Caylee Marie Anthony MURDER TRIAL- DAY 24- 6/21/11

[NickandNora]

I loved that Jeff asked him if he and his wife decided to make the doc the dna expert for their company.  He immediately answered yes.  lol  Gotcha

 

[trimmonthelake]

http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=623623406/21/2011      Notice of Filing
Deposition of Dr. William Rodriguez
06/21/2011     Notice of Filing
06/21/2011     Deposition
William Rodriguez III PHD 6/18/2011
06/21/2011     Deposition
Holly Gagne 9/30/2010
06/21/2011     Deposition
Dominic Casey 3/28/2011

OMG....Holly Gagne?  Why??? 

 DOMINIC CASEY   

[Northern Rose]

CFNews13Casey Casey Anthony News13
RE says his business is also inspected (audited) ever year compared to twice a year in United States. #CaseyAnthony -jfell

http://twitter.com/#!/CFNews13Casey

[darla]

OH Dear Lord why doesn't the defense just give it up already. They have nothing, nada, zip. We all know it and I am sure the jury does by now! And we all know how shoddy the Netherlands are in evidence handling.

[cubbeegirl]

This defense is somewhat painfully comical.  Where'd she find this knucklehead (Baez)?  Did she see him on a law firm commercial that played at 3am?  What a joke.

Quesyion I have though is...what, there is no DNA experts in the U.S.?  maybe if they had one, the Stenographer wouldn't be sweaty trying to keep up with his speech speed and accent...

Someone in jail reccommended him to her.....It is painfully comical...and it is really pissing me off that a mockery is being made of Caylees murder trial...

Good morning old friend!

[Cappuccino]

SIDEBAR

Ashton is hammering Bozo on trying to coach the witness to bolster qualifications he does NOT have

[flutterby42]

The red dots are in her eyes.

the red dots are 'above' her eyes...look down from the red dots...

That is not a skull, looks more like pelvic bones. In that picture the skull was, if i recall correctly, outside of the area where the bag ties can be seen. The skull is just outside of the frame on the lower left corner. The skull was just visible underneath a log that had either fallen or was placed on top of the bag with the body.

hmmm...I see two eye sockets staring up at me...

Are you saying that the large round opening is the top of the mouth? With the eye sockets above it? If that's what you're seeing, maybe.....

[cookie]

who is Holly Dagne? forgot...

[NickandNora]

Why not just keep two sets of equipment out for that poor woman reporting for the court...one in front of witness stand and one near the sidebar, just to save the poor woman from having to haul that back and forth so much?

[Cappuccino]

CFNews13Casey Casey Anthony News13
RE says his business is also inspected (audited) ever year compared to twice a year in United States. #CaseyAnthony -jfell

http://twitter.com/#!/CFNews13Casey

Inspected for specifically what?   That is a rather evasive answer considering the possibilities

[iowagirl]

Are you saying that the large round opening is the top of the mouth? With the eye sockets above it? If that's what you're seeing, maybe.....
[/quote]

I changed the pic.. it's now circling the skull.

[KittyMom]

I loved that Jeff asked him if he and his wife decided to make the doc the dna expert for their company.  He immediately answered yes.  lol  Gotcha

I'm appreciating that he's honest at least.  That puts him so far makes him somewhat unique among the witness for Casey.

I think he's being completely honest and has by now realized that he was taken advantage of by Jose.  Bet he'll be more careful before agreeing to work with any other defense atty in the US.  He's learned a difficult lesson.

[cubbeegirl]

JudgeJeanine Jeanine Pirro
Casey doesn't look too happy - nor should she..... #caseyanthony

http://twitter.com/#!/JudgeJeanine

She's lucky she has @$$hats even willing to fight for her, she knows what she did

Yes Capp... I think her tears are more..." oh , shit, I did that and everyone knows it..." Not for Caylee at all...jmo

[Northern Rose]

 Aphrodite_Jones Aphrodite Jones
#caseyanthony Ashton has already had this witness for lunch! He's an expert in luminol -- has no expertise in DNA!!!

http://twitter.com/#!/Aphrodite_Jones

[cookie]

The red dots are in her eyes.

the red dots are 'above' her eyes...look down from the red dots...

That is not a skull, looks more like pelvic bones. In that picture the skull was, if i recall correctly, outside of the area where the bag ties can be seen. The skull is just outside of the frame on the lower left corner. The skull was just visible underneath a log that had either fallen or was placed on top of the bag with the body.

hmmm...I see two eye sockets staring up at me...

Are you saying that the large round opening is the top of the mouth? With the eye sockets above it? If that's what you're seeing, maybe.....

the jaw is somewhat buried..

[KittyMom]

Why not just keep two sets of equipment out for that poor woman reporting for the court...one in front of witness stand and one near the sidebar, just to save the poor woman from having to haul that back and forth so much?

I suggested the other week that it needed wheels on it.

[Angiex911dsptchr]

This defense is somewhat painfully comical.  Where'd she find this knucklehead (Baez)?  Did she see him on a law firm commercial that played at 3am?  What a joke.

Quesyion I have though is...what, there is no DNA experts in the U.S.?  maybe if they had one, the Stenographer wouldn't be sweaty trying to keep up with his speech speed and accent...

IMO BOZO is a yellow page attorney.. maybe she let her fingers to the walking ! 
Bet shes shittin her pants now.. inmate dont look to happy today.. she HAS to know shes "F" d !

[SunnyinTX]

  This really pizzes me off!!  What a HUGE WASTE!!!   Now a Frye hearing.....grrrrrr

me too.....so once again JB violates a court order and no sanction.....but gets a frye hearing???

[Magic Eyes]

11:00am Tues, June 21, 2011 Court is in session. The jury is not present in the court.

The judge is reviewing an instruction to be read to the jury.  Did Dr. Eikelenbloom provide an affidavit?  Yes.  This is the instruction I will give.  All expert witnesses were to provide reports giving all opinions and were due prior to the trial, this report was not provided till June 21, 2011. 

Baez is objecting......

The judge says he needs the witness to come in.

Defense witness Is Dr. Eikelenbloom.

Judge asks, when were you first contacted by the defense?  July 2010.  Where you ever informed that you were required to produce a report giving your opinions?  No, not except for the affidavits.  Where you ever informed of the following court order that you must give.  Judge reads off the things that should of been complied with and asks him if he was ever informed of that order of the court?  No.  You do not live in the continental US?  No.  How were you communicating with the defense?  By phone, email and Skype.  Were you ever requested or asked to reduce your opinions in a written report in the format I just outlined?  No.  Who was the principal person of the defense you were in contact?  Mr Baez.  From May 2011 till up till todays date, were you ever asked to make a report including all your opinions?  Last Sat, I talked to Mr Baez and we went to the DA and was refused to give a depot, then I wrote a report.  How many times have you communicated with members of the defense team?  I am not sure, I had contact then lost contact and lost track of the case.  Were you readily available to be contacted by the defense team?  Yes.  You didn't disappear during that time period?  No.

Baez is up.................

Is this the first time you were asked to write a report on a case that had certain perimeters?  Yes, by an investigative judge.  That would be on things you have done?  Could be both.  The contact with your company on Jan 2011, that was done with your wife and Ms Medina?  Yes.  The info came from Ms Medina and then to your wife and then you?  Yes.  What you ended up doing is what your wife told you?  Yes.  What you in turn ended up doing was turning in an affidavit?  Yes.  That you had done some work in this case?  Yes.  Were you ever told to exclude or add things to your report?  No.  You never spoke to Ms Medina that a report needed to be done?  That was told to you by your wife?  No, I don't recall.  We were very busy at that time.  The questions and the opinions that you raised and formulated on Sat, they were first broached on Sat, correct?  Yes.  These are not opinions that you held before and were going to testify to?  Yes.  On Friday I made a power point demonstration, explaining touch DNA and PCR.  They were just to explain DNA.  After our talk on Sat, you were now asked to take a depot at the SA Office.  We had an appt at the SA Office and were refused entrance by Jeff Ashton.  Was he polite?  No, he was some kind of rude.  After that occurred were you instructed by Ms Medina to write a report?  Yes.  Then you emailed it to me on Sat night?

Jeff is up.........

Is there anything you wrote Sat that you could not have written prior?  If asked I could of written a report.  Did he give you any new info on Sat?  Yes, it was new to me because I did not follow the case. I needed guidance from him.  Did he give you any new reports any factual info you did not have before.  Yes, crime scene info and reports from the FBI on Friday.  What new FBI reports were given on Friday?  I got a whole folder.  What was new? I asked for more reports after I got the subpoena.

Judge is talking, citing case law.  McDuffy V State, 2007 decision of the Fl Supreme Court. Talks about the court's order and it being changed to new language, outlining the need for the expert to put his opinions in writing. This discovery violation was willful, it should of been clearly communicated to the expert.  It was a substantial violation, not trivial.  It has had a prejudicial effect on the prosecution's case.  Should he totally exclude his DNA testimony?  The court can not make that determination in this short period of time.  It is an extreme remedy, the court has decided to do the following:  The court will not allow the expert to testify about the DNA on decomposition fluid.  The court will give the defense until next week by Sat to file for a motion for Frye Hearing.  On the next Thurs after court and the attorneys have had dinner they will determine if it is a Frye matter.  This is a remedy short of exclusion but he will not permit this testimony at this time.

Baez is up.....

Today we were handed by the State of Florida......Jp interrupts him, OK, we will take that up at noon on your lunch hour but we have a jury sitting in there.  Jeff said something I couldn't hear and we are waiting for something. They are now bringing in the jury, 11:35am   

[Northern Rose]

bobkealing bob kealing
#CayleeAnthony Couple back row jurors taking swig of water. Now six is in front row. Two looking extra zen-like today.

http://twitter.com/#!/bobkealing