Caylee Marie Anthony, 2, FL Missing since June 16-just reported by mother #67

[always 1]

I am all dolled up for Christmas!!!   Thank you Brandi and Klaasend!!!

 

A1 ... you are not wear black silk Philip Lim blouse, Lucky Brand Jeans and boots.

However ... you are dressed very festive.  A size one figure dictates that you would look good in anything or ... nothing.

 

Janet

You are so sweet, Janet.

I dunno...we might need side by side photo's for comparison   

Bad bad Sea Searcher .....

[illuminated]

NOTE:  THIS IS AN OLD ARTICLE

Casey Anthony case: WFTV asks if Cindy Anthony obstructed justice -- and she plans to appear on Wednesday's "Today"
posted by halboedeker on Nov 25, 2008 7:07:04 PM


Tuesday was not a good day for Cindy Anthony. She was in tears Tuesday at a news conference. Then WFTV-Channel 9 raised doubts about her credibility in a Kathi Belich report.


Does that mean Cindy will keep a low profile on Wednesday? Not at all. She will be on "Today" in the 7 a.m. hour.

How big a deal was the WFTV report?

An e-mail obtained by Belich suggests that Cindy Anthony could have deliberately given the wrong evidence -- a hairbrush -- to investigators in July. They had sought a brush with the hair of missing toddler Caylee. WFTV anchor Bob Opsahl said, "She gave up Casey's brush, knowing full well it was the wrong one."

Anchor Martie Salt said, "It's a strange move for a grandmother so desperate to get her granddaughter back."

WFTV said it had told the FBI about the e-mail. In it, Cindy Anthony said, " I never lied I just never went to my bathroom to get the hairbrush that I used only for Caylee."

It's such a baffling statement. What to make of it?

Bill Sheaffer, the station's legal analyst, told Belich that the e-mail might be obstruction of justice but at the very least it undermined Cindy's credibility as a witness.

And the Anthonys' credibility has become a crucial issue as the public has wondered why Caylee cannot be found.

Belich noted that the Anthonys won't take lie-detector tests or answer investigators' follow-up questions.

Readers have wondered why Cindy Anthony washed clothing that contained evidence and changed her comments after alerting authorities to the smell of death in daughter Casey's car. Casey Anthony has been charged with first-degree murder in her daughter's disappearance.

In a WKMG-Channel 6 report Tuesday, Cindy Anthony sounded off emotionally at a noon news conference.

"We're going to bring Caylee Marie home," she said. "The last breath that I take, I'm going to continue to look for her. I feel confident every day that we're getting closer and closer to finding her."

Study that comment. Cindy isn't making a lot of sense.

On WESH-Channel 2, Michelle Bart, a spokeswoman for the Anthony family, blasted law enforcement for not looking for a living Caylee.

"The grandparents love their granddaughter," Bart said. And she added, "To declare this case closed is not only inhumane but disrespectful to Caylee."

How do you take a lecture by the Anthony family on showing respect for Caylee? I'd love to hear your feedback on that one.

The Casey Anthony case moved to court Tuesday. A judge may rule Wednesday on a state request for a gag order in the case

 Can't LE take legal action to force CA & GA to take a lie detector test? Anybody know what the legal procedure is concerning that kind of thing?

[Hudsunn]

If the Anthonys suddenly "find" Caylee and there is no indication of who had her or where she has been for all this time, I am going to wonder if some sort of hoax was carried out here.  Really. But I think the chances of that happening are nil.  Caylee was supposed to be "coming home" for her birthday and then for Halloween and now they are "close" again. 

[Kat_Gram]

Sure the Barbies have missing limbs and heads--what kind of moron gives a Barbie to a 2-year-old anyway?
She got the coveted Barbies from me. Her friends had them. And she got them for doing the potty thing. I did not realize it was a " moronic " thing to do. Sorry for being a moron. 

[OriginalKat]

George, Cindy Anthony Say Big Development In Case Is Coming

Caylee’s grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony, said a big development in the case is on the way.

George Anthony wouldn't elaborate much further, but said a team of private investigators are working on a new lead that could lead to the discovery of the girl.

"There is just a lot of positive things that are still happening. A lot more people are coming forward because they can see some progress of bringing Caylee home and it's pretty awesome stuff. I can't be too specific with you but we believe we're close,” he said.

The Anthonys said they will continue to hold vigils for Caylee as long as she's missing.

http://www.wesh.com/news/18188923/detail.html

Lisa

Has George Anthony heard of the children's tale .... "The Boy Who Called Wolf"?  The moral of this tale is applicable to what Cindy and him are doing in regards to the live Caylee sightings.

Janet

Spinning wheel.....it can't stop. If they would have their "investigator" checkout the organizations and people they associate with then maybe they could find some reputable and professional help.

Never Lose Hope Foundation (.org) website hasn't been working since Oct '08.
If you look on www.sunbiz.orgthe people listed in charge of foundation are Joseph Rossi, has many, many FL Corps and one that stuck out to me was Video Entertainment.
Richard Wade ,has many and one is FL Telemarketing which is under investigation for elder credit card fraud,
Mike Harris, has fewer but one being Enterprise Payment Svc and Swampwater Recording.
Those just stuck out to me.
Also the foundation is the one who hired Nejames for Anthony's.

We know about Kidfinders and Milsteads. We pretty well know with alot of postings on Michelle Bart and other aliases she has. She does not have professionalism on camera at all with all her experience that is listed over the last 20 years. Makes you wonder.

The A's and those around them have turned this into a terrible weight which I think is doing more harm to the defense part of the case (if there is anymore that can be done).

[no rose colored glasses]

My Fox Orlando 35 has an exclusive interview with Wanda Weary, the woman who said she saw Caylee at the Orlando Airport July 2nd. Wanda, do you not know that LE has totally discredited your story of seeing Caylee. Five months ago today she said she saw Caylee at the airport. I wonder if the Anthony's gave her money to come forward with this bogus story, must be part of their big announcement.

[Lovinlife]

Just peekin' my head in to say "hello"  , I'm so far behind (thread #66) and haven't even gotten to most of the 700 pages of documents!  Goes to show ya' what I get for going out of town for the holdiay and don't even get me started on the whole "work thing"!  I saw some new monkeys, if any are logged on...a warm welcome to you!  Well, better get back to reading, I'll probably catch up to you guys in thread #68!

See ya there!

[Hudsunn]

I have not been to the porn site.  How bad are the pix?

[Brandi]

you all look so festive

Now you do too! Please use this if you want!

[Fuzzball]

Even if the father weren't most likely Lee, that's not really true. First of all, you don't see any young men beating down the Anthony's door claiming Caylee now, and I'm pretty sure nobody was eager to claim her then, either. And you don't see any Grandma or Grandpa wannabees insisting on a DNA test to determine if their son's the Daddy. Even the parents of the deceased "father claimants" don't appear to ever have been curious at all. So I don't think it's fair to put it all on the Anthony family. "Daddy" and his family have to share at least half the blame for Caylee not knowing her biological father.

Jesse Grund was willing to step up to the plate, with the result that he was considered Caylee's "daddy" even after the paternity test showed they weren't related.

And how would you propose they do that? So now every guy in Orlando, the vacation capital of the world (think Spring Break), has to think back 3 years ago to see if he might has slept with KC and pay $550 for a DNA test? If a guy doesn't know the girl is pregnant, how is the Daddy family responsible?[quote/]
[quote/]The pregnancy was KC's responsibility, I'm sure she knew about protection and didn't use it very often according to sources. The moment she skipped her period, she should have been able to count back 1 month and figure out who the father was and notify him and his family. If my daughter got pregnant, I certainly wouldn't blame the father or his family for not actively pursuing the issue of whether she was pregnant or not.

That's just silly. It's a lot easier for a boy to slip on a condom than it is for a girl to shell out for the pill or the diaphragm or whatever. What's wrong with young men that they can't be bothered? Especially with a girl like Casey, you'd think they'd want to use a little protection just for their own health. I'm sure the guy who knocked Casey up also knew about protection and just didn't figure it was his problem. As for counting backwards, men can count, too, and Casey wasn't invisible. She may have denied that the giant tummy was actually a baby, but I think if her uncle Rick knew better, probably so did the guys she ran with. 

You're assuming there was one guy per month, and really, that's unlikely knowing Casey and her friends. These people "hook up" for a week, or a few days, or a one night stand, and then they're on to the next. In one month, it looks like Casey had at least 4 guys--Jesse, Eric, Jesus, and Jeff. Counting backwards by months isn't gonna narrow it down at all for a girl like Casey. And if she was at the wrong kind of party, there might even be another dozen guys she doesn't even know about herself.

If it was just a one night stand, how is she supposed to contact him? If she doesn't have his name or number, (and this is often the case with young men nowadays,) that's as good as saying, "if you get pregnant from this don't call me or bother me. I don't want to know."

And his family are every bit as responsible as her family is. If it's Casey's parents' job to know every guy she's slept with, then that works both ways. And who are these people raising sons who are too stupid to put on a condom, and too shallow to sleep with the same girl twice???


 

[no rose colored glasses]

Sure the Barbies have missing limbs and heads--what kind of moron gives a Barbie to a 2-year-old anyway?
She got the coveted Barbies from me. Her friends had them. And she got them for doing the potty thing. I did not realize it was a " moronic " thing to do. Sorry for being a moron. 

My oldest daughter handed them down to the youngest, I kept all the Barbies in a container. I call it the Barbie graveyard, heads off of some, arms, and legs here and there, and a couple with some really bad haircuts. They both are now in their twenties.

[OriginalKat]

My Fox Orlando 35 has an exclusive interview with Wanda Weary, the woman who said she saw Caylee at the Orlando Airport July 2nd. Wanda, do you not know that LE has totally discredited your story of seeing Caylee. Five months ago today she said she saw Caylee at the airport. I wonder if the Anthony's gave her money to come forward with this bogus story, must be part of their big announcement.

The lastest doc dum had the report on that. She and her son gave statements and I found it odd that the son said the woman had blonde hair (maybe a wig) but she was 45-50 yrs old. I immediately thought of Cindy but you know...I know if she were alive and they had hidden her...she would be home by now. And of course...there is the forensics of a dead body in the car and the hair with decomp.

[Fuzzball]

If the Anthonys suddenly "find" Caylee and there is no indication of who had her or where she has been for all this time, I am going to wonder if some sort of hoax was carried out here.  Really. But I think the chances of that happening are nil.  Caylee was supposed to be "coming home" for her birthday and then for Halloween and now they are "close" again. 

Spot on as usual, Hudsunn. If they suddenly "find" Caylee I'm going to suspect them of kidnapping. But I don't think they can fool a DNA test. They tried to this time and failed.

[illuminated]

I have not been to the porn site.  How bad are the pix?

There's just the 1 pic  - the 1 that is edited from the nose down - and it's pretty gross. I have no doubt that it is indeed KC.  I love your Anita B. avi!

[mammy]

Even if the father weren't most likely Lee, that's not really true. First of all, you don't see any young men beating down the Anthony's door claiming Caylee now, and I'm pretty sure nobody was eager to claim her then, either. And you don't see any Grandma or Grandpa wannabees insisting on a DNA test to determine if their son's the Daddy. Even the parents of the deceased "father claimants" don't appear to ever have been curious at all. So I don't think it's fair to put it all on the Anthony family. "Daddy" and his family have to share at least half the blame for Caylee not knowing her biological father.

Jesse Grund was willing to step up to the plate, with the result that he was considered Caylee's "daddy" even after the paternity test showed they weren't related.

And how would you propose they do that? So now every guy in Orlando, the vacation capital of the world (think Spring Break), has to think back 3 years ago to see if he might has slept with KC and pay $550 for a DNA test? If a guy doesn't know the girl is pregnant, how is the Daddy family responsible?[quote/]
[quote/]The pregnancy was KC's responsibility, I'm sure she knew about protection and didn't use it very often according to sources. The moment she skipped her period, she should have been able to count back 1 month and figure out who the father was and notify him and his family. If my daughter got pregnant, I certainly wouldn't blame the father or his family for not actively pursuing the issue of whether she was pregnant or not.

That's just silly. It's a lot easier for a boy to slip on a condom than it is for a girl to shell out for the pill or the diaphragm or whatever. What's wrong with young men that they can't be bothered? Especially with a girl like Casey, you'd think they'd want to use a little protection just for their own health. I'm sure the guy who knocked Casey up also knew about protection and just didn't figure it was his problem. As for counting backwards, men can count, too, and Casey wasn't invisible. She may have denied that the giant tummy was actually a baby, but I think if her uncle Rick knew better, probably so did the guys she ran with. 

You're assuming there was one guy per month, and really, that's unlikely knowing Casey and her friends. These people "hook up" for a week, or a few days, or a one night stand, and then they're on to the next. In one month, it looks like Casey had at least 4 guys--Jesse, Eric, Jesus, and Jeff. Counting backwards by months isn't gonna narrow it down at all for a girl like Casey. And if she was at the wrong kind of party, there might even be another dozen guys she doesn't even know about herself.

If it was just a one night stand, how is she supposed to contact him? If she doesn't have his name or number, (and this is often the case with young men nowadays,) that's as good as saying, "if you get pregnant from this don't call me or bother me. I don't want to know."

And his family are every bit as responsible as her family is. If it's Casey's parents' job to know every guy she's slept with, then that works both ways. And who are these people raising sons who are too stupid to put on a condom, and too shallow to sleep with the same girl twice???


 

I'm just a plain member here the same as you, but  Monkeys respect others opinions (even when we don't agree with each other) without calling them "silly" and "morons" or any other names.  JMHO

[Hudsunn]

There is some reason that Cindy did not want the boy or his father to know he had fathered Caylee.  As far as I can tell, there are just so many reasons to keep paternity from a guy.

  1.  She does not want him to in any way have access to the child or threaten to take custody.
  2.  He has no money, so he could not be of help in that department and could only cause them problems.
  3.  He is in prison or has some other bad history and Cindy does not want Caylee to bear the shame.
  4.  They actually have no idea who the father may be due to Casey's promiscuity.
  5.  It is someone within the family and they want to hide that fact.

[Fuzzball]

Sure the Barbies have missing limbs and heads--what kind of moron gives a Barbie to a 2-year-old anyway?
She got the coveted Barbies from me. Her friends had them. And she got them for doing the potty thing. I did not realize it was a " moronic " thing to do. Sorry for being a moron. 

My oldest daughter handed them down to the youngest, I kept all the Barbies in a container. I call it the Barbie graveyard, heads off of some, arms, and legs here and there, and a couple with some really bad haircuts. They both are now in their twenties.

Sorry--don't take it personally. I guess I was thinking of the way there's always some recall going on and someone's always suing some toy company, and practically everything on earth is considered a choking hazard now...if it comes apart in pieces smaller than the kid's fist. I overstated the case--of course you're not a moron. You'd only be that if you gave the kid a Barbie and expected it not to be chewed on, broken, etc....

I'll go back to lurking--I just seem to have a knack for rubbing people the wrong way. Sorry.

[BooMonkey]

Even if the father weren't most likely Lee, that's not really true. First of all, you don't see any young men beating down the Anthony's door claiming Caylee now, and I'm pretty sure nobody was eager to claim her then, either. And you don't see any Grandma or Grandpa wannabees insisting on a DNA test to determine if their son's the Daddy. Even the parents of the deceased "father claimants" don't appear to ever have been curious at all. So I don't think it's fair to put it all on the Anthony family. "Daddy" and his family have to share at least half the blame for Caylee not knowing her biological father.

Jesse Grund was willing to step up to the plate, with the result that he was considered Caylee's "daddy" even after the paternity test showed they weren't related.

And how would you propose they do that? So now every guy in Orlando, the vacation capital of the world (think Spring Break), has to think back 3 years ago to see if he might has slept with KC and pay $550 for a DNA test? If a guy doesn't know the girl is pregnant, how is the Daddy family responsible?[quote/]
[quote/]The pregnancy was KC's responsibility, I'm sure she knew about protection and didn't use it very often according to sources. The moment she skipped her period, she should have been able to count back 1 month and figure out who the father was and notify him and his family. If my daughter got pregnant, I certainly wouldn't blame the father or his family for not actively pursuing the issue of whether she was pregnant or not.

That's just silly. It's a lot easier for a boy to slip on a condom than it is for a girl to shell out for the pill or the diaphragm or whatever. What's wrong with young men that they can't be bothered? Especially with a girl like Casey, you'd think they'd want to use a little protection just for their own health. I'm sure the guy who knocked Casey up also knew about protection and just didn't figure it was his problem. As for counting backwards, men can count, too, and Casey wasn't invisible. She may have denied that the giant tummy was actually a baby, but I think if her uncle Rick knew better, probably so did the guys she ran with. 

You're assuming there was one guy per month, and really, that's unlikely knowing Casey and her friends. These people "hook up" for a week, or a few days, or a one night stand, and then they're on to the next. In one month, it looks like Casey had at least 4 guys--Jesse, Eric, Jesus, and Jeff. Counting backwards by months isn't gonna narrow it down at all for a girl like Casey. And if she was at the wrong kind of party, there might even be another dozen guys she doesn't even know about herself.

If it was just a one night stand, how is she supposed to contact him? If she doesn't have his name or number, (and this is often the case with young men nowadays,) that's as good as saying, "if you get pregnant from this don't call me or bother me. I don't want to know."

And his family are every bit as responsible as her family is. If it's Casey's parents' job to know every guy she's slept with, then that works both ways. And who are these people raising sons who are too stupid to put on a condom, and too shallow to sleep with the same girl twice???

Well Fuzzball, how "silly" is it for a guy to call every girl he slept with to see if she got her period the following month? If KC had all these guys and even one night stands, how is it the guys parents "responsibility" to find out this information?? I have two sons that don't live with me, am I to call them up every night to quiz him to see if they got laid and get the girls number to find out later if she might be pregnant? Like it or not, when the girl finds out she is pregnant it's up to her to do the contacting. SHE is the first one to know!! Condoms by the way are not 100%!!! You are making wide presumptions of guys and portraying KC as the innocent here.

[KarmaRoundUp]

HH replied...

It is my understanding that the father is indeed deceased, the family I think has been notified, but for their own reasons they havent decided to come forward, unless they have  been asked by law inforcement to remain that way for the time being, or they just dont see the point in saying anything during this three ring circus...I do not think they will be any reason to ask them to appear in court.......seeing as how they were not  aware of anything at the time this crime took place, what would be the point.....................The Anthony's will prolly hear from them eventually......I know if was me they certainly would......


Thank You so very much HH.  I don't know just why this reply makes me cry.  I can't seem to stop.  Oh but Sweet baby deserved so much more from life.  The bitterness I'm feeling for the uninformed (of Caylee's birth) family is immense.  I would need to be restrained but then I would seek the help of a good physician/psychologist to help to get me through this.

It's so difficult for me to say I HATE someone but I do HATE the Anthony's from Hopespring .

PJ (with no happy flower on purpose) 

I am confused.  Does Higher Hopes know for sure that LE has discovered who Caylee's father is?  So we know for sure it is not Lee? Or is HH simply feeling that this is the case? thanks to anymonkey who can clarify this for me!

Well,  I am simply saying what I was told,and although I know that it is the truth, it is your right, as you do not know me, and since my friend   cannot be revealed at this time, to believe or not to believe, I wont take it personally, because anybody can say any thing on the internet and how would we know otherwise, I have shared whatever I could here in this forum to try to give a little info into  what might be going on that we would be unaware off  and also to give hope when it looked like nothing was being done, my info has turned out to be correct so far and so, like I say,,,,,,,,,Its all up to you,

Oh and PJ....I miss  your happy flower.....please do not stop using it!

Hi HH
Didn't you state a while back that your friend thought Caylee's father was a Anthony relative,just not Lee or George?

[Garden Gnome]

Even if the father weren't most likely Lee, that's not really true. First of all, you don't see any young men beating down the Anthony's door claiming Caylee now, and I'm pretty sure nobody was eager to claim her then, either. And you don't see any Grandma or Grandpa wannabees insisting on a DNA test to determine if their son's the Daddy. Even the parents of the deceased "father claimants" don't appear to ever have been curious at all. So I don't think it's fair to put it all on the Anthony family. "Daddy" and his family have to share at least half the blame for Caylee not knowing her biological father.

Jesse Grund was willing to step up to the plate, with the result that he was considered Caylee's "daddy" even after the paternity test showed they weren't related.

And how would you propose they do that? So now every guy in Orlando, the vacation capital of the world (think Spring Break), has to think back 3 years ago to see if he might has slept with KC and pay $550 for a DNA test? If a guy doesn't know the girl is pregnant, how is the Daddy family responsible?[quote/]
[quote/]The pregnancy was KC's responsibility, I'm sure she knew about protection and didn't use it very often according to sources. The moment she skipped her period, she should have been able to count back 1 month and figure out who the father was and notify him and his family. If my daughter got pregnant, I certainly wouldn't blame the father or his family for not actively pursuing the issue of whether she was pregnant or not.

That's just silly. It's a lot easier for a boy to slip on a condom than it is for a girl to shell out for the pill or the diaphragm or whatever. What's wrong with young men that they can't be bothered? Especially with a girl like Casey, you'd think they'd want to use a little protection just for their own health. I'm sure the guy who knocked Casey up also knew about protection and just didn't figure it was his problem. As for counting backwards, men can count, too, and Casey wasn't invisible. She may have denied that the giant tummy was actually a baby, but I think if her uncle Rick knew better, probably so did the guys she ran with. 

You're assuming there was one guy per month, and really, that's unlikely knowing Casey and her friends. These people "hook up" for a week, or a few days, or a one night stand, and then they're on to the next. In one month, it looks like Casey had at least 4 guys--Jesse, Eric, Jesus, and Jeff. Counting backwards by months isn't gonna narrow it down at all for a girl like Casey. And if she was at the wrong kind of party, there might even be another dozen guys she doesn't even know about herself.

If it was just a one night stand, how is she supposed to contact him? If she doesn't have his name or number, (and this is often the case with young men nowadays,) that's as good as saying, "if you get pregnant from this don't call me or bother me. I don't want to know."

And his family are every bit as responsible as her family is. If it's Casey's parents' job to know every guy she's slept with, then that works both ways. And who are these people raising sons who are too stupid to put on a condom, and too shallow to sleep with the same girl twice???


 

I'm just a plain member here the same as you, but  Monkeys respect others opinions (even when we don't agree with each other) without calling them "silly" and "morons" or any other names.  JMHO

Standing "O", Mammy.