Caylee Marie Anthony #176 12/20/10 - 1/4/11

[trimmonthelake]

http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine State of Florida


 

12/30/2010           Motion
to Exclude Unreliable Evidence Pursuant to FRYE, Or in the Alternative, Motion in Limine to Exclude (Chloroform)
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
to Prohibit the Use, in any Fashion, of a Posting on the Internet Myspace References Attributable to Cindy Anthony, The Mother of the Defendant
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
to Prohibit the use, in any Fashion, of Internet Myspace References Attributable to the Defendant as "Diary of Days"
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
Preclude the use in any Fashion Whatsoever of a Certain "Jib Jab" Cartoon
12/30/2010           Motion
to Restrict in Court Photography/Videoing
12/30/2010           Notice of Hearing

OMG!! Who's going to come in court and use the "Jib Jab" cartoon?? He's really reaching now.

Seriously.....he's such an @ss!......Is he referring to the one Joy W. made??
What reason would the State have to use this nonsense at trial?

He intends to make the State pay dearly for prosecuting his girl.........  idiot.

[seemeatthebeach]

http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26323133/detail.html
Defense Wants Casey's Reaction To Remains Suppressed
Attorneys Claim Video, Statements Were A Jailhouse Setup
Gabe Travers, WESH.com

POSTED: 2:31 pm EST December 30, 2010
UPDATED: 4:55 pm EST December 30, 2010
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team doesn't want a jury to hear about or see Anthony's reaction to news reports when her daughter's remains were found.

Anthony's lawyers filed new paperwork asking that any such evidence be suppressed when the murder trial begins in May.

New Filing  http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26323238/detail.html
On Dec. 11, 2008, former meter reader Roy Kronk discovered remains off of Suburban Drive. The medical examiner did not positively identify the remains as Caylee Anthony's until Dec. 19.

At the time the remains were found, Anthony was in the Orange County Jail. She was indicted in October of that year in connection with her daughter's disappearance.

Anthony's attorneys contend that once the news broke that remains were discovered, authorities set up a situation at the jail to record and monitor her response to the news.

That day, Anthony was taken out of her cell and into the jail's medical area to watch the events unfold on television.

Defense attorneys claim that the Orange County Sheriff's Office made arrangements with the jail to place Anthony in a location monitored by cameras. Lawyers say Anthony was told she was being taken there for medical purposes, but in fact never received treatment.

Anthony attorney Jose Baez said that he arrived at the jail that day but was denied access to his client.
The new court filing claims that the situation was set up in order to "circumvent Anthony's Sixth Amendment right to council."

Defense attorneys contend that authorities hoped the situation would illicit a response that would incriminate herself.

The filing also asks that accounts of her response be suppressed, as well as the video.

Lt. Tammi Unser noted in a previously released account that she took Anthony to the female medical area to watch the events unfold on television.

Upon entering the office, Unser wrote that Anthony looked at the television and immediately fell into the chair, doubled over and began breathing rapidly.

Several minutes later, Unser said that she lifted her head up with her eyes still closed and muttered, "Oh no," upon hearing the location of the remains.

"She was set up and this is the exact kind of activity the courts frown upon," Orlando defense attorney Richard Hornsby recently told WESH 2 News. Hornsby is not affiliated with the Anthony case.
Hornsby compares the account to fruit from a poison tree, saying that Anthony should not have been placed in a position to potentially incriminate herself.
"It's no different from an interrogation done after someone invoked their right to an attorney. That's why it's inadmissible," Hornsby said.

"You have to be in custody and being interrogated," said Jeff Deen. "People make spontaneous statements to the police all the time who are in custody and they're used against them every day."

Anthony's reaction occurred before Unser asked her if she wanted to see a mental health counselor.

Legal experts disagree on whether her apparently spontaneous reactions before she was questioned will be introduced to the jury.

Anthony's defense claims the video and accounts are not relevant to her guilt or innocence and that showing such video at trial would only be prejudicial.

Defense lawyers also filed paperwork asking that decompositional odor analysis of Anthony's car be excluded from the trial.

SURVEY
Do you think jurors should be able to hear about Casey Anthony's reaction to the discovery of a body off of Suburban Drive?
Yes
No

She asked for a sedative IIRC......in my "professional" RN opinion, that's considered medical services.

I hope Bozo isn't thinking 2011 is going to be a better year than 2010.

[Cappuccino]

http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine State of Florida


 

12/30/2010           Motion
to Exclude Unreliable Evidence Pursuant to FRYE, Or in the Alternative, Motion in Limine to Exclude (Chloroform)
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
to Prohibit the Use, in any Fashion, of a Posting on the Internet Myspace References Attributable to Cindy Anthony, The Mother of the Defendant
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
to Prohibit the use, in any Fashion, of Internet Myspace References Attributable to the Defendant as "Diary of Days"
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
Preclude the use in any Fashion Whatsoever of a Certain "Jib Jab" Cartoon
12/30/2010           Motion
to Restrict in Court Photography/Videoing
12/30/2010           Notice of Hearing

Here we go....Oceans of Motions! I wonder if they're color coded???

Gee, what a shock they want Cindy Anthony's 7/3 myspace entry & other references prohibited from being used

Which jib jab LOL - look his client put herself out there, its her conduct she willingly not only made public but if she didnt do anything wrong, they shouldnt be worried how it will appear to others.   Same goes for Cindy, she posted on a public blog, sorry about your luck Bozo!

There will be a flood of these motions trying to get everything against their client surpressed & excuses upon excuses being given as to why the defense needs more tim, 98% of which is a huge waste of time, huge waste!

[trimmonthelake]

http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
12/30/2010           Motion to Suppress
Statements Made to George, Cindy Lee Anthony, Maya Derkovic, Robyn Adams, and Sylvia Hernandez
12/30/2010           Defendant's
Motion in Limine to Exclude all Evidence Relating to Canine Searches and Alerts
12/30/2010           Motion
and Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Stain in Trunk of Car
12/30/2010           Memorandum of Law
in Support of Defendant's Motion to Exclude Irreelevant Evidence of Tattoo
12/30/2010           Defense
Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Tattoo
12/30/2010           Motion
to Exclude Unreliable Evidence

[Cappuccino]

http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26323133/detail.html
Defense Wants Casey's Reaction To Remains Suppressed
Attorneys Claim Video, Statements Were A Jailhouse Setup
Gabe Travers, WESH.com

POSTED: 2:31 pm EST December 30, 2010
UPDATED: 4:55 pm EST December 30, 2010
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's defense team doesn't want a jury to hear about or see Anthony's reaction to news reports when her daughter's remains were found.

Anthony's lawyers filed new paperwork asking that any such evidence be suppressed when the murder trial begins in May.

New Filing  http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26323238/detail.html
On Dec. 11, 2008, former meter reader Roy Kronk discovered remains off of Suburban Drive. The medical examiner did not positively identify the remains as Caylee Anthony's until Dec. 19.

At the time the remains were found, Anthony was in the Orange County Jail. She was indicted in October of that year in connection with her daughter's disappearance.

Anthony's attorneys contend that once the news broke that remains were discovered, authorities set up a situation at the jail to record and monitor her response to the news.

That day, Anthony was taken out of her cell and into the jail's medical area to watch the events unfold on television.

Defense attorneys claim that the Orange County Sheriff's Office made arrangements with the jail to place Anthony in a location monitored by cameras. Lawyers say Anthony was told she was being taken there for medical purposes, but in fact never received treatment.

Anthony attorney Jose Baez said that he arrived at the jail that day but was denied access to his client.
The new court filing claims that the situation was set up in order to "circumvent Anthony's Sixth Amendment right to council."

Defense attorneys contend that authorities hoped the situation would illicit a response that would incriminate herself.

The filing also asks that accounts of her response be suppressed, as well as the video.

Lt. Tammi Unser noted in a previously released account that she took Anthony to the female medical area to watch the events unfold on television.

Upon entering the office, Unser wrote that Anthony looked at the television and immediately fell into the chair, doubled over and began breathing rapidly.

Several minutes later, Unser said that she lifted her head up with her eyes still closed and muttered, "Oh no," upon hearing the location of the remains.

"She was set up and this is the exact kind of activity the courts frown upon," Orlando defense attorney Richard Hornsby recently told WESH 2 News. Hornsby is not affiliated with the Anthony case.
Hornsby compares the account to fruit from a poison tree, saying that Anthony should not have been placed in a position to potentially incriminate herself.
"It's no different from an interrogation done after someone invoked their right to an attorney. That's why it's inadmissible," Hornsby said.

"You have to be in custody and being interrogated," said Jeff Deen. "People make spontaneous statements to the police all the time who are in custody and they're used against them every day."

Anthony's reaction occurred before Unser asked her if she wanted to see a mental health counselor.

Legal experts disagree on whether her apparently spontaneous reactions before she was questioned will be introduced to the jury.

Anthony's defense claims the video and accounts are not relevant to her guilt or innocence and that showing such video at trial would only be prejudicial.

Defense lawyers also filed paperwork asking that decompositional odor analysis of Anthony's car be excluded from the trial.

SURVEY
Do you think jurors should be able to hear about Casey Anthony's reaction to the discovery of a body off of Suburban Drive?
Yes
No

She asked for a sedative IIRC......in my "professional" RN opinion, that's considered medical services.

I hope Bozo isn't thinking 2011 is going to be a better year than 2010.

Im praying the prosecution is fully aware of what public statements Bozo made about his client December 11th, he was the first to discuss her reaction, emotion & medical services, as previously posted.

[Cappuccino]

http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
12/30/2010           Motion to Suppress
Statements Made to George, Cindy Lee Anthony, Maya Derkovic, Robyn Adams, and Sylvia Hernandez
12/30/2010           Defendant's
Motion in Limine to Exclude all Evidence Relating to Canine Searches and Alerts
12/30/2010           Motion
and Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Stain in Trunk of Car
12/30/2010           Memorandum of Law
in Support of Defendant's Motion to Exclude Irreelevant Evidence of Tattoo
12/30/2010           Defense
Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Tattoo
12/30/2010           Motion
to Exclude Unreliable Evidence

Who the H does he think he is inserting "irrelevant" to any motion, he has no idea what is relevant or not nor is he an expert, as a matter of fact most of the "experts" he has are nothing but paid mouthpieces to directly oppose the State's experts, some known tainted talkheads at that

[trimmonthelake]

31 days..........no motion in the world can make that go away.   

[tupelohoney]

Fanny was right.....Baez will try to remove EVERYTHING from this case.   It ain't gonna happen....No Way Jose!

[tupelohoney]

31 days..........no motion in the world can make that go away.   

Watch him try though.....he has always said there was a good explanation.  Not one anyone would buy, mind you, but he will try!

[Cappuccino]

31 days..........no motion in the world can make that go away.   

In the very shirt she bought at Target for herself with Amy's check, it still amazes me how stuck on stupid this monster is.

[Cappuccino]

31 days..........no motion in the world can make that go away.   

Watch him try though.....he has always said there was a good explanation.  Not one anyone would buy, mind you, but he will try!

Granted, that's his job but he's crossed every line & stretched every ounce of the truth into nothing but a web of lies, I'll go so far as to say he willingly participated in covering up evidence (yea, I went there)...none of which will be believed & his attitude will tick off the jury more than once, along with the rest of them.

[Fanny Mae]

It looks like everybody else took a holiday vacation, but somebody is working at Bobo's office. What a dork!! 

[trimmonthelake]

2010.12.29 Defense Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence - Trunk Smell
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68137874/20101229-Defense-Motion-to-Exclude-Unreliable-Evidence

H/T MuzikMan! http://www.docstoc.com/profile/muzikman

[trimmonthelake]

http://www.wftv.com/news/26325508/detail.html
Lawyers Want Casey's Reaction To Remains Found Suppressed
Posted: 6:15 pm EST December 30, 2010
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's lawyers don't want a jury to see her reaction to Caylee Anthony's remains being found, according to a motion WFTV obtained Thursday. Her reaction was caught on camera from inside the Orange County jail.

Caylee's remains were discovered in December of 2008. Casey was watching coverage about the discovery and became visibility upset, according to officers.

Her lawyers filed a motion late Wednesday to suppress the video. They say her reaction is not relevant and that cameras were rolling as part of a set up.

Casey Anthony is expected in court on Monday. At that time, the judge will hear a request by prosecutors to bring sanctions against Casey's defense team.

Prosecutors say the defense has ignored the judge's order to provide specific information about defense witnesses' testimony.

The hearing is scheduled for Monday afternoon at 1:30.

[Northern Rose]

http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine State of Florida


 

12/30/2010           Motion
to Exclude Unreliable Evidence Pursuant to FRYE, Or in the Alternative, Motion in Limine to Exclude (Chloroform)
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
to Prohibit the Use, in any Fashion, of a Posting on the Internet Myspace References Attributable to Cindy Anthony, The Mother of the Defendant
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
to Prohibit the use, in any Fashion, of Internet Myspace References Attributable to the Defendant as "Diary of Days"
12/30/2010           Motion In Limine
Preclude the use in any Fashion Whatsoever of a Certain "Jib Jab" Cartoon
12/30/2010           Motion
to Restrict in Court Photography/Videoing
12/30/2010           Notice of Hearing

Here we go....Oceans of Motions! I wonder if they're color coded???

Gee, what a shock they want Cindy Anthony's 7/3 myspace entry & other references prohibited from being used

Which jib jab LOL - look his client put herself out there, its her conduct she willingly not only made public but if she didnt do anything wrong, they shouldnt be worried how it will appear to others.   Same goes for Cindy, she posted on a public blog, sorry about your luck Bozo!

There will be a flood of these motions trying to get everything against their client surpressed & excuses upon excuses being given as to why the defense needs more tim, 98% of which is a huge waste of time, huge waste!

   Motion
to Restrict in Court Photography/Videoing
12/30/2010           Notice of Hearing

Did JP not "Spank " Bobo when he stood up in court last time complaining about a photographer looking at Casey writting?  Did JP not shut him and then the other lawyer down in under 30 seconds with a DENIED?  Now he puts it in a motion which to me seems akin to yelling at a deaf man to try to get them to hear you better.  Only difference is that JP is not deaf and Bobo has been told no already more than once.   I hope JP puts him in the time out corner this time.  I am starting to feel that Bobo is writing all these motions to get himself in trouble and get himself get thrown off the case as it has not turned out like he first thought it would be and he can not just withdraw. 

[Northern Rose]

It looks like everybody else took a holiday vacation, but somebody is working at Bobo's office. What a dork!! 

Maybe someone got a "Motions for Idiots" paper back in their stocking this year 

[trimmonthelake]

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2010/12/casey-anthony-what-were-the-top-developments-in-2010.html/comment-page-1
Casey Anthony: What were the top developments in 2010?
Caylee and Casey Anthony, Jose Baez, WESH, WFTV — posted by halboedeker on December, 30 2010 6:06 PM
Discuss This: Comments(1) | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it
WESH-Channel 2 looked back at the top developments in the Casey Anthony case in the past year. Here were reporter Bob Kealing’s choices:

1. Anthony became indigent.

2. Changes in her defense team.

3. A new judge entered the case.

Do you agree with those choices?

Kealing opened his concise recap with footage of Anthony falling in an Orange County Courthouse elevator. “It’s been that kind of a rocky 2010,” he said. She is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter, Caylee Marie.

Judge Stan Strickland was replaced by Chief Judge Belvin Perry. Brad Conway, former attorney for George and Cindy Anthony, told WESH that Perry has the luxury of moving the case along faster than Strickland did.

Anthony attorneys Linda Kenney Baden and Andrea Lyon left the case, and Cheney Mason and Ann Finnell came aboard. Orlando attorney Richard Hornsby, who provides legal analysis for WESH, wondered if people had left because there wasn’t as much celebrity interest in the case.

But Kealing said the most controversial development was Anthony’s being declared indigent after her $275,000 defense fund ran out. “We’ve all got to wonder where it went,” Conway said.

I’d say that’s a good choice as the top development, based on the response I get from the public.
In Anthony news today, WESH and WFTV-Channel 9 reported that the defense team filed a motion to suppress a jail tape of Anthony’s reaction to TV reports of the discovery of a child’s remains.

“Casey was watching coverage about the discovery and became visibly upset,” WFTV anchor Vanessa Welch said. “Her lawyers filed a motion late yesterday to suppress that video. They say her reaction is not relevant and that camera were running as part of a setup.”

WESH anchor Martha Sugalski described Anthony’s “extreme emotional reaction” on the tape and said that Anthony attorney Jose Baez in the motion called the tape part of a setup because a sheriff’s commander wanted to get incriminating information from Anthony.

Kealing said: “The judge has already ruled against making this video public, and this motion would keep it out of the trial entirely.”

The trial is scheduled to start in May.

WESH also highlighted that another defense motion asks Judge Perry to toss sniff tests on air in Anthony’s car. Baez argues that “the courtroom is no place for an untested and experimental  piece of science,” Kealing said.

The next hearing in the case will be at 1:30 p.m. Monday.

[tupelohoney]

Question......weren't these motions to be filed by last week so the CJBP could hear them due to the fact that he was not going to be in the court house this week?  I know that Baez said the 31st was the initial date given.  So is it possible that JP will not even hear these motions and if so does this not give Casey grounds for firing her defense team, thus causing this entire case to begin anew?   

[tupelohoney]

About the possibility of a plea deal.....I can't stand that the defense team is wasting Fla taxpayers money but I hope the State does not offer a plea deal (at the request of the defense/Casey) to save the state money. That money spent would be well worth it to me.

[Cappuccino]

Question......weren't these motions to be filed by last week so the CJBP could hear them due to the fact that he was not going to be in the court house this week?  I know that Baez said the 31st was the initial date given.  So is it possible that JP will not even hear these motions and if so does this not give Casey grounds for firing her defense team, thus causing this entire case to begin anew?   

Bozo knew what the deadline was TO BE HEARD (not filed as he sheepishly attempted to get away with) & he pushed the envelope.  Thus he got a stern clarification & instruction that the judge would not hear anything due to his scheduled vaca, that was on the Kronk issue.  Now, Bozo out of pure spite is flooding the court with a barrage of menacing motions, of which I'd say 99% will be denied or put aside due to lack of meeting the threshold for consideration at this juncture.   Yes, he's been told more than once that certain things will not be excluded, he's as dense as he is arrogant.

Just like Casey's defense with multiple "suspects" and a litany of designs diversions, they are throwing everything at the wall, hoping against hope that something will stick.   While it is not abnormal for a defense attorney to actively attempt to get evidence against their client thrown out, it is highly abnormal for a defense attorney to defy the court & push issues that have already been ruled on with merit repetitively.    I dont think he's purposely trying to get thrown off the case, snit its probably practically the only significant one he has in his law office at this point...no, he wants the limelight of this case & doesnt give a dang about his client.   Nope, he's throwing a Hail's Mary hoping that he might walk away considered to have won this case....there is a fool born every minute, unfortunately.