Caylee Marie Anthony MURDER TRIAL - DAY 26 - 6/23/11

[beth1970]

It was a one eyed one horned flying purple people eater...

There's our girl!  The one we all know.  The real cindy anthony, the liar, the manipulator, the con-artist, the deep dark secret keeper.  cindy anthony.

if they're not in jail when this is over they're going to have to move to another country

[TURBOTHINK]

Why didn't the presecution light her ass up on cross?  I didn't get to see, but shouldn't have Ashton been able to rip her a new one?

I would think they will get all her depositions together in this case and the ZG case then recall her about it. I am also guessing they are issuing a supeona for all her office emails. As dumb as she is about computers, I am guessing she has NO IDEA they can pull her records from her office. Just to say her supervisor made a mistake on the date will not wash, as there are time cards (she has told before) and there will be computer records. She will be destroyed in cross by the state.

[tupelohoney]

based on what we saw today does anyone else wonder if when the dufense has Geo up on the stand will they ask him to pull out his schmeckle and see if slore can ID it as the one she had in her mouth before she went to school when she was 13?

How long does it take for Viagra to kick in?!     Timing is of the essence, don't ya know....they'll want the jury to see good!!    You are too funny!!

[Northern Rose]

The "old" Cindy we knew from the beginning is back! IMO

SHEEEEESSSS BACKKKKKKKKKKK! 

[beth1970]

yikes what a look

[Tamikosmom]

Lippman just said that Cindy testified just as truthful (now) as she did for the State!!  So Cindy lied all the way through, imo.   

Wonder if Lippman is going under the bus next?

1.  Mark Nejames
2.  Brad Conway
3.  Mark Lippman

[cubbeegirl]

based on what we saw today does anyone else wonder if when the dufense has Geo up on the stand will they ask him to pull out his schmeckle and see if slore can ID it as the one she had in her mouth before she went to school when she was 13?

OMG....this goes right along the lines with what I was ranting about after SinSin's testimony....It makes me sick...she does not deserve to wear that jewelry with Caylee on it.....we care more about Caylee than she does...I fully expect Geoerge and then Lee to lie for her too....remember Mallory's teary testimony....ughhhh....Oh, I better quit before I get myself in trouble,

[Samarie]

Why didn't the presecution light her ass up on cross?  I didn't get to see, but shouldn't have Ashton been able to rip her a new one?

There's still time. I think the state will ream Spindy a new one during their rebuttal.

[cubbeegirl]

The "old" Cindy we knew from the beginning is back! IMO

SHEEEEESSSS BACKKKKKKKKKKK! 

Elton John wrote a song about her...

[Ono]

Lippman just said that Cindy testified just as truthful (now) as she did for the State!!  So Cindy lied all the way through, imo.  

Wonder if Lippman is going under the bus next?

Her testimony today contradicts her testimony if depositions. She is done........stick a fork in her because this will be brought out when they get the depos together. I hope this is the straw that broke the camel's back for them charging her with obstruction. They wanted to allow her to appear the grieving grandmother, but she crossed the line today lying and I think all hell with be released against her now.

I'm thinking you're right-at least the process has probably begun.  Leopards really do not change their spots.

[Magic Eyes]

3:35pm Thurs, June 23, 2011 Court is in session. Jury is in the courtroom.

Next witness is Kevin Stenger.

You are a computer forensic examiner and a Sgt for OC?  Baez wants him to be declared an expert witness again.  He is.

You first used Net.analysis and then Cacheback?  I don't know who did the recovery, I am aware of the search but I did not do it.  Do you see the print out on the screen, are you familiar with this document?  I am.  Is it a fair and accurate record of the analysis at the time it was done?  Yes.  Linda is asking if he has the whole document?  Baez wants to ask him about the month of March 2008.  Side bar...side bar over.

3:45pm Court is in a 10 minute recess.

3:55 Sidebar without court reporter. Sidebar over.....4:02

Linda is asking the judge about documents and he said for them to look them over and come to an agreement.  He doesn't want the jury brought in, just to be sent out again. 

4:10pm Jury is brought in the courtroom.

Defense witness is Kevin Stenger.

Baez is up............

Have you had the opportunity to review the document?  Yes.  Linda wants only the relevant portions of the document introduced, once the relevance has been established.  He is to use only the untabbed pages, he is now taking out the untabbed pages.  What is this?  This is a report of the deleted computer history done with Net analysis.  You met Mr Bradley after you completed this report?  Yes.  What did you ask him?  I asked him if he could use his program to figure out how to change the time because of daylight savings time.  Because of that half would be correct and half incorrect.  The only issue you were having is daylight savings time?  Yes.  Did Cacheback find more files than the other software did?  I don't know.  How long did it take him to use it?  I don't know.  Sustained.  Baez is approaching the witness.  Wants him to look at March 24, 2008 at a specific time.  He found it.  What is the website there?  Scispot.com.  What is this item? How many times was it visited? 1. It is this report from Cacheback, how many times does it say this website was visited?  84  Does it show whether the website was typed in? Yes My space was visited 84 times on the net.analysis.  Is My Space even listed on the Cacheback report? No, sir not at that time.  He is publishing that page to the jury.  What you just testified to is that on Net.analysis, the Scispot was visited 1 time and the My Space was visited 84 times?  Correct.  Baez is showing the witness a new document.  Do you see a particular entry?  I do?  That is one day earlier on March 20, 2008, that is My Space typed in how many times?  83.  You understand that 83 comes before 84?  Yes.  Now go to March 19, 2008.  Do you see where it was typed?  Yes.  That is where it was typed in the browser?  Yes and how many times does it show it was visited?  82.  Baez is pointing out March 13.  Do you see an entry that was typed for My Space 81 times?  Do you see any of these items on the Cacheback report?  You wouldn't it was only for March 21, 2008.  You can't see the natural progression that goes 81, 81, 82,84?  Yes.  That is just two row downs from the other entry?  What was the reason Net.analysis came up with more INTERNET history than the Cacheback did?  The reports are different.  You prepared the report for this jury?  Yes sir.  You did not testify to this report to the jury?  No sir.  You prepared this report also, a Cache back report for March 17, 2008.  You did not testify to this report, Mr Bradley did? Yes. 

Linda is up........

How is that you prepared a Cachback generated report, did you have that software?  Yes.  How did you prepare that?  The information that went into the report was nothing you worked on?  The program itself generated this information.  Why did you have Mr Bradley examine the data?  I thought he could help me with the problems I was having.  Do you see displayed on this page any of the Google searches that were conducted on March 21, 2008?  8 rows above.  Were the Google searches for How to make chloroform?  Yes, it is right above the My Space entry.  How did that happen?  It includes every word that you typed in.  Would it appear that way if someone was searching for Chlorophyll?  No, it would not.  What can you do on Net.Analysis?  You compare the dates to see if they are accurate or not.  Do you have confidence that the dates and times on this Net.Analysis were correct or would you Cacheback be more accurate.  I can't speak to how they were interpreted because I did not write the code.  What on this displays the date and time this internet history was made?  He is showing her the column it would be, she is showing it on the monitor.  Even in the net.analysis the My Space entry and the search for chloroform are seconds apart.  Yes

Baez is up..........

The visits for chloroform that were on the net.analysis report shows that those were the very first time those websites were visited, show one time? All of these websites were visited once on net.analysis?  Yes.  Can you tell how long anyone was looking at chloroform before moving on?  3 minutes.  Your Cacheback that doesn't show the My Space entries was purchased after you used the Net.analysis?  You need to get your cash back.  Sustained. 

Linda is up........

Even though they were done in a 3 minute time doesn't mean that a person wasn't opening other tabs at the same time?  Correct.  It tells us nothing about how long that person was reading what was on the web page or they printed it for subsequent reading?  No.

Baez.................

This tab stuff is pure speculation, you don't know that?  Yes.  You are an LE did anyone inform you they found pages that were printed out on chloroform?  I wasn't told that. Witness is excused.

4:50pm The judge is excusing the jury for the day.  He is going to go over legal matters.

Jeff talking about Nick Savage and Karen Martin.  They have no first hand knowledge of anything, he wants a proffer to see that they have nothing to say.

The judge says they are going to testify to hearsay.  Jeff says that Karen Martin only receives evidence, she would have to testify to something that someone told her, which would be interesting.

Mason says, this is a strange way to go about this, tell them what is coming.  They are from the FBI and they will testify to what they did in the case. 

Jeff is worried that they want testimony about George's paternity test.

Mason says that an FBI agent has memorialized in detail about emails saying that we will just say we did not take the pictures.  The integrity of this case is challenged.  The judge wants to hear the proffer.  Mason says let's go for it.

Defense witness is FBI Agent Nick Savage for proffer, the jury is not in the courtroom.

Mason is up......

Are you the lead FBI agent in the case of Caylee Anthony?  Yes, i was the missing children's coordinator and the violent crimes coordinator.  Where you in a meeting with prosecutes whether of not duct tape could of covered the nose and mouth of this child?  Objection work product.  Sustained.  After the meeting did you try to find some photos for the prosecution?  I would of coordinated with Karen Allen who was with the lab.  Did you make a request for photos at the ME's office with scales.  Possible yes.  Do you remember requesting of Karen Lowe or Karen Martin of scale sizes of the duct tape?  Yes.  Do you recall the reason for those photos?  I asked because I didn't think they had been taken up to that point.  Mason is approaching Nick with an email, do you recognize it?  Yes.  The first time I saw it was with your office.  Nick says that is the first time he has seen that email. 

Jeff sees nothing to argue yet.
The witness is excused.

Next witness is Erin Martin, FBI request coordinator.

Mason is up.

Do you remember sending an email to Karen Lowe?  No, he is showing it to her.  Yes, she did send it.  It says, Hey Karen, I did not decide to give the report to Nick and that there were no photos.  I do not understand why the ME's did not take photos when it was on the skull.  Did you have any other else to do with this part of the case?  No.

Judge wants to take up Agent Savage first, what does it prove or disprove? Mason says, if there is or is not a murder weapon?  Mr Ashton tried to make this tape a murder weapon.  He told Nick Savage to find photos of the tape on the skull with a scale.  He said we will just tell them we don't have the photos.  Should it have been potential Brady material?  They tried to create something?   

Jeff is up..........

This is not relevant to the case and should be excluded.

Mason is up........

They want the widths of the duct tape with scale and tape.  They were asked to redo the photos with a scale.  The response of the email, is I decided not to give the measurements to Nick Savage.  This attacks the whole system. 

Judge says, relevant evidence is tending to prove or disprove a material fact.  Ms Anthony has been charged with a 7 count indictment, he lists them....the court after hearing the testimony of Mr Savage does not have any material issues nor does it go to impeachment.  If this was evidence of trying to fabricate evidence this would be prosecutorial misconduct.  This evidence does not go to any material issues, they are purely collateral issues, therefore the objection in regards to the testimony for Agent Nick Savage will be sustained.  Next argument, unless it is the same and then I would use the same argument. 

Mason is talking about the super imposition.  With the tape over the skull over the child's head, they didn't have it, they didn't have the scales in the photos.

Jeff is up.......

The defense has known for 3 years that no scales were used in the ME's Office of the 3 pieces of duct tape.

Judge says that it goes to no material fact and it does not go to what was proffered.  Again the evidence does not meet the relative test of proffer.

Court is in recess till 8:30 for attorneys, 9:00 for jury.

5:20pm


 

[flutter1]

Have to ask again --

Will perjury charges be brought at this time and what does that mean?  Capp?

Yes I'd love for the experts to chime in I'm praying!

I am not an expert, but I don't think they would bring perjury charges until after the completion of the trial in order to not taint that process.  Depending on to whom the person commits perjury, it can be either a misdemeanor or felony.  I think in this case it would be considered a felony.

http://law.justia.com/codes/florida/2005/TitleXLVI/ch0837.html

[klaasend]

NEW BLINK POST:

http://blinkoncrime.com/2011/06/23/casey-anthony-trial-the-state-discovers-the-elusive-17th-allele-bombshell-discovery-of-the-deuchebag-chromosome-belongs-to-bereaved-gram-cindy-anthony/

Casey Anthony Trial: The State Discovers The Elusive 17th Allele- BOMBSHELL Discovery Of The Deuchebag Chromosome, Belongs To Bereaved Gram Cindy Anthony

[TURBOTHINK]

It was a one eyed one horned flying purple people eater...

There's our girl!  The one we all know.  The real cindy anthony, the liar, the manipulator, the con-artist, the deep dark secret keeper.  cindy anthony.

There she is..........and she will show it even worse before this is over. Mark my words.

[alagary]

Is wftv the first with replay video ? TIA

[beth1970]

hmm wonder if Nancy Grace's Cindy lovefest is over now?

[Gypsy DD]

Also, isn't perjury in a murder trial punishable by life in prison?

I hope so.

Earlier in the case the State wouldn't go after Cindy and George because they knew it would be bad press and look bad on the State's case to go after the Grandparents...however I think Cindy blew it today ..and Jeff Ashton will pick up any gauntlet he can to go after their testimony.  Linda was showing her tough side too..if Cindy thought they would treat her with kindness once she lied like she did today she is sadly mistaken.  I think they are going to go out of their way now to prove she lied, rather anyone believed her or not..you do not lie to the State during a murder trial about evidence and your role in that evidence..ie computer searches.

[flamom]

I guarantee it Bobo told Cindy she was the only hope to keep KC from the death penalty and this digusting piece of crap threw herself on the sword for her offspring piece of crap..

[TURBOTHINK]

NEW BLINK POST:

http://blinkoncrime.com/2011/06/23/casey-anthony-trial-the-state-discovers-the-elusive-17th-allele-bombshell-discovery-of-the-deuchebag-chromosome-belongs-to-bereaved-gram-cindy-anthony/

Casey Anthony Trial: The State Discovers The Elusive 17th Allele- BOMBSHELL Discovery Of The Deuchebag Chromosome, Belongs To Bereaved Gram Cindy Anthony

Perfect !!!  Leave it to Blink !!

[Ono]

Lippman yapping outside the courthouse right now

http://www.wftv.com/caseyanthony/index.html

I often wonder how long Lippman will last. 

George & Cindy go through lawyers like disposable sanitary wipes.

They truly do.