April 27, 2024, 01:11:44 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Haleigh Cummings #5 3/08/09 - 3/11/09  (Read 299412 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey Mega Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 74276



WWW
« Reply #60 on: March 09, 2009, 12:01:19 AM »

O/T:

Klaas:

I sent you email to your hotmail account with the URL to the Haleigh image I made for the forum.

Smile

Thanks Brandi
Logged
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #61 on: March 09, 2009, 12:01:37 AM »

Crazy question, so no nanners, but is it Peanut or someone else that follows WS astrology forum?????

Peanut might, I also follow that part over yonder. 



Just curious because Anna FL gave them Haleigh's birth time and it doesn't look good, now let me state I have NO freaking clue about any of this, but whomever follows it on this thread said they are really good .........well, here it is:


English translation:



Haleigh is subjected to the unwanted attentions (ARACHNE square CUPIDO-A) of a repeat sexual offender* (EROS conjunct ECHO) due to the actions of someone she trusted (ATLANTIS). Is this trusted person Ron C.? Is it Misty? Could it be both of them? Considering the lifestyle of Ron & Misty, it could be either or both. *Notice I didn’t say Registered S.O.; I said Repeat. It is still completely unclear whether the perp is an RSO or some POS who has managed to stay below the radar screen.

This is no way points to direct involvement by either Ron or Misty. Rather, it highlights an observation made in previous analysis, that a family connection exists. The perp is someone known to the family, or alternately, someone on the fringes of the family, perhaps a friend or acquaintance of a family friend, relative, or acquaintance. Regardless of the perp’s exact relationship to Ron and/or Misty, Haleigh was exposed to the perp because of the actions/ lifestyle of the people she most trusted, i.e., her dad and his GF.


Based on above, as well as the previous charts all the Astrologers have analyzed, I believe the perp is someone either known to the family (not necessarily known by Haleigh) or to a friend/acquaintance of the family. By "family," I specifically mean Ron C. & Misty C. as they were the "parents" at the time of the disappearance. This person is a pedophile, regardless of whether he is registered as such.


As Tuba keeps telling us, there is information that is not being divulged. LE is keeping vital information close to the vest regardless of their continued statements to media that they are "clueless."


What do they know and why won't they tell?


Thanks,




The astrologers over yonder are very good.  They've worked up charts on everyone they can find in Haleigh's case.  And for Haleigh herself.  The various different charts combined tell what has happened to her.  It's kind of hard to read one thing and understand all that they are saying.  They combine the charts and give the English translation that you see above.  They also recommend keeping emotions in check while reading the results. 

Basically... and unfortunately... what the charts are saying is not good news about Haleigh, and is news that no one wants to hear.   

The charts tell of kidnap, rape and murder. 

And by a 'repeat offender', not necessarily a *registered* sex offender, this one could have been living under the radar and not caught yet.  And that "Haleigh was exposed to the perp because of the actions/ lifestyle of the people she most trusted, i.e., her dad and his GF."   

The findings in their charts have been correct in other cases.  So, all we can do at this point is to wait and see if their findings in this case prove out to be true.   

If you want to read for yourselves, I suggest starting at the beginning of their threads on this case, they explain as they go along, for better understanding.  It's the 'Forensic Astrology Forum'.. over yonder. 




That's what I remembered
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Wyks
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10268



« Reply #62 on: March 09, 2009, 12:03:30 AM »


That 100 pages lock can sneak up on me. Smile

Yikes,  I guess I'll have to think about going with Wyks' idea and consider revisiting lurkerdom. (Glad you're back, Wyks!Smile


... snipped with respect

Thanks Rana!  Am thinking that when any of us get to thinking it's best back in lurkerdom, that we share those feelings in here and just take a lil break.  That works wonders, and so does getting warm fuzzies.  Thanks again! 
Logged

~ 'Things are not always what they seem' ~
fatcatlurker
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3883



« Reply #63 on: March 09, 2009, 12:07:03 AM »

ok the tat has plastic on it first!  that's why it looks fugly and supposedly that's just one tat he got, he also got a tat of jr, I'm guessing the other leg if that is true.

Haleigh is not fugly and I am sure once it's healed it will look really nice w/the plastic removed.
Logged
peanut
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2481


I can spell, I just can't type.


« Reply #64 on: March 09, 2009, 12:09:48 AM »

ok the tat has plastic on it first!  that's why it looks fugly and supposedly that's just one tat he got, he also got a tat of jr, I'm guessing the other leg if that is true.

Haleigh is not fugly and I am sure once it's healed it will look really nice w/the plastic removed.


ya the plastic really distorts the image. i think it was a nice gesture of whoever it was who gave him the tats...it obviously made ron happy to do.
Logged

Justice is truth in action - Benjamin Disraeli
annettef49
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


« Reply #65 on: March 09, 2009, 12:10:55 AM »

Does anyone know who it was that was watching the 2 children while Misty was gone for 3 days????
also. I remember Crystal saying that the kids didnt ant to go back to Ron's after their visit with her, She said the kids said they were being hit. That visit was the one before Haleigh was missing.I'm thinking that maybe who ever was hiting them found out that Haleigh told and :someone: decided to remove Haleigh form her house so she couldnt tell anymore on them. MAYBE? JMO
or.being the kids didnt want to go back home MAYBE Haleigh agreed to leave with someone because they were getting hit and she wanted to leave.Maybe Haleigh told someone other than her Grandmother and they talked to Haleigh about leaving. Maybe??
Let me know what ya'll think about this therory. thks! AGAIN ..JMO

I think Ron was off.  My understanding of these 10+ hour shifts is like some many days on some many days off and my understanding of this rumor is that he had been off for 3 days.  When my hubby worked 12 hr shifts it was the same and people who work nights/weekends got the pick for time off first, just what I know.  So I would say Ron = dad watching the children while Misty gone.
ok,thks! but,,, do you think its at all possible that Haliegh left with someone?? because she did tell her Grandmother that her and her brother were being hit and didnt want to go home. JMO

left w/who??
I dont know hwo but possibly a person she trusted and told that she was being hit.. i'm thinking. JMO
Logged
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #66 on: March 09, 2009, 12:11:09 AM »

ok the tat has plastic on it first!  that's why it looks fugly and supposedly that's just one tat he got, he also got a tat of jr, I'm guessing the other leg if that is true.

Haleigh is not fugly and I am sure once it's healed it will look really nice w/the plastic removed.


I hope you're right, because in the video I posted, he shows the Jr tat, and well it aint so hot either.........that's when I noticed the band on his left ring finger.
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Wyks
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10268



« Reply #67 on: March 09, 2009, 12:11:27 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uND4ogbsKD4


  OMG~Watch this video and tell me that's not a wedding ring on his finger...........I wonder if they got married in Tampa, you know how my mind thinks (spousal privilege)         


He has a shiny gold band on his left ring finger, yeppers.  Also has one on his right ring finger, for what it's worth.  Interesting!  And right after showing his tatoos, as he straightens up, he kind of moves his left hand in an odd way, as if showing his ring but not wanting to shove it into the camera.  Reminds me a lot of a girl with a new engagement ring, lol, ya know? 
Logged

~ 'Things are not always what they seem' ~
fatcatlurker
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3883



« Reply #68 on: March 09, 2009, 12:13:26 AM »

yeah, I totally agree it was a weird thing to do, but at 39 I don't pretend to know what a 25 yr old thinks anymore, it would be stupid of me to say the least, but I do have a tat and know that's plastic.
Logged
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 25374



« Reply #69 on: March 09, 2009, 12:13:34 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uND4ogbsKD4


  OMG~Watch this video and tell me that's not a wedding ring on his finger...........I wonder if they got married in Tampa, you know how my mind thinks (spousal privilege)         


He has a shiny gold band on his left ring finger, yeppers.  Also has one on his right ring finger, for what it's worth.  Interesting!  And right after showing his tatoos, as he straightens up, he kind of moves his left hand in an odd way, as if showing his ring but not wanting to shove it into the camera.  Reminds me a lot of a girl with a new engagement ring, lol, ya know? 


I noticed that awkward movement too!

Almost like he was not used to a ring on that finger, and he was just getting used to the feeling of it.
Logged

higherhopes
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6583



« Reply #70 on: March 09, 2009, 12:14:59 AM »

So  with the ring showing up and all are we thinking he married Mistie, I find that very highley unlikely, but I will try to find out tomorrow!
Logged

I don't know, I was at work....I don't know, I was sleeping........Where is Haleigh???????
fatcatlurker
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3883



« Reply #71 on: March 09, 2009, 12:15:03 AM »

ok the tat has plastic on it first!  that's why it looks fugly and supposedly that's just one tat he got, he also got a tat of jr, I'm guessing the other leg if that is true.

Haleigh is not fugly and I am sure once it's healed it will look really nice w/the plastic removed.


I hope you're right, because in the video I posted, he shows the Jr tat, and well it aint so hot either.........that's when I noticed the band on his left ring finger.

I'll check it out.  And that kinda would go w/my conclusion that Misty ain't Crystal if you know what I mean.
Logged
luckyday
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 466



« Reply #72 on: March 09, 2009, 12:16:28 AM »

Quote
Are you really going to listen to what one poster is saying? Just because one person doesn't want speculation doesn't mean it's some kind of rule here. 
Thanks for the clarification, Klassend!!! As a newbie, it's great to know we can speak our minds and voice our speculation/theories w/out retribution.
Logged

Mark Twain:
Always tell the truth. That way, you don't have to remember what you said.
Wyks
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10268



« Reply #73 on: March 09, 2009, 12:19:01 AM »

More from WS astrology:


This is "bad news" because if you reviewed the prior discussions, you know that the charts all pointed to kidnapping with probable rape and murder. If anything, the 6:49 - 6:50 am chart magnifies that probability.

I continue reluctantly.

Everyone, including myself and all the Astrologers, would like nothing better than for Haleigh to be found alive and well and returned to her family. Nothing would make me happier than to tell you the charts show a strong possibility for that outcome.

Unfortunately and tragically, the charts have not led us in that direction, and revisiting the charts in light of the assumed-to-be "correct" birth time only amplifies my original judgment: Haleigh was kidnapped, probably raped and murdered.


I wish it were different too.

Thanks for that; I like that you translated it b/c I tried to read it and couldn't get very far. It is very interesting.

I heard bit on one of those shows..... BOMBSHELL (NG) or one of them -- that a psychic was down there; but that's all I heard. Any word on that?



Well.. just want to say that the above was not translated here, but was taken in full from WS.  The astrology forum there has nearly always been very polite when taking info from here to use for their charts, etc. including giving credit where it's due, and I just want to be sure that we are returning the favor and that there's no misunderstanding about where that info (including their translations) comes from.   
Logged

~ 'Things are not always what they seem' ~
luckyday
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 466



« Reply #74 on: March 09, 2009, 12:20:36 AM »

Quote
Haleigh is not fugly and I am sure once it's healed it will look really nice w/the plastic removed.
No, Haleigh is far from fugly. I hope you are correct about the tat because it looked pretty freakish to me.

Logged

Mark Twain:
Always tell the truth. That way, you don't have to remember what you said.
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #75 on: March 09, 2009, 12:21:09 AM »

ok the tat has plastic on it first!  that's why it looks fugly and supposedly that's just one tat he got, he also got a tat of jr, I'm guessing the other leg if that is true.

Haleigh is not fugly and I am sure once it's healed it will look really nice w/the plastic removed.


I hope you're right, because in the video I posted, he shows the Jr tat, and well it aint so hot either.........that's when I noticed the band on his left ring finger.

I'll check it out.  And that kinda would go w/my conclusion that Misty ain't Crystal if you know what I mean.

  Huh? I don't , maybe too mcuh sun today, but I'm clueless......
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Wyks
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10268



« Reply #76 on: March 09, 2009, 12:23:10 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uND4ogbsKD4


  OMG~Watch this video and tell me that's not a wedding ring on his finger...........I wonder if they got married in Tampa, you know how my mind thinks (spousal privilege)         


He has a shiny gold band on his left ring finger, yeppers.  Also has one on his right ring finger, for what it's worth.  Interesting!  And right after showing his tatoos, as he straightens up, he kind of moves his left hand in an odd way, as if showing his ring but not wanting to shove it into the camera.  Reminds me a lot of a girl with a new engagement ring, lol, ya know? 


I noticed that awkward movement too!

Almost like he was not used to a ring on that finger, and he was just getting used to the feeling of it.

Exactly!  Like he was touching it behind with his thumb. 
Logged

~ 'Things are not always what they seem' ~
Kat_Gram
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7018



« Reply #77 on: March 09, 2009, 12:24:18 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uND4ogbsKD4


  OMG~Watch this video and tell me that's not a wedding ring on his finger...........I wonder if they got married in Tampa, you know how my mind thinks (spousal privilege)         

That's a wedding ring. If he married Misty, I will just keep my own thoughts to myself and you all can read my mind. Too bad I don't have webcam. The look on my face is worthy of a transmission !   
Logged
Wyks
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10268



« Reply #78 on: March 09, 2009, 12:25:48 AM »

Quote
Are you really going to listen to what one poster is saying? Just because one person doesn't want speculation doesn't mean it's some kind of rule here. 
Thanks for the clarification, Klassend!!! As a newbie, it's great to know we can speak our minds and voice our speculation/theories w/out retribution.

Yeppers, it's great!   

We can speak our minds and voice our opinions.. and some even wear helmets and invite nanner throwing, only to dodge them if need be.    
Logged

~ 'Things are not always what they seem' ~
rana
Monkey Junky Jr.
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 872


« Reply #79 on: March 09, 2009, 12:26:38 AM »

That 100 pages lock can sneak up on me. Smile

Yikes,  I guess I'll have to think about going with Wyks' idea and consider revisiting lurkerdom. (Glad you're back, Wyks!Smile

Minnie, you said,

"Until someone proves or decides to share the information that Misty did it, or Ron did it, I think we should keep that speculation to a minimum. Or maybe go and get a job with "LE" and help them solve the case."
 
If there is no speculation, then what do we talk about? I can listen to the news and read and watch LE's pressers by myself. I come here to discuss with fellow posters what they think and impressions they get from the news and the pressers. But I don't want to faux pas.
 
And are you saying that only those employeed by LE should express opinions or only if those opinions are in regard to Ron and Misty? Or are comments that are flattering or in Ron's and/or Misty's favor the only ones acceptable? Are only certain types of speculation allowed?




Are you really going to listen to what one poster is saying? Just because one person doesn't want speculation doesn't mean it's some kind of rule here. 



Thank you, Klaasend! Smile


Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 2.261 seconds with 20 queries.