September 18, 2019, 04:30:32 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Peter R. De Vries  (Read 2452 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NYC_lover
Monkey Junky Jr.
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 831


The Mercedes GL


« on: October 20, 2007, 11:35:05 AM »

News about Peter his business of crimes.

Rechter grijpt in bij uitzending Peter R. de Vries

AMSTERDAM - Een voor zondag geplande aflevering van het televisieprogramma van Peter R. de Vries gaat niet door. De uitzending zou gaan over een in 2004 voor kindermisbruik veroordeelde zeilinstructeur.

Dat meldde vrijdag een woordvoerder van televisiezender SBS6, die het programma van de misdaadjournalist uitzendt. 
Aflevering
De beslissing volgt op een uitspraak van de rechter in een door de zeilleraar aangespannen kort geding. Die bepaalde vrijdag dat De Vries geen beeld- en geluidsfragmenten van de man en zijn zeilschool mag uitzenden. Door de uitspraak blijft te weinig van de aflevering over om te tonen.
De instructeur kreeg drie jaar geleden een taakstraf en een verplichte behandeling voor het twee jaar lang misbruiken van een minderjarige jongen op zijn school.
Cel
Ook mocht hij van de rechter drie jaar lang geen les aan kinderen geven. De man overtrad die regel eerder al een keer en moest toen zes maanden de cel in.
De Vries stelt in zijn afgelaste aflevering dat de zeilleraar inmiddels weer lesgeeft aan minderjarigen, terwijl de drie jaar nog steeds niet zijn afgelopen. Ook zou hij ouders van kinderen die cursussen van hem krijgen, onvoldoende inlichten over zijn verleden.
Pedofielen
De misdaadjournalist wilde in zijn programma aan de kaak stellen dat veroordeelde pedofielen nog met minderjarigen kunnen werken, betoogde zijn advocaat Jacqueline Schaap. "Dat is van publiek belang."
De privacy van de instructeur telt echter zwaarder, oordeelde de rechter. Hij noemde de inbreuk hierop door de uitzending van De Vries "ernstig".
Volgens hem is het ook onnodig zo uitgebreid aandacht aan de zeilleraar te besteden om een vermeend maatschappelijk probleem aan de kaak te stellen. "Hij wordt voornamelijk gebruikt als illustratiemateriaal."
Heksenjacht
De rechter ging zo voor een groot deel mee met het betoog van Peter Plasman, de advocaat van de instructeur. Hij stelde dat de misdaadjournalist een maatschappelijke discussie "over het hoofd" van zijn cliënt wil voeren. "Hij is bezig met een heksenjacht. In feite speelt De Vries voor eigen rechter."
SBS6 zendt zondag een ander programma uit in plaats van dat van de misdaadjournalist. De zender wil de desbetreffende aflevering wel later dit seizoen nog tonen.
De instructeur zit momenteel ondergedoken. De politie had hem dat aangeraden naar aanleiding van de geplande uitzending van de Vries.
 

Judge intervenes at retransmission Peter R. De Vries spent
AMSTERDAM - a delivery of the television programme of Peter R. De Vries, planned, do not continue for Sunday. The retransmission will condemn concern in 2004 for child abuse sail instructor. That communicated a spokesman of television sender SBS6, who transmits the programme of the crime journalist to Friday. Delivery follows the decision on a pronouncement of the judge in by the sail teacher short lawsuit tightened. Those certain Friday that no picture - and sound fragments of the man and are sail school can transmit, De Vries said. By the pronouncement remains too a little of the delivery to show. The instructor got three years suffered a task sentence and long abuse an obligatory treatment for the two years of under 21 a boy on its school. Cell also could give he of judge for three years no lesson to children. The man broke that rule earlier already a time and had then six months cell in. Freeze the sail teacher puts meanwhile teaches to minors in its annulated delivery that, whereas the three years have not expired still. Also he parents of children who get cursussen of him insufficiently, inform concerning its past. Paedophiles the crime journalist wants in its programme to the jaw state that condemned paedophiles can work still with minors, demonstrated are lawyer Jacqueline Schaap. "that is of public importance." The privacy of the instructor counts however heavier, judged the judge. He called the violation on this by the retransmission of freezes "seriously". According to him it has been this way extended also unnecessary give attention on the sail teacher to put an alleged social problem on the jaw. "he is mainly used as an illustration material." Practising witchcraft huntings the judge went along this way for a large part with the betoog of Peter Plasman, the lawyer of the instructor. He stated that the crime journalist wants conduct a social discussion "concerning the head" of its customer. He is busy with a practising witchcraft huntings. In fact De Vries plays for own judge. SBS6 Sunday transmits a another programme instead of that instead of the crime journalist. The sender wants show, however, later this season to the delivery concerned still. The instructor sits at present gone into hiding. The police force had advised him that as a result of the planned retransmission of De Vries.

   

Logged

I am glad hear this media attention from the Netherlands. ‘Recherche verdraait informatie te vaak’
Investigators in a black breach and again a bad name of the Dutch police. It smells again to Corrpution and a negative researching in missing persons cases
Anna
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 18150



« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2007, 12:00:20 PM »

Thank you for this information, NYC!!!  I am ALWAYS very interested in Peter de Vries because he is so handsome and does good work.   

RAMM, did you see this?   So pedophiles do end up working with children even in your own system.  NO system is foolproof in this regard.  They just have a way of sneaking in around children and then we know what happens next.   Evil or Very Mad

But evidently the judge is blocking this program from airing.  Another big difference in our system in that we require the public to be notified of pedophiles in their area and an open registry of sex offenders.  Helps prevent this very thing from happening.  If people want privacy, they might consider not committing crimes.


Logged

PERSONA NON GRATA

All posts reflect my opinion only and are not shared by all forum members nor intended as statement of facts.  I am doing the best I can with the information available.

Murder & Crime on Aruba Summary http://tinyurl.com/2nus7c
NYC_lover
Monkey Junky Jr.
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 831


The Mercedes GL


« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2007, 01:03:13 PM »

You are welcome Anna.

Sorry to tell, pedophiles have a good live in the Netherlands. I am very MAD about that! 
Judge gives pedophiles, people that rape children or adults and people that has childporn on the computer or making that, get almost no sentence.
The most pedophiles, rapers and childporn makers or watchers, get mostly a task sentence.
But it is also very big corruption with judges. There was a public prosecutor on this computer was found childporn. And what did see the OM. Nothing! There was no case and he don't get dismissal. How do you mean corruption?
Logged

I am glad hear this media attention from the Netherlands. ‘Recherche verdraait informatie te vaak’
Investigators in a black breach and again a bad name of the Dutch police. It smells again to Corrpution and a negative researching in missing persons cases
Auntiem
Monkey Junky Jr.
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 517



« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2007, 06:34:47 PM »

   As long as Dutch Legislators want to delude themselves into believing that there is a cure for pedifiles, and their choice is to reform not imprsion them, the problem is going to grow into major proportions, and Dutch people need to guard their children "at every moment."   Home school them, keep the inside you own backyards or right in front of you while playing ( for go any type of double income families) and in view of the latest in home, in bedroom kidnappings, have family bedrooms.  Centuries ago this worked...I guess it's time to go back to "the old ways"
 Computers should be use WITH parents for school work only, tv shows monitored.   Watch out, Holland...it a Pedifile Free-for-all (like Damm Square used to be for drugs) and your children are in danger......

      Americans, take heed, this could happen to us!
Logged
Rammstein
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 451



« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2007, 07:22:41 AM »

Thank you for this information, NYC!!!  I am ALWAYS very interested in Peter de Vries because he is so handsome and does good work.   

RAMM, did you see this?   So pedophiles do end up working with children even in your own system.  NO system is foolproof in this regard.  They just have a way of sneaking in around children and then we know what happens next.   Evil or Very Mad

But evidently the judge is blocking this program from airing.  Another big difference in our system in that we require the public to be notified of pedophiles in their area and an open registry of sex offenders.  Helps prevent this very thing from happening.  If people want privacy, they might consider not committing crimes.

this man is a sailing instructor that happens to teach to underage people. The law requires people like teachers or people who almost exclusively work with children to request and produce a certificate of good behavior.

If I had been the company or organization that would have employed this person I would have requested a certificate of good behavior but that's just my personal opinion.

In our country the right to privacy is very important, even people who have been in jail have the right to some privacy.

The problem with Peter R. de Vries is that he does not report on news or what is wrong. This whole item could have been dealt with in 5 minutes of airtime after which he could have gone on with other news or gone on about his opinions about this item. But as usual Peter r. de Vries has made a simple case into a witch hunt (believe it or not, not the first time he has done this) because for Peter R. de Vries it is not justice or solving cases that are of importance, it is ratings and his own fame that take center stage, no matter who he needs to step on or who he needs to consort with to get his ratings and his fame up.
Logged

Rule 208. Sometimes the only thing more dangerous than the question is an answer
Rammstein
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 451



« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2007, 07:50:13 AM »

You are welcome Anna.

Sorry to tell, pedophiles have a good live in the Netherlands. I am very MAD about that! 
Judge gives pedophiles, people that rape children or adults and people that has childporn on the computer or making that, get almost no sentence.
The most pedophiles, rapers and childporn makers or watchers, get mostly a task sentence.
But it is also very big corruption with judges. There was a public prosecutor on this computer was found childporn. And what did see the OM. Nothing! There was no case and he don't get dismissal. How do you mean corruption?

sorry to tell you but you are wrong. Pedophiles do not have a good live in the Netherlands. But as you are not an unbiased individual I could prove it to you until the cows come home but it would still not convince you so I am not going to waste my time (and yours) by providing the evidence that shows that only part of the people who have child porn on their computers (and have not made/distributed or abused children) get no prison sentence but work punishment and mandatory treatment for their affliction. Most perverts who own, make and spread child porn do go to jail/get a jail sentence and virtually all who commit child molestation get jail time.
Logged

Rule 208. Sometimes the only thing more dangerous than the question is an answer
NYC_lover
Monkey Junky Jr.
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 831


The Mercedes GL


« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2007, 02:41:46 PM »

You are welcome Anna.

Sorry to tell, pedophiles have a good live in the Netherlands. I am very MAD about that! 
Judge gives pedophiles, people that rape children or adults and people that has childporn on the computer or making that, get almost no sentence.
The most pedophiles, rapers and childporn makers or watchers, get mostly a task sentence.
But it is also very big corruption with judges. There was a public prosecutor on this computer was found childporn. And what did see the OM. Nothing! There was no case and he don't get dismissal. How do you mean corruption?

sorry to tell you but you are wrong. Pedophiles do not have a good live in the Netherlands. But as you are not an unbiased individual I could prove it to you until the cows come home but it would still not convince you so I am not going to waste my time (and yours) by providing the evidence that shows that only part of the people who have child porn on their computers (and have not made/distributed or abused children) get no prison sentence but work punishment and mandatory treatment for their affliction. Most perverts who own, make and spread child porn do go to jail/get a jail sentence and virtually all who commit child molestation get jail time.

For the first. I don't have talk TO you about this. And how NAIVE are you? BTW I don't want any discussion with you.

And btw, I know exactly when it going on in the Netherlands with the Law system.
I have much and high connections with (KLPD, Amsterdam-Amstelland, Zuid-Oost-Gelderland, and Midden Brabant/Den Bosch) investigators that work in cases of Crimes Again Children and another cases.
And I get (directly) INFO about court cases of sentences.

END DISCUSSION!
Logged

I am glad hear this media attention from the Netherlands. ‘Recherche verdraait informatie te vaak’
Investigators in a black breach and again a bad name of the Dutch police. It smells again to Corrpution and a negative researching in missing persons cases
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 1.929 seconds with 19 queries.