Where is the money going? Tax the Rich? Fed profits?

[WhiskeyGirl]

"‘The Majority of White People Believe Those People Are Taking Our Money and Taxes’: DNC Interim Chair Donna Brazile Says Racist Fearful Whites Are Why the Dems Don’t Do Better With White Voters"

Watch video here - http://www.theblaze.com/stories/%E2%80%98the-majority-of-white-people-believe-those-people-are-taking-our-money-and-taxes%E2%80%99-dnc-interim-chair-donna-brazile-says-racist-fearful-whites-are-why-the-dems-don%E2%80%99t-do-better/

Where is the money going?  Anyone know?

Maybe Bernanke knows where all those checks government prints goes to?  Why are we sending it?  If you don't know why or who is getting the money, why do you continue to send it?  (see recent testimony regarding the debt ceiling, Bernanke doesn't seem to know who is getting the checks and why, therefore they can't prioritize the payments if the debt ceiling isn't raised).

Why should government STEAL/TAX/REGULATE take away anyone's money?  If these are worthy programs, let people vote for the program by VOLUNTARILY taking the money from their pocket and donating it?

The Fed.  Gives away money that is almost free, to foreign banks.  These banks in turn buy treasuries, and make lots of money on interest payments.  Isn't this a kind of welfare for foreigners?  How much are these foreigners making on the backs of working Americans and future generations?  Are they paying taxes on this money?

Who profits at those banks?  Is there where politicians, dictators, wealthy people of ALL colors, racial/ethnic backgrounds store their money?

Why not just cut out the middle man?  Stop spending, stop borrowing?  How many working Americans would like a home mortgage for just .25% (less than 1 percent)?

Why aren't Democrats adding TAXPAYERS?  All those billions that go to service the debt?  Who is profiting on the backs of Americans?

Maybe non Democrats see the fraud, waste, and abuse in this Federal shell game/racket? 

Let everyone keep their own money, make charity contributions based on their own priorities?

just my humble opinions

[WhiskeyGirl]

Donna Brazile utters a few words about scholarships for 'whites'.  Really?  She seems to think 'they' got scholarships for 300 years.

The reality?  Financial aid has only been available for a few decades.  In the REAL olden days, you paid for yourself, you worked, or you didn't go to school.  For some reason, there were folks that made millions.

Why don't they do a study to see which racial/ethnic groups get a free ride?  Which groups have to borrow more money than other groups?  Graduate with higher debt? 

When families compare (brag about) their child's financial aid package, which racial groups get the best deal from schools?

In the olden days, admission at some schools may have been based on alumni connections and CASH. 

Why would anyone, like Donna suggest that EVERY white person got a free ride to an education?  Maybe Donna should do some fact checking.

In the olden days, people often had to pay for books to go beyond sixth or eighth grade.  Many young people didn't go because their family didn't have money. 

These uneducated people managed to get jobs, buy homes, and raise families without a college education and welfare.

Why does it seem the more money government throws at problems, the bigger they get?

What's wrong with expecting everyone to solve their own problems, make their own path in life?