Caylee Marie Anthony, 2, FL Missing since June 16-just reported by mother #67

[jrzgrl]

[/quote]

Even if the father weren't most likely Lee, that's not really true. First of all, you don't see any young men beating down the Anthony's door claiming Caylee now, and I'm pretty sure nobody was eager to claim her then, either. And you don't see any Grandma or Grandpa wannabees insisting on a DNA test to determine if their son's the Daddy. Even the parents of the deceased "father claimants" don't appear to ever have been curious at all. So I don't think it's fair to put it all on the Anthony family. "Daddy" and his family have to share at least half the blame for Caylee not knowing her biological father.

Jesse Grund was willing to step up to the plate, with the result that he was considered Caylee's "daddy" even after the paternity test showed they weren't related.
[/quote]

what if the Daddy or Daddy's family didnt know about her what if like her friend said KC told her it was a random one night stand or maybe she not sure herself or maybe to scandalist to reveal CA sure wouldnt want her little KC to have a bad rep

[West Coast Monkey]

Now they have a third witness come forward to say they saw a child that looked like Caylee at the mall. I really wish the parents of that child would come forward already to end this. But maybe no parent can come forward to say that is my child, because it could very well be a pic of Caylee that was taken maybe in the spring, I don't trust those Anthony's what so ever.

I never thought of that, you are absolutely right.  Nothing would surprise me with this family! 

Then again, the child and parents could be tourists to Disneyworld, and not even know that this picture is out there and being circulated.  Personally, I don't think it looks like her - Caylee had a softer profile, in my opinion.

[Today]

ooops I saw wrong date on that article, Klaas if you want to remove to avoid confusion.

[Brandi]

Casey Anthony case: WFTV asks if Cindy Anthony obstructed justice -- and she plans to appear on Wednesday's "Today"
posted by halboedeker on Nov 25, 2008 7:07:04 PM

This is an old article. Note the date.

[txlisa]

George, Cindy Anthony Say Big Development In Case Is Coming

Caylee’s grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony, said a big development in the case is on the way.

George Anthony wouldn't elaborate much further, but said a team of private investigators are working on a new lead that could lead to the discovery of the girl.

"There is just a lot of positive things that are still happening. A lot more people are coming forward because they can see some progress of bringing Caylee home and it's pretty awesome stuff. I can't be too specific with you but we believe we're close,” he said.

The Anthonys said they will continue to hold vigils for Caylee as long as she's missing.

http://www.wesh.com/news/18188923/detail.html

Lisa

[yeknomaras]

you all look so festive

[Brandi]

George, Cindy Anthony Say Big Development In Case Is Coming

Caylee’s grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony, said a big development in the case is on the way.

George Anthony wouldn't elaborate much further, but said a team of private investigators are working on a new lead that could lead to the discovery of the girl.

"There is just a lot of positive things that are still happening. A lot more people are coming forward because they can see some progress of bringing Caylee home and it's pretty awesome stuff. I can't be too specific with you but we believe we're close,” he said.

The Anthonys said they will continue to hold vigils for Caylee as long as she's missing.

http://www.wesh.com/news/18188923/detail.html

Lisa

A broken record ...and a very sad song, eh?

[Garden Gnome]

Even if the father weren't most likely Lee, that's not really true. First of all, you don't see any young men beating down the Anthony's door claiming Caylee now, and I'm pretty sure nobody was eager to claim her then, either. And you don't see any Grandma or Grandpa wannabees insisting on a DNA test to determine if their son's the Daddy. Even the parents of the deceased "father claimants" don't appear to ever have been curious at all. So I don't think it's fair to put it all on the Anthony family. "Daddy" and his family have to share at least half the blame for Caylee not knowing her biological father.

Jesse Grund was willing to step up to the plate, with the result that he was considered Caylee's "daddy" even after the paternity test showed they weren't related.
[/quote]

what if the Daddy or Daddy's family didnt know about her what if like her friend said KC told her it was a random one night stand or maybe she not sure herself or maybe to scandalist to reveal CA sure wouldnt want her little KC to have a bad rep

[/quote]

Well, wouldn't the po po have to have the father's DNA to compare Caylee's DNA against?  It has to be somebody that has volunteered DNA or else been tested by some LE agency and their DNA is on record somewhere.  It's not like they have EVERY guy that KC slept with in their system?  Hell, who knows how many guys she has had carnal knowledge with!  Certainly most of her male friends!  Did she ever meet anyone and NOT sleep with them?

[no rose colored glasses]

George, Cindy Anthony Say Big Development In Case Is Coming

Caylee’s grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony, said a big development in the case is on the way.

George Anthony wouldn't elaborate much further, but said a team of private investigators are working on a new lead that could lead to the discovery of the girl.

"There is just a lot of positive things that are still happening. A lot more people are coming forward because they can see some progress of bringing Caylee home and it's pretty awesome stuff. I can't be too specific with you but we believe we're close,” he said.

The Anthonys said they will continue to hold vigils for Caylee as long as she's missing.

http://www.wesh.com/news/18188923/detail.html

Lisa

Maybe the big development is Cindy, George and Lee will be arrested for obstruction.

[always 1]

I am all dolled up for Christmas!!!   Thank you Brandi and Klaasend!!!

 

A1 ... you are not wear black silk Philip Lim blouse, Lucky Brand Jeans and boots.

However ... you are dressed very festive.  A size one figure dictates that you would look good in anything or ... nothing.

 

Janet

You are so sweet, Janet.

[BooMonkey]

Even if the father weren't most likely Lee, that's not really true. First of all, you don't see any young men beating down the Anthony's door claiming Caylee now, and I'm pretty sure nobody was eager to claim her then, either. And you don't see any Grandma or Grandpa wannabees insisting on a DNA test to determine if their son's the Daddy. Even the parents of the deceased "father claimants" don't appear to ever have been curious at all. So I don't think it's fair to put it all on the Anthony family. "Daddy" and his family have to share at least half the blame for Caylee not knowing her biological father.

Jesse Grund was willing to step up to the plate, with the result that he was considered Caylee's "daddy" even after the paternity test showed they weren't related.

And how would you propose they do that? So now every guy in Orlando, the vacation capital of the world (think Spring Break), has to think back 3 years ago to see if he might has slept with KC and pay $550 for a DNA test? If a guy doesn't know the girl is pregnant, how is the Daddy family responsible? The pregnancy was KC's responsibility, I'm sure she knew about protection and didn't use it very often according to sources. The moment she skipped her period, she should have been able to count back 1 month and figure out who the father was and notify him and his family. If my daughter got pregnant, I certainly wouldn't blame the father or his family for not actively pursuing the issue of whether she was pregnant or not.

[Sea Searcher]

Unless they can prove these porn pics were taken during the time Caylee was missing.Boy,wouldn't that be damaging......

Klaas...you have the original photo..from the web site...is there a time stamp on it or would that just show as the date it was uploaded to the web site???

[Fuzzball]

None of the GD dollies had clothes by the time she was finished with them. Heck, some of them ( Barbies ) had missing limbs and heads. The kid was just a kid. No signs of anything " strange",  perfectly ok.   

Then why do all her dolls have their clothes on in the pictures? They said she always stripped the clothes off her baby dolls the instant she got them, and that's why "mama" was naked in the car. But then when you look at the pictures, there are no naked dolls anywhere--least of all "mama," who's always wrapped up or dressed. Why would you lie about something like that?

Sure the Barbies have missing limbs and heads--what kind of moron gives a Barbie to a 2-year-old anyway? But baby dolls, esp a favorite doll, like the one Caylee wouldn't leave home without--that doll's usually a nice barometer of how the child is treated. So when I read that she supposedly stripped every doll the INSTANT she got it, I kinda got queasy. Could be she'd rather have stuff she could take apart and put back together, or it could be that she's acting out.


I always thought it was kind of bizarre and creepy that Caylee named her baby doll "Mamma," anyway.

[Tamikosmom]

George, Cindy Anthony Say Big Development In Case Is Coming

Caylee’s grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony, said a big development in the case is on the way.

George Anthony wouldn't elaborate much further, but said a team of private investigators are working on a new lead that could lead to the discovery of the girl.

"There is just a lot of positive things that are still happening. A lot more people are coming forward because they can see some progress of bringing Caylee home and it's pretty awesome stuff. I can't be too specific with you but we believe we're close,” he said.

The Anthonys said they will continue to hold vigils for Caylee as long as she's missing.

http://www.wesh.com/news/18188923/detail.html

Lisa

Has George Anthony heard of the children's tale .... "The Boy Who Called Wolf"?  The moral of this tale is applicable to what Cindy and him are doing in regards to the live Caylee sightings.

Janet

[always 1]

I am all dolled up for Christmas!!!   Thank you Brandi and Klaasend!!!

You are gorgeous my dear friend!

As are you!!!

[Sea Searcher]

I am all dolled up for Christmas!!!   Thank you Brandi and Klaasend!!!

 

A1 ... you are not wear black silk Philip Lim blouse, Lucky Brand Jeans and boots.

However ... you are dressed very festive.  A size one figure dictates that you would look good in anything or ... nothing.

 

Janet

You are so sweet, Janet.

I dunno...we might need side by side photo's for comparison   

[always 1]

I am all dolled up for Christmas!!!   Thank you Brandi and Klaasend!!!

And looking Beautiful as always!!!

PJ

Thank you PJ.

[Hudsunn]

In every picture of Caylee with a doll, the doll is always clothed, as in the two pictures featured on this page.

[Garden Gnome]

None of the GD dollies had clothes by the time she was finished with them. Heck, some of them ( Barbies ) had missing limbs and heads. The kid was just a kid. No signs of anything " strange",  perfectly ok.   

Then why do all her dolls have their clothes on in the pictures? They said she always stripped the clothes off her baby dolls the instant she got them, and that's why "mama" was naked in the car. But then when you look at the pictures, there are no naked dolls anywhere--least of all "mama," who's always wrapped up or dressed. Why would you lie about something like that?

Sure the Barbies have missing limbs and heads--what kind of moron gives a Barbie to a 2-year-old anyway? But baby dolls, esp a favorite doll, like the one Caylee wouldn't leave home without--that doll's usually a nice barometer of how the child is treated. So when I read that she supposedly stripped every doll the INSTANT she got it, I kinda got queasy. Could be she'd rather have stuff she could take apart and put back together, or it could be that she's acting out.


I always thought it was kind of bizarre and creepy that Caylee named her baby doll "Mamma," anyway.

Sorry, I raised three daughters and have not seen one young child keep a doll dressed.  They take the clothes off because they CAN and then wait for someone to dress them because they CAN"T.  I am sure there are hundreds of pictures of Caylee and I think if you looked at all of them, the dolls would be dressed sometimes and not others.  This is not an indicator of abuse - not in a two/three year old!

BTW, I think your post sounds a little confrontational.  You probably don't mean to call someone a moron but maybe you should read before posting.  JMHO

[mammy]

None of the GD dollies had clothes by the time she was finished with them. Heck, some of them ( Barbies ) had missing limbs and heads. The kid was just a kid. No signs of anything " strange",  perfectly ok.   

Then why do all her dolls have their clothes on in the pictures? They said she always stripped the clothes off her baby dolls the instant she got them, and that's why "mama" was naked in the car. But then when you look at the pictures, there are no naked dolls anywhere--least of all "mama," who's always wrapped up or dressed. Why would you lie about something like that?

Sure the Barbies have missing limbs and heads--what kind of moron gives a Barbie to a 2-year-old anyway? But baby dolls, esp a favorite doll, like the one Caylee wouldn't leave home without--that doll's usually a nice barometer of how the child is treated. So when I read that she supposedly stripped every doll the INSTANT she got it, I kinda got queasy. Could be she'd rather have stuff she could take apart and put back together, or it could be that she's acting out.


I always thought it was kind of bizarre and creepy that Caylee named her baby doll "Mamma," anyway.

I guess that I'm a "moron."  I have purchased Barbie's for little girls under the age of three.

In my experience, most kids love to take the clothes off their dolls and dress them again.

As far as the name "mamma", there's nothing strange about that name.  All kids have their own special names for dolls, pets, toys, parents, and grparents.

Kids are innocent and the innocence comes out while they play/grow.  IMO, the best times are when they are young enough for the innocence to come out daily.