Caylee Marie Anthony #183 03/04/11 - 3/07/11

[tupelohoney]

Robyn Adams was in the Orange County Jail on Monday

http://www.orlandosentinel2.com/data/arrests/mug_shots/index.php

Adams, Robyn Ann
Gender: Female
Booked: Monday, February 28th, 2011
Status: Presentenced

Charge(s):
Return Per Court Order - State Facility
Arresting agency: Unknown

[Brandi]

One parting comment, I am also disappointed in Baez' private smackdown by Judge Perry.  His very public obnoxious, rude, rebellious behavior, deserves a public correction session.  Not only as a deterrent to Mr. Baez, but also as to serve notice to any others thinking about "going over the hill".  It's called Respect For Authority and Baez doesn't have it and likely never will- if he hasn't learned it by his age. Ashton may or may not have been instructed to receive the apology (not that he needed the counsel, he's professional through and through). It's likely JP: read Baez the riot act in the presence of both the defense and prosecutions; informed Baez that he's used up his last chance; infomed both sides he will not tolerate any more personal attacks and stated this case will not be derailed or extended due to personal acrimony; warned that professional courtesy will be observed in his courtroom or their will be legal consequences; reminded Baez he's still subject to Bar inquiries; reminded Baez & Mason of civil lawyers looking for cause to sue them; and Baez would issue an immediate public apology to Ashton specifically.  Personally, I think JP has long tired of Baez throwing sand in Ashton's face, so to speak.  IMO, he didn't want to waste court time reprimanding him and thereby giving him attention (any attention to Baez= positive attention)...sort of like the class clown.  He was also severing Baez' ability to publicly whine "the Judge doesn't like me" or "they're trying to keep me down/they're picking on me because I'm Hispanic".  That's my take on it.  The proof of Baez' repentance will be in the pudding.  Let's see how long he goes before he personally attacks or twists the truth and blames LDB/Ashton/the state for his own incompetence or unwillingness to comply with court orders/motions.  We'll see.  JP is, once again, circumventing  any possible grounds for a mistrial.  I'm not worried, the State has their game on and Caylee will have the last word.  All MOO.

P.S. JP is not always going to do things the way I think they should be done.  However, his record,experience, and reputation speak for themselves.  Me, on the other hand, I've never been a judge.  LOL!

Excellent post, ISpy!

I agree. We have not been judges, and I have my faith in JP to do the right thing for the right reasons. And we may not understand them as they happen. But that's okay.

O/T: I'll see if I can get you ready for spring

 

[loca]

SOMEONE   from the hinky posted that she  had  been reading the replay of live blog on wftv they saying CM being treated for prostate cancer.
I was unable to find it? does anyone know? is this why he has been ill and sluggish pale looking lately aside from having larengitis?

[Babybear]

I missed where Judge Perry admonished Casey Ho for being late to court..darn it! I would have loved to have seen that!
Cindy must not have gotten her clothes to her on time then? I was told that Cindy brings her clothes to her each court appearance...No wonder she always makes her look so dumpy..Casey would never wear those clothes otherwise...Course she couldn't wear the pole dancing clothes to court either...

Hi, Gypsy.  I've never been in a criminal court but I have been in court for civil cases--in fact have been a litigant a couple of times.  But I have watched Court TV in the past and in all of the pretrial hearings I can recall seeing, the accused wears jail clothing and does so on any occasion when the jury is not present.  Remember OJ Simpson and his orange prison duds?  To me, this is just another example of preferential treatment for the Anthonys.  Casey should have to wear her inmate clothing until a jury is seated and the trial begins.  I recall that Baez asked Judge Strickland for permission for her to wear civilian clothes because her prison clothing might prejudice a prospective jury. But if that were the case, it would be prejudicial for any other accused as well.  IMO Judge Perry should have ordered that henceforth, Casey would appear in jail clothing, since it seems so very difficult for Cindy to get her clothes to her in time.

Wonder how the flag outfit would go over?

The judge should have said since this problem with getting the clothes here on time has happened twice..she now wear her prison clothes so that we do not have this problem again.

Perry is really bending over backwards to make sure KC and her lawyers don't screw up.  Personally, I would love to see and hear Baez schooled...but..I will to see Casey put away for life with no chance of appeal because she has no grounds.  I could not stand to watch this circus happen all over again simply because Baez is a jerk.

[Babybear]

I missed where Judge Perry admonished Casey Ho for being late to court..darn it! I would have loved to have seen that!
Cindy must not have gotten her clothes to her on time then? I was told that Cindy brings her clothes to her each court appearance...No wonder she always makes her look so dumpy..Casey would never wear those clothes otherwise...Course she couldn't wear the pole dancing clothes to court either...

Hi, Gypsy.  I've never been in a criminal court but I have been in court for civil cases--in fact have been a litigant a couple of times.  But I have watched Court TV in the past and in all of the pretrial hearings I can recall seeing, the accused wears jail clothing and does so on any occasion when the jury is not present.  Remember OJ Simpson and his orange prison duds?  To me, this is just another example of preferential treatment for the Anthonys.  Casey should have to wear her inmate clothing until a jury is seated and the trial begins.  I recall that Baez asked Judge Strickland for permission for her to wear civilian clothes because her prison clothing might prejudice a prospective jury. But if that were the case, it would be prejudicial for any other accused as well.  IMO Judge Perry should have ordered that henceforth, Casey would appear in jail clothing, since it seems so very difficult for Cindy to get her clothes to her in time.

Wonder how the flag outfit would go over?

The judge should have said since this problem with getting the clothes here on time has happened twice..she now wear her prison clothes so that we do not have this problem again.

Perry is really bending over backwards to make sure KC and her lawyers don't screw up.  Personally, I would love to see and hear Baez schooled...but..I will to see Casey put away for life with no chance of appeal because she has no grounds.  I could not stand to watch this circus happen all over again simply because Baez is a jerk.

Oh nuts.  I got in your box ZooMomology.  I know how to post correctly.  I don't know how I did that.  Sorry

[Sister]

Many thanks to all the monkeys for the links and the opinions.
You all are the best!

[trimmonthelake]

http://www.wftv.com/news/27077737/detail.html
Cindy Testifies, Baez Apologizes At Casey Hearing
Posted: 8:55 am EST March 4, 2011Updated: 6:03 pm EST March 4, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony and her attorneys were back in the courtroom Friday morning as a scheduled 2-day hearing pushed into a third day. Prosecutors and defense attorney's furthered their cases over the admissibility of conversations between Casey and her family, but not before taking up a matter concerning WFTV.

CASEY ENTERS 03/04: See Images http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/news/27077672/detail.html
 Raw Video  http://www.wftv.com/video/27077892/index.html
BELICH RULING: Watch Raw Video http://www.wftv.com/video/27078625/index.html
 Motion http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27042580/detail.html
BILL SHEAFFER: Pre-Day 3 Analysis http://www.wftv.com/video/27083725/index.html
CINDY ANTHONY: Raw Testimony http://www.wftv.com/video/27080164/index.html
PERRY CRACKS WHIP: Judge Chastises Attorneys http://www.wftv.com/video/27079791/index.html
BAEZ APOLOGY: Regarding Contempt Allegations http://www.wftv.com/video/27081023/index.html
DETECTIVE MELICH: Part 1 Of 2 http://www.wftv.com/video/27079379/index.html
 Part 2 http://www.wftv.com/video/27079769/index.html
IN COURT 03/04: Key Players In The Case http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/news/27078311/detail.html
VIDEO REPORT: Day 3 Of Hearing Ends http://www.wftv.com/video/27084637/index.html
READ: Motions To Be Heard March 2-3 http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27042057/detail.html

Friday afternoon, the judge announced he will hold a hearing next week on a set of key remaining pretrial motions he heard arguments on this week. While Ninth Judicial Circuit Chief Judge Belvin Perry ruled on a handful of small motions Friday that the defense and prosecution argued on over three consecutive days, he has called another hearing for 2:00pm Monday. It is then that he is expected to rule on other motions that could affect the strategies both the defense and state will employ in the upcoming trial of Casey Anthony.

Things got heated fast Friday morning with Judge Belvin Perry reprimanding Casey Anthony for arriving to the courtroom late. The hearing was scheduled for 8:45am, but Casey didn't arrive until around 8:50am.

Judge Perry explained that he would not wait for "clothes" to start the hearing and said that when he sets a hearing for 8:45am, it needs to start at that time. Apparently, Casey's clothes were late arriving for her at the courthouse.
 ::snipping2::

[seemeatthebeach]

One parting comment, I am also disappointed in Baez' private smackdown by Judge Perry.  His very public obnoxious, rude, rebellious behavior, deserves a public correction session.  Not only as a deterrent to Mr. Baez, but also as to serve notice to any others thinking about "going over the hill".  It's called Respect For Authority and Baez doesn't have it and likely never will- if he hasn't learned it by his age. Ashton may or may not have been instructed to receive the apology (not that he needed the counsel, he's professional through and through). It's likely JP: read Baez the riot act in the presence of both the defense and prosecutions; informed Baez that he's used up his last chance; infomed both sides he will not tolerate any more personal attacks and stated this case will not be derailed or extended due to personal acrimony; warned that professional courtesy will be observed in his courtroom or their will be legal consequences; reminded Baez he's still subject to Bar inquiries; reminded Baez & Mason of civil lawyers looking for cause to sue them; and Baez would issue an immediate public apology to Ashton specifically.  Personally, I think JP has long tired of Baez throwing sand in Ashton's face, so to speak.  IMO, he didn't want to waste court time reprimanding him and thereby giving him attention (any attention to Baez= positive attention)...sort of like the class clown.  He was also severing Baez' ability to publicly whine "the Judge doesn't like me" or "they're trying to keep me down/they're picking on me because I'm Hispanic".  That's my take on it.  The proof of Baez' repentance will be in the pudding.  Let's see how long he goes before he personally attacks or twists the truth and blames LDB/Ashton/the state for his own incompetence or unwillingness to comply with court orders/motions.  We'll see.  JP is, once again, circumventing  any possible grounds for a mistrial.  I'm not worried, the State has their game on and Caylee will have the last word.  All MOO.

P.S. JP is not always going to do things the way I think they should be done.  However, his record,experience, and reputation speak for themselves.  Me, on the other hand, I've never been a judge.  LOL!

Hello ISpy!!!  Great to see you stranger! I have missed you & all your great comments!!!

[loca]

hln has the on again and now they are saying that there maybe a plea deal that its damaging to the prosecution!!!

[loca]

this is interesting!
http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2011/03/a-favorable-appellate-case-for-the-state/

A Favorable Appellate Case for the State?
Mar 4th, 2011
by Richard Hornsby.

As many of you know, the focus of the hearings over the last three days has been on whether Casey Anthony was “in custody” and, if so, at what point was she “in custody.”

And as has been discussed at  WebSleuths by AZLawyer, Judge Perry’s decision will hinge on the following four factor analysis used in Florida and outlined in Ramirez v. State, 739 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1999):

   1. The manner in which police summon the suspect for questioning;
   2. The purpose, place, and manner of the interrogation;
   3. The extent to which the suspect is confronted with evidence of his or her guilt; and
   4. Whether the suspect is informed that he or she is free to leave the place of questioning..

[NewfieMonkey]

I find HLN less credible than the National Inquirer anymore! 

Turbo ... was it you yesterday that posted they didn't think the trip to Universal would come into trial?  If it wasn't Turbo ... who was it?  Pretty please. 

I missed the whole first day ... just watched the Georgie and SinSin that was posted on WFTV.

Just wondered what happened to keep that out.  I don't think it will make any difference in Casey being found guilty ... but would love for any jury to know what a complete lying egostistic narcissist she is from the get go

[Gizzie]

I'm not sure if this was posted. I may have missed it.

http://www.wftv.com/news/27085615/detail.html

Casey Docs Reveal Defense Expert Witnesses' Testimony

ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- Some of the most significant events in the case against Casey Friday didn't happen in the courtroom, despite a hearing. Instead, WFTV found them in a stack of documents released by the defense. The documents involve the defense team's expert witnesses.

 

[loca]

hope these havent already been posted.

transcripts released-----Defense experts----


http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085571/detail.html
---dr. Bock-------

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085544/detail.html
----dr. Bock #2---

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085526/detail.html
-----Furton----

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085513/detail.html
--------dr. Huntington-----

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085461/detail.html
-------dr. Huntington #2 ---

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085404/detail.html
-------dr. Fairgrieve----

[NewfieMonkey]

this is interesting!
http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2011/03/a-favorable-appellate-case-for-the-state/

A Favorable Appellate Case for the State?
Mar 4th, 2011
by Richard Hornsby.

As many of you know, the focus of the hearings over the last three days has been on whether Casey Anthony was “in custody” and, if so, at what point was she “in custody.”

And as has been discussed at  WebSleuths by AZLawyer, Judge Perry’s decision will hinge on the following four factor analysis used in Florida and outlined in Ramirez v. State, 739 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1999):

   1. The manner in which police summon the suspect for questioning;
   2. The purpose, place, and manner of the interrogation;
   3. The extent to which the suspect is confronted with evidence of his or her guilt; and
   4. Whether the suspect is informed that he or she is free to leave the place of questioning..

I think Byass is barking up the wrong tree on this one.  This case was about a "missing child" a "kidnapped child" and "child neglect" before it was ever about a murdering mother.  And the initial reason she was arrested was child neglect ... and if your child was either missing or kidnapped for 31 days before you called police ... I'd say that was child neglect.     They could have slapped handcuffs on her the first minute after arriving and still been within the law in my mind.  31 days!?

[TURBOTHINK]

I find HLN less credible than the National Inquirer anymore! 

Turbo ... was it you yesterday that posted they didn't think the trip to Universal would come into trial?  If it wasn't Turbo ... who was it?  Pretty please. 

I missed the whole first day ... just watched the Georgie and SinSin that was posted on WFTV.

Just wondered what happened to keep that out.  I don't think it will make any difference in Casey being found guilty ... but would love for any jury to know what a complete lying egostistic narcissist she is from the get go

It wasn't me as I see no problem with that trip. At the time she was volunteering to help them. From the testimony presented there was no coercion or demands made for her to go. From what was presented she willingly went and even insisted on getting on the premises by telling the guard she worked there & did not have her ID with her. They told her more than once she was free to leave the room where they were questioning her. I could have missed something but I believe it will be a part. 

Her being handcuffed @ the house appeared to be a result of Cindy wanting her arrested and expressed her fear she would leave. It is not unusual at a scene where the details are unclear for people to be cuffed until the officers sort out the particulars. If they are fishing for an appeal issue on the handcuffing, they are barking up the wrong tree unless there is something in Florida law which is different from here.

I am not sure how he will rule, but from what I can find out from my brother if it were here neither of them would meet the burden of proof the defense needed to get them excluded.

[Cappuccino]

I missed where Judge Perry admonished Casey Ho for being late to court..darn it! I would have loved to have seen that!
Cindy must not have gotten her clothes to her on time then? I was told that Cindy brings her clothes to her each court appearance...No wonder she always makes her look so dumpy..Casey would never wear those clothes otherwise...Course she couldn't wear the pole dancing clothes to court either...

Wonder how the flag outfit would go over?

The judge should have said since this problem with getting the clothes here on time has happened twice..she now wear her prison clothes so that we do not have this problem again.

Perry is really bending over backwards to make sure KC and her lawyers don't screw up.  Personally, I would love to see and hear Baez schooled...but..I will to see Casey put away for life with no chance of appeal because she has no grounds.  I could not stand to watch this circus happen all over again simply because Baez is a jerk.

Gypsy, I couldnt agree more.   Sometimes we might not like what we think we are not seeing but the truth is the larger picture always seems to be paramount on this Chief Justice's mind.

[TURBOTHINK]

hope these havent already been posted.

transcripts released-----Defense experts----


http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085571/detail.html
---dr. Bock-------

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085544/detail.html
----dr. Bock #2---

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085526/detail.html
-----Furton----

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085513/detail.html
--------dr. Huntington-----

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085461/detail.html
-------dr. Huntington #2 ---

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085404/detail.html
-------dr. Fairgrieve----

After reading the first one......I am lost here - WHO is this Dr. Bock? I sure hope he is not the prosecution's witness as he does not know a leaf from a hole in the ground.

[TURBOTHINK]

Sorry Loca - I didn't see where you had written "defense experts"...........I am glad to know that Dr. Bock is a defense witness.

[Curly]

hope these havent already been posted.

transcripts released-----Defense experts----


http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085571/detail.html
---dr. Bock-------

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085544/detail.html
----dr. Bock #2---

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085526/detail.html
-----Furton----

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085513/detail.html
--------dr. Huntington-----

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085461/detail.html
-------dr. Huntington #2 ---

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27085404/detail.html
-------dr. Fairgrieve----

I've only got through the first one by Bock.
Thank God she's a defense witness.
She's boring, has no opinion, and makes no sense.

[TURBOTHINK]

I've only got through the first one by Bock.
Thank God she's a defense witness.
She's boring, has no opinion, and makes no sense.

I didn't know it was a she, but I am telling you this person is a dork. She knows nothing about bodies and botanical plants. She even called the "Body Farm" in Knoxville "the pig farm" - geeshhhhhhh  Dr. William Bass is known all over the world for his work and she didn't know diddly about it. That told me A LOT !!