Election 2008 Produces No Change

I've never seen this site, but it does have a way with words...

Quote

The millionaire, warmongering, death penalty Democrat Barack Obama won with only 52% of the vote, defeating the millionaire, warmongering, death penalty Republican John McCain. This is not a mandate for change and of course, Obama did not offer any change whatsoever. His election on the basis of the color of his skin, being the first African-American president, is a sign of the depths of racism in this society, not the end of racism. Absolutely nothing has changed in this racist society and Obama offers absolutely no change whatsoever. He is bought and paid for by the same capitalist corporations as the Republican and will carry out the same agenda as the current occupant of the White House. The Democrats won the 2000 and 2004 elections, but refused to challenge the election fraud. This time, the Chicago Democratic Daley machine, an election-frauding gang for the Democrats, stopped enough of the election fraud to put a Democrat in the White House. It is said that the same gang made possible John Kennedy’s victory over Nixon.

Quote

Proposition 5, an excellent drug treatment reform was defeated by 59% voting No. This horror was made possible by the viciously reactionary Democratic Attorney General, Jerry Brown, the same one who is prosecuting the San Francisco 8, for a murder they did not commit some 30 years ago, and for which they were tortured to confess, the confessions having been tossed out by the courts years ago. For more on the friendly relationship between Democrat Jerry Brown and the California prison guards, see:
“Jerry’s Brown-Nosin with California Prison Guards” by Daniel Abrahamson, dated November 4, 2008 at
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=6255#more

Quote

San Francisco voters demonstrated how profoundly backward they are by giving only 16% of their vote (29,951 votes as of 1 a.m. on 11/5/08) to an excellent peace candidate, Cindy Sheehan. They gave the reactionary, pro-war, pro-bank bailout millionaire Democrat Nancy Pelosi 71% of their vote and 9% to the Republican, Diana Walsh. While Pelosi usually gets 80% of the vote, after the outstanding campaign Sheehan conducted, Sheehan deserved a far greater percentage of the vote. Please do not refer to San Francisco as “progressive” again; it is profoundly reactionary. Further proof of the very reactionary San Francisco electorate on the war and peace issue is its support of Prop V, the pro-JROTC measure, described below.

Board of Supervisors

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors retains its pro-rent control majority. It appears it still has only one Green Party member. We shall see if this new Board of Supervisors votes to put to an end to the Navy’s Blue Death flights over San Francisco. With all the money there is in San Francisco for nonsense proposals liking naming a much needed sewage treatment plant after George Bush (that was fortunately defeated with 69% voting No on Proposition R), perhaps someone will spend the money to put a proposal to end the Navy’s Blue Death flights over San Francisco on the November 2010 ballot, when other members of the Board of Supervisors are up for election, and when there will be a high voter turnout for the governor’s race.

Quote

Housing is always an issue in San Francisco, which is why rent control is the litmus test issue for the Board of Supervisors. Proposition M, ending some landlord harassment, passed with 60% of the vote. Proposition B, demanding the Board of Supervisors set aside funding for affordable housing for the workingclass, appears to be losing with 50.54% voting no. There is no federal money coming from the warmongering millionaire just elected to be president for workingclass housing as we cannot have guns and butter, so we will have to try again.

San Franciscans again voted, either with legitimate ballots or by election fraud, it is unknown at the present time which, to oppose public power by opposing Proposition H with 59% of their vote, falling for PG&E’s lies about Proposition H. It is the private profit company, PG&E that is not elected and not accountable; the revenue bonds proposed in Proposition H would have been issued by the elected and very accountable Board of Supervisors. So, we will continue to have blackouts and very expensive gas and electricity rates courtesy the private profit utility that provides San Francisco residents and businesses gas and electricity in clear violation of the 1913 Raker Act, which mandated public power.

San Franciscans opposed giving prostitutes the right to sue, voting against Proposition K with 57% of their vote. There is clearly no analytical thinking taking place at all on the part of most voters.

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/11/05/18549043.php

Wow...nothing like that at home.