Haleigh Marie Cummings #6 3/11/09 - 3/14/09

[lilymarie]

I looked and didn't see this posted yet - hope I'm right - sorry if I'm wrong:

http://www.bloggernews.net/120050

Haleigh and the Anniversary Killer

part of the blog:

In Alabama in 1999 it is believed that a construction worker abducted/killed a young girl age 11 named Teresa Dean from a low income trailer park. Her home was near a construction site. Teresa was never found. Then in 2001 there was another girl taken from a low income trailer park near a construction site her name was Shannon Paulk. She was found dead seven weeks later by rabbit hunters. Then in 2003 another 11 year old girl from a low income trailer park was abducted her name was Heaven Ross. Heaven and Teresa’s bodies were never found. The girls homes were all near a construction site either commercial, roadwork, or bridge building was going on near the parks they lived in. Teresa was taken in August 15, 1999, Shannon was taken August 16, 2001 and Heaven was taken August 19, 2003. All in August, Teresa and Shannon’s abduction’s are two years and one day apart, Shannon and Heaven’s abduction are two years and three days apart. Heaven and Teresa’s abductions are four years and four days apart. They have a description of the man that they believe abducted/killed these girls. They believe he is a construction worker. They dubbed him the anniversary killer. Each of the girls lived next to a wildlife refuges also.

The only differences in Haleigh’s abduction and the three girls from Alabama are, Haleigh lives in Florida, the three girls were all 11 years old, Haleigh is only 5 and the time of year that Haleigh was abducted compared to the time of the three victims from Alabama. Could someone of been watching Haleigh?

Ok, I do not see this Anniversary Killer as being the un-sub, given he would have to deviate his course and litter pick, which would be out of his comfort zone completely, BUT I do agree that I am leaning toward the possibility that she was taken by someone who had been watching her and scoping things out, that is if it is not one of the players already in the mix at this point. 
I am with John Walsh, everyone is a suspect at this point, I am not on either camps side, I am Switzerland, ALTHOUGH I do NOT agree with some of the actions taken thus far....but then again I have never had a child taken from me so I am not in a position to judge.

I agree. I don't really see a strong tie either. IMO this is a predator abduction. Just looking for anybody that might be looked at. Whatever you think about the family - I don't see them having the motive, smarts, resources and/or time to harm Haleigh. I don't agree with some of their antics - actually it makes me even more convinced that they just don't have it together enough to pull this off.

[cookie]

^^^^^ true Lily....

[Dolce]

FYI:

Birthday thread for JSM:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4677.new#new

Thank you Sassy...headed over!! 

[Wyks]

It's just a theory, Lucky.     Just one theory among several.  I have at least one each for Ron/Misty/Crystal/RSOs and SOs that aren't even registered yet.  Am an equal opportunity theorist.   

Wykes, glad to know you "keep it real" w/your theory's. From now on, I w/address you as the EOT!!

   Works for me!   

[Wyks]

10320 « prev | next » Go to last post | Jump to page:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516
Page#   justwhatithought
Laurel, MS
 Reply »
|Report Abuse |#10636 20 min ago
Note to Scaredmonkeys. I don't know anymore than you guys.I think when I first started posting I may have come on a little to strong,but I did put "heres what I think", "what if" ,jmo.or mho. I am only making a note to you guys so you don't waste to much time wondering about my comments. I am not a member of SM but I do like to read there. I think you all have a very nice forum.I have gotten a lot of good links from SM. I usually mention if I find a link there and repost it though. As for Laurel,ur right ,it's a cable thing..lol


Here's a post to SM  from Topix about what was said at the end of the last thread!!!!!

    

[Wyks]

10320 « prev | next » Go to last post | Jump to page:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516
Page#   justwhatithought
Laurel, MS
 Reply »
|Report Abuse |#10636 20 min ago
Note to Scaredmonkeys. I don't know anymore than you guys.I think when I first started posting I may have come on a little to strong,but I did put "heres what I think", "what if" ,jmo.or mho. I am only making a note to you guys so you don't waste to much time wondering about my comments. I am not a member of SM but I do like to read there. I think you all have a very nice forum.I have gotten a lot of good links from SM. I usually mention if I find a link there and repost it though. As for Laurel,ur right ,it's a cable thing..lol


Here's a post to SM  from Topix about what was said at the end of the last thread!!!!!

LOL, now we know that is wyks. Just kidding wyks, but that's funny.

        

Yep it's funny!  But not me posting over there.  I cannot make heads nor tails out of their site, get lost too much in there.  Might read a post there that someone refers us to, after that I beat a hasty retreat.  lol

[Heart]

Good morning Monkeys!

Are you all adorned in your wedding attending apparel.  Today is the big day.  Please bring your hankies.  I'm sure this will be a tear jerker 

[no rose colored glasses]

Good morning Monkeys!

Are you all adorned in your wedding attending apparel.  Today is the big day.  Please bring your hankies.  I'm sure this will be a tear jerker 

I know I'm ready, do you know what time the big event is? 

[Heart]

GRACE: With me, right now, is that attorney, Kim Picazio. She has an excellent reputation. She graduated summa cum laude from Florida State. She has been practicing over a decade.

Miss Picazio, thank you for being with us for your first interview.

KIM PICAZIO, ATTORNEY FOR MISSING HALEIGH`S MOM, FIRST INTERVIEW: Thank you, Nancy.

GRACE: . after the bio mom hires you. Why does Haleigh`s biological mother need a lawyer?

PICAZIO: Well, I was contacted, as your correspondent has stated, initially to handle the media. But then later we have found out through talking to people in the community and speaking with the police officers, et cetera, as well as speaking with the mother, that there may be some issues involving the minor child, Junior, is what they call the son of Crystal Sheffield, and his sister Haleigh with regard to whether or not he`s in the safest place in the home with the father.

GRACE: Miss Picazio, are you planning to launch a custody battle for the little boy?

PICAZIO: Well, at this time, I was just retained so I would need, of course, to explore all of the issues. I need to talk to everyone involved and so I guess what we first need to do is to go down or up to the town, speak with all of the officials and there are some things that give us grave concerns about the welfare of the child and about Haleigh when she is returned.

GRACE: OK.

PICAZIO: Hopefully safely.

GRACE: Miss Picazio, I understand your concerns. It makes perfect sense to me. If one child is snatched out of the home, what might happen to the next child? I understand that. But let me ask you this. Why did your client lose custody of Junior to start with?

PICAZIO: I need also the court records. I just pulled those today and I have not been down to the town. I`m going to be going tomorrow. And I would prefer to actually read the court documents as opposed to going what the renditions of the parties may be, which may be colored by just the perceptions and their emotions.

But I do know that the mother had retained an attorney prior -- after the original proceeding to seek a modification of custody. And it was my understanding that the mother was not aware of some very important hearings that she was to attend and I need to get to the bottom of that and then we can go from there.

GRACE: Miss Picazio -- everyone, Kim Picazio is joining us today from her first TV interview. She`s joining us out of Plantation, Florida and she has been hired by Haleigh`s biological mother.

Now, Miss Picazio, how long has your client not had physical custody of little Haleigh?

PICAZIO: It`s been for several years and it was -- actually we just found out today that the modification proceeding I don`t believe was ever filed. I need to speak with that attorney that was retained by Miss Sheffield to file that proceeding and I would have to defer to the court documents on that which I am in the process of obtaining.

But, again, there are grave concerns with regard to Junior and with regard to the household that Haleigh would be potentially returned to. There have, of course, been allegations but again, if you can imagine when you.

GRACE: Allegations of what?

PICAZIO: Allegations with regard to what was actually going on in that home prior to Haleigh disappearing and on that night. I mean we`ve got a situation you have a 4-year-old child in the home with a home that`s actually the -- the 7-year-old, I`m sorry, the 5-year-old child had disappeared right under the nose of the babysitter that then we learn is a teenage babysitter who is also living with the father in a romantic relationship.

This is not the first time that he has chosen a teenager to fall in love with and to live with and to watch his children.

GRACE: Are you suggesting, are you suggesting abuse on little Haleigh?

PICAZIO: I`m not suggesting that as of yet and we have not.

GRACE: I`m glad to hear it.

PICAZIO: . uncovered -- we have no uncovered anything as of yet and I`d like to do my own investigation. It`s my understanding the authorities are looking into every single avenue. But I have grave concerns again about the ability and the fitness of the parent who is going to consistently choose teenagers.

GRACE: Well.

PICAZIO: . to watch their children.

GRACE: Well, a couple of points, Miss Picazio, and believe me, I know you are a well-respected member of the bar. But I find it ironic that now is the time when the bio mom is trying to arrange all of her media requests, that she suddenly decides that Haleigh had been in a bad environment.

She`s certainly known all along who the father is dating and according to the judge in your client`s custody case, the mother, your client, did not have a job. The father did. Haleigh missed a total that we know of 12 doctor`s appointments while living with the mother.

Now maybe there`s an explanation for that, but I know the child has Turner syndrome and the mother not only didn`t have a job, but didn`t take the child to the doctor. It`s not like she was working all day and couldn`t make time to take the child to the doctor. I don`t understand that.

PICAZIO: Well, there`s also -- we have to look into the father`s history of taking the child to the doctor. Haleigh was never a child who was well. She had chronic pneumonia and bronchial problems and the father would often leave the children to a teenager who he was living with to drive this child to the doctor on a weekly basis.

GRACE: Why do you speak of Haleigh -- why do you speak of Haleigh in the past tense? I notice that you said Haleigh was a child with a lot of physical problems.

PICAZIO: Because she doesn`t have those physical problems anymore.

GRACE: OK, with me, everyone, Kim Picazio, attorney newly hired, attorney newly retained for Haleigh`s biological mother.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0903/11/ng.01.html

[no rose colored glasses]

Thank-you Heart for the NG transcript 

[fatcatlurker]

Hey I have a OT question??  Does FLove mean "fornication under carnal knowledge-EN Love?"  Sorry if it offends anyone I tried to use biblical words.  I just want to know what it means I'm still trying to catch up on blog lingo.

[fatcatlurker]

Another question; Does anyone think that with the DNA taken from more friends and family last week and now the door taken that just maybe we have some unknown transfer DNA on that door? 

[GramaMonkey]

Good morning Monkeys!

Are you all adorned in your wedding attending apparel.  Today is the big day.  Please bring your hankies.  I'm sure this will be a tear jerker 

I know I'm ready, do you know what time the big event is? 

Haven't seen a time, but I hope it is before the COURT CASE TODAY.

[no rose colored glasses]

Good morning Monkeys!

Are you all adorned in your wedding attending apparel.  Today is the big day.  Please bring your hankies.  I'm sure this will be a tear jerker 

I know I'm ready, do you know what time the big event is? 

Haven't seen a time, but I hope it is before the COURT CASE TODAY.

Me too, can't miss that. 

[GramaMonkey]

Another question; Does anyone think that with the DNA taken from more friends and family last week and now the door taken that just maybe we have some unknown transfer DNA on that door? 

My fingers are CROSSED, both hands~~~

[no rose colored glasses]

Another question; Does anyone think that with the DNA taken from more friends and family last week and now the door taken that just maybe we have some unknown transfer DNA on that door? 

That's what I'm thinking, your other question about FLove, I would have no idea what that means. 

[Heart]

Good morning Monkeys!

Are you all adorned in your wedding attending apparel.  Today is the big day.  Please bring your hankies.  I'm sure this will be a tear jerker 

I know I'm ready, do you know what time the big event is? 

No Rose, I don't know what time the wedding is set for, but I am sitting an waiting.

[no rose colored glasses]

Good morning Monkeys!

Are you all adorned in your wedding attending apparel.  Today is the big day.  Please bring your hankies.  I'm sure this will be a tear jerker 

I know I'm ready, do you know what time the big event is? 

No Rose, I don't know what time the wedding is set for, but I am sitting an waiting.

Thanks, I'm sure there will be pictures 

[fatcatlurker]

Another question; Does anyone think that with the DNA taken from more friends and family last week and now the door taken that just maybe we have some unknown transfer DNA on that door? 

My fingers are CROSSED, both hands~~~

Me too!  Hoping and praying.  I think it's interesting that it went down in that order.  More DNA than door a week later. 

[fatcatlurker]

Another question; Does anyone think that with the DNA taken from more friends and family last week and now the door taken that just maybe we have some unknown transfer DNA on that door? 

That's what I'm thinking, your other question about FLove, I would have no idea what that means. 

Thank you I was beginning to think I upset people but I see it here all the time and wanted to know what it meant.  I'll google it now.