April 24, 2024, 01:24:39 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Why Do We Have a Central Bank? - A good question!  (Read 932 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WhiskeyGirl
Monkey All Star Jr.
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7754



« on: December 06, 2010, 11:45:50 AM »

Why Do We Have a Central Bank?

Quote
In short, central banking has been neither necessary nor sufficient for the development of a modern economy and financial system. A number of reform proposals for the Fed are being crafted, but there is no agreement on why the institution exists.

Quote
There is no liquidity crisis now, however, and no justification for continued lender-of-last-resort activity. There are quite possibly still large unrecognized losses on banks' balance sheets associated with the housing collapse and other unwise lending. These losses mean such institutions are in reality undercapitalized, not short of liquidity.

Quote
...the economy suffers because none of the Fed's policies will fix the banking system. The failure to fix the banks, not a nonexistent deflation threat, is what calls into mind Japan's lost decade of the 1990s. Banks with large, unrecognized losses will not make new loans while losses from the old ones grow.

'banks aren't lending...we can't find qualified borrowers...businesses aren't hiring...'

Quote
Regulators should be consistent in calling for banks to write down assets and recapitalize themselves (and not just apply the policy to smaller institutions that are being closed). Now is not the time for banks to raise dividends, as numerous large banks are seeking to do. Now is the time to raise capital. In the meantime, the Fed must stop conducting fiscal policy under the guise of monetary policy. Taxpayer bailouts of weakened banks would be a terrible idea. But, if done by Congress, it would at least be subject to democratic debate and be conducted in the open.

What comes to mind? IndyMac.  I recall one person suggesting the dealmakers were acking like they were drunk or something.  Why isn't anyone looking out for taxpayers?  Main Str.?

Why do we have a central bank?  Give money to global businesses that move jobs to foreign workers?  Give money to foreign banks?  Give money to hedge funds?  Big banks without consumer exposure?  Special interests?  Elite individuals?

read more here - http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=12613
Logged

All my posts are just my humble opinions.  Please take with a grain of salt.  Smile

It doesn't do any good to hate anyone,
they'll end up in your family anyway...
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 6.144 seconds with 19 queries.