April 24, 2024, 07:38:26 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Haleigh Marie Cummings #28 11/10/09 - 1/21/10  (Read 545942 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jerseygirl345
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4752



« Reply #1340 on: January 06, 2010, 11:57:48 PM »

this one was from feb 12th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTl4PUY6o_E

Interviewer: I can't even imagine at my age going thru this

Lisa Croslin: it's horrible

Misty: It's very hurtful.. very
and I know at first it seems like there has been a lot of people that are like I don't understand how this could be the situation where you don't hear her did you hear anything I didn't hear anything at all nothing if I heard something I would have got up and I wouldn't have let them take her Interviewer: so what happened?

Misty: okay.. I put her to bed about you know 8 o'clock cuz that’s her bedtime she has school I put her to bed and her blanket and my blanket. my blanket was in the van they took so we had a blanket hanging on the window and I had to wash that and her blanket her blanket was she had peed on it the night before I guess and I was gonna put it on her but it spelled like pee so I washed the blanket and I gave her a little sheet to cover up with and she fell asleep and I went and come and put her blanket on her and then I laid down and it was I about I mean I'm not positive what time it was like 3 you know just I seen 3.. 3 o’clock in the morning I got up and I got up cuz I had to use the bathroom but I didn't make it to the bathroom I seen the a kitchen light on and I walked in the kitchen and the back door is wide open and I mean I didn't notice it about Haleigh then until I seen the backdoor open and I go in the room and she's gone and that's all I know is when I woke up when I went I went to sleep she was there and when I woke up she was gone

Interviewer: I know you've been intensively questioned by police
(misty nods in agreement)

Interviewer: What has what has that been like for you?

Misty: I mean it's been hard but I'm trying to do everything to find her ya know answer any questions I have to cuz I know I didn't do anything with to that little girl I would never hurt her I mean they love me they love me I mean they look at me like their mom um you ask little Jr you know he'll tell you they talk lovely about me and I'm so good to them kids real good

Interviewer: So so you woke up and that was it you saw the door open did you leave te light on or?

Misty: no I had the I was

Interviewer: somebody turned the light on

Misty: the lights had to get turned on cuz I know them lights no I was in the hallway where the backdoor is the dryers are right there I was washing clothes and that back door was shut ya know and I and I just wake up and it's open

Interviewer: Did you take the polygraph?

Misty: mmm  I did but I'm not supposed to talk about that they told me not to talk about that

Interviewer:  but you did good

Misty: yes I did take a polygraph

Interviewer: and you passed ?

Misty: I mean my understanding is that I passed it ya know

Interviewer:  what do you want people to know?

Misty: I just want everybody to know that I didn't do anything with that little girl I love her like she's my own and I'll do anything to get her back and if people think that I had something to do with it if I had something to do with it if I knew where she was we wouldn't be sitting here today we would have her and I don't I don't know where she is


Why would Misty assume THEM.....
Logged
strayze
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 444



« Reply #1341 on: January 07, 2010, 03:05:36 AM »

Misty speaks very sloppily, often using "them" to refer to the children "them kids", "them" lights, wouldn't let "them" take her.  Her speech is so imprecise that the use of a throwaway word for most anything could not mean a great deal from Misty.
Logged
penny for your thoughts
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1784



« Reply #1342 on: January 07, 2010, 08:57:33 AM »

this one was from feb 12th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTl4PUY6o_E

Interviewer: I can't even imagine at my age going thru this

Lisa Croslin: it's horrible

Misty: It's very hurtful.. very
and I know at first it seems like there has been a lot of people that are like I don't understand how this could be the situation where you don't hear her did you hear anything I didn't hear anything at all nothing if I heard something I would have got up and I wouldn't have let them take her Interviewer: so what happened?

Misty: okay.. I put her to bed about you know 8 o'clock cuz that’s her bedtime she has school I put her to bed and her blanket and my blanket. my blanket was in the van they took so we had a blanket hanging on the window and I had to wash that and her blanket her blanket was she had peed on it the night before I guess and I was gonna put it on her but it spelled like pee so I washed the blanket and I gave her a little sheet to cover up with and she fell asleep and I went and come and put her blanket on her and then I laid down and it was I about I mean I'm not positive what time it was like 3 you know just I seen 3.. 3 o’clock in the morning I got up and I got up cuz I had to use the bathroom but I didn't make it to the bathroom I seen the a kitchen light on and I walked in the kitchen and the back door is wide open and I mean I didn't notice it about Haleigh then until I seen the backdoor open and I go in the room and she's gone and that's all I know is when I woke up when I went I went to sleep she was there and when I woke up she was gone

Interviewer: I know you've been intensively questioned by police
(misty nods in agreement)

Interviewer: What has what has that been like for you?

Misty: I mean it's been hard but I'm trying to do everything to find her ya know answer any questions I have to cuz I know I didn't do anything with to that little girl I would never hurt her I mean they love me they love me I mean they look at me like their mom um you ask little Jr you know he'll tell you they talk lovely about me and I'm so good to them kids real good

Interviewer: So so you woke up and that was it you saw the door open did you leave te light on or?

Misty: no I had the I was

Interviewer: somebody turned the light on

Misty: the lights had to get turned on cuz I know them lights no I was in the hallway where the backdoor is the dryers are right there I was washing clothes and that back door was shut ya know and I and I just wake up and it's open

Interviewer: Did you take the polygraph?

Misty: mmm  I did but I'm not supposed to talk about that they told me not to talk about that

Interviewer:  but you did good

Misty: yes I did take a polygraph

Interviewer: and you passed ?

Misty: I mean my understanding is that I passed it ya know

Interviewer:  what do you want people to know?

Misty: I just want everybody to know that I didn't do anything with that little girl I love her like she's my own and I'll do anything to get her back and if people think that I had something to do with it if I had something to do with it if I knew where she was we wouldn't be sitting here today we would have her and I don't I don't know where she is


Why would Misty assume THEM.....
jerz i'm totally on board with ya on misty knowing what happened but to be fair i use the term "them" to describe an unknown single entity all the time.
like if some someone says i'm meeting an old friend for lunch i might say okay call me when your done spending time with them...
see what i mean... but i get what your saying totally
Logged
Heart
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7717



« Reply #1343 on: January 07, 2010, 08:57:55 AM »

Levi_Page
 
Gave Nancy Grace show permission to use my interview w Misty Croslin, hopefully this case get some national attn soon! #haleighcummings about 9 hours ago from web
http://twitter.com/Levi_Page
Logged

Heart
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #1344 on: January 07, 2010, 09:27:15 AM »

Levi_Page
 
Gave Nancy Grace show permission to use my interview w Misty Croslin, hopefully this case get some national attn soon! #haleighcummings about 9 hours ago from web
http://twitter.com/Levi_Page
From your mouth to God's ears an angelic monkey Please, HaLeigh, Adji and so many others have almost no nat'l attn anymore. I pray this will get the ball moving soon and we can bring Justice to this angel an angelic monkey
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Heart
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7717



« Reply #1345 on: January 07, 2010, 12:31:56 PM »

THESKY973DOTCOM
 
PCSO questions Charles Jones Wednesday...SOURCE: was questioned on many things, but no smoking gun in Haleigh case

http://twitter.com/THESKY973DOTCOM
Logged

Heart
trimmonthelake
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 43428



« Reply #1346 on: January 07, 2010, 12:37:26 PM »

Thanks heart. 
Logged

  ~241~ "The Longer You Love,The Longer You Live,The Stronger You Feel,The More You Can Give."
~ Peter Frampton
no rose colored glasses
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 45869


Zoe you will always be in my heart and soul


« Reply #1347 on: January 07, 2010, 12:43:18 PM »

THESKY973DOTCOM
 
PCSO questions Charles Jones Wednesday...SOURCE: was questioned on many things, but no smoking gun in Haleigh case

http://twitter.com/THESKY973DOTCOM
Thanks, I was kind of hoping he maybe knew something, that maybe Misty ran her mouth while she was drunk or drugged up when she lived with him.
Logged
cookie
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15663



« Reply #1348 on: January 07, 2010, 02:01:17 PM »

THESKY973DOTCOM
 
PCSO questions Charles Jones Wednesday...SOURCE: was questioned on many things, but no smoking gun in Haleigh case

http://twitter.com/THESKY973DOTCOM
Thanks, I was kind of hoping he maybe knew something, that maybe Misty ran her mouth while she was drunk or drugged up when she lived with him.

wishful thinking Rosie...this seems to be her condition most of the time and she hasn't ran her mouth yet!
Logged

Heart
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7717



« Reply #1349 on: January 07, 2010, 02:24:53 PM »



DAVID  STEVEN  CUMMINGS
OCALA,  FL
Booking Date & Time: 1/7/2010 1:57:23 PM  - Booking#: 10-00080
Release Date & Time:
DOB: 4/6/1974 -  RACE: W  -  SEX: M
Charges       Misd/Felony   Degree   Bond   Bond Posted
948.06-   PROB VIOLATION    N   N    $0.00    
                $0.00    
http://public.pcso.us/jail/bookingDetails.aspx?SYSID=758329&IMG=58335
Logged

Heart
cookie
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15663



« Reply #1350 on: January 07, 2010, 02:28:53 PM »

My eyes!! My eyes! ^^^^^^ Heart!
Logged

Heart
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7717



« Reply #1351 on: January 07, 2010, 02:56:44 PM »

My eyes!! My eyes! ^^^^^^ Heart!
Hes looking for you cookie.  And only you!   
Logged

Heart
mymonkey
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2433



« Reply #1352 on: January 07, 2010, 03:16:00 PM »

My eyes!! My eyes! ^^^^^^ Heart!
Hes looking for you cookie.  And only you!   


He is a Cummings for sure...they all have that chit eating grin 
Logged

no rose colored glasses
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 45869


Zoe you will always be in my heart and soul


« Reply #1353 on: January 07, 2010, 03:18:51 PM »

My eyes!! My eyes! ^^^^^^ Heart!
Hes looking for you cookie.  And only you!   


He is a Cummings for sure...they all have that chit eating grin 
  Is that a step brother of Ron's, or an uncle or cousin?
Logged
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #1354 on: January 07, 2010, 03:22:26 PM »

My eyes!! My eyes! ^^^^^^ Heart!
Hes looking for you cookie.  And only you!   


He is a Cummings for sure...they all have that chit eating grin 
Monkey Devil!

LoL~I thought the same thing.......a real smirk (chit eating of course!)
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
islandmonkey
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10379


HaLeigh~you are loved and in God's loving arms


« Reply #1355 on: January 07, 2010, 03:33:03 PM »

Jersey , Penny, NRCG etc........I have been feeling lately like we have come full circle again. I felt the way I do now just as I did in the beginning and went back and found this blog that put my EVERY thought and feeling into a nice neat package and if you'll notice it echoes much of what we've posted lately

 

Eyes for Lies
The Human Lie Detector Blog

One of the real "naturals" as depicted on "Lie to Me"





Sunday, February 15, 2009
Ronald Cummings, Misty Croslin and Little Haleigh
Many, many, many of you have asked me to review the case of missing Haleigh Cummings. She went missing last Monday night from her home, and hasn't been seen or found since. Haleigh's father, Ronald Cummings, and his girlfriend, Misty Croslin, tell us that Croslin put Haleigh to sleep, later went to sleep herself, and when she woke up to use the bathroom in the middle of the night, she found the kitchen light on, Haleigh was gone, and the back door was wide open, propped by a brick.

Read moreWhen I watch Cummings and Croslin speak, many things jump out at me. They are so numerous, I don't have the space here to write them all out, but I will identify a few things I've noted:

When I first saw Ronald Cummings crying in his first plea for his daughter, several things jumped out at me. His crying episode was eerily reminiscent of a child's cry. Most adults don't cry like children. He whined, and acted out of breath, yet he wasn't. It was notable and perplexing.

Yet he did sound truly congested; however, no tears fell from his face. Later on, however, he did cry very genuine and sincere tears, and the pouting cry notably changes into a regular cry. I find his behavior inconsistent here, and I can't explain it. Is he under the influence of something? He seems really glassy-eyed.


I am also immediately struck by how he portrays no composure of hope in this interview. He seems to have zero hope that his daughter could still be alive. Why isn't he hanging onto the fact that if he and others get out there, they can potentially find her? This disturbs me.


Why isn't he talking to his daughter on camera? "Haleigh, I'm here for you, if you are watching this. I'm going to find you." Does he even think about her being out there, and watching the news? Why isn't he thinking about being strong for her?

When I see this interview, it seems to be more about Cummings being devastated than finding Haleigh. It's like he is feeling sorry for himself. Why? This is odd. Haleigh's mom, ironically, does talk to her daughter on camera, as I would expect any parent would, if they feared their daughter was kidnapped. She says, "Everybody's here for you. If you're watching these, your momma misses you, daddy misses you ... your whole family misses you and we will bring you home" (source).


At time marker 1:15, Cummings drops down to the ground crying. This is so unusual for an adult to do. Children do this, but how many adults have you seen do this? Especially when the news is not conclusively devastating yet? How come everyone else who loved Haleigh is so composed and acting "normally", but Cummings is not? Here his cry is very shallow. It's not believable for me. If I re-look at this with the angle that Cummings could befeeling sorry for himself, it makes more sense.

He says, "I know somebody took my little girl...some sorry piece of trash that will be wasted when it's all over." This is baffling to me. Haleigh was once found floating in a nearby waterway and nearly drowned, so how could he so conclusively rule this out? How can he so confidently rule out that Haleigh didn't wander away, that he didn't lock the door as he thought he did, that when Croslin's relatives came to visit earlier that night, that they didn't unlock another door or open a window when he was away?

Would you as a parent be so certain about this, especially since you know your daughter wandered away before? This bothers me.


At one point, Cummings says, "All I want is my children…All I want is my child back.” I thought this was very unusual. Another day, he talks about how others are making this situation all about a custody issue. That was really strange, but if we pair that, with this statement above, you have to wonder, is he afraid he won't have either of his children, perhaps, due to something he has done here? Then this strange slip might actually make sense, wouldn't it?


Then he says something that unnerved me in a huge way. Cummings says, "I’d give my life for my child’s life back.”

What? Why is he saying this? It makes no sense. Is that why his cry is so confusing? Does he fake concern and worry, and then really cry over what he may know already happened to his daughter? You would think he would have said instead, "I'd give my life for my child back", but that is NOT what he says. Does this indicate that he believes his daughter is not alive? Is that why he thought earlier, "All I want is my children..." because he fears if the truth comes out, he will lose them, or at least his remaining son?

It's troubling, to say the least.


Notice how Cummings reiterates that he is trying to do the best he can, that someone stole his child while he was at work? Is he building an alibi? Setting a timeline? Why isn't he focusing his energy on getting Haleigh back instead of feeling sorry for himself? Most parents of missing children are focused on getting their children, and don't care at all about themselves, but Cummings is notably different. Most parents know they have to be strong for their children, and work to bring them home. Why not Cummings?


The reporter then asks, "Can I ask when you noticed the back door was open, and if that was what kind of alerted you to something?" Just before the reporter asks Cummings this, he is crying, sobbing and somber. Then listen to Cummings' response to the question. His demeanor and voice change dramatically. It's very notable and very alarming for me. You don't stop crying and change your entire demeanor when you are deeply sobbing and in pain like Cummings wants us to believe he is. You just don't do it, yet oddly Cummings does. Cummings says in an angry, deep and controlled tone, "No. My girlfriend was awake at 3 o'clock in the morning when I got off of work." When he says this, there is a deep anger in Cummings' voice that appears out of nowhere. It's chilling. Clearly, this question got Cummings angry. Why would that be?

Later in the interview, Cummings says very strangely and out of nowhere, when he deeply sobs, "I do plan to take the trash out when it is time." This blindsides you. It's not related to anything being said at the time. It's like Cummings is in his own world. I am sure like most people, at first you think, what is he talking about?? It's absolutely perplexing.

But when I watch him say it and watch his emotions, he shows pure destitution in his face. Like someone sold his soul. It's absolutely haunting. I can't help but wonder, is this some type of warning he is contemplating suicide "when it is time"? Perhaps, if he were to get caught?
What else could this statement mean? Is he warning us? Is he under the influence of drugs here and extra emotional? Also, just after he says it, and thinks about it, he also shows true distress and sadness on his face. It's alarming and notable. But when the reporter asks the next question, all of these genuine emotions fade away again.

The reporter asks, what would you say to people who may have information out there? Notice Cummings doesn't even think to talk to his daughter again. Why?


Both Cummings and Croslin's body language in all the videos I see displays a sense of defeat. They are hunched over. Their shoulders come forward. They physically look down, and act subdued. It appears they have no hope whatsoever, again and again, that Cummings' daughter will be returned to them. This strikes me as very odd. Why aren't they tense, nervous and anxious to find her? That would be normal. They should be on edge that things might not happen fast enough, yet there is no urgency with these two. Anyone can spot that? Why aren't these two on a mission to find Haleigh? Compare their behavior to that of George and Cindy Anthony. It's notably different.


News reports say that on the 911 call, Cummings was in a rage, and really worried about his daughter. I don't hear that in the call at all. I don't hear any indication of fear, stress or true and genuine alarm. I hear feigned anger, by his threats and choice of words.


Why did Croslin wait 30 minutes from waking up and finding Haleigh missing to alert someone of the possible abduction? Why didn't she summon for help earlier? Especially since she knows Haleigh once wandered off and nearly drowned before?


What predator is going to go into a house late at night, and risk taking one child out of a room full of people? Let's say Haleigh wandered outside; there should have been some proof of a door unlocked or something, but Cummings and Croslin deny that. They, instead, tell us that the door where the predator went out, had to be forced closed, that Haleigh couldn't open it, and couldn't reach the deadbolt. This tells us that the door likely stuck when you opened or closed it. That would likely mean the door made a fair amount of noise to open and close it, and it took some effort to open it, right? What predator would use that door?

What predator would turn on a light in the kitchen, risk announcing himself and make it possible to be clearly identified by someone in the house or outside? What predator would take the time to bring or find a cinder block, and take the time to prop the door open? How come there are no signs of forced entry into the home? To me, these are highly unlikely or implausible circumstances.


I also haven't seen Cummings or Croslin participate in any searches reported by any news agencies. Have I missed this? I have looked for it several times. Has anyone seen them help in the search? Post fliers, or go look for her themselves? If they haven't, why aren't they?


Cummings and Croslin have told two different stories of where Haleigh slept that night. This is interesting. You would think their stories would be the same. Cummings told Nancy Grace that Croslin slept in the same bed as the children on February 11. Then on February 12, Croslin says that Haleigh was in a different bed in the same room. Why aren't they getting their facts right?

Worse, when they are both on Greta van Susteren's show, Greta asks, "How far was Haleigh physically from you, Misty?" Croslin says, "Probably, like, not three or four inches away." Look at Cummings' eyes when Croslin talks. They are plastered towards Croslin though he doesn't turn his head. It's very controlling behavior. He is fascinating to watch.

Greta then asks Croslin how far they were apart a second time, and at that time, Cummings shakes his head in a side-to-side motion, indicating he is thinking "no". With that, Croslin backtracks and says, "No, um, I'm not sure. It wasn't that far away." Next, as Greta is talking again getting ready to ask another question, Cummings is trying to coach Croslin, and tell her what to say! I can't hear what he is saying, but why does he feel the need to do this? Cummings then says, "No, I know where the beds were at. They were about four feet apart from the edge of the bed she was in to the edge of the bed Haleigh was in."

These two can't even agree where the beds were placed in this room! Forget about who slept in what bed. This is a huge inconsistency. Clearly, both are capable of describing how far two beds are apart, but if the facts aren't true, we wouldn't be surprised to see such a discrepancy, would we?


Earlier on the Greta show, Greta asks Croslin who was closest to the back door: Haleigh or Croslin? Look how long it takes Croslin to answer that. She makes an "Hmmm...I don't know" expression. Why doesn't she know? She should spout the answer off without thought, but she doesn't. She finally answers and when she does, under his breath, Cummings says, "I'd like to comment." He doesn't say what is on his mind because Greta didn't hear him, but it shows he is controlling nonetheless, over and over.

Also in the Greta interview, Cummings says to Croslin, "Look at the camera" at one point. He gives us every indication he has a temper, and is very controlling and manipulative. Cummings also nods his head when hears what Croslin says at points in the interview, as if he approves. He is scrutinizing her every word, and Croslin knows it.

Croslin also keeps saying the same story over and over again. She says something to the effect that she got up, went to the bathroom, found the kitchen light on, and then she went back and found Haleigh was gone. She always finishes it with "That's all I know." I find her memory of that event is quite sparse and lacking. You would think she would remember more detail. When we recollect a story, oftentimes, we remember different details, or thoughts--things we were thinking at the time. Yet Croslin seems to have no "thinking memories" of her experience. It is more like she is talking from rote memory. She only repeats the same thing over and over again.


The same is true for her 911 call. The details are sketchy at best. Her memories don't flow logically. It doesn't make sense.


911: "911, what's your emergency"

Misty Croslin: "Hi...umm...we just woke up...and our back door was wide open, and we can't find our daughter."

We just woke up?

911: "OK, when did you last see her?"

Misty Croslin: "Um, we like just...you know...it was about 10 o'clock... we were...she was sleeping- I ...she?...cleaning...

Why doesn't she have normal recollections here?


I so hope I am wrong for Haleigh's sake. It doesn't look good from where I am sitting now.
Logged

"If two theories explain the facts equally well then the simpler theory is to be preferred''
[
Jerseygirl345
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4752



« Reply #1356 on: January 07, 2010, 03:47:32 PM »

Thanks Im for the article from Eyes For Lies.. 
Logged
penny for your thoughts
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1784



« Reply #1357 on: January 07, 2010, 03:52:31 PM »



DAVID  STEVEN  CUMMINGS
OCALA,  FL
Booking Date & Time: 1/7/2010 1:57:23 PM  - Booking#: 10-00080
Release Date & Time:
DOB: 4/6/1974 -  RACE: W  -  SEX: M
Charges       Misd/Felony   Degree   Bond   Bond Posted
948.06-   PROB VIOLATION    N   N    $0.00    
                $0.00    
http://public.pcso.us/jail/bookingDetails.aspx?SYSID=758329&IMG=58335
he just made me giggle
 
Logged
ospainter
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1934


Grandson in Ireland


« Reply #1358 on: January 07, 2010, 03:55:03 PM »

I went back to the archives of our posts last night, interesting.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4523.0



Logged

It's their lie they can tell it anyway they want.
Who, What, Where, When, How and Why
Jerseygirl345
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4752



« Reply #1359 on: January 07, 2010, 03:59:19 PM »

Then we have the blankets.. We dont know if they were washed or not . I have read they were not because dirty clothes were found in the dryer.. No detergent. There was supposed to be a blanket of Misty in the van when was she in the van as on her 3 day, drug, sexapade, no sleep bender she was escorted around with WBG and her drug friends- (Brooks and Prevatt).

So were any blankets found that had pee on them? Maybe there were no blankets with pee on them because according to the Sheffield Haleigh did not wet the bed when they had her over to their home.. Is there a blanket missing and was there a blanket put back on the window.. 
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 7.575 seconds with 19 queries.