March 28, 2024, 02:06:09 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Haleigh Marie Cummings #7 3/14/09 - 3/18/09  (Read 310139 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #60 on: March 14, 2009, 08:10:25 PM »

IM, my dad is telling me that within the police report for the drug vehicle there should be a quantity given for the drugs, usually in weights of kilo's....according to him, for his boys it means the car of which they are driving has over a certain weight of drugs within it, but that the terminology used by the cop writing it up could mean something along the lines of the instrument used to administer the drugs.  The weight/amount of drugs determines the severity of the case and if it is considered just a possession, which would be noted on the report, or a trafficking which would be noted on the report.  Might also find the answers within court filings.
Sorry so vague.

OK~I looked back, the records are for possesion, and it doesn't show a weight...it does show the affadavits, warrants and report links, but you have to go there in person to look at what they took into evidence.
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Dolce
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10844


Del senno di poi ne son piene le fosse...


WWW
« Reply #61 on: March 14, 2009, 08:11:51 PM »

IM, my dad is telling me that within the police report for the drug vehicle there should be a quantity given for the drugs, usually in weights of kilo's....according to him, for his boys it means the car of which they are driving has over a certain weight of drugs within it, but that the terminology used by the cop writing it up could mean something along the lines of the instrument used to administer the drugs.  The weight/amount of drugs determines the severity of the case and if it is considered just a possession, which would be noted on the report, or a trafficking which would be noted on the report.  Might also find the answers within court filings.
Sorry so vague.

I think I understand. I'll look back at the records as I don't remember the weight, just that it was a felony.
When you find it send me the link and I will shoot it on over to him to review if he has time.  May be nothin, but would be interesting!
Logged

Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 25374



« Reply #62 on: March 14, 2009, 08:11:59 PM »

IM, my dad is telling me that within the police report for the drug vehicle there should be a quantity given for the drugs, usually in weights of kilo's....according to him, for his boys it means the car of which they are driving has over a certain weight of drugs within it, but that the terminology used by the cop writing it up could mean something along the lines of the instrument used to administer the drugs.  The weight/amount of drugs determines the severity of the case and if it is considered just a possession, which would be noted on the report, or a trafficking which would be noted on the report.  Might also find the answers within court filings.
Sorry so vague.

I think I understand. I'll look back at the records as I don't remember the weight, just that it was a felony.

Found this (in my notes, of course)  LOL:
13 CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES 1983-10-29 N/A N/A, N/A N/A N/A
First Name RONALD Middle Name LEMYLES Last Name CUMMINGS
Primary Address N/A City N/A State N/A
ZIP Code N/A Phone Number N/A Date of Birth 1983-10-29
Race WHITE Offense Date 2002-12-12 Source State FL
Offense 0893.13.6A POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA (MORE THAN 20 GRAMS) Gender M

It's a long record, didn't want to paste it all in here.

Oh, Dolce, another post for you.
Logged

Dolce
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10844


Del senno di poi ne son piene le fosse...


WWW
« Reply #63 on: March 14, 2009, 08:16:28 PM »

IM, my dad is telling me that within the police report for the drug vehicle there should be a quantity given for the drugs, usually in weights of kilo's....according to him, for his boys it means the car of which they are driving has over a certain weight of drugs within it, but that the terminology used by the cop writing it up could mean something along the lines of the instrument used to administer the drugs.  The weight/amount of drugs determines the severity of the case and if it is considered just a possession, which would be noted on the report, or a trafficking which would be noted on the report.  Might also find the answers within court filings.
Sorry so vague.

OK~I looked back, the records are for possesion, and it doesn't show a weight...it does show the affadavits, warrants and report links, but you have to go there in person to look at what they took into evidence.
Alright, called him back.  For it to be felony it had to be a high amount in weight.  He said that the standard wording for "an instrument to administer drug" is usually under the umbrella term of "drug paraphernalia".  He said given the fact that it was considered a felony more than likely it was for the trafficking of drugs.
Now he wants to know what I have envolved myself in.  LOL
Logged

Dolce
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10844


Del senno di poi ne son piene le fosse...


WWW
« Reply #64 on: March 14, 2009, 08:18:31 PM »

IM, my dad is telling me that within the police report for the drug vehicle there should be a quantity given for the drugs, usually in weights of kilo's....according to him, for his boys it means the car of which they are driving has over a certain weight of drugs within it, but that the terminology used by the cop writing it up could mean something along the lines of the instrument used to administer the drugs.  The weight/amount of drugs determines the severity of the case and if it is considered just a possession, which would be noted on the report, or a trafficking which would be noted on the report.  Might also find the answers within court filings.
Sorry so vague.

I think I understand. I'll look back at the records as I don't remember the weight, just that it was a felony.

Found this (in my notes, of course)  LOL:
13 CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES 1983-10-29 N/A N/A, N/A N/A N/A
First Name RONALD Middle Name LEMYLES Last Name CUMMINGS
Primary Address N/A City N/A State N/A
ZIP Code N/A Phone Number N/A Date of Birth 1983-10-29
Race WHITE Offense Date 2002-12-12 Source State FL
Offense 0893.13.6A POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA (MORE THAN 20 GRAMS) Gender M

It's a long record, didn't want to paste it all in here.

Oh, Dolce, another post for you.

20 grams is a little under that of an ounce of marijuana.  If it was all in one bag it can be argued as just possession, but if it was distributed into individual baggies it would be considered trafficking.
Logged

islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #65 on: March 14, 2009, 08:19:28 PM »

IM, my dad is telling me that within the police report for the drug vehicle there should be a quantity given for the drugs, usually in weights of kilo's....according to him, for his boys it means the car of which they are driving has over a certain weight of drugs within it, but that the terminology used by the cop writing it up could mean something along the lines of the instrument used to administer the drugs.  The weight/amount of drugs determines the severity of the case and if it is considered just a possession, which would be noted on the report, or a trafficking which would be noted on the report.  Might also find the answers within court filings.
Sorry so vague.

I think I understand. I'll look back at the records as I don't remember the weight, just that it was a felony.
When you find it send me the link and I will shoot it on over to him to review if he has time.  May be nothin, but would be interesting!

Here is the PUTNAM county info on one of his arrests:



UCN: 542004CF002063XXAXMX
File Date: 2004-11-16 Judge: A W NICHOLS III   
Defense Atty: FELICIANO, SHARON 

Defendant
CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES 
Alias


Date # Docket Description
2004-11-16 1 ARREST REPORT - PCSO EDGAR (ARREST 11/12/04) 

2004-11-16 1 POSSESSION OF CANNABIS IN EXCESS OF 20 GRAMS 

2004-11-16 1 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA 

2004-11-16 1 MAINTAINING A DRUG VEHICLE 

2004-11-16 2 DEFENDANT PRESENT FOR FIRST APPEARANCE HEARING 11/13/04 

2004-11-16 2 ADJ INS P D APPOINTED FOR FIRST APPEARANCE ONLY 

2004-11-16 2 SUFFICIENT PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND 

2004-11-16 2 $2012.00 UNSECURED BOND SET 11/13/04 

2004-11-16 3 TRAFFIC CITATION - #7877-DBJ 2 

2004-11-16 4 AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY 

2004-11-16 5 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR 1ST APP HEARING 

2004-11-16 6 APPEARANCE BOND - UNSECURED $ 2,012 

2004-12-03 7 INFORMATION (CT 1-POSSESSION OF CANNABIS IN EXCESS 

2004-12-03 7 OF 20 GRAMS) 

2004-12-07 8 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (01-07-2005) 

2005-01-07 9 ARRAIGNMENT MINUTES: DEFT PRESENT, SWORN, ARRAIGNED, 

2005-01-07 9 PUBLIC DEFENDER APPOINTED, ENTERED PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, 

2005-01-07 9 SET FOR PRE TRIAL 02/03/2005. 

2005-01-07 10 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS 

2005-01-07 10 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED INDIGENT 

2005-01-07 10 $40.00 APPLICATION FEE IMPOSED 

2005-01-07 11 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER 

2005-01-07 12 ORDER SETTING PRE TRIAL 02/03/2005 

2005-01-07 13 NOTICE GIVEN TO DEFENDANT IN COURT FOR NEXT COURT DATE 

2005-01-10 14 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (02-03-2005) 

2005-01-18 15 DRUG COURT HEARING MINUTES: DEFT PRESENT, ATT BY KURT 

2005-01-18 15 TEIFKE, COURT DIRECTED DEFENDANT MAKE AND KEEP 

2005-01-18 15 APPOINTMENT WITH PUBLIC DEFENDER AND TREATMENT 

2005-01-18 15 PROVIDER, NEXT HEARING SET 01/25/2005 

2005-01-18 16 NOTICE GIVEN TO DEFENDANT IN COURT FOR NEXT COURT DATE 

2005-01-25 17 DRUG COURT HEARING MINUTES: DEFENDANT PRESENT, DEFT MET WITH 

2005-01-25 17 PUBLIC DEFENDER, DEFT SCREENED BY TREATMENT AND DEEMED 

2005-01-25 17 APPROPRIATE FOR DRUG COURT, DEFT DECLINED THE DRUG COURT 

2005-01-25 17 PROGRAM, DEFT WILL FOLLOW TRADITIONAL COURT DOCKET 

2005-02-03 18 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY SHARON FELICIANO 

2005-02-03 18 ON MOTION OF DEFENSE COUNSEL, COURT ORDERED CASE 

2005-02-03 18 CONTINUED TO 09/08/2005 

2005-02-03 18 ADI - LEVEL II 

2005-02-07 19 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (09-08-2005) 

2005-03-03 20 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY SHARON FELICIANO, 

2005-03-03 20 DEFT SWORN, W/D FORMER PLEA, PLEAD NOLO A/C, ADVISED 

2005-03-03 20 MAX PENALTY 5 YRS DOC &/OR $5000 FINE, PSI WAIVED, 

2005-03-03 20 PLEA ACCEPTED, SENTENCING SET SAME DAY 

2005-03-03 20 ADJUDICATION OF GUILT WITHHELD 

2005-03-03 20 $370.00 COURT COSTS (6 MONTHS TO PAY) 

2005-03-03 20 ADI PROGRAM - LEVEL II 

2005-09-08 21 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF ADI LEVEL II PROGRAM 

2005-09-08 21 $370.00 COURT COST PAID 

2005-11-14 22 $370.00 PAYMENT MADE TO CASE 



Here are the Sarasota ones, the one that you have to actually go down to see the evidence reports:

http://courtweb.co.sarasota.fl.us/crimapp/crimbrowse.asp?pg=1



Charges:
Statute Code General Offense Character Statute Description Disposition Date Disposition
893.13(6A) Principal DRUGS POSSESS-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned
893.13(6A) Principal DRUGS POSSESS-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned
893.147(1) Principal NARCOTIC EQUIP POSSESS-AND OR USE 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned
741.31 Principal VIOL INJUNCTION PROTECTION DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned
499.03 Principal DRUGS-POSSESS NEW LEGEND DRUG WO PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned


Docket Information:
Date Description Pages Image
10/27/2005 COURT EVENT CANCELLED The following event: CRIMINAL - ARRAIGNMENT FELONY scheduled for 11/04/2005 at 9:00 am has been resulted as follows: Result: CANCELLED (Criminal) 0 None
10/27/2005 Payment of Court Cost 0 None
10/19/2005 ARREST BOND RECORD CREATED Ref: Bond/Pwr No.: 2005AA079210 Initial Charge #: 1 Initial Action Code: POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE(MORPHINE) Prosecutor Count #: 1 Prosecutor Action Code: POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE(MORPHINE) Bonding Co.: AA LARAZA BAIL BONDS Bond Amount: $5000 The following field(s) on arrest bond 1 have been modified: New Bond Status Added: BOND RELEASED New Bond Status Date Added: 10/18/2005  0 None
10/18/2005 NOTICE OF CASE DISPOSITION/ACTION-DECLINED 1 Image
10/5/2005 ARREST BOND RECORD CREATED Arrest Bond Added to Case with: Arrest Date: 09/26/2005 Initial Charge #: 1 Initial Action Code: POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE(MORPHINE) Prosecutor Count #: Prosecutor Action Code: Custody Location: Bond Status: Posted Status Date: 09/28/2005 Bond Type: Surety Bond/Pwr No.: 2005AA079210 Bond Amount: $5000 Bonding Co.: AA LARAZA BAIL BONDS Cash Depositor:  0 None
10/3/2005 Court Event Set Event: CRIMINAL - ARRAIGNMENT FELONY Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 9:00 am Judge: ROBERTS, CHARLES E Location: Courtroom 3-A Result: CANCELLED (Criminal) 0 None
9/29/2005 ADVISORY HEARING BOND 2 Image
9/29/2005 COPY OF DRIVERS LICENSE 1 Image
9/29/2005 EVIDENCE / PROPERTY RECEIPT 10 Image
9/29/2005 REPORT 2 Image
9/29/2005 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT (FHPF05OFF062270) 17 Image
9/29/2005 NOTICE TO APPEAR - CRIMINAL 1 Image
9/28/2005 INVOCATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 1 Image
9/28/2005 INDIGENCY CIRCUIT CASE APPROVED Receipt: 422546 Date: 10/27/ 1 Image
9/28/2005 BOND - PAPER POWER # 2005-AA-07 3 Image
9/28/2005 DECISION TO DECLINE TO APPLY FOR THE SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 1 Image
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #66 on: March 14, 2009, 08:22:02 PM »

IM, my dad is telling me that within the police report for the drug vehicle there should be a quantity given for the drugs, usually in weights of kilo's....according to him, for his boys it means the car of which they are driving has over a certain weight of drugs within it, but that the terminology used by the cop writing it up could mean something along the lines of the instrument used to administer the drugs.  The weight/amount of drugs determines the severity of the case and if it is considered just a possession, which would be noted on the report, or a trafficking which would be noted on the report.  Might also find the answers within court filings.
Sorry so vague.

OK~I looked back, the records are for possesion, and it doesn't show a weight...it does show the affadavits, warrants and report links, but you have to go there in person to look at what they took into evidence.
Alright, called him back.  For it to be felony it had to be a high amount in weight.  He said that the standard wording for "an instrument to administer drug" is usually under the umbrella term of "drug paraphernalia".  He said given the fact that it was considered a felony more than likely it was for the trafficking of drugs.
Now he wants to know what I have envolved myself in.  LOL

  Your poor dad, he's probably wondering WHY you are asking him all these questions, but I really do appreciate your/his input.....still I am LMAO at that response
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Dolce
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10844


Del senno di poi ne son piene le fosse...


WWW
« Reply #67 on: March 14, 2009, 08:24:11 PM »

For all of that to be within his car, the narcotics, the perscription drugs, and the weed, that would be considered the vehicle housing the illegal substances.  Now, since it is not noted anywhere "With the intent to sell" it looks as if the arresting officer was trying to write him up for everything he possibly could at this traffic stop.
Logged

Dolce
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10844


Del senno di poi ne son piene le fosse...


WWW
« Reply #68 on: March 14, 2009, 08:26:08 PM »

Ya, when I said it was research he said "Put your Ma on the phone now"....LOL 
My Ma was like "I don't know she is on the computer".   
Darn Monkeys always gettin me in trouble.   
Gonna have to send her back home if she keeps tattling on me.
Logged

islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #69 on: March 14, 2009, 08:29:47 PM »

Ya, when I said it was research he said "Put your Ma on the phone now"....LOL 
My Ma was like "I don't know she is on the computer".   
Darn Monkeys always gettin me in trouble.   
Gonna have to send her back home if she keeps tattling on me.


Nah, not right now~you need to take it easy remember........anyway your hubs would be circling you if she wasn't there to make sure you aren't overdoing it!

I just wish we could see what is in those Baker County images......
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Brandi
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 25374



« Reply #70 on: March 14, 2009, 08:30:45 PM »

IM, my dad is telling me that within the police report for the drug vehicle there should be a quantity given for the drugs, usually in weights of kilo's....according to him, for his boys it means the car of which they are driving has over a certain weight of drugs within it, but that the terminology used by the cop writing it up could mean something along the lines of the instrument used to administer the drugs.  The weight/amount of drugs determines the severity of the case and if it is considered just a possession, which would be noted on the report, or a trafficking which would be noted on the report.  Might also find the answers within court filings.
Sorry so vague.

I think I understand. I'll look back at the records as I don't remember the weight, just that it was a felony.

Found this (in my notes, of course)  LOL:
13 CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES 1983-10-29 N/A N/A, N/A N/A N/A
First Name RONALD Middle Name LEMYLES Last Name CUMMINGS
Primary Address N/A City N/A State N/A
ZIP Code N/A Phone Number N/A Date of Birth 1983-10-29
Race WHITE Offense Date 2002-12-12 Source State FL
Offense 0893.13.6A POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA (MORE THAN 20 GRAMS) Gender M

It's a long record, didn't want to paste it all in here.

Oh, Dolce, another post for you.

20 grams is a little under that of an ounce of marijuana.  If it was all in one bag it can be argued as just possession, but if it was distributed into individual baggies it would be considered trafficking.

Thanks for the clarification, Dolce. I never did learn my metric equivalences. LOL (Nor am I a drug user/dealer, obviously.) I thought 20 grams might be a lot. 

Anyway, I left you another post in the other thread, Dolce Wink
Logged

Dolce
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10844


Del senno di poi ne son piene le fosse...


WWW
« Reply #71 on: March 14, 2009, 08:32:14 PM »

I had to ask what 20 grams was myself...I was thinking in terms of good old Teddy Grams.. YUMMY!!

I replied to you Brandi...you have created me a wardrobe!!  Smile
Logged

darla
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4348


In Honor of my son Lt. Brandon W. Rollins LCSO.


« Reply #72 on: March 14, 2009, 08:37:08 PM »

Good Evening Monkeys. I am so behind on reading...I just skipped about 10 pages in the last thread. I see there is nothing new on Haleigh.

Dolce, your pictures are just beautiful.
Logged

You will never know that Faith in prayer is all you need,
until it is all you have left!
God Bless!
GramaMonkey
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3282



« Reply #73 on: March 14, 2009, 08:39:10 PM »

I was just wondering what you all thought after seeing the door propped open the way it was? It wasn't wide open like we all had pictured, can anyone think of any reson possible someone would prop open a door in such a way?
My thought are so the person carrying out a child would not have to kick or back into the door in order to open it....would get pretty noisey.

On another note, in regards to the door...that incline is wood planks, similar to a doc, and walking on that even in my thong sandals makes a clink clink type sound.  That could/would be a bit noisey for a person to go up and down and up and down, first to open and prop with the brick, and second to walk up and walk down carrying a child back.

I am also a little disgruntled that foot prints have not been found...its not like we are dealing with a putting green here.

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/02/13/putnam.pdf

Here is a copy again of the Sheriff's report.  I noticed some things that are discrepancies in Misty's statement.

1.  Misty said they were...'sleeping in her bed'

2,  Woke up before 3AM...'to get  drink'. (nothing mentioned about bathroom)

3.  Ran around residence frantically and noticed 'back door was standing open' (did not specify which back door,inside or screen)

4.  'She was sure the back door had been locked prior to her going to bed'

The items in red are from the Sheriff's report.  Appear to be different than Misty is saying now. 
Logged

momm0f4
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #74 on: March 14, 2009, 08:40:32 PM »

I don't have the patience to search at the moment because I have lil ones wanting me off the computer, but which way did the dogs track her again?
I Was wondering because there is a house for sale at 111 Tyler St which is only 3 minutes away walking, going by google maps.
Have they checked the empty houses... im sure they have?
Also, any word on where the make shift chair was at exactly?
I guess what Im thinking is it may be possible for someone hiding out in a house for sale behind Ronalds home, and possibly creating the make shift chair between the vacant house and ronalds house to keep a close eye on habits?
Logged
Mary Ann
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 340


« Reply #75 on: March 14, 2009, 08:42:41 PM »

I thought that the Anthony family was the most messed up family on the planet....that is until I saw Haleigh's people....Wow. You just can't make up this stuff. I so hope that she is found alive and taken away from them and is able to have a wonderful, safe and happy life.
Dolce, I am glad you are okay. I totally understand about the licorice!! Your avitar pictures are absolutely beautiful. Thank you so much for sharing your journey into motherhood with us.
Logged
jules3699
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 457



« Reply #76 on: March 14, 2009, 08:44:21 PM »

I found this on Topix:

Judged:
 1
Also, there seems to be a witness that place Bandit pumping gas at 2:00am and then the neighbors reporting a woman in distress between 2-2:30am and confirms police were not called or there yet.

So who was there Before Bandit made it home Or was Bandit home 45min to an hour before calling 911?

LE has picked up on their spouting chit, you can guarantee that. They also are patient as heck.

I wanted to add to Smokey, she feels Safe with Ron and will follow his leads. If you notice, when she gets out of line, Bandit shows his control by walking right by her or in front of her like she isn't there, Smokey scuttles after him like a bunny rabbit.


I had read something about him being seen at the store/gas station before and just wondering if anyone has any knowledge/info on this?
Logged

GramaMonkey
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3282



« Reply #77 on: March 14, 2009, 08:44:22 PM »

5.  Sheriff's office iniated a track beginning at the back/side door of the residence...... as we traveled down a wooded path,

'what appeared to be a small child's footprint in dirt'.

Sorry hit post, before I was done.
Logged

darla
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4348


In Honor of my son Lt. Brandon W. Rollins LCSO.


« Reply #78 on: March 14, 2009, 08:45:08 PM »

I don't think Misty has told the same story twice this whole month.

I also noticed Ron said he was at work at least 5 times on the Today Show. He really is making sure everyone knows he works.
Logged

You will never know that Faith in prayer is all you need,
until it is all you have left!
God Bless!
GramaMonkey
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3282



« Reply #79 on: March 14, 2009, 08:49:02 PM »

I don't have the patience to search at the moment because I have lil ones wanting me off the computer, but which way did the dogs track her again?
I Was wondering because there is a house for sale at 111 Tyler St which is only 3 minutes away walking, going by google maps.
Have they checked the empty houses... im sure they have?
Also, any word on where the make shift chair was at exactly?
I guess what Im thinking is it may be possible for someone hiding out in a house for sale behind Ronalds home, and possibly creating the make shift chair between the vacant house and ronalds house to keep a close eye on habits?
I posted the Sheriff's report above, you can read the track that they followed in the report.
Logged

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 2.148 seconds with 20 queries.