Natalee Case Discussion #689 11/13 - 11/21/07

[robots]

Robots, I have really missed you and your unquenchable optimism!

nice to see you CBB
as well as everyone else
 

[Anna]

Tyler,
The beheaded guy was Dutch but some called his slit throat a Colombian Necktie but it really wasn't.  Technically, anyway.  That might be where you got the Colombian part about him.

Then was his wife Colombian?  I know the "Colombian necktie," but that is probably what I am thinking.  One of the "secret" witnesses was Colombian, however, right, and was deported?  Am I forgetting too much.  Maybe I have had a stroke.

Yes, two witnesses both supposedly named Carlos Ramos both Comombians as best I remember as well.

I may have had a stroke as well.  Feel maybe another one trying to cook and watch and read all at the same time.  Think I may have left out a few ingredients.

.

[klaasend]

www.cnn.com/heroes

To vote

[klaasend]

GREAT SHOW DANA!

[Anna]

Maybe they found the shoes. 

 

[oldfart]

Back to the kitchen, but I'll be back! 

CBB  How many you cooking for... and why did I not get an invite... I mean cooking cornbead a day ahead (hope you used cast iron) it has go to be a big party.
JMO  of course

[San]

Jossy said it is not safe to say a body has not been found.

[igsigs]

Greta still stalking KJ.   lol

[San]

John Q. Kelly said he has an idea of what the evidence is.

[Hat]

The Kalpoe's will crack - Joran never will.

That's a call.

[Observer]

Colombia is to the left of the white line and Venezuela to the right. The Colombian coastline is very close to Aruba.

[igsigs]

JQK knows what the new evidence is ... forensic. 

Required multi-juridictional cooperation. They had to *get it*....?

[San]

JQK said on a scale of 1 to 10 he said 7 or 8 positive on the info they have.

He said it is forensic evidence that he thinks they have.

[Tamikosmom]

newsflash the great legal oracle Heli has spoken 

Heli Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:10 pm

Arrested on suspicion of voluntary manslaughter -- cool but we know
how aruban law operates when arresting. They have to cite the basis
of their suspicion that the new evidence may support.

They can suspect all they want but you still need evidence of a body
or an eyewitness to her death or her dead body to prosecute on a charge
of manslaughter. Anything short of the latter three cannot possibly
result in a trial with any reasonable hope of conviction

(do you suppose charlierat is coaching her from behind his curtain? )

Hi none   

I know that I have allowed myself to jump on this Aruban roller coaster ride again ... a roller coaster ride that has time and time again taken me to the heights of expectation and then ... plunged me into the depths of dispair.

However ... this time I am allowing myself to enjoy the ride up but I am also bracing for the plunge.

I cannot forget the rearrest of the Kalpoe brothers at the end of August, 2005 ... only to be released from custody less than a week later.  Remember ... the media statement from prosecutor's office implied that there were "new suspicions" and ... "new facts and circumstances" were required to justify the Kalpoe brothers being arrested again.

If the presiding judge is going to disregard the "new suspicions" ... the "new facts and circumstance" ....

Janet

+++++++++++++++++

Statement from the Prosecutor's Office
'The Abrams Report'
August 26, 2005

In the early morning hours of Friday, the 26th of August, 2005, police once more arrested the brothers, Satish Kalpoe and Deepak Kalpoe. They are in custody based on the same suspicions as before. They are suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody.

Aside from these suspicions against the two brothers, there are new suspicions, which at this point the prosecutor is not commenting on.  To arrest S.K. and D.K. again, there had to be new facts and circumstances.  That is the case.


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
On the Record w/ Greta
August 30, 2006

ELLIS-SCHIPPER: Well, I think it's a big moment, Greta. You know, the prosecution and the investigation is moving very carefully. They don't want to make more mistakes, and they are very careful. So they must have had some real, real evidence and new facts that they felt confident enough to haul them back in.
<snipped>

ELLIS-SCHIPPER: Well, it means that the investigation is moving forward and there's hope that we might go towards a trial because, at first, I was doubting whether we were even facing a trial. It shows that the police have done some good work and apparently gathered evidence, new evidence enough for to bring them back in custody.

[SarahD]

Jossy said it is not safe to say a body has not been found.

Oh my!

[San]

He said he thinks the evidence they have will clear a lot up regarding the timeline.

[oldfart]

JQK said on a scale of 1 to 10 he said 7 or 8 positive on the info they have.

He said it is forensic evidence that he thinks they have.

Given what JQK... just said... Robots I'm breathing faster Now....  I wonder if Robots works for JQK ?

[igsigs]

JQK - evidence will clarify timeline.   WOW

[Angiex911dsptchr]

FINALLY ~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Awesome News !!!!! 

Had to work all damn day til late this evening. Just got home a few minutes ago.  THE CUZ had called me while I was at work and I about fell over !!!!!!!!!!!  Thank you to CUZ, Marlee, Yap and Rob for calling me.  !!! Just caught up reading and missed Danas show.     

Robots ~!!  Happy Birthday Sweety !! The humidor is keeping yours and Wrecks cigars nice and fresh !! 

Happy Thanksgiving to you all ~!!


Now.. PVDS needs to have his ass behind bars as well !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

What a wonderful day !!  THANK YOU GOD !!!!!!!!!
 

[San]

Dave spoke to Vinda de Sousa today and she will find out more information tomorrow.