June 01, 2024, 10:52:42 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Caylee Marie Anthony MURDER TRIAL- DAY 29 - 6/27/11  (Read 687058 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
strawberry thunder
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 139



« Reply #2180 on: June 27, 2011, 07:51:04 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.
Logged

Let not a man guard his dignity, but let his dignity guard him.
~Ralph Waldo Emerson
Puzzler
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8044



« Reply #2181 on: June 27, 2011, 07:52:49 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

It was placed there later, I agree - the 24th of June to be exact when George tried to get in her trunk. That baby was in the trunk that day covered with clothes to hide her. The timeline fits perfectly as to the way the body would have been at the time. I am a fanatic about forensics and I can tell you the forensics in this case are right on target.

I do think LE may have made one mistake and that was not having the larvae tested for DNA. It may be that they did and because of the time lapse between the time KC dumped the body and the time they got possession of the car the DNA was gone. It is very susceptible to heat.

Agree.  George go too close when he said he was going to go to the trunk...KC rushed ahead of him, took out the cans and stopped George from getting too close.  This made KC get in action to get rid of the body.  She drove down the street and around the corner to the first bare spot without house....LITERALLY....the "first spot" and threw Casey into the trash and toilet infested swamp!!

Logged

Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.
AZSunny
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4062



« Reply #2182 on: June 27, 2011, 07:53:24 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

I agree. 
Logged

~~We cannot direct the wind but we can adjust the sails ~~
DonFL
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1180



« Reply #2183 on: June 27, 2011, 07:53:49 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.

So someone came there with a sack of bones, blanket, clothes and chewed on the bones then spread them all around?  I'm sorry.  That seems irrational to me.
Logged

It's easier to get forgiveness than permission.
Titch
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4433



« Reply #2184 on: June 27, 2011, 07:54:18 PM »

I just thought of something. Cindy said she's salary but her company doesn't like them to show overtime hours, right? She did say she's on salary? The reason I'm asking os bc her direct deposit shows different amounts being deposited every other week. If she was salary, she'd receive the same amount each pay. Right?

Bump... Please...

Depends on how much she had taken out of her paycheck and when..health insurance, life insurance, IRA deposit and 401k..I know I got paid every two weeks and they were not always the same due to I elected 401k and IRA come out of every other paycheck.

Thanks Gypsy 

When I worked (I stay home now) I was salary. My health, extra life, 401, everything was taken out evenly. I was paid the exact same every 2 weeks, except for my bonus checks & when I received raises. That's what I was basing it on. Cindy's direct deposit amounts are nothing like each other. They differ every 2 weeks. I thought that was odd.

Thanks again!
Logged
strawberry thunder
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 139



« Reply #2185 on: June 27, 2011, 07:54:37 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.

So someone came there with a sack of bones, blanket, clothes and chewed on the bones then spread them all around?  I'm sorry.  That seems irrational to me.

You think it takes 6 months to chew on bones? I don't.
Logged

Let not a man guard his dignity, but let his dignity guard him.
~Ralph Waldo Emerson
TURBOTHINK
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6356



« Reply #2186 on: June 27, 2011, 07:54:56 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time?  

There were many people who were looking for Caylee's body in Orlando. I had more than one friend that was following up on clues we thought might be relevant. I think Kronk thought he saw something when the officer bungled looking for it. I think he was so convinced he kept going back and trying to get them to look again. There was a neighborhood boy who found a bag full of stuffed animals next to where the remains were found, many of which looked like the ones in Caylee's room from TV interviews. He took the bag, a Father's day balloon and another disney bag to the Anthony's house. Cindy didn't call LE and more or less shut the door in his face saying something like "those are not Caylee's throw them away". I think KC threw those away when she threw away Caylee and I have always thought Cindy KNEW they were Caylee's and didn't want LE looking there because she KNEW where KC dumped her.
Logged

Where you find a generational evil, you find chaos, lies and many family secrets.

There is a DEEP GENERATIONAL EVIL in the Anthony family.
AZSunny
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4062



« Reply #2187 on: June 27, 2011, 07:56:11 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.

You must be kidding?  Roots were growing through the remains. Do you think that happens in two weeks? Step away from the koolaid!
Logged

~~We cannot direct the wind but we can adjust the sails ~~
Puzzler
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8044



« Reply #2188 on: June 27, 2011, 07:56:16 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.

So someone came there with a sack of bones, blanket, clothes and chewed on the bones then spread them all around?  I'm sorry.  That seems irrational to me.

Don't forget the inches of silt and water to make it mucky silt and live fresh plants with long roots to run in and around the skull and through the other bones....must have been tricky to get those plant roots through those tiny bones.

Logged

Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.
Buckeye
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5376



« Reply #2189 on: June 27, 2011, 07:56:39 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

It was placed there later, I agree - the 24th of June to be exact when George tried to get in her trunk. That baby was in the trunk that day covered with clothes to hide her. The timeline fits perfectly as to the way the body would have been at the time. I am a fanatic about forensics and I can tell you the forensics in this case are right on target.

I do think LE may have made one mistake and that was not having the larvae tested for DNA. It may be that they did and because of the time lapse between the time KC dumped the body and the time they got possession of the car the DNA was gone. It is very susceptible to heat.


I think Casey had Caylee in the trunk and planned on putting her into the pool (after opening the gate and putting up the ladder) the 18th or 19th,  to stage an accident.  She took the hamper out of the trunk, layed it on the grass where the dogs hit, opened the bag and saw she had already started decomposing.  She borrowed the shovel to throw sand on the grass, left the gate and ladder up and took off.  She got scared after the gas can episode and threw Caylee into the woods.
Logged
TURBOTHINK
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6356



« Reply #2190 on: June 27, 2011, 07:57:19 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time?  

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.

So someone came there with a sack of bones, blanket, clothes and chewed on the bones then spread them all around?  I'm sorry.  That seems irrational to me.

You think it takes 6 months to chew on bones? I don't.

It takes 6 months for the vegetation to have grown through the bones as it was and for the skull to have vines in it and half sunken in the decayed dirt. Those forensics were right on target. NONE of that could have happened in a couple of months.
Logged

Where you find a generational evil, you find chaos, lies and many family secrets.

There is a DEEP GENERATIONAL EVIL in the Anthony family.
pharlap
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3289



« Reply #2191 on: June 27, 2011, 07:58:00 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.


They were their for a long time.
The videos made this point, so much vegetation I'm surprise anyone found them.  From the crime photos I could hardly tell and they were enlarged.  I would of walked right past.

 
Logged

CA = Albatross     Oh no "the fog"           
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #2192 on: June 27, 2011, 07:58:16 PM »

Did anyone else hear the testimony the way I interrputed it?

IMO Baez is trying to get the jury to believe that the PI checked the woods in the area where Caylee was and the remains were not there; therefore, Caylee was not there because Kronk had her and placed her there sometime after the PI search.

However, what I heard Dominic say....what he put on those sheets that some seem to be aggravated that Mr. George took all the time with....was...that Dominic was in that area BUT he was up on the middle of the road and walking in the middle of the road and was NOT down in the woods and looking.

Also, those sheets show that he was in the woods looking at an area farther down from where the remains were, toward the school.

It's clear to me that Mr. George got PLENTY out of Dominic. 



That is the way I interpreted it ......and I am grateful that everything was laid out showing he was NOT in the exact area. Not to mention even if you were 3 ft away from the remains you could miss them with so much debris, undergrowth etc. I also think I could be a PI in Florida if I ever need a new vocation 
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
TURBOTHINK
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6356



« Reply #2193 on: June 27, 2011, 07:58:28 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

It was placed there later, I agree - the 24th of June to be exact when George tried to get in her trunk. That baby was in the trunk that day covered with clothes to hide her. The timeline fits perfectly as to the way the body would have been at the time. I am a fanatic about forensics and I can tell you the forensics in this case are right on target.

I do think LE may have made one mistake and that was not having the larvae tested for DNA. It may be that they did and because of the time lapse between the time KC dumped the body and the time they got possession of the car the DNA was gone. It is very susceptible to heat.


I think Casey had Caylee in the trunk and planned on putting her into the pool (after opening the gate and putting up the ladder) the 18th or 19th,  to stage an accident.  She took the hamper out of the trunk, layed it on the grass where the dogs hit, opened the bag and saw she had already started decomposing.  She borrowed the shovel to throw sand on the grass, left the gate and ladder up and took off.  She got scared after the gas can episode and threw Caylee into the woods.

Exactly !!!
Logged

Where you find a generational evil, you find chaos, lies and many family secrets.

There is a DEEP GENERATIONAL EVIL in the Anthony family.
Puzzler
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8044



« Reply #2194 on: June 27, 2011, 07:58:56 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time?  

There were many people who were looking for Caylee's body in Orlando. I had more than one friend that was following up on clues we thought might be relevant. I think Kronk thought he saw something when the officer bungled looking for it. I think he was so convinced he kept going back and trying to get them to look again. There was a neighborhood boy who found a bag full of stuffed animals next to where the remains were found, many of which looked like the ones in Caylee's room from TV interviews. He took the bag, a Father's day balloon and another disney bag to the Anthony's house. Cindy didn't call LE and more or less shut the door in his face saying something like "those are not Caylee's throw them away". I think KC threw those away when she threw away Caylee and I have always thought Cindy KNEW they were Caylee's and didn't want LE looking there because she KNEW where KC dumped her.

I don't think Kronk actually saw the remains that first time.  He was too far from the remains....JUST LIKE Dominic noted with his drawings for Mr. George today.  Where Dominic was down in the woods....was a distance away toward the school.  When Dominic was up around where Caylee's remains actually were was when he was walking in the middle of the street.  Very important info that came out at the very end of today IMO.
Logged

Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.
IBE
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3554



« Reply #2195 on: June 27, 2011, 07:59:18 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.

Maybe they were "there" but then there after being moved by hurricane water in August?

There was still a current when P I Casey was looking, or so he said today.
Logged

Freedom is not free: it also takes ethics, character, accountability, responsibility and courage! Freedom for Scared Monkeys: donate to Red's legal fees.
sailcat
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 136



« Reply #2196 on: June 27, 2011, 07:59:47 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time?  

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.

So someone came there with a sack of bones, blanket, clothes and chewed on the bones then spread them all around?  I'm sorry.  That seems irrational to me.

You think it takes 6 months to chew on bones? I don't.

It takes 6 months for the vegetation to have grown through the bones as it was and for the skull to have vines in it and half sunken in the decayed dirt. Those forensics were right on target. NONE of that could have happened in a couple of months.

Absolutely. I'm not sure how there can be any doubt about it.
Logged

"Don't think there are no crocodiles because the water is calm."
DonFL
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1180



« Reply #2197 on: June 27, 2011, 08:01:10 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

Just what makes you think the body was placed there at a later date?  Everything I saw or heard has convinced me she was there pretty much the whole time? 

 Basically for the same reasons the defense claims. Those remains had not been there long at all when they were found.

So someone came there with a sack of bones, blanket, clothes and chewed on the bones then spread them all around?  I'm sorry.  That seems irrational to me.

You think it takes 6 months to chew on bones? I don't.

How long do you think the body was there?  Why would anyone move it to there?  I have seen NOTHING to connect Kronk to Caylee other than he found the body.  The reward was only for limited time.  If he hid the body like bozo claimed that also makes no sense.  I think it's pretty simple.  I won't be replying to your posts anymore because I feel there is no way we could ever agree on anything in this case and arguments here are not healthy.  We are each entitled to our opinions.
Logged

It's easier to get forgiveness than permission.
cece5300
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 476


« Reply #2198 on: June 27, 2011, 08:01:16 PM »

Not to mention none of them saw a RED DISNEY bad. They saw a toilet, lots of trash bags, and a green umbrella.
Logged
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey Mega Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 74276



WWW
« Reply #2199 on: June 27, 2011, 08:01:25 PM »

I happen to agree with the defense that the body was placed in that location at a later date. I don't know who or why someone did it, but I firnly believe it happened. And as for Kronk, he's a snake, imo. Something isn't right with him. His "I stopped on the side of the road to pee and stumbled across remains" is a CROCK of BS, imo.

I stand on the side of the forensic scientists for the prosecution and believe 100% the body was placed there in June 2008, not at a later date. 
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 2.262 seconds with 22 queries.