April 28, 2024, 03:15:51 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 - 12/6/08  (Read 277838 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
bleachedblack
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7607



« Reply #880 on: December 06, 2008, 06:34:21 PM »

i think these are arm bones nr 21







#21 is 1 bone humerus, forearm has 2 bones radius /ulna
Logged

".......O you who love clear edges
more than anything ......    watch the edges that blur"
truthseeker2
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1991



« Reply #881 on: December 06, 2008, 06:34:35 PM »


So did OE perform this overlay of Natalee based on that pic?  The one taken at 15:40 on 12/30...that would have been captured while the divers were in the water giving a thumbs down signal?  The shot made at 15:40 that nobody seemed to see on the monitors of the Persistence?  I thought when Tim called Dave he used that same terminology of "99.9% sure".  No?

Is someone monkeying around with the Monkeys?





TruthSeeker you are right!  According to what Kyle has said, Tim did see his overlay and calculations.  Oh, my God.


Look toward the rear of the photograph above.  Does this answer your earlier question about the cage?

Which photo.  (there are quite a few photos above.  And what do YOU see at the rear of the photo?)




This one.  It doesn't look like there's an opening at the rear of the cage.  Is this what you were asking?

Well, from the angle of this shot it may be difficult to see that opening on the side of the cage.  There is a sliver of 'light' there that could be it.  Hard to tell, though.
Logged

"Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking"..J.C. Watts
truthseeker2
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1991



« Reply #882 on: December 06, 2008, 06:36:06 PM »

In the one picture, it looks like a reflection of a skelton.
This one???



   Hard to tell, though, with those distracting red numbers all over it. 
Logged

"Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking"..J.C. Watts
WhiskeyGirl
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7754



« Reply #883 on: December 06, 2008, 06:37:14 PM »

With Kyle's estimate, the cage is 7.5 feet (80 inches) wide.  I count about 20 little squares across. That would make each square about 4 inches square.

Are there any shots of the cage with a known object inside?  A ruler?  

Like when someone puts a penny next to an object to show it's size?  



I don't know where that cartwheel came from.  I tried to post this for like 10 minutes!
Logged

All my posts are just my humble opinions.  Please take with a grain of salt.  Smile

It doesn't do any good to hate anyone,
they'll end up in your family anyway...
Tamikosmom
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 37229



« Reply #884 on: December 06, 2008, 06:39:45 PM »

Do we know which exact image or information Tim was relying on when he told Dave he was 99.9% certain that had found what they were looking for?



The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Tim Miller: I stepped on the boat and said “Natalee we're coming to get you.” Now we're finally coming to get you. And I still believe that from the bottom of my heart. She's out here and now we're on our way.

Over the holiday season, the crew of the persistence worked day and night to survey the ocean floor and look for targets that could hold the key to finding Natalee.

On Christmas Eve sonar pictures revealed what looked like a large trap, almost exactly where Tim Miller theorized it would be.

And on Dec. 29 the crew dropped a remote operated vehicle, or ROV, into the water to get a closer look.

Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.


... In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/




The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Dave Holloway: I got a phone call from Tim.

Chris Hansen: And what'd he say?

Dave Holloway: He told me, he said, "Dave, we found her."

Chris Hansen: "We found her?"

Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure." He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--" he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


Logged

Loving Natalee - Beth Holloway
Page 219: I have to make difficult choices every day.  I have to make a conscious decision every morning when I wake up not to be bitter, not to live in resentment and let anger control me.  It's not easy.  I ask God to help me.
_____

“A person of integrity expects to be believed and when he’s not, he let’s time prove him right.” -unknown
truthseeker2
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1991



« Reply #885 on: December 06, 2008, 06:40:29 PM »

Do we know which exact image or information Tim was relying on when he told Dave he was 99.9% certain that had found what they were looking for?



The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Tim Miller: I stepped on the boat and said “Natalee we're coming to get you.” Now we're finally coming to get you. And I still believe that from the bottom of my heart. She's out here and now we're on our way.

Over the holiday season, the crew of the persistence worked day and night to survey the ocean floor and look for targets that could hold the key to finding Natalee.

On Christmas Eve sonar pictures revealed what looked like a large trap, almost exactly where Tim Miller theorized it would be.

And on Dec. 29 the crew dropped a remote operated vehicle, or ROV, into the water to get a closer look.

Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.

 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/



But when he made the call did he tell Dave he was "99.9% certain"?  If so, did he base that on the 12/29 pics?  Seems like Kyle would have us infer that it was based on the pic where he did the overlay of Natalee.  That pic was captured on 12/30...after the thumbs down signal.  Maybe kyle did another overlay on one of the 12/29 pics????
Logged

"Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking"..J.C. Watts
2NJSons_Mom
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11324



« Reply #886 on: December 06, 2008, 06:40:36 PM »

the big hammer,

Blonde has photos here on this thread...posts 23, 24 have a full cage view but I'm not sure if it's what you are looking for....I'll bring if over if you pick one.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.20
Logged

R.I.P Dear 2NJ - say hi to Peaches for us!

I expect a miracle _Peaches ~ ~ May She Rest In Peace.

SOMEONE KNOWS THE TRUTH  

None of us here just fell off the turnip truck. - Magnolia
SS
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3216


« Reply #887 on: December 06, 2008, 06:40:44 PM »

With Kyle's estimate, the cage is 7.5 feet (80 inches) wide.  I count about 20 little squares across. That would make each square about 4 inches square.

Right: 7.5 FT X 7.5 FT X 2.5 FT

I count 21 squares.  But I think we are seeing only 1/2 the cage in that view and the actual size across is 40-42 squares.

Klaas, can you re-post the view of the cage so the entire thing is visible -- need to get a sense of dimensions and scale.

Thanks.

.




Hammer - I think that's just the size of each of the six sections.  The entire cage has to be bigger than 7.5 x 7.5.
Logged
SS
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3216


« Reply #888 on: December 06, 2008, 06:42:21 PM »

Hammer - are Kyle's measurements in feet or meters?  The cage could be 7.5 meters x 7.5 meters.
Logged
Buckeye
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5376



« Reply #889 on: December 06, 2008, 06:43:23 PM »

With Kyle's estimate, the cage is 7.5 feet (80 inches) wide.  I count about 20 little squares across. That would make each square about 4 inches square.

Right: 7.5 FT X 7.5 FT X 2.5 FT

I count 21 squares.  But I think we are seeing only 1/2 the cage in that view and the actual size across is 40-42 squares.

Klaas, can you re-post the view of the cage so the entire thing is visible -- need to get a sense of dimensions and scale.

Thanks.

.

Do you think the samples might be on the "collapsed" door??  Maybe only 7.5 X 2.5 ft??
Logged
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey Mega Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 74276



WWW
« Reply #890 on: December 06, 2008, 06:43:29 PM »

Hammer - are Kyle's measurements in feet or meters?  The cage could be 7.5 meters x 7.5 meters.

SS - do you have a full picture of the cage handy?  For Hammer?  Was the 7.5x7.5 the size of the one in the ocean or the size of the one at the Fisherman's Huts?
Logged
San
Super Moderator
Monkey Mega Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15883



« Reply #891 on: December 06, 2008, 06:43:35 PM »

Logged
Buckeye
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5376



« Reply #892 on: December 06, 2008, 06:44:46 PM »

Hammer - are Kyle's measurements in feet or meters?  The cage could be 7.5 meters x 7.5 meters.

Kyle's measurements were in feet: 7.5 x 7.5 x 2-2.5 ft. IIRC
Logged
2NJSons_Mom
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11324



« Reply #893 on: December 06, 2008, 06:45:06 PM »

Hammer - are Kyle's measurements in feet or meters?  The cage could be 7.5 meters x 7.5 meters.

SS - do you have a full picture of the cage handy?  For Hammer?  Was the 7.5x7.5 the size of the one in the ocean or the size of the one at the Fisherman's Huts?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.20

Post 22 has full view of top and one side.
Logged

R.I.P Dear 2NJ - say hi to Peaches for us!

I expect a miracle _Peaches ~ ~ May She Rest In Peace.

SOMEONE KNOWS THE TRUTH  

None of us here just fell off the turnip truck. - Magnolia
Buckeye
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5376



« Reply #894 on: December 06, 2008, 06:45:52 PM »

Hammer - are Kyle's measurements in feet or meters?  The cage could be 7.5 meters x 7.5 meters.

SS - do you have a full picture of the cage handy?  For Hammer?  Was the 7.5x7.5 the size of the one in the ocean or the size of the one at the Fisherman's Huts?

Kyle specified, the one in the water...don't remember him saying it was a different one than the one by the huts.
Logged
wreck
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7781



« Reply #895 on: December 06, 2008, 06:46:07 PM »

With Kyle's estimate, the cage is 7.5 feet (80 inches) wide.  I count about 20 little squares across. That would make each square about 4 inches square.

Right: 7.5 FT X 7.5 FT X 2.5 FT

I count 21 squares.  But I think we are seeing only 1/2 the cage in that view and the actual size across is 40-42 squares.

Klaas, can you re-post the view of the cage so the entire thing is visible -- need to get a sense of dimensions and scale.

Thanks.

.

Do you think the samples might be on the "collapsed" door??  Maybe only 7.5 X 2.5 ft??
That is what I think -- collapsed door.
Logged

johan555
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2943


hay welkom here !!!


« Reply #896 on: December 06, 2008, 06:46:30 PM »

do you have more pics Blonde or Klaas ?
Logged

Wanneer domme mensen domme dingen beweren, dan moet je ze niet corrigeren, maar glimlachend gelijk geven.

http://www.nataleeholloway.smfnew.com/index.php
truthseeker2
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1991



« Reply #897 on: December 06, 2008, 06:46:45 PM »

With Kyle's estimate, the cage is 7.5 feet (80 inches) wide.  I count about 20 little squares across. That would make each square about 4 inches square.

Right: 7.5 FT X 7.5 FT X 2.5 FT

I count 21 squares.  But I think we are seeing only 1/2 the cage in that view and the actual size across is 40-42 squares.

Klaas, can you re-post the view of the cage so the entire thing is visible -- need to get a sense of dimensions and scale.

Thanks.

.




Hammer - I think that's just the size of each of the six sections.  The entire cage has to be bigger than 7.5 x 7.5.


In the photo you have here we can see the opening on the side of the cage.  Look at the top left of the shot.  I see it there.  By my claculations, the divers were on the correct end of the cage to see what we believe may be human remains.
Logged

"Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking"..J.C. Watts
SS
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3216


« Reply #898 on: December 06, 2008, 06:47:11 PM »

Hammer - are Kyle's measurements in feet or meters?  The cage could be 7.5 meters x 7.5 meters.

SS - do you have a full picture of the cage handy?  For Hammer?  Was the 7.5x7.5 the size of the one in the ocean or the size of the one at the Fisherman's Huts?


Only what I just posted.  Maybe this one will help.
Logged
ospainter
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1934


Grandson in Ireland


« Reply #899 on: December 06, 2008, 06:47:24 PM »


It appears there were human remains in that trap, the question is whos?  Why would Kyle go to such lengths to make it appear to be Natalee's remains?  Was it Natalee?  Was it someone else?  Will we ever know?

I know..I don't know how I do it either 

I agree it looks like a skull of a human. Could be anyone including Natalee. FBI should have DNA results on skull and can verify if it's Natalee I would think unless they never received the

skull, but why send Blue material and not skull????

Why would Kyle go to such legnths-guess Kyle will have to answer that, I have no idea unless for money, only logical conclusion I can come up with.

Or maybe Kyle thought he could expose coverup in Aruba, but why then not give pics to FBI, that sure doesn't make sense. I would have marched pics to FBI myself not send  in

emails to someone on the internet don't care who they are.

Questions, more questions. I am done thinking for today, my brain is tired.

OS





Logged

It's their lie they can tell it anyway they want.
Who, What, Where, When, How and Why
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 2.163 seconds with 20 queries.