Documents in the Case

[grace-land]

My comment in green.

http://gzlegalcase.com/

Defendant's Motion to Continue
 on 30 January 2013.

The following DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE has been filed with the Court, as well as two additional motions and an AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING.

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE  (Use the link above to access the 38-page document)
 
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0113/defendants_motion_for_discovery_fdle.pdf

MOTION FOR ORDER ISSUING SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO 7-ELEVEN,INC
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0113/motion_for_subpoena_7-11.pdf

AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0113/amended_notice_of_hearing.pdf

[grace-land]

Witness 8, Trayvon's cell phone analysis, and various motions

http://gzlegalcase.com/

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
 on 31 January 2013.

The following motion has been filed with the Court, along with a SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING.

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0113/motion_for_specific_disc.pdf

SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0113/2nd_amended_noh.pdf

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

State's Response to Defendant's Motion to Continue
on 01 February 2013.

The State has filed the following motions with the Court:
 
STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/states_response_to_dmtc.pdf

STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT (FDLE)
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/states_response_to_specific_discovery_fdle.pdf

FDLE'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/fdle_memo.pdf

[grace-land]

Re:  witness identified as "someone from NASA"

http://gzlegalcase.com/

DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
 on 07 February 2013.

The following DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY has been filed with the Court.
 
DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/discovery_demand_nasa.pdf

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

NOTICE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT OF NON-PARTY BENJAMIN L. CRUMP, ESQ.
on 07 February 2013.

The following NOTICE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT OF NON-PARTY BENJAMIN L. CRUMP, ESQ. was filed in open Court during the hearing on February 5.

NOTICE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT OF NON-PARTY BENJAMIN L. CRUMP, ESQ.
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/crump_affidavit.pdf
 

[grace-land]

Information in green--added by me

http://gzlegalcase.com/

Court Orders from the February 5 Hearing
on 07 February 2013.

The following Orders were entered by the Court following the February 5 hearing:

ORDER ON AMENDED DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/order_amended_demand_specific_discovery.pdf (FBI; granted)

ORDER ON AMENDED DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/order_amended_demand_specific_discovery2.pdf (Dept of Justice Community Relations Services; granted)

ORDER ON MOTION TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITION
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/order_amended_demand_specific_discovery2.pdf (additional deposition of Police Investigator Irwin; granted)

ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER SETTING BAIL
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/order_motion_clarification_order_setting_bail.pdf (denied)

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/order_motion_compel_additional_discovery.pdf  (denied)

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE FROM THIRD-PARTY
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/order_motion_compel_production_evidence_3rd.pdf (granted)

ORDER ON MOTION TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF RELEASE
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/order_motion_modify_conditions_release.pdf (denied)

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

Notice of Hearing for February, 22 and Related Motion
 on 20 February 2013.

The following NOTICE OF HEARING and motions has been filed with the court:

NOTICE OF HEARING for February 22, 2012
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/notice_of_hearing022213.pdf

MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF WITNESS ADDRESSES
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0213/mot_production_of_wit_addresses.pdf
 

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION REGARDING DEPOSITION OF BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQUIRE
on 04 March 2013.

The defense has received the Court's ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION REGARDING DEPOSITION OF BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQUIRE.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION REGARDING DEPOSITION OF BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQUIRE.
http://184.172.211.159/~gzdocs/documents/0313/order_re_crump.pdf
 

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS
on 25 March 2013.

The following DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS has been filed with the Court:

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0313/mot_for_sanctions_discovery.pdf

The multi-media exhibits can be found below:

 Exhibit A 
 Exhibit B

[grace-land]

Regarding the depositions of State witnesses for March 13, 14, and March 15 to be taken in Miami, Florida

http://gzlegalcase.com/

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS
on 26 March 2013.

The following DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS has been filed with the Court:

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0313/mot_for_sanctions_fees.pdf

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO NON-PARTY BENJAMIN L. CRUMP, ESQ.'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
on 27 March 2013.

The following DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO NON-PARTY BENJAMIN L. CRUMP, ESQ.'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION has been filed with the Court:

DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO NON-PARTY BENJAMIN L. CRUMP, ESQ.'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0313/defendant_rep.pdf

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER DATED MARCH 4, 2013
on 28 March 2013.

The following ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER DATED MARCH 4, 2013 has been filed by the Court:

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER DATED MARCH 4, 2013
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0313/order_denying_reconsideration.pdf

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

With Respect to the State's Response to Defendant's Motion for Sanctions Against State Attorney's Office for Discovery Violations
on 29 March 2013.

The STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS, while pointed, has little substance that addresses the very serious motion we have before the Court.

From a legal perspective, the Zimmerman case is about whether George Zimmerman acted in self-defense, but we understand that the case has also become important to the national conversation about race relations, about gun control, and about “Stand Your Ground” laws. Although the Court will not be able to resolve these larger issues, we as the defense team, have chosen to engage in the national conversation in a responsible and respectful way.

George Zimmerman was arrested under an extraordinary set of circumstances, and he is being prosecuted under similar circumstances. As we prepare for a jury trial in June, we have real concerns about George’s ability to receive a fair trial. The DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS is not a frivolous attack on the prosecution, it is a serious attempt to seek remedy for discovery violations that have a substantial impact on our ability to defend George.

What is at stake is George Zimmerman’s right to a fair trial, and in a broader sense, what is at stake is the sanctity of the criminal justice system and its ability to function properly under the incredible public and political pressures that have been placed upon it.
----------------------
The state's response (below) includes the hand-written letter by Witness 8.

http://www.cfnews13.com/content/dam/news/static/cfnews13/documents/2013/03/Zimmerman-States-Response-to%20-Ds-Motion-for-Sanctions-Against-State-Attorneys-Office-for-Discovery-Violations-0328.pdf

STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS

[grace-land]

The petition to reverse the lower court's order denying the petitioner (defense) discovery request to take deposition of attorney Benjamin Crump

http://gzlegalcase.com/
Petition for Writ of Certiorari
on 04 April 2013.

The following PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI has been filed with the Fifth District Court of Appeal:

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/petition.pdf

Appendix
 

[grace-land]

Motion by defense to unseal Settlement Agreement submitted to the court by Benjamin Crump

http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/court-documents/139-motion-to-unseal-information-listed-as-confidential

MOTION TO UNSEAL INFORMATION LISTED AS CONFIDENTIAL
on 11 April 2013.

The following motion has been filed with the Court:

MOTION TO UNSEAL INFORMATION LISTED AS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN A COURT FILING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/mot_to_unseal.pdf

[grace-land]

Motion by Defense in response to Benjamin Crump's motion to continue to keep the Settlement Agreement sealed

http://gzlegalcase.com/

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DETERMINE CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO UNSEAL
on 18 April 2013.

The following document has been filed with the Court:

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DETERMINE CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO UNSEAL
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/resp_to_crump.pdf

-------------------------
Benjamin Crump's motion to continue to keep the Settlement Agreement sealed

http://www.flcourts18.org/PDF/Press_Releases/Motion%20to%20Determine%20Confidentiality%20of%20Court%20Records.pdf

[grace-land]

Response to the Defense petition for Writ of Certiorari by Florida Attorney General, Pamela Bondi

http://gzlegalcase.com/

RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
on 24 April 2013.

The following has been filed with the Fifth District Court of Appeal:

RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/response_to_writ.pdf

[grace-land]

Defense:  Regarding admissibility of opinion testimony of  "voice identification" experts

http://gzlegalcase.com/

Motion for Evidentiary Hearing
on 06 May 2013.

The following has been filed with the Court:

MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/mot_for_evidentiary_hearing.pdf

[grace-land]

http://gzlegalcase.com/

Defense Pleadings From May 10, 2013
on 13 May 2013.

The following documents have been filed with the Court:

NOTICE OF HEARING for May 28, 2013

MOTION TO ALLOW EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY AT HEARING ON MAY 28, 2013 TO BE BY VIDEO CONFERENCING
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/051013_witness_testimony.pdf

REDACTED MOTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL WITNESS DISCLOSURE
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/051013_video_expert.pdf

[grace-land]

Defendant asks court to establish a reasonable expert fee for state's voice identification expert, Tom Owen, to be paid for appearing at his deposition.

http://gzlegalcase.com/

MOTION TO ESTABLISH REASONABLE EXPERT FEE
on 21 May 2013.

The following has been filed with the Court:

MOTION TO ESTABLISH REASONABLE EXPERT FEE
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052113_reasonable_fee.pdf