Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007

[Sue]

NYC - thanks, it was already posted a couple pages back.  What do you make of it?

I think if they close the case all HELL is going to break loose

[robots]

NYC - thanks, it was already posted a couple pages back.  What do you make of it?

I think if they close the case all HELL is going to break loose

 

[klaasend]

The second weekend
February 12 2005


The second weekend was great too! From work straight to the Paddock where we had a few drinks, then off to a steak house. That food proved to be a good basis for the night out. In the Paddock we met heaps of people including some surfdudes who re-named Ilse and I, modepopje (fashionista) and surfchick respectively. Ilse already scored free wind surf lessons. Good on ya girl! I scored some free snorkeling lessons, but hey, I'd rather go scubadiving or windsurfing

Later that night we went to Carlos 'n Charlies where we found out what dancing really means here in Aruba. Turns out that white girls can dance (after a 1,5 meter cocktail of course). The next night was just as great

Sandwich in the Carlos 'n Charlies with Joran



She was in Aruba:

Aruba, Dutch Antilles
February 4 till the first of July 2005

[robots]

too many LIES

too many missing ITEMS

too many different stories that have CHANGED too many times



this case is SICKENING.......

NOT if, BUT when they LOCK PAULUS up.....it will be a nice day

 

[Nut44x4]

must be getting tired...can't seem to figure out what year this is> (found it on a goole search) http://145.37.208.76/160503/

According to other photos in Aruba it was 2004.

So loverboy was at C&C's in 2004...he would have been 16.

[Nut44x4]

must be getting tired...can't seem to figure out what year this is> (found it on a goole search) http://145.37.208.76/160503/

According to other photos in Aruba it was 2004.

So loverboy was at C&C's in 2004...he would have been 16.

Ahhhhhh....ok ty Klaas...2005 k

[robots]

is that the only shirt the sporter has ???



 

[crazybabyborg]

I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

[NYC_lover]

NYC - thanks, it was already posted a couple pages back.  What do you make of it?

I think if they close the case all HELL is going to break loose

Oh yeah, that goes sure happened! Believe me. That hell is going break loose soon, inside a year.
Well, I know some investigators been good, but KLPD?
I only know they work good, in child porn cases and crimes again children.

[klaasend]

I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

It's already been posted 2 or 3 times today.  I think it's alot of Bondia wishful thinking, IMO.

[robots]

I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

well, i think it is OUT of aruba's Rotten little hands

more BS from the writers 

[San]

I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

CBB, the reason why the Netherlands came to Aruba was because Rudy Croes invited them.  At the end of the day it is the Aruban prosecutor who will make the final decision whether to prosecute or not.  In my opinion that prosecutor will listen to anything Rudy Croes tells them to do.

Rudy Croes is corrupt.

[robots]

Natalee was NEVER on the beach.


NEVER


she was somewhere, probably at the sloot slaughterhouse.

the beech story is only real in the sense that the killers WENT to the beech but they did not have Natalee with them..... it was a disguise. tell the world we were at the beach, she fell asleep....blah blah blah...

not a single person with an ounce of CREDIBILITY has any prrof Natalee was EVER on the beach...

seeing sharks

went for a swim

made out on the beach

lost my shoes


ALL LIES

[mrs. red]

Natalee was NEVER on the beach.


NEVER


she was somewhere, probably at the sloot slaughterhouse.

the beech story is only real in the sense that the killers WENT to the beech but they did not have Natalee with them..... it was a disguise. tell the world we were at the beach, she fell asleep....blah blah blah...

not a single person with an ounce of CREDIBILITY has any prrof Natalee was EVER on the beach...

seeing sharks

went for a swim

made out on the beach

lost my shoes


ALL LIES

I agree never on the beach...

[robots]

the beach story leaves all kinds of other people to blame 

since when do three LOSERS listen to a young lady about where she wants to go...

why the beach???? 

no reason, except to be able to blame others or to blame Natalee herself.


i aint buying it, Joran is a terrible poker player 

he thinks he is really a good player   

[crazybabyborg]

I hope you're right, Klaas!

It absolutely burns me up! The "press coverage" could damage their island!? The FACT that a murdered tourist has been IGNORED and COVERED UP by their own Police Department IS NOT the hurtful thing to their island, Oh NO! The press coverage of the event is the problem!

The FACT that there are page after page of DOCUMENTED lies by the last known suspects to be with Natalee is no problem at all, as long as there is no one there to report it!

This island has to be convinced by some force, that furthering the "sweep under the rug" strategy is NOT the path to restoring their tourism trade. BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, until these idiots decide to hold Natalee's life in worthy regard! No one has ever suggested that horrible crimes only happen on that island. BUT, for the love of God, go after the truth and follow the path of Justice wherever it honestly leads!

[crazybabyborg]

I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

CBB, the reason why the Netherlands came to Aruba was because Rudy Croes invited them.  At the end of the day it is the Aruban prosecutor who will make the final decision whether to prosecute or not.  In my opinion that prosecutor will listen to anything Rudy Croes tells them to do.

Rudy Croes is corrupt.

OH, SAN! Say it ain't so! Please, Please, Please!
We have got to do something! Beth's book will be out by then, maybe it will stir up enough outrage that they'll finally give up this path of denial and cover-up and finally hold those responsible accountable for what they've done!

I really think they believe it would be worse for them to reveal the truth than to just try to keep the lid on it. What can we do to convince them otherwise?

[sb]

I am not going to lose any sleep over the November rumor because Aruba has NEVER held to any deadline or timeframe that they have set, not ONCE, since the beginning of the case.

They will do as much of nothing as they can get away with. Stall, delay, hinder and confuse. Indefinitely. That's what they do. They want this to drag out forever and fade from view.

[wreck]

I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

CBB, the reason why the Netherlands came to Aruba was because Rudy Croes invited them.  At the end of the day it is the Aruban prosecutor who will make the final decision whether to prosecute or not.  In my opinion that prosecutor will listen to anything Rudy Croes tells them to do.

Rudy Croes is corrupt.

OH, SAN! Say it ain't so! Please, Please, Please!
We have got to do something! Beth's book will be out by then, maybe it will stir up enough outrage that they'll finally give up this path of denial and cover-up and finally hold those responsible accountable for what they've done!

I really think they believe it would be worse for them to reveal the truth than to just try to keep the lid on it. What can we do to convince them otherwise?

If you all are awaiting ARUBA to do the right thing -- you will be sorely disappointed! The only way this will come to fruition (and it IS coming) is when the KLPD AND the FBI expose the corruption.

[dennisintn]

I am not going to lose any sleep over the November rumor because Aruba has NEVER held to any deadline or timeframe that they have set, not ONCE, since the beginning of the case.

They will do as much of nothing as they can get away with. Stall, delay, hinder and confuse. Indefinitely. That's what they do. They want this to drag out forever and fade from view.

if it's left to aruba, that's exactly what they'll do.  hopefully the article is a pipedream and the klpd and holland will remain in charge.  aruba does have a new prosecutor and maybe that will make a difference.  we can hope anyway.
dennisintn