Does anyone know how I can obtain dr drews transcripts for yesterday! Regarding Jodie arias and her kicking her cellmate and hiding screws or something in her light bulb? This show was yesterday. I went to hln but I'm not the greatest at finding things especially transcripts.
Tia
This is the Dr. Drew transcript from 6/11/13 (yesterday) . If it's not the one you're looking for, I can dig around some more. This transcript was mainly about the Brett Seacat trial but reading further down into it you can see there is discussion concerning Jodi Arias. I've snipped out the other stuff.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1306/11/ddhln.01.htmlDR. DREW
Brett Seacat Guilty
Aired June 11, 2013 - 21:00 ET Plus, Jodi Arias in chains. How did she manage to assault a fellow inmate? We`ll tell you.
Let`s get started.
Next up, how did a shackled Jodi Arias attack a fellow inmate? We`re going to tell you about that.
And later, the Dr. Drew cast members here, some of the theatrics, reenacting, more of the private conversation from Jodi`s trial coming up.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
PINSKY: Back with my co-host, Jenny Hutt, and the DR. DREW ON-CALL players, Anahita Sedaghatfar, Mark Eiglarsh, and Darren Kavinoky. But first, Jodi and her team promised she would be a model prisoner if the jury would just let her live. Take a look at this.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Let`s talk about some of the good things about Jodi. Things that show that she has value still.
JODI ARIAS, CONVICTED MURDERER: If I`m sentenced to life, I will live among the general population. Over the years, I`ve spent in incarceration, I received many request from women to teach them Spanish or American --
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Ryan told you that when she would come to these PPL meetings and these Super Saturday (ph) meetings, that these people enjoyed her. That she got along well with people.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Nine days out of ten, I don`t like Jodi Arias. But that doesn`t matter.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
PINSKY: And Jodi wore a stun belt in court. Her feet were shackled when she wasn`t in the courtroom. Now, we might, in fact, know why. Journalist, Shanna Hogan, is author of about to be a publish book, "Picture Perfect" about Jodi. Shanna, why was she in chains and a stun belt?
VOICE OF SHANNA HOGAN, AUTHOR: Right, Dr. Drew. We`re learning now that the sheriff wanted her shackled because he actually thought Jodi was a flight risk. He cites in his (INAUDIBLE) that her jailhouse rap sheet (ph) which was an 11-page document that included these infractions she committed while behind bars which ranged from things like hiding pens to really aggressive behavior.
PINSKY: Now, I have those reports right here in my hand, Shanna. I`ve got them right here. This is really fascinating. They`re very institutional kinds of report of misconduct. And then, there`s further actions taken by the judges who review these documents. And yes, she`s doing all kinds of squirrely things. Is that what they`re talking about, Shanna?
HOGAN: Absolutely. In 2009, she was in her cell and her back was pushed against the wall, and a guard saw her kicking one of her cell mates. And then, the next year in 2010, the guard noticed that there were screws missing from a light fixture. When they searched her cell, they found it underneath the toilet seat with several empty bags and some mysterious brown powder.
She also had pictures that were unauthorized. Pens that were not allowed in jail and mail belonging to some of the other inmates.
PINSKY: And what I love, Shanna, in every single one of these reports -- again, these are formal reports of misconduct. One of them, particularly, they told her over the loud speaker, told her to sit down and stop talking. She kept on going. But in every single report, she blamed other inmates. It`s classic Jodi. Right?
HOGAN: Absolutely. It`s very characteristic of her past behavior --
PINSKY: Fascinating.
HOGAN: -- of never accepting responsibility.
PINSKY: All right. Thank you, Shanna. Next -- now, I`m wondering this. Should Jodi`s spotty record be considered by the judge or jury when it comes to sentencing? Anahita, I`ll start with you.
ANAHITA SEDAGHATFAR, ATTORNEY: I don`t think so, Dr. Drew. I mean, five years in prison, these aren`t like the worst infractions possible. Hiding pens. I mean, Jodi was probably having TV camera withdrawals, because there`s no cameras in jail. She`s probably doing this for attention or who knows, maybe stealing pens so she could do more of her Picasso-esque wonderful paintings to sell on eBay or should I say tracing? You know? I don`t think it should come in. At the end of the day, they`re not the worst infractions --
(CROSSTALK)
PINSKY: I get you, and I thought the same thing myself. But then, Darren, we have Willmott out there saying, oh, she`s a model citizen. Everybody loves her. She`s so great. I think if you`re the guards or the administrator, she ain`t so great.
DARREN KAVINOKY, ATTORNEY: Yes. She clearly doesn`t play well with others. And, I think I join the rest of the panel that not terribly shocked by it. They don`t seem like the worst transgressions, but, they become more important if the defense team is going to make the argument that she deserves to live because of this good behavior that she demonstrates while in custody.
PINSKY: Now, mark, before you break into your Juan Martinez, I`ll let you have the last word on this.
MARK EIGLARSH, SPEAKTOMARK.COM: Yes. I think that the judge should consider them. I don`t think the judge should give it such great weight, especially again, keep in mind that the future of the cure for cancer lies in her hands based on her speech.
PINSKY: Right. That`s right. I forgot that. You`re right. Willmott seemed to echo those same kinds of sentiments. Interesting. All right. Enough of that. It is time for serious business of another edition of Dr. Drew`s theater.
My cast is going to reenact a segment of the secret closed door hearings about the defense in which case -- this is -- again, this is the hearing with the judge between Willmott and Nurmi and Martinez and the judge. The defense is wanting to portray Travis Alexander as a pedophile.
Tonight, as the judge, Anahita, Darren is Nurmi, and Mark, as I said, Martinez. Mr. Martinez.
KAVINOKY: Dr. Drew, I do object. I feel like I`m being typecast with this Nurmi thing. And I`ve gotten a lot of people tweet -- to distinguish that.
PINSKY: I`m going to pick up the crucible next. Don`t worry. Let`s get on with this.
(LAUGHTER)
PINSKY: Go ahead, Mr. Martinez.
EIGLARSH: I don`t start.
KAVINOKY: Oh, no, it`s the judge.
PINSKY: Oh, the judge. I beg your pardon.
SEDAGHATFAR: I see Martinez starting, but OK.
PINSKY: No, no. It says Martinez starts.
(LAUGHTER)
PINSKY: We`ve already screwed this up, guys.
SEDAGHATFAR: I can be Martinez.
(CROSSTALK)
PINSKY: -- attorneys and not actually actors.
(LAUGHTER)
PINSKY: All right. We`re starting at the hearing.
EIGLARSH: I don`t have any Martinez starting.
PINSKY: Where is that?
KAVINOKY: I have the first line. The next issue and it`s the judge.
PINSKY: Go ahead.
SEDAGHATFAR: OK.
EIGLARSH: The judge. Right. That`s what I have, Darren.
SEDAGHATFAR: OK.
The issue still relates to the observation that your client made of the victim with the photographs of the young boys.
KAVINOKY: Wait a second.
(LAUGHTER)
KAVINOKY: So, here`s your line Anahita. The next issue you`re going to have your expert testify regarding two issues. To which I replied, two issues regarding to pedophilia.
(LAUGHTER)
KAVINOKY: I don`t know what you mean by the other issue.
SEDAGHATFAR: I have a different script here.
PINSKY: You must have the one where I play Nurmi. Somebody from producing needs to help sort us out here.
KAVINOKY: I can do an interpretive reading of the judge and Nurmi.
PINSKY: I`m about to do an interpretive dance, you guys are so bad.
HUTT: Dr. Drew --
PINSKY: Jenny?
HUTT: I`m prepared to do our scene.
PINSKY: I am, too. So, what we will do --
HUTT: Let`s go.
PINSKY: Hang on. We`re going to take a little break. And, what you`re supposed to have heard was a closed door argument over Travis` alleged pedophilia. And the fact is I want the behavior bureau to weigh in on that, because it`s disturbing when you hear how they were portraying Travis behind closed doors. I have to figure how we`re going to give you that information because my cast has --
(LAUGHTER)
PINSKY: -- this reminds me of that -- "SNL" skit where all the cast members had Alzheimer`s. I`m just saying.
(LAUGHTER)
PINSKY: Next up, how worried were Jodi`s attorney about my jurors? You`re going to hear that. You`re going to hear what Kirk Nurmi said about our program. I will be Nurmi. We`ll be back after this.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
ARIAS: Remember the first time that you and I grinded? I ended up just (EXPLETIVE DELETED) and you`re like whoa just (EXPLETIVE DELETED). And at the same time, I looked around and there`s this (EXPLETIVE DELETED) like all over it. It was so hot.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I didn`t even notice it.
ARIAS: I know. I`ve done that once or twice two. Where it`s like I missed the (EXPLETIVE DELETED). The signature landmark. Have you seen "Ironman?"
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I`m not a huge fan of superhero movies, honestly. I`m actually not a big fan of "Spider-Man."
ARIAS: I like the story line, but I don`t like sitting through all the movie.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
PINSKY: Back with my co-host, Jenny Hutt, and our cast of re- enactors.
(LAUGHTER)
PINSKY: You guys, we have regrouped. We have your scripts in hand now. We`re going to -- Jenny and I have ours. We`re ready. We`re going to do our piece, then we`ll have you guys give the information on the next segment. But I want to give you the reviews are in. A tweet that came through.
By the way, my Twitterverse is ever vigilant, reminding me that things are called tweets and not Twitters. Thank you, guys, for doing that. Most of our Twitter handles are up there. "Oops! That was an epic fail. Had my popcorn ready and all for the theater." First, initial reviews --
EIGLARSH: We`re ready to go, man.
PINSKY: We`ll give --
SEDAGHATFAR: We`ll get a retake, Dr. Drew. We get a retake.
PINSKY: We will. Don`t worry. I`m going to give you that. But first, Jenny and I are going to have a reenactment of the private hearings in the judge`s chambers. We`re going to play this one out. I will play the part of the attorney who threw me and my staff under the bus, Kirk Nurmi. Jenny Hutt will be Judge Stevens. Jenny, you ready for this?
HUTT: I am.
PINSKY: OK. Thank you. Let`s do this some justice. Here it goes. It`s kind of interesting. It`s kind of stunning. I was stunned when I heard this, frankly. All right. Kirk Nurmi, here I am. Last night watching one of these shows, it came to my attention that a couple of people that are coming as members of the public are really acting as media. They`re being public and they`re going on as Dr. Drew`s jurors.
They`re watching the trial and they`re reporting as quote/unquote "Dr. Drew`s Jurors." I`m concerned that digital recording devices may be being employed to tape what`s going on and, obviously, one could be left behind. He`s getting paranoid.
When we play a tape, it goes over the speakers and a digital recorder somewhere placed outside of the view of security could easily be recording what`s going on. I am just concerned for Miss Arias` rights. Not wanting to get a mistrial here. Not much. Judge?
HUTT: I believe that there are three full-time security people in plain clothes stationed in the courtroom looking for anyone recording, taking photographs, improperly using their cell phones. So, I don`t think there should be an issue.
PINSKY: All right. I just thought that was stunning that he brought that up. And he insisted that we were somehow recording. I want to be really clear about something. We kid around. We don`t kid around when it comes to the justice system. The guests who served as my quote/unquote "jurors" were never serving as media on our behalf nor were they recording anything.
They were just giving, as public, as members of the public, their observations about what they saw. Mark, thoughts?
EIGLARSH: Well, you know, it`s his job to raise any potential issues. He wants to make sure that if she`s convicted, she potentially has a record. So, she could use that and get a new trial. Don`t kill the messenger. That`s him doing his job. It`s his job to be paranoid.
PINSKY: Anahita?
SEDAGHATFAR: I absolutely agree with Mark. I mean, this is a capital case. And the attorneys do need to raise every possible issue to make a record for appeal or to, you know, further request for mistrial. But I mean, Dr. Drew, you`re famous now. The judge knows you. People in Arizona know you.
PINSKY: Fantastic. What I`ve always wanted. Darren.
EIGLARSH: He was famous way before that.
PINSKY: Darren, your thoughts?
SEDAGHATFAR: Well, he`s more famous now. He`s more famous now.
KAVINOKY: Here`s my final thought. One, you are quite famous, Dr. Drew. And two, just because you`re paranoid doesn`t mean they`re not out to get you. And I think Nurmi might have been on to something. Although, I don`t buy for a second that he didn`t want a mistrial. He would have loved the mistrial. Things were not going his way.
PINSKY: Jenny, finish it up here.
HUTT: No, I agree. I was just thinking the whole time that you arrived. That`s all I was thinking.
(CROSSTALK)
PINSKY: I`ve finally arrived. Thank you. Thank you.
HUTT: I was proud of you.
PINSKY: I`m so proud. I`m so proud.
(LAUGHTER)
PINSKY: I`m going to take a break. How about that?
(LAUGHTER)
PINSKY: To me, I was stunned. Not in a good way. I thought, really? We can`t like report on these things without being dragged into it?
HUTT: No, I get it. I get what they were saying. Look, take Nurmi, what if an actual juror was going and then coming and being on the show or what if these people were recording --
PINSKY: I get it. He was doing his job. Still seems paranoid to me.
Up next, now, finally, after this intermission, you will get the dramatic conclusion -- well, actually, it was supposed to be the introduction that you missed ten minutes ago. We`re actually going to do it after the break.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
PINSKY: Back with my co-host, Jenny Hutt, Anahita Sedaghatfar, Mark Eiglarsh, Darren Kavinoky. Our cast, it is time for another of our theater reenactment. My cast for reenact the secret close door hearings in which the defense wanted to portray Travis as a pedophile. Tonight as the judge, Anahita, Darren is Nurmi, Mark is Martinez. We have limited time. I want people to get a sense of what was going on behind closed doors there, guys. Don`t let me down. Mark.
EIGLARSH: At the hearing involving the alleged pedophilia, Miss LaViolette indicated that when she spoke to the defendant, the defendant told her that Mr. Alexander was on the computer and that he was looking at this child porn. Officer Michael Melendes, I will call him to testify that he`s gone through the computer and there`s no child porn there. They have gotten through every single disk in the house, and there was no child porn that was found.
SEDAGHATFAR: The issue still relates to the observation that your client made of the victim with the photographs of the young boys.
KAVINOKY: Ms. LaViolette will telefy testiphonically to that. To which I think there`s some laughter now. Wait. What did I say?
EIGLARSH: Telefy testiphonically.
SEDAGHATFAR: Look, it`s been a long day and I knew what you meant. So we can address the issue with regard to the photographs of the boys from 10:30 to noon.
KAVINOKY: There`s no photographs.
SEDAGHATFAR: I know there are no photographs, but the issue. You wanted your client to testify about what she observed.
(APPLAUSE)
PINSKY: But aside from the great performance, the theater of the absurd is what was going on on Jodi`s defense. Yes, thank you, Mark. That`s about how good the defense was of trying to drag poor Travis through the mud. Let`s all remind ourselves, no evidence of anything, anywhere. There`s not an expert on the Earth that would say this guy was a pedophile. He saw him with the magazine that fell open. Forget it. Thank you, guys. Last call is next.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
PINSKY: Jenny, thank you for being by my side through this challenging program this evening. Interesting. My apologies to "HLN After Dark" who has to follow up. It was fun. Interesting. Hope you learn something, and it begins right now.
END
It's the one! Well I hope the second time around we will get a jury that will see it for what it is. Unbelievable that Jodie has issues of kicking, evidenced by her kicking an x cellmate and of course her mom when she came to Mesa to offer financial assistance to relocate to Yreka.
What I don't understand is her taking the screws out of the light thing and hid them behind the toilet and what was the brown powder all about? Oh and her discipline for not obeying correction officers when told to stop asking?
So I assume that sheriff Arpaio had his reasons for wanting her shackled along with the stunt belt. She's a very aggressive person and a danger to society. I bet her parents are kind of relieved that she's not around! Yes they love her but also fear her ability to harm. I mean geez at four years older she's hitting her little brother with a baseball bat. I think they are aware of other incidents they may have kept within the family. Her own dad said she was weird!
In her plea to the jury she said that in good conscious she couldn't ask for the death penalty because of her family.
She could care less about her family! It's all about her and what works for her only. She's a very spooky person! She was never intimidated by anyone, in fact she was the intimidator. DIDNT she not leave sky Hughes when asked to? She purposely remained an hour staring down either sky or her friend in the kitchen.
Showing up at travis house! Was asked to leave! She sleeps under the CHRISTMAS tree instead. Confronting other boyfriends new love interests! After. The relationships end?