April 26, 2024, 04:57:12 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Lively Case Discussion #579 1/28 - 2/2/2007  (Read 112263 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
SunFreak2
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3251



« Reply #360 on: January 29, 2007, 09:00:51 PM »

Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
So.........this doesn't mean that it can't be heard because of jurisdiction issues? It just means that Beth and Dave are on their own, like they were in New York, in pusuading that the case can be heard in California? And the fact that Kalpoes brought suit in California will aid them in that argument?

Does it mean that the Kalpoes aren't compelled to show up, or do depositions, even if JQK wins the jurisdiction argument? They can basically say "F it, get your default judgement, it means nothing to me,"?

I know, I'm all questions and no answers, but my money's on a monkey knowing the scoop!  Wink


Wouldn't it work both ways?  Couldn't Dr phil  & co say, F' it, get your default judgement.  Now try to get the money out of us - you'll have to come to the USA to get it.  Then Beth & Dave would have jurisdiction as the Kalpoes would be in the USA getting paid.  Then couldn't HT  file an injunction to freeze the award money, until their case is settled? I would assume the law in CA can't enforce payment of the settlement, as OJ has never paid the Browns & Goldman.
Logged
Sleuth
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2088



« Reply #361 on: January 29, 2007, 09:01:11 PM »

Quote from: "klaasend"
Sleuth - you are on their list now?  lol  Laughing


Hopefully I've dropped off by now due to good conduct.   And the good news is that I passed all the polygraph tests in a subsequent job background test  Wink

Another example is once you have participated in a search for a missing child, you get the feel for how the searches are conducted.

I just hope it was Shawn trying to send out smoke signals and not Devlin..
Logged

Check every detail-check it twice. At least check it once. FIND NATALEE
Kat_Gram
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7018



« Reply #362 on: January 29, 2007, 09:05:31 PM »

I read or heard that Devlin did not move into that apartment for about 8 weeks after Shawn went missing. And that Devlin did take some time off from work around that time due to his diabetes. So he told his employer as to why he needed the time off.
..
I can't tell if that is Arlin. The FBI is looking into all those cases in that area.  
..
Devlin used to hunt in and around that area, so he would have a familarity with shacks, cabins and what is secluded or not.
Logged
bleachedblack
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7607



« Reply #363 on: January 29, 2007, 09:07:27 PM »

Evening Monkeys, just getting started reading...looks like it's been pretty lively in here today.  Smile
Logged

".......O you who love clear edges
more than anything ......    watch the edges that blur"
Sleuth
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2088



« Reply #364 on: January 29, 2007, 09:10:52 PM »

Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
So.........this doesn't mean that it can't be heard because of jurisdiction issues? It just means that Beth and Dave are on their own, like they were in New York, in pusuading that the case can be heard in California? And the fact that Kalpoes brought suit in California will aid them in that argument?

Does it mean that the Kalpoes aren't compelled to show up, or do depositions, even if JQK wins the jurisdiction argument? They can basically say "F it, get your default judgement, it means nothing to me,"?

I know, I'm all questions and no answers, but my money's on a monkey knowing the scoop!  Wink


Wouldn't it work both ways?  Couldn't Dr phil  & co say, F' it, get your default judgement.  Now try to get the money out of us - you'll have to come to the USA to get it.  Then Beth & Dave would have jurisdiction as the Kalpoes would be in the USA getting paid.  Then couldn't HT  file an injunction to freeze the award money, until their case is settled? I would assume the law in CA can't enforce payment of the settlement, as OJ has never paid the Browns & Goldman.


Looks like questions for Cat.  
Cat is probably off chasing a mouse.  Meow, Meow.

Logged

Check every detail-check it twice. At least check it once. FIND NATALEE
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #365 on: January 29, 2007, 09:12:27 PM »

Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
So.........this doesn't mean that it can't be heard because of jurisdiction issues? It just means that Beth and Dave are on their own, like they were in New York, in pusuading that the case can be heard in California? And the fact that Kalpoes brought suit in California will aid them in that argument?

Does it mean that the Kalpoes aren't compelled to show up, or do depositions, even if JQK wins the jurisdiction argument? They can basically say "F it, get your default judgement, it means nothing to me,"?

I know, I'm all questions and no answers, but my money's on a monkey knowing the scoop!  Wink


Wouldn't it work both ways?  Couldn't Dr phil  & co say, F' it, get your default judgement.  Now try to get the money out of us - you'll have to come to the USA to get it.  Then Beth & Dave would have jurisdiction as the Kalpoes would be in the USA getting paid.  Then couldn't HT  file an injunction to freeze the award money, until their case is settled? I would assume the law in CA can't enforce payment of the settlement, as OJ has never paid the Browns & Goldman.


Sunfreak.........I'm not a lawyer, but I think that it works this way: The K2s have indeed already ( through their representitives ) come to California when they filed suit and have indeed obligated themselves personally to appear in California. Since both the K2s and Dr. Phil & Co are "in" California for the suit, any awarded money will be collected.

The HT suit has been ruled not related to the K2/Dr. Phil& Co. case so they are seperate issues.

At this point, JQK will have to do what he did in NY, and ask a Calif judge to rule that there is proper jurisdiction in Calif. to hear the wrongful death suit brought by Beth and Dave. IF a Calif judge rules that Calif IS the proper jurisdiction, then JQK will have to figure out how to get the K2s to respond to the suit. Remember that Joran was served in NY, but I'm not aware of anything that would have compelled him to show up for that court case.

OK, Monkeys, correct me if I'm wrong?
Logged
Lala'sMom
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13812


« Reply #366 on: January 29, 2007, 09:13:33 PM »

Good evening monkeys. Anything interesting.
Logged
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #367 on: January 29, 2007, 09:17:14 PM »

Just read that and need to clarify something. It's my understanding that even if the NY judge had ruled that NY was a proper jurisdiction and that a suit could be filed there, Joran would not have been compelled to come to the US to participate in it. A default judgement could have been made in his absence, but he would not be compelled to undergo deposition or stand "trial" in the civil suit. If a default judgement had been granted in the suit, good luck collecting anything.

I THINK the same would apply with K2 at this stage.
Logged
Kat_Gram
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7018



« Reply #368 on: January 29, 2007, 09:19:46 PM »

mdevlin65@sbcglobal.net
this is the email address that was being used.
Logged
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey Mega Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 74276



WWW
« Reply #369 on: January 29, 2007, 09:22:45 PM »

Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
mdevlin65@sbcglobal.net
this is the email address that was being used.

yep
Logged
Lala'sMom
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13812


« Reply #370 on: January 29, 2007, 09:23:38 PM »

CBB
So basically by the judge ruling that the two lawsuits are separate, the ability of the Kalpoes to be deposed in the H/T case is slim to none?  Is that what you mean?
Logged
Sam
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2387



« Reply #371 on: January 29, 2007, 09:25:22 PM »

I believe it is possible you are right CBB. In the case against Joran in NY. Joran would not have been obligated to appear but if The Holloways and Twittys had won the case if Joran ever showed up in the States in the future he could have been held or whatever he had could have been confiscated.


Kat Gram I had a question about one of your post recently, you werent here when I read it and now I have forgotten what it was. I have slept since then. LOL
Logged

Just a swinging with the tribe
crazybabyborg
Guest
« Reply #372 on: January 29, 2007, 09:38:34 PM »

Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
CBB
So basically by the judge ruling that the two lawsuits are separate, the ability of the Kalpoes to be deposed in the H/T case is slim to none?  Is that what you mean?


That's my fear, Lala's. Nothing would please me more than for somebody to prove me wrong!
Logged
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey Mega Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 74276



WWW
« Reply #373 on: January 29, 2007, 09:48:30 PM »

Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
CBB
So basically by the judge ruling that the two lawsuits are separate, the ability of the Kalpoes to be deposed in the H/T case is slim to none?  Is that what you mean?


That's my fear, Lala's. Nothing would please me more than for somebody to prove me wrong!


#1 The two cases started out as separate cases
#2 After Beth and Dave filed the wrongful death suit, their attorneys filed a request for the cases to be treated as related cases
#3  The judge as just denied that request

I really don't think it's going to make that much difference in whether or not the Kalpoes will be deposed in the H/T case.  Plus, if the Kalpoe suit goes to a jury trial (which they have requested) the Kalpoes will have to take the stand (I believe).  They will have to prove they aren't dirtbags and liars.
Logged
Cat
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1248



« Reply #374 on: January 29, 2007, 09:55:02 PM »

The k2 get deposed first.then the mcgraw crowd gets deposed.then jqk reviews all questions and answers before the H/T suit proceeds.H/T would go first,but he would have a base of answers under to compare and contrast to.For my thoughts at the mouse convention...Cat
Logged

Live with hope,looking for justice
Lala'sMom
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13812


« Reply #375 on: January 29, 2007, 09:55:25 PM »

Thanks Klaas.  I didn't know they wanted a jury trial.  Interesting.  Don't they know that means that there will be jurors that have daughters that could have easily been a victim? Wonder how that will go over? What? They want a jury of their peers...they would need to import them from Aruba for that to happen...okay I am smiling again.  Smile
Logged
Lala'sMom
Monkey All Star
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13812


« Reply #376 on: January 29, 2007, 09:57:23 PM »

Quote from: "Cat"
The k2 get deposed first.then the mcgraw crowd gets deposed.then jqk reviews all questions and answers before the H/T suit proceeds.H/T would go first,but he would have a base of answers under to compare and contrast to.For my thoughts at the mouse convention...Cat


Thanks for the info Cat. I was beginning to worry for a minute.
Logged
Cat
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1248



« Reply #377 on: January 29, 2007, 09:57:51 PM »

Sun Freak,are you watching me.How did you know about my supper tonight.I think the case is fine.CAT
Logged

Live with hope,looking for justice
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey Mega Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 74276



WWW
« Reply #378 on: January 29, 2007, 09:57:59 PM »

Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Thanks Klaas.  I didn't know they wanted a jury trial.  Interesting.  Don't they know that means that there will be jurors that have daughters that could have easily been a victim? Wonder how that will go over? What? They want a jury of their peers...they would need to import them from Aruba for that to happen...okay I am smiling again.  Smile

One of the Kalpoe peers maybe?  Laughing

Logged
AZSunny
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4062



« Reply #379 on: January 29, 2007, 10:04:30 PM »

Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Thanks Klaas.  I didn't know they wanted a jury trial.  Interesting.  Don't they know that means that there will be jurors that have daughters that could have easily been a victim? Wonder how that will go over? What? They want a jury of their peers...they would need to import them from Aruba for that to happen...okay I am smiling again.  Smile

One of the Kalpoe peers maybe?  Laughing



Where are the bows and arrows?  who has them now?..we have a target.
Logged

~~We cannot direct the wind but we can adjust the sails ~~
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 6.138 seconds with 19 queries.