"‘Lunacy?’ U.S. Agrees to Enter Into Treaty to Begin Cutting Emissions by 2020"

I look around, and I do not see problems.

Quote

A new International Climate Court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever-larger sums to third-world countries in the name of making reparation for supposed “climate debt”. The Court will have no power over third-world countries. Here and throughout the draft, the West is the sole target. “The process” is now irredeemably anti-Western.

“Rights of Mother Earth”: The draft, which seems to have been written by feeble-minded green activists and environmental extremists, talks of “The recognition and defence of the rights of Mother Earth to ensure harmony between humanity and nature”. Also, “there will be no commodification (whatever that may be: it is not in the dictionary and does not deserve to be_ of the functions of nature, therefore no carbon market will be developed with that purpose”.

“Right to survive”: The draft childishly asserts that “The rights of some Parties to survive are threatened by the adverse impacts of climate change, including sea level rise.” At 2 inches per century, according to eight years’ data from the Envisat satellite? Oh, come off it! The Jason 2 satellite, the new kid on the block, shows that sea-level has actually dropped over the past three years.

read more here - http://www.theblaze.com/stories/lunacy-u-s-agrees-to-enter-into-treaty-to-begin-cutting-emissions-by-2020/

Today, areas with severe water shortages, often had the same problem fifty years ago, and perhaps hundreds of years ago. Why do the people stay? Surely, those people should have moved decades ago?

The Grand Canyon was once the bottom of a great body of water. Could someone have prevented the change over a million years? Over a thousand years? Over one year? I don't think so.

Just my humble opinions.