June 23, 2018, 05:33:59 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Travis Alexander of Mesa, AZ Found Murdered June 2008-Jodi Arias on Trial  (Read 1164891 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #2100 on: May 01, 2013, 08:17:40 PM »

I guess she is an expert that will support Dr. Horn's findings - that Travis if shot first could not have gotten up and been a threat
to Jodi as she asserts.




http://hayespsychology.com/

Jill Hayes
Clinical, Forensic & Neuropsychologist

Examiner
Assess an individualís psychological and/or neuropsychological functioning and report findings to the attorney, a legal tribunal, an employer, an insurer, or others.  If necessary, provide testimony to judicial and/or administrative bodies.


Found it. Froggy posted her picture. Thanks, Kermit. 
Logged
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 25374



« Reply #2101 on: May 01, 2013, 08:17:47 PM »

Which side begins closing arguments, anyone know? TIA!

Closing Arguments

When both sides have presented their evidence, each side may make closing arguments. Closing arguments are similar to opening statements. They provide an opportunity for the attorneys to address the judge or jury a final time. The plaintiff/prosecutor speaks first, usually summarizing the evidence that has been presented, and highlighting items most beneficial to the prosecution. The attorney for the defendant speaks next. The defense attorney will usually summarize the strongest points of the defendantís case and point out flaws in the case presented by the prosecutor. The prosecutor then has one last opportunity to speak.

http://www.azcourts.gov/PublicServices/CriminalLaw.aspx
Logged

crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #2102 on: May 01, 2013, 08:19:36 PM »

Thx. Come to think of it, that's the way it was in the Casey Anthony case too.
Logged
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #2103 on: May 01, 2013, 08:26:27 PM »

I think I'd pull in the medical examiner again rather than yet another psychologist. JMO.

There's so much in psychology that is subjective and arbitrary that I'd just bar it all from court. You can always find someone to disagree with someone else and in the end, I think juries generally conclude that dueling experts just cancel each other out.
Logged
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #2104 on: May 01, 2013, 08:30:54 PM »

Juror questions........

I'm so glad Wilmott's done!
Logged
Kermit
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8195



« Reply #2105 on: May 01, 2013, 08:42:14 PM »

$13,000 - $13,000 to this guys institue for their services
Logged
Kermit
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8195



« Reply #2106 on: May 01, 2013, 08:43:06 PM »

$13,000 - $13,000 to this guys institue for their services

oh darn
that is
$13,000 to $14,000.00
Logged
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #2107 on: May 01, 2013, 08:57:00 PM »

How many more times will Wilmott be allowed to ask questions? My frontal lobe can't take much more of her........
Logged
Kermit
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8195



« Reply #2108 on: May 01, 2013, 09:02:29 PM »


https://twitter.com/suzie_patterson/status/321705367962783744
Logged
Kermit
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8195



« Reply #2109 on: May 01, 2013, 09:03:50 PM »


Logged
Kermit
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8195



« Reply #2110 on: May 01, 2013, 09:08:33 PM »


http://radaronline.com/category/tags/jennifer-willmott/
Logged
Kermit
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8195



« Reply #2111 on: May 01, 2013, 09:10:29 PM »

Get him Juan!


Juan Martinez: "When does an exaggeration become a lie?"

He doesn't know.
Logged
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #2112 on: May 01, 2013, 09:28:51 PM »

No. but he leaned toward, "never".

Please tell me that Walmott can't ask follow up questions to this.......
Logged
Kermit
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8195



« Reply #2113 on: May 01, 2013, 09:39:55 PM »

Juan: "Do you Redeemer testifying in other proceedings that you no longer treat patients
You devote all your time to consulting.............
$250.00 an hour up to $2500.00 a day



Given your experience he could have been dead and that would explain the lack of blood
Yes, sir.

When did you get involved?
Last Nov.

Juan asks to approach.



Logged
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #2114 on: May 01, 2013, 09:42:50 PM »

How do you guys think Dr. Geffner has done? IMO, he's better than that first expert that gave Jodi the book, but not nearly as good as the State's expert. As far as La La Violet goes, I really think she hates men and spends her days picking flowers and giving the "peace" sign at the tie dye store.. JMO
Logged
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #2115 on: May 01, 2013, 09:52:31 PM »

Dr, Drew just made a great point that we've all made today already. He said that we SHOULD be hearing from a forensic neurologist or brain surgeon that could testify with authority about the damage of ballistic injury to the brain accounting for the velocity of the bullet, etc.

Yes.......
Logged
Kermit
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8195



« Reply #2116 on: May 01, 2013, 09:56:04 PM »

How do you guys think Dr. Geffner has done? IMO, he's better than that first expert that gave Jodi the book, but not nearly as good as the State's expert. As far as La La Violet goes, I really think she hates men and spends her days picking flowers and giving the "peace" sign at the tie dye store.. JMO

He comes off as someone who knows nothing about testifying about a brain. so, for me, it seems like a desperate
attempt by Wilmott to fix her previous witnesses: Alyce Violette and Dick Samuels.
Spilling his water not once but twice. Constantly drinking water = a sign of his anxiety.

His attempt to discredit that young little PhD DeMarte is just that an attempt. It actually makes her look more
professional then Alyce LaViollet and Dick Samuels.

His previous testimony in other cases questionable was devastating. Similar to Samuels background.

I'm sure that the defence could hand pick a credible psychologist to tell the truth, but they seem to only find
these similar hucksters. It's a shame on all psychologists out there - that are good.

.

Logged
Green Eyes
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15496


Happy Spring


« Reply #2117 on: May 01, 2013, 10:00:38 PM »

How do you guys think Dr. Geffner has done? IMO, he's better than that first expert that gave Jodi the book, but not nearly as good as the State's expert. As far as La La Violet goes, I really think she hates men and spends her days picking flowers and giving the "peace" sign at the tie dye store.. JMO

I think Dr. Geffner has done better than the other two. I think Dr. Samuel was taken by Jodi. I think you are right about La La Violet is a man hater. Neither one did the defense any good. Is it almost over I hope. Since I am watching on HLN. We are just on the defense crossing Geffner after Juan finished his cross.

Logged

GOD BLESS AMERICA
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 25374



« Reply #2118 on: May 01, 2013, 10:00:50 PM »

How do you guys think Dr. Geffner has done? IMO, he's better than that first expert that gave Jodi the book, but not nearly as good as the State's expert. As far as La La Violet goes, I really think she hates men and spends her days picking flowers and giving the "peace" sign at the tie dye store.. JMO

He comes off as someone who knows nothing about testifying about a brain. so, for me, it seems like a desperate
attempt by Wilmott to fix her previous witnesses: Alyce Violette and Dick Samuels.
Spilling his water not once but twice. Constantly drinking water = a sign of his anxiety.

His attempt to discredit that young little PhD DeMarte is just that an attempt. It actually makes her look more
professional then Alyce LaViollet and Dick Samuels.

His previous testimony in other cases questionable was devastating. Similar to Samuels background.

I'm sure that the defence could hand pick a credible psychologist to tell the truth, but they seem to only find
these similar hucksters. It's a shame on all psychologists out there - that are good.

You stated my opinion quite well, Kermit! Wink

He did not come off as badly as Alyce or Dr. Samuels, but he came off as a hired gun to me, and not a person I trust in the least.

I think Juan, once again, did an exceptional job of cross with him.

Have they gone for the night? I never heard what the plans are for this break.
Logged

Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 25374



« Reply #2119 on: May 01, 2013, 10:03:56 PM »

Nevermind, they are back.

Guess Judge Stephens meant it when she said they would be here as long as it takes?

We'll see.
Logged

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 0.145 seconds with 19 queries.