March 28, 2024, 06:53:29 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: NEW CHILD BOARD CREATED IN THE POLITICAL SECTION FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Caylee Marie Anthony #180 2/04/11 - 2/22/11  (Read 167159 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
loca
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4742



« Reply #620 on: February 15, 2011, 06:33:37 PM »

http://www.wftv.com/news/26876699/detail.html
Jose Baez Accused Of Lying To Judge Again
Posted: 4:21 pm EST February 15, 2011Updated: 4:46 pm EST February 15, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- For the second time, Casey Anthony's lead defense attorney, Jose Baez, is being accused of lying in court to a judge. This time, however, it's dealing with the tax money paying for Casey's defense.
DOCUMENT: Reporter's Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26875662/detail.html
BILL SHEAFFER: On Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/video/26875755/index.html
<snipped.

Wait..Too many initials. Who's the FB? I'm confused.

Love it!

In the Bill Shaeffer interview above, Kathi Belich says listening to the defense in court is like listening to "white noise." LOL

Love Kathi and Bill!

 






Does the FB know about this complaint or  not. I think yes? does the Jp have a duty to report to the FB and are they aware of all these things this inept piece of crap is doing. Will baez get dibarred. I have alot of if's because I am so fed up with him.

fb is the florida bar!

speculation I could be wrong that the defense didnt meet the deadline! does anyone know. I know curly sometimes all the initials confoose me too!! I have to use those dead brain cells.
Logged

Loca
loca
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4742



« Reply #621 on: February 15, 2011, 06:35:25 PM »

http://www.wftv.com/news/26876699/detail.html
Jose Baez Accused Of Lying To Judge Again
Posted: 4:21 pm EST February 15, 2011Updated: 4:46 pm EST February 15, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- For the second time, Casey Anthony's lead defense attorney, Jose Baez, is being accused of lying in court to a judge. This time, however, it's dealing with the tax money paying for Casey's defense.
DOCUMENT: Reporter's Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26875662/detail.html
BILL SHEAFFER: On Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/video/26875755/index.html
<snipped.

Wait..Too many initials. Who's the FB? I'm confused.

Love it!

In the Bill Shaeffer interview above, Kathi Belich says listening to the defense in court is like listening to "white noise." LOL

Love Kathi and Bill!

 






Does the FB know about this complaint or  not. I think yes? does the Jp have a duty to report to the FB and are they aware of all these things this inept piece of crap is doing. Will baez get dibarred. I have alot of if's because I am so fed up with him.

fb is the florida bar!

speculation I could be wrong that the defense didnt meet the deadline! does anyone know. I know curly sometimes all the initials confoose me too!! I have to use those dead brain cells.



HAL’S NOTE: They did not. The state attorney’s office says everything that was due by today is in, my colleague Anthony Colarossi reports.

It was in reference to if they missed filing their expert reports.
Logged

Loca
Cappuccino
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17527



« Reply #622 on: February 15, 2011, 06:39:16 PM »

I have a question for you monkeys.  Since we are all aware of how incompetent Baez is.  And know that he isn’t fit to be an attorney . With this latest letter to Judge Perry saying that Baez didn’t tell the truth to the court yet again.  How is this going to effect the trial  for both  starting in May and giving  as much as I hate to say it. Giving CA a qualified attorney to represent her, so she gets a fair trial. I think she deserves Baez . But our laws say she is  entitled to fair representation.  Just how is this going to happen when  Baez has no idea what end is up.  If he can’t get any experts to testify in CA’s behalf  or doesn’t get their reports in on time. How is that going to work with keeping the trial date on time?  I want CA to pay  for killing sweet little Caylee. But I don’t want her to have any chance for a retrial either.  So what are your thoughts about Baez being kept or is he going to taken off the case as an ineffective attorney?

Green Eyes, because momster hired bozo to begin with and even though she is "not paying" him now, I believe she is the only one that can "fire" him.  The ant family love him because he plays the same word games they do.  Maybe someone else with more legal experience can say whether His Honor can question momster about whether or not she is happy with her counsel . . . we know the answer to that, of course.

Hi Green Eyes and Sister.  Hope Sister's sister is doing well.  As I recall, Judge Strickland did ask Casey if she were satisfied with her representation by Baez and she said that she was.  Whether this should be asked every time she appears in court, I don't know.
She is so isolated from the real world she might not know that she might not be receiving good representation.  I know she flirts with Baez and appears to have a crush on him. I sure wouldn't entrust my life to him or Mason, for that matter.  Mason by all accounts had a good professional reputation prior to joing up with the circus.  I know that boys just want to have fun, but IMO he is ridiculous. 

I believe, though, if Baez continues and if she is convicted, she will win an appeal because of her ineffective counsel.  Even though she told the judge she was satisfied with Baez, maybe that could be appealed because she isn't schooled in the law; she didn't realize what was going on and was kept isolated from everyone but her legal counsel.   



I respectfully disagree at the present time, she has had ample opportunity to reconsider her counsel.   She has been isolated but at the same time she has been present in court when her attorneys have been confronted as well as asked point blank if she was satisfied with her counsel, the court is under no obligation to continuously ask her the same question.  She is an adult & has not been determined to be mentally diminished or insane.  She has received every piece of paper regarding this case as we've witnessed by her inmate logs.  She has had a team in place (albeit alternating members), while Bozo may be deemed ineffective there is no excuse for the others individually or collectively & she has been equally willingly to have them represent her.   If he was her sole counsel I would tend to agree there is valid concern that she might win an appeal due to ineffective counsel but as of right now I do not think she would succeed on that issue.

IMHO, the only way he goes is if she fires him prior to trial or the judge removes him.  I'm not sure to what significance that would delay trial since she has other attorneys in place and/or if a substitute comes in the only delay would be so that attorney could get up to speed.  Even if he does something completely outrageous during trial that lands him in contempt of court with a recommendation to be disbarred, the trial will halt but will be scheduled to be retried.   It is my view there is no way she's not getting out due to his conduct.
Logged

Curly
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3389



« Reply #623 on: February 15, 2011, 06:49:16 PM »

http://www.wftv.com/news/26876699/detail.html
Jose Baez Accused Of Lying To Judge Again
Posted: 4:21 pm EST February 15, 2011Updated: 4:46 pm EST February 15, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- For the second time, Casey Anthony's lead defense attorney, Jose Baez, is being accused of lying in court to a judge. This time, however, it's dealing with the tax money paying for Casey's defense.
DOCUMENT: Reporter's Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26875662/detail.html
BILL SHEAFFER: On Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/video/26875755/index.html
<snipped.

Wait..Too many initials. Who's the FB? I'm confused.

Love it!

In the Bill Shaeffer interview above, Kathi Belich says listening to the defense in court is like listening to "white noise." LOL

Love Kathi and Bill!

 






Does the FB know about this complaint or  not. I think yes? does the Jp have a duty to report to the FB and are they aware of all these things this inept piece of crap is doing. Will baez get dibarred. I have alot of if's because I am so fed up with him.

fb is the florida bar!

Ok, thanks.
Logged

OMGWTF

"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice no matter who it's for or against."
                             Malcolm X
Babybear
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3266



« Reply #624 on: February 15, 2011, 06:50:12 PM »

I have a question for you monkeys.  Since we are all aware of how incompetent Baez is.  And know that he isn’t fit to be an attorney . With this latest letter to Judge Perry saying that Baez didn’t tell the truth to the court yet again.  How is this going to effect the trial  for both  starting in May and giving  as much as I hate to say it. Giving CA a qualified attorney to represent her, so she gets a fair trial. I think she deserves Baez . But our laws say she is  entitled to fair representation.  Just how is this going to happen when  Baez has no idea what end is up.  If he can’t get any experts to testify in CA’s behalf  or doesn’t get their reports in on time. How is that going to work with keeping the trial date on time?  I want CA to pay  for killing sweet little Caylee. But I don’t want her to have any chance for a retrial either.  So what are your thoughts about Baez being kept or is he going to taken off the case as an ineffective attorney?

Green Eyes, because momster hired bozo to begin with and even though she is "not paying" him now, I believe she is the only one that can "fire" him.  The ant family love him because he plays the same word games they do.  Maybe someone else with more legal experience can say whether His Honor can question momster about whether or not she is happy with her counsel . . . we know the answer to that, of course.

Hi Green Eyes and Sister.  Hope Sister's sister is doing well.  As I recall, Judge Strickland did ask Casey if she were satisfied with her representation by Baez and she said that she was.  Whether this should be asked every time she appears in court, I don't know.
She is so isolated from the real world she might not know that she might not be receiving good representation.  I know she flirts with Baez and appears to have a crush on him. I sure wouldn't entrust my life to him or Mason, for that matter.  Mason by all accounts had a good professional reputation prior to joing up with the circus.  I know that boys just want to have fun, but IMO he is ridiculous. 

I believe, though, if Baez continues and if she is convicted, she will win an appeal because of her ineffective counsel.  Even though she told the judge she was satisfied with Baez, maybe that could be appealed because she isn't schooled in the law; she didn't realize what was going on and was kept isolated from everyone but her legal counsel.   



I respectfully disagree at the present time, she has had ample opportunity to reconsider her counsel.   She has been isolated but at the same time she has been present in court when her attorneys have been confronted as well as asked point blank if she was satisfied with her counsel, the court is under no obligation to continuously ask her the same question.  She is an adult & has not been determined to be mentally diminished or insane.  She has received every piece of paper regarding this case as we've witnessed by her inmate logs.  She has had a team in place (albeit alternating members), while Bozo may be deemed ineffective there is no excuse for the others individually or collectively & she has been equally willingly to have them represent her.   If he was her sole counsel I would tend to agree there is valid concern that she might win an appeal due to ineffective counsel but as of right now I do not think she would succeed on that issue.

IMHO, the only way he goes is if she fires him prior to trial or the judge removes him.  I'm not sure to what significance that would delay trial since she has other attorneys in place and/or if a substitute comes in the only delay would be so that attorney could get up to speed.  Even if he does something completely outrageous during trial that lands him in contempt of court with a recommendation to be disbarred, the trial will halt but will be scheduled to be retried.   It is my view there is no way she's not getting out due to his conduct.

And I respectfully disagree with you.  By the way, I don't recall anyone ever saying that she's "Getting out."  I certainly did not. I don't think there's any way that she's "Getting out."  However, I think there is a good chance of an appeal claiming "Ineffective Counsel" and there will be a hearing on it as the law requires.  Whether or not it is successful is another story.  It depends on what she claims the outcome would have been had Baez not proven ineffective.  If the court decides that the outcome would have been the same, as I suspect it would, then no new trial.  But on the other hand, if there is good cause for the appeal which could have changed the outcome,  then a new trial. So far as I know, none of us here are attorneys, so one opinion is as good as another.  It is indisputable that should she be sentenced to death, there will be an  automatic appeal.  But you knew that, didn't you? 
Logged

Wrong is wrong, even if everybody does it.
Right is right, even if nobody does it. ~ Unknown
trimmonthelake
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 43428



« Reply #625 on: February 15, 2011, 06:55:10 PM »

http://www.wftv.com/news/26876699/detail.html
Jose Baez Accused Of Lying To Judge Again
Posted: 4:21 pm EST February 15, 2011Updated: 4:46 pm EST February 15, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- For the second time, Casey Anthony's lead defense attorney, Jose Baez, is being accused of lying in court to a judge. This time, however, it's dealing with the tax money paying for Casey's defense.
DOCUMENT: Reporter's Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26875662/detail.html
BILL SHEAFFER: On Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/video/26875755/index.html
<snipped.

I really think these 2 clowns are just con men, plain and simple.
They tried to play the court reporting firm with their typical smoke and mirrors diversions, but they were out foxed.
I don't share Bill S high regard for Mason. I find him to be an arrogant -blowhard, mumbling, bumbling fool.



I agree with everything you said .   
Logged

  ~241~ "The Longer You Love,The Longer You Live,The Stronger You Feel,The More You Can Give."
~ Peter Frampton
loca
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4742



« Reply #626 on: February 15, 2011, 07:02:08 PM »

http://www.wftv.com/news/26876699/detail.html
Jose Baez Accused Of Lying To Judge Again
Posted: 4:21 pm EST February 15, 2011Updated: 4:46 pm EST February 15, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- For the second time, Casey Anthony's lead defense attorney, Jose Baez, is being accused of lying in court to a judge. This time, however, it's dealing with the tax money paying for Casey's defense.
DOCUMENT: Reporter's Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26875662/detail.html
BILL SHEAFFER: On Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/video/26875755/index.html
<snipped.

I really think these 2 clowns are just con men, plain and simple.
They tried to play the court reporting firm with their typical smoke and mirrors diversions, but they were out foxed.
I don't share Bill S high regard for Mason. I find him to be an arrogant -blowhard, mumbling, bumbling fool.



I agree with everything you said .   

me too but I think bill does it to single baez out purposely.

Video Report with R. Hornsby: Casey Prosecutor: New Defense Witness List Missed Deadline

http://www.wesh.com/video/26877603/detail.html The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/pre2004/ops/sc95855.pdf
Logged

Loca
trimmonthelake
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 43428



« Reply #627 on: February 15, 2011, 07:04:29 PM »

http://www.wesh.com/r/26877299/detail.html
Letter: Anthony Defense Made False Statements
Transcript Agency Accuses Defense In Letter To Judge
POSTED: 5:03 pm EST February 15, 2011
UPDATED: 6:39 pm EST February 15, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. -- The owner of a court reporting service is accusing Casey Anthony's defense team of making false statements to the court regarding financial arrangements for his services.
In a letter to Judge Belvin Perry, the owner of a Knoxville, Tenn., court reporting service said a member of Jose Baez's legal staff used jargon he didn't understand and then incorrectly assumed the court reporter had agreed to deeply
 ::snipping2::
READ: Letter To Perry http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26877553/detail.html

Video Report  http://www.wesh.com/video/26878928/detail.html
Logged

  ~241~ "The Longer You Love,The Longer You Live,The Stronger You Feel,The More You Can Give."
~ Peter Frampton
trimmonthelake
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 43428



« Reply #628 on: February 15, 2011, 07:07:16 PM »

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-tuesday-motions-20110215,0,7636578.story
Casey Anthony prosecution challenges defense motions to exclude evidence
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel
6:34 p.m. EST, February 15, 2011
New motions filed by prosecutors in the Casey Anthony case this week challenge the defense team's attempts to exclude scientific evidence in the case.

The prosecution also objects to the defense team's listing of a WFTV reporter and others as witnesses so late in the case.

Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton on Tuesday filed a motion to strike the defense team's motion to exclude certain evidence regarding Chloroform -- evidence expected to be critical in the state's case against Anthony.

The defense is arguing that the evidence is unreliable. But Ashton's motion says the defense argument "contains only conclusory statements of counsel and no authorities suggesting that the procedure is not generally accepted."

Ashton goes on to say the defense motion is "glaringly insufficient" while saying that the test instruments used to detect chloroform in this case are known and the techniques "routinely accepted as evidence in courts throughout the state."
 ::snipping2::
Logged

  ~241~ "The Longer You Love,The Longer You Live,The Stronger You Feel,The More You Can Give."
~ Peter Frampton
loca
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4742



« Reply #629 on: February 15, 2011, 07:08:37 PM »

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-tuesday-motions-20110215,0,7636578.story
Casey Anthony prosecution challenges defense motions to exclude evidence
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel
6:34 p.m. EST, February 15, 2011
New motions filed by prosecutors in the Casey Anthony case this week challenge the defense team's attempts to exclude scientific evidence in the case.

The prosecution also objects to the defense team's listing of a WFTV reporter and others as witnesses so late in the case.

Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton on Tuesday filed a motion to strike the defense team's motion to exclude certain evidence regarding Chloroform -- evidence expected to be critical in the state's case against Anthony.

The defense is arguing that the evidence is unreliable. But Ashton's motion says the defense argument "contains only conclusory statements of counsel and no authorities suggesting that the procedure is not generally accepted."

Ashton goes on to say the defense motion is "glaringly insufficient" while saying that the test instruments used to detect chloroform in this case are known and the techniques "routinely accepted as evidence in courts throughout the state."
 ::snipping2::





The Rule of Sequestration - Feb 15th, 2011 by Richard Hornsby.

http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2011/02/the-rule-of-sequestration/


disregard if  this has already been posted.

Logged

Loca
Curly
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 3389



« Reply #630 on: February 15, 2011, 07:10:46 PM »

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/02/casey-anthony-wftv-sees-transparent-motive-ag

This is actually what I was thinking.

 ::snipping2::

“The station will resist any attempt to get Kathi Belich to testify for anyone, the prosecution or defense,” Jordan told me this afternoon. “She is a reporter. She has worked independently as a journalist. I’m wondering if the real motive is to keep her out of the courtroom. It’s pretty transparent.”

If she is on the witness list, Belich couldn’t sit in the courtroom and listen to testimony. She wouldn’t be able to cover the trial.
Logged

OMGWTF

"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice no matter who it's for or against."
                             Malcolm X
Cappuccino
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17527



« Reply #631 on: February 15, 2011, 07:20:53 PM »

I have a question for you monkeys.  Since we are all aware of how incompetent Baez is.  And know that he isn’t fit to be an attorney . With this latest letter to Judge Perry saying that Baez didn’t tell the truth to the court yet again.  How is this going to effect the trial  for both  starting in May and giving  as much as I hate to say it. Giving CA a qualified attorney to represent her, so she gets a fair trial. I think she deserves Baez . But our laws say she is  entitled to fair representation.  Just how is this going to happen when  Baez has no idea what end is up.  If he can’t get any experts to testify in CA’s behalf  or doesn’t get their reports in on time. How is that going to work with keeping the trial date on time?  I want CA to pay  for killing sweet little Caylee. But I don’t want her to have any chance for a retrial either.  So what are your thoughts about Baez being kept or is he going to taken off the case as an ineffective attorney?

Green Eyes, because momster hired bozo to begin with and even though she is "not paying" him now, I believe she is the only one that can "fire" him.  The ant family love him because he plays the same word games they do.  Maybe someone else with more legal experience can say whether His Honor can question momster about whether or not she is happy with her counsel . . . we know the answer to that, of course.

Hi Green Eyes and Sister.  Hope Sister's sister is doing well.  As I recall, Judge Strickland did ask Casey if she were satisfied with her representation by Baez and she said that she was.  Whether this should be asked every time she appears in court, I don't know.
She is so isolated from the real world she might not know that she might not be receiving good representation.  I know she flirts with Baez and appears to have a crush on him. I sure wouldn't entrust my life to him or Mason, for that matter.  Mason by all accounts had a good professional reputation prior to joing up with the circus.  I know that boys just want to have fun, but IMO he is ridiculous. 

I believe, though, if Baez continues and if she is convicted, she will win an appeal because of her ineffective counsel.  Even though she told the judge she was satisfied with Baez, maybe that could be appealed because she isn't schooled in the law; she didn't realize what was going on and was kept isolated from everyone but her legal counsel.   



I respectfully disagree at the present time, she has had ample opportunity to reconsider her counsel.   She has been isolated but at the same time she has been present in court when her attorneys have been confronted as well as asked point blank if she was satisfied with her counsel, the court is under no obligation to continuously ask her the same question.  She is an adult & has not been determined to be mentally diminished or insane.  She has received every piece of paper regarding this case as we've witnessed by her inmate logs.  She has had a team in place (albeit alternating members), while Bozo may be deemed ineffective there is no excuse for the others individually or collectively & she has been equally willingly to have them represent her.   If he was her sole counsel I would tend to agree there is valid concern that she might win an appeal due to ineffective counsel but as of right now I do not think she would succeed on that issue.

IMHO, the only way he goes is if she fires him prior to trial or the judge removes him.  I'm not sure to what significance that would delay trial since she has other attorneys in place and/or if a substitute comes in the only delay would be so that attorney could get up to speed.  Even if he does something completely outrageous during trial that lands him in contempt of court with a recommendation to be disbarred, the trial will halt but will be scheduled to be retried.   It is my view there is no way she's not getting out due to his conduct.

And I respectfully disagree with you.  By the way, I don't recall anyone ever saying that she's "Getting out."  I certainly did not. I don't think there's any way that she's "Getting out."  However, I think there is a good chance of an appeal claiming "Ineffective Counsel" and there will be a hearing on it as the law requires.  Whether or not it is successful is another story.  It depends on what she claims the outcome would have been had Baez not proven ineffective.  If the court decides that the outcome would have been the same, as I suspect it would, then no new trial.  But on the other hand, if there is good cause for the appeal which could have changed the outcome,  then a new trial. So far as I know, none of us here are attorneys, so one opinion is as good as another.  It is indisputable that should she be sentenced to death, there will be an  automatic appeal.  But you knew that, didn't you? 

You know I know the above.  I certainly did not say anyone else said she would be "getting out," I stated that I felt she wouldnt get out over anything her attorneys have done & we agree there is no way she is getting out.  In fact, I've been rather confident that she will be convicted, while holding doubt that she will receive the DP.  What is presented during an automatic appeal (if she received the DP) will obviously remain to be heard.  Im sure ineffective counsel will arise but I do not think it will succeed, yes that's my non-attorney but rather extensive work-related familiarity with the law opinion.   Sometimes we will agree, others we wont which is fine because I dont hold those opinion differences in a personal or disrespectful manner but rather taken only as a debate of a topic being discussed.  I respect your views whether we agree or not, I always appreciate when that same sentiment is returned in kind....its all good.
Logged

Cappuccino
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17527



« Reply #632 on: February 15, 2011, 07:22:26 PM »

http://www.wftv.com/news/26876699/detail.html
Jose Baez Accused Of Lying To Judge Again
Posted: 4:21 pm EST February 15, 2011Updated: 4:46 pm EST February 15, 2011
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- For the second time, Casey Anthony's lead defense attorney, Jose Baez, is being accused of lying in court to a judge. This time, however, it's dealing with the tax money paying for Casey's defense.
DOCUMENT: Reporter's Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26875662/detail.html
BILL SHEAFFER: On Complaint Against Baez  http://www.wftv.com/video/26875755/index.html
<snipped.

I really think these 2 clowns are just con men, plain and simple.
They tried to play the court reporting firm with their typical smoke and mirrors diversions, but they were out foxed.
I don't share Bill S high regard for Mason. I find him to be an arrogant -blowhard, mumbling, bumbling fool.



I agree with everything you said .   

Two    up!
Logged

Cappuccino
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17527



« Reply #633 on: February 15, 2011, 07:25:22 PM »

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-tuesday-motions-20110215,0,7636578.story
Casey Anthony prosecution challenges defense motions to exclude evidence
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel
6:34 p.m. EST, February 15, 2011
New motions filed by prosecutors in the Casey Anthony case this week challenge the defense team's attempts to exclude scientific evidence in the case.

The prosecution also objects to the defense team's listing of a WFTV reporter and others as witnesses so late in the case.

Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton on Tuesday filed a motion to strike the defense team's motion to exclude certain evidence regarding Chloroform -- evidence expected to be critical in the state's case against Anthony.

The defense is arguing that the evidence is unreliable. But Ashton's motion says the defense argument "contains only conclusory statements of counsel and no authorities suggesting that the procedure is not generally accepted."

Ashton goes on to say the defense motion is "glaringly insufficient" while saying that the test instruments used to detect chloroform in this case are known and the techniques "routinely accepted as evidence in courts throughout the state."
 ::snipping2::

I cannot imagine what these blowhards think they can achieve by putting Kathi Belich on the stand because she will have them for lunch and spit out the bones.   Do they forget that she was right on DC and JH being in those woods with a probe?   Do they forget that she discovered the same duct tape being used on "missing children" posters being utilized by the Anthonys?    IDIOTS!  OMG there arent words strong enough
Logged

Cappuccino
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17527



« Reply #634 on: February 15, 2011, 07:27:33 PM »

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/02/casey-anthony-wftv-sees-transparent-motive-ag

This is actually what I was thinking.

 ::snipping2::

“The station will resist any attempt to get Kathi Belich to testify for anyone, the prosecution or defense,” Jordan told me this afternoon. “She is a reporter. She has worked independently as a journalist. I’m wondering if the real motive is to keep her out of the courtroom. It’s pretty transparent.”

If she is on the witness list, Belich couldn’t sit in the courtroom and listen to testimony. She wouldn’t be able to cover the trial.

Of course that is their spiteful goal, there are no grounds sufficient to support their immaturity & if they were forced to state why they wanted her on the stand it will backfire in their faces HARD...this Im rather sure of
Logged

trimmonthelake
Monkey Mega Star
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 43428



« Reply #635 on: February 15, 2011, 08:06:56 PM »


The Rule of Sequestration - Feb 15th, 2011 by Richard Hornsby.

http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2011/02/the-rule-of-sequestration/


disregard if  this has already been posted.



Thanks Loca. I am going to check it out.
Logged

  ~241~ "The Longer You Love,The Longer You Live,The Stronger You Feel,The More You Can Give."
~ Peter Frampton
loca
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4742



« Reply #636 on: February 15, 2011, 08:10:41 PM »


The Rule of Sequestration - Feb 15th, 2011 by Richard Hornsby.

http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2011/02/the-rule-of-sequestration/


disregard if  this has already been posted.



Thanks Loca. I am going to check it out.


ALSO
someone at the hinky posted some links to some  posts by muzikman but the links wont work for me or  or anyone else. So I wont bring it over until I am clear so if anyone has it please post it. I dont know why we cant acess
Logged

Loca
loca
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4742



« Reply #637 on: February 15, 2011, 08:16:35 PM »


The Rule of Sequestration - Feb 15th, 2011 by Richard Hornsby.

http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2011/02/the-rule-of-sequestration/


disregard if  this has already been posted.



Thanks Loca. I am going to check it out.


ALSO
someone at the hinky posted some links to some  posts by muzikman but the links wont work for me or  or anyone else. So I wont bring it over until I am clear so if anyone has it please post it. I dont know why we cant acess







cool this one will work:

 Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:12 pm
I've been waiting for this one!!!!

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674378/20 ... trunk-Stain A half-truth is a whole lie.
Logged

Loca
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey Mega Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 74276



WWW
« Reply #638 on: February 15, 2011, 08:29:15 PM »

Don't miss the Dana Pretzer show tonight at 9pm ET:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2011/02/15/22540/

Logged
loca
Monkey Junky
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 4742



« Reply #639 on: February 15, 2011, 08:45:16 PM »


The Rule of Sequestration - Feb 15th, 2011 by Richard Hornsby.

http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2011/02/the-rule-of-sequestration/


disregard if  this has already been posted.



Thanks Loca. I am going to check it out.


ALSO
someone at the hinky posted some links to some  posts by muzikman but the links wont work for me or  or anyone else. So I wont bring it over until I am clear so if anyone has it please post it. I dont know why we cant acess







cool this one will work:

 Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:12 pm
I've been waiting for this one!!!!

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674378/20 ... trunk-Stain A half-truth is a whole lie.

ok someone fixed them!!

02/10/2011 SA Notice of Provision of Supplemental Discovery
I. CD-R - Discovery Documents Pages 24461-24569 (includes Dr. Haskell' s Addendum
Report - Pgs 24567-24569)
2 . CD-R - Julie Davis's Int. 2/3/11 "TES" K-9
3. CD-R- Color Photos of TES Documents RE: Julie Davis
4, CD-R - Items shown during Julie Davis' Interview 2/3/11
5. CD-R- NClS / Mark-Hawkins recorded on 10/10/08

02.04.2011 Court Minutes
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674110/20 ... rt-Minutes

2011.02.04 Notice of Filing - Kathy Reichs Twitters
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674168/20 ... s-Twitters

2011.02.10 State Response to Motion to Exclude Trunk Stain http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674378/20 ... runk-Stain

2011.02.14 JAC Response to Request for Transcription Services - WLF
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674450/20 ... ices---WLF

2011.02.14 JAC Response to Request for Transcription Services - Anthonys
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674511/20 ... --Anthonys

2011.02.15 State Motion to strike Defense Supplemental Witness List 02.14.2011 (WITH EXHIBITS)
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674592/20 ... t-02142011


OKAY SOMEONE - Fixed all the links. The ones in the quote above will now work.

Logged

Loca
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Use of this web site in any manner signifies unconditional acceptance, without exception, of our terms of use.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
 
Page created in 2.188 seconds with 20 queries.