April 25, 2024, 12:10:35 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Gov. Brewer: Arizona Immigration Ruling ‘Victory For The Rule Of Law’  (Read 2053 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Toler
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1255



« on: June 25, 2012, 12:05:17 PM »


June 25 '12
WASHINGTON (CBSDC/AP) – The Supreme Court struck down key provisions of Arizona’s crackdown on immigrants Monday but said a much-debated portion on checking suspects’ status could go forward.
 
The court did not throw out the state provision requiring police to check the immigration status of someone they suspect is not in the United States legally. Even there, though, the justices said the provision could be subject to additional legal challenges.
 
The decision upholds the “show me your papers” requirement for the moment. But it takes the teeth out of it by prohibiting police officers from arresting people on minor immigration charges.
 
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer was pleased with the ruling.

 “Today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is a victory for the rule of law. It is also a victory for the 10th Amendment and all Americans who believe in the inherent right and responsibility of states to defend their citizens,” Gov. Brewer said in a statement. “After more than two years of legal challenges, the heart of SB 1070 can now be implemented in accordance with the U.S. Constitution.”
 
The court announced that Thursday would be the last day of rulings this term, which means the decision on President Barack Obama’s landmark health care overhaul probably will come that day.
 
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the opinion for the court that was unanimous on allowing the status check to go forward. The court was divided on striking down the other portions.
 
The court struck down these provisions: requiring all immigrants to obtain or carry immigration registration papers, making it a state criminal offense for an illegal immigrant to seek work or hold a job and allowing police to arrest suspected illegal immigrants without warrants.
 
The Obama administration sued to block the Arizona law soon after its enactment two years ago. Federal courts had refused to let the four key provisions take effect.  ::snipping2:: 

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/06/25/supreme-court-split-on-arizona-immigration-law/
Logged
Slogger
Monkey Junky Jr.
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 736



« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2012, 01:45:56 PM »

Justice Scalia:

Quote
“The president said at a news conference that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’ failure to pass the administration’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the president declines to enforce boggles the mind,” Scalia said.

(same as above)
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/06/25/supreme-court-split-on-arizona-immigration-law/
 

Logged

Constitution101    hillsdale.edu/constitution/
Courtesy is requested; Respect is Earned.
Pace Yourself, for the LongHaul.  MOs
Toler
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1255



« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2012, 02:09:39 PM »

Leaving Arizona? After Supreme Court ruling some illegal immigrants may go, others vow to stay
June 25 '12

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down much of Arizona’s strict anti-illegal immigration law but upheld one of its most controversial provisions has some illegal aliens on edge. But will it prompt them to pack their bags and leave the state anytime soon?

Some may leave but more likely than not most will stay put, say immigration-rights activists and illegal aliens contacted by msnbc.com.

“The main thing we’re focusing on is advocating for families not to flee Arizona, to stay here and help fight for their rights to be here,” said Opal Tometi, a member of the board of the Puente Movement, an Arizona-based immigrant rights group, and national organizer for the Black Alliance for Just Immigration.
 
Leticia Ramirez, a mother of three who lives in the Phoenix area and says she is undocumented, said the mixed Supreme Court ruling could make day-to-day life harder for her family but they plan to stay anyway.

“If we fight together it’s going to be better for us than just one person fighting  for all the community,” she said.

The Supreme Court struck down key provisions of Arizona’s SB 1070 but said the state could go forward with a much-debated portion requiring police to check the immigration status of anyone they stop, detain or arrest for other reasons if they have “reasonable suspicion” that the person is in the country illegally. Even there, though, the justices said the "show me your papers” provision could be subject to additional legal challenges and advised states not to apply the law in such a sweeping way that it would become unconstitutional. They also said officers can't arrest people on minor immigration charges.

Tometi said the provision requiring police to try to determine the immigration status of a person stopped for other reasons might deter some illegal aliens from coming to Arizona. But she says it’s unlikely to lead to full-scale departures from the state, especially for families that have been in Arizona illegally for years -- and even decades.

”I think that people will stay,” she said.

“What we’ve decided as a community in Arizona is that we’re going to do community organizing and defend our families, whether they’re documented or undocumented,” Tometi said.

Both sides declare victory in court's immigration ruling

She said activists are establishing “barrio defense committees“-- volunteer neighborhood committees that provide a network of support services for people who might be swept up in detention or deportation proceedings.

Ramirez, who said she has been in the U.S. for 18 years, said the ruling will make routine day-to-day activities “difficult” for her family.

“We’re not going to be living a normal life anymore. We’ll be afraid when we get stopped,” she said.

“We’re not going to be able to take my kids to soccer practice, to soccer games, to movies, to the mall because I’m afraid we're going to be stopped. I don’t want to put my kids in that situation. A lot of people won’t even want to take their kids to school because they’re afraid of being stopped.”

She said while some illegal aliens might leave, she’s determined to stay.

“Leaving Arizona leaving is not going to resolve anything,” Ramirez said. “I would say to my community: Stay so we can fight together. People want to raise their kids and have a family. They’re going to risk it.  ::snipping2::

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/25/12400258-leaving-arizona-after-supreme-court-ruling-some-illegal-immigrants-may-go-others-vow-to-stay?lite
Logged
Toler
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1255



« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2012, 02:17:48 PM »


Arizona v. United States--- Scalia's Dissenting Bench Statement

PDF

http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/372493/scalia-statement.pdf
Logged
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2012, 12:00:48 AM »

Every action has a reaction.............. maybe not one that is particularly respectful, but a reaction, no less:


Homeland Security suspends immigration agreements with Arizona police

 ::snipping2::
The Obama administration said Monday it is suspending existing agreements with Arizona police over enforcement of federal immigration laws, and said it has issued a directive telling federal authorities to decline many of the calls reporting illegal immigrants that the Homeland Security Department may get from Arizona police.
 ::snipping2::

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/25/homeland-security-suspends-immigration-agreements-/
Logged
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 6.339 seconds with 19 queries.