Lively Case Discussion #594 3/29 - 4/1/2007

[BTgirl]

Evening monkeys!  Just dropping in to see that the Darkside is imploding and there has been earthquakes and all manner of insanity today.

So...how is everyone?

Hi Lalas! I saw you lurking last night and waved, but I don't think you saw me.

[Lala'sMom]

They might as well get over it now, it's too late.  It's on the internet and it's public knowledge.  Besides if it's the TRUTH what is the problem?  Oh, I forgot...it's not their version of the TRUTH.  

[Lala'sMom]

Hello BT!   I saw you wave at me, but company called and I had to drop everything and be nice...the nerve of some people!  Don't they know I have monkeys to talk to?  

[robots]

the TRUTH is a Beautiful Thing


TRUTH...........too bad the MOB of JACKASSES wouldnt know truth if it BIT em in the EAR

[Tamikosmom]

If what Glenda (cough, cough) said was true about the ALE being so appreciative about Roger's work in this case it proves one thing. IMO It seems Roger was working to exonerate Joran. So, I guess that means that ALE was hoping for the sporter to be exonerated. Why is this not surprising?!

Roger of Scrux.com originally represented the tape of the Deepak/Skeeters interview that came into his possession as being given to him "directly" from the "Aruban Police Department".  He claimed it was "real thing, uncut and unedited".  However ... he later changed the claim to a disclaimer.  Now ... the disclaimer does not appear at the link.  Who knows what the truth is?

Nevertheless, I contend that only the hard drive that was given by Jamie Skeeter to the FBI can confirm what was said during that interview.

Janet


POST - SCRUX.COM FORUM
Roger
http://www.scrux.com/discuss/viewtopic.php?t=118
January 30, 2006

I only know what I have been told. I received the recording directly from the Aruban Police Department. I was told that it is exactly what was provided to the NFI (Netherlands Forensic Institute) and verified as having not been manipulated in any way.

<snipped>

Some people have speculated that I probably got this from a defense attorney or maybe one of the Aruban public relations groups. I did not get a copy from any of those sources. I simply would not have hosted the recording if it had come from anyone other than the proper authority. Receiving this directly from the Aruban Police provided me assurance and confidence that it was exactly what they maintained it to be.


ORIGINAL CLAIM
Roger
http://www.scrux.com/natalee/deepakskeetersvideo.htm
January, 2006

"This is the real thing, uncut and unedited. What was broadcast on the Dr. Phil show was edited, censored, cut and pasted, to give a distorted view of what Deepak had to say. You will be amazed at the differences."

The entire Skeeters Deepak interview video and transcript

Here are links to the entire video. This is the exact original as tested by the NFI......


REVISED - DISCLAIMER
Roger
http://www.scrux.com/natalee/deepakskeetersvideo.htm
February, 2006

While this must be regarded as unsubstantiated information, it appears to be the real thing, uncut and unedited. What was broadcast on the Dr. Phil show was edited, censored, cut and pasted, to give a distorted view of what Deepak had to say. You will be amazed at the differences. However, we must say that we have not had the version we are hosting tested. We think that it is real. However, no one can know for sure, unless we are able to have a professional, forensic, audiology laboratory check the recording to see if this version has been altered. I have not had such a test conducted, but I would welcome just such an evaluation

The entire Skeeters Deepak interview video and transcript

Here are links to the entire video. This was represented to us as the exact original as tested by the NFI (although that is unsubstantiated).......
 

REVISED REVISED - DISCLAIMER
Roger
http://www.scrux.com/natalee/deepakskeetersvideo.htm
February, 2006

Here are links to the entire video. This was represented to us as the exact original as tested by the NFI (although that is unsubstantiated). The whole file is so large that it is impractical to put up on the net, but I divided it into manageable segments. Each one is ten minutes. After the first, each subsequent segment also includes about 30 seconds of over lap (the last 30 seconds of the previous one is included on each segment) for continuity.

There has been no further encoding (as is done to make videos web presentable). This is the exact original which Aruba and subsequently, the NFI, tested and reported as being unaltered (not manipulated).

[klaasend]

Tamikosmom - I agree 100%

[Sleuth]

O/T

Tsunami update, direct from Queensland (NE Australia).  Warnings in the area have been downgraded but beaches remain closed as a precautionary measure.  Good news.

[klaasend]

O/T

Tsunami update, direct from Queensland (NE Australia).  Warnings in the area have been downgraded but beaches remain closed as a precautionary measure.  Good news.

They are getting a ton of fairly significant aftershocks too.

[Tamikosmom]

The following endorsed the open letter to Oprah requested that the tape of the Deepak/Skeeters' interview that came into Rogers possession be exposed on her show.

Janet


{{edit- I feel better deleting it}}

[klaasend]

NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

So What Does Joran Van der Sloot Do as a Hobby? Train Graffiti Art

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/01/so-what-does-joran-van-der-sloot-do-as-a-hobby-train-graffiti-art/


This is the site of Joran's Elaine found.  Check out the front page train graffiti  

[greeneyedlady]

Klaas this was the only post Glenda made back at Diva after it went to HE.
Then Pax replied below.

DivaToo wrote:
I never discussed anything with Danse other than a mutual friend we have who used to be a poster  I resigned because of bull shit drama just like this. Its the interfuckingnet. Everyone is anonymous as they want to be.. and NO ONE is going to solve this lame, cold ass case on a message board.

Get over yourself Glenda. Everyone assumes Glenda is Julia. SO what if I referred to you as Julia in a post months and months ago?  It was an accident. I said that I was sorry. What else could I have done?
It's really unfortunate that you're so petty you can't let this go. I used to think alot of you until I read this and found out you were holding a grudge for this long.  

Glenda/Julia wrote:
Petty would be mentioning that you spent more on your fake D's than your aluminum house.

Pax wrote:
Glenda, you're making dubious allegations based on speculation and innuendo and revealing personal information. Sounds like what you and your 'friends' have been doing for a long time. Wonder if you'll ever get over it. It doesn't say much for your credibility, imho.

[klaasend]

Tamikosmom - Wasn't that foolish to put that on the internet?  I'd delete it but I know for a fact you can still pull it up.

[klaasend]

Klaas this was the only post Glenda made back at Diva after it went to HE.
Then Pax replied below.

DivaToo wrote:
I never discussed anything with Danse other than a mutual friend we have who used to be a poster  I resigned because of bull shit drama just like this. Its the interfuckingnet. Everyone is anonymous as they want to be.. and NO ONE is going to solve this lame, cold ass case on a message board.

Get over yourself Glenda. Everyone assumes Glenda is Julia. SO what if I referred to you as Julia in a post months and months ago?  It was an accident. I said that I was sorry. What else could I have done?
It's really unfortunate that you're so petty you can't let this go. I used to think alot of you until I read this and found out you were holding a grudge for this long.  

Glenda/Julia wrote:
Petty would be mentioning that you spent more on your fake D's than your aluminum house.

Pax wrote:
Glenda, you're making dubious allegations based on speculation and innuendo and revealing personal information. Sounds like what you and your 'friends' have been doing for a long time. Wonder if you'll ever get over it. It doesn't say much for your credibility, imho.

Wow, talk about petty.  Turning into quite the dirty cat fight.

[robots]

CcccCccccccccccccaaaaaaaaaaaaat   FIGHT  

[Elaine]

If what Glenda (cough, cough) said was true about the ALE being so appreciative about Roger's work in this case it proves one thing. IMO It seems Roger was working to exonerate Joran. So, I guess that means that ALE was hoping for the sporter to be exonerated. Why is this not surprising?!

Roger of Scrux.com originally represented the tape of the Deepak/Skeeters interview that came into his possession as being given to him "directly" from the "Aruban Police Department".  He claimed it was "real thing, uncut and unedited".  However ... he later changed the claim to a disclaimer.  Now ... the disclaimer does not appear at the link.  Who knows what the truth is?

Nevertheless, I contend that only the hard drive that was given by Jamie Skeeter to the FBI can confirm what was said during that interview.

Janet


POST - SCRUX.COM FORUM
Roger
http://www.scrux.com/discuss/viewtopic.php?t=118
January 30, 2006

I only know what I have been told. I received the recording directly from the Aruban Police Department. I was told that it is exactly what was provided to the NFI (Netherlands Forensic Institute) and verified as having not been manipulated in any way.

<snipped>

Some people have speculated that I probably got this from a defense attorney or maybe one of the Aruban public relations groups. I did not get a copy from any of those sources. I simply would not have hosted the recording if it had come from anyone other than the proper authority. Receiving this directly from the Aruban Police provided me assurance and confidence that it was exactly what they maintained it to be.


ORIGINAL CLAIM
Roger
http://www.scrux.com/natalee/deepakskeetersvideo.htm
January, 2006

"This is the real thing, uncut and unedited. What was broadcast on the Dr. Phil show was edited, censored, cut and pasted, to give a distorted view of what Deepak had to say. You will be amazed at the differences."

The entire Skeeters Deepak interview video and transcript

Here are links to the entire video. This is the exact original as tested by the NFI......


REVISED - DISCLAIMER
Roger
http://www.scrux.com/natalee/deepakskeetersvideo.htm
February, 2006

While this must be regarded as unsubstantiated information, it appears to be the real thing, uncut and unedited. What was broadcast on the Dr. Phil show was edited, censored, cut and pasted, to give a distorted view of what Deepak had to say. You will be amazed at the differences. However, we must say that we have not had the version we are hosting tested. We think that it is real. However, no one can know for sure, unless we are able to have a professional, forensic, audiology laboratory check the recording to see if this version has been altered. I have not had such a test conducted, but I would welcome just such an evaluation

The entire Skeeters Deepak interview video and transcript

Here are links to the entire video. This was represented to us as the exact original as tested by the NFI (although that is unsubstantiated).......
 

REVISED REVISED - DISCLAIMER
Roger
http://www.scrux.com/natalee/deepakskeetersvideo.htm
February, 2006

Here are links to the entire video. This was represented to us as the exact original as tested by the NFI (although that is unsubstantiated). The whole file is so large that it is impractical to put up on the net, but I divided it into manageable segments. Each one is ten minutes. After the first, each subsequent segment also includes about 30 seconds of over lap (the last 30 seconds of the previous one is included on each segment) for continuity.

There has been no further encoding (as is done to make videos web presentable). This is the exact original which Aruba and subsequently, the NFI, tested and reported as being unaltered (not manipulated).

Thank you for posting all this, amazing how things change, isn't it? Ex: revisions and revisions that disappeared, and even Roger himself! LMAO! Oh my goodness. ...He probably got whatever the heck he had from none other than JR herself,LOL!  I still beleive that in the end Skeeters hard drive has the truth, and until proven otherwise I beleive What Skeeters said. JMO

[Tamikosmom]

Tamikosmom - Wasn't that foolish to put that on the internet?  I'd delete it but I know for a fact you can still pull it up.

Klaas, please feel free to delete any of my posts if you feel they are not appropriate.

I apologize.

Janet

[carpe noctem]

The following endorsed the open letter to Oprah requested that the tape of the Deepak/Skeeters' interview that came into Rogers possession be exposed on her show.

Janet


{{edit- I feel better deleting it}}
-more to come-

{{edit}}

[klaasend]

Tamikosmom - Wasn't that foolish to put that on the internet?  I'd delete it but I know for a fact you can still pull it up.

Klaas, please feel free to delete any of my posts if you feel they are not appropriate.

I apologize.

Janet

I just asked Red about it.  He said if it's available by google (which it is) and they were dumb enough to put their email addys on it it's OK to leave.

[robots]

Tamikosmom - Wasn't that foolish to put that on the internet?  I'd delete it but I know for a fact you can still pull it up.

Klaas, please feel free to delete any of my posts if you feel they are not appropriate.

I apologize.

Janet

I just asked Red about it.  He said if it's available by google (which it is) and they were dumb enough to put their email addys on it it's OK to leave.

RED ROCKS  

[greeneyedlady]

LMAO-Do ya think Glenda/Julia was calling Diva trailor trash with the aluminum house bit?