March 28, 2024, 07:59:18 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Blood On Obama's Hands  (Read 1101 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WhiskeyGirl
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7754



« on: September 01, 2010, 08:19:53 AM »

72 migrants died in Mexico.  Their blood is on Obama's hands.

There has been a war going on in the United States, and along our southern border with Mexico.  It's been going on a long time.

As cities like Chicago were overrun with gangs for decades, and good people moved out of the city, or moved behind high walls and security buildings, I used to wonder why government didn't do something to keep these people, the gangs, out of the nation.  Why weren't they sent home when they had run in's with the law? 

According to Mr. Holder and the DOJ "The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people."

Why isn't something being done along the border?  Arizona and other states have passed laws that are supported by the 'will' of the people.

Why would Mr. Obama and others not want to keep Americans safe? 

The blood of 72 people is on Mr. Obama's hands.

Laws from states like Arizona are from the most common of people - those that live on Main Street.

Law from Washington, are from the most uncommon people, the elite that seem to pander to other global elitists.

The blood of 72 people is on Mr. Obama's hands.
He could have sent 30,000 service people from Iraq to the southern border to protect America and keep her free of hostile and criminal aliens.  He and his government look the other way.

"Operation Iraqi Freedom is over, and the Iraqi people now have lead responsibility for the security of their country." 

Seems like Washington has abandoned the American people.  Why aren't Obama and Holder stepping aside and letting the states take responsibility for border security?  Surely, people in the states have a personal interest in keeping their families safe, Obama and Holder do not.

"This year also saw Iraq hold credible elections that drew a strong turnout."  Why isn't Mr. Obama pushing credible elections in the US?  Elections that require a picture government issued ID to vote?  Even India, with it's millions is creating a national identity card with biometrics to ensure that welfare and other benefits got to CITIZENS.  Others need not apply.

"They understand that, in the end, only Iraqis can resolve their differences and police their streets."  Oddly, Washington wants to make laws, but doesn't want to eforce them.  Perhaps in the US, due to it's size, only states can police their streets and borders...

"Our most urgent task is to restore our economy, and put the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs back to work. "  10 million unemployed, and over 10 million illegal aliens, and more coming every day.  Do the math.

Why isn't Obama moving 30,000 of those troop to the border?  Why isn't he taking a real interest in border security? 

He witnessed the wind down of the combat mission in Iraq, but ignore the war on our south border.


The blood of 72 people is on Mr. Obama's hands.
Logged

All my posts are just my humble opinions.  Please take with a grain of salt.  Smile

It doesn't do any good to hate anyone,
they'll end up in your family anyway...
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 6.139 seconds with 19 queries.