Haleigh Marie Cummings #37 5/24/10 - 7/15/10

[Wyks]

Yes, Marie Griffis was married to him at one time.

This one is Jr. ....  She I believe was married to Sr. ...

Thanks Grama!

[Wyks]

Well, this naughty JJ Jr. violated his probation. 

Course, it's hecka easy to violate probation in this day and age.  My bad bad boy violated his just by tossing an empty McD's bag in a random garbage can on the street. 

http://public.pcso.us/jail/bookingDetails.aspx?SYSID=761235&IMG=29877

[Jerseygirl345]

Details:

UCN: 542010CF000145XXAXMX
File Date: 2010-01-21 Judge: TERRY J LARUE   
Defense Atty: SHOEMAKER, TERRY J 

Defendant
CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES 
Alias


Date # Docket Description
2010-01-21 1 COMPLAINT - PCSO DET. T CAMPBELL (1/13/10) 

2010-01-21 1 BOOKING NUMBER: N/A 

2010-01-21 1 TRAFFICKING IN HYDROCODONE MORE THAN 14 GRAMS LESS 

2010-01-21 1 THAN 28 GRAMS 

2010-01-21 2 WARRANT ISSUED - BOND SET AT $150,000.00 

2010-01-22 3 ARREST REPORT - 1/20/2010 

2010-01-22 3 BOOKING NUMBER: 10-00276 

2010-01-22 3 BOND SET AT $150,000.00 

2010-01-22 4 ORDER TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT TO FLAGLER COUNTY 

2010-01-22 4 FROM PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA 

2010-01-22 5 MOTION FOR PRODUCTION AND DISCLOSURE OF SOURCE 

2010-01-22 5 OF BAIL PREMIUM AND COLLATERAL PRIOR TO DEFENDANTS 

2010-01-22 5 RELEASE ON BAIL (NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-01-22 6 ORDER REQUIRING PRODUCTION AND DISCLOSURE OF 

2010-01-22 6 SOURCE OF BAIL PREMIUM AND COLLATERAL (NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-01-22 6 PRIOR TO DEFENDANTS RELEASE ON BAIL 

2010-01-22 7 FELONY WARRANT RETURNED EXECUTED 

2010-02-03 8 INFORMATION - TRAFFICKING IN HYDROCODONE (14G - 28G) 

2010-02-03 9 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE FOR TRIAL 

2010-02-05 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FILED BY: TERRY J SHOEMAKER 

2010-02-05 11 NOTICE OF DISCOVERY 

2010-02-09 12 ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE 

2010-02-10 13 STATE'S DISCOVERY EXHIBIT 

2010-02-10 14 WITNESS LIST 

2010-02-10 15 DEMAND FOR RECIPROCAL DISCLOSURE 

2010-02-11 16 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (02-18-2010) IN JAIL 

2010-02-11 17 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY (02-18-2010) 

2010-02-17 18 WAIVER OF ARRAIGNMENT,PLEA OF NOT GUILTY,AND DEMAND 

2010-02-17 18 FOR JURY TRIAL FILED BY: TERRY J SHOEMAKER (FAX) 

2010-02-18 19 ORDER SETTING CASE FOR PRETRIAL 03/31/2010 

2010-02-19 20 WAIVER OF ARRAIGNMENT,PLEA OF NOT GUILTY,AND DEMAND 

2010-02-19 20 FOR JURY TRIAL FILED BY: TERRY J SHOEMAKER (ORIGINAL) 

2010-02-23 21 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (03-31-2010) IN JAIL 

2010-02-23 22 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY (03-31-2010) 

2010-03-03 23 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY / WITNESS LIST 

2010-03-17 24 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY 

2010-03-31 25 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY TERRY J SHOEMAKER 

2010-03-31 25 ON MOTION OF DEFENSE COUNSEL, COURT ORDERED CASE 

2010-03-31 25 CONTINUED TO 05/13/2010 

2010-04-07 26 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (05-13-2010) IN JAIL 

2010-04-07 27 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY (05-13-2010) 

2010-04-26 28 MOTION TO REDUCE BOND 

2010-05-06 29 NOTICE OF HEARING SET ON 05/07/2010 AT 2:30 PM 

2010-05-06 29 MOTION TO REDUCE BOND 

2010-05-06 30 NOTICE OF HEARING SET ON 05/07/2010 AT 2:00 PM 

2010-05-06 30 STATE'S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION AND DISCLOSURE OF SOURCE 

2010-05-06 30 OF BAIL PREMIUM AND COLLATERAL PRIOR TO DEFENDANT'S 

2010-05-06 30 RELEASE ON BAIL (NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-05-07 31 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING 

2010-05-07 32 NOTICE OF HEARING SET ON 05/07/2010 AT 2:00 PM 

2010-05-07 32 ISSUED TO: TERRY J SHOEMAKER 

2010-05-07 33 NOTICE OF HEARING SET ON 05/07/2010 AT 2:30 PM 

2010-05-07 33 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REDUCE BOND 

2010-05-10 34 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING (FAX) 

2010-05-10 35 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING (ORIGINAL) 

2010-05-11 36 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING 

2010-05-13 37 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY TERRY J SHOEMAKER 

2010-05-13 37 STATE AND DEFENSE ANNOUNCED READY FOR TRIAL 

2010-05-13 37 CASE SET FOR JURY TRIAL 07/19/2010 

2010-05-13 38 ORDER SETTING TRIAL 07/19/2010 

2010-05-28 39 LETTER FROM ANNETTE SYKES 

2010-06-07 40 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (07-19-2010) 

2010-06-07 41 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY (07-19-2010) 


What happened to the plea day court date?

http://www.putnam-fl.com/clk_apps/crim_dkts/frame.php

[Jerseygirl345]

UCN: 542010CF000144XXAXMX
File Date: 2010-01-21 Judge: TERRY J LARUE   
Defense Atty: SHOEMAKER, TERRY J 

Defendant
CUMMINGS, RONALD LEMYLES 
Alias


Date # Docket Description
2010-01-21 1 COMPLAINT - PCSO DET. T CAMPBELL (1/14/10) 

2010-01-21 1 BOOKING NUMBER: N/A 

2010-01-21 1 TRAFFICKING IN HYDROCODONE MORE THAN 28 GRAMS 

2010-01-21 2 WARRANT ISSUED - BOND SET AT $250,000.00 

2010-01-22 3 ARREST REPORT - 1/20/2010 

2010-01-22 3 BOOKING NUMBER: 10-00276 

2010-01-22 3 BOND SET AT $250,000.00 

2010-01-22 4 ORDER TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT TO FLAGLER COUNTY 

2010-01-22 4 FROM PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA 

2010-01-22 5 MOTION FOR PRODUCTION AND DISCLOSURE OF SOURCE OF 

2010-01-22 5 BAIL PREMIUM AND COLLATERAL PRIOR TO DEFENDANTS 

2010-01-22 5 RELEASE ON BAIL (NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-01-22 6 ORDER REQUIRING PRODUCTION AND DISCLOSURE OF SOURCE 

2010-01-22 6 OF BAIL PREMIUM AND COLLATERAL (NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-01-22 6 PRIOR TO DEFENDANTS RELEASE ON BAIL 

2010-01-22 7 ORDER TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT TO FLAGLER COUNTY 

2010-01-22 7 FROM PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA 

2010-01-22 8 MOTION FOR PROTECTION AND DISCLOSURE OF SOURCE 

2010-01-22 8 OF BAIL PREMIUM AND COLLATERAL PRIOR TO DEFENDANTS 

2010-01-22 8 RELEASE ON BAIL (NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-01-22 9 ORDER REQUIRING PRODUCTION AND DISCLOSURE OF SOURCE 

2010-01-22 9 OF BAIL PREMIUM AND COLLATERAL (NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-01-22 9 PRIOR TO DEFENDANTS RELEASE ON BAIL 

2010-01-22 10 FELONY WARRANT RETURNED EXECUTED 

2010-02-03 11 INFORMATION - TRAFFICKING IN HYDROCODONE (28G - 30KG) 

2010-02-03 12 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE FOR TRIAL 

2010-02-05 13 NOTICE OF APPEARNCE FILED BY: TERRY J SHOEMAKER 

2010-02-05 14 NOTICE OF DISCOVERY 

2010-02-09 15 ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE 

2010-02-10 16 STATE'S DISCOVERY EXHIBIT 

2010-02-10 17 WITNESS LIST 

2010-02-10 18 DEMAND FOR RECIPROCAL DISCLOSURE 

2010-02-11 19 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (02-18-2010) IN JAIL 

2010-02-11 20 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY (02-18-2010) 

2010-02-17 21 WAIVER OF ARRAIGNMENT,PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, AND DEMAND 

2010-02-17 21 FOR JURY TRIAL FILED BY: TERRY J SHOEMAKER (FAX) 

2010-02-18 22 ORDER SETTING CASE FOR PRETRIAL 03/31/2010 

2010-02-19 23 WAIVER OF ARRAIGNMENE,PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, AND DEMAND 

2010-02-19 23 FOR JURY TRIAL FILED BY: TERRY J SHOEMAKER (ORIGINAL) 

2010-02-23 24 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (03-31-2010) IN JAIL 

2010-02-23 25 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY (03-31-2010) 

2010-03-03 26 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY / WITNESS LIST 

2010-03-17 27 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY 

2010-03-29 28 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY / WITNESS LIST 

2010-03-31 29 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY TERRY J SHOEMAKER 

2010-03-31 29 ON MOTION OF DEFENSE COUNSEL, COURT ORDERED CASE 

2010-03-31 29 CONTINUED TO 05/13/2010 

2010-04-07 30 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (05-13-2010) IN JAIL 

2010-04-07 31 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY (05-13-2010) 

2010-04-26 32 MOTION TO REDUCE BOND 

2010-05-06 33 NOTICE OF HEARING SET ON 05/07/2010 AT 2:30 PM 

2010-05-06 33 MOTION TO REDUCE BOND 

2010-05-06 34 NOTICE OF HEARING SET ON 05/07/2010 AT 2:00 PM 

2010-05-06 34 STATE'S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION AND DISCLOSURE OF SOURCE 

2010-05-06 34 OF BAIL PREMIUM AND COLLATERAL PRIOR TO DEFENDANT'S 

2010-05-06 34 RELEASE ON BAIL (NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-05-07 35 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING (FAX)(BOND HEARING) 

2010-05-10 36 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING(FAX)(NEBBIA HEARING) 

2010-05-10 37 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING (ORIGINAL)(NEBBIA) 

2010-05-10 38 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING (ORIGINAL)(BOND) 

2010-05-13 39 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY TERRY J SHOEMAKER 

2010-05-13 39 STATE AND DEFENSE ANNOUNCED READY FOR TRIAL 

2010-05-13 39 CASE SET FOR JURY TRIAL 07/19/2010 

2010-05-13 40 ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE 07/19/2010 AND LAST CHANCE 

2010-05-13 40 PLEA DAY 07/09/2010 

2010-05-21 41 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (07-19-2010) IN JAIL 

2010-05-21 42 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY (07-19-2010) 

2010-05-28 43 LETTER FROM ANNETTE SYKES 


Hmm I see the plea day on 7/09 is for the higher amounts of grams..

[Heart]

Speaking after a hearing before Circuit Judge Terry LaRue in Palatka Thursday morning, attorney Terry Shoemaker said Cummings, 26, will likely agree to plead to three of five charges. Each of those three charges carries a minimum mandatory prison sentence of 15 years. A judge could order them to be served concurrently for a total of 15 years in prison

I noticed of the 5 dockets:

542010CF000144XXAXMX    2010-01-21   28 grams
542010CF000145XXAXMX    2010-01-21   14 grams or less
542010CF000146XXAXMX      2010-01-21   14 grams
542010CF000253XXAXMX    2010-02-03   14-28 grams
542010CF000254XXAXMX    2010-02-03   28-30 grams

Two of the five charges -- involving trafficking in larger amounts of prescription drugs -- carry a minimum sentence of 25 years. Shoemaker said the tentative deal in the works involves dropping the two more severe charges.

The plea deal might be completed by July 1, he said. Cummings would agree to testify against his co-defendants and would be sentenced after those cases went to trial.

more...
http://www.ocala.com/article/20100513/articles/100519854?tc=ar

[Heart]

Speaking after a hearing before Circuit Judge Terry LaRue in Palatka Thursday morning, attorney Terry Shoemaker said Cummings, 26, will likely agree to plead to three of five charges. Each of those three charges carries a minimum mandatory prison sentence of 15 years. A judge could order them to be served concurrently for a total of 15 years in prison

I noticed of the 5 dockets:

542010CF000144XXAXMX    2010-01-21   MORE THAN 28 GRAMS
542010CF000145XXAXMX    2010-01-21   MORE THAN 14 GRAMS LESS
   THAN 28 GRAMS 
542010CF000146XXAXMX      2010-01-21   (14G-28G)
542010CF000253XXAXMX    2010-02-03   (14G-28G)
542010CF000254XXAXMX    2010-02-03   (28G-30KG)

Two of the five charges -- involving trafficking in larger amounts of prescription drugs -- carry a minimum sentence of 25 years. Shoemaker said the tentative deal in the works involves dropping the two more severe charges.

The plea deal might be completed by July 1, he said. Cummings would agree to testify against his co-defendants and would be sentenced after those cases went to trial.

more...
http://www.ocala.com/article/20100513/articles/100519854?tc=ar

[GramaMonkey]

Well, this naughty JJ Jr. violated his probation. 

Course, it's hecka easy to violate probation in this day and age.  My bad bad boy violated his just by tossing an empty McD's bag in a random garbage can on the street. 

http://public.pcso.us/jail/bookingDetails.aspx?SYSID=761235&IMG=29877

Johnny Jack ... is ONE BAD BOY....

Defendant
LAURAMORE, JOHNNY JACK JR 
Alias
LAURAMORE, JACK JOHNNIE 


Date # Docket Description
2007-07-19 1 COMPLAINT - PCSO DET. RON FRANK (6/15/07) 

2007-07-19 1 BURGLARY UNOCCUPIED STRUCTURE 

2007-07-19 1 GRAND THEFT 

2007-07-19 2 WARRANT ISSUED - BOND SET AT $1504.00 CT. I 

2007-07-19 2 BOND SET AT $1504.00 CT. II 

2007-07-20 3 ARREST REPORT - 7-19-2007 

2007-07-20 3 BOND SET AT $1504.00 CT 1 $1504.00 CT 2 

2007-07-20 4 DEFENDANT PRESENT FOR FIRST APPEARANCE HRG 

2007-07-20 4 ADJ INS P D APPOINTED FOR FIRST APPEARANCE ONLY 

2007-07-20 4 SUFFICIENT PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND 

2007-07-20 4 $3008.00 SECURED BOND SET 

2007-07-20 5 AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY 

2007-07-20 6 APPLICATION AND ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER 

2007-07-20 7 FELONY WARRANT RETURNED EXECUTED 

2007-08-29 8 INFORMATION 

2007-08-29 8 BURGLARY OF A STRUCTURE OR CONVEYANCE 

2007-08-29 8 GRAND THEFT 

2007-09-04 9 ARRAIGNMENT MINUTES: DEFT PRESENT, SWORN, ARRAIGNED, 

2007-09-04 9 PUBLIC DEFENDER APPOINTED, ENTERED PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, 

2007-09-04 9 SET FOR PRE TRIAL 10/17/2007. 

2007-09-04 10 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS 

2007-09-04 10 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED INDIGENT 

2007-09-04 10 $40.00 APPLICATION FEE IMPOSED 

2007-09-04 11 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER 

2007-09-04 12 ORDER SETTING CASE FOR PRETRIAL 10/17/2007 

2007-09-12 13 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (10-17-2007) IN JAIL 

2007-09-24 14 NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION 

2007-10-15 15 SCORESHEET FILED 

2007-10-17 16 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY GEORGE BECKUS 

2007-10-17 16 W/D FORMER PLEA, PLEAD NOLO AS CHARGED TO 

2007-10-17 16 CT I - BURGLARY OF A STRUCTURE OR CONVEYANCE 

2007-10-17 16 CT II - GRAND THEFT 

2007-10-17 16 ADVISED OF MAX PENALTY 5 YRS DOC &/OR $5000 FINE 

2007-10-17 16 ADVISED OF MAX PENALTY 5 YRS DOC &/OR $5000 FINE 

2007-10-17 16 PLEA ACCEPTED, PSI WAIVED, SENTENCING - 

2007-10-17 16 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED GUILTY OF BOTH COUNTS 

2007-10-17 16 CT I - 3 YEARS PROBATION 

2007-10-17 16 88 DAYS PCJ WITH 88 DAYS CREDIT TO RUN 

2007-10-17 16 CONCURRENTLY WITH 07-1180CFMA52 

2007-10-17 16 CT II - 3 YEARS PROBATION 

2007-10-17 16 88 DAYS PCJ WITH 88 DAYS CREDIT TO RUN 

2007-10-17 16 CONCURRENTLY WITH 07-1366CFMA52 CT I 

2007-10-17 16 $370 COURT COST 

2007-10-17 16 $425.00 RESTITUTION TO CHARLES LABAR 

2007-10-17 16 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: DRUG EVALUTION 

2007-10-22 18 ORDER OF PROBATION 

2007-11-01 19 JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE - ENT MIN CIR CT BK PG 

2007-11-01 20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AS TO JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE 

2007-12-17 21 AFFIDAVIT: VIOLATION OF PROBATION 

2007-12-17 21 CT 1: BURGLARY OF STRUCTURE OR CONVEYANCE 

2007-12-17 21 CT 2: GRAND THEFT 

2007-12-17 22 WARRANT FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION ISSUED 

2007-12-17 22 BOND SET AT NONE 

2008-01-07 23 REARREST REPORT - VIOLATION OF PROBATION 1-4-2008 

2008-01-07 23 BOND SET AT NONE 

2008-01-07 24 DEFENDANT PRESENT FOR FIRST APPEARANCE HRG 

2008-01-07 24 ADJ INS P D APPOINTED FOR FIRST APPEARANCE ONLY 

2008-01-07 24 SUFFICIENT PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND 

2008-01-07 24 BOND SET AT NONE 

2008-01-07 25 AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY 

2008-01-07 26 APPLICATION AND ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER 

2008-01-07 27 WARRANT FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION RETURNED EXECUTED 

2008-01-08 28 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (01-24-2008) IN JAIL 

2008-01-24 29 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS 

2008-01-24 29 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED INDIGENT 

2008-01-24 29 $40.00 APPLICATION FEE IMPOSED 

2008-01-24 30 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER 

2008-01-24 31 VOP ARR MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY GEORGE BECKUS 

2008-01-24 31 ARR ENT PLEA OF NOLO TO VOP #1,5 

2008-01-24 31 PLEA ACCEPTED, SENTENCED AS FOLLOWS: 

2008-01-24 31 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED GUILTY OF VOP 

2008-01-24 31 PROBATION CONVERTED TO DRUG OFFENDER PROBATION 

2008-01-24 31 ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS CARRIED OVER 

2008-01-24 32 FINGERPRINTS OF DEFENDANT 

2008-01-24 33 ORDER OF REVOCATION OF PROBATION 

2008-06-19 34 AFFIDAVIT: VIOLATION OF DRUG OFFENDER PROBATION 

2008-06-19 34 BURGLARY OF A STRUCTURE OR CONVEYANCE 

2008-06-19 34 GRAND THEFT 

2008-06-19 35 WARRANT FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION ISSUED 

2008-06-19 35 BOND SET AT NO BOND 

2008-09-09 36 REARREST REPORT - VIOLATION OF PROBATION 

2008-09-09 36 ARREST DATE:09/08/2008 

2008-09-09 37 DEFENDANT PRESENT FOR FIRST APPEARANCE HRG 

2008-09-09 37 ADJ INS P D APPOINTED FOR FIRST APPEARANCE ONLY 

2008-09-09 37 SUFFICIENT PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND 

2008-09-09 37 BOND SET AT NO BOND 

2008-09-09 38 AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY 

2008-09-09 39 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR 1ST APP HEARING 

2008-09-09 40 WARRANT FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION RETURNED EXECUTED 

2008-09-18 41 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (10-17-2008) IN JAIL 

2008-10-17 42 AFFIDAVIT FOR CRIMINAL INDIGENT STATUS 

2008-10-17 43 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER 

2008-10-17 44 VOP ARRAIGNMENT MINUTES: DEFT PRES, P D APPOINTED 

2008-10-17 44 ARRAIGNED,ENTERED PLEA OF NOLO TO VOP CONDITIONS 

2008-10-17 44 #1, 15A, AND 17C 

2008-10-17 44 ADVISED OF MAX PENALTY 5 YRS DOC &/OR $5000 FINE 

2008-10-17 44 ADVISED OF MAX PENALTY 5 YRS DOC &/OR $5000 FINE 

2008-10-17 44 PLEA ACCEPTED, PSI WAIVED, SENTENCING - 

2008-10-17 44 DEFENDANT ADJUDGED GUILTY OF VOP 

2008-10-17 44 COURT ORDERED PROBATION REVOKED 

2008-10-17 44 9 MONTHS PCJ WITH 149 DAYS CREDIT 

2008-10-17 44 CT II CONCURRENT WITH CT I 

2008-10-17 44 ALL COSTS ENTERED AS A CIVIL LIEN 

2008-10-17 45 ORDER OF REVOCATION OF DRUG OFFENDER PROBATION 

2008-10-21 46 DEFENDANT'S REMAINING MONETARY OBLIGATIONS PER 

2008-11-03 47 JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE - INST # 

2008-11-03 48 CHARGES, COSTS, AND FEES ASSOCIATED WITH SENTENCE 

2008-11-03 48 INST #200854661819 

2008-11-03 49 RESTITUTION ORDER - $425.00 TO CHARLES LABAR 

2008-11-03 49 INST #200854661823 

2008-11-04 50 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AS TO JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE 

2008-12-05 51 DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR REDUCTION OR MODIFICATION 

2008-12-05 51 OF SENTENCE 

2008-12-18 52 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REDUCTION OR MODIFICATION OF 

2008-12-18 52 SENTENCE 

JOHNNY JACK LAURAMORE
SATSUMA, FL
Booking Date & Time: 12/18/2009 12:42:46 AM - Booking#: 09-05169
Release Date & Time:
DOB: 9/13/1984 - RACE: W - SEX: M


Charges Misd/Felony Degree Bond Bond Posted
948.06- PROB VIOLATION N N $504.00
948.06- PROB VIOLATION N N $504.00
$1,008.00

[trimmonthelake]

http://www.wesh.com/news/23827387/detail.html
Croslin To Appear At Pre-Trial Hearing
Ronald Cummings' Ex-Wife Last Person To See Missing Girl Haleigh

POSTED: 6:27 am EDT June 8, 2010
UPDATED: 6:37 am EDT June 8, 2010
WINTER PARK, Fla. --
One of the key figures in a local missing child case will head to court Tuesday for a pre-trial hearing on drug trafficking charges.

Misty Croslin was the last known person to see Haleigh Cummings before she disappeared last year.

She is accused of trafficking prescription drugs.

Croslin's trial date is set for Aug. 23.

[Heart]

Thanks trim for the article on MC's pretrial!

[Heart]

Misty Croslin's drug trials set for same day St. Augustine and Palatka

By Cindy Swirko
Staff writer

Published: Tuesday, June 8, 2010 at 2:17 p.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, June 8, 2010 at 2:17 p.m.

ST. AUGUSTINE - A judge in St. Johns County scheduled Misty Croslin's trial on a drug trafficking charge for Aug. 23 - the same date as her drug trial in Putnam County.

Croslin, 18, the woman who was baby-sitting 5-year-old Haleigh Cummings at their Satsuma home in February 2009 when the girl was reported missing, faces seven counts in Putnam County. Those charges, like the charge in St. Johns County, resulted from an undercover operation.

The Patatka trial date was set there on Thursday, June 3.

During the hearing Tuesday in St. Augustine, neither defense attorney Robert Fields nor the prosecutor mentioned the apparent scheduling conflict to Circuit Judge Wendy Berger.

http://www.gainesville.com/article/20100608/ARTICLES/100609483/1002

[trimmonthelake]

Heart,thank you for the update!Today has been very challenging!

Prayers for Haleigh

[Heart]

Defendant Attorneys
CROSLIN, MISTY JANETTE FIELDS, ROBERT M
CROSLIN CUMMINGS, MISTY JANETTE (Alias)
CUMMINGS, MISTY JANETTE (Alias)
Charges: Disposition:
TRAFFICKING IN OXYCODONE (28 G - 30 KG) (893.135 1c1c) (N/A)
Case Number Party Type Charge Case Status Disposition Fees Due Next Court Event
Date Event Judge Location Result
8/23/2010 9:00:00 AM FELONY HEARING BERGER, WENDY W Courtroom 328
8/17/2010 9:00:00 AM FELONY DOCKET CALL BERGER, WENDY W Courtroom 328
6/8/2010 1:30:00 PM FELONY PRETRIAL BERGER, WENDY W Courtroom 328 CONTINUED
4/6/2010 1:30:00 PM FELONY PRETRIAL BERGER, WENDY W Courtroom 328 CONTINUED
3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM FELONY ARRAIGNMENT BERGER, WENDY W Courtroom 328 PLEA FILED


http://doris.clk.co.st-johns.fl.us/c...&caseid=192668

[Heart]

Misty Cummings Quiet In Pretrial Hearing
Ex-Stepmom Of Missing Girl Facing 8 Drug Trafficking Charges

POSTED: Tuesday, June 8, 2010
UPDATED: 3:59 pm EDT June 8, 2010

ST. JOHNS COUNTY, Fla. -- Misty Cummings didn't say anything at all Tuesday when she appeared in a St. Johns County courtroom, where she's facing one of eight drug trafficking charges.

The other seven charges are in Putnam County.

Cummings is slated to stand trail in Palatka on all the charges at the end of August. That is, unless she makes a plea deal by the Aug. 16 deadline.

"I think the drug charges pretty much was a set up," Cummings' father, Hank Croslin Sr., told Channel 4 last week. "Misty or (Hank Croslin Jr.) wasn't drug traffickers. They just was middlemen runners. (Police) have not got none of the drug dealers out there. They just went after Misty and (Hank). It was nothing about the drugs. It was about (missing 6-year-old) Haleigh (Cummings)."

Croslin Sr. said his daughter isn't guilty of these charges, even though investigators released undercover surveillance video they said proves Cummings and her ex-husband, Ronald Cummings, and her brother, Croslin Jr., did, in fact, sell drugs.

Croslin Sr. said the case boils down to the Haleigh homicide investigation, and that investigators are just trying to get information out of Misty Cummings about what could've happened to the Satsuma girl who disappeared in February 2009. Investigators said Misty Cummings was the last person to see Haleigh.

http://www.news4jax.com/news/23831637/detail.html

[Heart]

Putnam County Judge Sets Trial Date for Misty Croslin on Drug Charges

PUTNAM COUNTY, Fla. -- The person considered a central figure in the disappearance of Haleigh Cummings was in court this morning learning when her trial on drug charges will go before a jury.

Misty Croslin was arrested in January on drug charges.

Today in court, Putnam County Court Judge Wendy Berger asked if the prosecution had any offers on the table for her; they do not.

Croslin's trial is now set for Aug. 23. She faces six counts of trafficking in prescription medication.

In February, 2009, Croslin was babysitting her then-boyfriend Ronald Cummings' children, including Haleigh. Croslin said she put the kids to bed, and when she woke up, Haleigh was gone.

Haleigh, 5-years-old at the time, hasn't been seen since.

Investigators have maintained from the beginning that while she may not be a suspect, Croslin knows more than she's letting on about what happened that night.

The search has continued ever since then, but reintensified in April after a tip led investigators to a boat ramp near Haleigh's home in Satsuma. The tip turned up nothing.

Putnam County Sheriff Jeff Hardy has told Haleigh's family that she is most likely dead, but the search will continue.

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/local/news-article.aspx?storyid=157135&catid=3

[Heart]

gngr~snap  posted:

 Has anyone mentioned this?

IMO LINDSY has filed for divorce because as long as she is married to ToC she cannot get assistance from the state.

I realize ToC has not been convicted of anything yet but if he is... it sounds like the entire family(wife and kids) are disqualified because of him. MOO

Some categories of people are not eligible for food stamps regardless of income or need. Non-citizens without a qualified status and those convicted of drug trafficking are not eligible for food stamp benefits.

Disqualifiers:
Applicants who have been convicted of drug trafficking or have a felony warrant out against them are not eligible for Florida food stamps.

Ineligibility Reasons:

People who are convicted of drug trafficking, who are running away from a felony warrant, who break Food Stamp Program rules on purpose, who are noncitizens without a qualified status, and some students in colleges or universities are not eligible for food stamp benefits.

See Page 2: FOOD STAMPS and TEMPORARY CASH ASSISTANCEhttp://www.hrsa.gov/homeless/pa_mate...assist_ess.pdf

http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/programs/...odstamps.shtml


could be the reason why IMO she'd want a divorce... MOO

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5243801&postcount=235

[Heart]

Haleigh Cummings Update: Misty Croslin Back in Court Today

Posted on June 8th, 2010
by Jan Barrett in Society and Culture, crime


The last known person to see little Haleigh Cummings, who is the Florida girl that has been missing since February 10, 2009, was the then babysitter, 17 year old Misty Croslin. Police claim she is not actually considered as a suspect but they definitely think she holds the key to the puzzle they need to solve this crime.

Misty along with her now ex-husband, Ronald Cummings, Misty’s brother, Tommy Croslin, Ronald’s 18 year old cousin, Hope Sykes and Donna Brock were all arrested during an undercover drug bust in Florida in January. Misty is being charged with 8 counts of drug trafficking in Putnam County and St. John’s County.

Hope Sykes plead a no contest plea and everyone was in total shock when the judge sentenced her to 15 years in prison. Now brother, Tommy Croslin has pled no contest and he will receive his sentence next month sometimes. I am sorry to say but it wouldn’t shock me if Tommy is sentenced a bit more than just the three years he keeps saying he expects to serve.

Misty’s court date was set in Putnam County for August 23, 2010 which coincidentally is the same date that a judge set today for her to appear before a jury trial in St. John’s County as well.  Gainesville.com is reporting that neither the defense attorney, Robert Fields not the prosecutor bothered to mention to the judge, Circuit Court Judge Wendy Berger, that the two dates are the same. Fields claims he is waiting on evidence analysis from the Department of Law Enforcement and said he does expect to later ask for a change in the trial date in St. John’s County.

Hank Croslin Sr. is standing by his daughter saying she is not guilty of these charges despite the released surveillance video where she is clearly seen making the deal along with Ronald, Tommy, Hope and Donna Brock.

Hank says all this is because of the Haleigh Cummings investigation. He claims the police are just trying to get more information from Misty about what could have possibly happened to Haleigh when she disappeared that night.

Although I do agree that that is probably why the drug deal came out, I think it will be hard to argue that she is innocent in what she is currently being charged for. It has to be really hard for Hank Sr. to accept this though. I know if it were my two kids involved in this I would have lost my mind by now.

I do hope that all of this has been done for nothing though. I pray that after all these months being behind bars for the drug charges that one of those arrested will finally open up and for once in their life tell the truth here.

I don’t know who is guilty here but I still stick with my theory that NO ONE should be cleared in this until the guilty party is found. No one should be eliminated until we get the truth. I know everyone doesn’t agree with me but I seriously think this. In my eyes no one has been cleared completely yet. I don’t think anyone involved in this case should be able to sit back and relax about not being investigated. I think they all should be drilled over and over again with questions.

Let’s pray we will have an answer soon. I worry sometimes that no one will ever open up about what happened to Haleigh and her case will go unsolved and then the person responsible will go unpunished. Haleigh would never receive the justice she rightfully deserves if that happens and that is so unfair to this adorable little girl. If this happens I do hope the one responsible is cursed with bad luck for the rest of their life. I hope they will be haunted by the memory of what they have done every day that they live. I hope when they wake up in the mornings that Haleigh’s face is the first thing they think about and the last thing they think about when they go to sleep at night. I hope they will suffer from losing their own sanity after what they have done to this child.

God be with you Haleigh Cummings. They say you are no longer with us on this earth but I still can’t let go of that gut feeling that you are still alive out there somewhere. No one knows for sure if you are or not though. If they say it as a fact then that someone must know more about what happened than they are saying and they should speak up about what they know. I do pray that someone will one day soon.

Jan Barrett

http://www.bloggernews.net/124684

[penny for your thoughts]

Misty Croslin's drug trials set for same day St. Augustine and Palatka

By Cindy Swirko
Staff writer

Published: Tuesday, June 8, 2010 at 2:17 p.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, June 8, 2010 at 2:17 p.m.

ST. AUGUSTINE - A judge in St. Johns County scheduled Misty Croslin's trial on a drug trafficking charge for Aug. 23 - the same date as her drug trial in Putnam County.

Croslin, 18, the woman who was baby-sitting 5-year-old Haleigh Cummings at their Satsuma home in February 2009 when the girl was reported missing, faces seven counts in Putnam County. Those charges, like the charge in St. Johns County, resulted from an undercover operation.

The Patatka trial date was set there on Thursday, June 3.

During the hearing Tuesday in St. Augustine, neither defense attorney Robert Fields nor the prosecutor mentioned the apparent scheduling conflict to Circuit Judge Wendy Berger.

http://www.gainesville.com/article/20100608/ARTICLES/100609483/1002

quick question slash thought when you take the stand or offer up info slash mention it yourself you are then allowed to be questioned on the info... like if you were on trial for something on the stand and you mention something about your criminal past you are then liable for all questions asked of such said criminal past even if a judge is not allowing the other case to come iinto play... did they not mention it because if they did then the prosecutor would be able to bring up the other pending trial from case a in case b? hope i explained that right and my motive theory could be off but i don't see why else they wouldn't have mentioned it.. it is very easy to reschedule a trial when you validate why you need to... i just don't get why they wouldn't have done that

[penny for your thoughts]

gngr~snap  posted:

 Has anyone mentioned this?

IMO LINDSY has filed for divorce because as long as she is married to ToC she cannot get assistance from the state.

I realize ToC has not been convicted of anything yet but if he is... it sounds like the entire family(wife and kids) are disqualified because of him. MOO

Some categories of people are not eligible for food stamps regardless of income or need. Non-citizens without a qualified status and those convicted of drug trafficking are not eligible for food stamp benefits.

Disqualifiers:
Applicants who have been convicted of drug trafficking or have a felony warrant out against them are not eligible for Florida food stamps.

Ineligibility Reasons:

People who are convicted of drug trafficking, who are running away from a felony warrant, who break Food Stamp Program rules on purpose, who are noncitizens without a qualified status, and some students in colleges or universities are not eligible for food stamp benefits.

See Page 2: FOOD STAMPS and TEMPORARY CASH ASSISTANCEhttp://www.hrsa.gov/homeless/pa_mate...assist_ess.pdf

http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/programs/...odstamps.shtml


could be the reason why IMO she'd want a divorce... MOO

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5243801&postcount=235

here is my take on that if and i mean if tommy was even on the foodstamps to begin with then that could possibly be true..if he was getting unemployment their food money would not have been much since it was his family that were pros at robbing the system and they liked to take family field trips to court etc they probably did fam trips to the welfare ofc also... the state does not go after baby daddy's for food stamps only cash assistance also it is very likely that welfare was not even aware he was in jail... and if tommy was the head of house hold on food stamps then even if they did know and kick him off they would still give lindsy and kids food stamps.... food stamps and cash assistance are 2 totally diff things... food stamps are very easy to get and keep and not have to ever pay back there are virtually no situations other then too much income that woulg get lindsy and kids denied food stamps... as far as cash assistance you might be on to something i knew a real scumbag that divorced her husb strictly for welfare money and you do have to show welfare that you at least initiated the divorce process (which is exactly what she did only initiated and they will usually pay for the divorce for you) from the deniable other spouse (like too much income drugs or any other reason listed above) if you are legally full blown married to someone then they would have to be on your cash assistance application/case file and if that person was deniable then you are to... food stamps do not work this way at all you could walk in and say your man went out for a pack of butts and never came back and they would believe you
food stamps is the snap program federal check out the eligibilities on this page and you will see lindsy is prob getting $668 a month and will most likely remain so unless she gets at least a $14hr job and works 40 hours a week...
http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/applicant_recipients/eligibility.htm

[GramaMonkey]

Yes, Marie Griffis was married to him at one time.

This one is Jr. ....  She I believe was married to Sr. ...

Thanks Grama!

Most welcome Wyks ... just returning a favor that I am sure you have responded to many requests before.

[Brandi]

gngr~snap  posted:

 Has anyone mentioned this?

IMO LINDSY has filed for divorce because as long as she is married to ToC she cannot get assistance from the state.

I realize ToC has not been convicted of anything yet but if he is... it sounds like the entire family(wife and kids) are disqualified because of him. MOO

Some categories of people are not eligible for food stamps regardless of income or need. Non-citizens without a qualified status and those convicted of drug trafficking are not eligible for food stamp benefits.

Disqualifiers:
Applicants who have been convicted of drug trafficking or have a felony warrant out against them are not eligible for Florida food stamps.

Ineligibility Reasons:

People who are convicted of drug trafficking, who are running away from a felony warrant, who break Food Stamp Program rules on purpose, who are noncitizens without a qualified status, and some students in colleges or universities are not eligible for food stamp benefits.

See Page 2: FOOD STAMPS and TEMPORARY CASH ASSISTANCEhttp://www.hrsa.gov/homeless/pa_mate...assist_ess.pdf

http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/programs/...odstamps.shtml


could be the reason why IMO she'd want a divorce... MOO

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5243801&postcount=235

Very possible, IMO, Heart!