MONKEY MUSINGS DAILY OPEN DISCUSSION #27 3/14/09 - 3/17/09

[mytime]

MyTime, Sometimes I think you are wise to stay in Musings and avoid the Missing Persons Threads.  Only nice people post in here, lol.

i have officially banished myself from haleighs thread as of today, ill check it again after theres some concrete news. 

 

[Green Eyes]

I am with MyTime I read Caylee everyday. For Haliegh I have read a couple times I can't figure out what everyone's going on about. There sure seems to be lot of drama.

[peanut]

MyTime, Sometimes I think you are wise to stay in Musings and avoid the Missing Persons Threads.  Only nice people post in here, lol.

i have officially banished myself from haleighs thread as of today, ill check it again after theres some concrete news. 

I may do that as well as people tend to invent news when there isn't any.

But I can't in the Natalee Holloway thread as it would make too many people who hate me happy.  Must'nt have that!

goodness, no...dont do that!

im sure i wont be missed, but its just gotten too over the top for me. besides, i like it here!

[KCJackie]

jackie, you have nanners!  (wow i finally get to say that...woohooo!)

    I just forwarded it to the rest of the gang - Thank You!!!!!

[peanut]

I am with MyTime I read Caylee everyday. For Haliegh I have read a couple times I can't figure out what everyone's going on about. There sure seems to be lot of drama.

oh yes, im still on caylees. have no intention of leaving either haha.

and ya, much drama. also too much...well, nm. haha.

just too much.

[Green Eyes]

MyTime, Sometimes I think you are wise to stay in Musings and avoid the Missing Persons Threads.  Only nice people post in here, lol.

i have officially banished myself from haleighs thread as of today, ill check it again after theres some concrete news. 

I may do that as well as people tend to invent news when there isn't any.

But I can't in the Natalee Holloway thread as it would make too many people who hate me happy.  Must'nt have that!

goodness, no...dont do that!

im sure i wont be missed, but its just gotten too over the top for me. besides, i like it here!

We like you here too

[KCJackie]

Are you done ignoring me yet, MT?

[mytime]

I have one question......Do you think Ron marry Misty to avoid statutory rapes charges??

794.05 Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.

(1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. As used in this section, "sexual activity" means oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

(2) The provisions of this section do not apply to a person 16 or 17 years of age who has had the disabilities of nonage removed under chapter 743.

(3) The victim's prior sexual conduct is not a relevant issue in a prosecution under this section.

(4) If an offense under this section directly results in the victim giving birth to a child, paternity of that child shall be established as described in chapter 742. If it is determined that the offender is the father of the child, the offender must pay child support pursuant to the child support guidelines described in chapter 61

[peanut]

jackie, you have nanners!  (wow i finally get to say that...woohooo!)

    I just forwarded it to the rest of the gang - Thank You!!!!!

yay, youre an angel, thank you so much!! *squishy hug*

[mytime]

Are you done ignoring me yet, MT?

Maybe!!   

[Anna]

I have one question......Do you think Ron marry Misty to avoid statutory rapes charges??

794.05 Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.

(1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. As used in this section, "sexual activity" means oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

(2) The provisions of this section do not apply to a person 16 or 17 years of age who has had the disabilities of nonage removed under chapter 743.

(3) The victim's prior sexual conduct is not a relevant issue in a prosecution under this section.

(4) If an offense under this section directly results in the victim giving birth to a child, paternity of that child shall be established as described in chapter 742. If it is determined that the offender is the father of the child, the offender must pay child support pursuant to the child support guidelines described in chapter 61

I dunno but maybe and also he might think it would help him retain custody of his kids if they were married instead of just shacking up.

Would like to think he is actually trying to do better. 

[peanut]

I have one question......Do you think Ron marry Misty to avoid statutory rapes charges??

794.05 Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.

(1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. As used in this section, "sexual activity" means oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

(2) The provisions of this section do not apply to a person 16 or 17 years of age who has had the disabilities of nonage removed under chapter 743.

(3) The victim's prior sexual conduct is not a relevant issue in a prosecution under this section.

(4) If an offense under this section directly results in the victim giving birth to a child, paternity of that child shall be established as described in chapter 742. If it is determined that the offender is the father of the child, the offender must pay child support pursuant to the child support guidelines described in chapter 61

as far as i know she was of the age of consent...16. i dont know why they married, but you can never please some folks, they b*itch about living together and having babies out of wedlock, but this has to be a big dark conspiracy too. *shrugs*

[Green Eyes]

I have one question......Do you think Ron marry Misty to avoid statutory rapes charges??

794.05 Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.

(1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. As used in this section, "sexual activity" means oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

(2) The provisions of this section do not apply to a person 16 or 17 years of age who has had the disabilities of nonage removed under chapter 743.

(3) The victim's prior sexual conduct is not a relevant issue in a prosecution under this section.

(4) If an offense under this section directly results in the victim giving birth to a child, paternity of that child shall be established as described in chapter 742. If it is determined that the offender is the father of the child, the offender must pay child support pursuant to the child support guidelines described in chapter 61

I really don't know.

[peanut]

MyTime, Sometimes I think you are wise to stay in Musings and avoid the Missing Persons Threads.  Only nice people post in here, lol.

i have officially banished myself from haleighs thread as of today, ill check it again after theres some concrete news. 

I may do that as well as people tend to invent news when there isn't any.

But I can't in the Natalee Holloway thread as it would make too many people who hate me happy.  Must'nt have that!

goodness, no...dont do that!

im sure i wont be missed, but its just gotten too over the top for me. besides, i like it here!

We like you here too

aww ge! *huggers*

[KCJackie]

Are you done ignoring me yet, MT?

Maybe!!   

[mytime]

Second and last comment - Did it ever get mentioned about the light purple hat,  Jessica Lunsford had one similar too.  Her father also had custody and lived in a "trailer"

Just weird coincidences!!  Put it this way - My daughter can never have a light purple hat!! 

[mytime]

I have one question......Do you think Ron marry Misty to avoid statutory rapes charges??

794.05 Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.

(1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. As used in this section, "sexual activity" means oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.

(2) The provisions of this section do not apply to a person 16 or 17 years of age who has had the disabilities of nonage removed under chapter 743.

(3) The victim's prior sexual conduct is not a relevant issue in a prosecution under this section.

(4) If an offense under this section directly results in the victim giving birth to a child, paternity of that child shall be established as described in chapter 742. If it is determined that the offender is the father of the child, the offender must pay child support pursuant to the child support guidelines described in chapter 61

as far as i know she was of the age of consent...16. i dont know why they married, but you can never please some folks, they b*itch about living together and having babies out of wedlock, but this has to be a big dark conspiracy too. *shrugs*

Ron is 24, Misty is 17............makes me wonder??

[crazybabyborg]

Are you done ignoring me yet, MT?

Maybe!!   

We ALL need a hug!!!  We'll just gather around the campfire and sing Kumbaya!   

[mytime]

Are you done ignoring me yet, MT?

Maybe!!   

[KCJackie]

  Hi CBB

I'm telling on MT - she's being wayyyyyy too serious - and wayyyyy OT.  Could you please put her on a Time Out?