Caylee Marie Anthony, 2, FL Missing since June 16-just reported by mother #82

[JodyO]

TURBOTHINK
Were you Bad? 
Think you will like it here

Thanks for the welcome !!  I am always bad......LOL  - I don't believe all the BS some of those posters put out and I am not good at keeping my "keyboard quiet".........ROFL~~

I think you will like it here, too, Turbo.    I recongize your name.....   LOL

Hi Turbo!  I know your name too!  I hope you weren't too bad.  This is a great place to be!

Nah............just never learned when to keep my mouth shut. LOL 

I don't deal with stupid well. ROFL!!

Just curious - did you get the boot from W/S? If so, you lasted WAY longer than I did. LOL

[no rose colored glasses]

You know Monkeys...nothing really surprises me with this case...but, is anybody involved here on the up and up?  I truly wanted to believe the meter reader was just a good guy.  Now, not so much.  It just upsets me to no end how many people have failed this sweet little girl.  FTLOG...if people can't step up and do what's right by a 2 year old child, what has the world come to?  It makes me sad. 
I have to begin to believe what JJ's "sexy LP" was hinting at.  Is it coincidence that Lee's attorney is announcing he thinks LE will charge Lee AND this PI videotaping the PI videotaping the area where the meter reader decided to answer nature's call and it just happened to be where this baby's remains were found?  Who could make this crap up?  What are the chances of happenstance? 

I just want to know why these so called PI's were videotaping out in the woods  -  when they were supposed to be looking for a live Caylee?????   

Good Question, can't wait to hear the spin on this.

[Sassycat]

Putting on a defense for someone charged with a crime does NOT include planting or moving evidence!

OMG, if JB is found to be at the root of planting or moving evidence, this case will go down in History. So many twists and turns, I really don't think Hollywood could keep up with this one!!! 

No, and I watched many a soap opera, this could be a storyline in one of them. I'm ill thinking if the Anthonys knew that Caylee was there.

But if he's in love with Casey (I shudder to think!!), he'd probably do it! 

There are several things Baez has done which cause me to question whether or not it is ethical behaviour between an attorney and client.  First, when he referred to Casey as "MY girl" as in "I have to go get my girl." when he got her out of the slammer.  Then when he actually escorted her out of the jail in the rain and they were snuggling under the umbrella. I don't know, my attorney has never snuggled with me.  In fact I wouldn't want him to.  Of course having her stay at his office a minimum of 6 hours per day after she was bailed out.  I mean, doesn't this man have any other clients? I don't know what was happening during those six hours per day, but whatever it was sometimes they needed more time to do it since Casey often asked permission to stay longer.  Then there was the report that Baez was acting inappropriately by hugging her during jail visits and on one occasion they had to practically be separated when their heads were too close for Casey's keepers' taste.

We have heard that Casey can be an absolutely charming person, although we know this is an act to get whatever it is she wants at the time.  IMO she wants Baez and is well on the way......What a dope.

And then throw in the rumor that Baez doesn't wear his wedding ring, anymore!     

[Shell]

You gotta admit.. that's one sexy monkey drivin' that boat   

   (((( combing hair back..fixing cap..applying Old Spice ))))

       DAD??????????

I was about to say...POP????? (G-Dad) 

[wendiw8780]

Brandi, how do i get a picture for you to see from photobucket? i already downloaded it but don't know how to get it to you. plus, or first i have to ask, would you dress me up? i would really like something pretty for my kitty oscar to wear. i won't change it alot, but since he's gone, i would like to use him for my avi. thank you,
wendi

[Sassycat]

TURBOTHINK
Were you Bad? 
Think you will like it here

Thanks for the welcome !!  I am always bad......LOL  - I don't believe all the BS some of those posters put out and I am not good at keeping my "keyboard quiet".........ROFL~~

I think you will like it here, too, Turbo.    I recongize your name.....   LOL

Hi Turbo!  I know your name too!  I hope you weren't too bad.  This is a great place to be!

Nah............just never learned when to keep my mouth shut. LOL 

I don't deal with stupid well. ROFL!!

Just curious - did you get the boot from W/S? If so, you lasted WAY longer than I did. LOL

LOL.   I post there sometimes (under a different name).   Not often though.    I like it here much, much better.   You guys rock.

[Babybear]

LA's mouthpiece saying Lee's been cooperative.  Re: misuse of funds, running parallel investigation with police, and used money appropriately.
SA has not issued subpoena, and that's why atty thinks LE may file charges against Lee.

Guilty dog barks first.
Why else would they be thinking this way. WOW.

I don't understand the part I highlighted in red. Can a monkey explain to me?

Monks...the atty said something about a guarantee of immunity that comes with the issuance of a subpoena.  I'm going to rewind and listen again.

JVM:  Tell us what you know about these possible obstruction of justice charges against Lee Anthony.

T Luka:  No charges are pending as of yet.  What we are concerned about is that here in Florida, the laws regarding tampering of evidence
and obstruction of justice are extraordinarily broad as opposed to other states.  Because of that, there is some concern that some activities
that Lee might have been involved with during the investigation might be seen by law enforcement to be misleading or to be in some way as
hindering the investigation.  That's what we're trying to make clear, that throughout this investigation he's been cooperating fully.

JVM:  You're dancin' around something that we're trying to play detective here and figure out what exactly you're saying.  There seems to be a couple of possibilities:  1.  His sister asked him to do something he thought was a totally innocent request and turns out down the road it wasn't innocent...or perhaps he threw something out thinking it was irrelevant that later it became relevant...am I ...am I getting warmer?

Luka:  Actually, you're not..you're very cold.  Mr Anthony did not throw anything out, in fact he has talked to KC several times in the jail at law enforcement's request in the search for his niece.  He's been fully cooperating with police, including giving a DNA sample.

JVM:  You say he's cooperating, but I had read a published report that says he had to be subpoenaed before he'd give his fingerprints..that's not exactly giving them voluntarily.

Luka:  Well, actually, it is and it isn't.  A subpoena simply preserves the chain of evidence in any criminal case.  Subpoenas can or cannot be issued.  That's up to the State Attorney's office that's up to law enforcement agencies itself.

(Money discussion.....................)

JVM:  Have the authorities indicated to you that they could be hitting him with charges?

Luka:  Well, they have not come to me as of yet.  What they have done though, is they have NOT yet issued him a subpoena for his trial testimony.  That subpoena would give him immunity to anything he would say in a court of law.  The state attorney's office has not issued a subpoena for him yet and that is what has troubled me at least as far as there might be charges on the horizon.

A subpoena would not give him immunity for anything he would say in a court of law.  If he should confess to a murder while testifying does this jerk think he would be immune?  It does not protect him from perjury charges should he lie under oath.  Remember Mark Fuhrman?  (Although IMO he was railroaded, but that's not the point here.) A subpoena simply compels him to testify.  If he should take the Fifth Amendment, as he has a right to do, he could possibly work out an immunity deal in exchange for his truthful testimony.  However, a subpoena in no way protects Lee Anthony or anyone else from criminal charges should he implicate himself during testimony or commit perjury.  Is this guy a lawyer for sure?

[jjayinthemorning]

You know Monkeys...nothing really surprises me with this case...but, is anybody involved here on the up and up?  I truly wanted to believe the meter reader was just a good guy.  Now, not so much.  It just upsets me to no end how many people have failed this sweet little girl.  FTLOG...if people can't step up and do what's right by a 2 year old child, what has the world come to?  It makes me sad. 
I have to begin to believe what JJ's "sexy LP" was hinting at.  Is it coincidence that Lee's attorney is announcing he thinks LE will charge Lee AND this PI videotaping the PI videotaping the area where the meter reader decided to answer nature's call and it just happened to be where this baby's remains were found?  Who could make this crap up?  What are the chances of happenstance? 

I just want to know why these so called PI's were videotaping out in the woods  -  when they were supposed to be looking for a live Caylee?????   

Point of view dear.
Too often we look from the outside in and expect it to make sense. Look at it from the point of view of Lee and Casey scheming. Then listen to LP's words because he's seeing through that transparent point of view because he was on the inside.

Another thing that happens is that the villian switches places with the damsel to throw off the hero. It's a criminal psychological triangle game. Casey is playing big time. Easy to see through. Add Lee and meterreader into the mix of the game now. Unfortunately these dumb criminals don't realize that once LE is on their trail it's over soon.

ps. LP is sexy!

[N2WISHN]

You know Monkeys...nothing really surprises me with this case...but, is anybody involved here on the up and up?  I truly wanted to believe the meter reader was just a good guy.  Now, not so much.  It just upsets me to no end how many people have failed this sweet little girl.  FTLOG...if people can't step up and do what's right by a 2 year old child, what has the world come to?  It makes me sad. 
I have to begin to believe what JJ's "sexy LP" was hinting at.  Is it coincidence that Lee's attorney is announcing he thinks LE will charge Lee AND this PI videotaping the PI videotaping the area where the meter reader decided to answer nature's call and it just happened to be where this baby's remains were found?  Who could make this crap up?  What are the chances of happenstance? 

Zero Probability!!! 

[abbey09]

LA's mouthpiece saying Lee's been cooperative.  Re: misuse of funds, running parallel investigation with police, and used money appropriately.
SA has not issued subpoena, and that's why atty thinks LE may file charges against Lee.

Guilty dog barks first.
Why else would they be thinking this way. WOW.

I don't understand the part I highlighted in red. Can a monkey explain to me?

Monks...the atty said something about a guarantee of immunity that comes with the issuance of a subpoena.  I'm going to rewind and listen again.

JVM:  Tell us what you know about these possible obstruction of justice charges against Lee Anthony.

T Luka:  No charges are pending as of yet.  What we are concerned about is that here in Florida, the laws regarding tampering of evidence
and obstruction of justice are extraordinarily broad as opposed to other states.  Because of that, there is some concern that some activities
that Lee might have been involved with during the investigation might be seen by law enforcement to be misleading or to be in some way as
hindering the investigation.  That's what we're trying to make clear, that throughout this investigation he's been cooperating fully.

JVM:  You're dancin' around something that we're trying to play detective here and figure out what exactly you're saying.  There seems to be a couple of possibilities:  1.  His sister asked him to do something he thought was a totally innocent request and turns out down the road it wasn't innocent...or perhaps he threw something out thinking it was irrelevant that later it became relevant...am I ...am I getting warmer?

Luka:  Actually, you're not..you're very cold.  Mr Anthony did not throw anything out, in fact he has talked to KC several times in the jail at law enforcement's request in the search for his niece.  He's been fully cooperating with police, including giving a DNA sample.

JVM:  You say he's cooperating, but I had read a published report that says he had to be subpoenaed before he'd give his fingerprints..that's not exactly giving them voluntarily.

Luka:  Well, actually, it is and it isn't.  A subpoena simply preserves the chain of evidence in any criminal case.  Subpoenas can or cannot be issued.  That's up to the State Attorney's office that's up to law enforcement agencies itself.

(Money discussion.....................)

JVM:  Have the authorities indicated to you that they could be hitting him with charges?

Luka:  Well, they have not come to me as of yet.  What they have done though, is they have NOT yet issued him a subpoena for his trial testimony.  That subpoena would give him immunity to anything he would say in a court of law.  The state attorney's office has not issued a subpoena for him yet and that is what has troubled me at least as far as there might be charges on the horizon.

A subpoena would not give him immunity for anything he would say in a court of law.  If he should confess to a murder while testifying does this jerk think he would be immune?  It does not protect him from perjury charges should he lie under oath.  Remember Mark Fuhrman?  (Although IMO he was railroaded, but that's not the point here.) A subpoena simply compels him to testify.  If he should take the Fifth Amendment, as he has a right to do, he could possibly work out an immunity deal in exchange for his truthful testimony.  However, a subpoena in no way protects Lee Anthony or anyone else from criminal charges should he implicate himself during testimony or commit perjury.  Is this guy a lawyer for sure?

Yeah, that is what i was asking.  Is he really that stupid.  How could any person, especially an attorney think that subpeona  =  immunity  ????

[Brandi]

Does anyone have any info to clarify this post that I found on another forum??

She was spreading around the crap about George being married to a Terry before he was married to Cindy...and that Casey was not George's daughter.  I produced a link to documents that showed Terry and George Anthony being married (different George..not Casey's dad) in 1988.  Then I showed her a document that showed George and Cindy being married in 1984 - making it kind of hard for George to be also married in 1988 to Terry.  I told her it was probably a different George.  I also mentioned that Casey was born in 1986, so it's kind of hard for Cindy to have been a single parent when she was born.  Another thing, Rick (Cindy's brother) said Cindy was a nurse in an orthopaedic office when Lee was born and she took time off after his birth.  Since Lee was born in 1982, that means they were at least married back through 1982.

Another thing that this poster said was all this information was available online, at the "Portage County Court" web site.  She said she lived right near Niles, OH, and that's how she knew this information was available.  That's when I pointed out to her that Niles, OH is in TRUMBULL County Ohio....not Portage County.   She didn't post again after that....LOL!

Also, has it ever been posted whether LEE is George's son or are Lee and Casey 1/2 bro & sis...or full blooded. 

Or....is George Casey's bio father.

I know some of this had speculation, but has anyone found any concrete info on this??

Thanks,

I asked Rick that on here I think (maybe somewhere else) and he said they were BOTH George and Cindy's biological kids.

 

In the bond hearing, Cindy testified that Lee and Casey are the biological children of George and Cindy. I know, it was "Cindy" stating that (under oath) but I believe this one. From all that I have read throughout this case, I believe they both are biological children of this marriage.

O/T: Turbo .. I have some avatars I made for people who do not have on in the thread in my sig if you want to take a look. And, thank you, that snake was creeping me out, too. 

[cheeky monkey]

At the very beginning of Lee's visit with Casey (part 2) on July 25th he asks her as far as areas and places where he should focus a search, tips or reaching out to people and Casey says, "Check things locally Lee.  In all honesty.  Places that are familiar to us, to our family.  Ask mom specific places that I mentioned when her and I spoke over the last period of time.  Over the last few weeks.  She should remember specific places."

VERY telling.  I always thought that maybe George disposed of the body after finding it in the trunk in mid-July.  This sounds like she may be trying to tell Lee where to find Caylee.  In the beginning (part 1) of the interview I was confused by how Lee seemed to pressure Casey to talk to LE.  He emphasizes that Jose's priorities are himself (Jose) and her.  He tells her the best way to communicate is through letters and not directly through Jose b/c he could decide not to pass on the letters.  I wondered why he was doing this and if he was sincere in trying to help LE.  In light of the above conversation though, I wonder if he was trying to tell Casey that should could give him info on where to really find Caylee by writing him directly and that by going through Jose, he would not forward that information b/c it would be an admission by Casey that she had, at the very least, disposed of Caylee's body.



 

[Grandma2Maddie]

TURBOTHINK
Were you Bad? 
Think you will like it here

Thanks for the welcome !!  I am always bad......LOL  - I don't believe all the BS some of those posters put out and I am not good at keeping my "keyboard quiet".........ROFL~~

I think you will like it here, too, Turbo.    I recongize your name.....   LOL

Hi Turbo!  I know your name too!  I hope you weren't too bad.  This is a great place to be!

Nah............just never learned when to keep my mouth shut. LOL 

I don't deal with stupid well. ROFL!!

Just curious - did you get the boot from W/S? If so, you lasted WAY longer than I did. LOL

LOL.   I post there sometimes (under a different name).   Not often though.    I like it here much, much better.   You guys rock.

Me too!  I used to post there under another name and read here.  Now I read an post here.  Sometimes I read there too.  I think a certain mod has let the power go to thier head.  LOL  Giving people time outs/changing posts, etc.  This is a much nicer group of people.

[Babybear]

One of the funniest things I have heard today was Lee Anthony's attorney referring to Lee's parallel investigation.  This guy reminds me of Gomer Pyle, although with Jim Nabors it's only an act.  With Lee, it's for real.  I mean this guy fought a piece of cardboard and the cardboard won.  And that outfit he was wearing when he destroyed the flower memorial in front of his parents' house.  The knee socks? And the eyebrows....need I go on?  A parallel investigation?  Sure. I wonder what his IQ is?

And calling his sister, "Darling?" My brothers have never called me "Darling."  Bizaare.

[JodyO]

LA's mouthpiece saying Lee's been cooperative.  Re: misuse of funds, running parallel investigation with police, and used money appropriately.
SA has not issued subpoena, and that's why atty thinks LE may file charges against Lee.

Guilty dog barks first.
Why else would they be thinking this way. WOW.

I don't understand the part I highlighted in red. Can a monkey explain to me?

Monks...the atty said something about a guarantee of immunity that comes with the issuance of a subpoena.  I'm going to rewind and listen again.

JVM:  Tell us what you know about these possible obstruction of justice charges against Lee Anthony.

T Luka:  No charges are pending as of yet.  What we are concerned about is that here in Florida, the laws regarding tampering of evidence
and obstruction of justice are extraordinarily broad as opposed to other states.  Because of that, there is some concern that some activities
that Lee might have been involved with during the investigation might be seen by law enforcement to be misleading or to be in some way as
hindering the investigation.  That's what we're trying to make clear, that throughout this investigation he's been cooperating fully.

JVM:  You're dancin' around something that we're trying to play detective here and figure out what exactly you're saying.  There seems to be a couple of possibilities:  1.  His sister asked him to do something he thought was a totally innocent request and turns out down the road it wasn't innocent...or perhaps he threw something out thinking it was irrelevant that later it became relevant...am I ...am I getting warmer?

Luka:  Actually, you're not..you're very cold.  Mr Anthony did not throw anything out, in fact he has talked to KC several times in the jail at law enforcement's request in the search for his niece.  He's been fully cooperating with police, including giving a DNA sample.

JVM:  You say he's cooperating, but I had read a published report that says he had to be subpoenaed before he'd give his fingerprints..that's not exactly giving them voluntarily.

Luka:  Well, actually, it is and it isn't.  A subpoena simply preserves the chain of evidence in any criminal case.  Subpoenas can or cannot be issued.  That's up to the State Attorney's office that's up to law enforcement agencies itself.

(Money discussion.....................)

JVM:  Have the authorities indicated to you that they could be hitting him with charges?

Luka:  Well, they have not come to me as of yet.  What they have done though, is they have NOT yet issued him a subpoena for his trial testimony.  That subpoena would give him immunity to anything he would say in a court of law.  The state attorney's office has not issued a subpoena for him yet and that is what has troubled me at least as far as there might be charges on the horizon.

A subpoena would not give him immunity for anything he would say in a court of law.  If he should confess to a murder while testifying does this jerk think he would be immune?  It does not protect him from perjury charges should he lie under oath.  Remember Mark Fuhrman?  (Although IMO he was railroaded, but that's not the point here.) A subpoena simply compels him to testify.  If he should take the Fifth Amendment, as he has a right to do, he could possibly work out an immunity deal in exchange for his truthful testimony.  However, a subpoena in no way protects Lee Anthony or anyone else from criminal charges should he implicate himself during testimony or commit perjury.  Is this guy a lawyer for sure?

I said back several pp, I think he must be a Law School classmate of Baez and both received their JD from the same CrackerJack box.

[Brandi]

Brandi, how do i get a picture for you to see from photobucket? i already downloaded it but don't know how to get it to you. plus, or first i have to ask, would you dress me up? i would really like something pretty for my kitty oscar to wear. i won't change it alot, but since he's gone, i would like to use him for my avi. thank you,
wendi

hey wendi!

Go to the link in my sig line, and we can discuss that there

[Babybear]

Hey Monks, I found this link about the PI.  It sounds like he wasn't working for Baez in November but for the Anthony's at that point, pro bono.

http://www.momlogic.com/2008/11/casey_anthonys_private_investi.php

Very strange.  I think it is extremely important for LE to figure out who asked him to film there and whether or not he tampered w/ evidence.

I will serve up banana splits for everyone if they find this guys shoe prints in the area close to where Caylee was found.  Then i will pass around chocolate syrup for all of us if they charge the whole dumb a$$ group of them with obstruction, etc. etc

And a cherry on top for anyone who can list what Baez took out of the A's home following the search done immediately after finding Caylee's remains. 
 
 

I think it was his hemorhoid cushion he left the last time he was there.

[numbersgirl]

JJ.....I agree that LP is sexy.  I was just making the concession that he's yours!  You called it first. 

[Sassycat]

You know Monkeys...nothing really surprises me with this case...but, is anybody involved here on the up and up?  I truly wanted to believe the meter reader was just a good guy.  Now, not so much.  It just upsets me to no end how many people have failed this sweet little girl.  FTLOG...if people can't step up and do what's right by a 2 year old child, what has the world come to?  It makes me sad. 
I have to begin to believe what JJ's "sexy LP" was hinting at.  Is it coincidence that Lee's attorney is announcing he thinks LE will charge Lee AND this PI videotaping the PI videotaping the area where the meter reader decided to answer nature's call and it just happened to be where this baby's remains were found?  Who could make this crap up?  What are the chances of happenstance? 

I just want to know why these so called PI's were videotaping out in the woods  -  when they were supposed to be looking for a live Caylee?????   

Point of view dear.
Too often we look from the outside in and expect it to make sense. Look at it from the point of view of Lee and Casey scheming. Then listen to LP's words because he's seeing through that transparent point of view because he was on the inside.

Another thing that happens is that the villian switches places with the damsel to throw off the hero. It's a criminal psychological triangle game. Casey is playing big time. Easy to see through. Add Lee and meterreader into the mix of the game now. Unfortunately these dumb criminals don't realize that once LE is on their trail it's over soon.

ps. LP is sexy!

LOL.    I agree!   I was being sarcastic.   I am pissed that on NG tonight, the host and guest were acting like the defense was going to have fun with this video tape that the PI took - that the prosecution will have to explain how the body got there after the fact.  They didn't think it thru - that it was a plan by the defense!    I can't wait for LE to go after the whole bunch!!!!

[Shell]

Please forgive my O/T but I think those that know Peaches will understand.

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=Peach

How does one go about lighting one? I can't figure it out.