Home
Blog
Radio
Missing Persons
Crime
April 26, 2024, 09:32:28 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
:
NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
Home
Help
Login
Register
Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum
>
Missing Persons - High Profile
>
Missing Persons - High Profile - Archives
> Topic:
Haleigh Cummings #4 3/04/09 - 3/08/09
Pages:
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
»
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Haleigh Cummings #4 3/04/09 - 3/08/09 (Read 297565 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 25374
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1860 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:11:59 PM »
There is a thread for prayers/best wishes for Dolce here if you'd like to leave a post:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4650.0
Logged
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
Offline
Posts: 10379
HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1861 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:13:17 PM »
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 07:07:52 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:00:37 PM
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 06:53:50 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 06:40:36 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
Quote from: luckyday on March 08, 2009, 03:50:11 PM
Quote
ote from: luckyday on Today at 02:21:00 PM
Quote
Ok I call the 1888-277-8477- Made a report about Madison Ave off of highway 17 south of Myra Lake and a SO 1 block over on Baker.. They gave me a report # to refer back to add any notes or info.. Its done..
HMMMM. I called last week reference AnnaFl's post about Ron stealing drugs. They gave me no report #. I called last night (actually early this am) on the dream/Madison Ave/RR tracks as well and DID get a report #.
DEA agents??? The jig is up if that is the case. No wonder Ron/Misty have not been on camera lately. Maybe they found drugs in the trailer.
I find that very interesting, about not getting a report # on the AnnaFL's post about Ron stealing drugs. Are they not supposed to take everything called in with some seriousness, but the dream they gave you a report #. That makes no sense to me.
Tell me about it. Makes absolutely no sense.
Yes, we have no nanners for you, Wyks!!
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason
. If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Actually, its the reverse according to the NCMEC:
The good news, experts say, is that recent high-profile kidnapping cases do not reflect a growing problem. According to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, the number of serious abduction cases is consistent with last year's figures, but overall trends show an actual decline in such cases. In 2001, 725,000 children - nearly 2,000 per day - were reported missing. Most cases involved abduction by a parent, or a child running away. The vast majority of kids were recovered quickly.
Three thousand to 5,000 children were involved in so-called "stranger danger" cases, taken by a non-family member. Of these, 200 to 300 were cases where the child was murdered or ransomed.
http://life.familyeducation.com/stranger-safety/safety/36556.html
im confused, and the bolding is mine. to me this info reads that there are 3 to 5000 out of over 700,000 that are 'stranger danger' ie drugs, ransom etc. help me please, what am i misunderstanding?
Oh, my brain is so fried, but I believe they mean out of over 700,000 only 3-5m are true stranger abductions (bu someone completely unknown to family).
well ya, this case will do it to you thats for sure haha! thats how i read it as well, thats why i was confused as it supports what was being said about the chances of it being a drug related abduction, that the chances are extremely slim.
' true stranger ' doesnt mean unknown to family/friends, it means unknown to the victim.
No~I think it means COMPLETE stranger to the family as in Creepy Couey, etc. I'll go back and find it again as I forgot the link anyway
Logged
"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
cookie
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 15663
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1862 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:13:23 PM »
Quote from: Brandi on March 08, 2009, 07:11:59 PM
There is a thread for prayers/best wishes for Dolce here if you'd like to leave a post:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4650.0
thanks...was just there...
Logged
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 25374
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1863 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:16:55 PM »
Quote from: cookie on March 08, 2009, 07:13:23 PM
Quote from: Brandi on March 08, 2009, 07:11:59 PM
There is a thread for prayers/best wishes for Dolce here if you'd like to leave a post:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4650.0
thanks...was just there...
heh .. I think posting it in red was a little over the top. Sorry.
Logged
rana
Monkey Junky Jr.
Offline
Posts: 872
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1864 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:17:33 PM »
Quote from: Searching on March 08, 2009, 04:17:58 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt
. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason.
If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Sounds as though LE are as well.. Now that she has come up yet again, I have to say, when WS claimed that she sent pm's to admin and said it was inappropriate for anyone to invite her to SM, I e-mailed her and asked her if it was true and went on to let her know that she asked for our help and I would like to know why she would do that... She never responded,so I am taking that as an yes answer to if she did that since from what I hear she is still on WS working hard to muddy the waters. I at this point HAVE to look at ANNA FL and that side of the family with VERY high suspicion. How many times did CA muddy the waters and continue to do so... yes I know,separate cases,yet one side of the family has members online working to muddy waters..go ahead, throw nanners, love me some nanners.
Hey,
Searching,
granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I
'memmer
it wrong?
Lilymarie,
(red bolding mine) about the % of children taken..... were you saying that the 99% refers to..... in other words.... OF THE SMALL % of children actually taken by NON-family..... that the REASON (out of that very small non-family %) that the
reason
is generally one reason. (If I read it right -- you weren't saying that 99% of children TAKEN are TAKEN by NON-family? (Bc that would be an incorrect % as far as I know)
Did I read that right? In more other words -- the high percentage relates to the REASON for non-family abductions - not to the
frequency
of non-family abductions?
Logged
peanut
Monkey Junky
Offline
Posts: 2481
I can spell, I just can't type.
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1865 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:23:59 PM »
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:13:17 PM
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 07:07:52 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:00:37 PM
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 06:53:50 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 06:40:36 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
Quote from: luckyday on March 08, 2009, 03:50:11 PM
Quote
ote from: luckyday on Today at 02:21:00 PM
Quote
Ok I call the 1888-277-8477- Made a report about Madison Ave off of highway 17 south of Myra Lake and a SO 1 block over on Baker.. They gave me a report # to refer back to add any notes or info.. Its done..
HMMMM. I called last week reference AnnaFl's post about Ron stealing drugs. They gave me no report #. I called last night (actually early this am) on the dream/Madison Ave/RR tracks as well and DID get a report #.
DEA agents??? The jig is up if that is the case. No wonder Ron/Misty have not been on camera lately. Maybe they found drugs in the trailer.
I find that very interesting, about not getting a report # on the AnnaFL's post about Ron stealing drugs. Are they not supposed to take everything called in with some seriousness, but the dream they gave you a report #. That makes no sense to me.
Tell me about it. Makes absolutely no sense.
Yes, we have no nanners for you, Wyks!!
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason
. If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Actually, its the reverse according to the NCMEC:
The good news, experts say, is that recent high-profile kidnapping cases do not reflect a growing problem. According to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, the number of serious abduction cases is consistent with last year's figures, but overall trends show an actual decline in such cases. In 2001, 725,000 children - nearly 2,000 per day - were reported missing. Most cases involved abduction by a parent, or a child running away. The vast majority of kids were recovered quickly.
Three thousand to 5,000 children were involved in so-called "stranger danger" cases, taken by a non-family member. Of these, 200 to 300 were cases where the child was murdered or ransomed.
http://life.familyeducation.com/stranger-safety/safety/36556.html
im confused, and the bolding is mine. to me this info reads that there are 3 to 5000 out of over 700,000 that are 'stranger danger' ie drugs, ransom etc. help me please, what am i misunderstanding?
Oh, my brain is so fried, but I believe they mean out of over 700,000 only 3-5m are true stranger abductions (bu someone completely unknown to family).
well ya, this case will do it to you thats for sure haha! thats how i read it as well, thats why i was confused as it supports what was being said about the chances of it being a drug related abduction, that the chances are extremely slim.
' true stranger ' doesnt mean unknown to family/friends, it means unknown to the victim.
No~I think it means COMPLETE stranger to the family as in Creepy Couey, etc. I'll go back and find it again as I forgot the link anyway
that makes no sense tho, one can determine if someone is unknown to the victim, but how can it be definitively stated that
no
friend or family member ever crossed paths with them. isnt that just too broad of a of a distinction to make?
Logged
Justice is truth in action - Benjamin Disraeli
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 25374
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1866 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:24:17 PM »
rana
:
You asked:
Quote
Hey, Searching, granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I 'memmer it wrong?
Although I am not Searching, I pasted each posting that was posted here that apparently AnnaFL posted on WS.
In them, are:
"Yes, I am a close relative. I don't want to say which side because 1) it seems irrelevant 2) I'm afraid of Ron and 3) It won't help find Haleigh."
and also:
"I have no ties to Crystal's family at all but I am related to Ron (first time I've posted that here in the open forum) but not immediate family."
So take that as you will.
Logged
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
Offline
Posts: 10379
HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1867 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:29:54 PM »
Quote from: rana on March 08, 2009, 07:17:33 PM
Quote from: Searching on March 08, 2009, 04:17:58 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt
. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason.
If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Sounds as though LE are as well.. Now that she has come up yet again, I have to say, when WS claimed that she sent pm's to admin and said it was inappropriate for anyone to invite her to SM, I e-mailed her and asked her if it was true and went on to let her know that she asked for our help and I would like to know why she would do that... She never responded,so I am taking that as an yes answer to if she did that since from what I hear she is still on WS working hard to muddy the waters. I at this point HAVE to look at ANNA FL and that side of the family with VERY high suspicion. How many times did CA muddy the waters and continue to do so... yes I know,separate cases,yet one side of the family has members online working to muddy waters..go ahead, throw nanners, love me some nanners.
Hey,
Searching,
granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I
'memmer
it wrong?
Lilymarie,
(red bolding mine) about the % of children taken..... were you saying that the 99% refers to..... in other words.... OF THE SMALL % of children actually taken by NON-family..... that the REASON (out of that very small non-family %) that the
reason
is generally one reason. (If I read it right -- you weren't saying that 99% of children TAKEN are TAKEN by NON-family? (Bc that would be an incorrect % as far as I know)
Did I read that right? In more other words -- the high percentage relates to the REASON for non-family abductions - not to the
frequency
of non-family abductions?
Actually Anna FL is a relative of Marie's (but not blood relative), not brother, sister or any immediate relative, and she's just relating what she is hearing in Satsuma which other locals (IF TRUE ie, Pirate etc) are also hearing....it may be total bunk, and that's why she is grasping at straws trying to put it out there so someone can either disprove or prove what she is hearing, then the family can move on. They are desperate and even followed a psychic's tip to a Island in the middle of St. John's river at night to rule it out. She even said NO one is cleared, nobody period......Unfortunately this case is pulling in alot of the same media whores that Caylee's case did, for instance even Dominic Casey called offering his services
I hope they listened (they never heard of him) when I told them about his escapades in Orlando.
Logged
"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
peanut
Monkey Junky
Offline
Posts: 2481
I can spell, I just can't type.
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1868 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:32:17 PM »
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:29:54 PM
Quote from: rana on March 08, 2009, 07:17:33 PM
Quote from: Searching on March 08, 2009, 04:17:58 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt
. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason.
If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Sounds as though LE are as well.. Now that she has come up yet again, I have to say, when WS claimed that she sent pm's to admin and said it was inappropriate for anyone to invite her to SM, I e-mailed her and asked her if it was true and went on to let her know that she asked for our help and I would like to know why she would do that... She never responded,so I am taking that as an yes answer to if she did that since from what I hear she is still on WS working hard to muddy the waters. I at this point HAVE to look at ANNA FL and that side of the family with VERY high suspicion. How many times did CA muddy the waters and continue to do so... yes I know,separate cases,yet one side of the family has members online working to muddy waters..go ahead, throw nanners, love me some nanners.
Hey,
Searching,
granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I
'memmer
it wrong?
Lilymarie,
(red bolding mine) about the % of children taken..... were you saying that the 99% refers to..... in other words.... OF THE SMALL % of children actually taken by NON-family..... that the REASON (out of that very small non-family %) that the
reason
is generally one reason. (If I read it right -- you weren't saying that 99% of children TAKEN are TAKEN by NON-family? (Bc that would be an incorrect % as far as I know)
Did I read that right? In more other words -- the high percentage relates to the REASON for non-family abductions - not to the
frequency
of non-family abductions?
Actually Anna FL is a relative of Marie's (but not blood relative), not brother, sister or any immediate relative, and she's just relating what she is hearing in Satsuma which other locals (IF TRUE ie, Pirate etc) are also hearing....it may be total bunk, and that's why she is grasping at straws trying to put it out there so someone can either disprove or prove what she is hearing, then the family can move on. They are desperate and even followed a psychic's tip to a Island in the middle of St. John's river at night to rule it out. She even said NO one is cleared, nobody period......Unfortunately this case is pulling in alot of the same media whores that Caylee's case did, for instance even Dominic Casey called offering his services
I hope they listened (they never heard of him) when I told them about his escapades in Orlando.
so shes not related to rons family as she posted, shes actually a relative of crystals?
Logged
Justice is truth in action - Benjamin Disraeli
cookie
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 15663
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1869 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:32:55 PM »
Quote from: Brandi on March 08, 2009, 07:24:17 PM
rana
:
You asked:
Quote
Hey, Searching, granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I 'memmer it wrong?
Although I am not Searching, I pasted each posting that was posted here that apparently AnnaFL posted on WS.
In them, are:
"
Yes, I am a close relative
. I don't want to say which side because 1) it seems irrelevant 2) I'm afraid of Ron and 3) It won't help find Haleigh."
and also:
"I have no ties to Crystal's family at all but I am related to Ron (first time I've posted that here in the open forum)
but not immediate family."
So take that as you will.
ok...now I am really confused..
not the first time..
I thought all along that AnnaFl was related as a distant relative to Crystals family?
but either way, is it close relative or distant relative to whomever? stated as both
Logged
rana
Monkey Junky Jr.
Offline
Posts: 872
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1870 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:33:11 PM »
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:56:12 PM
Quote from: rana on March 08, 2009, 04:48:45 PM
Quote from: no rose colored glasses on March 08, 2009, 12:41:36 PM
Quote from: GramaMonkey on March 08, 2009, 12:35:26 PM
from WS
The door situation has really bothered me since we got a firsthand look last night.
Scenerio:
You are going to enter the home through THAT side entrance. You have to PULL open the screen door and then place the cinderblock to hold it in place.
Then (either its unlocked or you "pick it") you now turn the door handle and you PUSH the solid door open.
When you push that door open, you are also going to push anything (laundry) that is on the floor behind the door. So, whatever what was on the floor is going to end up BEHIND the door (laundry will now be between the door and the wall).
There will be nothing on the floor to HOLD that door open as you have pushed it out of the way when you opened it. So, now you have to PUT something in front of that door on the floor to keep it from swinging shut. Plus, you have to know that the door does slowly swing shut
(which you could observe once inside and past the door).
Point is - there just isn't something on the floor to "block" the solid door from swinging shut if you entered through it (you pushed everything out of the way just by opening the door). You have to make an effort to put something there to stop it from swinging back shut.
Does that make sense?
NOW with this.... and you add the fact that she only stated the door was wide open which is the door with the brick......this was IMO staged! JMO
Yes, I read that also, and my opinion is like you, I feel it was staged.
Yes exactly. Misty mentioned that a "brick" was holding open the screen door. Why not mention what was "propping" open the inside door? (keeping it from slowly swinging shut)
The inside door reported as WIDE open and found wide open by LE? (right?) If the inside door were closed, how would she have noticed that the screen door was propped open with a brick.... to tell 911 that it was propped open with a "brick" - the cinderblock?
IMO some piece of laundry could have easily been pushed in front of the door to hold it open. It was stated that there was laundry on the floor. Why not just take your foot and slide some of it in front of the door so it stays open?
Sure, I agree. And along that same vein, why not mention it?
HOW the door was held open seems like a significant thing to report if the door were WIDE open.
MOO (My Opinion Only)
Am I confused? (could be)
Logged
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
Offline
Posts: 10379
HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1871 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:34:14 PM »
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 07:23:59 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:13:17 PM
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 07:07:52 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:00:37 PM
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 06:53:50 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 06:40:36 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
Quote from: luckyday on March 08, 2009, 03:50:11 PM
Quote
ote from: luckyday on Today at 02:21:00 PM
Quote
Ok I call the 1888-277-8477- Made a report about Madison Ave off of highway 17 south of Myra Lake and a SO 1 block over on Baker.. They gave me a report # to refer back to add any notes or info.. Its done..
HMMMM. I called last week reference AnnaFl's post about Ron stealing drugs. They gave me no report #. I called last night (actually early this am) on the dream/Madison Ave/RR tracks as well and DID get a report #.
DEA agents??? The jig is up if that is the case. No wonder Ron/Misty have not been on camera lately. Maybe they found drugs in the trailer.
I find that very interesting, about not getting a report # on the AnnaFL's post about Ron stealing drugs. Are they not supposed to take everything called in with some seriousness, but the dream they gave you a report #. That makes no sense to me.
Tell me about it. Makes absolutely no sense.
Yes, we have no nanners for you, Wyks!!
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason
. If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Actually, its the reverse according to the NCMEC:
The good news, experts say, is that recent high-profile kidnapping cases do not reflect a growing problem. According to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, the number of serious abduction cases is consistent with last year's figures, but overall trends show an actual decline in such cases. In 2001, 725,000 children - nearly 2,000 per day - were reported missing. Most cases involved abduction by a parent, or a child running away. The vast majority of kids were recovered quickly.
Three thousand to 5,000 children were involved in so-called "stranger danger" cases, taken by a non-family member. Of these, 200 to 300 were cases where the child was murdered or ransomed.
http://life.familyeducation.com/stranger-safety/safety/36556.html
im confused, and the bolding is mine. to me this info reads that there are 3 to 5000 out of over 700,000 that are 'stranger danger' ie drugs, ransom etc. help me please, what am i misunderstanding?
Oh, my brain is so fried, but I believe they mean out of over 700,000 only 3-5m are true stranger abductions (bu someone completely unknown to family).
well ya, this case will do it to you thats for sure haha! thats how i read it as well, thats why i was confused as it supports what was being said about the chances of it being a drug related abduction, that the chances are extremely slim.
' true stranger ' doesnt mean unknown to family/friends, it means unknown to the victim.
No~I think it means COMPLETE stranger to the family as in Creepy Couey, etc. I'll go back and find it again as I forgot the link anyway
that makes no sense tho, one can determine if someone is unknown to the victim, but how can it be definitively stated that
no
friend or family member ever crossed paths with them. isnt that just too broad of a of a distinction to make?
Logged
"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
cookie
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 15663
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1872 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:35:25 PM »
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 07:32:17 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:29:54 PM
Quote from: rana on March 08, 2009, 07:17:33 PM
Quote from: Searching on March 08, 2009, 04:17:58 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt
. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason.
If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Sounds as though LE are as well.. Now that she has come up yet again, I have to say, when WS claimed that she sent pm's to admin and said it was inappropriate for anyone to invite her to SM, I e-mailed her and asked her if it was true and went on to let her know that she asked for our help and I would like to know why she would do that... She never responded,so I am taking that as an yes answer to if she did that since from what I hear she is still on WS working hard to muddy the waters. I at this point HAVE to look at ANNA FL and that side of the family with VERY high suspicion. How many times did CA muddy the waters and continue to do so... yes I know,separate cases,yet one side of the family has members online working to muddy waters..go ahead, throw nanners, love me some nanners.
Hey,
Searching,
granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I
'memmer
it wrong?
Lilymarie,
(red bolding mine) about the % of children taken..... were you saying that the 99% refers to..... in other words.... OF THE SMALL % of children actually taken by NON-family..... that the REASON (out of that very small non-family %) that the
reason
is generally one reason. (If I read it right -- you weren't saying that 99% of children TAKEN are TAKEN by NON-family? (Bc that would be an incorrect % as far as I know)
Did I read that right? In more other words -- the high percentage relates to the REASON for non-family abductions - not to the
frequency
of non-family abductions?
Actually Anna FL is a relative of Marie's (but not blood relative), not brother, sister or any immediate relative, and she's just relating what she is hearing in Satsuma which other locals (IF TRUE ie, Pirate etc) are also hearing....it may be total bunk, and that's why she is grasping at straws trying to put it out there so someone can either disprove or prove what she is hearing, then the family can move on. They are desperate and even followed a psychic's tip to a Island in the middle of St. John's river at night to rule it out. She even said NO one is cleared, nobody period......Unfortunately this case is pulling in alot of the same media whores that Caylee's case did, for instance even Dominic Casey called offering his services
I hope they listened (they never heard of him) when I told them about his escapades in Orlando.
so shes not related to rons family as she posted, shes actually a relative of crystals?
then IM, how do you explain this?
"I have no ties to Crystal's family at all but I am related to Ron (first time I've posted that here in the open forum) but not immediate family."
Logged
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 25374
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1873 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:35:43 PM »
Quote from: cookie on March 08, 2009, 07:32:55 PM
Quote from: Brandi on March 08, 2009, 07:24:17 PM
rana
:
You asked:
Quote
Hey, Searching, granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I 'memmer it wrong?
Although I am not Searching, I pasted each posting that was posted here that apparently AnnaFL posted on WS.
In them, are:
"
Yes, I am a close relative
. I don't want to say which side because 1) it seems irrelevant 2) I'm afraid of Ron and 3) It won't help find Haleigh."
and also:
"I have no ties to Crystal's family at all but I am related to Ron (first time I've posted that here in the open forum)
but not immediate family."
So take that as you will.
ok...now I am really confused..
not the first time..
I thought all along that AnnaFl was related as a distant relative to Crystals family?
but either way, is it close relative or distant relative to whomever? stated as both
Agreed.
I never took much stock in her posts. A bit contradicting to me, and again, ya never know who is behind that keyboard.
Exactly why I said, "Take that as you will."
Logged
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
Offline
Posts: 10379
HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1874 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:36:17 PM »
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 07:23:59 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:13:17 PM
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 07:07:52 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:00:37 PM
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 06:53:50 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 06:40:36 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
Quote from: luckyday on March 08, 2009, 03:50:11 PM
Quote
ote from: luckyday on Today at 02:21:00 PM
Quote
Ok I call the 1888-277-8477- Made a report about Madison Ave off of highway 17 south of Myra Lake and a SO 1 block over on Baker.. They gave me a report # to refer back to add any notes or info.. Its done..
HMMMM. I called last week reference AnnaFl's post about Ron stealing drugs. They gave me no report #. I called last night (actually early this am) on the dream/Madison Ave/RR tracks as well and DID get a report #.
DEA agents??? The jig is up if that is the case. No wonder Ron/Misty have not been on camera lately. Maybe they found drugs in the trailer.
I find that very interesting, about not getting a report # on the AnnaFL's post about Ron stealing drugs. Are they not supposed to take everything called in with some seriousness, but the dream they gave you a report #. That makes no sense to me.
Tell me about it. Makes absolutely no sense.
Yes, we have no nanners for you, Wyks!!
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason
. If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Actually, its the reverse according to the NCMEC:
The good news, experts say, is that recent high-profile kidnapping cases do not reflect a growing problem. According to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, the number of serious abduction cases is consistent with last year's figures, but overall trends show an actual decline in such cases. In 2001, 725,000 children - nearly 2,000 per day - were reported missing. Most cases involved abduction by a parent, or a child running away. The vast majority of kids were recovered quickly.
Three thousand to 5,000 children were involved in so-called "stranger danger" cases, taken by a non-family member. Of these, 200 to 300 were cases where the child was murdered or ransomed.
http://life.familyeducation.com/stranger-safety/safety/36556.html
im confused, and the bolding is mine. to me this info reads that there are 3 to 5000 out of over 700,000 that are 'stranger danger' ie drugs, ransom etc. help me please, what am i misunderstanding?
Oh, my brain is so fried, but I believe they mean out of over 700,000 only 3-5m are true stranger abductions (bu someone completely unknown to family).
well ya, this case will do it to you thats for sure haha! thats how i read it as well, thats why i was confused as it supports what was being said about the chances of it being a drug related abduction, that the chances are extremely slim.
' true stranger ' doesnt mean unknown to family/friends, it means unknown to the victim.
No~I think it means COMPLETE stranger to the family as in Creepy Couey, etc. I'll go back and find it again as I forgot the link anyway
that makes no sense tho, one can determine if someone is unknown to the victim, but how can it be definitively stated that
no
friend or family member ever crossed paths with them. isnt that just too broad of a of a distinction to make?
Ok~just looked it up.....Stranger: A perpetrator whom the child or family do
not know, or a perpetrator of unknown identity.
Defining Nonfamily Abduction and
Related Terms
• Nonfamily abduction: (1) An episode in which a
nonfamily perpetrator takes a child by the use of
physical force or threat of bodily harm or detains
the child for a substantial period of time (at least
1 hour) in an isolated place by the use of physical
force or threat of bodily harm without lawful authority
or parental permission, or (2) an episode in
which a child younger than 15 or mentally incompetent,
and without lawful authority or parental permission,
is taken or detained or voluntarily accompanies
a nonfamily perpetrator who conceals the
child’s whereabouts, demands ransom, or expresses
the intention to keep the child permanently.
• Stereotypical kidnapping: A nonfamily abduction
perpetrated by a slight acquaintance or stranger in
which a child is detained overnight, transported at
least 50 miles, held for ransom or abducted with
intent to keep the child permanently, or killed.
• Stranger: A perpetrator whom the child or family do
not know, or a perpetrator of unknown identity.
• Slight acquaintance: A nonfamily perpetrator whose
name is unknown to the child or family prior to the
abduction and whom the child or family did not know
well enough to speak to, or a recent acquaintance who
the child or family have known for less than 6 months,
or someone the family or child have known for longer
than 6 months but seen less than once a month.
Logged
"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
cookie
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 15663
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1875 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:38:08 PM »
Quote from: Brandi on March 08, 2009, 07:35:43 PM
Quote from: cookie on March 08, 2009, 07:32:55 PM
Quote from: Brandi on March 08, 2009, 07:24:17 PM
rana
:
You asked:
Quote
Hey, Searching, granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I 'memmer it wrong?
Although I am not Searching, I pasted each posting that was posted here that apparently AnnaFL posted on WS.
In them, are:
"
Yes, I am a close relative
. I don't want to say which side because 1) it seems irrelevant 2) I'm afraid of Ron and 3) It won't help find Haleigh."
and also:
"I have no ties to Crystal's family at all but I am related to Ron (first time I've posted that here in the open forum)
but not immediate family."
So take that as you will.
ok...now I am really confused..
not the first time..
I thought all along that AnnaFl was related as a distant relative to Crystals family?
but either way, is it close relative or distant relative to whomever? stated as both
Agreed.
I never took much stock in her posts. A bit contradicting to me, and again, ya never know who is behind that keyboard.
Exactly why I said, "Take that as you will."
Me either...I don't take much stock in what she says either...
Logged
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
Offline
Posts: 10379
HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1876 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:38:11 PM »
Quote from: Brandi on March 08, 2009, 07:24:17 PM
rana
:
You asked:
Quote
Hey, Searching, granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I 'memmer it wrong?
Although I am not Searching, I pasted each posting that was posted here that apparently AnnaFL posted on WS.
In them, are:
"Yes, I am a close relative. I don't want to say which side because 1) it seems irrelevant 2) I'm afraid of Ron and 3) It won't help find Haleigh."
and also:
"I have no ties to Crystal's family at all but I am related to Ron (first time I've posted that here in the open forum) but not immediate family."
So take that as you will.
Brandi~ The red quote is from Pirate, not Anna FL...........the earlier quote IS from Anna FL
Logged
"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
Offline
Posts: 10379
HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1877 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:39:56 PM »
Quote from: cookie on March 08, 2009, 07:35:25 PM
Quote from: peanut on March 08, 2009, 07:32:17 PM
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:29:54 PM
Quote from: rana on March 08, 2009, 07:17:33 PM
Quote from: Searching on March 08, 2009, 04:17:58 PM
Quote from: lilymarie on March 08, 2009, 04:03:08 PM
I have been taking EVERYTHING AnnaFL says with a HUGE grain of salt
. She is connected/related to the mother's side of the family and many of the internet rumors about Ron & Misty have come from her via this site or WS. It is very slanted. I think she believes what she is saying - and I think she wants what's best for Haleigh but I don't think she is objective.
So it is a big leap to say Ron IS dealing drugs based upon what AnnaFL says. It does appear that he has had drug issues in the past (and heck he may now) but wouldn't he have been arrested if anything had been found by now? Yes he would have. Also, there is a very good chance that part of the wall was taken near the water heater - which is near the back door - in order to obtain a palm print or print of some sort.
Also, jumping to any conclusions based upon a reporter that is a friend of a poster that says that the DEA is in town - well they could be there for ANY reason. The DEA is going to be focused on drug related cases only. Right now this is a local LE and FBI missing child case. To conclude this is related to Ron at all is just a giant leap IMO.
Again there seems to be an undercurrent of speculation that this child was abducted over drugs. I just don't see the connection.
A 5 year old girl is 99.9% (don't quote me on that statistic) of the time is taken by a non-family member for one reason.
If its family then there is usually an easily identified abuse issue involved. But not drugs.
Sounds as though LE are as well.. Now that she has come up yet again, I have to say, when WS claimed that she sent pm's to admin and said it was inappropriate for anyone to invite her to SM, I e-mailed her and asked her if it was true and went on to let her know that she asked for our help and I would like to know why she would do that... She never responded,so I am taking that as an yes answer to if she did that since from what I hear she is still on WS working hard to muddy the waters. I at this point HAVE to look at ANNA FL and that side of the family with VERY high suspicion. How many times did CA muddy the waters and continue to do so... yes I know,separate cases,yet one side of the family has members online working to muddy waters..go ahead, throw nanners, love me some nanners.
Hey,
Searching,
granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I
'memmer
it wrong?
Lilymarie,
(red bolding mine) about the % of children taken..... were you saying that the 99% refers to..... in other words.... OF THE SMALL % of children actually taken by NON-family..... that the REASON (out of that very small non-family %) that the
reason
is generally one reason. (If I read it right -- you weren't saying that 99% of children TAKEN are TAKEN by NON-family? (Bc that would be an incorrect % as far as I know)
Did I read that right? In more other words -- the high percentage relates to the REASON for non-family abductions - not to the
frequency
of non-family abductions?
Actually Anna FL is a relative of Marie's (but not blood relative), not brother, sister or any immediate relative, and she's just relating what she is hearing in Satsuma which other locals (IF TRUE ie, Pirate etc) are also hearing....it may be total bunk, and that's why she is grasping at straws trying to put it out there so someone can either disprove or prove what she is hearing, then the family can move on. They are desperate and even followed a psychic's tip to a Island in the middle of St. John's river at night to rule it out. She even said NO one is cleared, nobody period......Unfortunately this case is pulling in alot of the same media whores that Caylee's case did, for instance even Dominic Casey called offering his services
I hope they listened (they never heard of him) when I told them about his escapades in Orlando.
so shes not related to rons family as she posted, shes actually a relative of crystals?
then IM, how do you explain this?
"I have no ties to Crystal's family at all but I am related to Ron (first time I've posted that here in the open forum) but not immediate family."
That was Pirate at WS
Logged
"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 25374
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1878 on:
March 08, 2009, 07:40:03 PM »
Quote from: islandmonkey on March 08, 2009, 07:38:11 PM
Quote from: Brandi on March 08, 2009, 07:24:17 PM
rana
:
You asked:
Quote
Hey, Searching, granted I got confused among all the Anna FL posts, but somehow I thought she was deemed to be on Misty's side of the family. Did I 'memmer it wrong?
Although I am not Searching, I pasted each posting that was posted here that apparently AnnaFL posted on WS.
In them, are:
"Yes, I am a close relative. I don't want to say which side because 1) it seems irrelevant 2) I'm afraid of Ron and 3) It won't help find Haleigh."
and also:
"I have no ties to Crystal's family at all but I am related to Ron (first time I've posted that here in the open forum) but not immediate family."
So take that as you will.
Brandi~ The red quote is from Pirate, not Anna FL...........the earlier quote IS from Anna FL
My mistake then.
I do apologize ... was pasting what the monkeys here were posting from WS. I have never been to WS, myself.
However, I still take little stock in those posts.
That's just me.
Logged
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey Mega Star
Offline
Posts: 74276
Re: Haleigh Cummings 5 yrs old missing in Satsuma, Florida last seen 2/9/09 #4
«
Reply #1879 on:
March 08, 2009, 08:05:05 PM »
Dugga fixed the error! Thanks Dugga!
Logged
Pages:
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
»
Go Up
Print
Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum
>
Missing Persons - High Profile
>
Missing Persons - High Profile - Archives
> Topic:
Haleigh Cummings #4 3/04/09 - 3/08/09
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
FORUM RULES
-----------------------------
=> Forum Rules and Tips
-----------------------------
Polls, Polls and more Polls
-----------------------------
=> Missing Persons Polls
=> Current Events/News Polls
=> Crime and Trial Polls
=> Just For Fun Polls
-----------------------------
Missing Persons - High Profile
-----------------------------
=> Missing Persons High Profile
===> Dylan Redwine, 13yrs old, last seen 11/19/12, Vallecito, CO
===> Kyron Horman - Portland Oregon
===> Caylee Marie Anthony - Florida (BODY FOUND)
=====> Caylee's Law - by State
=======> Caylee's Law - text
=======> ALABAMA
=======> ALASKA
=======> ARIZONA
=======> ARKANSAS
=======> CALIFORNIA
=======> COLORADO
=======> CONNECTICUT
=======> DELAWARE
=======> DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
=======> FLORIDA
=======> GEORGIA
=======> HAWAII
=======> IDAHO
=======> ILLINOIS
=======> INDIANA
=======> IOWA
=======> KANSAS
=======> KENTUCKY
=======> LOUISIANA
=======> MAINE
=======> MARYLAND
=======> MASSACHUSETTS
=======> MICHIGAN
=======> MINNESOTA
=======> MISSISSIPPI
=======> MISSOURI
=======> MONTANA
=======> NEBRASKA
=======> NEVADA
=======> NEW HAMPSHIRE
=======> NEW JERSEY
=======> NEW MEXICO
=======> NEW YORK
=======> NORTH CAROLINA
=======> NORTH DAKOTA
=======> OHIO
=======> OKLAHOMA
=======> OREGON
=======> PENNSYLVANIA
=======> PUERTO RICO
=======> RHODE ISLAND
=======> SOUTH CAROLINA
=======> SOUTH DAKOTA
=======> TENNESSEE
=======> TEXAS
=======> UTAH
=======> VERMONT
=======> VIRGINIA
=======> WASHINGTON
=======> WEST VIRGINIA
=======> WISCONSIN
=======> WYOMING
=====> Caylee Marie Anthony Murder Trial Archives
===> Sierra Lamar, 15yrs old, Morgan Hill, CA Missing Since March 16, 2012
===> JO ANN (JODIE) BAIN AND 3 DAUGHTERS MISSING 4/27/2012(2 murdered 2 safe)
===> Isabel Mercedes Celis, 6 yrs old missing 4/21/12 Tucson, AZ (Body Found)
===> Jennifer Kesse - Orlando/Ocoee, Florida
===> Susan Powell 28yrs old, missing 12/6/09 West Valley City, Utah
===> Michelle Loree Parker, Last Seen 11/17/11, Orlando, FL
===> Celina Cass, 11yrs old missing 7/25/11 New Hampshire
===> Aliayah Lunsford, 3yrs old, Weston, West VA, missing since 9/24/2011
===> Lisa Irwin, 10mo old missing since 10/4/2011 KC, MO
===> Robyn Gardner missing in Aruba August 2, 2011
=> Missing Persons - High Profile - Archives
-----------------------------
Virginia Area Missing and Murdered - possible connections
-----------------------------
=> Morgan Dana Harrington, 20yrs missing VA Tech 10/17/09(BODY FOUND)
=> Hannah Elizabeth Graham missing since 9/13/14 Charlottesville, VA
=> Alexis Murphy, missing since 8/3/13 Charlottesville, VA
=> Samantha Ann Clarke 19yrs. old Orange Va. Last seen 09/13/10
=> Dashad Sage Smith missing since 11/20/12 Charlottesville, VA
=> Cassandra Morton 23, Lynchburg, missing 10/10/09 body found 11/29/09
-----------------------------
High Profile Crimes and Trials (not missing persons)
-----------------------------
=> Jodi Arias trial - for the murder of Travis Alexander
=> Trial of George Zimmerman - 2nd Degree Murder of 17yr old Trayvon Martin
=> Scott Peterson Appeal of Murder Conviction
-----------------------------
Missing, Exploited and True Crime
-----------------------------
=> Missing Exploited and True Crime
===> Missing Persons Forum
=====> Missing Found or Presumed Deceased
=====> Missing Found Safe
=====> Missing Endangered Runaways
=====> Resourses, Search Groups and Fundraisers
===> Crimes Against Children, Elderly and the Disabled
===> Crimes of Passion/Anger
===> Serial Killers and Their Possible Victims
===> Unsolved Crimes
=====> Finally Solved
===> Haleigh Marie Cummings - Florida
===> Adji Desir - Florida
===> Somer Renee Thompson 7 yo, Orange Park FL 10/19/09(BODY FOUND)
===> Tracy Ocasio - Orlando/Ocoee, Florida
===> Shaniya Nicole Davis, 5 Fayetteville, NC Missing 11/10/09(BODY FOUND)
===> Holly Bobo, 20yrs old missing Parsons, TN 4/13/11
===> Hailey Dunn - 13yrs old - Colorado City, TX missing 12/27/10 (Body Found)
===> Elizabeth Olten - 9yrs, Jefferson City, MO missing 10/21/09 (BODY FOUND)
===> Lindsey Baum - McCleary, WA 6/26/09
===> Amber Leeanne Dubois 14yrs old - Escondido, CA(BODY FOUND)
===> Chelsea King, 17, Missing 2-25-2010 Rancho Bernadino CA (BODY FOUND)
===> Sandra Cantu, 8 years old - Tracy, CA(BODY FOUND)
===> Madeleine McCann - Portugal
===> Christine Marie Sheddy - missing since 11/13/2007 - Maryland(BODY FOUND)
===> Nevaeh Amyah Buchanan 5yr Monroe Michigan(BODY FOUND)
===> Gabriel Johnson 8 mo., last seen 12/26/09 Tempe AZ-San Antonio TX
===> Stacy Ann Peterson missing & Kathleen Savio murdered - Illinois
===> Zahra Clare Baker - 10yrs old Hickory, NC (Body Found)
-----------------------------
Natalee Holloway
-----------------------------
=> Natalee Holloway
=> Important Case Documents
===> Joran Statements/PV's
===> Paulus Statements/PV's
===> Deepak Statements/PV's
===> Satish Statements/PV's
===> Misc Statements/PV's
=> LCD Archive
=> Shango/Simian and other Codetalkers
-----------------------------
Current Events and Musings
-----------------------------
=> Monkey Musings / Open Discussion
=> Pop Culture Main
===> Hugely Popular TV Shows
===> Movies and Television
===> Social Media
===> Music
===> Books
===> Scared Monkeys Radio with Dana Pretzer
=> Health and Medical Issues
=> Food and Product Recalls
=> News of the Day
=> Business News
=> Sports
=> Political Forum
=> Religion (discussion and debate)
-----------------------------
The Monkey Lounge
-----------------------------
=> The Monkey Lounge
===> Fashion & Decorating
===> What's Cooking? Recipes
===> Games
=> Inspirational
===> Memorial - Gone but Never Forgotten
===> Gratefulness - Light a Candle in Prayer
===> Inspirational scriptures, songs, stories and prayers
-----------------------------
Natalee Discussions (2005 ARCHIVE)
-----------------------------
=> Natalee Holloway
=> Theory and Speculation
=> Links and References Only
=> Natalee Breaking News Archive
-----------------------------
General Discussions (2005 ARCHIVE)
-----------------------------
=> News Issues
=> Chit Chat
Loading...