after her murder. He will only do what is in his best interest. I gave up on George a long, long time ago. I guess we sad bloggers, media people like Kathi and the prosecution will have to be on Caylee's side. At least we are still here and haven't budged.

I am thinking when trail time comes Cindy's family will be there on Caylee's side. I also believe there might be some from George's family who will be there to represent Caylee's interest. I can understand why they don't want to get involved now, but I am betting that Cindy's family will cross her and be right there for Caylee.

"trial" not trail...........geeshhhhhhhh


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 06, 2011, 12:57:14 AM

here is a youtube of the hearing today for those that could not hear it this afternoon & its well worth a second listen to catch just how much Bozo fumbled:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Magic, feel better!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 06, 2011, 02:38:41 AM
I hate that most motions are denied w/o prejudice.  That allows the idiot to refile motions 50 million times if they wish, wasting taxpayer money yet again.
Zoo, I hear you.  But bozo better be sure what he's talking about (which is impossible imo) or he won't get a smack down from His Honor, he will get a knock down.  bozo should be learning (which he isn't) Judge Perry is wise to his smoke and screen dance.  He wants facts, not fish.

BBM

I choked on that!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 06, 2011, 02:51:19 AM
If I was Cindy I would be at every court appearance whether Casey was there or not..where has George been lately?

Probably hiding under the bed.  ::piggy::

Whose?



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 06:44:04 AM
http://www.bradenton.com/2011/01/06/2854674/judge-rejects-casey-anthonys-request.html
Judge rejects Casey Anthony’s request
Published: Thursday, Jan. 06, 2011
Updated: Thursday, Jan. 06, 2011

By ANTHONY COLAROSSI - The Orlando Sentinel
ORLANDO -- Casey Anthony’s defense attorneys suffered another blow Wednesday when they were denied a subpoena to collect what they suspect are a blogger’s photos of the vacant, wooded area where her daughter’s remains were found in 2008.

Judge Belvin Perry denied a defense motion to subpoena searcher Joe Jordan’s blog and internet photos, finding no factual basis to compel those items that may have appeared online.

Perry was not satisfied they would reveal meaningful “tangible” evidence and he expressed concerns that the defense was going on a “fishing expedition.”

“I cannot give you a license to fish,” Perry said soon before issuing his ruling.

Perry did, however, deny the motion without prejudice, meaning the defense attorneys could revisit the issue if they can make a more compelling argument for the obtaining the information they seek.

Anthony, 24, is charged with first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie, whose body was found in a lot near the Anthony home months after she was reported missing.

The woman faces the death penalty if convicted. Her trial is set to start in May.

The defense motion stated that a Dec. 8, deposition of Jordan, a state witness, showed that he was an online blogger, who visited and blogged on various websites discussing the Casey Anthony case and the search for Caylee Anthony.

Two sites both posted photos taken by Jordan and linked to his personal website, according to the motion.

“Some of the photographs illustrated areas searched that were near or on Suburban Drive,” the motion states. “These photographs are material to the preparation of the defense in this cause.”

In court, defense attorney Jose Baez that these photos are no longer found online, but were out there and public at one time.

“I think this witness has relevant information,” Baez said, noting that Jordan has been involved with the case for some time by communicating with law enforcement and expressing opinions online.

Baez also said today that during the December deposition Jordan indicated that he has searched within 20 or 30 feet of where Caylee’s remains were found.

“He potentially does have evidence that would be useful to the defense,” said Baez, particularly if Jordan holds photos of the immediate areas where he searched.

The defense team has tried to show that the area where Caylee’s remains were found was passable and not under water when searchers scoured the area off Suburban Drive in the summer of 2008, suggesting that the child’s body was placed where it was found at a later time. Showing this would help undermine the prosecution’s case.

The child’s remains were ultimately found in December 2008.

Jordan attorney William McClellan, however, said the defense has made assumptions about Jordan being responsible for the photographs. McClellan said the defense proved “no factual basis” to grant the motion for the subpoena.

“There’s no evidence Mr. Jordan is in possession of any photographs or took any photographs,” McClellan said.

He suggested that the defense efforts to obtain any of his online opinions about the case or other materials amounted to “harassment.”

The defense had wanted “any and all photographs related to this case in Joseph S. Jordan’s possession and the production of all content posted on the worldwide web by Joseph S. Jordan regarding this case.”

Following the hearing, defense attorney Cheney Mason said they are still very much interested in seeing the photos and recognized that Judge Perry left the door open to seek them out later. He is unsure what they will show, but suggested they could be quite helpful to the defense if they show the immediate area
where the remains were found.

“We’re trying to get them to find out what they show,” Mason said. “We don’t know without seeing them.”

In another development, the judge encouraged the prosecution and the defense to discuss timeframes for future depositions of expert witnesses for the defense and the sharing of discovery information about those witnesses.










Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 06:46:59 AM
Does anyone see a link to the video of the hearing today? I am not seeing it. TIA

Shout out to my Klaasend ::dogwag::

Hey Blink.  ::HelloKitty:: Muzikman has it on You Tube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 06:49:43 AM
Marinade Dave has some of the pictures up that Joe Jordan took, which are in dry land, which is probably why the defense wants these, although they are not where caylee was?  I am so confused. 

http://marinadedave.com/journal/2011/1/1/twill-be-a-very-good-year.html

And according to this post, these items/pictures were taken on Yates Road, not where Caylee was found.  Post found at the Marinade Dave site about halfway down in the comments.

I remember these photos so I just did a search.
The sports top and sandal were found, in a wooded area on Yates Road, August 17, 08.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/searchers-find-items-in-woods-police-examining/


Why do I feel that Marinade Dave has once again inserted himself in this case. He has been seen in conversation with CA and Bozo. Talk about a no life blogger. ::MonkeyMad::

I know some folks do not ejoy MD.  I don't have an opinion on him, didn't read his site much.  Just posted the link cause of the pics and that is where I found them, but not by directly going to his site, I was googling Joseph Jordan and wound up there. 

I have all his pictures and the location labeled on my other computer. There is NONE on Suburban or anywhere close to there. The closest to Suburban was off Econ Trail but it was miles away. I hate it that they are trying to use JJ like this. That man spent every day he was off for months looking for Caylee. IMO he was one of the most dedicated searchers there was for her.

OMG, you rock.  I would so love to see your computer.  I could never be so organized.  I know none of those pics were near where Caylee was found and you are right, he just wanted to find that baby. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 06:54:28 AM
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2011/01/06/just-google-it/
Caylee Anthony case: Just Google It!
Posted on January 6, 2011 by JWG




Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 07:00:35 AM
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2011/01/06/just-google-it/
Caylee Anthony case: Just Google It!
Posted on January 6, 2011 by JWG




Just did the google image search like this article says, and one of the links was for Brian's Dreams.  Gosh it has been so long.  What is the dear boy up to lately?  He was so weird, locked the page, unlocked the page, had audio shows for a whlie, opened a forum, OMGosh could not keep track.  He thought Caylee was something to do with Trenton Duckett.  Many is very strange.  Wonder if he still thinks ICA is innocent? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 07:01:53 AM
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2011/01/06/just-google-it/
Caylee Anthony case: Just Google It!
Posted on January 6, 2011 by JWG




Just did the google image search like this article says, and one of the links was for Brian's Dreams.  Gosh it has been so long.  What is the dear boy up to lately?  He was so weird, locked the page, unlocked the page, had audio shows for a whlie, opened a forum, OMGosh could not keep track.  He thought Caylee was something to do with Trenton Duckett.  Many is very strange.  Wonder if he still thinks ICA is innocent? 

How come we cannot edit our posts for typos...Many should be man. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 08:20:10 AM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/01/casey-anthonys-defese-team-loses-bid.html
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Casey Anthony's Defese Team Loses Bid For Pictures





Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 09:00:57 AM
So, I decided to read about a few other cases for a while since few people are posting on Caylee's forum so early, and wound up in Morgan Harrington's thread.  I had no idea what 241 meant so goggled that.  I know the basics of her case, do not follow it nearly as closely as Caylee's case.  Let me just say that I am so emotional today for some reason, tears coming to my eyes.  I found the family blog and both dad and mom are such gifted writers.  I feel their pain. 

This is how a lost family member's family acts when their loved one is murdered.  This is how Caylee's family should be acting for Caylee.  Granted, nobody in the family is being tried for her murder, but in all the rumors and innuendo about their daughter, they have stayed strong and have been her voice. 

What an example of how a family is supposed to work.  So sorry that Caylee did not have that.  Thank God for the people who never knew you who are speaking for you. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 09:22:27 AM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/01/casey-anthonys-defese-team-loses-bid.html
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Casey Anthony's Defese Team Loses Bid For Pictures





At this link, it says this:  Judge Perry asked if Casey's appearance had been waived.

How would Casey's appearance have been waived, unless he had approved her waiving it? 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 09:48:08 AM
Does anyone see a link to the video of the hearing today? I am not seeing it. TIA

Shout out to my Klaasend ::dogwag::

Hey Blink.  ::HelloKitty:: Muzikman has it on You Tube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Wow, Bozo said Caylee's name.  I am marking this date on my calendar.  Amazing.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 09:50:05 AM
Who calls the web the "world wide web" but putz? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 09:55:55 AM
JP, "some thing that is called probable cause" "in order to invade that citizen's space."

Classic.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 10:08:16 AM
Bayeez turned down for 30, so he asked for 20.  What a putz.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 10:11:41 AM
I think the reason Bozo is having such difficulty providing reoprts from experts, is they are all coming to the same conclusion as the state did, his client killed Caylee. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 06, 2011, 10:20:49 AM

here is a youtube of the hearing today for those that could not hear it this afternoon & its well worth a second listen to catch just how much Bozo fumbled:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Magic, feel better!



Thanks, Capp.
Will watch as soon as I get home from work.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 10:22:26 AM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-48-hours-mystery-repeats-on-investigation-discovery.html
Casey Anthony: ‘48 Hours Mystery’ repeats on Investigation Discovery
48 Hours Mystery, CBS, Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony — posted by halboedeker on January, 6 2011 8:44 AM
Discuss This: Comments(7) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

The show may sound familiar. “The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony” will air at 9 p.m. Sunday on the channel Investigation Discovery.

The show airs under the banner “48 Hours on ID” because it’s the same show that CBS’ “48 Hours Mystery” presented. Maggie Rodriguez reported the hour, which aired on CBS in October 2009.

Here’s a synopsis from Investigation Discovery: “In July of 2008 Cindy and George Anthony discover that their two-year old granddaughter Caylee is missing. Once her body is found five months later, investigators zero in on their prime suspect: the couple’s daughter and Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony.”

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her child’s death in 2008.

“Somebody else is the killer of this child,” defense attorney Linda Kenney Baden told Rodriguez.

The interview with defense lawyers Kenney Baden, Todd Macaluso and José Baez was the main headline when the program originally aired. But Kenney Baden and Macaluso are no longer part of the case.

The program features interviews with George and Cindy Anthony; Jesse Grund, Casey’s former fiancé; and Zenaida Gonzalez, who is suing Casey for defamation.

The “48 Hours Mystery” also revealed that the Anthonys had turned their Orange County home into a shrine to Caylee and that they kept the child’s death certificate out in the open. Cindy says: “It wasn’t Casey’s child. It was our child. She belonged to all of us.”


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 06, 2011, 10:27:43 AM
I hate that most motions are denied w/o prejudice.  That allows the idiot to refile motions 50 million times if they wish, wasting taxpayer money yet again.
Zoo, I hear you.  But bozo better be sure what he's talking about (which is impossible imo) or he won't get a smack down from His Honor, he will get a knock down.  bozo should be learning (which he isn't) Judge Perry is wise to his smoke and screen dance.  He wants facts, not fish.

BBM

I choked on that!

:fish: :fish: :fish: :fish: :fish: :fish: :fish: :fish: :nemo: :nemo: :nemo: :nemo: :nemo: :smt046


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 06, 2011, 10:29:28 AM
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2011/01/06/just-google-it/
Caylee Anthony case: Just Google It!
Posted on January 6, 2011 by JWG




Just did the google image search like this article says, and one of the links was for Brian's Dreams.  Gosh it has been so long.  What is the dear boy up to lately?  He was so weird, locked the page, unlocked the page, had audio shows for a whlie, opened a forum, OMGosh could not keep track.  He thought Caylee was something to do with Trenton Duckett.  Many is very strange.  Wonder if he still thinks ICA is innocent? 

How come we cannot edit our posts for typos
...Many should be man. 

(Bolded by me)
Zoo, we no longer have the edit feature here at Scared Monkeys, so it's best to be careful when you post and also posters can use the "preview" button before  hitting "post".  Don't worry about spelling and typos.  Mods will help with a problem post if it's something wrong that may give misinformation (like a trial date or link) and etc., but for the most part, mods don't have time to edit for spelling and typos and such. So, post away and don't worry so much about the typos.   ::bananadance:: ::bananadance::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 06, 2011, 10:33:26 AM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-48-hours-mystery-repeats-on-investigation-discovery.html
Casey Anthony: ‘48 Hours Mystery’ repeats on Investigation Discovery
48 Hours Mystery, CBS, Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony — posted by halboedeker on January, 6 2011 8:44 AM
Discuss This: Comments(7) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

The show may sound familiar. “The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony” will air at 9 p.m. Sunday on the channel Investigation Discovery.

The show airs under the banner “48 Hours on ID” because it’s the same show that CBS’ “48 Hours Mystery” presented. Maggie Rodriguez reported the hour, which aired on CBS in October 2009.

Here’s a synopsis from Investigation Discovery: “In July of 2008 Cindy and George Anthony discover that their two-year old granddaughter Caylee is missing. Once her body is found five months later, investigators zero in on their prime suspect: the couple’s daughter and Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony.”

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her child’s death in 2008.

“Somebody else is the killer of this child,” defense attorney Linda Kenney Baden told Rodriguez.

The interview with defense lawyers Kenney Baden, Todd Macaluso and José Baez was the main headline when the program originally aired. But Kenney Baden and Macaluso are no longer part of the case.

The program features interviews with George and Cindy Anthony; Jesse Grund, Casey’s former fiancé; and Zenaida Gonzalez, who is suing Casey for defamation.

The “48 Hours Mystery” also revealed that the Anthonys had turned their Orange County home into a shrine to Caylee and that they kept the child’s death certificate out in the open. Cindy says: “It wasn’t Casey’s child. It was our child. She belonged to all of us.”
::MonkeyMad::
I hope that it is updated with the facts by the host of the show, preferably in the beginning but I'll settle for at the end of the segment. I really can't believe they are airing it again as so much has changed....LKB and TM's statements were down right lies then, they're gone now, so should be their statements. 

Do G & C get royalties from this?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 10:56:59 AM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-48-hours-mystery-repeats-on-investigation-discovery.html
Casey Anthony: ‘48 Hours Mystery’ repeats on Investigation Discovery
48 Hours Mystery, CBS, Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony — posted by halboedeker on January, 6 2011 8:44 AM
Discuss This: Comments(7) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

The show may sound familiar. “The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony” will air at 9 p.m. Sunday on the channel Investigation Discovery.

The show airs under the banner “48 Hours on ID” because it’s the same show that CBS’ “48 Hours Mystery” presented. Maggie Rodriguez reported the hour, which aired on CBS in October 2009.

Here’s a synopsis from Investigation Discovery: “In July of 2008 Cindy and George Anthony discover that their two-year old granddaughter Caylee is missing. Once her body is found five months later, investigators zero in on their prime suspect: the couple’s daughter and Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony.”

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her child’s death in 2008.

“Somebody else is the killer of this child,” defense attorney Linda Kenney Baden told Rodriguez.

The interview with defense lawyers Kenney Baden, Todd Macaluso and José Baez was the main headline when the program originally aired. But Kenney Baden and Macaluso are no longer part of the case.

The program features interviews with George and Cindy Anthony; Jesse Grund, Casey’s former fiancé; and Zenaida Gonzalez, who is suing Casey for defamation.

The “48 Hours Mystery” also revealed that the Anthonys had turned their Orange County home into a shrine to Caylee and that they kept the child’s death certificate out in the open. Cindy says: “It wasn’t Casey’s child. It was our child. She belonged to all of us.”
::MonkeyMad::
I hope that it is updated with the facts by the host of the show, preferably in the beginning but I'll settle for at the end of the segment. I really can't believe they are airing it again as so much has changed....LKB and TM's statements were down right lies then, they're gone now, so should be their statements. 

Do G & C get royalties from this?

They probably do and I have a feeling Bald Dude Jim helped set that up.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 06, 2011, 11:01:53 AM
Okay, I've been thinkin'...(dangerous habit at best of times,)  I reread the DCF report on Casey and company...At one point, she says that LE never showed her the right photo of Zanny...I've never seen reported that anyone ever asked her if SHE had a photo of Zenaida.
The only mention was the bogus one that someone out of town had that was of Zanny, Caylee and I can't remember, Casey, too?  Why doesn't, didn't anyone ask this?  I know we all speculated with all the pics Casey took, and her "photographic expertise," that this was a gaping hole in her story, (I want to say something snarky about Casey and a gaping... but I'm too much of a lady, right?)  but why, when Cindy was whining that they never showed Casey a picture of the Nanny, did not someone ask, "Well, okay, where's the pics of Zanny, we can clear this up right now."  Did this happen and I missed it completely?  I'd love to see Linda D-B, or John A. have a stack of photos at trial, and ask, if not Casey, (most likely not going to testify, but I'd give a lot to see her on the stand,)  or Cindy, "All these pictures, some sold to pay for Casey's defense and disseminated to the Media, but none of the Nanny, which could have solved everything...LE could have put out an all-[points bulletin and someone would have turned her in."  I just would love to see them squirm out of that.  (It would take some creative fiction writing to do it.)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 06, 2011, 11:02:42 AM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-48-hours-mystery-repeats-on-investigation-discovery.html
Casey Anthony: ‘48 Hours Mystery’ repeats on Investigation Discovery
48 Hours Mystery, CBS, Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony — posted by halboedeker on January, 6 2011 8:44 AM
Discuss This: Comments(7) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

The show may sound familiar. “The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony” will air at 9 p.m. Sunday on the channel Investigation Discovery.

The show airs under the banner “48 Hours on ID” because it’s the same show that CBS’ “48 Hours Mystery” presented. Maggie Rodriguez reported the hour, which aired on CBS in October 2009.

Here’s a synopsis from Investigation Discovery: “In July of 2008 Cindy and George Anthony discover that their two-year old granddaughter Caylee is missing. Once her body is found five months later, investigators zero in on their prime suspect: the couple’s daughter and Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony.”

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her child’s death in 2008.

“Somebody else is the killer of this child,” defense attorney Linda Kenney Baden told Rodriguez.

The interview with defense lawyers Kenney Baden, Todd Macaluso and José Baez was the main headline when the program originally aired. But Kenney Baden and Macaluso are no longer part of the case.

The program features interviews with George and Cindy Anthony; Jesse Grund, Casey’s former fiancé; and Zenaida Gonzalez, who is suing Casey for defamation.

The “48 Hours Mystery” also revealed that the Anthonys had turned their Orange County home into a shrine to Caylee and that they kept the child’s death certificate out in the open. Cindy says: “It wasn’t Casey’s child. It was our child. She belonged to all of us.”
::MonkeyMad::
I hope that it is updated with the facts by the host of the show, preferably in the beginning but I'll settle for at the end of the segment. I really can't believe they are airing it again as so much has changed....LKB and TM's statements were down right lies then, they're gone now, so should be their statements. 

Do G & C get royalties from this?

They probably do and I have a feeling Bald Dude Jim helped set that up.
::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Blink34 on January 06, 2011, 11:04:46 AM
Does anyone see a link to the video of the hearing today? I am not seeing it. TIA

Shout out to my Klaasend ::dogwag::

Hey Blink.  ::HelloKitty:: Muzikman has it on You Tube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Thank You, I should have just asked him lol. (laugh out loud, not potluck or whatever)

I appreciate it!
B


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Blink34 on January 06, 2011, 11:11:30 AM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-48-hours-mystery-repeats-on-investigation-discovery.html
Casey Anthony: ‘48 Hours Mystery’ repeats on Investigation Discovery
48 Hours Mystery, CBS, Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony — posted by halboedeker on January, 6 2011 8:44 AM
Discuss This: Comments(7) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

The show may sound familiar. “The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony” will air at 9 p.m. Sunday on the channel Investigation Discovery.

The show airs under the banner “48 Hours on ID” because it’s the same show that CBS’ “48 Hours Mystery” presented. Maggie Rodriguez reported the hour, which aired on CBS in October 2009.

Here’s a synopsis from Investigation Discovery: “In July of 2008 Cindy and George Anthony discover that their two-year old granddaughter Caylee is missing. Once her body is found five months later, investigators zero in on their prime suspect: the couple’s daughter and Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony.”

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her child’s death in 2008.

“Somebody else is the killer of this child,” defense attorney Linda Kenney Baden told Rodriguez.

The interview with defense lawyers Kenney Baden, Todd Macaluso and José Baez was the main headline when the program originally aired. But Kenney Baden and Macaluso are no longer part of the case.

The program features interviews with George and Cindy Anthony; Jesse Grund, Casey’s former fiancé; and Zenaida Gonzalez, who is suing Casey for defamation.

The “48 Hours Mystery” also revealed that the Anthonys had turned their Orange County home into a shrine to Caylee and that they kept the child’s death certificate out in the open. Cindy says: “It wasn’t Casey’s child. It was our child. She belonged to all of us.”
::MonkeyMad::
I hope that it is updated with the facts by the host of the show, preferably in the beginning but I'll settle for at the end of the segment. I really can't believe they are airing it again as so much has changed....LKB and TM's statements were down right lies then, they're gone now, so should be their statements. 

Do G & C get royalties from this?

Not to pee in anyone's Cheerios this morning, but whoever got paid from the airing of that episode, likely gets paid everytime it airs.  The contracts have never been made public, but that is fairly standard in the limited use and royalty clauses for imaging rights.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 06, 2011, 11:23:27 AM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-48-hours-mystery-repeats-on-investigation-discovery.html
Casey Anthony: ‘48 Hours Mystery’ repeats on Investigation Discovery
48 Hours Mystery, CBS, Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony — posted by halboedeker on January, 6 2011 8:44 AM
Discuss This: Comments(7) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

The show may sound familiar. “The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony” will air at 9 p.m. Sunday on the channel Investigation Discovery.

The show airs under the banner “48 Hours on ID” because it’s the same show that CBS’ “48 Hours Mystery” presented. Maggie Rodriguez reported the hour, which aired on CBS in October 2009.

Here’s a synopsis from Investigation Discovery: “In July of 2008 Cindy and George Anthony discover that their two-year old granddaughter Caylee is missing. Once her body is found five months later, investigators zero in on their prime suspect: the couple’s daughter and Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony.”

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her child’s death in 2008.

“Somebody else is the killer of this child,” defense attorney Linda Kenney Baden told Rodriguez.

The interview with defense lawyers Kenney Baden, Todd Macaluso and José Baez was the main headline when the program originally aired. But Kenney Baden and Macaluso are no longer part of the case.

The program features interviews with George and Cindy Anthony; Jesse Grund, Casey’s former fiancé; and Zenaida Gonzalez, who is suing Casey for defamation.

The “48 Hours Mystery” also revealed that the Anthonys had turned their Orange County home into a shrine to Caylee and that they kept the child’s death certificate out in the open. Cindy says: “It wasn’t Casey’s child. It was our child. She belonged to all of us.”
::MonkeyMad::
I hope that it is updated with the facts by the host of the show, preferably in the beginning but I'll settle for at the end of the segment. I really can't believe they are airing it again as so much has changed....LKB and TM's statements were down right lies then, they're gone now, so should be their statements. 

Do G & C get royalties from this?

Not to pee in anyone's Cheerios this morning, but whoever got paid from the airing of that episode, likely gets paid everytime it airs.  The contracts have never been made public, but that is fairly standard in the limited use and royalty clauses for imaging rights.

I guess Spindy has got to buy a new wardrobe for her daily appearances at court this spring/summer. Buy some bras, Spindy! (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/YAPYAP-1.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 11:53:53 AM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 06, 2011, 11:55:26 AM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::
Tons o' Fun, Shannondeep.  Welcome to Scared Monkeys! ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 06, 2011, 12:03:53 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

Welcome SHANNONDEEP. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/smiley-welcome-wagon.gif)

It was really fun, wasn't it. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/ATT12MA15662745-0018.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 06, 2011, 12:24:16 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

Hi shannondeep :smt006

(http://bestsmileys.com/welcome/4.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 06, 2011, 12:38:00 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::
Hi!   ::HelloKitty::  Welcome!

Yes, it was fun, I was almost giddy, well, I was giddy!  The family was just looking at me like I had lost my mind as I was dancing around, laughing and snickering. It was great!

I believe we will see more of the same from here on out.....Baez can't take a hint.....or a flat out smack upside the head either!

I bet BLINK is correct about JL setting up the repeat BS 48 Hours episode. Now if we only knew who is the one getting the royalties, Baez or Cindy.  I just remembered Baez walking out of court with Cindy on Monday.  When was the last time that happened?  Did Baez ask her to get the movie ball rolling or was he telling her he had?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 06, 2011, 12:41:55 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::
Hi!   ::HelloKitty::  Welcome!

Yes, it was fun, I was almost giddy, well, I was giddy!  The family was just looking at me like I had lost my mind as I was dancing around, laughing and snickering. It was great!

I believe we will see more of the same from here on out.....Baez can't take a hint.....or a flat out smack upside the head either!

I bet BLINK is correct about JL setting up the repeat BS 48 Hours episode. Now if we only knew who is the one getting the royalties, Baez or Cindy.  I just remembered Baez walking out of court with Cindy on Monday.  When was the last time that happened?  Did Baez ask her to get the movie ball rolling or was he telling her he had?

They are both so greedy it is a toss up which it would be. However, Spindy and George were interviewed, and I'll bet it wasn't for free.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 06, 2011, 12:43:25 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::
Hi!   ::HelloKitty::  Welcome!

Yes, it was fun, I was almost giddy, well, I was giddy!  The family was just looking at me like I had lost my mind as I was dancing around, laughing and snickering. It was great!

I believe we will see more of the same from here on out.....Baez can't take a hint.....or a flat out smack upside the head either!

I bet BLINK is correct about JL setting up the repeat BS 48 Hours episode. Now if we only knew who is the one getting the royalties, Baez or Cindy.  I just remembered Baez walking out of court with Cindy on Monday.  When was the last time that happened?  Did Baez ask her to get the movie ball rolling or was he telling her he had?

They are both so greedy it is a toss up which it would be. However, Spindy and George were interviewed, and I'll bet it wasn't for free.

Oops! Bozo was interviewed too. They probably all have their hands in the pot.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Magic Eyes on January 06, 2011, 12:45:31 PM

here is a youtube of the hearing today for those that could not hear it this afternoon & its well worth a second listen to catch just how much Bozo fumbled:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Magic, feel better!



Dear Cappy,

Thank you so much for the link, I was able to see it last night before I went to bed.  I don't know why it bothered me so much that I had missed a hearing but it was the first I had missed and I felt awful about it.  I am so emotionally attached to Caylee and this case.  I feel so blessed to have first met you on the first forum, I had ever gone to.  I clicked on a link about this crazy grandmother, I had not seen but only heard on the TV talking about a dead body in the damn car.  I clicked on the story and it took me to a Comcast.com story about Caylee being missing and then to the Comcast Forum.  There you were Cappy and I was so overwhelmed with how well you wrote and how much you added to the conversation.  How lucky I am to have found you again here.  My next forum was a crazy nonsense place, with too many crazies in with normal, caring people. I am also glad that a few of those people....Fannie, Searching and more that I can't seem to remember at the moment are here at Scared Monkeys too. 

I was so happy to see the hearing for myself, although Brandi with her screen caps and the rest of the monkeys with their postings made me feel somewhat better.  It was the first time I had not *been in* the courtroom for Caylee.  I loved seeing Bozo fumble about as if he had just done his homework before class, remember that feeling?  Knowing that you aren't really prepared but going to class anyway, hoping that you won't be called on to join the discussion, because you haven't really a clue what the discussion is going to be about.  Bozo is fighting for someone's life, albeit an evil, hateful, imo murdering mother. He should not only have done his homework, he should of been checking and rechecking it as if every day was going to be a final test.  I am so proud of Judge Perry to have seen through this *fishing expedition* and cut his bait.  I remember when Joe Jordan was a monkey, he seemed somewhat self-important but I had admired his continued searching...in those days, I just wanted Caylee's lil body found.  When I read the email he sent to the LE, I was so dissapointed, I knew it couldn't be true, that precious body had been dumped and never, ever moved from that horrid swamp.  I am sure that Joe Jordan, now wishes that he never sent that email, without that, he is just like every other blogger who went searching and had a blog or posted photos of something in the case.  Joe has learned his lesson, I hope he just tells the truth now to both the defense and the state and everyone will know he adds nothing to the case, other than he was one of many, many searchers who never found Caylee's body.  The defense had already tried to hoodwink him as they have done many of the people who have inserted them into this case, he unlike Joy Wray and Dave Marinade and Laura Buchanon was too honest to take the bait and contacted LE, to tell the truth.  I don't think he or any other searcher were ever very close to Caylee's body.  It was underwater in a swamp, during the searching.  Although Kronk may have seen something of interest at different times, I don't believe he actually was at Caylee's body until the day he called about finding the skull.  It is unfortunate that the hero who found the body is under so much scrutiny but most of that has come from others than LE and that is good enough for me.  It is crazy to me for anyone to think that Kronk could of been involved in this case in any other way than finding her precious body.  Every single thing has pointed at one person from the very beginning, her own, evil, lying mother.  I just hope the jury is able to see enough evidence to understand without a doubt that Casey Marie Anthony killed her baby, not only without a reasonable doubt but with no doubt at all.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 12:48:52 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::
  When was the last time that happened?  Did Baez ask her to get the movie ball rolling or was he telling her he had?

Thanks for the warm welcome everyone! 

Exactly!  She is suddenly acting like his BFF when she has openly hated him for 2 years.  Not only did she wait for him yesterday and leave with her hand on his back but she did the same thing at the hearing a couple of weeks ago.  She waited and was all touching him all over his back and whispering in his ear. 

I was like......HUH????? 

You might be on to something.  We all know that Cindy is very motivated buy press, control, and blood money.  Gross.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 12:49:03 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

 ::MonkeyDance::  WELCOME shannondeep   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 06, 2011, 12:49:27 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::
Hi!   ::HelloKitty::  Welcome!

Yes, it was fun, I was almost giddy, well, I was giddy!  The family was just looking at me like I had lost my mind as I was dancing around, laughing and snickering. It was great!

I believe we will see more of the same from here on out.....Baez can't take a hint.....or a flat out smack upside the head either!

I bet BLINK is correct about JL setting up the repeat BS 48 Hours episode. Now if we only knew who is the one getting the royalties, Baez or Cindy.  I just remembered Baez walking out of court with Cindy on Monday.  When was the last time that happened?  Did Baez ask her to get the movie ball rolling or was he telling her he had?

They are both so greedy it is a toss up which it would be. However, Spindy and George were interviewed, and I'll bet it wasn't for free.
I doubt it either, not after hearing River's account of George yelling at Cindy for not getting the money first....top priority, ya know.   ::MonkeyMad::   But who knows which "performance" River was referring to, there were so many.  It really is hard to call who this belongs to, but I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the 2 parties have an "agreement" to split proceeds.....neither one of them is going to let the other get more than his/her share.  JMOO


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Magic Eyes on January 06, 2011, 01:01:06 PM

here is a youtube of the hearing today for those that could not hear it this afternoon & its well worth a second listen to catch just how much Bozo fumbled:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Magic, feel better!



Dear Cappy,

Thank you so much for the link, I was able to see it last night before I went to bed.  I don't know why it bothered me so much that I had missed a hearing but it was the first I had missed and I felt awful about it.  I am so emotionally attached to Caylee and this case.  I feel so blessed to have first met you on the first forum, I had ever gone to.  I clicked on a link about this crazy grandmother, I had not seen but only heard on the TV talking about a dead body in the damn car.  I clicked on the story and it took me to a Comcast.com story about Caylee being missing and then to the Comcast Forum.  There you were Cappy and I was so overwhelmed with how well you wrote and how much you added to the conversation.  How lucky I am to have found you again here.  My next forum was a crazy nonsense place, with too many crazies in with normal, caring people. I am also glad that a few of those people....Fanny, Searching and more that I can't seem to remember at the moment are here at Scared Monkeys too. 

I was so happy to see the hearing for myself, although Brandi with her screen caps and the rest of the monkeys with their postings made me feel somewhat better.  It was the first time I had not *been in* the courtroom for Caylee.  I loved seeing Bozo fumble about as if he had just done his homework before class, remember that feeling?  Knowing that you aren't really prepared but going to class anyway, hoping that you won't be called on to join the discussion, because you haven't really a clue what the discussion is going to be about.  Bozo is fighting for someone's life, albeit an evil, hateful, imo murdering mother. He should not only have done his homework, he should of been checking and rechecking it as if every day was going to be a final test.  I am so proud of Judge Perry to have seen through this *fishing expedition* and cut his bait.  I remember when Joe Jordan was a monkey, he seemed somewhat self-important but I had admired his continued searching...in those days, I just wanted Caylee's lil body found.  When I read the email he sent to the LE, I was so dissapointed, I knew it couldn't be true, that precious body had been dumped and never, ever moved from that horrid swamp.  I am sure that Joe Jordan, now wishes that he never sent that email, without that, he is just like every other blogger who went searching and had a blog or posted photos of something in the case.  Joe has learned his lesson, I hope he just tells the truth now to both the defense and the state and everyone will know he adds nothing to the case, other than he was one of many, many searchers who never found Caylee's body.  The defense had already tried to hoodwink him as they have done many of the people who have inserted them into this case, he unlike Joy Wray and Dave Marinade and Laura Buchanon was too honest to take the bait and contacted LE, to tell the truth.  I don't think he or any other searcher were ever very close to Caylee's body.  It was underwater in a swamp, during the searching.  Although Kronk may have seen something of interest at different times, I don't believe he actually was at Caylee's body until the day he called about finding the skull.  It is unfortunate that the hero who found the body is under so much scrutiny but most of that has come from others than LE and that is good enough for me.  It is crazy to me for anyone to think that Kronk could of been involved in this case in any other way than finding her precious body.  Every single thing has pointed at one person from the very beginning, her own, evil, lying mother.  I just hope the jury is able to see enough evidence to understand without a doubt that Casey Marie Anthony killed her baby, not only without a reasonable doubt but with no doubt at all.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060

Oops, edited to fix Fanny's name.  For some reason that is how I *see* your name spelled.  It must have to do with the spelling of Fannie Mae's in the financial world.  Sorry about that Fanny, silly me, I see your name day after day.

Hugs, Magic :smt060


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 01:08:40 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 06, 2011, 01:12:28 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26389939/detail.html

Casey Judge Fines Baez, Sets Timeline

State: Defense Didn't Comply With Court Order

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Judge Belvin Perry officially granted the prosecution's request for sanctions on Thursday, setting forth both a fine and a time line for the defense in the case against Casey Anthony.
At a hearing on Monday, Perry said the defense had committed a willful violation of a court order by not submitting proper documentation of the subject matter of what its experts would testify to when the murder trial begins in May.
 READ: Judge Perry's Order   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26389960/detail.html
Prosecutor Jeff Ashton suggested that Jose Baez be sanctioned with civil contempt and be fined $500 per day for not complying with the court.
Perry said on Monday he would sanction the defense and set a timeline for the submission of the experts' reports.

In Thursday's order, Perry fined the defense $583.73. That cost was the state's estimate of costs for filing the motion that asked for sanctions. Baez has 5 days to contest the amount.
The defense now has 10 days to submit the report from one of its expert witnesses, Dr. Kenneth Furton, and 20 days for the remaining experts.
Perry said that all opinions not expressed in the written reports will not be allowed at the trial


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 01:13:29 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Oh I believe that Cindy is that horrible. And then some.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 06, 2011, 01:14:28 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

shannondeep
:

(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Welcome/Image98.png)

I think there will be more smack downs to follow!

Nice to have you join us.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 01:19:43 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

shannondeep
:

(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Welcome/Image98.png)

I think there will be more smack downs to follow!

Nice to have you join us.

Thank you so much.  All of you.

Baez got a glimpse at what trial will be like this week and it ain't pretty!  He pushed too far for too long.  It is crystal clear that Judge Perry has no respect or tolerance left for him.  Bet he is kicking himself for having Strickland recuse himself. I loved Strickland, but  Perry is no joke, and is exactly the type of ringmaster needed to reign in the clowns in this circus. 

I was watching old video of case evidence recently and noticed ( I think) that Judge Perry was the presiding judge with the grand jury during Casey's Indictment. I never knew that until recently. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 01:25:23 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Oh I believe that Cindy is that horrible. And then some.

Welcome ShannonDeep.  I too think she is that horrible, but after all this time, I had hoped she was getting a conscience.  Guess not. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 01:27:02 PM
Thanks Tupelo!   ::HelloKitty::

Welcome shannondeep. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 01:27:47 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

shannondeep
:

(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/Welcome/Image98.png)

I think there will be more smack downs to follow!

Nice to have you join us.

Thank you so much.  All of you.

Baez got a glimpse at what trial will be like this week and it ain't pretty!  He pushed too far for too long.  It is crystal clear that Judge Perry has no respect or tolerance left for him.  Bet he is kicking himself for having Strickland recuse himself. I loved Strickland, but  Perry is no joke, and is exactly the type of ringmaster needed to reign in the clowns in this circus. 

I was watching old video of case evidence recently and noticed ( I think) that Judge Perry was the presiding judge with the grand jury during Casey's Indictment. I never knew that until recently. 

I would so love to be a fly on the wall of Judge Perry's home, where he probably speaks about his day to his wife (does he have a wife) and I bet the subject of Bozo comes up frequently.  Now, I know they are not supposed to talk to people about cases, but surely they do with their wives away from media, etc. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 01:30:54 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Oh I believe that Cindy is that horrible. And then some.

Welcome ShannonDeep.  I too think she is that horrible, but after all this time, I had hoped she was getting a conscience.  Guess not. 
Thank you!

I lost any and all hope (I never really had any lol!) when she sat on the stand recently and stated under oath that she believed Caylee was still alive.  I have no words for that.  I'm still not understanding whose ashes she is wearing and who she thinks she "memorialized" 2009. 

Unless Spindy is trying to pretend that she is "crazy" to get more disability money and to get out of testifying at Casey's trial.  Sometimes I think that is exactly what she is doing. 

Unfortunately for Cindy her frantic voice is forever memorialized in her 911 call where she stated it smelled like a dead body in the car.  Thank God that the one truthful thing Cindy has ever said is on public record along with all of her backtracking and lies.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 01:33:31 PM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/191050/Casey-Anthonys-attorney-Jose-Baez-ordered-to-pay-583
Casey Anthony's attorney Jose Baez ordered to pay $583
By Jacqueline Fell, Reporter
Last Updated: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:18 PM
ORLANDO --

Casey Anthony’s attorney Jose Baez has been ordered to pay hundreds out of his own pocket.

Thursday, Judge Belvin Perry ordered Baez to pay a $583.73 fee to the State Attorney’s Office.

The amount is assessed costs incurred by the state to bring a motion to sanction and compel.

Last week Judge Perry sanctioned Baez for not following courts orders.

In December, the state filed a motion asking for more information on the defense’s expert witnesses. The state didn’t think the defense gave enough information, so it filed a motion for sanctions.

Chief Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton asked that the defense be held in civil contempt of court and face fines of up to $500 a day until they handed over the information.

Last week, Judge Perry said Baez “committed a willful violation of the order to provide additional discovery regarding expert witnesses.”

On top of the $583 fine, the defense was ordered to provide written reports to the state from all expert witnesses, a complete statement of opinions the expert will express at trial, and any other information used for that witness to form their opinion.

The defense was given specific due dates for each expert.
If the defense leaves something out in the report, the judge will not let that expert express testify to it once the case heads to trial.

The judge said he will not let this be a “trial by ambush” or a “trial by surprise.”


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 06, 2011, 01:34:10 PM

here is a youtube of the hearing today for those that could not hear it this afternoon & its well worth a second listen to catch just how much Bozo fumbled:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Magic, feel better!



Dear Cappy,

Thank you so much for the link, I was able to see it last night before I went to bed.  I don't know why it bothered me so much that I had missed a hearing but it was the first I had missed and I felt awful about it.  I am so emotionally attached to Caylee and this case.  I feel so blessed to have first met you on the first forum, I had ever gone to.  I clicked on a link about this crazy grandmother, I had not seen but only heard on the TV talking about a dead body in the damn car.  I clicked on the story and it took me to a Comcast.com story about Caylee being missing and then to the Comcast Forum.  There you were Cappy and I was so overwhelmed with how well you wrote and how much you added to the conversation.  How lucky I am to have found you again here.  My next forum was a crazy nonsense place, with too many crazies in with normal, caring people. I am also glad that a few of those people....Fanny, Searching and more that I can't seem to remember at the moment are here at Scared Monkeys too. 

I was so happy to see the hearing for myself, although Brandi with her screen caps and the rest of the monkeys with their postings made me feel somewhat better.  It was the first time I had not *been in* the courtroom for Caylee.  I loved seeing Bozo fumble about as if he had just done his homework before class, remember that feeling?  Knowing that you aren't really prepared but going to class anyway, hoping that you won't be called on to join the discussion, because you haven't really a clue what the discussion is going to be about.  Bozo is fighting for someone's life, albeit an evil, hateful, imo murdering mother. He should not only have done his homework, he should of been checking and rechecking it as if every day was going to be a final test.  I am so proud of Judge Perry to have seen through this *fishing expedition* and cut his bait.  I remember when Joe Jordan was a monkey, he seemed somewhat self-important but I had admired his continued searching...in those days, I just wanted Caylee's lil body found.  When I read the email he sent to the LE, I was so dissapointed, I knew it couldn't be true, that precious body had been dumped and never, ever moved from that horrid swamp.  I am sure that Joe Jordan, now wishes that he never sent that email, without that, he is just like every other blogger who went searching and had a blog or posted photos of something in the case.  Joe has learned his lesson, I hope he just tells the truth now to both the defense and the state and everyone will know he adds nothing to the case, other than he was one of many, many searchers who never found Caylee's body.  The defense had already tried to hoodwink him as they have done many of the people who have inserted them into this case, he unlike Joy Wray and Dave Marinade and Laura Buchanon was too honest to take the bait and contacted LE, to tell the truth.  I don't think he or any other searcher were ever very close to Caylee's body.  It was underwater in a swamp, during the searching.  Although Kronk may have seen something of interest at different times, I don't believe he actually was at Caylee's body until the day he called about finding the skull.  It is unfortunate that the hero who found the body is under so much scrutiny but most of that has come from others than LE and that is good enough for me.  It is crazy to me for anyone to think that Kronk could of been involved in this case in any other way than finding her precious body.  Every single thing has pointed at one person from the very beginning, her own, evil, lying mother.  I just hope the jury is able to see enough evidence to understand without a doubt that Casey Marie Anthony killed her baby, not only without a reasonable doubt but with no doubt at all.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060

Oops, edited to fix Fanny's name.  For some reason that is how I *see* your name spelled.  It must have to do with the spelling of Fannie Mae's in the financial world.  Sorry about that Fanny, silly me, I see your name day after day.

Hugs, Magic :smt060

Oh MAGIC, thank you so much for missing me. I am so happy to be back. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/computer2.gif)

You are so right. CAPP and BRANDI do add so much to the thread.  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/SharonBlinX_012307-1-SMILE.gif)

Caylee grabbed my heart too. I know we are not the only ones. It has been a long haul, and will be, but I have no doubt we will hang in there to the end, if it ever comes.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 01:34:25 PM
OT, AND I DID NOT EVEN KNOW THIS WAS IN THE COURTS RIGHT NOW, BUT HOWARD K STERN WAS SET FREE.  JUDGE THREW OUT JURY'S VERDICT. 

http://www.tmz.com/2011/01/06/howard-k-stern-walks-in-anna-nicole-smith-judge-jerry-brown/2/#comments-anchor


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 01:37:45 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Oh I believe that Cindy is that horrible. And then some.

Welcome ShannonDeep.  I too think she is that horrible, but after all this time, I had hoped she was getting a conscience.  Guess not. 
Thank you!

I lost any and all hope (I never really had any lol!) when she sat on the stand recently and stated under oath that she believed Caylee was still alive.  I have no words for that.  I'm still not understanding whose ashes she is wearing and who she thinks she "memorialized" 2009. 

Unless Spindy is trying to pretend that she is "crazy" to get more disability money and to get out of testifying at Casey's trial.  Sometimes I think that is exactly what she is doing. 

Unfortunately for Cindy her frantic voice is forever memorialized in her 911 call where she stated it smelled like a dead body in the car.  Thank God that the one truthful thing Cindy has ever said is on public record along with all of her backtracking and lies.



I cannot stand Cindy, make no mistake, but when she does that thing that Caylee is still alive, it's for show.  I think she is bat crazy anyway. 

Maybe, Cindy is proactively setting up her own defense for when, after her spawn is convicted of murder and sent down the river for life, the popo come to arrest Cindy for obstruction of juctice. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 06, 2011, 01:38:44 PM

here is a youtube of the hearing today for those that could not hear it this afternoon & its well worth a second listen to catch just how much Bozo fumbled:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Magic, feel better!



Dear Cappy,

Thank you so much for the link, I was able to see it last night before I went to bed.  I don't know why it bothered me so much that I had missed a hearing but it was the first I had missed and I felt awful about it.  I am so emotionally attached to Caylee and this case.  I feel so blessed to have first met you on the first forum, I had ever gone to.  I clicked on a link about this crazy grandmother, I had not seen but only heard on the TV talking about a dead body in the damn car.  I clicked on the story and it took me to a Comcast.com story about Caylee being missing and then to the Comcast Forum.  There you were Cappy and I was so overwhelmed with how well you wrote and how much you added to the conversation.  How lucky I am to have found you again here.  My next forum was a crazy nonsense place, with too many crazies in with normal, caring people. I am also glad that a few of those people....Fanny, Searching and more that I can't seem to remember at the moment are here at Scared Monkeys too. 

I was so happy to see the hearing for myself, although Brandi with her screen caps and the rest of the monkeys with their postings made me feel somewhat better.  It was the first time I had not *been in* the courtroom for Caylee.  I loved seeing Bozo fumble about as if he had just done his homework before class, remember that feeling?  Knowing that you aren't really prepared but going to class anyway, hoping that you won't be called on to join the discussion, because you haven't really a clue what the discussion is going to be about.  Bozo is fighting for someone's life, albeit an evil, hateful, imo murdering mother. He should not only have done his homework, he should of been checking and rechecking it as if every day was going to be a final test.  I am so proud of Judge Perry to have seen through this *fishing expedition* and cut his bait.  I remember when Joe Jordan was a monkey, he seemed somewhat self-important but I had admired his continued searching...in those days, I just wanted Caylee's lil body found.  When I read the email he sent to the LE, I was so dissapointed, I knew it couldn't be true, that precious body had been dumped and never, ever moved from that horrid swamp.  I am sure that Joe Jordan, now wishes that he never sent that email, without that, he is just like every other blogger who went searching and had a blog or posted photos of something in the case.  Joe has learned his lesson, I hope he just tells the truth now to both the defense and the state and everyone will know he adds nothing to the case, other than he was one of many, many searchers who never found Caylee's body.  The defense had already tried to hoodwink him as they have done many of the people who have inserted them into this case, he unlike Joy Wray and Dave Marinade and Laura Buchanon was too honest to take the bait and contacted LE, to tell the truth.  I don't think he or any other searcher were ever very close to Caylee's body.  It was underwater in a swamp, during the searching.  Although Kronk may have seen something of interest at different times, I don't believe he actually was at Caylee's body until the day he called about finding the skull.  It is unfortunate that the hero who found the body is under so much scrutiny but most of that has come from others than LE and that is good enough for me.  It is crazy to me for anyone to think that Kronk could of been involved in this case in any other way than finding her precious body.  Every single thing has pointed at one person from the very beginning, her own, evil, lying mother.  I just hope the jury is able to see enough evidence to understand without a doubt that Casey Marie Anthony killed her baby, not only without a reasonable doubt but with no doubt at all.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060

Oops, edited to fix Fanny's name.  For some reason that is how I *see* your name spelled.  It must have to do with the spelling of Fannie Mae's in the financial world.  Sorry about that Fanny, silly me, I see your name day after day.

Hugs, Magic :smt060

Magic, you have touched my heart from day one & you will always be there...I hope you know just how much your sentiments are reciprocated warmly & respectfully. 

Huggs, Cappy


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 01:40:30 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Oh I believe that Cindy is that horrible. And then some.

Welcome ShannonDeep.  I too think she is that horrible, but after all this time, I had hoped she was getting a conscience.  Guess not. 
Thank you!

I lost any and all hope (I never really had any lol!) when she sat on the stand recently and stated under oath that she believed Caylee was still alive.  I have no words for that.  I'm still not understanding whose ashes she is wearing and who she thinks she "memorialized" 2009. 

Unless Spindy is trying to pretend that she is "crazy" to get more disability money and to get out of testifying at Casey's trial.  Sometimes I think that is exactly what she is doing. 

Unfortunately for Cindy her frantic voice is forever memorialized in her 911 call where she stated it smelled like a dead body in the car.  Thank God that the one truthful thing Cindy has ever said is on public record along with all of her backtracking and lies.



I cannot stand Cindy, make no mistake, but when she does that thing that Caylee is still alive, it's for show.  I think she is bat crazy anyway. 

Maybe, Cindy is proactively setting up her own defense for when, after her spawn is convicted of murder and sent down the river for life, the popo come to arrest Cindy for obstruction of juctice. 

I agree.  There is something to it because I believe that Cindy has known that Caylee was dead as soon as she made the decision to wash the pants "that smelled like the car" and began obstructing from day one.  I agree with you, it's an act. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 01:47:18 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Oh I believe that Cindy is that horrible. And then some.

Welcome ShannonDeep.  I too think she is that horrible, but after all this time, I had hoped she was getting a conscience.  Guess not. 
Thank you!

I lost any and all hope (I never really had any lol!) when she sat on the stand recently and stated under oath that she believed Caylee was still alive.  I have no words for that.  I'm still not understanding whose ashes she is wearing and who she thinks she "memorialized" 2009. 

Unless Spindy is trying to pretend that she is "crazy" to get more disability money and to get out of testifying at Casey's trial.  Sometimes I think that is exactly what she is doing. 

Unfortunately for Cindy her frantic voice is forever memorialized in her 911 call where she stated it smelled like a dead body in the car.  Thank God that the one truthful thing Cindy has ever said is on public record along with all of her backtracking and lies.



I cannot stand Cindy, make no mistake, but when she does that thing that Caylee is still alive, it's for show.  I think she is bat crazy anyway. 

Maybe, Cindy is proactively setting up her own defense for when, after her spawn is convicted of murder and sent down the river for life, the popo come to arrest Cindy for obstruction of juctice. 

I agree.  There is something to it because I believe that Cindy has known that Caylee was dead as soon as she made the decision to wash the pants "that smelled like the car" and began obstructing from day one.  I agree with you, it's an act. 

I also think Cindy knew where Caylee was, and I believe with every part of my being that Bozo knew from the day he met Casey where little Caylee was and his disgusting arze decided to just keep that info secret. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 01:53:05 PM
I can't shake that either Zoomom.  Why else would Dominic Casey be poking around with a stick where Caylee was found? He KNEW what he was looking for and even said that "he knew where Caylee was and she was dead" I have never ever believed that a psychic had anything to do with his trip there. 

It is my opinion that Cindy sent him there because Cindy was told where the body was. As we have seen, Cindy will go to any and all lengths to protect Casey, even as far as the unthinkable. (moving /tampering with the body)

Cindy raised manipulative, pathological liar and sociopath.  Much like herself. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 02:19:27 PM
I can't shake that either Zoomom.  Why else would Dominic Casey be poking around with a stick where Caylee was found? He KNEW what he was looking for and even said that "he knew where Caylee was and she was dead" I have never ever believed that a psychic had anything to do with his trip there. 

It is my opinion that Cindy sent him there because Cindy was told where the body was. As we have seen, Cindy will go to any and all lengths to protect Casey, even as far as the unthinkable. (moving /tampering with the body)

Cindy raised manipulative, pathological liar and sociopath.  Much like herself. 

Yup.  I think Bozo knew first though.  Maybe bozo told Spindy to get Dominic to get on it and go out and look.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 02:24:01 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-jose-baez-sanction-order-20110106,0,2881376.story
Casey Anthony defense attorney Jose Baez slapped with formal sanction
Baez must pay $583 to the prosecution

By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

1:44 p.m. EST, January 6, 2011
Chief Judge Belvin Perry today filed his written order hitting attorney Jose Baez with a sanction for a "willful violation" of an earlier court order to turn over expert witness discovery information to the prosecution.

As a result, Baez will have to pay $583.73 in prosecutor's "attorney's fees" and provide written reports for all expert witnesses.

Those reports must include "a complete statement of opinions the witnesses will express and the reasons for those opinions, and any data or other information considered by the witnesses in forming their opinions and conclusions."

The report of defense expert Dr. Kenneth Furton will be filed within 10 days and the reports of the other experts will come within 20 days. That schedule was agreed to by both the defense and prosecution following a hearing yesterday.

Perry's order today states, "Opinions that are not expressed in a written report or at depositions taken during discovery will not be allowed at trial."

Casey Anthony, 24, is charged with first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee Marie. The child's remains were found in a vacant, wooded area off Suburban Drive and not far from the Anthony home. Casey Anthony faces a possible death sentence if convicted. Her trial is set to start in May.

Perry assessed costs for the state having to bring the motion to impose sanctions against Baez for failing to turn over the discovery. Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton calculated his costs to research, prepare and present the issue in court at $583.73.

"Mr. Baez shall have five days to contest the amount; otherwise, this order will become final and Mr. Baez shall deliver the check, made payable to the 'State of Florida' to assistant state attorney Jeff Ashton within seven days," Perry's order states.

Baez has to provide the court with a copy of the check.

In late November, the prosecution said it needed additional discovery information about the defense witnesses in the case. The court granted the request in early December. And in response the defense sent an e-mail to the state with the experts' names and brief references to their areas of specialization and their addresses.

The state filed another motion for clarification and compliance with the order for additional discovery. And Perry issued another order requiring statements of the subject areas the experts would testify about, the substance of the facts about which they would testify and a summary of their opinions.

A Dec. 15 response from the defense lacked the information but instead stated each expert would "rebut any false claims," raised by the state's experts. For one expert, well-known forensic expert Dr. Henry Lee, the defense said "it is difficult to give a complete summary of his opinions and the grounds for those opinions."

After that the state on Dec. 22 filed a motion with the court, seeking a sanction of civil contempt and a $500 daily fine until compliance "with defense counsel Jose Baez as the responsible party," Perry's order states.

On Monday, during a hearing on the issue, Casey Anthony's other defense attorney Cheney Mason said the defense has received many pages of additional discovery from the state and taken more than 130 depositions and "is still trying to catch up with the state's belated filing of discovery."

However, Perry noted in today's order, "he failed to provide a direct, or sufficient, response to the question of why the defense had failed to comply with the very specific instruction in the court's order."

Baez also "failed to explain the non-compliance with the order."
It is highly unlikely that defense counsel has no idea of the substance of the testimony of these witnesses, who have been retained at taxpayer expense and deposed by defense counsel, or that the experts are unable to provide a specific summary of their testimony," Perry wrote in today's order.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 02:24:24 PM
I bet judge perry thinks to himselfself  AS he chokes on his saliva!!
what  an arrogant incompetent ! pompus ! idiot!
this hispanic  attorney is !! this hispanic attorney according to only himself is trying a case of such magnitude!!  of course we all know he blows smoke up his own arse!!No doubt baez has proven to judge perry how ignorant! lazY!  and inept he truly was long ago!!. The man continously lies comes to court unprepared and if thats not bad enough he brings his arrogant attitude., Arorogance is more befitting to someone deserving and worthy of it! earned! this clown is so stupid!! and has not earned the right to be arrogant!!

makes me wonder why we havent seen any more open support to him by gerlado. I think geraldo has seen through him and is probably embarassed to be of the same heritage.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 06, 2011, 02:28:38 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Judge Perry's Court Order says Bozo has to pay his $583.00 to "The State of Florida"
by January 13th!

(Bozo has 5 days from today to contest the $$ amount)
Let's hope he's not stupid enough to contest it. He is getting off cheap.

I'm not sure if Bozo can legally receive funds "for Casey's defense" since she is now considered indigent. Of course there's the possibility Cindy has agreed to give him a portion of whatever $$ she gets from re-airing of the show.
Personally I don't think Cindy has any intention of ever giving the idiot 1 cent.

Bozo might just have to sell one of his gawd awful suits on ebay.
Better hurry Bozo, Jan. 13th is fast approaching. tick tock-tick-tock.......and the State of Florida doesn't give extensions!! Pay up @ssclown!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 02:30:41 PM
I was thinking that baez is more be-fitting of working with the mafia/underground world! but than on second thoguht he would be killed right away because of his ineffective presentations in court. I dont think theres a place for him in the legal system be it  above or below board. He just isnt cut out for either. god doesnt want him and the devil   doesnt either!!!
back to selling bikini's on ebay!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 06, 2011, 02:31:13 PM
OT, AND I DID NOT EVEN KNOW THIS WAS IN THE COURTS RIGHT NOW, BUT HOWARD K STERN WAS SET FREE.  JUDGE THREW OUT JURY'S VERDICT. 

http://www.tmz.com/2011/01/06/howard-k-stern-walks-in-anna-nicole-smith-judge-jerry-brown/2/#comments-anchor

OMG, that is just WRONG!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 02:32:27 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Judge Perry's Court Order says Bozo has to pay his $583.00 to "The State of Florida"
by January 13th!

(Bozo has 5 days from today to contest the $$ amount)
Let's hope he's not stupid enough to contest it. He is getting off cheap.

I'm not sure if Bozo can legally receive funds "for Casey's defense" since she is now considered indigent. Of course there's the possibility Cindy has agreed to give him a portion of whatever $$ she gets from re-airing of the show.
Personally I don't think Cindy has any intention of ever giving the idiot 1 cent.

Bozo might just have to sell one of his gawd awful suits on ebay.
Better hurry Bozo, Jan. 13th is fast approaching. tick tock-tick-tock.......and the State of Florida doesn't give extensions!! Pay up @ssclown!



I love that @ssclown!!!!!  I just read this new post, about having 5 days to contest and then 7 to pay.  Poor Bozo :(  NOT!!!! 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 02:35:54 PM
I bet judge perry thinks to himselfself  AS he chokes on his saliva!!
what  an arrogant incompetent ! pompus ! idiot!
this hispanic  attorney is !! this hispanic attorney according to only himself is trying a case of such magnitude!!  of course we all know he blows smoke up his own arse!!No doubt baez has proven to judge perry how ignorant! lazY!  and inept he truly was long ago!!. The man continously lies comes to court unprepared and if thats not bad enough he brings his arrogant attitude., Arorogance is more befitting to someone deserving and worthy of it! earned! this clown is so stupid!! and has not earned the right to be arrogant!!

makes me wonder why we havent seen any more open support to him by gerlado. I think geraldo has seen through him and is probably embarassed to be of the same heritage.

I don't know how his incompetence really has anything to do with his heritage.  Idiots come in every flavor.  And he is an idiot of the highest order.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 02:37:56 PM
I can't shake that either Zoomom.  Why else would Dominic Casey be poking around with a stick where Caylee was found? He KNEW what he was looking for and even said that "he knew where Caylee was and she was dead" I have never ever believed that a psychic had anything to do with his trip there. 

It is my opinion that Cindy sent him there because Cindy was told where the body was. As we have seen, Cindy will go to any and all lengths to protect Casey, even as far as the unthinkable. (moving /tampering with the body)

Cindy raised manipulative, pathological liar and sociopath.  Much like herself. 

Yup.  I think Bozo knew first though.  Maybe bozo told Spindy to get Dominic to get on it and go out and look.

Either that or Casey told Cindy or Lee when she was out on bail.  She went back to jail for good in October.  When was Dominic poking around there?  I can't remember.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 02:38:40 PM
I bet judge perry thinks to himselfself  AS he chokes on his saliva!!
what  an arrogant incompetent ! pompus ! idiot!
this hispanic  attorney is !! this hispanic attorney according to only himself is trying a case of such magnitude!!  of course we all know he blows smoke up his own arse!!No doubt baez has proven to judge perry how ignorant! lazY!  and inept he truly was long ago!!. The man continously lies comes to court unprepared and if thats not bad enough he brings his arrogant attitude., Arorogance is more befitting to someone deserving and worthy of it! earned! this clown is so stupid!! and has not earned the right to be arrogant!!

makes me wonder why we havent seen any more open support to him by gerlado. I think geraldo has seen through him and is probably embarassed to be of the same heritage.

I don't know how his incompetence really has anything to do with his heritage.  Idiots come in every flavor.  And he is an idiot of the highest order.






Oh and!!
Mason sttod up in court and told the judge that in all his  long career he nas never been sanctioned.

Funny how baez has that on his record from the begining. Not very impressive and I truly dont think this will be his only!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 02:39:56 PM
I bet judge perry thinks to himselfself  AS he chokes on his saliva!!
what  an arrogant incompetent ! pompus ! idiot!
this hispanic  attorney is !! this hispanic attorney according to only himself is trying a case of such magnitude!!  of course we all know he blows smoke up his own arse!!No doubt baez has proven to judge perry how ignorant! lazY!  and inept he truly was long ago!!. The man continously lies comes to court unprepared and if thats not bad enough he brings his arrogant attitude., Arorogance is more befitting to someone deserving and worthy of it! earned! this clown is so stupid!! and has not earned the right to be arrogant!!

makes me wonder why we havent seen any more open support to him by gerlado. I think geraldo has seen through him and is probably embarassed to be of the same heritage.

I don't know how his incompetence really has anything to do with his heritage.  Idiots come in every flavor.  And he is an idiot of the highest order.






Oh and!!
Mason sttod up in court and told the judge that in all his  long career he nas never been sanctioned.

Funny how baez has that on his record from the begining. Not very impressive and I truly dont think this will be his only!!


I only metioned his heritage because of the big deal he and jane velez and geraldo made of it! I agree it should have nothing to do with! I am hispanic and would never flaunt such comments around. It sounds ignorant doesnt it.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 02:41:04 PM
I can't shake that either Zoomom.  Why else would Dominic Casey be poking around with a stick where Caylee was found? He KNEW what he was looking for and even said that "he knew where Caylee was and she was dead" I have never ever believed that a psychic had anything to do with his trip there. 

It is my opinion that Cindy sent him there because Cindy was told where the body was. As we have seen, Cindy will go to any and all lengths to protect Casey, even as far as the unthinkable. (moving /tampering with the body)

Cindy raised manipulative, pathological liar and sociopath.  Much like herself. 

Yup.  I think Bozo knew first though.  Maybe bozo told Spindy to get Dominic to get on it and go out and look.

Either that or Casey told Cindy or Lee when she was out on bail.  She went back to jail for good in October.  When was Dominic poking around there?  I can't remember.

I don't keep a organized list of events, but it was close to when she was out and/or went back in.  I still remember her rearrest and oh how I loved it.  I miss the cameras at the A's house.  Maybe when the trial gets going, they will be back there with cameras.  One can hope.  I'll need to have my TV on for the trial and the puter on the live webshots of the A's house. 

I am sure another monkey does know though and will be along shortly.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 02:42:41 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26390467/detail.html
Request For Sanction Granted In Casey Case
Posted: 1:41 pm EST January 6, 2011Updated: 1:52 pm EST January 6, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Judge Belvin Perry granted the prosecution's request for sanctions in the case against Casey Anthony, according to an order released Thursday.
DOCUMENT: Read Judge's Order   http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26390295/detail.html
Judge Perry said Monday during a hearing in Orlando that Casey's defense attorneys missed deadlines last month. The defense told the judge it has tried to comply with every order and accidentally missed the key deadline of December 14 to turn in paperwork.

Prosecutors requested that Casey's attorneys be fined $500 a day until they provided the information. Perry ordered Casey's attorney Jose Baez on Thursday to pay $583.73. Perry also set a time line for the defense. The document states that Jose Baez has five days to contest the amount otherwise the order will become final.

Meanwhile, defense expert, botanist Dr. Jane Bock will be deposed on January 18. Defense bug expert Dr. Tim Huntington will be questioned under oath on January 28.

The experts have been ordered by the judge to provide written reports before the depositions.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 02:45:49 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 02:46:14 PM
I can't shake that either Zoomom.  Why else would Dominic Casey be poking around with a stick where Caylee was found? He KNEW what he was looking for and even said that "he knew where Caylee was and she was dead" I have never ever believed that a psychic had anything to do with his trip there. 

It is my opinion that Cindy sent him there because Cindy was told where the body was. As we have seen, Cindy will go to any and all lengths to protect Casey, even as far as the unthinkable. (moving /tampering with the body)

Cindy raised manipulative, pathological liar and sociopath.  Much like herself. 

Yup.  I think Bozo knew first though.  Maybe bozo told Spindy to get Dominic to get on it and go out and look.

Either that or Casey told Cindy or Lee when she was out on bail.  She went back to jail for good in October.  When was Dominic poking around there?  I can't remember.

I don't keep a organized list of events, but it was close to when she was out and/or went back in.  I still remember her rearrest and oh how I loved it.  I miss the cameras at the A's house.  Maybe when the trial gets going, they will be back there with cameras.  One can hope.  I'll need to have my TV on for the trial and the puter on the live webshots of the A's house. 

I am sure another monkey does know though and will be along shortly.

Wow.  Was it really that close to the time that she was out/went back in?  So creepy!  I think I remember Cindy saying to LE "We sent our people to look in that area in November and there was nothing there" 

As if we are supposed to believe one word that comes out of her lying mouth. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 03:09:19 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

WTH is this?  Anybody know.

Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 03:11:42 PM
I can't shake that either Zoomom.  Why else would Dominic Casey be poking around with a stick where Caylee was found? He KNEW what he was looking for and even said that "he knew where Caylee was and she was dead" I have never ever believed that a psychic had anything to do with his trip there. 

It is my opinion that Cindy sent him there because Cindy was told where the body was. As we have seen, Cindy will go to any and all lengths to protect Casey, even as far as the unthinkable. (moving /tampering with the body)

Cindy raised manipulative, pathological liar and sociopath.  Much like herself. 

Yup.  I think Bozo knew first though.  Maybe bozo told Spindy to get Dominic to get on it and go out and look.

Either that or Casey told Cindy or Lee when she was out on bail.  She went back to jail for good in October.  When was Dominic poking around there?  I can't remember.

I don't keep a organized list of events, but it was close to when she was out and/or went back in.  I still remember her rearrest and oh how I loved it.  I miss the cameras at the A's house.  Maybe when the trial gets going, they will be back there with cameras.  One can hope.  I'll need to have my TV on for the trial and the puter on the live webshots of the A's house. 

I am sure another monkey does know though and will be along shortly.

Wow.  Was it really that close to the time that she was out/went back in?  So creepy!  I think I remember Cindy saying to LE "We sent our people to look in that area in November and there was nothing there" 

As if we are supposed to believe one word that comes out of her lying mouth. 

Well, if I am not mistaken, but readily admit I might be, she went back in on 10/8 or so wasn't it, so "in november" is not that far from her rearrest.  I love that it has been what 2 whole years and then some in the pokey for her. 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 06, 2011, 03:16:49 PM
I can't shake that either Zoomom.  Why else would Dominic Casey be poking around with a stick where Caylee was found? He KNEW what he was looking for and even said that "he knew where Caylee was and she was dead" I have never ever believed that a psychic had anything to do with his trip there. 

It is my opinion that Cindy sent him there because Cindy was told where the body was. As we have seen, Cindy will go to any and all lengths to protect Casey, even as far as the unthinkable. (moving /tampering with the body)

Cindy raised manipulative, pathological liar and sociopath.  Much like herself. 

Yup.  I think Bozo knew first though.  Maybe bozo told Spindy to get Dominic to get on it and go out and look.

Either that or Casey told Cindy or Lee when she was out on bail.  She went back to jail for good in October.  When was Dominic poking around there?  I can't remember.

Dom Casey admitted to searching Suburban Drive the week of November 15th, 2008. In his statements to LE, he states he went there 3 times.
I believe Dom Casey found some evidence of Caylee's remains during his last search.
My reason for this belief is because:

The week of Thanksgiving (the week after Dom Casey) went poking in the woods on Suburban Drive, several chatters in ustream SOS chat were PM'd info that matches up to his searches.

We were told Caylee's remains had been located, and a family member had led this person/persons to the area where she was located.

We were not to let this info out, but we would probably get confirmation by the following Monday........of course that confirmation never came to be.....well until December 11th. By the Grace of God Kronk found precious Caylee.

It is my firm belief that Dom Casey, Cindy, Lee or someone involved with the Anthony's wanted someone else (unconnected) to Casey/Anthony's to find Caylee's remains. If any of them had found her, LE knew only 1 person could have led them to the exact spot.

Don't know if you remember how freaked Cindy was the day Tim M. and TES were supposed to search the exact spot where Caylee was found. Unfortunately, the area was flooded and Tim pulled out of Orlando, but planned on returning when water levels went down. I could be wrong but I think the same day Casey and Lee did their high-fiving at the was the day Tim postponed the searches where Caylee was eventually found.

JMO
I think Dom Casey freaked out when he actually found her. I would not be surprised to find out Cindy asked Dom to move Caylee's remains, and get rid of any other evidence he found.
Cindy (according to LE) even admitted to LE she had sent DC down to search on Suburban Drive into the woods. (but yet she was certain Caylee was alive......ughh)





Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 03:23:01 PM
I


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 03:23:51 PM
I




Ooops sorry about that!
I found this elsewhere but thought how interesting that this happened in the state of florida!!
http://www.wftv.com/news/26368921/detail.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 06, 2011, 03:25:55 PM
We have to remember that Casey and the Ant's were communicating while Casey was in jail......albeit illegally.
They were sending emails and letters back and forth via Bozo.

Because of client /attorney *cough* confidentiality, LE can't legally search Bozo's computer. (the laws are only enforced when it benefits Bozo)

Would it shock me to find out Casey told the Ant's where Caylee was, and to move her and destroy all evidence????

HELL TO THE NO!!!!

This is another part of the case we will never get the truth.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 06, 2011, 03:29:28 PM
I

I thought maybe you had a bad case of the hiccups! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 03:32:13 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

WTH is this?  Anybody know.

Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

JAC has a website in accordance with the Sunshine laws of Florida.  I posted links from it in the last thread I believe as to how much the two PI's Mort and Lyons have been paid so far.  I think Bobo (shout out to Bobo  - your bald spot in your buzz cut still makes you look like a weeble)  has been reading blogs again and had a poopy pants moment that we can see the invoices and payments and all his "special secret defense witnesses" names could possibly appear on the invoices if Lyons actually provided invoices with the information JAC requires.  What a twisted web  of cotton candy the clown factory is spinning about all these secrets.  Too bad the USSR does not exist anymore as some attorneys may be better suited working there with all the secrets they want to keep/create.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 06, 2011, 03:37:16 PM
I

I thought maybe you had a bad case of the hiccups! ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 06, 2011, 03:44:07 PM
Casey Anthony defense attorney Jose Baez slapped with formal sanction, $583 bill
Baez must pay $583 to the prosecution

By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel
2:45 p.m. EST, January 6, 2011

Chief Judge Belvin Perry today filed his written order hitting attorney Jose Baez with a sanction for a "willful violation" of an earlier court order to turn over expert witness discovery information to the prosecution.

As a result, Baez will have to pay $583.73 in prosecutor's "attorney's fees" and provide written reports for all expert witnesses.

Those reports must include "a complete statement of opinions the witnesses will express and the reasons for those opinions, and any data or other information considered by the witnesses in forming their opinions and conclusions."

The report of defense expert Dr. Kenneth Furton will be filed within 10 days and the reports of the other experts will come within 20 days. That schedule was agreed to by both the defense and prosecution following a hearing yesterday. 

(http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo242/Brandi-Monkey/little-red-scissors.gif)<snipped>
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/caylee-anthony/os-jose-baez-sanction-order-20110106,0,3430840.story


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 03:48:55 PM
I

I thought maybe you had a bad case of the hiccups! ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


lol laughing out loud
not
lotofluck
hey that is realy going to stick on the net huh?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 03:54:41 PM
bozo is going to have to pass that tin can around the office! panhandle his workers! leave mason alone though he needs his chump change to keep his flask filled.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 06, 2011, 04:02:31 PM
bozo is going to have to pass that tin can around the office! panhandle his workers! leave mason alone though he needs his chump change to keep his flask filled.

I was thinking the same thing Loca.......Bozo doesn't even have to change his outfit, he can panhandle as an @ssclown for money! ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 04:09:31 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

WTH is this?  Anybody know.

Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

JAC has a website in accordance with the Sunshine laws of Florida.  I posted links from it in the last thread I believe as to how much the two PI's Mort and Lyons have been paid so far.  I think Bobo (shout out to Bobo  - your bald spot in your buzz cut still makes you look like a weeble)  has been reading blogs again and had a poopy pants moment that we can see the invoices and payments and all his "special secret defense witnesses" names could possibly appear on the invoices if Lyons actually provided invoices with the information JAC requires.  What a twisted web  of cotton candy the clown factory is spinning about all these secrets.  Too bad the USSR does not exist anymore as some attorneys may be better suited working there with all the secrets they want to keep/create.

Here is the JAC link to PI Lyons.  He has so far been paid $19,219.83 from JAC

http://www.transparencyflorida.gov/SearchVendors_Warrant.aspx?FY=11&VID=434110&BE=21300800&LI= 786E&AC=103540&Fund=1000&ST=jeremiah+lyons&M=N


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 06, 2011, 04:11:03 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

WTH is this?  Anybody know.

Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

JAC has a website in accordance with the Sunshine laws of Florida.  I posted links from it in the last thread I believe as to how much the two PI's Mort and Lyons have been paid so far.  I think Bobo (shout out to Bobo  - your bald spot in your buzz cut still makes you look like a weeble)  has been reading blogs again and had a poopy pants moment that we can see the invoices and payments and all his "special secret defense witnesses" names could possibly appear on the invoices if Lyons actually provided invoices with the information JAC requires.  What a twisted web  of cotton candy the clown factory is spinning about all these secrets.  Too bad the USSR does not exist anymore as some attorneys may be better suited working there with all the secrets they want to keep/create.

Here is the JAC link to PI Lyons.  He has so far been paid $19,219.83 from JAC

http://www.transparencyflorida.gov/SearchVendors_Warrant.aspx?FY=11&VID=434110&BE=21300800&LI= 786E&AC=103540&Fund=1000&ST=jeremiah+lyons&M=N

Isn't he the same one who has been harrassing the TES searchers?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:11:20 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

WTH is this?  Anybody know.

Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

JAC has a website in accordance with the Sunshine laws of Florida.  I posted links from it in the last thread I believe as to how much the two PI's Mort and Lyons have been paid so far.  I think Bobo (shout out to Bobo  - your bald spot in your buzz cut still makes you look like a weeble)  has been reading blogs again and had a poopy pants moment that we can see the invoices and payments and all his "special secret defense witnesses" names could possibly appear on the invoices if Lyons actually provided invoices with the information JAC requires.  What a twisted web  of cotton candy the clown factory is spinning about all these secrets.  Too bad the USSR does not exist anymore as some attorneys may be better suited working there with all the secrets they want to keep/create.

Oh okay, so is this a motion or did the judge approve it? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 04:16:18 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

WTH is this?  Anybody know.

Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

JAC has a website in accordance with the Sunshine laws of Florida.  I posted links from it in the last thread I believe as to how much the two PI's Mort and Lyons have been paid so far.  I think Bobo (shout out to Bobo  - your bald spot in your buzz cut still makes you look like a weeble)  has been reading blogs again and had a poopy pants moment that we can see the invoices and payments and all his "special secret defense witnesses" names could possibly appear on the invoices if Lyons actually provided invoices with the information JAC requires.  What a twisted web  of cotton candy the clown factory is spinning about all these secrets.  Too bad the USSR does not exist anymore as some attorneys may be better suited working there with all the secrets they want to keep/create.

Here is the JAC link to PI Lyons.  He has so far been paid $19,219.83 from JAC

http://www.transparencyflorida.gov/SearchVendors_Warrant.aspx?FY=11&VID=434110&BE=21300800&LI= 786E&AC=103540&Fund=1000&ST=jeremiah+lyons&M=N

Isn't he the same one who has been harrassing the TES searchers?

Yup


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 06, 2011, 04:25:31 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

Loved it a lot!
Love Karen, too!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:26:09 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

WTH is this?  Anybody know.

Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

JAC has a website in accordance with the Sunshine laws of Florida.  I posted links from it in the last thread I believe as to how much the two PI's Mort and Lyons have been paid so far.  I think Bobo (shout out to Bobo  - your bald spot in your buzz cut still makes you look like a weeble)  has been reading blogs again and had a poopy pants moment that we can see the invoices and payments and all his "special secret defense witnesses" names could possibly appear on the invoices if Lyons actually provided invoices with the information JAC requires.  What a twisted web  of cotton candy the clown factory is spinning about all these secrets.  Too bad the USSR does not exist anymore as some attorneys may be better suited working there with all the secrets they want to keep/create.

Here is the JAC link to PI Lyons.  He has so far been paid $19,219.83 from JAC

http://www.transparencyflorida.gov/SearchVendors_Warrant.aspx?FY=11&VID=434110&BE=21300800&LI= 786E&AC=103540&Fund=1000&ST=jeremiah+lyons&M=N

Wow, I had never seen that.  Problem is you cannot see details of what was billed.  Watch, BOBO is going to make PI LYONS SUBMIT AN INVOICE FOR 583 odd dollars, so that will cover his sanctions, MY OPINION ONLY. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 06, 2011, 04:27:02 PM
If Bozo and Chompy got together after court on Monday to discuss getting more pictures on some channel, that would really disgust me.  How could they sleep doing this?  I have to not believe it for now.  It is too horrible to think that Caylee's grandmother would agree to this.  I know she is horrible, but that horrible?  So that he can pay his fines or have extra money?  I have no doubt Bozo would do it, but her grandmother, even contemplate it, come on now.  This cannot be right.  It has to be a co-inky dinky. 

Nope, the reality is she is that horrible and she would do it.  So sad.  All I can say is karma sucks and what goes around comes around.  Caylee will have her day some where, some how, maybe up in heaven when it is Cindy's day of reckoning, maybe somewhere down the line, but Cindy will regret her choices right now, I sincerely hope any way. 

Oh I believe that Cindy is that horrible. And then some.

Welcome ShannonDeep.  I too think she is that horrible, but after all this time, I had hoped she was getting a conscience.  Guess not. 
Thank you!

I lost any and all hope (I never really had any lol!) when she sat on the stand recently and stated under oath that she believed Caylee was still alive.  I have no words for that.  I'm still not understanding whose ashes she is wearing and who she thinks she "memorialized" 2009. 

Unless Spindy is trying to pretend that she is "crazy" to get more disability money and to get out of testifying at Casey's trial.  Sometimes I think that is exactly what she is doing. 

Unfortunately for Cindy her frantic voice is forever memorialized in her 911 call where she stated it smelled like a dead body in the car.  Thank God that the one truthful thing Cindy has ever said is on public record along with all of her backtracking and lies.



I cannot stand Cindy, make no mistake, but when she does that thing that Caylee is still alive, it's for show.  I think she is bat crazy anyway. 

Maybe, Cindy is proactively setting up her own defense for when, after her spawn is convicted of murder and sent down the river for life, the popo come to arrest Cindy for obstruction of juctice. 

I agree.  There is something to it because I believe that Cindy has known that Caylee was dead as soon as she made the decision to wash the pants "that smelled like the car" and began obstructing from day one.  I agree with you, it's an act. 

Ive agreed with that thought ever since I saw that pitbull face grace our TV's & heard the 911 calls & by the way welcome!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:30:31 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

Loved it a lot!
Love Karen, too!


??? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:31:44 PM
Ah shucks, the JAC, that I can find, does not have a search by Case, shucks. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 04:34:07 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

Loved it a lot!
Love Karen, too!

Karen Walker is my hero! 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 04:38:03 PM
We have to remember that Casey and the Ant's were communicating while Casey was in jail......albeit illegally.
They were sending emails and letters back and forth via Bozo.

Because of client /attorney *cough* confidentiality, LE can't legally search Bozo's computer. (the laws are only enforced when it benefits Bozo)

Would it shock me to find out Casey told the Ant's where Caylee was, and to move her and destroy all evidence????

HELL TO THE NO!!!!

This is another part of the case we will never get the truth.

Thanks for your really informative post.  The part about PM's that someone in the Anthony family found the body was really interesting.  Crazy!

I have no doubt in my mind that they found out through Casey where she dumped that poor baby.  I can only hope that one fine day we will see Cindy and George arrested for obstruction.  Sometimes I think that LE is doing an entire investigation on them and is just waiting until the end of Casey's trial to pursue it. If they aren't it would be astounding. Then Anthony's should have been arrested at least 20 times by now.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:41:40 PM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

Loved it a lot!
Love Karen, too!

Karen Walker is my hero! 



Oh okay.  I have no idea who Karen Walker is, by my here is hmmmmmmmm, I'll have to think on that for a while. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:44:55 PM
The JAC seems a wee bit behind, it only shows up till November. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:46:35 PM
By any chance, ShannonDeep, is that Karen Walker in your avi?  I am very slow sometimes. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 06, 2011, 04:47:17 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

WTH is this?  Anybody know.

Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

I believe that is related to Ann Finnell's list of witnesses for the Penalty phase- mitigation.
Remember she is so afraid of media 'harrassing' people so much that they would not want to be witnesses for Casey.
You mean she finally dug up someone who has a good word to say about her??


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:48:32 PM
Okay, Shannon, yes that is Karen Walker in your avi.  I googled and figured out who she is.  I am not familiar with her or anything she may have acted in. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 06, 2011, 04:50:37 PM
OT, AND I DID NOT EVEN KNOW THIS WAS IN THE COURTS RIGHT NOW, BUT HOWARD K STERN WAS SET FREE.  JUDGE THREW OUT JURY'S VERDICT. 

http://www.tmz.com/2011/01/06/howard-k-stern-walks-in-anna-nicole-smith-judge-jerry-brown/2/#comments-anchor

OMG, that is just WRONG!

Hopefully the SA will appeal that and have that Judge investigated for his obvious bias.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 04:53:51 PM
By any chance, ShannonDeep, is that Karen Walker in your avi?  I am very slow sometimes. 

lol!  Karen Walker (Will & Grace) is my avi.   ::monkeywine2:: :drunken: :smt030


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 04:58:23 PM
OT, AND I DID NOT EVEN KNOW THIS WAS IN THE COURTS RIGHT NOW, BUT HOWARD K STERN WAS SET FREE.  JUDGE THREW OUT JURY'S VERDICT. 

http://www.tmz.com/2011/01/06/howard-k-stern-walks-in-anna-nicole-smith-judge-jerry-brown/2/#comments-anchor

OMG, that is just WRONG!

Hopefully the SA will appeal that and have that Judge investigated for his obvious bias.

I don't want to really talk about this here.  But, I agree with it.  It was a fishing expedition.  by the time the trial was over, they only wanted probation and a fine, anyway, cause I think they realized how silly the whole thing became.  I never thought he did anything wrong, BUT BE A DUMMY.  Much like in the MJ case, I believe will be same outcome, cept CA will now want to make an example out of this doctor.  But, I was happy to read that.  Probably the only one here that thinks that too.

Now, why doesn't other states have things like the JAC.  Why does it seem Florida just puts everything out there?  I don't mind, don't get me wrong, but this is the most info I have ever had available for any case I have followed.   


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 06, 2011, 05:10:13 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

01/06/2011           Notice of Taking Deposition(s)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 06, 2011, 05:16:08 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

01/06/2011           Notice of Taking Deposition(s)


I never understand these postings. So this was granted? If so, BOO.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 05:22:30 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

01/06/2011           Notice of Taking Deposition(s)


I never understand these postings. So this was granted? If so, BOO.


What does it mean?  Are they going to seal the certain witnesses that the Defense calls?  So that they don't get harassed by the big mean bloggers and the media? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Girlzrock on January 06, 2011, 05:25:11 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/06/2011           Order Granting
State's Motion for Sanctions / Motion to Compel
01/06/2011           Order
Directing the Judicial Administrative Commission to Retain Confidentiality and Not Disclose Identity of Certain Defense Witnesses (This Order to be Sealed)

01/06/2011           Notice of Taking Deposition(s)


I never understand these postings. So this was granted? If so, BOO.


What does it mean?  Are they going to seal the certain witnesses that the Defense calls?  So that they don't get harassed by the big mean bloggers and the media? 

i suspect it's the Mitigation witnesses, Ms. Finnell asked be sealed?  Maybe?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 06, 2011, 05:25:26 PM
I think that's what it means SDeep, but am trying to ascertain if it's a done deal.

Bozo hasn't volunteered his FB profile.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 06:00:43 PM
BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis On Granted Motion In Casey Case
http://www.wftv.com/video/26393038/index.html
Judge's Order
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26390295/detail.html

http://www.wftv.com/news/26390467/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Ordered To Pay Nearly $600
Posted: 1:41 pm EST January 6, 2011Updated: 5:40 pm EST January 6, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Judge Belvin Perry granted the prosecution's request for sanctions in the case against Casey Anthony, according to an order released Thursday. Defense attorney Jose Baez was fined nearly $600 for breaking the rules.
Perry ordered Baez on Monday to give prosecutors more information about defense experts, but he didn't do it. However, Perry punished Baez in a way that won't jeopardize Casey Anthony's right to a fair trial.

The jury will never know about the fine, but WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said Baez's actions could have backfired.

"Was there any particular reason why that was not complied with?" Perry asked Casey's attorney Cheney Mason in court Monday.

"The answer to that is I don't know," Mason replied.

Baez let Casey's other lawyer answer to accusations that Baez wasn't playing fair. He refused to provide prosecutors with defense experts' opinions, before the experts are questioned under oath, before the May murder trial and he defied the judge's order to do so.

Instead, he wisecracked that his botany expert would testify about botany and one expert would rebut any false claims made by prosecution experts.

"A lack of maturity, again a lack of experience and it just doesn't speak well of him professionally," Sheaffer said.

Perry gave Baez seven days to write a $583.73 check to the state. It's reimbursement for the seven hours it took the prosecution to work on its motion demanding action against Baez for breaking the rules.
Otherwise, Baez could have hurt the defense.

"You run the risk of having sanctions imposed, that sanction being the exclusion of that witness's testimony," Sheaffer said.

The judge told Baez those opinions that don't go into those defense expert reports won't come into trial.

Baez has five days to appeal the amount of his fine and he now has up to 20 days to provide those reports to prosecutors.

Casey's defense team will be back in court next week to discuss picking a jury for her murder trial. A status hearing is scheduled for a week from Friday.

The judge said they'll talk about the costs of selecting and sequestering the jury. Jurors will be chosen in another county and will be brought to Orange County for the trial in May.

Casey is not required to attend the hearing.

Meanwhile, defense expert, botanist Dr. Jane Bock will be deposed on January 18. Defense bug expert Dr. Tim Huntington will be questioned under oath on January 28.

The experts have been ordered by the judge to provide written reports before the depositions.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 06:21:16 PM
The Bill Sheaffer video was good!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 06, 2011, 06:44:15 PM
The Bill Sheaffer video was good!   ::MonkeyCool::
Yes, it was!  So how does Casey get the message that she needs to ask Mason to take over?  Baez isn't going to offer!   ::MonkeyJnBox::  He's got her brainwashed I guess. Of course she really doesn't give a damn about this case, doesn't even want to appear in court even tho a motion was heard and no status hearings.  Baez may have told her she wasn't really needed at this hearing 'cause he didn't want to be embarrassed in front of her.  I still can't figure out why JP allowed that to happen.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 06:50:59 PM
The Bill Sheaffer video was good!   ::MonkeyCool::
Yes, it was!  So how does Casey get the message that she needs to ask Mason to take over?  Baez isn't going to offer!   ::MonkeyJnBox::  He's got her brainwashed I guess. Of course she really doesn't give a damn about this case, doesn't even want to appear in court even tho a motion was heard and no status hearings.  Baez may have told her she wasn't really needed at this hearing 'cause he didn't want to be embarrassed in front of her.  I still can't figure out why JP allowed that to happen.

That video was the best.Baez is gonna be pizzed.
I am still wondering about the hearing too.I thought Casey had to be at there unless it was a status hearing.I say drag her by the hair of her head to every hearing.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 06:55:23 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-what-will-jose-baezs-fine-mean-to-trial.html
Casey Anthony: What will Jose Baez’s fine mean to trial?
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 6 2011 6:34 PM

Judge Belvin Perry has fined Jose Baez nearly $600 for failing to turn over information to prosecutors about his expert witnesses’ opinions in the Casey Anthony case.

WFTV-Channel 9 anchor Bob Opsahl wanted to know tonight, “Will this affect Casey’s trial?”

WFTV’s Kathi Belich said it shouldn’t. “The jury won’t know about the fine,” she said.

The WFTV team’s analysis, which was refreshingly low-key, added a lot to understanding today’s developments.

WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer saw “a lack of maturity, again a lack of experience” in Baez’s failure to meet the judge’s order and also in Baez’s wisecracks. “It just doesn’t speak well of him professionally,” Sheaffer said.

Sheaffer underscored what could have been a big problem for the defense in Baez’s actions: “You run the risk of having a sanction imposed — that sanction being exclusion of that witness’ testimony.”

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter, Caylee. The trial is scheduled to start in May.

Belich highlighted that Baez has seven days to write the check to the state for the fine — the amount represents the prosecution’s seven hours of work on its motion against Baez for breaking the rules.

WESH-Channel 2 anchor Martha Sugalski recapped the story: ”Perry ordered Baez to provide the state written reports from Casey’s expert witnesses. Baez missed the court’s deadline and is now being fined more than $583 in attorney’s fees for the delay. Baez now has five days to contest the amount or hand over a check to the state of Florida.”

WFTV reminded viewers that a status hearing on jury selection is set for Jan. 14. Anthony is not required to attend, WFTV anchor Opsahl said.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 07:10:39 PM
BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis On Granted Motion In Casey Case
http://www.wftv.com/video/26393038/index.html
Judge's Order
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26390295/detail.html

http://www.wftv.com/news/26390467/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Ordered To Pay Nearly $600
Posted: 1:41 pm EST January 6, 2011Updated: 5:40 pm EST January 6, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Judge Belvin Perry granted the prosecution's request for sanctions in the case against Casey Anthony, according to an order released Thursday. Defense attorney Jose Baez was fined nearly $600 for breaking the rules.
Perry ordered Baez on Monday to give prosecutors more information about defense experts, but he didn't do it. However, Perry punished Baez in a way that won't jeopardize Casey Anthony's right to a fair trial.

The jury will never know about the fine, but WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said Baez's actions could have backfired.

"Was there any particular reason why that was not complied with?" Perry asked Casey's attorney Cheney Mason in court Monday.

"The answer to that is I don't know," Mason replied.

Baez let Casey's other lawyer answer to accusations that Baez wasn't playing fair. He refused to provide prosecutors with defense experts' opinions, before the experts are questioned under oath, before the May murder trial and he defied the judge's order to do so.

Instead, he wisecracked that his botany expert would testify about botany and one expert would rebut any false claims made by prosecution experts.

"A lack of maturity, again a lack of experience and it just doesn't speak well of him professionally," Sheaffer said.

Perry gave Baez seven days to write a $583.73 check to the state. It's reimbursement for the seven hours it took the prosecution to work on its motion demanding action against Baez for breaking the rules.
Otherwise, Baez could have hurt the defense.

"You run the risk of having sanctions imposed, that sanction being the exclusion of that witness's testimony," Sheaffer said.

The judge told Baez those opinions that don't go into those defense expert reports won't come into trial.

Baez has five days to appeal the amount of his fine and he now has up to 20 days to provide those reports to prosecutors.

Casey's defense team will be back in court next week to discuss picking a jury for her murder trial. A status hearing is scheduled for a week from Friday.

The judge said they'll talk about the costs of selecting and sequestering the jury. Jurors will be chosen in another county and will be brought to Orange County for the trial in May.

Casey is not required to attend the hearing.

Meanwhile, defense expert, botanist Dr. Jane Bock will be deposed on January 18. Defense bug expert Dr. Tim Huntington will be questioned under oath on January 28.

The experts have been ordered by the judge to provide written reports before the depositions.




Love me Mr. Bill Schaeffer!!
so now  sweet smart monkeys!!
do yall think baez has seen this interview???


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 07:18:04 PM
BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis On Granted Motion In Casey Case
http://www.wftv.com/video/26393038/index.html
Judge's Order
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26390295/detail.html

http://www.wftv.com/news/26390467/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Ordered To Pay Nearly $600
Posted: 1:41 pm EST January 6, 2011Updated: 5:40 pm EST January 6, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Judge Belvin Perry granted the prosecution's request for sanctions in the case against Casey Anthony, according to an order released Thursday. Defense attorney Jose Baez was fined nearly $600 for breaking the rules.
Perry ordered Baez on Monday to give prosecutors more information about defense experts, but he didn't do it. However, Perry punished Baez in a way that won't jeopardize Casey Anthony's right to a fair trial.

The jury will never know about the fine, but WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said Baez's actions could have backfired.

"Was there any particular reason why that was not complied with?" Perry asked Casey's attorney Cheney Mason in court Monday.

"The answer to that is I don't know," Mason replied.

Baez let Casey's other lawyer answer to accusations that Baez wasn't playing fair. He refused to provide prosecutors with defense experts' opinions, before the experts are questioned under oath, before the May murder trial and he defied the judge's order to do so.

Instead, he wisecracked that his botany expert would testify about botany and one expert would rebut any false claims made by prosecution experts.

"A lack of maturity, again a lack of experience and it just doesn't speak well of him professionally," Sheaffer said.

Perry gave Baez seven days to write a $583.73 check to the state. It's reimbursement for the seven hours it took the prosecution to work on its motion demanding action against Baez for breaking the rules.
Otherwise, Baez could have hurt the defense.

"You run the risk of having sanctions imposed, that sanction being the exclusion of that witness's testimony," Sheaffer said.

The judge told Baez those opinions that don't go into those defense expert reports won't come into trial.

Baez has five days to appeal the amount of his fine and he now has up to 20 days to provide those reports to prosecutors.

Casey's defense team will be back in court next week to discuss picking a jury for her murder trial. A status hearing is scheduled for a week from Friday.

The judge said they'll talk about the costs of selecting and sequestering the jury. Jurors will be chosen in another county and will be brought to Orange County for the trial in May.

Casey is not required to attend the hearing.

Meanwhile, defense expert, botanist Dr. Jane Bock will be deposed on January 18. Defense bug expert Dr. Tim Huntington will be questioned under oath on January 28.

The experts have been ordered by the judge to provide written reports before the depositions.


whatcha wanna bet that Mason isnt to happy with bozo these days. His stupidity unprofessionalism is well noted and documented in all the newspapers these last few days.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 06, 2011, 07:21:30 PM
The Bill Schaeffer video was great! You could tell he was holding back, even with what he did say!

I don't want Mason to take the lead. It's far more entertaining to watch Baez continually have to remove his foot from his mouth!!  ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Magic Eyes on January 06, 2011, 07:42:08 PM
Wow, that Bill Sheaffer video was just amazing.  I have never in my whole life heard one attorney take another attorney to task like that.  It was very well deserved and I think that Mr. Sheaffer even held back what he truly wanted to say.  To be called a "School Boy" by another attorney must really be stinging Bozo.  Would hate to have to deal with him after he reads this.  I hope Casey doesn't wise up and let's her guy take her all the way to...........................GUILTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for all of the links, monkey-dear's, this week has been a very good week for our sweet Caylee.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 06, 2011, 07:48:42 PM
The Bill Schaeffer video was great! You could tell he was holding back, even with what he did say!

I don't want Mason to take the lead. It's far more entertaining to watch Baez continually have to remove his foot from his mouth!!  ::MonkeyJnBox::

I laughed out loud (LOL) when Schaeffer said KC should be telling Mason to take the lead more.

That will never happen, IMO
KC picks her male attorneys just like she does/did her other guys in her past sexcapades life.

Only attorneys-with-benefits qualify.......I don't see KC wanting anything from the likes of Mason. But then again, she might be getting more desperate!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 06, 2011, 08:01:33 PM
The Bill Schaeffer video was great! You could tell he was holding back, even with what he did say!

I don't want Mason to take the lead. It's far more entertaining to watch Baez continually have to remove his foot from his mouth!!  ::MonkeyJnBox::

I agree, CBB.
Bozo's ego would never allow the Jar to take over the reigns.
Personally, I don't think Foghorn is all that professional, but he is a giant step above Bozo.
I hope Bozo's crying into his Superman pillow covers tonight.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 06, 2011, 08:04:53 PM
How sad was it when Foghorn Leghorn had to stand up and defend Baez at Monday's hearing?  It reminded me of a parent making excuses for a badly behaved child. >>> ::MonkeyTease::

Casey isn't smart enough to tell Mason to take the lead more.  I think she is so delusional she believes that she is part of the defense team and they are defending someone else entirely.   

I noticed Mason's body Weekend at Bernie's body language at the hearing yesterday.  Either he was asleep or distancing himself from Baez and his barely contained temper tantrum.

I thought he was going to collect his crayons and coloring books and storm out yesterday.   



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 06, 2011, 08:09:37 PM
OT, AND I DID NOT EVEN KNOW THIS WAS IN THE COURTS RIGHT NOW, BUT HOWARD K STERN WAS SET FREE.  JUDGE THREW OUT JURY'S VERDICT. 

http://www.tmz.com/2011/01/06/howard-k-stern-walks-in-anna-nicole-smith-judge-jerry-brown/2/#comments-anchor

OMG, that is just WRONG!

Hopefully the SA will appeal that and have that Judge investigated for his obvious bias.

Of course he did.......it was a pre-planned and PAID in advance. Even if he walks in the end, he will live a short life because he is as much an addict as she was and "THERE ARE NO OLD ADDICTS"


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 06, 2011, 08:11:03 PM
Yeah, Casey does seem to think she's an integral part of the defense team.

Foghorn always looks like he's sleeping to me. I guess he bores himself as much as hm and Bozo bore me with their whining.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 06, 2011, 08:22:25 PM

I don't want to really talk about this here.  But, I agree with it.  It was a fishing expedition.  by the time the trial was over, they only wanted probation and a fine, anyway, cause I think they realized how silly the whole thing became.  I never thought he did anything wrong, BUT BE A DUMMY.  Much like in the MJ case, I believe will be same outcome, cept CA will now want to make an example out of this doctor.  But, I was happy to read that.  Probably the only one here that thinks that too.

Now, why doesn't other states have things like the JAC.  Why does it seem Florida just puts everything out there?  I don't mind, don't get me wrong, but this is the most info I have ever had available for any case I have followed.   

In my opinion HKS is a pre-meditated killer just like KC. I will always believe him and the doctor deliberately killed her by over medicating and keeping her sedated knowing she would die. I also will always believe he killed her son in that hospital room because her son was on to him. It was all for money and she had cut him off. If she got clean & sober he KNEW that he was gone. He "thought" he could keep that baby with all his lies, but thank God that didn't happen.

He will never live to enjoy the money he stole from her because he is an addict himself and some say he has aids. Funny  how karma has a way of evening out the playing field even for the most evil of people.

I see karma in the fact that KC has Bozo as a lawyer so Florida will turn and burn her.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 08:49:33 PM
The Bill Sheaffer video was good!   ::MonkeyCool::

For an older dude, Bill Sheaffer is pretty hawt.  He speaks so elogently too. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 06, 2011, 08:51:55 PM
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-anthonys-jail-visits-more-like-a-parade-for-attorneys/
Casey Anthony's Jail visits Like a "Parade for Attorneys"
01/06/11


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 08:57:44 PM

I don't want to really talk about this here.  But, I agree with it.  It was a fishing expedition.  by the time the trial was over, they only wanted probation and a fine, anyway, cause I think they realized how silly the whole thing became.  I never thought he did anything wrong, BUT BE A DUMMY.  Much like in the MJ case, I believe will be same outcome, cept CA will now want to make an example out of this doctor.  But, I was happy to read that.  Probably the only one here that thinks that too.

Now, why doesn't other states have things like the JAC.  Why does it seem Florida just puts everything out there?  I don't mind, don't get me wrong, but this is the most info I have ever had available for any case I have followed.   

In my opinion HKS is a pre-meditated killer just like KC. I will always believe him and the doctor deliberately killed her by over medicating and keeping her sedated knowing she would die. I also will always believe he killed her son in that hospital room because her son was on to him. It was all for money and she had cut him off. If she got clean & sober he KNEW that he was gone. He "thought" he could keep that baby with all his lies, but thank God that didn't happen.

He will never live to enjoy the money he stole from her because he is an addict himself and some say he has aids. Funny  how karma has a way of evening out the playing field even for the most evil of people.

I see karma in the fact that KC has Bozo as a lawyer so Florida will turn and burn her.

I agree, thank God that Larry was the daddy.  IMO, there is zero comparison between him, her doctor, and KC.  KC murdered, then dumped her child of 2 years of age, in a swamp, in garbage bags, and then partied for 31 days before being asked to answer to where her daughter was.   

IMO, what the judge did today was legally sound.  There really was no evidence saying he murdered her or her son.    IMO, it was a horrible accident, coupled with her being sick, and her horrible depression after her son died. 

Is there a thread somewhere for this?  I didn't look.  I am gonna go look later see what others are saying.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 09:01:05 PM
The Bill Schaeffer video was great! You could tell he was holding back, even with what he did say!

I don't want Mason to take the lead. It's far more entertaining to watch Baez continually have to remove his foot from his mouth!!  ::MonkeyJnBox::

I agree, CBB.
Bozo's ego would never allow the Jar to take over the reigns.
Personally, I don't think Foghorn is all that professional, but he is a giant step above Bozo.
I hope Bozo's crying into his Superman pillow covers tonight.

Gosh, I think if Jar took over the case, people would committ suicide listening to him for however long the case will go on for.  He bores me to tears.  At least Bozo, I laugh at.  He is amusing in his stupidity. 

Superman pillow covers, now there is an assuring image for a capital murder defendent. 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 06, 2011, 09:04:22 PM
The Bill Schaeffer video was great! You could tell he was holding back, even with what he did say!

I don't want Mason to take the lead. It's far more entertaining to watch Baez continually have to remove his foot from his mouth!!  ::MonkeyJnBox::

I agree, CBB.
Bozo's ego would never allow the Jar to take over the reigns.
Personally, I don't think Foghorn is all that professional, but he is a giant step above Bozo.
I hope Bozo's crying into his Superman pillow covers tonight.

Gosh, I think if Jar took over the case, people would committ suicide listening to him for however long the case will go on for.  He bores me to tears.  At least Bozo, I laugh at.  He is amusing in his stupidity. 

Superman pillow covers, now there is an assuring image for a capital murder defendent. 





Well its about time baez starts wearing his big boy chonies!!
or depends could help him this month! i AM  sure he has had a few accidents. I hear they come in different colors and shapes.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 06, 2011, 09:42:43 PM
The Bill Schaeffer video was great! You could tell he was holding back, even with what he did say!

I don't want Mason to take the lead. It's far more entertaining to watch Baez continually have to remove his foot from his mouth!!  ::MonkeyJnBox::

I agree, CBB.
Bozo's ego would never allow the Jar to take over the reigns.
Personally, I don't think Foghorn is all that professional, but he is a giant step above Bozo.
I hope Bozo's crying into his Superman pillow covers tonight.

Gosh, I think if Jar took over the case, people would committ suicide listening to him for however long the case will go on for.  He bores me to tears.  At least Bozo, I laugh at.  He is amusing in his stupidity. 

Superman pillow covers, now there is an assuring image for a capital murder defendent. 



They're both really snoozefests, but I agree, Bozo's amusing in his idiocy.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 06, 2011, 10:15:02 PM
The Bill Sheaffer video was good!   ::MonkeyCool::

For an older dude, Bill Sheaffer is pretty hawt.  He speaks so elogently too. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 06, 2011, 10:16:00 PM
The Bill Sheaffer video was good!   ::MonkeyCool::

For an older dude, Bill Sheaffer is pretty hawt.  He speaks so elogently too. 
:thumright:


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 11:36:49 PM
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-anthonys-jail-visits-more-like-a-parade-for-attorneys/
Casey Anthony's Jail visits Like a "Parade for Attorneys"
01/06/11


Two new lawyers and two new psychologist visiting her. No wonder The Jar wanted the bigger table against the wall for trial. 

Gilbert (Gil) R Colon
Bryan C Hugo
Deborah Daskam Day
Kyle Joseph Goodwin

Wonder how many out of these new 4 have books to pimp?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 11:44:52 PM
aggressive legal representation...

Gil Colón, Jr.

After practicing law for several years with both the State Attorney's Office and the Office of Public Defender, Gil Colón, Jr. founded the firm in 1992 with one attorney and one secretary in a small, rented office in Bartow. Ten years later, the firm celebrated a decade in practice with three attorneys, 13 support staff, and three locations throughout Florida. We now have 5 offices to better serve our cliental

Gil is an accomplished trial lawyer representing the injured and accused. Gil has been involved in over 180 trials in multiple venues and courts, both on the Federal and State levels. He is an experienced litigator who has handled trials throughout central Florida including hundreds of death penalty, drug trafficking, and major sex offense cases.

Gil graduated from Rutgers University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science and earned his law degree from Rutgers College of Law. Gil is a former First Lieutenant in the United States Army Reserve, Armor Division. Born in New Jersey and raised in Puerto Rico, Gil is fluent in both Spanish and English.

Gil's professional affiliations include the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Lakeland Bar Association, National Association of Criminal Lawyers, Polk County Trial Lawyers Association, Polk County Criminal Defense Lawyers, Polk County Lawyers Association, and the Florida Bar Lawyers Referral Service.

Gil and his wife Felicia have three children and live in Lakeland, Florida where they attend Highland Park Church of the Nazerene. He enjoys golf, swimming and spending time with family

http://www.cal-pa.com/gil_colon.cfm


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 11:46:26 PM
Attorney Hugo's Qualifications:


PRACTICE FOCUS:

     My current practice involves the exclusive concentration on criminal defense matters. This practice includes felony and misdemeanor charges, violation of probation, appeals and post conviction relief. Previously I have obtained verdicts in cases involving capital sexual battery; armed robbery; kidnapping with a firearm; credit card fraud; sale and delivery of narcotics; and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, amongst others. In addition, I have litigated numerous cases involving attempted murder, drug trafficking, sex offenses and related crimes which were resolved either on substantive or procedural grounds prior to trial. Finally, my experience includes numerous matters which I have litigated in the appellate courts of the state and federal system, involving both criminal and civil matters.

     Further information as to my litigation history and experience may be obtained from my office upon request.

http://www.bryanhugolaw.com/attorney_profile.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 06, 2011, 11:58:24 PM
Youtube of Deborah  Day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vkk4Q_wY_s

Dr. Deborah Day is a "Making a Difference" Award Recipient from The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar in October

The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar publicly acknowledges, through the monthly ‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE” award, those individuals who have made a difference in the lives of the underserved or disadvantaged within our State.  The individuals who receive this award either provide outstanding pro bono services or engage in other types of outstanding volunteer community activities and pursuits that improve the lives of Florida’s children and families.  The recipients for the award for October, 2010 are Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Esq. and Deborah O. Day, Psy.D.  A brief description of the pro bono services and volunteer work of each individual appears below.  Congratulations to each recipient, and thank you for your past and continued efforts on behalf of the children and families of Florida.

In addition to her clinical and forensic practice in psychology, Dr. Day has contributed enormous amounts of time as a volunteer not only in her profession, but also to the legal profession and to the community.  In her professional affiliations, she has served in numerous roles with the Florida Psychological Association, including President of the Central Florida Chapter from 2001-2002, Chair of the Ethics and Domestic Violence Committees, and has volunteered her time to the Florida Chapter of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts as a Board member from 2001 – 2008.  She also served as the Vice President of Florida Chapter of AFCC in 2006, and the Chair of the 2004 and 2005 AFCC Conference Committees.

Dr. Day has donated her time and professional services to numerous non-profit organizations which include services to the Kids House of Seminole County as a Board member from 2001 – 2006 and as pro bono Clinical Director from 2002 – 2005.   She has served as a volunteer consultant to the Children’s Home Society from 1991-1993, as an Advisory Board member for Family Focus of Seminole County from 1992 – 1997, the Sexual Abuse Treatment Program from 1992-1997, and to HEAT (Help End Abuse Today), whose main goal is to prevent child abuse through education.

Dr. Day has also been appointed to numerous prestigious positions including her service on the Judicial Nominating Committee for the Supreme Court from 1997 – 2000, as a member of the Mediation Ethics Advisory Committee from 2002-2009, and by appointment by the Florida Supreme Court as a mediator of the Child Welfare Standards and Training Council from July, 1990 to August, 1993.

Dr. Day has selflessly devoted her time to improve the lives of Florida families by serving the legal community in many and varied roles.  She has served as Chair of the Community Service Workshop of the Orange County Domestic Violence Task Force Commission from 2004 to the present, as a committee member of the Orange County Coalition Victim Services Committee and with the Orange County Bar Association as a volunteer with the Family Law Committee and the Child Care Committee.  She has also been a contributor and guest speaker for the George C. Young First Central Florid Inn of Court and the Central Florida Family Law American Inn of Court, as well as a frequently invited guest speaker to the annual Judicial College.  She has donated her time and expertise as a member of the Florida Bar Bounds of Advocacy Committee.

Perhaps most notably, Dr. Day has been a frequent and long standing volunteer and contributor to the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar.  She has served on numerous and varied standing committees, including as Vice Chair of the Litigation Support Committee from 2004 - 2005 and Co-Chair from 2008-2009; as a member and Vice Chair of the Domestic Violence Committee from 2004-2005 and from 2007-2008; as a member of the Legislation Committee, Continuing Legal Education Committee, Parental Responsibility and Timesharing Ad Hoc Committee, and as a special Advisor to the Chair, both in 2009 and 2010 in the areas of children’s issues and domestic violence.

http://de-de.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=156331501069706


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 06, 2011, 11:58:52 PM
Attorney Hugo's Qualifications:


PRACTICE FOCUS:

     My current practice involves the exclusive concentration on criminal defense matters. This practice includes felony and misdemeanor charges, violation of probation, appeals and post conviction relief. Previously I have obtained verdicts in cases involving capital sexual battery; armed robbery; kidnapping with a firearm; credit card fraud; sale and delivery of narcotics; and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, amongst others. In addition, I have litigated numerous cases involving attempted murder, drug trafficking, sex offenses and related crimes which were resolved either on substantive or procedural grounds prior to trial. Finally, my experience includes numerous matters which I have litigated in the appellate courts of the state and federal system, involving both criminal and civil matters.

     Further information as to my litigation history and experience may be obtained from my office upon request.

http://www.bryanhugolaw.com/attorney_profile.html

This guy sounds as putzy as Bozo does.  He is so full of himself. How many times can a person use litigatd in a paragraph? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 12:01:12 AM
Youtube of Deborah  Day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vkk4Q_wY_s

Dr. Deborah Day is a "Making a Difference" Award Recipient from The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar in October

The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar publicly acknowledges, through the monthly ‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE” award, those individuals who have made a difference in the lives of the underserved or disadvantaged within our State.  The individuals who receive this award either provide outstanding pro bono services or engage in other types of outstanding volunteer community activities and pursuits that improve the lives of Florida’s children and families.  The recipients for the award for October, 2010 are Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Esq. and Deborah O. Day, Psy.D.  A brief description of the pro bono services and volunteer work of each individual appears below.  Congratulations to each recipient, and thank you for your past and continued efforts on behalf of the children and families of Florida.

In addition to her clinical and forensic practice in psychology, Dr. Day has contributed enormous amounts of time as a volunteer not only in her profession, but also to the legal profession and to the community.  In her professional affiliations, she has served in numerous roles with the Florida Psychological Association, including President of the Central Florida Chapter from 2001-2002, Chair of the Ethics and Domestic Violence Committees, and has volunteered her time to the Florida Chapter of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts as a Board member from 2001 – 2008.  She also served as the Vice President of Florida Chapter of AFCC in 2006, and the Chair of the 2004 and 2005 AFCC Conference Committees.

Dr. Day has donated her time and professional services to numerous non-profit organizations which include services to the Kids House of Seminole County as a Board member from 2001 – 2006 and as pro bono Clinical Director from 2002 – 2005.   She has served as a volunteer consultant to the Children’s Home Society from 1991-1993, as an Advisory Board member for Family Focus of Seminole County from 1992 – 1997, the Sexual Abuse Treatment Program from 1992-1997, and to HEAT (Help End Abuse Today), whose main goal is to prevent child abuse through education.

Dr. Day has also been appointed to numerous prestigious positions including her service on the Judicial Nominating Committee for the Supreme Court from 1997 – 2000, as a member of the Mediation Ethics Advisory Committee from 2002-2009, and by appointment by the Florida Supreme Court as a mediator of the Child Welfare Standards and Training Council from July, 1990 to August, 1993.

Dr. Day has selflessly devoted her time to improve the lives of Florida families by serving the legal community in many and varied roles.  She has served as Chair of the Community Service Workshop of the Orange County Domestic Violence Task Force Commission from 2004 to the present, as a committee member of the Orange County Coalition Victim Services Committee and with the Orange County Bar Association as a volunteer with the Family Law Committee and the Child Care Committee.  She has also been a contributor and guest speaker for the George C. Young First Central Florid Inn of Court and the Central Florida Family Law American Inn of Court, as well as a frequently invited guest speaker to the annual Judicial College.  She has donated her time and expertise as a member of the Florida Bar Bounds of Advocacy Committee.

Perhaps most notably, Dr. Day has been a frequent and long standing volunteer and contributor to the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar.  She has served on numerous and varied standing committees, including as Vice Chair of the Litigation Support Committee from 2004 - 2005 and Co-Chair from 2008-2009; as a member and Vice Chair of the Domestic Violence Committee from 2004-2005 and from 2007-2008; as a member of the Legislation Committee, Continuing Legal Education Committee, Parental Responsibility and Timesharing Ad Hoc Committee, and as a special Advisor to the Chair, both in 2009 and 2010 in the areas of children’s issues and domestic violence.

http://de-de.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=156331501069706

This one reads like she is more of an expert than a defense lawyer.  What will she do?  Only speak to her saneness?  Will she pop up only at parts of the trial where her mental state comes up?  Wonder how they are paying her? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Rowanvamp0 on January 07, 2011, 12:02:03 AM
After all my searching monkeys I found the video of Yesterday's hearing(1-05-11) just in case others like me want to see the feed in full view..altho we do appreciate monks screen shots and captures nothing says it all like seeing the body(Language) in motion.  So here's the link to the feed..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 07, 2011, 12:06:41 AM
Kyle and Deborah have worked  together before

03/08 Day, D.  An MMPI-2 and MCMI-III Based Cluster Analysis Among Child Custody Litigants.  Co- Author Kyle J. Goodwin. 

http://psychologicalaffiliates.com/docs/resume/Deborah_Day.pdf

Here is another paper by Kyle
The role of academic performance, association, and perceived dangerousness in shaping the attitudes of college students toward people with mental illness

http://www.worldcat.org/profiles/showx2/lists/80817?view=print&se=added&sd=desc&count=all


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 07, 2011, 12:31:31 AM
How many attorneys are going to enter this case and then run away when the realize that it is impossible to defend Casey?  There is no getting around her fantastic lies, ghost nanny, inappropriate behavior, and most of all 31 days. 


Good Luck with all of that.  or LOL!  Johnnie Cochran couldn't get her off.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 07, 2011, 12:35:07 AM
After all my searching monkeys I found the video of Yesterday's hearing(1-05-11) just in case others like me want to see the feed in full view..altho we do appreciate monks screen shots and captures nothing says it all like seeing the body(Language) in motion.  So here's the link to the feed..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY)

Thank you, Rowan.   ::MonkeyKiss::  And I appreciate the monks that provided dialog, screen shots, links and etc.   ::MonkeyKiss:: ::MonkeyKiss::

Justice for Caylee.   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 12:37:14 AM
How many attorneys are going to enter this case and then run away when the realize that it is impossible to defend Casey?  There is no getting around her fantastic lies, ghost nanny, inappropriate behavior, and most of all 31 days. 


Good Luck with all of that.  or LOL!  Johnnie Cochran couldn't get her off.


Yeah, and for the brief period they flit in to the case, who is paying them.  Doesn't the JAC limit how many freaking lawyers these idjits can waste money on?  The whole thing makes me sick really.  I am losing patience, and cannot wait until the verdict is polled AND ALL WHAT IS IS 12 JURORS SAY GUILTY.

As for Bozo and Company, I am sure that Walmart or McDonald's will be hiring then too. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 12:44:09 AM
Night all.  Zoo is beat and needs some beauty sleep.  See ya all later. 

Maybe I will wake up and it will be May and little Caylee will be watching up in heaven when her Justice is handed down to her murdering mother.  One can dream. 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Rowanvamp0 on January 07, 2011, 12:49:08 AM

here is a youtube of the hearing today for those that could not hear it this afternoon & its well worth a second listen to catch just how much Bozo fumbled:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Magic, feel better!



Hey Capp you beat me to it..LOL I missed your post somehow and well I posted the link to the video as well..darn I'm always the day late dollar short but this time I think Baez is alot more the a dollar short in my book..LOL


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Rowanvamp0 on January 07, 2011, 12:52:39 AM
After all my searching monkeys I found the video of Yesterday's hearing(1-05-11) just in case others like me want to see the feed in full view..altho we do appreciate monks screen shots and captures nothing says it all like seeing the body(Language) in motion.  So here's the link to the feed..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY)

Thank you, Rowan.   ::MonkeyKiss::  And I appreciate the monks that provided dialog, screen shots, links and etc.   ::MonkeyKiss:: ::MonkeyKiss::

Justice for Caylee.   ::MonkeyAngel::

I appreciate the monks that do Screen Shots and dialog to I mean without them some of us wouldn't have the full picture.  Their hard work helps us all out as for me I just have to see the body in motion I love reading people/body language it is sooo telling..if you go over the jail house videos those are chalk full of lies just by body language for all to see..there are some truths but very little.  Just interesting that's all...wonder if down the line in this will end up being one of those Case Study cases in school...huumm??


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 07, 2011, 03:56:54 AM
Hi All,

I've been following the case since day one and am happy to join you here at SM.  How fun was it to watch Baez finally get seriously smacked down from Perry twice in one week? 

I loved every minute of it.  ::MonkeyCheer4::

Welcome, it's nice to have you here!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 07:07:54 AM
http://mhutch.blogspot.com/2011/01/jose-baez-fined-almost-600-for-willful.html
Thursday, January 06, 2011
Jose Baez Fined Almost $600 For Willful Violation


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 07:09:32 AM
The Bill Sheaffer video was good!   ::MonkeyCool::

For an older dude, Bill Sheaffer is pretty hawt.  He speaks so elogently too. 

I love to listen to him. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 07:13:14 AM
Kyle and Deborah have worked  together before

03/08 Day, D.  An MMPI-2 and MCMI-III Based Cluster Analysis Among Child Custody Litigants.  Co- Author Kyle J. Goodwin. 

http://psychologicalaffiliates.com/docs/resume/Deborah_Day.pdf

Here is another paper by Kyle
The role of academic performance, association, and perceived dangerousness in shaping the attitudes of college students toward people with mental illness

http://www.worldcat.org/profiles/showx2/lists/80817?view=print&se=added&sd=desc&count=all

Thanks Northern.I'll go read this.   ::rhino::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 07, 2011, 08:31:31 AM
Thanks for all the info on these attys who have visited Casey.  I agree.....this is all penalty phase prep.  And yes.....how are they getting paid?  Oh, that's right.....it's pro bono!  Ha Ha

I find it very odd that neither Baez or Mason are making trips to the jail.  How else could they be communicating.......snail mail?!   ::MonkeyJnBox::



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 07, 2011, 08:40:22 AM
http://mhutch.blogspot.com/2011/01/jose-baez-fined-almost-600-for-willful.html
Thursday, January 06, 2011
Jose Baez Fined Almost $600 For Willful Violation

What?  Baez is not working this case pro bono?  We, the taxpayers, are paying him?   ::MonkeyMad::  Mason too?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 07, 2011, 08:47:21 AM
The state is not paying Baez.  He is still a privately retained attorney in this case, for which he has already been paid. (blood money) 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 09:43:03 AM
The state is not paying Baez.  He is still a privately retained attorney in this case, for which he has already been paid. (blood money) 
You can understand the confusion with all the chaos Baez creates.  ::MonkeyCool::
I remember when we went over this.
http://www.justiceadmin.org/court_app_counsel/contracts/IFC%20memo%202010%20statutory%20changes.pdf


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 09:44:13 AM
 
[/quote]
The state is not paying Baez.  He is still a privately retained attorney in this case, for which he has already been paid. (blood money) 

Sometimes I swear I have dyslexia.  I read the above BBM, as privately RUINED.....

He He. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 07, 2011, 09:53:37 AM

The state is not paying Baez.  He is still a privately retained attorney in this case, for which he has already been paid. (blood money) 

Sometimes I swear I have dyslexia.  I read the above BBM, as privately RUINED.....

He He. 
[/quote]

 ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 07, 2011, 09:55:32 AM
The state is not paying Baez.  He is still a privately retained attorney in this case, for which he has already been paid. (blood money) 
You can understand the confusion with all the chaos Baez creates.  ::MonkeyCool::
I remember when we went over this.
http://www.justiceadmin.org/court_app_counsel/contracts/IFC%20memo%202010%20statutory%20changes.pdf
Thanks Trimm. After reading the end of the article, I thought maybe something had changed....but that subject is set in stone.  The thought of any of my money going to him personally, well, it just gags me. It's bad enough we are paying for these worthless motions, etc.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 07, 2011, 09:56:55 AM

The state is not paying Baez.  He is still a privately retained attorney in this case, for which he has already been paid. (blood money) 

Sometimes I swear I have dyslexia.  I read the above BBM, as privately RUINED.....

He He. 

 ::MonkeyDevil::
[/quote]
 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Oh how true that statement is!  He has himself to thank!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 10:09:17 AM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011           Notice of Hearing
3/2/11 and 3/3/11



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 10:10:09 AM

The state is not paying Baez.  He is still a privately retained attorney in this case, for which he has already been paid. (blood money) 

Sometimes I swear I have dyslexia.  I read the above BBM, as privately RUINED.....

He He. 

 ::MonkeyDevil::
::MonkeyHaHa::  Oh how true that statement is!  He has himself to thank!

[/quote]

 :2rofl:


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 07, 2011, 11:27:47 AM
Wow, that Bill Sheaffer video was just amazing.  I have never in my whole life heard one attorney take another attorney to task like that.  It was very well deserved and I think that Mr. Sheaffer even held back what he truly wanted to say.  To be called a "School Boy" by another attorney must really be stinging Bozo.  Would hate to have to deal with him after he reads this.  I hope Casey doesn't wise up and let's her guy take her all the way to...........................GUILTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for all of the links, monkey-dear's, this week has been a very good week for our sweet Caylee.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060


It was great wasn't it? Particularly since they work in the same community. Baez is embarrassing the whole legal profession.
It ranks up there with Richard Hornsby's comment that in his professional and personal opinion Baez is a moron.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 11:32:17 AM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26390467/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Ordered To Pay Nearly $600
Posted: 1:41 pm EST January 6, 2011Updated: 10:42 am EST January 7, 2011

ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Judge Belvin Perry granted the prosecution's request for sanctions in the case against Casey Anthony, according to an order released Thursday. Defense attorney Jose Baez was fined nearly $600 for breaking the rules.

DOCUMENT: Read Judge's Order  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26390295/detail.html
BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis Of Granted Request  http://www.wftv.com/video/26393038/index.html
Perry ordered Baez on Monday to give prosecutors more information about defense experts, but he didn't do it. However, Perry punished Baez in a way that won't jeopardize Casey Anthony's right to a fair trial.

The jury will never know about the fine, but WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said Baez's actions could have backfired.

"Was there any particular reason why that was not complied with?" Perry asked Casey's attorney Cheney Mason in court Monday.

"The answer to that is I don't know," Mason replied.

Baez let Casey's other lawyer answer to accusations that Baez wasn't playing fair. He refused to provide prosecutors with defense experts' opinions, before the experts are questioned under oath, before the May murder trial and he defied the judge's order to do so.

Instead, he wisecracked that his botany expert would testify about botany and one expert would rebut any false claims made by prosecution experts.

"A lack of maturity, again a lack of experience and it just doesn't speak well of him professionally," Sheaffer said.

Perry gave Baez seven days to write a $583.73 check to the state. It's reimbursement for the seven hours it took the prosecution to work on its motion demanding action against Baez for breaking the rules.

Otherwise, Baez could have hurt the defense.
You run the risk of having sanctions imposed, that sanction being the exclusion of that witness's testimony," Sheaffer said.

The judge told Baez those opinions that don't go into those defense expert reports won't come into trial.

Baez has five days to appeal the amount of his fine and he now has up to 20 days to provide those reports to prosecutors.

Casey's defense team will be back in court next week to discuss picking a jury for her murder trial. A status hearing is scheduled for a week from Friday.

The judge said they'll talk about the costs of selecting and sequestering the jury. Jurors will be chosen in another county and will be brought to Orange County for the trial in May.

Casey is not required to attend the hearing.

Meanwhile, defense expert, botanist Dr. Jane Bock will be deposed on January 18. Defense bug expert Dr. Tim Huntington will be questioned under oath on January 28.

The experts have been ordered by the judge to provide written reports before the depositions.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Scatty on January 07, 2011, 11:45:39 AM
http://mhutch.blogspot.com/2011/01/jose-baez-fined-almost-600-for-willful.html
Thursday, January 06, 2011
Jose Baez Fined Almost $600 For Willful Violation

What?  Baez is not working this case pro bono?  We, the taxpayers, are paying him?   ::MonkeyMad::  Mason too?

I seem to recall in the hearing, Mr. Pro Bozo trying to joke (through his tears) to the judge that the sanctions were cutting into his $3 an hour.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 07, 2011, 12:39:20 PM
http://mhutch.blogspot.com/2011/01/jose-baez-fined-almost-600-for-willful.html
Thursday, January 06, 2011
Jose Baez Fined Almost $600 For Willful Violation

What?  Baez is not working this case pro bono?  We, the taxpayers, are paying him?   ::MonkeyMad::  Mason too?

I seem to recall in the hearing, Mr. Pro Bozo trying to joke (through his tears) to the judge that the sanctions were cutting into his $3 an hour.

If he did a career change he would make more at the drive through at Mickie Dee's.  Would you like that supersized?   ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 07, 2011, 12:46:22 PM
snipped:
A court may not appoint an attorney based upon a finding of indigency for costs where
the person has privately retained and paid counsel.
 If the defendant is convicted, the defendant is liable for reimbursement of due process costs expended by the state. The attorney is responsible for providing an accounting to the court of all costs paid or to be paid within 90 days after disposition of the case notwithstanding any appeals. The court shall then enter an order determining the amount of costs paid which will thereafter be recorded as a lien against the defendant. If the attorney fails to provide a complete accounting such that costs are omitted from the lien, then JAC is not authorized to pay or reimburse any such costs that remain unpaid and the attorney is personally liable to repay the state for any such costs already paid.
The clerk of court is authorized to place the attorney on a payment program to obtain
repayment of those costs.
---------------------
BBM
does that say what I hope it says . . . when momster is found guilty . . .


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 12:58:35 PM
http://drlillianglassbodylanguageblog.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/casey-anthony-continues-flirting-grooming-and-smiling-in-the-courtroom/
Casey Anthony Continues Flirting, Grooming, and Smiling in the Courtroom
01/07/11


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: cadillac on January 07, 2011, 01:09:33 PM
Note the word "schoolgirl" was used to describe her.  I don't think she is even that mature.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 01:41:47 PM
http://drlillianglassbodylanguageblog.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/casey-anthony-continues-flirting-grooming-and-smiling-in-the-courtroom/
Casey Anthony Continues Flirting, Grooming, and Smiling in the Courtroom
01/07/11



Unbelievable ! andrea leaves and she commences to regress to her old habits of grooming ! I agree with Dr. Glass eventhough I dont always agree with her on everything. She commented that the jury would not like caseys grooming and flirting. I say bring it on casey!! casey your daughter will get her due justice with your help. Because Mickey mouse and co cannot train you otherwise.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 01:56:41 PM

here is a youtube of the hearing today for those that could not hear it this afternoon & its well worth a second listen to catch just how much Bozo fumbled:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY

Magic, feel better!



Hey Capp you beat me to it..LOL I missed your post somehow and well I posted the link to the video as well..darn I'm always the day late dollar short but this time I think Baez is alot more the a dollar short in my book..LOL


speaking of being a dollar short. I wonder when baez will pay the state the money or will he  fight it! we all know he has to try to make his point!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 01:59:12 PM
How many attorneys are going to enter this case and then run away when the realize that it is impossible to defend Casey?  There is no getting around her fantastic lies, ghost nanny, inappropriate behavior, and most of all 31 days. 


Good Luck with all of that.  or LOL!  Johnnie Cochran couldn't get her off.


Yeah, and for the brief period they flit in to the case, who is paying them.  Doesn't the JAC limit how many freaking lawyers these idjits can waste money on?  The whole thing makes me sick really.  I am losing patience, and cannot wait until the verdict is polled AND ALL WHAT IS IS 12 JURORS SAY GUILTY.

As for Bozo and Company, I am sure that Walmart or McDonald's will be hiring then too. 




Johny cochran said if the glove dont fit you must aquit!!

with casey Its like!!
if she didnt report her her for 31 than she's the one!! you must convict!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 07, 2011, 02:26:21 PM
Attorney Hugo's Qualifications:


PRACTICE FOCUS:

     My current practice involves the exclusive concentration on criminal defense matters. This practice includes felony and misdemeanor charges, violation of probation, appeals and post conviction relief. Previously I have obtained verdicts in cases involving capital sexual battery; armed robbery; kidnapping with a firearm; credit card fraud; sale and delivery of narcotics; and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, amongst others. In addition, I have litigated numerous cases involving attempted murder, drug trafficking, sex offenses and related crimes which were resolved either on substantive or procedural grounds prior to trial. Finally, my experience includes numerous matters which I have litigated in the appellate courts of the state and federal system, involving both criminal and civil matters.

     Further information as to my litigation history and experience may be obtained from my office upon request.

http://www.bryanhugolaw.com/attorney_profile.html

This guy sounds as putzy as Bozo does.  He is so full of himself. How many times can a person use litigatd in a paragraph? 

Notably missing from his "listings of litigation" is murder charges.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 07, 2011, 02:31:13 PM
How many attorneys are going to enter this case and then run away when the realize that it is impossible to defend Casey?  There is no getting around her fantastic lies, ghost nanny, inappropriate behavior, and most of all 31 days. 


Good Luck with all of that.  or LOL!  Johnnie Cochran couldn't get her off.


Yeah, and for the brief period they flit in to the case, who is paying them.  Doesn't the JAC limit how many freaking lawyers these idjits can waste money on?  The whole thing makes me sick really.  I am losing patience, and cannot wait until the verdict is polled AND ALL WHAT IS IS 12 JURORS SAY GUILTY.

As for Bozo and Company, I am sure that Walmart or McDonald's will be hiring then too. 


Johny cochran said if the glove dont fit you must aquit!!

with casey Its like!!
if she didnt report her her for 31 than she's the one!! you must convict!!

Clever Loco....if the nanny is existence evicted, Casey must be convicted.   Nothing for nothing, Walmart or Mickee D's wouldnt even hire them, they have firm with a team of attorneys on retainer & very well paid....they would eat Bozo for lunch & then ask for a drink to wash the bad taste out of their mouths.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 07, 2011, 02:32:19 PM
Loca, I loved your lines and that is a key factor in this case that can not be explained away!

No report for 31
Absolutely, she's the one

The jury will not be tricked
For Justice, they must convict.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 02:35:46 PM
Loca, I loved your lines and that is a key factor in this case that can not be explained away!

No report for 31
Absolutely, she's the one

The jury will not be tricked
For Justice, they must convict.



Yes Tupelo
there is no way  they can get past that. Her actions arent good when she is in court but that and the 31 will do her in.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 02:39:12 PM
How many attorneys are going to enter this case and then run away when the realize that it is impossible to defend Casey?  There is no getting around her fantastic lies, ghost nanny, inappropriate behavior, and most of all 31 days. 


Good Luck with all of that.  or LOL!  Johnnie Cochran couldn't get her off.


Yeah, and for the brief period they flit in to the case, who is paying them.  Doesn't the JAC limit how many freaking lawyers these idjits can waste money on?  The whole thing makes me sick really.  I am losing patience, and cannot wait until the verdict is polled AND ALL WHAT IS IS 12 JURORS SAY GUILTY.

As for Bozo and Company, I am sure that Walmart or McDonald's will be hiring then too. 


Johny cochran said if the glove dont fit you must aquit!!

with casey Its like!!
if she didnt report her her for 31 than she's the one!! you must convict!!

Clever Loco....if the nanny is existence evicted, Casey must be convicted.   Nothing for nothing, Walmart or Mickee D's wouldnt even hire them, they have firm with a team of attorneys on retainer & very well paid....they would eat Bozo for lunch & then ask for a drink to wash the bad taste out of their mouths.



Bozo knows he is no Johny Cochran he nor Mason do not  come close. The judge has now figured bozo out fully. He knows that they bounced from one person to the other not being able to make any of them stick as the one's comitting the crime on caylee. Everything points to her! who else come!! on!! would bury a kidnapped child so close to home. Thats no coincidence. I hope when she is convicted that they arrest the Anthonys !! I guess one at a time.
arrest one anthony two anthonys three anthonys Done!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 07, 2011, 02:40:16 PM
Youtube of Deborah  Day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vkk4Q_wY_s

Dr. Deborah Day is a "Making a Difference" Award Recipient from The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar in October

The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar publicly acknowledges, through the monthly ‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE” award, those individuals who have made a difference in the lives of the underserved or disadvantaged within our State.  The individuals who receive this award either provide outstanding pro bono services or engage in other types of outstanding volunteer community activities and pursuits that improve the lives of Florida’s children and families.  The recipients for the award for October, 2010 are Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Esq. and Deborah O. Day, Psy.D.  A brief description of the pro bono services and volunteer work of each individual appears below.  Congratulations to each recipient, and thank you for your past and continued efforts on behalf of the children and families of Florida.

In addition to her clinical and forensic practice in psychology, Dr. Day has contributed enormous amounts of time as a volunteer not only in her profession, but also to the legal profession and to the community.  In her professional affiliations, she has served in numerous roles with the Florida Psychological Association, including President of the Central Florida Chapter from 2001-2002, Chair of the Ethics and Domestic Violence Committees, and has volunteered her time to the Florida Chapter of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts as a Board member from 2001 – 2008.  She also served as the Vice President of Florida Chapter of AFCC in 2006, and the Chair of the 2004 and 2005 AFCC Conference Committees.

Dr. Day has donated her time and professional services to numerous non-profit organizations which include services to the Kids House of Seminole County as a Board member from 2001 – 2006 and as pro bono Clinical Director from 2002 – 2005.   She has served as a volunteer consultant to the Children’s Home Society from 1991-1993, as an Advisory Board member for Family Focus of Seminole County from 1992 – 1997, the Sexual Abuse Treatment Program from 1992-1997, and to HEAT (Help End Abuse Today), whose main goal is to prevent child abuse through education.

Dr. Day has also been appointed to numerous prestigious positions including her service on the Judicial Nominating Committee for the Supreme Court from 1997 – 2000, as a member of the Mediation Ethics Advisory Committee from 2002-2009, and by appointment by the Florida Supreme Court as a mediator of the Child Welfare Standards and Training Council from July, 1990 to August, 1993.

Dr. Day has selflessly devoted her time to improve the lives of Florida families by serving the legal community in many and varied roles.  She has served as Chair of the Community Service Workshop of the Orange County Domestic Violence Task Force Commission from 2004 to the present, as a committee member of the Orange County Coalition Victim Services Committee and with the Orange County Bar Association as a volunteer with the Family Law Committee and the Child Care Committee.  She has also been a contributor and guest speaker for the George C. Young First Central Florid Inn of Court and the Central Florida Family Law American Inn of Court, as well as a frequently invited guest speaker to the annual Judicial College.  She has donated her time and expertise as a member of the Florida Bar Bounds of Advocacy Committee.

Perhaps most notably, Dr. Day has been a frequent and long standing volunteer and contributor to the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar.  She has served on numerous and varied standing committees, including as Vice Chair of the Litigation Support Committee from 2004 - 2005 and Co-Chair from 2008-2009; as a member and Vice Chair of the Domestic Violence Committee from 2004-2005 and from 2007-2008; as a member of the Legislation Committee, Continuing Legal Education Committee, Parental Responsibility and Timesharing Ad Hoc Committee, and as a special Advisor to the Chair, both in 2009 and 2010 in the areas of children’s issues and domestic violence.

http://de-de.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=156331501069706

This one reads like she is more of an expert than a defense lawyer.  What will she do?  Only speak to her saneness?  Will she pop up only at parts of the trial where her mental state comes up?  Wonder how they are paying her? 

She is there for the sob fest the defense is going to put on post conviction to portray Casey as a victim of a) familial sexual abuse b) child abuse and God knows what else based on Casey's allegations of which none she can prove nor had she ever sought help for previously to Caylee's murder.  IMHO, the jury will see right through this circus at trial and during penalty phase, albeit I do think they stand a good chance of sparing her from the needle.   I'm confident in the outcome of conviction, a tad less that she will indeed receive the death penalty.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 07, 2011, 03:46:36 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  Look at this....
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011     Order Denying
Motion to Seal Penalty Phase Discovery

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
DENIED, NO SOUP FOR YOU, MS. FINNELL!
Oh, Judge Perrry, you are my hero!
 ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 07, 2011, 03:57:22 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  Look at this....
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011     Order Denying
Motion to Seal Penalty Phase Discovery

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
DENIED, NO SOUP FOR YOU, MS. FINNELL!
Oh, Judge Perrry, you are my hero!
 ::MonkeyGavel::

Mine too, MONK!   ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 07, 2011, 04:09:17 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  Look at this....
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011     Order Denying
Motion to Seal Penalty Phase Discovery

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
DENIED, NO SOUP FOR YOU, MS. FINNELL!
Oh, Judge Perrry, you are my hero!
 ::MonkeyGavel::

Mine too, MONK!   ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyGavel::

My favourite lines:
"To the contrary, many potential penalty phase witnesses are presumably already known to the public at large and are already associated with this case.  Release of any known individual's name could not possibly deprive the Defendant of her fair trial rights."


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 04:24:51 PM
Attorney Hugo's Qualifications:


PRACTICE FOCUS:

     My current practice involves the exclusive concentration on criminal defense matters. This practice includes felony and misdemeanor charges, violation of probation, appeals and post conviction relief. Previously I have obtained verdicts in cases involving capital sexual battery; armed robbery; kidnapping with a firearm; credit card fraud; sale and delivery of narcotics; and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, amongst others. In addition, I have litigated numerous cases involving attempted murder, drug trafficking, sex offenses and related crimes which were resolved either on substantive or procedural grounds prior to trial. Finally, my experience includes numerous matters which I have litigated in the appellate courts of the state and federal system, involving both criminal and civil matters.

     Further information as to my litigation history and experience may be obtained from my office upon request.

http://www.bryanhugolaw.com/attorney_profile.html

This guy sounds as putzy as Bozo does.  He is so full of himself. How many times can a person use litigatd in a paragraph? 

Notably missing from his "listings of litigation" is murder charges.

Yeah, what a co-inky dink.  He probably just forgot that one.  No, really, I did notice that.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 04:32:07 PM
Youtube of Deborah  Day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vkk4Q_wY_s

Dr. Deborah Day is a "Making a Difference" Award Recipient from The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar in October

The Family Law Section of the Florida Bar publicly acknowledges, through the monthly ‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE” award, those individuals who have made a difference in the lives of the underserved or disadvantaged within our State.  The individuals who receive this award either provide outstanding pro bono services or engage in other types of outstanding volunteer community activities and pursuits that improve the lives of Florida’s children and families.  The recipients for the award for October, 2010 are Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Esq. and Deborah O. Day, Psy.D.  A brief description of the pro bono services and volunteer work of each individual appears below.  Congratulations to each recipient, and thank you for your past and continued efforts on behalf of the children and families of Florida.

In addition to her clinical and forensic practice in psychology, Dr. Day has contributed enormous amounts of time as a volunteer not only in her profession, but also to the legal profession and to the community.  In her professional affiliations, she has served in numerous roles with the Florida Psychological Association, including President of the Central Florida Chapter from 2001-2002, Chair of the Ethics and Domestic Violence Committees, and has volunteered her time to the Florida Chapter of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts as a Board member from 2001 – 2008.  She also served as the Vice President of Florida Chapter of AFCC in 2006, and the Chair of the 2004 and 2005 AFCC Conference Committees.

Dr. Day has donated her time and professional services to numerous non-profit organizations which include services to the Kids House of Seminole County as a Board member from 2001 – 2006 and as pro bono Clinical Director from 2002 – 2005.   She has served as a volunteer consultant to the Children’s Home Society from 1991-1993, as an Advisory Board member for Family Focus of Seminole County from 1992 – 1997, the Sexual Abuse Treatment Program from 1992-1997, and to HEAT (Help End Abuse Today), whose main goal is to prevent child abuse through education.

Dr. Day has also been appointed to numerous prestigious positions including her service on the Judicial Nominating Committee for the Supreme Court from 1997 – 2000, as a member of the Mediation Ethics Advisory Committee from 2002-2009, and by appointment by the Florida Supreme Court as a mediator of the Child Welfare Standards and Training Council from July, 1990 to August, 1993.

Dr. Day has selflessly devoted her time to improve the lives of Florida families by serving the legal community in many and varied roles.  She has served as Chair of the Community Service Workshop of the Orange County Domestic Violence Task Force Commission from 2004 to the present, as a committee member of the Orange County Coalition Victim Services Committee and with the Orange County Bar Association as a volunteer with the Family Law Committee and the Child Care Committee.  She has also been a contributor and guest speaker for the George C. Young First Central Florid Inn of Court and the Central Florida Family Law American Inn of Court, as well as a frequently invited guest speaker to the annual Judicial College.  She has donated her time and expertise as a member of the Florida Bar Bounds of Advocacy Committee.

Perhaps most notably, Dr. Day has been a frequent and long standing volunteer and contributor to the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar.  She has served on numerous and varied standing committees, including as Vice Chair of the Litigation Support Committee from 2004 - 2005 and Co-Chair from 2008-2009; as a member and Vice Chair of the Domestic Violence Committee from 2004-2005 and from 2007-2008; as a member of the Legislation Committee, Continuing Legal Education Committee, Parental Responsibility and Timesharing Ad Hoc Committee, and as a special Advisor to the Chair, both in 2009 and 2010 in the areas of children’s issues and domestic violence.

http://de-de.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=156331501069706

This one reads like she is more of an expert than a defense lawyer.  What will she do?  Only speak to her saneness?  Will she pop up only at parts of the trial where her mental state comes up?  Wonder how they are paying her? 

She is there for the sob fest the defense is going to put on post conviction to portray Casey as a victim of a) familial sexual abuse b) child abuse and God knows what else based on Casey's allegations of which none she can prove nor had she ever sought help for previously to Caylee's murder.  IMHO, the jury will see right through this circus at trial and during penalty phase, albeit I do think they stand a good chance of sparing her from the needle.   I'm confident in the outcome of conviction, a tad less that she will indeed receive the death penalty.

I sure hope so, I feel confident most days, some days less so than others, cause I cannot believe their carp is allowed to go on day after day.  I do not think she will get DP though.  I keep thinking how there is only 1 female on Death Row in florida.  She will get life, IMO, which is fine for me.  Life in GenPop, she will wish she got DP.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 04:32:46 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  Look at this....
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011     Order Denying
Motion to Seal Penalty Phase Discovery

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
DENIED, NO SOUP FOR YOU, MS. FINNELL!
Oh, Judge Perrry, you are my hero!
 ::MonkeyGavel::

Woo Hoo.  Rocking the Kasbar (spelling?).   ::MonkeyCheer4::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 04:35:45 PM
Attorney Hugo's Qualifications:


PRACTICE FOCUS:

     My current practice involves the exclusive concentration on criminal defense matters. This practice includes felony and misdemeanor charges, violation of probation, appeals and post conviction relief. Previously I have obtained verdicts in cases involving capital sexual battery; armed robbery; kidnapping with a firearm; credit card fraud; sale and delivery of narcotics; and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, amongst others. In addition, I have litigated numerous cases involving attempted murder, drug trafficking, sex offenses and related crimes which were resolved either on substantive or procedural grounds prior to trial. Finally, my experience includes numerous matters which I have litigated in the appellate courts of the state and federal system, involving both criminal and civil matters.

     Further information as to my litigation history and experience may be obtained from my office upon request.

http://www.bryanhugolaw.com/attorney_profile.html

This guy sounds as putzy as Bozo does.  He is so full of himself. How many times can a person use litigatd in a paragraph? 

Notably missing from his "listings of litigation" is murder charges.

Yeah, what a co-inky dink.  He probably just forgot that one.  No, really, I did notice that.

He really should spend a few bucks and pay somebody to redo his resume/website.  it reads like a juvenile wrote it. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 07, 2011, 04:36:24 PM
Attorney Hugo's Qualifications:


PRACTICE FOCUS:

     My current practice involves the exclusive concentration on criminal defense matters. This practice includes felony and misdemeanor charges, violation of probation, appeals and post conviction relief. Previously I have obtained verdicts in cases involving capital sexual battery; armed robbery; kidnapping with a firearm; credit card fraud; sale and delivery of narcotics; and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, amongst others. In addition, I have litigated numerous cases involving attempted murder, drug trafficking, sex offenses and related crimes which were resolved either on substantive or procedural grounds prior to trial. Finally, my experience includes numerous matters which I have litigated in the appellate courts of the state and federal system, involving both criminal and civil matters.

     Further information as to my litigation history and experience may be obtained from my office upon request.

http://www.bryanhugolaw.com/attorney_profile.html

This guy sounds as putzy as Bozo does.  He is so full of himself. How many times can a person use litigatd in a paragraph? 

Notably missing from his "listings of litigation" is murder charges.

Yeah, what a co-inky dink.  He probably just forgot that one.  No, really, I did notice that.
He also says he "has obtained verdicts."  Well, duh.  There is always a verdict.  But what kind of verdict?  He's not saying they were all in his favor, is he?  I think that's a little spin-a-rama.  But maybe I'm not getting the whole picture.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 04:39:08 PM
Attorney Hugo's Qualifications:


PRACTICE FOCUS:

     My current practice involves the exclusive concentration on criminal defense matters. This practice includes felony and misdemeanor charges, violation of probation, appeals and post conviction relief. Previously I have obtained verdicts in cases involving capital sexual battery; armed robbery; kidnapping with a firearm; credit card fraud; sale and delivery of narcotics; and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, amongst others. In addition, I have litigated numerous cases involving attempted murder, drug trafficking, sex offenses and related crimes which were resolved either on substantive or procedural grounds prior to trial. Finally, my experience includes numerous matters which I have litigated in the appellate courts of the state and federal system, involving both criminal and civil matters.

     Further information as to my litigation history and experience may be obtained from my office upon request.

http://www.bryanhugolaw.com/attorney_profile.html

This guy sounds as putzy as Bozo does.  He is so full of himself. How many times can a person use litigatd in a paragraph? 

Notably missing from his "listings of litigation" is murder charges.

Yeah, what a co-inky dink.  He probably just forgot that one.  No, really, I did notice that.
He also says he "has obtained verdicts."  Well, duh.  There is always a verdict.  But what kind of verdict?  He's not saying they were all in his favor, is he?  I think that's a little spin-a-rama.  But maybe I'm not getting the whole picture.

No, I think you got the whole picture.  Bozo does not pick his lawyers/experts too well.  I guess when you look for free ones, what can you expect?  i bet he sits there and googles stuff like "free defense attorneys,"  "free death penalty experts," "free junk science experts/lawyers."  Would love to see his google trail.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 04:42:04 PM
Attorney Hugo's Qualifications:


PRACTICE FOCUS:

     My current practice involves the exclusive concentration on criminal defense matters. This practice includes felony and misdemeanor charges, violation of probation, appeals and post conviction relief. Previously I have obtained verdicts in cases involving capital sexual battery; armed robbery; kidnapping with a firearm; credit card fraud; sale and delivery of narcotics; and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, amongst others. In addition, I have litigated numerous cases involving attempted murder, drug trafficking, sex offenses and related crimes which were resolved either on substantive or procedural grounds prior to trial. Finally, my experience includes numerous matters which I have litigated in the appellate courts of the state and federal system, involving both criminal and civil matters.

     Further information as to my litigation history and experience may be obtained from my office upon request.

http://www.bryanhugolaw.com/attorney_profile.html

This guy sounds as putzy as Bozo does.  He is so full of himself. How many times can a person use litigatd in a paragraph? 

Notably missing from his "listings of litigation" is murder charges.

Yeah, what a co-inky dink.  He probably just forgot that one.  No, really, I did notice that.
He also says he "has obtained verdicts."  Well, duh.  There is always a verdict.  But what kind of verdict?  He's not saying they were all in his favor, is he?  I think that's a little spin-a-rama.  But maybe I'm not getting the whole picture.

No, I think you got the whole picture.  Bozo does not pick his lawyers/experts too well.  I guess when you look for free ones, what can you expect?  i bet he sits there and googles stuff like "free defense attorneys,"  "free death penalty experts," "free junk science experts/lawyers."  Would love to see his google trail.

I was going to mention all the "My" and "I" usages, however, since it is his website, explaining his capabilities, I decided I would let him slide on this one. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 04:49:32 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 07, 2011, 05:19:27 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  Look at this....
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011     Order Denying
Motion to Seal Penalty Phase Discovery

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
DENIED, NO SOUP FOR YOU, MS. FINNELL!
Oh, Judge Perrry, you are my hero!
 ::MonkeyGavel::
I just came back from having dinner.....don't need dessert now!  SWEET!   ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 05:22:05 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26404459/detail.html
Casey Hearings Set; Defense Motion Denied
Posted: 4:19 pm EST January 7, 2011Updated: 4:24 pm EST January 7, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- New hearings have been scheduled for defense motions to suppress key prosecution evidence against Casey Anthony in her upcoming murder trial in May.

On March 2 and March 3, the defense will try to convince the judge to throw out evidence that cadaver dogs alerted to different spots in Casey's backyard. It also wants to throw out Casey's statements to her family, her jail pen pals, and to law enforcement.

Meanwhile, Casey's defense team was dealt another blow to the case Friday. Chief Judge Belvin Perry denied the defense request to seal the names of the death penalty witnesses and the information they provide.

The defense claimed the potential public exposure is preventing people from helping Casey avoid a death sentence if she's convicted of murdering her daughter Caylee.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 05:23:49 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26403861/detail.html
Casey Judge Won't Seal Penalty Phase Witness List
Perry Says Defense's Argument Didn't Meet Legal Requirements
POSTED: 3:33 pm EST January 7, 2011
UPDATED: 3:43 pm EST January 7, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- If Casey Anthony's murder trial moves into a penalty phase, the defense's witness list will be made public, Judge Belvin Perry said on Friday.

The defense had filed a motion asking that the penalty phase witness list be sealed.

"We're concerned that any potential penalty phase witnesses who know that they are going to be listed or once they have been listed will be reluctant to come forward," Anthony defense attorney Ann Finnell said at a December hearing on the motion.

Perry said in an order that Anthony's defense did not adequately prove a reason for why the list needed to be kept private.
READ: Judge Perry's Order   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26403877/detail.html

"Many of the potential penalty phase witnesses are presumably already known to the public at large and are already associated with this case," Perry said in the order. "Release of any known individual's names could not possibly deprive (Anthony) of her fair trial rights."

The next hearing in the case is scheduled for Jan. 14. WESH.com will provide live coverage.

Anthony's murder trial is scheduled to begin in May.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 05:25:58 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

4:08 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011
The Orlando Sentinel has won a public records fight in the Casey Anthony case.

The victory prevents the Casey Anthony defense team from blocking the release of penalty phase witnesses in the woman's first-degree murder case.

Chief Judge Belvin Perry today issued a four-page order denying the Casey Anthony team's defense motion to seal its penalty phase discovery.

The defense team had wanted to prevent the public from learning the names of witnesses it would use if Casey Anthony is convicted of first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee Marie. Those witnesses would appear and testify during the trial's "penalty phase" in which the jury would determine a recommended sentence for the 24-year-old – life in prison or death.

Casey Anthony's trial is set to begin with jury selection in early May.
Judge Perry cited a three-part test designed to identify "factors that threaten the administration of justice" before any court may close public records based on "fair-trial grounds." It was a test, he said, the defense arguments did not meet.

The defense team claimed the release of the penalty phase discovery material would threaten Casey Anthony's right to a fair trial. But Perry did not agree with the defense position.

"The court agrees with the Sentinel that the defense bears the burden of proof in sealing this penalty phase discovery," he wrote. "It is well settled that the party seeking closure has the burden of proving by the greater weight of the evidence that closure is necessary to prevent a serious and imminent threat to the administration of justice."

While the defense argued the release of the witness list could have a "chilling effect," Perry said "this bald assertion is insufficient."

"To the contrary, many potential penalty phase witnesses are presumably already known to the public at large and are already associated with this case," Perry wrote. "Release of any known individual's name could not possibly deprive the defendant of her fair trial rights.

"Even for witnesses not known," Perry said, "counsel's conclusory assertion that some witnesses may be reluctant to come forward is insufficient to demonstrate a real threat to the defendant's fair trial rights. Any penalty phase witness will testify in an open courtroom and be publicly identified with this case."

The defense has not shown the delayed association of those witnesses with the case will protect Casey Anthony's "fair trial rights," Perry concluded.

It was not immediately clear how soon the penalty phase discovery will be made available.

This is a breaking story. Check back for more details.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 07, 2011, 05:39:20 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 07, 2011, 06:23:59 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  Look at this....
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011     Order Denying
Motion to Seal Penalty Phase Discovery

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
DENIED, NO SOUP FOR YOU, MS. FINNELL!
Oh, Judge Perrry, you are my hero!
 ::MonkeyGavel::

My two favorite sentences from the above:
"A find of cause . . . cannot rest in air."
"The Defense does not satisfy its burden."


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 07, 2011, 06:29:07 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  Look at this....
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011     Order Denying
Motion to Seal Penalty Phase Discovery

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
DENIED, NO SOUP FOR YOU, MS. FINNELL!
Oh, Judge Perrry, you are my hero!
 ::MonkeyGavel::

My two favorite sentences from the above:
"A find of cause . . . cannot rest in air."
"The Defense does not satisfy its burden."


 :smt038 :thumbdown: :smt038 :thumbdown: :smt038 :thumbdown: :smt038 :thumbdown: :smt038:thumbdown:


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 07, 2011, 06:30:28 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 07, 2011, 06:53:18 PM
Foiled again, duhfense.
"Tears on my pillow, pain in my heart",..NOT!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 07:02:12 PM
2011.01.07 Notice of Hearing - 03/02 and 03/03
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726973/20110107-Notice-of-Hearing---0302-and-0303

2010.12.30 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence of Plant or Root Growth
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726576/20101230-Motion-to-Exclude-Unreliable-Evidence-of-Plant-or-Root-Growth

(H/T Muzikman)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 07, 2011, 07:04:38 PM
2011.01.07 Notice of Hearing - 03/02 and 03/03
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726973/20110107-Notice-of-Hearing---0302-and-0303

2010.12.30 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence of Plant or Root Growth
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726576/20101230-Motion-to-Exclude-Unreliable-Evidence-of-Plant-or-Root-Growth

(H/T Muzikman)
o/t trimm -- I can see your signature line . . . maybe it's my computer . . . just thought you'd like to know.  Just can read the words/numbers.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 07:09:00 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/
Casey Anthony: Hearings set for March on defense motions
Caylee and Casey Anthony, WESH, WFTV, WKMG — posted by halboedeker on January, 7 2011 6:24 PM

The latest developments in the Casey Anthony case were quickly recapped during newscasts tonight.

WFTV-Channel 9 reported that hearings have been set for March 2 and 3 on defense motions to suppress prosecution evidence against Anthony. She is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter, Caylee.

Anchor Martie Salt said the defense motions focus on Anthony’s statements to her family, her jail pen pals and investigators. Another motion concerns evidence that  cadaver dogs hit on spots in the Anthony back yard.

WFTV and WESH-Channel 2 reported that Chief Judge Belvin Perry today denied a defense motion to seal the names of death-penalty-phase witnesses and their information. WFTV’s Salt said the ”defense team was just dealt another blow to their case.”

WKMG-Channel 6 anchor Lauren Rowe called it “a big setback” for Anthony’s attorneys.

Later, WFTV anchor Bob Opsahl said that prosecutors on Jan. 20 will question 10 Texas EquuSearch volunteers who looked for Caylee.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 07:23:43 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/
Casey Anthony: Hearings set for March on defense motions
Caylee and Casey Anthony, WESH, WFTV, WKMG — posted by halboedeker on January, 7 2011 6:24 PM

The latest developments in the Casey Anthony case were quickly recapped during newscasts tonight.

WFTV-Channel 9 reported that hearings have been set for March 2 and 3 on defense motions to suppress prosecution evidence against Anthony. She is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter, Caylee.

Anchor Martie Salt said the defense motions focus on Anthony’s statements to her family, her jail pen pals and investigators. Another motion concerns evidence that  cadaver dogs hit on spots in the Anthony back yard.

WFTV and WESH-Channel 2 reported that Chief Judge Belvin Perry today denied a defense motion to seal the names of death-penalty-phase witnesses and their information. WFTV’s Salt said the ”defense team was just dealt another blow to their case.”

WKMG-Channel 6 anchor Lauren Rowe called it “a big setback” for Anthony’s attorneys.

Later, WFTV anchor Bob Opsahl said that prosecutors on Jan. 20 will question 10 Texas EquuSearch volunteers who looked for Caylee.



Justice for caylee!!
we low life no life bloggers love caylee more than her Jail  bird mom
anyone can be a mother but not everyone can be a mommy!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 07:25:16 PM
Foiled again, duhfense.
"Tears on my pillow, pain in my heart",..NOT!



Poop in my depends!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 07:26:38 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 






Betcha spindy is  swinging that hammer of hers like a lasso at a rodeo.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 07:30:03 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 


spindy can sit by the drive through mail boxs with her sign and cup!!
I actualy seen a woman sitting there today as I drove thru!! she didnt look like she was in any  shape that would prevent her from working.

Yeah it's all hitting the fan now!! next we know  scared monkeys will be targeted for fresh meat!!  I am so surprised that after that email I sent baez he didnt have me checked out
yet!! lol bring it on!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 07:59:57 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 07, 2011, 08:02:02 PM
2011.01.07 Notice of Hearing - 03/02 and 03/03
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726973/20110107-Notice-of-Hearing---0302-and-0303

2010.12.30 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence of Plant or Root Growth
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726576/20101230-Motion-to-Exclude-Unreliable-Evidence-of-Plant-or-Root-Growth

(H/T Muzikman)
o/t trimm -- I can see your signature line . . . maybe it's my computer . . . just thought you'd like to know.  Just can read the words/numbers.

Hey sister.   ::HelloKitty:: I see Tink,241,and the countdown clock. 
Check out some of the penalty phase witnesses I posted.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 07, 2011, 08:03:29 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  Look at this....
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/07/2011     Order Denying
Motion to Seal Penalty Phase Discovery

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
DENIED, NO SOUP FOR YOU, MS. FINNELL!
Oh, Judge Perrry, you are my hero!
 ::MonkeyGavel::

Mine too, MONK!   ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyGavel::

My favourite lines:
"To the contrary, many potential penalty phase witnesses are presumably already known to the public at large and are already associated with this case.  Release of any known individual's name could not possibly deprive the Defendant of her fair trial rights."
Bam  ::MonkeyGavel:: Bam  ::MonkeyGavel:: BAM BAM BAM BAM ::MonkeyGavel::  Absolutely spot on & once again CJBP exhibits carefully consideration & bases his decision on  solid ground.      Chicken turds probably dont want their fabricating hired hands getting too nervous about their tainted testimony before trial, most of which probably will have backed out by May...that's my gut instinct on that cuz attorneys & experts already are dropping like flies.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 07, 2011, 08:11:15 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/
Casey Anthony: Hearings set for March on defense motions
Caylee and Casey Anthony, WESH, WFTV, WKMG — posted by halboedeker on January, 7 2011 6:24 PM

The latest developments in the Casey Anthony case were quickly recapped during newscasts tonight.

WFTV-Channel 9 reported that hearings have been set for March 2 and 3 on defense motions to suppress prosecution evidence against Anthony. She is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter, Caylee.

Anchor Martie Salt said the defense motions focus on Anthony’s statements to her family, her jail pen pals and investigators. Another motion concerns evidence that  cadaver dogs hit on spots in the Anthony back yard.

WFTV and WESH-Channel 2 reported that Chief Judge Belvin Perry today denied a defense motion to seal the names of death-penalty-phase witnesses and their information. WFTV’s Salt said the ”defense team was just dealt another blow to their case.”

WKMG-Channel 6 anchor Lauren Rowe called it “a big setback” for Anthony’s attorneys.

Later, WFTV anchor Bob Opsahl said that prosecutors on Jan. 20 will question 10 Texas EquuSearch volunteers who looked for Caylee.



Justice for caylee!!
we low life no life bloggers love caylee more than her Jail  bird mom
anyone can be a mother but not everyone can be a mommy!!!


This too, both issues shall fail & PS Colonel Crusty I'm still waiting, bring it or shut it  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 07, 2011, 08:24:14 PM
He/She Finnell is drinking some toxic kool-aid!!

With the exception of Tony R., KC and her Mommy Dearest accused all the friends listed with murdering Caylee. ::MonkeyMad::

Yea, I bet her friends (victims) are dying to get up on the witness stand and sing "I love you" songs to killer KC! Please spare the skanks life......pleeeezzzzz, she hasn't ruined enough of MY life yet! Then they will plan for a group Kumbaya moment!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 07, 2011, 08:35:58 PM
He/She Finnell is drinking some toxic kool-aid!!

With the exception of Tony R., KC and her Mommy Dearest accused all the friends listed with murdering Caylee. ::MonkeyMad::

Yea, I bet her friends (victims) are dying to get up on the witness stand and sing "I love you" songs to killer KC! Please spare the skanks life......pleeeezzzzz, she hasn't ruined enough of MY life yet! Then they will plan for a group Kumbaya moment!


::MonkeyDevil:: 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 07, 2011, 08:36:30 PM
Maybe he/she should add Rob Dick to her list of DP witnesses.....I mean the skank did make him brownies special for him!  LMAO ::MonkeyTongue::

This is a wish list if I ever saw one!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 07, 2011, 08:39:04 PM
"Finnell can wish in one hand, & sh!t in the other and see which one gets filled first."

 ::MonkeyJnBox::



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 07, 2011, 08:44:24 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 






Betcha spindy is  swinging that hammer of hers like a lasso at a rodeo.

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 07, 2011, 08:46:15 PM
2011.01.07 Notice of Hearing - 03/02 and 03/03
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726973/20110107-Notice-of-Hearing---0302-and-0303

2010.12.30 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence of Plant or Root Growth
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726576/20101230-Motion-to-Exclude-Unreliable-Evidence-of-Plant-or-Root-Growth

(H/T Muzikman)
o/t trimm -- I can see your signature line . . . maybe it's my computer . . . just thought you'd like to know.  Just can read the words/numbers.

Hey sister.   ::HelloKitty:: I see Tink,241,and the countdown clock. 
Check out some of the penalty phase witnesses I posted.   ::MonkeyCool::

When SISTER posted, I couldn't see penalty clock either. Tink and 2 4 1 was all I could see.

I'll go look at the penalty phase witnesses.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 08:51:24 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 






Betcha spindy is  swinging that hammer of hers like a lasso at a rodeo.

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif)







Lol fanny loved your hammer!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 08:53:56 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 






Betcha spindy is  swinging that hammer of hers like a lasso at a rodeo.

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif)







Lol fanny loved your hammer!!







Hope some kind indiidual is kind enough to hand bozo a complimentary newspaper this week. for his scrap book!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 07, 2011, 09:03:35 PM
2011.01.07 Notice of Hearing - 03/02 and 03/03
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726973/20110107-Notice-of-Hearing---0302-and-0303

2010.12.30 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence of Plant or Root Growth
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726576/20101230-Motion-to-Exclude-Unreliable-Evidence-of-Plant-or-Root-Growth

(H/T Muzikman)
o/t trimm -- I can see your signature line . . . maybe it's my computer . . . just thought you'd like to know.  Just can read the words/numbers.

Hey sister.   ::HelloKitty:: I see Tink,241,and the countdown clock. 
Check out some of the penalty phase witnesses I posted.   ::MonkeyCool::
Are they crazy . . . those are witnesses for the duhfense . . . oh, please!
I can't see Tink in the sig line.  Must be my computer.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 07, 2011, 09:06:26 PM
I must be blind again..Where is the list of the defense witnesses?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 07, 2011, 09:12:39 PM
In the Motion to Exclude Evidence . . . bozo is making a big mistake.  What it appears he is striving (and will fall flat on his face) is the theory of when Caylee's body was placed on Suburban Drive.  He is going about this all wrong.  Wrong questions, wrong exclusion, and his expert's report will not back him up.  Dufus again (or is that still).


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 07, 2011, 09:15:46 PM
I must be blind again..Where is the list of the defense witnesses?

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: I'm so glad you asked, Curly! I was looking for it too! 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 09:16:05 PM
In the Motion to Exclude Evidence . . . bozo is making a big mistake.  What it appears he is striving (and will fall flat on his face) is the theory of when Caylee's body was placed on Suburban Drive.  He is going about this all wrong.  Wrong questions, wrong exclusion, and his expert's report will not back him up.  Dufus again (or is that still).


Sister
he is famous for doing things the wong way!! the truth is he doesnt know what he is doing. He isnt called to be a lawyer and do his own thingie!! he has to follow law and not his ego!! I agree with you he is wong wong wong!! that is  not a good thingie.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 07, 2011, 09:17:02 PM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 






Betcha spindy is  swinging that hammer of hers like a lasso at a rodeo.

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif)







Lol fanny loved your hammer!!







Hope some kind indiidual is kind enough to hand bozo a complimentary newspaper this week. for his scrap book!
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/62-1.gif)



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 09:17:56 PM
In the Motion to Exclude Evidence . . . bozo is making a big mistake.  What it appears he is striving (and will fall flat on his face) is the theory of when Caylee's body was placed on Suburban Drive.  He is going about this all wrong.  Wrong questions, wrong exclusion, and his expert's report will not back him up.  Dufus again (or is that still).


Sister
he is famous for doing things the wong way!! the truth is he doesnt know what he is doing. He isnt called to be a lawyer and do his own thingie!! he has to follow law and not his ego!! I agree with you he is wong wong wong!! that is  not a good thingie.






Funny though bozo will continue to push the issue and do things his way and now I wonder if eaton didnt come on behalf of the bar to see him in action.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 07, 2011, 09:20:52 PM
I must be blind again..Where is the list of the defense witnesses?

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: I'm so glad you asked, Curly! I was looking for it too! 

Lol.  Still in the dark here!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 07, 2011, 09:22:32 PM
In the Motion to Exclude Evidence . . . bozo is making a big mistake.  What it appears he is striving (and will fall flat on his face) is the theory of when Caylee's body was placed on Suburban Drive.  He is going about this all wrong.  Wrong questions, wrong exclusion, and his expert's report will not back him up.  Dufus again (or is that still).
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeywinkdunce.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 07, 2011, 09:24:34 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 07, 2011, 09:35:21 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped

Thank You, Fanny!!   ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 07, 2011, 09:40:00 PM
In the Motion to Exclude Evidence . . . bozo is making a big mistake.  What it appears he is striving (and will fall flat on his face) is the theory of when Caylee's body was placed on Suburban Drive.  He is going about this all wrong.  Wrong questions, wrong exclusion, and his expert's report will not back him up.  Dufus again (or is that still).
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeywinkdunce.gif)

Thanks Fanny -- yes, a dunce!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 07, 2011, 09:40:23 PM
Ditto! Thanks, Fanny, although I did read that article I must have sped-read through that paragraph.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 07, 2011, 09:47:06 PM
I must be blind again..Where is the list of the defense witnesses?

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 07, 2011, 09:49:06 PM
KC is going to feel very special tonight


<snipped>
Mindy Lawton, an Orlando waitress identified in more than 600 news stories as one of Tiger Woods' lovers received a year in jail Friday for a 2009 drunk-driving crash, court records show.

Lawton now resides in the same the Orange County Jail cellblock as accused killer Casey Anthony and other high-profile inmates, jail records show.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-tiger-woods-mistress-jailed-20110107,0,3996628.story


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 07, 2011, 09:49:59 PM
I must be blind again..Where is the list of the defense witnesses?

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.


They are all witnesses for the penalty phase ( we know there will be a conviction,so it's as well to be prepared)  but IMO they will not appear in order to say good things about Casey, but to say bad things about Cindy and George. She has to blame someone for her vicious evil behavior, and they are the most likely candidates..


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 07, 2011, 09:59:47 PM
KC is going to feel very special tonight


<snipped>
Mindy Lawton, an Orlando waitress identified in more than 600 news stories as one of Tiger Woods' lovers received a year in jail Friday for a 2009 drunk-driving crash, court records show.

Lawton now resides in the same the Orange County Jail cellblock as accused killer Casey Anthony and other high-profile inmates, jail records show.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-tiger-woods-mistress-jailed-20110107,0,3996628.story

Yep! I bet this makes her think she's a star, rubbing elbows with Tiger's mistress.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 07, 2011, 10:28:47 PM
KC is going to feel very special tonight


<snipped>
Mindy Lawton, an Orlando waitress identified in more than 600 news stories as one of Tiger Woods' lovers received a year in jail Friday for a 2009 drunk-driving crash, court records show.

Lawton now resides in the same the Orange County Jail cellblock as accused killer Casey Anthony and other high-profile inmates, jail records show.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-tiger-woods-mistress-jailed-20110107,0,3996628.story

Yep! I bet this makes her think she's a star, rubbing elbows with Tiger's mistress.

Well, if they speak thru the vents at least they compare ho ho ho stories to amuse themselves, what! I meant a story about Santa  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 07, 2011, 10:56:40 PM
KC is going to feel very special tonight


<snipped>
Mindy Lawton, an Orlando waitress identified in more than 600 news stories as one of Tiger Woods' lovers received a year in jail Friday for a 2009 drunk-driving crash, court records show.

Lawton now resides in the same the Orange County Jail cellblock as accused killer Casey Anthony and other high-profile inmates, jail records show.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-tiger-woods-mistress-jailed-20110107,0,3996628.story

Cat fight? Meeeooowwwie!   ::MonkeyEek:: Must be the slore section of the jail.    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 07, 2011, 11:10:07 PM
KC is going to feel very special tonight


<snipped>
Mindy Lawton, an Orlando waitress identified in more than 600 news stories as one of Tiger Woods' lovers received a year in jail Friday for a 2009 drunk-driving crash, court records show.

Lawton now resides in the same the Orange County Jail cellblock as accused killer Casey Anthony and other high-profile inmates, jail records show.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-tiger-woods-mistress-jailed-20110107,0,3996628.story

Cat fight? Meeeooowwwie!   ::MonkeyEek:: Must be the slore section of the jail.    ::MonkeyCool::







Meow sniff I tink I schmell a  pootie cat!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 08, 2011, 12:07:11 AM
Thanks, NR.
I finally saw it.
Anyway...just because the duhfense is going to call them, doesn't exactly mean that they'll testify in her behalf.
Basically, Jesse is one of the few that can testify as to the Anthony family dynamics.
Amy and Anthony really never witnessed anything first hand. Amy just met Cindy on the night she took her to collect slore from Tony's.
It will be very interesting.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 12:14:58 AM
Thanks, NR.
I finally saw it.
Anyway...just because the duhfense is going to call them, doesn't exactly mean that they'll testify in her behalf.
Basically, Jesse is one of the few that can testify as to the Anthony family dynamics.
Amy and Anthony really never witnessed anything first hand. Amy just met Cindy on the night she took her to collect slore from Tony's.
It will be very interesting.


TO SAY THE LEAST.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: AzGrama on January 08, 2011, 12:16:29 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 12:18:41 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: AzGrama on January 08, 2011, 12:19:44 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?
Electronic book readers.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 12:38:01 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?
Electronic book readers.


OIC  thanks :)

I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 01:30:15 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Sounds like her book is sitting on death row, karma's a B  :smt079


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: AzGrama on January 08, 2011, 01:47:06 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Sounds like her book is sitting on death row, karma's a B  :smt079
::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Rowanvamp0 on January 08, 2011, 02:28:21 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?
Electronic book readers.


OIC  thanks :)

I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   
Loca you beat me to it..I wonder if Casey's tray had any bugs on it and if so did she receive it??  Wonder what she thinks of that??  It's fitting in a way she IMO L-O-V-E-S being there so lie with bugs Casey L-I-E with bugs!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: yuknomenot on January 08, 2011, 02:33:51 AM
KC is going to feel very special tonight


<snipped>
Mindy Lawton, an Orlando waitress identified in more than 600 news stories as one of Tiger Woods' lovers received a year in jail Friday for a 2009 drunk-driving crash, court records show.

Lawton now resides in the same the Orange County Jail cellblock as accused killer Casey Anthony and other high-profile inmates, jail records show.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-tiger-woods-mistress-jailed-20110107,0,3996628.story
Or will she hate sharing the "spotlight"?  Wish we had some robot flies in that jail  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 02:39:49 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?
Electronic book readers.


OIC  thanks :)

I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   
Loca you beat me to it..I wonder if Casey's tray had any bugs on it and if so did she receive it??  Wonder what she thinks of that??  It's fitting in a way she IMO L-O-V-E-S being there so lie with bugs Casey L-I-E with bugs!!







Lol huh you have to take the card that you dealt to yourself! and live with it!!  now  the coocarochas are your new  friends!!  you can either talk to them or eat them !!  in some  countries they are a delicacy!!! LIKE ESCARGO LOL


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 02:41:56 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?
Electronic book readers.


OIC  thanks :)

I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   
Loca you beat me to it..I wonder if Casey's tray had any bugs on it and if so did she receive it??  Wonder what she thinks of that??  It's fitting in a way she IMO L-O-V-E-S being there so lie with bugs Casey L-I-E with bugs!!







Lol huh you have to take the card that you dealt to yourself! and live with it!!  now  the coocarochas are your new  friends!!  you can either talk to them or eat them !!  in some  countries they are a delicacy!!! LIKE ESCARGO LOL





I have insomnia tonight!!
 but anyways she deserves what she gets caylee  didnt have to die so that she could  live the good life and now she is probably blaming caylee for  her dilema. she only she did this crime and now its time to pay.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 02:46:06 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?
Electronic book readers.


OIC  thanks :)

I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   
Loca you beat me to it..I wonder if Casey's tray had any bugs on it and if so did she receive it??  Wonder what she thinks of that??  It's fitting in a way she IMO L-O-V-E-S being there so lie with bugs Casey L-I-E with bugs!!







Lol huh you have to take the card that you dealt to yourself! and live with it!!  now  the coocarochas are your new  friends!!  you can either talk to them or eat them !!  in some  countries they are a delicacy!!! LIKE ESCARGO LOL





I have insomnia tonight!!
 but anyways she deserves what she gets caylee  didnt have to die so that she could  live the good life and now she is probably blaming caylee for  her dilema. she only she did this crime and now its time to pay.





what bothers me the most is her demeanor! she doesnt seem to get the seriousness of her dilema she is in deep dodoo and doesnt get it. I mean come on  is this  normal! isnt baez cluing her in on anything or is he making her believe she will walk and they will live happily ever after. She  thinks she finaly hit the jackpot she snagged a  lawyer!!
she has one foot in hell and he has one foot out the door and his career.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 08, 2011, 05:57:07 AM
teehee, next thing you know, the duhfense will be calling her as a "bug" expert. teehee
Loca, momster creates her own reality.  It amazes me how she lied not only to her family, but her friends for years about working.  She loves drama and the adrenaline rush she must get from all the lying.  She and bozo are mfeo (made for each other). jmo.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 06:10:44 AM
teehee, next thing you know, the duhfense will be calling her as a "bug" expert. teehee
Loca, momster creates her own reality.  It amazes me how she lied not only to her family, but her friends for years about working.  She loves drama and the adrenaline rush she must get from all the lying.  She and bozo are mfeo (made for each other). jmo.



lol sister
you have to rolling laughing here laughing out lous and I dont mean lol for lots of luck hahaaa!! about the bug expert! she can be an expert witness in her own case how bout that . oh this is way to funny. yup they sure are made for eachother never seen a lawyer lie as much if not more  than his client. I think he is smitten with her.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 06:12:23 AM
teehee, next thing you know, the duhfense will be calling her as a "bug" expert. teehee
Loca, momster creates her own reality.  It amazes me how she lied not only to her family, but her friends for years about working.  She loves drama and the adrenaline rush she must get from all the lying.  She and bozo are mfeo (made for each other). jmo.



lol sister
you have to rolling laughing here laughing out lous and I dont mean lol for lots of luck hahaaa!! about the bug expert! she can be an expert witness in her own case how bout that . oh this is way to funny. yup they sure are made for eachother never seen a lawyer lie as much if not more  than his client. I think he is smitten with her.




you have me rolling here is what I meant and  I think you know what I meant to say. Lying is a way of life for all anthonys.  from tubesocks lee to  hammer swinging cindy to gas can george.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 08, 2011, 06:25:30 AM
teehee, next thing you know, the duhfense will be calling her as a "bug" expert. teehee
Loca, momster creates her own reality.  It amazes me how she lied not only to her family, but her friends for years about working.  She loves drama and the adrenaline rush she must get from all the lying.  She and bozo are mfeo (made for each other). jmo.

lol sister
you have to rolling laughing here laughing out lous and I dont mean lol for lots of luck hahaaa!! about the bug expert! she can be an expert witness in her own case how bout that . oh this is way to funny. yup they sure are made for eachother never seen a lawyer lie as much if not more  than his client. I think he is smitten with her.

you have me rolling here is what I meant and  I think you know what I meant to say. Lying is a way of life for all anthonys.  from tubesocks lee to  hammer swinging cindy to gas can george.
Absolutely loca, they have establish lying as a way a life a long time ago.  How sad.  They do this game of playing on words, how tiresome it would be to have a conversation with them.  Course my conversation would be peppered with some words not becoming a lady.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 06:59:22 AM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 


spindy can sit by the drive through mail boxs with her sign and cup!!
I actualy seen a woman sitting there today as I drove thru!! she didnt look like she was in any  shape that would prevent her from working.

Yeah it's all hitting the fan now!! next we know  scared monkeys will be targeted for fresh meat!!  I am so surprised that after that email I sent baez he didnt have me checked out
yet!! lol bring it on!!

I sent him a few way back too.  My favorite one was, I sent a list from 1-10, about when he was caught hugging/molesting his client.  I cut and pasted the rules of the jail, and did 1:  something like KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF YOUR CLIENT.  2-10 WAS THE SAME THING.  Then, I wrote something like you cannot say you did not know the rules of the jail any more, so don't play dumb next time.  Never heard back from him.  I have not written to him recently though. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:02:46 AM
Can you all hear it?   I can.  Spindy is at home, pissed off from this week's hearings, and all the denials.  She is probably fuming and poor Georgie Porgie, having no unmentionables (he has to hand them to her for safekeeping,) has to sit there and listen to her go on and on about how unfair this judge is and how her poor spawn is being treated so unfairly.  How every agency in the State of Florida, to include the police, FBI, CIA, JAC, all the judges, every single website that exists for this case, the search organizations that look for missing children, all her prior lawyers are all out to get Ms. Casey Anthony who is the Mother of the year and are all conspiring with each other to make sure Casey is convicted of killing her child, when there is no way Casey could have done this, the Invisi-Nanny did it, or Mr. Kronk did it, or maybe JJ did it, or maybe somebody on some website did it.   

::MonkeyDevil::

Not only that but her ABC gravy train seems to have dried up at least temporarily. Looks like she might have to get up and go to work for a living soon.  Her disability policy has to be at an end or close to it...

I do not know how they are eating.  They have no income comeing in.  I guess, maybe they have some extra from the pictures and what not that they sold.  How did they swing keeping the house, how are they paying the mortgage? 

I know Lee works, but could he make enough to keep them in their home?  Pay bills? 

Who would hire them really though.  I guess every so many months, they call whatever channel it is that keeps reairing that show they did, and they get a few month's worth of money?  Who knows. 






Betcha spindy is  swinging that hammer of hers like a lasso at a rodeo.

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif)







Lol fanny loved your hammer!!







Hope some kind indiidual is kind enough to hand bozo a complimentary newspaper this week. for his scrap book!

I bet that news lady that he hates so much is kind enough to update him.  I forget her name, the one that Jar hates too. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:03:48 AM
I must be blind again..Where is the list of the defense witnesses?

I didn't see them either, keep hoping a monkey relinks.  I should probably put my darn glasses on, and get some coffee to wake up my eyes.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 08, 2011, 07:05:48 AM
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/01/08/2006215/judge-wont-seal-anthony-witness.html
Posted on Saturday, 01.08.11

    *
      0Share
    * email
    * print
    * comment

FARK it!
Send to AIM
Seed Newsvine
Add to Reddit
Add to Google Bookmarks
Thumb this up at StumbleUpon.
Publish this post to LinkedIn
Add to del.icio.us
Post to MySpace
Add to facebook
DIGG This
Bookmark this post on Twitter.
tool name
close
tool goes here
Judge won't seal Anthony witness list
 
The Associated Press

ORLANDO, Fla. -- A judge is refusing to seal a list of witnesses who may be used at the trial of a Florida mother charged with killing her 2-year-old daughter.

Circuit Judge Belvin Perry ruled Friday that arguments made by Casey Anthony's attorneys fell short of the standards required to seal the list of witnesses who will be called if the Florida mother is convicted and there is a sentencing phase. Anthony's attorneys say allowing the list to become public would hinder her right to a fair trial

Anthony has pleaded not guilty in the death of her daughter Caylee and said a baby sitter kidnapped her daughter.




Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:08:37 AM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped

Thanks Fanny.  Wow, this is who they want kept super secret?????????????? 

OH EM GEE. 

so, Jesse, Ricardo, Anthony, Amy are going to speak for her, thought they were states witnesses, can they do that? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 08, 2011, 07:09:15 AM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped

Bumped


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:10:43 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

It's a good thing I don't own a Kindle, cause I like free things, and I might have been tempted to get it for free. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:12:49 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?
Electronic book readers.


OIC  thanks :)

I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   


Ewww, roaches and/or thinking about one literally freaks me out.  I would be crying nonstop if I had to be in that jail.  I would probably stand in the middle of my cot all day, so that one cannot touch me or come near me. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:19:03 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

Az
kindle owwners? What is that I dunno?
Electronic book readers.


OIC  thanks :)

I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   


Ewww, roaches and/or thinking about one literally freaks me out.  I would be crying nonstop if I had to be in that jail.  I would probably stand in the middle of my cot all day, so that one cannot touch me or come near me. 

Glowed by me.

If they were waiting in line, I assume that means waiting to get food, so how could they find roaches in their food if they had not gotten any food yet?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:32:11 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:44:56 AM
I am not the best photoeditor in the world, but I just thougth this picture was special and had to memorialize it forevah.

(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/6631/caseyandbozo2.gif) (http://img34.imageshack.us/i/caseyandbozo2.gif/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)



The colors won't upload right, but really, it matters not.  One can clearly see how happy they are in each other's company.  That song, Happy together, you and me, and me and you, ........................ so happy together.  Awe!!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 07:50:13 AM
(http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/9864/caseyandbozo.jpg) (http://img227.imageshack.us/i/caseyandbozo.jpg/)


Or for the artistic type, here is all black and white version.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 08:45:20 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!   ::HelloKitty::

I found it amusing that jail staff didn't see these roaches as they passed out plates......or did they just have a blind eye?   ::MonkeyHaHa::

The defense's penalty phase witnesses.... hard to believe they are calling her friends after all that has happened.  The defense will ask them point blank questions, such as, "Was Casey a good mother?"  Answer should be it APPEARED as if she was a good mother.  I would give the "appeared" answer where ever possible.

Question.....does the prosecution get to question these same witnesses during the penalty phase?  If these witnesses are called to testify during the trial, could not their answers there, undo what the defense is trying to do during penalty phase?



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 08:51:24 AM
I am not the best photoeditor in the world, but I just thougth this picture was special and had to memorialize it forevah.

(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/6631/caseyandbozo2.gif) (http://img34.imageshack.us/i/caseyandbozo2.gif/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)



The colors won't upload right, but really, it matters not.  One can clearly see how happy they are in each other's company.  That song, Happy together, you and me, and me and you, ........................ so happy together.  Awe!!!!

There is a saying....he who laughs last, laughs best.  I don't think they will be laughing last.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 09:00:38 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over as Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 09:02:01 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over ast Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach(ed) fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.

self edit


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 09:26:59 AM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there. 

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 09:55:36 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over as Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.

Joy sent her 7 bux, really not 8, not 5, but 7?  Weird lady fo'sho.  Who is inmate Lloyd and how is he able to put money in another inmate's commisary fund? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:00:54 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over as Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.

Reading the link, they pay for doc's visits and medications?  When I think of beotchface going to the doctor, I can't help but think about Caylee who probably needed a doctor as she was dying, but didn't get one.  :(


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:02:36 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over as Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.

What is a daily self-substinence fee? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 10:02:47 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over as Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.

Joy sent her 7 bux, really not 8, not 5, but 7?  Weird lady fo'sho.  Who is inmate Lloyd and how is he able to put money in another inmate's commisary fund? 
My Bad!  FORMER inmate from Georgia, Lloyd Walsh.  He has been giving her money since 2009. Who knows why....


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 10:03:45 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over as Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.

What is a daily self-substinence fee? 
Is that the fee the jail charges each inmate to "live" there?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:04:02 AM
Oh, I see.  Lloyd Walsh was a prior inmate, and therefore, can put money in anybody's commissary fund if he wishes, but WHY IS MY QUESTION.  That is 1200 a year he can spend on anything else. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:05:34 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over as Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.

What is a daily self-substinence fee? 
Is that the fee the jail charges each inmate to "live" there?

Do they really get charged to live there?  What if they can't pay it?  1.50 a day seems affordable to me, 3 solids a day, a warm bed/cot, some pets (roaches), and look at all the intellectual conversation she has been having.  I say that is a bargain.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:08:15 AM
Interestingly, Mr. Lloyd Walsh thinks ICA has a good lawyers and that ANY MONKEY CAN GET HER OUT. 

http://www.cayleedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/__-_jo18.jpg


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 10:09:21 AM
Has the princess not gotten a commissary order lately?  Is she not ordering so we don't know what she is getting?  Did Bozo tell her she probably should lay off the pork rinds for a while?  Or, is her fund empty and nobody is filling it? 

The last one I have seen is posted over as Cayleedaily......   http://www.cayleedaily.com/2010/11/casey-anthony-gets-sick-owes-jail-money-again/

Joy Wray sent her $7.00!  Joy flip flops more than a beach fish.  The inmate Lloyd sends her $100.00 each month and advised Casey to take a box of Kleenex with her to trial.  Why?  Because her hands may sweat, (he knows she can't cry), and this is a sign of nervousness the jurors will pick up on!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If Mom and Pop haven't been depositing any money lately, I foresee a deposit in the very near future as the 48 Hours episode will be re-airing this Sunday....more royalties.

What is a daily self-substinence fee? 
Is that the fee the jail charges each inmate to "live" there?

Do they really get charged to live there?  What if they can't pay it?  1.50 a day seems affordable to me, 3 solids a day, a warm bed/cot, some pets (roaches), and look at all the intellectual conversation she has been having.  I say that is a bargain.
I imagine that money must be paid at some point and time, even after release, but I don't really know how that works. I'm pretty sure that if money comes into your account, the jail gets theirs first and then you can spend on commissary items.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:11:01 AM
Got stuck in South Florida due to cold. Sorry I'm late with money. I haven't abandoned you.

I'm homeless in Florida. My residence is in Georgia. I take a dog (doverman) and panhandle to make you money. Probally me and the dog will go to Orlando next month and hold a sign for you. Probally saying, "Casey did not kill her daughter" and "the state is on a witch hunt."

This will be dangerous. Have to have the dog with me.

With the love of Christ,

Lloyd Douglas Walsh

Alma, Ga.



Oy vey, this guy is not the brigthest crayon, eh? 


http://seamusoriley.blogspot.com/2010/11/love-letters-to-casey-anthony.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 08, 2011, 10:12:07 AM
snipped
I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   


Ewww, roaches and/or thinking about one literally freaks me out.  I would be crying nonstop if I had to be in that jail.  I would probably stand in the middle of my cot all day, so that one cannot touch me or come near me. 

Glowed by me.

If they were waiting in line, I assume that means waiting to get food, so how could they find roaches in their food if they had not gotten any food yet?

Shouldn't be a problem...this lady survived.....
Cockroach Found In A Woman’s Colonoscopy
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/01/cockroach-found-in-a-womans-colonoscopy/


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:13:41 AM
OH EM GEE, LOVE THIS ONE. 

Many centuries ago, parents had a legal right to kill their children without the court prosecuting them for murder, in Europe.

http://seamusoriley.blogspot.com/2010/11/love-letters-to-casey-anthony.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 10:14:40 AM
Interestingly, Mr. Lloyd Walsh thinks ICA has a good lawyers and that ANY MONKEY CAN GET HER OUT. 

http://www.cayleedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/__-_jo18.jpg
Wow! I hadn't seen this current article. Yes, how does Cindy deposit $200.00, disability must pay well.   And I see Casey is still, well....Casey. She went through that money in a heartbeat. Old habits never die......but murdering skanks do!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:15:53 AM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there. 

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo

I remember at teh end of Scott Peterson's trial, his defense putting nothing/nobody up as a defense and I was thinking, what the heck.  Will Bozo do something similar? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 10:18:58 AM
Got stuck in South Florida due to cold. Sorry I'm late with money. I haven't abandoned you.

I'm homeless in Florida. My residence is in Georgia. I take a dog (doverman) and panhandle to make you money. Probally me and the dog will go to Orlando next month and hold a sign for you. Probally saying, "Casey did not kill her daughter" and "the state is on a witch hunt."

This will be dangerous. Have to have the dog with me.

With the love of Christ,

Lloyd Douglas Walsh

Alma, Ga.



Oy vey, this guy is not the brigthest crayon, eh? 


http://seamusoriley.blogspot.com/2010/11/love-letters-to-casey-anthony.html
He's right up Casey's alley tho, fits right in with the bunch she hangs out with these days (even if it is from afar and a few actual fleeting moments).....Baez, Mason, Mom and Dad, etc.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:19:40 AM
snipped
I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   


Ewww, roaches and/or thinking about one literally freaks me out.  I would be crying nonstop if I had to be in that jail.  I would probably stand in the middle of my cot all day, so that one cannot touch me or come near me. 

Glowed by me.

If they were waiting in line, I assume that means waiting to get food, so how could they find roaches in their food if they had not gotten any food yet?

Shouldn't be a problem...this lady survived.....
Cockroach Found In A Woman’s Colonoscopy
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/01/cockroach-found-in-a-womans-colonoscopy/

Blech, I would be mortified.

When I was a child, I lived/stayed with my grandma in Brooklyn, under the L train, above a fish bait store, and she was immaculate, but no matter what she did, she had roaches.  I would leave the lights on so that my BF would not see them scattering around at night. 

I SKEEVE THEM.  I hate them and just the thought of them makes me hyperventilate. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 10:20:07 AM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there. 

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo

I remember at teh end of Scott Peterson's trial, his defense putting nothing/nobody up as a defense and I was thinking, what the heck.  Will Bozo do something similar? 
He will have to let Cindy testify or she will castrate him!   ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:23:09 AM
Got stuck in South Florida due to cold. Sorry I'm late with money. I haven't abandoned you.

I'm homeless in Florida. My residence is in Georgia. I take a dog (doverman) and panhandle to make you money. Probally me and the dog will go to Orlando next month and hold a sign for you. Probally saying, "Casey did not kill her daughter" and "the state is on a witch hunt."

This will be dangerous. Have to have the dog with me.

With the love of Christ,

Lloyd Douglas Walsh

Alma, Ga.



Oy vey, this guy is not the brigthest crayon, eh? 


http://seamusoriley.blogspot.com/2010/11/love-letters-to-casey-anthony.html
He's right up Casey's alley tho, fits right in with the bunch she hangs out with these days (even if it is from afar and a few actual fleeting moments).....Baez, Mason, Mom and Dad, etc.

Yeah, maybe they will add him to the dufense's witness list later. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 10:28:42 AM
Have we seen the State's penalty phase witness list?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:30:41 AM
Have we seen the State's penalty phase witness list?
]


I haven's seen one yet. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:33:46 AM
Have we seen the State's penalty phase witness list?
]


I haven's seen one yet. 

OY, If I would use the silly spell check, I would not have to quote myself to fix things like haven's to haven't. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 10:41:25 AM
This is old, but did you all see the Liar LIar video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSv93CUgL_8&feature=player_embedded#!

Found here:  http://nosufferingfools.lefora.com/2009/12/23/dicsussion-thread-for-casey-anthony-case/page22/


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 10:57:27 AM
This is old, but did you all see the Liar LIar video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSv93CUgL_8&feature=player_embedded#!

Found here:  http://nosufferingfools.lefora.com/2009/12/23/dicsussion-thread-for-casey-anthony-case/page22/
Great video!  The timing, of images and Casey's words, to the words of the song are perfect! 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 11:06:52 AM
Geeze ZooMonkey, you got me hooked on viewing old videos again!  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Here's a good one..."Message to the Anthonys: It's not called Larry King LIE"   Bill Scheaffer's comment says it all, but I have a question?  Isn't Casey being found guilty of murdering her own baby not dramatic enough for the DT? And possibly being put to death?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCDSWSVLPh8&feature=related


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 11:10:05 AM
Geeze ZooMonkeymology, you got me hooked on viewing old videos again!  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Here's a good one..."Message to the Anthonys: It's not called Larry King LIE"   Bill Scheaffer's comment says it all, but I have a question?  Isn't Casey being found guilty of murdering her own baby not dramatic enough for the DT? And possibly being put to death?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCDSWSVLPh8&feature=related

Self edit

I beg your pardon, please.   :2redman:    IDK where my head is.....    I'm sorry.   


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 11:35:00 AM
This is old, but did you all see the Liar LIar video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSv93CUgL_8&feature=player_embedded#!

Found here:  http://nosufferingfools.lefora.com/2009/12/23/dicsussion-thread-for-casey-anthony-case/page22/
Great video!  The timing, of images and Casey's words, to the words of the song are perfect! 

I know, I especially like the pinochio pictures of her.  Classic. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 11:38:01 AM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped

Thanks Fanny.  Wow, this is who they want kept super secret?????????????? 

OH EM GEE. 

so, Jesse, Ricardo, Anthony, Amy are going to speak for her, thought they were states witnesses, can they do that? 

The point to this is I bet they didnt even ask these individuals if they would be willing to testify on her behalf in penalty phase & now as if it was even a question prior to this point they probably would be very reluctant if not flat out refuse.   As far as Jesse goes, I know that he's had a very difficult time facing Casey could do such a heinous thing much less to a child he cared deeply for & he did love Casey (God knows why cuz she was a lil B then too) so he could possibly have mixed emotions as to not wanting to see her put to death.  Additionally, the defense may be foolishly counting on the fact that Rev Grund is rather religious & might have misgivings condemning an individual to death but that doesnt necessarily mean that either would be willing to testify on her behalf so that doesnt happen.  To my knowledge, the defense cannot force anyone to testify in this phase.

I've resigned myself to the thought that the defense might actually be successful in sparing her the death penalty, not that I personally feel she should be spared or for that matter any other person whatsoever who in a calculated & premeditated manner murders a child.  That being said, whether she gets life or the death penalty by lethal injection, this monster will die sooner or later in jail & will never see the light of day amongst us again.   If she doesnt get condemned to die, she will have a slow & painful demise. After many years in whatever capacity I worked & to date still following these horrific crimes, I've hardened to wish that it was legal for individuals who kill go out the same way they took the life of their victim, it might not be a deterrent but at least they'd know their fate in advance.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 11:38:30 AM
Geeze ZooMonkeymology, you got me hooked on viewing old videos again!  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Here's a good one..."Message to the Anthonys: It's not called Larry King LIE"   Bill Scheaffer's comment says it all, but I have a question?  Isn't Casey being found guilty of murdering her own baby not dramatic enough for the DT? And possibly being put to death?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCDSWSVLPh8&feature=related

Self edit

I beg your pardon, please.   :2redman:    IDK where my head is.....    I'm sorry.   

ZooMonkey is just fine with me.  Don't worry about it.  Yeah, I would think that would be dramatic enough for most with 2 brain cells, but maybe not them. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 11:43:11 AM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped

Thanks Fanny.  Wow, this is who they want kept super secret?????????????? 

OH EM GEE. 

so, Jesse, Ricardo, Anthony, Amy are going to speak for her, thought they were states witnesses, can they do that? 

The point to this is I bet they didnt even ask these individuals if they would be willing to testify on her behalf in penalty phase & now as if it was even a question prior to this point they probably would be very reluctant if not flat out refuse.   As far as Jesse goes, I know that he's had a very difficult time facing Casey could do such a heinous thing much less to a child he cared deeply for & he did love Casey (God knows why cuz she was a lil B then too) so he could possibly have mixed emotions as to not wanting to see her put to death.  Additionally, the defense may be foolishly counting on the fact that Rev Grund is rather religious & might have misgivings condemning an individual to death but that doesnt necessarily mean that either would be willing to testify on her behalf so that doesnt happen.  To my knowledge, the defense cannot force anyone to testify in this phase.

I've resigned myself to the thought that the defense might actually be successful in sparing her the death penalty, not that I personally feel she should be spared or for that matter any other person whatsoever who in a calculated & premeditated manner murders a child.  That being said, whether she gets life or the death penalty by lethal injection, this monster will die sooner or later in jail & will never see the light of day amongst us again.   If she doesnt get condemned to die, she will have a slow & painful demise. After many years in whatever capacity I worked & to date still following these horrific crimes, I've hardened to wish that it was legal for individuals who kill go out the same way they took the life of their victim, it might not be a deterrent but at least they'd know their fate in advance.

I was wondering if they can subpeona witnesses for the penalty phase, but that would probably not go over too well, meaning the testimony would not be free flowing and the witnesses would be angry. 

she will get life, IMO.  I really don't mind that at all and in some ways it is worse.  Imagine never getting out ever again, in a cell, for the rest of your life.  At least with DP, they can envision what the afterlife will be like when they get there.  I would not mind, however, her getting the DP, and then having that hang over her head for 20 years wondering what date the courts will give her to die, before they convert her to life.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 08, 2011, 12:15:28 PM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

It's a good thing I don't own a Kindle, cause I like free things, and I might have been tempted to get it for free. 

I have one and the thought crossed my mind.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 12:17:06 PM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

It's a good thing I don't own a Kindle, cause I like free things, and I might have been tempted to get it for free. 

I have one and the thought crossed my mind.

Kewl, let us know how awesome it is.  LOL.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 08, 2011, 12:29:57 PM
I doubt she will get the DP either and for the first time in my life, I feel she should. Yes, it took Casey Anthony to change my mind about the death penalty. She had options to achieve her "dream", and they didn't involve Caylee being murdered. Heck, they didn't even involve her working! Point is, she could have adopted Caylee out at any point during her short life.  No matter what Cindy said. She CHOSE to kill her....whether by accidental overdose, which is not an accident in my book, or with the duct tape.

I feel Casey planned this for some time. Her and Cindy most likely had many arguments about Caylee, and one of them triggered the thought process of taking Caylee away from Cindy for good. She's mad at Caylee at the same time because all these arguments are about Caylee. Arguments continue, searches on the computer finally begin. It all came to a head on Caylee's fateful day.

THEN to see what Casey did in the month following is just unbelievable to me. She was obviously very happy and content. She still appears to be content. Not one thing Casey has said about what happened to Caylee and what she did that month after, is true. Nothing.

A person like Casey will not really be affected while in GP, even for the rest of her life. She will adapt and continue on with her ways. Every day will be like cocktail hour for her.....little miss social butterfly.....a different side for everybody, what ever it takes to get what she wants.  She may have some run-ins but she will overcome....she will be in control and she will have things her way.  Of course she will run through every prisoner there, using them all.

BUT....if she is on death row, which will be many years of appeals, and even if she wins an appeal, that time spent is in solitude for the most part. THAT is what will get to Casey. Mentally and physically.  That is a punishment.

I know this case itself should not be used to send a message to others out there that feel a child's life and well being have no merit, but something has to change. Laws need to be set and upheld for the protection of our innocent children. Let them know that if you kill a child, you will be put to death. Period.
There is no other option. They can spend the rest of their life fighting for their own, all alone in a cell.  As always....jmoo



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 08, 2011, 12:40:28 PM
This is old, but did you all see the Liar LIar video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSv93CUgL_8&feature=player_embedded#!

Found here:  http://nosufferingfools.lefora.com/2009/12/23/dicsussion-thread-for-casey-anthony-case/page22/

That was a great video, Zoo.
I hadn't seen it before.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 08, 2011, 12:51:22 PM
I KNOW Casey will be found guilty...even the duhfense knows that.
I don't really see her receiving the DP. I see her getting LWOP, and the A's moving so they can be closer to her on visiting days.
My other daydream is, the A's being arrested as soon as the Guilty verdict is read.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 12:53:09 PM
I doubt she will get the DP either and for the first time in my life, I feel she should. Yes, it took Casey Anthony to change my mind about the death penalty. She had options to achieve her "dream", and they didn't involve Caylee being murdered. Heck, they didn't even involve her working! Point is, she could have adopted Caylee out at any point during her short life.  No matter what Cindy said. She CHOSE to kill her....whether by accidental overdose, which is not an accident in my book, or with the duct tape.

I feel Casey planned this for some time. Her and Cindy most likely had many arguments about Caylee, and one of them triggered the thought process of taking Caylee away from Cindy for good. She's mad at Caylee at the same time because all these arguments are about Caylee. Arguments continue, searches on the computer finally begin. It all came to a head on Caylee's fateful day.

THEN to see what Casey did in the month following is just unbelievable to me. She was obviously very happy and content. She still appears to be content. Not one thing Casey has said about what happened to Caylee and what she did that month after, is true. Nothing.

A person like Casey will not really be affected while in GP, even for the rest of her life. She will adapt and continue on with her ways. Every day will be like cocktail hour for her.....little miss social butterfly.....a different side for everybody, what ever it takes to get what she wants.  She may have some run-ins but she will overcome....she will be in control and she will have things her way.  Of course she will run through every prisoner there, using them all.

BUT....if she is on death row, which will be many years of appeals, and even if she wins an appeal, that time spent is in solitude for the most part. THAT is what will get to Casey. Mentally and physically.  That is a punishment.

I know this case itself should not be used to send a message to others out there that feel a child's life and well being have no merit, but something has to change. Laws need to be set and upheld for the protection of our innocent children. Let them know that if you kill a child, you will be put to death. Period.
There is no other option. They can spend the rest of their life fighting for their own, all alone in a cell.  As always....jmoo



I agree with everything you say.  I was never a pro/anti DP person.  I base my opinion on a case by case basis.  For instance, the dirtbag that killed/kidnapped the Groene family, DEFINITE DP CANDIDATE FOR ME.  No ifs, ands, or buts, and I would be happy to pull the plug myself. 

Casey deserves it, IMO.  There will be her supporters that say there is no hard evidence, but I believe there is plenty of hard evidence, if you take off your blinders and see it.  I do not think the State of Florida will give her that though.  Jurors have sympathy for women, no matter how horrible their crime is. 

Alone in her cell works for me too.  Nothing, I'm afraid, will take away her mindframe.  She is oblivious and will be oblivious until, like most inmates, she finds god in prison and has "changed." 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 12:54:04 PM
I KNOW Casey will be found guilty...even the duhfense knows that.
I don't really see her receiving the DP. I see her getting LWOP, and the A's moving so they can be closer to her on visiting days.
My other daydream is, the A's being arrested as soon as the Guilty verdict is read.

OH, this is my dream too!!!  I would be so happy.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 12:56:34 PM
I KNOW Casey will be found guilty...even the duhfense knows that.
I don't really see her receiving the DP. I see her getting LWOP, and the A's moving so they can be closer to her on visiting days.
My other daydream is, the A's being arrested as soon as the Guilty verdict is read.

OH, this is my dream too!!!  I would be so happy.

And, I might add, if as she was leaving the court room from Casey's guilty verdict, they would arrest them in the hallway, and not even allow them to reach their home.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 08, 2011, 01:01:29 PM
I picture them being surrounded by officers as the guilty verdict is being read and arrested right in the courtroom.
I also have a helter skelter scenario involving George, but I won't go there.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 01:02:59 PM
I picture them being surrounded by officers as the guilty verdict is being read and arrested right in the courtroom.
I also have a helter skelter scenario involving George, but I won't go there.

Oh, now that would be good. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 08, 2011, 01:03:36 PM
snipped
I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   


Ewww, roaches and/or thinking about one literally freaks me out.  I would be crying nonstop if I had to be in that jail.  I would probably stand in the middle of my cot all day, so that one cannot touch me or come near me. 

Glowed by me.

If they were waiting in line, I assume that means waiting to get food, so how could they find roaches in their food if they had not gotten any food yet?

Shouldn't be a problem...this lady survived.....
Cockroach Found In A Woman’s Colonoscopy
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/01/cockroach-found-in-a-womans-colonoscopy/

Blech, I would be mortified.

When I was a child, I lived/stayed with my grandma in Brooklyn, under the L train, above a fish bait store, and she was immaculate, but no matter what she did, she had roaches.  I would leave the lights on so that my BF would not see them scattering around at night. 

I SKEEVE THEM.  I hate them and just the thought of them makes me hyperventilate. 

Meet Skanky's newest little friend. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/43345.jpg)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 01:06:00 PM
snipped
I Just seen this elsewhere

LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. "He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch," Daleo said, "my son almost threw up."

County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.

Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, "It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded."


http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html   


Ewww, roaches and/or thinking about one literally freaks me out.  I would be crying nonstop if I had to be in that jail.  I would probably stand in the middle of my cot all day, so that one cannot touch me or come near me. 

Glowed by me.

If they were waiting in line, I assume that means waiting to get food, so how could they find roaches in their food if they had not gotten any food yet?

Shouldn't be a problem...this lady survived.....
Cockroach Found In A Woman’s Colonoscopy
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/01/cockroach-found-in-a-womans-colonoscopy/

Blech, I would be mortified.

When I was a child, I lived/stayed with my grandma in Brooklyn, under the L train, above a fish bait store, and she was immaculate, but no matter what she did, she had roaches.  I would leave the lights on so that my BF would not see them scattering around at night. 

I SKEEVE THEM.  I hate them and just the thought of them makes me hyperventilate. 

Meet Skanky's newest little friend. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/43345.jpg)

OMG, that is too funny.  I love it.  Makes Roaches a little more tolerable.  maybe those roaches are really little robots sent in by the FBI to set up Casey Anthony even more. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 01:06:58 PM
I picture them being surrounded by officers as the guilty verdict is being read and arrested right in the courtroom.
I also have a helter skelter scenario involving George, but I won't go there.

Gotta admit, that helter skelter scenario sounds interesting.  Now, you have my mind wandering. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 08, 2011, 01:10:05 PM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there.  

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo

I already know the defense's opening statement........" Uh, uh, my papers are here somewhere that say why KC should not be found guilty. Let me see, uh, uh, there really is no reason to put her to death since she only threw her baby away in the woods to rot with bugs. uh, uh, you know, you know...........


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 08, 2011, 01:10:19 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped

Thanks Fanny.  Wow, this is who they want kept super secret?????????????? 

OH EM GEE. 

so, Jesse, Ricardo, Anthony, Amy are going to speak for her, thought they were states witnesses, can they do that? 

The point to this is I bet they didnt even ask these individuals if they would be willing to testify on her behalf in penalty phase & now as if it was even a question prior to this point they probably would be very reluctant if not flat out refuse.   As far as Jesse goes, I know that he's had a very difficult time facing Casey could do such a heinous thing much less to a child he cared deeply for & he did love Casey (God knows why cuz she was a lil B then too) so he could possibly have mixed emotions as to not wanting to see her put to death.  Additionally, the defense may be foolishly counting on the fact that Rev Grund is rather religious & might have misgivings condemning an individual to death but that doesnt necessarily mean that either would be willing to testify on her behalf so that doesnt happen.  To my knowledge, the defense cannot force anyone to testify in this phase.

I've resigned myself to the thought that the defense might actually be successful in sparing her the death penalty, not that I personally feel she should be spared or for that matter any other person whatsoever who in a calculated & premeditated manner murders a child.  That being said, whether she gets life or the death penalty by lethal injection, this monster will die sooner or later in jail & will never see the light of day amongst us again.   If she doesnt get condemned to die, she will have a slow & painful demise. After many years in whatever capacity I worked & to date still following these horrific crimes, I've hardened to wish that it was legal for individuals who kill go out the same way they took the life of their victim, it might not be a deterrent but at least they'd know their fate in advance.

I looked at the list of names, and outside of the family and maybe even Jesse, the rest seem to have had their lives changed by Skanky's actions and have more or less ruined their lives also, or at least left a big pox. I don't think they will voluntarily testify for her in the death penalty phase. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the first time they knew Bozo is planning on using them for this. Can you have hostile witnesses testifying for your client in a penalty phase?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 01:11:41 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped

Thanks Fanny.  Wow, this is who they want kept super secret?????????????? 

OH EM GEE. 

so, Jesse, Ricardo, Anthony, Amy are going to speak for her, thought they were states witnesses, can they do that? 

The point to this is I bet they didnt even ask these individuals if they would be willing to testify on her behalf in penalty phase & now as if it was even a question prior to this point they probably would be very reluctant if not flat out refuse.   As far as Jesse goes, I know that he's had a very difficult time facing Casey could do such a heinous thing much less to a child he cared deeply for & he did love Casey (God knows why cuz she was a lil B then too) so he could possibly have mixed emotions as to not wanting to see her put to death.  Additionally, the defense may be foolishly counting on the fact that Rev Grund is rather religious & might have misgivings condemning an individual to death but that doesnt necessarily mean that either would be willing to testify on her behalf so that doesnt happen.  To my knowledge, the defense cannot force anyone to testify in this phase.

I've resigned myself to the thought that the defense might actually be successful in sparing her the death penalty, not that I personally feel she should be spared or for that matter any other person whatsoever who in a calculated & premeditated manner murders a child.  That being said, whether she gets life or the death penalty by lethal injection, this monster will die sooner or later in jail & will never see the light of day amongst us again.   If she doesnt get condemned to die, she will have a slow & painful demise. After many years in whatever capacity I worked & to date still following these horrific crimes, I've hardened to wish that it was legal for individuals who kill go out the same way they took the life of their victim, it might not be a deterrent but at least they'd know their fate in advance.

I was wondering if they can subpeona witnesses for the penalty phase, but that would probably not go over too well, meaning the testimony would not be free flowing and the witnesses would be angry. 

she will get life, IMO.  I really don't mind that at all and in some ways it is worse.  Imagine never getting out ever again, in a cell, for the rest of your life.  At least with DP, they can envision what the afterlife will be like when they get there.  I would not mind, however, her getting the DP, and then having that hang over her head for 20 years wondering what date the courts will give her to die, before they convert her to life.

Upon further reflection of what I said, yes the defense can subpoena witnesses, which in essence means they are forcing a witness to testify to what they may not want to voluntarily.  In my mind's eye that is a serious contemplation because for whatever spec they might get out of it, there is a ton against her that will pale in comparison & you never want a jury to see a witness reluctant, defiant or feeling forced to answer any other way then they already did.   All these individuals noted will have testified in the case-in-chief & simply being asked if they feel Casey should be put to death, as far as I see it, is only an opinion.   They will ask character questions in mitigation of her heinous crime but to me by then anything positive about Casey will be far overshadowed by her aggravating factors....still in all this future jury may not see that she should receive the DP.  Jurors are instructed explicitly as to what by law they should consider & what they should not but as evidenced in so many cases it is obvious that some do behind closed doors despite the instruction.   As Ive expressed before I'm rather confident she will be found guilty of felony murder & her other charges, I'm not as confident the jury will recommend the DP.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 01:12:46 PM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there.  

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo

I already know the defense's opening statement........" Uh, uh, my papers are here somewhere that say why KC should not be found guilty. Let me see, uh, uh, there really is no reason to put her to death since she only threw her baby away in the woods to rot with bugs. uh, uh, you know, you know...........

Then, it will be Jar's turn, who will say HE WAS NOT THERE THAT DAY. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 01:22:28 PM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there.  

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo
::MonkeyHaHa::    Ah yes but he was around to give an opinion that she was in essence guilty & this defense (before he flip flopped to sign on) will have to fight to keep her alive as we all witnessed in that interview.


I already know the defense's opening statement........" Uh, uh, my papers are here somewhere that say why KC should not be found guilty. Let me see, uh, uh, there really is no reason to put her to death since she only threw her baby away in the woods to rot with bugs. uh, uh, you know, you know...........

Then, it will be Jar's turn, who will say HE WAS NOT THERE THAT DAY. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 01:23:15 PM
The monkey laugh is my comment above ^^  goofed in the posting


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 08, 2011, 01:26:11 PM
He/She Finnell is drinking some toxic kool-aid!!

With the exception of Tony R., KC and her Mommy Dearest accused all the friends listed with murdering Caylee. ::MonkeyMad::

Yea, I bet her friends (victims) are dying to get up on the witness stand and sing "I love you" songs to killer KC! Please spare the skanks life......pleeeezzzzz, she hasn't ruined enough of MY life yet! Then they will plan for a group Kumbaya moment!



That list is almost as insane as the rest of her defense strategy. These are people she scammed, lied to and stole from. I bet the prosecution is laughing their butts off at this list. If they could not get in anywhere else how KC stole, lied and screwed over people this will be a golden opportunity in cross. It never ceases to amaze me how totally inept the defense is in this case. It is almost like they are trying to get her the DP.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 08, 2011, 01:32:08 PM
Have we seen the State's penalty phase witness list?
]


I haven's seen one yet. 

Why would they need one with that list? Those are the people that KC tried to ruin their lives, and if the defense thinks they are going to paint a nice picture of her they are showing again how stupid they are. Most of those people are on the prosecution's trial list - Is Bozo getting paid to get KC killed by any chance? That is sure what it looks like.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 08, 2011, 01:33:57 PM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there.  

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo

I already know the defense's opening statement........" Uh, uh, my papers are here somewhere that say why KC should not be found guilty. Let me see, uh, uh, there really is no reason to put her to death since she only threw her baby away in the woods to rot with bugs. uh, uh, you know, you know...........

Then, it will be Jar's turn, who will say HE WAS NOT THERE THAT DAY. 

Lol! Right, and can u please speak up, my hearing aids are buzzing.
I skeeve roaches too, and that Bozo-roacho image was funny and gross at the same time.
Hope I can get it out of my head.
They should be using Annie Downing not Amy, if they're trying to find someone to speak about life inside the Anthony home.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 01:42:24 PM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there.  

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo

I already know the defense's opening statement........" Uh, uh, my papers are here somewhere that say why KC should not be found guilty. Let me see, uh, uh, there really is no reason to put her to death since she only threw her baby away in the woods to rot with bugs. uh, uh, you know, you know...........

Then, it will be Jar's turn, who will say HE WAS NOT THERE THAT DAY. 

Lol! Right, and can u please speak up, my hearing aids are buzzing.
I skeeve roaches too, and that Bozo-roacho image was funny and gross at the same time.
Hope I can get it out of my head.
They should be using Annie Downing not Amy, if they're trying to find someone to speak about life inside the Anthony home.


I don't know.  Maybe I am behind on my info, but i can't think of really anybody, other than Spindy, GeorgiePeorgie, and Knee-HighLee, who really has any sympathy, nice things to say about her, and even their testimony is filled with ICA's character being pretty poor, i.e., stealing, lying, etc.  I can see it now.

Please Cindy tell us why Casey should not be given the DP.

Umm, well let me think.  She did steal, and lie, and there was never a nanny, but look at her, does she look like she could murder her child.  My grandbaby is gone, but I still want to have her, so I can choke the chit out of her after she gets out.  She only looks Beotchy, really, underneath the mug is a really sweet girl who loved her baby (until she killed her). 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 01:43:53 PM
Yes, penalty phase witnesses may be cross examined, by both sides.  I found this link that explains things.   http://books.google.com/books?id=8xxjJTGrEhAC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=can+penalty+phase+witnesses+be+cross+examined&source=bl&ots=ARtI2ssYba&sig=ESGSQeZZwoI_x5MkPiUnyJGXEf4&hl=en&ei=3nEoTYbCFMP-8AaLxoXIAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

This starts on page 87, chapter 9, if the link does not take you directly there.  

It is stated that the defense, for strategic reasons, may not give an opening statement until the prosecution has given their opening statement and  presented all of it's evidence.  I see this happening in this case.  moo

I already know the defense's opening statement........" Uh, uh, my papers are here somewhere that say why KC should not be found guilty. Let me see, uh, uh, there really is no reason to put her to death since she only threw her baby away in the woods to rot with bugs. uh, uh, you know, you know...........

Then, it will be Jar's turn, who will say HE WAS NOT THERE THAT DAY. 

Lol! Right, and can u please speak up, my hearing aids are buzzing.
I skeeve roaches too, and that Bozo-roacho image was funny and gross at the same time.
Hope I can get it out of my head.
They should be using Annie Downing not Amy, if they're trying to find someone to speak about life inside the Anthony home.


I don't know.  Maybe I am behind on my info, but i can't think of really anybody, other than Spindy, GeorgiePeorgie, and Knee-HighLee, who really has any sympathy, nice things to say about her, and even their testimony is filled with ICA's character being pretty poor, i.e., stealing, lying, etc.  I can see it now.

Please Cindy tell us why Casey should not be given the DP.

Umm, well let me think.  She did steal, and lie, and there was never a nanny, but look at her, does she look like she could murder her child.  My grandbaby is gone, but I still want to have her, so I can choke the chit out of her after she gets out.  She only looks Beotchy, really, underneath the mug is a really sweet girl who loved her baby (until she killed her). 

Oopps, forgot to inlcude the "chomps for hre gum chewing" every other word.  Wonder if those chomps will be recorded by the court reporter. 

Cindy Anthony:  Um, chomp, she chomp, used to be, chomp, a very, chomp, chomp, chomp, sweet girl, chomp. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 08, 2011, 01:57:40 PM

She is there for the sob fest the defense is going to put on post conviction to portray Casey as a victim of a) familial sexual abuse b) child abuse and God knows what else based on Casey's allegations of which none she can prove nor had she ever sought help for previously to Caylee's murder.  IMHO, the jury will see right through this circus at trial and during penalty phase, albeit I do think they stand a good chance of sparing her from the needle.   I'm confident in the outcome of conviction, a tad less that she will indeed receive the death penalty.

Yes, she will be the one to describe all the behaviors the jury has observed as being a result of molestation by one or more family members. She will tell how KC had no control over her rage because she was brought up in a family of raging behaviors. She will tell how kids when molested at a very young age become anti social and then describe how KC fits that description. I see the bus coming for not only George & Lee about molestation but Cindy as well for her rage.They will all three be stomped on in this phase and I don't think they have a clue yet. I believe the "secret" list was to keep them from knowing what was coming and not the general public. Even as stupid as they are, this is obvious what is being planned.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 08, 2011, 02:05:07 PM

I don't know.  Maybe I am behind on my info, but i can't think of really anybody, other than Spindy, GeorgiePeorgie, and Knee-HighLee, who really has any sympathy, nice things to say about her, and even their testimony is filled with ICA's character being pretty poor, i.e., stealing, lying, etc.  I can see it now.

Please Cindy tell us why Casey should not be given the DP.

Umm, well let me think.  She did steal, and lie, and there was never a nanny, but look at her, does she look like she could murder her child.  My grandbaby is gone, but I still want to have her, so I can choke the chit out of her after she gets out.  She only looks Beotchy, really, underneath the mug is a really sweet girl who loved her baby (until she killed her). 

Has anyone noticed there were NO family members on that list except for immediate family? NOT the grandmother who could have garnished some sympathy if she was willing to speak for KC - NOT ONE family member from either side is going to be speaking for KC. You would think even the most low life in a family would have ONE person to speak up. In all the criminal trials there are usually some family members who think their life is worth saving, but not this one.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Scatty on January 08, 2011, 02:41:51 PM
Tony Lazarro and Jesse must be on the list to testify about KC's comments about sexual abuse from Lee and/or George. All her ex-friends must be getting called to testify about KC's complaints about Cindy and George.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 08, 2011, 02:43:17 PM

I don't know.  Maybe I am behind on my info, but i can't think of really anybody, other than Spindy, GeorgiePeorgie, and Knee-HighLee, who really has any sympathy, nice things to say about her, and even their testimony is filled with ICA's character being pretty poor, i.e., stealing, lying, etc.  I can see it now.

Please Cindy tell us why Casey should not be given the DP.

Umm, well let me think.  She did steal, and lie, and there was never a nanny, but look at her, does she look like she could murder her child.  My grandbaby is gone, but I still want to have her, so I can choke the chit out of her after she gets out.  She only looks Beotchy, really, underneath the mug is a really sweet girl who loved her baby (until she killed her). 

Has anyone noticed there were NO family members on that list except for immediate family? NOT the grandmother who could have garnished some sympathy if she was willing to speak for KC - NOT ONE family member from either side is going to be speaking for KC. You would think even the most low life in a family would have ONE person to speak up. In all the criminal trials there are usually some family members who think their life is worth saving, but not this one.

Yeah, that's quite interesting. I'm not sure that the entire list has been released, so we'll have to wait and see.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 08, 2011, 02:50:03 PM

I don't know.  Maybe I am behind on my info, but i can't think of really anybody, other than Spindy, GeorgiePeorgie, and Knee-HighLee, who really has any sympathy, nice things to say about her, and even their testimony is filled with ICA's character being pretty poor, i.e., stealing, lying, etc.  I can see it now.

Please Cindy tell us why Casey should not be given the DP.

Umm, well let me think.  She did steal, and lie, and there was never a nanny, but look at her, does she look like she could murder her child.  My grandbaby is gone, but I still want to have her, so I can choke the chit out of her after she gets out.  She only looks Beotchy, really, underneath the mug is a really sweet girl who loved her baby (until she killed her). 

Has anyone noticed there were NO family members on that list except for immediate family? NOT the grandmother who could have garnished some sympathy if she was willing to speak for KC - NOT ONE family member from either side is going to be speaking for KC. You would think even the most low life in a family would have ONE person to speak up. In all the criminal trials there are usually some family members who think their life is worth saving, but not this one.

Which is the reason Finnell wanted the list sealed......she didn't want the public to see KC has no support from anyone other than her whacko parents and wee wee brother. I doubt no one is surprised with this flimsy list except delusional Cindy.
Cindy thinks everyone loved the skank.....she was everyones "mom".
Well KC should have focused on being a MOM to Caylee.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2011, 03:07:44 PM

I don't know.  Maybe I am behind on my info, but i can't think of really anybody, other than Spindy, GeorgiePeorgie, and Knee-HighLee, who really has any sympathy, nice things to say about her, and even their testimony is filled with ICA's character being pretty poor, i.e., stealing, lying, etc.  I can see it now.

Please Cindy tell us why Casey should not be given the DP.

Umm, well let me think.  She did steal, and lie, and there was never a nanny, but look at her, does she look like she could murder her child.  My grandbaby is gone, but I still want to have her, so I can choke the chit out of her after she gets out.  She only looks Beotchy, really, underneath the mug is a really sweet girl who loved her baby (until she killed her). 

Has anyone noticed there were NO family members on that list except for immediate family? NOT the grandmother who could have garnished some sympathy if she was willing to speak for KC - NOT ONE family member from either side is going to be speaking for KC. You would think even the most low life in a family would have ONE person to speak up. In all the criminal trials there are usually some family members who think their life is worth saving, but not this one.

I would assume Uncle Rick is not on the lists.

Janet

++++++


FLASHBACK

Cindy Anthony Says Someone Hacked Her Email Account
Posted: 4:47 pm EST December 1, 2008
Updated: 5:29 pm EST December 1, 2008


FAMILY FEUDS OVER WHETHER CAYLEE IS DEAD

Eyewitness News has obtained new documents from prosecutors that show Casey's own relatives believe she killed her daughter. In the 700 pages of evidence there were emails that started a family feud between Cindy Anthony and her brother.

Cindy's brother said he's frustrated that she believes Casey. In early August reporters asked Cindy Anthony a lot of tough questions about Casey's lies and Eyewitness News has learned Cindy's own brother was asking those same questions.

However, his inquiries ended in a family feud. In an email exchanged in August, Cindy's brother Rick Plesea, who she rarely talked to, told her his theory: "Caylee drowned in the pool, and Casey put Caylee's body in the trunk of her car." and "That is why the dogs hit on the trunk." From there the exchange deteriorated to insults.

Cindy wrote: "The next time you say Caylee is dead I will personally come there and kick your sorry a** all the way to hell."

Her brother fired back: "Your granddaughter is dead. There, I said it. Casey has killed her someway either by accident or on purpose."

"You have both lost your minds," Plesea writes to Cindy and George.

He also said Casey Anthony attended his wedding seven months pregnant with Caylee and when Rick asked Cindy about it she said Casey told her she wasn't pregnant then proceeded to say, "She would have to have sex to be pregnant."

Rick Plesea forwarded all of his emails to detectives.

http://www.wftv.com/news/18181289/detail.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 03:29:31 PM

I don't know.  Maybe I am behind on my info, but i can't think of really anybody, other than Spindy, GeorgiePeorgie, and Knee-HighLee, who really has any sympathy, nice things to say about her, and even their testimony is filled with ICA's character being pretty poor, i.e., stealing, lying, etc.  I can see it now.

Please Cindy tell us why Casey should not be given the DP.

Umm, well let me think.  She did steal, and lie, and there was never a nanny, but look at her, does she look like she could murder her child.  My grandbaby is gone, but I still want to have her, so I can choke the chit out of her after she gets out.  She only looks Beotchy, really, underneath the mug is a really sweet girl who loved her baby (until she killed her). 

Has anyone noticed there were NO family members on that list except for immediate family? NOT the grandmother who could have garnished some sympathy if she was willing to speak for KC - NOT ONE family member from either side is going to be speaking for KC. You would think even the most low life in a family would have ONE person to speak up. In all the criminal trials there are usually some family members who think their life is worth saving, but not this one.

I would assume Uncle Rick is not on the lists.

Janet

++++++


FLASHBACK

Cindy Anthony Says Someone Hacked Her Email Account
Posted: 4:47 pm EST December 1, 2008
Updated: 5:29 pm EST December 1, 2008


FAMILY FEUDS OVER WHETHER CAYLEE IS DEAD

Eyewitness News has obtained new documents from prosecutors that show Casey's own relatives believe she killed her daughter. In the 700 pages of evidence there were emails that started a family feud between Cindy Anthony and her brother.

Cindy's brother said he's frustrated that she believes Casey. In early August reporters asked Cindy Anthony a lot of tough questions about Casey's lies and Eyewitness News has learned Cindy's own brother was asking those same questions.

However, his inquiries ended in a family feud. In an email exchanged in August, Cindy's brother Rick Plesea, who she rarely talked to, told her his theory: "Caylee drowned in the pool, and Casey put Caylee's body in the trunk of her car." and "That is why the dogs hit on the trunk." From there the exchange deteriorated to insults.

Cindy wrote: "The next time you say Caylee is dead I will personally come there and kick your sorry a** all the way to hell."

Her brother fired back: "Your granddaughter is dead. There, I said it. Casey has killed her someway either by accident or on purpose."

"You have both lost your minds," Plesea writes to Cindy and George.

He also said Casey Anthony attended his wedding seven months pregnant with Caylee and when Rick asked Cindy about it she said Casey told her she wasn't pregnant then proceeded to say, "She would have to have sex to be pregnant."

Rick Plesea forwarded all of his emails to detectives.

http://www.wftv.com/news/18181289/detail.html





Great point ! What about the aunt that supposedly was writing casey
(on gas can georges side of the family)?


We all  know Rick isnt going to say anything nice nor will the other uncles and you cant blame them. I am sure that has cindy quite pissed.  And theres always the mallory family that is on the caylee board and the milsteads anyone!!  the fact that no family members is why finnel tried to keep the list private!! because think about it friends! it shows   and speaks volumes of her as a person and with no credibility or respect from anyone. I recall a time when baez held a news conference outside of his office. He made the comment  that the media needs to respect him and his client. what kind man is that!! comment!! to make such a stupid comment. Every word that has come out of his mouth makes him look so bad!!!  where did he go to law school what did he learn.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 03:33:12 PM
Tony Lazarro and Jesse must be on the list to testify about KC's comments about sexual abuse from Lee and/or George. All her ex-friends must be getting called to testify about KC's complaints about Cindy and George.










Scatty
this makes alot of sense to me.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 03:39:02 PM

She is there for the sob fest the defense is going to put on post conviction to portray Casey as a victim of a) familial sexual abuse b) child abuse and God knows what else based on Casey's allegations of which none she can prove nor had she ever sought help for previously to Caylee's murder.  IMHO, the jury will see right through this circus at trial and during penalty phase, albeit I do think they stand a good chance of sparing her from the needle.   I'm confident in the outcome of conviction, a tad less that she will indeed receive the death penalty.

Yes, she will be the one to describe all the behaviors the jury has observed as being a result of molestation by one or more family members. She will tell how KC had no control over her rage because she was brought up in a family of raging behaviors. She will tell how kids when molested at a very young age become anti social and then describe how KC fits that description. I see the bus coming for not only George & Lee about molestation but Cindy as well for her rage.They will all three be stomped on in this phase and I don't think they have a clue yet. I believe the "secret" list was to keep them from knowing what was coming and not the general public. Even as stupid as they are, this is obvious what is being planned.





Turbo
right now the A's just dislike bozo but come May they will hate him with a vengeance. I think baez is keeping on their goodside until  this is over with. He has to know she is toast. I do agree with the comment about sparing her from the needle. She will more likely get LWOP.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2011, 03:39:21 PM
February 09, 2009
A Shocking Twist

An E-Mail Family Feud


As the Caylee case goes on and new evidence emerges, Cindy Anthony's e-mails with her brother Rick become increasingly hostile

Sunday, Aug. 10, 2008. 2:48 p.m. SUBJECT: CAYLEE FROM: RICK PLESEA TO: CINDY ANTHONY

Dear Cindy, George and Lee: This is the hardest letter that I ever had to write. My heart is breaking with the passing of Caylee's birthday and she is not home with you guys. You have to be going through hell.... The cell phone records point out that Casey made a bunch of calls to you and George that you guys did not answer on the 16th of June. I think Caylee drowned in the pool, and Casey was trying to call you guys....

Sunday, Aug. 10, 2008. 5:49 p.m. SUBJECT: RE: CAYLEE FROM: CINDY ANTHONY TO: RICK PLESEA

There's a lot you guys don't know and we cannot say. I can assure you I am not mad at you, but the facts cannot be released for many reasons.... It's tough but we are confident we will have Caylee back with us. Love, Cindy

Sunday, Aug. 10, 2008. 9:20 p.m. SUBJECT: RE: CAYLEE FROM: RICK PLESEA TO: CINDY ANTHONY

... Cindy, no one knows the "ghost sitter." This is a person that Casey made up to fool you about her having a job for two years! She pretended to go to work and said she used this fake sitter to scam you. Can't you see this? There is no sitter....

Monday, Aug. 11, 2008. 2:27 a.m. SUBJECT: RE: CAYLEE FROM: CINDY ANTHONY TO: RICK PLESEA

There are a lot of facts that I cannot tell you about at this time. Lying does not make someone a murderer. I am not in denial.... The sheriff's office thought that Casey would crack being in jail this long. She hasn't because she is protecting Caylee. We have a lot of people working to prove Casey's innocence. We cannot come out with other evidence until Caylee is safe. You need to keep an open mind.

Monday, Aug. 11, 2008. 2:24 p.m. SUBJECT: BABYSITTER FROM: RICK PLESEA TO: CINDY ANTHONY

Cindy, you still didn't say if any human being has ever witnessed the existence of this "ghost babysitter." ... Casey is the only person that really knows where Caylee is and what really happened to her. She is playing you, George and Lee like a base [sic] fiddle and has for years. You need to wake up.

Monday, Aug. 11, 2008. 5:47 p.m. SUBJECT: RE: BABYSITTER FROM: CINDY ANTHONY TO: RICK PLESEA

This is why I am no longer going to reply to you again. You did not read a word I wrote. I cannot tell you everything that is going on. We do not want or need your sympathy, or even pity. Please do not reach out to me again.

Thursday, Aug. 21, 2008. 12:59 a.m. SUBJECT: WON'T DO GRETA FROM: RICK PLESEA TO: CINDY ANTHONY

You need help. You are delirious. I WAS trying to help you. Your granddaughter is dead. There I said it. Casey has killed her some way either by accident or on purpose.

http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20258165,00.html




Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: NewfieMonkey on January 08, 2011, 03:46:29 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 03:46:53 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-sentinel-ruling-20110107,0,900386.story
Sentinel wins battle for Casey Anthony witness list
Judge Perry rules against sealing names
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:45 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

<snipped>
The list of penalty phase witnesses provided today does identify Casey Anthony's close family members, including her parents and brother, many friends, ex-boyfriends and others already long associated with the case. Included on that list are familiar names such as Jesse Grund, Ricardo Morales Anthony Rusciano, Anthony Lazzaro and Amy Huizenga.

In other news today, hearings were set for March 2 and 3 for several key defense motions aimed at keeping certain statements out of the trial. Those include statements involving Casey Anthony's parents, her brother, law enforcement and fellow jail inmates.

Bumped

Thanks Fanny.  Wow, this is who they want kept super secret?????????????? 

OH EM GEE. 

so, Jesse, Ricardo, Anthony, Amy are going to speak for her, thought they were states witnesses, can they do that? 

The point to this is I bet they didnt even ask these individuals if they would be willing to testify on her behalf in penalty phase & now as if it was even a question prior to this point they probably would be very reluctant if not flat out refuse.   As far as Jesse goes, I know that he's had a very difficult time facing Casey could do such a heinous thing much less to a child he cared deeply for & he did love Casey (God knows why cuz she was a lil B then too) so he could possibly have mixed emotions as to not wanting to see her put to death.  Additionally, the defense may be foolishly counting on the fact that Rev Grund is rather religious & might have misgivings condemning an individual to death but that doesnt necessarily mean that either would be willing to testify on her behalf so that doesnt happen.  To my knowledge, the defense cannot force anyone to testify in this phase.

I've resigned myself to the thought that the defense might actually be successful in sparing her the death penalty, not that I personally feel she should be spared or for that matter any other person whatsoever who in a calculated & premeditated manner murders a child.  That being said, whether she gets life or the death penalty by lethal injection, this monster will die sooner or later in jail & will never see the light of day amongst us again.   If she doesnt get condemned to die, she will have a slow & painful demise. After many years in whatever capacity I worked & to date still following these horrific crimes, I've hardened to wish that it was legal for individuals who kill go out the same way they took the life of their victim, it might not be a deterrent but at least they'd know their fate in advance.

I was wondering if they can subpeona witnesses for the penalty phase, but that would probably not go over too well, meaning the testimony would not be free flowing and the witnesses would be angry. 

she will get life, IMO.  I really don't mind that at all and in some ways it is worse.  Imagine never getting out ever again, in a cell, for the rest of your life.  At least with DP, they can envision what the afterlife will be like when they get there.  I would not mind, however, her getting the DP, and then having that hang over her head for 20 years wondering what date the courts will give her to die, before they convert her to life.

Upon further reflection of what I said, yes the defense can subpoena witnesses, which in essence means they are forcing a witness to testify to what they may not want to voluntarily.  In my mind's eye that is a serious contemplation because for whatever spec they might get out of it, there is a ton against her that will pale in comparison & you never want a jury to see a witness reluctant, defiant or feeling forced to answer any other way then they already did.   All these individuals noted will have testified in the case-in-chief & simply being asked if they feel Casey should be put to death, as far as I see it, is only an opinion.   They will ask character questions in mitigation of her heinous crime but to me by then anything positive about Casey will be far overshadowed by her aggravating factors....still in all this future jury may not see that she should receive the DP.  Jurors are instructed explicitly as to what by law they should consider & what they should not but as evidenced in so many cases it is obvious that some do behind closed doors despite the instruction.   As Ive expressed before I'm rather confident she will be found guilty of felony murder & her other charges, I'm not as confident the jury will recommend the DP.



Hi Capp
I agree she will only eventualy end up with life. But thats better in a sense she will  grow old in prison and thinking of what could have been.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 08, 2011, 03:53:14 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: NewfieMonkey on January 08, 2011, 04:01:52 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 04:14:10 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 04:15:11 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.





there was a song that went like this
two faces have I
one to laugh
and one to cry!!
dunno who sang it. It was an oldie like me lol


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 04:23:28 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 04:25:28 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.





there was a song that went like this
two faces have I
one to laugh
and one to cry!!
dunno who sang it. It was an oldie like me lol






wow this is realy interesting reading
http://niecey456.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/jose-baez-his-unhealthy-blog-obsession-determination-to-railroad-the-innocent/


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 04:31:48 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.





there was a song that went like this
two faces have I
one to laugh
and one to cry!!
dunno who sang it. It was an oldie like me lol

Two Faces Have I by Lou Christie 1963
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w05w1XbZTG8


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 08, 2011, 04:35:27 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.

I can't do it!! Please don't make me! I can't listen two these two code talking preppy wantabee's again! ARGH!  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/babies_131-1.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 04:47:58 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.

I can't do it!! Please don't make me! I can't listen two these two code talking preppy wantabee's again! ARGH!  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/babies_131-1.gif)





LMAO  I love it  oh thats too funny.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 04:49:06 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.





there was a song that went like this
two faces have I
one to laugh
and one to cry!!
dunno who sang it. It was an oldie like me lol

Two Faces Have I by Lou Christie 1963
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w05w1XbZTG8





Lol that's it thats the song. Two faces has she!! and several sybil personalities.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 05:04:19 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.

I can't do it!! Please don't make me! I can't listen two these two code talking preppy wantabee's again! ARGH!  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/babies_131-1.gif)
No tears, we'll all be doing the happy dance of justice  (http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b152/mslaitte/MUSIC-DANCE/DANCEboomBoxWONDER.gif) in the end


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 05:25:51 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."

I really think so too.  Either her, or her spawn, will explode during this trial at some point.  It might be while somebody else is testifying, but one of them is going to have to be removed from the court room.  I would bet my last cookie on that. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 08, 2011, 05:27:46 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.

I can't do it!! Please don't make me! I can't listen two these two code talking preppy wantabee's again! ARGH!  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/babies_131-1.gif)

LOL, LMAO, AND ROFL.  You don't have to, there there.  It's okay.  Mommy's here.  he he he. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 08, 2011, 07:20:44 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."
:smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 09:08:01 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."
:smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045


Cindy perwsonality  will be  (sybil) when she is bad.
 and the exorcist when she is  way to bad!!!
her gum will turn into green slime!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 09:09:11 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."
:smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045


omg fannie
I typed before I read your mention of the exorcist !! were on the same page!! too funny!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 09:11:22 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."

I really think so too.  Either her, or her spawn, will explode during this trial at some point.  It might be while somebody else is testifying, but one of them is going to have to be removed from the court room.  I would bet my last cookie on that. 




I agree we are going to see the many faces of cindy come out at trial. She will meaner than ever!!! what do they manufacture evil and lies  at the anthony compound!! trhe house of horrors and whores. lol


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 08, 2011, 09:12:20 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."
:smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045


omg fannie
I typed before I read your mention of the exorcist !! were on the same page!! too funny!!!

That was SISTER who said that. I am trying to sit quietly and behave.   ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 09:12:49 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
  ::rhino:: You're right Fanny.  I've gotten to the point that I want her to spend a few years in jail almost as much as I want Casey found guilty!  I suppose I should just be happy that she'll have to visit her darling daughter behind plexiglass for the rest of her life.





http://www.wftv.com/video/18212491/index.html


Re-cap
how baez came to be caseys attorney.

I can't do it!! Please don't make me! I can't listen two these two code talking preppy wantabee's again! ARGH!  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/babies_131-1.gif)
No tears, we'll all be doing the happy dance of justice  (http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b152/mslaitte/MUSIC-DANCE/DANCEboomBoxWONDER.gif) in the end






lol capp thats a cute avatar!!
 I so want to be there when she is sentenced. I will pull a medea' and holler halleluer!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 09:14:27 PM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."
:smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045 :smt046 :smt045


omg fannie
I typed before I read your mention of the exorcist !! were on the same page!! too funny!!!

That was SISTER who said that. I am trying to sit quietly and behave.   ::MonkeyJnBox::


Ok sister that was funny and yes sure fannie is trying to behave lol ok
Any ways we will see alot of strange happenings with cindy and casey!! I can just see caseys head twist to the back of her neck and give her mom an evil look!!!   oh this is too crazy!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 08, 2011, 09:27:54 PM
Oh no. I was wrong. It was CAPPY who said exorcist.   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/paranoid.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Gypsy DD on January 08, 2011, 09:38:27 PM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.

Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 09:45:09 PM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.

Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 08, 2011, 09:53:08 PM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.

Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.

I go both ways on thinking they will plea out at the end. They are no way near ready to try this, but I just can't see Bozo and Mason relinquishing the possibility of being on national tv for weeks. They want the notoriety of being  household names, even if they do look bad. Even the losing lawyers in the OJ trial went on to write books and had lucrative careers after flubbing up the trial.
Casey just craves being the center of attention and will play it out to the end. She loves Bozo's "in your face" style, as it mirrors hers. I still don't the the consequences have become reality in her head. She's a star.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 08, 2011, 10:02:05 PM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.

Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 08, 2011, 10:03:58 PM
I really don't think that a plea is an option anymore.
Both of their ego's are too huge to do that even if they could.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 10:11:23 PM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.

Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!









I hadnt seen it either
but glad someone else posted it! judge perry knows this case and now has restrengthened my faith in him !! is that even a word lol!
he  sure is professionel!!!  I think we can rest assured he will do right by caylee. And now I wouldnt be surprised if he doesnt have a hand in getting  bozo reported to the bar!! after all judge strickland did!! and thats what made bozo seek revenge  on jusge strickland. WRONG MOOVE!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 08, 2011, 10:12:13 PM
I really don't think that a plea is an option anymore.
Both of their ego's are too huge to do that even if they could.




Curly I dont think so either!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 11:32:05 PM
I really don't think that a plea is an option anymore.
Both of their ego's are too huge to do that even if they could.




Curly I dont think so either!!!

Nope, too late & too much money as well as aggravation.  At one point maybe if she took a life sentence after spilling her confession but no less, certainly not now either.

PS  ::MonkeyJnBox::  pssst Fanny dont run off ducking yet laughing at the same time, Im rolling over here!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 08, 2011, 11:45:56 PM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.

Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!


Exactly why Bozo knowing dang well who the Chief Justice was & previously granted the indictment shouldnt have acted like a spoiled brat with a silly excuse to throw a tantrum....as I said before when Judge Strickland felt the need to recuse himself "BOZO, be careful what you ask for."   In hindsight, its the best thing that could have happened pre-trial & not in the defense's favor.   By the time this is all said and done, a new hat is going to have to be created for the defense because a dunce cap just doesnt suffice.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 12:13:34 AM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.



Am I right to assume that the trial would last two months? did I hear it here?  is that about right?
Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!


Exactly why Bozo knowing dang well who the Chief Justice was & previously granted the indictment shouldnt have acted like a spoiled brat with a silly excuse to throw a tantrum....as I said before when Judge Strickland felt the need to recuse himself "BOZO, be careful what you ask for."   In hindsight, its the best thing that could have happened pre-trial & not in the defense's favor.   By the time this is all said and done, a new hat is going to have to be created for the defense because a dunce cap just doesnt suffice.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 12:16:40 AM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.



Am I right to assume that the trial would last two months? did I hear it here?  is that about right?
Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!


Exactly why Bozo knowing dang well who the Chief Justice was & previously granted the indictment shouldnt have acted like a spoiled brat with a silly excuse to throw a tantrum....as I said before when Judge Strickland felt the need to recuse himself "BOZO, be careful what you ask for."   In hindsight, its the best thing that could have happened pre-trial & not in the defense's favor.   By the time this is all said and done, a new hat is going to have to be created for the defense because a dunce cap just doesnt suffice.







I must of not posted what I just said lol
I asked if it was right that I heard the trial will last about two months??
Can you imagine caseys behaviour throughout this time! all the  grooming! and baez is realy gonna play it up for the cameras!  maybe he doesnt want cameras in the court because he doesnt have confidence in his ability to perform. I  cannot wait to see how kathi belich  acts  lol her questions and so forth. oh how sweet it will be! hornsby making comments and bill shaeffer!! oh what a roundup getty up shinding this will be.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 12:17:50 AM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.

betcha the court will be packed to capacity.



Am I right to assume that the trial would last two months? did I hear it here?  is that about right?
Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!


Exactly why Bozo knowing dang well who the Chief Justice was & previously granted the indictment shouldnt have acted like a spoiled brat with a silly excuse to throw a tantrum....as I said before when Judge Strickland felt the need to recuse himself "BOZO, be careful what you ask for."   In hindsight, its the best thing that could have happened pre-trial & not in the defense's favor.   By the time this is all said and done, a new hat is going to have to be created for the defense because a dunce cap just doesnt suffice.







I must of not posted what I just said lol
I asked if it was right that I heard the trial will last about two months??
Can you imagine caseys behaviour throughout this time! all the  grooming! and baez is realy gonna play it up for the cameras!  maybe he doesnt want cameras in the court because he doesnt have confidence in his ability to perform. I  cannot wait to see how kathi belich  acts  lol her questions and so forth. oh how sweet it will be! hornsby making comments and bill shaeffer!! oh what a roundup getty up shinding this will be.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 02:17:07 AM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.



Am I right to assume that the trial would last two months? did I hear it here?  is that about right?
Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!


Exactly why Bozo knowing dang well who the Chief Justice was & previously granted the indictment shouldnt have acted like a spoiled brat with a silly excuse to throw a tantrum....as I said before when Judge Strickland felt the need to recuse himself "BOZO, be careful what you ask for."   In hindsight, its the best thing that could have happened pre-trial & not in the defense's favor.   By the time this is all said and done, a new hat is going to have to be created for the defense because a dunce cap just doesnt suffice.







I must of not posted what I just said lol
I asked if it was right that I heard the trial will last about two months??
Can you imagine caseys behaviour throughout this time! all the  grooming! and baez is realy gonna play it up for the cameras!  maybe he doesnt want cameras in the court because he doesnt have confidence in his ability to perform. I  cannot wait to see how kathi belich  acts  lol her questions and so forth. oh how sweet it will be! hornsby making comments and bill shaeffer!! oh what a roundup getty up shinding this will be.

Now granted this is just my personal best estimate but here goes:  3-5 weeks to seat a death qualified jury & alternates, 2-1/2 to 3-1/2 months at trial.   I doubt highly that the jury will be out long deliberating their verdict, no more than a week & I wouldnt be surprised if they return within a day.  Then a brief break before DP phase as I do firmly project she will be convicted on felony murder, and believe it or not after all this hoopla approximately 1 at most 2 weeks for the DP phase.

Good night monkeys


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 09, 2011, 06:58:38 AM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

6:28 p.m. EST, January 8, 2011
For almost as long as the Casey Anthony murder case has been a part of the public awareness, there have been murmurs about her attorney José Baez's handling of the case.

They're all variations on the same theme: that Baez, a defense lawyer with limited experience working on perhaps one of the most visible local murder cases, is swimming in waters — and taking on legal challenges — beyond his depth.

For many, the latest but most vivid example to support this lingering suspicion came nearly one week ago when Chief Judge Belvin Perry struck Baez with a sanction for a "willful" violation of his court order to share expert-witness discovery with prosecutors.

Defense lawyers and legal scholars familiar with the Casey Anthony case say sharing discovery in Florida is like "Criminal Law 101," helping ensure there is no "trial by ambush." Following a judge's repeated orders, meanwhile, is even more fundamental, something readily understood by lawyers and nonlawyers alike.

William Sheaffer, a criminal-defense attorney and media analyst well-versed in the Casey Anthony case, said the judge's punishment last week "doesn't speak well of Baez on a professional level."

"There is a valid criticism — and it was certainly reflected by the court's ruling — by attorneys, the judges, law professors …," Sheaffer said, that Baez "is inexperienced, perhaps has some hubris that's not warranted and that, more importantly, he has failed to rise to the challenge of representation of this client and the most serious charge one could face."

Anthony, 24, is scheduled to go to trial in May for first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie. She faces the death penalty if convicted.
Sheaffer and other attorneys interviewed for this article say the verdict is still out on Baez. Legal-ethics scholar Bob Jarvis, a professor at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, said Baez might pull off a real-life "My Cousin Vinny."

He was referring to the 1992 Joe Pesci film in which a rookie lawyer from Brooklyn exonerates his young cousin and his friend in a Deep South murder case.

"Baez may manage to pull out a victory from the jaws of defeat," Jarvis said. "Until a trial is done, it's too early to call winners and losers."

Baez, 42, would not directly answer questions about the sanction or other concerns raised by the attorneys and legal scholars watching this case.

Previous concerns

Judge Perry's punishment this month was not the first time a judge handling this case has taken action in response to Baez. In March 2009, Circuit Judge Stan Strickland, who was then hearing the case, wrote a letter to The Florida Bar about ethical concerns he had about Baez.

The issue involved allegations that Baez directed investigator Dominic Casey to "walk away" if he found Caylee's lifeless body during a 2008 search — and then contact Baez rather than law enforcement.
The judge asked that the matter be investigated as soon as possible, writing that if the Bar punished or suspended Baez, "prompt action will be required on my part."

The Strickland letter and the entire Dominic Casey issue were investigated by a Florida Bar grievance committee and resulted in a finding of no probable cause against Baez, a Bar spokeswoman said last week.

When asked to discuss the Strickland letter, Baez said, "I have been cleared of all Bar complaints filed against me."

In April 2010, Baez argued to have Strickland removed, saying the judge had a "personal relationship" with a blogger critical of Anthony. Strickland dismissed the idea that he was biased against Baez and his client, but ultimately recused himself. He would not comment for this article.

Mixed relations with media

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

But Baez's relationship with the media was not always so combative.

In fact, other local attorneys say Baez's playing up to the media — especially national organizations — early on in the case demonstrated his inexperience, floating alternative defense theories and directing blame at others.

His moves, they say, inflated the case, earning it more national exposure than it perhaps would have received had he simply focused on the defense or even attempted to work out a plea deal before Caylee's remains were found in December 2008.
"These high-profile cases really are a different animal," said Mark NeJame, who is no stranger to cases that get a lot of media attention. "You really, really have to know how to handle it."

NeJame's one-time representation of Casey Anthony's parents and then Texas EquuSearch has put him at odds with Baez. But it also has made him very familiar with the case.

Meanwhile, Sheaffer, who serves as a legal analyst for WFTV-Channel 9 and comments frequently on the Casey Anthony case, said having the national media court an attorney the way they did Baez "becomes real heady," but it also helps prop up the circus tent that has surrounded this case for more than two years now.

Sheaffer said comparing the Casey Anthony defense to the handling of the James Robert Ward murder case reveals Baez's lack of difficult criminal-defense work and the considerable skills of another veteran attorney with many years of experience, Kirk Kirkconnell.

Ward's case — the shooting death of his wife inside their Isleworth mansion — had all the elements of a media circus, Sheaffer said, but Kirkconnell has managed to keep the case, well, managed.

"Kirkconnell does everything that he should do, and he does it right," said Sheaffer. "Mr. Baez has stepped on land mine after land mine and continues to so do."

In particular, Sheaffer said, Baez appears unwilling or unable to take "criticism in a constructive vein, even from the bench."
Experts mystified

With Perry's recent sanction against Baez, NeJame said, "The judge is simply saying, 'Enough and no way, José.' Ignoring a judge is not an option. Especially ignoring this particular judge is not an option."

That is not to say the defense has sat idle for the past two-plus years. Dozens of defense motions, many attacking media coverage and pre-trial publicity and picking at details that appear to have little impact on the client's defense, now fill a clerk's court file comprised of 16 folders.

Jarvis, the Nova professor, has followed the drama revolving around Baez and asked why a judge hasn't removed him from the case through one of several avenues, including The Florida Bar inquiry sought by Strickland. Beyond that, he asked why Casey Anthony hasn't moved on to another lead attorney.

"It would be fascinating to know, 'Why are you sticking with this guy?' " Jarvis said.

Many in Central Florida's criminal-defense community figured that once veteran and highly experienced attorney Cheney Mason joined the Anthony defense team that Baez would elevate his game and rise to the very serious nature of the case, Sheaffer said.

"That does not, at least at this juncture, appear to be the case," he said. But, he added, the trial has not started yet, and the only people Baez and his team will have to impress are the jurors seated to hear this case.

"My hope is that Mr. Mason has a more prominent role in the trial of this case and or that Mr. Baez at trial again rises to the occasion or is motivated by Mr. Mason's appearance at trial."

Mason did not respond to requests for comment.

Anthony Colarossi can be reached at acolarossi@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5447.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2011, 07:12:10 AM
The answer is simple. They know she is guilty. They know we know she is guilty. They know any jury will find her guilty. They know they are all screwed. They have no defense  ::MonkeyHang:: ::MonkeyJustice::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Gypsy DD on January 09, 2011, 07:42:03 AM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.



Am I right to assume that the trial would last two months? did I hear it here?  is that about right?
Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!


Exactly why Bozo knowing dang well who the Chief Justice was & previously granted the indictment shouldnt have acted like a spoiled brat with a silly excuse to throw a tantrum....as I said before when Judge Strickland felt the need to recuse himself "BOZO, be careful what you ask for."   In hindsight, its the best thing that could have happened pre-trial & not in the defense's favor.   By the time this is all said and done, a new hat is going to have to be created for the defense because a dunce cap just doesnt suffice.







I must of not posted what I just said lol
I asked if it was right that I heard the trial will last about two months??
Can you imagine caseys behaviour throughout this time! all the  grooming! and baez is realy gonna play it up for the cameras!  maybe he doesnt want cameras in the court because he doesnt have confidence in his ability to perform. I  cannot wait to see how kathi belich  acts  lol her questions and so forth. oh how sweet it will be! hornsby making comments and bill shaeffer!! oh what a roundup getty up shinding this will be.



LOL..Casey will be bald by the time the trial is over from all the hair touching and primping.    ::piggy::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 09, 2011, 09:08:46 AM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

6:28 p.m. EST, January 8, 2011
For almost as long as the Casey Anthony murder case has been a part of the public awareness, there have been murmurs about her attorney José Baez's handling of the case.

They're all variations on the same theme: that Baez, a defense lawyer with limited experience working on perhaps one of the most visible local murder cases, is swimming in waters — and taking on legal challenges — beyond his depth.

For many, the latest but most vivid example to support this lingering suspicion came nearly one week ago when Chief Judge Belvin Perry struck Baez with a sanction for a "willful" violation of his court order to share expert-witness discovery with prosecutors.

Defense lawyers and legal scholars familiar with the Casey Anthony case say sharing discovery in Florida is like "Criminal Law 101," helping ensure there is no "trial by ambush." Following a judge's repeated orders, meanwhile, is even more fundamental, something readily understood by lawyers and nonlawyers alike.

William Sheaffer, a criminal-defense attorney and media analyst well-versed in the Casey Anthony case, said the judge's punishment last week "doesn't speak well of Baez on a professional level."

"There is a valid criticism — and it was certainly reflected by the court's ruling — by attorneys, the judges, law professors …," Sheaffer said, that Baez "is inexperienced, perhaps has some hubris that's not warranted and that, more importantly, he has failed to rise to the challenge of representation of this client and the most serious charge one could face."

Anthony, 24, is scheduled to go to trial in May for first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie. She faces the death penalty if convicted.
Sheaffer and other attorneys interviewed for this article say the verdict is still out on Baez. Legal-ethics scholar Bob Jarvis, a professor at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, said Baez might pull off a real-life "My Cousin Vinny."

He was referring to the 1992 Joe Pesci film in which a rookie lawyer from Brooklyn exonerates his young cousin and his friend in a Deep South murder case.

"Baez may manage to pull out a victory from the jaws of defeat," Jarvis said. "Until a trial is done, it's too early to call winners and losers."

Baez, 42, would not directly answer questions about the sanction or other concerns raised by the attorneys and legal scholars watching this case.

Previous concerns

Judge Perry's punishment this month was not the first time a judge handling this case has taken action in response to Baez. In March 2009, Circuit Judge Stan Strickland, who was then hearing the case, wrote a letter to The Florida Bar about ethical concerns he had about Baez.

The issue involved allegations that Baez directed investigator Dominic Casey to "walk away" if he found Caylee's lifeless body during a 2008 search — and then contact Baez rather than law enforcement.
The judge asked that the matter be investigated as soon as possible, writing that if the Bar punished or suspended Baez, "prompt action will be required on my part."

The Strickland letter and the entire Dominic Casey issue were investigated by a Florida Bar grievance committee and resulted in a finding of no probable cause against Baez, a Bar spokeswoman said last week.

When asked to discuss the Strickland letter, Baez said, "I have been cleared of all Bar complaints filed against me."

In April 2010, Baez argued to have Strickland removed, saying the judge had a "personal relationship" with a blogger critical of Anthony. Strickland dismissed the idea that he was biased against Baez and his client, but ultimately recused himself. He would not comment for this article.

Mixed relations with media

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

But Baez's relationship with the media was not always so combative.

In fact, other local attorneys say Baez's playing up to the media — especially national organizations — early on in the case demonstrated his inexperience, floating alternative defense theories and directing blame at others.

His moves, they say, inflated the case, earning it more national exposure than it perhaps would have received had he simply focused on the defense or even attempted to work out a plea deal before Caylee's remains were found in December 2008.
"These high-profile cases really are a different animal," said Mark NeJame, who is no stranger to cases that get a lot of media attention. "You really, really have to know how to handle it."

NeJame's one-time representation of Casey Anthony's parents and then Texas EquuSearch has put him at odds with Baez. But it also has made him very familiar with the case.

Meanwhile, Sheaffer, who serves as a legal analyst for WFTV-Channel 9 and comments frequently on the Casey Anthony case, said having the national media court an attorney the way they did Baez "becomes real heady," but it also helps prop up the circus tent that has surrounded this case for more than two years now.

Sheaffer said comparing the Casey Anthony defense to the handling of the James Robert Ward murder case reveals Baez's lack of difficult criminal-defense work and the considerable skills of another veteran attorney with many years of experience, Kirk Kirkconnell.

Ward's case — the shooting death of his wife inside their Isleworth mansion — had all the elements of a media circus, Sheaffer said, but Kirkconnell has managed to keep the case, well, managed.

"Kirkconnell does everything that he should do, and he does it right," said Sheaffer. "Mr. Baez has stepped on land mine after land mine and continues to so do."

In particular, Sheaffer said, Baez appears unwilling or unable to take "criticism in a constructive vein, even from the bench."
Experts mystified

With Perry's recent sanction against Baez, NeJame said, "The judge is simply saying, 'Enough and no way, José.' Ignoring a judge is not an option. Especially ignoring this particular judge is not an option."

That is not to say the defense has sat idle for the past two-plus years. Dozens of defense motions, many attacking media coverage and pre-trial publicity and picking at details that appear to have little impact on the client's defense, now fill a clerk's court file comprised of 16 folders.

Jarvis, the Nova professor, has followed the drama revolving around Baez and asked why a judge hasn't removed him from the case through one of several avenues, including The Florida Bar inquiry sought by Strickland. Beyond that, he asked why Casey Anthony hasn't moved on to another lead attorney.

"It would be fascinating to know, 'Why are you sticking with this guy?' " Jarvis said.

Many in Central Florida's criminal-defense community figured that once veteran and highly experienced attorney Cheney Mason joined the Anthony defense team that Baez would elevate his game and rise to the very serious nature of the case, Sheaffer said.

"That does not, at least at this juncture, appear to be the case," he said. But, he added, the trial has not started yet, and the only people Baez and his team will have to impress are the jurors seated to hear this case.

"My hope is that Mr. Mason has a more prominent role in the trial of this case and or that Mr. Baez at trial again rises to the occasion or is motivated by Mr. Mason's appearance at trial."

Mason did not respond to requests for comment.

Anthony Colarossi can be reached at acolarossi@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5447.
Fantastic article!  Baez threatening to not discuss the case anymore?  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::  When pigs fly! 

Jose,

Even though your peers think you are hubris and failing miserably, I believe you are giving Casey Anthony the representation she deserves. You know best so just keep on keepin' on!                                                                                                                                 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Puzzler on January 09, 2011, 09:43:53 AM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."

And this one:  I still think Caylee's alive.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 10:35:11 AM
I really don't think that a plea is an option anymore.
Both of their ego's are too huge to do that even if they could.

I agree, there is no way they are pleading this case.  Their egos won't let them see the practicality of it. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 10:39:38 AM
Me..I think that Baez has always thought he would plea her out at the 9th hour prior to trial....no reason for him to be prepared for anything..and his penalty phase witness list speaks for itself.. He could ask them anything he wants..however I can hear the State objecting that it was hearsay from Casey about the sexual abuse..nothing any of them witnessed.

Nope he and the Jar are not prepared to try this case because they never thought they would have to..but I think they are wrong.  I think that if Baez requests another plea deal from the State the State will turn him down cold.  End of story.  I also don't think that he or Jar give a horse's potout what happens from here on out to their client....they were both in this for the fame, glory and more importantly the money to be made after the fact.





Found this elsewhere I didnt know this did any of you.
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html







Gosh! The day Skanky was arrested was such a wild and over the top day. I am not sure I ever did see that video. I just remember finding out she had been indited for murder. And no, I didn't know Judge Perry was judge that day.  Thanks, LOCA!









I hadnt seen it either
but glad someone else posted it! judge perry knows this case and now has restrengthened my faith in him !! is that even a word lol!
he  sure is professionel!!!  I think we can rest assured he will do right by caylee. And now I wouldnt be surprised if he doesnt have a hand in getting  bozo reported to the bar!! after all judge strickland did!! and thats what made bozo seek revenge  on jusge strickland. WRONG MOOVE!!!

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 09, 2011, 11:23:03 AM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 11:27:42 AM
I'll be really interested to see which Cindy we get at the trial.  Will it be the poor crying feel sorry for me grandmother or the defiant defender of Casey still espousing that Caylee is alive?

If past behavior is any indication, Cindy and Lee are both going to need a lot of coaching before they take the stand!

I think we will see all the faces of Eve. errrrr....Spindy..
Yup, Cybil eat your heart out this B is gonna pull an exorcist head spinning event on the stand, full of hostility, misplacement of blame, playing the victim with a whole heck of a lot of "pinocchiette moments."

And this one:  I still think Caylee's alive.



And then there is that Puzzler  ::MonkeyNoNo::   Cindy, is that exactly why we all had to endure your "production" designed by you to memorialize Caylee when in essence it was more designed to save the monster your bore...beeotch please you knew even before we knew so  STIFLE IT!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 09, 2011, 11:36:15 AM
snipped from above:
When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

----------------
He is a legend in his own mind.  I can hear some civil attorneys chomping at his heels.  He will have more lawyer filing suit against him than lies he has told . . . or maybe not as many lies.

Sister- would you please include the link you're quoting even if it's snipped??  I know you feel you had it covered, but sometimes a post will be quoted and so on and it all gets lost and muddled.  Thanks.  Muffy 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 11:46:09 AM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

Basically in a word, no.   I would venture to say that when Judge Strickland went to CJBP with Bozo's accusation that they both discussed that it bordered merit but Bozo just didnt realize what he asked for, I wish I had been a fly on the wall in chambers.  He oversees all other judges & makes the assignments in that circuit so he would have been kept abreast of the case regardless.  These same judges go to him for guidance & a review of the law when needed in the process of making their rulings, so the bottom line is he's the head huncho.   IMHO,the only thing I can see that would reverse CJBP rulings would be if he overtly "ruled from the bench" which means he adjudicated of his own principles & not the law or showed an undue prejudice from this point forward, not happening.   Bozo doesnt stand a snowball's chance in H getting the judge's sanction reversed much less anything else...on the other hand Bozo has been dangerously close to getting more sanctions for misconduct or flat out removal so he should learn to cut his losses & zip it....he wont & I expect him getting slapped further in the future.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: cookie on January 09, 2011, 11:57:16 AM
Andrea Lyons book, Angel of Death Row was just listed on Amazon as a free book for Kindle owners.  Gee, doesn't look like she will make much money with that kind of a deal.   ::MonkeyDevil::

It's a good thing I don't own a Kindle, cause I like free things, and I might have been tempted to get it for free. 

I own a Kindle and I still won't order it even if it is free!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 09, 2011, 12:15:44 PM
http://bullstopper.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/what-price-does-jose-baez-place-upon-his-dignity/#comments
What Price Does Jose Baez Place Upon His Dignity? 01/09/11


http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/ex-friends-may-help-save-casey-anthonys-life/
Ex-Friends May Help Save Casey Anthony's Life  01/09/11 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 01:19:39 PM
Classic BOZO.

“I don’t have to answer any questions. Who are you?”

He added, “Do you have something to offer my client? It’s a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client.” He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, “You’re lying and being unethical.”


What is he saying the reporter was lying and being unethical about?  I missed that part.  I loved how he called back.  What a dweeb wonderful defense lawyer.  If you don't want to talk to somebody, you hang up and you don't call back.   

I have something to offer him and his client, and I offer it without any comment, for free.  It can be found on either of my hands.....my middle finger.    


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 01:40:09 PM
O/T I see you above reading Magic, just wanted to interject I hope you are feeling better

As far as the above question by bullstopper "What price does Jose Baez place upon his dignity?"
http://bullstopper.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/what-price-does-jose-baez-place-upon-his-dignity/#comments

He has none, so he couldnt even give it away.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Magic Eyes on January 09, 2011, 02:03:35 PM
O/T I see you above reading Magic, just wanted to interject I hope you are feeling better

As far as the above question by bullstopper "What price does Jose Baez place upon his dignity?"
http://bullstopper.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/what-price-does-jose-baez-place-upon-his-dignity/#comments

He has none, so he couldnt even give it away.

Hi Cappy, there is rarely a morning I don't check Caylees, thread.  Thank you so much for asking, I feel much better.  This was one long cold, I am not the only one that had it, my hubby had it, my daughter, her hubby and all 3 grandchildren had it all through Christmas and beyond.  It just seemed to never end.  The only thing I have left is the cough but after what I have been through that is a piece of cake. 

I think the funniest thing about the latest Bozo call is that he hung up and then called back, lol, what a dufus.  I think the only reason Casey keeps him, is that he is the kind of crazy narcissist that Casey is and had her convinced from the beginning that, he and he alone would be able to get her off.  They certainly deserve each other.  She would be better off with the Jar but I don't think she is gonna ever turn her back on Bozo.  They are two of a kind and meant for each other.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 09, 2011, 02:13:56 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 02:29:58 PM
O/T I see you above reading Magic, just wanted to interject I hope you are feeling better

As far as the above question by bullstopper "What price does Jose Baez place upon his dignity?"
http://bullstopper.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/what-price-does-jose-baez-place-upon-his-dignity/#comments

He has none, so he couldnt even give it away.

Hi Cappy, there is rarely a morning I don't check Caylees, thread.  Thank you so much for asking, I feel much better.  This was one long cold, I am not the only one that had it, my hubby had it, my daughter, her hubby and all 3 grandchildren had it all through Christmas and beyond.  It just seemed to never end.  The only thing I have left is the cough but after what I have been through that is a piece of cake. 

I think the funniest thing about the latest Bozo call is that he hung up and then called back, lol, what a dufus.  I think the only reason Casey keeps him, is that he is the kind of crazy narcissist that Casey is and had her convinced from the beginning that, he and he alone would be able to get her off.  They certainly deserve each other.  She would be better off with the Jar but I don't think she is gonna ever turn her back on Bozo.  They are two of a kind and meant for each other.

Hugs, Magic  :smt060

Spot on Magic & continued wellness to you and yours.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 02:37:31 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 02:39:11 PM
I still worry that Scott Peterson's verdict will be reversed, based on his stupid dufense team. 

Do I have to worry about that with this case?  Do I have to worry about issues with errors judge may have made or may make?  Please say no.  I really hate the legal system sometimes. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 09, 2011, 02:55:21 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/os-ed-mark-russell-010911-20110107-1,0,5147218.column
Editor takes you behind the scenes in newsroom
Mark Russell ORLANDO SENTINEL EDITOR

12:00 a.m. EST, January 9, 2011
<snipped>
This year will also bring the start of the trial of Casey Anthony, who is charged with murdering her two-year-old daughter. Here's an early look at how we're planning to cover the Anthony case, which has garnered national attention and will draw dozens of national media members to Orlando.

In the weeks leading up to the trial, which is scheduled to begin May 9, the Sentinel will explore the jury-selection process and the likely strategies of both the prosecution and the defense.

And when the trial begins, we will provide gavel-to-gavel coverage. We will have at least two reporters, led by courts reporter Anthony Colarossi, at the Orange County courthouse at all times, providing continuous updates for OrlandoSentinel.com, mobile devices and daily coverage for the print edition.

While we will aggressively cover courtroom proceedings, we will also provide on-the-scene reporting of how the local and national media are covering the Casey Anthony trial, with commentary from television writer Hal Boedeker. We will also send text alerts, along with Facebook and Twitter posts, when something significant happens inside the courtroom.
<snipped>


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 09, 2011, 03:25:54 PM
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2011/01/09/caylee-anthony-case-bock-and-hall-with-bouts-of-folly/
Caylee Anthony Case: Bock and Hall with Bouts of Folly
Posted on January 9, 2011 by JWG


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 03:50:46 PM
I still worry that Scott Peterson's verdict will be reversed, based on his stupid dufense team. 

Do I have to worry about that with this case?  Do I have to worry about issues with errors judge may have made or may make?  Please say no.  I really hate the legal system sometimes. 




ZOO
I dont think you have anything to worry about with scott peterson he is there for life and will go no where. wait did he get the dp? either way he is  stuck. just my IMO


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 04:05:20 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

Basically in a word, no.   I would venture to say that when Judge Strickland went to CJBP with Bozo's accusation that they both discussed that it bordered merit but Bozo just didnt realize what he asked for, I wish I had been a fly on the wall in chambers.  He oversees all other judges & makes the assignments in that circuit so he would have been kept abreast of the case regardless.  These same judges go to him for guidance & a review of the law when needed in the process of making their rulings, so the bottom line is he's the head huncho.   IMHO,the only thing I can see that would reverse CJBP rulings would be if he overtly "ruled from the bench" which means he adjudicated of his own principles & not the law or showed an undue prejudice from this point forward, not happening.   Bozo doesnt stand a snowball's chance in H getting the judge's sanction reversed much less anything else...on the other hand Bozo has been dangerously close to getting more sanctions for misconduct or flat out removal so he should learn to cut his losses & zip it....he wont & I expect him getting slapped further in the future.


Hi Capp
I was wondering if  you think that JP would make a complaint to the bar about baez and his ethics/lack of respect for the court and  zilch proffesionalism? If I recall right! JS turned him into the bar(strickland JS) and perhaps this is what set baez on a mission to get rid of JS. Could he have perhaps gotten arrogant over the fact that he was able to acomplish such. I dont see baez having any boundaries or concerns for anyone other than himself. His motives are always are  with his interest and not that of casey or anyone else. Clearly he should have never been left to be lead in this case. I dont think we will be seeing much of that anymore! I think he will be a model for what should have never happened.

So if I dont make sense  sorry.

but JP is in power to report ! him and I  DONT THINK !!!  that its to far fetched ?
what  do you think/infer?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 04:14:02 PM
snipped from above:
When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

----------------
He is a legend in his own mind.  I can hear some civil attorneys chomping at his heels.  He will have more lawyer filing suit against him than lies he has told . . . or maybe not as many lies.

Sister- would you please include the link you're quoting even if it's snipped??  I know you feel you had it covered, but sometimes a post will be quoted and so on and it all gets lost and muddled.  Thanks.  Muffy 





Sister
I agree with your post.
You know this man is a raging lunatic and truly needs to be disbarred before he  breaks record in filling up death row for the state of florida.  He just spits venom and  evil! I hope there are civil actions against him he needs  to go  elsewhere to find work and not legal work!
He cannot force people to  support casey. He surely is cutting his own throat by making enemies with the media. If no one agrees with him he lashs out. I think judge perry will report his ethics/lack of to the bar!  I didnt know JP was the judge when they had the indictment come down on casey. I am  refreshed  in my belief and faith that JP  is the one.   Baez cannot destroy everyone that doesnt agree with him and especialy the honorable JP.
so he was worried about the reporter asking him questions and wanted it off the record ! and look who is  calling the kettle black(he) is  the one that  lacks  integrity/ethics etc etc.

thanks JP  because finaly !!
we are cooking with gas!!
as my late motherinlaw used to say!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 09, 2011, 04:15:40 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

It's their job to be impartial, although I see your point that they're human and would have an opinion.
The judge has to making his rulings according to the law, and unless they're corrupt (which Perry is not) , that's what guides their rulings. Also, the jury is the entity that finds the defendant guilty or innocent, not the judge.

He's denying the motions because they are not sound according to the law, and I don't think his rulings would be reversed if they were challenged.



I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 09, 2011, 04:16:21 PM

It's their job to be impartial, although I see your point that they're human and would have an opinion.
The judge has to making his rulings according to the law, and unless they're corrupt (which Perry is not) , that's what guides their rulings. Also, the jury is the entity that finds the defendant guilty or innocent, not the judge.

He's denying the motions because they are not sound according to the law, and I don't think his rulings would be reversed if they were challenged.

Sorry, got in your quote somehow, Zoo.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 04:16:50 PM
snipped from above:
When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

----------------
He is a legend in his own mind.  I can hear some civil attorneys chomping at his heels.  He will have more lawyer filing suit against him than lies he has told . . . or maybe not as many lies.

Sister- would you please include the link you're quoting even if it's snipped??  I know you feel you had it covered, but sometimes a post will be quoted and so on and it all gets lost and muddled.  Thanks.  Muffy 





Sister
I agree with your post.
You know this man is a raging lunatic and truly needs to be disbarred before he  breaks record in filling up death row for the state of florida.  He just spits venom and  evil! I hope there are civil actions against him he needs  to go  elsewhere to find work and not legal work!
He cannot force people to  support casey. He surely is cutting his own throat by making enemies with the media. If no one agrees with him he lashs out. I think judge perry will report his ethics/lack of to the bar!  I didnt know JP was the judge when they had the indictment come down on casey. I am  refreshed  in my belief and faith that JP  is the one.   Baez cannot destroy everyone that doesnt agree with him and especialy the honorable JP.
so he was worried about the reporter asking him questions and wanted it off the record ! and look who is  calling the kettle black(he) is  the one that  lacks  integrity/ethics etc etc.

thanks JP  because finaly !!
we are cooking with gas!!
as my late motherinlaw used to say!!


If anything  baez's ill actions may have prompted the honorable JP to do a lil research on him and whamo!! there you see the florida bar's actions against baez
the times he was denied entry. Speaks volumes all the same. Just a pig in a suit.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 04:19:24 PM

It's their job to be impartial, although I see your point that they're human and would have an opinion.
The judge has to making his rulings according to the law, and unless they're corrupt (which Perry is not) , that's what guides their rulings. Also, the jury is the entity that finds the defendant guilty or innocent, not the judge.

He's denying the motions because they are not sound according to the law, and I don't think his rulings would be reversed if they were challenged.

Sorry, got in your quote somehow, Zoo.









Hiya curly
how are you? I like your post.  I think baez will try! but he has no support from other attorneys he is a man  rowing without a paddle. helo baez stop while your ahead idiot. dont piss JP off!! or you may be selling bekinis  to your friends gerlado and jane velez!! in puerto rico.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 04:30:57 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

6:28 p.m. EST, January 8, 2011
For almost as long as the Casey Anthony murder case has been a part of the public awareness, there have been murmurs about her attorney José Baez's handling of the case.

They're all variations on the same theme: that Baez, a defense lawyer with limited experience working on perhaps one of the most visible local murder cases, is swimming in waters — and taking on legal challenges — beyond his depth.

For many, the latest but most vivid example to support this lingering suspicion came nearly one week ago when Chief Judge Belvin Perry struck Baez with a sanction for a "willful" violation of his court order to share expert-witness discovery with prosecutors.

Defense lawyers and legal scholars familiar with the Casey Anthony case say sharing discovery in Florida is like "Criminal Law 101," helping ensure there is no "trial by ambush." Following a judge's repeated orders, meanwhile, is even more fundamental, something readily understood by lawyers and nonlawyers alike.

William Sheaffer, a criminal-defense attorney and media analyst well-versed in the Casey Anthony case, said the judge's punishment last week "doesn't speak well of Baez on a professional level."

"There is a valid criticism — and it was certainly reflected by the court's ruling — by attorneys, the judges, law professors …," Sheaffer said, that Baez "is inexperienced, perhaps has some hubris that's not warranted and that, more importantly, he has failed to rise to the challenge of representation of this client and the most serious charge one could face."

Anthony, 24, is scheduled to go to trial in May for first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie. She faces the death penalty if convicted.
Sheaffer and other attorneys interviewed for this article say the verdict is still out on Baez. Legal-ethics scholar Bob Jarvis, a professor at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, said Baez might pull off a real-life "My Cousin Vinny."

He was referring to the 1992 Joe Pesci film in which a rookie lawyer from Brooklyn exonerates his young cousin and his friend in a Deep South murder case.

"Baez may manage to pull out a victory from the jaws of defeat," Jarvis said. "Until a trial is done, it's too early to call winners and losers."

Baez, 42, would not directly answer questions about the sanction or other concerns raised by the attorneys and legal scholars watching this case.

Previous concerns

Judge Perry's punishment this month was not the first time a judge handling this case has taken action in response to Baez. In March 2009, Circuit Judge Stan Strickland, who was then hearing the case, wrote a letter to The Florida Bar about ethical concerns he had about Baez.

The issue involved allegations that Baez directed investigator Dominic Casey to "walk away" if he found Caylee's lifeless body during a 2008 search — and then contact Baez rather than law enforcement.
The judge asked that the matter be investigated as soon as possible, writing that if the Bar punished or suspended Baez, "prompt action will be required on my part."

The Strickland letter and the entire Dominic Casey issue were investigated by a Florida Bar grievance committee and resulted in a finding of no probable cause against Baez, a Bar spokeswoman said last week.

When asked to discuss the Strickland letter, Baez said, "I have been cleared of all Bar complaints filed against me."

In April 2010, Baez argued to have Strickland removed, saying the judge had a "personal relationship" with a blogger critical of Anthony. Strickland dismissed the idea that he was biased against Baez and his client, but ultimately recused himself. He would not comment for this article.

Mixed relations with media

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

But Baez's relationship with the media was not always so combative.

In fact, other local attorneys say Baez's playing up to the media — especially national organizations — early on in the case demonstrated his inexperience, floating alternative defense theories and directing blame at others.

His moves, they say, inflated the case, earning it more national exposure than it perhaps would have received had he simply focused on the defense or even attempted to work out a plea deal before Caylee's remains were found in December 2008.
"These high-profile cases really are a different animal," said Mark NeJame, who is no stranger to cases that get a lot of media attention. "You really, really have to know how to handle it."

NeJame's one-time representation of Casey Anthony's parents and then Texas EquuSearch has put him at odds with Baez. But it also has made him very familiar with the case.

Meanwhile, Sheaffer, who serves as a legal analyst for WFTV-Channel 9 and comments frequently on the Casey Anthony case, said having the national media court an attorney the way they did Baez "becomes real heady," but it also helps prop up the circus tent that has surrounded this case for more than two years now.

Sheaffer said comparing the Casey Anthony defense to the handling of the James Robert Ward murder case reveals Baez's lack of difficult criminal-defense work and the considerable skills of another veteran attorney with many years of experience, Kirk Kirkconnell.

Ward's case — the shooting death of his wife inside their Isleworth mansion — had all the elements of a media circus, Sheaffer said, but Kirkconnell has managed to keep the case, well, managed.

"Kirkconnell does everything that he should do, and he does it right," said Sheaffer. "Mr. Baez has stepped on land mine after land mine and continues to so do."

In particular, Sheaffer said, Baez appears unwilling or unable to take "criticism in a constructive vein, even from the bench."
Experts mystified

With Perry's recent sanction against Baez, NeJame said, "The judge is simply saying, 'Enough and no way, José.' Ignoring a judge is not an option. Especially ignoring this particular judge is not an option."

That is not to say the defense has sat idle for the past two-plus years. Dozens of defense motions, many attacking media coverage and pre-trial publicity and picking at details that appear to have little impact on the client's defense, now fill a clerk's court file comprised of 16 folders.

Jarvis, the Nova professor, has followed the drama revolving around Baez and asked why a judge hasn't removed him from the case through one of several avenues, including The Florida Bar inquiry sought by Strickland. Beyond that, he asked why Casey Anthony hasn't moved on to another lead attorney.

"It would be fascinating to know, 'Why are you sticking with this guy?' " Jarvis said.

Many in Central Florida's criminal-defense community figured that once veteran and highly experienced attorney Cheney Mason joined the Anthony defense team that Baez would elevate his game and rise to the very serious nature of the case, Sheaffer said.

"That does not, at least at this juncture, appear to be the case," he said. But, he added, the trial has not started yet, and the only people Baez and his team will have to impress are the jurors seated to hear this case.

"My hope is that Mr. Mason has a more prominent role in the trial of this case and or that Mr. Baez at trial again rises to the occasion or is motivated by Mr. Mason's appearance at trial."

Mason did not respond to requests for comment.

Anthony Colarossi can be reached at acolarossi@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5447.
Fantastic article!  Baez threatening to not discuss the case anymore?  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::  When pigs fly! 

Jose,

Even though your peers think you are hubris and failing miserably, I believe you are giving Casey Anthony the representation she deserves. You know best so just keep on keepin' on!                                                                                                                                 
[/quWow
what a great article hope baez reads the newspaper(surely) I would be very nervous to step on any toes if I were him. It suck to be Jose these days. But somehow I dont think he's lernt  any thing. what say you?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 09, 2011, 04:42:07 PM
I'm sure he's been advised to just pay the sanction. Whether he listens or not remains to be seen, but I think even he knows he's skating on thin ice.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 09, 2011, 05:07:51 PM
Loca,  NO Baez has not learned anything yet and may never learn anything.  He is so immature.  He is going to do what he wants to do.  He may very well be ending his "career" (snort).  Face it, a lawyer he is not.  It's time for JB to move on, time to chase a new dream, imo. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 09, 2011, 05:23:20 PM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/01/katfish-ponders-attends-casey-anthony.html
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Katfish Ponders Attends a Casey Anthony Hearing


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 09, 2011, 05:23:52 PM
snipped from above:
When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

----------------
He is a legend in his own mind.  I can hear some civil attorneys chomping at his heels.  He will have more lawyer filing suit against him than lies he has told . . . or maybe not as many lies.

Sister- would you please include the link you're quoting even if it's snipped??  I know you feel you had it covered, but sometimes a post will be quoted and so on and it all gets lost and muddled.  Thanks.  Muffy 

No problem Muffy.  Thanks for the reminder.  I was taking a short cut by not quoting such a long stack.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: NewfieMonkey on January 09, 2011, 05:26:49 PM
Oh Capp ... Need your reassurance!  She can't get off for inadequate counsel?   Pre-trial or Post-trial?  They can't plea out at the last minute?  Baez isn't outfoxing everyone is he? 

I feel so invested in this!  Need Casey found guilty!  And honestly, need Cindy and Lee found guilty of obstruction of justice before I'll be completely happy! 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 09, 2011, 05:28:47 PM
snipped from above:
When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

----------------
He is a legend in his own mind.  I can hear some civil attorneys chomping at his heels.  He will have more lawyer filing suit against him than lies he has told . . . or maybe not as many lies.

Sister- would you please include the link you're quoting even if it's snipped??  I know you feel you had it covered, but sometimes a post will be quoted and so on and it all gets lost and muddled.  Thanks.  Muffy 

No problem Muffy.  Thanks for the reminder.  I was taking a short cut by not quoting such a long stack.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story


TY.  I appreciate your snipping the long stack.  All it needed was the link.   ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:29:14 PM
I still worry that Scott Peterson's verdict will be reversed, based on his stupid dufense team. 

Do I have to worry about that with this case?  Do I have to worry about issues with errors judge may have made or may make?  Please say no.  I really hate the legal system sometimes. 




ZOO
I dont think you have anything to worry about with scott peterson he is there for life and will go no where. wait did he get the dp? either way he is  stuck. just my IMO

Yeah, he got the DP, but I don't think it will ever be carried out.  I hope he ain't going nowhere. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:31:43 PM
I still worry that Scott Peterson's verdict will be reversed, based on his stupid dufense team. 

Do I have to worry about that with this case?  Do I have to worry about issues with errors judge may have made or may make?  Please say no.  I really hate the legal system sometimes. 




ZOO
I dont think you have anything to worry about with scott peterson he is there for life and will go no where. wait did he get the dp? either way he is  stuck. just my IMO

I was worried that with Caylee's case, something similar would happen.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:34:52 PM
snipped from above:
When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

----------------
He is a legend in his own mind.  I can hear some civil attorneys chomping at his heels.  He will have more lawyer filing suit against him than lies he has told . . . or maybe not as many lies.

Sister- would you please include the link you're quoting even if it's snipped??  I know you feel you had it covered, but sometimes a post will be quoted and so on and it all gets lost and muddled.  Thanks.  Muffy 

Muffy, I didn't post a link either, because it has been linked quite a few times, didn't think it was necessary (plus I was being lazy) in my below post.  I needed to post a link?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classic BOZO.


“I don’t have to answer any questions. Who are you?”

He added, “Do you have something to offer my client? It’s a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client.” He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, “You’re lying and being unethical.”


What is he saying the reporter was lying and being unethical about?  I missed that part.  I loved how he called back.  What a dweeb wonderful defense lawyer.  If you don't want to talk to somebody, you hang up and you don't call back.   
 

I have something to offer him and his client, and I offer it without any comment, for free.  It can be found on either of my hands.....my middle finger. 
   


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:35:58 PM
I'm sure he's been advised to just pay the sanction. Whether he listens or not remains to be seen, but I think even he knows he's skating on thin ice.

Who would advise hiM?  He does not seem to listen to anybody.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:39:46 PM

It's their job to be impartial, although I see your point that they're human and would have an opinion.
The judge has to making his rulings according to the law, and unless they're corrupt (which Perry is not) , that's what guides their rulings. Also, the jury is the entity that finds the defendant guilty or innocent, not the judge.

He's denying the motions because they are not sound according to the law, and I don't think his rulings would be reversed if they were challenged.

Sorry, got in your quote somehow, Zoo.

I, in no way, shape, or form think JP is corrupt.  I like him alot.  I was just a bit worried with all the denials, that's all.  I want him to deny all Bozo's motions.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:41:34 PM
Oh Capp ... Need your reassurance!  She can't get off for inadequate counsel?   Pre-trial or Post-trial?  They can't plea out at the last minute?  Baez isn't outfoxing everyone is he? 

I feel so invested in this!  Need Casey found guilty!  And honestly, need Cindy and Lee found guilty of obstruction of justice before I'll be completely happy! 

It is scary because Bozo is so inadequate, it is hard to not worry. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 05:42:05 PM
snipped from above:
When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

----------------
He is a legend in his own mind.  I can hear some civil attorneys chomping at his heels.  He will have more lawyer filing suit against him than lies he has told . . . or maybe not as many lies.

Sister- would you please include the link you're quoting even if it's snipped??  I know you feel you had it covered, but sometimes a post will be quoted and so on and it all gets lost and muddled.  Thanks.  Muffy 

No problem Muffy.  Thanks for the reminder.  I was taking a short cut by not quoting such a long stack.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story


TY.  I appreciate your snipping the long stack.  All it needed was the link.   ::MonkeyKiss::



Dont yall think that his ego (baez) has been severely wounded!!
his pride
well how befitting! pride cometh before a fall!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:42:50 PM
Loca,  NO Baez has not learned anything yet and may never learn anything.  He is so immature.  He is going to do what he wants to do.  He may very well be ending his "career" (snort).  Face it, a lawyer he is not.  It's time for JB to move on, time to chase a new dream, imo. 

lOVE THE SNORT MID PARAGRAPH.  LOL


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 05:43:31 PM
snipped from above:
When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

----------------
He is a legend in his own mind.  I can hear some civil attorneys chomping at his heels.  He will have more lawyer filing suit against him than lies he has told . . . or maybe not as many lies.

Sister- would you please include the link you're quoting even if it's snipped??  I know you feel you had it covered, but sometimes a post will be quoted and so on and it all gets lost and muddled.  Thanks.  Muffy 

No problem Muffy.  Thanks for the reminder.  I was taking a short cut by not quoting such a long stack.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story


TY.  I appreciate your snipping the long stack.  All it needed was the link.   ::MonkeyKiss::



Dont yall think that his ego (baez) has been severely wounded!!
his pride
well how befitting! pride cometh before a fall!!!



I'VE fallen and cant get up
hmmm seems like caseys isnt the only one that will fall this  time around.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 05:44:23 PM
Loca,  NO Baez has not learned anything yet and may never learn anything.  He is so immature.  He is going to do what he wants to do.  He may very well be ending his "career" (snort).  Face it, a lawyer he is not.  It's time for JB to move on, time to chase a new dream, imo. 

lOVE THE SNORT MID PARAGRAPH.  LOL








I so agree with you and love the snort lol


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:49:23 PM
I was reading some comments before off of a few articles on the Orlando something newspaper, where a certain few people keep posting who think Casey is innocent.  Someone else had said that a certain somebody was seen posting on a blog that is favorable to Jose Baez and Casey, calling the judge biased or wahtever.  But that got me looking for blogs that are favorable to Casey and Bozo, and I can't find any.

Anybody know of any pro-Duhfense blogs or places to read up at.  I feel like hitting my head on the wall while I read them for a while. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 05:50:42 PM
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5928000&postcount=146

regarding baez former client sitting on death row.
did I post this part? if so sorry!
Defense lawyers Baez and Jonathan Kasen said they intend to attack the state's case by assailing detective Dan Conlee for zeroing in too quickly on Diaz, by criticizing the work of a medical examiner and by accusing the young mother. They pointed an accusing finger Tuesday at the slain toddler's mother, saying she had treated the 2-year-old like "an animal."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
now he is representing  a woman that treated her child like an animal. (casey)

he is doing this now:

In documents seeking a new trial and other post-conviction relief, Diaz says he lost his freedom because of Baez's trial performance, strategy and failure to disclose evidence to prosecutors, a tactical decision that prevented jurors from viewing a defense video. Diaz said “…Mr. Baez wanted to surprise the prosecution, and the surprise blew up in the defense’s face.”

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
he will say this about casey in the end when she wants to appeal
as he did to this man sitting on death row.

Nilton Diaz, filed a motion for a new trial, claiming he was convicted due to the “defectiveness” of his defense attorney, Jose Baez.

Baez called it a common post-conviction strategy that often cites defense mistakes to win a new trial.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 05:54:54 PM
I was reading some comments before off of a few articles on the Orlando something newspaper, where a certain few people keep posting who think Casey is innocent.  Someone else had said that a certain somebody was seen posting on a blog that is favorable to Jose Baez and Casey, calling the judge biased or wahtever.  But that got me looking for blogs that are favorable to Casey and Bozo, and I can't find any.

Anybody know of any pro-Duhfense blogs or places to read up at.  I feel like hitting my head on the wall while I read them for a while. 




lol doesnt that speak volumnes about her.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 05:55:38 PM
I was reading some comments before off of a few articles on the Orlando something newspaper, where a certain few people keep posting who think Casey is innocent.  Someone else had said that a certain somebody was seen posting on a blog that is favorable to Jose Baez and Casey, calling the judge biased or wahtever.  But that got me looking for blogs that are favorable to Casey and Bozo, and I can't find any.

Anybody know of any pro-Duhfense blogs or places to read up at.  I feel like hitting my head on the wall while I read them for a while. 




lol doesnt that speak volumnes about her.

it sure does.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 05:57:54 PM
I'm sure he's been advised to just pay the sanction. Whether he listens or not remains to be seen, but I think even he knows he's skating on thin ice.

Who would advise hiM?  He does not seem to listen to anybody.

lol correct!! he had the best of the best on his team before mason and he has refused constructive criticism! his ego is going to be the downfall of his career. 
Baez and casey went up the hill
casey fell down
and baez  lost her  appeal.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 06:31:59 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 

I wish any defense attorney luck with that with all the sarcasm I can muster, it doesnt matter how many denials there are so long as they are based on precedent, applicable to the law.  I have all the faith in CJBP that he is making sure that nothing he says or does gives the defense an inkling to base an appeal.   The defense will have to look under another rock because this one is planted firm  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 06:33:43 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

Basically in a word, no.   I would venture to say that when Judge Strickland went to CJBP with Bozo's accusation that they both discussed that it bordered merit but Bozo just didnt realize what he asked for, I wish I had been a fly on the wall in chambers.  He oversees all other judges & makes the assignments in that circuit so he would have been kept abreast of the case regardless.  These same judges go to him for guidance & a review of the law when needed in the process of making their rulings, so the bottom line is he's the head huncho.   IMHO,the only thing I can see that would reverse CJBP rulings would be if he overtly "ruled from the bench" which means he adjudicated of his own principles & not the law or showed an undue prejudice from this point forward, not happening.   Bozo doesnt stand a snowball's chance in H getting the judge's sanction reversed much less anything else...on the other hand Bozo has been dangerously close to getting more sanctions for misconduct or flat out removal so he should learn to cut his losses & zip it....he wont & I expect him getting slapped further in the future.


Hi Capp
I was wondering if  you think that JP would make a complaint to the bar about baez and his ethics/lack of respect for the court and  zilch proffesionalism? If I recall right! JS turned him into the bar(strickland JS) and perhaps this is what set baez on a mission to get rid of JS. Could he have perhaps gotten arrogant over the fact that he was able to acomplish such. I dont see baez having any boundaries or concerns for anyone other than himself. His motives are always are  with his interest and not that of casey or anyone else. Clearly he should have never been left to be lead in this case. I dont think we will be seeing much of that anymore! I think he will be a model for what should have never happened.

So if I dont make sense  sorry.

but JP is in power to report ! him and I  DONT THINK !!!  that its to far fetched ?
what  do you think/infer?

It is not out of the realm of possibilities, I'll put it that way.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 06:41:42 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 

I wish any defense attorney luck with that with all the sarcasm I can muster, it doesnt matter how many denials there are so long as they are based on precedent, applicable to the law.  I have all the faith in CJBP that he is making sure that nothing he says or does gives the defense an inkling to base an appeal.   The defense will have to look under another rock because this one is planted firm  ::MonkeyWink::

I guess I just do not watch enough court Tv.  When Bozo and co. argue a motion, the hardly ever mention case law.  They talk about this blog and that blog and about people with "felonious" acts and "liers" and "leaking" stuff, so really JP has nothing to go on.  He has no case law, in their motions, to base his denials on.  I might be saying what I mean wrong.  I am sure in most other cases, there is not all this bogus stuff going on, and I guess I just worry somehow JP will get buried in all the carp and slip one day and just deny on emotion or just because he can and bozo is stupid, LOL.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 07:22:49 PM
Oh Capp ... Need your reassurance!  She can't get off for inadequate counsel?   Pre-trial or Post-trial?  They can't plea out at the last minute?  Baez isn't outfoxing everyone is he? 

I feel so invested in this!  Need Casey found guilty!  And honestly, need Cindy and Lee found guilty of obstruction of justice before I'll be completely happy! 

While Ive never personally claimed to be a highly regarded legal authority, I'll give a simple response based on what I've observed during my working years & knowledge I've ascertained along the way.  I'd safely bet that Casey has little to no grounds to claim after conviction that she had inadequate counsel.  For one, there is a team in place even if one is found to have been incompetent and/or been removed for misconduct.  Secondly, she is CHOOSING to keep her lead attorney even after witnessing for herself that he was admonished & sanctioned.   If she is even contemplating it now, she better move fast pre-trial with adequate grounds because on average judges do not grant a change in counsel easily or lightly.   If that were to occur pre-trial then another lead would catch up after asking for a continuance & represent her which would make "inadequate counsel" pretty much moot but would most likely cause a brief delay in the trial starting as scheduled.   During trial it is rarely granted & often seen as a ploy to delay the trial so if a judge were to grant a change in counsel it would have to be established to be something rather egregious at which point another lead attorney would be assigned with or without the rest of the team in place followed by a continuance before the trial would proceed.   A judge does not have to grant a change in counsel merely because the defendant desires one at this point, it has to be something rather legally significant.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 07:26:42 PM
Oh Capp ... Need your reassurance!  She can't get off for inadequate counsel?   Pre-trial or Post-trial?  They can't plea out at the last minute?  Baez isn't outfoxing everyone is he? 

I feel so invested in this!  Need Casey found guilty!  And honestly, need Cindy and Lee found guilty of obstruction of justice before I'll be completely happy! 

While Ive never personally claimed to be a highly regarded legal authority, I'll give a simple response based on what I've observed during my working years & knowledge I've ascertained along the way.  I'd safely bet that Casey has little to no grounds to claim after conviction that she had inadequate counsel.  For one, there is a team in place even if one is found to have been incompetent and/or been removed for misconduct.  Secondly, she is CHOOSING to keep her lead attorney even after witnessing for herself that he was admonished & sanctioned.   If she is even contemplating it now, she better move fast pre-trial with adequate grounds because on average judges do not grant a change in counsel easily or lightly.   If that were to occur pre-trial then another lead would catch up after asking for a continuance & represent her which would make "inadequate counsel" pretty much moot but would most likely cause a brief delay in the trial starting as scheduled.   During trial it is rarely granted & often seen as a ploy to delay the trial so if a judge were to grant a change in counsel it would have to be established to be something rather egregious at which point another lead attorney would be assigned with or without the rest of the team in place followed by a continuance before the trial would proceed.   A judge does not have to grant a change in counsel merely because the defendant desires one at this point, it has to be something rather legally significant.

I keep forgetting this simplet fact Capp.  She could, at any time have said I want a new attorney, so thanks, you made me feel better. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 07:34:59 PM
Oh Capp ... Need your reassurance!  She can't get off for inadequate counsel?   Pre-trial or Post-trial?  They can't plea out at the last minute?  Baez isn't outfoxing everyone is he? 

I feel so invested in this!  Need Casey found guilty!  And honestly, need Cindy and Lee found guilty of obstruction of justice before I'll be completely happy! 

While Ive never personally claimed to be a highly regarded legal authority, I'll give a simple response based on what I've observed during my working years & knowledge I've ascertained along the way.  I'd safely bet that Casey has little to no grounds to claim after conviction that she had inadequate counsel.  For one, there is a team in place even if one is found to have been incompetent and/or been removed for misconduct.  Secondly, she is CHOOSING to keep her lead attorney even after witnessing for herself that he was admonished & sanctioned.   If she is even contemplating it now, she better move fast pre-trial with adequate grounds because on average judges do not grant a change in counsel easily or lightly.   If that were to occur pre-trial then another lead would catch up after asking for a continuance & represent her which would make "inadequate counsel" pretty much moot but would most likely cause a brief delay in the trial starting as scheduled.   During trial it is rarely granted & often seen as a ploy to delay the trial so if a judge were to grant a change in counsel it would have to be established to be something rather egregious at which point another lead attorney would be assigned with or without the rest of the team in place followed by a continuance before the trial would proceed.   A judge does not have to grant a change in counsel merely because the defendant desires one at this point, it has to be something rather legally significant.

I keep forgetting this simplet fact Capp.  She could, at any time have said I want a new attorney, so thanks, you made me feel better. 

Glad it helped Zoo & to make you laugh a bit, its not a judge's job to give an adult defendant not deemed to be insane a brain  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 07:46:45 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 

I wish any defense attorney luck with that with all the sarcasm I can muster, it doesnt matter how many denials there are so long as they are based on precedent, applicable to the law.  I have all the faith in CJBP that he is making sure that nothing he says or does gives the defense an inkling to base an appeal.   The defense will have to look under another rock because this one is planted firm  ::MonkeyWink::

I guess I just do not watch enough court Tv.  When Bozo and co. argue a motion, the hardly ever mention case law.  They talk about this blog and that blog and about people with "felonious" acts and "liers" and "leaking" stuff, so really JP has nothing to go on.  He has no case law, in their motions, to base his denials on.  I might be saying what I mean wrong.  I am sure in most other cases, there is not all this bogus stuff going on, and I guess I just worry somehow JP will get buried in all the carp and slip one day and just deny on emotion or just because he can and bozo is stupid, LOL.

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 08:05:56 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 

I wish any defense attorney luck with that with all the sarcasm I can muster, it doesnt matter how many denials there are so long as they are based on precedent, applicable to the law.  I have all the faith in CJBP that he is making sure that nothing he says or does gives the defense an inkling to base an appeal.   The defense will have to look under another rock because this one is planted firm  ::MonkeyWink::

I guess I just do not watch enough court Tv.  When Bozo and co. argue a motion, the hardly ever mention case law.  They talk about this blog and that blog and about people with "felonious" acts and "liers" and "leaking" stuff, so really JP has nothing to go on.  He has no case law, in their motions, to base his denials on.  I might be saying what I mean wrong.  I am sure in most other cases, there is not all this bogus stuff going on, and I guess I just worry somehow JP will get buried in all the carp and slip one day and just deny on emotion or just because he can and bozo is stupid, LOL.

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.

I have noticed his grinning, and I swear his face reads BS, as bozo is going on and on, but have not noticed the rocking.  I will have to go rewatch a few hearings. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: cookie on January 09, 2011, 08:18:53 PM
snipped from Capps quote above^^^

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.


yep! quite right Cappys! have noticed this about the Judge...also he starts bouncing his leg..you can see the chair moving!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 09, 2011, 08:19:55 PM
snipped from Capps quote above^^^

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.


yep! quite right Cappys! have noticed this about the Judge...also he starts bouncing his leg..you can see the chair moving!



Hey hey Cookie!   Yea, he does.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 08:28:19 PM
snipped from Capps quote above^^^

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.


yep! quite right Cappys! have noticed this about the Judge...also he starts bouncing his leg..you can see the chair moving!



I have also noticed the bouncing legs.  He's kinda cute with all these mannerisms he has. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 09, 2011, 08:56:22 PM
I was reading some comments before off of a few articles on the Orlando something newspaper, where a certain few people keep posting who think Casey is innocent.  Someone else had said that a certain somebody was seen posting on a blog that is favorable to Jose Baez and Casey, calling the judge biased or wahtever.  But that got me looking for blogs that are favorable to Casey and Bozo, and I can't find any.

Anybody know of any pro-Duhfense blogs or places to read up at.  I feel like hitting my head on the wall while I read them for a while. 

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/headbang.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 09, 2011, 08:57:09 PM
snipped from Capps quote above^^^

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.


yep! quite right Cappys! have noticed this about the Judge...also he starts bouncing his leg..you can see the chair moving!



I have also noticed the bouncing legs.  He's kinda cute with all these mannerisms he has. 

I'm in love with his smile. :smt060


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 09, 2011, 09:11:42 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

6:28 p.m. EST, January 8, 2011
For almost as long as the Casey Anthony murder case has been a part of the public awareness, there have been murmurs about her attorney José Baez's handling of the case.

They're all variations on the same theme: that Baez, a defense lawyer with limited experience working on perhaps one of the most visible local murder cases, is swimming in waters — and taking on legal challenges — beyond his depth.

For many, the latest but most vivid example to support this lingering suspicion came nearly one week ago when Chief Judge Belvin Perry struck Baez with a sanction for a "willful" violation of his court order to share expert-witness discovery with prosecutors.

Defense lawyers and legal scholars familiar with the Casey Anthony case say sharing discovery in Florida is like "Criminal Law 101," helping ensure there is no "trial by ambush." Following a judge's repeated orders, meanwhile, is even more fundamental, something readily understood by lawyers and nonlawyers alike.

William Sheaffer, a criminal-defense attorney and media analyst well-versed in the Casey Anthony case, said the judge's punishment last week "doesn't speak well of Baez on a professional level."

"There is a valid criticism — and it was certainly reflected by the court's ruling — by attorneys, the judges, law professors …," Sheaffer said, that Baez "is inexperienced, perhaps has some hubris that's not warranted and that, more importantly, he has failed to rise to the challenge of representation of this client and the most serious charge one could face."

Anthony, 24, is scheduled to go to trial in May for first-degree murder in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie. She faces the death penalty if convicted.
Sheaffer and other attorneys interviewed for this article say the verdict is still out on Baez. Legal-ethics scholar Bob Jarvis, a professor at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, said Baez might pull off a real-life "My Cousin Vinny."

He was referring to the 1992 Joe Pesci film in which a rookie lawyer from Brooklyn exonerates his young cousin and his friend in a Deep South murder case.

"Baez may manage to pull out a victory from the jaws of defeat," Jarvis said. "Until a trial is done, it's too early to call winners and losers."

Baez, 42, would not directly answer questions about the sanction or other concerns raised by the attorneys and legal scholars watching this case.

Previous concerns

Judge Perry's punishment this month was not the first time a judge handling this case has taken action in response to Baez. In March 2009, Circuit Judge Stan Strickland, who was then hearing the case, wrote a letter to The Florida Bar about ethical concerns he had about Baez.

The issue involved allegations that Baez directed investigator Dominic Casey to "walk away" if he found Caylee's lifeless body during a 2008 search — and then contact Baez rather than law enforcement.
The judge asked that the matter be investigated as soon as possible, writing that if the Bar punished or suspended Baez, "prompt action will be required on my part."

The Strickland letter and the entire Dominic Casey issue were investigated by a Florida Bar grievance committee and resulted in a finding of no probable cause against Baez, a Bar spokeswoman said last week.

When asked to discuss the Strickland letter, Baez said, "I have been cleared of all Bar complaints filed against me."

In April 2010, Baez argued to have Strickland removed, saying the judge had a "personal relationship" with a blogger critical of Anthony. Strickland dismissed the idea that he was biased against Baez and his client, but ultimately recused himself. He would not comment for this article.

Mixed relations with media

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

But Baez's relationship with the media was not always so combative.

In fact, other local attorneys say Baez's playing up to the media — especially national organizations — early on in the case demonstrated his inexperience, floating alternative defense theories and directing blame at others.

His moves, they say, inflated the case, earning it more national exposure than it perhaps would have received had he simply focused on the defense or even attempted to work out a plea deal before Caylee's remains were found in December 2008.
"These high-profile cases really are a different animal," said Mark NeJame, who is no stranger to cases that get a lot of media attention. "You really, really have to know how to handle it."

NeJame's one-time representation of Casey Anthony's parents and then Texas EquuSearch has put him at odds with Baez. But it also has made him very familiar with the case.

Meanwhile, Sheaffer, who serves as a legal analyst for WFTV-Channel 9 and comments frequently on the Casey Anthony case, said having the national media court an attorney the way they did Baez "becomes real heady," but it also helps prop up the circus tent that has surrounded this case for more than two years now.

Sheaffer said comparing the Casey Anthony defense to the handling of the James Robert Ward murder case reveals Baez's lack of difficult criminal-defense work and the considerable skills of another veteran attorney with many years of experience, Kirk Kirkconnell.

Ward's case — the shooting death of his wife inside their Isleworth mansion — had all the elements of a media circus, Sheaffer said, but Kirkconnell has managed to keep the case, well, managed.

"Kirkconnell does everything that he should do, and he does it right," said Sheaffer. "Mr. Baez has stepped on land mine after land mine and continues to so do."

In particular, Sheaffer said, Baez appears unwilling or unable to take "criticism in a constructive vein, even from the bench."
Experts mystified

With Perry's recent sanction against Baez, NeJame said, "The judge is simply saying, 'Enough and no way, José.' Ignoring a judge is not an option. Especially ignoring this particular judge is not an option."

That is not to say the defense has sat idle for the past two-plus years. Dozens of defense motions, many attacking media coverage and pre-trial publicity and picking at details that appear to have little impact on the client's defense, now fill a clerk's court file comprised of 16 folders.

Jarvis, the Nova professor, has followed the drama revolving around Baez and asked why a judge hasn't removed him from the case through one of several avenues, including The Florida Bar inquiry sought by Strickland. Beyond that, he asked why Casey Anthony hasn't moved on to another lead attorney.

"It would be fascinating to know, 'Why are you sticking with this guy?' " Jarvis said.

Many in Central Florida's criminal-defense community figured that once veteran and highly experienced attorney Cheney Mason joined the Anthony defense team that Baez would elevate his game and rise to the very serious nature of the case, Sheaffer said.

"That does not, at least at this juncture, appear to be the case," he said. But, he added, the trial has not started yet, and the only people Baez and his team will have to impress are the jurors seated to hear this case.

"My hope is that Mr. Mason has a more prominent role in the trial of this case and or that Mr. Baez at trial again rises to the occasion or is motivated by Mr. Mason's appearance at trial."

Mason did not respond to requests for comment.

Anthony Colarossi can be reached at acolarossi@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5447.

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyLaugh::    ::MonkeyLaugh::

The first hispanic lawyer to try a high profile case either lost his soother or did not spend enough time in the time out corner.  I will assist you Bobo - they say opposites attact.  I sincerely hope you meet somebody who is intelligent, honest, cultured and attractive.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 09:33:57 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 

I wish any defense attorney luck with that with all the sarcasm I can muster, it doesnt matter how many denials there are so long as they are based on precedent, applicable to the law.  I have all the faith in CJBP that he is making sure that nothing he says or does gives the defense an inkling to base an appeal.   The defense will have to look under another rock because this one is planted firm  ::MonkeyWink::

I guess I just do not watch enough court Tv.  When Bozo and co. argue a motion, the hardly ever mention case law.  They talk about this blog and that blog and about people with "felonious" acts and "liers" and "leaking" stuff, so really JP has nothing to go on.  He has no case law, in their motions, to base his denials on.  I might be saying what I mean wrong.  I am sure in most other cases, there is not all this bogus stuff going on, and I guess I just worry somehow JP will get buried in all the carp and slip one day and just deny on emotion or just because he can and bozo is stupid, LOL.

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.

I have noticed his grinning, and I swear his face reads BS, as bozo is going on and on, but have not noticed the rocking.  I will have to go rewatch a few hearings. 


Oh I noticed the rocking and twitching. I thought it was a nervous twitch or he was  ready to atttack.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 09:35:05 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 

I wish any defense attorney luck with that with all the sarcasm I can muster, it doesnt matter how many denials there are so long as they are based on precedent, applicable to the law.  I have all the faith in CJBP that he is making sure that nothing he says or does gives the defense an inkling to base an appeal.   The defense will have to look under another rock because this one is planted firm  ::MonkeyWink::

I guess I just do not watch enough court Tv.  When Bozo and co. argue a motion, the hardly ever mention case law.  They talk about this blog and that blog and about people with "felonious" acts and "liers" and "leaking" stuff, so really JP has nothing to go on.  He has no case law, in their motions, to base his denials on.  I might be saying what I mean wrong.  I am sure in most other cases, there is not all this bogus stuff going on, and I guess I just worry somehow JP will get buried in all the carp and slip one day and just deny on emotion or just because he can and bozo is stupid, LOL.

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.

I have noticed his grinning, and I swear his face reads BS, as bozo is going on and on, but have not noticed the rocking.  I will have to go rewatch a few hearings. 


Oh I noticed the rocking and twitching. I thought it was a nervous twitch or he was  ready to atttack.




P.S
No doubt in my mind that this weekend baez is surfing the net like a maniac escaping from a 5150 hold.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 09:39:13 PM
The first hispanic to try a case of this magnitude lmao and that backfired on him !! none of  my hispanic culture here  in california support his ass because culture/heritage has nothing to do with those stupid comments of his. The moves  he has made are now a joke on the net.
 Menso menso menso.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 09:56:19 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

snipped......

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyLaugh::    ::MonkeyLaugh::

The first hispanic lawyer to try a high profile case either lost his soother or did not spend enough time in the time out corner.  I will assist you Bobo - they say opposites attact.  I sincerely hope you meet somebody who is intelligent, honest, cultured and attractive.



Snipped because that article is so long, but I prob snipped wrong.  Anywho, what could a reporter have to offer his client?  Is he talking money for an interview, is that what Bozo was getting at? 

Actually, it looks like I did the snipping right, woo hoo.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 09, 2011, 09:58:23 PM

I just wonder if it could be an issue for appeal.  That the judge that tried the indightment stage, tried the entire case, is that considered some type of conflict of interest? 
I was wondering how he was the one selected to take JS's place. I'm sure the indictment was taken in to account, and maybe it was in his favor as he was up to speed on the case due to him being the judge at that time.  IDK but sure would like to know why he was the one selected.  If Baez thinks he can go there, conflict of interest, no doubt he'll try.  I say LOL!

I don't know where or when I heard/read about Judge Perry taking Casey's case, BUT, I think he decided to take it himself after checking the calendars of all the judges.....he had the lightest schedule.
JP being the indictment judge is not a conflict of interest.

I hope not. 

Another question I had, you know how they keep the jurors sometimes on lockdown, can't read news papers, listen to news, etc., is a judge allowed to red the news, etc.  I guess they need to keep their opinions to themselves and try to be partial, but I am sure they form opinions.  NO?  How do judges keep themselves from being brought up on appeal for partiality?  I am not saying this judge is partial, but with all the denials, I am getting worred some other defense laywer down the road might try to get a retrial based on the judge being partial to the prosecution. 

I wish any defense attorney luck with that with all the sarcasm I can muster, it doesnt matter how many denials there are so long as they are based on precedent, applicable to the law.  I have all the faith in CJBP that he is making sure that nothing he says or does gives the defense an inkling to base an appeal.   The defense will have to look under another rock because this one is planted firm  ::MonkeyWink::

I guess I just do not watch enough court Tv.  When Bozo and co. argue a motion, the hardly ever mention case law.  They talk about this blog and that blog and about people with "felonious" acts and "liers" and "leaking" stuff, so really JP has nothing to go on.  He has no case law, in their motions, to base his denials on.  I might be saying what I mean wrong.  I am sure in most other cases, there is not all this bogus stuff going on, and I guess I just worry somehow JP will get buried in all the carp and slip one day and just deny on emotion or just because he can and bozo is stupid, LOL.

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.

I have noticed his grinning, and I swear his face reads BS, as bozo is going on and on, but have not noticed the rocking.  I will have to go rewatch a few hearings. 


Oh I noticed the rocking and twitching. I thought it was a nervous twitch or he was  ready to atttack.

I do not see a nervous twitch at all.  JP Is very sure of himself when it comes to his motions, and the way he rules the courtroom.  I can definitely tell when he is annoyed though. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 10:03:59 PM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Defense To Pay $583 In Court Costs
Court Hearing Scheduled For Wednesday Afternoon

POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:56 pm EST January 4, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense attorneys will be in court again on Wednesday, one day after her attorneys were ordered to pay nearly $600 in sanctions for failure to comply with a court order.

Judge Belvin Perry ordered Anthony's defense to pay the sanctions in a Monday hearing, saying the attorneys failed to provide the prosecution with details regarding defense witnesses by a court ordered deadline in December.

The prosecution said the cost to pursue the motion for sanctions was $583.73. The defense team can appeal the amount.

Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.

Wow, if that is how much it costs to file a motion, so Bozo and company filed what 23 on the 31st, so what was that, about $13,340.00 in one day.  No wonder he needs more JAC funds.

They should consider themselves fortunate, pay up & wise up...could have been much steeper for the defense & it was put to them sternly that next time it will be much more severe (my words, not quoted).



48 hrs has a special on tnight @ 9:00 about the casey case. trying to find out what channel on cable.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 09, 2011, 10:07:22 PM
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/26369273/detail.html
Anthony Defense To Pay $583 In Court Costs
Court Hearing Scheduled For Wednesday Afternoon

POSTED: Tuesday, January 4, 2011
UPDATED: 6:56 pm EST January 4, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense attorneys will be in court again on Wednesday, one day after her attorneys were ordered to pay nearly $600 in sanctions for failure to comply with a court order.

Judge Belvin Perry ordered Anthony's defense to pay the sanctions in a Monday hearing, saying the attorneys failed to provide the prosecution with details regarding defense witnesses by a court ordered deadline in December.

The prosecution said the cost to pursue the motion for sanctions was $583.73. The defense team can appeal the amount.

Meanwhile, a hearing in Anthony's murder trial has been set for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Anthony will not be in court.

The hearing will address amateur photographs taken by a volunteer in the search for Anthony's daughter, Caylee, while Caylee was missing in 2008.

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's death. Caylee was 2 years old when she was reported missing in July 2008 after being missing for a month. Her remains were found in a wooded area in east Orange County in December 2008.

Wow, if that is how much it costs to file a motion, so Bozo and company filed what 23 on the 31st, so what was that, about $13,340.00 in one day.  No wonder he needs more JAC funds.

They should consider themselves fortunate, pay up & wise up...could have been much steeper for the defense & it was put to them sternly that next time it will be much more severe (my words, not quoted).



48 hrs has a special on tnight @ 9:00 about the casey case. trying to find out what channel on cable.
cant find it.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Rowanvamp0 on January 09, 2011, 10:58:27 PM
I KNOW Casey will be found guilty...even the duhfense knows that.
I don't really see her receiving the DP. I see her getting LWOP, and the A's moving so they can be closer to her on visiting days.
My other daydream is, the A's being arrested as soon as the Guilty verdict is read.
I second that motion...here..here!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Leroy on January 09, 2011, 11:14:54 PM
48 Hours on ID
The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony
TV-14 (V), CC

In July of 2008 Cindy and George Anthony discover that their two-year old granddaughter Caylee is missing. Once her body is found five months later, investigators zero in on their prime suspect. The couple's daughter and Caylee's mother, Casey Anthony

http://investigation.discovery.com/tv-schedules/daily.html?date=20110110.010

If anyone has the ID channel, they are playing this at 12am my time (in Ohio).  I'm not sure if its been on before but I had not seen it.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 09, 2011, 11:17:41 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

snipped......

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyLaugh::    ::MonkeyLaugh::

The first hispanic lawyer to try a high profile case either lost his soother or did not spend enough time in the time out corner.  I will assist you Bobo - they say opposites attact.  I sincerely hope you meet somebody who is intelligent, honest, cultured and attractive.



Snipped because that article is so long, but I prob snipped wrong.  Anywho, what could a reporter have to offer his client?  Is he talking money for an interview, is that what Bozo was getting at? 

Actually, it looks like I did the snipping right, woo hoo.

Bozo thinks they ought to pay him for talking.   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/emoticon-talking-dollar-sign.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 09, 2011, 11:29:32 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

snipped......

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyLaugh::    ::MonkeyLaugh::

The first hispanic lawyer to try a high profile case either lost his soother or did not spend enough time in the time out corner.  I will assist you Bobo - they say opposites attact.  I sincerely hope you meet somebody who is intelligent, honest, cultured and attractive.



Snipped because that article is so long, but I prob snipped wrong.  Anywho, what could a reporter have to offer his client?  Is he talking money for an interview, is that what Bozo was getting at? 

Actually, it looks like I did the snipping right, woo hoo.

Bozo thinks they ought to pay him for talking.   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/emoticon-talking-dollar-sign.gif)

Or send a reporter named Zanny who used to be a Nanny  ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 10, 2011, 12:10:57 AM
48 Hours on ID
The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony
TV-14 (V), CC

In July of 2008 Cindy and George Anthony discover that their two-year old granddaughter Caylee is missing. Once her body is found five months later, investigators zero in on their prime suspect. The couple's daughter and Caylee's mother, Casey Anthony

http://investigation.discovery.com/tv-schedules/daily.html?date=20110110.010

If anyone has the ID channel, they are playing this at 12am my time (in Ohio).  I'm not sure if its been on before but I had not seen it.

I believe it is a repeat of last year's and there have been some rumors that this was requested to be replayed by the A's to generate revenue for the defense team.  This is MOO, not a fact, and just was a coinidence based on this came up after Bozo was given the sanction hammer this week.  Same old thing that was on last year. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 10, 2011, 12:17:07 AM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

6:28 p.m. EST, January 8, 2011
For almost as long as the Casey Anthony murder case has been a part of the public awareness, there have been murmurs about her attorney José Baez's handling of the case.

Anthony Colarossi can be reached at acolarossi@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5447.
*SNIPED*

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyLaugh::    ::MonkeyLaugh::

The first hispanic lawyer to try a high profile case either lost his soother or did not spend enough time in the time out corner.  I will assist you Bobo - they say opposites attact.  I sincerely hope you meet somebody who is intelligent, honest, cultured and attractive.



O now you did it NorthernRose, you've got this Paula singing & dancing to Paula's song (http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mxxZnWDN3wQ/default.jpg)

To my knowledge he was married with one foot out the door & I recall it being reported he was in so much debt he might lose his house...haven't heard anything lately but if I were her I'd run.   PS years ago he was also in arrears with child support from his first marriage, in fact the board refused to let him practice law for 8 years after he graduated from his "Sears & Roebuch" law school & the Florida Supreme Court agreed.
I recalled above but to be more accurate the OS did a two part article, the link no longer brings you to the articles directly but I saved the content (and please excuse the length) here it is serving as a refresher & repost for our most recent members that may have not seen this information:

Jose Baez, Casey Anthony's defense attorney, leaves after conducting a news conference in December in front of his Kissimmee office. (RED HUBER, ORLANDO SENTINEL / May 2, 2009)

Casey Anthony Case: Special report on Jose Baez: First of 2 parts
Casey Anthony's lawyer, Jose Baez, rejected by Florida Bar on first try
TOMORROW: Becoming Casey Anthony's lawyer has brought Jose Baez celebrity — and controversy.

Jose Baez, Casey Anthony's defense attorney, leaves after conducting a news conference in December in front of his Kissimmee office. (RED HUBER, ORLANDO SENTINEL / May 2, 2009)

His defense of a young mother charged with killing her toddler has transformed José Ángel Baez into one of the best-known lawyers in America.

For eight years after he graduated from law school, however, the board that screens prospective attorneys in Florida would not let him practice law. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the decision, issuing an order in 2000 that cataloged unpaid bills, extravagant spending and other "financial irresponsibility" up to that time. Justices reserved their strongest condemnation for his failure to stay current on support payments for his only child.

His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law."

He worked instead as a paralegal for the Miami-Dade public defender and then taught Internet research to lawyers and started four business ventures, including two bikini companies. Before Florida Bar officials admitted him in 2005, he had to demonstrate that he had rehabilitated himself.

Today, as lead defense attorney for Casey Anthony — the Orange County woman charged with killing her 2-year-old daughter— 40-year-old Baez has become the sort of instant celebrity monitored by TV, newspapers, tabloids and the Internet.

He is a Bar member in good standing, his office spokeswoman reminded the Orlando Sentinel in a prepared statement. She also questioned the motives behind the newspaper story.

"Based on your questions and actions," she wrote, "this profile you are writing has nothing to do with Jose Baez's representation of Casey Anthony and appears to be a sensationalist persecution of a Hispanic lawyer who has been targeted by a newspaper lucky to find itself at the center of a national story."

The Supreme Court order, which the Sentinel found in public records, shows that nearly a decade ago, he could not satisfy the character and fitness standards Florida requires of prospective lawyers.

It identifies Baez by his initials, J.A.B. — standard procedure in cases in which prospective lawyers challenge their denial of a law license at the state's highest court. Using other public records and interviews, the Sentinel matched many details in the document to Baez, however.

For instance, the lawyer listed as representing J.A.B. was Manuel Alvarez, an attorney with the Miami-Dade Public Defender's Office, where Baez worked at the time.

The office confirmed that Alvarez helped Baez with his Bar application. Supreme Court records show J.A.B.'s is the only case involving the Bar that Alvarez has handled in the state's highest court.

Alvarez would not comment, but Executive Assistant Public Defender Rory S. Stein said that Alvarez wrote a legal brief on behalf of Baez in 1998, the year after he graduated from law school. Stein called it "a friendly gesture" to a staff member who needed help with his lawyer application.

In an interview last year, Baez described his eight years out of law as a personal choice, saying he could earn more money in other fields. He would not be interviewed for this story but commented on the court order in the statement issued through Marti Mackenzie, his office spokeswoman:

"The ruling you claim that was made about a lawyer with the initials J.A.B. has nothing to do with Mr. Baez's current status as a member in good standing with The Florida Bar. Many people, including lawyers, have monetary misunderstandings, disputes and child support disagreements that have no effect on their ability to represent clients."


From Navy to law school
Born in Puerto Rico in 1969, Baez told reporters he grew up in the Bronx and South Florida with his mother, a single parent. He dropped out of Homestead High School in ninth grade.

He married at 17, became a father, earned a GED diploma and joined the Navy in 1986.

According to his résumé, Baez spent three years assigned to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Norfolk, Va., trained as an intelligence analyst with what he described as a "Cosmic Top Secret" security clearance.

He left active duty in May 1989 as a yeoman seaman, a rank associated with administrative duties, and then served in the U.S. Navy Reserve, according to the National Archives and Records Administration.

In the next six years, Baez divorced, attended Miami-Dade Community College and graduated from Florida State University. A black belt in tae kwon do, Baez competed with the karate, pistol and crime-scene team from FSU's chapter of Lambda Alpha Epsilon, a fraternity of criminology majors.

"We probably ranked first overall in every category in every national competition," said Ken Koehler, the fraternity's former sergeant-at-arms. "José was more or less the primary instructor. ... We did academic testing as well, and he did pretty good with that, too."

After graduating in 1997 from St. Thomas University School of Law in Miami, Baez applied to become a lawyer. In April 1998, he was called before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners, which screens prospective lawyers. The later Supreme Court order outlined how this review uncovered the debts and other problems that concerned the Bar examiners.

That order is the only public record of the review, which is designed to protect the public and safeguard the judicial system. The Bar examiners have responsibility for ensuring that all lawyer applicants meet Florida's requirements for character and fitness, education and technical competence, according to Supreme Court rules.

The process is not open to the public, except when a candidate who is turned down asks the Supreme Court to review the decision. The court identifies the rejected applicant only by his or her initials when its findings are released.

Court critical of finances
According to the Supreme Court summary of the case, the Board of Bar Examiners filed formal allegations against J.A.B. in September 1998. In addition to unpaid child support, a personal bankruptcy and default on a student loan, the investigators said he left out parts of his history, including that he wrote a bad check and entered a pretrial program to avoid conviction.

Investigators also found fault with J.A.B.'s participation in a foreign-studies program in summer 1995 and his leasing of a Mazda Miata in Miami — unnecessary expenses when he owed money to others, they said.

After a formal hearing, the board found the allegations proven and recommended that he not be admitted to the Bar.

"Additionally, the Board found that J.A.B.'s misrepresentations and lack of candor in his answers to the specifications and during his formal hearing testimony were further grounds for disqualification," the Supreme Court wrote.

Many details in the order can be confirmed in public records for José Baez:

•Miami-Dade Circuit Court records show that Baez failed repeatedly to pay his $200-a-month child support after his 1993 divorce. The sum owed reached $12,000 by 2004. Asked recently about this, Baez said through his spokeswoman that he and his ex-wife have resolved their child-support issues. Like J.A.B., Baez's only child is a daughter.

•Baez declared bankruptcy in September 1990, the same month and year cited for J.A.B. The records on Baez are filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, where he lived during and after his service in the Navy.

•The Virginia Education Loan Authority filed liens against Baez for $4,336 in unpaid loans in 1995, the same year the Supreme Court says J.A.B defaulted on his student loan.

•Baez leased a Mazda Miata in 1998, just as J.A.B did. The Sentinel obtained a copy of his Progressive Express insurance card for the vehicle, which Baez had submitted to the Public Defender's Office in Miami. Files from the State Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles show the car was leased.

In April 1998 — the same month that the Bar examiners held their investigative hearing into J.A.B.'s qualifications as a lawyer — the Miami-Dade Public Defender's Office reassigned José Ángel Baez to tasks that did not require a law degree.

Baez spent the next 16 months interviewing witnesses and investigating cases to compensate the office for its investment in his preparation to be a lawyer, records show. He resigned in September 1999.
The following year, in June 2000, the Supreme Court issued its findings in case No. SC95855, Florida Board of Bar Examiners RE: J.A.B.: "Accordingly, we approve the Board's recommendation that J.A.B. not be admitted to the Florida Bar at this time."

Baez tries bikini business
Turned down by the Bar, Baez started a series of businesses.

They included Bon Bon Bikinis and Brazilian-Bikinis.Com to sell bathing suits, corporate records show. He also applied for a real-estate license and created two companies selling computer know-how: LawStudentWebsites.Com and LawyerConcepts.

From 2000 to 2005, according to his spokeswoman, Baez worked for LexisNexis, the information company. In an interview last year, he said he taught lawyers and judges to research cases using the Internet and made twice as much as he could practicing law.

Records show that a court in Miami docked $550 a month from his LexisNexis paycheck in 2004 to pay child support to his first wife.

An applicant denied admission to the Bar can reapply after two years or other such period set by the Bar examiners. The application must include a "written statement describing the scope and character of the applicant's evidence of rehabilitation," according to Supreme Court rules.

The court requires them to produce "clear and convincing evidence of rehabilitation," such as strict compliance with judicial or administrative orders, assurances to "conduct one's self in an exemplary manner" and demonstrations of excellent character, good reputation for professional ability and "positive action" in their occupation, religion or community or civic service.

Baez launched two community-service ventures during his time away from the law.

In 2001, according to state records, Baez created a nonprofit group, the Miami Domestic Violence Project. It dissolved two years later. Mackenzie, Baez's office spokeswoman, said the project disbanded because another group with an almost identical purpose and name already existed.

In 2004, Baez created another nonprofit in Miami, Miracles for Children Foundation Corp., according to state records. It continued until Sept. 16, 2005.

The following week, Sept. 22, Baez was admitted to practice law. Because the admission process for lawyers is not public, there is no way to know what effect these nonprofit groups had on the Bar's action.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...,3439656.story
Who is Jose Baez? Defending Casey Anthony brings celebrity, headaches.

Henry Pierson Curtis | Sentinel Staff Writer
May 4, 2009

Casey Anthony is not the first murder suspect Jose Baez has defended.

But representing her has brought him more public attention, scrutiny and controversy than any other case since he became a lawyer four years ago.

In the process, he has bristled at suggestions that his trial experience is limited and at questions about how he is paying for the expensive legal team he has assembled.

From his office down the street from the Osceola County Jail, he has worked on several hundred criminal cases conducted in courthouses across Central Florida. This semester he also taught a course in pretrial practice at Florida A&M University College of Law in Orlando.

He was a low-profile local attorney, however, until he started working for Anthony, the 23-year-old mother accused of killing her toddler daughter, Caylee. Before that, no one was asking him to appear on ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN or to jump aboard Fox TV reporter Geraldo Rivera's 70-foot ketch for an afternoon of sailing.

Along with the celebrity have come insinuations that Baez is over his head in the Anthony case — sometimes from a law professor or someone such as former prosecutor Nancy Grace of Headline News.

Baez, 40, would not be interviewed for this story. His spokesperson issued a statement accusing the Orlando Sentinel of engaging "in a sensationalist persecution of a Hispanic lawyer…"

Earlier, however, he suggested that the newspaper could get a balanced view of his legal abilities by talking to the judge and prosecutor in a Lake County child-murder case he defended last year.

Circuit Judge Mark Nacke would not comment. Judges rarely comment on attorneys because anything they say might suggest they are not impartial toward a lawyer who could appear before them in court again.

Assistant State Attorney Bill Gross said it was the first time in his 30-year career that a defense lawyer had used him as a professional reference. He said Baez had done a competent job and showed promise.

"I've been doing this a lot longer than he, and I could recognize that he does have a lot of God-given talent. He is quite quick-witted, has an excellent ability to communicate," Gross said. "He did a very good job considering his relatively short time as an attorney."

Baez's client was convicted and sentenced to 15 years in prison for manslaughter and child abuse in the fatal beating of a 2-year-old girl. Baez fielded questions from reporters in English and Spanish because the victim was the granddaughter of Puerto Rican boxer Wilfredo Vázquez, a world champion.

William H. Stone, chief assistant public defender in Lake County, said he, too, was impressed.

"I heard nothing but glowing comments about his abilities and representation of his client," Stone said.

Disputes over bills, support

Since he became a lawyer, Baez has been involved in several money disputes. They are mostly small compared with the bankruptcy, bad debts and other financial issues that prompted the Florida Board of Bar Examiners to refuse his application to the Bar after he graduated from law school in 1997. He was not admitted to practice law until 2005.

Darlene Bryant, a court reporter in North Carolina, said she spent six months in 2007 trying to get Baez to honor a $275 bill for work she did for him.

"He finally paid after I got the state Bar Association involved," she said.

Baez also ended up being sued in April 2007 over an $837.62 bill for 1,000 of his plastic business cards, which are decorated with a golden crest. Sir Speedy Printing went to court and won after Baez refused an offer from the Orange County Bar Association to mediate.

And in January 2007, four months before he bought a $670,000 waterfront home in a country-club community on East Lake Tohopekaliga, Baez was held in contempt of court for failing to pay $4,000 in child support, according to Miami-Dade Clerk of Court records.    my note:  (the home I believe he was in threat to lose in the past year or so-notice the date this two bit wambulance chaser wannabe high profile attorney assumed) he'd get rich off of Casey's case and/or he's doing something shady thinking he could afford an over half a mil home
His office spokeswoman, Marti Mackenzie, told the Sentinel that Baez and his former wife have resolved their support issues.

Part 2
Spotlight follows big case


Baez's finances would be of little interest had the case of a lifetime not fallen into his lap in July. When Anthony picked Baez to defend her — based on the recommendation of someone she met in jail, her mother has told reporters — he took on a case that has attracted attention around the world.

Since then, he has appeared on Good Morning America and 20/20 on ABC, The Early Show on CBS, Today on NBC, Larry King Live on CNN, Geraldo at Large on Fox and others.

Last summer, he traveled to New York City, where he and his wife spent part of a day sailing with Fox's Rivera. Photos of the outing show a grinning Baez on deck with Rivera.

Heavy media schedules by defense lawyers raise the eyebrows of some seasoned lawyers. University of Florida law professor Michael Seigel, a former federal prosecutor, said any lawyer who goes public risks being accused of tainting the jury pool.
"It's very dangerous," Seigel said "Unless you are very skilled at it, it can truly backfire. ... Most of the best attorneys around the country tend to be very quiet. They wait to try the case in a courtroom setting."

Setting a tone for the defense
Early on, Baez confounded reporters by taking on a media-relations company that used three anonymous — and often irritable — spokesmen calling themselves "Todd Black." Baez severed ties with Press Corps Media after one of the spokesmen turned out to be a felon who served time for trying to extort money from a TV reporter in California.

Mackenzie, who was hired to replace Press Corps Media, said in March that Baez had not known the felon's background.

Robert M. Jarvis, who teaches classes in legal ethics and law and popular culture at Nova Southeastern University Law Center in Fort Lauderdale, said the incident is just one of many twists in the case.

"I think he's a guy who's clearly in over his head. Handling a capital-murder case is obviously the most challenging thing a lawyer can do," Jarvis said. "So it's very surprising right from the get-go that a lawyer with less than four years of experience is handling this case. ... Right off the bat, you have to say this is a guy who is very cocky or who is really naive."

Baez does his own speaking in court, where he has annoyed state prosecutors with his motions.

He has demanded repeatedly that the state speed up release of evidence it has and make it available for analysis by his experts. He has sought to block release of photos and videos that he said could show his client in a bad light. He has sought sanctions for prosecutors he accused of moving too slowly on his requests. He complained to the judge when the State Attorney's Office sparked a Florida Bar investigation by sending it news releases from his former spokesman.

He often does not prevail. For example, when the state wanted to force Anthony to appear in court, Baez balked, saying she didn't want to appear in public. The judge ruled against him, requiring she attend every hearing.

What Baez makes clear in all his court appearances is that he intends to vigorously challenge the state's interpretation of what the evidence against his client shows.

Who is paying, state asks?
A continuing controversy stems from the question of how Anthony, who had no assets when arrested in July, is paying for her defense, including the hiring of nationally recognized expert witnesses. One of them, pathologist Dr. Henry Lee, testified for O.J. Simpson at his murder trial.

In March, prosecutors asked Circuit Judge Stan Strickland to investigate whether Baez was playing two potentially conflicting roles for Anthony: defense lawyer and story agent.

Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton speculated in a motion that Anthony's "seeming conversion from pauper to princess" could be based on sale of her photos and videos, which had appeared in national TV reports about the case. He further speculated whether Baez could be managing both her assets and her defense.

TV networks admit that they often pay "licensing fees" for videos and photos, but they will not say whether — and whom — they paid to use photos and video of Anthony and her family.

Strickland refused to step in after Baez denied having any arrangement with Anthony to sell her story. Baez accused prosecutors of trying to intimidate and embarrass him.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...,6717896.story



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: CarolF on January 10, 2011, 02:32:31 AM
Thanks Cappy for posting that! I had not seen it before and it was very interesting. Bozo sure knows how to show his true Clown Colors in all facets of his life! Hope he just keeps on clowning right on through the trial.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 10, 2011, 06:47:50 AM
snipped from Capps quote above^^^

Absolutely right, Bozo & the rest of the clowns in court have relied more on their pompous "tudes," wild accusations & blatant finger pointing against innocent people rather than arguing applicable case law that established precedent.   Hint for the future, if not observed readily already, when CJBP begins to grin like a Cheshire cat & starts rocking in his chair, his mind is made up & its not favourable to the arguing counsel.    When he poses a question to counsel with one eye tweaked upward & his chin tucked down, its another sign that he knows he's being fed poppycock & with merit knows what his ruling will be already.


yep! quite right Cappys! have noticed this about the Judge...also he starts bouncing his leg..you can see the chair moving!


A poster over at the HM said that she imagines Judge Perry bouncing Caylee on his knee.  I loved that!    CJBP is nobody's fool and the sooner Baez figures that out the better.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 10, 2011, 07:16:52 AM
Cappy,thanks for posting that article for OS. ::HelloKitty::
Here is a link from way back when we discussed it.We knew JB was a putz.   ::MonkeyTongue::
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4946.msg794643#msg794643


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 10, 2011, 07:33:22 AM
Capp, didn't want to quote you because of the length of that article, but oh em gee.  Bikini companies, really?  Bikini companies!!!!  OMG, that is how I will forever remember this putz.  He should come to court in a kini.  A BozoKini. 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 10, 2011, 08:01:53 AM
I remember reading, so long ago it seems, about bozo's lack of experience, his excuses for why he chose not to practice law after graduating from law school, etc.
momster deserves what she asked for . . . namely bozo.
bozo deserves what he asked for . . . a new judge who will not be snookered by his BS!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 10, 2011, 09:47:28 AM
Good morning monkeys!   Well, I guess this Jersey born girl didnt move far enough south, we got 7 inches of snow overnight!   ::snowmanlaugh:: Be safe everyone, especially those that are not used to traveling thru this white stuff  Happy shoveling  ::MonkeyShovel::

O my goodness Zoo, now you went and did it...visions of Bozo in a "kini" well let's just say that is way too muckin fuch to nightmare over  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: akmom on January 10, 2011, 09:54:28 AM
Morning Monkeys, I did a search to see if this has been posted, but couldn't find it.  Figured we could use a couple more chuckles at J.A.B.'s expense.

http://eggtreenews.wordpress.com/


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 10, 2011, 10:01:16 AM
Thanks akmom.   ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: akmom on January 10, 2011, 10:07:37 AM
Thanks akmom.   ::HelloKitty::

Most welcome Trimm


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: cookie on January 10, 2011, 10:12:34 AM
morning Monkeys..


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: shannondeep on January 10, 2011, 10:59:44 AM
I started a thread to discuss "things that The Anthony's have said that baffle you the most"  I know, I know, everything that has ever come out of their mouths.  I find the thread content interesting.  Join me in that thread to ::MonkeyDance:: discuss? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 10, 2011, 11:01:24 AM
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/coffeeroll-1.gif) Good morning monkeys. I love re-reading about Bozo's history.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 10, 2011, 11:11:22 AM
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/coffeeroll-1.gif) Good morning monkeys. I love re-reading about Bozo's history.
Me too Fanny, me too!
 ::Baseball::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 10, 2011, 12:40:12 PM
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726973/20110107-Notice-of-Hearing---0302-and-0303
2011.01.07 Notice of Hearing - 03/02 and 03/03

(H/T Muzikman)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 10, 2011, 01:16:57 PM
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726973/20110107-Notice-of-Hearing---0302-and-0303
2011.01.07 Notice of Hearing - 03/02 and 03/03

(H/T Muzikman)

Has anyone seen this? found it at THM

..baez gets noticed on the Florida Bar daily newsletter:

http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/PI/PIN ... jose,baez*
-----jan.7 2011----Lawyer Ethics/Legal Discipline---

http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/PI/PIN ... enDocument
---jan.4 2011---Criminal Justice Issues-------



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 10, 2011, 01:34:55 PM
I can't open those, Loca.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 10, 2011, 01:47:17 PM
I can't open those, Loca.






snipped:

sorry curly wonder why let me try something else for you.
http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/PI/PINewsSummary.nsf/41bc6044e7aa779e8525688d0073e8f8/68a4540a6ef61cc08525781100545140!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,jose,baez*
News and Events
Daily News Summary

An electronic digest of media coverage of interest to members of The Florida Bar compiled each workday by the Public Information and Bar Services Department. Electronic links are only active in today's edition. For information on previous articles, please contact the publishing newspaper directly.


Links to online newspapers
Jan. 7, 2011

--Legal Profession--


PEOPLE'S LAW SCHOOL PROGRAM TO BEGIN IN CLEARWATER-- St. Petersburg Times, http://www.tampabay.com, Jan. 7, 2011.
 The Clearwater Bar Association will present People's Law School, a free 15-week program, starting Thursday [Jan. 13]. The program will run on Thursdays through April 28, with one week off for spring break, at the Clearwater campus of St. Petersburg College, 2465 Drew St. It is designed to increase knowledge of legal concepts that affect everyone's daily life. A different topic, ranging from bankruptcy to identity theft, will be covered each week by volunteer judges and lawyers.

--Judiciary--

CRIST LEAVES OFFICE WITHOUT APPOINTING JUDGE TO THE APPELLATE COURT-- The Palm Beach Post, http://www.palmbeachpost.com, Jan. 7, 2011.
Four judges nominated to fill an appellate court vacancy met with Gov. Charlie Crist and his staff last month. They waited during the holidays, expecting Crist to make the appointment to the Fourth District Court of Appeal at any time. They waited Monday [Jan. 3], Crist's final full day in office when he made another judicial appointment in Orlando. Then Crist was governor no more and Rick Scott was sworn into office Tuesday [Jan. 4]. Now lawyers and judges are buzzing about why the vacancy was not filled. While not unprecedented, it's highly unusual for an outgoing governor to pass on making a judicial appointment.

CIVIL RIGHTS WILL BE A KEY TOPIC AT JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SYMPOSIUM-- South Florida Times, column, http://www.sfltimes.com, Jan. 7, 2011.
The guest column is by Miami probate and real estate attorney Marva L. Wiley, who is a member of the 11th Judicial Circuit's Centennial Committee and one of three co-chairs of the Civil Rights Symposium. The column, detailing some of the circuit's legal history, states: "The 11th Judicial Circuit of the state of Florida will celebrate its 100th anniversary in May. When the Legislature established it in 1911, however, the circuit included all of southeastern Florida -- from Palm Beach County to Monroe County. The celebration of this centennial will include four symposia focusing on different aspects of the court's history: Civil Rights, Diversity in the Judiciary, Media and the Courts and Evolution of the Modern Jury Trial. . . . [The] civil rights history is intrinsically linked to the court’s history and, thus, the opportunity for this retrospective is poignant."

BRIDENBACK RECOGNIZED AS 'TIRELESS ADVOCATE' FOR COURTS, PUBLIC-- Washington County News, http://www.chipleypaper.com, Jan. 7, 2011.
Michael L. Bridenback, court administrator for the 13th Circuit in Tampa, is the recipient of a 2010 Distinguished Service Award, one of the highest recognitions given by the National Center for State Courts. Florida Supreme Court Justice Peggy A. Quince, who also is on NCSC's Board of Directors, presented the award to Bridenback during Florida's Joint Judicial Branch Leadership Meeting in Tampa. NCSC presents six Distinguished Service Awards annually to those who have made significant contributions to the judicial or court administration fields and to the work of the National Center.

--Lawyer Ethics/Legal Discipline--

CASEY ANTHONY ATTORNEY JOSE BAEZ SLAPPED WITH FORMAL SANCTION, $538 BILL-- Orlando Sentinel, http://www.orlandosentinel.com, Jan. 7, 2011.
Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Belvin Perry Thursday [Jan. 6] filed his written order hitting attorney Jose Baez with a sanction for a "willful violation" of an earlier court order to turn over expert witness discovery information to the prosecution. Baez will have to pay $583.73 in prosecutor's "attorney's fees" and provide written reports for all expert witnesses. Those reports must include "a complete statement of opinions the witnesses will express and the reasons for those opinions, and any data or other information considered by the witnesses in forming their opinions and conclusions."

--Civil Justice Issues--








Is the Answer Malignant Narcissism?
by Diane Fanning

http://womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/200 ... ssism.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: klaasend on January 10, 2011, 02:03:55 PM
REMINDER:  WE REQUIRE WHEN POSTING A QUOTE OF AN ARTICLE OR EVEN ANOTHER POSTER THAT YOU EITHER SUPPLY THE LINK OR QUOTE THE POST.  PLEASE DON'T JUST SAY "ACCORDING TO", OR "I READ".  WE ALWAYS WANT A LINK BACK TO THE SOURCE.  WE HAVE NOTICED RECENTLY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN NEGLECTING TO DO SO.  THANKS!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Treehouse on January 10, 2011, 02:06:45 PM

snipped:

http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/PI/PINewsSummary.nsf/41bc6044e7aa779e8525688d0073e8f8/68a4540a6ef61cc08525781100545140!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,jose,baez*
News and Events
Daily News Summary


--Lawyer Ethics/Legal Discipline--

CASEY ANTHONY ATTORNEY JOSE BAEZ SLAPPED WITH FORMAL SANCTION, $538 BILL-- Orlando Sentinel, http://www.orlandosentinel.com, Jan. 7, 2011.
Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Belvin Perry Thursday [Jan. 6] filed his written order hitting attorney Jose Baez with a sanction for a "willful violation" of an earlier court order to turn over expert witness discovery information to the prosecution. Baez will have to pay $583.73 in prosecutor's "attorney's fees" and provide written reports for all expert witnesses. Those reports must include "a complete statement of opinions the witnesses will express and the reasons for those opinions, and any data or other information considered by the witnesses in forming their opinions and conclusions."
Quote



===========
Baez got off light. I believe the prosecution was asking $500 per day as a sanction. Nevertheless, this is another nail in Baez's legal career coffin.

Good thing he can fall back on the bikini business. Just hope he doesn't decide to cut operating costs by modeling the bikinis himself. Ugh.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 10, 2011, 02:17:24 PM
REMINDER:  WE REQUIRE WHEN POSTING A QUOTE OF AN ARTICLE OR EVEN ANOTHER POSTER THAT YOU EITHER SUPPLY THE LINK OR QUOTE THE POST.  PLEASE DON'T JUST SAY "ACCORDING TO", OR "I READ".  WE ALWAYS WANT A LINK BACK TO THE SOURCE.  WE HAVE NOTICED RECENTLY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN NEGLECTING TO DO SO.  THANKS!

sorry klaasend will do.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 10, 2011, 03:54:09 PM

snipped:

http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/PI/PINewsSummary.nsf/41bc6044e7aa779e8525688d0073e8f8/68a4540a6ef61cc08525781100545140!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,jose,baez*
News and Events
Daily News Summary


--Lawyer Ethics/Legal Discipline--

CASEY ANTHONY ATTORNEY JOSE BAEZ SLAPPED WITH FORMAL SANCTION, $538 BILL-- Orlando Sentinel, http://www.orlandosentinel.com, Jan. 7, 2011.
Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Belvin Perry Thursday [Jan. 6] filed his written order hitting attorney Jose Baez with a sanction for a "willful violation" of an earlier court order to turn over expert witness discovery information to the prosecution. Baez will have to pay $583.73 in prosecutor's "attorney's fees" and provide written reports for all expert witnesses. Those reports must include "a complete statement of opinions the witnesses will express and the reasons for those opinions, and any data or other information considered by the witnesses in forming their opinions and conclusions."
Quote



===========
Baez got off light. I believe the prosecution was asking $500 per day as a sanction. Nevertheless, this is another nail in Baez's legal career coffin.

Good thing he can fall back on the bikini business. Just hope he doesn't decide to cut operating costs by modeling the bikinis himself. Ugh.

Its under Jan 7th's daily news summary & o boy looks like the lock is in on Bozo, if I were him I'd realize he's pushed his luck way too muckin fuch already...to bad his arrogant self won't take that advice.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 10, 2011, 03:57:06 PM
Thanks, Loca.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 10, 2011, 07:44:13 PM
Thanks, Loca.


Curly
your certainly welcomed.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Scatty on January 10, 2011, 09:32:55 PM
Classic BOZO.

“I don’t have to answer any questions. Who are you?”

He added, “Do you have something to offer my client? It’s a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client.” He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, “You’re lying and being unethical.”


What is he saying the reporter was lying and being unethical about?  I missed that part.  I loved how he called back.  What a dweeb wonderful defense lawyer.  If you don't want to talk to somebody, you hang up and you don't call back.   

I have something to offer him and his client, and I offer it without any comment, for free.  It can be found on either of my hands.....my middle finger.    

Sorry if this has already been addressed, but I'm just catching up. Baez is projecting when he accused the reporter of being unethical.Baez realized he had just made a big boo-boo when he asked what the reporter could do for his client--it being a two-way street. In other words, "You'll have interviews and access to me if you give my client favorable coverage." He then thought, oops what if they print that? And hurriedly called the reporter back to say the convo was off the record. When told it wasn't, he acted in typical juvenile Bozo fashion with name calling: You're lying and unethical. Waaaaa!
PROJECTION!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Scatty on January 10, 2011, 09:37:50 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

snipped......

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyLaugh::    ::MonkeyLaugh::

The first hispanic lawyer to try a high profile case either lost his soother or did not spend enough time in the time out corner.  I will assist you Bobo - they say opposites attact.  I sincerely hope you meet somebody who is intelligent, honest, cultured and attractive.



Snipped because that article is so long, but I prob snipped wrong.  Anywho, what could a reporter have to offer his client?  Is he talking money for an interview, is that what Bozo was getting at? 

Actually, it looks like I did the snipping right, woo hoo.

OOOh, I didn't think about interview for money angle. You may be onto something there.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 10, 2011, 09:52:24 PM
Classic BOZO.

“I don’t have to answer any questions. Who are you?”

He added, “Do you have something to offer my client? It’s a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client.” He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, “You’re lying and being unethical.”


What is he saying the reporter was lying and being unethical about?  I missed that part.  I loved how he called back.  What a dweeb wonderful defense lawyer.  If you don't want to talk to somebody, you hang up and you don't call back.   

I have something to offer him and his client, and I offer it without any comment, for free.  It can be found on either of my hands.....my middle finger.    

Sorry if this has already been addressed, but I'm just catching up. Baez is projecting when he accused the reporter of being unethical.Baez realized he had just made a big boo-boo when he asked what the reporter could do for his client--it being a two-way street. In other words, "You'll have interviews and access to me if you give my client favorable coverage." He then thought, oops what if they print that? And hurriedly called the reporter back to say the convo was off the record. When told it wasn't, he acted in typical juvenile Bozo fashion with name calling: You're lying and unethical. Waaaaa!
PROJECTION!!



Scatty
you hit it right on. It's like you scratch my back I will scratch yours.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 10, 2011, 10:26:37 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

snipped......

When reached last week to respond to the criticism and the management of the case in light of Perry's sanction, Baez said, "I don't have to answer any questions. Who are you?"

He added, "Do you have something to offer my client? It's a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client." He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, "You're lying and being unethical."

He threatened to stop discussing the case altogether, an approach he has at various times taken with other Central Florida reporters.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyLaugh::    ::MonkeyLaugh::

The first hispanic lawyer to try a high profile case either lost his soother or did not spend enough time in the time out corner.  I will assist you Bobo - they say opposites attact.  I sincerely hope you meet somebody who is intelligent, honest, cultured and attractive.



Snipped because that article is so long, but I prob snipped wrong.  Anywho, what could a reporter have to offer his client?  Is he talking money for an interview, is that what Bozo was getting at? 

Actually, it looks like I did the snipping right, woo hoo.

OOOh, I didn't think about interview for money angle. You may be onto something there.

I buy that! It has always seemed to me that Baez was in this for the fame and fortune. He has a huge ego and the skills he tries to muddle through with, just can't feed it.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 10, 2011, 10:34:48 PM
Classic BOZO.

“I don’t have to answer any questions. Who are you?”

He added, “Do you have something to offer my client? It’s a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client.” He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, “You’re lying and being unethical.”


What is he saying the reporter was lying and being unethical about?  I missed that part.  I loved how he called back.  What a dweeb wonderful defense lawyer.  If you don't want to talk to somebody, you hang up and you don't call back.   

I have something to offer him and his client, and I offer it without any comment, for free.  It can be found on either of my hands.....my middle finger.    

Sorry if this has already been addressed, but I'm just catching up. Baez is projecting when he accused the reporter of being unethical.Baez realized he had just made a big boo-boo when he asked what the reporter could do for his client--it being a two-way street. In other words, "You'll have interviews and access to me if you give my client favorable coverage." He then thought, oops what if they print that? And hurriedly called the reporter back to say the convo was off the record. When told it wasn't, he acted in typical juvenile Bozo fashion with name calling: You're lying and unethical. Waaaaa!
PROJECTION!!



Scatty
you hit it right on. It's like you scratch my back I will scratch yours.

And the OS said..... (http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b152/mslaitte/EXPRESSIONS/KISSTHISsilentBLINK.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 10, 2011, 10:36:07 PM
Classic BOZO.

“I don’t have to answer any questions. Who are you?”

He added, “Do you have something to offer my client? It’s a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client.” He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, “You’re lying and being unethical.”


What is he saying the reporter was lying and being unethical about?  I missed that part.  I loved how he called back.  What a dweeb wonderful defense lawyer.  If you don't want to talk to somebody, you hang up and you don't call back.   

I have something to offer him and his client, and I offer it without any comment, for free.  It can be found on either of my hands.....my middle finger.    

Sorry if this has already been addressed, but I'm just catching up. Baez is projecting when he accused the reporter of being unethical.Baez realized he had just made a big boo-boo when he asked what the reporter could do for his client--it being a two-way street. In other words, "You'll have interviews and access to me if you give my client favorable coverage." He then thought, oops what if they print that? And hurriedly called the reporter back to say the convo was off the record. When told it wasn't, he acted in typical juvenile Bozo fashion with name calling: You're lying and unethical. Waaaaa!
PROJECTION!!



Scatty
you hit it right on. It's like you scratch my back I will scratch yours.

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/emoticon-talking-dollar-sign.gif)

LOL!" Money for nothin' and your chicks for free."    (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/020.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 10, 2011, 10:47:35 PM
Classic BOZO.

“I don’t have to answer any questions. Who are you?”

He added, “Do you have something to offer my client? It’s a two-way street. … The door is open if you can assist me or my client.” He hung up the phone, called back minutes later and said that conversation was off the record. Told that the conversation was not, Baez responded by saying, “You’re lying and being unethical.”


What is he saying the reporter was lying and being unethical about?  I missed that part.  I loved how he called back.  What a dweeb wonderful defense lawyer.  If you don't want to talk to somebody, you hang up and you don't call back.   

I have something to offer him and his client, and I offer it without any comment, for free.  It can be found on either of my hands.....my middle finger.    

Sorry if this has already been addressed, but I'm just catching up. Baez is projecting when he accused the reporter of being unethical.Baez realized he had just made a big boo-boo when he asked what the reporter could do for his client--it being a two-way street. In other words, "You'll have interviews and access to me if you give my client favorable coverage." He then thought, oops what if they print that? And hurriedly called the reporter back to say the convo was off the record. When told it wasn't, he acted in typical juvenile Bozo fashion with name calling: You're lying and unethical. Waaaaa!
PROJECTION!!



Scatty
you hit it right on. It's like you scratch my back I will scratch yours.

And the OS said..... (http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b152/mslaitte/EXPRESSIONS/KISSTHISsilentBLINK.gif)


oh how funny!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 10, 2011, 11:53:40 PM
I thought this was interesting. It involves the Anthonys. Very interesting read to say the least.

 it's regarding the anthonys foundation.
http://www.taxexemptworld.com/organization.asp?tn=1716246


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 11, 2011, 04:58:27 AM
Loca, I notice the filing was December of 2009.  It will be interesting to see what they file for 2010.  Thanks for catching this . . .


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 11, 2011, 03:19:18 PM
Loca, I notice the filing was December of 2009.  It will be interesting to see what they file for 2010.  Thanks for catching this . . .



Sister
Your welcome and a top of the day to you.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 03:28:05 PM
I hope TRIMM is ok. I haven't seen her online all day.  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 11, 2011, 03:48:23 PM
I hope TRIMM is ok. I haven't seen her online all day.  ::MonkeyAngel::


I havent seen sunny in texas is she ok


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 11, 2011, 03:54:26 PM
I hope TRIMM is ok. I haven't seen her online all day.  ::MonkeyAngel::

Same here...could be just weather related or loss of service, fingers crossed.  The dumping we got down south is heading up towards my home state & the entire northeast & expected to be another wallop of a storm...just great days before my babygirl, boyfriend & grammie dog are due to fly down for a week.

Isnt it incredible how concerned & acutely aware we are about each other, yes friends of a forum yet strangers face to face but yet we follow countless cases including this one where flesh & blood relatives failed what should have been their constant top priority treasured loved one.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 04:06:08 PM
I hope TRIMM is ok. I haven't seen her online all day.  ::MonkeyAngel::


Hey Fanny.    ::HelloKitty::
(Uncle passed away/family phone calls,etc.Trying to get snow off my deck. )
It is so quiet.I wish we would get some documents.   ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 04:07:21 PM
http://bullstopper.wordpress.com/2011/01/11/is-george-anthony-an-agent-of-the-state-of-florida/
Is George Anthony an Agent of the State of Florida?  01/11/10


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 04:09:27 PM
I hope TRIMM is ok. I haven't seen her online all day.  ::MonkeyAngel::


Hey Fanny.    ::HelloKitty::
(Uncle passed away/family phone calls,etc.Trying to get snow off my deck. )
It is so quiet.I wish we would get some documents.   ::MonkeyTongue::

Oh TRIMM. I am so sorry.  ::MonkeyAngel::

Yes it's been slow.  So you got snow too. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/snowshovel-1.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 04:13:49 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/11/2011           Notice of Taking Deposition(s)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 11, 2011, 04:52:04 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/11/2011           Notice of Taking Deposition(s)
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234

01/11/2011           Motion
Defendant's; for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting State's Motion for Sanctions/Motion to Compel and Request to Vacate Finding of Contempt

Sorry to hear about your Uncle, Trimm.  Hugs and prayers for you. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 05:05:28 PM
I want to see that motion.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 05:10:32 PM
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html
Casey Defense Asks For Reconsideration Of Sanctions
Jose Baez Had Until Today To Contest Fine

POSTED: 4:55 pm EST January 11, 2011
UPDATED: 5:00 pm EST January 11, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team has filed a motion asking for Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider his order that sanctioned the defense and levied a fine of more than $500.

On Jan. 6, Perry issued an order that said the defense had committed a willful violation of a court order by not submitting proper documentation of the subject matter of what its experts would testify to when the murder trial begins in May.

In that order, Perry fined the defense $583.73. That cost was the state's estimate of costs for filing the motion that asked for sanctions. Baez had until Monday to contest the amount or until Wednesday to pay the court.

Perry's order said that the defense had 10 days as of Jan. 6 to submit the report from one of its expert witnesses, Dr. Kenneth Furton, and 20 daysfor the remaining experts.

Perry said that all opinions not expressed in the written reports will not be allowed at the trial.Prosecutor Jeff Ashton had suggested that Jose Baez be sanctioned with civil contempt and be fined $500 per day for not complying with the court.

The defense's filing on Tuesday also asks for the court to vacate a finding of contempt.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Gizzie on January 11, 2011, 05:17:45 PM
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html
Casey Defense Asks For Reconsideration Of Sanctions
Jose Baez Had Until Today To Contest Fine

POSTED: 4:55 pm EST January 11, 2011
UPDATED: 5:00 pm EST January 11, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team has filed a motion asking for Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider his order that sanctioned the defense and levied a fine of more than $500.

On Jan. 6, Perry issued an order that said the defense had committed a willful violation of a court order by not submitting proper documentation of the subject matter of what its experts would testify to when the murder trial begins in May.

In that order, Perry fined the defense $583.73. That cost was the state's estimate of costs for filing the motion that asked for sanctions. Baez had until Monday to contest the amount or until Wednesday to pay the court.

Perry's order said that the defense had 10 days as of Jan. 6 to submit the report from one of its expert witnesses, Dr. Kenneth Furton, and 20 daysfor the remaining experts.

Perry said that all opinions not expressed in the written reports will not be allowed at the trial.Prosecutor Jeff Ashton had suggested that Jose Baez be sanctioned with civil contempt and be fined $500 per day for not complying with the court.

The defense's filing on Tuesday also asks for the court to vacate a finding of contempt.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.

BBM

And this is exactly how Bozo works!. Hope this one gets a big red denied as well just for being late, AGAIN!  ::MonkeyNoNo::

5 more days for those reports you knucklehead! Perhaps you should be working on that instead?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Gizzie on January 11, 2011, 05:24:40 PM
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html

This fixed the date to Tuesday, but still, Bozo waited to the last possible day!  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Casey Defense Asks For Reconsideration Of Sanctions
Jose Baez Had Until Today To Contest Fine


ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team has filed a motion asking for Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider his order that sanctioned the defense and levied a fine of more than $500.

On Jan. 6, Perry issued an order that said the defense had committed a willful violation of a court order by not submitting proper documentation of the subject matter of what its experts would testify to when the murder trial begins in May.

In that order, Perry fined the defense $583.73. That cost was the state's estimate of costs for filing the motion that asked for sanctions. Baez had until Tuesday to contest the amount or until Thursday to pay the court.

Perry's order said that the defense had 10 days as of Jan. 6 to submit the report from one of its expert witnesses, Dr. Kenneth Furton, and 20 days for the remaining experts.

Perry said that all opinions not expressed in the written reports will not be allowed at the trial.


Prosecutor Jeff Ashton had suggested that Jose Baez be sanctioned with civil contempt and be fined $500 per day for not complying with the court.

The defense's filing on Tuesday also asks for the court to vacate a finding of contempt.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 05:25:43 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/11/2011 Transaction Assessment 19.00
01/11/2011 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2011-02419 ANTHONY, CASEY MARIE (19.00)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 11, 2011, 05:34:54 PM
I want to see that motion.  ::MonkeyCool::

I just have a feeling that THe Jar wrote this motion. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 11, 2011, 05:36:09 PM
O/T Sorry for the loss of your Uncle, Trimmy.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Gizzie on January 11, 2011, 05:38:10 PM
O/T Sorry for the loss of your Uncle, Trimmy.

I am also sorry Trimm  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 11, 2011, 05:40:25 PM
I hope TRIMM is ok. I haven't seen her online all day.  ::MonkeyAngel::


I havent seen sunny in texas is she ok

OT:

Name:    SunnyinTX
Posts:    19366 (11.272 per day)
Position:    Monkey Mega Star
Date Registered:    April 28, 2006, 09:15:22 PM
Last Active:    January 06, 2011, 08:20:29 AM

That's a long time for Sunny not to sign in or post.  I hope things are okay.   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 11, 2011, 05:42:42 PM
eek, it sure is.

We DeMaNd a DoC DuMp! Something new that we do not already know.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 05:43:04 PM
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html
Casey Defense Asks For Reconsideration Of Sanctions
Jose Baez Had Until Today To Contest Fine

POSTED: 4:55 pm EST January 11, 2011
UPDATED: 5:00 pm EST January 11, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team has filed a motion asking for Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider his order that sanctioned the defense and levied a fine of more than $500.

On Jan. 6, Perry issued an order that said the defense had committed a willful violation of a court order by not submitting proper documentation of the subject matter of what its experts would testify to when the murder trial begins in May.

In that order, Perry fined the defense $583.73. That cost was the state's estimate of costs for filing the motion that asked for sanctions. Baez had until Monday to contest the amount or until Wednesday to pay the court.

Perry's order said that the defense had 10 days as of Jan. 6 to submit the report from one of its expert witnesses, Dr. Kenneth Furton, and 20 daysfor the remaining experts.

Perry said that all opinions not expressed in the written reports will not be allowed at the trial.Prosecutor Jeff Ashton had suggested that Jose Baez be sanctioned with civil contempt and be fined $500 per day for not complying with the court.

The defense's filing on Tuesday also asks for the court to vacate a finding of contempt.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.

How thick headed is Bozo? You would think he would quietly pay the court and try to finish his depos and reports. What does he think Judge Perry is going to do? Say "Never mind?"


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 11, 2011, 05:47:25 PM
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html
Casey Defense Asks For Reconsideration Of Sanctions
Jose Baez Had Until Today To Contest Fine

POSTED: 4:55 pm EST January 11, 2011
UPDATED: 5:00 pm EST January 11, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team has filed a motion asking for Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider his order that sanctioned the defense and levied a fine of more than $500.

On Jan. 6, Perry issued an order that said the defense had committed a willful violation of a court order by not submitting proper documentation of the subject matter of what its experts would testify to when the murder trial begins in May.

In that order, Perry fined the defense $583.73. That cost was the state's estimate of costs for filing the motion that asked for sanctions. Baez had until Monday to contest the amount or until Wednesday to pay the court.

Perry's order said that the defense had 10 days as of Jan. 6 to submit the report from one of its expert witnesses, Dr. Kenneth Furton, and 20 daysfor the remaining experts.

Perry said that all opinions not expressed in the written reports will not be allowed at the trial.Prosecutor Jeff Ashton had suggested that Jose Baez be sanctioned with civil contempt and be fined $500 per day for not complying with the court.

The defense's filing on Tuesday also asks for the court to vacate a finding of contempt.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.

How thick headed is Bozo? You would think he would quietly pay the court and try to finish his depos and reports. What does he think Judge Perry is going to do? Say "Never mind?


It's certainly going to be interesting to see what happens.  With Baez, I don't think anything is easy.  Enough of the BS from the defense. JMHO


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 05:49:04 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-jose-baez-sanction-appeal-20110111,0,4602564.story
Attorney Jose Baez motions court to reconsider his fine and punishment
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel

5:18 p.m. EST, January 11, 2011
os-jose-baez-sanction-appeal-20110111

Casey Anthony attorney Jose Baez has filed a lengthy motion asking the court to reconsider the sanction imposed against him last week for failing to turn over discovery information to the prosecution.

Baez was hit with the sanction early last week and ordered to pay the state $583.73 in prosecutor's fees for bringing the discovery violation issue to the court and arguing the case.

Baez represents Casey Anthony, 24, who is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee Marie in 2008. Casey Anthony is scheduled to go to trial in May. She faces the death penalty if convicted.

This is a breaking news story. Check back for more details.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 06:13:00 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 11, 2011, 06:14:52 PM
Pathetic excuse for a Lawyer and a man!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 06:16:09 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26455776/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Files Motion Fighting Sanctions
Posted: 5:59 pm EST January 11, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Late Tuesday afternoon, in the case against Casey Anthony, WFTV obtained the 12-page motion (read it) Casey Anthony's attorney, Jose Baez, filed asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against him.

READ:  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html
In court last week, Baez was ordered to give prosecutors more information about defense experts. Baez now owes $583 in fines.

The money reimburses the state for the motion prosecutors wrote demanding Baez be punished for failing to comply.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 06:17:27 PM
Pathetic excuse for a Lawyer and a man!

I think so too Nut.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 11, 2011, 06:43:02 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

Already 1 expert has jumped ship.....Dr. Michael Freeman (epidemiologist)
 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 11, 2011, 06:44:04 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

Already 1 expert has jumped ship.....Dr. Michael Freeman (epidemiologist)
 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Sorry, forgot to add.....page 10 of Bozo's motion


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 11, 2011, 07:17:04 PM
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html
Casey Defense Asks For Reconsideration Of Sanctions
Jose Baez Had Until Today To Contest Fine

POSTED: 4:55 pm EST January 11, 2011
UPDATED: 5:00 pm EST January 11, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team has filed a motion asking for Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider his order that sanctioned the defense and levied a fine of more than $500.

On Jan. 6, Perry issued an order that said the defense had committed a willful violation of a court order by not submitting proper documentation of the subject matter of what its experts would testify to when the murder trial begins in May.

In that order, Perry fined the defense $583.73. That cost was the state's estimate of costs for filing the motion that asked for sanctions. Baez had until Monday to contest the amount or until Wednesday to pay the court.

Perry's order said that the defense had 10 days as of Jan. 6 to submit the report from one of its expert witnesses, Dr. Kenneth Furton, and 20 daysfor the remaining experts.

Perry said that all opinions not expressed in the written reports will not be allowed at the trial.Prosecutor Jeff Ashton had suggested that Jose Baez be sanctioned with civil contempt and be fined $500 per day for not complying with the court.

The defense's filing on Tuesday also asks for the court to vacate a finding of contempt.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.

They just do not know when to stop pushing - and its not like its a fortune which Bozo should consider himself lucky.   IMHO, he's more concerned that the Florida State Bar Association cited his sanction in their news releases...as he should be, then again he should have thought about that ions ago.

Trimm, so sorry to hear about your uncle, prayers & thoughts to you and your family.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 07:19:08 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

Already 1 expert has jumped ship.....Dr. Michael Freeman (epidemiologist)
 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Sorry, forgot to add.....page 10 of Bozo's motion

"The saga begins as follows" (page 1)
Seriously,they should both have the chit slapped out of them.   ::MonkeyCool:: IMO


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 07:24:42 PM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/193179?cmpid=twitter
Casey Anthony defense experts offer evidence Caylee’s remains were moved
By Adam Longo, Reporter
Last Updated: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:13 PM
ORLANDO --

Lawyers defending Casey Anthony are finally revealing why they believe 2-year-old Caylee Anthony’s remains were moved from their original location.

In court papers filed late Tuesday, defense attorneys indicate one of their experts will testify about Caylee’s remains and how his findings are inconsistent with the theory of the prosecution.
               
News 13 will have more on this story later tonight.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Scatty on January 11, 2011, 07:26:00 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26455776/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Files Motion Fighting Sanctions
Posted: 5:59 pm EST January 11, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Late Tuesday afternoon, in the case against Casey Anthony, WFTV obtained the 12-page motion (read it) Casey Anthony's attorney, Jose Baez, filed asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against him.

READ:  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html
In court last week, Baez was ordered to give prosecutors more information about defense experts. Baez now owes $583 in fines.

The money reimburses the state for the motion prosecutors wrote demanding Baez be punished for failing to comply.

That twerp is almost more twisted than his client! His arrogance is just foolhardy in this instance, but of course he's too dense to realize it. I wonder how Judge Perry is going to handle this deliberate flouting of his ruling. Can't wait to find out!  ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 11, 2011, 07:26:34 PM
Thanks monkeys for your kind words.  ::MonkeyAngel::
See you in the morning.   ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 11, 2011, 07:27:19 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

Already 1 expert has jumped ship.....Dr. Michael Freeman (epidemiologist)
 ::MonkeyHaHa::





Sorry, forgot to add.....page 10 of Bozo's motion

Ive anticipated that a few more may drop out.   Obviously, Bozo has been trying to conceal that all total he doesnt have much of anything to defend Casey with.   Now, does that mean he's having difficulty getting a doc to say Caylee's remain findings & Casey's behavior are correlated....yup, I think so.
http://library.thinkquest.org/15569/car1bch1.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 11, 2011, 07:39:11 PM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/193179?cmpid=twitter
Casey Anthony defense experts offer evidence Caylee’s remains were moved
By Adam Longo, Reporter
Last Updated: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:13 PM
ORLANDO --

Lawyers defending Casey Anthony are finally revealing why they believe 2-year-old Caylee Anthony’s remains were moved from their original location.

In court papers filed late Tuesday, defense attorneys indicate one of their experts will testify about Caylee’s remains and how his findings are inconsistent with the theory of the prosecution.
               
News 13 will have more on this story later tonight.



And that Dr. will appear as the fool he is because the plant & bug life say otherwise substantially.   But then again, the more he pushes this issue the more it will look like her family helped her after the fact i.e. DC in those woods in November, a mere 2-3 weeks before the remains were found pretty much right there...keep going Bozo, you putz!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 11, 2011, 07:49:07 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

Already 1 expert has jumped ship.....Dr. Michael Freeman (epidemiologist)
 ::MonkeyHaHa::





Sorry, forgot to add.....page 10 of Bozo's motion

Ive anticipated that a few more may drop out.   Obviously, Bozo has been trying to conceal that all total he doesnt have much of anything to defend Casey with.   Now, does that mean he's having difficulty getting a doc to say Caylee's remain findings & Casey's behavior are correlated....yup, I think so.
http://library.thinkquest.org/15569/car1bch1.html
Henry Lee also may not be needed.  ::MonkeyRoll::

He is gonna sing that song all the way to the end about, the State can do this and the State can do that.......and traffic stopped him, THIS time, from filing on time yet he doesn't file this motion ON time?  LOL and LOL Jose!  Where is that wammmmbulance?

About the statement made about Dr. G not cutting the skull......How important is this, especially in regard to the soil/dirt found inside?  Does that have more bearing on how long the skull was there and I'm assuming it is the same soil type?  Or is this just part of the "sloppy work" defense tactic?



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 11, 2011, 07:59:13 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

Already 1 expert has jumped ship.....Dr. Michael Freeman (epidemiologist)
 ::MonkeyHaHa::





Sorry, forgot to add.....page 10 of Bozo's motion

Ive anticipated that a few more may drop out.   Obviously, Bozo has been trying to conceal that all total he doesnt have much of anything to defend Casey with.   Now, does that mean he's having difficulty getting a doc to say Caylee's remain findings & Casey's behavior are correlated....yup, I think so.
http://library.thinkquest.org/15569/car1bch1.html
Henry Lee also may not be needed.  ::MonkeyRoll::

He is gonna sing that song all the way to the end about, the State can do this and the State can do that.......and traffic stopped him, THIS time, from filing on time yet he doesn't file this motion ON time?  LOL and LOL Jose!  Where is that wammmmbulance?

About the statement made about Dr. G not cutting the skull......How important is this, especially in regard to the soil/dirt found inside?  Does that have more bearing on how long the skull was there and I'm assuming it is the same soil type?  Or is this just part of the "sloppy work" defense tactic?



I read that on pg 5 and was posting but something happened while I was typing & my google chrome shut down...ugh.   Guess they dont want to risk Dr Lee being asked if he met with Cindy or anyone from Casey's family to get hairs off of a brush (ahem).  Additionally, maybe they dont want him to be put to the wall by the prosecution on cross when they bring up Dr Lee's previous admonishments for tampering/altering evidence.  He also had to interject his sarcasm again about the defense being told on Dec 12th they would not be permitted onto the remains recovery site.   The way Bozo worded it its as if Dr. Lee asked for permission personally, idiot!  They showed up to Suburban Dr despite the court order they were all well aware of with Geraldo in place to record their angst in an attempt to fuel the public with outrage that was NOT merited.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 08:10:07 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

Already 1 expert has jumped ship.....Dr. Michael Freeman (epidemiologist)
 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Sorry, forgot to add.....page 10 of Bozo's motion
|

I guess Dr Freeman's report agreed with the State expert.  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 11, 2011, 08:11:48 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 08:16:58 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.

Looks like he is defending himself a lot more vigorously that we have seen him defend Skanky. He probably even broke a sweat getting this all together.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 08:21:15 PM
Baez Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

Already 1 expert has jumped ship.....Dr. Michael Freeman (epidemiologist)
 ::MonkeyHaHa::





Sorry, forgot to add.....page 10 of Bozo's motion

Ive anticipated that a few more may drop out.   Obviously, Bozo has been trying to conceal that all total he doesnt have much of anything to defend Casey with.   Now, does that mean he's having difficulty getting a doc to say Caylee's remain findings & Casey's behavior are correlated....yup, I think so.
http://library.thinkquest.org/15569/car1bch1.html
Henry Lee also may not be needed.  ::MonkeyRoll::

He is gonna sing that song all the way to the end about, the State can do this and the State can do that.......and traffic stopped him, THIS time, from filing on time yet he doesn't file this motion ON time?  LOL and LOL Jose!  Where is that wammmmbulance?

About the statement made about Dr. G not cutting the skull......How important is this, especially in regard to the soil/dirt found inside?  Does that have more bearing on how long the skull was there and I'm assuming it is the same soil type?  Or is this just part of the "sloppy work" defense tactic?



Did somebody call for the wammmmmmmmbulance? (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/wambulance.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 11, 2011, 08:23:14 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.

Looks like he is defending himself a lot more vigorously that we have seen him defend Skanky. He probably even broke a sweat getting this all together.

Tru dat, but he's also a coward cuz he had Colonel Crusty author and/or sign the motion.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 11, 2011, 08:23:30 PM
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/11/2011           Notice of Taking Deposition(s)
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234

01/11/2011           Motion
Defendant's; for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting State's Motion for Sanctions/Motion to Compel and Request to Vacate Finding of Contempt

Sorry to hear about your Uncle, Trimm.  Hugs and prayers for you. 


My condolences, Trimm.

Oy, I can't believe he's going to fight this. What a BOZO.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 08:27:20 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.

Looks like he is defending himself a lot more vigorously that we have seen him defend Skanky. He probably even broke a sweat getting this all together.

Tru dat, but he's also a coward cuz he had Colonel Crusty author and/or sign the motion.

I'm guessing Papa is going to argue the motion for sonny.   ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 11, 2011, 08:47:31 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.

Looks like he is defending himself a lot more vigorously that we have seen him defend Skanky. He probably even broke a sweat getting this all together.

Tru dat, but he's also a coward cuz he had Colonel Crusty author and/or sign the motion.

I'm guessing Papa is going to argue the motion for sonny.   ::MonkeyTongue::

Bozo couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 11, 2011, 08:51:44 PM
I am in a real hurry, so cannot stay, so I am posting and running, but i had to comment.

What a putz.  Asking for the judge to take back his big bad sanction.  Has any lawyer ever done this before?  I cannot imaigine JP will be too receptive.  What are his grounds for wanting the judge to wipe this off the record? 

Secondly, the scull not being cut?  I didn't read the motion, but will later, but a skull is wide open is it not?  Why would one need to cut it? 

Dr. G, i do not believe has ever even had a questionable autopsy.  Who is he getting to find otherwise. 

Be back later.

 Trimm I am sorry about your uncle. 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 08:56:43 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.

Looks like he is defending himself a lot more vigorously that we have seen him defend Skanky. He probably even broke a sweat getting this all together.

Tru dat, but he's also a coward cuz he had Colonel Crusty author and/or sign the motion.

I'm guessing Papa is going to argue the motion for sonny.   ::MonkeyTongue::

Bozo couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag! ::MonkeyTongue::

I can hardly wait to see Judge Perry's leg start jiggling, and he purses his lips, and gives that cold hard stare when Jar Head starts talking. If Mason had any sense he would be afraid. I can't wait for the hearing date to be posted. I'm already ready.  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/smiley-eatdrink033.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: cookie on January 11, 2011, 08:58:07 PM
right there with ya Fanny! lol...


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 11, 2011, 09:04:24 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.

Looks like he is defending himself a lot more vigorously that we have seen him defend Skanky. He probably even broke a sweat getting this all together.

Tru dat, but he's also a coward cuz he had Colonel Crusty author and/or sign the motion.

I'm guessing Papa is going to argue the motion for sonny.   ::MonkeyTongue::

Bozo couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag! ::MonkeyTongue::

I can hardly wait to see Judge Perry's leg start jiggling, and he purses his lips, and gives that cold hard stare when Jar Head starts talking. If Mason had any sense he would be afraid. I can't wait for the hearing date to be posted. I'm already ready.  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/smiley-eatdrink033.gif)





Oh how funny!! I knew it!! I was waiting for the ax to fall and now I am waiting for poop to hit the fan!!! on friday!!! Omg I cannot believe his ignorance!! my my why didnt the idiot just pay up!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 11, 2011, 09:05:20 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.

Looks like he is defending himself a lot more vigorously that we have seen him defend Skanky. He probably even broke a sweat getting this all together.

Tru dat, but he's also a coward cuz he had Colonel Crusty author and/or sign the motion.

I'm guessing Papa is going to argue the motion for sonny.   ::MonkeyTongue::

Bozo couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag! ::MonkeyTongue::

I can hardly wait to see Judge Perry's leg start jiggling, and he purses his lips, and gives that cold hard stare when Jar Head starts talking. If Mason had any sense he would be afraid. I can't wait for the hearing date to be posted. I'm already ready.  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/smiley-eatdrink033.gif)





Oh how funny!! I knew it!! I was waiting for the ax to fall and now I am waiting for poop to hit the fan!!! on friday!!! Omg I cannot believe his ignorance!! my my why didnt the idiot just pay up!!!




p.s
that iggnerent fool just love's defiance and drama!! he has no boundaries he is out of control he needs prosak!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 11, 2011, 09:06:43 PM
All that motion showed me is that Bozo is attempting to scold the judge for jumping the gun & blaming the prosecution of misrepresentation of "the facts."   He is rewriting history & we can anticipate him being admonished AGAIN.   Bozo is a legend in his own mind & CJBP is NOT going to take to kindly to him suggesting to the court that they did not consider all the facts or missed facts in making its ruling.   Now look, if Bozo had a valid point in his defense during the hearing, that was the time to point out any discrepancies or omissions in what was presented before the judge...this is not going to fly either.

He's whining like a temper tantrum toddler & as far as his record goes, he should have been worried about what the bar thought of him a decade ago.

Looks like he is defending himself a lot more vigorously that we have seen him defend Skanky. He probably even broke a sweat getting this all together.

Tru dat, but he's also a coward cuz he had Colonel Crusty author and/or sign the motion.

I'm guessing Papa is going to argue the motion for sonny.   ::MonkeyTongue::

Bozo couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag! ::MonkeyTongue::

I can hardly wait to see Judge Perry's leg start jiggling, and he purses his lips, and gives that cold hard stare when Jar Head starts talking. If Mason had any sense he would be afraid. I can't wait for the hearing date to be posted. I'm already ready.  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/smiley-eatdrink033.gif)





Oh how funny!! I knew it!! I was waiting for the ax to fall and now I am waiting for poop to hit the fan!!! on friday!!! Omg I cannot believe his ignorance!! my my why didnt the idiot just pay up!!!




p.s
that iggnerent fool just love's defiance and drama!! he has no boundaries he is out of control he needs prosak!!


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 09:13:56 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!


LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: 4 Donks on January 11, 2011, 09:28:49 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!


LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?

Did I misunderstand. I thought he had 5 days to object to the amount of money..not the entire ruling.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 11, 2011, 09:34:52 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!
at the HinkyMeter

LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?

Did I misunderstand. I thought he had 5 days to object to the amount of money..not the entire ruling.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 09:37:44 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!
at the HinkyMeter

LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?

Did I misunderstand. I thought he had 5 days to object to the amount of money..not the entire ruling.


Ok, thanks!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 11, 2011, 09:38:33 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!
at the HinkyMeter

LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?

Did I misunderstand. I thought he had 5 days to object to the amount of money..not the entire ruling.


Here it is I went and snipped it

regarding the hearing

Snipped: A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.

Read more:
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 11, 2011, 09:38:38 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!


LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?

Did I misunderstand. I thought he had 5 days to object to the amount of money..not the entire ruling.

You did not misunderstand.  He had 5 days to object to the amount.  Somehow it got translated in Bobo world to objecting to the whole ruling.  Surprised they are not taking this one step further and asking for the day to be ignored in it's entirety and wiped from every calendar under one of their constitutional rights.  I am waiting for them to ask JP to step down and for Stan to come back next. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 09:38:45 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!


LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?

Did I misunderstand. I thought he had 5 days to object to the amount of money..not the entire ruling.

I thought so too. I guess Bozo took this real personal.   ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 09:40:04 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!
at the HinkyMeter

LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?

Did I misunderstand. I thought he had 5 days to object to the amount of money..not the entire ruling.


Here it is I went and snipped it

regarding the hearing

Snipped: A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.

Read more:
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html


Thanks again, LOCA. I guess I better clear my calendar.  ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 09:41:19 PM


We will be singing here comes the judge on friday!!! oh wow ow is all I can say!! will skanky be there??/
 judges leg is gonna be twitchin at the same rate as cindys gum chewing!!


LOCA, where did you see the hearing date?

Did I misunderstand. I thought he had 5 days to object to the amount of money..not the entire ruling.

You did not misunderstand.  He had 5 days to object to the amount.  Somehow it got translated in Bobo world to objecting to the whole ruling.  Surprised they are not taking this one step further and asking for the day to be ignored in it's entirety and wiped from every calendar under one of their constitutional rights.  I am waiting for them to ask JP to step down and for Stan to come back next. 

So true. Bozo and company should be careful what they wish for.  ::piggy::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 11, 2011, 09:42:28 PM
pg 11 - No 11  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

...Clearly , the information provided and the additional information included in this supplemental disclosure are more than sufficient for an experienced senior lawyer like Mr. Ashton to take complete and meaningful depositions.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 11, 2011, 09:43:41 PM
Oh my stars!  I go out to dinner with friends, and come back to Baez and the Jar scaling new heights of stupidity!  This isn't just objecting to the sanctions, this is an inefficient dueling glove aime at the Honorable Judge Perry.   But go ahead, Baez, your ego and pride are seriously getting in the way of any type of legal career you might have had.  As for Mason, I get a distinct feeling that this case and how he's mishandling it, is a big FU to the powers that be in Orlando.  I hope that Judge P. administers a Major Stooge Slap on Friday.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Babybear on January 11, 2011, 09:51:30 PM
Oh my stars!  I go out to dinner with friends, and come back to Baez and the Jar scaling new heights of stupidity!  This isn't just objecting to the sanctions, this is an inefficient dueling glove aime at the Honorable Judge Perry.   But go ahead, Baez, your ego and pride are seriously getting in the way of any type of legal career you might have had.  As for Mason, I get a distinct feeling that this case and how he's mishandling it, is a big FU to the powers that be in Orlando.  I hope that Judge P. administers a Major Stooge Slap on Friday.

I agree with you, Monkalicious, except I didn't go out to dinner.  I'm snowed in.  About 8 inches and expecting more tonight.  Global warming is a b**ch.

I think it's funny that Baez seems to think that these sanctions besmirch his character and cast doubt on his abilities as an attorney.  This is a man who sold Brazilian bikinis, didn't pay child support, didn't repay loans, took eight years to be admitted to practice not to mention the mysterious recent sex seminar and this besmirches his good name? 
Jose, Jose, Jose, Honey, you're already besmirched, bothered and bewildered.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 09:53:33 PM
pg 11 - No 11  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

...Clearly , the information provided and the additional information included in this supplemental disclosure are more than sufficient for an experienced senior lawyer like Mr. Ashton to take complete and meaningful depositions.



I can't copy from the posted PDF, but on the same page and same #11 I see where he is saying the Judge is mistaken about the payment to the experts. I see a major blow up. I will be very disappointed if we don't see two defense lawyers running for their lives. (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/haironfire.gif)(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/haironfire.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 11, 2011, 10:00:28 PM
Oh my stars!  I go out to dinner with friends, and come back to Baez and the Jar scaling new heights of stupidity!  This isn't just objecting to the sanctions, this is an inefficient dueling glove aime at the Honorable Judge Perry.   But go ahead, Baez, your ego and pride are seriously getting in the way of any type of legal career you might have had.  As for Mason, I get a distinct feeling that this case and how he's mishandling it, is a big FU to the powers that be in Orlando.  I hope that Judge P. administers a Major Stooge Slap on Friday.

I agree with you, Monkalicious, except I didn't go out to dinner.  I'm snowed in.  About 8 inches and expecting more tonight.  Global warming is a b**ch.

I think it's funny that Baez seems to think that these sanctions besmirch his character and cast doubt on his abilities as an attorney.  This is a man who sold Brazilian bikinis, didn't pay child support, didn't repay loans, took eight years to be admitted to practice not to mention the mysterious recent sex seminar and this besmirches his good name? 
Jose, Jose, Jose, Honey, you're already besmirched, bothered and bewildered.
::MonkeyDevil::
He is a legend in his own mind.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2011, 10:25:24 AM
A 15 MINUTE SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE LAST NIGHT TURNED INTO 12 HOURS.  SORRY ABOUT THE DOWNTIME.  EVERYTHING SHOULD BE OK NOW.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2011, 10:25:40 AM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-wftv-legal-analyst-blasts-new-defense-motion.html
Casey Anthony: WFTV legal analyst blasts new defense motion
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 8:46 AM
Discuss This: Comments(27) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it
What about Casey Anthony’s defense fighting sanctions against Jose Baez?

The motion, filed late Tuesday by Anthony attorney Cheney Mason, came in for blunt criticism from WFTV-Channel 9 legal analyst Bill Sheaffer last night.

In a report by WFTV’s Kenneth Moton, Sheaffer saw Mason’s motion as more semantics than substance. Mason wrote that statements by Chief Judge Belvin Perry — in citing Baez for willfully violating court rules and fining Baez nearly $600 — were inaccurate and confused.

Sheaffer predicted that Perry wouldn’t be happy about the motion and would deny it.

Sheaffer offered advice to the defense: “Accept the sanction. Move on. Learn from it. And make sure you don’t repeat that mistake.”

Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter, Caylee. The trial is scheduled to begin in May.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2011, 10:28:32 AM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/193179/Casey-Anthony-team-offers-evidence-Caylee%E2%80%99s-remains-were-moved
Casey Anthony team offers evidence Caylee’s remains were moved
By Adam Longo, Reporter
Last Updated: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:19 AM
ORLANDO --

Lawyers defending Casey Anthony are finally revealing why they believe 2-year-old Caylee Anthony’s remains were moved from their original location.

In court papers filed late Tuesday, the defense team is going into greater detail on what their experts will testify about.
   
One of those experts, Dr. Werner Spitz, will testify that his autopsy on Caylee shows her remains had been placed on the ground on their left side.

However, her remains were found facing upwards, according to the defense.

The defense team contends Caylee's remains were placed in the woods after Casey had been indicted and jailed.

The defense is also asking the judge to reconsider an order placing financial sanctions on the defense team.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2011, 10:34:05 AM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26455776/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Files Motion Fighting Sanctions
Posted: 5:59 pm EST January 11, 2011Updated: 10:14 am EST January 12, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team is fighting sanctions against its lead attorney. Attorney Cheney Mason filed a motion Tuesday, asking the judge to reconsider his decision to fine Jose Baez.
Read: http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html
Legal Analyst Bill Sheaffer said Casey's attorneys just needed to focus on her defense. Sheaffer said a lot of manpower went into Tuesday's motion, which asks Chief Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider a ruling he has already made.

The work could have gone to preparing for Anthony's defense when she goes on trial for her daughter Caylee Anthony's murder.

At a Casey hearing last week, Judge Perry was very clear that Baez intentionally violated court rules by not turning over detailed reports on his expert witnesses. A few days later, he was fined $583.

However, that ruling wasn't clear enough for Mason, who filed the motion to reconsider.

"In examining the motion, it appears to be more semantics over substance," Sheaffer said.

Mason's motion claims Perry didn't fully understand some key details in the arguments and said certain statements made by the judge were false.

Sheaffer said a tough-talking, no-nonsense judge like Perry will not be happy.

"No, I don't think the judge is going to be pleased to see this motion and I expect he's just going to deny the motion," Sheaffer said
Perry told Baez he could only argue the amount of his fine, which is basically court costs. But Sheaffer said it appears Casey's attorneys are wasting time re-arguing the entire motion instead of focusing on her defense.

"Accept the sanctions, move on, learn from it and make sure you don't repeat the mistake," he said. Baez has until the end of the month to get the rest of the reports on his expert witnesses in. If he doesn't, he's facing a contempt charge and a daily fine of $500.
CASEY HEARINGS SET; DEFENSE MOTION DENIED

New hearings have been scheduled for defense motions to suppress key prosecution evidence against Casey Anthony in her upcoming murder trial in May.
On March 2 and March 3, the defense will try to convince the judge to throw out evidence that cadaver dogs alerted to different spots in Casey's backyard. It also wants to throw out Casey's statements to her family, her jail pen pals, and to law enforcement.

Meanwhile, Casey's defense team was dealt another blow to the case Friday. Chief Judge Belvin Perry denied the defense request to seal the names of the death penalty witnesses and the information they provide.

The defense claimed the potential public exposure is preventing people from helping Casey avoid a death sentence if she's convicted of murdering her daughter Caylee.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 10:36:02 AM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/193179/Casey-Anthony-team-offers-evidence-Caylee%E2%80%99s-remains-were-moved
Casey Anthony team offers evidence Caylee’s remains were moved
By Adam Longo, Reporter
Last Updated: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:19 AM
ORLANDO --

Lawyers defending Casey Anthony are finally revealing why they believe 2-year-old Caylee Anthony’s remains were moved from their original location.

In court papers filed late Tuesday, the defense team is going into greater detail on what their experts will testify about.
   
One of those experts, Dr. Werner Spitz, will testify that his autopsy on Caylee shows her remains had been placed on the ground on their left side.

However, her remains were found facing upwards, according to the defense.

The defense team contends Caylee's remains were placed in the woods after Casey had been indicted and jailed.

The defense is also asking the judge to reconsider an order placing financial sanctions on the defense team.


Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 10:45:48 AM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/193179/Casey-Anthony-team-offers-evidence-Caylee%E2%80%99s-remains-were-moved
Casey Anthony team offers evidence Caylee’s remains were moved
By Adam Longo, Reporter
Last Updated: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:19 AM
ORLANDO --

Lawyers defending Casey Anthony are finally revealing why they believe 2-year-old Caylee Anthony’s remains were moved from their original location.

In court papers filed late Tuesday, the defense team is going into greater detail on what their experts will testify about.
   
One of those experts, Dr. Werner Spitz, will testify that his autopsy on Caylee shows her remains had been placed on the ground on their left side.

However, her remains were found facing upwards, according to the defense.

The defense team contends Caylee's remains were placed in the woods after Casey had been indicted and jailed.

The defense is also asking the judge to reconsider an order placing financial sanctions on the defense team.


Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”




Found this at the caylee daily
interesting info



http://www.cayleedaily.com/
regarding the hearing on friday.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 12, 2011, 10:56:14 AM
Hey, Monkeys, got caught in the maintenance black hole, but am able to post now.  All I can do is quote from a Pete Seeger song:


It'll be a little soggy but just keep slogging.
We'll soon be on dry ground."
We were -- waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool said to push on.


More lyrics: http://www.lyricsmania.com/waist_deep_in_the_big_muddy_lyrics_pete_seeger.html
All about Pete Seeger: http://www.musictory.com/music/Pete+Seeger
The Big Fool(s)--Mason and Baez, talk about your perfect storm of incompetence, arrogance and stupidity!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2011, 11:06:24 AM
I thought you all pack up and moved without me.   ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 12, 2011, 11:08:34 AM
Hey, Monkeys, got caught in the maintenance black hole, but am able to post now.  All I can do is quote from a Pete Seeger song:


It'll be a little soggy but just keep slogging.
We'll soon be on dry ground."
We were -- waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool said to push on.


More lyrics: http://www.lyricsmania.com/waist_deep_in_the_big_muddy_lyrics_pete_seeger.html
All about Pete Seeger: http://www.musictory.com/music/Pete+Seeger
The Big Fool(s)--Mason and Baez, talk about your perfect storm of incompetence, arrogance and stupidity!
I had held out some hope that mason jar held at least one shred of sanity . . . he has now proven to me, he has been sucked in.  Don't they understand when you surround yourself with only people who echo what you want to hear, even if it is a lie(s), it will become your reality even if it is fartherest from the truth!  Somebody needs to give them a tank full of reality . . . unfortunately, if His Honor does it they will be very, very sorry IMO.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 12, 2011, 11:13:12 AM
Hey, Monkeys, got caught in the maintenance black hole, but am able to post now.  All I can do is quote from a Pete Seeger song:


It'll be a little soggy but just keep slogging.
We'll soon be on dry ground."
We were -- waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool said to push on.


More lyrics: http://www.lyricsmania.com/waist_deep_in_the_big_muddy_lyrics_pete_seeger.html
All about Pete Seeger: http://www.musictory.com/music/Pete+Seeger
The Big Fool(s)--Mason and Baez, talk about your perfect storm of incompetence, arrogance and stupidity!
I had held out some hope that mason jar held at least one shred of sanity . . . he has now proven to me, he has been sucked in.  Don't they understand when you surround yourself with only people who echo what you want to hear, even if it is a lie(s), it will become your reality even if it is fartherest from the truth!  Somebody needs to give them a tank full of reality . . . unfortunately, if His Honor does it they will be very, very sorry IMO.
I think the "tank full of reality" will be inside the bus that is heading towards them.  And I am hoping against hope that Judge P. administers a serious "Stooge Slap" on Friday!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 12, 2011, 11:14:40 AM
I thought you all pack up and moved without me.   ::MonkeyJnBox::
I did, too.  I wrote a witty, pithy reply to Babybear and was, (hopefully like this anti-sanction motion,) DENIED!  ::MonkeyGavel::
 Thanks for catching us up, Trimm.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 12, 2011, 11:14:43 AM

Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”

I saw that too, over at HM, but we were down here, so thanks for posting this Loca!   Baez is, as usual.....grasping.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 12, 2011, 11:16:02 AM
I thought you all pack up and moved without me.   ::MonkeyJnBox::

Trimmy, never, never -- couldn't get in.
My prayers for comfort for you and your family . . .


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 12, 2011, 11:23:45 AM

Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”

I saw that too, over at HM, but we were down here, so thanks for posting this Loca!   Baez is, as usual.....grasping.

(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff95/shamlin1/straws.jpg)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 12, 2011, 11:35:07 AM

Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”

I saw that too, over at HM, but we were down here, so thanks for posting this Loca!   Baez is, as usual.....grasping.

(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff95/shamlin1/straws.jpg)
:smt046 :smt038 :smt046 :smt038 :smt046 :smt038 :smt046 :smt038 :smt046 :smt038 :smt046 :smt038 :smt046 :smt038


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Babybear on January 12, 2011, 11:36:53 AM

Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”

I saw that too, over at HM, but we were down here, so thanks for posting this Loca!   Baez is, as usual.....grasping.

(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff95/shamlin1/straws.jpg)

Monkalicious---Too funny.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 12, 2011, 11:40:14 AM

Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”

I saw that too, over at HM, but we were down here, so thanks for posting this [[/b]!   Baez is, as usual.....grasping.

(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff95/shamlin1/straws.jpg)

Monkalicious---Too funny.
Hey, Babybear, I responded to you last night, but got booted out before it posted.  (Loved the global warming comment!) Besmirch is my new favorite word, ( followed by "Thwart". "Honey, I couldn't get anything done today because I was thwarted by traffic.")


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2011, 11:45:32 AM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/193179/Casey-Anthony-team-offers-evidence-Caylee%E2%80%99s-remains-were-moved
Casey Anthony team offers evidence Caylee’s remains were moved
By Adam Longo, Reporter
Last Updated: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:19 AM
ORLANDO --

Lawyers defending Casey Anthony are finally revealing why they believe 2-year-old Caylee Anthony’s remains were moved from their original location.

In court papers filed late Tuesday, the defense team is going into greater detail on what their experts will testify about.
   
One of those experts, Dr. Werner Spitz, will testify that his autopsy on Caylee shows her remains had been placed on the ground on their left side.

However, her remains were found facing upwards, according to the defense.

The defense team contends Caylee's remains were placed in the woods after Casey had been indicted and jailed.

The defense is also asking the judge to reconsider an order placing financial sanctions on the defense team.


Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”




Found this at the caylee daily
interesting info



http://www.cayleedaily.com/
regarding the hearing on friday.

Thanks Loca.  ::HelloKitty::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Sister on January 12, 2011, 11:47:51 AM
In the Motion for Reconsideration, it begins . . . Now comes Casey Anthony, by her blah, blah . . . what does Casey have to do with this issue?  just wondering.  The sanctions have nothing to do "legally" with her case.  Just wondering if he even filed it correctly.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Babybear on January 12, 2011, 12:02:18 PM

Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”

I saw that too, over at HM, but we were down here, so thanks for posting this [[/b]!   Baez is, as usual.....grasping.

(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff95/shamlin1/straws.jpg)

Monkalicious---Too funny.
Hey, Babybear, I responded to you last night, but got booted out before it posted.  (Loved the global warming comment!) Besmirch is my new favorite word, ( followed by "Thwart". "Honey, I couldn't get anything done today because I was thwarted by traffic.")

Hi again, Delicious one.   I'm often thwarted.  I hope Baez is thwarted.  I hope Judge Perry thwarts him.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 12, 2011, 12:29:04 PM
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/193179/Casey-Anthony-team-offers-evidence-Caylee%E2%80%99s-remains-were-moved
Casey Anthony team offers evidence Caylee’s remains were moved
By Adam Longo, Reporter
Last Updated: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:19 AM
ORLANDO --

Lawyers defending Casey Anthony are finally revealing why they believe 2-year-old Caylee Anthony’s remains were moved from their original location.

In court papers filed late Tuesday, the defense team is going into greater detail on what their experts will testify about.
   
One of those experts, Dr. Werner Spitz, will testify that his autopsy on Caylee shows her remains had been placed on the ground on their left side.

However, her remains were found facing upwards, according to the defense.

The defense team contends Caylee's remains were placed in the woods after Casey had been indicted and jailed.

The defense is also asking the judge to reconsider an order placing financial sanctions on the defense team.


Good morning
I thought this might be of interest.
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut ... ee-Anthony

”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”




Found this at the caylee daily
interesting info



http://www.cayleedaily.com/
regarding the hearing on friday.

So what the defense is claiming their expert will testify to is nothing short of trying to besmirch Dr. G & her examination where if Im reading it correctly, she did denote sandy dirt in that cavity whether she had to cut the skull or not, to me as a layman seems inconsequential.    It certainly does NOT prove she was placed there or moved AFTER Casey was incarcerated...but then again the Anthonys & Bozo know that already right, Dominic?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Girlzrock on January 12, 2011, 12:34:40 PM
Good Morning, Monkeys!  Capp:  Speaking of Dominic.... did the public ever get full disclosure on his depositions and interviews, or not?  It seems late now for anything to be released of magnitude... did I miss it?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 12, 2011, 12:39:20 PM
Hope Judge Perry denies this and imposes the sanctins that the state had originally suggested.
They just have no boundaries, and Foghorn is supposed to be the smart, seasoned attorney...They are playing with fire. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 12, 2011, 12:44:47 PM
Hope Judge Perry denies this and imposes the sanctins that the state had originally suggested.
They just have no boundaries, and Foghorn is supposed to be the smart, seasoned attorney...They are playing with fire. 

The judge will not reverse his decision nor take kindly to the implication that he needs advice as to how he should do his job or missed something...these tools are gonna get schooled again & Im going to enjoy every blessed second of it.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 12, 2011, 12:56:46 PM
Good Morning, Monkeys!  Capp:  Speaking of Dominic.... did the public ever get full disclosure on his depositions and interviews, or not?  It seems late now for anything to be released of magnitude... did I miss it?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4380098/Transcript-of-Dominic-Casey-interview-01072009

In the civil suit the judge ruled he did not have to be subjected to deposition pending the criminal case.

To my knowledge, we have not seen a deposition of DC in the criminal case.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 01:53:18 PM
Good Morning, Monkeys!  Capp:  Speaking of Dominic.... did the public ever get full disclosure on his depositions and interviews, or not?  It seems late now for anything to be released of magnitude... did I miss it?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4380098/Transcript-of-Dominic-Casey-interview-01072009

In the civil suit the judge ruled he did not have to be subjected to deposition pending the criminal case.

To my knowledge, we have not seen a deposition of DC in the criminal case.

Well, why haven't we. Isn't it about time for all the card to be on the table? Judge Perry said "no surprises."



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 12, 2011, 02:06:07 PM
Good Morning, Monkeys!  Capp:  Speaking of Dominic.... did the public ever get full disclosure on his depositions and interviews, or not?  It seems late now for anything to be released of magnitude... did I miss it?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4380098/Transcript-of-Dominic-Casey-interview-01072009

In the civil suit the judge ruled he did not have to be subjected to deposition pending the criminal case.

To my knowledge, we have not seen a deposition of DC in the criminal case.

Well, why haven't we. Isn't it about time for all the card to be on the table? Judge Perry said "no surprises."


In time Fanny, in time......good things come to those who wait!  I have a feeling this won't come out until right before the trial.  A lot of good info will come out in my opinion.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 12, 2011, 02:09:03 PM
Good Morning, Monkeys!  Capp:  Speaking of Dominic.... did the public ever get full disclosure on his depositions and interviews, or not?  It seems late now for anything to be released of magnitude... did I miss it?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4380098/Transcript-of-Dominic-Casey-interview-01072009

In the civil suit the judge ruled he did not have to be subjected to deposition pending the criminal case.

To my knowledge, we have not seen a deposition of DC in the criminal case.

Well, why haven't we. Isn't it about time for all the card to be on the table? Judge Perry said "no surprises."



I know they were fighting to get it sealed if and when & he's "lawyered up," beyond that Im not sure if I missed info Im not aware of & dont want to project further without something to go on.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 02:23:04 PM
Good Morning, Monkeys!  Capp:  Speaking of Dominic.... did the public ever get full disclosure on his depositions and interviews, or not?  It seems late now for anything to be released of magnitude... did I miss it?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4380098/Transcript-of-Dominic-Casey-interview-01072009

In the civil suit the judge ruled he did not have to be subjected to deposition pending the criminal case.

To my knowledge, we have not seen a deposition of DC in the criminal case.

Well, why haven't we. Isn't it about time for all the card to be on the table? Judge Perry said "no surprises."



I know they were fighting to get it sealed if and when & he's "lawyered up," beyond that Im not sure if I missed info Im not aware of & dont want to project further without something to go on.

I'll project. I predict Dom's testimony is going to be the nail in the coffin. BAM!!  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 12, 2011, 02:27:52 PM
I have always had a feeling that Dominic is a loose cannon and knows, if you'll pardon the expression, where all the bodies are buried.  I wonder how he feels now that Jeremiah Lyons is actually getting paid by the JAC?  I'd be grinding my teeth with rage...let's hope we get to see the "investigative interview", that Baez could have been a part of, if he had only put D. Casey on the defense witness list.  Bet he was very afraid to have him on there.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 12, 2011, 02:28:45 PM
Good Morning, Monkeys!  Capp:  Speaking of Dominic.... did the public ever get full disclosure on his depositions and interviews, or not?  It seems late now for anything to be released of magnitude... did I miss it?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4380098/Transcript-of-Dominic-Casey-interview-01072009

In the civil suit the judge ruled he did not have to be subjected to deposition pending the criminal case.

To my knowledge, we have not seen a deposition of DC in the criminal case.

Well, why haven't we. Isn't it about time for all the card to be on the table? Judge Perry said "no surprises."



I know they were fighting to get it sealed if and when & he's "lawyered up," beyond that Im not sure if I missed info Im not aware of & dont want to project further without something to go on.

I'll project. I predict Dom's testimony is going to be the nail in the coffin. BAM!!  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif)
Will they borrow Cindy's hammer?
 ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 12, 2011, 02:45:51 PM
Good Morning, Monkeys!  Capp:  Speaking of Dominic.... did the public ever get full disclosure on his depositions and interviews, or not?  It seems late now for anything to be released of magnitude... did I miss it?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4380098/Transcript-of-Dominic-Casey-interview-01072009

In the civil suit the judge ruled he did not have to be subjected to deposition pending the criminal case.

To my knowledge, we have not seen a deposition of DC in the criminal case.

Well, why haven't we. Isn't it about time for all the card to be on the table? Judge Perry said "no surprises."



I know they were fighting to get it sealed if and when & he's "lawyered up," beyond that Im not sure if I missed info Im not aware of & dont want to project further without something to go on.

I'll project. I predict Dom's testimony is going to be the nail in the coffin. BAM!!  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/nailingsmilie.gif)

O I agree he will not only help convict Casey but it most likely will come out that the Anthonys sent him to those woods with previous knowledge.   What I cant project is the status of the State taking his deposition and/or if it was sealed versus not released yet in discovery as I havent seen anything on the issue in recent months.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 12, 2011, 03:21:53 PM
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html

pg 5 - c
...it is highly unlikely that Dr. Lee would be called upon or deemed necessary to testify in this case.

pg 6 - d
... Dr. Spitz, if called to testify, would specifically additionally testify that the examination by Dr. Garavaglia was less than the appropriate standard for such medical examiner's protocol.  Dr. Spitz would testify that the skull should have been opened by Dr. Garavaglis, which he did in the performance of his second autopsy. Dr. Spitz discovered that there was a deposit of dirt/mud on the inside of the cranium, on the left side, which had not been discovered by Dr. Garavaglia.  Dr. Spitz would testify that that is material because it indicates that the remains had been laid on the left side in such a fashion to allow the interior of the cranium to collect dirt/mud and, therefore, the body had not been left in an upright or straightforward position as has been claimed by the investigators, as well as experts for the prosecution. 

pg 7 - e
Dr. Kathy Reichs...  It is not anticipated that she would be required to provide other testimony, given the fact that the defense has taken the deposition testimony of the State's anthropologists and other experts.

pg 7 - f
... Additionally, subsequent to the defense taking the deposition of the State's entomology expert, Dr. Haskill, prosecution has disclosed at Dr. Huntington's deposition, that additional evidence, resulting from some vacuuming process, was sent to Dr. Haskill for further analysis, review, and potential further discovery. 

pg 8 - i
.... Dr. John Leeson has been engaged by the defense as a consultant with respect to various computer related analysis.  It is unlikely that Dr. Leeson will be called to testify.....

pg 9 - j
Dr, William Rodriguez ....  Dr. Rodriguez has been engaged primarily as a consultant to aid the defense with his forensic area and is not likely to testify......

pg 9 - k
Richard Eikekenboom.... More importantly he and his partner were photographed by the CSI taking the photographs of the evidence.....
Mr. Eikelenboom, along with the other witness, is available for depostion by Skype or WebEx, as are so many of the other witnesses being questioned by the state and/or have been questioned by the defense. 

pg 10 - 1
Dr. Michael Freeman has his name included on the expert witness list because of the pressure of the time lines in doing so.  However, the defense has determined that is not going to be called as a witness in this case and, accordingly, no further disclosures are necessary. 


Wheehaw!!!!

Dr. Lee - highly unlikely to testifying
Dr. Kathy Reichs - not anticipated to testifying
Dr. John Leeson- unlikely to testify
Dr. William Rodriguez - not likely to testify
Dr. Michael Freeman  - not going to be called as a witness

For some reason team Bobo have a hard time with the Dutch connection being photographed, and have forgotten that his "partner" and "other witness" is Selma the one that stopped and chatted with the media the day they rolled in.  Also of note on that day as they rolled out Kathi cornered Bobo about the cost to taxpayers flying the Dutch connection in and he said several times that taxpayers WOUDL NOT be paying for them to fly to the US, they were coincidentally in the US as they were setting up a lab in the US (which subsequently to that statement Bobo HAS filed to have their flight reimbursed by taxpayers).

The comment about Dr. Freeman's name being included because of the pressure of the time lines made me giggle snort. This case is now on year 3.  Did they expect a century to get ready?

Dr G. conducted on autopsy and Spitz conducted two, how many autopsies does it take to make Rosebud believe Caylee is dead?

On the findings of dirt/mud on the inside of the cranium, does this not prove that there  was water in the area?  Deep enough water to move silt /dirt inside the skeleton?  As for  how the remains were found, the skeleton was so scattered and apart that it is highly likely animals got at it.  Why would the skull stay in the same position if the rest of the remains have been dragged apart and scattered?  They are grasping now that invisinanny and the duct tape loving meter reader will not fly IMO.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 12, 2011, 04:35:36 PM
The dirt they say they found proving to them that Caylee was moved, might be true.  How do we know animals didn't move the bag, moving her from her left side as they seem to believe, to upright.

I saved that grasping at straws picture, love it.  It made me laugh cause my bird, a brat Senegal parrot, loves straws.  He is, at this comment, stealing my straw from my coffee cup, or trying to, but I keep catching him.  He is so bad.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 12, 2011, 04:39:24 PM
The dirt they say they found proving to them that Caylee was moved, might be true.  How do we know animals didn't move the bag, moving her from her left side as they seem to believe, to upright.

I saved that grasping at straws picture, love it.  It made me laugh cause my bird, a brat Senegal parrot, loves straws.  He is, at this comment, stealing my straw from my coffee cup, or trying to, but I keep catching him.  He is so bad.

Oops, at this comment should be at this moment. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 12, 2011, 04:46:15 PM
http://wdbo.com/localnews/2011/01/casey-anthony-attorney-seeks-r.html

WDBO Local News      
Anthony's attorney seeks reconsideration of fine
By Joe Ruble @ January 12, 2011 1:53 PM Permalink | Comments (0)

Jose Baez, lead attorney for Casey Anthony's defense, is asking Chief Circuit Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider his order to fine Baez almost $600 for filing paperwork late and not complying with the rules for Discovery.

The defense motion states "The issue boiling over in this case is one dealing with discovery and alleged violations thereof."
It then lists, chronologically, the motions and hearings held to compel the defense team to share information it received from its list of expert witnesses in the upcoming death penalty murder trial.

The motion filed Tuesday claims that Anthony's defense was ordered to share the list of experts and their contact information, but not the "substance" of their expected testimony. Instead, the motion said the defense was required to proivide "the subject matter as to what the experts will testify to."

Chief Judge Perry told attorneys in court this month that rules of discovery are written to prevent "trial by ambush" and that it's not what is presented in court, but how it is presented that's important, urging the defense to supply copies of written reports or depositions from their experts.

You can read the motion here.  http://wdbo.com/common/pdf/orlando/def_mot_for_reconsideration_courts.pdf

No date for a hearing has been set.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 12, 2011, 05:29:23 PM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Casey Anthony's Attorneys Strike Back, Hearing Friday


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 05:48:31 PM
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Casey Anthony's Attorneys Strike Back, Hearing Friday


Bozo and Jar Head should be feeling the ground shake under their feet as we speak.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 12, 2011, 05:57:59 PM
I wish JP would throw them in the slammer for contempt.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 12, 2011, 06:03:37 PM
I wish JP would throw them in the slammer for contempt.

His chair is going to be a rocking on Friday is my prediction!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 06:17:35 PM
I wish JP would throw them in the slammer for contempt.

Maybe they could have adjoining cells.  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 06:20:03 PM
I wish JP would throw them in the slammer for contempt.

His chair is going to be a rocking on Friday is my prediction!

I hope the maintenance men are putting heavy duty shock absorbers on it.  ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 06:26:30 PM
I wish JP would throw them in the slammer for contempt.

His chair is going to be a rocking on Friday is my prediction!

I hope the maintenance men are putting heavy duty shock absorbers on it.  ::MonkeyJnBox::


Lol if this rocker's rocking!!
dont bother squawking!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 06:30:14 PM
I wish JP would throw them in the slammer for contempt.

His chair is going to be a rocking on Friday is my prediction!

I hope the maintenance men are putting heavy duty shock absorbers on it.  ::MonkeyJnBox::


Lol if this rocker's rocking!!
dont bother squawking!!

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/thHaHa.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 12, 2011, 06:42:30 PM
http://wdbo.com/localnews/2011/01/casey-anthony-attorney-seeks-r.html

WDBO Local News      
Anthony's attorney seeks reconsideration of fine
By Joe Ruble @ January 12, 2011 1:53 PM Permalink | Comments (0)

Jose Baez, lead attorney for Casey Anthony's defense, is asking Chief Circuit Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider his order to fine Baez almost $600 for filing paperwork late and not complying with the rules for Discovery.

The defense motion states "The issue boiling over in this case is one dealing with discovery and alleged violations thereof."
It then lists, chronologically, the motions and hearings held to compel the defense team to share information it received from its list of expert witnesses in the upcoming death penalty murder trial.

The motion filed Tuesday claims that Anthony's defense was ordered to share the list of experts and their contact information, but not the "substance" of their expected testimony. Instead, the motion said the defense was required to proivide "the subject matter as to what the experts will testify to."

Chief Judge Perry told attorneys in court this month that rules of discovery are written to prevent "trial by ambush" and that it's not what is presented in court, but how it is presented that's important, urging the defense to supply copies of written reports or depositions from their experts.

You can read the motion here.  http://wdbo.com/common/pdf/orlando/def_mot_for_reconsideration_courts.pdf

No date for a hearing has been set.

What an idiot.............he should take his slap down and shut up. He is determined to lose this case. He is the perfect example of the  "IDIOT WHO POLE VAULTS OVER MOUSE TURDS"


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: NewfieMonkey on January 12, 2011, 06:47:40 PM
Oh my ...

Capp ... (and everyone else) ... I may need a weekly reminder that she will not get a second bite of the apple for faulty counsel!

I just can't believe ... Casey hasn't fired Bozo, one of the other attorneys haven't asked him to step to the rear, a judge hasn't held a side bar telling him he's WAY over his head, and lastly ... the State's Attorneys are so nice ... and know they have a slam dunk case ... I can't believe they haven't told Perry ... get Casey a new attorney so we at least feel like it's a fair fight!!



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 12, 2011, 06:50:13 PM

I agree with you, Monkalicious, except I didn't go out to dinner.  I'm snowed in.  About 8 inches and expecting more tonight.  Global warming is a b**ch.

I think it's funny that Baez seems to think that these sanctions besmirch his character and cast doubt on his abilities as an attorney.  This is a man who sold Brazilian bikinis, didn't pay child support, didn't repay loans, took eight years to be admitted to practice not to mention the mysterious recent sex seminar and this besmirches his good name? 
Jose, Jose, Jose, Honey, you're already besmirched, bothered and bewildered.

You forgot the foreclosures on his properties..............Besmirch his name? It could only go up from where he is.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 12, 2011, 06:51:31 PM
I don't know if it is just my computer or what but I have not been able to get on here for days. Been having withdrawals not knowing what was happening. LOL


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 12, 2011, 06:51:56 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26471656/detail.html?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=casey+updates

Did Caylee's Initial Autopsy Follow Protocol?

Defense Expert May Support Theory That Caylee's Remains Were Moved

POSTED: 5:28 pm EST January 12, 2011
UPDATED: 6:19 pm EST January 12, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team claims it has evidence that may support the theory Caylee Anthony's remains were moved to the spot on Suburban Drive where they were found.
A defense expert also claims that medical examiner Jan Garavaglia didn't follow proper protocols in her autopsy.

According to new court documents, when the defense did its second autopsy, its expert opened Caylee's skull and discovered evidence that contradicts the state's theory about where the remains were discovered.

The defense claims that Dr. Warner Spitz, who did the second autopsy, found a deposit of dirt on the inner left side of the skull. He said that could indicate the remains had been laid on the left side and not in a straightforward or upright position as investigators claimed.

 READ: Latest Defense Filing   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26466440/detail.htmlpart

"Now you've called into question a large of the state's case," said veteran defense attorney and prosecutor Jeff Deen, who is not affiliated with the case.
Deen said Spitz' findings are also significant because he claims the medical examiner didn't open the skull during the first autopsy, which would be against protocol.

"What red-flagged me is his questioning whether she follwoed protocols or not. That's a huge thing," Deen said.
Garavaglia could not be reached for comment.

Anthony's defense claims someone else moved the remains after Anthony was indicted and jailed.

They also claim to have new witnesses who say the remains were not there when the area was searched weeks before Anthony's arrest.


Video at link


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: NewfieMonkey on January 12, 2011, 06:56:51 PM
I still think he's just sucking money from the State of FL.  IMO - he went into this thinking he'd really make a name for himself.  Found out he won't ... or at least not a good name ... but he's in Casey's good graces ... so no way will she get rid of him.  Made a lot of money on the front end ... IMO probably making some money now via verbal "deals" with people being paid by JAC ... and hoping to make money on the backend ... whatever the end result ... thinks people are going to want to interview him?!

I really think he will try to get her to plea at the last minute.  While I'm sure the State would love to say NO and take this to trial ... they do have to think about the monetary bottom line ... and will go for it.

I mean seriously ... he know's by now that this is a NO WIN!  So what else would keep him in it?  MONEY


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 12, 2011, 07:02:10 PM
I am in a real hurry, so cannot stay, so I am posting and running, but i had to comment.

What a putz.  Asking for the judge to take back his big bad sanction.  Has any lawyer ever done this before?  I cannot imaigine JP will be too receptive.  What are his grounds for wanting the judge to wipe this off the record?  

Secondly, the scull not being cut?  I didn't read the motion, but will later, but a skull is wide open is it not?  Why would one need to cut it?  

Dr. G, i do not believe has ever even had a questionable autopsy.  Who is he getting to find otherwise.  

Be back later.

 Trimm I am sorry about your uncle.  



They don't always cut open the skull unless they find some evidence of trauma to the bone. They usually examine it by light and note their findings.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 12, 2011, 07:08:12 PM
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26471656/detail.html?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=casey+updates

Did Caylee's Initial Autopsy Follow Protocol?

Defense Expert May Support Theory That Caylee's Remains Were Moved

POSTED: 5:28 pm EST January 12, 2011
UPDATED: 6:19 pm EST January 12, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team claims it has evidence that may support the theory Caylee Anthony's remains were moved to the spot on Suburban Drive where they were found.
A defense expert also claims that medical examiner Jan Garavaglia didn't follow proper protocols in her autopsy.

According to new court documents, when the defense did its second autopsy, its expert opened Caylee's skull and discovered evidence that contradicts the state's theory about where the remains were discovered.

The defense claims that Dr. Warner Spitz, who did the second autopsy, found a deposit of dirt on the inner left side of the skull. He said that could indicate the remains had been laid on the left side and not in a straightforward or upright position as investigators claimed.

 READ: Latest Defense Filing   http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26466440/detail.htmlpart

"Now you've called into question a large of the state's case," said veteran defense attorney and prosecutor Jeff Deen, who is not affiliated with the case.
Deen said Spitz' findings are also significant because he claims the medical examiner didn't open the skull during the first autopsy, which would be against protocol.

"What red-flagged me is his questioning whether she follwoed protocols or not. That's a huge thing," Deen said.
Garavaglia could not be reached for comment.

Anthony's defense claims someone else moved the remains after Anthony was indicted and jailed.

They also claim to have new witnesses who say the remains were not there when the area was searched weeks before Anthony's arrest.


Video at link

I truly believe this is much ado about nothing.  Just cuz this defense paid (well ya know what I mean) expert is willing to challenge Dr. G & claim something rare for a doctor to do to another doesnt make it so.    I'm pretty sure that whether Dr G decided to split a skull or not was optional versus their claim of against protocol.  This defense team is trying to dodge a bullet, first off Casey did it...thats obvious, secondly even if it were moved it would have been by her direction & then the focus is on the Anthony family & their hired hand who was also in bed with the defense, that being Dominic Casey whom was caught digging & probing in those woods in November 2008, approximately 3 weeks before the remains were found...you sure you want to go down this road BOZO?   You sure that material doesnt match to the Anthony house?   Once again, be careful what you ask for...just saying  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: NewfieMonkey on January 12, 2011, 07:09:34 PM
And while I say "Hello" to everyone!  I want to say a special "Hello" to Turbo!  I haven't seen you in a while ... though I do still lurk and read alot!  Sorry for every bad thing I ever said about JJ!  I was completely wrong about that guy.  So sorry for that ... and you can pass that on. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 07:17:56 PM
And while I say "Hello" to everyone!  I want to say a special "Hello" to Turbo!  I haven't seen you in a while ... though I do still lurk and read alot!  Sorry for every bad thing I ever said about JJ!  I was completely wrong about that guy.  So sorry for that ... and you can pass that on. 

I too take everything back that I too said about JP.
Now a question???
can Mason and baez get this judge thrown off the case as they did strickland when they didnt get their way????


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 07:21:30 PM
I don't know if it is just my computer or what but I have not been able to get on here for days. Been having withdrawals not knowing what was happening. LOL


Turbo
Klaasend said the site was down for like 16 hrs unintentionaly!! I was having withdrawls!!! LOL laughing out loud not lots of luck  lol like mason thought.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 07:23:23 PM
I wish JP would throw them in the slammer for contempt.

His chair is going to be a rocking on Friday is my prediction!

I hope the maintenance men are putting heavy duty shock absorbers on it.  ::MonkeyJnBox::


Lol if this rocker's rocking!!
dont bother squawking!!

(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/thHaHa.gif)



Lol fanny!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 07:36:55 PM
And while I say "Hello" to everyone!  I want to say a special "Hello" to Turbo!  I haven't seen you in a while ... though I do still lurk and read alot!  Sorry for every bad thing I ever said about JJ!  I was completely wrong about that guy.  So sorry for that ... and you can pass that on. 

I too take everything back that I too said about JP.
Now a question???
can Mason and baez get this judge thrown off the case as they did strickland when they didnt get their way????

I don't think Judge Perry will do anything like calling Marinade Dave up to the bench to tell him how much he enjoys his blog. Bozo and Jar may not like Judge Perry laughing in their faces, but oh well.  ::piggy::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 07:43:37 PM
Oh my ...

Capp ... (and everyone else) ... I may need a weekly reminder that she will not get a second bite of the apple for faulty counsel!

I just can't believe ... Casey hasn't fired Bozo, one of the other attorneys haven't asked him to step to the rear, a judge hasn't held a side bar telling him he's WAY over his head, and lastly ... the State's Attorneys are so nice ... and know they have a slam dunk case ... I can't believe they haven't told Perry ... get Casey a new attorney so we at least feel like it's a fair fight!!



Hi NEWFIE!   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/poppyflower.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: NewfieMonkey on January 12, 2011, 08:00:07 PM
Hi NEWFIE!   (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/poppyflower.gif)
Hi Fanny!  Miss you all!  Try to keep up - sometimes impossible!  But I'm so glad you all keep this thread up to date with all the newest info and feelings!

Caylee is when I joined Scared Monkeys ... I've chimed in on other cases ... but this one has my heart.

I can't wait until Caylee gets some justice!  I've come to feel that we - strangers, bloggers, posters - and the State Attorneys of Florida - are all that Caylee has.  I've hoped that her family would stand up for her at some point ... but they haven't.  That's heartbreaking IMO.  Someone has to stand for Caylee.  And we do.  And what makes it more heartbreaking is that I wonder if Caylee really ever had anyone standing for her ... or if she was just a pawn to all of them.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 12, 2011, 08:34:05 PM
And while I say "Hello" to everyone!  I want to say a special "Hello" to Turbo!  I haven't seen you in a while ... though I do still lurk and read alot!  Sorry for every bad thing I ever said about JJ!  I was completely wrong about that guy.  So sorry for that ... and you can pass that on. 

Hi there missed u. I can't be here as much as I would like, but I do try to keep up and read all the insane motions. Yes, JJ is an awesome person, which was evidenced to most when he went to LE when the defense tried to get him to lie through LB. He is very honest and was one of the few persons who searched tirelessly every day he was off from work for little Caylee. I love it they tried to get  him in trouble because he taped their lies and it backfired on them.

I think George has turned on them again. I believe it was because CA had the PI poking around for the body. That alone shows everyone they knew where little Caylee was and it is abhorrent to me to think a grandparent would be so cruel as to let her little body be out there in swampland with critters eating her bones.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 12, 2011, 08:36:38 PM
And while I say "Hello" to everyone!  I want to say a special "Hello" to Turbo!  I haven't seen you in a while ... though I do still lurk and read alot!  Sorry for every bad thing I ever said about JJ!  I was completely wrong about that guy.  So sorry for that ... and you can pass that on. 

I too take everything back that I too said about JP.
Now a question???
can Mason and baez get this judge thrown off the case as they did strickland when they didnt get their way????

I don't think Judge Perry will do anything like calling Marinade Dave up to the bench to tell him how much he enjoys his blog. Bozo and Jar may not like Judge Perry laughing in their faces, but oh well.  ::piggy::

Those two have done all the damage to KC they can with asking for a new judge. I love it they got what they asked for and it will be their demise. I really don't think Strickland could have handled all the crap they have thrown out in court and Judge Perry seems to take it all in stride then rule what the laws say.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 12, 2011, 08:41:58 PM
For eight years after BOZO graduated from law school,  the board that screens prospective attorneys in Florida would not let him practice law. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the decision, issuing an order in 2000 that cataloged unpaid bills, extravagant spending and other "financial irresponsibility" up to that time. Justices reserved their strongest condemnation for his failure to stay current on support payments for his only child.

His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law."


Nothing has changed about his total lack of respect for the legal system...........he shows that every time he going into court.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 12, 2011, 08:54:26 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 09:01:50 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.







Does the sanction go on bozo's record?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 09:05:59 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.







Does the sanction go on bozo's record?
(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/yes.gif)
Yup!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 12, 2011, 09:06:59 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.

Bozo has paid his fine, but he wants it back! (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeywinkdunce.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 12, 2011, 09:07:38 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

 ::MonkeyGavel::   ::MonkeyGavel::     ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 12, 2011, 09:08:16 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.

Bozo has paid his fine, but he wants it back! (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeywinkdunce.gif)

Bets on if he asks for interest too?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 09:47:14 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

 ::MonkeyGavel::   ::MonkeyGavel::     ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::

he is only doing that cuzz he knows the florida  bar is on his asss and I dont mean the bar down the street from his office hehe ::monkeywine2::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 12, 2011, 09:55:00 PM
Now I'm confused.
The hearing on Fri. isn't related to the sanction?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 10:00:32 PM
Now I'm confused.
The hearing on Fri. isn't related to the sanction?

Curly
I thought I knew but now I am confoosed too.
hiya bi the way


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 10:01:44 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.

Bozo has paid his fine, but he wants it back! (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/monkeywinkdunce.gif)

Bets on if he asks for interest too?

He wants it hand delivered by Ashton because it's not fair ashon gets favoritism. ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Babybear on January 12, 2011, 10:16:29 PM
For eight years after BOZO graduated from law school,  the board that screens prospective attorneys in Florida would not let him practice law. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the decision, issuing an order in 2000 that cataloged unpaid bills, extravagant spending and other "financial irresponsibility" up to that time. Justices reserved their strongest condemnation for his failure to stay current on support payments for his only child.

His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law."


Nothing has changed about his total lack of respect for the legal system...........he shows that every time he going into court.

Turbo, do you think it's disrespect or is Baez just plain ol' dumb?  Or is it both?

Have you heard anything about your FOI request?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Babybear on January 12, 2011, 10:20:40 PM
Werner Spitz may question Dr. G's work, but I question his.  In the Andrea Yeats trial, he single-handedly IMO caused a new trial which reversed the guilty verdict.  (IMO Yeats was guilty as sin, but that's another story.) He testified that Yeats got the idea to kill her children from a TV drama with which he had some connection.  Only problem was, the TV show had not been shown prior to the murders. Bingo! New trial.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 12, 2011, 10:34:31 PM
I wish JP would throw them in the slammer for contempt.

I wish he would make them wear dunce hats and go stand in the corner with the foreheads stuck in the corner. 



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 12, 2011, 10:36:10 PM
I don't know if it is just my computer or what but I have not been able to get on here for days. Been having withdrawals not knowing what was happening. LOL

I had issues not last night, but night before.  Whole shabang was down, apparently, for 12 hours. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 12, 2011, 10:41:30 PM
Werner Spitz may question Dr. G's work, but I question his.  In the Andrea Yeats trial, he single-handedly IMO caused a new trial which reversed the guilty verdict.  (IMO Yeats was guilty as sin, but that's another story.) He testified that Yeats got the idea to kill her children from a TV drama with which he had some connection.  Only problem was, the TV show had not been shown prior to the murders. Bingo! New trial.

Spitz is a putz & the prosecution will have a field day with him....I will have the popcorn ready!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 12, 2011, 10:53:09 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/modlock4.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 12, 2011, 11:13:35 PM
I don't know if it is just my computer or what but I have not been able to get on here for days. Been having withdrawals not knowing what was happening. LOL

I had issues not last night, but night before.  Whole shabang was down, apparently, for 12 hours. 


tooo funny the site was down! and I was  tripping thinking I  did something wrong. I was having withdrawls.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 12, 2011, 11:17:06 PM
I don't know if it is just my computer or what but I have not been able to get on here for days. Been having withdrawals not knowing what was happening. LOL

I had issues not last night, but night before.  Whole shabang was down, apparently, for 12 hours. 


tooo funny the site was down! and I was  tripping thinking I  did something wrong. I was having withdrawls.

I am so stupid, I was wondering, since Bozo hates this site, if maybe he got it shut down somehow. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Mary on January 12, 2011, 11:17:49 PM
I was over at Humble Opinion to-day, they had that old letter Casey wrote, trying to get a
change of Venue. She brought up about her parents getting hassled by people outside their
house every night among other things. I'm willing to bet that Bozo paid those people, that
he sent Dominic to collect them. It wouldn't have cost that much.
Also, during the 2nd trial of Spector, when the state questioned Spitz (wrong spelling) how
much was he being paid, he went crazy, yelling and screaming and wouldn't shut up. He
never did tell them. But I think the jury got the drift.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 12, 2011, 11:24:45 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-defense-expert-questions-medical-examiners-work-jose-baez-pays-fine.html

Casey Anthony: Defense expert questions medical examiner’s work; Jose Baez pays fine
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on January, 12 2011 6:44 PM
Discuss This: Comments(20) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it

Dr. Jan Garavaglia talked at an Orange County Commission meeting in November. Photo credit: Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel

Highlights from the Casey Anthony coverage tonight:
***WESH-Channel 2’s Bob Kealing focused on a defense expert’s claim that Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner, didn’t follow the correct protocols in performing an autopsy on the toddler.

Kealing noted that the defense says its expert, Dr. Werner Spitz, found a ”deposit of dirt” inside Caylee’s skull during a second autopsy. Kealing also highlighted that Spitz claims that Garavaglia didn’t open the child’s skull in the first autopsy.

Veteran attorney Jeff Deen, providing analysis for WESH, said “it’s a huge thing” that Spitz is questioning whether Garavaglia followed protocols.

Kealing said WESH wasn’t able to reach Garavaglia for a comment. But he cited “a source close to the investigation” who said the prosecution could say flood water brought dirt into the child’s skull.

Casey Anthony is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter. 

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

“We’re still waiting for a ruling on a defense motion asking the judge to reconsider the sanctions against Baez,” anchor Martie Salt said.

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

 ::MonkeyGavel::   ::MonkeyGavel::     ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::

I wonder if he had to pay it personally to the prosecution team in person or did he hand a check (they better make sure it is not rubber) over to some clerk?  I would have loved to see his face if he had to hand it to Ashton personally. 

Idjit he is.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 03:19:25 AM

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

 ::MonkeyGavel::   ::MonkeyGavel::     ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::

I think he was afraid NOT to pay it...........I believe he has finally figured out or someone has told him that judge is not going to put up with anymore of his antics.  He is trying to get it removed off his record now but that won't happen either.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 03:24:23 AM
For eight years after BOZO graduated from law school,  the board that screens prospective attorneys in Florida would not let him practice law. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the decision, issuing an order in 2000 that cataloged unpaid bills, extravagant spending and other "financial irresponsibility" up to that time. Justices reserved their strongest condemnation for his failure to stay current on support payments for his only child.

His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law."


Nothing has changed about his total lack of respect for the legal system...........he shows that every time he going into court.

Turbo, do you think it's disrespect or is Baez just plain ol' dumb?  Or is it both?

Have you heard anything about your FOI request?

I believe it is total disrespect. He is so narcissist he believes that he can do anything and get by with it. I have not heard a word about my FOIA request and since I was snowed in yesterday, I sent another one making reference to the prior one and the time limits set up for them.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 07:08:55 AM
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-expert-speculates-on-piece-of-dirt-in-caylees-skull/
Casey's Expert Speculates On Pieces of Dirt In Caylee's Skull
01/12/11


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 13, 2011, 08:37:29 AM
I don't know if it is just my computer or what but I have not been able to get on here for days. Been having withdrawals not knowing what was happening. LOL

I had issues not last night, but night before.  Whole shabang was down, apparently, for 12 hours. 


tooo funny the site was down! and I was  tripping thinking I  did something wrong. I was having withdrawls.

I am so stupid, I was wondering, since Bozo hates this site, if maybe he got it shut down somehow. 
Not stupid at all, I couldn't get in here or at The Caylee Daily.  I was thinking conspiracy.  There's been so many shenanigans with the A's and the defense, I'm a little paranoid.
 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: monkalicious on January 13, 2011, 08:38:37 AM

***WFTV-Channel 9 reported that Jose Baez today paid  the nearly $600 fine that Chief Judge Belvin Perry handed down last week.

 ::MonkeyGavel::   ::MonkeyGavel::     ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::    ::MonkeyGavel::

I think he was afraid NOT to pay it...........I believe he has finally figured out or someone has told him that judge is not going to put up with anymore of his antics.  He is trying to get it removed off his record now but that won't happen either.
What if it the check did bounce?  wouldn't that be hysterical?  (I'm just being plain mean now.)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 13, 2011, 09:12:04 AM
I saw this link posted over at Cayleedaily   
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-expert-speculates-on-piece-of-dirt-in-caylees-skull/comment-page-3/#comment-387522   by hateliars at 8:43 am today.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2tg1XAQi9I&feature=related
48 Hours Mystery - To Catch A Killer (Part 5/6)

Cheney Mason is atty. for Nelson Serrano, accused of killing 4 people.  Mason doesn't call any witnesses!!!  Serrano ends up with 4 life sentences.   Will history repeat itself?


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 13, 2011, 10:16:20 AM
I saw this link posted over at Cayleedaily   
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-expert-speculates-on-piece-of-dirt-in-caylees-skull/comment-page-3/#comment-387522   by hateliars at 8:43 am today.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2tg1XAQi9I&feature=related
48 Hours Mystery - To Catch A Killer (Part 5/6)

Cheney Mason is atty. for Nelson Serrano, accused of killing 4 people.  Mason doesn't call any witnesses!!!  Serrano ends up with 4 life sentences.   Will history repeat itself?

I thought he got 4 death sentences, but no matter...

I wouldn't be surprised if Jar head repeats history, but with Bozo "seemingly" in the driver's seat who knows.
Reading between the lines of jar head's last motion, it doesn't sound like many (if any) of their experts will end up testifying.
The only witnesses who will put Casey in a good light are her (lying) parents and brother. They won't succeed because the State will show they are not credible, and lie about everything.
These @ssclowns have no defense and they are desperate.
Having fun yet Mason??? LMAO


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 11:31:23 AM
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2011/01/13/caylee-anthony-case-defense-wants-a-take-back-and-a-do-over-and-use-spin-to-request/
Caylee Anthony case: Defense wants a take-back and a do-over, and use spin to request
Posted on January 13, 2011 by Valhall


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 11:41:16 AM
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2011/01/13/caylee-anthony-case-defense-wants-a-take-back-and-a-do-over-and-use-spin-to-request/
Caylee Anthony case: Defense wants a take-back and a do-over, and use spin to request
Posted on January 13, 2011 by Valhall


Anither interesting article. Thanks TRIMM.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2011, 12:17:21 PM
NEW BLINK POST:

http://blinkoncrime.com/2011/01/13/cayleecasey-anthony-case-halt-your-hubristic-hubrishness-jose-baez-we-are-all-stocked-up-here/

Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Halt Your Hubristic Hubrishness Jose Baez.. We Are All Stocked Up Here


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 01:21:54 PM
Thanks Klaas.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 02:13:42 PM
I saw this link posted over at Cayleedaily   
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-expert-speculates-on-piece-of-dirt-in-caylees-skull/comment-page-3/#comment-387522   by hateliars at 8:43 am today.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2tg1XAQi9I&feature=related
48 Hours Mystery - To Catch A Killer (Part 5/6)









Cheney Mason is atty. for Nelson Serrano, accused of killing 4 people.  Mason doesn't call any witnesses!!!  Serrano ends up with 4 life sentences.   Will history repeat itself?

I thought he got 4 death sentences, but no matter...

I wouldn't be surprised if Jar head repeats history, but with Bozo "seemingly" in the driver's seat who knows.
Reading between the lines of jar head's last motion, it doesn't sound like many (if any) of their experts will end up testifying.
The only witnesses who will put Casey in a good light are her (lying) parents and brother. They won't succeed because the State will show they are not credible, and lie about everything.
These @ssclowns have no defense and they are desperate.
Having fun yet Mason??? LMAO






what makes this case more dramatic and  bazaar is the  new attorney in the drivers seat.
I see him headed to a point of no return!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 02:14:36 PM
I saw this link posted over at Cayleedaily   
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-expert-speculates-on-piece-of-dirt-in-caylees-skull/comment-page-3/#comment-387522   by hateliars at 8:43 am today.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2tg1XAQi9I&feature=related
48 Hours Mystery - To Catch A Killer (Part 5/6)

Cheney Mason is atty. for Nelson Serrano, accused of killing 4 people.  Mason doesn't call any witnesses!!!  Serrano ends up with 4 life sentences.   Will history repeat itself?

I thought he got 4 death sentences, but no matter...

I wouldn't be surprised if Jar head repeats history, but with Bozo "seemingly" in the driver's seat who knows.
Reading between the lines of jar head's last motion, it doesn't sound like many (if any) of their experts will end up testifying.
The only witnesses who will put Casey in a good light are her (lying) parents and brother. They won't succeed because the State will show they are not credible, and lie about everything.
These @ssclowns have no defense and they are desperate.
Having fun yet Mason??? LMAO



forgot to add that masons client Nelson serrano got 4 life terms yes.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 02:16:38 PM
I saw this link posted over at Cayleedaily   
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-expert-speculates-on-piece-of-dirt-in-caylees-skull/comment-page-3/#comment-387522   by hateliars at 8:43 am today.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2tg1XAQi9I&feature=related
48 Hours Mystery - To Catch A Killer (Part 5/6)

Cheney Mason is atty. for Nelson Serrano, accused of killing 4 people.  Mason doesn't call any witnesses!!!  Serrano ends up with 4 life sentences.   Will history repeat itself?




thanks for posting that I saved it! I have never forgotten that story. I


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 02:17:43 PM
I saw this link posted over at Cayleedaily   
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-expert-speculates-on-piece-of-dirt-in-caylees-skull/comment-page-3/#comment-387522   by hateliars at 8:43 am today.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2tg1XAQi9I&feature=related
48 Hours Mystery - To Catch A Killer (Part 5/6)

Cheney Mason is atty. for Nelson Serrano, accused of killing 4 people.  Mason doesn't call any witnesses!!!  Serrano ends up with 4 life sentences.   Will history repeat itself?




thanks for posting that I saved it! I have never forgotten that story. I

LOL I meant to say I briefly remember mason as one of his lawyers. I did followed the story.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Ono on January 13, 2011, 03:04:58 PM
 ::MonkeyCool::   Thanks for the links-have been offline for awhile busy with other things... so good to be able to catch up!;  Gotta love the good Judge Perry!!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 03:16:02 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26483763/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Pays Fine, Explains Himself
Posted: 2:41 pm EST January 13, 2011Updated: 2:48 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony, it's clearer now what allegedly caused Casey's lead attorney to have to be sanctioned by the court.

In a motion Jose Baez filed to challenge a $583 fine ( http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html ), he said bad traffic in Kissimmee kept him from delivering more defense expert information to prosecutors and he claimed the file was too big to fax.

Baez paid the fine January 12.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 03:19:02 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26483763/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Pays Fine, Explains Himself
Posted: 2:41 pm EST January 13, 2011Updated: 2:48 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony, it's clearer now what allegedly caused Casey's lead attorney to have to be sanctioned by the court.

In a motion Jose Baez filed to challenge a $583 fine ( http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html ), he said bad traffic in Kissimmee kept him from delivering more defense expert information to prosecutors and he claimed the file was too big to fax.

Baez paid the fine January 12.


(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 03:21:14 PM
::MonkeyCool::   Thanks for the links-have been offline for awhile busy with other things... so good to be able to catch up!;  Gotta love the good Judge Perry!!!!

Hey Ono!  ::HelloKitty::
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/05/2011           Notice of Hearing  1/14/2011


Hearing is at 1:30 Eastern.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 03:22:04 PM
Fanny,you can't make this stuff up.   ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 13, 2011, 03:23:56 PM
Werner Spitz may question Dr. G's work, but I question his.  In the Andrea Yeats trial, he single-handedly IMO caused a new trial which reversed the guilty verdict.  (IMO Yeats was guilty as sin, but that's another story.) He testified that Yeats got the idea to kill her children from a TV drama with which he had some connection.  Only problem was, the TV show had not been shown prior to the murders. Bingo! New trial.

He can question all he wants - I guess that's why he's being paid- but it won't go anywhere.
He says Dr G did not 'open the skull' - umm, Dr G did not need to open the skull-  all she had to do was remove the duct tape, with that the mandible would separate and she could look directly into the skull.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 03:34:09 PM
::MonkeyCool::   Thanks for the links-have been offline for awhile busy with other things... so good to be able to catch up!;  Gotta love the good Judge Perry!!!!

Hey Ono!  ::HelloKitty::
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/05/2011           Notice of Hearing  1/14/2011


Hearing is at 1:30 Eastern.

I am soooooo ready! (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/biggrin.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 03:39:04 PM
::MonkeyCool::   Thanks for the links-have been offline for awhile busy with other things... so good to be able to catch up!;  Gotta love the good Judge Perry!!!!

Hey Ono!  ::HelloKitty::
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/05/2011           Notice of Hearing  1/14/2011


Hearing is at 1:30 Eastern.

I am soooooo ready! (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/biggrin.gif)

Me too.I hope they get there on time.   ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 04:06:46 PM
::MonkeyCool::   Thanks for the links-have been offline for awhile busy with other things... so good to be able to catch up!;  Gotta love the good Judge Perry!!!!

Hey Ono!  ::HelloKitty::
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
01/05/2011           Notice of Hearing  1/14/2011


Hearing is at 1:30 Eastern.

I am soooooo ready! (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/biggrin.gif)

Me too.I hope they get there on time.   ::MonkeyJnBox::

They may need to take the Wambulance to get there though all that nasty traffic.   ::MonkeyDevil::(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/bozo.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 04:24:42 PM
Amended order.Hearing is at 2:00 p.m. tomorrow.
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Amended%20Notice%20of%20Hearing%20-%20Status%20Conference2.pdf


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 04:35:25 PM
Amended order.Hearing is at 2:00 p.m. tomorrow.
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Amended%20Notice%20of%20Hearing%20-%20Status%20Conference2.pdf

How are we going to wait thirty more minutes??    (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/waiting-bored-waiting-boy-smiley-emoticon-000413-large.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 04:40:24 PM
http://www.wesh.com/r/26484890/detail.html
Case Against Casey Returns To Court For Friday Hearing
Jury Selection Expected To Be Main Topic Of Hearing

POSTED: 4:11 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 4:22 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- The case against Casey Anthony heads back to court on Friday.

Attorneys for both sides are expected to discuss the jury selection process at the hearing with Judge Belvin Perry. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 2 p.m. WESH.com will provide live coverage.
May 2010, Perry ruled that an out-of-town jury would be used for Anthony's murder trial, which is expected to begin in May.

Anthony's attorneys had asked for the entire trial to be moved to another venue, saying they did not believe she could get a fair trial in Orlando due to the media attention the case has drawn.

Perry has said in the past there would be a gag order regarding the location of jury selection.

Anthony will not be present at Friday's hearing. The court said no motions are expected to be discussed.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 04:45:45 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-jose-baez-pays-fine-20110113,0,3643288.story
Casey Anthony attorney Jose Baez pays $583.73 penalty
Compiled by Orlando Sentinel

4:21 p.m. EST, January 13, 2011
os-casey-anthony-jose-baez-pays-fine-20110113
Casey Anthony defense attorney Jose Baez has paid the $583.73 penalty for failing to turn over witness information to the prosecution, records show.

Chief Judge Belvin Perry slapped Baez with the penalty last week after finding Baez in "willful" violation of his court order requiring the defense turn over specific information on the experts.

Anthony, 24, who is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee Marie in 2008.

The trial is scheduled for May.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 13, 2011, 04:52:14 PM
I saw this link posted over at Cayleedaily   
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/01/casey-expert-speculates-on-piece-of-dirt-in-caylees-skull/comment-page-3/#comment-387522   by hateliars at 8:43 am today.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2tg1XAQi9I&feature=related
48 Hours Mystery - To Catch A Killer (Part 5/6)

Cheney Mason is atty. for Nelson Serrano, accused of killing 4 people.  Mason doesn't call any witnesses!!!  Serrano ends up with 4 life sentences.   Will history repeat itself?

I thought he got 4 death sentences, but no matter...

I wouldn't be surprised if Jar head repeats history, but with Bozo "seemingly" in the driver's seat who knows.
Reading between the lines of jar head's last motion, it doesn't sound like many (if any) of their experts will end up testifying.
The only witnesses who will put Casey in a good light are her (lying) parents and brother. They won't succeed because the State will show they are not credible, and lie about everything.
These @ssclowns have no defense and they are desperate.
Having fun yet Mason??? LMAO

Yes it matters!  I meant to say death sentence..... ::MonkeyConfused::   :smt095   No excuse.....and I agree with what you say.



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Cappuccino on January 13, 2011, 04:53:00 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26483763/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Pays Fine, Explains Himself
Posted: 2:41 pm EST January 13, 2011Updated: 2:48 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony, it's clearer now what allegedly caused Casey's lead attorney to have to be sanctioned by the court.

In a motion Jose Baez filed to challenge a $583 fine ( http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html ), he said bad traffic in Kissimmee kept him from delivering more defense expert information to prosecutors and he claimed the file was too big to fax.

Baez paid the fine January 12.


(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif)

Yea, yea, yea Bozo....guess what the judge will say that you know the area and should have allotted extra time for traffic ...cry me a river  :smt089


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 13, 2011, 05:02:44 PM
Amended order.Hearing is at 2:00 p.m. tomorrow.
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Amended%20Notice%20of%20Hearing%20-%20Status%20Conference2.pdf
Notice the date this was delivered, Jan. 4th....6 full days before the original date and 10 full days before the amended date. 

JP is busy too, Jose, yet he still manages to do his work on time.  See what a difference it makes when issues are taken care of in the proper manner and allotted time?  That notice gave you 4 extra days to read the blogs to see if you could come up with your next motion!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 13, 2011, 05:30:09 PM
I wonder how many times Cindy wanted to talk to Casey just to encourage her to get a "real" attorney. I guess she wouldn't tell her in the many letters passed back and forth via Baez.(I'm sure he read them before giving them to Casey) If Cindy said anything negative about Baez, you can bet Casey got to read them.

Cindy can't be that stupid to think Bozo is doing a "bang-up" job as a defense attorney, can she????......... ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 13, 2011, 05:31:38 PM
I wonder how many times Cindy wanted to talk to Casey just to encourage her to get a "real" attorney. I guess she wouldn't tell her in the many letters passed back and forth via Baez.(I'm sure he read them before giving them to Casey) If Cindy said anything negative about Baez, you can bet Casey NEVER got to read them.

Cindy can't be that stupid to think Bozo is doing a "bang-up" job as a defense attorney, can she????......... ::MonkeyTongue::

self edit...
If Cindy said anything negative about Baez, you can bet Casey NEVER got to read them.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 13, 2011, 06:19:43 PM
I wonder how many times Cindy wanted to talk to Casey just to encourage her to get a "real" attorney. I guess she wouldn't tell her in the many letters passed back and forth via Baez.(I'm sure he read them before giving them to Casey) If Cindy said anything negative about Baez, you can bet Casey got to read them.

Cindy can't be that stupid to think Bozo is doing a "bang-up" job as a defense attorney, can she????......... ::MonkeyTongue::

If CA ever had faith in JB I'm sure she has lost it by now, and I am surprised she hasn't been running her mouth on TV about it, trying to get rid of him. Those new Attys must know she's on the verge of being charged with significant crimes, and forced her to keep her trap shut.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 06:24:39 PM
I wonder how many times Cindy wanted to talk to Casey just to encourage her to get a "real" attorney. I guess she wouldn't tell her in the many letters passed back and forth via Baez.(I'm sure he read them before giving them to Casey) If Cindy said anything negative about Baez, you can bet Casey got to read them.

Cindy can't be that stupid to think Bozo is doing a "bang-up" job as a defense attorney, can she????......... ::MonkeyTongue::

If CA ever had faith in JB I'm sure she has lost it by now, and I am surprised she hasn't been running her mouth on TV about it, trying to get rid of him. Those new Attys must know she's on the verge of being charged with significant crimes, and forced her to keep her trap shut.

I expect to see her charging out of the chute any minute.  ::CowboySmiley::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 06:44:49 PM
Saw this posted over at Websleuths. http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6006430&postcount=695
WESH just reported they HAVE a copy of Baez's check and a letter written by Mason to Jeff Ashton asking him NOT to cash it..and hopes he will not argue against their Motion for Reconsideration

No link, yet...Nums?

The Reporter did state that the SAO Office said the check and letter are not going to be released as Public Record BUT when the Court Admin received it, he said they gave him (reporter) a copy.

Waiting for Link to be posted on WESH...


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on January 13, 2011, 06:47:41 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Brandi on January 13, 2011, 06:59:37 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


That is just so pitiful.

...and laughable.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 07:06:32 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


That is just so pitiful.

...and laughable.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you suppose it might bounce.  ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 07:41:46 PM
I was watching a show last night which I have never watched before. (There was nothing else on) It was called Investigations & I think it was on the Discovery channel. It was about a Major in the Dade County Police dept who was stopped in Orange County (same area) and he was charged with resisting arrest because he was acting belligerent and refusing to cooperate with officers. Guess WHO was the defendant's attorney? Mason.

This was a few years ago but he screwed up that case SO horribly by trying to plead to the jury that the man was targeted because he was black and it was a racial thing.  The state let him go through his WHOLE speech accusing the officers of only stopping the man on "trumped up" charges because he was black. He went on and on about the man being black and being a target.

Then the state brought out the patrol car video and showed how the guy did resist arrest. (not really bad, but he did have a gun and they were concerned with him refusing to obey them) All four officers testified to the same thing the video showed. Mason obviously had not even bothered to subpoena the first officer's video and EVERYONE knows they record all traffic stops. It was SUCH a screw up by him in my opinion as the guy being a police officer could have worked that out without even being fined if he had agreed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor instead of asking for a jury trial for the felony charges. The state offered him that but he went on Mason's opinion that it would all be found not guilty by the jury.

Now, the guy who had been on the force 28 years, ready to retire got jail time from the jury and lost not only his job but his retirement as well. He should have sued Mason and maybe did. If I could remember his name I would try to look it up, but I have a feeling this is a common theme in Mason's trials - NOTHING being done correctly to give the defendant a fair trial. This guy needed a reprimand for being such an azz but he didn't hurt anyone or fight them. It was more a misunderstanding the way TV showed it and the Orlando police not being impressed with someone in LE from Miami who gave them grief.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 07:42:54 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


That is just so pitiful.

...and laughable.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you suppose it might bounce.  ::MonkeyJnBox::

Totally unbelievable............I bet they called & the check would not cash so they notified him it was no good, so now he is taking another rabbit trail to try to fend off the court.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2011, 07:57:39 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


OMG!! ROFLMAO!!!! 

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 07:58:52 PM
Werner Spitz may question Dr. G's work, but I question his.  In the Andrea Yeats trial, he single-handedly IMO caused a new trial which reversed the guilty verdict.  (IMO Yeats was guilty as sin, but that's another story.) He testified that Yeats got the idea to kill her children from a TV drama with which he had some connection.  Only problem was, the TV show had not been shown prior to the murders. Bingo! New trial.

He can question all he wants - I guess that's why he's being paid- but it won't go anywhere.
He says Dr G did not 'open the skull' - umm, Dr G did not need to open the skull-  all she had to do was remove the duct tape, with that the mandible would separate and she could look directly into the skull.


That is TOO STUPID to even comment on but I will anyway. LOL - WHY would she need to OPEN the skull - the skull was ALREADY OPEN from the mandible being only held up by duct take. If I read the report correctly that skull had been rinsed not once but more an once with saline. If there was any sediment in it that would have settled in which position they laid the skull after the washing which proves NOTHING about how the body laid in the marsh. GEESH.........


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 13, 2011, 08:02:19 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


These @ssclowns are going to be the reason my head implodes.......VERY soon!

First of all, why is Jar Head cleaning up all of Bozo's messes??
Because Bozo is an arrogant coward, and can't own up to his blunders and mistakes.
I'll say it again.....Bozo and Skank are a match made in He!!


Isn't Bozo's goal to get qualified to be a death penalty attorney? (first chair)
Personally I don't think he has a chance in he!!
I would think sanctions would disqualify his @ss in a new york minute.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: tupelohoney on January 13, 2011, 08:03:17 PM
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/01/casey-anthony-what-are-the-defense-attorneys-up-to.html

Casey Anthony: What are the defense attorneys up to?
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH — posted by halboedeker on January, 13 2011 6:54 PM

Tonight’s WESH-Channel 2 report on the Casey Anthony case certainly raised a few questions about the defense team.
WESH’s indefatigable Bob Kealing reported that defense attorney Cheney Mason sent a letter along with Jose Baez’s $583 check for a court fine. In the letter to prosecutor Jeff Ashton, Mason talked about Baez’s youth and experience level. Mason also asked prosecutors to consider not cashing the check.

Kealing said Mason is trying persuade Ashton not to oppose a defense motion asking Chief Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider Baez’s fine for willful violation of the judge’s order.

Which made me made wonder:

1. Are Baez and Mason talking to each other?

2. Did Baez give Mason the blessing to send the letter?

3. Does Baez have enough money in the bank to cover the check?

4. Why did Mason put these thoughts in writing — which are now in the public record?

5. Why would Mason call attention to Baez’s youth and experience?

This latest move is bringing even more attention to the defense team’s methods. How does that help Casey Anthony? And shouldn’t her defense be the attorneys’ main focus? She is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter, Caylee.

The defense attorneys sound like children who won’t take any criticism. In the WESH report, veteran attorney Jeff Deen seemed exasperated with the defense team. “This is starting to wear down everybody,” Deen said.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: seemeatthebeach on January 13, 2011, 08:06:46 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


OMG!! ROFLMAO!!!! 

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Probably a big ole' rubber check that bounced to the moon!! ::MonkeyHaHa::
Bozo is going to be rocketed there tomorrow by JP.

I bet the hearing time was changed because maintenance needs some extra time to put new springs on JP's chair. I think he'll be bouncing double time!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2011, 08:09:33 PM
Let's see now.......... mason jar asks the prosecution to "PWEEZE, PWEEZE don't challenge our motion?"   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I suppose since all of their motions are too stupid to get by JP, Mason figures he'll try to get this one past the Judge by begging the prosecution to "let them win one."  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 08:18:41 PM
This is the background on the million dollar lawsuit filed against Masonn- The original suit was filed in Texas but the judge didn't find standing in that state so they refiled and that suit is pending.

Mason seems to make a habit of letting his MOUTH WRITE CHECKS his butt can't cash.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2009-10-31/news/0910300153_1_kolodziej-judge-miller-mason-s-attorneys

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202463499234&Lawyer_Sues_Again_Over_Attorneys_Alleged__Million_Challenge


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 08:20:21 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


OMG!! ROFLMAO!!!! 

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Probably a big ole' rubber check that bounced to the moon!! ::MonkeyHaHa::
Bozo is going to be rocketed there tomorrow by JP.

I bet the hearing time was changed because maintenance needs some extra time to put new springs on JP's chair. I think he'll be bouncing double time!

Maybe the time was changed to see if the check would cash and if not, big time bad news for Bozo...........LOL


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 13, 2011, 08:21:07 PM
The check does not belong to J Ashton, it was made out to the State of Florida, so he can hardly send it back.
Baez' reputation couldn't be any worse, it took years for him to be allowed to practice Law because of his disreputable behavior, he has paraded before the Media and taunted people constantly. Now because he is too idiotic to know that documents ordered by a Judge have to be produced on time, he is supposed to be cut some slack. Really.  Youth and inexperience!
There are lots of Surgeons out there way younger than him who have lives in their hands every day- 40 years is plenty to have developed a professional way of behaving -he needs to grow up and take his responsibilities seriously or he is going to end up being disbarred.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Western Observr on January 13, 2011, 08:23:09 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


OMG!! ROFLMAO!!!! 

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Probably a big ole' rubber check that bounced to the moon!! ::MonkeyHaHa::
Bozo is going to be rocketed there tomorrow by JP.

I bet the hearing time was changed because maintenance needs some extra time to put new springs on JP's chair. I think he'll be bouncing double time!

 ::MonkeyGavel::   He's gonna do some serious rocking tomorrow  ..    ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 13, 2011, 08:31:31 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


That is just so pitiful.

...and laughable.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you suppose it might bounce.  ::MonkeyJnBox::

I'll bet that's exactly the case, lmao.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 08:40:25 PM
I hate like  heck to say this, but I am of the opinion now.......... that the judge needs to REMOVE all of the defense team and give it to a court appointed attorney. I know this would delay the trial 6 months or so, but KC is not going anywhere and I do see many problems with her defense team's outrageous, incompetent behaviors. I am wondering if the judge will fire them all tomorrow.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 09:00:44 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26483763/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Pays Fine, Explains Himself
Posted: 2:41 pm EST January 13, 2011Updated: 2:48 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony, it's clearer now what allegedly caused Casey's lead attorney to have to be sanctioned by the court.

In a motion Jose Baez filed to challenge a $583 fine ( http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html ), he said bad traffic in Kissimmee kept him from delivering more defense expert information to prosecutors and he claimed the file was too big to fax.

Baez paid the fine January 12.


(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif)

Yea, yea, yea Bozo....guess what the judge will say that you know the area and should have allotted extra time for traffic ...cry me a river  :smt089

Extra time for traffic? It was to be filed by 12 NOON on Dec 14th. and he arrived at 5:02?? It took him over 5 HOURS to get there. I call BULL CRAP !!  He also said the clerk would not let him fax it ANOTHER LIE.......all he had to get there by noon was Bock's info and Fergrieve's info on the 14th - that was NOT 300 PAGES. In other words, they LIED about not being able to get that to the court. The rest of the info was required by 3:00 PM on the 23rd.

THIS IS ALL BULL CRAP AND BOZO IS GOING TO GET THE GUY WHO SIGNED THE AFFIDAVIT IN TROUBLE TOO. If you read it he was very unspecific about what time he started his trip or when he was given the document so he may have seen this SCAM OF BOZO'S coming..


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 09:10:44 PM
(http://i406.photobucket.com/albums/pp150/TURBOTHINK/checkbozo.jpg)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 09:16:19 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26483763/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Pays Fine, Explains Himself
Posted: 2:41 pm EST January 13, 2011Updated: 2:48 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony, it's clearer now what allegedly caused Casey's lead attorney to have to be sanctioned by the court.

In a motion Jose Baez filed to challenge a $583 fine ( http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html ), he said bad traffic in Kissimmee kept him from delivering more defense expert information to prosecutors and he claimed the file was too big to fax.

Baez paid the fine January 12.


(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif)

Yea, yea, yea Bozo....guess what the judge will say that you know the area and should have allotted extra time for traffic ...cry me a river  :smt089

Extra time for traffic? It was to be filed by 12 NOON on Dec 14th. and he arrived at 5:02?? It took him over 5 HOURS to get there. I call BULL CRAP !!  He also said the clerk would not let him fax it ANOTHER LIE.......all he had to get there by noon was Bock's info and Fergrieve's info on the 14th - that was NOT 300 PAGES. In other words, they LIED about not being able to get that to the court. The rest of the info was required by 3:00 PM on the 23rd.

THIS IS ALL BULL CRAP AND BOZO IS GOING TO GET THE GUY WHO SIGNED THE AFFIDAVIT IN TROUBLE TOO. If you read it he was very unspecific about what time he started his trip or when he was given the document so he may have seen this SCAM OF BOZO'S coming..

It's all the dam*ed tourists fault! Yeah, that's it! Blame the tourist attractions.  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/fireworks.gif)


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 13, 2011, 09:21:29 PM
Could it be that the defense team is going to ask for this to be heard with the other things which don't require KC to be there and hoping the judge will not notice and have this without her which might be part of an appeal?  I always have the feeling that when they are doing something up front there is something lurking behind they are hiding and trying to do.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 09:24:25 PM
Could it be that the defense team is going to ask for this to be heard with the other things which don't require KC to be there and hoping the judge will not notice and have this without her which might be part of an appeal?  I always have the feeling that when they are doing something up front there is something lurking behind they are hiding and trying to do.

Could be. Judge Perry allowed Skanky to waive being at the last hearing, and he did hear a motion.  :smt102


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 09:32:47 PM
I hate like  heck to say this, but I am of the opinion now.......... that the judge needs to REMOVE all of the defense team and give it to a court appointed attorney. I know this would delay the trial 6 months or so, but KC is not going anywhere and I do see many problems with her defense team's outrageous, incompetent behaviors. I am wondering if the judge will fire them all tomorrow.

Sadly, I agree with you. And that would be such a miscarriage of anything close to justice for Caylee. I think it would delay the trial for a lot longer than six months. That may even be the ploy at the time. Delay, delay, delay. I think Skanky has got the defense team she deserves. She chose it, and evidently she condones and likes the in-your-face show.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Northern Rose on January 13, 2011, 09:55:03 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


......As you recall when we talked,  I think there is good faith reason to not oppose the
reconsideration, given the potential future impact of the contempt citation on Mr. Baez, his youth and relative experience in these matters.  I believe it would be the right thing to do, but the decision is certainly yours, and I guess Lawson's.

 :smt082   :smt082   :smt082   :smt082

The Jar is acting mentor and father figure NOW to Bobo and asking Mr.  Ashton to consider the ramifications?  You just can not make this stuff up.  News Flash Jar, Bobo is an adult and had many months to think about his actions as well as comply. It did not seem to bother him then why should it bother him now and why FTLOG should it become Mr.  Ashton's issue when it was Bobo's actions? 

LOL (lots of luck )


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 10:27:03 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


......As you recall when we talked,  I think there is good faith reason to not oppose the
reconsideration, given the potential future impact of the contempt citation on Mr. Baez, his youth and relative experience in these matters.  I believe it would be the right thing to do, but the decision is certainly yours, and I guess Lawson's.

 :smt082   :smt082   :smt082   :smt082

The Jar is acting mentor and father figure NOW to Bobo and asking Mr.  Ashton to consider the ramifications?  You just can not make this stuff up.  News Flash Jar, Bobo is an adult and had many months to think about his actions as well as comply. It did not seem to bother him then why should it bother him now and why FTLOG should it become Mr.  Ashton's issue when it was Bobo's actions? 

LOL (lots of luck )

I must say, I am enjoying seeing them grovel. I wonder how Jar is going to get Bozo to wipe that smirk off of his face.  :smt005


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 10:38:51 PM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


......As you recall when we talked,  I think there is good faith reason to not oppose the
reconsideration, given the potential future impact of the contempt citation on Mr. Baez, his youth and relative experience in these matters.  I believe it would be the right thing to do, but the decision is certainly yours, and I guess Lawson's.

 :smt082   :smt082   :smt082   :smt082

The Jar is acting mentor and father figure NOW to Bobo and asking Mr.  Ashton to consider the ramifications?  You just can not make this stuff up.  News Flash Jar, Bobo is an adult and had many months to think about his actions as well as comply. It did not seem to bother him then why should it bother him now and why FTLOG should it become Mr.  Ashton's issue when it was Bobo's actions? 

LOL (lots of luck )

I must say, I am enjoying seeing them grovel. I wonder how Jar is going to get Bozo to wipe that smirk off of his face.  :smt005

OMG I WAS GONE ALL DAY AND CAME HOME TO THIS WOW


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2011, 10:40:07 PM
If I were Bozo, I'd have lost my smirk when my co-atty put in writing to the prosecution that, basically, I was inexperienced and inept! 

 ::piggy::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 10:42:52 PM
Could it be that the defense team is going to ask for this to be heard with the other things which don't require KC to be there and hoping the judge will not notice and have this without her which might be part of an appeal?  I always have the feeling that when they are doing something up front there is something lurking behind they are hiding and trying to do.



SO in essence baez is young and inexperienced means to me HE SHOULD NOT  be on this case period.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2011, 10:43:07 PM
It's a real eye opener, isn't it loca??   ::MonkeyHaHa::

The hearing should prove INTERESTING!!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 10:48:55 PM
It's a real eye opener, isn't it loca??   ::MonkeyHaHa::

The hearing should prove INTERESTING!!   ::MonkeyCool::

Maybe Mason is trying to get Bozo's job.  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Curly on January 13, 2011, 11:00:21 PM
The Jar could never replace Bozo in Casey's heart.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: Fanny Mae on January 13, 2011, 11:42:40 PM
The Jar could never replace Bozo in Casey's heart.

So true. But Mason is really cutting Bozo down at the knees.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 11:50:59 PM
It's a real eye opener, isn't it loca??   ::MonkeyHaHa::

The hearing should prove INTERESTING!!   ::MonkeyCool::


cbb
it sure is


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 11:55:00 PM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26483763/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Pays Fine, Explains Himself
Posted: 2:41 pm EST January 13, 2011Updated: 2:48 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony, it's clearer now what allegedly caused Casey's lead attorney to have to be sanctioned by the court.

In a motion Jose Baez filed to challenge a $583 fine ( http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html ), he said bad traffic in Kissimmee kept him from delivering more defense expert information to prosecutors and he claimed the file was too big to fax.

Baez paid the fine January 12.


(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif)

Yea, yea, yea Bozo....guess what the judge will say that you know the area and should have allotted extra time for traffic ...cry me a river  :smt089

Extra time for traffic? It was to be filed by 12 NOON on Dec 14th. and he arrived at 5:02?? It took him over 5 HOURS to get there. I call BULL CRAP !!  He also said the clerk would not let him fax it ANOTHER LIE.......all he had to get there by noon was Bock's info and Fergrieve's info on the 14th - that was NOT 300 PAGES. In other words, they LIED about not being able to get that to the court. The rest of the info was required by 3:00 PM on the 23rd.

THIS IS ALL BULL CRAP AND BOZO IS GOING TO GET THE GUY WHO SIGNED THE AFFIDAVIT IN TROUBLE TOO. If you read it he was very unspecific about what time he started his trip or when he was given the document so he may have seen this SCAM OF BOZO'S coming..

It's all the dam*ed tourists fault! Yeah, that's it! Blame the tourist attractions.  (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/fireworks.gif)




SERIOUSLY

IS IT POSSIBLE!!
 
that baez has no funds to cover the check?
what a hoot if it bounced


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 11:57:43 PM
I hate like  heck to say this, but I am of the opinion now.......... that the judge needs to REMOVE all of the defense team and give it to a court appointed attorney. I know this would delay the trial 6 months or so, but KC is not going anywhere and I do see many problems with her defense team's outrageous, incompetent behaviors. I am wondering if the judge will fire them all tomorrow.

Turbo
that would be the right thing to do in my opinion and your too oviously wow wouldnt that be a setback for the trial but not  a blessing to  the defense to get those clowns given what they wanted(removed!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 13, 2011, 11:59:04 PM
I hate like  heck to say this, but I am of the opinion now.......... that the judge needs to REMOVE all of the defense team and give it to a court appointed attorney. I know this would delay the trial 6 months or so, but KC is not going anywhere and I do see many problems with her defense team's outrageous, incompetent behaviors. I am wondering if the judge will fire them all tomorrow.


Turbo
can the judge fire them? is that a possibility has it been done before????


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: loca on January 14, 2011, 12:01:23 AM
Letter Asks Prosecutors To Consider Not Cashing Baez Fine Check

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST January 13, 2011
UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST January 13, 2011
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26487150/detail.html


OMG!! ROFLMAO!!!! 

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Probably a big ole' rubber check that bounced to the moon!! ::MonkeyHaHa::
Bozo is going to be rocketed there tomorrow by JP.

I bet the hearing time was changed because maintenance needs some extra time to put new springs on JP's chair. I think he'll be bouncing double time!

 ::MonkeyGavel::   He's gonna do some serious rocking tomorrow  ..    ::MonkeyGavel::

Probably a big ole' rubber check that bounced to the moon!!
Bozo is going to be rocketed there tomorrow by JP.

I bet the hearing time was changed because maintenance needs some extra time to put new springs on JP's chair. I think he'll be bouncing double time!


AND I PEED MY DIAPERS.




LMAO
YALL SAID



Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:10:33 AM
What time is the hearing tomorrow? I can't wait!!   ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:17:44 AM
HEY! I just thought of something! If Bozo wrote and signed a bad check........... that's a criminal offense!

I think I'm right in saying that a check MUST have sufficient funds as of the date it is written. Anything less and it's a criminal offense!

Oh, that would just be too good!!   ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 14, 2011, 12:28:35 AM
I don't know if it is just my computer or what but I have not been able to get on here for days. Been having withdrawals not knowing what was happening. LOL

I had issues not last night, but night before.  Whole shabang was down, apparently, for 12 hours. 


tooo funny the site was down! and I was  tripping thinking I  did something wrong. I was having withdrawls.

I am so stupid, I was wondering, since Bozo hates this site, if maybe he got it shut down somehow. 
Not stupid at all, I couldn't get in here or at The Caylee Daily.  I was thinking conspiracy.  There's been so many shenanigans with the A's and the defense, I'm a little paranoid.
 ::MonkeyEek::


Me too and I would  not put it past them to try shutting down sites such as this one because we are mean.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:28:59 AM
Waving to the rafters!!   ::monkeywine2::

It's almost time to jump threads!!  Good! We'll have a clean cage for the hearing!!   ::piggy::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 14, 2011, 12:31:02 AM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26483763/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Pays Fine, Explains Himself
Posted: 2:41 pm EST January 13, 2011Updated: 2:48 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony, it's clearer now what allegedly caused Casey's lead attorney to have to be sanctioned by the court.

In a motion Jose Baez filed to challenge a $583 fine ( http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html ), he said bad traffic in Kissimmee kept him from delivering more defense expert information to prosecutors and he claimed the file was too big to fax.

Baez paid the fine January 12.


So, Bozo is blaming traffic and the clerks office.  What a putz!!!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:31:06 AM
Hi Zoo!! This site has a nightly maintenance and for a few minutes it goes down. It used to happen around 1:00am Eastern, but I've noticed lately it jumps around!  :smt102


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:33:34 AM
Yep! Bozo is blaming traffic and Mason is blaming Bozo's inexperience!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 14, 2011, 12:33:41 AM
Werner Spitz may question Dr. G's work, but I question his.  In the Andrea Yeats trial, he single-handedly IMO caused a new trial which reversed the guilty verdict.  (IMO Yeats was guilty as sin, but that's another story.)  He testified that Yeats got the idea to kill her children from a TV drama with which he had some connection.  Only problem was, the TV show had not been shown prior to the murders. Bingo! New trial.

OH MY GOSH, I so agree.  LUCKILY, and hopefully, she will stay locked away somewhere, even if I think it should be a jail cell and she is in a hospital.  What a travesty that was.  If this guy is Bozo's witnesses, good luck is all I can say. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 14, 2011, 12:35:37 AM
Trying to catch up a few pages, We lock on page 50 and I am panicing that somehow my posts will get lost, sigh.  I'll be back.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 14, 2011, 12:37:31 AM
http://www.wftv.com/news/26483763/detail.html
Casey's Attorney Pays Fine, Explains Himself
Posted: 2:41 pm EST January 13, 2011Updated: 2:48 pm EST January 13, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- In the case against Casey Anthony, it's clearer now what allegedly caused Casey's lead attorney to have to be sanctioned by the court.

In a motion Jose Baez filed to challenge a $583 fine ( http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26455761/detail.html ), he said bad traffic in Kissimmee kept him from delivering more defense expert information to prosecutors and he claimed the file was too big to fax.

Baez paid the fine January 12.


(http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif) (http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab6/fannymae66/laugh3.gif)

Yea, yea, yea Bozo....guess what the judge will say that you know the area and should have allotted extra time for traffic ...cry me a river  :smt089

I also do not consider filing a motion 5 minutes before the court closes filing it on time.  They should have a deadline like 12 noon or something. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 14, 2011, 12:39:03 AM
Saw this posted over at Websleuths. http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6006430&postcount=695
WESH just reported they HAVE a copy of Baez's check and a letter written by Mason to Jeff Ashton asking him NOT to cash it..and hopes he will not argue against their Motion for Reconsideration
No link, yet...Nums?

The Reporter did state that the SAO Office said the check and letter are not going to be released as Public Record BUT when the Court Admin received it, he said they gave him (reporter) a copy.

Waiting for Link to be posted on WESH...

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME.  I bet the check is no good.


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:39:48 AM
I agree, Zoo! I like High Noon!! Your posts won't be lost! They'll be right here, I promise!!

Actually, I'm working on a CRAPPY computer and it may take me a minute after we get to page 50................ so no worries, Zoo!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:41:21 AM
I love reading retro posts! You Go Zoo!!   ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 14, 2011, 12:44:42 AM
(http://i406.photobucket.com/albums/pp150/TURBOTHINK/checkbozo.jpg)

What is that crossed out at the bottom of the check, account number or something? 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:47:28 AM
It looks like it's the account number. I'm sure they wouldn't want to reveal that. Baez would get downright squeaky over that one!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:52:17 AM
4 more posts and we'll be at page 50!   ::MonkeySkate::

Just a warning............. my computer is in the shop, so I'm working on a really slow one! I'll get it changed, but it may be slower than usual!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: ZooMomology on January 14, 2011, 12:52:40 AM
I lost when the hearing is tomorrow, it is tomorrow right?  I will be watching.  I cannot believe how stupid these 2 are.  Asking to not cash a check.  OMG, I cannot wait to see all the contorsions JP's face makes as he listens to them drone on, while bouncing his legs, rocking, and wording his words the way he loves to do.

If it bounced or he has no money to cover it, really Bozo is in sad shape.  How will he pay his staff if he cannot cover a check for 583.00?  I bet, and It is JMO, I have no proof, but a strong suspicion that all those charges billed to the JAC, somehow, he is working with the billers to pump up the charges so he can get some of it. 

I  have to go grab a nap, so lock away.  I will catch you all on the new one tomorrow. 


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: TURBOTHINK on January 14, 2011, 12:54:34 AM
I hate like  heck to say this, but I am of the opinion now.......... that the judge needs to REMOVE all of the defense team and give it to a court appointed attorney. I know this would delay the trial 6 months or so, but KC is not going anywhere and I do see many problems with her defense team's outrageous, incompetent behaviors. I am wondering if the judge will fire them all tomorrow.


Turbo
can the judge fire them? is that a possibility has it been done before????

I really don't know but I do know in a criminal court here a judge has removed an attorney for "CAUSE". The "cause' was never stated, but the consensus of opinion in the legal community was the defendant was not getting  an adequate defense. It was done in a "closed hearing" with just the attorneys and the judge. That hearing was sealed.

Now, whether that was a hired attorney or a court appointed attorney I don't know. It is the judge's responsibility to make sure the defendant is getting a fair trial and I would guess if he felt the attorney was not capable of doing that they could remove them.

I asked my brother about this hearing to get the judge to rescind his contempt order & he said he would assume the reason that Mason was trying to get it removed is because if ONE attorney in a defense team is cited it goes on all their records. It does not just go on Bozo's but also on Mason's because he knew what the order was and did not provide what the court ordered. Even if Bozo is fined, Mason would also be responsible because as co-counsel if Bozo would not provide it then he had make Bozo or do it himself as the order as he read it was NOT just to Bozo but to the defense, period !!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:54:37 AM
Night Zoo!! See you tomorrow!!  ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:56:13 AM
Thanks, Turbo! Geez......... no wonder Mason is trying to get it reversed!


Title: Re: Caylee Marie Anthony #177 1/4/11 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2011, 12:56:56 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/MODLOCK1.gif)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=9238.0